Canada’s Tightening Immigration Policy May Be Felt in U.S.

Kim Murphy, Los Angeles Times, January 14, 2012

For years, Canada has had one of the most generous immigration policies in the world, welcoming tens of thousands of asylum applicants who claim to be fleeing persecution in their homelands.

But Canada’s Conservative government has begun rolling up the welcome mat, stepping up efforts to track down and deport thousands of asylum-seekers whose applications have been denied.

The clampdown is likely to be felt not only across Canada, but in the United States.

Fresh from the revelation that Los Angeles arson suspect Harry Burkhart traveled to the U.S. from Vancouver after losing his nearly three-year bid for refugee status, immigration analysts here warn that the United States could become a new destination for thousands of asylum applicants soon to be pushed out of the pipeline in Canada.

{snip}

The most dramatic change is set to take effect at the end of June, with a $540-million “balanced refugee reform” program designed to speed up the asylum review process and start slicing through a backlog of more than 42,000 refugee cases, many of which have been awaiting a decision for years.

The tough new timelines call for asylum applicants to be given a hearing within 90 days, or even less for refugees from some countries, with most appeals heard within an additional 120 days, accompanied by stepped-up enforcement to eject those who fail to prove they would be persecuted if sent home.

U.S. officials say that asylum claimants who are denied refugee protection in Canada will not be automatically turned away at the U.S. border, despite a 2004 agreement between the countries that bars new arrivals in either from entering the other to claim asylum. That pact was put in place to halt the flow of asylum-seekers from the U.S., with its comparatively tough immigration policies, into Canada, where winning asylum had been easier.

{snip}

In any event, U.S. officials say they do not anticipate a massive increase—at least in the number of those seeking to cross the border through legal channels—because they expect that Canada will allow some failed applicants to stay under other exemptions and will deport as many as possible of those deemed not at risk of persecution in their home countries.

But with Canada typically granting about 40% of asylum petitions, the prospect of moving more rapidly through 42,000 pending cases and the more than 124,000 already targeted for deportation, analysts say, is bound to make migration patterns much more unpredictable.

“If you deprive a large number of people of asylum options, they’re going to look for the next place to go, in large numbers,” Kurland said. “So it is utterly incomprehensible to not figure out that come June-July 2012, when the new rules kick in, there will be a drive to seek sanctuary somewhere else, such as the largest neighbor in North America.”

{snip}

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Impertinent

    Wonderful…we can’t build a fence in the south or the north…so now they’ll fly to Vancouver and walk across to Seattle. Hope the tree huggers in the NW like the invasion about to happen there.

  • What they could do is if some of them want political asylum in the US is to put them in detention and some of them will voluntarily deport back to their country of origin just to get out of detention.

  • Anonymous

    When Canada becomes tougher on immigration than America, then something is truly wrong with the world.

    • Anonymous

      the problem is we are flooded with criminals and rejects who see canada as an easy mark…hopefully they are deported to their respective countries and will not seek asylum in the US.

  • Anonymous

    Hopefully the USA will get a bunch of Somali Muslims……a big plus that would be.

    • Don’t we have enough of them already?

      • Anonymous

        Not if the Demorat-Liberals and Republirat-Phonycons have anything to say about it.

  • Anonymous

    Canada “tightens” its immigration policy? What, can immigrants only bring 15 relatives with them now instead of 20?