To Avoid Looking Like a Criminal, Don’t Commit a Crime

Ann Coulter, July 17, 2013

Black liberals keep bemoaning the danger to their own teenage sons after the “not guilty” verdict in George Zimmerman’s murder trial. To avoid what happened to Trayvon Martin, their boys need only follow this advice: Don’t walk up to a stranger and punch him, ground-and-pound him, MMA-style, and repeatedly smash his head against the pavement.

The Justice-for-Trayvon crowd keeps pretending there hasn’t been a trial where the evidence overwhelmingly showed that Trayvon committed the first (and only) crime that night by assaulting Zimmerman. Instead, the race agitators are sticking with the original story peddled by the media, back when we had zero facts. To wit, that Zimmerman had stalked a young black child and shot him dead just for being black and wearing a hoodie.


The case most like George Zimmerman’s is the Edmund Perry case. In 1985, Perry, a black teenager from Harlem who had just graduated from Phillips Exeter Academy, mugged a guy who turned out to be an undercover cop. He got shot and a few hours later was dead.

Instead of waiting for the facts, the media rushed out with a story about Officer Lee Van Houten being a trigger-happy, racist cop. When that turned out to be false, The New York Times looked at its shoes. It was the kind of story the elites wanted to be true. It should be true. We had such high hopes for that one. Damn!

The initial news accounts stressed not only that Perry was a graduate of Exeter on his way to Stanford, but that he was unarmed. (In all white-on-black shootings, the media expect the white to have RoboCop-like superpowers to detect any weapons on the perp as well as his resume.)

A few weeks after the shooting, The New York Times called Perry “a prized symbol of hope.” In a telling bit of obtuseness, The Times said that “all New Yorkers have extraordinary reasons to wish for the innocence of the young man who was killed.” I doubt very much that the cop being accused of being a murderous racist hoped for that.

An article in The Village Voice explained: “[L]ike so many other victims in this city,” Perry was “just too black for his own good.”

Luckily for the policeman, Perry had mugged him in a well-lit hospital parking lot. Twenty-three witnesses backed the officer’s story in testimony to the grand jury. (Unlike Zimmerman, Van Houten’s case was at least presented to a grand jury.)

As I wrote in “Mugged”: “God help Officer Van Houten if he had been mugged someplace other than a hospital parking lot with plenty of witnesses.” Such as, for example, a dark pathway in The Retreat at Twin Lakes. There weren’t 23 witnesses backing Zimmerman’s story, only about a half-dozen. But, as with Van Houten, the evidence overwhelmingly corroborated Zimmerman’s story.

In Van Houten’s case, even after it was blindingly clear that Perry had mugged him, the truth was only revealed amid great sorrow. When the facts were unknown, the cop was a racist. When it turned out Perry had mugged the cop, it was no one’s fault, but a problem of “violence,” “confusion” and “two worlds” colliding.

Perhaps, someday, blacks will win the right to be treated like volitional human beings. But not yet.


Instead of turning every story about a black person killed by a white person into an occasion to announce, “The simple fact is, America is a racist society,” liberals might, one time, ask the question: Why do you suppose there would be a generalized fear of young black males? What might that be based on?

Throw us a bone. It’s because a disproportionate number of criminals are young black males. It just happens that when Lee Van Houten and George Zimmerman were mugged by two of them, they survived the encounter.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Creepy as a cracker!

    It is high time for the blacks in this country to look at themselves in the mirror and take personal responsibility for their actions rather then to blames Whites for all of their failures!

    • cancerous bananna

      Thats a tall order… If you were black would you want to look in the mirror?
      Face reality, the things you’ve done or might do in the future?
      Nah, its easier to wait for the cheque then blow it on dope and feel like a king.

    • [Guest]

      I think you’re mistaken. American blacks, with their toxic levels of self-esteem, are unable to see themselves as they really are and therefore are not going to reform based on self-examination. And the sense of personal responsibility among them, which is hardly evident in the first place, is now all but dead.

      The problem, I believe, is that a whole lot of people expect black people not to think, speak, and behave like black people. And, despite all the evidence, they refuse to accept the fact that black is black.

      • Vonhauer

        They also lack the altruism commonly found among NW Europeans. This is why you never see blacks protesting against other blacks like you do with whites. Its why, of all races, blacks give the least to charities, and why groups like PETA have no black members. They’re a different critter alright.

        • [Guest]

          They do seem to be empathy-deprived, don’t they? Maybe that’s a result of their obsessive (and psychopathic) love of themselves as a race.

      • I agree to a point, but let’s not forget the low IQ issue, they cannot change, savages will ALWAYS be savages. On the other side of the coin, they know EXACTLY what they are doing. They have whitey on the run and that’s how they want it.

        • [Guest]

          Yeah, blacks’ low IQ is probably one of those things that we all generally accept as fact without ever having been presented with the unmentionable statistics.

          As to having people on the run: Even a rabid hyena knows that much by instinct. No higher brain functions are necessary for that.

          • That’s true. But the Hyena knows when it has the advantage over the Lion and will pursue that advantage and kill the Lion. It is a primitive instinct but it works in all of us, it must.

    • Spartacus

      Doing that would require being smarter than a tree stump…

    • Nick Gherz

      WE share the same fantasy.

    • JackKrak

      If you got them to look in the mirror, they’d most likely get distracted by how dey hair look

      • Creepy as a cracker!

        Congratulations on your move eastward! I wish I could do the same.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      I just found out that I can’t write [email protected]@py C4rac&er on this board either! (Can’t do it on CNN).

  • MekongDelta69

    The more NoBama speaks, the more ‘regular’ (IRL) White people are waking up. Not fast enough for me (and probably not for any of us), but something is better than nothing.

    Just look at the amount of comments on ALL KINDS of (what we would call) ‘regular’ sites – even leftist sites. (Yes, really – I’ve read them.)

    I absolutely HATE saying this, but this MAY BE the ONLY good thing this blankety-blank [censored] [double-censored] has ever done. (Although that certainly wasn’t his intention or plan.)

    You know what they say about payback and karma…

    • sbuffalonative

      I’m not sure they’re getting angry but they are increasing annoyed by all of this.

      I have a very liberal sister and even she was rolling her eyes over this case. She made a comment to the affect that ‘they’re trying to make another OJ case’. By that I think she saw the clearly racially driven animosity and even she found it too much.

      • MekongDelta69

        “I’m not sure they’re getting angry but they are increasing annoyed by all of this.”

        I hear you, but I respectfully semi-disagree (at least when it comes to the Net).

        Go here (for just one example of endless thousands):

    • Sick of it

      I’ve met a few liberals who have started changing their tune about things since Obama took office and basically wrecked the country (or wrecked it further rather). Buyer’s remorse is great, but not ever having been put in such a situation would have been better.

    • to add to our problems is a Republican Party that absolutely won’t flat out go after the vote. It’s like a football game where the opposing defense has lost both starting corners on it’s last place pass defense, but YOUR last place rush offense keeps handing the ball off.

      • Sick of it

        They could win with more of the white vote. They could win by following their conservative platform. Instead they go socialist lite.

        • MBlanc46

          Except there are a lot of white people who don’t like the conservative platform.

          • Sick of it

            Smaller government, less taxes, less spending, stopping the rush on immigration…trust me that will draw in independents at least.

          • MBlanc46

            I’m not sure you’re getting the third in any case. With regard to the first two, there are many possible ways those could be implemented. There is great debate on which of them, if any of them, should be implemented. Those were both major issues in the 2012 campaign. How would you propose to frame those issues in order to make them more attractive to independents than they were then?

          • Sick of it

            Reduce government oppression of common people by eliminating organizations such as the ATF and EPA. Let hard working Americans take home more of what they make, as rich people can keep paying high taxes without suffering, but working Americans cannot. You know, the truth.

          • MBlanc46

            Truth or not, I don’t see that you’re getting an electoral majority with that platform.

          • Sick of it

            Not sure that it matters anymore. The people with the most snouts in this snoutcounting venture seem to be quite self-destructive. They seem to prefer slavery over freedom and poverty over success. They seem to want a third world banana republic.

          • MBlanc46

            Third World banana republic isn’t too far off from the future that I think the elites have in store for us. That’s one reason I don’t put much faith (almost none) in partisan electoral politics. Whilst we ultimately will need elected officials to act regarding black crime and violence, they’re surely not going to do so until we create a popular movement insisting on so acting.

      • I am sure that the Republicans are working WITH the anti-whites in their efforts at white genocide.

  • sbuffalonative

    To wit, that Zimmerman had stalked a young black child and shot him dead just for being black and wearing a hoodie.

    I am kicking myself!

    I don’t listen to local black radio much anymore but today I decided to switch it on.

    The black host was telling of an incident.

    He was driving around a ‘nice’ neighborhood (he stressed nice) when he saw a black male wearing a white hoodie pulled over his head in 89 degree weather just aimlessly walking around.

    He became suspicious (though he doesn’t like to use that word). He said he thought to himself ‘Is that kid crazy or what?’ Regardless, he decided to watch the kid to try to figure out what was going on.

    Then it hit him. He surmised that this black kid in the white hoodie pulled over his head in 89 degree weather aimlessly walking around this ‘nice’ neighorhood was ‘protesting’ the way Trayvon Martin was profiled. The radio host thought it was a good way to protest.

    So there you have it folk. A black man sees a black teen wearing a hoodie in a ‘nice’ neighborhood and he immediately becomes suspicous and decides to watch him.

    I rushed to connect the radio to the computer to record the show but by the time I got it hooked up, the host went to commercials and after didn’t return to the subject.

    • [Guest]

      >>>Then it hit him. He surmised that this black kid in the white hoodie pulled over his head in 89 degree weather aimlessly walking around this ‘nice’ neighorhood was ‘protesting’ the way Trayvon Martin was profiled.

      I wonder whether it occurred to the radio host that the hoodie-wearing black was hoping to provoke an incident that could be used as a weapon against white people.

    • George

      Of course, the radio announcer’s interpretation might be incorrect.
      The black thug he saw probably wasn’t smart enough to ‘protest’ in this way. The thug was casing houses.
      Was it on WBLK? That’s the local black radio station in Buffalo, broadcasting on 93.7. I always refer to that station as WNGR.

      • cancerous bananna

        I’ve been told that this sub-culture wears winter jackets and sweaters in the blistering sun, and boxer shorts and a t-shirt on the coldest day of winter because it intensifies the effects of narcotics.
        It also makes them looo ridiculous.. much like how much status a brotha has on the street by how low his drawers-droop. Sickening.

  • ViktorNN

    Anyone else get the feeling that Coulter has been reading AmRen lately?

    Hi Ann – great column, keep it up please.

    • The__Bobster

      She now writes for the racially aware Vdare site. She gets plenty of good material there.

    • Luca

      She steals stuff from me on a regular basis. (joking)

    • If you are aware of Amren, then you are aware of Vdare, and vice versa.
      I’ll bet you anything Ann reads, but doesn’t comment.

    • So CAL Snowman

      I bashed Ann regularly on this site, I may have been wrong. However I’m still skeptical about ANY reptile that slithers in from the main stream media and all of a sudden starts to champion the White race.

      • Especially when they are known to have SUCH GOOD BLACK FRIENDS. But then maybe even this “Conservative” waking up.

        • Luca

          I believe she is smart enough to know that if she doesn’t at least pretend and appear to have diverse friends, she will not be allowed a voice in the main stream. Best guess is she has a high IQ of about 150 or so, not exactly a dummy.

          • You may be correct, I hope so. After all there a few “undercover lovers” out there.

  • The__Bobster

    A few weeks after the shooting, The New York Times called Perry “a prized symbol of hope.” In a telling bit of obtuseness, The Times said that “all New Yorkers have extraordinary reasons to wish for the innocence of the young man who was killed.” I doubt very much that the cop being accused of being a murderous racist hoped for that.

    Ah, the good old NY Slimes, Engelman’s favorite rag. They never fail to take the wrong side of every story.

    • Xerxes22

      The same is true of the N.Y. Post and The N.Y. Daily News. They pretend to be conservative but always support the anti-White side in every single situation.

    • Romulus

      The Jew York times. It is owned by the salzburgs.

    • SFLBIB

      Like taking Stalin’s side in the Harvest of Sorrows story.

  • sbuffalonative

    “…the media rushed out with a story about Officer Lee Van Houten being a trigger-happy, racist cop.

    Every time there’s a shooting [or a bombing], the media rushes to blame the mythical ‘angry, white, NRA, Tea Party, male’. That beast, like Bigfoot, has yet to be found.

    Look what they did with the Gifford shooting. They blamed it on Sara Palin having a target scope on her webpage. ‘Yeah, that’s the ticket’.

  • Spartacus

    You guys would be better off by just getting rid of the corpse. Separate the perishables from the non-perishables. Chop and grind the perishables, boil and grind the non-perishables, then throw the contents in a river or in the middle of a forest so that animals can eat them. Impossible to recover any kind of proof from that.

    • Dental records.

      I have written at length during a similar discussion about how to dispose of a body, but was moderated, and in all reason, rightly so. People who have had serious bone breaks also tend to have all sorts of screws and pins in them. Rather than be moderated for repeating a deleted earlier post, I would say that if you need an instruction manual, you have no business even starting a project like this.


    Evolutionary biologists now know that both violence and passivity/non-violence have large genetic components in both animals and humans.

    Africans, Europeans and Asians differ greatly in tendency toward violence, because of their extremely different evolutionary histories. During pre-civilization, violence was necessary for the tribes survival. The tribe needed a few super-violent alpha males, who could go from passive to 100% violent in seconds, in order to defend the tribe. A tribe that lacked such genes, was soon exterminated.
    Aggressive, violent alpha males got all the mates, both from within the tribe, and from captured women, and, thus, violent genes proliferated. About 4,000 years ago, Asians and Europeans started living in larger, perment towns and cities, where a strong central government stabalized society and allowed wealth acquisition. As a result, quick and extreme violence was no longer needed nor selected for. In fact, most civilizations quickly terminate individuals possessing genes for extreme violence (exicution), or otherwise remove them from the gene pool. (jail). After 4,000 years of such selection by civilized societies, violent genes have been largely removed from Europeans and Asians.
    In contrast, Africans were still living in small primative warrior tribes only 150 years ago, where violence was still selected for. There has not been time enough to reduce the high prevelence of violent genes in Africans. This is why Africans and Asians/Europeans cannot live together.

    • Stan D Mute

      I hardly know where to begin..

      Whites and northeast Asians are by far the most violent people on the planet. And of the two, whites are at the top of the violence chain. Whites are so hyper violent that they and they alone created weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear, chemical, and biological warfare with which they may exterminate enemies by the millions.

      Clearly there is a vast difference between whites, Asians, and Africans, but it’s equally clear that the bulk of the difference is in general intelligence. Whites and Asians are MUCH smarter than Africans. It also appears that impulsivity and time preference are tied to G (general intelligence) which I think is what you believe you are seeing with regard to white vs black difference in violence. Where a white man may have an impulse to grab a pretty girl and have his way with her, he is intelligent and restrained enough to stifle his impulse where an African will simply rape and possibly murder his victim. The African lacks the intelligence to fully comprehend the consequences of his action and lack the impulse control necessary to function in civilized society.

      Whites are more than capable of violence on a scale the world has too often seen. History is replete with warfare I hope I never see. Our society and culture have made the white man tame (at least in his homelands). It would be unwise to think that history will not repeat itself.

      • Romulus

        you are incorrect in only a small portion of your comment. The vast majority of all scientists in the us particularly since the turn of the last century have been the OWP! The other white people, the jews. All twelve of the creators of the atom bomb were jews, who share a common ancestry with their middle eastern caucasoid cousins middle easterners. Most of the supposed german scientists that came here before ww2 were jews not germans. As was also the case in russia. In the annals of evolutionary biology, nothing is more intrinsic to battle than competition for resources. Peace is best described as the time between wars. Libertaiarian is right that pre civilized humans were more violent but only to a degree less. The smarter our species has become , the tools of violence have gotten better, but violence has not been bred out. It has only been suppressed or stabilized as more resources could be shared equitably in a “civilized” society. Since resources themselves are not ditributed equally around the globe, competition for them will become more intense. Violence is not an exception to human nature.,but rather the other half of the same coin with altruism. Modern psuedo scientistist

        • Sick of it

          BPS, BPA, certain chemical in shampoos, etc. They have a lot of methods for neutering males. Also, if we really invested in scientific development, we could sustain a much larger population than we do now.

      • Romulus

        One more thing Stan d mute. No other piece of ground on earth has been invaded or fought over more in all of human history than EUROPE. That is why they are the greatest warriors that have ever lived. No people have been subjected to battle for longer, by more people(often intra tribally) than Europe. The combination of their hunter/gatherer past with being battle hardened by foreigners and you get one awesome soldier. Modern society run by females and gays ,a very high standard of living,and machines have had a net negative effect on male prowess. Europeans whipped the pants off the Asians, just for the record.

        • During World War Two’s straight-up battles, outside southeast Asia and the drubbing the IJN gave the USN at Savo Island, it was very lopsided. At Savo, Junichi Mikawa was commanding, and he was brilliant. USN didn’t do all that well at Coral Sea or Tassafaronga, but those were still strategic victories, and since we could build new ships faster than Japan could repair their own, the losses mattered only a little. Japan’s 1944 offensive at Imphal and Kohima ended in disaster, when the British, Ghurkas and Indians simply refused to get out of the way and dug in. The battles of the tennis court and admin box by name alone would give one an idea of the close-quarters fighting in which Japanese normally excelled. Charging dug-in belt-fed, water-cooled Vickers machineguns isn’t “macho”. It is suicide.

          Say “soldiers” instead of “warriors”. There is an enormous gulf between the two. I never had any of the basic training and ceremonies the makes John Doe into a good soldier. I went in thinking I was “macho” and came out knowing only a little about it.

          • Romulus

            Let’s not quibble over which word we will use. I loved my time imams wouldn’t trade it for anything. Please forgive my grammatical and spelling errors in above posts. I forget to check from time to time. Military history is fascinating. In total history with the asiatics we’ve given them a sound drubbing, notwithstanding the bomb. Luca is quite right. America saved over million SOLDIERS by dropping them. The approx estimate of invading the Isles. The Japanese were very fierce, but we won. American soldiers,I believe, are becoming to dependent on tech and hardware and are losing panache or intensity. We are not yet a push button military(bombs excepted).

          • Sick of it

            Monomolecular blades and exosuits could make things interesting again.

          • The British had almost everything go wrong for them at Falklands when the Atlantic Conveyor was hit, leaving them with only one Chinook helicopter, but the men marched across country in freezing rain and got the job done anyway. Trashcanistan has seen a lot of infantry firefights. Sure, arty and air is called for, but that’s why we have them.

          • Romulus

            There is nothing quite like the sound of an artillery barrage!!! Excepting the payload of a B52 or naval battery, of course.
            I miss it.
            “It is good that war is so terrible, lest we grow fond of it”
            R.E. Lee

          • I prefer the sounds of my hobnailed jika-tabi. Walking in them sounds like rocks are being ground up. There’s also nothing like the sound of the screams someone being righteously pounded delivers. My wife and daughter and I were asked to move for someone driving a motorcycle on the sidewalk. I stepped forward, and sneered “No” in a voice I usually reserve only for the police. On our way back home, the same critter got off his motorcycle – going the other way and on the road this time – and assaulted me, so I let some of the bad hatred out to play. Mr. Engelman once opined that I hate everybody, but it isn’t true. I don’t even hate Jews. I hate being physically assaulted.

            When you are driving a motorcycle on a sidewalk, we don’t have to get out of your way.

          • Romulus

            I treat people with the same regard that I receive. Generally, on street level, I get along with most everyone I meet. I AVOID toxic people and those I care not to associate with in private life. That keeps my circle small. *wink* *nudge* *nudge*
            Im comfortable with myself and don’t need the worlds approval.
            No um sayn!

          • watling

            The bombing of Stanley Airport was an incredible achievement involving 12 fuel tanker aircraft to get one Vulcan bomber to its target. Things went wrong of course. One of the three Vulcans that set off from the UK for the Azores had to turn back and the original main strike aircraft was grounded leaving the back-up Vulcan to do the actual bombing.

      • Luca

        Whites created weapons of mass destruction not because they are violent, but because they are smart. WMD have been used mostly as deterrents since WW1 and therefore are more of a line of defense. The two A-bombs dropped during WW2 have been argued as having saved lives in the long run and I tend to agree.

        We have chemical and biological agents that are odorless, colorless and easily deployed. If we were truly violent we could have wiped out Baghdad (for example) with just a few test tubes or canisters dispersed in the air over their major metropolitan water supply.

        • We got rid of all or chemical weapons. They were incinerated at Johnston Atoll.

          • Romulus

            If you haven’t read any of CHRIS KYLE’s books, I think you’d enjoy them.

      • Yes, but we do that as collective entities, organized by the governments to which we subordinate ourselves. We Yanks did nuke Japan, but only to make them quit fighting. Douglass MacArthur did not allow other allied countries to occupy Japan, and in fact threatened to shoot the Soviet military attache of the USSR invaded Hokkaido. A European-style parliament – the Diet – was restored, but with full male suffrage, and MacArthur insisted women be given the right to vote. The zaibatsu (vertically-integrated industrial combines) were broken up and tennant farmers given ownership of their fields.

        We didn’t continue to punish Japan the way China might have done.

      • Like I say – they are savages.


        Stan, There is a difference between individual violence, and state-sponsered warfare. Yes, because of many genetic factors, Whites and Asians are very capable of executing extremely violent and effective warfare.
        But Whites and Asians are less emotion-based, and more logical, slow to anger, seek comprimises, work for long-term goals, etc. Afrcans tend to live in the emmotional moment, are quick to anger, are illogical, and impulsive — many are just on the edge of violence, and any little thing can set them off.
        Quick violence was adaptive in protecting the tribe or elimininating rival males for mates. Tribes lacking some extremely violent males, were simply eliminated by adjacent tribes with such males. Violence is adaptive in a primative tribal society. It is not adaptive in long-term civilized societies, and was largely selected against by governments (prison, execution). In civilization, the viiolent individual is exicuted. In the jungle, the violent individual get to mate with all the females and leave more offspring.
        Lastly, anthropological studies show that the levels of violence in primative tribal groups are much higher than in civilized Europe — i.e., the probability of a man dying by war or murder. This is in spite of modern warfare (WWI & II).

      • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

        “…whites are at the top of the violence chain.”

        They’d do well to remember that.

  • kjh64

    This advice goes to all races. If you look like a lowlife, act like a lowlife, hang out with lowlifes, then people will think, and rightfully so, that you’re a bad person.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    “An article in The Village Voice explained: “[L]ike so many other victims in this city,” Perry was “just too black for his own good.”
    Yeah. Mugged an armed man and suffered the consequences of his typical blackness.
    Coulter = brave. Never thought I’d say it, but go Anne go!

    • willbest

      Its one of her better books. Though its still hard to read her snark. It would probably have been more effective to moderates without it. Then again, that is why people know who Ann is

  • blindsticks

    I’ve got to hand it to you people, we in Britain would never get an article published like this. The nearest we have to an Anne Coulter is Melanie Philips, and even she has to stop and gush occasionally over Britain’s ‘majority of decent hardworking minorities’.
    Well, if we ever had a majority of hardworking minorities, that went about the beginning of the noughties – soon after Tony Blair said – WELCOME EVERYBODY.

    • Why do you think the London D-M publishes stories daily about US crime?

      It’s because they know they can’t publish stories about UK crime.

    • Europeans must fight to get their freedoms back.

    • Creepy as a cracker!

      You can get arrested by the thought police over there. I see it coming to the shores of the USA soon.

  • Bob

    Take a lesson from Canada and its Natives (indians), this feeling of entitlement will never end as long as the government keeps apologizing and trying to make “right” past wrongs. Now we here in Canada are stuck with a two tier justice system that treats each tribe as its own distinct nation that is supported completely off the taxpayer. The legend of their mistreatment grows with each passing year and they never, ever seem to be able to “heal”. Enough to make you puke up a bowl load.

    • Romulus

      Are your liberals of the French-Canadian Alex trebec variety or Anglo British?

      • Bob

        Mostly Anglo British by sheer numbers but the French are a whole type of crazy of their own (French are mainly Quebec) very liberal…and the next possible heir to the thrown is a clueless liberal named Justin Trudeau. If this guy ever becomes Prime Minister, all I can say is…there’s gonna be a Gong Show.

        • cancerous bananna

          Qubecois are poisonous Quebec is the biggest drain on this country.. they invented air, water, beer, everything.. they are the master race here and all the white english money gets funnelled through Quebec.
          If Justin Trudeau gets in expect a floodload of the worlds garbage to come in and nest next door…

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            You need a separation from Quebec, ‘toot sweet’ — like we White Americans need a separation from blacks and hispanics.


        • Romulus

          Lol. Thanks Bob, haha. I knew the French were out there. I didn’t know the British were too. We have a saying here when someone comes unhinged. It’s called having a “French Canadian frenzy”

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Don’t tell me he is related to that other idiot, Pierre Trudeau? He certainly did a LOT of damage to your country — ongoing, insidious damage to your economy and culture. Sort of like the American politicians we have now.

          For more (although I’m sure you know all this because you have to LIVE with Trudeau’s policies) here is a (sort of) link to Steve Sailer’s excellent article:

          “Half-Blood Prince” Was As Disastrous for Canada As Obamamania”

          www dot vdare dot com/ Remembering Trudeaumania— Canada’s “Half-Blood Prince” Was As Disastrous For Canada As Obamamania dot com

          And, another excellent article from Vdare that explains the discrimination caused by a government-enforced, bi-lingual culture — another Trudeau policy.

          “Beware Bilingualism! The Catastrophic Canadian Case”

          www dot vdare dot com/a cautionary case of bilingualism dot com

          I was in Vancouver a couple of years ago and was amazed that EVERYTHING had to be translated, by law, into French. Really, how many francophones are there in BC??

          All I saw were newly arrived Asians.


          • Bob

            Yes, he is the son of the former Prime Minister. This guy is even more dangerous than his old man if that is possible. Google Justin Trudeau’s comment to reporter Peter Mansbridge after the Boston bombing…this guy is more clued out than Obama.

            As far as francophones in BC there are 27 i’m pretty sure. So did you have a good time in Hongcouver/Vankong. lol… you are right on the money Bon.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            I was just passing through on my way home from Alaska so I wasn’t there very long.

            I remember VanKong (mind if I swipe that) because that is where I got the worst case of food poisoning I’d ever had in my life after eating in an Asian-run fast food place in the Vancouver airport. Should have known better. Also noted that it was OK to use American money, but any change returned was in Canadian dollars only.

            Was sick as death for about a week and it took around 6 weeks to recover, I probably should have been hospitalized, my cousin also got sick and DID go to the hospital. Horrible horrible experience.

            Saw very few Whites which made it worse…


          • Bob

            Sorry you had that terrible experience in this once fine country Bon. That left coast is very beautiful but the people are the most liberal in Canada and are being over run by Asians, Turbans and drug addicts and they seem happy about it (the libs that is).

        • Sick of it

          We have similar problems with our own Acadians (cajuns) in my home state. Huge difference between North and South Louisiana.

    • cancerous bananna

      And the latest gravy train is about how they were used as experiments force-d “newfie flour” funny it only took 60 years to come out.. why would that be?

    • Bossman

      Canada never had to fight the Indians. One day when most of the Indians were drunk from drinking a lot of Jamaican rum, the British told them that were now the subjects of a great king across the ocean.

      • Bob

        haha, While we know this to be true it seems the legend has changed quite a bit through their unshakable, drunken, word of mouth historical record keeping system.

  • Mahound

    We need to destroy the media and take control of what’s left and rebuild it in the spirit of truthful reporting. That is the only way to take back control of the country.

    • Yes, but by whom? Sensationalism sells copy, so they hype stuff up. On the other hand government-controlled media cover up everything they do.

      • Sick of it

        Non-profit media with an independent oversight board to ensure that all reporting is 100% accurate and free from personal bias?

        • That would work. I suppose we could use existing antitrust laws in the US to break up some of the monopolies. MediaNews Group owns 56 newspapers in 12 states, including every major newspaper in Colorado. How does this facilitate the “independent” press that is allegedly supposed to keep the educated voting public in an ostensible democracy well-informed?

          • Sick of it

            Absolutely. All monopolies/cartels need to be broken up so we can have competition in America again.

          • MBlanc46

            The trouble with that, of course, is that the transnational corporations control the political process with their money.

          • Sick of it

            You’re preaching to the choir. If we let things continue along this path we’re on, as you stated elsewhere, the elites have a nasty future planned for us.

          • That works both ways. We can do anything we want to them once Civil War Two kicks off.

    • Funruffian

      We first need to clean house in the White House, The Senate, Congress and the Media.


    I Absolutely Love Ann Coulter, She Cuts Straight To The Heart Of The Matter. If You Don’t Want To Be Seen As Suspicious,, Stop Being Suspicious!

  • JohnEngelman

    I am pleased that it is gradually possible for conservatives to publicly criticize blacks.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    You have a long way to go, Ann, before you win me back as part of your audience. You lost me with your slavering over Romney and Christie.

    As for advice to “avoid what happened to Trayvon Martin:”

    When you play the knockout game, make sure the victim goes down hard with the first punch and make sure your victim doesn’t have a Kel-Tec on him. Also, don’t bring Skittles to a gun fight.


  • Gereng

    Never going to happen. It’s DNA NOT nurture.. Look at Africa and Haiti and every other place with a high proportion of blacks. The incidence of violence and the savage and cruel nature of the crimes follow the same pattern. I just wish some of the liberals in this country could have been with me in Liberia, Uganda and Somalia in the 1980s. It has NOTHING to do with ‘white’ anything and EVERYTHING to do with innate black behavior. The are a race without compassion, conscience, impulse control, or any moral compass whatever.

    • Creepy as a cracker!

      Well said! Short, factual and to the point.


    Anybody know of a country that isn’t racist?

  • One aspect to this phenomenon Coulter forgot to mention is that blacks have been conditioned by the social welfare system that they are exempt from the unpleasant consequences of their own behavior. When they have kids out of wedlock, the taxpayers support the children. When they drop out of school with no marketable skills, the taxpayers again are expected to come to the rescue. Given this sort of environment, it seems natural that blacks would react with shock and amazement when violent black predators are shot to death when they inadvertently attack armed victims.

    • Ella

      Overall, they are treated like children since they rely on so many government programs for their survival. Blacks also don’t understand the reactions from Whites who are tired of their constant whines and blatant disregard of the law.

  • candide

    Only a mentally defective white would go near A BLACK WITHOUT A GUN.

  • MBlanc46

    You’re entirely welcome to want what you want, but you’re not going to get it. Therefore, you either continue to dwell in a fantasy world of your own, or you join in the effort to devise strategies to bring blacks back under control.

  • We call this “hypocrisy”.

  • Michelle

    Hearing stories like this you’d think the media was run by a gang of blacks..But it isn’t. I don’t understand why the white media is so vilagent at making our race look bad and blacks look like hero’s, with their twisted facts and stories.. How do they sleep at night. They’re disgusting, they have no shame about ruining America.