Coulter Blasts Rubio, ‘Endless Bushes’ on Immigration

Kevin Robillard, Politico, March 16, 2013

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter, in a CPAC appearance on Saturday that resembled a stand-up comedy routine more than a speech, attacked Sen. Marco Rubio for supporting “amnesty” for illegal immigrants.

“If amnesty goes through, America becomes California and no Republican will ever win another national election,” Coulter said, adding: “I can see why Democrats would want amnesty, but why on earth are Marco Rubio and these endless Bushes supporting it? Even Shemp and Zippo Bush are supporting amnesty for illegals.”

Coulter’s attack drew cheers from the CPAC crowd.

{snip}

“Republicans are grasping at these suicidal policies because they’re panicked, they’re demoralized after the last election,” Coulter said. “Stop panicking, Republicans!”

Coulter also said she could no long support New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in 2016, adding, “I’m now a single-issue voter against amnesty. So Christie’s off the list.” Christie has supported a “common sense” path to citizenship.

[Editor’s Note: The full speech is below. Miss Coulter’s comments on immigration start at 11:45.]

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dmxinc

    I think she said “I am NOW a single issue voter against amnesty.”

    Welcome to the club Ann – only 20 years late.

    • fakeemail

      Seriously. Good for Anne for having the guts to speak up now, but there were plenty of conservatives who sounded the alarm on this matter decades ago and were shouted down by their fellow Repubs as racist hate mongers. But now, finally, the Amren message may be starting to go mainstream. We need people like Coulter and Trump who start putting the mere idea of white interests out there.

      • SargeInCharge

        I get the feel from both Trump and Coulter that they want to say more, something akin to the comments on this site, but they’re pulling back on the reins so that the message is more palatable to the masses. Still, these baby steps are positive.

        • Did you actually listen to what she was saying, or did you just focus on the part where she doesn’t support amnesty?

          • SargeInCharge

            I’ve read and listened to every article about Coulter posted on this site over the past couple years. It’s obvious that she’s had a metamorphosis in her thinking or, at the very least, she’s outwardly expressing pro-white opinions more now. Certainly more than almost any other mainstream pundit.

          • CrowBoi1977

            Yes Coulter has come a long way and should be commended!

            ‘Ann Coulter’s MUGGED: Far Better Than The MSM Controversy Suggests’

            http://www.vdare.com/articles/ann-coulters-mugged-far-better-than-the-msm-controversy-suggests

          • Tucker

            Coulter has probably been a closeted White Nationalist for quite some time. After all, if you check her wikipedia page – you’ll see a huge list of men that she has been involved with and a majority of them have had jewish ancestry.

            This might be viewed by some as a research project by Coulter – and it makes me wonder how many times she has had to listen to anti-White diatribes and anti-White rants blasting out of the mouths of the men she has been in relationships with, and perhaps this is what helped her understand that Whites are engaged in a race war and the outcome of this battle will determine our very survival on this planet.

            Still, her irrational support for all these illegal and unnecessary wars that Bush & his neo-con cabal lied us into, makes me question her sincerity on racial issues. White soldiers are 72% of the casualties in these senseless wars, and now the Cultural Marxists are licking their white genocide craving chops over the prospect of sending our white females into combat so they can get slaughtered, so as to make sure their wombs do not hatch any White babies.

      • OnGuard

        I’m glad she’s come around. She spoke at Univ.of Florida about 3-4 years ago, and didn’t say a word about the immigration problem! I met with her afterwards and brought up the issue; she responded that it was not a big problem!

      • liberalsuck

        We warned them even ten years ago, but they didn’t want to do anything. Same with Europe. They awake, but it’s too late. Now if they want to take back even a portion of their European countries from these third-world savages, they are going to have to be stronger than they’ve ever been before, even stronger than their ancestors have. Same with whites in the US. Yeah, they have guns, yeah they have ammo, but how many of them have been in combat? How many of them are willing to literally fight soldiers or thugs kicking their door down for their guns or to take their children away for ‘re-education’? Seriously?

    • The__Bobster

      Better late than never.

      I, too, am a single issue voter, as this is the only issue that has the potential of destroying America.

      • More like TOO LATE TO MATTER.

        • Nancy Thomas

          It’s NOT too late. it’s time to FIGHT BACK!

          • sbuffalonative

            As long as you’re alive to fight, it’s not too late.

        • Felix_M

          The hour may be late but we MUST fight back.

          It must be known, at least by posterity, that there were those of us who said “No! No politician is going to be able to surrender MY country, MY patrimony for my children and grandchildren without serious cost to themselves and their political party.”

        • Felix_M

          The hour may be late but we MUST fight back.

          It must be known, at least by posterity, that there were those of us who said “No! No politician is going to be able to surrender MY country, MY patrimony for my children and grandchildren without serious cost to themselves and their political party.”

          • anonymous

            Unfortunately, the politicians HAVE surrendered the country and your patrimony and for the most part their betrayal hasn’t cost them a thing.

          • Morris LeChat

            there is a punishment for treason you know. Keep your list of names and someday they will have to face white America when it finally is tired of being afraid of minorities. Christie is on the list.

          • liberalsuck

            It hasn’t cost them YET. ‘Yet’ being the key word. If the backlash doesn’t come from the white voters they’ve screwed over, it will be when the brown and black hordes turn on them and there isn’t anybody there to protect them, like in all countries when they had revolutions.

        • anonymous

          I agree. It’s too late. That’s been obvious for years now. You don’t have to be Nostradamus to see what’s coming. The future is all around us at this very moment. The only event that MIGHT change things at this point is a major global war that completely rearranges the existing map. Whatever happens, though, we are heading into a very long period of turmoil and trouble.

      • Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans will benefit from this so-called amnesty. Once they gain the upper hand, they will establish a Mexican style government here and will vote PAN or PRI. You guys ain’t seen nothing yet.

    • Bobby

      There is a saying, “better late than never”. But there is also a saying, “the biggest problem in the world would have been easy to solve when it was small.”
      Illegal immigration with tens of millions of people in the U.S. illegally, and most of them coming from one of the most corrupt nations in the world, Mexico, is now in the “biggest” catergory and yes, if only influential people like Ann would have gotten on board about twenty five years ago.
      This reminds me, why are Republicans so surprised at the treachery of the Republican party on this issue now, Ronald Reagan was the first traitor on this issue, AND NO, the excuse “he got snookered” won’t do. Aren’t Americans tired yet of making up excuses for these selfish and self serving politicians?

      • liberalsuck

        It’s in white people’s nature to not do anything until the problem gets too big, or until we get pissed off enough. hence, “The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon” by Rudyard Kipling. Saxons are slow to anger, but strike back hard once they get angry.

  • Yep. I too place illegal immigration, Affirmative Action, and black crime above all else.
    A republican candidate who leans to the left of these issues will find me, a guy who thinks Coulter is too liberal for my tastes, voting for the democratic opponent, just to make sure this version of the GOP fades away.

    So, What happens when J.Bush/M.Rubio 2016 loses to Hillary?

    • Luca

      I wonder, will it be Hillary and Michelle or Michelle and Hillary? They don’t care who they run as long as it gets them votes and Power.

      • Johnny Clay

        If Michelle, or any black, runs for the Democrat nomination, the party will be under extreme pressure to nominate them.

    • pcmustgo

      And just the general white-bashing that goes on everywhere in our culture.

    • Bill

      Yeah, that’s a smart policy. Vote for supreme evil rather than demanding a political party which represents OUR race and OUR nation. I wonder if Obama now sits on the throne again because too many with YOUR spiteful policy acted on it? Or ARE you even one of us, and rather a provocateur liberal pretending to be outraged and recommending a suicidal policy for whites as “retribution” against the treasonous republican party? The solution is NOT to vote for ultimate evil. It’s to demand either a party of our own, and raise so much hell against the RNC and neo-cons that the quake more in fear of US than of being called “racist”.

      • And your solution is to accept being force-fed chocolate covered dog poop instead of the freshly squoze garden variety, simply because it tastes a little better? At what point in your life do you finally realize that you shouldn’t be eating dog crap at all?

        I’ve heard this Nation-Building for Dummies approach for decades. When do the movers and shakers finally start to make their big move? We have a very liberal black President, and I’m pretty sure I remember guys telling me that’s all it would take for White America to get fed up. They were wrong because people will take demoralization and ultimate defeat if you do it in stages, always making them believe that one step forward for two steps back is a winning approach. That’s the Republican party in a nutshell.

        • Bill

          Apparently you cannot read and comprehend as well. Your rant had nothing to do with what I had said. Tells me you ARE a liberal in sheep’s clothing, because their main method of attack is NOT to actually respond to what was said, or facts, but to immediately engage in vulgarities and continue their rant in another guise, but same innocuous claptrap with NO solutions suggested of their own, merely criticisms. If you’d actually READ what I had said, I did NOT recommend the Republican party as any sort of salvation, but one to be avoided just as the democraps. YOUR recommendation was to vote for the ultra evil democraps out of spite.

          • That’s the second time you’ve suggested someone was lying or pretending to be something else(a provocateur) because they see just as much, if not more, of a threat in a passive aggressive Republican party as they do the Leftists. You’re a chocolate-flavored poop kind of guy. Okay, you’ve established that.

      • “Bill”, I’m 45, and have been using your strategy ever since I was old enough to vote for original Bush and straight ticket Republican back in 1988.
        How many presidential elections and mid terms did I do that? YOUR strategy is not working!
        My strategy is to get rid of this version of the Republican Party as fast as possible, which is easy because they are already committing suicide.
        I already know that the clueless white democrat just needs one minute of experiencing Affirmative Action or black crime before they turn. The Democratic Party has the white vote by a thread, and I want a Republican Party that wants to seize it.
        Slow death, or hurry up and get down to business?

    • liberalsuck

      Me, too. I don’t want to hear anymore talk about homosexuality or abortion or “defending Israel” or “outreach” to nonwhites. Most people don’t care about those things. No. Here is what most whites want a politician to do: Speak out against black crime, speak out against the destruction of white nations and of white south africans, put our military on the border, repeal the anti-2nd amendment laws, repeat the federal anti-discrimination ‘civil rights’ laws, kick out the illegals, fine companies who do business with illegals, etc. Oh, and make it easier and cost effective for our jobs to come home and give them to American citizens first.

  • Tom Iron

    The Democrats don’t like it when Obama is call “lazy.” They say it’s racist. Alright, I’m an accomodating guy. He’s not lazy then, he’s shiftless, like most blacks.

  • David Ashton

    Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    The lead quote is wrong (as dmzinc notes). Coulter said, “I’m now a single-issue voter against amnesty, so Christie’s off my list.”

    VDARE.com blogger Paul Nachman has captured Coulter’s powerful remarks in print. See: Ann Coulter: ‘Everything Comes Down To Immigration.’ And Sen. Ted Cruz [R-TX] Is There To Hear Her
    By Paul Nachman on March 17, 2013
    http://tinyurl.com/cy5o4pw

  • The__Bobster

    Reconquista Maquito Rubio is not one of us…and the people promoting him (Sheldon Adelson) damn well know it.

    http://www.vdare.com/posts/senator-rubio-supports-latino-museum-in-smithsonian-complex

    Senator Rubio Supports Latino Museum in Smithsonian Complex
    By Brenda Walker on March 16, 2013 at 1:06pm

    Evidence continues to mount that diverse Republican star Senator Marco Rubio is at heart a race man, who feels loyalty to his tribe rather than to the nation he took an oath to serve. He talks up the virtues of the American people, but his behavior suggests a different preference.

    The Florida Senator makes fine speeches on basic conservative themes, no question. His recent CPAC presentation was typically well crafted. [Watch.] Notably, his speech avoided the immigration topic in which he is currently immersed as an important member of the Gang of Eight secret amnesty schemers. Democrat Luis Gutierrez says Rubio is “key” to achieving comprehensive amnesty.

    The latest race-based preference is Rubio’s support for a Latino museum to be built next to the Smithsonian Castle in Washington. The museum is designed to show that Hispanics have had a long and positive effect on American history, even though the hispanic population in 1940 was less than 1.9 million. We have seen such historical revisionism before, such as the raza gang’s demanding filmmaker Ken Burns to refilm his PBS documentary about WWII to include special attention to Hispanic contributions, which in fact were not substantial.

    • StillModerated

      Latino Museum in Smithsonian Complex

      Hmmm! I can see it now. A Puerto Rican living room with a doily on top of the television topped with an epoxy statue of Mary — oh, my mistake, that’s already in the 1876 exhibit — it replaced the display of rifles, a low rider, a storefront gangster church (we get you a job and you get to tithe), a 7-11 with a bunch of loitering day laborers, a gang of spincah pickers who dump in the fields instead of using the Don’s Johns the farmer is required to provide. The mind boggles.

    • Felix_M

      Rubio is Sarah Palin with a dick. If his last name didn’t end a vowel, no one would be giving him a second look.

    • Felix_M

      Rubio is Sarah Palin with a dick. If his last name didn’t end a vowel, no one would be giving him a second look.

  • a multiracial individual

    Yea, Cons…..the problem is: gays, feminists, environmentalists, drugs, abortion, assault of the second amendment……..you guys are so brilliant at discerning priorities. lol

    Keep arguing about minor issues while Rome burns.

    • We’ll stop when you stop.

    • StillModerated

      AIDS, drugs, abortion — don’t liberals just kill you.

      • a multiracial individual

        How do liberals support AIDS? They support sex education (a not fully adequate but necessary weapon against AIDS).

        Abstinence only programs always yield the highest VD rates and amount of teen pregnancies.

        • CrowBoi1977

          Loads of tax payers dollars are paid to find a cure for AIDS. This is done because the Sodomite lobby wants a cure for this disease that disproportionately affects them.

          If they stopped visiting the bath-houses so often this actually wouldn’t be a huge issue…

          Michael Savage (who has a PHD and knows alot about mediciine) has gone on about this before)

          • a multiracial individual

            HIV/AIDS is disproportionately gay in America you are correct. However, globally it is a heterosexual disease.

            Dr. Savage is a crackpot. While he does have a Ph.D in Nutriton, he appears to have a limited grasp of the cognitive sciences. His shamefully ignorant view of autism is less accurate than that of Tom Cruise.

  • Flaxen-headed Strumpet

    Are you gonna go on a date with that young buck if he brings you a note from his mama Ann?

    • She probably would. But more importantly, she wouldn’t hesitate to tell aspiring Ann-Coulter-wannabes that it wouldn’t hurt them to date a black man, as long as that black gentleman called himself a Republican.

  • Luca

    Ann is an intelligent realist. The Republicans would do well to heed her advice.

    • Ann is an opportunist. She’s not pro-White, she’s pro-Ann.

      • Luca

        The enemy of my enemy is my friend. And I don’t mind if my friend is making a buck as long as she is on the right side of the equation…and she is. She is making a very nice living speaking the realistic truth.

        If more women in this country spoke, thought and acted as she does, we’d have a better country.

        • Your friend believes more black people injecting themselves and their opinions into the Republican party is what’s needed. Your friend is very, very, very clear about the objection to amnesty being about nothing more than votes. Your friend is extremely “cozy” with black gentlemen. Tell me a little more about your belief that more White women like her is what this country needs.

          • Epiminondas

            Can you back up your claims? How do you know all this?

          • They’re not claims, they are facts. In the video she claims that “we owe black people” and “blacks and Republicans go together like chocolate and peanut butter.”

            The underlying premise of just about every angle that Ann attacks amnesty and illegals is centered around the fact that, according to her, Republicans just can’t do enough to get those illegals to vote for Republicans. They will vote Democrat, and that is the core of the problem.

            And if you don’t know that Ann is smitten with gentlemen of the black, brown and ethnic persuassion, then you might not know as much about Ann as you think you do.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            I for one am sick to death of Republicant attempts to claim some moral superiority when it comes to blacks. “Repulicans freed the slaves” “the KKK were all democrats” blah blah blah. Lincoln wanted to send them back and understood the danger of an unrestricted alien presence in our midst.

          • Epiminondas

            I’ve been diligently searching the internet, and I don’t think Ann is being two-faced. She may in the past have made silly remarks about blacks and slavery, but she IS a catholic from New York City. I’m amazed she’s come around as much as she has. There is a LOT of leftist misinformation about her floating around on the internet, so be careful what you read. Anyway, she has infuriated the Republican money boys, and I’m delighted to have her on our side in the immigration battle. And if she understands the leftist/corporatist plot to undermine white America, then she will eventually stand up to the civil rights crowd.

          • Steven Bannister

            None of you have even mentioned that Ann Coulter’s CURRENT best-selling book is entitled “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama”

            The book skewers liberals and blacks who constantly play the race card, it’s worth checking out.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            She is friends with Jimmie “good times” Walker and when they are asked if they have a relationship they both play coy with the tabloids. IMO it’s a game they play to tweak the “press”. There’s no real evidence that they are in a relationship other than platonic.

          • I don’t think I would put too much of the decision-making process in the hands of anyone who dreams of pro-White sentiments coming from a woman who plays coy about playing with Jimmie’s Jimmy.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Point taken. But I think people are starving to hear someone, ANYONE to speak bluntly and directly on the illegal invasion. Even if it is Coulter, it’s still a relief to hear it said. She may very well be a mudshark but I still appreciate what she said.

          • Nate Miller

            To be fair there is ample evidence that Ann Coulter has dated and was even once engaged to a non-white. But to be precise, her ex-fiance/ lover was not an African American, he was of Asian Indian descent. And that ethnic gentleman who happened to be Ann’s lover-boy was none other than the uber-exalted conservative pundit, writer, academic, editor and filmmaker – Dinesh D’Souza. Oddly enough, Dinesh’s ex-girlfriend was another big time white blonde conservative woman – Laura Ingraham. And his current wife Dixie Brubaker is another attractive blonde. Looks like this man has a thing for pretty blondes!

            Dinesh with wife Dixie Brubaker D’Souza & daughter:

            http://www.exploretalent.com/model_page_pic.php?media_id=5286779&talentnum=2013738&s=01dbfc881efbf8d474baf229f9430df6

            http://www.nndb.com/people/810/000049663/

            Dinesh recently wrote, produced & directed the highly acclaimed big budget highest grossing conservative movie of all time: “Obama 2016”.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfLsSg9wZlE

          • David Ashton

            Suppose Dinesh D’Souza had not written his book against multiculturalism and Ann Coulter had never spoken against any immigration, would the WN position in public opinion and its prospects for political change be better or worse?

          • Luca

            Much like me, my “friend” Ann is a realist and not a White Supremacist. She is able to get her point across by being a witty celebrity, best selling author and a sharp speaker. She is vehemently anti-Liberal because she knows the true problem. The problem is Liberals. Without Liberals, blacks would be nowhere the problem they are today. She puts on a good PR, otherwise she would never be allowed in the media or to speak if someone could call her out as a racist.

          • Tucker

            If the GOP does manage to liberalize itself to the point of desperation that might attack more blacks, one of the first demands that blacks will issue will be for the GOP to add a platform plank that guarantees the right of every black male to have a trophy white woman in his bed.

            Black males are obsessed with grabbing a white female. I see Tiger has a new White gold digger chick on the string now.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          “If more women in this country spoke, thought and acted as she does, we’d have a better country.”

          If more men in this country spoke, thought and acted like Pat Buchanan or Jared Taylor, we’d have a better country.

          • Tucker

            Courtney? I ran across a 40 plus minute long video interview of Pat Buchanan the other day on the undergrounddocumentaries.com website, where he was being interviewed about the book he wrote that got him fired, Suicide of a Superpower. So, I decided to give it a look.

            I couldn’t make it all the way through, and here is why: Patrick Buchanan, despite his occasional near to bravery caliber literary efforts, is not a courageous White man. He is certainly not even close to the caliber of Jared Taylor.

            Watching Buchanan discussing his book and responding to questions that were thrown at him by the interviewer, I noticed that he has a very unsettling habit of not maintaining direct eye contact with his interviewer when he is responding. I’ve noticed this habit in Buchanan before, in other videos I’ve seen of him where he is attempting to tip-toe, ever so gingerly and timidly, down the thin line of discourse that relate to issues that affect the survival of White European people and our Western Civilization. Instead of looking squarely and confidently at his interviewer or at the camera – he directed his eyes downward, staring at the table top and then making his familiar up & down hand gestures.

            I remember as kid, being told by my father on a number of occasions, that any man who will not look you in the eye when he is talking to you – is a man who is either weak and lacking in self confidence, or he is insincere and subconsciously worries that direct eye contact might allow you to detect his insincerity. I have always remembered that advice and my life’s experiences have shown me that it was good advice.

            With Buchanan, I doubt that he is insincere – so, that leaves the first condition – he lacks self confidence in the message he is attempting to deliver. This, I believe, is probably related to his Catholic upbringing – and as many others on AmRen have previously stated, it seems as if Christianity and/or Catholicism have been corrupted so severely in modern times by our Cultural Marxist enemies, that those who are most heavily influenced by their religions appear to be suffering from internal conflicts and a sense of guilt over having twinges of their racial survival instincts rising up to compete with their religious indoctrinations against acknowledging the importance of race in the world they live in.

            Tancredo suffers from this same illness. He claims to see nothing wrong with an America that might become 40 or 50 percent more more Hispanic, while at the same time trying to pretend that he is fighting to salvage what remains of Western Civilization – which Hispanics had no role in creating and which they will refuse to play any role in preserving?

            Thus, when I think of Buchanan – I think of two things, both of which cause me pain and which are negative. First, I wish I had the $265 bucks back that I sent him as a donation to his last Reform Party presidential run.

            Secondly, I think of Ezola Foster – which was clearly a move by Buchanan to fall down on a hand grenade in order to make sure Bush won the election against Gore.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Okay, I will take your criticisms of Buchanan. My main point was directed at the other poster. Claiming that “our race would be better if white women changed” is such a weak argument, and it gets repeated all the time on here. Are white men free from all blame? If they are, then I guess that means we are supposed to start believing the liberal lie that “women can do anything men can do, if not better”.

          • Tucker

            There is plenty of blame to cover both White men and White women.

            I remember the tragically now departed fellow who called himself Yankee Jim, and who used to call the old FBI informant Hal Turner on his CoinTelpro radio show on a regular basis – and one particularly astute comment that Yankee Jim made once, regarding his fellow White men.

            He pointed out that when White men gather together every Sunday, to sit on their backsides in front of their 32″ inch wide electronic brainwashing & sewage dispensing devices and proceed to drool, slobber, and gush their worship of inner city, IQ of 80, criminally prone, dred lock sporting blacks playing football or basketball – that their White wives, White daughters, White sons, or their White girlfriends would observe this slavish and disgusting White male worship of these black athletes, and this became a subconscious signal to our women and children that worshiping blacks was the proper and normal kind of behavior for all Whites to engage in.

            I thought that was an absolutely brilliant observation by Yankee Jim and I am convinced that White men of that sort are largely to blame for the coal burning young white females we see so often in our society, and for the ‘whigger’ acting young white males, and, ultimately – for the elevation of the current anti-White mulatto racist to our White House and for his subsequent reelection.

            It always seems to go back to the principle that one must lead by example. In today’s world, there is a serious shortage of White men who understand this principle and who are self disciplined enough to live their lives according to this principle.

          • Luca

            I agree. But the statistical fact is, Democrats win because they have cultivated the female vote and females are generally 51% of the population. Take away that cultivated female vote and Democrats (Liberals) lose. It is their greatest demographic. The majority of men do not vote for Democrats. That’s all I meant.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Are we looking at the overall female vote or just the white female vote?

            I agree that women vote more emotionally than men. I also agree that women perhaps shouldn’t be voting. I agree the genders aren’t equal. The reason I get fed up with this movement is because of all the blame put on white women for our race’s current problems. If men are the more capable gender, then this constant blame makes little sense. I am not saying that you are doing that, and thanks for your polite response to me.

            If you look at voting patterns by region, women tend to mimic what their men do for the most part, and if they don’t, it is because the men of that region are wimpy and aren’t really putting their foot down on issues. The men of New England and the Pacific Coast come to mind. Men on here complain about the women in those regions being feminists who vote for Obama, but then again, what are the men in those regions like? Why do they allow their women to act like that? Here in the South I can’t even think of any couple I know where the wife voted differently than her husband did (most couples voted for Romney).

            In the last election, wasn’t it 35% of white men and 41% of white women who voted for Obama? Yet immediately after the election, all I kept hearing from this movement was how white women gave him the presidency. Are we really certain about that? The fact that 35% of rational white men voted for him, is just as upsetting as 41% of white women voting with their emotions.

          • Luca

            We are looking at the overall female vote.

            Obama got 54% of the Womens’ vote vs. Romney’s 37%.

            Romney got 48% of the Mens’ vote vs, Obama 44%

            I wish all the numbers were different but there is an obvious numerical disparity in the gender vote, I’m still trying to figure out how 24% of conservatives voted for Obama.

            http://www.people-press.org/obama-romney-voter-preferences/#sex

      • iberianpride

        Very true.

    • a multiracial individual

      Although Ann is mostly scientifically illiterate (she does not accept natural selection). She does seem to possess an accurate picture regarding human cognitive ability.

      [After years of censorship on the subject of IQ, the entire book was a stunning revelation. Once the taboo was shattered and the unspeakable was spoken, IQ turned out to be an extraordinary commodity. Among many other things, IQ is a better predictor than socioeconomic status of poverty, unemployment, criminality, divorce, single motherhood, workplace injuries, and high school dropout rates. The ability to speak different languages is not correlated with IQ, but nearsightedness is. Spouses tend to have closer IQ than siblings. Although other factors influence IQ, such as a good home environment and nutrition. The Bell Curve authors estimated that IQ was about 40 to 80 percent genetic…the New York Times complained that The Bell Curve “belabor[s] the well-known fact that the average IQ of blacks is 15 points below that of whites.”]

      – Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, Hardcover, Pgs. 172-174

  • rick

    The only issue I have with Coulter is that she spent the better part of the last decade defending Dubya’s asinine war in Iraq when instead she should have used her bully pulpit to draw attention to the immigration crisis.

    • SargeInCharge

      The Obama victories, particularly the second one, woke a lot of whites up that they are quickly losing the America their ancestors built.

      • NM156

        The period of America’s greatest demographic change, however, was during the subprime era of George W. Bush.

  • wattylersrevolt

    If Ann Coulter was serious about halting and reversing Native Born White American race-replacement at the hands of very hostile and very high fertility post-1965 nonwhites..saw a chinese family of 9 last week in the mall..seven kids…..she would be jumping with joy over the imminent extinction of the Republican Party. But why the psychological trauma over the extinction of the Republican Party? Because:Ann Coulter is a corporate whore and an invade the world enthusiast. Ann Coulter is hoping to focus the current nascent Native Born White American Patriot Movement into essentally a conservative neocon Israeli worshippng- corporatism…in other words, Native Born White American Youth from the Heatland are disposable cannon foder for the Zionists and the Military Industrial Complex.
    The alternative is a highly racialized Native Born White American Patriot movement that challenges the divine rights of coporations…that is pro-labor…pro-ecology…socialistic-communitarian so as to protect human bengs from the psychopathy inherent in unregulated free markets. In other words, the Native Born White American Patriot Movement puts blood-gentically entrenched-local-long term Native Born White Communities as that which has the greatest value in society.. we don’t exist to serve the psychopath Bill Gates. There is no other game in town for the long term survival of Native Born White Americans.
    I have no respect for Ann Coulter. She is a 51 year old childless White Skank…you couldn’t find a more accurate description. Why any one would call her conservative is beyong me.

    • Nate Miller

      I wonder if you are a troll. Do you realize that you actually sound like a maniac? Posts by people such as yourself is the perfect fodder needed by the liberals to prove the sheer futility of the white conservative movement. Get a grip, man!

      • wattylersrevolt

        I’m not interested in something as vapid as a White Conservative Movement. I’m interested in a ful-blown race revolt against race-replacement at the hands of high fertility post-1965 hostile nonwhites. I’m not the least bit interested in having the respect of Chrissy tingle up my leg Mathews.

        White Liberals are actually correct about the futility of a White Conservative Movement. Native Born White American race-replacement can not be reversed through the current utterly corrupt poliical and economic system. This why a populist-anarchist framework is the only viable game in town for millions of ordinary Native Born White Americans.

        American society is going to collapse..one way or another. The Northeast experienced a collapse for two weeks. Human Civilization reached a breaking point in the tri-state area with the gas shortage…fits fights were breaking out on gas lines.
        The Skank Ann Coulter is offering the pinheads neocon corporatism…this is what you mean by respectable White Conservatism.

        • Luca

          If you are advocating full blown, race revolt and anarchy, you are on the wrong website. I think this website promotes free speech mingled with intelligence and realism, not violence.

          I think a better approach would be a political one, whereby Republican voters move to swing states and take back the electoral votes that Liberals have been stealing. In States that are already Red, the States should discourage illegals as Arizona is trying to do. In fact. creating a hostile environment for Liberals and their Useful Idiots would be a good bet also. I don’t think Republicans are God’s gift to us but they are the only realistic option at this time.

          As soon as you advocate revolts, violence, anarchy or racism you lose 80% of your audience.

          It’s healthy to vent your anger and express your feelings, but how productive would it really be?

          • wattylersrevolt

            Actually, what I am proposing is a radical change in conciousness in thinking about fundamental economic relations. Once this happens, millions of Native Born White Americans will figure out what the right thing to do is. They will start asking themselves questions along the lines of:How far do I want China’s genetic borders to extend into America?
            The low wage labor policy of the Republican and Democratic Parties is the force behind post-1965 Immigration. It is not that all complicated or hard to understand.

          • Luca

            The 1965 Immigration Act was not just about low wages, it was mainly about displacing Native Born White Americans who tended to vote Republicans into office.

            The Liberals wanted to import voters for the Democratic Party and to divide and conquer America. Everything else is just a side-effect.

  • pcmustgo

    I AM a single issue voter on immigration, race and amnesty. And yeah, I thought that up even before I saw out of the corner of my eye others writing it on here.

  • pcmustgo

    Wow , that Blatino (black/latino?) chick was sounding a little ghetto…. hard not to notice.

    • AutomaticSlim

      And very poor reading skills.

  • ConcernedYoungAmerican

    Hers was the best speech at CPAC. She didn’t just go after amnesty, she called out Ted Kennedy’s treasonous Immigration Act and how it was “designed to change the demographics of America forever.” However, I doubt the Republican Establishment will heed her warning (and the warnings of their base that many will never vote Republican again), as that pug Reince Preibus topped his list of RNC “reforms” by declaring that the Republicans must support amnesty. This country is screwed.

    • Luca

      I like her comment about the Democrats’ “War on Women” and Ted Kennedy having the only confirmed kill. ted Kennedy and LBJ are the two designers of this current mess. LBJ secured the Black vote and Ted took care of the third-worlders.

      • Conan

        Actually it was Hart, Cellar and Jarvitz.

        • TeutonicKnight67

          Jacob Javits you mean

          • Beetlejuice

            Until everyone gets it Teutonic Knight.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            I’m working on it Beetlejuice!

          • ConcernedYoungAmerican

            Honestly, thanks. I used to be a naive supporter of “them” because they’re on the front lines fighting Muslims. Now that I know what they’re behind, I believe a certain German leader was right.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Careful!

    • DelmarJackson

      Pat Caddell’s electrifying CPAC Speech rips GOP RINO Washington consultancy class

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDjW0WlpfY

      I liked Pat Caddells speech as much as anns and I thought Anns was brilliant

    • mobilebay

      CYA – Perhaps we should all drop our reps an email and say, “Hope you heard Ann Coulter’s remarks. Please take them to heart if you want to salvage this country.”

      • ConcernedYoungAmerican

        I actually did write my Congressman about torpedoing amnesty a few weeks ago. Although I live in one of the last predominantly white areas of California, I am represented by a white Hispanic Republican of the Marco Rubio variety that has pretty poor ratings on immigration from NumbersUSA (Devin Nunes is his name)—so I’m not holding my breath for him to listen. The only hope for this nation-destroyer from not going through is for Jeff Sessions to filibuster it or for European-American Republican House members to vote no.

    • There’s a reason why they won’t, and in fact, are going to go full Hispandering ahead:

      http://www.vdare.com/articles/ann-coulters-tremendous-speech-at-cpac-and-the-decadence-of-conservatism-inc

      CPAC is getting be so big and so expensive to hold that the only way it can keep on happening is if the amnesty and open borders lobby keeps on funding it. While there can and will be good speeches at CPAC, for now, the fact that the American Conservative Union is relying more and more on the cheap labor lobby for funding to hold CPAC and do whatever else it does means that eventually, with every passing year and every passing CPAC, the open borders voices will become more and more and any hint of immigration patriotism (even in the half baked form) will get fewer and fewer.

    • Beetlejuice

      The 1965 immigration act was indeed treasonous but it was not Ted Kennedy’s bill, he was merely the front man. Kennedy was too drunk and stupid to write the legislation.

      The bill was written by two Jews, Javits and Celler and then pushed by the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe.

      Read this: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/

      “Most important for the content of immigration reform [i.e., anti-restrictionism], the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s…. Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York.”

      http://www.amazon.com/Collisio

      • BAW

        Among the most anti-Semitic people in the country today are Islamic radicals who wouldn’t even be in the country were it not for the 1965 immigration act.

      • Luca

        The jewish Liberals never want to be in the limelight, that goes without saying. They are behind the SPLC, ADL, NAACP, GLAAD, ACLU, Hollywood, the banking industry, the media, lobbyists, etc, and the list goes on and on. They always need an “fresh-faced” emcee to front the filth they create. Ted Kennedy was nothing more than a puppet that could be presented to the public, much like Obama, MLK and the rest.

  • Anon

    “Republicans are grasping at these suicidal policies because they’re panicked, they’re demoralized after the last election,”

    Quite the opposite. Anyone who doesn’t realize by now that our elections are flat out rigged, has stepped beyond ignorant (ie you are IGNORING the obvious) and stepped into the stupid category. There is no conflict between democrats and republicans on any issue, beyond base rhetoric. No matter who “wins” the policies are all the same. It’s been that way at least since 1965, at least with regard to the immigration issue. Probably far longer.

    Let me tell you what comes next. The democrats have stepped on a “hot” issue. Gun control. Hell, I’ll go further…..the democrats murdered a whole bunch of innocent people including lots of children, just to bring this issue up, which, not only can they not possibly win, but were they serious about it, is probably the one thing that would spark a civil war. Why?

    That’s not easy to understand unless you know there is no such thing as democrat or republican. Those people are actors designed to put on a show. And the next drama coming up will be the handy flushing out of democrats from most areas of government to be replaced by republicans and the restoration of our gun rights.

    And NOTHING will change. The next president will be an ultra-conservative with GOP control of both house and senate, and most governships.

    And nothing will change.

    • JohnEngelman

      And NOTHING will change. The next president will be an ultra-conservative with GOP control of both house and senate, and most governships.

      And nothing will change.

      – Anon

      In “That is the Matter with Kansas?” Thomas Frank said that Republicans love to lose on social issues. These are the issues that cause lower income whites to vote Republican. The persistence of high rates of immigration, legal abortion, morally decadent Hollywood R rated movies, and so on does not convince lower income whites that the leaders of the GOP do not care about these issues. That persistence causes lower income whites to become more passionate in their support for the Republican Party.

      The Republican Party exists to make the rich richer. On that issue the GOP has won decisively since 1980. High rates of immigration contribute to the enrichment of the rich. It raises prices, lowers wages, and raises profits.

    • CrowBoi1977

      ‘The next president will be an ultra-conservative with GOP control of both house and senate, and most governships.

      And nothing will change.’

      The first few years of the W. Bush administration could be used to back up this assertion. They had the House, Senate, White House and even the Supreme Court and really did not do diddly squat…

      I have been re-reading Pat Buchanans ‘State of Emergency’ and he lays a lot of blame on W. Bush, and rightfully so.

      • Jack’s War

        No surprise, Bush was a bigger swine than his father, and that is saying something. You have to be really trying to be a bigger creep than George Herbert. This is the guy after all, who abandoned Iraqi’s to the full wrath of the murdering tyrant Saddam Hussein after getting them to believe that he would support their insurrection, knowing full well what Hussein would do. I wouldn’t have expected any different of GW than to surround himself with a bunch of Neocons, commit war crimes, trash the constitution and waste a golden opportunity to put patriotic people into influential position. It was a given he was a creep, he was a Bush and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

        Reagan is the big disappointment failure, and most of this mess can be directly tied back to him. He had a chance to lead a real cultural revolution and he wasted it. First by picking Herby, second by giving away California to Amnesty and third by refusing to allow those who had got him there, to put real America first patriots into positions of longstanding influence, like the left always does with their anti-American people when they have the chance. Reagan basically sold out to the neocons and in the process, he sold out America.

  • wattylersrevolt

    Politics abhors a vacum. When the Republican Party expires..a poltical vacum will be created..and the only thing that can fill is a highly racialized Native Born White American Patriot Movement. There is no other game in town.
    Forget about Ron and Rand Paul..they are vicious race-replacement enthusiasts.
    I really can’t find words to describe how disgusting Ann Coulter is..she is a worshipper of the evil Nuclear Power Industry and the malignant genetic mutations that it has inflicted on the Japanese People. She also promotes extreme scientific ignorance with denial that species evolution is a fact.

  • DelmarJackson

    All of you Ann haters, you might be right,

    but I said it before and I will say it again,

    I would vote for Krusty the Klown if he reduced immigration.

    You have issues with Ann?

    All those other issues, as important as they are, none of them matter if we don’t reduce immigration and get rid of those who want to import a new electorate.

    None

    of

    Them.

    Join Numbersusa

    read vdare every day.

    and vote all weasels out,

    regardless of party.

    by the way, I just saw on vdare a link to a powerful CPAC video of Pat caddell who is ripping the GOP a new one.
    look up Pat Caddell Speech on youtube

  • wattylersrevolt

    The Republican Party can never represent millions of ordinary Native Born White Americans for it is an owned subsidiary of the very psychopathic Corporations. For the life of me, I do not know why Steve Sailer and Peter Brimelow waste their time dispensing advice to the Republican Party.
    Since at least the Time..check out the Washington Times expose on this…of Ronnie Reagan, the Republican Party inner core has ben infested with homosexual pedaphiles. The Republican Party is the Party of Satanists!!! It is monumental madness to try and save this decrepit and rancid party….

    • IstvanIN

      Homosexual pedophiles and satanists? Aren’t they one in the same?

    • Beetlejuice

      We need to think in terms of being White and ask again and again and again: “Is it good for the White Race?”

      This is what every other race does and we must too.

      • wattylersrevolt

        That’s all Jared Taylor has to do in every “debate” and media appearaence…Native Born White American racial interests completely define the terms of the debate. And from this it follows that White Liberal Immigration Reformers are a cancer on Native Born White America.

      • Ralph

        Absolutely. I’ve put this in slightly different terms elsewhere: Everything in life has three possibilities: 1. It is good for White people. 2. It is neutral. 3. It is bad for White people. We must always support the first possibility and oppose the third. The second is neither good nor bad for us so we needn’t waste our time on it.

    • Tucker

      Steve Sailer’s mission is to keep a dog leash on Brimelow and Vdare, constantly churning out articles that blather on and on about metrics and redistricting schemes, and all sorts of other inane and unimportant statistical mumbo-jumbo, and this helps keep the discussion off of planning for a new, exclusively White Ethnostate (which should be priority #1) and lets the Cultural Marxist left run out the clock on White European people.

      Sailer is a mole and he was sent to attach himself to Brimelow and keep him distracted.

      And, he is doing a great job.

      • wattylersrevolt

        Another option for Sailer:focus exlusively on the interaction of race-replacement immigration policy…low wage labor policy…destruction of ecological amenities…and destruction of ecosystems. He would never have to read another policy wonk study ever again. It’s his choice.

  • White Elmo

    Hats off to Coulter. She is coming along quite nicely now.

    I saw Pedro Bush on Huxsterbee awhile back saying he was thinking about running for prez. He wants his turn now. Right. Like that is going to happen. He also said the Republican Party needs to be more inclusive and reach out to minorities.

    I’d say most people have had enough Bushes for this century. Connecticut liberals.

    • Ralph

      JEB is an evil miscegenationist. He has turned the White Bush line into a Brown Bush line and has helped destroy his genetic heritage.

      • Tucker

        Maybe we should cheer him for at least doing that?

  • mobilebay

    Thanks for speaking up, Ms. Coulter, however it’s about thirty years too late for anyone to try to stop the constant flow of criminals into our country. We don’t have anyone who knows the real cost in money and lives they take except perhaps Sen. Jeff Sessions and Rep. Steve King. Most of the rest of our “leaders” rally around the cheap labor and votes contingents and care nothing for the ones who put them there. So, remember, we can fight back when it’s time to vote. Let’s hunt until we find a true American. I’d like to see Kris Kobach in the White House.

  • I’m sorry, I have said that I would give Ann a reprieve, but this Republican freak show is not representative of pro-White people in any way.

    “the traditional home for blacks is in the Republican party”

    “blacks and Republicans go together like chocolate and peanut butter”

    “blacks have been in this country longer than… their roots in America go back longer than most whites. I think we owe them something more than someone that has just run across the border”

    We owe them?

    • TeutonicKnight67

      Yes we do. We owe them a one-way ticket to Da Muddaland.

  • Shattered

    The future is always now. What happens now determines the future.

  • CPAC is a joke. It tries so hard to be SEE-BLACK. “Hey look, we got a black woman hosting the event, so we are not ‘racist’.”
    Blacks ARE the problem. The hell with GOP trying to win over blacks.

    • I couldn’t agree more.

    • Fredrik_H

      Agreed. People who are too concerned with who represents them will never be part of the solution. “Oh look! We have a transgender muslim african candidate! This surely proves we are not the monsters those lefties say we are!”

      Whigga please…

    • Tucker

      If the CPAC gang and the RINO’s think that they are going to ‘rebrand’ the GOP and the 120 plus million white voters who voted for the RINO loser Romney because they see the minority infested Democrat Party as being viscerally and vocally anti-white – well, how do these CPAC and RINO numbskulls think their base will react when they see a parade of the same minority, non-white faces becoming elevated to the new rebranded face of the GOP?

      Non-whites are anti-White. Period. If you corner any of these minorities who the RINOs are now trying to anoint as their new messengers – and ask them what their opinions are of Whites who disapprove of miscegenation, I will guarantee that 99% of them will express negative opinions of Whites who disapprove of race mixing. This effectively means that non-Whites do not support the right of White European people to be concerned about the survival of their race; let me repeat this – non-Whites have so little respect for Whites that they do not even support our right to continue to exist, which most certainly cannot and will not happen if we engage in miscegenation.

      The GOP is self-destructing, and I say, step aside and let it die.

      • sbuffalonative

        My answer to miscegenation is this: If you believe in God, miscegenation is an affront to God’s creation. He created distinct races. It’s not up to man to think he can improve on God’s creation or play god.
        If you believe in evolution, then miscegenation destroys the uniqueness of biodiversity.

    • Ralph

      Weak seed Whites keep trying to hide behind Blacks [and other non-Whites to a lesser degree].

      The GOP seems to be having an open casting call for Blacks and other non-Whites. The first requirement is that they be really Black or clearly non-White–say with a Latino surname. Then, they must parrot so called conservative rhetoric. That’s about it. Audition and have those two things and you’ll be on the fast track to sitting in the window. And, even if you’re an idiot, the weak seed Whites will gush all over you while telling everyone to be sure to get a photo of them and you smiling together. “See, I’m not a racist, why I don’t even notice skin color and this Black person standing next to me, why I don’t even notice that he’s Black. Did you get the photo of us together? Good.”

  • All you white guys, find a nice girl and have more kids. That is the only way to win, only way to survive.

    And no more ‘conservatism’. The new concept should be CONTINUALISM. Conservatism means we should preserve something from the past. Continualism says we as a race and culture must continue and survive. Survive and march forward than conserve and hunker down. We must all be Continuals than conservatives.

    • IstvanIN

      We also need a place to survive and thrive.

      • Ralph

        While you’re waiting for such a place, just have White kids. As many as possible.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      A culture must have a past if it is to have a future. True conservatism is traditionalist and seeks to preserve the societal factors that are proven to work in practice. We can still progress as people without abandoning the virtues that made us great in the first place.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Before Whites can “have more kids” we must feel safe, comfortable and secure in our own environment — an environment free from the evil, aggressive, anti-White genocidal agenda being waged against us, The White Race.

      The following MUST be stopped:

      *Mass flooding of non-Whites into White homelands.

      *FORCED integration of White living spaces by Third World sludge.

      *An end to the non-stop, hostile, anti-White propaganda spewed by the media and schools.

      Blaming Whites for not reproducing is akin to blaming the victim for the crime committed against him.

      Bon

      • Ralph

        I disagree. I’ve heard variants of this argument for years. I was previously married to a woman who said she didn’t want to bring children into this horrible world. I divorced her, because the most important thing to me is having as many White children as possible.

        We will never live in a perfect world. It is always struggle and change. Just have White children, and things will work themselves out.

    • Ralph

      Absolutely. Expand always, contract never. But, I would go further and say to overcome the old morality that is helping hold down our numbers and find a way to have as many White children as possible.

  • blond bush

    blond bush. i will vote for a blond bush.

  • Ralph

    Coulter has more brass ones than many of the bloodless wimps in the GOP leadership.

  • If The Big Guy Upstairs has me slated for an eternity in the way-down-there place, when I get there, I just might find out that hell is hell not because it’s full of red monsters with horns and pitchforks and eternal fires, but because it’s full of infinite and eternal focus groups and polling.

    With that in mind, here is a piece of related news:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/03/18/exclusive-priebus-on-rnc-report/

    This is about the supposed RNC “autopsy report” of the failed Romney campaign. Except the report doesn’t really delve into reasons, much less any honest reasons, why Romney didn’t win. What it really does is fawn over the “importance” of the Hispanic vote and only the Hispanic vote. Based almost entirely on focus groups of Hispanic voters.

    So what is it really about?

    If you look at the names of those who were responsible for the “autopsy,” and the unctuous rear-end kissing of a certain political family with a four-letter surname (hint: Starts with “B”), then it’s perfectly clear that this report isn’t really a serious political analysis. What it really is is the effective declaration of Jeb Bush’s campaign for President in 2016.

    Maybe someone should tell Jen Rubin and Rinse Pree-BUS that there are people other than Hispanics who are allowed to vote. Watch as their brains blue screen. Ask them: Who the hell died and made Hispanics the be-all and end-all of American elections? Anyone who studies the issue honestly enough that controlling for a lot of factors, the Hispanic vote isn’t really that important or powerful. “The Bush family does well” — I don’t think any Bush has ever won a majority of the Hispanic vote in any election, even considering each state within a Presidential election as its own separate “election,” which it legally is.

    One more thing: You can count on one hand the number of times Romney actually used the phrase “self-deportation,” and that was entirely in the primary season before he had the Republican nomination locked up. Yes, he got that phrase from Kris Kobach, and yes, these were in the days when Romney actually pretended to care about Kobach just long enough to fool enough Republican primary voters. Of course, as you know by now thanks to my bean-spilling, once he clinched the nomination, he dumped Kobach and then went back to his usual open borders self. Besides, what is “self-deportation” but illegal aliens willingly obeying immigration law? That’s how most laws function, genius: Because people willingly obey them in fear of the consequences of not obeying them and having someone else enforce them upon them.

  • So when you show up to the Republican fish and goose soiree, do you have to bring your own token black or is one supplied to you by Ann Coulter and the GOP?

  • bigone4u

    When a best selling woman author publicly scolds the pro-amnesty sell-outs in the Republican Party, it can only be a good thing for the white nationalist movement. Whatever Miss Coulter’s personal life is like is irrevelent as far as I am concerned. The real problem is that the powers that be want amnesty and the sell-outs aren’t listening to anyone else. Unless there is a massive email or street protest, organized by anti-amnesty forces, the Congressional votes for amnesty seem to be in place. Will Ann or anyone step forward to organize that protest? Talk is cheap. It’s time for shouting or more.

    • No, the problem is that White people can’t even speak up for White people as White people without having to invoke some spirit of Marting Luther King, where we just have to help raise the black people up so we’re not seen as racist and esoteric. “We Owe Them” black people something sounded just as ridiculous and suicidal coming from Ann as it does when the Leftist stooges say it. Ann would be first in line to fellate the illegals if she was certain they would be voting for Republicans.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Exactly! St. Michael King – patron of Plagiarists help us! Please return and tell the sons of Obama to vote republicant! Pretty please!

      • bigone4u

        Owe them? We’ve given them a free ride for 150 years. Enough already.

  • [Guest]

    I’m against amnesty too. But it’s a lost battle in a lost war.

    • Grim Jim

      What a coward, the fight has been rigged so far, the battle hasn’t even begun. What a pitiful example of a wimp are you.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    I’m confused. I thought Coulter carried water for Chris Christie and Romney. Or did she throw Christie under under the bus after he burst into tears when he met Bruce Springsteen? And, was she not a rabid supporter of “Romneycare?” I find I just can’t put much stock in anything she says anymore. She’s part of the inside the beltway ruling class, irrelevant and self-serving.

    Coulter has to make up for ALL her faux pas and is trying to regain her lost popularity to remain relevant on the cocktail circuit. Sorry, I ain’t buying it.

    Ann, your GOP credentials are as phony as McCain’s. Nothing your say or write interests me any longer.

    Bon

  • splitsing

    Sorry, mudshark Ann supports immigration from the likes of her ex-BF Dinesh D’Souza and all the other bantus that she has bedded. I agree with her sentiments on this topic but she can still go to hell.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      You first

    • Nate Miller

      Dinesh D’Souza her ex-fiance is NOT a Bantu! He is an Asian Indian.

      • Popeye Doyle

        He still isn’t white by any stretch. Another porn addict lusting after white women would be my guess. I appreciate what Coulter says on some topics but we have to counter weigh that with her being a race traitor in other aspects of her life. Are white babies anywhere in her past or future or is she just having ‘Good Times” with kid Dynomite? Celestial Time is really correct on this if we really look at it.

      • splitsing
  • Buchanan and others were way ahead of Coulter on halting illegal immigration, but better late than never I suppose. Actually, Mitt’s strategy of ‘self-deportation’ wasn’t a bad way of addressing the issue. If America’s demography hadn’t changed so much over the past generation, Romney would now be president.

    Unfortunately, all of America’s new minority groups vote pretty much as ethnic blocks and are overwhelming against the GOP (‘White’ party). Ironically, only white Americans vote along ideological (rather than ethnic, racial or gender) lines. So as ‘diversity’ grows in America, the Democrats will get stronger, since Whites remain disunited here.

    As for shutting the door on illegal immigration, it’s virtually too late. The horses have already left the barn.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      Ann’s never been pro-illegal. Stop with the revisionism.

  • JohnEngelman

    “Republicans are grasping at these suicidal policies because they’re panicked, they’re demoralized after the last election,” Coulter said. “Stop panicking, Republicans!”

    – Kevin Robillard, Politico, March 16, 2013

    ———–

    The recent election was too close to draw many conclusions from it. President Obama was reelected by a smaller percentage of the vote than he won in 2008. The Democrats won fewer seats in each house of Congress than they won in 2008.

    My take on things is that the clear majority of the voters were dissatisfied with the President’s handling of the economy, but that a smaller majority thought Republican policies would make things worse, at least for them.

    It remains the truth that Republicans cannot ease restrictions on immigration without angering American citizens for whom more immigrants mean lower wages.

    Christian conservatives remain a critical GOP constituency. Republican politicians cannot
    reach out to homosexuals and feminists without alienating that constituency.

    Non whites, homosexuals, and women who vote Republican do not vote Republican for the same reasons most of those people vote Democratic. They vote Republican because they feel they can prevail in our increasingly competitive economy. For them tax increases are more threatening than the caprices of capitalism.

    In addition, most women Republicans feel comfortable playing traditional female roles in American society.

    • Beetlejuice

      “In addition, most women Republicans feel comfortable playing traditional female roles in American society.”

      It is your OPINION that “most women Republicans feel comfortable playing traditional females roles in American society.” It is extremely arrogant and presumptuous of you to pontificate as to how “most women Republicans” feel. You have no way of knowing this. This is exactly what makes lefties like you so insufferable, you presume to have some kind of inside knowledge about how “most people” think and feel.

      • JohnEngelman

        The Equal Rights Amendment was not stopped by Democrat women. It was not stopped by Republican men. It was stopped by Republican women.

  • guest

    Moderators, fix this article! Your headline says, “Coulter: “I’m not a single-issue voter against amnesty.”” which is the opposite of what she said. She said “I’m ow a single-issue voter against amnesty”. Very different!

  • NeoconsNailed

    The next question is how long Miss Ann is going to have this stance. She’s as solid as water, as schizophrenic as any Bush. Taking best on whether she’s still singing this tune even a year from now.
    The next question after that is how long it will take her to spew some sellout opinion. Most people who are not proven, long-term rightists follow up a strong, desperately needed statement with a stupid, compromising or dead-wrong one. Note that if you ever hear an outspokenly conservative sermon in a church not noted for it, the same preacher spews nonsense the following week.

    It is a nice surprise she got such a good reception with this speech — the next question is whether the CPAC crowd will go with her truth or continue to exalt and applaud neoconsters.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      She’s never been pro-amnesty.

      End of story.

  • tacheles

    Coulter’s opposition to amnesty has to do solely with votes. She believes correctly that adding 11-15 million Hispanic new voters will give the demagogue party a permanent lock.

  • Candid

    Ann is right on, and dead on when it deals with weakness of repubs and slimeness of demonrats.
    She is hated by the wimpy leftistas because she has more balls than their girlfriends,
    and is infinitely more intelligent.

  • Zackersman

    I’m a Continualist. Just another one of the Continuals. I like it. As an added bonus it will even confuse them for awhile.

    Then all the black kids and kids of color will want to copy it and say they are Continuals too, in order to sound progressive and hip?

    • pawcatch

      I really don’t think Ann is a true small government conservative.Anybody who pals around with as many liberals ascant cant be trusted.I much prefer Laura Ingrahm in Michelle Malkin.I actually think that they really believe in the free market.

  • Grim Jim

    POS Rand Paul has thrown his FULL support behind “amnesty” a la the complete destruction of the America we grew up in. Rand wants to turn America into a mirror image of the slums of Brazil.

  • bubo

    Honestly, there’s no saving the country as it is now. It’s too far gone, both ideologically and racially. Just be ready for when the break up comes.

    • There are White Nationalist in the Pacific Northwest preparing for the break up.

      Check out www dot Northwestfront dot org

  • wattylersrevolt

    Moderator

    Why did you erase my first comment in this thread? PC reasons?

  • Tucker

    Did anyone besides me, who watched the entire Coulter speech, notice that, and I think it was the very first ‘question’ that came from the audience – came from the voice of a guy who immediately announced (for the benefit of the TV viewers. web viewers and listeners who he apparently and curiously knew would not be shown his face) that he was ‘an African American male’, and then he said he had a two-part question, and the first of which was ‘Would you go out on a date with me’?

    This ‘question’, and the announcement in advance that he was black, I do not think for one minute was any innocent coincidence. This guy was a plant – and I am convinced that he was sent to CPAC and placed in the audience by our virulently anti-white, white genocide craving, mortal enemies and then deliberately selected by someone out of an audience of hundreds of White conservatives for the express purposes of delivering that race mixing question to Ann Coulter.

    Coulter, as I fully anticipated, blew the response. She wimped out and went the Politically Correct path and said ‘yes’, but then tried to make light of it by adding that she would need a note from the black race card player’s mother. That was the exact wrong way to handle that kind of question. White females need to grow a pair and start having the courage and guts to flatly and firmly state that they do not date outside of their race and that it is their perfectly legitimate right to have and express that position.

    Same rule applies to White males, except that in most cases, women are less likely to ask a guy for a date right out – but will instead resort to flirtation in order to get the guy’s attention. In either case, the answer must be a firm and clear ‘no thanks’.

    In this CPAC incident, I suspect that the intent was to try to lure Coulter into saying ‘no’ and then the Cultural Marxist anti-White left would have tried to use this to smear Coulter as a ‘racist’. This was clearly a trap, but it goes right back to what we in the AmRen community continually declare over and over again: Whites have to stop letting ourselves be intimidated and cowed into submission over the fear of being called a ‘racist’.

    Standing up for our legitimate racial interests is NEVER going to be approved by our enemies, folks. Their goal is our destruction and genocide – so, when they try to set clever little traps like the one they set for Coulter at CPAC – hold our heads high, show that we are fearless and march right into them and be DEFIANT about it. That is the only way that we will defeat this foe – render their dirty tricks useless by curing ourselves of our cowardice.

    Example: Coulter could have politely told the black guy no, and then turned his question around on him and asked him if he thought that White European people, who constitute only 10 percent of the World’s population and who all top demographers admit are facing potential extinction over the coming century, should not be permitted to adopt behaviors and making their dating and marrying and reproductive selections that would help, rather than hinder, their ability to survive as a distinct racial group on this planet? Using the Cultural Marxist’s own technique, before he had time to answer this question, pepper him with another question such as: “Do you believe that White European people have a right to survive or do you believe that they have an obligation to engage in behaviors such as miscegenation that will lead to their extinction?”

    Believe me, folks. Not only would the air have gone out of that black guy’s balloon, but the opportunity to get a message as powerful as the one I just suggested out to millions of Whites in the viewing audience would have sent shock waves of demoralizing horror through the ranks of our Cultural Marxist genocide craving enemy.

    This is the way we play hardball with the Cultural Marxists, folks. This is the way we go on the offensive. Maneuver them into a position of trying to defend White genocide in a public forum where millions of our fellow Whites will be able to see and hear it.

    • Luca

      I think you are right, he was a plant, and it was a trap, but I think her answer was appropriate. She diffused the situation with humor and made age the issue and not race. She deflated his argument by changing the subject and getting a laugh from the audience. The black guy was using humor in his question as well. Why take it to another volatile level regarding race, sex, and miscegenation? She did the right thing, she kept it simple, avoided the trap and responded curtly. I have a good idea of what was on her mind but it’s never wise to let your thoughts exit your mouth before thinking about the consequences.

      • Tucker

        For how much longer should Whites continue to play the coy game?

        2042 is only 29 years away, and if these RINOs cut a deal with Obama and give amnesty to 30 or 40 million illegals, plus family reunification provisions that will let them import 50 or 100 million of their family members – whites will be a minority within 10 years from today, if not sooner.

        From a tactical standpoint, I do not think that Whites can afford to NOT go on the offensive and to get proactive and openly advocate in favor of our ethnic specific interests. The sooner this happens, the more courage that we will begin to see in all of our white friends, family, and also in our white politicians.

        Courage is contagious, and so is fear and cowardice. And, based on my personal interactions with blacks and the other minorities I’ve known and spent time around, refusing to apologize for being white and being honest about having racial pride is more likely to earn respect from minorities than it is to earn you their scorn.

        • Luca

          The only Whites playing games are politicians. The problem is, how many Whites have their eyes open? How many have been programmed to be pro-gay, pro-diversity, immoral, anti-Christian, anti-White, pro-feminism, pro-liberal, not to hate, to believe the main stream media, to be passive and are distracted with drugs, TV, Facebook, smart phones, money, pornography and thug culture? How many of these Whites will have courage or are even aware of the real world? They have been dumbed-down on purpose.

          Whites are a minority and will need allies, where will they come from if all we do is think in terms of race? You will alienate everyone else and then they will join forces as they do now.

          You cannot have a solution if you don’t understand the problem. The problem is Liberalism and their useful idiots who follow along, believing they have something to gain. Liberals have empowered and united the forces bent on destroying America.

          Believe it or not, blacks and browns are not the real problem, they are a symptom of the real problem. It’s like that old joke about the guy who takes his car into a service station because of the red warning light on his dashboard. The mechanic looks at the light and says “I know the problem” and proceeds to cut the wire to the red light. The real problem is you need oil in the car. Without fixing the real problem you are fooling yourself and only addressing the symptom.

          Success can only be achieved politically, with allies, and not through racially ideological aggressiveness.

    • sbuffalonative

      She could have also politely said, ‘dating is a personal and private issue. I decide who I’m going to date based on many factors; personality, compatibility, similar interest, etc. I don’t know you or anything about you other than you’re asking me this question and you’re black. What’s the purpose of asking me this question? Are you trying to shock me or embarrass me?”

      Turn it around on him and make HIM defensive. Demand that he explain his motives in asking this question.

      On a side note, this is why I like when our enemies come here to question us and play ‘gotcha’. We need to know how they think and what they think so we can know how to respond when we’re ambushed. Being able to counter their arguments here makes us stronger.

  • JoePatriot12345

    Rubio is an ethnically caucasian Cuban.

    99% of hispanics, and 100% of Cubans, view each other as being quite different from each other.

    Kissing this guy’s butt will not result in any sort of large turnout of hispanic voters for the Republicans.

    • They will kiss his butt because he’s not “White” and doesn’t pretend to speak for White people.

      Since I don’t have much of a chance getting a response from asking a dog what happens after it finally catches its tail, I should probably find the nearest Republican to get their response. As a very pro-White person, I just don’t understand the thought process of the Republican brain when it tries to claim ultimate victory by having every living black person and non-White Hispanic vote for the Republicans. Wouldn’t a reality of having every White person vote Republican statistically be a landslide victory? Focusing on White people would be racist though, right Ann? You can talk about Democrats not really caring about black people or brown people, and that Republicans are the ones who really want to help those poor victimized souls, but you just can’t single out White people.

  • Leon Haller

    I hope ALL of you people are furiously lobbying your GOP reps to vote against ANY amnesty – and not just complaining amongst the dwindling patriot venues! I tell each one’s office peon that I will be donating $1000 to any primary opponent of theirs who is better on immigration (and I will be donating to Lindsay Graham’s opponent, if he has one).

    Note: Rand Paul has now sold us out, too.

    • Rand Paul is talking out of both sides of his mouth on the immigration issue, depending on which group he is with. Rand Paul are Libertarian true believers, racial pussyfooters.

  • Felix_M

    Coulter is right! Why is it most of the republicans today with balls are women?
    Look at what the GOP has? John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio and the Bushes? All a bunch of lily-livered cowards, afraid to make a principled stand. Even Rand Paul is now selling out.

  • Felix_M

    Coulter is right! Why is it most of the republicans today with balls are women?
    Look at what the GOP has? John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio and the Bushes? All a bunch of lily-livered cowards, afraid to make a principled stand. Even Rand Paul is now selling out.

  • LaSantaHermandad

    If we grant amnesty to illegal aliens then is this the slippery slope to amnesty for all criminals; given that a large number of rapes, murders and homcide by auto are attributable to illegals. When I say illegals, I’m not restricting that to Hispanics alone. Are all those Somalis who are reaking havoc in Lewiston, St.Paul and other cities all legals? Are all the Arab muslims in the country legal or did they also cross the border from Mexico. Saadam Hussein could also have passed for a Mexican or Central American.

  • William Allingham

    That race is not important is the silliest idea that has ever been said, even mexicans recognize that the industrialized part of their country is the North (where you find the highest concentration of whites) because they look forward to imitate the USA then you have the mestizo center of the country (including or rather, specially mexico city) of corrupt nepotist, bureaucrats that care just about form but no substance and at last you have the poor south, composed of illiterate, unskilled Indians who can not even speak Spanish.

    we notice some pattern (gradation) right?

    mexican northerners see the rest with contempt specially the ones of the center because they are only expecting for the government to solve their problems instead of leaving excuses aside and putting themselves to work, its worth noting that most of immigrants to the USA come from this latter region of mexico.

    so if you get to work you can have a good life even in a poor country, (you create your own opportunities) but if you are lazy, unskilled or simply a criminal, it doesn’t matter where you go or what reforms you extract from your hosts government (usually by “moral” blackmail).that culture of poverty will give you the same results.

    ofcourse a hard working man will always do better surrounded by people like himself otherwise he will become culturally isolated (he will not be enriching himself) at best, at worst he will be dried out by the opportunistic rest. and obviously we don’t want this latter situation to become the destiny of the USA.

    these unskilled wretched people don’t go to America precisely because they look to enrich her or to start to do things right, they go simply because they can, the same way they would pick a 100 bill from the floor if they find it there lying (they never ask if they deserve it or if there would be consequences, these kind of judgments are made only by farsighted people).

  • Andrea Ostrov Letania
  • Andrea Ostrov Letania

    Time to the end the GOP?
    All should join the Dems and focus on joining with all groups against the globalist elites. Fight one enemy at a time, and fight the main enemy first.

    Mexers are not leading the amnesty movement. It’s being funded by the globalists and rich libs, esp the Jews.

    PS. Paradoxically, class warfare and even Marxism might actually be good for white power.
    Without class struggle, all whites–even the poor and working class–are categorized as ‘privileged’ and ‘powerful’ under multi-cultism whereas all non-whites(and special whites: Jews, conquis, gays)are tagged as ‘victims’.

    Victim-hood is crucial in current politics. Class warfare can victimify most whites as most whites are closer to the 99% than to the 1%. Thus, class warfare ‘ennobles’ most white people as ‘victims’ of the uber-class.
    Communism in Europe didn’t vilify most white people but victimified them against the upper class bourgeoisie globalists.

    Though the Right has been against class warfare, the absence of such and its replacement by race conflict politics–dominated by leftist discourse–has actually weakened the Right since race politics took away the halo of victim-hood from whites. Instead, all whites got tagged with ‘privilege’ though most whites never knew privilege throughout history. Even the descendants of serfs, factory workers, and poor farmers got tagged with the ‘sins’ of the master class, the upper class, the owner class.
    And since ALL whites got tagged with privilege, it became convenient for rich whites to vilify and punish ‘unenlightened’ poorer whites in the name of fighting ‘white privilege’ while their own elite privileges kept expanding. White master attacks the white serf for ‘white privilege’ and takes moral credit for working for equality while his own wealth and privilege keep growing.

    This is why the ‘new-new privileged globalist left’ prefers the elite gay agenda and multi-cultism to old class struggle. Multi-cultism is great for rich whites. Class struggle would vilify rich whites, but multicultism allows rich whites to put on a good progo-show and just dump all the blame of ‘oppression’ on poorer whites.

    The rich class gave us Obama and section 8 housing.
    It’s time for the right to take up class struggle.
    Class consciousness must be a component of the new right… at least the rich drop their dirty act of racial betrayal.
    Burn down the golf courses. Hitler, a national-SOCIALIST understood this.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703724104575379630952309408.html

    Jim Webb knew. He realized the GOP is useless and took up the rightist class struggle line. A man ahead of his time.
    Be like Webb. Quit the useless gop, all join the Dem party and subvert it from the inside by playing class struggle politics. First go after the globalists.

    • jeffaral

      Spot on.

  • Jaego

    Greg Johnson suggested that the Republican Party was being self destructed before it could become a “German Worker’s Party” for White Americans.

  • Bobby

    I give old Donald Trump, more credit, in that he stuck out his neck much further than Ann, when he called for the ultimate “sin” of increasing European immigration and not giving amnesty to millions of border criminals. Isn’t interesting where some of your allies can come from?

  • Anon

    While I don’t appreciate Coulter’s pandering to blacks, she has a valid point. Illegal immigration hurts black job prospects more than anything else, since it robs them of the low skilled work they could be doing to benefit society.

    Blacks, whether we like it or not are valid citizens of the United States. If we had maintained the demographic integrity of the U.S. (90% white, 10% black) I believe that Whites would have been able to curtail their social problems better than we do now. Maybe that’s just the liberal side of me coming out, but it’s far easier to maintain an underclass of 10% than it is at 50% plus. Which will happen soon if we maintain our current course.

  • MBlanc46

    It was Zeppo, not Zippo, Marx. Sorry about the pedantry.

    • I have strange memories of elementary school where I was made to dress up like Harpo and thrown on a stage to toot some damn horn for a few minutes. I’m not sure what that means or how that applies to the story, but there it is. I wonder if I was being punished for something?

      • MBlanc46

        There are worst things to be forced to dress up as.

  • Couture is great.

    I’ve been waiting for a tough American woman leader like Maggie Thatcher – someone who won’t back down to Muslim, Black and Latrino rapists.

  • splitsing

    Is Ann still dating Jimmie Walker from Good Times or has she moved on to some other bantu?

  • Dave4088

    To Annine’s credit she has been the most stridently anti-amnesty of the milquetoast neo-conservative punditocracy who have better things to worry about like how to remake the middle east to better serve the geopolitical interests of Israel. All the while Rome burns.

  • Charles Lufkin

    Thank you Anne.You and Pat Buchanan are my favorites

  • Morris LeChat

    It seems we are getting closer and closer to talking about the big black elephant in the room–that elephant is race and ethnicity and how the racial/ethnic makeup of a nation determines the character of a nation

  • Safari69

    Ann Coulter is a boss! I am a single issue voter and my issue is immigrants, their are so many other voters like me….why cant the republicans stop being pussies.