Checking Job Applicants’ Credit Discriminates, Feds Say

Christopher Maag, Creditbloggers, December 22, 2010

The federal government sued Kaplan Higher Education, one of the nation’s largest providers of for-profit education, for allegedly discriminating against African-Americans by using credit scores to weed out job applicants.

{snip} About 60% of American companies check credit scores for at least some job applicants, according to a recent study by the Society for Human Resource Management. More companies are performing such checks now that high unemployment rates from the recession leave more people applying for fewer jobs.

The practice is discriminatory, the EEOC alleges, because African-Americans have disproportionately lower credit scores than whites, the EEOC alleges.

“Employers need to be mindful that any hiring practice be job-related and not screen out groups of people, even if it does so unintentionally,” the commission said in a press release.

{snip}

The lawsuit will hinge on two questions, says Mathew W. Finkin, director of the comparative labor and employment law & policy program at the University of Illinois. First, the EEOC must prove that the policy of checking applicants’ credit scores has a “disparate impact” African-Americans.

That’s largely a question of demography, Finkin says: Do the statistics support the fact that blacks have markedly lower credit scores than whites? According to a Federal Reserve report, the average credit score for an African-American consumer is less than half the average score of a white consumer.

“There is no question that African American and Latino applicants fare worse than white applicants when credit histories are considered for job applications,” Chi Chi Wu, a lawyer for the National Consumer Law Center, said in testimony before the EEOC in October.

The same test has been used before. Because African-Americans are more likely to be arrested than whites, the EEOC has shown that screening job applicants by arrest records has a disparate impact on blacks.

{snip}

If the government clears that hurdle, next it falls on Kaplan to prove that, while its practice may be discriminatory, it has legitimate business reasons to do it anyway. Employers have argued that a credit check is a legitimate part of determining an applicant’s qualifications, especially for workers involved in finances and corporate leadership.

{snip}

In addition to potentially far-reaching impacts of the lawsuit for the nation’s 15 million unemployed people, the lawsuit could cause problems for the Washington Post, {snip}. Kaplan has been an important source of profit for the company as the newspaper has faltered in recent years, according to reporting by the Post.

{snip}

[The EEOC’s press release can be read here.]

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Comments are closed.