American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Library Plans to Collect Sermons for Inauguration

More news stories on Barack Obama

Kamala Lane, AP, January 3, 2009

Inauguration-week sermons would be videotaped to highlight Barack Obama’s rise to power in an unprecedented quest by the Library of Congress to capture this transfer of power for future generations.

The folks at the library’s American Folklife Center are soliciting churches, synagogues, mosques and others for copies of sermons or passionate speeches that focus on the significance of the Jan. 20 inauguration of Obama as the country’s first black president.

The Folklife Center is looking for both video and audio clips, all to be preserved in a public collection that includes interviews after Pearl Harbor and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“If a historian asks ‘How did Americans react to Obama’s inauguration?’ we’ll have immediate responses to this powerful event,” said Dr. David A. Taylor, head of research and programs at the American Folklife Center.

The “Inauguration 2009 Sermons and Orations Project” marks the first time the library has gathered this sort of material from a U.S. presidential inauguration. Taylor says the project is especially timely—with the inauguration coming a day after the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday—and as it ties into King’s reputation as a great orator.

{snip}

Foundry United Methodist Church, where President Bill Clinton and his family attended services, says that it plans to invite the Obamas to attend services and will contribute to the project by providing tapes and a manuscript of the inauguration-centered sermon to be delivered by guest Illinois preacher Bishop Gregory A. Palmer, president of the United Methodist Council of Bishops.

{snip}

Among The Folklife Center’s vast collection of songs, pictures and speeches, are children’s drawings commemorating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and recorded interviews with 23 Americans who endured slavery.

The center is asking churches and others only for video and audio clips of speeches given Jan. 16-25. Contributors are encouraged to provide related items, such as written texts, photographs or church programs. The items will be copied and preserved in acid-free folders and in climate-controlled areas.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on January 5, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Paleoconservativeone wrote at 10:58 PM on January 5:

The white clergy of the West has declined since around the 1960s. Once, you could find at least a few who would speak for their race, mainly in the American South and in South Africa. Today, they all want to “apologize” for the wickedness of their ancestors; prove to everyone how “diverse” they can make their congregations; go on do-gooder trips to prop up Muslim countries like Somalia (or better yet, invite them all back to the West). As the white clergy has shifted Left, so too, it seems has their flock.

True, you may find a few self-described evangelical Protestants or traditionalist Catholics who are animated against abortion or homosexual marriage — but do they ever take a stand for their race and civilization? No, no… that would be the “sin of racism” in their modern minds, the worst sin of all! So let the fashionable white clergy, the Rick Warren’s of the world, add their sermons in praise of Obama to this so-called library.

The only white minister I’m aware of who has something to say on behalf of his people nowadays is the Rev. Robert Slimp, M.Div., who writes for the Council of Conservative Citizen’s newspaper, the “Citizen Informer.” It’s a shame there are not more like him.

2 — Bobby wrote at 11:42 PM on January 5:

Sorry to say, libraries have been among some of the most subversive institutions responsible for culturally destroying this nation. It seems providence caused the internet to arrive just in time to make them near useless.

3 — Southern Hoosier wrote at 6:17 AM on January 6:

This is the legitimate purpose of the Library of Congress, to collect and store America’s history in the making.

My concern is how this material will be presented in the future. Remember the Smithsonian and how they portrayed the Enola Gay’s bombing mission?

4 — Me wrote at 11:48 AM on January 6:

“but do they ever take a stand for their race and civilization? No, no… that would be the “sin of racism” in their modern minds, the worst sin of all!”

Posted by Paleoconservativeone at 10:58 PM on January 5


Surely you jest Paleoconservativeone? They’re not afraid to take a racist stand at all. Isn’t that what this whole article is about? Noting the significance of the presidents, race. Doting on it. Dwelling on it. Dedicated to it. This article is nothing but naked racism, delineating human beings by race. Oh, they stand up on behalf of and promote racism all the time.

I’m beginning to think AmRen is right. It really is all about race.

5 — Legal Eagle wrote at 12:31 PM on January 6:

Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama’s inaugural speech (why is repeatedly called a “sermon”?) will soon be a mandatory part every elementary school’s annual pilgrimage to WashDC each spring. The itinerary will go something like this: Mon. - Holocaust Museum, Tue. - MLK memorial (coming soon!), Wed. - Barack Obama National Shrine, Thurs. - travel home. No time for Jefferson or Washington or the other dead, White, slaveholding racists.

6 — Anonymous wrote at 2:43 PM on January 6:

My local Borders Bookstore is having not just one, but 2 inaugration parties. One on Saturday to indoctrinate children, and another for adults on the evening of the glorious day itself.

I love to read. I’ve spent thousands of dollars in that store over the last 20 years.

From now on, Borders won’t get another dime from me. Amazon, Barnes&Noble, second hand stores, anything but borders. Borders had nothing for Clinton or the 2 Bushes, but their bias shows for Obama.

7 — Anonymous wrote at 3:38 PM on January 6:

All of this to “document the racial progress we’ve made”!

Well, it’s all according to how you define “progress”… and who’s defining it. Personally, when I look at Obama, I don’t see “racial progress.”

I wonder if they’ll be including articles and comments from Amren as well — just to give objective balance for future historians to read.

Answer to S. Hoosier: No, I don’t recall. Sorry. Please tell us.

8 — gee vee wrote at 7:15 PM on January 6:

I pass through a Books-a-Million store when entering my local mall. I bought a copy of Coulter’s new book today. I got the next to last copy. The saleslady said they got them today and they are flying off the shelves. In contrast, the tables are filled with books about Obama. The tables are still filled with them and there are no takers.

9 — BonBon wrote at 11:23 PM on January 6:

“…Answer to S. Hoosier: No, I don’t recall. Sorry. Please tell us….”

Posted by at 3:38 PM on January 6

I remember the Enola Gay controversy well.

This is a concise explanation from Wikipedia—other sources I found were too long and complicated with each side going into minute detail in support of its premise:

“…Critics of the exhibit, especially those of the American Legion and the Air Force Association, charged that the exhibit focused too much attention on the Japanese casualties inflicted by the nuclear bomb, rather than on the motivations for the bombing or the discussion of the bomb’s role in ending the World War II conflict with Japan…. As a result, after various attempts to revise the exhibit…the exhibit was canceled on 30 January 1995.

The entire aircraft has since been restored for static display and is currently a major permanent exhibit… As a result of the earlier controversy, the signage around the aircraft provides only the same succinct technical data as is provided for other aircraft in the museum, without discussion of the controversial issues.

The aircraft is shielded by various means to prevent a repetition of the vandalism which was attempted against it when it was first placed on display….”

History in the US is not written by the victors; it is re-written by the politically correct.

Bon


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search