Immigration Agency: Single Hispanic Females Deserve Asylum in U.S.

Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, April 23, 2015

Being a single mother or witnessing a gang crime could be enough for Central American illegal immigrants to get on the path to asylum under guidance the Homeland Security Department issued last week, opening new ways for the surge of illegal immigrants to gain a legal foothold in the U.S.

The guidance, a 27-page training document from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, says women who flee Central America because they fear being single heads of households can be deemed part of a targeted social group and can make claims of “credible fear” of being targeted in their home countries.

Likewise, victims of gang crimes, which are epidemic in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, can make the case that they fear retaliation–also proving a “credible fear” and earning a place on the pathway to getting asylum in the U.S.–according to the agency documents, which were obtained by the Judiciary Committees in both the House and Senate, and which suggest a creeping definition that could allow ever more people to claim a right to remain in the country.

“It is an evolving area of law,” Joseph E. Langlois, associate director of the refugee and asylum program at USCIS, told the Senate committee at a hearing Thursday.

Congressional critics, though, said the rules are more a rewrite than an evolution and predicted that they will make it possible for most of those who have arrived in the recent surge of illegal immigration from Central America to gain initial protected status.

“It changes the standards. It’s breathtaking in its liberalities in regard to what a refugee is,” Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican and chairman of the Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee, told Mr. Langlois.

{snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    Oh wait – You’re a straight White male? Get out. Your kind aren’t wanted in the ‘New America.’

    • propagandaoftruth

      All poor, unhappy, non-White people in the world should be allowed to come here. We need to have 6-8 billion poor, unhappy, non-White people here so we can save them all.

      It’s what you fought for, Mekong.

      Sorry – I was channeling our Marxist Governancy there for a second. One of my powers.

      • MekongDelta69

        The channeling force is strong with you Luke!

        • propagandaoftruth

          Thank you, Obi Wan.

    • George Moriarty

      When your nation was still run by straight white males your government may have had enough guts to come up with an ultimatum to the Mexicans; Your country now presents a security risk to us, sort out your mess quickly or we will send in the troops and close the border..

    • LHathaway

      Please, let me out.

  • At this point, it would be easier for the powers that be to list us who they think shouldn’t be granted refugee status. And if we don’t let them in, well, slavery and Holocaust.

    • George Moriarty

      It would make a very interesting list, the ENTRY DENIED checklist would contain some or all of the following; (as we all probably know)
      White male/family.
      Protestant Christian,
      Educated
      Employable
      English speaking.
      Normal sexual orientation.

  • Alexandra1973

    Yep, just play on people’s emotions. These mamacitas might be gang members themselves for all we know, or be related to some.

    • JohnEngelman

      Or they give birth to some.

      • Alexandra1973

        That falls under “related to.” 🙂

  • how about this

    So can we get another country to accept our Blacks as refugees? I am pretty sure quite a few of them have experienced “Being a single mother or witnessing a gang crime.”

    • Dave West

      I nominate the socialist republics of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark.

      As well all know black people do poorly in America because they are “treated bad.” When blacks arrive in Scandinavia and are not bombarded with American police brutality and racist micro-aggressions, they will magically surpass whites in educational performance!!

      • Deacon Blue

        Seconded.

  • IstvanIN

    1) There is NO such thing as a single mother. There are divorced mothers, widowed mother and then there are trollops.
    2) Who do you think birthed and raised these gang members? Their mothers! And all they will do is birth more future criminals right here as “native citizens”.

  • mobilebay

    Why does anyone even pretend that we are a nation of laws? Perfhaps we can change that to “a naion that once had laws, but whose recent administrations changed them at will to include any third world inhabitant who can walk, swim or fly in.”

  • dd121

    We can’t absorb 500 million or a billion third worlders no matter how hard luck their story is.

    • JohnEngelman

      Uncle Sam can’t be the world’s policeman. He can’t be the world’s social worker either.

      • Deacon Blue

        Wow! We agree John! I hate to sound like an isolationist or a craven
        greedy pig but if there ain’t something in it for me {i.e., America} then what do I care if half of Africa starves to death or all the Haitians “muh dik” one another into HIV pandemonium?

        Who once said, “one death is a tragedy but a million deaths is a statistic?”

        I don’t want my tax dollar funding Black kleptocracies. I would rather my
        tax dollars go to funding American veterans, heroes, people who served
        this country and who are getting bent over by the Obama Administration,
        the VA, etc. I vote we take care of ours here before we take care of
        yours there. Yes, that goes for the entire Middle East too.

        I might offer Saudi Arabia some protection in exchange for oil at
        sub-OPEC pricing. Or maybe I would just send American troops there
        to “protect and guard” their oil fields.

        Israel? You are on your own. Sink or swim by your own fists kiddies!

        Unless there is some “real” reason for America to spend lives and/or
        treasure for another country? Meh…better we spend the $$$ here
        at home.

        Better still, how about we pay down our mounting national debt?

        • George Moriarty

          Who once said, “one death is a tragedy but a million deaths is a statistic?” Joseph Stalin!

        • listenupbub

          Nat’l debt doesn’t matter with our modern monetary system.

          We should stop spending money on America and focus on getting out. We have too many minorities to save ourselves now. Whites make up a minority of births.

  • superlloyd

    I’m surprised that these fifth columnists even go through the motions of thinking up reasons to let these illegal immigrants in. The door is already wide open thanks to Obozo and the Department of Homeland Insecurity.

  • Luca

    Exactly what we need. More single mothers and more hispanic immigrants. So when do we start taking in boatloads of African refugee single mothers with 10 or 12 kids each?

    They know this is all going to descend into chaos and when it does, they’ll blame it all on White, Christian, male, hetero-sexual, capitalist republicans.

    • DonReynolds

      Chaos does not stay chaos for very long….it soon leads to the restoration of order. What sort of order results depends entirely on the armed, White, Christian, male, hetero-sexual, capitalists…..who will drive out the invaders and hang the traitors.

    • LHathaway

      “They know this is all going to descend into chaos and when it does, they’ll blame it all on White, Christian, male, hetero-sexual, capitalist republicans”.

      You’re not predicting the future but telling us what they have done in the past.

  • Jason Lewis

    We need more incubators?

  • DonReynolds

    According to international law and treaty……a refugee loses their status as a refugee the moment they leave the first country they flee to. Thus, any and all refugees who enter Mexico from Central American countries are no longer considered refugees when they cross the US border.
    Being a legal refugee does not mean you have the ability to go through dozens of countries until you find one you like. You are a refugee when you leave your own country into the FIRST country……after that, you are no longer a refugee.

  • DonReynolds

    I know of nothing in the article (or anywhere else) that pretends to explain how single hispanic females DESERVE asylum in the US. They have done nothing to deserve anyting. What the Liberals in the Obama administration want to do is coach them all what lies will win them the prize at the border. Resist the invaders.

    • Exuberant Auditor

      Just another excuse to bring more Democratic voters in. Hispanic + single mother = surefire Democratic voter.

  • IKUredux

    WOW. This is great! So, not only do we have home grown sluts, we get to import foreign sluts! What a win for America. So tired of hearing about single mothers. Hey look, just because you made a stupid decision to have a baby out of wedlock, why are the rest of us being forced to think you are great? WTF? You are nothing but a dumb ass h*le. Why is that anything to celebrate, much less, revere? Are you kidding me? You made a dumb slut decision to get laid, get pregnant, now you expect taxpayers to pay for your slutty stupid mistake,AND, were supposed to REVERE you for being a single mother, which you brought on yourself? Screw you and your brats all to hell.

    • Lexonaut

      Please don’t be offended, it’s just a joke …

      Folks, IKUredux is the solution to the shortage of renewable energy sources. He’s always boiling

  • Spaniard in LA

    More EBT cards.

  • listenupbub

    If you look closely at Obama’s marxist, community-organizing history, you will see that this is all his plan to bring America to communism. Obama is not the same kind of liberal as Engelman. I hope Engelman didn’t vote for him.

    • Exuberant Auditor

      He’s certainly a Leftist as he believes in some form of wealth redistribution, but I don’t think he’s a Marxist or a commie. He’s not calling for nationalization of major companies, nor has he ever said a bad word of private ownership and enterprise.

      As to Engelman, he did vote Obama, twice.

      • listenupbub

        I should have said that Obama is a radical, not a communist.

        How about a more blurred definition of “nationalization” of companies? How about enough regulations and lawsuits to control the affairs of the companies from the shadows? How about telling companies how to hire in order to create “equality?” It is a matter of degree, not kind, in my opinion.

        Obama is not protecting American workers, as Engelman would want. Obama is forcing equality on the human race, with a particular emphasis on bringing whites down at every opportunity.

    • dd47

      America is becoming Communist in the sense that:

      – “State” takes the role of parents (Thomas Dewey was a socialist who supported this as early as the 1920’s, claiming that parents have no right to control their children). The Soviet Union through its most radical (the earliest) years tried very hard to do this but quit in the mid-late 20’s.

      – Schools are essentially indoctrination centers. A large amount of Americans don’t even know which country the Ebola epidemic is, or the where the IS is building up. Education hasn’t been the objective of schools for a long time- overcoming “racism” and other -isms is.
      – Becoming a borderless or “stateless” society as preached by early Communists.
      – Outlawing “anti-Semitism” was one of Lenin’s first enacted policies.
      – Blurring the difference between genders. The ideas that male/female have no particular difference, have the same strengths and weaknesses, are capable of all the same things as each other.
      – Anything that disagrees with the system- including other leftist ideas- was deemed as “counter-revolutionary” or “revisionist”. Now they just the terms “racist”, “sexist”, “discriminatory”, etc.

      Some parts of “Americanism” have been transitioned into this same form of Communism:

      – The idea that anyone who wants to be American is American, that being American is not tied to race. Whereas all nations (including most conventional Communist ones) are built and continue to stand as race and its offshoots bind it together. It was inevitable that a “melting pot” of Whites-only would turn into a “melting pot” of anything deemed human. Ironically Sovietologists (mostly Americans studying the Soviet Union and trying to predict its collapse) thought it would come from ethnic diversity leading to conflict- yet those same Americans were unable to see their own country is just the same and wouldn’t be somehow an exception.
      – Equality of opportunity has been slowly transitioned into equality of outcome (socialism). Affirmative Action is the leading offender in that regard (in quasi-Communist nations like South Africa you have “Black Economic Empowerment” where businesses need to meet mandatory requirements of employees of a certain type).
      – Political rule of the people has been transitioned into economic rule of the people. Business leaders are increasingly having to adhere to “diversity” regulations, whereas in proper capitalism business leaders are free to do essentially as they wish. Public (employee/worker) ownership of business and abolishment of “capitalists” (business owners) is a major goal of Communism- and business owners are simply losing their grip in the face of “diversity this” and “diversity that”.

      Some aspects of Communism I think have been genuinely discarded- for example:
      * Push towards a “money-less” society. Money will remain in some form or other. Inheritance will probably remain. Businesses will still be ostensibly privately owned, employees will still have the freedom to generally leave businesses at their will.
      * Anything that stems from social rightism (the Soviet Union was more anti-homosexual than most Western countries, more anti-alcohol whereas the US had given up after Prohibition). It will be absolute social leftism this time around.
      * The overt police state will become much more covert and likely remain that way.

      Karl Marx stated “Democracy is the roadway to socialism”. He also stated that world government would come through international trade. And what is America than a democracy deeply in love with free trade and its so-called “free market economy”? If he was right, America will inevitably be Communist without any deliberate infiltration- so will most of the world. It has promoted for a long time the very system that Marx believed would transform by itself into Communism.

      • David Ashton

        Check Alinksy and his recommendations.

    • HE2

      Listenupbub, Mr. Engelman voted for him twice, and once, in a moment of fervent enthusiasm said he would do it again.
      Hope all Obummer voters are happy with the promised “fundamental transformation” that is rapidly devolving our country into a banana republic run by a rogue regime.
      May these kool aid drinking voters contract the “developing country” diseases currently being introduced as a result of this invasion.
      Case in point, leprosy [endemic in squalid Mexico and Central America] is here.
      Texas has the second highest number of cases in the U.S., behind California, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Gee, I wonder why?

      • expitch

        On another thread, I asked Engelman to explain why he votes for the party of PC and programs, policies, and attitudes on race that are the reverse of his own.
        He replied that the most important issue for him is income disparity. He supports a much higher minimum wage. And he thinks that the Republicans are as bad as the Democrats on immigration because they want cheap workers.
        The fundamental flaw in his reasoning is the failure to understand fully the implications of the truth that culture trumps politics. It is the context in which politics is practiced. The intellectual dishonesty and debasement of language promoted by the Left have undermined what was once a national culture of considerable virtue and stability, flaws and all. Economics cannot function well for long in a state without a solid cultural foundation.
        The Republicans are perfectly capable of messing up on immigration. But there are differences between the two parties that will become even clearer during the election season. ( Now almost year round every year. ) See Rubio and Walker.
        In spite of considerable evidence to the contrary, Engleman continues to insist that the New Deal ended the Depression. I gave him the names of two economists at UCLA who make a persuasive case that in fact the New Deal prolonged the Depression. There are respectable studies that show how continual raising of the minimum wage has deleterious effects on the retention and creation of jobs.
        Engleman fancies himself an empiricist. He frequently boasts of his use of factual evidence. Whose facts?
        I am not entirely unsympathetic to Engleman’s concern about income disparity. But I hesitate to support the mechanisms of social democracy to address the issue, as was done in Europe, now feeling the accumulative negatives of those mechanisms. I think that John once said that he favors the European models.

        • David Ashton

          In poor old Comrade John’s “autistic” world-view he thinks his one vote makes a difference.

    • stedman holder

      He did and will again.

  • Hilis Hatki

    I give alot of money to unwed mothers, Judge says I have to. Wink, not really.

  • George Moriarty

    I think the only answer to that is that traditional white nations are still suffering from a collective mental disease called “white guilt”.
    Many individuals will continue to suffer this disease until well after the time they become a minority in their own country and the health care system as well as the electricity grid and economy are on the brink of failure. Many will get temporary relief from the symptoms of white guilt by moving into a secure estate and living behind razor wire.
    Towards the end, when this disease is in its terminal phase many whites will be in total despair, their kids will not be able to get a proper education let alone paid employment and their daughters will be subject to all sorts of abuse while the local black/brown policeman will show no concern whatsoever. By now many whites will be living in hand to mouth poverty.
    At this stage some whites, mainly males with guns, will start looking for a cure for what remains of white guilt, they may even be able to eliminate it, they may even be successful but I do know it will not be a pretty sight.

    • George Moriarty

      After posting the above comment I thought I would do a “Wiki” search on White Guilt. No surprise really, I got a result together with all the associated topics such as White Privilege. Needless to say the articles seem to strongly support the concept of white guilt and privilege.

  • Ken Dometriosis .

    Our immigration policy is a sham! It doesn’t matter because our communistic dictator will just let in ALL the turd world sub-humans he wants and to hell with the American people! if there was ever a time for another Revolution, now is the time!

  • Ken Dometriosis .

    Thank Ted “The Chappaquiddick Killer” Kennedy for that. His 1965 policy effectively cut off ALL white, European immigration.

  • stedman holder

    We already have plenty of overweight, diseased , welfare collecting prostitutes as it is.