Survey Marks 2nd Year of Crime Increases

Pete Yost, ABC News, October 24, 2013

The violent crime rate went up 15 percent last year, and the property crime rate rose 12 percent, the government said Thursday, signs that the nation may be seeing the last of the substantial declines in crime of the past two decades.

Last year marked the second year in a row for increases in the crime victimization survey, a report that is based on household interviews.

The 2012 increases were driven by a rise in crimes that were not reported to police, a category frequently involving less-serious offenses. Simple assaults also rose. The rate of property crimes increased due to a rise in theft.

“One year of bad news is something you notice but don’t necessarily draw conclusions about. Two years of bad news suggests it might be time to start worrying,” said Carnegie Mellon University professor Jonathan Caulkins.

University of Maryland criminology professor James Lynch said the crime victimization survey, combined with a separate report recently issued by the FBI, suggests that the 20-year trend of dropping crime rates may be approaching an end.

{snip}

In the earlier FBI report, violent crime reported to police rose 1.2 percent last year compared to 2011. The number of property crimes reported to authorities declined 0.8 percent. But that report doesn’t include crimes not reported to authorities. Less than half of violent crimes were reported to police last year, and only about a third of property crimes were reported.

Crime rates had been declining since 1993, with an uptick in 2006 the only exception. From 1993 to 2011, the rate of violent crime declined by 72 percent.

{snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Direct Action Social Justice NEEDS TO BE increasing to meet the suborn resistance of unearned White privilege.

  • Jesse James

    So it just isn’t our imaginations or a collection of anecdotal evidence that is making a lot of us feel uneasy with what we perceive to be rising crime rates, somebody tell our resident Emmanuel Goldstein, he is constantly claiming crime rates have been going down for years now.

    • Sick of it

      People don’t feel safe letting their kids roam around freely anymore. That should be the only indicator one needs to see the obvious.

  • sbuffalonative

    Crime fluctuates from year to year, decade to decade, century to century. The MSM was trying to convince us that in a few years if trends continued, there would be little or no crime and soon we could dismantle the racist criminal justice system.

    When crime goes down in your town, the police are quick to take credit. Has your police department ever taken responsibility for increasing crime?

    As crime goes up, listen to the reasons liberals give. You’re going to hear some wacky theories.

  • Anon

    Crime is a white idea. White people and white people ONLY hold to certain rights and responsibilities all people have….so called inalienable rights endowed to us by God. Violation of these rights makes one a criminal. Violating the rights of another is crime.

    Where there is no recognition of those rights, there can be no crime. This is literally what almost every black person caught committing “crime” means when he exclaims “I didn’ do nuffin”. He means he didn’t do anything wrong. His non-recognition of the basic rights of others, even to exist means that the very idea that he might be doing something wrong, never enters into his head and he has no guilt whatsoever over the most heinous of acts….rape, robbery, murder, assault. The only limits he recognizes (and only during those rare times he bothers to think rationally at all) is the punishment and pain, even death, others will heap on him in retaliation. Such things, to his thinking are always unreasonable (I didn’ do nuffin’) However, the flip side of such is a much desired outcome. How much he can get away with, and his victims are helpless to do anything about it, determines his status. The contradiction never enters his mind. At best, non-whites are psychopaths, by our standards. But really, what they are, are monsters. What makes a monster a monster is his nature. Monsters don’t make decisions. Monsters lack choice. This is the fundamental misunderstanding all white people have with regard to non-whites. People have choice. People change. People can be rehabilitated. People repent. Monsters cannot. Evil isn’t something they do. It’s something they are. As far as repentance goes, the term means to return. To go back to the beginning to a state of innocence and start again. Monsters can’t do that. They were never innocent. Think on THAT, the next time you see black children and wonder what they will be in twenty years. The liberal sees them and feels hope. He feels hope because he sees children in a state of innocence. More experienced people notice that at age, 4, 5, 6, the black “children” are already hurting others. Where did they “learn” this? It is mystery until you admit they did not have to learn it. It’s not what they do. It’s what they are.

    What is the point of all that. The point is that a crime rate that goes up and down, is largely meaningless. Who cares if monsters are more or less active that season than in seasons prior. They are still monsters. No “progress” has been made just because the “crime rate” is down. Quite frankly, such things have far more to do with changing demographics and the propensity for those in charge to simply lie, than anything else.

    Which is a very important point. There is a certain threshold where the monsters take over and crime mysteriously disappears. Did the criminal behaviors stop? No….if anything they’ve dramatically increased. What is happening is a combination of monsters pretending to be cops, no longer arresting other monsters. Monsters in charge of keeping the stats, simply make up whatever lie is handy. And, worst of all, a monster faces a true jury of his peers when called to court and other monsters agree wholeheartedly with him that “he didn’ do nuffin”.

    So called crime is a white idea we virtually eliminated among ourselves. This issue with the monsters is completely different. Our techniques for dealing with crime are ludicrous in the face of what monsters are. What good is it to arrest a monster and jail him when the entire population he belongs to is just like him. Will you arrest everyone? The US seems to have tried. Some small success at incredible costs. Can you rehabilitate a monster? Hahahaha…no. Punish a monster? Dat be rayciss….is the only response you will ever get.

    All these things have in common the false paradigm of inclusion. That, at the end of the day, what matters is they are, of us, just like us, only different in skin color. That is not only untrue its an intentional deception (by whom is a whole other question….one that leads to war). But with regard to “crime” what we need is a paradigm of exclusion. They are not human. They are monsters. No different than if we were in the middle of a bad zombie film. A whole different set of assumptions, behaviors and beliefs apply.

    Of course, “dat be rayciss”.

    • Homo_Occidentalis

      The only authority blacks have ever deferred to is strength. This “law of the Jungle” mentality held by nearly all blacks is the reason the Afro-Caribbean nations and Africa are the world’s ultimate hellholes.

      • Mergatroyd

        Blacks have the force of government on their side. This government is anti-white and will do whatever it can to destroy white American, like moving blacks into white neighborhoods, your kid’s school, your workplace, etc.

    • Mergatroyd

      Blacks are only doing what they’re allowed to get away with by the DOJ, media, government and any other authorities. In the old days, there would have been righteous retribution, now anyone laying a hand on a black is a criminal and anyone who deigns to mention black perfidy is a racist and hater.
      They are the ultimate useful idiots being used as a battering ram by TPTB to terrorize and destroy white American because blacks have no conscious sense of right or wrong, violent only animal instincts to get what they want.

      Blacks are white enemies but it is those who let blacks attack, murder, rape, assault and destroy whites with near impunity who are the REAL white enemy.

    • saxonsun

      The complete dismissal of the social contract.

  • Son of Galton

    I’m a bit shocked that less than half of violent crimes were reported to police; is that a typical figure? If that is indeed the case, then I think we can safely triple or even quadruple crime rates for certain cities–like Detroit, Camden, Philadelphia, and other Bantustans and ‘Ricanstans with No-Snitching cultures.

    Fun fact: SNITCH = “S***, N***a, I’m Trying to Come Home”

    • willbest

      How many of those unreported violent crimes are ex post facto regret rape?

  • I can believe crime has gone down since an early ’90s high, mainly because of vastly increased incarceration, more carry permits and better law enforcement tactics, and perhaps (but I’m not so sure) the Freakonomics theory of the timing of legalized aborticide.

    But I do think that some of the decrease is due to obfuscation.

    • pcmustgo

      crack epidemic ended

    • PouponMarks

      13 million Black abortions since 1973, estimated. The larger the Black and Hispanic percentage of the population, the faster and further the overall decline of the Nation.

    • Steven Bannister

      This is an important point. Whenever some statistician says “Crime is going down!” the first question everyone should ask is: Down from WHAT?

      After their “liberation” in the 1960’s, blacks grew more bold in their criminal behavior and as a result, the 1970’s, 80’s and 90’s were FILLED with crime levels that had never been seen in the 1950s, 40’s, 30’s, etc.

      So, blacks RAISED the crime level in America and during the “crack epidemic” (ie the “black epidemic”) of the 1990’s it reached an astronomical high this nation had never seen before. It was only aggressive crime fighting and welfare reform that eventually brought that crime level down.

      So yes, when statisticians say “crime has gone down over the last 20 years” they are technically correct – but that DOESN’T mean we have a low crime rate, after all, people are still getting killed by the thousands every year. It just means that things are better that those TERRIBLE YEARS of the 1990s when blacks raised crime to an astronomical high.

      The REAL question Whites need to ask themselves is “What is the crime rate of today compared to the pre-civil rights America of the 1950’s?” (adjusted for population.) Or even ask themselves “What would the crime rate of an ALL white America look like compared to what we have now?”

      Don’t be fooled by crime statistics – blacks RAISED the bar on crime levels in America and we shouldn’t be celebrating just cause we see a slight drop from that black-induced high number.

  • Spartacus

    “The violent crime rate went up 15 percent last year, and the property crime rate rose 12 percent…”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Good. The worse things are, the better .

    • willbest

      Except that gun ownership increased as well so you know that will get the scapegoat.

      • Spartacus

        Why would you care what the enemy says ?

        • willbest

          What they say is irrelevant What they convince the sheep to do, however, that is the problem.

          • Spartacus

            Sheep are no threat to wolves. Make sure you’re a wolf, and whatever the sheep think will be irrelevant .

          • bigone4u

            Spartacus, you’re leaving out the shepherd and the sheepdog, both trusted to keep the sheep safe and kill the wolf. Our “shepherd” is a mulatto named Barry O and he very much wants to see the skins of dead wolves hanging on his wall.

          • Spartacus

            Groids aim so bad, I’m not worried .

          • Mergatroyd

            Winner: Spartacus.
            You’ve got a great attitude and focus, too bad more whites don’t have this mind set. The big bad government is not as fearsome as they’d like us to think. People said the same thing about the Soviets and the Nazis and this lame government is a weak sister compared to them. The military is becoming more Third World and won’t know what to do when the high tech equipment breaks down.

    • JohnEngelman

      Nothing good can come from the cataclysm you are looking forward to.

      • Nothing good? What about a white Europe?

        • JohnEngelman

          How many millions of whites would be killed to achieve that?

          Millions of whites will fight to oppose that.

          • Dear John: Millions of whites will be murdered by blacks, Arabs and Mexicans anyway.

            I wouldn’t mind blowing London into the stratosphere to save us. I’d hate to do it to Paris or Rome, but I still would.

            It was 1991 when I killed my first man in what used to be Jugoslavia, before the US got involved. I punched his ticket from about 50 yards away, only because I was a little bit faster. I’d have been dead for 22 years now if he’d heard me first.

          • saxonsun

            Paris wins hands down.

          • Spartacus

            Millions of Whites are standing idly by while dark-skins are raping, beating and killing their children. They are cattle, nothing else, and once we wrestle the whip from the hands of our ancient enemies, they will follow us blindly, just like they follow them now .

          • JohnEngelman

            You exaggerate the problems caused by “dark-skins” while you seem to have no idea how horrible a race war would be. (Keep in mind that Orientals usually behave and perform better than whites.)

            Think of the Rwandan genocide, but on a much larger and longer scale with no peace keeping forces to stop it.

            In about 100 days as many as twenty percent of the population of Rwanda was killed. Is that what you want, only magnified?

          • Spartacus

            I am not exaggerating anything…

            http://www(DOT)barenakedislam(DOT)com/2012/01/18/sweden-20-muslim-invaders-gang-rape-11-year-old-swedish-girl-in-public-bathhouse/

            And Rwanda is a joke compared to what I have in mind.

          • JohnEngelman

            In a race war many more white women will be raped.

            Many non white women will be raped by white men, but you do not seem to care about that.

          • Spartacus

            Only those that will have been stupid enough to stay around the critters will suffer, the rest will be ok. Once the System that has a stranglehold on us collapses, and we get a level playing field, the darkies don’t stand a chance .

          • JohnEngelman

            You sound like a teenage boy who has never experienced war.

            You also sound like someone whose political thinking is almost entirely motivated by hate.

          • Spartacus

            Unlike a battle-hardened veteran such as yourself ?

            And of course it’s motivated by hatred ! The scum want to wipe us of the face of the earth, they’re not even bothering to hide it anymore, what the hell would you expect me to feel for them ?

          • JohnEngelman

            Have you ever been a victim of non white crime, or are you just looking for excuses to hate people?

          • Spartacus

            I haven’t, but not because the bastards didn’t try, but because I put up a fight and won, something you’re obviously incapable of doing .

          • JohnEngelman

            I doubt you could have defeated four black ghetto thugs. I doubt you could have blocked a pistol bullet.

          • Garrett Brown

            And you have experienced war? That’s funny. Or did you read a book?

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            I know what violence and combat is, I know what real pain feels like, and I know what it’s like for bullets to barely miss me. Tell me, do you know what it feels like to be punched in the face by a thug twice your size? I do. have you ever pointed a gun at someone ready to blow his head off? How about clubbing them with a pipe, kicking them in the face or groin? I have. I doubt you do anything about warfare, I on the other hand know quite a lot about the subject because my Slavic ancestors were and still are the meanest whites on the planet when it comes to killing the enemy without compunction. Do I like violence? Of course not, but if things get to that point for me and many other whites, it will be because we have nothing to lose and the darkies, those who cannot be named or blames, and white collaborators left us no other choice. I have a mean streak, and I know how to use it. You on the other hand, sound like someone who doesn’t have it in him to defend what matters most to him, I hope however I am wrong on that one.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have been robbed at gunpoint, mugged, and nearly murdered by blacks. I was also beaten up by two police officers once, although I was doing nothing illegal, immoral, or even impolite. It’s a long story.

            I hate the people who did this to me, and I have no illusions about the Negro race.

            Nevertheless, my political thinking is not motivated by hatred.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            I once thought as you do, but the violence, threats of violence, discrimination against me, and other things have changed all of that. Do not be surprised if your political thinking becomes motivated by the hatred that is directed against us. When I realized just how much hatred there is being directed against me because I am white, I began to hate THEM. I had my own experience with law-enforcement that nearly resulted in death for me, so I can relate to your experience. I do not trust law-enforcement.

          • JohnEngelman

            I like every black person I know. Nevertheless, I realize that blacks have a crime rate that is much higher than the white crime rate, and I do not think that is because of white racism, but genes.

            Blacks and whites have evolved in response to different population pressures. Qualities that had survival value in the African jungle earn one felony convictions in a civilized country.

            Whites have a lower crime rate because for several thousand years whites with criminal inclinations tended to be executed.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            I don’t, I feel quite frankly uncomfortable around most of them. When push comes to shove they will side with their own over us no matter what. You will find that out the hard way. When the real killing starts, I’m siding with other whites, not blacks. As for the non-whites the Devil can have them, ALL of them, along with anyone else aiding and abetting them.

          • JohnEngelman

            At the predominantly black and consequently high crime city where I live, the only place I used to feel safe when surrounded by young black men I did not know was a local tavern. Unfortunately, it closed. A black bar tender there saved my life once.

            I try to avoid the approach of young black men I do not know unless they are obviously dressed for work or church.

          • Garrett Brown

            White women that ignorantly choose to continue the bottom feeding lifestyle they are already accustomed to, yes. But we don’t care about them anyway. Most are being raped right now before things even escalate.

          • Mergatroyd

            Prove it.

          • JohnEngelman

            I suspect that much if not most of this concern about race war, race displacement, genocide, and cultural Marxists is really a concern over the evolution of our economy.

            Those without plenty of IQ power are becoming marginalized. It is satisfying for them to imagine that they are defenders of the white race and western civilization. The reality is that in an increasingly competitive economy they have little of value to offer employers.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Many white men will kill non-white women and their children along with them out of sheer revenge during any such race war. It will be payback, since the darkies have killed untold millions of whites for the sake of death and destruction. Do you know how many times they massacred totally the populations of Kiev and Moscow? That is why in a race war, we must avenge their massacres by killing a far greater number of THEM.

          • “Think of the Rwandan genocide, but on a much larger and longer scale with no peace keeping forces to stop it.”

            Sounds good. Can we use nukes?

          • 5Sardonicus

            I really don’t think we are anywhere near a general “race war” There would have to be total governmental anarchy, economic collapse and incipient chaos, even then I doubt it would happen,

            I’m also not sure if “Orientals” behave better than whites in warfare with historical Asian characters like Genghis and Kubla Khan, Tamerlane The Great, Hideki Tojo, Kim IL Sung and Mao Zedong. I’m not implying that Americans/Europeans are angels who are not utterly ruthless and savage in warfare as well, but historically Asians have been experts at torture and extermination.

          • Katherine McChesney

            My Father knew much history about east Asians. He said out of all nations the east Asians are the cruelest and most brutal in times of war. I trust my Father’s assertions as he was a very well read gentleman.

          • Yes.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            As long as the right ones are decimated, expelled from our lands or both.

          • Yes, but I want the issue of atom bombs to be rationally discussed.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Bottom line, Mr. Engelman, is that Whites, including Jews of European descent, need to separate politically from the multicultural stew. Not all Whites will do this. Only racially aware, racial realist Whites will do so. Secession movements, such as the Western Maryland statehood movement, are the right approach. The United States no longer makes sense as a single country. We need to have at least three countries, with the rural/conservative, red county, culturally homogenous areas of the Northern states, for one, seceding first from their parent states, and second from the multicult disaster in D.C. Such a country could close the borders to all immigration save that from Europe and Israel, and maintain a European American, Judeo-Christian culture. Such a country could certainly be allied with a Confederate States of America, as a Northern version, so to speak, but with a small to non-existent population of Negroes/Hispanics/Muslims, and no further in-migration of those backward groups permitted. I agree with you that war is not what we want. What we do want is secession/amicable political divorce from the multicult Leftists.

          • M&S

            Engleman is right about one thing: It’s better to create exclusion zones than fight a race war we don’t need to win. America is still big enough for a responsible white population to survive an elective internment in our middle States while the ethnics destroy themselves, recreating the habitat their genes have built in Mexico and Africa.
            Society is a racial construct, race is not a social one.

            Right now, we have no plan and though we win every battle, having no strategic outcome in mind is the certain road to defeat in the war that is coming. Sun Tzu says so.

            Bleed for time, bleed for lives, bleed for victory. Don’t bleed for nothin’. Find a group you can agree with and give your energy to it.

          • M&S

            JE,
            In 1950, we were 27% of the world population. This after fighting a major war that cost us millions in needless dead whites.
            In 2010, we were 16% of the global population. After decades spent elevating protected predators above us.
            In 2050 we will be 9.8% of the world population. And it won’t matter if we ‘suddenly realize’ the risk of not being culturally dominant in our own homelands (specifically, no population which has fallen below 10% have ever regained control over their own destiny).
            In 2100 we will be 4% of the planetary population, many of us cross bred 2-3 times with other populations and so no longer really ‘white’. Or we will be nothing. Because the slope after the tipping point is really kind’ve slippery.
            We can afford another fight, now. Though it will cripple us.
            We cannot do so in 2060.
            And everyone on the liberal side knows it and looks forward to the day when their own people’s elective suicide is assured. Are you among them?

          • JohnEngelman

            There will not be a race war. There will not be a white ethno state. The future of the United States is more prosaic. Whites will lose their majority status. The Republican Party will cease to exist, or it will become irrelevant.

            Some whites will thrive. They will be whites with genius level IQ’s and professional degrees from elite universities. They are already thriving. Most of them vote Democratic.

            The future will be multi racial, multi ethnic, and meritocratic. Jews have always done well in that environment.

            Eventually there will be one hybrid race on this planet with a much higher IQ. Evolution is an ugly process. The results are beautiful.

          • M&S

            Your position is not supported by either anthropological nor even general paleontological studies sir.
            Dinosaur populations were already on their way out with the asteroid hit due to lack of remaining adaptive potential in a world where extreme competition lead to giantism and a changing climate meant that necessary caloric resources were simply no longer available to support it.
            Hominid populations have been on this world since the Pleistocene. They each performed well in niche environments as what Darwin called ‘Terrain Isolates’, evolving as they could within stable punkeek norms.
            There is MASSIVE and overwhelming evidence that it was the shift away from this isolationism as geographic and climatological obstructive genetics and into new environments which selected for new traits that caused the L1/L2/L3 variant genetics to further split andevolve into the M and N variants which we know as the White and Asian subspecies.
            That we did this via endrun through Saudi Arabia and into an India rendered almost uninhabitable thanks to the Tuba eruption, avoiding the cannibalistic Neanderthal, is a miracle.
            It is telling however that the Neanderthal died out in our presence and we began the long road to lactose tolerance, complex speech and blue eyes and blonde hair in an environment where Europe was so cold nobody wanted in. And our genepool was kept dense enough that sweeps of mutational variance were able to move through a common population.
            ‘And the rest is history’ defined by White and Asian discoveries in science, philosophy, art and law among so many others.
            Presently, what differentiates us is that Whites, unlike Asians, learned the discipline of cold as the conservation of resources. You do not impregnate a woman whom you can’t feed through the winter or else by the time spring finally arrives, she will be dead, your kid will be dead and your geneline with them. Because no other white man will ‘loan’ you his woman.
            That kept us in balance with our environment and drove our minds to imagine and achieve as more than just animals. To the extent that the non-whites who now make up 84% of the global population and have, on average, less than 90IQs (even including your preferred Asians) are now the giantist group whose call upon the resources of the planet will become ever harder to contain and sustain as the isolation which protected us is removed thanks to the idiocy of open travel and immigration.
            Those who cannot create solutions to complex problems will only breed those Malthusian conditions bigger in a rich, supportative, white environment.
            And then the climate will change and Mazcats will happen at levels that DWARF the losses of all wars put together. While whites wither on the vine or are ‘blended out’, taking our marvelous conceptual IQ with us.
            I am not a Jew. I couldn’t care less what happens to them, I do not see a bright future for a people living in a region where they are surrounded by a hostile indigenous Arab population that outnumbers them 20:1. Having gone through four wars while increasing from 50 million to 320 million, 1950-2003 (_Eurabia_).
            I don’t believe Jews will find many advanced universities here or in Asia where all the R&D is moving to that will let them in for the simple statistical reason that 3% of Jewish brethren in American society gets 25% of the college scholarships while 8% of our society (as Asians) gets 20%.
            And without whites, Asians will exclude Jews as the biggest competitor on the block.
            That’s competition and a Chinese society which has wisely remained 93% Han Chinese, will not open their doors to the Jewish sponsored liberal view with the obvious induced suicide of America as an example.
            Beyond this, Indians live by the rule: “Food, Clothes, Shelter.” driving an existence where the upper castes pay off the lower ones and so Indian culture doesn’t rise so much as hover, as it’s own population spirals towards 3.2 billion it will achieve by 2060.
            I doubt if Blacks, who will achieve the greatest population shift of any subspecies of man, from less than 300 million in 1950 to 4.3 billion in 2100, will suddenly find a need for advanced culture. Given South Africa and Mozambique as examples of degradation to a sustainable mean of corruption and absolute entropy as decay.
            With the U.S. tenuring as few as 2 professors in physics during a single year (_Wired For War_), you can imagine a society where we have taught Asians all we know, they have taken from us all we have as industrial and research base soft capital and nobody comes to Dangerous And Dirty America for an education because quite frankly there are no profs whose research programs interest them enough to become grad students and it costs too much to live here when they could be making contacts in their own, advanced, landscape.
            China is not stupidly liberal sir, they will control all mercantile interests within their own nationalist economy and suck the world dry of all resources once they no longer need to feed the West to keep the illusory monetary exchange game running in place.
            Without an exclusive ethnostate which _every other population group has_ Whites will die out by 2100 and the world will be a poorer place on the way to utter resource depletion and mass die offs by populations that have no hope, intellectually or culturally, of updating the infrastructure which made us great until we gave our system away.
            And for what? Evolution ends in 99.99% of the species _dead_ for want of adaptability. If it must happen, why not let it be the Hispanics or the Asians or the Blacks who have never learned not to breed until they exceed the environmental carrying capacity before setting out upon wanderjar that turns into overrun like Genghis and Tamarlane.
            Why can it not be the whites who, collectively, will never consume as much as these groups do because we do not breed like locusts in the field?
            Finally, you are wrong because there is no ‘outcome’ to evolution, it is random and assortatively unreliable in generating useful traits in peoples whom are clearly several millennia back on the timeline from whites and who would need drastically more fixes, genomically, to be brought up to our level, than we could sprint ahead with, on our own.
            And they will not let us do this without conflict because it is the nature of the genetic algorithm to trip up and sabotage what you cannot match.
            In this, Nature is the greatest serial killer in history. It cares not who or why or when. It takes opportunistically from those who fail to follow it’s sole dictum: Survive. Breed. Succeed.
            And if evolution is to be so random, there is no shame in wanting it to strike down someone else’s race.
            Let it spare my people. We have done more than enough to deserve our own destiny, not that of a muddled and muddied race.

          • JohnEngelman

            I see two problems facing the human species on this planet. First, computer technology reduces the economic value of jobs that can be learned by those of average or below intelligence. Second, the less intelligent races (on the average) are the most prolific.

            I am not sure how this will be resolved. Nevertheless, those who can master complex job skills quickly will always have an advantage over those who cannot.

            Mastery of computer technology can also determine the outcome of wars.

            No matter what happens, the brilliant of all races will prevail. Their descendants will populate this planet a thousand years from now. The descendants of unmarried welfare mothers will not.

          • M&S

            Mr. Engleman,
            Computer technology is the key to the next genetic ‘environmental shift’ by which a lack of ditch digger forcing mechanisms give us the ability to shift our epigenetic emphasis of development towards something which is IQ driven. Specifically, anthropomorphic robotics offers the Paul Bunyon vs. Steam Engine explicit refutation of ‘work etchic’ by which the human brain is optimized towards task accomplishment (via neuro motor developmental emphasis) vs. higher cognitive development.
            It takes a lot of calories to functionally create and innovate new ideas. It takes a lot of calories to drive the muscle twitch to make those ideas possible. Trying to force both into one body will lead to metabolic scalarism of such a level as to burn out the cellular engines. This is the warning that blacks with their rapid burn lifestyles and sudden droop in middle age should be telling us.
            OTOH, electrohydraulics don’t function on cellular efficiencies of caloric transformation and distribution but rather direct conversion of existing energy stores to motion.
            It is their ability to create a work force which executes our ideas without having to be paid off, socially, for the wage slavery they enter into that will mark our ‘next step’.
            Which is where your uncertainty over dealing with massive populations of the uninhibited breeder and criminal populations, always seeking leverage by numbers or by threat of dominant violence and _living amongst us_ suggests in fact that they are our doom, not our salvation.
            You cannot pour honey into an ocean and get wine. Neither body ever was or will be what each can become on their own.
            This is the biological truth of evolution. We are _not intended_ to become a merged growth path. Specialization has taken us on totally different trajectories and trying to merge them will only lead to the loss in potential for each. Parallelism is not tangential, by definition.
            The Hispanic and Asian and black populations of this world are an endless horde the attempted satiation of whose appetites for what we have made for ourselves will only lead to total environmental collapse as resources depletion and pollution destroy everything we know as good _because_ we are the sole species of man to have achieved homeostasis.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            The brilliant members of our Caucasian race cannot prevail economically when Negroes and Hispanics are constantly given positions they do not deserve in order to fill affirmative action quotas.

          • JohnEngelman

            I agree. I am opposed to affirmative action.

          • The “lack of remaining adaptive potential” you mention among dinosaurs is nonsense. There are more species of birds living today than there are mammal species, which suggests that they remain quite viable. I have fossil skulls of both Velociraptor mongoliensis and Teratornis meriami in my living room. Separated by over 70 million years, they’re the same size; the only major difference between these skulls is that the first has teeth and the second has a beak. It is known that Velociraptors had feathers. Dinosaurs didn’t go extinct.

          • Neuday

            Given the tensions and their inexorable rise, and given the history of mankind, it is far, far more probable that we will have war than no war. Man used to fight for his God, then his country, next it will be his race. The winners of that war will force their race upon the losers, genocide is the right word for it. This is the way of man.

          • JohnEngelman

            Among intelligent, well educated whites I do not detect much racial consciousness. What those people want determines the direction of the future.

          • I don’t think so. What most of them are doing via their apathy is deciding to postpone a decision.

          • JohnEngelman

            No matter what else happens, they will prevail.

          • Neuday

            As the entire purpose of civilization is to have a means to live together productively and to communicate that means to the next generation, if you find yourself the benefactor of such a birthright and fail to have consciousness of it, then you’re manifestly unintelligent, docile, not educated, but rather a receptacle of propaganda fed by those who mean harm to you and yours. A useful idiot.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Of course you do not detect racial consciousness amongst well educated Whites. Our Constitutional rights to free speech have been trampled on. If we are racially aware, we only share this sentiment with trusted friends, and in the anonymity of cyberspace, such as here on AmRen. To get a true measure of how folks really feel in the current police state environment, you must get to know someone, and become a trusted friend before they will take the risk of sharing these feelings. Whites are fired, and thrown under the bus these days if we voice our racial realist convictions to the wrong person.

          • JohnEngelman

            Intelligent, well educated white Gentiles have no reason to resent Jews and Orientals because they can compete with them.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            It’s one thing to compete with them while they are living in their own lands while we are living in ours. Quite another when they are here competing with us with an artificial advantage bestowed by anti-white government policies.

          • JohnEngelman

            In the United States affirmative action policies work against Orientals.

            http://www.amren.com/news/2011/12/some_asians_col/

            By the way, Orientals and Jews have as much right to live in the United States as you do.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            I don’t agree, they have NO right to be here. They have homelands, and they are displacing us in our own. Sorry, I disagree with you on this one.

          • JohnEngelman

            Of course you don’t agree, but that does not matter. Unless they are illegal aliens, and most of them are not, they have every legal right to be here, and every moral right. What is more, they tend to behave and perform better than white Gentiles. That is why they tend to make more money, and why they are less likely to be in prison.

          • White1

            And you’ve already taken the plunge in subsuming the white race…

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Whites have not done well in the multicult environment, and this includes Jews of European descent. Some Jews of European descent like to give lip service to the supposed merits of multiculturalism, like most White Leftists do, but they do not do well in, or prefer this type of environment. Jews were originally more tolerant of Blacks moving into their neighborhoods in the Northern cities than other Whites in the postwar era, but they were no more impressed by Black degeneracy than other Whites, and have also abandoned city neighborhoods for the burbs to escape Black violence. Israel is the only country in the Middle East that is remotely livable, and Jewish neighborhoods that are still populated by the descendants of European Jews are safe and clean.

          • JohnEngelman

            Because Jews have been discriminated against they have tended to be sympathetic to blacks. Nevertheless, proximity to blacks dispels sympathy.

            It is easier to feel sorry for blacks when one has little contact with them.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            One of the few things we can agree on. Tolerance for “die-versity” is inversely proportional to one’s distance from it. The closer it is to you, the less you tolerate it.

          • JohnEngelman

            I enjoyed living with Vietnamese war refugees in downtown San Jose, California.

          • Funruffian

            Jared Taylor once quoted that Whites are now only 9% of the World populace. Is he speaking solely of people with White European ancestry or does he include Whites of the Middle East as well?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I would certainly consider Arab Christians to be White, as long as their racial genetics are purely Caucasian (many Arabs have a large share of Negroid admixture), but would never consider a Muslim to be White. Even if a Muslim is racially White, they are not culturally White.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I’ve heard many a White Leftist say that they welcome the day when we are a minority in our own countries. When I ask them why in the heck they welcome such a tragic situation, and suggest that they look at South Africa, Detroit, Philly, etc., as examples of what life will be like for us, they naively insist that I am mistaken, and that the Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims will be living in peace at that point due to a lack of racism…Ugghhh!!! It is hard to believe, indeed, that many are this naïve, but it is nevertheless the case.

          • M&S

            ODKR,
            I don’t really know where to start here, though I appreciate what you say.
            I think it’s been a gradual indoctrination in self delusion backed by an odious ‘vision’ of first assurance of material wealth as social continuity (for my generation) and now, as wealth for whites subsides and the arriving Hordes ‘asks’ us to give for nothing but displacement in return; a creaky sense of herd consciousness as a shift to ‘social rapproachment’ which is to say acceptance among friends and tolerance by conquering enemies.
            Bluntly, young men of my age never dared say: “But I don’t want to be like them, be with them or be accepting of them.” because we would lose the chance to move through our classes’ wealth enablement system, have decent lives and stay away from the races as the poverty whose squalor they engender.
            Today, the attempt to dull and blend in the sharp edges of white intellect leads as a regression to a mean leaves whites with a decidedly ugly position where they don’t want to be awoken at their own social execution but rather wish only to be seen as one victim among many ‘just ignore the skin’.
            It won’t work. Because it’s a genetic algorithm and blacks and Hispanics and Asians all recognize the weakening as the exploitable potential of a race in it’s death throes and the option to improve their own impoverished existence by scavenging from the corpse of our own.
            We will become MORE victims than they ever dreamed of being because while they have a background of genetic failure, our success is something we can only plea as what we have chosen to lose.
            In this you see the truth of racism: it is a naturalist protection of the specific gene pathways by which the people create the nation in the model of their folkway.
            It has been with us for millennia as an instinctive and diversity ensuring protection of genetic capabilities so that, eventually, speciation can occur.
            As society is a racial construct so to is race a product of an isolated environmental norm where the genes can optimize, breed large populations, and thus _create_ the genetic mutations which sweep through to make us better and better.
            It is no accident that things like Lactose Tolerance, Complex Speech and Blue Eyes and Blonde Hair and the heightened intelligence that seem to go with started out in the Middle East, spread north and -then- underwent a massive explosion relative to the Other Populations of the planet which were often the last to inherit the trait and rarely if ever the first to pioneer it.
            Whites are not taught this. They are subjugated to an endless stream of warped paranoid fantasy, engendered by the people who control Hollywood, which depict us as mindless butchers without moral center or higher conscience instead of competitors resolving a fight for dominance in our own gene group that frankly hardly involved the other races.
            This basically only comes down to jealousy. Of our lands, our wealth and our genes. And like the idiots who killed the goose looking for the gold, there are so many OPs out there that even if we went willingly unto the darkened night of racial self-genocide, we would never improve them so much as lose what we are, ourselves.
            It saddens me, endlessly, to understand that genocide is not only what my own people seek as the path of least resistance in a society that is no longer their own to be telling them what to think or do. But the excuses they make up for choosing that pathway are the excuses of a world which will not be a better place if we are gone.
            Hispanics and Blacks and Asians and Jews will not get along when we are gone, they will simply turn on the next provider culture with hands out and predatory expectation in their eyes. And in their numbers as lack of credible high IQ problem solving, they will implode because they are the locusts of this earth.
            They never learned The Rule Of Cold.

          • You are still leaving out the nuclear part of the equation and my comments about nuclear weapons are almost always deleted. That given, someone very much like me will be running the United States or a large part of it someday, and that man will simply not care how much “millions” of “whites” will be willing to “fight”. They’ll stop wanting to fight once they understand that they won’t even get to fight.

            A smaller case example was given to me by an Assyrian Christian Iraqi vet from 1991 I once spoke with. He said that the first US aircraft bombs gave a small “pop” far overhead and everybody laughed. “Then Hell opened up”. These were cluster munitions. He said than another truly hideous realization came once everyone understood that the air war and artillery bombardment would go on for weeks.

            Most folks simply can not or will not understand. Please read “The Mote In God’s Eye” by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. The alien home planet is described as covered with overlapping, circular lakes – nuclear craters. They had really big wars. So do we.

            Our closest biological relatives are chimps, who have wars and celebrate the end of each of them by eating the babies of their defeated enemies. It is part of our biological makeup.

            Tom Chittum predicted that Mexico would become actively involved in the future US racial civil war. What he never admitted was that this will end up with Mexico City being turned into a deep lake. When the survival of an entire people is at stake, they will use the weapons at their disposal.

          • Spartacus

            Correct me if I’m mistaking, but the US has thousands on nukes, and they’re spread across the entire country. What would stop an organized White movement from taking over a couple of those ?

          • Permissive Action Links. It would take some trouble to get around those.

  • NoMosqueHere

    In NYC, crime dropped when Giuliani was elected mayor in 1993. Giuliani policed the blacks aggressively with Stop & Frisk and other tough methods, and of course he was accused of racism on a continuing basis by the blacks and their white leftist allies. But the black menace in the streets lessened .

    Bloomberg followed most of Giuliani’s police methods, and things were going fairly well until Barry Soetoro was elected POTUS. Now, blacks have the upper hand (or fist), and I expect things to get worse quite fast when the sick liberal Bill De Blasio becomes NYC’s mayor.

    • M.

      ..

  • 48224

    This whole country will turn into Detroit.

    • Epiminondas

      I suspect we won’t be a “whole country” by then.

  • The only reason there was ever a decrease in crime ever was because crimes were being reclassified and unreported. And violent crime took off the day Obama was elected.

  • bigone4u

    The bribery effect of welfare, in effect paying blacks to behave themselves, is wearing off after 50 years of the “Great Society.” Nothing will stop crime now other than the death penalty, whether it’s administered by the State or by the intended victim.

    • JohnEngelman

      I favor the gallows, using short drops.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Georgia has considered using the guillotine. One of their politicians lobbied for it on the grounds that organs could be harvested for transplantation.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Bribery is right. We need to re-institute Chain Gangs. That is the only answer. They are Schvartse, and there is nothing we can do to change their temperament. We might as well put the worst of the Negroes to work building our highways, as was done in the good old days Down South.

  • JohnEngelman

    Because of the decline in tax revenue states are under pressure to reduce prison populations.

    • We Americans lock too many people up. Get some of them on reporting probation, ankle monitors and random drug tests. This would cost less, have them back with their families, as well as working and paying taxes.

      • JohnEngelman

        I suspect that most criminals in maximum security prisons are unemployable. I would rather have them work at hard labor, enforced by the whip.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          You are right on the money with this John. This is what the South did in the old days. Chain gangs were used to build roads. White Southerners understood the Negro temperament, and knew that putting these sociopathic Blacks to work, under tight supervision, was the best thing to do with them. They were paying their debt to society, being forced to get work done and contribute.

      • John R

        You obviously don’t live near Philly, dude. In Philly, probation/parole is a joke. There have been so many crimes in the city committed by people who, according to our LIBERAL news media, were, “currently on parole” if even the media recognize this, what is that saying? No, HARSH punishment is called for, plain and simple. Blacks have no shame over being criminals.

        • Were I was locked up, a a “low” in Texas, about 1/3 of the inmates were white, and I think at least half of those guys should have been at home on ankle monitors and drug rehab..

          One of my friends had been a meth user. He was stopped with “too much” (more than 500 pills) Sudafed – he was taking it to his meth cook. This is a six-month federal misdemeanor. He was also caught with illegal fireworks, also a misdemeanor, but the court called it an “explosives” enhancement – which isn’t even supposed to apply to misdemeanors – and gave him an additional ten years. Rex ended up doing nine-and-a-half years on two misdemeanors. His wife divorced him and kept their house.

          I have very little sympathy for hard drug-users, but there has to be a better way.

          One of them who never got over his mother dying of cancer went back. Drugs again. He had been a mechanical engineer. At the age of 53, he really ought to leave that garbage alone. He’s out, but at a halfway house. Of course his wife divorced him and kept the house.

          Another of my friends was paroled this spring after serving 13 years on 37 for being stabbed in the neck. He’s on intensive supervision. His girlfriend stabbed him and Luis refused to press charges. Under Colorado state law, the police are legally required to arrest and charge SOMEONE in any case of domestic violence, so he wound up in the hot-seat. He had been a highly-paid software engineer for Qwest and was so well-behaved and trustworthy that the prison eventually had him working on their computers.

          One really has to be at ground-zero for this to understand it.

          • WR_the_realist

            It’s good to have a description of what’s really going on. The case of the guy who was in prison because his girl friend stabbed him is crazy. Stupid laws by stupid politicians certainly help to keep our prisons fuller than they need to be.

          • I think the reason for the Colorado law is that a woman who called the cops on her abusive husband and didn’t press charges was later murdered by him.

            I knew Luis was telling me the truth because along with his epic neck scar, his Denver County Jail inmate ID tag was with him wearing a hospital gown. His ex-girlfriend later looted out his checking account. Since this was at Wells Fargo and my mother worked there, mom was able to get that stopped for him after I put him on the telephone with her. The ex- also forged his signature on the pink slip to his Range Rover and sold it.

            Luis was suffering from very severe depression, and I could tell he had been on some sort of suicide watch because he had been issued shoes with velcro closures – not laces.

          • WR_the_realist

            That case with the woman who didn’t call the cops on her abusive husband and was later killed by him proves the truth of the aphorism well known by lawyers: Hard cases make bad law.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Thank you, Mike, for elaborating on what prison is like. It seems, in recent years, that law enforcement has been treating Blacks with the most lenience, and Whites with the least. You have confirmed that this is indeed the case.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Appalachian Ohio here, familiar with Western PA area in particular, and PA in general. I’m familiar with the Negro problems in Philly, same Negro problems as any city with lots of Negroes, but seemingly a little worse. I’ve been following the Western Maryland secession movement in the news, and am all for this. Neighboring Central PA, as you probably know, is an area that would be perfect for secession as well. Metro Pittsburgh is too Liberal to join any such thing, though greater Pitt is more Conservative than most metro areas. With the exception of the Libtards in State College, the whole central part of PA is very conservative, and as ripe for secession from Harrisburg as Western MD is from Annapolis. Altoona, Johnstown, and Scranton/Wilkes-Barre are all very conservative, with small non-White populations, and a history of low crime. In recent years, though, some towns have suffered demographic dispossession thanks to the Liberalism of PA. Have you read about Hazleton?? This coal region town has turned into a crime infested sewer, due to the influx of massive numbers of Hispanics from NY/NJ. The town is something like 40% Hispanic these days, and has gangs everywhere and drive-by shootings. As recent as 2000, this town was mostly White, and crime free, a typical coal region town that needed more jobs, but was quiet and peaceful. Whites in Hazleton have been dispossessed, and this has happened suddenly and rapidly.
          The Western Maryland secession movement is an excellent thing, and I hope it is successful, and has a domino effect, with Central PA following suit, a block of red counties in Southeast Ohio, and the state of Superior movement in Northern MI and WI. Such new states could then look at aligning with the Confederate States in seceding from D.C., due to shared European American values and culture, and a desire to stop immigration from the third world. Once in a separate nation, with no immigration, a town like Hazleton could say no to Blacks and Hispanics moving in, and prevent dispossession.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        We lock up far too many who really should be put to death by hangmen, or firing squads. Every alien here illegally who commit murders, rapes, armed robberies, terrorism and trafficking should all be executed as enemy insurgents without exception.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Some of the Whites who have gone to prison for non-violent drug offenses, yes, I agree that they should be out of prison, with proper behaviors being reinforced, staying clean and working hard every day.
        Most Leftists would say to me, what about the Blacks who fit this description? This highlights the problem with Leftists. Blacks who fit this description are the exception. The rule, with Blacks, is senseless violence. This is why racial realist Whites need to start planning our separation from the multicult Leftists. Some good steps are underway these days. The Western Maryland secession movement is an excellent thing. This Western portion of densely populated and strongly Leftist Maryland, the five Western Counties of the state, which are very conservative and still strongly European American descent, is excellent.
        Secession of these counties would be excellent. Black populations in the three Western Maryland cities, Frederick, Hagerstown, and Cumberland, have grown precipitously in recent years, as these cities are stuck in a state where Leftist White Liberals are embracing and encouraging their own dispossession. As a new and separate state, Western Maryland could halt the handouts that are encouraging this influx. Other states, such as neighboring West Virginia, are not having such influx issues, due to smaller handouts on Welfare/Food Stamps. In the big picture, Western Maryland as a separate state would be the kind of state to join a Confederate States of America, seceding with other Southern states due to being below the Mason Dixon.
        On this note, I encourage you, Mike, my AmRen friend, to peruse Southern Nationalist Network’s website. Southern Nationalists are on the right track. The largest problem I see with them is their anti-Yankee stance, which is an obvious departure from Racial Realism and efforts at White American unity, but I think that these sentiments are mainly from members in the deep South. Secession is indeed the answer for preservation of European culture. If West Virginia and Western Maryland, as a new state, were to secede from the Government in Washington, neighboring areas that are Conservative and White in Ohio and PA, for example, I think would take secession from their Leftist, Urban state Governments seriously.

  • John R

    We should be catching on to the pattern by now: Blacks move in large numbers in the 1960’s, into the cities; crime rates skyrocket. Then, in the 1980’s and 90’s, new get tough measures against crime are enacted. Crime rates start to fall. Now, the election of the first black president, we are all once again made to feel “sensitive” to racism, (i.e. Zimmermann case, for example) and, like any other competing species, blacks sense the weakness in White society. Crime is on the rise again. Crime is really about racial war, plain and simple, and we must once again fight back. That is the simple truth.

    • PouponMarks

      Yes, the offered helping hand, the trillions of wealth transfer, the murder of Whites, the reverse discrimination of Whites stepping aside for less qualified “Minorities”, has resulted in no gains or improvement for Blacks, and in fact, animus and hate from them to us. How about that? Biting the hand that fed them and kept them alive. Make that mauling the hand. Like any organism, low or high, pain tends to check behaviors that initiate that. Only basic “negative reinforcement” will deter sub-human future behavior and provide deterrence and impulse reserve.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        We can’t win with Blacks. They have a contentious temperament. With them, everything we do will always be wrong, even if we are pampering the daylights out of them, as is being done these days. Segregation is the only answer. God put them in Africa, separated from us by geographical barriers, because they are meant to live separate from us.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Right on the money. Blacks are more violent than we are. Anytime a community gains a large Black population, crime and violence skyrocket. Blacks have a contentious, violent temperament, and engage in violence far more often than we do. The 1990’s was a good period. It was good because Clinton was a Southern White guy, and he enacted some good, Conservative policies as far as crime. He had a sympathetic attitude towards Blacks for a Southern White guy, no doubt, but he also seemed to realize that Blacks, if not punished for bad behavior, will go overboard with violence. If Hillary Clinton were President right now, She probably would have given some syrupy speech on racial healing after the Zimmerman trial, no doubt, not something that will encourage any kind of racial awakening amongst Whites, but would surely not have given the hate filled, Black Hitler speech that our Black Muslim dictator gave following this trial. Blacks do not identify with Bill and Hillary, and do not pay much attention to syrupy liberal rhetoric about racial healing. They do listen to the likes of Sharpton and Jackson, though, and Obama gets them charged up in the same manner. Obama’s hatred of Whites is very calculated, and his speech regarding the Zimmerman trial was intentionally calculated to incite greater hatred of Whites by Blacks than already exists in our country. While I am no fan of Libtards like the Clintons, who encourage Whites to feel sorry for Blacks, they are surely not as dangerous as what we have now. We have a hateful Black Muslim dictator at the helm, who hates Whites, pure and simple.

      • John R

        Thank you for your reply. Generally, I agree with you. But, I have one minor disagreement that is worth mentioning. You say Obama’s hatred of Whites is very calculating. No. I think his SCHMOOZING of people is very calculating. In front of the teleprompter he comes across as a very reasonable guy who everyone should support, regardless of race. But, every once in a while, he goes off script. His moderate mask falls and his hate shows. Examples? The comment about the police in the Harold Lois Gates incident, saying that the police “behaved stupidly” when he wasn’t even there. Then his statement of a white relative-I think it was his grandmother-who he said was like “a typical white person.” And of course his “if I had a son…” comment that I probably didn’t even have to mention. That is not calculation. These statements reveal his real feelings. But, no matter. He gets away with it because of the bleeding heart liberal press that refuses to criticize an obviously White hating racist as he. That’s all. Peace.

  • T_Losan

    I always bristle when I listen to goofy liberals complaining about the “Disneyfication” of NYC when they wouldn’t have lasted a week in the NYC of the late 80s/early 90s

  • JohnEngelman

    I advocate an end to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), free abortion on demand, and a criminal justice system that emphasizes the frequent use of capital punishment, and the more frequent use of long prison sentences at hard labor enforced by corporeal punishment.

    I am in favor of race profiling, and stop and frisk.

    • I dislike the idea of capital punishment because I had to listen to an FBI agent lie under oath on the stand in my case. The smug look on that one’s face was remarkable.

      • JohnEngelman

        I am not asking what you were accused of. I am wondering if the testimony of the FBI agent under oath was believed. Was it?

      • bigone4u

        I had a minor skirmish with the law and the law enforcement officer lied in my case too. Thus, I sympathize with you, but I still support the death penalty in cases where the evidence is overwhelming and not dependent on the testimony of liars.

  • The problem there is what constitutes “violence”. Under US federal law, any illegal narcotics sale is called “violent”.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Exactly!! The criminalization of marijuana smoking has only succeeded at sending far too many young White guys to prison to be bullied and sodomized by violent Negroes, and inculcating far too many such young White guys into the violent Black culture. Don’t get me wrong, I am not in favor of marijuana smoking. A person choosing to smoke this stuff, though, is no different from some of us choosing to sip a glass of Whiskey or Vodka in the evening after a hard day’s work. As long as we don’t try to operate any machinery or make any important decisions while we are enjoying our adult beverages, we are not harming society.
      Again, as usual, racial realism needs to be front and center. Most Whites do not go and shoot people when we are drunk. Blacks do. I don’t know for certain, but I’ll bet that some of the same racial differences in behavior come out with pot smoking. I’ve read that folks in Southern Appalachia have grown their own pot and smoked for many years, right along with making moonshine. They rarely go and shoot someone as a result. If America would just focus on punishing violence properly, and punish violence instead of a behavior that sometimes leads to violence, and when so, mainly amongst non-White racial groups, that would be best.
      The racial difference here, as you know, is the key which unlocks many of the answers. As Jared Taylor always points out, glossing over the importance of race, a key biological difference between humans, creates massive problems. American Indians tend to get drunker than skunks on amounts of alcohol that most of us Whites can easily handle, and will only react to with a mellow buzz. Blacks, already violent when sober, are that much more ready to shoot someone when the alcohol flows. Yet, alcohol consumption rates in this country are highest in areas that have low homicide and violent crime rates. Wisconsin used to have the highest alcohol consumption rate in the country, but one of the lowest murder rates. One can visit the country of Poland, for example, where there is a lot of drinking, and very little resulting violence. Some Muslim countries have no drinking, but nothing but constant violence. If we could only accept racial realism in America, we could have a good public dialogue on the racial realities of alcohol and marijuana affecting behavior. Alcohol, in our European American culture, oftentimes serves a valuable purpose of calming nerves, and soothing emotions. This is not true with non-Whites.

  • Funruffian

    A race war is in our midst. But the Real physical upheaval will happen within the next 25 years. However soon it occurs and how people will form alliances is somewhat vague to me. Will the White liberals play it neutral, become Race traitors, or decide to defend themselves? Who knows to what extent this variable will play out? I just wonder how the MSM will try to hide or obfuscate the truth. They can’t possibly think they are impervious to Black violence forever.

  • lessthantolerant

    The young man who broke into my home last year showed no signs of remorse or willingness to surrender. For a brief period I regretted him leaving my home under a sheet.
    It was later discovered he had broken into several homes in the neighborhood and had no real need except the thrill of it.
    His parents still claim he death was racially motivated.

    • QuinnTheEskimo9

      There should be a parade and medal struck in your honor for such fine public service. Imagine all the misery you have curtailed.
      The next homeowner might not have been so lucky and got himself “kilt.”

    • OHDeutscheRebel

      Of course his parents claim that. Same old B.S. as with Trayvon Martin’s family, and all Negroes anytime we stand up to their bullying. Negroes always make it a race issue when we defend ourselves against them, and try to pretend that we are attacking their skin color without provocation. Just and Zimmerman acted in self defense when attacked by thug bully Trayvon, and should be praised for doing so, you should be praised for standing up to this Negroid bully who seemed to think it was his right to enter your home as an intruder. Blacks always try to divert the focus to skin color, and away from the real issue, that being their sociopathic behavior. I think that most of us can see what their true psychology is from this. The Negro race has a sociopathic mentality. Our expectations for them to live peacefully, and to respect others, is seem by them as an affront. Only the few Negroes who have actually embraced such values, and they are very, very few indeed, have a shred of respect for our expectations of basic decency that we hold as a society. Our European American conception of basic decency is not only alien to Negroes. It offends them. Apparently, their idea of freedom entails freedom to engage in violence whenever and wherever one pleases.
      Most White Leftists would roundly castigate me for what I have just pointed out, because they actually believe that most Blacks share our values. They especially believe that Blacks who attend church regularly share our Christian values, and this is the most dangerous misconception of all held by Leftists. Blacks churches are places that, by and large, preach hate against us. MLK was a pastor. Black pastors are usually ugly bigots who hate European Americans, hate our culture, and everything we stand for. Like MLK, they want a society where Blacks are free to act upon their violent and hedonistic urges. Attempts to maintain order and morality in society are what they really mean when they use words like “racism” and “discrimination”. Most of these pastors, like MLK, want to be free to bed down with whichever woman in the church that they have managed to swoon from the pulpit with their sermon, engaging in recreational sex whenever they like, with whoever they like. Our White European concepts of chastity and standards of sexual morality and decency mean nothing to Blacks. Once White Leftists grasp this, especially the average Jewish Leftist, who is especially ardent about differentiating between good Blacks and bad Blacks, and thinking that most Blacks actually fit their definition of good Blacks, racial realism will once again be the agreed upon belief of European Americans and Jewish Americans. With Jewish Americans, especially, the misconception that Blacks like Trayvon Martin do not represent the average amongst Blacks is preventing, in my opinion, their embracing of racial realism.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Wealth transfers don’t work. If they did, black crime wouldn’t be what it is.
    Nothing works except barring blacks from your living space which is exactly what the Israelis are doing now by pushing their criminal black population, which is all of them, back into Africa and building fences to keep them out.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I agree. All of this socioeconomic claptrap that the Lefties bandy about as the supposed catalyst for Negro violence is beyond ridiculous. That was the general lesson we should have learned from the O.J. Simpson trial. Poverty does not cause violence. A person thinking that it is okay to not control their urges causes violence. We all have the urge to kick someone in the tail every now and then, and most of us who are reasonably physically fit are more than capable of doing some damage if we let ourselves. Having a proper moral fabric, with respect for others and a sense of right and wrong is what prevents violence, not monetary wealth. This socioeconomic deprivation as a cause for violence would make more sense amongst poor Whites and Asians than amongst poor Blacks, as Whites and Asians are much more driven to make something of our lives than most Blacks. A person who doesn’t give a rat’s a*s about feeding their mind and accomplishing personal goals is not going to be very angry about lack of opportunity. The reason for Black violence is that most Blacks do not think that violence is wrong.

  • saxonsun

    Agreed, and we will be subjected to this nut because we live a block from the mayor’s mansion.

  • OHDeutscheRebel

    Carnegie Mellon professor Jonathan Caulkins probably lives in one of those almost entirely White suburbs of Pittsburgh that makes Pittsburgh metro the safest larger metro area in the nation. I am sure that he knows very well where the bad areas are in Pittsburgh Metro, and knows that the higher crime areas are the areas with larger Black populations. If Mr. Caulkins wasn’t bullied into submission by the politically correct thought police, and didn’t have to risk losing his career for speaking the truth, I suspect that he would speak freely of the real reason crime has risen. Blacks are more arrogant than ever with their Black Muslim representative now in his second term as dictator, and are becoming more like their Negro brethren over in Africa, hesitating less before acting on their violent impulses. Racial realists don’t need stats to see that Negro bullying of non-Negroes is being encouraged by the dictatorship of the Black Muslim who has been tragically and unjustly placed in the highest office in our land. Not only does his dictatorship only reflect the will of Negroes, it disrespects everything our country stands for. America was built as a European culture, upon European cultural ideals. This was indeed the greatest country on earth when our immigrants were coming from Europe, and building a land of the free where Europeans from all classes could live in peace and freedom. Peace and freedom are concepts that Negro mind is not able to grasp. Under continued leadership such as the current Negro Muslim dictatorship, peace and freedom will become nothing more than a memory as Negroes, along with the Mestizo and Muslim hordes flow into our homeland, and we become a minority in our own land.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    The implementation of such punishments would indeed be a positive thing. When the Blacks scream racism, though, claiming they are being especially targeted by such punishments, we should calmly and rationally point out the truth, that they are being targeted specifically for their degenerate behavior, not their skin color. Blacks need to be stopped from shifting the focus to their skin color every time they are rightfully in trouble for their degeneracy. This is only going to happen, though, if a presidential candidate from the Constitution Party takes the helm. White Leftists have been brainwashed by the Black bullies, and most conservatives will only speak out when and if their Constitutional rights to freedom of speech, as Whites, are properly defended, as they were in the old days, by our Government.

  • Katherine McChesney

    ‘photogenic’???

    LOL. That son with the matted, dirty looking afro? Photogenic, my eye.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Even so, I agree with Jared Taylor on the Asian issue. Asians should maintain their cultures and racial characteristics. We Whites should do the same. There is no reason for any White culture to be overrun with Asians, even though they are generally good citizens.

  • Mergatroyd

    I will protect myself and family with deadly force despite that the government tells us to “lay down and take it from blacks” — while these hypocrites are protected themselves by bodyguards who use…deadly force.

    NO ONE will tell me that I can’t protect myself and my family, that is a basic human and civil right.

    The Founding Fathers themselves warned us about tyranny and the Second Amendment was created to protect us just from that. Use it.