The Next Trayvon Case About to Explode?

WND, January 26, 2014

A racially charged shooting incident in North Carolina with eerie parallels to the Trayvon Martin drama has ended in the same way–with a jury refusing to hand state authorities the politically pressured charges they sought against the shooter.

In a decision angering the NAACP and other civil-rights activists clamoring for “justice,” a Charlotte grand jury has declined to indict Charlotte Police Officer Randall Kerrick for voluntary manslaughter in the shooting death of a 24-year-old black man who refused to obey orders to stop after police responded to a robbery call.

Jurors thought the evidence presented against the white officer did not support the manslaughter charge. As WND first reported in October, evidence showed authorities overcharged the shooter, who claimed self defense. Kerrick faced a prison sentence of up to 11 years.

Still, state authorities plan to resubmit the charge to a new panel of grand jurors scheduled to meet on Monday. The NAACP plans to protest outside the Charlotte courthouse during their deliberations.

During a local black church rally Thursday night, about 150 civil-rights activists organized by THUG–True Healing Under God–threatened to boycott the city if jurors fail to indict Kerrick for a second time.

Charlotte NAACP President Kojo Nantambu called the jury decision “despicable,” asserting, “Something is wrong with the system that we live in . . . something is wrong in this country.”

Rally organizer John Barnett, founder of THUG, said Ferrell would be alive if he were white like Kerrick.

Jonathan Ferrell and

Jonathan Ferrell and Randall Kerrick

“I’m trying to figure out: What does 14 jurors and one attorney general don’t see that people in Africa see?” Barnett asked. “That all of us see. What do they not see?”

{snip}

Kerrick was charged in connection with the Sept. 14 shooting death of Ferrell, a former Florida A&M football player who dashcam video shows violently charged Kerrick and other police officers.

Kerrick repeatedly fired at Ferrell with his gun after a Taser failed to stop him and after Ferrell failed to show his hands. Though Ferrell was found later to be unarmed, Kerrick and others who viewed the video insist the use of deadly force was justified.

As WND reported, the video shows Kerrick first opened fire after Ferrell–who was much larger than Kerrick–charged him while ignoring commands and concealing his hands. Kerrick fired more rounds after Ferrell continued to move forward to the point where he made physical contact with the officer.

{snip}

Ferrell may have been under the influence of controlled substances.

Witnesses reported to investigators that they saw Ferrell, who had dropped out of college, drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana in the hours before he crashed his car at an entrance to a suburban Charlotte neighborhood that Saturday at 2:30 a.m.

The police chief, who is African-American, still has not released the results of the toxicology report.

At least one resident of the neighborhood reported Ferrell acting violently several minutes before the confrontation with police.

A 9-1-1 tape reveals a frantic call from homeowner Sarah McCartney, who was home alone with her 1-year-old son while her husband was traveling. Through tears, she reported Ferrell trying to kick in her front door in what she thought was an attempted robbery. Banging and yelling can be heard in the background.

“I need help!” McCartney can be heard pleading with the operator. “There’s a guy breaking into my front door, he’s trying to kick it down!”

The 9-1-1 tape refutes the initial narrative told by the NAACP and the media, who claimed an injured and stranded Ferrell rang McCartney’s doorbell seeking help only to have McCartney slam the door shut after seeing a black man.

{snip}

A number of black activists posted McCartney’s home address along with photos of her home on social media. As a result, a number of vehicles have driven by her house harassing her family. They have had to hire security for protection.

{snip}

Experts say they’ve never seen a police officer charged so swiftly in a shooting. Normally investigations into police shootings take weeks, if not months.

Yet Kerrick was thrown in jail within hours, bypassing the usual lengthy interviews by internal affairs. Authorities said they wanted to avoid any “ambiguity” as outrage in the black community grew and the NAACP and other groups threatened protests.

{snip}

The NAACP wants the charges against Kerrick elevated to murder. Anger in the community may grow if charges are dropped completely.

{snip}

In fact, footage from a dashboard-mounted police camera shows officers commanded Ferrell at least three times to stop before Kerrick fired, but Ferrell continued to advance in a threatening manner toward them. Another Charlotte police officer, Thornell Little, fired a Taser at Ferrell before Kerrick resorted to using his firearm.

{snip}

The NAACP, however, insists it was an “execution” of a black man in “cold blood.”

“There is no evidence that shows Jonathan Ferrell should have been shot at all, but for officer Kerrick to shoot 12 times and striking Mr. Ferrell 10 times indicates more than a reflex, it smells more of hatred and rage, which shows that Mr. Kerrick was predisposed in killing a black man and did so with extreme prejudice,” the NAACP’s Nantambu insisted.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • D.B. Cooper

    Boo hoo!
    What about THESE crimes?

    • LHathaway

      Exactly, Mr Cooper.

    • Fathercoughlin

      Not a priority for Nambu Mubootu or whatever his name is.

    • Long Live Dixie

      Who’s that on the right?

    • Boris McGuffin

      Is there a website where a comprehensive list of such atrocities is maintained?

      If not, there ought to be. In fact, it would make a nice addition to AmRen. It would have to be updated daily, of course.

      It’s tough going, looking at the pictures of the victims, and then at the perpetrators, but white America should really have to choke it down and start confronting facts.

      • ColdSoldier

        Try: Council of Conservative Citizens, DailyKenn, and Chimpout.

  • sbuffalonative

    The 9-1-1 tape refutes the initial narrative told by the NAACP and the media, who claimed an injured and stranded Ferrell rang McCartney’s doorbell seeking help only to have McCartney slam the door shut after seeing a black man.

    Ah yes, ‘the narrative’. We can’t discuss facts, we have to be lectured to about ‘the narrative’.

    • Laura Dilworth

      so, kerrick may become a fugitive, like z-man

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Oh yeah, Trayvon–part deux.

        • Laura Dilworth

          unbelievable

    • Who Me?

      Smart lady, Mrs. McCartney. If she had let him in the “narrative” would only have been that another young White mother was found in her home, raped and murdered by another black. The usual.

  • Diana Moon Glampers

    THUG is going to boycott the city.
    Can I sign my city up?

    • sbuffalonative

      THUG–True Healing Under God

      I see blacks are once again trying to take control of their word.

      • Non Humans

        Yeah but theyll never own or take control of the word that describes them best (both physically and behaviourly) and are also their closest biological kin: Apes.

    • NotTooSwift

      I’m moving my family to Charlotte if the boycott goes into effect.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yeah, real estate prices would shoot through the roof.

      • Garrett Brown

        It’s a great city to live in. Third fastest growing economy in the union.

    • Fathercoughlin

      At least they’re demonstrating a bit of honesty:the thug is the hero of the black community.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It would be like an LGBTQ boycott. They turn into buy-cotts.

  • It can’t be the next Trayvon case.

    That’s because the Most Holy Name of Trayvon has been Traydemarked.

    Not original on my part, so don’t give me credit.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Still, state authorities plan to resubmit the charge to a new panel of grand jurors scheduled to meet on Monday. The NAACP plans to protest outside the Charlotte courthouse during their deliberations.

      And if that doesn’t work they plan to try him on hate crimes legislation, and if that doesn’t work they plan to use the full power of the office of attorney general of the United Jiggy States to find some other way to crucify a good White man trying to do his job.

      • ncpride

        They did indict him this afternoon on voluntary manslaughter charges. No surprise there. I knew they would get him one way or another. For the record folks, before this story went national, there were several officers who came forward and stated their colleague was being thrown under the bus due to PC. They have since went silent, and I suspect they were threatened. They are not allowed to defend one of their own, nor are they given a chance to do so publicly, while race hustlers and the media get to smear this man anyway they please. But what’s new?

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Look at the face of this poor scapegoated “witch”.

          This is the face of all of us. That look of shocked betrayal. The face of WHITE GENOCIDE, just as surely as the Knoxville Horror victims.

          Nail him up boys. The blacks want more flesh, demand more blood. Give ’em up this one…

          No White civil servant is safe from BLACKS IN CHARGE!

          • NeanderthalDNA

            You’re country despises you. Your people have abandoned you.

            You are “evil”.

            Now hide and pray it doesn’t happen to YOU.

            But it will…unless you live in a gated community. But even that will cease to protect you when enough MEN like this are thrown onto the burning alter of DIEVERSITY.

        • This is absolutely sickening that good people have to go silent.

    • r j p

      My first thought as well.

      Still trying to figure out why a thug, most likely athletic sKolaship student, just drops out of his HBCU Kollege.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        1. Too stupid even for that.

        2. Gittin’ crunk!

  • ncpride

    Not satisfied with the first grand jury decision NOT to indict this young officer, the DA re-submitted the same charges today to a second grand jury who has indeed indicted him of voluntary manslaughter. The local coverage of this story is exactly what you would expect: One sided, full of half truths, and no unbiased reporting of the facts. Poor black guy gunned down for no other reason than being black. It’s disgraceful the way it’s reported on, and I blast every news site that has a comments section. I’m sure I’ll be banned soon, but oh well.

    • Tom B.

      If only the South had won it’s independence!! We would not be enduring these indignities.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Look at the way the first story I clicked on Google News presents this…

        http://www.reuters[dot]com/article/2014/01/28/us-usa-ncarolina-police-idUSBREA0R00820140128

        Completely refused to give any version beyond the “get whitey” angle.

      • Anon

        Part of the lies told about our history is that the south was anti-black while the north wanted free blacks running amok. As made clear in various speeches and letters by Lincoln, the goal was not to free slaves but to eliminate the institution of slavery and purge all blacks from the border of the US. The south did not want to do that and it wasn’t for economic reasons. It was because southerners, although anti-black in general, loved “their” blacks. They made the unpardonable sin of making black slaves a part of their families and did not want to give them up.
        All of that should not mattered. Before the Civil War a deal was struck. The US would buy every slave, paying top dollar for them. Every slave owner would be forced to sell. All these bought slaves would be forcibly relocated to Liberia with a generous allowance to get them started in their new country. Free blacks would be encouraged and later forced to re-locate.
        That was the plan and the South agreed to it. A small group of southern n***** lovers absolutely would not part with their “families”, probably because of miscegenation and waged horrific acts of terrorism…bombings and murders to foment the Civil War. The Civil War should not have happened…but, after the atrocities it became personal.
        The South lost…badly. And STILL would not give up their blacks. The war ended slavery but Lincoln’s assassination prevented the forcible expulsion of blacks. Essentially, nothing changed. Blacks went nowhere. The very next day, they were back at work for their adopted fathers, only their legal status was changed.
        Loving blacks and providing for them is a wicked act with specific punishments the US is now experiencing. For all the posturing, the problem is mostly southern whites who hate blacks but love “their blacks”. A race map of the US census reveals this in depth. Blacks live in Dixie and nowhere else except a few inner cities they were shipped in as biological warfare weapons by communists.
        Had the south won its independence it would be Liberia writ large.

        • jeffaral

          If the South had won the war, they would have annexed all ot the Caribbean. Southerners can’t live withouth their blacks.

          • Tom B.

            I have often wondered why the Yankees didn’t take all the blacks back up North with them after the war. They stole everything else the South had, why not the dearly beloved slaves that they so righteously freed. After twelve years of reconstruction, an era of heavy handed rule where whites were disenfranchised and blacks placed in positions that they could no way handle. For twelve solid years the North could have done anything they wanted to–including forcing the Negroes to another country or as I said, take them home to be treated as equals—isn’t that what your egalitarian ancestors believed? Every insane, politically correct, liberal, Marxist idea that has destroyed our country was given birth in the North. You people still want to blame the South for all the problems that beset our nation—I just can’t figure out why. Truly amazing and disappointing that I see such grotesque ignorance and dishonesty still exists in that section of the country that brought all this misery down on us. I think it is time for me to depart from further participation on this website—it is foolish to believe that you people will ever change—it is the Yankee, not the blacks who will destroy and is destroying this land!

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            I wouldn’t blame everything on the Yankees. Wasn’t it Lyndon Johnson, a southern democrat, who signed the civil rights act of ’64 and the immigration act of ’65 into law?

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Anon is a slimy antifa agitprop troll. That’s my take. Anon…yeah right, sounds like some wannabe “hactivist” basement bum on a pathetic messianic bong binge.
            See my post to Tom below.

          • Tom B.

            Yes, you are right and I do not include any politician as an example of the South—we all know that the only thing lower than a politician is a child molester. But come on!! The South as a region has had no political power since the Civil War. Virtually all political power has resided in the North and all major political decisions have been dictated and controlled by Wall Street and the power elite. No independent Southern politician has ever or will ever be allowed to gain any significant power in Washington D.C.—which means the ones who get to the higher positions are bought and paid for. I quit voting in 1994. It was at this time I came to the conclusion that elections at the national level are a scam. Also remember—Lyndon Johnson and his civil rights act could not have been passed without the support of northern republicans. He met solid resistance from Southern democrats and knowingly threw his own party under the bus—it was his civil rights act that allowed the republican party to take the South. The republican party was birthed in evil and has not changed–the democrat party once upon a time was pretty decent, but has become even more corrupt than the repubs. I honestly don’t know what can be done to save our country, but as long as the Blue States hold all political power, we are doomed!

          • jeffaral

            You’re repeating another myth: “Blame it all on the Demoncrats”. Texa has been since ages a republican stronghold; look how it’s becoming a province of Mexico. Secede Texas and it wil be annexed to Mexico.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Texas has been reliably Republican in US presidential contests only since 1980. I don’t consider that to be “ages” ago.

            An independent Texas will easily be able to repel a Mexican annexation.

          • Tom B.

            I don’t know how you got that. I despise both parties. Back in my voting days I always voted Republican even though my parents were good ole Southern Democrats. As I stated there was a time when there were some good Democrats ( a long time ago!). My mistake in voting Republican took a few years of research and observation to realize they were no good either. I no longer vote. The game is rigged and only those candidates from both parties are selected by virtue of their being under the control of the ruling elite, whom I believe are the heirs of the same men who promoted the Civil War, but I won’t go into that. Suffice it to say that I consider both parties the flip side of the same coin! We are given no real choice–it is an illusion to think there is a significant difference in the two parties. The only things they disagree on are wedge issues like abortion, or gun control–it keeps the masses in one corner or the other. A total fraud– the whole system!!

          • John K

            It was governed by democrats in the 80s and early 90s.

          • Long Live Dixie

            In addition to what Tom B. has said, it should be remembered that Johnson himself realised his policies were anti-Southern. After signing the so-called civil rights act he said, “We have lost the South for a generation.”

          • Who Me?

            Johnson was a Texan. Haven’t we all had some recent examples of what happens when Texans get into the White House?

          • Long Live Dixie

            Haven’t we all had some recent examples of what happens when Texans get into the White House?

            I’m tired of hearing this. George Bush is from New Haven, Connecticut. The Bushes have no roots at all in Texas or anywhere in the South. They are nothing but Carpetbaggers.

          • jeffaral

            Texans are a joke: too fat to run, too slow to think, but full of bravado. Jorge Bush junior is a typical Texan.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Jorge Bush junior is a typical Texan.

            This myth props up again after I just posted that Bush is from Connecticut? Look it up yourself. The Bushes are old stock New Englanders.

          • Svigor

            ‘Cept he’s a New England Yankee.

          • texasoysterman

            What do you know of Texans or Texas?
            You are a jacka**.

          • John K

            And where are you from, a**wipe?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Johnson was the most corrupt American president in 100 years. Barry Goldwater was stunned at the depths LBJ would sink to.

            Then PBS makes LBJ into a saint on the American Experience: 1964.

            I barfed out loud.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I’d neither blame North nor South or blame both. Hindsight 20/20, you know?

            I’ll never deny that the South did some very unwise things, but I’d never argue anything but the same in regard to the North.

            Enough of this. It was a LONG time ago and we’re all WHITE and in very real danger NOW.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Enough of this. It was a LONG time ago . . .

            The Yankee domination of the South started a long time ago but it is continuing right now. It is absolutely false to suggest that Southerners grievances against the USA and Yankeedom are issues of the past. They are very much issues of the present day.

            . . . we’re all WHITE and in very real danger NOW.

            That’s true, but it is also true that we are in very real danger largely because of Yankee liberalism. I have heard the argument a million times that we should put aside our differences and unite with the Yankees. Nonsense! That would be suicide for the South.

            1) The Yankees are a domineering people who are stronger than us and outnumber us heavily. They do not wish to unite with us on fair terms for a common good. They wish to dominate us and take our land from us.

            2) The Yankees are habitually liberal, particularly on racial matters. Uniting with them means lurching far to the Left.

            3) Assuming that we need to unite with anyone, why unite with the Yankees over any other people? There are several white nations that are far closer to us culturally and ethnically. The only “closeness” we have with the Yankees is that we are in an involuntary union with them.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            2014 – 1876 (arbitrary end of reconstruction) = 138
            Compared to broad scope of history it happened yesterday. Compared to the average human lifespan it may as well have never happened.
            Based on the postings I think the agitprop has succeeded.
            I’m a Southerner. Believe me, I get it. Old WT Sherman burned my city to the ground. One of my ancestors, who had been a consul to Genoa, Italy, supposedly ran the Genovese flag up and saved the house by lying to the Yankees and telling them he was their Consul, according to family legend. Because of the near total destruction, Columbia, SC didn’t even have an historical preservation movement until relatively recently, too late to save the Herbemont house and vinyards from something far more destructive than Sherman – progress, lol… Nice office building, I suppose.
            As much as I love my heritage and hate the hypocrisy of the conqueror…
            Enjoy sniping at each other because some agitprop or fool (what’s the difference) got y’all all riled up and slinging names and accusations back and forth.
            From my understanding WT Sherman was none too happy about what he did, by the way.

          • Long Live Dixie

            You are talking about the past. Though the past is reason enough to sever all ties with the Yankees, you really aren’t getting it. I am talking about our present and our future. Being tied to the Yankees is killing us right now, in our day and age.

            We are a people denied our self-determination right now.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I’m not adverse to an eventual break-up of the United States. Not at all.

          • Brian

            What is the plan to form the Republic of Dixie? The only scenario I can see is waiting for the financial collapse of the USSA, and then rebuilding from the chaos.

          • Long Live Dixie

            The only scenario I can see is waiting for the financial collapse of the USSA, and then rebuilding from the chaos.

            Essentially, I think that’s our best bet in that I do not think Dixie will be free until either the late stages of the US’s collapse or after the US’s complete collapse. But rather than waiting for that to happen, Southern nationalists need to be educating, organising, and radicalising the Southern people. There needs to be a nationalist infrastructure and a large base of Southern nationalists ready to take over from the departing USA. And that is just what we are doing now. The Southern nationalist movement is getting back on its feet after almost fifty years of slumber.

          • Svigor

            It’s not really the past, when Yankees have denied that they’re responsible for turning blacks loose on America, denied it right up until the present. Hard to move on when Yankees still won’t own up to their guilt.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I remember as a kid, some distant relatives from outside Dixie visiting, all hepped up on anti-South black loving propaganda. My crazy red headed Scarlett O’Hara mother did not evince that old tradition of Southern Hospitality after they insisted on trying to “educate” us about our “shameful” history and I never heard from them again. Good one, mom!

            Regardless I’ve come to know many many many modern day Yankees, some transplants, some visitors, others good folk I’ve met when travelling outside Dixie (many right here for that matter) who LOVE the South and highly regret what happened.

            I ‘ve moved on, brother Svigor. Not worth it in my opinion. Many Yankees I’ve known agree 100%.

            “Ain’t no redneck like a New Jersey redneck!” one once told me over a few cold ones…

          • Long Live Dixie

            When you say you’ve moved on what you are saying is that Southern interests are a thing of the past – something to be moved on from – something to be overcome in the name of modernity.

            No one denies that there are some inoffensive Yankees (though I refuse to consider any “transplant” as inoffensive since they are colonisers of my land). Yet, the same could be said of blacks, Mexicans, and any people; there are always going to be inoffensive people within groups whose interests oppose our own. The existence of exceptions does not compel us to be politically connected to a different folk in an involuntary union in which we are outnumbered and subordinate.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            John C. Pemberton

            “At the start of the American Civil War in 1861, Pemberton chose to resign his commission in the Union and join the Confederate cause, despite his Northern birth and the fact that his two younger brothers both fought for the Union. He resigned his commission, effective April 29.[1] His decision was due to the influence of his Virginia-born wife and many years of service in the southern states before the war.”
            Yankee by birth, Southern by the Grace of God. As Tom B. points out below, the difference is more ideological and personal than simply residential.
            I had ancestors who fought on both sides. You wouldn’t want to exchange some Southern Whites for some Northern Whites?
            Yes, I do fervently believe things have changed. I see White kids in Michigan waving the stars and bars

          • Long Live Dixie

            Again, you are focusing on a small number of exceptions. For every one Pemberton, there are 1,000 Yankees who truly believe that if Dixie re-asserts her independence, then the only answer is to engage in mass slaughter yet again. And those people are not just racial liberals. I have seen exactly that attitude from Yankee white nationalists. There is a clash of civilisations between us and the Northerners. It is not a new thing. Even in the earliest days of English settlement the Northern and Southern colonies came to blows over such issues as egalitarianism, parliamentarianism, hierarchism, and religion.

            Now, to a more fundamental issue. There is no such thing as a Yankee becoming a Southerner (by the grace of God or otherwise). There are admittedly a small number of Yankees who have a more Southern outlook. But the Southern people are a tribe – a folk. Admittance to the folk is not based on ideological conviction but rather on birth. By birth I do not mean location of birth, I mean blood and ancestry. Similarly, if I decided that my outlook is more, let’s say, Greek, I can’t just move to Greece and say I am Greek by the grace of God.

            Any distinct white nation of any size deserves its own living space and deserves to be able to govern that living space as it sees fit – at the exclusion of other nationalities. Why should Southerners be an exception? And why are people always calling for us to unite with Yankees when we have far more in common with our Anglo-Celtic brothers in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and other places? If we had to unite with anyone (which we don’t) it would be those people of very similar stock and with no inborn hatred of our people whom I would choose.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            OK, well, I’d argue that White Americans of whatever region have more in common with each other than I do with a Greek. Not a fair analogy.

            My primary loyalty at the moment is to the White race and I say this because we are more truly endangered than ever. I do not believe we have as an option the luxury to antagonize fellow White who are sympathetic to our common cause.

            Things have changed and do change, and too desperate a grasping to a past that is gone will have disastrous results. My opinion.

            Why don’t we assure the survival of the greater good first, of the White race, before we start gearing up for the third battle of Bull Run’s all I’m saying…

          • Long Live Dixie

            Things have changed and do change, and too desperate a grasping to a past that is gone will have disastrous results.

            Again, this is not about the past. The domination of the entire South by the USA, the colonisation of large areas of Dixie by Northern colonists, and the continued transformation of the South into a mirror image of the North are not archaic issues. They are things that are happening today even though the roots of those things are in the past.

            Why don’t we assure the survival of the greater good first, of the White race . . ..

            Assuring white survival is impossible without securing our independence from the USA. As a powerless minority within the forced union, the South’s healthy racialist instincts will forever be subverted or overruled by the more dominant element. We have seen this happen many times before.

            As a Southern nationalist, I see race and nation as being linked. They are not the same as the white nationalists would say. Rather, the survival of my nation (Southerners) automatically means the survival of my race (whites).

            What’s more, the Southern nation is in serious peril by the mass colonisation mentioned above. We can not simply ignore that issue, and other threats to our survival and well-being, just on account of the people doing that to us being white. Dispossession is dispossession whether it is being carried out by Mexicans or by Yankees.

            What’s up with that, sir?

            I generally give a thumbs up only to posts that I agree with and that I believe add a good deal of insight to the discussion. Don’t read too much into it.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            OK, duel cancelled then. Look forward to more discussions but gotta work early despite this snow storm.
            Agreed to disagree,

          • Long Live Dixie

            Agreed to disagree,

            We’ll have to leave it at that for now. I’m sure we’ll have some more discussions on this subject later on.

          • Tom B.

            That’s good to hear my friend and I can concur that I have had similar experiences. But isn’t it kind of like talking about the few good blacks we have known? Do we ignore the majority and base our opinion on the few? How do we ignore the big picture and once again accept an inferior position against a majority of people who will never see us as equals. If I am wrong about this please prove me wrong and I will accept it, but all you have to do is look at the voting results of Blue State vs. Red State–where do the majority of liberals reside. What section of the country has forced us all into this corner we are in, a fight for the very survival of our race. You well know, the black race on its own could never have amassed the power that it has without help from some very powerful allies. Who are these allies, where do they come from? I am not trying to be argumentative for no good reason and I know you are trying to keep the peace for a worthy cause, but do you really think it is possible?? The only way I can see that happening is if the majority of the people in the North abandon their liberal beliefs. I just don’t think that will happen–not in my lifetime.

          • saxonsun

            Not all of us up North. I’ve always lived here and yet I always sympathized with the South. How can a sentient being do less?

          • Svigor

            That’s all any southerner can ask. We’re referring to all the bad Yankees (and they are legion). 🙂

          • Long Live Dixie

            I appreciate your sympathies. As long as Northerners stay in the North and don’t interfere in our business, I have no problem with your people. Like Svigor said, that’s really about all we can ask for.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Said a guy claiming to be from Germany?

          • jeffaral

            I didn’t claim to be german! I just live in Germany for now!

          • Svigor

            Yankees turned ’em loose on everyone. Fought America’s bloodiest war to get it done, in fact.

          • John K

            The south would have eventually sent them all to Liberia, but Lincoln screwed that plan up.

        • The Final Solution

          It’s unbelievable that whites actually paid money to have blacks in their presence. Totally incomprehensible.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Don’t feed the agitprop, braw. Troll alert.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            You do have a nose for the agit-props. Like a bloodhound.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Meh, hard to say, but thanks. Sometimes I like to engage them, either lead them on and then punch them in the nose, or sometimes punch first and see what happens.

            If punch first, then the reaction is critical. Things that interest me…

            1. First, don’t trust Discus. I punched who I now believe to be a bright Scandinavian woman on the “chair” article forum. She said something I later came to believe was a simple translation error on her part, AND had a different discus handle in my e-mail notification from that of the forum than that which she appeared…hmmm… Regardless I apologized after we engaged in a delightful conversation and as a Southern evil Whitey, felt a little bad for punching a girl, lol…

            1a. Something I’m puzzled by – posters for whom NO information appears when I pass the cursor over their names. The nature of their posts run the gamut from suspicious to solid, don’t know whether it’s just ol Discus, or they might have some hacking skills, or if they might be a heavy hitter with some form of posting status not extended to the general population.

            2. Small number of postings. Gotta be careful, don’t want to drive away a sincere newbie, but…content is important.

            3. Too good to be true. Especially if a female. Not unlike life in general, lol… Again though, let not my cynicism cloud a pleasant reality, eh?

            4. Suspicious handles, as I pointed out.

            Much of it is a very squishy and intuitive thing.

            And rest assured that the moderators here are well trained, educated, and have much better tools at their disposal than you or I in this regard.

            Kissin’ moderator butt is also a clue, by the way, HA HA!
            It’s a fine line between vigilance and paranoia, but in that people are indeed out to get us…

            I personally would rather run a questionable-but-sincere poster through the wringer a little and apologize later than get suckered by a real agitprop. The wringer is a good filtration system and I think does not deter the sincere poster once vetted. The sincere poster should appreciate, in fact.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “Kissin’ moderator butt is also a clue, by the way, HA HA!”

            I saw that, too. Goading moderator butt, more like. Two supposed and new lovelies were tag teaming that tactic during the race card project. Two new arrivals were goading JT into getting his race card quote on the record. Hmmmmmmmmm, I said.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yup. Before my epiphany and conversion I engaged in this stuff some, never got paid for it, but was pretty good at it. This helps me, in that I KNOW how they think, and that’s a hard thing to describe, believe me.

            Choice of handle is interesting. Although it’s safer to try to totally blend in, most agitprop sees itself as intellectually superior and likes to leave clues to their true nature they don’t think the stupid Philistines they infiltrate have the brains, sense, or education to pick up on. Which is why anything with “anon” sets my radar off.
            I sometimes used the handle, “ham sammich”, for example, when infiltrating conservative forums, or when engaging conservatives on, for example, The Nation – which used to be pretty open to opposing opinion prior to some time into the Obama administration. I’d parrot the conservatives, heartily agree, but slowly devolve into embarrassing idiocy until I got tired or they seemed to figger it out. Ham Sammich.

            But you know…after engaging in this pathetic idiocy for a while something funny started to happen. My aping of the enemy began making more and more sense…to me…

            Until I came to realize I was the enemy. Method acting can indeed be “dangerous”, lol…

          • AndrewInterrupted

            It sounds like something out of J.D. Salinger’s diary.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Oh, we surely should have listened to Hinton Helper.

          • Long Live Dixie

            You have obviously never experience a summer in the Lower South.

          • The Final Solution

            Why would I want to go there where Africans live?

          • Katherine McChesney

            Hot and humid. Those Alabama summers were horrendous when I lived near Livingston, AL. Drenching sweat.

        • Tom B.

          Sir, I am 63 years old and have been studying and reading everything I can get my hands on concerning the history of my country for well over 40 years. I grew up on a farm where we had blacks that worked for our family for many years, so I know a little about this fantasy you have written regarding the relationship of whites and blacks. I could go into some of the nonsense you wrote on an item by item issue and tear it apart but all I will say at this time is that you don’t know what the hell you are talking about. What absolute drivel!! Where you came up with this garbage is astounding and an absolute lie!! It saddens me that there is such gross ignorance in America. It is the kind of propaganda you spew that will always keep a wedge between the North and South. I will end by just saying—YOU ARE A LIAR!!

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yeah…never heard that version.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Oh, and by the way, Anon is agitprop or idiot.
            Look at number of posts. I know

          • jeffaral

            Hi Tom! Do you deny some proven facts, like e.g that some Southerners even used black mamas as a supply of milk for white babies?

          • Tom B.

            I see nothing wrong with that. If the white mother was unable to provide milk for her child, would it have been preferable to let the baby die? The problem is that the Yankees have no clue what the relationship between blacks and whites was really like in the South. I was born in 1950 and a black nanny ( her name was Suzy Mae) helped take care of us four kids. She ( in her own, somewhat primitive way) loved me and my siblings maybe even more than her own children. People from the North just cannot understand that a peaceful relationship existed between the races. It was not on equal terms, it could not be, for it had been well established for many generations prior to my birth that such an idea would have been devastating for both races. We lived peacefully and worked the blacks and provided housing and even automobiles for them. Medical expenses were low back then and my father took care of all these things for his farm laborers. Contrary to Yankee propaganda, miscegenation back then was rare and the Yankee myths of plantation owners raping black women on a large scale is ludicrous. We are talking about the existence of a complex society that was found only in the South and could be understood only if you lived there. The Yankee has distorted and lied about so many things over the years that finding the truth is very difficult. They will NEVER understand what it was like but they are so damned arrogant trying to explain anything to them is like butting your head against an oak stump. Our countries should have been separated a long, long time ago. I do believe that even if that had occurred, with the advent of technology, and the disappearance of farms that a clash between blacks and whites would have been inevitable. I can’t pretend to know how, exactly, it would have turned out but I do know that the whites would have remained in control. Yankee liberals have so completely destroyed the natural balance of things we are all doomed to watch as our country falls apart. I see no bright future ahead for any of us!

          • jeffaral

            The South had their lovely pet blacks doing the manual jobs, now the whole nation has their lovely wetbacks doing the manual jobs. Looks like things are improving as the whole country is becoming more like the South. If i remember well, South Africa had a similar social system.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Are you for real? Both the South and South Africa had racial caste systems that were designed to maintain racial separation and white dominance. Both systems were undone by outside meddlers.

            You say the US is becoming like the South but you have that backwards. Races are legally able to mix (genetically and socially) now in the South only because the South has become like the North.

          • Tom B.

            Once again, thanks for better explaining something I was trying to assert. I suppose I am attempting to read between the lines from these people and explain how things were in the Old South. When I was a boy, the old nanny I mentioned, was allowed to come in the house and do the jobs laid out for her but she instinctively knew that to sit at the supper table with the white family during meal time was a no-no. She would usually take her meal out to the back porch or elsewhere out of site of the family. The average Yankee would be totally baffled by this I am sure. The reason it was done that way was to keep up the barriers of social separateness. Good people just did not cross certain lines. Yes, South Africa had similar lines and look what a strong country it was until outside meddlers mucked it up just like in our country. We know now that blacks will not tolerate going back to those ways so I don’t see what is wrong with all of them moving to the North to be treated as equals. Either way, they are now and always have been a burden on the white race. During slavery was the only time they provided any real value and it wasn’t much even then!

          • Tom B.

            Well, you just don’t get it. I say let us rebuild the underground railroad!! only this time it can be above ground and provided free, unrestricted travel. We evil, racist Southerners will even help you build it! And as that train, loaded down with free black people is headed North, we will all stand on the platform singing Battle Hymn of the Republic, waving Old Glory, with a huge portrait Abe Lincoln in the background!! Spielberg will be there making a heartbreaking movie and oh what a grand occasion it will be!!, the North will have truly secured a victory for egalitarianism!!

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yeah and they used mules to pull plows and horses to pull carriages too.
            Perhaps they understood something.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Go away.

          • jeffaral

            Where is your good Southern manners? I don’t think Anon is a troll, he/she is just telling some inconvenient truths.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I think he’s an ignoramus if not agitprop. The truth is far more subtle than he presented it and was insulting and needlessly divisive.

            The flip side to good Southern manners is a hearty barrage on Fort Sumter and a blood curdling redneck yell to those who insist on messing with.

          • jeffaral

            Well, now I’m impressed. I’d better retreat….

          • NeanderthalDNA

            As long as we’re having fun, eh?

        • Long Live Dixie

          Wow. How’s that for some revisionist history? I don’t have the time or the patience to refute your nonsense point by point, but I will address the Lincoln myth.

          Northerner white nationalists are always saying that Lincoln wanted to deport the blacks. Well then, why didn’t he? He had unprecedented police powers in his day. He had an enormous military and merchant marine fleet. Why didn’t he round up the free blacks in the North and deport them? Why did he arm blacks and train them as soldiers? Why, in his last speech in April 1865, did he say he supports giving the vote to blacks veterans?

          • Tom B.

            Thanks for joining in brother, you are more capable than I to properly refute these ridiculous allegations. I recall you saying in an earlier post that there would be no reconciliation between North and South?, I have to reluctantly concede to your wisdom—you are right, but I have hoped for many years that a great awakening in the North would open the eyes of their people. If only they could understand what a horrible mistake their ancestors made when they invaded the South and destroyed a civilization that would have sustained the rightful place of leadership with the white race and would never have allowed the darker races to ascend to the level they now occupy. I have been on a ” fools errand”, arrogance and hatred of the South will always blind them to the truth. A few have apparently seen the light, but not enough to significantly alter the character of our nation. The Constitutional Republic the founders gave us was destroyed in 1865 and like humpty dumpty, will never be put back together again. Secession is once again being contemplated by a number of states, even in the North, and I see that as the only viable solution. I recall some of the blue state people praising Obama as the reincarnation of their beloved Lincoln–they could be right!! Even so, I would still opt for separation, even on the threat of another invasion!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            They are doing secession right this time—->incrementally, like the Leftist parasites do.

            City-from-City (Baton Rouge), State-from-State (North Colorado, West Maryland).

            Beat the Left with their own tactics.

          • Tom B.

            I have often wondered at how anguished friends and relatives from North and South must have felt when the country came apart and war loomed inevitable. Imagine what a great nation we could be if the two regions were truly united to end the corruption that permeates our government. It will never happen as long as Lincoln is held in such high esteem. I remember reading somewhere about a Union Captain who upon hearing of Lincolns’ death stated ” I wish they had shot that S.O.B. four years ago, we wouldn’t have had this damn war”. The poor fellow was court martialed for his statement, but at least some were aware of what kind of man he was!! I don’t see anything good coming to America, at least for the foreseeable future, certainly not in my lifetime. The future of the white race is in peril all over the world due to the same Marxist ideology that dominates the U.S.. It seems that Russia may become the last hope for the white race—Putin is doing a lot of admirable things right now—he is in a position at this time to secure a place in history as one of the greatest men of all time if he doesn’t screw it up!! Until recently I would have never dreamed such a thing was possible!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            There is also a lack of ideological competition. If North America were 100 countries instead of 50 states, you would have 100 working models rather than one.

          • Long Live Dixie

            You make a good point. How could we possibly unite with people who hold Lincoln in high regard?

            I also once hoped for reconciliation with them. Then I came to realise that they don’t want anything from us but our assimilation to their ways.

            I think the historical narrative that the original colonies were settled by different people of different civilisations is essential to a re-awakening of the Southern spirit.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Jefferson Davis said it best in 1862:

            “There is indeed a difference between the two peoples. Let no man hug the delusion that there can be renewed association between them. Our enemies are a traditionless and a homeless race; from the time of Cromwell to the present moment they have been disturbers of the peace of the world. Gathered together by Cromwell from the bogs and fens of the North of Ireland and of England, they commenced by disturbing the peace of their own country; they disturbed Holland, to which they fled, and they disturbed England on their return. They persecuted Catholics in England, and they hung Quakers and witches in America.”

          • Tom B.

            Wow!! I must have missed that quote! but he is totally right! Isn’t it amazing how so little has changed in all these years. As far as human nature is concerned there really is ” nothing new under the sun”.

          • Tom B.

            Yes, my friend, you are a very perceptive person. I have tried for many years to reconcile our differences, but they will never yield to any great extent. Our people are just too different!! Their ideology has already done so much damage to the South I honestly don’t know if we will ever recover from it, but we have to try. The good people on this website, and I admire them, are trying to do what I have failed at. Eventually they have got to come to the conclusion that blacks are only a symptom of the disease—-the real disease is white liberalism, and until that ideology is eradicated there will never be reconciliation to any degree. We in the South really have no other option but to try again to separate from the North. Maybe it will happen, I sure would like to see it before I die!! Stay in touch–it is good to know someone who really understands!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Ummmm………because he was a pandering politician?

          • Svigor

            Abe Lincoln was an inveterate liar, a former railroad shyster, and a consummate politician. He was fond of telling the audience whatever it wanted to hear, regardless of how directly contradicted what he’d told other audiences.

            “Honest Abe” is one of those reverse nicknames.

          • John K

            Lincoln was a war criminal who waged war on fellow Americans. In my brief contact with Long Live Dixie, I thought about what he said to me, and I’ve concluded that he is right. The military is made up of predominantly southerners. The south is largely conservative and is for limited government. The biggest liberal vermin in government are from either the north or from California. The south is largely Christian, and Christians in America are attacked and ridiculed. I saw things as whites vs non-white, but the enablers helping non-whites are themselves white and are predominantly from the north.

        • jeffaral

          You tell the truth and you still get down votes. It only shows some people, even on Amren, are still brainwashed. Moreover some good christian slave owners coudn’t resist their sexual urge of “making love” with the dark female creatures, which might explain the curiosity of many american blacks not being black at all but brown.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            “You tell the truth and you still get down votes”

            Yeah, like that?
            He/she/it does make some valid points, and is at the very least quite truthy. In 20/20 hindsight CERTAINLY the South should have listened to Hinton Helper, OBVIOUSLY should have gone along with the plan to “ship ’em all back”, etc.
            And I know for a fact that some Southern slave owners were degenerate miscegenationists and some guilty of stupid White overextension of compassion.
            The problem I’m having with the poster is…
            1. I would argue an over-imputation of the obviousness at the time of the correctness of the assertion. I think his assumptions of the popularity of his suggestions are inaccurate and were not shared by as many in the North as he asserts. How serious was the Conferderacy in regard to conquering the Caribbean and extending a slave empire and how would other powers have reacted, especially the Brits? It’s always smacked more of some idle and poorly thought out ruminations elevated falsely in order to further demonize the South and the Confederacy, for example.
            2. Reconstruction. Why didn’t the virtuous ol’ North take that opportunity to ship ’em all back without even having to compensate them? Seems like that was the perfect time, does it not? I understand the North suffered greatly, that there was some understandable vindictiveness, but…rather than do as the poster claims they so virtuously desired they intentionally humiliated the South and tried to inflict upon us precisely what they inflicted on the entire country a hundred years later – BLACKS IN CHARGE. And not unlike the slimiest liblefties, they had no intention of allowing such to occur in their “neighborhood”.
            I could go on and on but gotta run out and get some batteries and foodstuffs as this noreaster snowstorm is about to hit, but my point is that this poster is at the least unwise and subtly inaccurate, at the worst a subtle troublemaker and divider.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Another lie perpetrated by Northern bigots.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          “Part of the lies told about our history is that the south was anti-black while the north wanted free blacks running amok.”

          Part of the lies…what about the phrasing of that reminds me more of a liblefty angle than a race realist take? Hard to put my thumb on it, but easy to thumb down.

        • Brian

          Nice fantasy you have going there.

    • NotTooSwift

      Too bad Sarah McCartney was not armed when he was kicking in her door. This story would have had a happy ending.

      • ncpride

        Then SHE would be on the alter of sacrifice, no doubt. You know how it works. She made the mistake of opening the door, saw it was not her husband returning and immediately slammed the door shut. That makes her a racist in America because the man was black, and had she defended herself after he started to kick her door down, well…… that’s no excuse to shoot the poor black guy!

        • AndrewInterrupted

          This early false narrative reminds me of the Trayvon case where the MSM initially showed imagery of a child wrapped in swaddling clothing. Then, it turned out, he had been a thief since he was 15–and was 6′ 3″..!

          How old is that 6′ 3″ thug, hiding his face with a hoodie, in the dark, in the rain, peering into your neighbors’ windows? Is he 17 or 27?

          • ncpride

            Same thing here. Poor helpless black guy just wrecked his car and was only seeking help when gunned down by the racist White cop just because he is black. I swear that’s the way even the local media are reporting it. It’s infuriating.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Do they have an idea what that suppressed toxicology report might reveal? Was he jacked-up on something?

          • Svigor

            The idea that any black, at 17 years of age, is properly described as a “child” is totally risible. Don’t these people know any blacks? To ask is to answer…

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Plus his physical presence could have easily mistaken him for a legal adult.

      • Non Humans

        I wouldnt open my door for any nonhuman, for any reason. In fact, if one did strike the ringer, I’d check the locks on both of the doors, then double check the windows. But not before grabbing the 12g and the riot shield made of job applications.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I remember you brought this case to our attention last week.

  • MekongDelta69

    “Rally organizer John Barnett, founder of THUG…”

    Only blacks would name their organization “THUG.”

    • ncpride

      There was NO way this cop was not going to have to fight for his life in BRC (Black Run Charlotte) That morbidly obese Kojo has been running off at the mouth despite the fact he hasn’t even seen the dash cam footage, but still given a huge platform to preach his hatred. Funny the DA had two ‘extra’ witnesses today that were not there last week. This stinks from top to bottom. Another White man forced to defend himself to calm the natives.

  • Truthseeker

    Another day, another case of blacks trying to exploit the consequences of their own dysfunctional behavior for the purposes of guilt-based shakedown of gullible whites.

  • Bantu_Education

    I hope for his sake this policeman has never in his life used the “N” word, has never spoken a harsh word against fine upstanding black citizens and, especially, has never visited any “extreme-right-wing” or “hate” websites like Amren.

    • Oldcorporal

      When Mark Fuhrman was questioned at the O.J. Simpson trial about whether he’d ever used “the N-word” (how I hate that we can’t just say it, even on here!), I’ve always wished he’d have answered, “Hell, yes, I’ve used it, and I’ll bet you have too, Mr. District Attorney!”

      • dubyasee

        You cannot say the “N” word and you definitely cannot complain about they who must not be named, but rhymes with blues.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          You can say “Jew”. Mods get it.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Depending on what day it is. Don’t quite know the criteria there.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yeah, lawyers are masters at narrowing witnesses into “Yes” or “No” boxes.

  • pcmustgo

    Surprised you guys didn’t post about the Baltimore Maryland mall shooter who was a black teen and killed 2 white teens a few days back. He targetted a skate board shop. They are still trying to figure out the “motive” and are reading the black teen’s diaries.

    • negrolocaust

      i mailed the link 7 times

    • negrolocaust

      he must have felt “disrespected”

    • Kenner

      It took the media over two days to post his photo. People were already guessing he was black due to that alone.

  • Ronald

    Charlotte NAACP President Kojo Nantambu (asserted) “Something is wrong with the system that we live in … something is wrong in this country.”

    How right he is. From the mouths of the Africans themselves…

    • Oldcorporal

      He’s one of the things that’s wrong with America.

    • A Freespeechzone

      Make NO mistake, the ‘wrong’ means that when blacks are held accountable for violent behavior, it must be ‘racist’.

      Under the administration of Obama and Holder, the message has been sent from the top that this is the era of punishment and revenge for injustices NOBODY alive today ever experienced.

      Furthermore, the message is that anyone who resists these violent actions against society and Whites will be pursued by the DOJ, media, Sharpton, Jackson and self-loathing liberals.

      Look at the no action against the New Black Panther Party, for voter intimidation and murder for hire against George Zimmerman as stark examples of what this administration is about.

      It will only get worse, if nothing is done.

  • DLRisVH

    Maybe the naacp will lend a hand and help find the killers of Amber Long.

  • Luca

    This sounds like a text book case of “Death by cop”.

    Oh wait,…. the victim was black and the shooter was White? Well that’s a little different. It was the KKK, discrimination, racism and a hate crime all in one.

    First comes Al and Jesse, the ACLU, the DOJ, then Spike Jones and/or Seven Spielberg to make the movie.

    • Oldcorporal

      Don’t insult a fine and comical band leader, now deceased, by confusing him with a thuggish modern-day director-wannebe, please. Spike Jones was the band leader; Spike Jonze is the wannabe.

      • Luca

        Thank you, it’s been a rough day, I made too mistakes on that one.. See edit.

  • Greg Thomas

    “I’m trying to figure out: What does 14 jurors and one attorney general don’t see that people in Africa see?” Barnett asked. “That all of us see. What do they not see?”

    What is this THUG mumbling on about?

    • TheAntidote

      he beez sayin’ YT beez blin’ n’ sheit!!. YT beez rayciz!

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      I’m sure people in Africa see a lot of things jurors and attorney generals in America don’t see because Africans do a lot of things (white) Americans don’t do.

      Cannibalism, baby rape (to cure AIDS), necklacing, etc.

  • bigone4u

    The version of this story I read on the MSM had the cop as a racist murderer in a state filled with racist murderers and racist juries–a place where it’s open season on innocent blacks. Without the Internet, we would never know the truth. I wish I could figure out how best to punish CNN, etc. for their lies. They need a good whuppin’.

    • Alexandra1973

      Snail mail campaign? Too easy to hit the delete button on e-mails, harder to ignore a stack of letters from realists IMO.

    • Jim Barlow

      Well… well… the MSM must be right? Right? Look, the black guy is composed and wearing a tie in his picture. And the cop looks so shady in his photograph. So clearly, this is intentional-white-on-black-cold-blooded-murder! Right?

    • libertarian1234

      If the country hadn’t gotten wealthy and soft, the CNN building right now would be a pile of ashes….as well as MSNBC.

      I wonder what the future holds for them?

      • Non Humans

        It will still be a burning pile of ashes, along with all of the other treasonous news outlets, and (most importantly) the homes and burning bodies of the traitorous and spineless politicians who chose a love of bribes over that of country and countrymen. When the economy implodes, it will be a reality!

  • king and slave

    They named their organization THUG. Enough said.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Yes, didn’t Richard Sherman inform us that the term “thug’ is just a synonym for “ni99er”? Isn’t that organization racist?
      Oh, and yes, there is a problem in this country, to wit, that black people are still here 150 years after the end of the Civil War.

      • king and slave

        Abraham Lincoln should’ve been forceful to remove them.

        • Oldcorporal

          He wanted to, after freeing them. Historians will try to say that he “moderated his views” on deportation after the Civil War had been going on for a while, but I suspect that’s just a lot of eyewash. Or maybe I should say, “Whitewash.”

          • king and slave

            I’d be interested to know the real story as to why he didn’t deport them all. Any ideas or theories out there?

          • TheAntidote

            The Southerners, that is the Rebels, did not want the ex slaves deported to Africa. They wanted to utilize them as wage or share cropping agricultural workers. Unfortunately, the plantation system and the cotton culture never recovered enough to produce antebellum type wealth.

          • king and slave

            Well, I blame Whitey, then. 😉

          • Luca

            Hogwash. Southerners knew they were not good workers and more trouble than they were worth. That is why America stepped up wholesale immigration in the late 1800’s. They would rather use immigrants than negroes.

          • TheAntidote

            Indeed. European immigrants in the factories of the North and Negroes in the fields of the South.

          • Tom B.

            What are you people smoking? The Rebels did not want ex slaves sent to Africa?. A totally nonsensical statement all around. First–they would have been elated to see the negroes gone–look at all the crime and misery to our people that would have been prevented. Second–you seem to presume the South had a choice as to the disposition of the negro after the war. The South was totally laid waste and destitute–they had no say so in regards to anything for twelve years of horror during reconstruction. They could not vote or hold any public office—just how the hell were they going to decide any thing that would require political power to enact. You are either a troll or a fool!

          • TheAntidote

            No, sport, I’m no troll; I’ve been with AR since it was by snail mail once a month. I’m also not a fool. Being descended from New York Yankees who invaded Virginia, Arkansas, and Louisiana during the Secession War, I’ve always been deeply interested in the war and in Reconstruction.
            With the assassination of Lincoln any plans for repatriation and a soft peace died. The hard peace, equality boys of Boston were calling the shots with Andrew Johnson, a Southerner, somewhat moderating their efforts.
            The plantocracy were devastated but attempts were being made to form the Negroes into wage-earning productive work units. Nathan Bedford Forrest (!!!) gave speeches in which he promoted economic cooperation between Negroes and whites. Jefferson Davis drew into negotiations with his former slaves to work his land. In 1870 as in 1860 there was money to made through Negro labour. It can truthfully be said that the Negro was esteemed in the South until mechanization made him an anachronism.
            The years of military government in the South were the first attempt by the Federal government at social engineering. The Negro slave was instantly promoted to citizen, soldier, landowner and legislator and the result was hell on earth. As the light of civilization was fading all sensible and concerned people realized Negro equality was folly, and that for the good of all segregation and separate but equal had to become law.

          • Tom B.

            Well, slick, I’m glad to get this response from you and for the most part it is pretty accurate, but if I may, let me take a look at some of it. First, I have always had a little trouble believing that if Lincoln had not been assassinated he would have been much more generous toward the South than the Radical Republicans who took over after his death. He certainly showed no mercy on our people during the war and prior to the war showed no inclination to even listen to or negotiate with them on any issue. It was ” my way or the highway” for Lincoln, no compromise. He wouldn’t even allow prisoner exchanges during the war although southern leaders offered to let them go without an exchange of Confederate prisoners. Lincoln knew damn well that the Confederacy was unable to properly care for these prisoners–his blockades had seen to that. I believe he had the foresight to use this tactic as a way to condemn the South in the future. It was a splendid ploy!! and has worked to the benefit of Yankee historians for generations.
            As for Andrew Johnson, I have always regarded him as a traitor, but at least he did show some compassion and tried to reign in the wonderful saviors of the Union, who really wanted complete extinction of the Southern people. Nathan Bedford Forrest!! the greatest warrior of the entire conflict!! I admit to being disappointed at some of his behavior after the war, but I believe he did what he did to keep from being hanged—he was a much feared and hated man by the Union officers who had to fight him-he whipped their asses so often! It may have been a survival method for him. You say the negro was “esteemed” in the South?, a poor choice of words. His labor may have had value, but his character and his poor work ethics were well founded long before the Yankee invasion to free him. Your last line I find interesting—as if a light came on in the heads of the benevolent occupiers and they saw the error of their ways? If so, why did they come back a hundred years later with a vigor just as strong as ever and force their views on the South once again. Forced integration, forced bussing, rampant crime, destroyed cities, North and South, miscegenation on a massive scale mostly due to Yankee propaganda we are inundated with 24/7 by Yankee controlled media. I gather you are proud of your New York Yankee heritage that invaded the South and has brought us such wonderful transformations, well good for you, I fear I just can’t understand why, but what is poor Southern boy going to do–our Superiors in the North have all the answers and if for some reason their ideas don’t work, all we have to do is dredge up some new ways to blame the evil South!!

          • Luca

            Lincoln promoted a number of schemes to re-colonize them in the Caribbean or Central America. There was a lack of consensus, no countries willing to take them, Liberia was too far away and too costly and there was a lack of funds in the middle of a terrible war.

            Had Lincoln lived, the outcome may have been more agreeable, the Reconstruction not so brutal and a long term plan could have been put in place to moderately repatriate the former slaves. It would have worked to some degree and we’d have been much better off then we are now.

      • dubyasee

        Ha ha. Pretty slick way to write the “N” word.

    • libertarian1234

      Can you imagine how stupid someone would have to be to use an acronym like “thug” to name his group?

      • king and slave

        Pretty damn stupid. Especially to name a religious group about healing.

        • Non Humans

          These are nonhumans were speaking of. Theyre not known for their intellectual pursuits. Actually, quite the opposite.

          • Alexandra1973

            They have their own kind of logic, if you take my meaning.

      • TheAntidote

        Here in Pittsfield area there is a [email protected] activist church called, ‘The Missing Link Church’. The leader, the pastor, decided upon this name……

  • Greg Thomas

    Yet Kerrick was thrown in jail within hours, bypassing the usual lengthy interviews by internal affairs. Authorities said they wanted to avoid any “ambiguity” as outrage in the black community grew and the NAACP and other groups threatened protests.”

    “Ambiguity” = Threats of violence from race hustling blacks!

    • Erasmus

      We should have picked our own cotton.

      • libertarian1234

        Yes, our greatest enemies are easily the slave traders who brought these miscreants to our shores, and holding second place are the fools who bought them to pick cotton.

  • So CAL Snowman

    This story is up right now on CNN as the lead story and they show a very unflattering picture of officer Kerrick next to Ferrell in his football jury. There is no mention in the story of Ferrell aggressively charging officer Kerrick. The CNN story basically states that Kerrick shot a noble, unarmed black man at 2:35 am (the rush hour for church services).

    • sbuffalonative

      Of course, CNN could post the video but that would throw a wrench into ‘the narrative’.

    • Fathercoughlin

      Maybe he was out trying to round up stray puppies.

    • 1stworlder

      That be da church of Our Lady of Jiggling Ta Tas

  • So CAL Snowman

    “Rally organizer John Barnett, founder of THUG, said Ferrell would be alive if he were white like Kerrick.”

    That is the black mindset 100%, if they had White skin everything would be different for them. “If I were White (fill in any outrageous claim here)”

    • Jim Barlow

      I agree. He probably would be alive if he were like Kerrick. Because a white guy would have been less likely to 1) drop out of school, 2) smoke/drink up then 3) ‘go act a fool’ and attack a cop!

    • Erasmus

      If he were white like Kerrick he would have had an IQ higher than a warm summer’s day and the frontal lobes to know engaging in criminal activity can get him killed.

    • dubyasee

      “Rally organizer John Barnett, founder of THUG, said Ferrell would be alive if he were white like Kerrick.”

      I have to agree. Had he been white like Kerrick, he wouldn’t have been acting in such a stupid fashion as to get his grits splattered. Whiteness is a WHOLE lot more than a light complexion. But try explaining Shakespearean sonnets to Koko the talking gorilla.

  • Bantu_Education

    There is a sinister ulterior motive behind the massive orchestrated black “outrage” whenever one of their “innocent” bruthas is shot by a white man, even under the most obvious self-defence scenario as with Trayvon and now this latest THUG poster boy.

    • Yes, they are trying to criminalize the basic human right of Whites to defend themselves from black predators. These circuses are meant to be a warning to other White American gun owners: defend your life, or that of your family, and we will destroy your livelihood, smear your reputation, seize what little wealth you have, and throw you in a cage for the rest of your life unless you’re extraordinarily lucky (like mestizo George Zimmerman).

      We can’t let the intimidation stop us though. State after state is considering legislation that would nullify all federal gun-grabbing laws within its borders. An out-of-control fedgov can only do so much if the states refuse to cooperate. We have to “go local” and refuse to back down.

    • Mergatroyd

      What does it say about a media that encourages and promotes black outrage against White America?

      THERE is the problem…

  • Spartacus

    “Charlotte NAACP President Kojo Nantambu called the jury decision
    “despicable,” asserting, “Something is wrong with the system that we
    live in . . . something is wrong in this country.”

    ——————————————————————————————————————–

    Take a look in the mirror , and you’ll know what .

    • sbuffalonative

      Kojo Nantambu. That’s all you need to know.

      • Erasmus

        I hope Mr. Nantambu is barefoot and wearing a loincloth or grass skirt.. To publicly wear a business suit or pants and shoes would be publicly making a mockery of our white culture.

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          “Baldrick may look like a monkey who’s been put in a suit and then strategically shaved, but he is a brilliant politician.” – Blackadder.

  • shawnmer

    This is absolutely insane. There is physical size superiority, video of a physical attack, repeated non-compliance with police commands, a failed non-lethal taser attack, a 9/11 tape of a woman documenting the an attempted robbery by the guy, and the blacks are STILL calling this “murder??”

    • libertarian1234

      I don’t think they’re looking for a subject to propagandize. I think they just so lacking in reasoning ability and problem solving they believe what they’re saying.

      They’re ability to reach a logical conclusion based on a set of facts is close to zero.

      I’m convinced of it.

      And, of course, that makes them even more dangerous than if they were propagandists.

      • Non Humans

        Agreed. Nonhumans seriously lack in the reasoning and reasonable categories. That statement is supported by their obvious lack of future-time orientation and lack of multiudes of other basic cognitive functions.

        • Who Me?

          Hows about we just sterilize them all at birth, males AND females? Send out the message, leave and retain your children’s fertility. Stay, get $5,000/apiece. In about 50 years we’d have no problems.

    • Mergatroyd

      They are anti-White and that is the purpose of all of this publicity, to show and “prove” the White race is violent and murderous toward all blacks. The family also hopes to win the ghetto lottery with a huge payoff, which they’ll most likely receive.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    “I’m trying to figure out: What does 14 jurors and one attorney general don’t see that people in Africa see?” Barnett asked. “That all of us see. What do they not see?”

    Oh I dunno, Rastus, they probably see lots of things your 85 IQ can’t comprehend.

    • libertarian1234

      Yes, if it’s REALLY even 85.

      • r j p

        He went to FAM, a place where banging on a drum is seen as the highest level of achievement. How low does your IQ have to be that FAM is your only option to play feetsball?

  • Oldcorporal

    Why is it that, with all the millions of gang-bangers out there in America 2014, and the large number of Negroes who rob convenience stores, etc., while armed with guns, every time one of them gets what is coming to him from the police, he’s “an unarmed black man?” Here’s hoping the state’s attempt to railroad Officer Kerrick backfires, big-time. And if I were a city leader in Charlotte, I would tell THUG (what an appropriate name!), “Boycott and be damned to you!”

    • libertarian1234

      Black boycotts are a blessing.

      • DNA Explains It All

        I would give my right n.t to have them “Boycott” everywhere I ever go.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Because he ditched his weapon(s) before being caught red-handed literally after killing people with them. That is how the mythical unarmed black man came to be, but rest assured, they are all armed with stolen guns, knives and other weapons the police do not know they have.

  • Extropico

    A cartoon regarding Kojo Nantambu in the Charlotte NC vicinity.

  • Steven Barr

    Question for my American friends: what is a Grand Jury and how does it differ from other juries? I believe we used to have them in England and also in Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand etc but they were abolished.

    • Anglo

      In the federal legal system, the grand jury is used to decide whether someone
      should be charged for a serious crime. The grand jury decides if there is enough evidence for a jury trial; it does not decide guilt or innocence. The grand jury hears
      evidence presented by the prosecutor: the U.S. Attorney. The grand jury uses
      subpoenas to gather this evidence; it can subpoena documents, physical evidence,
      and witnesses to testify.

  • Anglo

    “Ferrell, a former Florida A&M football player who dashcam video shows violently charged Kerrick”
    This is the reason so many Blacks are recruited to play football. They’re like bulls in a china shop — almost unstoppable.

    • Erasmus

      Plus they haven’t the brains not to engage in behavior that will leave them with life-long injuries.

      • Non Humans

        And extra thick primitive skulls to protect those barely functioning brains.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      A medieval boar spear might have done the trick too. The cross section is to prevent the feral and furious beast from simply running down the length of the spear after being impaled.

      A feral Bantu hepped up on God-know-what could probably be stopped too.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Boar spear.

  • Anon

    THUG–True Healing Under God
    Because naming a black organization THUG is totally unlikely to make white people shoot blacks just on basic principle.
    A grand jury refusing to charge a person has a very specific meaning. The standard is if that jury thinks the case is unwinnable if there is no defense present.
    If a Grand Jury thinks that, were the prosecution to go ahead and absolutely no defense was presented, it is still unlikely the prosecution could convince a jury to convict, than the grand jury avoids wasting everyone’s time, effort and money.
    This is what should have killed the George Zimmerman case. Actually, he was booted at the very beginning as a police chief refused to issue charges BECAUSE IT WAS OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY TO PASS A GRAND JURY. He was actually legally obligated to do this. Rather than stand by his decision (something that would have saved everyone a lot of drama), he chose to retire. Or, let’s be honest here…he was threatened into retiring.
    Florida has some interesting laws with regard to this. It was illegal to go around the Grand Jury process. The people who charged Zimmerman had no authority to do so. Those who arrested him had no authority to do so. The judge selected was inappropriate and got booted early. Zimmerman’s case meets the criteria of unwinnable. In Florida, it is a CRIMINAL offense to bring such cases to trial. Also, self-defense indemnifies against all charges and all civil cases that arise from this. You could not, as they wanted to desperately to do, charge Zimmerman with denying a person their civil rights….not in Florida. Did I mention all these things are criminally prosecuted in Florida?
    An important book for everyone to read is “The Law of Self-Defense” by Andrew F. Branca. Lays it right on the line. The reality of self defense laws.
    The only thing missing from that book is something we all know but few will admit. Blacks are racist scum. In actual trials, any black will ignore the law (not that they are capable of understanding any of it) and will convict any white, for no reason whatsoever, not convict any black for any reason and actively interfere with justice for any white person. Liberals will do much the same but won’t cross a certain threshold of unreasonableness.
    These things are extremely important. Obeying what Branca reveals will usually result in being “kicked” out of the system early in a self defense case. But the bottom line is you only have justice to the degree that the population where you were was white and non-liberal.
    Carrying a gun should be mandatory among whites. Carrying a gun wherever blacks are is absolutely mandatory but, understand, your most dangerous enemy will confront you after the self-defense incident.
    Where you live matters. You wouldn’t expect justice in the congo or Liberia….why would you expect it in Detroit? The rule of law isn’t what you think it is and its all about who will stand with you, who will stand against you and who is likely to stab you in the back.

    • shawnmer

      Jared Taylor asked a very insightful, and unsettling, question during the Trayvon farce: Has he, as a white man who has made his views on race so public, forever forfeited his right to self-defense against a non-white? Can he be in the process of being smashed to a pulp, manage to reach a gun and shoot his attacker dead, all to be told he is thus guilty of “murder” because he’s a “racist?”

    • libertarian1234

      “Or, let’s be honest here…he was threatened into retiring.”

      Yes, and the white weenie politicians were so terrified they hired an incompetent black to take his place.

  • LHathaway

    The grand jury declined to prosecute, and I wasn’t there, but did they really need to kill the guy? I’ve heard a few people here claim the would ‘defend their house’ with violence or be violent if ever someone came to ‘take their guns away. The report says there were a group of policemen there and only 1 perp.

    • When a perpetrator of color cannot be subdued by a taser, and then continues to be aggressive, I think the proper course of action would be to notify Pajama Boy. PJ Boy could then reason with the perpetrator of color over a mug of warm cocoa.

      Surely PJ Boy would have been summoned if the perpetrator was White.

      • r j p

        I don’t even want to think how PJ Boy would have subdued him.
        I doubt PJ Boy’s mouth would have been on a warm cup of cocoa,
        but have no doubt his mouth would have been on something dark cocoa
        and that his hand would have been cupping something.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        Maybe PJ boy could offer a Chosen TM woman for Feral’s pleasure? Or is it possible that even Ferals don’t want them?

        Ever notice how there are no Chosen TM on Black videos? Or Chosen TM on Arab? It always the prettiest gentile girls and sub Saharan animals.

        Nothing to see, here, you vile racist.

    • libertarian1234

      “…..did they really need to kill the guy?”

      Well, that’s one of the great injustices of life, Hathaway, that will only be a mystery to those like you.

    • Yes, they really needed to kill the guy. Back when the West was still civilized, this obvious fact would have been unquestionable. Today, criminals and savages are in charge, put into power by racial cuckolds and other emasculated weaklings who worship their primitive aggression (aggression and strength being two qualities they severely lack). So of course our modern laws are written to favor criminals and savages over good law-abiding people.

      I don’t know how any self-respecting man could possibly ask whether that animal needed to be put down. Perhaps the answer to our weak seed White problem is mandatory testosterone injections starting at puberty?

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        If a black man burst into your home and came after you or your kids and you had a 12-gauge pump shotgun, damn right you’d shoot him in the head with it with a load of buckshot. Yes, it was absolutely necessary to send that creature back to his maker, whether or not it took one bullet or ten. This is why if you own a gun, it would be wise to learn to be a good enough marksman to shoot an assailant between the eyes or at least smash his spine, both of which will instantly stop him.

        • Incredibly, there are thousands of weak seed Whites that would rather watch their family brutalized and murdered than fight back with an icky, nasty, evil gun. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.

    • Mergatroyd

      Yes, he needed killing. He was trying to break down the door with his fists and feet. There was a young mother and baby inside and at no time did he ask for help, in fact he told her to “turn off the alarm” according to a post above. The police told him THREE times to get down while he lunged at them.

      What should the mother have done? invited him in for a cup of tea with her baby sleeping upstairs?

      He deserve no sympathy for his behavior which lead to his death.

  • This is a bad joke.

    The perp’s name is Jonathon Ferrell feral.
    Good shoot, officer.

  • negrolocaust

    he just was indicted

  • Jim Barlow

    “The police chief, who is African-American, still has not released the results of (Ferrell’s) toxicology report.”

    Yeah, I bet it’ll get “lost in the mail” or have a “lab error” – they’re always out to protect their own.

    • negrolocaust

      he was drunk and on drugs

      • Jim Barlow

        I know he was drunk and on drugs. But that was the cops/witnesses interpretation of his behavior.

        THUG will downplay their personal account and, rewrite history, making it as if he wasn’t on drugs. I’d like a solid lab report that says he was in fact on drugs – so THUG cannot play it down

        • Non Humans

          Maybe he WAS just being his nonhuman self. I think the absence of the tox report will look worse for the nonhuman more than its presence. If the nonhuman commits savagery like this unaffected by intoxicants, It lends more credibility to Kerrick, and paints a savage picture of the nonhuman.

  • RisingReich

    One down. Could have been worse.
    Real crime is how this White Man was even put on trial at all.

  • OhWow

    Charlotte NAACP President Kojo Nantambu called the jury decision “despicable,” asserting, “Something is wrong with the system that we live in . . . something is wrong in this country.”

    So go move to Africa and be with your bruddas an sistaz. No evil whitey there. Oh, what’s that? You don’t want to? Must not be too bad then. Black justice is what they want to happen regardless of facts. Regular justice is making the right decision regardless of race or emotion.

    Would he have been alive if he were white? Yeah, probably. The key is WHY? Because white men don’t go around shooting, stabbing, and stealing every night like blacks do. Blacks work hard to keep up their thug image and succeed. Then they blame whites for noticing patterns.

  • libertarian1234

    “Something is wrong with the system that we live in … something is wrong in this country.”

    Yes, so the best thing for us to do is to reinstitute segregation. Integration has been a horrible failure. We will NEVER be able to get along with you and your people, so separation is the only answer to prevent war.

    “I’m trying to figure out: What does 14 jurors and one attorney general don’t see that people in Africa see?” Barnett asked. “That all of us see. What do they not see?”

    Well, for one thing they’re not as stupid as you are, nor the Africans whose average group I.Q. is only 70. And that’s a real biggie. Nor do they have even a fraction of the hate you have coursing through your body.

    And, for another, after hearing the 911 tapes they saw that it was evident the NAACP lied when it said a black was knocking on the lady’s door seeking help and she saw he was black and slammed the door in his face.

    He was trying to break in by kicking and slamming against the door.

    “The NAACP, however, insists it was an “execution” of a black man in “cold blood.”

    Oh, yes. Just like Trayvon Martin.

    These people are so stupid, violent and impulsive, they couldn’t integrate with anybody.

    • Alexandra1973

      Nowadays when I think segregation, I’m not thinking water fountains, I’m thinking countries.

    • Who Me?

      a black was knocking on the lady’s door seeking help and she saw he was black and slammed the door in his face

      He was trying to break in by kicking and slamming against the door.

      ———————————————
      A man knocking at my door at 2.30 am going to get the door slammed in his face no matter WHAT color he is! (Actually not quite, because I would never answer the door in the first place…)
      His pounding and kicking the door trying to break in is apparently documented by the 911 tape so there is really no excuse for this dog and pony show.

  • Fathercoughlin

    I dont recall any slaves with the name Kojo Nantambu. Is it possibel that this lowlife lying piece of garbage is one of our dear beloved Dreamers? The NAACP is a nutcase hate group. That they would DARE make upa story about this pavement ape (politely,no doubt)knocking on a white womans door to “ask for help” when in fact he was pounding on the door ina aterrifying bid to get his hands on her. J.C.CHRIST!How much of this animalism do we have to tolerate from this 4th world trash??

    • Katherine McChesney

      Kojo Nantambu.

      Probably a fake name like Chokwe Lumumba. Blacks are forever giving themselves false identities to make them appear to be more than they are. Another, Michael King’s father used a White mans name….the Reformist Martin Luther, a former monk in the Roman Catholic church.

  • John K

    “Charlotte NAACP President Kojo Nantambu called the jury decision “despicable,” asserting, “Something is wrong with the system that we live in . . . something is wrong in this country.””

    Something is very wrong when the “justice” system would resubmit charges when the officer was found to be justified in shooting a worthless black thug, on camera no less. These idiots are so afraid of black criminals rioting, they’ll throw an innocent man under the bus.

    Charge at a cop, get shot. End of story.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    Africans see only that they have a God given right to murder whites with impunity, that is why they are poisoning the jury system so NO white can ever get a fair trial. All they are doing is convincing more and more whites that they and those who cannot be named too are their blood enemies. It is a well known fact that the National Association for the Advancement of Criminal Psychopaths is of, by and for those who cannot be named. This is nothing less than another attempt to render whites utterly defenceless against violent attack let alone genocide at the hands of blacks or other hostile racial aliens who will have to be driven out of our lands, or eliminated. Otherwise, it will be us that will be eliminated.

    • Aditya Vivek Barot

      The most maniacal support for that piece of sh*t nation of Those Who Cannot be Named is American whites.

      Maybe it’s time to start sending money and weaponry to the democratically elected government in PA and Gaza as well as Lebanon. The only good thing Obongo did is by dissing the sh*teaters in J*w York on the Med from day one.

      I wonder how they’ll feel when the whole USG structure is in the hands of animals and sub Saharan primates who make no distinction between YT and The Chosen TM. Think they’ll care about the boohoocaust? Or about their security? Or anything?

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Many whites cannot get it through their heads two simple facts. One is arming and supporting those who cannot be named will come back to haunt them in the form of blowback. The other is arming and supporting them will be repaid by those who cannot be names by treachery, nay indeed they are already doing this right now. These racial aliens who often can masquerade as whites are their enemies, and most whites still are blind to that fact.

        • Aditya Vivek Barot

          There is a certain blog, a very good one, that fearlessly tackles the Muslim Question run by a chosen TM.

          I despise and loath Moslems as much as I hate the mud people of which I am one (no, not self loathing, just other muds loathing). On that blog, I commented on a story that discussed hollywood’s anti American sewage pipe.

          Not only did the Chosen TM that runs the blog refuse to admit that there is an element of implacable and obvious ethnic hatred, but the other commentators, most of them Gentiles, attacked me like rabid dogs!!!

          From afar, Americans seemed to be the most open minded people in the world. After nine years of attempted assimilation, I must, dispairingly, pronounce them as fanatic and close minded as the vile wogs I sought to escape.

          In spite of the theological injunctions against despair, I can’t help it. America is doomed and it’s totally attributable to Americans.

          No wogs or Chosen TM could succeed in their ventures without American acceptance and approval. Americans have elected to skip and dance and f*ck all the way to Gomorrah.

          There is no hope. I only wish I had the talent and the money to escape to Switzerland.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Fanaticism comes when you are cornered and you’re back is against the wall. THAT describes me and every other white person in their rightful homeland. Many Americans are Americans in name only unlike myself whose blood ties to this land go back over 300 years. Many of my ancestors bled, suffered and died fighting in America’s name, just as a far greater number of them died defending Ukraine and Russia from darkie invaders. You have NO idea what we are going to revert to, but you can be sure that when the next great blood letting’s over, the whites who emerge on the other side are going to be more like those around the time of Julius Caesar than most around today.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            I’m afraid I wasn’t specific enough.

            Your kind of “fanaticism” would be welcome as a strong antidote to despair.

            I am referring to PC fanaticism. It’s only in India that I’ve encountered such a high degree of reality-denying fanaticism aka Liberalism aka PC.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Yes, PC fanaticism is indeed demoralizing, because it leads people to do things that are anything but in their own personal and group interests. In other words, PC fanaticism is self-destructive. I understood where you were coming from, what I was saying is that we are going to revert to what the woman with the war paint on her face was to the Romans, fanatical guerrillas not interested in compromise, only inflicting death upon their enemies. They never conquered the Picts, who later had a field day eliminating the descendants of those very same Romans. Unfortunately, when this starts, it is going to send shockwaves around the world that will affect your country.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Amen to that brother.

            For two millennia, roman policy was centered around keeping the Germanic/Celtic tribes at bay.

            If, the wheel turns, and whites revert,

            “No one here comes
            Out alive.”

            I welcome that. The world needs a lesson in manners. As always, it’ll be the white man’s burden.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Switzerland better boost their defense spending.

      • Mergatroyd

        Their biggest, most adamant support group in the U.S. is Christian Zionists.

      • Katherine McChesney

        I’m beginning to notice black commenters screaming ‘racist’ towards Israel for deporting blacks. They’re organizing against Hebrews.

  • Kenner

    There’s a website called ‘white watch’, run by a black, monitoring crimes committed by whites: as in ‘Whites do crimes too!’ …pitiful.
    I posted on yahoo recently, asking blacks to name one neighborhood or city being destroyed by white violent crime.
    I got quite a few responses, all about serial killers, pedophiles, and meth use…not one could answer the question.

  • MBlanc46

    “…[S]omething is wrong in this country”.

    Mr. Kojo Nantambu is certainly right about that. When a cop shoots an out-of-control maniac who has disregarded a police order to stop is brought before a grand jury, not once, but twice, there is something seriously wrong.

  • negrolocaust

    Guzman suggested that the crowd take a step further with acts of
    peaceful civil disobedience if Kerrick was not indicted on Monday. “Are
    you guys ready to go the whole way for this man? Are you willing to get
    arrested if there is no indictment?” he asked, as audience members
    cheered.

    After the indictment was announced, Barnett said, “We are not jumping
    up and down. We are not celebrating at all because there is still a
    loss of life.”

    Uptown resident Tyricah Simpson attended the rally to support
    Ferrell. She said she worries that the CMPD’s behavior toward black
    citizens has become “consistent” but wishes that a more diverse crowd
    would have showed up on Monday.

    “This doesn’t always happen to just minorities,” Simpson said. “This affects people, not just black people.”

  • OhWow

    And if it wasn’t for another white (or white hispanic?) hero, another black thug would have raped a white woman and stolen everything only to have her blame herself the next day.

    Liberals hate when whites get in the way of letting blacks commit crimes and rape white women. Because those are among their favorite things.

    • Mergatroyd

      The black thug would have “kilt” that young mother and her baby and thought nothing of it. He would have laughed at the trial while his lawyers blamed White oppression.
      There are plenty of examples on New Nation News and elsewhere.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        Indeed, it appears that was his motive for trying to kick in the door to being with. What apparently happened here is a white cop killed a black man threatening a white family with death or serious injury, and the blacks as well as their Jewish puppet masters are angry he got ten well deserved bullets pumped into him. This is all about creating the stage for mass murder of whites, never forget it. They are trying to deny any pretense of protection under the law for us.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Jonathan Ferrell couldn’t seem to communicate to the homeowner OR the cops that he’d been in a car wreck and “needed help.”

    A close neighbor said: It wasn’t knocking, he was pounding at her door and kicking. She was home alone with her baby. He never said he needed help… he didn’t say he needed help.

    At 2.36 am, she was shaken awake by thunderous booms at the front door. McCartney ran downstairs and opened the door, possibly thinking it was her husband returning home. But she quickly slammed it shut again on seeing Ferrell there.

    At one point during the distressed call she told the dispatcher: ‘He’s yelling. He’s yelling to turn off the alarm.’

    McCartney can be heard telling Ferrell: ‘No! I’m calling the police, I’m on the phone with 911!’…According to McCartney’s friend, Ferrell wasn’t acting like a helpless man but a ferocious threat.

    The loser in all this is the taxpayer when the Ferrell family collects a massive payout from the city.

  • The Final Solution

    Ain’t that the same boy who was infecting all them people with AIDS? No matter they’re all guilty of something.

  • Aditya Vivek Barot

    Can we all agree that the USG and it’s subsidiaries are utterly morally and intellectually bankrupt since they actively persecute whites and, with equal zeal, molly-coddle and otherwise privilege blacks and other minorities.

    In effect, this is a suicidal government devoted to destroying productivity and beauty. It is, by the same token, dysgenic. Perhaps, the first organized dysgenic campaign.

    Can we all adopt Larry Auster’s philosophy of refusal to cooperate in any manner, shape, or form?

    Don’t join the military. Don’t join the police. Don’t work for any state organs.

    If you own a business, keep it in the family and don’t ever employ more than 50 employees. That’s when most regs kick in. And hard.

    Don’t vote. Don’t campaign. If you can, immigrate. Learn german and move to Switzerland. Or, any majority white country that will accept white Americans.

    Let darkies like me control the nation. Most of us have destroyed whatever Europe and Europeans gave us in less than a generation. How much time will it take here?

    Eventually, they’ll be begging you to return. And you can loo down upon them and say, “sure, as soon as you leave.”

    • Mergatroyd

      You’ve written a fine post, I’d only add that one should also pay in cash or barter whenever possible to avoid feeding the federal, anti-White beast through onerous taxation.

      Make sure your focus is on WHO is doing this and WHY. They mean to genocide every single White person off the face of the earth. The answers are found in Culture of Critique.

      Blacks in Zimbabwe are begging the White man to return, many blacks in SA too.

      Is there anything more important than securing a homeland and future for White children?

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        We should not return, except to rid those lands of ever last one of them after most of them eat each other or starve to death. They wanted a land with no whites, now let they suffer the consequences they and they alone created. Because of them, the angel of death will have to hire extra help.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Whites may well have to leave some of their former homelands, but before they do that, there is a final parting gift they should leave. That is, scorched earth. Whatever they cannot take with them, they should destroy. Burn down the cities, salt the land, poison the wells, and leave nothing for our enemies. The Russians have done this time and time again, devastating numerous enemies because they were left with nothing but cold, snow, wind and a devastated wasteland with nothing to sustain them. THEN the Russians come and kill every last one who doesn’t die of exposure or starvation. That is how we can crush our enemies too.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        You’d need to satisfy two conditions for such a policy:

        1. White Solidarity:

        This is a myth. Unicorns are more common than white solidarity. The English Empire was liquidated because upper class whites despised the middle and lower class whites engaged in the day to day business of government.

        The RSA was lost for the same reason.

        Of course, the War of Northern Aggression is the quintessential example of white fraternal suspicion. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to state that whites are their worst enemies. If they weren’t not only would we have avoided American fratricide, we would have avoided European fratricide.

        There is a story about Brezhnev’s meeting with Maggie Thatcher when her asserted white solidarity, arguing, that underneath it all, what mattered was for whites to maintain their superiority.

        It didn’t even register with Maggie.

        Today, in the UK, owing to my posh-ish manners and diction, Upper-Middle and Upper Classes feel more comfortable around me than they do around working class whites.

        Thus, there can be no concerted effort until whites begin to act in concert.

        2. Unified Command:

        Whites need a world-wide movement spanning all white nations which will, eventually, be unified under one structure to streamline policy and action pursuant thereto. This is a corollary of white solidarity.

        Again, it doesn’t look too promising. Europeans harbor age-old suspicions and ethnic hatreds unlike the US where some sort of white common cause can be made.

        The US and Anglophone nations must cooperate with Europe and Europeans to reverse this decline. The enemy has been at it for a hundred years. It may take as long, if not longer, for white revanchism to take off.

        Hey, it only took the Greeks five hundred years to win their independence!

        Illegitimi non carborundum!

  • indoctrination_FAIL

    Very poor word choice. Zimmerman did not “murder” anyone. He used justifiable deadly force to defend himself, and that is not murder.

    Do you understand this?

    Language matters, and should be used correctly.

  • GeneticsareDestiny

    “A 9-1-1 tape reveals a frantic call from homeowner Sarah McCartney, who was home alone with her 1-year-old son while her husband was traveling. Through tears, she reported Ferrell trying to kick in her front door in what she thought was an attempted robbery. Banging and yelling can be heard in the background.”

    […]

    “A number of black activists posted McCartney’s home address along with photos of her home on social media. As a result, a number of vehicles have driven by her house harassing her family. They have had to hire security for protection.”

    Remember everyone, it is now racist and un-PC to not let black men into your home at any time, day or night, for any reason.

    • Mergatroyd

      Remember everyone, it is now racist and un-PC to not let black men kick your door down at any time, day or night, for any reason, even if there’s a mother and tiny baby sleeping inside.

  • humura

    The NAACP has become the National Assn. for the Advancement of Criminal Perpetrators.

    • Alexandra1973

      Negroes Are Always Causing Problems.

      (I hope that’s acceptable, mods, if not, I won’t be offended if you delete it.)

      • Katherine McChesney

        Negroes Ain’t Acting (Like) Colored People.

  • Who Me?

    Wow! They couldn’t find a picture of him as a 10 yr old cherub?

  • Mergatroyd

    I’ll tell you what: If that black had been trying to kick in my front door and I had an innocent baby sleeping upstairs there would have been no call to 911; the only call needed would have been to the coroner.

    The end result would have been much better too: try convicting a young mother who was only protecting herself and her baby from a large, raging black man. I’m sure there are marks on the front door to back up her story.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      A black man trying to kick down my door will find out I don’t call 911, until after he’s dead and the smoke clears. I have an elderly mother to worry about.

      • Alexandra1973

        Yep. Because when seconds count, the police are minutes away.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          Let’s see what the blacks and the National Association for the Advancement of Criminal Psychopaths say when thugs like this one are found dead of multiple, fatal gunshot wounds inside white folks homes armed with weapons. The moment they try to convict whites of murder for that, then we have prima facie evidence of impending organized mass killing of whites.

  • Mergatroyd

    It also says more about a media that present a one-sided story and parade the perp’s family all over the TV and front page of the newspapers for weeks on end, just like they did Trayvon — while completely ignoring heinous black crime against Whites.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Yes, it was a trap. Bailey was constructing a straw man.

    Lawyer 101: Only ask questions when you already know the answer.

  • Ezra Pound

    The 2nd Grand Jury indicted him.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      That’s a shame. At least it all goes public now.

  • Svigor

    Libs love this Monday-morning quarterbacking over how many times people shoot aggressors because they’re willfully ignorant about the lethality of firearms. Basically, they watch too much television and too many movies, and don’t read enough books.

    If they did a bit of research, they’d know that the feds, among others, have done studies that show that firearms are only rarely instantly lethal, as they are in TV and film fantasies. The only way to produce an instantly-fatal wound is with a direct hit to the central nervous system: a direct hit to the brain or the spinal cord, basically. In that case, yes, the target drops like a stone. In nearly any other case, even when fatally wounded, the target has ample time to harm or kill other people before he bleeds out. Yes, bleeding out is by far the main cause of death from gunshot wounds. This is why cops are trained to keep shooting until a suspect drops – because the seconds or minutes a target has before he bleeds out is more than enough time to do serious harm to others.

    Libs should turn off the television and read more.

  • Svigor

    Check out the point on top of that skull. I’m guessing that’s not extra grey matter.

  • Conrad

    “There is no evidence that shows Jonathan Ferrell should have been shot at all, but for officer Kerrick to shoot 12 times and striking Mr. Ferrell 10 times indicates more than a reflex, it smells more of hatred and rage, which shows that Mr. Kerrick was predisposed in killing a black man and did so with extreme prejudice,” the NAACP’s Nantambu insisted.”
    ………
    It doesn’t smell of hatred to me, it smells of PCP!
    Oh by the way … stop carrying 9mm pistols. Sure they hold more ammo … but it’s worthless ammo.

  • Who Me?

    They’re always “children” until they are well up in the later 20’s.

    • Katherine McChesney

      It’s spelled “chulren” or ‘chirren’.

      • Who Me?

        Yes, I do believe it’s chirren, now that you mention it. My bad, sorry, I’ll try not to let it happen again…

  • disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

    Just like with Martin, one more black killed by his own stupid.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    No aspersion to Dixie, but there are folks down here who disagree.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    Dixie doesn’t speak for all Southerners.

    I do. (LOL).

  • FransSusan

    They cave in to the NAACP and other race hos every time!!! The NAACP is nothing but a group of sub-human, useless pukes, and they don’t give a dam about this dead negro! They’re all about extortion and nothing more. Yet whites seem to put them on a pedestal and bow to their every whim. This has to stop! The evidence is so clear. Kerrick is obviously innocent and should not be subjected to a trial. It’s time to stop giving in to the pukes and let the negroes riot and kill them as they loot and create mayhem. Nothing is worth giving in to this useless, sub-human species and sacrificing this innocent man to political correctness!

  • Long Live Dixie

    If there is no alliance amongst Whites in this country, then our eradication is on your hands- not mine.

    That is just rhetoric. There is no compelling case that the white race would be strengthened by North-South unity. All it would mean is a steamrolling of the Southern identity and a dilution of Southern racialism by the much more dominant and numerous liberals of the North. In every single example I can think of, Southern racialism has been weakened by our interactions with Yankees. If Northerners were good for us, then northern Virginia would be a racialist bastion instead of one of the most multi-racial and liberal areas in all of Dixie.

    I suggest you spend your time trying to convince your own people to stop fawning over Obama instead of worrying about whether Southerners want to unite with you on hypothetical and unrealistic terms.

    I have said it before but I’ll repeat it: if Southerners are to unite with anyone, why would the expectation be that we unite with Yankees? We have far more in common – culturally and ethnically – with other white nations.

  • RyanP

    “Mr. Kerrick was predisposed in killing a black man” Oh yes, because life goes so smoothly for white people that kill blacks(ex Zimmerman) If they were to study this I would not be surprised to find that white cops actually hesitate shooting a black slightly more than shooting a white under the same circumstances.

  • Long Live Dixie

    If you guys were so “outnumbered”, then why does all of the national data on demographics show that most people are migrating to the Sun Belt now?

    That doesn’t make sense. Are you saying that since a lot of non-Southerners are moving here we are not outnumbered? That the non-Southern newcomers are bolstering our numbers? That would suggest that you think the mere act of living in the South makes someone Southern. The fact that non-Southerners are moving here is, in fact, a major threat to Southern survival and well-being. We are being displaced by the newcomers on a large scale. Maryland, northern Virginia, and southern Florida are very obvious examples of this trend. The newcomers are also greatly altering the cultural and political atmosphere throughout the land. They are making Dixie into a reflection of the North. So, the example you used only works towards what I have been saying.

    Some of you people act like perpetual victims . . ..

    Not at all, and certainly not anymore than any white racialist who points out the negatives of black crime, Mexican immigration, etc., is acting like a perpetual victim. What I am saying is that the involuntary union and its effects are harmful to the Southern people and that the Southern people must take steps to undo the forced union and its effects. Rather than me acting like a victim, I say that you are acting like an aggressor by opposing Southern self-determination and Southern living space. I have no interest in meddling in your affairs or demographically replacing you with millions of Southern settlers – that courtesy is not returned on your part.

    What I am saying is really quite simple: we wish to be left alone. We want to finalise the divorce of 1860/1861 and we want nothing further to do with the Yankees.

  • John K

    I disagree with both of you. I am a southerner born and raised in Texas, but I have no animosity towards northerners, though I like to joke that more of them died in the Civil War.

    The problem is a lunatic fringe of libtards who are hoping to divide us by just this type of thing- north vs south, American vs American. Do I think the north was wrong? Yes. But that’s in the past. I’m more concerned that whites as a race have become a bunch of suicidal apologists who cower to a bunch of lazy black racists who can’t even function in western civilization.

    This is what they want, you at each other’s throats so that the Mexican invaders and black thugs can swoop in to murder you and rape your wives.

    • Long Live Dixie

      The problem is a lunatic fringe of libtards who are hoping to divide us by just this type of thing- north vs south, American vs American.

      It is false to suggest that liberals want Southern identity and Southern nationalism to increase. Which people – Yankees or Southerners – have been their sole obstacle to power on this continent?

      There is no chance of Yankees being anything but egalitarians. They have been egalitarians since 1620. Their culture is heavily based on egalitarian principles. Unity between us and the Yankees = Yankee domination = egalitarianism. That is clearly seen in what has happened to the South since the Yankee victories in the 1960s and in what is happening on an even greater scale in the regions of the South where Yankees are now a majority (Maryland, northern Virginia, and southern Florida). Let’s stop nursing a fantasy that Yankees will suddenly come to their senses, become race realists, and then unite with us on fair terms to beat back our racial foes. If there is a large scale white resistance in the so-called USA, then it will – as it always has been – come from Southerners.

      History has shown us that people who have a strong tribal identity are far more likely to be racialists than those who have only a racial identity. In other words, nationalism leads to racialism. Racialism without nationalism is untested in the real world and exists thus far only as an idea.

      Still, no one has answered my question as to why – assuming that we must unite with someone – it should be the Yankees. They are our age-old foe and present-day occupier. They are habitually liberal. They see the South as a place to dominate, not as a place to fairly collaborate with. What’s more, they are the people who gave us the racial mess in the first place. Nothing in the Yankee attitude has changed since the days when they unleashed the slaves on us hoping for mass rape and killing of our people. Their ways are embedded in their culture.

      But that’s in the past.

      Northern domination of the South, the denial of Southern self-determination, the Northernisation of the South, and the mass colonisation of large areas of the South are things that are happening today. It is 100% false to suggest that Southern interests are obsolete in this day. It is a reflection of the ability of the US’s propaganda machine that you, a self-proclaimed Southerner, are repeating this propaganda line. You say you disagree with me, but then you act as though you have not even read my posts.

      This is what they want, you at each other’s throats so that the Mexican invaders and black thugs can swoop in to murder you and rape your wives.

      There will be no Mexican invaders or black thugs in a free Southland. Southerners have always had good racial sense and have known how to deal with racial threats. The only times the South has had major racial crises are during the times that Yankee influence here has been dominant.

      • Tom B.

        You are so right my friend! I wish I had your skill with words, you express my opinions far better than I could ever do. It is so sad that after 150 years of domination and outrages poured down on us by the North, we still have people who just don’t get it. Why they cannot see that the racial problems we have are fostered by and totally supported by the liberal North. The same people who invaded our land, burned, raped, looted and stole everything they could haul away are the same people forcing these very atrocities down our throats again! THINK !! people–how is it that the blacks and Mexican invaders are getting away with their crimes and massive invasion of our land!! Do you believe that they have acquired this power on their own?. You know better than that! I have stated it before! the real enemy is the liberal white! and just where do these liberals live? What section of the country holds all political power and has for a century and a half? For crying out loud! your being slapped in the face with the truth every single day but you refuse to see it! The only hope we have of salvaging any portion of the America that the founders gave us is a separation from the North. We know there are a few exceptions, but the liberal insanity that dominates the minds of those people will never bring us anything but more misery. I hope you wake up my friends, we need to start making plans, because if you think the liberals are ever going to change you are wrong!

      • John K

        What I’m saying is that not everyone in the north is a liberal, and unfortunately, I’ve had the misfortune of knowing southern liberals, ones actually from the south. I am not suggesting that we abandon southern heritage. What I am saying is that there have been southerners that sided against their own, like LBJ, who did get the Civil Rights Act passed into law, and allowed the black savages to declare war on whites.

        Whether the leaders are from the north or south, their masters are the same. They’ve all forgotten who wears the collar, and who holds the leash. I am not convinced that anyone can save the country at this point. With my interactions with southern liberals, along with the morons that destroyed California flooding in from the west, I fear we may be screwed. I don’t see any republicans except for Ted Cruz doing anything to stop illegal aliens. So, forgive me if I’m not optimistic when I see whites bickering…..

        • Long Live Dixie

          1) I know that not everyone in the North is a liberal. But this talk of white unity ignores the fact that most Northerners are liberals. As long most Northerners are liberals then white unity, on political grounds alone, is a fantasy. What good is it to talk of North-South unity defeating our racial foes when Vermont votes 2:1 for Obama? I have said it again and again: unity with them means our dominance and the triumph of liberalism. How much clearer can northern Virginia, etc., be as examples of what their influence and dominance bring us?

          That said, there are more than just political reasons that make unity with Yankeedom impractical and undesirable. I have already mentioned those reasons.

          2) You are suggesting we abandon Southern heritage, even if you don’t realise it. Like I said, unity with Yankees just means them dominating us. They are domineering by nature and numerous. We are conciliatory by nature and few. Every time we have “united” with them we have lost something.

          3) It is a cop out to say the Yankees are themselves dominated (I guess you mean by the Jews). The Yankee agenda has remained the same through the generations – before the Jews arrived in numbers and after the Jews arrived in numbers. The only difference afterwards is that the Jews jumped on board with the Yankee agenda.

          4) The Southern liberals you speak of would be marginalised and politically powerless in a Southland ruled by Southern nationalists. LBJ, for instance, was hated by Southerners and gained political power by pandering to Northern liberals. I mentioned in another post recently that even LBJ admitted that his “civil rights” act cost him Southern support. In statewide elections during those days, the South was dominated by conservatives.

          5) Why are white unity people more concerned about Southerners wanting to keep the South Southern than you are about the fact that two-thirds of Vermonters support Obama?

          • John K

            Point taken. I guess I never looked at it that way.

          • Tom B.

            John, Mr. Dixie is obviously an educated man with a keen intellect. I think his counsel at a time like this is well worth considering. If any movement is ever to gain traction, men of his abilities are going to be needed to make it work. I , for one, have no problem recognizing a person who has superior knowledge of a subject than I. The Southern people have been scattered and divided for too long- we should make every effort to rejoin our brothers and sisters in a common goal of unity. What he said about the Yankees being a domineering people and Southerners being a conciliatory people is the truth. I lived in a Yankee dominated society for fifteen years in Alaska. Prior to that experience I had no idea that such differences existed but they do. We will never be treated as equals by them. You have to ask yourself if you are willing to join hands with a people who have always looked down on you and will always keep you in a subservient position, or lend your support to your own folks. I made a vow when I left Alaska that never again would I live in a Yankee dominated society , and I intend to keep that vow.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Yup. He would be alive today if he followed that video.

  • Dunnyveg

    It should be quite obvious by now that to the liberal, “justice” is served only when non-liberal whites are dead. Things are really going to get interesting when Americans become a minority in our own country.