The Changing Guard of White Separatism Convenes at a Tennessee State Park

Jonathan Meador, Nashville Scene, March 29, 2012

Inside the hangar-like conference room of Montgomery Bell State Park Inn, about 40 miles west of Nashville, more than 100 white faces stare in unison at a man in a dark gray suit.

A man in his early 60s, Jared Taylor has the charisma of someone half his age. He is genteel, erudite and soft-spoken as he addresses a receptive audience of writers, thinkers and assorted hangers-on. It’s nearly 5 p.m., and the American Renaissance Conference is under way.

The mood is relaxed, as if old friends have reunited after years of absence. Jokes and ensuing backslaps are shared. One man laments forgetting his copy of Why We Fight—a furious anti-Islam screed by one of the weekend’s featured speakers, the French journalist and author Guillaume Faye. As many conference goers have proudly noted, the decision to host this gathering on publicly owned lands affords it all sorts of First Amendment protections. For the past two years, they said, so-called “anti-fascist” protesters shut AmRen down.

And come these old friends have, from all corners of the Western world, from California to Maryland, from Canada to England, France and beyond, to experience an atmosphere of camaraderie that only those with a persecution complex can fully understand or appreciate. In the bucolic and firmly isolated Montgomery Bell State Park Inn—which would be, as one conference goer with a background in law enforcement told me, an ideal place to terrorize any protesters who might be stupid enough to travel the park’s lone, winding road without carrying firearms—they can loosen their belts (and their tongues) a few notches and let their freak flags unfurl.

“Our views aren’t very popular,” says a woman who’d come all the way from Manhattan for the conference. “You don’t get invited to all the fancy dinner parties on the Upper East Side.” She explains it’s not often you find people—particularly upper-middle-class liberals—who are willing to break bread with those who look down on your value system.

But here, she’s among friends who’ve paid $150 for a weekend of lectures, book signings and above all, networking. For $35 more, she gets a banquet of wilted asparagus and dry pork tenderloin, plus the dinner entertainment of an address by Faye, the French New Right author renowned in these circles for his anti-Muslim writings.


[Editor’s Note: The rest article is here.]

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Annoyed In Illinois
    •  Does anyone who was there remember speaking to this nitwit?  Might not be a bad idea in future  for AmRen to screen those who register.  Just use google. This spy’s connections to leftwing media would have been easy to spot, and AmRen could have cancelled his registration.

      • Oil Can Harry

        You’re assuming they would’ve ejected this nebbish if they knew he was a liberal reporter.

        It could be that Mr. Taylor believes any publicity is good publicity and even hit pieces like this get the word out about AmRen. 

        • Well, that may be.  Though Mr Taylor did say on the opening night that he had turned down the request of an SPLC person to attend, because he thought nothing good could come of letting such “contemptible swine”  walk amongst us. He is of course entitled to make the rules and I’m sure he has good reasons.  I only note that the attendance of spies makes networking at the conference much harder for those of us, for instance, in academia, who would certainly be blackballed if a spy leaked our personal information.

          • Yes, anyone in government, public education or senior management in most larger private firms would be taking great liberties with their future to be exposed here.  Not because it is wrong but because we are the most heavily deiscriminated against demographic group in America today.  To be brave is also to not be stupid.  I would rather such important people remain secret to help their brothers and sisters on the inside.

          • Pandemonium

            You have hit on something I consider extremely important; working for the Cause on the inside, outside,  and every conceivable side! It’s amazing how little things can create ripples which travel far and wide. For example, I tell many people that having only two children is NOT replacement. The usual response is, “what do you mean?”. Then I get to explain how the White race is dying out, etc. This small comment will make people think! 

            That comment cannot be construed as racist, but will be taken as a simple statistic. But it has the potential to make someone think.


    • MekongDelta69

      The Nashville Scene is one of those ‘alternative indie’ papers that hippies, hipsters and the oh-so-swell academic crowd read.

      There’s more circulation in my boiler room than this paper has. And the few ‘kewl kidz’ who do read the paper already had their minds made up a long time ago. Oh tsk, tsk. Another racist gathering. Such neanderthals… Care for another white wine and brie Heather my dear?”

      Don’t sweat the small stuff…

  • Mike O’Sullivan

    I will be there next year, sounds great, I’ll be there next year.

  • Anon12

    You are damned if you do and damned if you don’t, comes to mind

    . Here Jared and the AR Conference tries to please all their detractors and wear suits, be nice, talk intellectually, throw out David Duke because of ONE fat baldy man, and look where it has gotten Amren?   Goes to show never appease nor apologize or accomodate those that are really NOT on your side. They just act and talk like it.  But I am sure Jared knows this by now.

    • You are on to something there that needs further discussion.

    • anonymous_amren

      But white people like being nice and talking intellectually, it’s not just to please their detractors.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

       When I checked in on David Duke last year, he was still focused obsessively on Jews and Israel, so lost in his mission and ironically, his Christianity that he and his followers didn’t seem to be even a little concerned over more pertinent issues of race and politics in this country or Western Culture.

  • I wonder  in what type of upscale neighborhood the author of this article resides…..Probably one rich in diversity and vibrant people right??  God these liberals are such pathetic excuses for human beings.

    • Lots of homosexuals, I bet. That makes it “vibrant”, right?

  • Round up the usual anti-White, anti-Conservative images and references: A cartoon of the main speaker as a Klansman (are we surprised? No). Repeated reverential references to the Southern Poverty Law Center, as if it were the God-anointed arbiter of who is “Good” and who “Evil” in American society. Snarky little digs at AmRen and the racial realist movement in general.

    In short, it’s as if Rolling Stone Magazine had done a review of the conference.

     Why are the Left always so smugly superior, so cock-sure that they are the morally right side, and we the unwashed, ignorant spawn of Tobacco Road, or some other equally seamy “trailer trash” location? I know people personally in my own home town who are like that. They may speak to me and smile, even chat on the street. But on a deeper level, they wouldn’t have me in their homes, or truly treat me as an equal. Why? Because they are convinced that my heart is “not pure.” Because I’m not on the side of the “better angels of our nature” as they are so sure that THEY are.

     Their world view is hopelessly compromised and self-defeating, because as much as they accuse us of “hate,” they are the true haters. They hate themselves, the White race, and they hope we miscegenate ourselves into oblivion, the sooner, the better.

    • haroldcrews

      We are the ‘Other’.  The object of their hate and ridicule.  Human nature will express itself somehow.  If hatred of another race or ethnicity is taboo, a replacement will be found.

    • Timbuc2

       I do not believe there is any self-hatred involved whatsoever.  These are self-serving opportunists, who have wet their finger and put it up in the air to determine which way the wind is blowing.

      Disingenuous White Liberals compose two classes of people; the higher rung of the hierarchy is a highly organized group pursuing its own agenda and the lower rung is composed of closet racial realists who have made their own separate peace with the Anti-White coalition.  It is obvious they have no intentions of being “enriched” by vibrant communities of color themselves through miscegenation, so they live the kind of lifestyle any klansman would envy.  However, they know that The Diversity demands its White Sacrifices, so they have made escaping The Diversity very expensive for the poor, working class and lower-middle class Whites

      IOW, they are like the idiot who erroneously thinks he is saving his own hide by pushing others into the mouth of a big, hungry crocodile, believing it will die of indigestion before it ever reaches him.  However, the big, hungry crocodile has an insatiable appetite that increases as it the big, hungry crocodile itself grows in size. 

      However, thanks to the Internet, the MSM propaganda is being bypassed and more and more average Whites are waking up every day.  The Diversity may think they have won, because they have succeeded in shutting down all debate, but they better be more concerned about what the average White is NOT saying than what he is!   Time not wasted in discussion can be devoted to planning a course of action. 

      I think several smug sycophants are going to be in for a rude awakening and I, for one, am going to be wildly amused to watch how quickly they scramble to get in front of the line and act like they have always been Pro-White when the vast majority of Whites say enough is enough.

  • JohnEngelman

    The New Face of Hate
    That description was neither called for nor accurate, but what should one expect? 

  • mikejones91

    When have we ever said we are supreme? They keep bringing up “supremacy” in the article. In describing us.

    • Well if you talk about the history of accomplisments were europeans had calculus before blacks had writing, and then throw out IQ data ,ignoring east asians like they always do when talking about minorities, it makes a pretty good case.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

       Maybe because many articles and many posts seem to make Amreners seem obsessed with proving our innate supremacy?  Even though both may be true, we should act surprised when the same old, trite, hackneyed, stereotyped accusations are used.  We might point out that blacks feel they are superior to everyone.  Their rage is based on not running everything, not owning everything and being denied ANYTHING.

  • I am convinced that collapse of the dominant anti-White climate in the US society will not come as the result of “enlightening” or correct media reporting. Mr. Taylor’s work is a good preparatory effort. What will crush this farce of the society must be something revolutionary, like war that will engulf parts of the US or global crisis that will count hundreds of thousands deaths, or some smaller nuclear war, like, perhaps in the India-Pakistan area (the result being the global climate change and 1-2 billion dead from hunger as a result).

    In sum- I don’t know any example in history where in a short time span dominant societal trends have been changed-just like that. It took a few decades to prepare the ground for the French revolution; the same with transformation of Rome from the republic to the empire; or American revolution; or the collapse of Communism (OK, this happened due to complete rottenness).

    Perhaps US social system will start to leak, seriously, and there will be no more money for 3rd worlders; perhaps cities will explode, just like in 1960s, but on a bigger scale & White people will not tolerate that anymore; perhaps …

    But – the White America will survive and triumph, and the transition will include violence ultra-rich would not be able to contain nor control in usual ways.

  • Good thing for you Sam Francis isn’t among the living.  I know precisely the tongue lashing he would administer in reaction to that suggestion.

  • Jerrybear

    The writer is a smug self righteous pontificator. The author just kept repeating ‘according to the SPLC… hate, racists, racism, etc.’. He does even attempt to argue against many of the valid arguments that he chose to quote. It’s just more guilt by association, anti-heretical fluff.

    • ncpride

      Actually, I thought his commentary was juvenile and childish in a lot of areas. Seriously Jonathan, do grow up a bit, will ya? I would ask that you try to at least see if any of our concerns are valid, but I know that’s just too much maturity to ask of you.

    • What explains the brown nosing?  I would lay money on him trying to get the SPLC to hire him.  (See also:  Sebesta, Ed).

      • Robert Binion

        It is a tenet of modern, literary criticism that a writer’s work be judged without reference to his politics or personal life–hard to do, I know.  And while I dislike his personal attacks, must concede that Meador writes well.  We will never defeat these people with self righteous outrage, as they know not what righteousness is.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      He went after the food and location because he couldn’t find anything of substance to talk about.  Listing a scroll of White Separatist/Realist positions would be too labor intensive and might have left him lost for replies.

  • Sam was not the kind who thought white people needed the permission of some black to think what we think and say what we say.  That’s all I’ll say, I’m not really at liberty to fill in the rest of the details.

  • “wilted asparagus” maybe we can use that to ID who the spy was. Did anyone go to the bathroom and notice someone tapping their foot alot like that gay senator?

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

       The dry pork tenderloin was no doubt served to keep Jews and those liberal chefs away.  How was the dinner, Reuben?

  • .

    I wonder if Meader lives in the same “white privileged” Nashville suburb as Tim Wise?

  • MekongDelta69

    I read the first page of the original article, and since it was the ‘usual’ thing we’ve all read 1,000x before, I didn’t even waste my time with pps. 2 & 3.

    From the 1st pg.:
    There is the Council of Conservative Citizens, a St. Louis-based right-wing separatist group with national reach that has been denounced as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    The SPLC would deem my deceased grandmother a ‘hate group.! The ONLY group which they should deem a ‘hate group’ are themselves.

    The rest of the usual diatribe will be picked to pieces by the rest of the posters here. (Which saves me the keystrokes!)

  • Thanks, anon. I do feel “at home” since I came back to this website after an extended absence.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    I attended the conference and I find it eerie that this guy was present. I am trying to think of all the young guys who were there and who of them looked suspicious. Who left the banquet early? Usually these moles are easy to spot as you can see that they seem uncomfortable and unenthusiastic. This is why I don’t put my last name on my nametag. Of course he doesn’t want anyone to know that there were young women there such as myself or that most people there looked and acted normal. By the way, the food was excellent and I find it quite juvenile that he jumped ship over hearing Fraum say that the Chinese shouldn’t rule the world. Was that really that offensive?

  • Kudzu_Bob

    While I could not go to the conference, a good buddy of mine who is rather younger (early thirties) than are most of the attendees did manage to make it. Amusingly, he tells me that one of the better-known guests came up to him and voiced the opinion that my friend was an SPLC spy.

    As it happens, he was nothing of the sort. However, he did write an article about his experience for Taki’s Magazine that some of you might enjoy: 

  • robinbishop34

    Blacks and browns, as well as gays and now white women are simply proxies used by the left in an ideological war against  the traditional west. The aforementioned, programmed foot soldiers aren’t sophisticated enough to launch any sophisticated opposition on their own. You certainly know this?

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

       White women new proxies?  NOW was preaching that White women shouldn’t have white children back in the early 1980s at least.

  • robinbishop34

    They seek solace in an identity. Leftism is so easy to agree with, while the common sense approach of conservatism demands a principled stand on issues backed by common sense. Unfortunately today, common sense and truth are ‘hate,’ while idiocy and weakness is a virtue.

  • Excellent post, Jupiter7.

  • No

    Look, it no longer matters what they think or what they write.   We’re on course to either collide with them or separate from them.  What matters is that we define who we are.

    I continue to claim that we haven’t done that.

    For whatever reason, we are afraid to form a political party with its own newspaper/website and its own clear message.  Until we do, the only way our message reaches the white masses is through the goons, thugs, crazies and confused who seem to dominate white forums. 

  • haroldcrews

    That would be a great project.  Record various black gatherings including churches and disseminate the more inflammatory material. 

    • Dave4088

      Good point.  Even honest blacks said that the incendiary sermons of Jeremiah the bullfrog Wright were only the tip of the iceberg of what occurs in black churches.   But don’t expect the hipper than thou left wing journalists to cast aspersions on them.   

  • The_Bobster

    One should be heartened, however, that America is still by and large a conservative country.  The vast majority of people identify themselves as conservative or at least moderate, and only about 25% to 35%, I believe, would consider themselves liberal.

    PRINCETON, NJ — Thus far in 2009, 40% of Americans interviewed in national Gallup Poll surveys describe their political views as conservative, 35% as moderate, and 21% as liberal. This represents a slight increase for conservatism in the U.S. since 2008, returning it to a level last seen in 2004. The 21% calling themselves liberal is in line with findings throughout this decade, but is up from the 1990s.


    You’re overestimating their numbers. The last figure I saw was 21%.

  • Kurt Plummer

    Never discuss the concepts when you can abuse the and attack the conversants.  Saul Alinsky I think?

    Can’t find the exact quote but this one will do-

    …The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. — P.126-129

    You know your enemy is terrified of you when they attack you for what you are rather than risk being caught ‘in an incontrovertible truth’ of what you believe.

  • I don’t see the problem here. I didn’t attend the conference but I see nothing wrong w/the views of Amrener’s or Race-Realism. I think we should welcome the uninitiated in to hear what our speakers have to say. Our ideas are reasonable and statistically based. We have nothing to be ashamed of, we are not the Klan.

  • Kudzu_Bob

    You didn’t even go the site, much less read the piece, did you? Taki’s Magazine, which regularly publishes Steve Sailer’s and John Derbyshire’s writing, strikes me as an unlikely outlet for SPLC spies.

    In the interests of financial security, you would do well to avoid making wagers of any sort, if the above post is indicative.

  • Kudzu_Bob

    I happen to agree with your point. As I have told the piece’s author before, he tends to dwell too much on the exception rather than the rule: Just because lady basketball plays are very tall does not mean that women are taller than men on average. That said, for someone who is not necessarily fully on-board with the American Renaissance, he wrote an unusually fair-minded and sympathetic article.

    • Joseph Allen

      Lord have mercy, Bob, you know how sensitive tall women can be about their height.  No need to make them even more self-conscious about their giraffe-like appearance among their diminutive peers.

      By the way, I did record our last conversation for my SPLC file, and I’m thinking about double-dipping by forwarding it to the New Black Panthers. They are going to be furious when they find out that white people like fried chicken, too. 

      • Kudzu_Bob

        Luckily I can run like the wind!

        • Joseph Allen

          You’ve obviously proven that you can out-pedal any C.H.U.D. who might come after your bike.

  • Integration Anxiety

    You make some interesting points about the “in” crowd and their cool minority friends. The funny thing is how many cool Hollywood types ever are seen with a minority besides blacks? Why isn’t there like a cool Chinese guy or Indian guy? They are usually stereotyped into uncool nerdy types like White males. I do want to make a point about blacks in Hollywood as opposed to blacks in society. This idea that rich White liberals throw out to people that every White person should hang out with Will Smith, or Morgan Freeman or the late Bernie Mac, or Mike Epps, Omar Epps etc. fine, at face value maybe these are upstanding guys and okay to hang around with. The reality, though, is most White middle class citizens or poor Whites aren’t around the black elite classes, and the blacks that they see everyday aren’t all cool like what they see on tv. That is the problem.

    I compare this to an alcohol advertisement. You see all the scantily clad girls on the beach having fun in the sun, the happy go lucky guys looking for a chick and a drink. What you don’t see is the ugly half of extreme alcohol abuse. The DUIs (now OVIs), domestic violence, robbing liquor stores, police involved shootings, rape, assault, murder). That just wouldn’t sell booze now would it?

  • anarchyst

    Me too!  Finally, a kindred spirit who shares my views and attitude . . . there are many more of us out there . . . best regards

  • Oil Can Harry

    Anon12, I appreciate your thoughtful comments.

     I recall Mr. Taylor saying that his appearance on the Phil Donahue Show caused a large increase in new subscribers. As a result I thought he might not be opposed to hostile journalists attending the conference.

    That being said, I have no idea whether or not the old saying about any publicity being good publicity is true. 

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Nope, there are quite a few of us. I have been on here since 04. Love it!

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    I think I remember you as being a regular poster on here. Always upsetting when I find out there were other regular posters at the conference like myself but I didnt get to meet them.

  • Joseph Allen

    We do not share the same sense of humor.  That’s fine with me.

    My response to John Cougar FEMAcamp certainly showed irritation, but only because what he said was completely false.  Much like your accusation that I am somehow affiliated with the SPLC.  Nonsense.

    As I made clear to everyone I met at AmRen, I am a writer, not a joiner.  My only obligation was to be honest, and I was. The only rude or indignant reactions have come from people–like yourself–who weren’t there and do not know me. 

    You have cherry-picked passages that may seem disparaging if taken out of context or viewed by someone who takes himself too seriously, but you seem to have missed my point.

    I don’t expect you to be on my wavelength, but you should refrain from making false assumptions, especially in public.


  • Joseph Allen

    Back to the point I made originally–that depends on who they are.  Do I get to take stock of their individual characteristics before I choose?

    If they are just nebulous blobs of statistical averages, then I would obviously go with the group that is more empathic, intelligent, and attractive.

    Someone should do a study on that.

  • Harumphty_Dumpty

    “The first speaker Saturday morning was the always stimulating Robert Weissberg, Emeritus professor of University of Illinois at Champagne, who proposed “A Politically Viable Alternative to White Nationalism.” He argued that any movement that is explicitly based on white racial identity is “dead on arrival,” and must be repackaged in order to win successful recognition. The reality—that racial nationalism “is intuitive and written in our genes” and that even children are conscious of race—is a huge advantage for those who want to build a racial movement, but any white movement today that takes an explicitly racial stand will fail: “We are considered just above child molesters.” Prof. Weissberg also noted that there is no economic advantage to promoting white racial consciousness, and that most people do not act without financial incentives.”

    I can’t think of anything to say to this absolutely astonishing paragraph, other than what another commenter said on another site:

    “Wow. I don’t even know what to say. Welcome to Amren, where you get to be lectured by jews on how White nationalism could never possibly succeed, so you should just give up!”

    • Harumphty_Dumpty

      Looking through my files, I found another bit of nonsense from this man Weissberg. Why is such a man invited to speak at a pro-White function?

      “In a nutshell, while Madison’s radical political environment undoubtedly had, as MacDonald correctly notes, a “Jewish” flavor, to suggest that Jews had a major impact on campus life beyond some predictable attention-getting publicity is an exaggeration. The physical and intellectual damage was minimal. Most disruptive radicals may have been Jews (“New Yorkers”, to use the correct code word), but most Jews were not the trouble-makers MacDonald depicts. Not even close.”

      That last sentence is so incredibly stupid. “Most” of ANY group always do nothing, as any half-intelligent person knows.

      For God’s sake, Amren, if you must have Jews at the podium, can’t you at least find a Jew who can successfully pretend to be one of us????

    • Harumphty_Dumpty

      Re Prof. Weissberg’s remarks, the way to build a movement based on White racial consciousness is indirectly, by hammering into White minds the phrases, “anti-White,” “White Genocide,” and “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

  • Dave4088

    How do these people sneak in to the Amren conference?  I realize all screening procedures are not perfect and I fully expected at least one political enemy to sneak in undetected.    Then again, there is nothing to hide or be ashamed of at an Amren conference.

    If this Jonathon Meador was a sincere liberal he would have fairly and objectively weighed the arguments of the speakers before rendering harsh judgement on the core beliefs of American Renaissance and the conferees.   But he’s an ultra left wing hardliner and propagandist with a one track mind and a visceral disdain for racially conscious white people. 

    I’m sure he would only only have kind words for La Raza, NAACP, NOI and other non-white racial organizations who harbor a pathological hatred of white people.  

  • anonymous_amren

    “If liberals were out of the average white person’s life, we wouldn’t be sitting here talking about how screwed the West is.”

    Unfortunately, that’s not true. White people need liberals. White people would not have been anywhere near so successful without them. White history has been a history of white liberals and conservatives making up for each other’s weaknesses.

    White people don’t need black and brown people though.

  • anonymous_amren

    I would probably have been mistaken for a plant if I had been able to attend. I used to be from a far-left background, and I’m shy in real life. But I value and understand science, and when I discovered that science says black people are very much inferior in most important areas such as intelligence, I had to change my views to match reality.

  • OTOH, now we know how to keep the infiltrators away:  Make sure the asparagus is wilted.  Evidently, that’s all that matters to them.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Thanks for the compliment, Ben…..without giving too much away, I have really long blonde hair and I was always in a skirt. To answer your other question, I think first men in this movement need to realize that white men are a huge part of the problem too. Constantly fingerpointing at just white women and going into how Asian women are better (which lots of men in the movement do), only drives white women away. And yes, there are many Southern women who are feminine and lady like, …….like me :-).

    • A Calwell

      Courtney, I don’t think white men would favour Asian women over white women such as yourself. But as a general rule, some white men prefer Asian women, not because they think Asian women are genetically superior or more naturally beautiful than white women, but because Asian women tend to be more feminine in the traditional sense than white women. And Asian women are rarely overweight.

  • Harumphty_Dumpty

    Moderator: I’m not even allowed to encourage readers to check out what’s being done to anti-Whites in the comment section at the original article now?

    What’s the deal?

  • Harumphty_Dumpty

    Why am I not permitted to post a simple request that readers check out the current activity in the comment section to the original article?

  • Yet more proof that theirs is an ideology based on what feels good, rather than what is rational and grounded in reality.

    You’ll notice not once does he actual deign to point out in what ways the Amren speakers are wrong.   He just calls them nasty names and pretends like he’s doing something other than making himself look like a gigantic ponce.

  • Harumphty_Dumpty

    Wow, the anti-Whites have been destroyed in the comment section to the original article! There are excellent pro-White comments of all stripes…I’ve really never seen anything quite like it on a mainstream liberal article. (Though I understand that something like it happened recently to a Tim Wise article).

    Check it out…it certainly raised my spirits. I have a lot of irritations with Amren, but I do recognize that Jared Taylor is likely a smarter man than I am, and the response in the Nashville Scene comment section is one more of the things that convince me every now and then that Mr. Taylor must be doing something right.

  • Joseph Allen

    See previous reply for my answer.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    I went to the original article and enjoyed the comments from our side except for the guy who said AR only sees blacks and whites as different from each other but Asians are seen as superior to whites. I sure hope he was being sarcastic. I agree to give credit where it is due, but constantly exaggerating the achievements of Asians at the expense of degrading our own, only turns lots of whites like myself away. If we arent saying that whites are superior to blacks, then where in the world is that commenter getting his logic from that it makes sense to say Asians are superior to whites?

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     Well, let me help you a little.  Whites score just two point lower on average than the Asians who get into our system and go to our schools, while blacks score way down in the double digit category.  The impression of “in the middle” makes it sound as if whites are in-between the scores of Asians and blacks, which you and I know isn’t true.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    I think I might get beat up if I showed up there.   Someone tell me I wouldn’t.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     You ought to study up on the history of the communist and socialist movements in America.  They’re quite old.  It is fascinating and enlightening to learn as well as defining the issues we face, at least in part because international capitalism is also our enemy.

  • Carney3

    Why does the Left have such an affinity for, and tendency toward, infiltration and espionage?  Seems like we can’t even meet without someone in the room being an enemy spy.   I doubt their gatherings are similarly penetrated by us.  During the Cold War the Communists were masters at the game and ran rings around us, and did the same to the Germans in Wold War 2.  Why are we so bad, never mind at intelligence, but even at counter-intelligence, just keeping them out?

    My boss is a former leftist activist who boasts of having spied on religious right gatherings, and chortles over having boasted of convincing one woman not to vote for Rick Santorum because he’s not pro-life enough.  I have to suppress my fury over this deeply dishonorable behavior.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     What you haven’t noticed is conservatives doing the same thing.  It’s a gigantic pissing contest that’s been going on a long time.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     I think there must have been a film wherein all the attendees at a spy conference were hired to spy on the event.  Peter Sellers must have been in it.

  • jeffaral

    JONATHAN MEADOR!    Love this name.   Guess why?

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    But you said above that these races arent as stupid as whites. Which is it? I get your point, but I am getting tired of people in this movement making degrading statements like that when it is obvious and well known that whites are pretty darn smart. We get degraded enough by the media. I dont see how blacks wanting to stick with their own makes them smarter.