American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Holder: US a Nation of Cowards on Racial Matters

More news stories on Blacks in Charge

Devlin Barrett, AP, February 18, 2009

Attorney General Eric Holder described the United States Wednesday as a nation of cowards on matters of race, saying most Americans avoid discussing awkward racial issues. In a speech to Justice Department employees marking Black History Month, Holder said the workplace is largely integrated but Americans still self-segregate on the weekends and in their private lives.

{snip}

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, Holder said, but “we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

He urged people of all races to use Black History Month as a chance for honest discussion of racial matters, including issues of health care, education, and economic disparities.

{snip}

He told hundreds of Justice Department employees gathered for the event that they have a special responsibility to advance racial understanding.

Even when people mix at the workplace or afterwork social events, Holder argued, many Americans in their free time are still segregated inside what he called “race-protected cocoons.”

“Saturdays and Sundays, America in the year 2009 does not in some ways differ significantly from the country that existed almost 50 years ago. This is truly sad,” said Holder.

{snip}

“If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified,” Holder told reporters after the speech.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on February 18, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — mike wrote at 5:51 PM on February 18:

Give me a break! You want me to speak openly and honestly about race in America? How long do I have before I have to pack up my belongings and leave my job? There is no public outlet for honest discourse, short of sites like this; but alas, I’m sure big brother is watching.

2 — Question Diversity wrote at 5:51 PM on February 18:

I agree with AG Holder. And I also think that American Renaissance, the New Century Foundation and the Council of Conservative Citizens fall under the non-cowardly category, in that they are all willing to engage in honest dialogue about race.

But honest dialogue is that AG Holder doesn’t want. He wants a monologue — us evil white people are going to get told the way it’s going to be.

3 — Anonymous wrote at 5:51 PM on February 18:

Why is the attorney general using his new office as a platform for something that is not in his job description? Oh I forgot he is black; he can say and do whatever he wants and no one will say anything.

4 — Anonymous wrote at 5:56 PM on February 18:

Cowardice starts at work when you have an Affirmative Action meeting and you fail to defend your culture.

5 — PhilipL wrote at 5:59 PM on February 18:

I bet he has no idea just how right he is, at least about whites.
I am certain he knows how wrong he is about blacks and mestizos. But this is a shakedown after all, that is why he is AG. It is also why no blacks were tapped for foreign policy, economic, or other highly technical positions. Obama wants to run America well enough that he can extort whitey for a full eight years, not ruin it apace.

6 — Alexandra wrote at 6:00 PM on February 18:

I’ll associate with whomever I want to associate, thank you very much!

What’s next, forced miscegenation?

7 — Anonymous wrote at 6:01 PM on February 18:

He’s right!

I work at a school in Kansas, and this week there are all kinds of posters on campus that talk about domestic violence and rape. They say that a certain number of women in college are raped…They say that some percentage of rapes are planned ahead of time, etc, etc.

Of course what they don’t say is anything about race. For example: don’t you think it would be important to know that a recent study concluded that there were approximately 15,000 black on white rapes each year; versus 900 white on black rapes?

And yes, I am a coward for not bringing that up. But if I dared bring it up someone might think I was a racist, and then bye bye tenure!

8 — Anonymous wrote at 6:03 PM on February 18:

Did it ever occur to Holder than people might prefer self-segregation? Or that freedom of association is part of living in a free societ? Or that he is overstepping his authority in using his position as Attorney Geneeral to preach his own beliefs that others might not share?

9 — Jesse wrote at 6:03 PM on February 18:

He urges for an honest discussion on racial matters….but somehow I doubt it’s honest opinions he’s actually looking for.

No, he wants whites to talk about how racist they are, and what they are doing wrong and what they can do to make things better for blacks.

And then he talks about accepting criticism, again he’s most likely talking about white racism, and not about blacks accepting some criticism that they might be the ones that needs to shape up, if they want to be equal.

It would be very interesting if he was actually honest though, in wanting a real honest debate, about how things really look and why they look the way they do.

10 — William Hendershot wrote at 6:06 PM on February 18:

I’ve always been willing to discuss race and I particularly enjoy talking about school test scores, police and fire test scores, crime rates, mortgage default rates, and welfare statistics. My efforts to have an honest discussion is almost always met with “the differences are cultural and to think otherwise is racist”.

Let’s not give up however. Let’s invite all the libs to come on AmRen and have a frank discussion regarding race.

11 — Mike Harrigan wrote at 6:08 PM on February 18:

Perhaps it would be wise to allow all to pick their own friends without the social engineers involving themselves.

As far as an honest discussion on race? How can you have an honest discussion on race when whites are called racists as soon as they open their mouths?

12 — Anonymous wrote at 6:10 PM on February 18:

But guys like Holder have made it impossible for whites to engage in an honest discussion. What if a white person was really honest, like Jared Taylor, would his thoughts be treated with respect? Would his thoughts be welcome at universities and in the work place? What if the person said they think diversity causes stress and disunity? What if a person objected to affirmative action, calling it nothing more than a license to discriminate against whites? What if a person said they prefer to live in a white neighborhood because they see high crime rates, poor schools, trash, and low property values in black neighborhoods? Would Holder thank him for engaging in honest discussion?

Most likely these discussions would earn you a visit to the Human Resources Department where a black person would then try to fire you for creating a hostile work environment.

13 — Civilized Neighbor wrote at 6:25 PM on February 18:

He is right but probably not in the way he thinks he is. I think everybody on Amren is willing to talk about race but are the first ones to be told to shut up.

14 — NorthAmericanWhiteMan wrote at 6:27 PM on February 18:

He means we whites should accept criticism. Any criticism of blacks is racist, remember? The fact is if I were honest with blacks during black history month or any other month I would be ostracised and branded all kinds of ugly things. As for segregating I remember in highschool how all of the blacks sat at their own lunch tables and hung out together. No one made them do this or shunned them. The only time they made any attempt to have contact with whites was to hit on blonde girls or on the sports teams that they were all a part of.

15 — sbuffalonative wrote at 6:34 PM on February 18:


“Holder said the workplace is largely integrated but Americans still self-segregate on the weekends and in their private lives.”

Can anyone expect wisdom from the clueless?

“Holder said, but “we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

On the contrary, we talk too much about race. The reason this dialogue is unproductive is because what we’re allowed to talk about in regards to race is restricted to approved topics only.

We can’t talk about black IQ, or black violence, or black destruction of neighborhoods, or black disruptions in the workplace, or any number of black pathologies.

“If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified,” Holder told reporters after the speech.

With all the hate speech laws and the threats of losing your job if you speak your mind, how can this man think we can have an honest discussion of race?

When Mr. Holder defends my constitutional right to speak my mind and defends my right to keep my job for anything I say, then we can talk.

16 — Howard wrote at 6:34 PM on February 18:

The differences between blacks and Whites are so great that living in the same country is impossible. And as far as talking with blacks about race that is impossible as well. Blacks want to lecture Whites not talk.

17 — Emerson wrote at 6:37 PM on February 18:

Here’s what Mr. Holder really thinks about “accepting criticism.“

“In a 1997 National Public Radio interview conducted soon after his appointment as the Justice Department’s second in command, he shared a quote by the late Samuel Proctor, a pastor in Harlem, that he carried in his wallet. “It says that blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America,” Holder said. “No matter how affluent, educated and mobile a black person becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/02/04/ST2009020403869.html

Spare us the lectures, hustler.

18 — Jordan NYC wrote at 6:56 PM on February 18:

“It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified”

I find this comment especially hypocritical. Last year on Father’s Day, President Obama gave a speech bemoaning the illegitimacy rate in the black community, which is something like 75%. He was immediately denounced by Jesse Jackson and the NAACP as “talking down” to black people.

“Nobody wants to be considered a coward. We’ve learned to get along by exclusion and silence. We need to talk about it. People need to feel comfortable saying the wrong things,” said Shelton of the NAACP.

This remark, too, reeks of hypocrisy. The question is: who is allowed to say the wrong things? I suspect that if whites were allowed to frankly voice their criticisms and concerns they would be labeled racist in the harshest since of the word.

In what I have personally experienced, whites are open to discussion of race and criticism so long as it’s made in a civilized, open and somewhat academic setting. However, once you include blacks into the debate, it suddenly becomes personal and heated.

19 — Robert wrote at 7:01 PM on February 18:

“Saturdays and Sundays, America in the year 2009 does not in some ways differ significantly from the country that existed almost 50 years ago. This is truly sad,” said Holder.


The evils of freedom of association! This guy is an absolute joke. If Holder wants honesty maybe he can address the rate of psychopathic personality disorder amongst blacks (and the crime that goes along with it) and why whites deserve to be subjected to all this anti-social behavior. Then he can address IQ differences and how they are to blame for the disparity in attainment between the races instead of discrimination by whites. I WISH there was an honest discussion on race because the end result would be that whites have a more than justifiable bias towards the black community as a whole.

20 — Spartan24 wrote at 7:10 PM on February 18:

Mostly it is because Whites have to see lesser qualified minorites get promoted and hired over them, be subjected to “sensitivity and multicultural training” and be screamed at about “white privilige” ad nauseum. All of this while not seeing any overt racist behavior in the community at large other than what is directed at them.

21 — Tim in Indiana wrote at 7:11 PM on February 18:

Attorney General Eric Holder described the United States Wednesday as a nation of cowards on matters of race

I agree with him, although perhaps not in the way that he meant.

Why are whites so terrified of honest discussion of race issues? I suspect one reason is that people like to think we as humans are capable of achieving anything we set our minds to, and can’t stand to admit otherwise. But I think it goes much deeper than that.

Whites are terrified, not of blacks, who hold little real threat to them (except in the area of overbreeding) but of their own awesome power (specifically nuclear power).

Whites have become convinced that if we want to survive in this nuclear age, we have to “learn to get along with everybody,” including blacks, asians, hispanics, etc. in our own white countries. Of course it’s absurd; there’s no connection between the two goals, but that’s what whites have been made to believe.

So when whites seem terrified to admit things about race that are as obvious as the nose on your face, what they are really terrified of is a nuclear holocaust. I think psychologists call it “projection.”

Perhaps the only thing that will break this delusion is some kind of nuclear incident on the part of a non-white nation, but I hope it doesn’t come to that.

22 — Anonymous wrote at 7:12 PM on February 18:

“New attorney general thinks Americans don’t “talk enough with each other about race.”


Who wants to? Blacks accuse us of being overly race-conscious. That’s false. We’re not! Most of us, most of the time, don’t give it a second thought.

It’s blacks who are OBSESSED with race! Now, they want to talk to us about it. Fact is, if you ever listen to them, that’s practically all they ever talk about.

23 — Old Atlantic wrote at 7:13 PM on February 18:

http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm

“Racial differences exist, with blacks disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders “

If you go to above and click on graphs and click on spreadsheet you get stuff like following. These can be saved as text files
with extension .csv and then opened in a spreadsheet program,
including free ones.

You may want to get this data now before it disappears.

http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/homicide/sheets/vracetab.csv

Bureau of Justice Statistics,,,
Homicide trends in the United States,,,
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide,,,
Date of release: January 17 2007,,,

“Homicide Victimization Rates per 100,000 Population by Race”,,,
,,,
Year,White,Black,Other
1976,5.1,37.1,4.9
1977,5.4,36.2,4.7
1978,5.6,35.1,4
1979,6.1,37.5,4.1

24 — Anonymous wrote at 7:15 PM on February 18:

From the article:

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, Holder said, but “we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

Holder is absolutely right. That’s why I read and post on AmRen!

25 — Hugo wrote at 7:18 PM on February 18:

Great, let’s talk about how the Community Reinvestment Act has bankrupted this country. Or how about interacial violence? Taxes? Immigration? …

26 — Anonymous wrote at 7:35 PM on February 18:

It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified,” Holder told reporters after the speech.

{snip}


White Americans are forced to endure all criticism by all other races whether justified or not.Any response, “other than to agree” is met by being labeled racist.

27 — Robert Kelly wrote at 7:43 PM on February 18:

The reason there’s a vast social gap between whites and blacks is because a huge percentage of the black population is at a lower intellectual level and there’s no commonality that both groups can share, beyond whites taking on a dumbed down attitude and spending a lot of time giggling and scratching when in the company of blacks….and, of course, restricting the conversation to sports or something else other than ideas and abstract thinking.

Blacks don’t have the same humor; they are abysmally deficient in abstract thinking; they do not and cannot reason nor logic in coherent terms; they’re loud, rude, crude, prone to violence, and they have a serious problem with impulse control. Plus as we’ve seen from literally thousands of news stories, blacks are prone to whining and crying like children if they don’t get their way on everything, and whites are repulsed by bellyachers who want to blame everyone but themselves for their obvious inabilities.

Crime is another problem. No race on earth has the levels of crime blacks do. Even the higher income types are involved with criminal acts, and a huge majority of them just can’t seem to rise above a primitive class.

They’re given educational preferences and benefits as affirmative action for school entry as well as grades and diplomas and degrees. As one white professor put it, we have to certify a certain percentage of blacks in the universities or answer for it if we don’t do as expected of us.

Instead of recognizing that they have a lot of advancing to do to reach the level of not just whites, but every other race also, they pretend as if the white/black gap is something that could be closed were it not for white racism, and as regards their behavior, they, of course, consider themselves perfect, blinded by their arrogance, which is by far their greatest weakness right after low group intelligence. Never do they recognize that it is their failings that are the obstacles. Instead they whine about anything and everything that has to do with black/white relations except their reluctance to recognize their shortcomings and improve themselves as a group.

Too, white elites are too cowardly to come right out and tell these people they should be trying to reach the accomplishment level of Hispanics, Middle Easterners, Indians and Asians, before worrying about reaching a parallel with whites.

Every shyster that pops up always whines about a white/black gap, whether it’s about the numbers of them in prison to their lack of representation in any of the professional fields.

Now, here’s another mulatto that is like a good number of them, putting his pro-black agenda on the front burner as if it hasn’t been there for several decades now by others both black and white, and in denial that the real problem lies with the fact that blacks cannot compete in a first world society. Instead of whining, he should thank his lucky stars he has considerable white blood in him, because if he had attempted to get a degree in law without his racial admixture, he more than likely would have failed. He owes his position to whites actually, just as Obama does.

I’d like to know what this evil racist thinks he’s going to accomplish by putting black matters before any others. I mean there’s so many others who pushed the same agenda yet blacks still can’t go to college or get professional jobs, for the most part, without affirmative action.

Hearing a federal Attorney General announce openly a pro-black agenda instead of making it known he is the attorney general of everybody shows so much bias it is mind boggling.

Closing the gap by this evil man will have to mean causing the deterioration of whites down to black levels, because not in a hundred years could blacks elevate themselves beyond their present primitive niche they have occupied for thousands of years.

Here goes another giant round of “let’s pretend.”

28 — Jack wrote at 7:48 PM on February 18:

Mr. Holder could it be that some black people are so out of step with the rest of society?

How can anyone reason with a race of people that do not accept responsibility for their actions?

Mr. Holder are you going to force these black people to follow the laws like everyone else?

29 — loudmouth57 wrote at 7:56 PM on February 18:

I have no problem talking about awkward racial issues.However when I do talk about such issues I am called racist.As an example I use black history month when I send people of other races at my work place to amren.com and tell them to follow the link black invention myths.Now thats not being a coward is it?However I am sure thats not the kind of discussion Mr Holder is looking for.

30 — Ron Randell wrote at 8:05 PM on February 18:

Here goes another call for a “dialogue” on race which always translates to a monologue by the non-white while the white is expected to sit down, shut up and nod approvingly.

31 — HH wrote at 8:06 PM on February 18:

“…for honest discussion of racial matters.”

Oh Heaven and Earth! If only we COULD have such discussions, how different everything might be! Holder doesn’t want “discussion” however, he wants still more floor time to do the Black-grievances song and dance like all race-hustlers…nothing more!

He is correct about the cowardice though. Were it not for collective White cowardice, there wouldn’t even be an Eric Holder scolding America one way or the other. One can only hope his audacity and gall wakes a few Whites up. I’m not holding my breath, but one can hope…

32 — White is Beautiful Robert wrote at 8:11 PM on February 18:

I just knew this would be one of the stories on Amren -and it deserves to be. I see Holder as trying to set up a gullible White readership who, if hectored enough, might be obliged to enter into a dialogue (read:monologue) over the tired issue of Black “victimization” and White “oppression”.

33 — Noble Pagan wrote at 8:15 PM on February 18:

True.

We Whites have seen those of us, who did boldly talk about race, become ruined—either financially or careerwise.

Holder, you know where you can go.

And take your boss with you.

34 — Whiteplight wrote at 8:29 PM on February 18:

Eric Holder has declared war on Whites. He wants more and as attorney general he will work to re-affirm/establish AA in a more virulent form than ever. He will work to increase spending and emphasis on minority studies or rather their glorification at the founding White races expense in terms of prestige and social/political position.

Expect to see the new AG use the term “melting pot” repeatedly. He is of the impression that “melting pot” meant miscegenation, rather than simply a society where Europeans of different religions, languages and cultures could co-exist. That was the issue of the time, not the idea that Whites destiny was to interbreed with Indians, Blacks, Asians and every non-White sub-race that could be located and brought to our doorsteps for the convenience of easy sexual access and baby production.

As unlikely as it seems because of the banality of the idea, it always seems that the endless complaining boils down to the demand for unrestricted sexual access to White females with no possibility of even personal rejection.

Eric Holder is a more dangerous man as Attorney General than Barak Obama as president. The time has come for all Whites, even Liberals to dig in their heels and resist the coersion and robbery of our own.

35 — Steve wrote at 8:34 PM on February 18:

Cowards - maybe. Just because we know if we speak the truth we’re likely to be fired or fire-bombed.

36 — Whiteplight wrote at 8:35 PM on February 18:

“If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. “

> Well here’s some honesty, I don’t want to be ruled by Black men and I resent the notion that I have an obligation to seek out non-Whites or anyone in my private life at your bidding, request or by any social/legal edict that you may seek to conjur up.

This country was founded on several principals regarding our inherent freedoms. One of them is freedom of association. For an attorney general to suggest that we need to follow some political formula socially is not only verging on totalitarian coersion, it is un-American on its face.

I also wonder what Eric Holder’s idea of “progress” might be?

37 — Whiteplight wrote at 8:38 PM on February 18:

Holder: US a Nation of Cowards on Racial Matters

> What would that make just about every other nation in the world, especially Africa, the Islamic world, and Latin America?

Eric Holder is plainly a racial centrist with blinkers on. Now he is our attorney general and may prove to be the worst aspect of Obama’s presidency.

38 — tnecvolfan2001 wrote at 8:44 PM on February 18:

well the reason there will never be an honest dialogue on race is because some ugly truths would have to come out as to why white people simply don’t like or trust minorities. the answer to that question would never be allowed in open discussion. too bad

39 — William wrote at 8:46 PM on February 18:

I’ll talk frankly about race.

Bring back segregation. Whites have gained nothing but crime, social dysfunction, miscegenation and genocide as a result of the move to make every city, town, and even family look like the Star Wars Bar.

40 — roller wrote at 8:47 PM on February 18:

People do segregate themselves in their own time. That is human nature. People are attracted to people whom are like themselves. No matter what color they are, they stick to their own kind. Integration is an unnatural act that has been shoved down our throats since LBJ’s “great Society” scam. Trillions of dollars have been wasted since 1965, while trying to shove us all together. It will not work now, or ever. You will never see Ted Kennedy or any of his ilk living next door to a crack house.

41 — Wayne Engle wrote at 8:49 PM on February 18:

Brave words, or what many will perceive as being brave words, from the attorney general. But notice how he weasels — he says we need to “talk more about race.” Of course, when a black or a White liberal says that, what they really mean is, “White people have got to be more open about admitting how guilty they’ve been in racial matters throughout U.S. history.” What they DON’T mean is, “Black people have got to be more honest about acknowledging that they bring at least some of the racial problems on themselves, and that racial guilt in this country must be apportioned to both sides.” No, you won’t hear them say anything like THAT.

In addition, notice how the only people the AP interviewed for reaction were those either dependably White liberal, or that fount of all black sanctimony, the NAACP, itself!

42 — Anonymous wrote at 8:51 PM on February 18:

I had my discussion on race over a decade ago when I was denied a job for being a white male.

43 — Butkis wrote at 8:58 PM on February 18:

Why is this government official trying to tell me who I should spend my time with. We self segregate because we prefer our own kind. Why does that have to be a bad thing?

44 — Bobby wrote at 9:02 PM on February 18:

……”race protected cocoons.”

For many people Comrade Holder, it isn’t a matter of race protected cocoons, so much as protecting ones body and well being. That is why there are sometimes “race protected cocoons”. Now we’re back to square one.

“If we’re ever going to make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination to be “honest” with each other. It also means we are going to have to accept criticism where that is justified.”

Well, these are nice sentiments, but I am kind of cynical about what would happen if criticism were freely expressed, which brings us back to the “honest” part of Mr. Holders comment. Honesty is the last things most liberals want from people. They are interested mainly in the “right answer”, which is the same as their answer.

45 — Awakened wrote at 9:04 PM on February 18:

We don’t talk enough about race? He’s sure right about that, except we should be talking to each other (other Whites) about the discrimination faced by Whites everywhere, not to mention the 60 or 70 thousand Whites who have been murdered since the civil rights days.

“Even when people mix at the workplace or afterwork social events, Holder argued, many Americans in their free time are still segregated inside what he called “race-protected cocoons.””

This sob wants to force Blacks upon us any way he can. Now we’re required to associate with people we don’t want to be anywhere near even in our social lives. Yes sir, these next 4 or God-forbid 8 years, are going to be the worst in the history of the United States.

46 — Anonymous wrote at 9:11 PM on February 18:

Whose the coward? The man who obediently conforms to the
prevailing mass hypnosis of the time..in this case Racial Political Correctness, or the man who refuses to lie
about what reality and experience has taught him is the truth?

47 — StrangeToSay wrote at 9:15 PM on February 18:

“…we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

What is there to say? What are we allowed to say? “Gee, I wish blacks would all just go away…” “Gee, I wish I could live someplace where there were no blacks at all…” Yeah, say that out loud, & see how long you still have a job.

If we whites were allowed to speak freely, the things we would say. It would be quite astounding.

48 — JAKE wrote at 9:17 PM on February 18:

He urged people of all races to use Black History Month as a chance for honest discussion of racial matters, including issues of health care, education, and economic disparities.

This is what Holder wants the talks to be about. How can we give blacks more benefits, money, education and understanding. Probably second on his list is reparations, an issue John Conyers will take to the grave.

Another good issue to talk about would be why blacks have black colleges, a black caucus, black history month, etc, etc,.

It might be a good time to talk about a WHITE history month and a white caucus in both houses of congress.

Another issue Holder knows something about is pardons but he probably doesn’t want to talk about that.


49 — Anonymous wrote at 9:31 PM on February 18:

Usually, when blacks wish to discuss the topic of race, what they’re actually interested in is a whine-fest where they air their grievances about White people while we White people have to sit there and nod in agreement. NEVER can White people tell it straight about the black race. Never. When we do, we hear the same, shopworn arguments about slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings, and how they’ve been kept down by the Founding population. There can never be a genuine. legitimate discussion on race relations because political correctness dictates that only the “victim” race can/must be heard, and unfortunately and innacurately it is the black race that is considered such.

50 — Jean-Jacques wrote at 9:31 PM on February 18:

Gird your loins, readers! When a hybridic (of mixed racial heritage)Attorney General issues a decree concerning “racial understanding” and breaking down the barriers that insulate one racial group from another, you should expect the governmental thought police to be investigating every avenue of white insularity (social clubs, neighborhoods, hockey teams?, college baseball [very few minorities], etc.) What was the mantra of Obama’s racial message: we have transcended our latent apartheid and affirmative action is an anachronism that can be shelved? Never say never: the ever-vigilant proponents of white guilt will now unleash the hounds of racial equality until we are shamed, if not coerced into a fully blended society. Obama, of course, will look away and pretend not to notice. Those who object publicly will be vilified and bullied into submission. It’s only beginning. Eight more years!

51 — GetBackJack wrote at 9:43 PM on February 18:

Surprise, surprise, surprise. No one on this site expected any less from an Obama Administration. I’ll compact his message into five little words… “Whitey, we’re coming after you!”

52 — Anonymous wrote at 9:49 PM on February 18:

“If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified.”

I completely agree. And completely recognize that it ain’t gonna happen. Liberals would never be able to handle the truth being spoken openly.

Here is real honesty: whites with any sense fear blacks - in terms of physical safety, and in terms of national destiny. Blacks do not fear whites, but rather look for ways to mock and dispossess them.

53 — Anonymous wrote at 9:56 PM on February 18:

Anyone who is honest with himself and with others knows that there is not a snowball’s chance in hell to have an honest dialogue about race. - Thomas Sowell

How can there be an honest dialogue on race when any white person who speaks certain inconvenient truths on racial issues will be called a racist and, if he is in public life, have his career threaten or loss? Remember what happened to the noble prize winner Dr. Watson.

That no non-PC racial truth speaking will go unpunished is a rule that most blacks feel is of extreme importance to keep enforced. There is a long history of racial truth telling persecutions:

http://www.amazon.com/New-Know-Nothings-Political-Scientific-Nature/dp/0765804972/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235011915&sr=1-1

54 — GenX in Oz wrote at 10:01 PM on February 18:

Here in OZ, I’ll use talking online as a example.

You can talk all you like about race, until you offend someone.
So obviousily the discussion will only flow in one direction.
I would imagine the situation in the States is similar, in fact thinking about your ‘hate crime’ laws it’s got to be worst.

‘Cyber Racism’
http://tinyurl.com/bu7jgp

The RDA (Racial Discrimination Act 1975) has a section on racial hatred (section 18C) that says that any public act that is reasonably likely, in all circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate people on the basis of their race, colour or national or ethnic origin, is unlawful unless it is done reasonably and in good faith in certain specific circumstances.

To make a complaint under the RDA, you need to be able to identify the person or provide information that would enable the person to be identified whose acts you are complaining about.

This doesn’t exactly encourage me to make my personal details public.
So from my point of view, civil discussions like the ones that occur on this website, or worst (see any unmoderated public website talking about race) have to stay anonymous.

To talk about race openly, you have to cross the lines of political correctness. And then risk being labelled as ‘a racist’ and as a consequence ostracized.
This critism is a cheap shot. It’s right up there with pushing for the social feminisation of men, then complaining that there are no ‘real men left’.

55 — Anonymous wrote at 10:03 PM on February 18:

There is a double standard. Blacks are rewarded for complaining about racial discrimination. We see it in many of the articles presented. No matter the lack of evidence or how irrational, blacks are free to criticize as they see fit. Also, blacks are encouraged to congregate among themselves. We have the Black Caucus, Black Firefighters Association, the Urban League, the NAACP, Black Colleges, Black Student Unions, and it goes on and on. Whites, however, are demonized for organizing any association along racial lines. Blacks love diversity when it means displacing whites, but they resist diversity if it means opening up black colleges, or disbanding an all black organization.

56 — Anonymous wrote at 10:03 PM on February 18:

The good news: Sharpton and Jackson are out of business.
The bad news: Their replacements have genuine power over our lives.

57 — White man cometh wrote at 10:08 PM on February 18:

“Homicide Victimization Rates per 100,000 Population by Race”,,,
,,,
Year,White,Black,Other
1976,5.1,37.1,4.9
1977,5.4,36.2,4.7
1978,5.6,35.1,4
1979,6.1,37.5,4.1

Posted by ‘Old Atlantic’

The question is does the category - ‘White’ include Hispanics? I didn’t see any category for Hispanics. They perpetrate crime to almost as high a level as Blacks. If they lumped Hispanics in with the White statistics I would imagine the White stats are next to Zero.

58 — ice wrote at 10:14 PM on February 18:

We need to quit being cowards and start talking about race?

Okay. Let’s start right now.

Blacks concern themselves only with black interests and they place their kin above everything else, including what is best for this country. Blacks are concerned more with blacks all over the world than they are about their own countrymen that are non-blacks. Whites are the only race in America that want to do what is best for the country.

But let me point something out to you, Mr. Holder, that you’re obviously not bright enough to know. Reverend Wright was claimed to the the norm in black churches by the talking black heads on T.V. How on earth can you have a dialogue with people who are so racist and filled with unreasonable hatred? And how can you have this same dialogue with people who regard loyalty to race above country and everything else on earth?

Somehow I think I’m not going to get an answer.

59 — Anonymous wrote at 10:18 PM on February 18:

“Americans…still self-segregate on weekends”,,,,

So now the state has control over my weekends too? It’s called freedom of choice. Why are blacks so obsessed with race?

60 — Lee wrote at 10:20 PM on February 18:

“Gird your loins, readers! When a hybridic (of mixed racial heritage)Attorney General issues a decree concerning “racial understanding” and breaking down the barriers that insulate one racial group from another, you should expect the governmental thought police to be investigating every avenue of white insularity (social clubs, neighborhoods, hockey teams?, college baseball [very few minorities], etc.) What was the mantra of Obama’s racial message: we have transcended our latent apartheid and affirmative action is an anachronism that can be shelved? Never say never: the ever-vigilant proponents of white guilt will now unleash the hounds of racial equality until we are shamed, if not coerced into a fully blended society. Obama, of course, will look away and pretend not to notice. Those who object publicly will be vilified and bullied into submission. It’s only beginning. Eight more years!

Posted by Jean-Jacques at 9:31 PM on February 18


I agree completely—-and in an equally cynical manner. Most people overlook the ramifications of this article.

The United States Attorney General is discussing “talking about race” less than 2 months into office. The Executive branch’s main law enforcement arm is saying this.

The Justice Department has been politicized for years now and we can expect to see outrageous yet unreported policies that will be carried out.

61 — Anonymous wrote at 10:21 PM on February 18:

Whites are Losers:
Whether you’re an adult or child checking the (Black) or (Latino) box on the next… Census, Survey, Poll, Application, or Test can effectively end the preferential treatment afforded to other races the idea is simple; end discrimination by subversion… if the bureaucrats are unable to differentiate between the races; how can they discriminate against the White race. If the Government wants a colored blind society… lets give them one.

62 — Anonymous wrote at 10:31 PM on February 18:

I thought this guy’s job was supposed to be the attorney general. What do my weekends have to do with that?

63 — SCV wrote at 10:45 PM on February 18:

What is there to talk about? Whites are the new Jews in Nazi Germany. We are responsible for all the evil in the world. The rap lyrics are no different Than the songs of the Storm Troopers, “When on the Knife the Jew blood spurts”. Amren readers beware, The ovens beckon!

64 — rational thinker wrote at 11:05 PM on February 18:

I think an open discussion of race is not only necessary but very probable. In my old school when discussing the problems of blacks in America, Africa, the Caribbean, and elsewhere I gave an honest open opinion. I got disgruntle looks but by the end people were agreeing with me. That is why I believe it is not nesessary but is able to be done.

Blacks know that whites will be a minority in this country. They want to secure their position in this country as well. Listening to what blacks say in town hall meeting and churches isnt to far off from what is said here (minus some stuff of course).

We need to organize and push for this because our place in this country is slipping away.

65 — Cassiodorus wrote at 11:17 PM on February 18:

The last thing this canting affirmative action lawyer wants is an “honest” discussion of race. If anything he will do everything in his power to punish anyone who ventures into racial heterodoxy. This nonsense about “race-protected cocoons,” for instance, is merely an acknowledgement that the private lives of white Americans falls somehow under the jurisdiction of government, which can or ought to compel them to behave in some “acceptable” manner. The time is past when certain, even most aspects of life were none of the government’s business.

This

“He told hundreds of Justice Department employees gathered for the event that they have a special responsibility to advance racial understanding”

is the assertion not of an office holder in a constitutional republic but of a miniature Mao. And you thought the Justice Department’s job was to enforce the law!

66 — Mike B. wrote at 11:34 PM on February 18:

Posted by Robert Kelly at 7:43 PM on February 18

…because not in a hundred years could blacks elevate themselves beyond their present primitive niche they have occupied for thousands of years.

Almost right Bob. I won’t repeat what everybody’s already said here and I’ve said uncounted number of times on here too, to save space. My friend (who posts here too) and I always argue about how long it will take blacks to reach our level (in evolutionary terms). A long time ago, we started out with the figure of approximately 5,000 years. Lately, I’ve edged closer to 25,000 years and my friend is up to about 50,000 years. Brain/cranium capacity and IQ take a long time to develop. It used to be the survival of the fittest. Now it’s the survival of the most ‘oppressed’ and ‘dependent’. I’m so glad I lived in the period before America went in the sewer or I never would have believed the stories if other people had relayed them to me.

Btw, this joker went to my High School a few years after I did. What an embarrassment.

67 — browser wrote at 12:17 AM on February 19:

With all the hate speech laws and the threats of losing your job if you speak your mind, how can this man think we can have an honest discussion of race?

When Mr. Holder defends my constitutional right to speak my mind and defends my right to keep my job for anything I say, then we can talk.
Posted by sbuffalonative
— — — — — —
Actually, I don’t think he wants to hear what you have to say. He wants to tell YOU what HE has to say. And you will shut up and listen!

Probably in a setting like that recent “discussion” on race in Paris Tex., where they had monitors from the Department of Justice sitting in.

Oh boy! Sounds more like a gulag re-education camp.

68 — DixieGhick wrote at 12:32 AM on February 19:

I work with African-Americans on my job every day. As a matter of fact, I am the only White in my workgroup. I spend my precious free time outside with White people….and I have NO desire to socialize with Afican-Ameicans in my free time!!!

69 — flyingtiger wrote at 12:53 AM on February 19:

Between 1861 and 1865, 500,000 white men gave up their tommorrows to fight to free black slaves. Eric Holder is calling these men cowards. Damn you Eric Holder. Resign and move to Zimbomwee where they need farmers.
Blacks insist that race can only be talked about on their terms. If whites bring up the reality of race, they are accused of being “Racists.” Balck on white crime is the reality of race relationships in America today.

70 — generalquagmyer wrote at 1:07 AM on February 19:

There is no LIMIT to the stupidity!

The very Justice Department this man heads would be all over any white person, like flies on stink, who’d actually dare to tell it like it is. Especially if that person were to become a political force to be reckoned with… and even if that person used the Department’s own statistics to make his points virtually irrefutable!

71 — Anonymous wrote at 2:03 AM on February 19:

Eric Holder was the assistant Attorney General under the Clinton Administration. He stated publicly that the Second Amendment was a collective right and that citizens have no individual rights to a firearm. Bush’s Attorney General, John Ashcroft refuted that claim stating the Second Amendment was an individual right,to which the Supreme Court recently agreed.

72 — Hernando wrote at 2:28 AM on February 19:

Pity the non-blacks who are working for him. He is really a pathetic person being so self absorbed in his deficiency that he is proclaiming he is a racist. We sure got a lot of “change” in a few weeks.

73 — H. Dumpty wrote at 4:16 AM on February 19:

He and his boss will get the conversation on race they’re asking for, but when it comes, they won’t like it.

For almost a year, I’ve been posting at knoxnews.com. There’s about 3 other posters there with amren level consciousness, but many more who are just sick of hustlers like Holder.

It’s been a struggle to write my posts there in a way that they won’t get removed, but I’m now able to say anything there that I’d say here, if I use a different tone and language. Also, I think the site is now slightly less restrictive than it was before.

When it seems opportune, I urge the readers there to visit white sites I like, including amren—I urge them to go directly to jared’s interviews, and warn them that although the posts here are intelligent, the anger may put them off at first (I know from experience that it does.)

I’m not sure how much good all that does, but I think the thing to do is to keep pressing and try to get them to good sites.

Some of the blacks that sometimes post there are like some of the ones that have posted here over the last few years—arrogant know-it-alls who think they’re twice as smart as they are, and think whites are blessed to receive their instruction.

I’m sick to death of being preached to by blacks!

74 — elitist wrote at 5:55 AM on February 19:

A real “dialogue about race” would mean blacks actually listening to the concerns and criticisms of whites - and vice versa!!

It would mean no prior censorship on content.

So IQs or crime or anything else could be discussed.

Has AMREN ever tried to organize a dialogue like this? There are plenty of blacks who are fed up with hustlers like Holden and believe that blacks need to take responsibility for their own failings instead of milking white guilt for treats.

Maybe someone should take Holden at his word and organize such an event.

Real dialogue is HARD WORK, talking in a echo chamber (like as in PC cutre, or even right here) is fun and easy.


75 — Anonymous wrote at 6:36 AM on February 19:

I would like to show you a few things in the Constitution that I am sure
you will find to be very interesting.

Article 1. Section 9.3} No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall
be passed.

I hate to have to break this to you, but the 14th Amendment fails these
basic tests of Constitutionality. That amendment is a bill of attainder
and it was passed ex post facto. I will not even mention the coercion
and illegal expulsion from Congress of our Representatives and Senators
for our failure to ratify this Amendment. The history of this amendment
is a three ring circus of lies and murder.

Article 3. Section 3.2} The Congress shall have power to declare the
punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work
corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person
attained.

This is really great. Remember that Article 1.Section 9.3} declared
that Congress may not pass Bills of Attainder or ex post facto laws. Now
we see an exception or a mistake.

Attainders of treason are permitted with some very serious restrictions
on them to protect the decendants of the traitors. That is us, by the
way. The language of the Section seems to me to imply that ex post
facto is okay here because otherwise the attainder could not work
forfiture. No person would vote beforehand to give up his property for
his upcoming treason unless he is insane, therefore we can safely say
that the 13th Amendment is okay.

The entire problem is the 14th Amendment.
The value of the slaves concerns us here. That value is the forfiture
that is Constitutionally bound to be returned to the Southern people as
we shall not suffer Corruption of Blood or lose our property except
during the lifetimes of the Confederate Politicians and Soldiers.

They are now all dead. Also, the theory known as the Incorporation Doctrine
is defunct. The application of the Incorporation Doctrine is Corruption
of Blood and is Unconstitutional. We, the Southerners living now, are
not and have never been Traitors to the United States.

We are thereby under the jurisdiction of the original Constitution or else Corruption
of Blood is being allowed to function as the Supreme Law of the Land
rather than the Constitution of the United States. This cannot continue.

“Let My People Go!”

76 — Turtle wrote at 7:03 AM on February 19:

You can’t fix stupid. Other people have pointed this out but I’ll restate the idea. Blacks and their fellow travlers want a monologue, not a dialogue. Mr. Holder is engaged in Orwellian doublespeak and only the deluded or naive would believe that he wants or is interested in any opinion other than the PC version of race relations.

77 — truthbetold wrote at 8:28 AM on February 19:

Open letter to Mr. Holder,

It might surprise you to hear that as a race realist I agree with you that collectively we are a “nation of cowards” to not speak on race as you say. However, as the top legal agent of the Federal government you realize that for many people to speak frankly about race could jeopardize their livelihood or worse. It is to subject oneself to a barrage of irrational, filthy name-calling to say the least. Frank discussion of race is a taboo to European Americans. Since race realists are not those whom you would encourage to dialogue on the matter, your comments only compound the problem.

Since you have forced the issue, and I still have some degree of first amendment to speak the truth I’ll address your further comments. To the degree that I’ve been able to avoid problems in my life I’ve avoided the company of African Americans. The facts of their temperament, lower intelligence, and subsequent criminality and social deviance are clear for any to see. Yes, many Blacks are personable and upstanding, but there’s always a “package deal” of friendship involved. Their in-laws and outlaws will inevitably stop-by, “infiltrate”, or otherwise interact with myself and my family along with their self-inflicted problems. In other words, the friendship drags my family into all sorts of problems. Our relationship would not exist in a vacuum apart from miscreant Black children, siblings, etc. That factor by itself is enough to avoid relationships with Blacks.

Again, you have forced this issue so the truth must be said that despite some disagreement which exists over the matter, most European Americans find most Blacks somewhat hideous in physical appearance. I am sorry to say such a rude comment which you force from me.

In addition, lower collective Black intelligence means that our Saturday outings with them would consist of dealing with childish explanations with inevitable misunderstandings. Like your boss Mr. Obama who is half-white, your white genes have likely gifted you with a higher capacity for intelligence and you probably project your own IQ into all other Blacks. So perhaps this is one of those inevitable misunderstandings.


78 — sam d wrote at 8:59 AM on February 19:

How utterly stupid. The man is a propagandist without a brain. I’d be interested to read some of his trial transcripts to see if he’s another affirmative action shill.

By concentrating on group ideology he isn’t going to be able to effectively run the office of attorny general.

The man is an incompetent boob that is preoccupied with crying and whining.

79 — June wrote at 9:06 AM on February 19:

Nothing will ever be enough. A black President doesn’t satisfy them, nor does any other ofice or position they achieve. They can go as far as their desires and talents take them. Everything is open to blacks, but as long as we have Sharptons, Jacksons and American-hating ministers, we’ll have demands that “whites should do more.” Can we not ever associate with those we want? I’d love to know just what it is they want. Hey, they’ve got a whole month to celebrate their own kind. When is it our turn?

80 — Captain Jack Aubrey wrote at 9:19 AM on February 19:

I am absolutely honest about my views regarding racial matters. Africans were brought to America to fulfill a role as agricultural stoop laborers. Since the end of slavery and the replacement of stoop farm laborers as agriculture was mechanized in the mid-to-late 1800s, Africans in America have been a superfluous people. In fact, due to their many dysfunctions, they are a major drag on America.

81 — Anonymous wrote at 9:22 AM on February 19:

Whenever “race” is discussed it’s all ways one sided.They point their finger at us and say “Whites are the problem”. All they wanna hear is “I’m sorry,you’re right,we’ll try harder.I dare any white man to attempt to have an “honest discussion” with blacks.Because if you dare to be open and honest,you’re in for a trip to the hospital.It’ all just more smoke and mirrors.The sheeple herded blindly towards extinction. Teach your children well.

82 — Anonymous wrote at 9:25 AM on February 19:

Well, nobody wants to hear whites make unPC comments about race. If we do we get ostracized, assaulted, intimidated, lose our careers, and we’re made out to be worse than child molestors. So yes. That’s why people “simply do not talk enough with each other about race.” If us whites say things like we want to self-segregate and keep our nations predominately white, do the powers that be really want to hear that?

83 — Anonymous wrote at 10:01 AM on February 19:

We (whites) are having a lot to do with each other(blacks) now days. Our little white girls get pregnant by black males. Then they come back to white neighborhoods and let momma and daddy(white)take care of their babies.Ever hear of Obama anyone?
Who raised him after daddy skipped out? I know of several cases like this in my area.

84 — WbuMongo wrote at 10:15 AM on February 19:

Mr. Holder is free to express his opinions on race. As Attorney General his opinions are relevant to illegal discrimination in public accommodations or employment. On matters of association his remarks are irrelevant. As a lawyer he must be aware of freedom of association, one of the basic founding principles of our country. I do not associate with blacks because I choose not to. I don’t need to engage in an “honest discussion” about race. Mr. Holder should focus on his job and understand that his opinions on race, or anything else for that matter, are irrelevant to me.

85 — ehunter wrote at 10:43 AM on February 19:

Want to improve America? Copy the comments above. Make
100 million copies of them. Drop them from airplanes all over the USA. This will advance the cause of truth more than any of Holders
muzzled “conversations”. There is more truth on one page of AMREN than the entire mass media manages to achieve in a year.

86 — Californian wrote at 12:42 PM on February 19:

The multicult tells us that “race is just a construct” and that skin color has no more relevance than the color of one’s eyes. Yet here we see one of their spokesmen telling us that race is so real that it must become a topic for action from the highest government offices.

Can we get the story straight? If race has nothing to do with IQ, propensity towards violence, illegitimacy, political culture, and the general wrecking of White civilization (as per post-colonial Africa) then why ought it to be a topic at all?

Because maybe race is real, so real that all the government programs in the world will not change it. The USA has implemented the entire liberal agenda on race: desegregation, civil rights laws, affirmative action, busing, minority set-asides, minority studies, “hate crime” laws, the destruction of White Rhodesia and South Africa. And yet we are told that race is still as issue—even when blacks have gotten everything they have demanded.

Perhaps the reason things do not change is because of the inherent differences between races, which no amount of social engineering can change? Or is it that the multicultists see race as a means to take down the last remnants of the old guard and thereby gain uncontested power in the West?

It is the multicultists through their obsession with race who have demonstrated that race does indeed have reality.

87 — Brett Stevens wrote at 1:02 PM on February 19:

Honest dialogue require that all positions be accepted.

That’s very, very far from what the truth is.

So there cannot be honest dialogue until “I am a nationalist and prefer to live with my own kind by culture, values, heritage, language and class” is an acceptable statement.

88 — Guilty Liberal wrote at 1:09 PM on February 19:

Here’s a video clip of _exactly_ what every single white male in the room was thinking when Holder gave that speech.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dddAi8FF3F4

Seriously, this kind of set up only works on the kind of sweet naive whites who live in flyover country and haven’t been subjected to this kind of scam already. You know, Obama voters.

89 — Great White Observer wrote at 1:15 PM on February 19:

I have to agree with Holder, although from a different angle. Most of White Americans have been turned into absolute cowards, but they have to be if they wish to continue to hold a job. This is the price of Political Correctness. The most absurd statements though from Holder and other PC Clowns like him is to have dialogue about race. There can be no dialogue about race in America today all you can have is a monologuge, that is complete agreement with the likes of a Holder or Obama or you are RACIST.

90 — A Reader wrote at 1:16 PM on February 19:

This is an insult to the injury.

Blacks and “Latino” Mexcans can speak about race issues as much as they feel like, even if it becomes de facto racist (like in the case of razist organization “La Raza”) or a case of hate speech against whites.

We, the white Americans, have been labeled “cowards” by a coward who has armed to teeth law enforcement and army behind him because we don’t dare to confront, with our bare hands, a gang of militant thughs that call themselves “progressives”.

No surprises here. Arrogance has been the defining attribute of the Left. For those who forgot it, just listen to those who rule the White House and the Capitol Hill.

91 — Thrasymachus wrote at 1:47 PM on February 19:

Since when is it the governments business what citizens do legally in their private lives?

That’s been the problem with “liberalism” over the last 60 years. It isn’t liberal! We do not have the people governing themselves or their nation, with government officials serving the public mind, but rather the government dictating to the people. Tragic!

92 — Gary wrote at 1:56 PM on February 19:

“If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified,” Holder told reporters after the speech.”

Here’s some honesty Mr. Holder: Whites prefer to separate themselves from blacks because of unchangingly low black culture, low black behavior, endless black self-pity, vile black social mentality and manners, and continuously horrendous black crime statistics.

93 — B J Deller wrote at 2:03 PM on February 19:

Now here is an American black man who is not a coward and tells it like it really is. But he tells the truth so will he be targetted by the white liberals?

I could be friends with this courageous man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=ZuEc-nFULY8

94 — ODDL wrote at 3:33 PM on February 19:

What a bizarre racist slur coming from the top lawyer in the country. He smeared an entire population group as being cowards. If it were any other group that had had this despicable treatment forced upon them then Holder would quickly find himself wearing a burlap sack as anti-discrimination lawyers looted everything he owns.

95 — Bob23 wrote at 5:28 PM on February 19:

The only race I care about is the White race. The only people I care to talk to are my fellow Whites. Other races just aren’t part of anything I care about.

No hatred in this at all;just complete indifference.

Whether they live or die is of no real concern to me. I have no interest in what they think or do so long as it doesn’t affect me and mine.

They should just live their separate lives and I’ll live mine.

96 — Anonymous wrote at 5:45 PM on February 19:

Sep. 24, 1957 was the day that President Eisenhower ordered the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock Arkansas to start the utter and complete destruction of the white race.
Our leaders have systematically turned ever more vigilant in keeping the white race down and suppress white men with affirmative actions, set asides and all manner of laws and judicial directives.

97 — Anonymous wrote at 7:06 PM on February 19:


H. Dumpty wrote:


When it seems opportune, I urge the readers there to visit white sites I like, including amren—I urge them to go directly to jared’s interviews, and warn them that although the posts here are intelligent, the anger may put them off at first (I know from experience that it does.)


Thank you Mr. Dumpty, this is a good suggestion. I’ve had the same problem with the few people I’ve ever directed to this site: they come here to the news/comments area and find it too hostile for their liking. And although I happen to disagree with that assessment of AmRen, let’s face it, everybody has their own line in the sand with this stuff — and for many people, even many “conservative” white ones, AmRen’s Comments section crosses that line.

But the essays of Jared Taylor generally do not. Mr. Taylor has the rare ability to discuss hot topics in an even-handed and cool-headed way. He seems never to raise his voice — a remarkable achievement, considering how vexing and emotional and volatile are the issues and problems Mr. Taylor addresses. (I wish I had his self-control: for me, every such encounter would end up a screaming match!)

Accordingly, Jared Taylor essays might be the way to start for AmRen newbies. Let the uniniated absorb some Race Realism basics this way before daring to mingle amongst us hot-heads here in the Comments section.

I figure after reading a few of Mr. Taylor’s classics, the newbs will finally be as angry as we are!

Oh, and I will also take H. Dumpty’s advice and check out that knoxnews.com site, which I’ve never heard of before.


98 — Douglas wrote at 7:06 PM on February 19:

Too often blacks version of talking about race is for whites to shutup and listen to their griping. I wonder if he would be willing to listen to my idea of race problems or if he would call it hate speech.

99 — Anonymous wrote at 9:56 PM on February 19:

This AmRen site has been up and running for years.

To the best of my knowledge, Eric Holder has never posted here.

So who’s the coward now?

100 — ENwhiten wrote at 11:31 PM on February 19:

You’ve heard of the “shot heard ’round world”? Well, this may be the “shot off his mouth” heard ’round the world.

101 — Jake G. wrote at 11:36 PM on February 19:

This comment of Holder’s made my blood boil.
You know, he is out-of-touch, to say the least.
He has no idea what the avg. day in the life of a
white or black person is.
I wrote him a letter and I am mailing it off tomorrow.
It may never reach him, I felt this needed to be addressed and he needs to be reached, and I said what I had to say.
Here is his mailing address if you want to let him know.

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

102 — Anonymous wrote at 11:49 PM on February 19:

These remarks of Holder’a are to pre-empt any beginning white nationalist movements.

Didn’t Pat Buchanan just have a column on this suject?

103 — sam d wrote at 12:19 AM on February 20:

Okay, okay. I’ll speak openly about race with courage if everybody else does.

We can start right now.

Why is the black crime rate so high, much much greater than their percentage of the population?

Why do blacks rape 37,500 white women per year, and whites hardly no blacks at all?

Why is black on white crime so high, many times greater than white on black, excluding the crimes for just money?

Why do blacks want to be considered on a par with whites when their group I.Q. of 85, and their miserable test scores are behind every other race besides whites?

Why do blacks have 70% of their births out of wedlock, the highest in the nation?

Why are there hardly no black fathers in the home?

Why do so many blacks, especially males, drop out of school and a large portion of them lose low tiered jobs to mestizos, while another large percentage don’t even bother to work and would rather do crime?

Why do black males insult their women so greatly by trying to get women of another race, causing a huge number of black females to be unmarried?

We can get started on these for now, but I have altogether about a hundred more topics to cover, but let’s get these questions answered first, then we can move on to debate once they are responded to, that is, of course, if blacks can understand the points being raised.

I’ll mail these to Mr. Holder and await his reply, but I think I know already what the answers to all my questions will be. It will be just one sentence long and will be in response to ALL the questions: Blacks are as they are because of slavery, white oppression and racism.

Really a courageous answer, eh? Boy that Holder has got all us Honkies figured out.

Incidentally, is he going to be doing any legal work or is he going to continue to use his office as a second EEOC and propaganda arm for advancing blacks any way he can?

Another wrong pic by Obama.

104 — Rudy wrote at 1:16 AM on February 20:

This cry of “racism” is merely a MARXIST TOOL AND TRICK-as part of a overall conspiracy and in this case manifested by a high level black government official-used by blacks, with the aid and support of influential white liberals, to maintain there control in this country.

Why this control, and “obsession” with race? It’s really a simple explanation. American blacks, (as well as european blacks,) basically cannot support themselves and as a result are dependent on others, especially the whites who are the majority in both Europe and United States. And because returning back to Africa-for various reasons-is not an option, they become increasingly more dependent….and cannot exist without us whites.

105 — SKIP wrote at 1:44 AM on February 20:

I wonder which government organization is responsible for monitoring what is posted on this site? The former Army Security Agency did have MOS 05G which monitored domestic comms out of Vint Hill Farms, Va. and Ft Huachuca (sp) in Az. we called them ‘buddy f..kers’

106 — Anonymous wrote at 1:52 AM on February 20:

It’s hard to have a conversation on the weekends when every effort you’ve made to be good to the African American community is thrown back in your face as “racism”.

If we let you go to your own schools for an education, we’re told that we’re racists because we graduate more people than your schools do.

If we force bussing and desegregation to have your black children next to our white children in school, you call us racists because our white kids do better.

If we dumb down the class curriculum so that your black children can finally keep up academically, you say we’re racists because they still fail the SAT exams for college entrance.

If we dumb down the SAT so that you can score better, you say that we’re racists because the colleges try to teach us about “dead white men”.

If we dumb down the college experience so that you can feel more comfortable, you call us “racists” because there aren’t as many scientists, doctors, and engineers who are black.

Whites aren’t cowards because we don’t seek you out on the weekends. We’re simply exhausted with trying to keep up with your latest accusation.

107 — WR the elder wrote at 2:00 AM on February 20:

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, Holder said, but “we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.

Somebody should invite Holder to come over here to amren.com and join the discussion. We talk about race every day. Of course we don’t adhere to the politically correct script, in which we whites meekly accept black tirades our wickedness. So it won’t be what Holder is looking for.

108 — Mike Miller wrote at 2:42 AM on February 20:

In reference to U.S. Attorney General Holder’s remark that America is a “nation of cowards” concerning race relations…

The only cowards are the Liberal broadcast media and newspapers who insist on not identifying Blacks and illegal Mexican aliens as murderers and rapists of White Americans. Apparently, news reports of violent racist minorities and illegal alien child rapists don’t look good when the Preachers of Multiculturalism are pushing their agenda.

109 — Anonymous wrote at 3:00 AM on February 20:

Hold on here…
You can’t even choose how and with whom you choose to spend your limited free time with (family, friends who may be of the same racial stock as you - include me in there) without some sort of ‘racial’ accusation. Not only that, be called a COWARD to boot! Ha! I think this bloke spends his free time with people of his own comfy socio-economic class more-so with his downtrodden ‘homies’.
The poor bugger obviously has many sleepless nights pondering over such trifles.

110 — kassie wrote at 10:22 AM on February 20:

The only cowards I know of in this country are white liberals!!

111 — jIMMY wrote at 12:39 PM on February 20:

Watch as some weak-sister whites now try to deny themselves by fawning over blacks, like the GOP is doing with that new creep they put in charge of the RNC.

Look, if you’re not racially aware, you’e just stupid.

Race (actually, the genes that make up race),is not only important; it is the most important thing about each of us.

Our white skin isn’t just some after though paint job put on a universal model human being. It comes from within and is only one of the thousands of differences between us and non-whites.

You go ahead and think you should be aracial. I don’t buy it. That’s the way to extinction. Whiten up!

112 — mark wrote at 5:41 PM on February 20:

An immature and silly person, is this Holder. As an African stuck in America, he is typically obsessed with his race and views the world as obsessed as he is, but it isn’t. Will there ever be relief from these narcissists? The Japanese, Chinese, Germans, Indians, et al must be shaking their heads in disbelief at the level of non-seriousness displayed by this new “Administration” …in quotes because it remains to be seen what precisely they will administer as opposed to what they will bungle.

113 — Anonymous wrote at 2:00 AM on February 21:

Intellectually we are incompatible. The average American white IQ is 100. The average American black IQ is 85. That is one of several reasons why we don’t run around together on the weekends.

Another is that we are emotionally incompatible, in so many ways. Forcing us to socialize is like forcing a cardinal and a bluejay to share the same nest, and to like it.

Ultimately, the reason the social Marxists want blacks and whites to befriend and marry one another is to dissolve the white race while simultaneously elevating the black race with an infusion of white genes. Don’t kid yourselves that it is anything less than that.

114 — Guilty Liberal wrote at 4:16 PM on February 21:

@SKIP. Let them read it. It might give a few of them something to think about.

115 — Anonymous wrote at 5:12 AM on February 23:

Blacks are the most-race-conscious people on the planet. It is virtually an obsession with them. Any dialogue would have to begin after blacks cease blaming whites for the troubles created by their own negative attitudes. Blacks also seem to suffer a huge memory loss concerning black-on-black slavery which has gone on since time immemorial and continues to the present day in African countries like Benin, Mauritania, Sudan and others. Failure to acknowledge this fact is used by the black grievance industry to keep the wheels of the race-hustling gravy train turning. It seems Hell will freeze over before the majority of blacks ever accept their own failings with attitude and stop blaming everyone except themselves.

116 — Michael C. Scott wrote at 4:40 PM on February 25:

Americans don’t “talk to each other” about race, because one side becomes enraged every time the “dialogue” diverges from the script the Politically-Correct elite has chosen.

The seeming “cowardice” on our part is really a withdrawal of consent. We are simply refusing to play in a rigged game.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search