Deterring Illegal Immigration in Alabama

Hans von Spakovsky, The Foundry, August 21, 2012

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision on Monday over Alabama’s Arizona-style immigration law, enjoining many provisions similar to those that the Supreme Court held were preempted by federal law when it issued its decision in June concerning Arizona’s law but upholding other key provisions.

In U.S. v Alabama, the 11th Circuit refused to issue an injunction against Sections 12, 18, and 30 of Alabama’s HB 56. According to the court, those sections of Alabama law:

  • Require officers “to determine a lawfully seized individual’s immigration status when the officer has reasonable suspicion that the seized individual is unlawfully present in the United States” (Section 12).
  • Provide that if a driver cannot show a driver’s license upon request by a state official, “a reasonable effort must be made within forty-eight hours to determine that driver’s citizenship and, if an alien, whether the individual is permissibly present in the country” (Section 18).
  • Prohibit illegal aliens from “entering, or attempting to enter, into a ‘public records transaction’ with the state or a political subdivision thereof.” A “public records transaction” is defined as applying for a car license plate, a driver’s license, or a business, commercial, or professional license. Violations are a felony (Section 30).

Section 12—the ability of police officers to check the immigration status of individuals they have detained or arrested—was the most prominent provision of the law that the Obama Administration attacked. The Justice Department failed to have that provision enjoined, leaving Alabama police officers free to seek such information from those the officers have a reason to suspect are illegal aliens. Following the Supreme Court’s decision on an almost identical provision in the Arizona case, the 11th Circuit said that “it is not problematic to request information explicitly contemplated by federal law.”

{snip}

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Church_of_Jed

    Amnesty Diversity Crime will get so bad that local White police will nullify the federal courts’ demands that they participate in giving America away to border jumping, blood thirsty, tax sucking parasitic Aztec mongrel invaders.

    • Rocky Bass,

       Other than a few of us inbred, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing southern, mental retards, I don’t know. My block is good, beyond that I don’t really know.

  • GM (Australia)

    Both sides of politics here in Australia have agreed to deter illegal immigration by setting up detention camps on two dreadful off-shore locations, Nauru in the Pacific and Manus Island off PNG. This will commence  very soon and has worked effectively in the past. But I did think this was all a bit too good to be true, sure enough it was, on last night’s news it appears that we will double our intake of legitimate refugees. These will of course mainly be ME Muslims, Somalis and Sri Lankens, none of whom will ever fit into our society.

    • Rocky Bass,

       It’s in all of our governments best interests to flood us with turd worlders, as it keeps up cowering in our homes, disconnected and begging for more Geshtapo to protect us from the crazzies THEY brought in! Diversity means an ABSOLUTE POLICE STATE, you know, so we can enjoy it’s many benefits.

  • crystal evans

    With deferred action, the young illegals will now be able to get drivers licenses along with their work permits. I wonder if the governor of Alabama will do what Arizona and Nebraska did in barring these immigrants with no status from getting drivers licenses?

  • The States are facing the fact that they can no longer afford the tax parasites.