A Black and White View of the O.J. Simpson Case 20 Years Later

Jesse Washington, Huffington Post, June 8, 2014

The O.J. Simpson murder trial exposed many painful truths. None hit harder than the idea that white and black people often look at the same facts and see different realities.

Today, 20 years after the case captivated and divided the nation, few opinions about the saga have changed. Despite two decades’ worth of increasing racial acceptance, the Simpson case still reflects deep-rooted obstacles to a truly united America.

Most people still believe that the black football legend killed his white ex-wife and her friend, polls show. But for many African-Americans, his likely guilt remains overwhelmed by a potent mix: the racism of the lead detective and the history of black mistreatment by the justice system.

For these people, Simpson’s acquittal is a powerful rebuke to what they see as America’s racial crimes. Others simply see a murderer who played the race card to get away with it. Across the board, emotions remain vivid.

“It was very tense at work,” recalls Carlos Carter, who at the time was one of the few black people working in the trust department of a Pittsburgh bank. “The whites felt like OJ was guilty, they were rooting for their team. We thought he was innocent, that he was kind of framed, so we were on the black team.”

He adds: “We were consumed with it. Like Sugar Ray Robinson fighting the great white hope. It was like a match. It represented something bigger than the case, the battle between good and evil, the battle between the white man and the black man. It was at that level.”

This sentiment, widespread in the black community, was confusing to Shannon Spicker, a white woman who was working her way through college in Ohio at the time.

“Most of us didn’t understand why it was racially charged,” she says. “We didn’t understand how people could defend him just because he was black, is what it felt like. We knew he was guilty but they defended him because he was black. It was weird.”

{snip}

“It becomes a very complex study in American history,” says Ronnie Duncan, who was working as a TV sportscaster at the time.

“O.J. was in a weird place,” says Duncan, 55, who is black. “He lived a lavish life in L.A., sunny skies, beautiful women, everyone takes you out to lunch. But one thing we recognize, you can deny it all you want, but I can be driving right now and —”

Duncan makes the sound of a police siren, then quotes a common saying among black folk:

“You may be a million-dollar star, but when it’s finally said and done, you are still, to them, the N, the I, the G, the G, the E, and the R.”

The sirens sounded for Simpson on June 17, during the legendary slow-speed Bronco chase.

{snip} A police caravan trailed him down the 405 freeway as crowds lined the overpasses and more than 90 million people watched on live television.

“It was such a surreal scene,” says Todd Looney, a black Los Angeles native.

“What was so strange was the fact how even reactions to his pursuit were divided along racial lines,” says Looney, 46, a media company consultant. “I remember seeing people on the overpass by Sunset Boulevard, cheering as he went by, and most of them were black. I’m thinking, why are you cheering? Somebody’s about to kill himself. It was kind of disgusting, as if it was O.J. versus the police.”

{snip}

The prosecution had a pile of evidence, including something relatively new then: DNA analysis. Prosecutors said that DNA matched Simpson’s blood to samples from the murder scene. They said they found blood matching the victims’ in his Bronco, on a glove at Simpson’s property, and on a sock in his bedroom.

But the prosecution had a big problem: the lead detective, Mark Fuhrman–the one who had produced the bloody glove from Simpson’s estate.

Fuhrman was a white cop who used racist language and lied about it on the stand during the trial. (He was later convicted of perjury.) He was on tape bragging about assaulting black gang members and making them beg for mercy: “You do what you’re told, understand, nigger?” Before the murders, he had arrested Simpson for beating Nicole.

Defense lawyers suggested that he planted the glove out of a racist desire to frame a black man. They said that other blood evidence could have been planted, too, or at least was unreliable due to sloppy police work.

{snip}

The bloody glove itself, which probably was the strongest evidence of Simpson’s guilt, also was seen through very different lenses.

Prosecutors asked Simpson, in court, to try it on. The former movie star struggled and grimaced while trying, apparently unsuccessfully, to fit the glove on his hand.

Spicker laughs at the memory.

“I’m sorry, I thought it was hysterical. I laughed that day too,” she says. “It doesn’t make any sense. Any good attorney wouldn’t make him try it on. Those were his gloves. His facial expression, it was comical. He was acting.”

But it was a big moment for Carter. He repeats the famous line from Cochran’s closing statement:

“If it does not fit, you must acquit.”

The 12-person jury did exactly that. Nine jurors were black, two white, and one Hispanic.

Duncan was at home, watching on television, as the verdict was announced. He literally jumped for joy.

“It wasn’t so much for O.J. I was jumping for joy. It was the process. . . . It was the victory over the United States justice system that has always had a different treatment for me and my brother.”

“I never said O.J. wasn’t guilty,” Duncan continues. “I just said he got off. That’s what it is: O.J. got off. There’s a side of me that’s annoyed by my jubilation. But my jubilation is motivated by the ills and pains of the past. There have been too many tears.”

{snip}

There was no solace for Spicker. The cheers that echoed across black America that day troubled her.

“These two innocent people were killed, and you’re cheering because their murderer was just set free,” she said. “It was a shame. It feels racist against the white victims.”

Spicker recognizes white racism, then and now. She has black family members, and when she hears white people making racist remarks, she speaks out. But that doesn’t change her sense of injustice over the Simpson verdict.

“A lot of inner-city kids and adults are taught not to trust the system, not to trust police; as a young black person you’re going to be found guilty before any evidence comes out because you’re black,” she says.

“That may be true sometimes,” she says, “and it may not be true sometimes.”

Carter now thinks that Simpson was guilty, but he makes no apologies for his feelings at the acquittal 20 years ago.

“That pride that I felt, I don’t take it back. I don’t feel I was hoodwinked. I was just living in the moment, and it was a victory for my people,” says Carter, now 42.

“I didn’t think of it then, but that’s what it was for me. A victory,” he says. “I could have cared less about O.J., but when I saw him, I saw myself.”

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • [Guest]

    >>>…When it’s finally said and done, you are still, to them, the N, the I, the G, the G, the E, and the R….

    He has that part right.

  • Diversity Fatigue

    Hogwash. Simpson was simply acting like the African he was. MLK’s “dream” is our nightmare.

    • Erasmus

      How sad that Nicole Brown never had anyone to give her The Derbyshire Talk.

      If you haven’t done so, have the Derbyshire talk with the people you love. It saves lives.

  • The most famous failed interracial marriage in history, offering a lesson to stupid white women. But do they get it? No, many of them don’t. And they get the same as bought and paid for whore Nicole got. But who am I to say they deserve what they get.

    • So CAL Snowman

      These White women deserve what they get.

      • Alucard_the_last

        I agree. I watch Judge Judy and cannot tell you how many times a white woman is suing her ex-buck. I have no sympathy.

        • juju444

          Are you saying you have no sympathy toward a white woman suing a former black boyfriend? If so, what kind of racist are you?

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        Prostitutes deserve more respect than mudsharks. At least prostitutes have the good sense to not sleep with negroes.

        • DonReynolds

          I have not noticed that to be true.

        • Ron Cheaters

          They know the score first hand. And for the most part they’re honest and up front. At least the one’s not on drugs.
          From what I understand, of course.

        • Katherine McChesney

          I don’t believe your last remark. Bet you can’t prove it. Remember that White prostitutes ‘serviced’ MLK.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            If you knew anything about escorts or ever looked at escort ads, the phrase “no black men” would be extremely familiar to you. Prostitution is an unregulated industry and when you have that, you end up with Jim Crow-style segregation and discrimination. Black men are universally despised among prostitutes. Don’t believe me? Google “no black men,” “escort” and/or “prostitute.”

            This is why a white woman who sleeps with blacks is lower than a prostitute.

          • juju444

            Really? As a teenager, I was once attracted to a black guy. Does that mean I’m inferior to other white women? Or are you just a moronic racist?

    • [Guest]

      I see MANY more examples of that combination of interracial coupling today than I did 20 years ago. The murders didn’t seem to open up any white people’s eyes, and neither did the gleeful reactions of blacks to the murders.

      • ElComadreja

        It seems that nothing will open up the eyes of these brain-dead white negro worshipers.

        • juju444

          Racist much?

    • Harry

      I am in my 50’s, I am single and I do not have any children.

      But if I was married and had adult children, I would much rather have any of my daughters marry someone who is Jewish, of Greek heritage, of Italian heritage, of Albanian heritage, or of Portuguese heritage than ever marry a black man. Because at least, my grandchildren would still be white like me!

      I would even much rather have any of my daughters convert and marry a Mormon than ever marry a black man, even though the the rest of my family and I would not be allowed to attend the wedding. This is also of course, because at least, my grandchildren would still be white like me!

      If any liberals reading my comment think that I am some kind of “Archie Bunker”, there are many other white men who would not be as tolerant and “liberal” as I am!

    • ElComadreja

      I’ll say it. I have more respect for women that do donkey shows than those that sleep with blacks. They deserve whatever they get.

      • Harry

        Gee, I can’t decide which is worse, having children come into this word who are mulattoes because their white mothers slept with black men? Or having children come into this world because who are centaurs, because their mothers did donkey shows or horse shows?

        • ElComadreja

          If you believe that horses, donkeys and humans can breed you’re more out of touch with reality than the pitiful white women that degrade and humiliate themselves by laying with blacks. Mulatto is a very misleading term. These creatures may be half white genetically but they’re all black in their self identification and attitude. I’ve seen “blacks” that could easily pass for white until they open their mouths and the rotten diction and attitude comes spilling out.

        • ElComadreja

          Did you cry to the mods to have my other comment removed, loser?

          • Harry

            No , I did not because I am for the 1st Amendment right of free speech, even for people I disagree with.

            There is a saying that goes “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it!”

  • D.B. Cooper

    20 years later, and people still don’t have a clue, and gleefully tell kids born after 1994 that diversity is juuuuust great!

    • Ron Cheaters

      I can’t watch anymore “Naked Gun” movies without my stomache churning.
      As funny as they were its like a time capsule to me.

      • D.B. Cooper

        I used to think the Naked Gun movies were funny, but they’re tainted now. In fact, I doubt anyone watches them anymore.

  • Truthseeker

    This article really shows why nationalism is the answer. People see themselves in others of the same race, and feel an instinctive affinity for them which can take precedence over their sense of justice. If people are so tribal, they shouldn’t be part of the same society. They should be with their own where everyone can agree to play by the same rules and those in the out-group won’t have to battle them.

  • Not original on my part, but here goes anyway:

    ***

    OJ the predatory negro
    Had a sharp samurai knife
    And if you ever saw it
    You knew that he could take a life

    All of the other negroes
    Used to say that he was white
    They’d never let poor OJ
    Join the liberation fight

    Then one murky summer’s eve
    Satan came to say,
    “OJ wiff yo’ sam’rai knife,
    Won’t you slay yo’ honkey wife?”

    Then how the negroes loved him
    As they shouted out with glee,
    “OJ you beat the system,
    You’ll go down in history!”

    • John R

      I remember that one. Still funny, though. I will have to copy and paste it for future reference. Thanks for repeating it here.

      • Brian

        OJ also is famous for having the shortest website URL ever: backslash backslash escape.

    • JohnEngelman

      Laughing out loud.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      A golden oldie!

    • ElComadreja

      He wanted nothing to do with his fellow negros until this incident. He became black so fast it was incredible.

      • Spikeygrrl

        re: Instant Blackness, a certain “President” springs to mind…

  • IBWHITE

    “None hit harder than the idea that white and black people often look at the same facts and see different realities.”
    Especially in subjects like math, English, science etc.

  • Tom Thumb

    A few things about this idiotic case. First thing is how they talked up how smart all the lawyers/liars were. Secondly, I said to myself, how can such smart people allow a full jury of morons/blacks? Once the jury was selected, I bet my liberal sister $20 he walks. My sister watched all the dumb analysis on the TV every night during the trial and I just kept smugly saying he walks, look at the jury (she said I was a racist) I told her. She was one unhappy person when she had to pay up, and I was a horrible winner, gloating all over the place. My sister has very much come to her senses since those days. Lastly, I remember learning something about these brilliant people (lawyers/liars). They’re so smart, they couldn’t figure out that the leather gloves would shrink from the blood. They looked like total idiots when OJ couldn’t get his hand in the glove.

    • “How can such smart people allow a full jury of morons/blacks”

      That’s entirely on Marcia Clark’s back. She went with black women because she thought they’d side with gender over race. Just like all those black women who voted in Democrat primaries in 2008 sided with gender over race by voting for Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama. (???)

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        That’s an interesting point QD: recently (i will look for the link) i was reading an article about the race and age breakdown of votes in the 2012 election.

        Among young (18-29) black male voters Obama got 80% of the total while Romney won a not insignificant 19%. Among black women in the same age group well it was a 98%-1% landslide of epic, North Korean proportions.

        We gotta give it to them: nobody is more ethno-centric on this planet than black women, which is kinda sad considering how well they are generally treated by their own male peers

        • Sure, but very few black men under 30 actually vote. Sure, one could say that Romney got 20% of black men under 30 (big whoop), but all that means is that of the five black men under 30 that voted, one of them voted Romney. Sure I’m being glib, but I’m not being that glib. If there was an incentive for U30BM to vote Romney, it was military and armed forced related issues.

          Like I said in the Mississippi thread today, elderly black women do most of the voting in the black community.

          • John R

            Also, at least some of the young black men voted for Romney because they “ain’t inta dat gay she-it, knomesayin?”

          • Spikeygrrl

            Even when they do it themselves “on the DL.”

          • Eagle_Eyed

            Even some of the dead ones, too.

          • cherrie greenbaum123

            One thing that leans in whites’ favor is that ex felons can’t vote. The rare black buck not serving time probably did time at one point in his life making him ineligible to vote.

          • A previously convicted black felon is almost likely to be a black men, and like I said, voting in the black community is far more an elderly woman thing than anything.

          • [Guest]

            >>>One thing that leans in whites’ favor is that ex felons can’t vote.

            Sure they can! It just varies by state and by crime committed. And what barriers remain are coming down year by year. There’s even a movement on now to permit criminals to vote WHILE SERVING.

            ______

            The New York Times, 11 February 2014: “Holder Urges States to Lift Bans on Felons’ Voting”

            …Holder described today’s prohibitions … as a vestige of the racist policies of the South after the Civil War….

          • rightrightright

            Ditto in the EU. It is deemed to be in breach of criminals’ “human rights” to deny them the vote. Cameron’s softly softly methods of destroying the UK means he has back-pedalled on this one for the time being for tactical reasons, but he or whoever else becomes Prime Minister, will get back to it.

          • [Guest]

            Some people object to a criminal suffering any official consequences after release. I don’t. For instance, I believe in restitution, and that can take place only AFTER release. Denial of voting privileges is similar. I think prison time should be only part of the punishment/rehabilitation process.

            In this area, as in many others, I’m probably a couple of centuries out of date.

          • WR_the_realist

            Actually, that varies by state.

          • r j p

            Depends upon the state whether felons can vote.
            And there is no such thing as an ex-felon.

          • Sheik Yerbouti

            I don’t agree. The same statues in so many states also trap white people. Probably more of them than the blacks. But the real point I’d make is that if a citizen has paid their debt, shouldn’t we return them whole to society? Why chops their rights up IF they have paid their debt? Or is it true that America never forgives?

          • [Guest]

            How do we determine what constitutes paying the debt, though? Does serving the sentence imposed by the justice system always constitute paying the debt?

            I don’t think so.

            If a lifetime ban on voting rights is unjust, is lifetime ineligibility for the job of policeman unjust? How about ineligibility for security clearances such as are required in certain jobs?

            The war against the “disenfranchisement” of felons is intended to gain as many votes as possible from black males. Would more votes from blacks with felony convictions improve things?

            >>>Or is it true that America never forgives?

            If light sentencing constitutes forgiveness, then America forgives every time it sentences a murderer to anything other than the death penalty.

          • Sheik Yerbouti

            I can’t help but wonder how many whites are caught in that trap though.

          • [Guest]

            Quite a few, I’d guess. But waaay fewer than blacks.

          • Sheik Yerbouti

            Given our population numbers, I don’t see how that’s possible. People get felonies for bad checks. I usually associate blacks more with violent crime, but the felony level of crimes cover quite a range. People will cop to it in a plea to avoid jail and lose their rights for life. I don’t see the voting issue as any sort of racial filter.

          • Stan D Mute

            More than Afros. Don’t forget Afros are only 16% of the population. In all but a very few states, whites are the majority race in prison. Often, when the Afro population creeps up over 50% the courts will take a proactive stance on sentencing more whites to prison and more Afros to probation just to lower the percentage for political reasons. Also, the Afro is more likely to be a repeat offender than the white and the Afro is more likely to die or be murdered.

          • DonReynolds

            Convicted felons are prevented by law from voting. That knocks out quite a bit of their voting behavior. Of course, Eric Holder has demanded that these “discriminatory” restrictions on the voting rights of convicted felons be removed.

          • In most states, convicted felons can start voting again once they’re off papers.

          • [Guest]

            >>>Convicted felons are prevented by law from voting.

            Not so.

            Almost every state places some limits on voting by felons. All but two — Maine and Vermont — bar prisoners from casting ballots; 13 and Washington, D.C. prevent felons from voting only while imprisoned; and 25 states let felons vote once they have served their sentences, plus probation or parole sentences. Nebraska has a two-year waiting period.

          • r j p

            Wake up.

          • awb

            3yrs. Mo. D.O.C. Class D felony. Right’s restored in 5 yrs. after completion of sentence.

          • DonReynolds

            We are almost there….it seems. Sooner or later murder will be no more serious than a 50 dollar fine for discharging a firearm in the city limits. I can get a cash advance on my credit card.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            Is it still the case ? Often i bump into articles on MSM where they gloat all over the place about the rising political activism of minority youth

        • Ron Cheaters

          Consider that LA was still reeling from the Rodney King riots just 3 or 4 years prior. But you have a good point there.

        • r j p

          Black women are generally:
          .
          Not in prison or parole.
          Are on welfare or employed in low wage jobs (most likely both).
          Employed by the gubmint.

          • juju444

            Yes, unless they are not on welfare, or not in low-wage jobs, or employed by the government.

        • ElComadreja

          Most black men only go after their own women as a last resort.

      • John R

        Right. Only Whites have a “gender gap.” For all others, it is their people/race that is important.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          Whites only have a gender gap of around 7% each election (always under 10%). That is a smaller gap than the one mentioned in the comments above in reference to the black community.

          • John R

            Okay, point taken. But, in part, the narrowing gender gap is probably due to the fact that even White women are getting sick and tired of violent Negroes. Remember the George Zimmermann trial? (Like who doesn’t!) The prosecutor was so confident that seating White women on the jury would convict Zimmermann-they would identify as mothers with the “loss” (HA! HA!) of a son. LMAO! Boy, were THEY wrong! Those White women did NOT identify with Trayvon’s parents. They were-justifiably-afraid of the thug Trayvon Martin. Good. Maybe our racial awakening is finally beginning…

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Good point. But I am not sure the gender gap was ever larger than what I mention above. But the verdict to the Zimmerman trial was pretty refreshing for sure!

          • connorhus

            Gallup has the Male to Female gender gap for the 2012 election as the largest in it’s history actually. It has been steadily growing since the 72 elections. The gender disparity among Whites is a fact that no other race seems to have an issue with so while I agree attacking constantly maybe overkill trying to smooth it over and pretend it isn’t a problem is just as bad. The White Men and Women who betray their race both need to have a finger pointed at them.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            With all due respect, I don’t see how you have negated from my point. The gender gap in 2012 is where I am getting the 7% from. If that is what it has grown to, then we are better off than even I was assuming.

            I am obviously not against pointing out problems, but a lot of people on here conjure up problems that don’t even exist, and I will continue to call it out as I see fit. It is destructive, especially if it is pitting white men and women against each other on here.

            And how exactly is our gender gap larger than that of any other race? What were the results for black men and women in 2012?

          • connorhus

            Courtney I will say I believe your heart is in the right place from your statements so far. However…

            I think the real problem here is that it is a matter of simple perspective and age. Men who pay particular attention to Women are generally younger on average and the support of Obama and Democrat policies in particular is much higher statistically in the Younger White Women than it is for those who are older and Married to White Men. Therefore to a Young White Man it may very well appear that ALL White Women support Obama.

            And guess what as far as his world is concerned that is truth. All the old Geriatric Women down the road may love the young White guy to pieces but that ain’t gonna help him, or our race’s chances at continuation one bit.

            You are in this case cherry picking your overall statistics pooling them into a general fund to hide a leak in a specific area. A leak that will only continue to get worse unless it is plugged. From an overall standpoint the Older White Females are still repressing the Younger White Female vote just a bit but that will NOT continue and is in fact why the disparity has grown with each election. If you look at Age and Gender statistics the gap widens even more even when many of the younger White Men vote Democrat as well.

            As for answering your question I was unaware I didn’t perhaps I got confused following the reply links or something. I would not ignore any question from you, blow you off or anything. I see real potential in you honestly so I would give any question of yours top priority.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            connorhus, thanks for the explanation. I understand where you are coming from on this a little better.

          • connorhus

            It’s also possible my reply to your question was hit with the censor bat too. It seems to happen a lot sometimes.

          • Stan D Mute

            @Courtney – I haven’t seen this:

            But I see a lot of people calling white women out for stuff on this website but giving men a pass. It might not be the overall opinion, but it sure seems to be in about a third of the discussions.

            But I have seen you make the same charge “even if the above poster didn’t claim that, others on this page have.”

            Maybe I’m not paying enough attention and the comments here are rife with misogyny against white women. If so, I agree that’s a big problem. Can you point out where I’ve missed all this? On the other hand, if it’s just a lot of negative commentary on white women who consort with Africans, then it is what it is. Nobody here will run to defend Mayor DeBlackio in NYC either.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Stan, I have been posting on here since 2004 and have seen the issue I pointed out above, quite often. It is such a big problem that other women have taken issue with it as well, as have male leaders in the movement. It is a topic that comes up at conferences, and on radio shows. Read the various discussions under multiple websites in this movement, listen to the shows etc….and you will see what I am talking about over time.

            The men who show up at conferences and who act as leaders in the movement aren’t guilty of this by any means. It is all these anonymous posters on websites who show up, griping about life, and white women, making horrendous claims, etc…. that only cause division…..that is what I take issue with.

            In regards to what you quote from me above, with all due respect, I am not guilty of the same thing as what I am complaining about above, in this case. I specifically said that the poster above me didn’t accuse most white women of voting for Obama. But others below have, unless their comments have now been deleted. The poster above me complained about a gender gap. I clarified that on purpose.

          • Stan D Mute

            Not to excuse, but as explanation: our enemies know that portraying white women with Africans is demoralizing and they do it constantly. For those who still watch mass media, there is an endless barrage of pretty white women with African athletes, rappers, etc. Commercials portray white women happy with their African mongrel pups. White men are ridiculed as effeminate idiots incessantly.

            As intended, all this demoralizes and divides. When we see the polling that shows white women more likely to vote for the Kenyan, it reinforces what the media has shown. Unfortunately, instead of questioning how we might reverse this and save our women, we see only the anger.

            There is a LOT of counter-productive bile on the race conscious right message boards. We see the purist nonsense condemning a blond haired and blue eyed man if genetic analysis shows him to be 1/16 Amerindian or if he prays to the wrong “god”. We see pure evil in comments advocating genocide and racial violence. We see gross generalizations obviously falsifiable (ie “all negroes are retarded violent animals”). And we see posts so poorly written we must question the intellect of the writer. If one of the primary problems with Africans is extremely low intelligence, a comment here written at a third grade level is ironic. Sadly, we have no way of knowing how much of this is trolling by the Marxists or even baiting by law enforcement hoping to entrap the mythical “white supremacist mass murderer.”

            Over the years since these online venues have flourished, I have several times utterly given up and stopped bothering to visit or comment. In fact, I’m nearing that point again. Why bother?

            So I understand your frustration. Just look at it in the context of all the other counter-productive garbage I mentioned above and realize that while our race can get by very nicely without the semi-illiterate homicidal trolls, without smart, brave, and noble white women giving us beautiful white children, we are just another evolutionary dead end. Any “white nationalist” or race realist who doesn’t understand the importance of white women for our race to survive and thrive is unfit for reproduction and should be shunned or expelled to Africa where he’ll no longer have to worry about it.

          • juju444

            Umm…what is wrong with a white woman who chooses to love a black man? Or vice versa?

          • Stan D Mute

            More than a finger pointed at them, white men and women who act deliberately against their race need to be *exiled* to Africa. We cannot trust them and chances are they have some kind of genetic defect causing them to work toward destruction of our genome. It would be positive evolutionary strategy to ensure they don’t pass along whatever is wrong with them.

          • Spikeygrrl

            YES. Too many White men in here seem to have forgotten that without smart, strong White WOMEN on their side it’s gonna be pretty hard to make more White BABIES!

          • Stan D Mute

            WHO? Who here has forgotten that? I couldn’t even guess how many times I’ve commented here and on other sites that white women have the single most important role there is.

            Are you sure you’re not seeing extremely negative comments about the behaviors of *some* white women and incorrectly feeling it as an attack on you? Or is advocacy for traditional gender roles an issue? It certainly goes against everything women are programmed to believe today, but biologically “barefoot and pregnant” is what we need at least until menopause. We need white babies. Lots and lots and lots of healthy, smart, and strong white babies. We need those babies to have mothers who will teach them to be proud of their heritage and eager to go out and make more white babies themselves. Literally, nothing else matters if we can’t get white women to resume giving us more white babies. It is THE single most important job in the universe.

          • Spikeygrrl

            I agree entirely.

            Now, please explain to me why the men here who don’t trust a woman to vote morally and intelligently would trust a woman to bear, raise, and educate their children.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I don’t see where I have disagreed with you on traditional gender roles. Far from it. That has nothing to do with what my concern is.

            Go ahead and read some of the horrendous exaggerations on this page, if they haven’t been deleted yet. Some men below claimed that “most white women voted for Obama”. In most of the comments I have seen in regards to this topic (voting for Obama, sleeping with blacks, being traitors to white men etc…..), the commenters are very careless about making sure they are making it clear that they are only referring to some. Before I ever respond I read their comments very carefully. Most of the time it is either an accusation about “most white women” or just “white women”…..it is hardly ever “some white women”.

          • Stan D Mute

            I may be guilty of such hyperbole myself. I think if I paused to reflect or to edit my comments I’d use “too many white women” in place of the exaggerations or minimalisms. There are more white women in our enemies’ camp than there are white men and it’s something we need to understand and try to reverse. I would not be surprised to find that if we reversed the problem of women acting against our race, we would see most of our men reverse course as well. Marxist mothers raise Marxist sons. Marxist girls cause hormone crazed boys to do, say, and believe whatever they must to gain the girls’ affections. I believe our enemies understand this subject better than we do and take advantage through pop culture targeting girls and young women.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I agree, but only to an extent. We can look at the flip side also, in how men are supposed to be the ones leading. Perhaps it goes both ways, but we can’t just place everything on the women to turn things around. White women are only doing what the women of any society would do, if said society was infiltrated with liberalism. If we go back to the beginnings of our problems, way back in history, I am sure most of us would agree that women had very little to do with what went wrong.

            As I said in previous discussions, any race of people that resorts to blaming the women when things go wrong, is surely weak. I understand that that isn’t necessarily what you are doing, but I am just writing this as a reminder on who exactly we are supposed to be blaming for the root of all this.

          • Stan D Mute

            What I’ve wondered is if there is a big difference in voting for women with children versus women without. For example, a woman with a son would be deliberately harming her own progeny by supporting affirmative action or sex based quotas. Do white women become more conservative if they have sons?

          • Stan D Mute

            A “battle of the sexes” is simply counter-productive. What we need to do is identify the fault lines and figure out how to eliminate them. There *are* more women than men in the cultural Marxist and anti-white camp. How are our enemies recruiting these girls and women and how do we stop them? If our women are lost, then ALL is lost.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            You have been repeating this in a lot of your posts: “there are more white women in enemy lines than white men”.

            I don’t see how this is relevant, and you aren’t the first on here I have said this to.

            This isn’t about blaming this gender or that gender. So many people on here are consumed in that and I find it weak and silly. I am not accusing you of this, but I am just demonstrating how we have to be careful with wording.

            White women are only acting the way God made women to act when confronted with certain stimuli. But at the end of the day, it rests on the men’s shoulders to lead their society in the right direction.

            Women had very little to do with the origins of liberalism in our race’s history.

            White women today are simply a product of the culture that created them, and white men are part of that culture too, and obviously, too many white men are going along with it, even if it isn’t quite as large a number as with white women. So at the end of the day the fact that “more white women are liberal than white men”, means nothing.

            Stating over and over that “more white women are liberal than white men” sounds like 1) stating the obvious even though it isn’t relevant to saving our race, 2) weak, 3) a nanny-nanny-boo-boo I am better than you argument.

            It reminds me of a situation where a house is a mess, and when figuring out how to clean it up, the adults in the house say “but there were more children making a mess than there were adults”.

      • Carney3

        Do NOT use the term “gender” with regard to humans or other living organisms. Words have gender, just as they do tense and number. Gender is a term of GRAMMAR, not biology.

        As they saying goes, people don’t have gender, they have sex.

        It’s amazing to me how prudish the Left is about using the word sex in its only universally appropriate and non-suggestive context, referring to whether one is male or female rather than to intercourse.

        Of course, there’s a REASON for using “gender” – it makes the physical facts of biology fade away, replaced by abstraction that can then be manipulated. Instead of two sexes, we can have many “genders”.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          I was corrected recently on here for using gender instead of sex as well. I honestly wasn’t aware before. Now I only use the word “sex”. When Bill Clinton was in office, I was still under my parents’ roof and barely over the age of 10. I grew up with the stupid word (gender).

          • John R

            No need to apologize, imo. I use the term “gender gap” myself. What else am I supposed to say? “Sex gap”? And there are a lot of far more PC terms that I get more annoyed at, that we can focus on instead. Example: At my job, a black customer called, and mentioned he spoke to a “Caucasian man.” I didn’t care. I corrected him, and said, “a White man.” He got the message. That is how we must stand up. Not offensively, but firmly enough. Thank you.

      • WR_the_realist

        Exactly. The defense was delighted because they had done focus testing and understood the hatred that black women have towards blond white “hussies” who take their men. They knew they had a jury that would believe Nicole Simpson deserved to die.

      • ElComadreja

        The race card trumps the gender card every time. The only card that can ever trump the race card is the “gay” one.

        • Spikeygrrl

          “Gay is the new black” — the perfect pun because it references the arbitrary, shamelessly.commercial, shifting fads of the fashion industry.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      My dad was an attorney and he was blown away that OJ got off.

      • DonReynolds

        Your dad was probably influenced by the chase scene with OJ in the back of a Ford Bronco, with a gym bag containing tens of thousands of dollars in cash, a revolver, and a passport. They were trying to get to LAX and when the dozens of police cars gave chase, OJ threatened to shoot himself.

        • cherrie greenbaum123

          He din do nuffins!

        • Who Me?

          “…when the dozens of police cars gave chase, OJ threatened to shoot himself.”

          Too bad he didn’t do it, For one thing, we’d have never had to hear all about the Kartrashians, lo all these many years later!

          • DonReynolds

            Is that where those clowns came from? Never knew that. I figured they were Turks or something. Not really my type.
            Claudia Schiffer is more like it. Cannot post her pix here, but you can do a quick search.

        • bilderbuster

          There had also been a boat rented for them waiting in the Bahama’s.
          Quite a different story than the one he told that he was intending to go to his ex wife’s grave to commit suicide because he couldn’t live without her.

          • DonReynolds

            Your story is much more believable.

      • dd121

        I thought the trial was a total slam dunk for the prosecution. Shows how dumb or prejudiced these brown jurors were.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          It also shows that if you or a family member was murdered by blacks, even in their own home, the killers will not be punished in expanding tracts of the country. OJ being acquitted also proves the lives of whites mean nothing to the ruling elite, and we have no civil rights, indeed no rights at all. Sooner than later, the only way whites will get justice for black on white violence is acts of vigilantism and vengeance. That is one reason why King Obama wants to disarm us, so the blacks can rape, kill and maim us with impunity.

          • dd121

            You’re right. That’s why I live in a whites only neighboorhood. There’s a very small brass placque at the entrance that says “Whites Only”.

          • juju444

            Really? Does that mean black people are inferior to you, or do you just have no use for them?

          • juju444

            The OJ jury was just wrong, no doubt about it. With that said, there is no reason to believe that black people generally want to rape, murder, and kill white people with impunity! Black people have morals too, you know!

      • r j p

        Every reasonable individual was blown away.
        If the glove doesn’t fit?
        OJ didn’t even try to put it on his faked arthritic hand.

    • Funruffian

      Mistrial of the century.

    • Ron Cheaters

      Seinfeld made a parody of that cochrane lawyer in a couple episodes.. the one where Kramer sues Mcdonalds for scalding himself with coffee comes to mind.
      When it comes to darkies its not about substance, its all about being slick.

      • Usually Much Calmer

        Jackie Childs!

        “who told you to put the balm on?”

  • Samuel_Morton

    “…white and black people often look at the same facts and see different realities.”

    Should read: “white people look at facts and black people construct their own realities”.

    • Stan D Mute

      Correction: “Race realists look at facts while cultural Marxists construct their own realities”

  • Lewis33

    “The whites felt like OJ was guilty, they were rooting for their team. We thought he was innocent, that he was kind of framed, so we were on the black team.”

    I thought it was because everyone thought he was guilty but blacks either didn’t care (just a couple of crackers!) or wanted to stick it to whitey.

    • John R

      Exactly. Do you think most blacks really cared whether OJ did it or not? Heck, they probably liked him more BECAUSE he was guilty. He really stuck it to YT.

      • Ron Cheaters

        Rodney King riots still being fresh at the time really swayed things. I doubt if the same trial were held today that the outcome would be the same.

        • John R

          We have had twenty more years of “Negro fatigue.” And the “glorious” days of the “noble” “civil rights movement” are thankfully fading more into distant memory.

        • Stan D Mute

          It would be the same outcome if it had the same jury. Black jury nullification has only grown since OJ.

  • Whitetrashgang

    I hate to say it but I was pulling for OJ because he was a former NFL player and I don’t like the police.Looking back its a story of just another story of dead mudshark and also a member of the tribe. . If white woman want to lay with a beast they get what they deserve sometimes.

    • John R

      At least you were being honest. But, and please don’t take offense at this: You were being an idiot! What the (F-word) difference does it matter if he was an NFL star? That is the problem with many of us Whites: We look at other things besides race, when race is the primary loyalty. I say, don’t be offended by me calling you an idiot. Because I remember the case, too, and, yes, I thought the black jury would look beyond race and do the right thing. Yep. You have company; I was an idiot, too.

      • Whitetrashgang

        I was a kid and there were no negros for 1000s of miles in Canada.Now that I am 33 I would burn them all at the stake.

        • John R

          OK. So you are a Canadian. Sorry then for calling you an idiot. You didn’t know. As you said, you rarely encountered black people ever. All you knew about American blacks then was what was probably broadcast to you by our American media stations that you watched. I am ashamed to say, I didn’t have your excuse. As an American, even years ago I should have known better about our black people, their true nature. Anyway, peace, and thank you for your reply.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        I agree. Why get upset over a mudshark if you are a white man who cheers for black football players? I think the two deadly sins feed off each other and influence each other.

        • connorhus

          I agree with that completely. How these White Men who idolize the Black Sports star can look at themselves int he mirror is beyond me.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Fortunately, some white men don’t idolize these ball chasing thugs, me among them. I get disgusted with how many whites over this very dangerous and self-destructive behavior. it puts our women in close proximity to these apes, when they are most impressionable and vulnerable. That is why at my employer there’s the likes of this young, very good looking white girl who very publicly shows her preference for blacks. I give her a disgusted cold look every time she walks by me. She would have no problem finding a white boyfriend or husband, but she disrespected all whites doing what she did. I wouldn’t touch her with a ten foot pole if I was a young man.

          • Stan D Mute

            There is a good film you should see. “Big Fan” A typical white sports fan idolizes negroes, sees one of his negro heroes, follows him, and gets his @ss beaten so badly he’s hospitalized. I have no respect for white men who cheer for negroes.

        • juju444

          I am confused…please define mudshark.

    • DonReynolds

      I thought maybe you liked his movie roles.

      • Whitetrashgang

        No I was a kid and a huge NFL fan, for me it was no different than Robert blake getting away with murder. I saw maybe one black while growing up, one seriously. The rest were on TV so I didn’t understand.

  • freddy_hills

    No matter how much DNA evidence proves OJ murdered Nicole, blacks will be on Team OJ.

    No matter how many witnesses testify Zimmerman was defending himself, blacks will be on Team Trayvon.

    • Truthseeker

      I remember watching Twitter during the Zimmerman trial. While one of the witnesses was testifying that he saw Trayvon beating up Zimmerman, they were saying “this guy needs to stop lying.” The idea that Zimmerman actually could’ve been acting in self-defense wasn’t even on their radar.

      • Ron Cheaters

        Yes. And looking like a thug, behaving like a thug, casing people’s homes like a thug, and throwing punches like a thug. Doesn’t mean you’re a thug apparently.
        OK

    • Ron Cheaters

      So true

  • Simonetta

    I remember the OJ trial as the story that didn’t make any difference to anybody and wouldn’t go away because the MainStream media was too lazy and too “me-too” addle-brained to actually cover the real news stories that were happening in the world at the time.

    Between OJ, the idiot Palestinians, and JFK Jr. you have the entire 1990s mainstream news program’s contents. None of them meant squat to anyone twenty years later.

    The opportunity cost of having the news organizations obsessively covering 90s fluff stories is that the missed the most important story of the decade: the transformation of Communist China from a dirt poor backwater run by psychopathic cult warlords to a modern rich and powerful first-world technocracy in less than a generation. That was a world transforming event that was completely ignored by the media. It was 90s fluff that caused most people to start discounting the importance of the mainstream media and led to the rise in importance of internet-based web sites such as this one.

    As far as OJ himself, did he do it? Who cares? A buxom bimbo mates with a big black buck who makes millions of dollars bashing the snot out people for the entertainment of people who find this kind of stuff amusing. Then a few years later she finds herself dead in disputable circumstances. Who cares? Only the blacks would think that this is somehow important, or is a metaphor of “society’s inherent racism”, or whatever.

    When OJ was found ‘innocent’, I was actually glad. Because it meant that the circus was finally going to leave town.

    • John R

      And don’t forget the even more important story of that decade: The rapidly changing demographics of this country. In two or three decades, we went from an over 80% White nation to a barely two thirds White nation and that percentage is still falling.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      OJ was not found “innocent.”

      He was found “not guilty,” which is not the same thing. It means the prosecutor did not make the case to the jury.

      • DonReynolds

        If he had been tried in Scotland……the verdict would have been “not proven” and we could say he got off…..”Scot free”.

      • [Guest]

        The prosecution did make the case, though. It’s just that the jury dismissed the facts because the murderer was black.

        Black first. Truth second.

    • DonReynolds

      Oh wow…..you did not even mention the historic Million Man March on Washington in 1995, which was practically carried live, with long tiresome speeches by Louis Farrakhan, surrounded by all the Fruit of Islam bodyguards and thugs.

  • Truth Teller

    It wasn’t a victory for blacks, especially in California and specifically Los Angeles. It came just 2 years after the Rodney King riots made it perfectly clear to the world that Los Angeles was ruled by black thugs and their jewish commie leaders like Stanley Sheinbaum, marxist economist married to the Jack Warner movie fortune.

    I live in Los Angeles and lived there then. I don’t know anyone in city goverment, but here’s my my take on why the DA allowed the trail to take place in the blackest courthouse in the county instead of Santa Monica where it belonged. It has always been my opinion that the black and jewish leadership including Stanley Sheinbaun went to the Mayor, DA, business leaders like Eli Broad, the Chandler Otis family and others and simply told them that if OJ were not aquitted they would unleash another riot. So it was arranged to have the trail in the courthouse located in the blackest court district and a jury of 11 blacks in a county that was 10 percent black at the time.

    The elite went along with the OJ aquittal. But it was the end of hiring blacks for goverment jobs at all levels. The hispanics were hired for all goverment job openings and began their ethnic cleansing of S. Central, Watts, Compton, Carson and other black ghettoes.

    The police got their revenge by ignoring crime for a few years. Why arrest or even stop and question a black when they might end up like Mark Furhman? Believe me, blacks became very confident about invading wealthy White areas for a few years. It was just revenge on all the elites who love black criminals and hate the White goyim.

    I made a bet of a nice dinner and a movie that OJ would be aquitted when I saw the attorneys. On OJ’s side, 2 White men and one black who was not affirmative action but an excellent proven attorney. And on the prosecution, 2 affirmative action attorneys, a White woman and a black man. I won of course. Remember, It was a White woman, Ms. Clark who decided to trash Mark Furhman as a racist. She hoped to curry favor with the black women on the jury by trashing a fellow White.

    Living among the jewish feminazis of West Los Angeles area, I truly enjoyed the show as
    all my jewish feminazi black worshipping friends struggled with the fact that a black man actually did murder 2 Whites including the ex wife who he beat while they were married. In this case, woman trumped black man.

    Darden, the ineffectual black DA ended up hated by the black community. But he got a good book deal that enabled him to move out of the Carson ghetto to a nice White area. He ended up as a token attorney in a big law firm. He didn’t have to do any actual work, just be their affirmative action token.

    Despite the OJ trail and the evidence of wife beating, the White women of America like the idiots most of them are ended up voting for Obama.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Most white women, like all blacks, worship King Obama. A You tube video of Obama drowning kittens wouldn’t dissuade their adoration of him.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        MOST white women? I don’t think so. Most white women voted for Romney.

        • connorhus

          How about Most single White Women worship Obama? Does that ring more true?

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            If it is true, then I support the statement. But then it needs to be stated that way. But let’s not overlook the overall percentages which completely negate the above poster’s point: 35% of white men voted for Obama and 42% of white women voted for him.

            I don’t even think women should be voting. But I also don’t like comments that make white women enemies of white men. We need to work together.

          • connorhus

            As I said above you need to break those statistics down to see which way the problem is going. When you break down not only by gender but by age the disparity becomes much higher. This is why it is a real problem for Whites as the older Women keep dying off the younger numbers become more and more important.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Yes, but people DO tend to get more conservative as they age.

            Older conservative women will in the main be replaced by younger liberal women when the younger women go through the typical maturation process and emerge from the cocoon of experience in a different form. . . as middle aged conservative women.

            I do not see your cause for alarm.

          • connorhus

            The cause for alarm is that it is growing. That specific demographic is not following the trends of the ones before it.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Apparently your original comment has been removed, I apologize if I misremember it.

            But I do not understand your point. So I remain ignorant of your cause for alarm.

          • connorhus

            Who knows at this point. The censorship around here is, well, hard to figure out and never seems to be dealt out in an even spread so /shrug.

          • connorhus

            Also Gallups Gender gap for 2012 was the highest gender gap for all races in total. 2012 actually showed a slight decrease in the White gender voting gap (Down to 7% from 12% in 2008 if I remember right) but that was due entirely to Married White Women not the younger Single ones.

            So why the overall problem with the White Female vote may not look as bad on paper when you combine age to the formula it waves a large red flag.

          • Stan D Mute

            Not necessarily. I’d like to see the role motherhood plays. I suspect it plays a bigger role than age. A white mother of white children has to be pretty evil to act against their future. Then again, she may suppress thought of the issue unless forced to confront it. Female psychology has never been my strongest subject – do mothers’ instincts for protection of their children overpower cultural programming and herd-thinking without outside prompting to think explicitly in those terms?

          • connorhus

            Oh I can show you several White Mothers right now who are actively working against their White Male Child’s future and sleep quite well at night over it. They are all employees of the State EEOC and not a one of them will admit they are helping destroy their own children. All they see are easy money and pension plans.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I have known a lot of white fathers who vote Democrat as well. This doesn’t meant most of them do so. Just because you know some people in your life who do something, doesn’t mean they are representative of most.

          • connorhus

            One can only give those observations they have seen. However since I have never seen it work in reverse that in itself shows something as well.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            You have never seen white fathers who are democrats? I have seen plenty, outside of Alabama mainly. But that doesn’t mean I am going to use that as gospel. Instead I go by voting stats.

          • connorhus

            Oh I know of a few. But very few who actually have sons when you get right down to it and that maybe a point worth looking into. White Fathers of daughters are usually very Liberal in their views I have found. I could theorize why but of course there would be no data to back up my conclusion no matter how obvious I thought it was.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            connorhus, I am not saying this to be disrespectful. You have been very kind to me, so please don’t take this the wrong way. But it seems that your facts keep changing each time we discuss this. We were discussing something completely different but within the realms of the same topic under another article. To give just one example, earlier here you mentioned that the gender gap is the worst ever among whites. Now you are saying that what you meant to say was that is has become the worst ever for all the races. I have been noticing this pattern in your comments the whole time we have been debating. You start off with a pretty bold claim, but then later in the argument start refining your point more and more.

          • connorhus

            Courtney my statement was true, at least according to Gallup, I just continued to break it down to show you cannot take the general statement and then apply it equally to all sub groups. Perhaps I was not as explicit as I should have been but it does make a difference as you can see.

          • Stan D Mute

            I don’t care if it “rings” more true – my question is whether it IS more true. Does the process of becoming mother to white children change the political views of white women? I pray it does, but I’d like to KNOW.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            Stan, it seems to me that women being married, mothers, AND /OR older, causes them to vote more conservative. To be honest, here in Alabama, I really don’t notice any difference at all between how the sexes of our race vote. But that is just here. Yes, white women here are softer on issues like animal rights etc….. but not when it comes to politics.

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        Back in November 2008 i was still living in Italy and travelling extensively around Europe for work, mostly Switzerland where we kept our main office.
        Europe being Europe you can only imagine how despised W was but still i was shocked to see many many women from pretty much every walk of life literally glowing and jubilant about Obongo election.

        The only people who seemed iindifferent or downright annoyed were the Swiss…i always liked the Swiss

    • DonReynolds

      Yes, I was suprised that the “jewish feminazis” would side with OJ, since one of the victims was a nice jewish boy, named Ronald Goldman, who worked as a waiter.

    • LHathaway

      Yer the first one to tie OJ to Obama, that I’ve heard.

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      Most white women didn’t vote for Obama. Where are you getting “most” from?

  • IstvanIN

    Blacks have no respect for life. When Simpson was found not guilty the blacks at work just cheered and hooted and hollered like something out of an old National Geographic film about natives. The rest of us stayed quiet. Even the Hispanics were cowed by their behavior. They are not us in any sense of the word.

    • Kenner

      One of my blue-black co-workers shambled around wagging his pink tongue like a flag saying ‘He got OFF!! He got OFF!!’
      O.J. killed two attractive young whites, so it was like a twofer.
      I lived in L.A. at the time…

      • Ron Cheaters

        Have you read OJ’s book “If I Did It”
        I have a e-version here. I might be convinced to upload it if there’s sufficient interest.

        But it basically describes how if he did it all the ways he would have done it better by covering his tracks. Worth reading though if you’re into pathology.

        • Kenner

          His first book was ‘Let Me Tell You’.
          The joke title for the sequel?
          ‘Don’t Make Me Tell You Again, B:#@h !!’

  • Katherine McChesney

    I believe O.J.’s son, Jason, murdered Nicole and Ron Goldman.

    • Whitetrashgang

      No not at all I watched the trial being to end and it was painfully obvious he did it.

  • Rhialto

    He butchered a White man, and he walked. The Blacks cheered.
    He was sentenced to a long imprisonment for armed robbery under somewhat mitigating circumstances. The Blacks yawned.

    What conclusions do you draw?

    • Geo1metric

      “What conclusions do you draw?”

      That for us, separation is the only answer.

    • Ron Cheaters

      Once a black, always a black?

    • juju444

      There were many ‘blacks’ who didn’t cheer, just as there were many whites who did cheer.

  • LACountyRedneck

    I was working at USC at the time and was in a large lobby on campus with about 30-40 people standing in front of a large TV set, possibly a big-screen, I don’t remember. I actually thought he was going to be convicted of murder and when they announced the verdict most of the negroes standing there became excited. They seemed to be a combination of shocked, happy, and in celebration. I was also shocked and remember saying out loud, “WHAT!?”

    • In other words, you were reacting like an intelligent white person.

  • John R

    I will say one positive thing about the OJ acquittal. For me, it was the beginning of my racial awakening. Yes, at the time, I seriously believed that the blacks on the jury would look past race and do the right thing. When I heard the verdict, and saw the reaction of most black people, I finally realized how racist and hateful most blacks were. Nothing we had done for them meant anything. Race was everything to them. They had the mentality of “them against us” and stood united. From then on I drifted more and more into race realism. I am sure my experience was not unique.

    • Rhialto

      Another point is how quickly the verdict was reached; it was a few hours after the jury was charged. The Blacks, either because of stupidity or contempt, didn’t even pretend to consider the complex evidence.

      • John R

        Point taken.

  • TheCogitator

    I never had any doubt about the outcome. When people would talk about it, I would just remind them there were nine negroes on the jury. It was preordained. If it happened now, the blacks would do the same. There are more differences between us than many people realize or would admit.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      The celebrate violence, Michael Vick being just one example among many. Anything vulgar, idiotic, sick, or twisted is what they worship. An absolutely loathsome, disgusting, stupid group of people.

      • TheCogitator

        An excellent job of describing them. They are as useful and mosquitoes and sand spurs.

      • juju444

        Do you have such a low opinion of black people? I mean, I loathe Michael Vick, but I would hate him just as much if he was a white boy! It sounds like you need to get your white sheets out of storage!

  • Alucard_the_last

    Blacks have really bad karma and as a result, they are victims of their own immature, barbaric behavior. Murders are seen as something to admire while hard work is ‘acting white’ thus avoided. Damnation is theirs. The race card won’t work in hell.

    • Geo1metric

      “The race card won’t work in hell.”

      It’s hell right now in the U.S., and the race card is working pretty well.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Damnation will not wait that long for them. You can count on that. What they will face before their deaths will just be a warm up for the hot reception in the basement level of HELL that awaits them.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        I love how you have visual additions to most of your posts. It adds a nice touch.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          I do that for emphasis, and I believe some among us are literally demon spawn.

    • Dave West

      I wonder if they serve skittles and iced tea in Hell?

      • Ron Cheaters

        Yes, but its sugar-free.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Most people still believe that the black football legend killed his white ex-wife and her friend, polls show.

    I remember hearing an interview with Fred Goldman, Ron Goldman’s father, about a year after his son’s killer walked.

    He said one of the things about the whole outrage that bothered him the very most was constantly seeing his son namelessly depicted as “Nicole’s friend” by the press.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      The blacks were delighted by three things: OJ got off of murder rap, OJ butchered a white woman, and OJ killed a Jew boy. For blacks it was like three for the price of one. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the black community that united or filled with joy in my life. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 didn’t even come close.

  • NotTooSwift

    I have never witnessed a more disfunctional group of people than those who participated in this trial. From Judge Ito, who had no control of the entire Charlie Foxtrot to Marsha Clark, who was banging the black guy. You know, the black guy who told Simpson to try on the gloves. Then there was F**ked-up Fung, who screwed up the the crime scene so bad that I am sure books will be written about how not to do what he did or did not do. How about the detective who threw evidence (shoes) into the trunk of his car, no chain-of-custody, no nothin?

    Of course the drunk F. Lee Bailey added more icing on the cake. Then there was the egotistical Mark Furman who rounded out the circle of weirdness. That guy is, to this day, considered an expert. Don’t forget “Suitecase Kardashian (sp?). He’s now gone, but we are being haunted by his progeny.

    Say what you want about Johnnie Cochran, but he kicked butt and got the a**hole off. Speaking of O.J., he was about the only person who conducted himself in a professional manner. All he did was look interested and “doodled” on the legal pad…and he kept his mouth shut. Alfred Hitchcock could not have written such a tale. It was inevitable the trial ended the way it did. I was sickened by the incompetence of the State and I am not in law enforcement.

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      I was very young when the trial was on, and the main clown I remember was Kato Kaelin. Was he on drugs or something? Even at my age I could tell something was off.

      • [Guest]

        Are there any drugs strong enough to turn someone into Orenthal Simpson’s houseboy? The guy was simply a moron.

  • Evette Coutier

    I was the only white standing in a room of blacks when the OJ verdict was announced. The room erupted in cheers, and several of the blacks said, “OJ got away with killing a white bitc&”, “Phuced that white bitc& up.” They acted like animals celebrating OJ getting away with black on white murder. This is the reality of black mentality.

  • MekongDelta69

    …the idea that white and black people often look at the same facts and see different realities.

    Facts are FACTS.
    We see FACTS.
    They ‘see’ what they WANT to ‘see.’

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    “He (OJ) lived a lavish life in L.A., sunny skies, beautiful women…

    He lived a lavish life in WHITE West L.A., far from “his own people,” blacks.

    And why DA Gil Garcetti moved the trial to downtown LA to make sure the jury wasn’t White; he got what HE and the defense wanted, a mostly non-White jury of mental midgets. Prosecutors Marcia “You may not like me for bringing this case” Clark and Chris “Nobody wants to do anything to this man!” Darden aided and abetted the defense with jury selection:

    Don Vinson, head of Litigation Sciences, assisted the prosecution team, led by Marcia Clark.

    The advice he gave was ignored, the prosecution had their own ideas of a pro-prosecution juror.

    Vinson felt African American Women would be strong Simpson supporters, Clark thought otherwise. Vinson found African American Women were more tolerant of physical force within a marriage, saying

    ‘In every relationship, there’s always a little trouble’

    ‘People get slapped around, That just happens’

    Vinson was dismissed after one and one half days of jury selection.

    Marcia Clark thought that African American Females would be :

    More likely to have experienced domestic violence in the past, and therefore would judge O.J. more harshly than males. She was guided by her own ‘Implicit Personality Theory.’ One perceptual problem Marcia Clark had is that the African American Female Jury members held a negative opinion of the lead prosecutor, referring to her as a ‘castrating b****,’ who was attempting to smear the reputation of an African American celebrity.

    Judge Ito also helped lead defense lawyer Johnny Cochran, his former boss, by making the trial about whether Mark Furman used the “n” word 10 years previously and not about a cold blooded murdered who had almost decapitated the mother of his children, and Ron Goldman, who was stabbed almost sixty times: in his neck, which severed his jugular vein

    Former law professor Bill Handel says that law schools use Ito as an example of what NOT to do in a court of law.

    OJ Simpson should be sitting on California’s death row; I hope he dies in prison, the same way Ron and Nicole died.

    Never forget.

  • JohnEngelman

    “A lot of inner-city kids and adults are taught not to trust the system, not to trust police; as a young black person you’re going to be found guilty before any evidence comes out because you’re black,” she says.

    – Jesse Washington, Huffington Post, June 8, 2014

    A young black male who is taught to fear the police more than other young black males has been raised incorrectly.

    • Dave West

      Oh yes, the black mistrust and fear of “the system.” Anything blacks don’t understand they perceive as racism and their is a lot they don’t understand. To blacks everything is racial, from being honked at while “driving,” to a football coach playing a white player over a black one.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    OJ Simpson proved blacks can murder whites in the most savage manner imaginable, and get away with it. He also exposed not only the anti-white justice system for what it is, he also exposed blacks as the enemy they are of all whites.

    • LHathaway

      What if OJ didn’t do it. For that matter, what if the whole episode was faked? The most interesting response to the entire ‘manufactored’ story was one I only heard about. Apparently, on one of those Ricky Lake style daytime talk show, they had on a ‘white supremacist’ guest and his angle was that he was glad OJ murdered her.

      Blacks and white supremacists do have a lot in common.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        He did it, the evidence against him was overwhelming. There is no way you can virtually decapitate someone without getting her blood all over you. The blood of the other victim was all over him too. Plus there is a prior history of domestic violence on the part of Mr. Simpson. Then the truth came out when he was involved in that armed robbery for which he will die behind bars. Like many blacks, he thinks he can outsmart the system, well his psychopathic nature got him locked up where he belongs.

  • A Freespeechzone

    This isn’t any difference than the Trayvon Martin incident….frankly, many blacks felt that this black POS was justified in attacking George Zimmerman and still would have supported Martin had Zimmerman been murdered.

    Make NO mistake, many negroes feel justified in attacking and killing Whites because they ARE Whites….

    Best reason to insure that you are always prepared to defend your person if you are White.

    • LHathaway

      Life in America would be exponentially easier if we were simply faster runners than they are. To be honest, unless robbery is the motive, I bet they don’t often make a big effort to chase you down.

      • Dave West

        Speed is the one advantage evolution dealt to negroes.

  • MBlanc46

    I suspect that the Simpson trial was the event which demonstrated for the first time to many white Americans just how racist black Americans are.

    • CourtneyfromAlabama

      I was young, very young, and I remember how shocked and angry I felt. I also remember how most of white America reacted.

    • Evette Coutier

      If you compare racism by percentage of ethnic group, white are by far the least racist group. And that’s the problem.

      • Ron Cheaters

        When white’s are offended, they “banish” you. When blacks get offended they kill you. When muzzies are offended they “honour” kill you.
        I’ll take the banishment thank’s.

  • DonReynolds

    I remember it well……he was acquited by a jury of 10 black women, 1 black man, and 1 hispanic woman. I seemed to be the only person in my area that was unsurprised by the verdict. What did anyone else expect with a jury like that?

  • LHathaway

    “white and black people often look at the same facts and see different realities”.

    Black people are unable to see reality. Whites see some of reality but must keep this knowledge a secret unable to ever express it. A click on AmRen affirms to the reader that they are not alone, as repugnant as it can sometimes be. But generally not as repugnant as reality.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Robert Kardashian was OJ’s defense attorney. Is it any wonder that his daughters have the current preferences they do? Just a thought. Not that I really consider them white anyways.

  • Carney3

    The prosecutor of Charles Manson, Vincent Bugliosi, was so enraged by the pathetic incompetence of the prosecution that he wrote a book about it. From Wikipedia:

    “Bugliosi wrote a bestselling book, Outrage, on the acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman, in which Bugliosi asserts Simpson’s guilt, and criticizes the work of the district attorney, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and Judge Lance Ito; he uses these profiles to illustrate broader problems in American criminal justice, the media, and the political appointment of judges.

    Bugliosi is very critical of prosecutors Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden and points out what he regarded as glaring mistakes that they made during the trial. He faults them, for example, for not introducing the note that Simpson had written before trying to flee. Bugliosi writes that the note “reeked” of guilt and that the jury should have been allowed to see it. He also points out that there was a change of clothing, a large amount of cash, a passport and a disguise kit found in the Bronco, of which the jury was never informed. Bugliosi also takes Clark and Darden to task for not allowing the jury to hear the tape of Simpson’s statement to police about cutting his finger the night of the murders.

    Bugliosi writes that the prosecutors should have gone into more detail about Simpson’s abuse of his wife. He writes that it should have been made clear to the mostly African-American jury that Simpson had little impact in the black community and had done nothing to help blacks less fortunate than he. Bugliosi points out that, although the prosecutors knew that Simpson’s race had nothing to do with the murders, once the defense “opened the door” by trying to paint Simpson falsely as a “leader” in the black community, the evidence to the contrary should have been presented to prevent the jury from allowing it to bias their verdict.

    In several books, Bugliosi has written that, when preparing a case for trial, he starts with his final summation. In this book, he stated that, if he had been prosecuting the case, he would have put at least 500 hours of preparation into his final summation, and that it was obvious that Clark and Darden had waited until the night before to prepare for it.

    Bugliosi writes at length about the allegations that LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman had planted a bloody glove in order to frame Simpson. He argues that in order for Fuhrman to do this, there would have had to have been a broad-reaching conspiracy between Fuhrman and the other officers who worked the case. Bugliosi points out that it was highly improbable that Fuhrman and anyone else involved in the case would have tried to frame Simpson, as California law of the time provided that anyone who planted evidence in a death penalty case could have faced the death penalty themselves.”

    • Ron Cheaters

      I have that book and it is worth reading.
      How he ever got the Manson plan for Helter Skelter was genious… but he did it… and he proved it.

  • Truth Teller

    have you ever seen the movie Bernie? It is based on a true story about a very nice man who killed a nasty older woman. The man was so popular around town that the District attorney had to ask for a change of venue. He was convicted, his hometown friends were outraged. There was one line that applies to the OJ jury “non one brain among the 12 of them.”

  • Evette Coutier

    Blacks and whites do see things different. Whites saw the DNA evidence in the case as conclusive. Blacks saw the DNA evidence and said, “All that science don’t mean Jack. It be planted by racist cops. What is DNA anyway, just some white man’s voodoo.”

  • Truth Teller

    Katherine McChesney
    I’ve heard the Jason did it theory too. He had no motive and he did not leave his job until about 20 minutes before the murder. If he drove fast he did have time to get there, but there was no blood in his car, none of Nicole’s DNA found on his person or clothes and most of all, he had no motive as OJ and Jason’s Mother broke up about 15 years before the murder.
    Nicole and Goldman’s blood was found in OJ’s house, car and on his clothes.

    • Stan D Mute

      Watch the full documentary. Also watch the doc on the white serial killer who was in town at the time and could have been paid to hit Nicole. He had info he should not have had if he weren’t there. Either way, OJ was at least an accomplice and therefore guilty.

  • Funruffian

    I won’t forget when an older friend of mine, who passed away 4 years ago, told me after we were discussing the LA Rams’ lackluster history. The only Superbowl they made was in 1980. My friend was at that game. He remarked, ” I was at that game in the Coliseum. Standing behind me was OJ Simpson and the woman he killed.”

  • Truth Teller

    Carney, I read the book by Bugliosi too. He wrote that the prosecution was incompetent. I have always felt that Ito, Clark, Darden and Garcetti planned to get Simpson aquitted to avoid another riot. It is a proven fact that the affirmative action black scum working in the DAs office leaked information to the defense. In 1994 Los Angeles county goverment was more or less a black monopoly. I think abut 40 percent black and almost everyone hired after 1975 black or White female marxist

    Marcia Clark’s claiming she thought black women would be sympathetic to a battered wife was ridiculous. Marcia Clark was a good looking young White women attorney who knew perfectly well she and other White women like her were absolutely hated by the affirmative action sows in the DA’s office and police department.

    • LHathaway

      Don’t you mean she was hated by the ‘other’ affirmative action sows?

  • Truth Teller

    Some of the other books written about the case point out that the black baliffs were going back and forth between the sequestered jury and the defense. Ito got rid of 2 jurors early on. One was a hispanic woman. Her black co workers claimed that she had made anti black racist remarks over the years. When these lies were brought to Ito’s attention, he dismissed that juror. Another was a black man who had 3 foster children, one White and 2 hispanic. Ito got rid of him early on when the other black jurors reported that he and his wife seemed affectionate towards the foster children during the weekend family visits.

  • Truth Teller

    For a long time there were rumors going around Los Angeles that somewhere hidden away in the police evidence storage is the knife OJ used covered with Goldman’s and Nicole’s blood. At the time, virtually every evidence clerk and LAPD civilian employee was an affirmative action black.
    By the way, Furhman was not the lead detective.

    • Dave West

      Even if they had the knife as evidence the negro brigade that made up the jury still wouldn’t have convicted him. In fact, if there was a video of O.J. committing the crime and he told the courtroom that he did it the jury still wouldn’t have convicted him.

  • Anon

    What the OJ Simpson case proved is that white people should wipe blacks from the face of the earth because they are monsters.
    What does it mean to be a “monster”? First of all, it means to hold an identity other than human. Whatever black people think they are, it is quite clear that, universally, they consider themselves as “other” than white people. That means, by their own choice, they are not of us and have no right to exist wherever we are. More to the point, they act on that. They are at war with us. A genocidal war they wage to the exact extent of their power to do so. The only reason that isn’t taken seriously is we are so much stronger then they are. Make no mistake though. That makes them an existential threat.
    In very real terms. If ever their power becomes appreciable, they will genocide us. There can be only one response to such a thing. Such has been obvious for going on a thousand years now. In the last 50, however, it has reached a crisis stage. White people will have to choose….us or them.
    Being monsters means we can not appeal to goodness, decency, love or anything else positive. In fact, I argue long and hard that those things are euphemisms for white and that other races are only capable of being those things. It isn’t normal for them. Blacks, by contrast are different than all other races. They are NOT capable of those things.
    The OJ Simpson case was NOT about blacks and whites seeing two different things when presented by the facts. Both white people and black people agree when lead down the logic train. The difference is, black people ENJOY the thought of raping, murdering, torturing and butchering a couple of white people. They think that is AOK and sense that white people are too weak to do anything about it. In other words, they are monsters.
    This is not a dispute. Not a conflict. There is no resolution. You kill monsters or they kill you. Don’t agree? Then you might as well dig your own grave.
    Blacks won’t even give you that basic decency. They can’t. That’s something human beings do. Or rather, it’s something white people do and all other races except blacks are capable of doing but would rather not.

    • sddasasd

      Why don’t you get started then?

      • sddasasd

        I mean, I do agree with a large part of what you’re saying- blacks and whites are, for the most part, fundamentally different and a disturbingly large number of blacks carry a deep-seated hatred of whites, to the point where they’d cheer on one of their own for getting away with murder of two white people. We can’t coeexist, simple as that.

        But then there’s this whole thing about all of them being “monsters” and blacks alone carrying these behaviors (looking at many parts of latin america, or the behaviors many non-black peoples throughout history, I’d disagree) and that we, when you get down to it, need to exterminate an entire race. I have to disagree.

        You tell someone like me to dig their own grave, but I have a better solution- since the last thing white nationalism needs is paranoid psychopaths openly advocating mass genocide, perhaps you can dig your own grave, and afterwards, swallow a bottle of xanax, or a jug of bleach, or a bullet. Or walk into rush hour traffic. There’s plenty of possibilities.

        • superlloyd3 coon

          Blacks have never created civilisation ever nor can they maintain it when it is handed to them on a plate viz. All of SS africa, Haiti, Detroit etc. Look at what happened to Zimbabwe – the breadbasket of Southern Africa and what’s happening to South Africa as we speak. Localised agriculture was non existent prior to the advent of the European in Africa; Subsistence pastoralism being the norm.

          What remains of these “developed societies” in Africa? Only a few crude artefacts. No architecture, no art, no literature, no science, no legal codes, no philosophy etc. Granted, the last four areas are pretty difficult to perform when writing is absent.

          Blacks en masse in western society are a negative force in economic, cultural and social terms. They can’t compete in modern societies so should be repatriated to their glorious motherland and left to fend for themselves where their cultural expression can bloom without being stymied by evil YT.

          The point about Caucasian and Mongoloid historical barbarity is that both groups have advanced and tried (and to some extent succeeded) to transcend their wanton bloodlust through experience and the institution of legal checks and balances. Blacks haven’t and can’t.

          Let them sink or swim by their own efforts. Whites are sick of supporting the dead weight of useless, lazy, whining parasites whose contribution is overwhelmingly negative and destructive to civilised nations.

    • LHathaway

      We’re all monsters. .

    • sddasasd

      Thought I’d revisit this post.

      6 upvotes. Not a single other person calling it down.

      I really hate what Amren has become. This site used to be the best white nationalism has to offer. Ever since it went Disqus, all sorts of vermin and psychopaths have been airing their insanity. People cheering on Ebola. People openly calling for genocide.

      “Anon”, LHathaway, benvad, Zaporizhian Sich, and the other 3 guests- the white race would be truly improved if you all committed suicide.

  • Alexandra1973

    There’s evidence that OJ’s son Jason did it. http://nypost(dot)com/2012/04/01/o-j-is-innocent-book/

    Still, there’s the hazard of interracial (especially black/white) relationships, and if OJ covered up for his son he’s guilty of obstruction of justice.

    • Stan D Mute

      There is ample evidence OJ visited the crime scene. It’s also clear he wasn’t the only person there. So whether Jason committed the murders or the serial killer who may have been hired to do the job, the end result for Simpson is that he is guilty as an accomplice at minimum. The big take aways are the gross incompetence of the police and prosecution as well as the response by Africans to the verdict.

  • fgbrunner3

    The case showed that many African Americans are so alienated from society that they are not able to act rationally.

    • sddasasd

      Yes, white society. They’re alienated because they’re not compatible with it.

  • TrayvonCohen

    “Nine jurors were black, two white, and one Hispanic.”

    That explains everything.

    • Alexandra1973

      I was reading the book that Ron Goldman’s father Fred wrote about the case, and Fred Goldman recalled one of the jurors throwing up a “black power” hand sign.

  • Ron Cheaters

    20 years later I guess that mouth-breather Kanye is fighting the fight against tacism by marrying that Kardashian.. not that I care, they make me want to rip my eyes and ears out. Just saying its bizarre.

    • Cid Campeador

      KIm Kardashian is a typical example of the waste of beauty on a cretin. We can thank her father who was OJs Kiss Butt. The family had some potentially fatal attraction to Afros.
      Armenians are a very close knit ethnicity and most Armenians I know are married to Armenians; the few who aren’t are married to Italians.

      • Alexandra1973

        When I hear the name “Kardashian” the word that comes to mind is “race-traitor.”

        Okay, *one* word. There are a few others too.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          How about mudshark?

        • Stan D Mute

          The word that comes to my mind is “Bangkok trans-sexual with sixteen pounds of silicone injected into its ass.” Wait, that’s eleven words isn’t it?

      • Stan D Mute

        “Waste of a beauty”? Wow. I guess as they say in the car business, “there’s an ass for every seat.” But I’m pretty shocked that there could be a white seat for that ass..

  • benvad

    I’ve been waiting for this article for years. Reason being is that when this verdict was announced June 8, 1994 was the day that I came to the truth about blacks. Before that day, I bought into all the Cosby Show mythology and media hood winking of what these things are really like.

    Growing up in Canada we had more then our fair share of hubris & condescension towards Americans (Southerners in particular).

    I thought that they were without cause or reason to act against coloreds as they did, but after seeing the joy and the enthusiasm of one of their own getting away with slaughter of two innocents, I finally saw their true soul. It’s as evil as the bible says they are, and the Mormons were correct with their judgement of this race.

    Again id like to apologize to all Americans who’ve been slandered by ignorants like myself, who didn’t know the real problems that whites have to face.

  • alwaysright21

    coalburning whore killed by jealous buck, what a cliche

  • LHathaway

    “when I saw him, I saw myself”

    You have to admit, the media can still be entertaining. . .

  • Brian

    I wonder how many of those in the free-the-Juice peanut gallery realize that their lack of concern about the crime and their pure tribalism is part of what makes me dislike them in the first place. I don’t like murderers getting away with it and laughing it up, regardless of melanin. I wouldn’t want OJ or Butch Cassidy to be my neighbor, but they don’t care, because ‘he black’. Disgusting.

  • Truth Teller

    DA Garcetti did not move the OJ trial downtown from Santa Monica so Clark and Darden could stay close to the main office. He agreed soon after the arrest to move the trial downtown so as to have an excuse for a black jury. Marlon Brandon’s son’s murder trial attracted as much media attention as OJ and it, like the Cheryl Turner and other celebrity trials was held where it belonged in Santa Monica.
    Santa Monica courthouse is far better for a media circus than downtown because there is no space for a media encampment near the downtown courthouse. SM courthouse is located in a 4 block long 1 block wide parking lot with plenty of space. There is a lot of office space in the SM courthouse. Right across 4th street is a large office building that always has lots of empty space that could have been rented. There is also a big hotel where rooms could have been rented for additional space.

    The LADAs office has used the SM courthouse office space and the media has used the parking lot for 70 years of celebrity trials. There was no practical reason at all to move the trial downtown.

    The fact that the downtown courthouse is right up on the street instead of in a 4 block long parking lot meant there was no open space for the media encampment.

  • Truth Teller

    Thank you Carney for pointing out that gender is a grammatical term that has nothing to do with sex. I used to do so, but I stopped because no one cares or gets it.
    Transgender????? The proper meaning would be someone unfamiliar with French or Italian and didn’t know whether a noun would be le or la or un or une.

  • Truth Teller

    WR_the_realist Question Diversity • 10 hours ago
    “The defense was delighted because they had done focus testing and understood the hatred that black women have towards blond white”

    Surprised they had to do focus testing. That is a natural fact, like the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. As a White woman attorney surrounded by black women goverment workers in the DAs office, Marcia Clark, like every White women who works with black sows had to know how much the affirmative action black women hated her and every other White women in the DAs office

  • Truth Teller

    One thing the prosecution and defense collaborated on was the re decoration of OJ’s house for the jury. Ito allowed the defense to give the jury a tour of OJ’s house. With the cooperation of the DAs office, the house was staged to appeal to blacks. The place had numerous pictures of black celebrities and preachers such as Jesse Jackson, Sharpton and others. There were also large bibles placed around to appeal blacks bizarro version of Christianity. The most marginally competent DA would have checked the house before and insisted on the pictures and bibles removal. The jurors were not shown the bloodstains on the light wood floor which were still there.
    The Jason theory is nonsense. He had no motive and would barely have arrived at the time of the murder. The murderer was lying in wait in the bushes on the right side of the house when Nicole opened the door for Goldman.
    Jason arrived home about 15 minutes after he left work with no blood stains, not agitated, calm and normal.
    At the time I worked in the medical center abut 4 blocks from Jason’s restaurant. I live in the area. Nicole’s house was on Bundy, a major north south street. I have driven on Bundy many times before and after the murder. Even at 10/30 pm it would have been a stetch for Jason to get from Westwood to Bundy in time to commit the murder and get away. Antoher thing, there is little streeet parking in Westwood village. Everyone who works there has to park in lots several blocks away and it takes time to walk those blocks.

    By 2000 I remember several blacks admitting to me that they thought OJ was guilty.
    I too hoped there would be a White awakening because of the OJ trial. But 24 years later we elected the jewish commie front man Obama as president and then re elected him which is worse.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      “Frogman”.

    • Stan D Mute

      I find the serial killer’s admission more plausible. But a negro known for psychotic episodes and having an obsession with knives deserved at least a very close look. He didn’t get it. He was never investigated. Yet someone else was there. Who?

  • Truth Teller

    The Kardashian girls are half Armenian (central Asian White) and on their Mother’s side, Scots and English. The laws of genetics decree that girls look like their Fathers and boys look like their Mothers. So they look Armenian. Remember, the girls are half Scots/English and after the divorce they were brought up by their Scots English Mother and stepfather Bruce Jenner. Jenner is an English name.

    One thing I like about the immigrant invasion of California, the White immigrants may be total corrupt crooks, but those Russian, Armenian, Persian and Israelis would never allow their daughters to look at a black. Don’t blame the Kardashian women’s Armenian blood on their diving into the sewers for husbands. Blame their Scots English Mother and English stepfather.

    • Alexandra1973

      I’ve heard it said that newborns look like their fathers, but my son looked more like me when he was born, so that makes sense.

      He’s going on 13 and he’s starting to look more like his father. Same big hands and feet. 🙂

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      I don’t care what their ethnicity is, I would sooner stick my hand in a riled up yellow jacket nest before I’d be around any of them. They have eyes like a shark’s, and they appear to be really narcissistic too.

    • Pelagian

      Good Point. Same thing is true with the Bosnian invasion in St. Louis, as far as I can tell. I’ve never seen one with a black. So they introduce a good, white, often blue-eyed stock into the St. Louis gene pool. Just have to hope they convert to Catholicism gradually through inter-marriage. But given how tepid most Catholics are post-Vat II, I fear the marriage converts may be the other way around … to Muslim.

      • I see some Bosnians around here, and some of them look like native St. Louisans. One thing you have to give them credit for is stopping the southward spread of the undertow by planting themselves in and around Bevo when they first got here. But now that they’re starting to have kids that were born here and they’re getting school aged, and the SLPS is not acceptable, they’re migrating to Affton and Bayless.

  • Gus Baker

    A little OT here guys, but I’d like some of your input. My cousin, who I am real close with, is marrying a black woman. He even asked me to stand up in the wedding. All of my family (for the most part) is against this, but they are still going to the wedding because “it’s family, and what can you do?”

    I am not going to the wedding, nor would I stand up in it. It does suck tho because as I say my cousin and I were very close, my whole family is very close, and tho they disagree with this wedding they think I am wrong not to go to it, what would any of you do?

    • Harry

      As I have said in an earlier reply to someone else also commenting, I would much rather have a member of my family either marry someone who is Jewish, of Italian heritage, of Greek heritage, of Albanian heritage, or of Portuguese heritage, than ever marry a black man, because at least, their children would still be white like me.

      I also said I would much rather have a member of my family, even convert and marry a white person who happens to be a Mormon, even though I would not be allowed to attend the wedding, even if I wanted to. Because even if their children were brought up as Mormons, they would still be white like me.

      Gus, I would be very interested to see your comment on my reply. Thank you very much.

    • Sloppo

      I have a niece who seems delusional enough about race to do something that foolish. We’re very close friends now and I do a lot to help her when I have the chance. If she were to actually make the same decision as your cousin, I’m pretty sure that I would not go to the wedding and I would no longer consider her to be a part of my family. Nevertheless, I would feel very sad about losing her and I would be willing to go to her funeral if her new husband happened to murder her.

      • Gus Baker

        Well, I can’t shun the guy, that would mean shunning my whole family, as I say, we are all close, I’m hoping he won’t go through with it, still 2 months to go, they got engaged after knowing each other for 3 months, will be married before they’ve even known each other for a year, so even the race thing aside this whole thing was a bad idea.

        As I say, I can’t outright shun him, but there’s no doubt it’s changed our relationship and I rarely see him anymore.

        • Sloppo

          If my niece were to do that, I would still want to be polite to her without necessarily considering her to be part of my family. I have to admit though that I would probably end up having to avoid her most of the time because I would not want to see the results of her decision. I hope your cousin comes to his senses before it’s too late.

    • Alexandra1973

      Don’t go. People like that have to learn that they can’t expect people to accept their poor choices, just because “they’re family.” Any relative who goes, IMO, is being an enabler.

    • LHathaway

      Go to the wedding and celebrate the tiniest sliver of ‘equailty’ you are ever likely to see in this insane, and insanely unequal world. If you feel you must expose your cousin to some ‘race reality’, at some point, in an effort to reduce the odds he’ll be killed, that would be up to you.

    • Stan D Mute

      I’d explain that he’s not just marrying her, but also her entire clan of negroes. And all the spouses, cousins, and friends of her clan of negroes. I’ve known some really upstanding Africans. Wouldn’t for a nanosecond consider sleeping with any, but good people nonetheless. The problem is that once you move a bit into their world it becomes more Afro-chaotic. And as you move outward in concentric circles from the few good and decent Africans it very very quickly begins to resemble Haiti or Detroit. Your cousin’s decision invites that into your family. His girl may be that 1 in 10,000 African, but I’d bet dollars to donuts she personally knows rapists, drug dealers, welfare queens, burglars, and a murderer or two. By bringing that home, he draws a target on not just himself, but on every white person in his family and even on his negro girlfriend.

  • Harry

    Just maybe if black people would not condone, but even condemn those of their race who commit crimes of violence such as robbery, rape and murder. Would not make heroes out of such black violent criminals as O.J. Simpson and cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal(whose real name is Wesley Cook). Just maybe, if black people would start to pull themselves up their own bootstraps and get off welfare, like other minorities have done such as Italian-Americans, Jewish-Americans, and Asian-Americans. Just maybe if black community leaders would urge their people to reform themselves to be better citizens, instead of always blaming everything on “whitey”. Just maybe if black people would stop complaining about American slavery before the American Civil War, but instead support human rights causes to combat the 21st Century slavery that is happening around the world today. In other words, just maybe if black people would start to behave themselves, then maybe everyone else would start to respect black people, rather than dislike them.

    Wow, a naive idiot I must be!

    Oh, wait, I am in the wrong universe. I must have accidentally slipped into a portal to the parallel universes either of THE BRADY BUNCH, THE PARTRIDGE FAMILY, or that parallel universe of NARNIA, that is ruled by the talking lion Aslan!

  • Michael Whalen

    A little insight from Fuhrman’s book, Murder in Brentwood. He said that one mistake the prosecution made was to stress the domestic violence aspect of the case. Fuhrman said that most juries would not be overly concerned by the idea of a black man beating up his white wife. Imagine that.

  • Michael Whalen

    Come to think of it, I would have voted for acquittal also. The slut had it coming. Her sister, Denise isn’t much better.

  • Truth Teller

    Kato kaelin gave excellent circumstantial evidence. OJ dropped him off at their home and left. About 1 1/2 hours later, shortly after the estimated time of the murder OJ ran past his room in the back of the property banging accidentally on the wall. Kaelin’s testimoney proved OJ was away from home a couple miles away at Bundy at the time of the murder.

    • Stan D Mute

      That doesn’t even begin to make sense. He dropped the guy off and 1.5 hours later bumped into a wall – thus proving he killed his wife. Really? Sounds like the time I slammed my door and made President Ford trip on his way down the steps of Air Force One.

  • Truth Teller

    Gus Baker a major problem I hope you will not involve yourself in is the fact that so many black children end up in the care of relatives in lieu of foster care because their parents are so incapable. Southerners on this website report all the time of seeing middle aged White women with half breed grandchildren. When the black kids end up in the care of relatives the black parents end up harassing the relatives and causing endless problems.

  • Tardola Anthony

    Hey i have a question for you all. I know i might be getting off topic here but since we’re talking about crime here, how come this organization has not said a word about the Las Vegas killings? I mean you had two “WN” types go about gunning down two white decorated police officers and an innocent white bystander who try to defend them. What is your take? I’m just curious!!

    • r j p

      My take? You are a troll.

    • Stan D Mute

      A street performer meth head who was thrown off the Bundy Ranch for being a nutjob? I looked at his Facebook site and he was NOT a white nationalist. He was more the CopBlock type than he was any sort of conservative. I’ve never heard of a conservative who didn’t support law and order nor one who was a meth addict street clown. His favorite band was “Tool” and there are photos of him wearing a beanie that has “Tool” emblazoned on the forehead. I think that pretty well sums him up right there.

      Once again, the whackadoodle social leftists see one of their own go off the deep end and try to spin it.

  • Jacobite2

    Blacks have lived in the US for 300 years, and they still reject white society entirely. Races do not co-exist peacefully. although the violence might be low-intensity.

  • Truth Teller

    This is from CNN, might not be true.
    Majority of African-Americans now say O.J. Simpson was guilty
    CNN ^ | 06/10/2014

    Twenty years after the start of the O.J. Simpson murder case, attitudes towards Simpson and towards race relations in the country have dramatically changed, according to a new national poll. Monday night’s release of the CNN/ORC International survey comes just a few days before 20th anniversary of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, the former football star and actor’s ex-wife, and of Ronald Goldman. The case against Simpson and the ensuing more than eight-month-long criminal trial, dubbed the “trial of the century,” engrossed the nation. Simpson was eventually acquitted. According to CNN polling in 1994, a large majority of whites…

  • Truth Teller

    I just had a look at the latest Jason did it book by some idiot named William Dear. The publisher should have employed a fact checker. First and foremost Dear claims that Jason was at work in a Beverly Hills restaurant at the time of the murder. He did not work in Beverly Hills, he worked about 5 miles west in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Westwood. Dear claims that Jason planned to cook a family dinner that night. He did not, he went to work in the restaurant as usual. Author also, like many who do not bother with the truth wrote that Furhman was the lead detective. He was not. He worked out of West Los Angeles station. He was the homicide detective on call that night. The lead detectives worked out of Parker Center downtown and took over from Furhman about 2 hours after Furhman arrived.

    If the Jason did it author can’t even get the name of the city Jason worked in right and the names of the lead detectives right, how can anyone believe anything they write.

    • Stan D Mute

      What difference does it make? If OJ’s psycho negro kid killed his white stepmom and OJ helped cover it up, the serial killer was paid by OJ to kill her, or OJ did it himself, it’s twenty year old news. At minimum OJ was an accomplice and thereby guilty of murder. The serial killer was executed. And OJ’s psycho kid is best avoided at all costs anyway.

  • Stan D Mute

    There is a pretty well made documentary out recently that gives me pause. It concludes that there is/was some very compelling evidence against OJ’s older son by another female. This one has some violent psychotic episodes in his past and has a documented obsession with knives. There was also a serial killer known to have committed other murders in the area at the time and who admitted he did it before he was executed. That one was/is buttressed by others who claim that one of OJ’s associates was trying to put a hit out on Nicole for OJ and the serial killer happened to get paid for his work that night. The one thing beyond dispute is that the cops and prosecutors did a truly horrible job on the case from basic investigation through jury selection and trial.

  • Michael Whalen

    Another thought. Simpson’s two half breed children are at the age right now that they can put two and two together. They have to know now that he committed the crime.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    “It becomes a very complex study in American history,” says Ronnie Duncan

    There’s nothing complex about it at all. It’s one of the least complex things in the world — blacks will almost always side with blacks regardless of evidence or qualifications. How much more evidence do people need on this “complex” matter?

  • Truth Teller

    Stan Mute
    I checked out the documentary by William Dear. He has so many elementary facts wrong. He claims Jason worked in a restaurant in Beverly Hills. He did not work in a restaurant in Beverly Hills. He worked in a restaurant in the Westwood neighborhood about 5 miles west of Beverly Hills. He claims Jason planned to cook a family dinner the day of the murderers. Not true at all. There was a dinner, but it was at Mezza Luna on Brentwood av near Nicole’s home. He claims Nicole Brown did not attend the dinner. Not true, Nicole was at the dinner with her family at Mezza Luna.
    Jason had no plans for that day but to cook dinner for customers at his restaurant in Westwood, not Beverly Hills. he did own knives, but he is a professional chef and all chefs owned their own knives, so do most minimum wage cooks. The knife in a leather sheath he claims Jason used to kill Nicole? My brother in law has several knives in sheathes, they are fish knives, very narrow and sharp.

    Are you black? The Jason did it idea was first bruited about by Los Angeles blacks.

    If Dear cannot even get the elementary fact of what town Jason worked in, how can anyone believe he had anything to do with it.?
    Furhman was not the lead detective either. In fact he left the scene and had nothing to do with the investigation as soon as the lead detectives from downtown left.
    If you are White, you know that TV documentaries seldom tell the truth. Dear just has so many facts wrong.

  • jwald1

    Is this an aryan nation or American nazi site? Just guessing based on the comments…

  • Ron Cheaters

    The high-class one’s would probably think a taxi was not up to the high standards.