Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • It’s a sad day.
    When Sikhs have
    MORE BALLS
    than a country of whites that once ruled the world.

    • The british people where protesting the take aways where paki muslims targeted white girls but the news covered it as racist attacks on asians.

  • JackKrak

    This is the only thing Muslims will respect – the threat of giving back what they like to deal out.

  • Church_of_Jed

    There would be no tensions if the White Brits would do the right thing and kick all the immigrants out. Send them to Paris where nobody will notice that they are there.

    • mikejones91

      What do you mean by that? Are you referring to the French census not asking about race?

      • Church_of_Jed

        Last time I was in Paris, it was infected by swarms of hideous Diversity.

        • mikejones91

          Yeah I have heard it is VERY “diverse” over there. 

          • Church_of_Jed

            Unsustainably Diverse- White will be extinct.

        • Sherman_McCoy

          True.  I won’t travel there any more.  Then again, Frankfurt is pretty well full of diversity diseases, too.

  • loyalwhitebriton

    Notice how respectful the British Biased Corporation were in their reporting of hundreds of Sikhs protesting (quite rightly) about the sexual abuse of their young girls by Muslim men?

    Yet when hundreds of whites recently protested in Liverpool about the sexual abuse of white girls by Muslim men, the small amount of coverage it did receive portrayed the the protestors as “Far Right”!

    Muslim men see non-muslim women worthy of sexual conquest; interesting to see Sikhs learning this.

  • crystal evans

    What is the problem with the Pakistani male, it seems that they cannot keep their hands off of young women other than their own. I guess it is just part of their tribal system that gives the right to rape and sexually assault women other than those of their own ethnic group or religion.

    • That region is very patriarchal as a result of numerous warlike tribes leaving their cultural mark, with Islam being the last one to exert cultural dominance. Rape/abuse of women from downtrodden communities is normal and common in that region. Muslim North Africans and Arabs in Europe also exhibit a tribal mindset, which must be why rape of native European women is dispropotionaly dominated by said groups.

  • Sikhs are very traditional people. Devout Sikhs are required to wear a Kirpan, the traditional knife and self defense weapon. One thing the Pakis need to remember, the Sikhs were among the fiercest of all fighters of the old Brit Empire and if this outrage continues, some Pakis will be laid out with their throat slashed. That is how they do things in the old country. And rightly so.

  • I recently found out about how General Blackjack Pershing stoped muslim attacks on US interests for 42 years. He got 50 jihadists, killed 2 pigs, had his soldiers dip the bullets in pigs blood (has the power to send muslims to hell) shot all but one dead. He then buried the 49 with cut up pig parts and set the last one go. While there had been muslim attacks for a while before the US was not attacked by muslims for 42 years after.

    • In today’s military, urinating on a dead insurgent is likely to get you arrested. In the military of diversity, we are now required to show respect to those that want to annihilate us. I suspect that General Pershing would not fare well in the military of today, even if his methods were 100% Effective.

  • splitsing

    And yet what did you see on CNN tonight?  Anderson Cooper featuring some Westboro-type white Christian nutty church that had a young child singing against homosexuals.  Oh, the horror.  Yet ask any imam what their take is on homosexuals and it doesn’t fit the multiculty narrative of disingenuous white liberal guilt.

    • StivD

      A.C. will do that because he’s gay; he’s also a lot more open about it than he used to be. He will use his show as a platform for gay privilege. 

      • Screamin_Ruffed_Grouse

         True, at least when gay privilege conflicts with Christianity. Christians, even the Westboro kooks and their ilk, are highly unlikely to commit violence when against gays when they see something on TV that they don’t like. Muslims? Let’s just say I doubt Anderson will be running in-depth exposes on anti-gay intolerance running rampant in mosques across America.

  • StivD

    Sikhs and Muslims have had bad clashes, in India, before; Sikhs aren’t people to take lightly, but I think they’re outnumbered.

    • Greg West

      But Sikhs are fighters and Muslims are cowards.
      I have a high degree of respect for the Sikhs.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        True, but one wonders why either need to be living in England.

        • Many Sikhs, a north Indian ethnic group, being part of British India (pre-independence i.e. before 1947) were brought as British subjects to serve in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and other colonial states all over the world which were part of the crown.
          Additionally, a great many served under the royal armed forces, air force and navy and they certainly were amongst the most prized fighters in modern British history.

          Today like other Indian sub sects, within the broader Indian diaspora, the Sikh communiy have prospered very well as good businessmen. Sikh-Britons are the 2nd wealthiest ethno-racial group just closely after Jewish-Britons. The wealthiest man in the UK is another fellow north Indian (we call them Asian here) Lakshmi Mittal, the man who owns the world’s biggest Steel companies and most expensive real estate properties in London, UK.

          http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/CASEreport60.pdf

  • Johnny Reb

    I’ve only met one Sikh.  He was in my unit, a white kid, very mild mannered and peaceful.  But his religion demanded that he always carry a sword and we kept his under lock and key in the Arms Room.  Maybe raping a Sikh girl might not be the best idea these muslims have had lately.  You don’t want to mess with people who carry swords.

    Much easier to just rape white women.  Whites won’t do anything.

    • “Much easier to just rape white women.  Whites won’t do anything.”

      Says you.

      And that’s all I can say about the subject.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Anyone can defend their own family members, community members, racial/ethnic members…. as long as they are not white.

  • Kurt Plummer

    Two Comments:

    This is Sikhism, according to Wiki-

    >
    Sikhs are expected to embody the qualities of a “Sant-Sipahie”—a saint-soldier. One must have control over one’s internal vices and be able to be constantly immersed in virtues clarified in the Guru Granth Sahib. A Sikh must also have the courage to defend the rights of all who are wrongfully oppressed or persecuted irrespective of religion, colour, caste or creed.
    The principal beliefs of Sikhi are faith and justice, in Waheguru—represented by the phrase ik ōaṅkār, meaning one God.
    >

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism

    And the obvious blind here is the use of the term ‘racially motivated’ which puts ALL the responsibility for proving that the victimization is systematic ON THE VICTIM.

    Get a clue people.  If _One Group_ is committing a disproportionate number of crime X, as a function a culture as much as religion exclusively associated with that group.

    It.  Is.  Racial.

    You don’t have to be looking to hurt someone specific to be doing it for racial reasons.  That is the entire focal point of our beliefs here.  That culture comes from genes.  Where race is another word for subspecies and the Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims have been cutting each other up for centuries, culture has come to define genetic differences inherent to in-group isolates.

    But it is still race.

    This is where the libiots needs a hard spanking by rationally minded (remove the cause, remove the effect) peoples.

    And Britain is so egalitarianly obsessed that it is going to take a full fledged revolution as race war before their leadership admit how evilly they have acted.

    It’s that simple.

  • StivD

    I have some sympathy for the American Indians but find a new point to beat on. That one is dead.

  • David

    I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental, or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with white men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work. Let white men from anywhere in the world, who would come to Africa, remember that you must continually retain this status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you.