What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals

Beverly Gage, New York Times, November 2014

The note is just a single sheet gone yellow with age, typewritten and tightly spaced. It’s rife with typos and misspellings and sprinkled with attempts at emending them. Clearly, some effort went into perfecting the tone, that of a disappointed admirer, appalled by the discovery of “hidious [sic] abnormalities” in someone he once viewed as “a man of character.”

The word “evil” makes six appearances in the text, beginning with an accusation: “You are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that.” In the paragraphs that follow, the recipient’s alleged lovers get the worst of it. They are described as “filthy dirty evil companions” and “evil playmates,” all engaged in “dirt, filth, evil and moronic talk.” The effect is at once grotesque and hypnotic, an obsessive’s account of carnal rage and personal betrayal. “What incredible evilness,” the letter proclaims, listing off “sexual orgies,” “adulterous acts” and “immoral conduct.” Near the end, it circles back to its initial target, denouncing him as an “evil, abnormal beast.”

The unnamed author suggests intimate knowledge of his correspondent’s sex life, identifying one possible lover by name and claiming to have specific evidence about others. Another passage hints of an audiotape accompanying the letter, apparently a recording of “immoral conduct” in action. “Lend your sexually psychotic ear to the enclosure,” the letter demands. It concludes with a deadline of 34 days “before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.”

“There is only one thing left for you to do,” the author warns vaguely in the final paragraph. “You know what it is.”

When the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. received this letter, nearly 50 years ago, he quietly informed friends that someone wanted him to kill himself–and he thought he knew who that someone was. Despite its half-baked prose, self-conscious amateurism and other attempts at misdirection, King was certain the letter had come from the F.B.I. Its infamous director, J. Edgar Hoover, made no secret of his desire to see King discredited. A little more than a decade later, the Senate’s Church Committee on intelligence overreach confirmed King’s suspicion.

Since then, the so-called “suicide letter” has occupied a unique place in the history of American intelligence–the most notorious and embarrassing example of Hoover’s F.B.I. run amok. For several decades, however, only significantly redacted copies of the letter were available for public scrutiny. This summer, while researching a biography of Hoover, I was surprised to find a full, uncensored version of the letter tucked away in a reprocessed set of his official and confidential files at the National Archives. {snip}

The F.B.I.’s entanglement with King began not as an inquiry into his sex life but as a “national security” matter, one step removed from King himself. In 1961, the bureau learned that a former Communist Party insider named Stanley Levison had become King’s closest white adviser, serving him as a ghostwriter and fund-raiser. The following year, Attorney General Robert Kennedy approved wiretaps on Levison’s home and office, and the White House advised King to drop his Communist friend. But thanks to their surveillance, the bureau quickly learned that King was still speaking with Levison. Around the same time, King began to criticize bureau practices in the South, accusing Hoover of failing to enforce civil rights law and of indulging the racist practices of Southern policemen.

This combination of events set Hoover and King on a collision course. In the fall of 1963, just after the March on Washington, the F.B.I. extended its surveillance from Levison and other associates to King himself, planting wiretaps in King’s home and offices and bugs in his hotel rooms. Hoover found out very little about any Communist subterfuge, but he did begin to learn about King’s extramarital sex life, already an open secret within the civil rights movement’s leadership.

Hoover and the Feds seem to have been genuinely shocked by King’s behavior. Here was a minister, the leader of a moral movement, acting like “a tom cat with obsessive degenerate sexual urges,” Hoover wrote on one memo. In response, F.B.I. officials began to peddle information about King’s hotel-room activities to friendly members of the press, hoping to discredit the civil rights leader. To their astonishment, the story went nowhere. If anything, as the F.B.I. learned more about his sexual adventures, King only seemed to be gaining in public stature. {snip}

At this point Hoover decided to escalate his campaign. On Nov. 18, 1964–50 years ago this week–Hoover denounced King at a Washington news conference, labeling him the “the most notorious liar in the country.” A few days later, one of Hoover’s deputies, William Sullivan, apparently took it upon himself to write the anonymous letter and sent an agent to Miami, to mail the package to Atlanta.

Even now, looking at a full copy of the letter, it’s tough to puzzle out just what the bureau wanted King to do. The largest unredacted section focuses on King’s sex life, recounting in graphic language what the bureau believed it knew. Another uncovered portion of the note praises “older leaders” like the N.A.A.C.P. executive director Roy Wilkins, urging King to step aside and let other men lead the civil rights movement. And some maintain that they simply meant to push King out, not induce suicide.

{snip}

[Editor’s Note: The letter is available at the original article link below.]

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • “Typos and misspellings”

    So why is everyone assuming the FBI wrote it? If it is full of typos and misspellings, then bet on black. Namely, some other black person jealous of Martin Luther King’s growing fame, who was in a position to know MLK’s moral baggage and wanted to use it as an extortion ploy to get a piece of the action.

    Hoover and the Feds seem to have been genuinely shocked by King’s behavior. Here was a minister, the leader of a moral movement, acting like “a tom cat with obsessive degenerate sexual urges,” Hoover wrote on one memo. In response, F.B.I. officials began to peddle information about King’s hotel-room activities to friendly members of the press, hoping to discredit the civil rights leader. To their astonishment, the story went nowhere. If anything, as the F.B.I. learned more about his sexual adventures, King only seemed to be gaining in public stature.

    That’s because the civil rights movement really wasn’t about Martin Luther King, and if it was only up to Martin Luther King alone, it would never have happened.

    • Dwight

      Martin Luther King was a filthy sexual degenerate fraud. There that P*S was, a married Minister, having orgies and beating the hos for his sexual gratification. And the whole nation thought, “Oh, what a wonderful hero.” He was scum.

      • Diversity Fatigue

        What is really sad is that little white girls and boys in the first grade are taught (indoctrinated) about what a marvelous leader he was — right up there with Jesus Christ. The truth is he never did anything for whites. Nothing. Yet, he is worshipped by them as a diety.

        • Petronius

          Actually the indoctrination now begins in pre-school.

          Perhaps not yet a diety, but clearly on the fast track to sainthood, no doubt soon to be known as:

          “St. Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.”

          • tetrapod

            Honorable Holiness St. Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr II.

          • Who Me?

            I like my sister’s reply when her son came home from second grade talking about the “wonderful Dr. MLK.” She simply turned around and looked at him and said, “Boy, that (n-word) never did anything for you or our kind.” This is of course true, but it was surprising coming from her. She was in no way a racial realist–still isn’t.

        • Julius Caesar

          I went to my nieces school musical last night. I expected to hear some nice Christmas songs, instead I got an hours worth of songs about MLK and how our nation is for EVERYONE to live in and it’s up to us to take care of them, no matter what. I was disgusted. She’s in 4th grade.

          • Fr. John+

            Take her out of the school, and tell your sibling to homeschool her. It’s for her own good. And the good of the American (white) People.

      • Cecil Broomsted

        Quite the man of the cloth wasn’t he.

      • Harley Sims

        Interesting how the media just glosses over King’s drunken orgies and goes straight after Hoover instead. I don’t think Hoover did enough myself.

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        Oh, I dunno. He seemed like a pretty typical Negro preacher.

      • William Hinkle

        Sounds like King was just following his jewish handlers’ examples.

      • superlloyd

        It seems as if all black revrums engage in this type of behaviour usually with their own congregations. It’s their definition of pastoral care.

      • monster

        Will MLK Day ever get the same treatment as Columbus Day gets nowadays?

    • jane johnson

      Too bad there were no social media back then. He wouldn’t have been able to resist. Remember “Carlos Danger”?

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      The really interesting thing about this article to me is how it dovetails with other information, namely those fringe investigators that have been persistently delving into the JFK assassination, LBJ’s links to it, Hoover’s involvements, etc. Something I learned along the way (reading one very detailed book, “LBJ; The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination”) is that Hoover and LBJ lived across the street from one another in Washington, DC and that they were long time buddies. LBJ was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1947 and soon got control of the farm and oil bureaus. As VP, he had a secretary named Bobby Baker. People old enough will remember that name. The three of them had run a bugging campaign that allowed Hoover to hold a file on nearly every elected official in Washington. It was done chiefly through bugging the hotel where a club for the politicians was set up. Lots went on there, drink, drugs, sex and more. Bobby Baker’s work made certain that a huge amount of power rested in LBJ’s and Hoover’s hands.

      It isn’t much of a secret that MLK was if not a frank communist, certainly affiliated with communist groups, including the Communist Party USA. His “Dream” speech is riddled with Marxist aspirations masquerading as Christian ideals. This all worked very well into Hebert Marcuse’s New Left politics, including the Neo-Marxist philosophy he expounded upon in his book, “Eros and Civilization.” MLK must have taken Marcuse’s philosophy of sexual liberation as a vehicle toward universal equality to heart. We also now know that Jackie Kennedy hated MLK precisely because she was aware of his sexual deviance. She knew for example that MLK was planning a sex orgy for the very evening of his famous speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

      I think the FBI could have easily produced this letter. They wouldn’t have wanted it to look too professional, after all. After LBJ became president, the issue was moot. He had his own plans. LBJ’s aspirations was to be another FDR. He wanted to be a wartime president and the author of another “New Deal.” That one was aimed as opportunity provided. So he created and signed off on The Great Society legislation, etc., and enlarged our commitment in Vietnam, calling it a limited involvement. The Pentagon Papers revealed later how deceptive he was in his aims and how quickly things got out of control. Also, Billy Sol Estes testified on a promise of immunity in the 70s after LBJ died, regarding LBJ’s 1947 “Precinct Box 13 voter fraud” in Texas and his role in a number of strategic assassinations in Texas (known as “The Texas Suicides” well before November 22, 1963.

      • Whitesneedtobebrave

        WOW, I must read the book. Thanks

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          The book is pretty well done. The only problem I have is when the author says that the Italian Manlicher rifle used in the “dummy” assassination was a cheap and poor quality weapon. That is not true. What is true is that you could buy excellent WW2 vintage weapons very cheaply in the ’50s and 60s. I remember seeing 8mm Mausers in a barrel at one gun shop for $25.00 each in about 1966. These rifles were cheap, but not junk by any means and the Manlicher is renowned for accuracy and bolt speed/smoothness. So that was one spot where I sensed a bias not based in well backed fact. The vast majority of the book is well argued and documented.

          For a real stunner, anyone reading this and interested may go on Youtube and look for the E. Howard Hunt clips. He states outright that LBJ was “likely behind it.”

          I also have found it interesting that a Broadway Play glorifying LBJ should appear lately. I always howl every November when the routine of the completely transparent “expert” reviews of the multiple shooter theory appears with ridiculous claims about ballistics and such aimed at debunking the theory and so protecting many from what busting open the conspiracy would expose about the really deeply corrupt state of affairs in national government during the 50s and 60s.

          Another astonishing read is “Acid Dreams, The Complete Social History of LSD, The CIA, The Sixties and Beyond.” Based on the CIA files released in 1976, the two researchers that authored this book spent ten years researching and writing this incredibly revealing history.

  • Mike Dirty Sanchez King is as Christian as a potted plant.

    • WR_the_realist

      Stop insulting my potted plants.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        Potted plants, being potted plants, hold much more promise for a decent America than the First-Filthy-Mulatto-In-Chief and Marchin’ Lucifer Koon.

    • [Guest]

      King was something of a plant, however.

      • jane johnson

        Eggplant?

        • [Guest]

          a shill

    • Samuel Hathaway

      My ex-pastor who escaped to another church now as an afternoon radio show that I listen to from time to time. He actually said that MLK was a “godly man.” Yeah, about as godly as Marchin’ Lucifer Koon.

    • Dwight

      He wasn’t even remotely a Christian. He was trash.

      • Reverend Bacon

        Hmm, a black leader with closeted sexual perversions, pretending to be Christian, that white liberals think walks on water. Ring any bells?

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          Err, all of them?

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          Reminds me of some Republicans and high profile tv ministers.mega church leaders who are strict political conservatives.

      • Fathercoughlin

        He was as “Christian” as any black.

  • MekongDelta69

    Unlike The New York Slimes speculation, I have no idea from where this letter came originated.

    However, (besides leaving out his plagiarism), I don’t see anything untruthful in it.

    • Dwight

      The letter is nothing. Listen to the actual FBI recordings of that ugly degenerate to have your eyes opened.

  • David Ashton

    All is forgiven if “Ah have a dream”.

  • james AZ

    OH we have to wait till JAN 2027 to open the case which federal judge ordered many years ago……I think in 1960’s or 1970’s not sure…..

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      I’m sure as soon as the files are opened they’ll be released into the custody of the King family lawyers.

  • Caucasoid88

    When his sealed records are available no one will care. Like St. Skittles and the Gentle Giant, he will be a saint until the end of time.

  • Bryce Armstrong

    Remember when the FBI was filled with patriots?

    • Usually Much Calmer

      No, I don’t.

      • Bryce Armstrong

        Well, your probably right about that.

      • I do. There were many clean-cut, disciplined and honorable men who truly loved their country. I’m not so sure that this is the case with the majority of FBI agents today.

  • [Guest]

    So what The New York Times is telling us is that the letter is a fraud intended to damage the exalted reputation of Mike King and that therefore speculation about the content of sealed records about King’s degeneracy is also false.

    Got it, Mr. Sulzberger.

    • TruthBeTold

      Even now, looking at a full copy of the letter, it’s tough to puzzle out just what the bureau wanted King to do.

      Kill himself.

      The letter presented the facts as there were, likely with indisputable hard evidence that Mr. King couldn’t refute or deny.

      The accusations wouldn’t have been presented to Mr. King if the sender couldn’t prove every one.

    • WR_the_realist

      I’d give that letter a 50% chance of being from an FBI agent who was fully aware of how King behaved and who he was behaving with, and a 50% chance of being from a disgruntled insider who was fully aware of how King behaved and who we was behaving with.

      Does it make a difference? Facts are facts.

      • TruthBeTold

        Whoever wrote the letter likely had the goods and the evidence to back it up on Mr. King.

        If none of these accusations were true, Mr. King would have make a big show of publicly exposing the letter.

        That he didn’t use it to his advantage means he knew everything was true and provable.

  • JohnEngelman

    Unless Martin Luther King Jr. committed rape and/or statutory rape his sex life is a matter between him, his wife, and his God.

    • Katherine McChesney

      He had no God. He was a moral degenerate and it was all American citizens business to know what that fraud was about.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        The epistle of Jude before the book of Revelation, spells out the phonies who cloak their lives in Christianity.

      • Dwight

        Amen. Correct. He was a high profile public figure.

    • katzkiner

      If you were alive back then you would remember the photo of a nude White prostitute fleeing King’s hotel room with the good reverend half naked in hot pursuit. The Life journalist & photographer waiting for an interview got one heck of a story that night. Nationwide. Being an innocent high school student at the time I can still see the crazed look in the good reverend’s eyes and the terror in the prostitute’s. They were haulin’ a**. King was known to rough up his playmates a little. That’s why it is hilarious that he has a statute on the National Mall. What a crock! But, most idols are manufactured.

      • rebelcelt

        I knew one of the Memphis Polcemen that was around him the night before he was murdered. He said he was so drunk that he sh## on himself that night.
        i

      • Lenin

        I can’t find that damn pic anywhere! Google Images must have “edited” it.

        • Oil Can Harry

          Google can’t edit a photo that never existed.

      • KnowNothing

        Does this photo still exist? Where did you see it originally? I doubt Life would have ran it.

        • katzkiner

          Yes, it was in Life & some newspapers and no it will not be found before 2027. Most people forget the 60’s were wide open. Free love, acid and cocaine were “groovy”.
          We will probably see Obama’s transcripts or Lerner’s emails first. There was a book years ago titled “MLK The Man, The Legend”. King’s escapades were well documented before he became the “Messiah”. Ask your grandpa. Today, you’d think he didn’t need toilet paper.

    • Lygeia

      The night before MLK was killed, he is reputed to have raped and battered, as well as sexually tortured, a white prostitute that he and his black mistress hired to have sex with the two of them.

      • Paul F. Smith

        This is false. He was with a Black women (not his wife) three days before his murder. The two of them. The women (Georgia Brown and Dr. King) got into shoving match in King’s hotel room where he eventually slapped her. This information can be found in David Garrow’s 1990 fantastic book And The Walls Came Tumbling Down. King was in fact involved with White women, but many of them were upper class and wealthy White women he would meet at fundraisers in places such as Scarsdale , New York, Malibu, California etc… where he was attempting to raise money for Black organizations.
        Please AMREN posters. STOP POSITNG INACCURATE INFORMATION ON THE WEBSITE. Misinformation can be damaging in the long run and it causes the website to lose credibility.

        • Oil Can Harry

          And The Walls Came Tumbling Down was written not by David Garrow in ’90 but by Ralph Albernathy in ’89.

          King consorted with white hookers in Norway the week he was unjustly awarded the Nobel Peace Price. I’d be surprised if he didn’t do the same in the US.

        • TruthBeTold

          It becomes difficult to fact check every alleged fact.

          I have always read that it was white women who were involved with King in the hotel incident.

          If you can find an reputable online reference it would be of great help.

          • Bryce Armstrong

            How realistic is it that a white prostitute would want anything to do with this beast?

          • Rick O’Shea

            Very realistic, unfortunately.

    • OS-Q

      Usually people can accept this with secular officials, but not reverends or preachers.

    • rebelcelt

      Not when he assumes the mantle of a pastor. That tells everyone to expect a high level of moral uprightness. Especially in the sexual arena of a mans life.

    • Whitetrashgang

      So Johnny if I ask you for a blow job no harm no foul?

    • Dwight

      And maybe the fathers of the girls he beat. The point is he was no saint as he pawned himself off as.

    • dd121

      It was also a matter for the American people to judge when this country had a moral anchor.

    • LHathaway

      adultery?

    • tlk244182

      Are you speaking Ex Cathedra here, John, or merely as a private theologian?

  • TruthBeTold

    It says King believed he know it came from the FBI but did he ever deny any of the accusations?

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      We know Jackie Kennedy believed them to be true and one would imagine she had access to good avenues of information.

    • Diversity Fatigue

      Hard to deny when recordings were made.

      • TruthBeTold

        That’s just it. That he didn’t deny these things and use this as proof of an alleged smear campaign only goes to show he knew everything was true and could be proven.

  • phorning

    He was a typical hypocritical politician, who tailored his message based on his audience. Although it seems to be typical in an assassination, there is no reason for him to receive the deification that he gets. I point out his extreme left wing economic policies to conservatives who cite him.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    The Corrupt Leftist Media were about as interested in M.L. King’s peccadilloes as they are in those of another communist, pathological liar, Islamic Marxist, and Illegal Alien, who just happens to reside in the White House…

    • Valmont

      God forbid Dear Leader should ever fall to an assassin’s bullet.
      The lachrymose deification of BHO could not be endured.

      • Bryce Armstrong

        Only one way to find out I guess…

  • dd121

    Today’s MLK mythology is a construct of the liberal mind. They needed a negro hero and this is what they got. It’s very telling of the negro character that they couldn’t even find one real hero.

    • Nancy

      Just like back when Kennedy (and later LBJ) realized that all astronauts were white, and wanted a negro in NASA. We were landing on the Moon, and the negroes were grumbling and “protesting” because they resented the cost of the NASA program, and had the temerity to demand that money be spent on THEM!

      Yet the best and brightest negro they could find was a mediocre pilot who needed tons of extra tutoring just to pass the academics…and he STILL had to drop out, because he was out-classes by dozens of superior white pilots.

      Paul Kersey’s “Whitey on the Moon” is an excellent read, and very eye-opening.

      • LHathaway

        You’re delusional, and uneducated. A black astronaut died in training. If he hadn’t died, he might have walked on the moon. His name, along with other fallen astronauts is engraved on a plaque that was placed on the moon and still sits today.

    • Douglas Quaid

      The best black leaders are guys like Bill Cosby, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Booker T Washington, their answer to black problems is never to blame whites, but to get your act together through hard work, personal responsibility, and thrift. Unfortunately this message is nearly universally rejected by blacks in favor of the “Gib me my reparations!” and “Whitey keepin us down!” mentality

      • Bryce Armstrong

        So what your saying is the BEST black leaders are just as sycophantic about our King as the worst radical leftest (our Glenn Beck)?

      • dd121

        Most blacks reject the “personal responsibility” message of Bill Cosby and others. To them he’s an uncle tom.

  • John

    A few facts about MLK the article neglects to mention (no surprise considering it’s the NYT). King was a philanderer well know for his sexual peccadilloes. His FBI records were sealed for 50 year prior to the big push for recognizing his birthday as a holiday. His PhD dissertation was largely plagiarized, a fact that’s largely overlooked by the disingenuous white liberals in the academic community. He was also a known communist sympathizer and his private beliefs were diametrically the opposite of his public statements and speeches. In short, just like every other icon of the black community, he’s a fraudulent imposter. More details at martinlutherking*dot*org.

    • dd121

      I’ll be you $20 that his FBI dossier never sees the light of day.

  • Roninf9

    Mike King (his legal name) was a trained puppet of dual-citizen New York Bolsheviks. The entire “civil rights” movement was a intelligence psyop carried out against the 90% White majority by Washington, D.C., the District of Criminals, a.k.a. Mordor on the Potomac, Wall St., and the Corporate Media. Mike King was just the black mailable, malleable, front man, exactly like Barry Soetoro (his legal name).

    • Yancy Derringer

      He was born Michael King.

  • Bryan Dennis

    I want to state for the record that American Renaissance is censoring the comments section. Anything involving Jews and their overwhelming influence in this country is censored. I had three comments removed last week, none of which included any profanity or anything unreasonable. I’m deeply disappointed.

    • Katherine McChesney

      There are other topics that are verboten. I’ve had so many comments removed that I’ve lost count. Makes me wonder if there is someone pulling the strings behind Amren.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      You can say things like Jews disproportionately vote democrat, you can say Jews, Ashkenazi at least are disproportionately represented in academia, Nobel Laureates, Fed Reserve Chairmen (women now) heck you can even say Jews have supported policies detrimental to whites.

      Certain things cross their line, as they do not want to be known (or accused) as anti Semetic.
      Jared Taylor’s position seems to be Jews are generally productive members of society and not contributing to the problems that racial diversity cause.

      You’ll also see edits for colorful descriptions of coloreds.

      • Whitetrashgang

        Jews cause 90 percent of the problems in white countries , sorry 100 percent.

      • Diversity Fatigue

        So many Jews are actually on our side that the tired old conspiracy meme is just annoying.

        • Ike Eichenberg

          You can’t honestly say that Jews do not have a disproportionate influence in America when 1/3 of the Supreme Court Justices are Jewish.

          But you can argue that Jewish success is (at least partially) a result of different genetic groups having different intellectual abilities and that is an excellent way to spread race reality.

          And yes, there are many conservative Jews and many if not most Jews are open to the idea that the races have different abilities.

        • tlk244182

          As long as one is familiar with the works of Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, David Irving, etc., it is all right with me if he is pro-Jew, since this is a question about which reasonable men may differ.
          The problem is that many Whites are pro-Jewish out of ignorance. I know this because I was pro-Jewish at one time, for that reason.
          But I am now of the opinion that there indeed is a Jewish conspiracy to subjugate what might be called the Christian West, and that the colored races are Jewish pawns in that conspiracy, Michael King being a conspicuous example of such.
          In other words, where most on this blog might use the word “liberal,” I would use the word “Jew,” since I believe it to be more precise, as well as more informative.
          I also subscribe to a revisionist view of WW2, of its causes, and of the “Holocaust.”

        • Franklin_Ryckaert

          Conspiracies are by definition done by small numbers of people, of any ethnic background.

      • Anna Tree

        Bryan Dennis, I also had a few critical comments about what it seems as a big chunk of Jews that have been deleted, and I am not anti-Jews and I think European Jews are white. So it’s not personal.

        I believe in absolute freedom of speech but I also know that Amren is not anti-jewish and that there are jewish Amreners. There are other pro-white websites that are anti-jewish, so I presume there is somewhere else where those particular comments can be posted (and again, I believe in freedom of speech, exchange of ideas and that expressed opinions are needed so to be refuted: sometimes not letting something be expressed and/or refuted, can be seen as contra-productive or even endorsement!)

        I think it is just easier for the mods and indeed like Ike Eichenberg said
        “Certain things cross their line, as they do not want to be known as anti Semetic.”

        • Anna Tree

          Oh there seem to be another post deleted… I wanted to quote him a part of Clytemnestra’s post about the movie Elysum (from amren com/news/2013/08/elysium-hollywood-open-borders-propaganda-concedes-nativists-are-right/ ) especially the third paragraph:

          “Max Da Costa is one of the last Whites left working in the dystopian multicultural world of tomorrow. Max Da Costa represents the remnant of working class Whites who saw their jobs in-and-outsourced to foreigners, saw their neighborhoods block-busted then overwhelmed by urban blight into extinction, and saw any hope of upward mobility stymied by affirmative action and diversity quotas that displaced them in university admissions and in the workforce.

          All of this at the agency of the class made up by the Jessica Delacourts and the John Carlyles who cheered Truman on as he integrated the military, Eisenhower as he desegregated Southern schools at bayonet point, Johnson as he squandered millions of dollars on food stamps, Medicaid, and free housing to Black welfare queens, Ronald Reagan as he signed off on the first amnesty bill, etc. ad nauseum ad infinitum. All of this diversity was imposed on Da Costa’s people by the Delacourts and the Carlyles who saw to it that they themselves would never know enrichment by diversified vitality.

          Even today, White Nationalists have this really huge blind spot about the White Hierarchy itself in their fulminations against Non-Whites and Jews. Dr. Kevin McDonald carries on like there was no such thing in any White society as a hostile elite until Jews acquired positions of power. Yet, throughout White history, the White elite have gorged themselves in mansions while the White poor have starved in hovels, unable to even hunt a rabbit or be executed for poaching.”

          ——

          I can’t edit my previous post above. I want to write “critical comments about anti-white Jews” not “critical…. big chunk of Jews” (I didn’t succeed to write what I meant in English, so this edit is closer to what I mean)

      • dd121

        I don’t think my realistic description of blacks is colorful. I believe they’re literally black and white. Shame the mods don’t see it that way. However, I tend toward Taylor’s views on Jews. It’s just not productive to make our problems the center of some Jewish conspiracy.

  • I understand where you’re coming from, but MLK knew what he was doing. He was supposed to be a man of God. He was supposed to know the Scriptures and the level of moral accountability that shepherds are to possess. He knew so much, yet he allowed himself willingly to align with wicked forces.

    Truth is, MLK was trained in higher-critical views of the Bible and the origins of Christianity. Coupled with his liberal views of the Bible, he was deeply influenced by Communist ideas. He may not have had it all figured out in his mind, but he knowingly continued in a direction that was dead wrong both morally and socially.

    MLK was a false prophet and, in many respects, no different than our current Kenyan sitting in the Oval Office.

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    Just think, without James Earl Ray. Martin Luther King would be little more than a slow speaking, race hustling version of a has been Alphonso Sharpstone.

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    Just think, without James Earl Ray. Martin Luther King would be little more than a slow speaking, race hustling version of a has been Alphonso Sharpstone.

    • Douglas Quaid

      Both signs missed it, they went 0 for 2 on this.

  • Samuel Hathaway

    “You are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that.”

    Might as well have been written to the First-Filthy-Mulatto-In-Chief and all that stupid lying about all that hopey-changey stuff.

  • Dwight

    King was a typical negro. His “private” behavior bears witness to that.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    King’s view of God is not one many Christians maintain. Google “King’s God: The Unknown Faith of  Dr. Martin Luther King Jr”.

  • Augustus3709

    “In 1961, the bureau learned that a former Communist Party insider named Stanley Levison had become King’s closest white adviser, serving him as a ghostwriter and fund-raiser.”

    So now Levison was his “White” adviser was he. The house of Levi is located somewhere in Iceland I take it.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      Well the FBI thinks Juan Valdez is white, if he commits a crime.

      • dave

        And Hispanic if he’s a victim of a crime.

      • Augustus3709

        One mistake deserves another?

        But the fraudulent racial classification in America definitely needs to be fixed. I learned about this problem first from Mr. Taylor.

        Don’t call me a “white (lower case W) non-Hispanic (upper case H).

        I am neither a “negative” identity, nor am I a lower-case letter.

        Hispanic is not a race, it is a language. By that logic I would be a White “Anglo.”

        So, a “Hispanic” who speaks only English would be? –> brown non-Hispanic.

        How about a White person who only speaks Spanish? –> White non-Anglo.

        Classification fix: Mestizo for Hispanic (for the most part) and European for “white non-Hispanic”.

        • Ike Eichenberg

          It’s sarcasm.

  • Garrett Brown

    MICHAEL Luther King was a woman beating, anti white, Communist savage who deserved to be put down for what he did to White women in those hotel rooms.

  • Spikeygrrl

    …and at least one other: advocates of the preposterous push for “marriage equality.”

  • TruthBeTold

    I tend to agree that what people do in private is one thing.

    But when you hold yourself as a moral figure above others you put a target on your back.

    It’s all about glass houses and throwing stones.

  • LHathaway

    Right, the man wasn’t bestowed by nature with the ability to think. . haha

  • Texan1st

    Check out the white guilt pseudo-intellectuals coming to the defense of the womanizing communist and plagiarist in the NYT’s comment section.

  • Mark Caplan

    I haven’t seen evidence of King’s “DEGENERATE sexual urges.” What was degenerate about King’s illicit sexual escapades? I had the impression Hoover regarded sex itself as a form of degeneracy, so maybe he was projecting his own queer attitudes onto King.

    • Hoover liked sex with other men.

      • Bardon Kaldian

        I don’t care about Hoover, but I’ve seen an interview with his biographer (I forgot the guy’s name). This writer was explicit about his dislike of Hoover and stated that he searched for evidence that Hoover had engaged in gay sex, orgies etc. The result of meticulous search was: it was all gossip.

    • Bardon Kaldian

      It could be that MLK engaged in sex with teens, maybe even pre-teens. He wasn’t gay- at least it looks like. And, in all likelihood, the “letter” was not an FBI fabrication.

      • Paul

        King’s sexual identity (all evidence shows that he was heterosexual) is irrelevant. It is his undisciplined behavior and hypocrisy that is the issue here.

  • Lt. Greyman, NVA

    Agreed.

    Hoover hired brave men and good gunfighters to work against the Mafia and the Communists. Sadly, as AA and Communists took over, the “caliber” of the men was reduced. Now all they do is hire squealers (informants) and hope they can pull in a midlevel. The big fish never get caught, even those who are heads of street gangs, but if you are a White Hispanic defending your life or a White police officer defending your life, Holder will have you run to the area to check out you “background”.

  • Demo P. Seal; PouponMarks

    Glenn Beck is the biggest MLK groupie of all. Pure idol worship, with Alveda King , the keeper of the flame and hider of the toilet.

  • tlk244182

    Shallow as it may be, sniping at Michael King helps to balance the otherwise unrealistic image of him that many people still have, and which is politically useful to the “Left.”

  • MLK is another part of the destructive social engineering that has been foisted on whites for the last 60 years. It’s destroying our society. Everything about The Civil Rights crap is illogical, counter productive, and flagrantly abusive to whites. Replacing merit with affirmative action was perverted!!

  • Whitesneedtobebrave

    Levison is a Jew and like we all know these Jews will use these colored or Negroes to destroy white countries. The fact that nobody wants to talk about is that Jews were heavily involved in the African slave trade.

    • ghettovalley

      “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” – Voltaire

  • Bardon Kaldian

    Sigh…..copy-paste

    Jooz again.

    I’ll try to write a comment about the controversy surrounding this ethnic-religious group in the US, without going too far back into history. Anyone can agree or disagree, this is a free discussion forum.

    First- there is no Jewish conspiracy against “white America”. This idea is simply bollocks. As a group, Jews in the US consider themselves to be disseminators, contributors & propagandists of white European culture (and white American, too). For instance- leaving aside exact sciences, which are not so culturally “hued”- American Jews have popularized & spread European “high culture” (Nietzsche, Heidegger, Picasso, Russian formalism, modern music, Mann, existentialism, various post-modern blah blah etc.). In the humanities fields, you got opposing figures of Stephen Greenblatt & Harold Bloom, who insist- both- on the continuation & dominance of Western culture & Western cultural norms.

    Some US Jews may be specialists in other areas (Chinese, Babylonian, Islamic, ..cultures), but it doesn’t mean they’re fiery advocates of “culture replacement”. As for Jewish culture, it is too narrow & antiquated in most respects; most cultured Jews are actually not much aware of it, and when they are, this is just a part, a smaller one, of their interests & cultural affinities.

    Most US Jews are leftists & ethical universalists. They were overwhelmingly numerically over-represented during civil rights era (1950s and after). Not because they wanted to destroy “white America”, but because, along with other Europeans (especially Christians), they saw segregation as injustice- which, in fact, it was. Nobody knew how blacks would behave if given all rights. Virtually all leftists thought they were just whites with black skin.

    The root of all their behavior is- they are terminally lefty oriented. They cannot assent to “race realism” because that would mean their sacred cows- equalism, for instance- were just a self-delusion. Of course they cannot be friendly towards “white nationalism”-WN movement, in its Nordicist, Hitler-friendly way, is anti-Jewish to the core. So they are left with their liberalism & leftism.

    And they are divided – their typical dilemma- between universalism & particularism. In the US, they are losing their ethnic-cultural core: ca. 50-60% of intermarriage rate leads to 2/3 of children not considering themselves to be Jewish anymore. As far as Israel is concerned- they do, most of them, support Israel, but this support is far from unequivocal & unconditional. The growing numbers of them would like to see Israel a “multicultural”, essentially a non-Jewish national state (google Washington Post Patricia Marks Greenfield). IMO, this is lunacy, but this only shows they are a part of a wider, suicidal Western anti-national self-delusion.

    Many commenters here think that:
    * Jews are very homogeneous: no, they’re not
    * that they are anti-European or anti- white American in their cultural outlook & sympathies: you can’t be more wrong
    * that they invented all kinds of subversive ideologies in order to crush white European (and American) culture: no, the dominant ideologies are products of European cultural development in past 3 centuries. Even Marxism is a German, not “Jewish” ideology (although it is much more)
    * that they don’t self- identify as white, at least sincerely: this may be true. Phenotypically, most of them are Mediterranean types, like Italians; just, they don’t possess a uniquely “white” American identity. But the point is- nor do US Gentile whites.

    Socio-politically, Jews in the US are incurably leftist universalists. They are not “anti-white”; just, they are stuck with lefty egalitarianism to such a degree that virtually all of them simply cannot accept, say, the trivial fact of black, or African-American anti-Semitism. They are hopelessly caught in some kind of idiotic equalist fantasy delusion & self-intoxication, and cannot awaken from their la-di-da Weltanschauung egalitarian nightmare.

    • Whitesneedtobebrave

      Bardon, you really are stupid. Jews are anti WHITE and anti Christian. So take your pro Jewish nonsense and go troll on a Jewish website.

    • curri

      “Nobody knew how blacks would behave if given all rights. Virtually all leftists thought they were just whites with black skin.”

      Southerners knew, but nobody wanted to listen to them:

      http://thosewhocansee(dot)blogspot(dot)com/search?q=Emancipation+Provocation

      • Bardon Kaldian

        They knew, but the general tendencies among Western peoples, especially after Hitler’s extremist policies, had been in favor of egalitarianism. Most of whites, even in the US, had been delusional about blacks & their nature/culture. Heck, many, way too many still are.

        • Bleeding heart liberals are delusional about the nature of blacks, but most of the world is not. Any intelligent person can see the reality of the nature of blacks all over the world.

      • Abraham Lincoln knew:

        “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”

        He was anti-slavery, not pro-negro.

        Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
        (The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, pp. 145-146.)

  • I wonder if it was a hate hoax letter to hisself.

  • Mark Caplan

    Evidently the “Rev.” in Rev. Martin Luther King, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton is short for revved, as in all revved up.

    • I think it’s an abbreviation for ‘revolting.’

  • Fr. John+

    Can we NOW rescind this adulterer’s spurious ‘civic sainthood’????
    Anyone who can say, ‘I’m white tonight’ as he fornicated with prostitutes the night before he met his maker, is NO Saint.