Could the Next Pope Be Black? Ghanaian and Nigerian Cardinals Are Both Possible Replacements for the Pontiff

Richard Hartley-Parkinson, Daily Mail (London), February 11, 2013

Following the shock announcement that Pope Benedict XVI will stand down later this month, speculation is rife over who the next Pontiff will be.

One thing that experts appear to agree on is that there is a strong possibility he will be the first non-European leader of the Roman Catholic Church.

The frontrunner according to some bookmakers is Ghanaian Cardinal Peter Turkson who, if he was voted in for the top job, would be the first black person to do so.

Peter Turkson

Peter Turkson

Three popes have hailed from Africa, but all were from Roman Africa and there is debate over whether they were white or Arab in appearance.

They were Pope Victor I from 189 to 199, Pope Miltiades from 311 until 314, and Pope Galasius, pope from 492 until 496.

Other sources suggest that the next leader could be from even further afield and they suggest he could be a Latin American where there are 1.2 billion Catholics – 42 per cent of the world’s Catholic population.

Until John Paul II, who was from Poland, and Benedict XVI, from Germany, became popes the position was reserved solely for Italians. However, the post is now open to all.

Who gets the nod depends on the profile of the new pope that the cardinals who elect him at the next conclave think will guide the Church best.

Cardinal Turkson is currently the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and took over from the post of Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for Divine Worship after Joseph Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI.

He has spoken about the prospect of the first black pope saying: ‘If God would wish to see a black man also as pope, thanks be to God’.

He was born in Wassaw Nsuta, Western Ghana, and studied at St Teresa’s Seminary in the village of Amisano and Pedu.

He went on to get a Bachelor’s degree in theology at St Anthony-on-Hudson Seminary in Rensselaer, New York. In July 1975 he was ordained to the priesthood by Archbishop John Amissah.

Pope John Paul II made him Archbishop of Cape Coast in October 1992 and he became the first Ghanaian cardinal in 2003.

When it comes to Aids he keeps true to the Catholic teaching on contraception but conceded that condoms could be used by a married, faithful couple where one partner is infected.

He is not the only black African cardinal who could be elected to the job of pope with good odds being offered for Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze.

Francis Arinze

Francis Arinze

He is currently Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for Divine Worship and succeeded Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) to become Cardinal Bishop of Velletri-Segni.
However, he could be hampered by his extreme conservative views on birth control and abortion which would not sit well with North America and Europe.

From Latin America, Odilo Scherer, Archbishop of Sao Paolo, or Italian-Argentine Leonardo Sandri.

Two senior Vatican officials recently dropped hints about possible successors. The upshot of their remarks is that the next pope could well be from Latin America.

‘I know a lot of bishops and cardinals from Latin America who could take responsibility for the universal Church,’ said Archbishop Gerhard Mueller, who now holds the pope’s old post as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

‘The universal Church teaches that Christianity isn’t centred on Europe,’ the German-born archbishop told Duesseldorf’s Rheinische Post newspaper just before Christmas.

Swiss Cardinal Kurt Koch, head of the Vatican department for Christian unity, told the Tagesanzeiger daily in Zurich at the same time that the Church’s future was not in Europe.

‘It would be good if there were candidates from Africa or South America at the next conclave,’ he said, referring to the closed-door election in the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel.

Asked if he would vote for a non-European over a European candidate if they were equally qualified, he responded: ‘Yes.’

If the next conclave really is Latin America’s turn, the leading candidates there seem to be Odilo Scherer, archbishop of the huge diocese of Sao Paolo, or the Italian-Argentine Leonardo Sandri, now heading the Vatican department for Eastern Churches.

About half the cardinals who can vote are from Europe, even though only a quarter of the world’s Catholics live there.

If the conclave tilts to the Old Continent, Vatican watchers say Angelo Scola of Milan is in pole position.

Vienna Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, a former student and close ally of Benedict, is also considered a strong candidate.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    Doesn’t NoBama already hold that position (in addition to being Dictator of the Known Universe)?

    • Bill

      They called Barry the Messiah. As to the universe, I think Al Gore created that before he invented the internet.

      • MekongDelta69

        Oh I know that. I just figured they’d give him a shot at being the first muslim Pope.

        It’s the least they could do for the most brilliant man in the Time-Space Continuum – and he drinks Dos Equis.

        Stay Thirsty My Friends.

      • Thomas Katt

        But Ron Paul owns the internet.

        • Joseph

          That is a myth. There are only two unemployed geeks living in a basement who supported Paul.

          • Juxtaposedhearts0

            Millions actually

          • Garrett Brown

            Guess I’m one of those geeks. He’s the closest thing to a pro white candidate that we have.

      • Joseph

        Then, verily, Al-Gore redeemed his creation from universal warming through the sacrifice of lowly taxpayers by his priests of liberalism.

    • Johnny Clay

      Obamao is The Messiah, one step above Pope.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      He certainly THINKS he does, at least.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Yes.

  • Welcome to the end of The Church.

    Benedict was forced out by the UN and the next pope will most assuredly not be from the Northern Hemisphere.

    Shut it down.

    Just give up the 501(c)3’s and tell the government that what is left is theirs.

    No true charity needs 501(c) status.

  • Bill

    I wouldn’t be surprised. It would be a sign of the times. Not only concerning BRA, but the last Pope is supposed to be the one who establishes and leads the One World Religion of the anti-christ.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      Stop reading Left Behind books.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Indeed. Not only are they heretical and incorrect but terribly written as well. I ried to read them just to see what the hubbub was all about. Blecch!

      • Katherine McChesney

        “Left Behind’ was based on false doctrine and the lie of the secret rapture.

        • Bobbala

          1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
          1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Bill you are correct. Prepare for Petrus Romanus. Read Rev. 17: 10-11. Benedict = ‘a short space’. The eighth is the one to come.

      • MarcusTrajanus

        Benedict means “blessed”, not “a short space”.

        • Katherine McChesney

          I never said that. In prophecy Benedicts ‘reign’ is ‘a short space’. He’s the seventh in a line of so-called ‘kings’ in Rev. 17. The next is Petrus Romanus.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            So, you mix and match “prophesies” and add your own baseless interpretation (why is Benedict “the seventh”?)… No, of course you didn’t come up with this, you are just following some internet guru who’s been spouting this stuff on YouTube,

          • Katherine McChesney

            Marcus, you are seriously confused. You haven’t researched this. I did take from Malachy’s prophesies. And I read the scriptural history of the eight kings in the Beast System. Ratzinger is seventh out of eight ‘kings’, meaning popes. Do your research and stop being combative.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            There’s been a lot more that seven popes. There’s no basis for your claim that he’s the seventh anything. Stop believing in silly conspiracy theories and “prophecies” and start researching reality.

          • Katherine McChesney

            You are so shallow. You’ve not done the research. I’m ignoring you from now on.

      • KevinPhillipsBong
  • The__Bobster

    Since that religion is now based on ignorance and superstition, this does not surprise me in the least

  • It’s strange how much interest irreligious Anglicans have in the RCC electing a non-White pope. Or is it?

    • TeutonicKnight67

      Curious. Ain’t it?

      • Room101

        The queer churches are hoping former Catholics will become “questioning”, and invite the family, especially the kids.

    • rebellisMMXII

      Interesting, but it’s also the major lefty talking heads…why should they care so much? Has to be because they know it would destroy the fabric of the Roman Catholic Church…no other reason.

      • Sadly, the Church of England has basically surrendered itself to leftist dogma. I suppose that’s a byproduct the head of the CofE being the same person who oversaw the loss of Britain’s empire and also the same person currently overseeing the demographic genocide of England’s native population.

  • MarcusTrajanus

    I’m an atheist, so I guess I shouldn’t care whom Catholics choose to lead their religion. However, I dislike seeing blacks lording it over Whites, and the idea of a black sitting on a throne in Rome, as the leader of the Catholic Church, disgusts me. It’s the ultimate humiliation.

    At least the two Latin American candidates are White.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      Agreed. I am a devout, traditional Roman Catholic and have ZERO desire to see a black pope. To me it would be just as incongruous as all those Black Jeebus paintings found in the ghetto. If that makes me a sinner then so be it. Mea Culpa

      • Extropico

        For full disclosure, I am an atheist. Even back when I was raised as a Christian believer, I’d never accept the idea that my race or nation must be conquered in order for my original sin of having a pallid skin tone to be deracinated.

      • MarcusTrajanus

        Sadly the sickness of globalism, egalitarianism and multiculturalism infects all institutions in the West. The churches, no matter what denomination, liberal or conservative, are no exception. Electing a black leader is a way of showing how “with it” they are, how they are some boring, old, White anachronism. They are modern, multiracial, like the Third World masses that represent the future.

        Other than a few explicitly racialist fringe sects, Christians have no theological defenses against the idea that all races are “God’s children”, “brother’s in Christ”, “created equal”, etc. So I don’t know what loyal White Christians can do to get other White Christians and the churches back on the White side.

        • Room101

          Leftism is the most dynamic ‘religion’ in the world today, even more than Islam. It comes as no surprise that the Left would install someone of an officially-approved race to be the puppet of one of their institutions. The Church seems to be principally involved in secular political affairs promoting Leftism and has been for quite some time. Catholic Charities gets thousands for each Somali they can ship over to America, pretend to “sponsor”, all-the- while signing up black muslim East-African cave-people onto government entitlement programs funded by the “racists”/taxpayers. The Lutheran churches also have a similarly lucrative scam going with the government that by-and-large seems to be a bounty system. The US taxpayers are made to fund the importation of hostile people full of grievances, put them on the dole, then see what happens. And various church “non-profits” get a couple grand for each one they can get over here to sign up for benefits, register to vote, etc.

          • Katherine McChesney

            All the ecumenical churches are complicit in the political correctness leading to One World Government headed by Rome.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight, it’s cutting off the circulation to your brain.

          • Joseph

            You are welcome to give us the atheist version of events but there is no reason to denigrate Katherine in the process. Many of the greatest minds of white history have been Christians so intelligence is not the exclusive domain of atheists. You can think we are wrong, but that does not make anyone less intellectually capable than you.

            This forum is for promotion of racial identity and the article herein is specifically about the election of a spiritual leader of the largest denomination of the largest religion in the world. It does have importance to MOST people. Why not address it in those terms?

          • MarcusTrajanus

            My comments regarding Catherine have nothing to do with her being a Christian, or with me thinking that Christians can’t be intelligent. It’s not her Christianity I object to, it’s the silly mish-mash of various “prophecies” that she spouts. Her ravings are on the level of David Ike and the like. I don’t consider such delusions worthy of a serious discussion amongst adults. Her ideas are more suited to Rapture-Ready, the Huffinton Post, WorldNutDaily, or Prison Planet rather than Amren.
            If you haven’t noticed I did address the undesirability of electing a black pope from a racialist perspective.

          • Joseph

            You wrote: “I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight, it’s cutting off the circulation to your brain.”

            That is not very specifically addressing what you claim in your response to her unless there is some other exchange which I didn’t see.

            “Why caint we awl jus’ git along?” -Rodney King

          • Katherine McChesney

            Marcus is a troublemaker. I’ve seen his rants on other articles. But, he has the right to say whatever he want. He could use some research on the matter because he’s been mind-controlled by Rome.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Correction; most of the greatest minds have had to overcome Christianity in order to express themselves or establish Western progress. Must I remind you of the Christian suppression of first, literacy, then books, and then the printing press? Do I really have to remind you of people like Leonardo Da Vinci who was under house arrest for his mathematics and engineering advances, etc.? Must I remind you that explorers like Christopher Columbus had to run the gauntlet against a backward Church that claimed the earth was flat and spent time in jail after proving them wrong?

            The fact is that most progressive minds in the West had to hide and form secret societies far from the Vatican’s reach, with Charles ll of England’s “Royal Society” as the first publicly proclaimed organization for scientific research in the 17th century. The Western Philosophers from the ancient Greek to the Roman to the later Scottish and German were the vanguard and preservers of the use of the human brain for reason and logic, which still to this day is responsible for the establishment and use of the Scientific Method and all critical thinking worldwide. During the early centuries of Christianity, even numbers and therefore any math or geometrical studies were considered sorcery and Satanic, with Hypatia of Alexandria’s history perhaps one of the worst (or best) cases of the Christian attitude toward forward thinking. It’s in Gibbon (Decline and Fall) and he lists chief among other causes, the rise of superstition ignorance due to the rise of Christianity.

            Christianity and in particular, the Catholic Church began by usurping other extant religious forms, particularly Judaism and polytheistic paganism. Over the centuries it found that it had to absorb what it could not convert or destroy. What was deemed “Satanic” just 40 years ago is routinely found inside Christian culture and practice today. So when the Vatican announced that Darwin’s theory of Evolution and its attendant science was not heresy and the world was not just 6,000 years old, they were attempting to once again modify against the inevitability of facts whose denial results in rendering the denier as foolish and backward. The eventual result is the notion among believers that this modified doctrine was the result of the wonderful influence of Catholicism in the West (or anywhere). And This is a HUGE lie by the best organized liar organization in history.

            How this has gone on for two centuries is a constant source of amazement to me.

          • Katherine McChesney
          • HarmsTorheit

            NWO headed by rome? i think you got something confused there

          • GM (Australia)

            If, and I stress if, the NWO is totally entwined with the EU which is also regarded by some as the “evil empire” we should remember that the EU was founded by the “Treaty of Rome” and that the “The Club of Rome” is the ultimate conspiracy organisation. Both of these organisations seem to have direct links to the Holy Roman Empire which in turn is descended from the original Roman Empire. In the world of fringe politics I am certain that this is good enough to suggest that the NWO could be run from Rome by a black pope or the powers that put him on the throne!
            (And I hope this post does not get me banned from Amren!)

          • Felix_M

            She’s never read what David Ben-Gurion said about Jerusalem being the seat of world power.

          • Joseph

            I think it is a an allegorical modern “Rome”. The related prophecies DO suggest the destruction of the great temple and the church by Rome in 70 ad.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Yes, but not just them. I would agree that this has always been the dream of the Roman Catholic Church. This is why Catholicism and Christianity have never been good for Europeans or whites. It was only a matter of time before the advantages that it seemed to provide Europeans world wide reversed.

          • Joseph

            The whore with a cup full of blasphemies astride the red beast.

          • David Ashton

            This refers to pagan Rome/Babylon not to the Christian Church.

          • GM (Australia)

            Yes, but “fringe” and some not so fringe theories/politics/religion sees the continuing connection between ancient Rome and modern Rome. The White Horse of the Apocalypse is often seen to be the Church of Rome which defends the Faith and keeps the Faith alive but is given power to conquer!

          • Katherine McChesney

            Rev. 6 – It’s symbolic. Caesar rode a white horse in war and in ceremony.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Wrong, Christianity strode up to the Throne and seated itself upon it by the fourth century. They became the Great Whore and took up its policies and practices of genocide in Europe just as pagan Rome had done earlier, only they did it more thoroughly and for far longer.

          • Katherine McChesney

            It refers to pagan Catholicism.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Yes, Revelation 17 refers to Rome (the Vatican) as the Beast System.

            “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” The harlots are Protestants who have returned to Rome.

          • David Ashton

            This is one of several conspiracy theories actually challenged by some of the most traditional and “Romanist” Catholics with alternatives of their own.

          • Anone

            Except there is no evidence that “Rome” is a power in the world anything but by a dwindling monetary fortune from generations past.

            If you “follow the money”, or more to the point, follow the chain of influence peddling in the world, the last place it leads to is Rome. It does lead somewhere, just not to Rome.

            Want to know who? Just ask the question….who aren’t you allowed to criticize and there is your answer.

          • GM (Australia)

            I feel this is going to be the most anticipated Papal Election in history. Perhaps the world is just waiting for a new Messiah.I feel that expectations on the new Pope will be phenomenal.
            As far as the original article is concerned this is just another example of how, by sheer numbers, the 3rd World, The Asian World, The African World and the Islamic World are fast displacing the traditional white/European world and are fast gaining the upper hand in running this planet. This should be our main concern.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            I disagree with you completely. The Vatican, (as “Rome”) has a huge amount of influence in the world because the religion has a huge amount of adherents worldwide, and most of them are from families and cultures that have been members for hundreds and sometimes over a thousand years. The Pope’s opinion is publicized worldwide; The Vatican has been involved in the International Monetary Fund decisions and funding allocations, steered public opinion on many issues. If you ever lived in Southern Europe as I have, you would have no question of the deep cultural influence (and not for the best) Catholicism has there. And if you travel ANYWHERE that the “Latin Church” established a conquering presence, you would also be forced to acknowledge its huge ongoing influence, despite its present problems with sex scandals and corruption. (That’s always been there. One medieval pope had a dozen (or so) virgins murdered so that he could bath in their blood because he thought it would prolong his life. (See “The Bad Popes”)

            I think it is amusing when people assiduously point to some shadowy Jewish world plot (sustained perhaps by the long debunked fraud of the Protocols of Zion), that although it cannot be located or identified, makes the list through ongoing misinformation and conspiracy theory hacks who often happen to have a strong Catholic (or Protestant) backgound. Conspiracy theories and theorists are typically narcissistic neurotics, who are obsessed with feeling special via secret information only known to those “inside” through self-sustaining, circular logic and proofs, while the only provable and historically well-documented conspiracy IS the Church of Rome.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Indeed. By the by, I like this…

            Asked if he would vote for a non-European over a European candidate if they were equally qualified, he responded: ‘Yes.’

            Really? What kind of question was that? Was the guy going to say “No”? And…he would vote for the non-European OVER the European? REALLY? WHY? Problem with Europeans?

            Regardless I saw this coming long ago. “God deliver us from stupid white’s self genocidal obsession with magical negroes!”

            Whites – if the church goes here, leave it forever. Black pope, eh? Hmmm…

            Regardless the Argentine Italian or perhaps the Brazilian may be acceptable.

        • Andy

          All races are God’s children. That doesn’t mean we’re all the same. We are called to love our neighbor, but not delude ourselves about him.

        • Joseph

          Political correctness notwithstanding we (the church) can decry the rampant promiscuity, degradation of women, addiction and crime indigenous to this “culture” without being explicit about race. That is what I do among other Christians. People make the (obvious) connection in their own minds. I’m not going to just pretend that this is all okay. It just has to be done without an appearance of hatred or some “raciss” agenda. Bad behavior is bad regardless of who engages in it and it can be addressed that way.

        • jeffaral

          Over 90% of Christians are Third Worlders, hence the need for third world religious leaders. As a Whiteman I don’t mix with Third Worlders,

      • rebellisMMXII

        Catholic here…the discussion/idea/possibility of a black pope is beyond sickening. I had enough to worry about before this. Ugh…

      • third wave

        Many Nazis were devout Catholics as well. The pope was from a supposed Christian, civilized and cultured country that liquidated millions of white people.

        • MarcusTrajanus

          Ratzinger is not responsible for the actions of his government while he was a child. The barbarism of blacks is not confined to the past, it’s ongoing. Wherever blacks arrive, they bring it with them.

          • third wave

            What excuses do you have for adult Germans? Seventy years is not that long ago in terms of history. Whites are just as barbaric as ever. Adam Lanza cold-blooded shot and killed little kids at point blank range. In one instance he pumped eleven bullets into the body of a seven year old.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            Lanza was a lunatic, his actions are the exception, not the rule. The murder, rape, mutilation of children in Africa is a daily occurrence, so common it’s not even news anymore.

          • third wave

            Were millions of Germans lunatics as well? What about the atrocities in the Balkans? Any time a white does something atrocious it is explained away by mental illness. Whites murder, rape, and mutilate on a daily basis as well. Whites have actually committed worse acts of depravity — like the cannibal Jeffery Dahmer.

          • Wayne

            No, Germans were defending their borders, language and culture from commie elements within. You don’t know much about whe World War, do you, aside from your high school history myth.

          • third wave

            Is that why they referred to Slavs — like Russians and Poles as Untermenschen, and waged a war of extermination against them? Are some whites more equal than others?

          • wayne

            Germans waged war of extermination against no one. You really are a sucker for myth. The German people waged war, same as was waged on them. If any nation is to blame it is the USA for getting involved in WWI. The Lusitania was carrying ammo, illegally, like the Germans said.

          • Triarius

            And up until that point the US was more prone to side with Germany considering the British were sinking more US cargo ships than anyone. The Lusitania was the tipping point since it had US civilians.

          • Andy

            …Let’s not be silly. The Nazi regime did indeed work to exterminate Jews, Gypsies, the mentally ill, and the politically problematic. (Eastern Europeans were also disliked, but allowed join the ranks of life worthy of life if they adopted Nazi thinking.) The Germans fell prey to one of the eternal human tendencies – to hate those that have more than us. The Jews were richer, smarter, and more influential than the Germans. We can see the same pattern in most genocides and class killings – French and Chinese Revolutions, Armenia, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, South Africa. Distorting history will do no one any good. White people do bad things too. Denying the obvious is for the anti-whites, because the obvious is not on their side.

          • Daisy

            No, that wasn’t the Nazi regime; it was Hitler’s. True Nazism – founded ideologically by the Strassers – was abolished when Hitler took power of the german government. You sadly in your admirable drive to honor history have distorted it so profoundly.

          • David Ashton

            Gregor Strasser was also anti-Jewish.

          • Daisy

            Strasser was anti-aristocracy. He didn’t blame jewish people singularly at all for the oppression of the german people but instead decried their exploitation at the hands of both the white gentile landowners and the jewish bankers. So was he anti-white too or is criticizing jewish greed the only vein that somehow could be seen as a form of resistance or hostility?

          • David Ashton

            Hitler also had an anti-aristocratic streak.
            I am not quite sure what your question means, and in any event I do not wish to be drawn further here into discussions of Hitler, the Nazis or their Jewish policies. These can sidetrack from our present and future issue of protecting the white race, and the case that can be made for it.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I respect that and partly agree. Although a firm follower of ol’ Godwin’s rule…

            Gotta say that I think discussions of Hitler, Nazis, and their policies are, if wearisome, ESSENTIAL to the big discussion and therefore appropriate to ANY thread found here if presented halfway intelligently.

            My belief is that the neo-nazi movement is the biggest impediment to white solidarity as well as the surest path to irrelevance and marginalization to the “evil racist white” intellectual dump for those who otherwise might actually listen to the Truth and engage in prohibited thinking…

            Example: If there existed a movement that had as it’s goal the protection and well being of Whites that was willing to “take it to the streets” and demonstrate or something, based on the ideals of Amren, for example…

            I might be willing to join in and take a stand.

            But if my only choice is some form of Jew baiting neoNazi movement…no, for two very valid reasons.

            1. The reputation of such organizations, right or wrong, is so low amongst the general population, that to go there is to marginalize one’s self automatically.

            2. I find their junk science and downright superstitious evil-Jew obsession…less than admirable, let’s say.

            But again, as wearisome as it can be, as dangerously close to the idiotic liblefty histrionics that too much Naziology can bring any conversation, considering the nature of the modern beast, hardly ever is a legitimate discussion of the phenomenon not germaine to a topic presented and commented upon here at Amren.

            Sure, too much of anything, I know, but still…

          • Daisy

            Certain aristocrats instigated Hitler’s purge of the true nazi party; he did nothing to disempower this class as a whole. I’m not the one who always brings Hitler up although I will say that even today I read a headline once again exploiting the white DNA is evil via nazis so I’d have to agree with NDNA that remaining silent about what the truth really is becomes complicity to anti-whiteness.

          • Luca

            All wars are fought over geo-political reasons under patriotic banners. Politicians send their people to war. Politicians create the reasons. War is conducted without rules and war is hell. Hitler wanted Germany for Germans and he wanted more room to grow his people and his power. The world blames Hitler for starting WW2 but forgets to mention they were allied with Russia in 1939 and Russia attacked Poland from the east while Hitler attacked from the west.

            Hitler viewed the Jews as non-Germans who banded together for group enrichment at the expense of the German people. He didn’t go after the richer, smarter, Jews because most of the richer, smarter Jews self-deported in the late 30’s early 40’s. Think Warburgs, Rotshcilds etc.

            All races do bad things in times of war. Sub-Saharans do bad things as a way of life, everyday, everywhere you find them. It’s imprinted in their DNA and culture. They are primitive, violent, low IQ people and they do what primitive, violent, low IQ people do.

          • Skincognito

            Hitler was supportive of Zionist settlement in Palestine. Wartime border enforcement hindered the emigration of Jews from Fortress Europe; tragic for them and us. This is not radical revisionism either. East German historians, yes card-carrying commies, spent 40 years NOT reducing National Socialism to voelkisch anti-semitism. The German Right and German Arbeiterbewegung are more complex than you suggest. Certainly pan-German ideology was more than an expression of material envy! In many ways it grew as a response to Napoleonic universalism. Also bear in mind the crucial role played by Jewish solidarity. “German” Jews (predominantly middle-class) lost a lot of credibility in the eyes of German Christians when they displayed their tribal loyalties to backward, rural Polish Jews fleeing Russian pogroms in the late-19th century. The Jewish middle-class remained patriotic until WWI, but the formation of a distinctly Jewish nationalism, best depicted in Herzel’s Der Judenstaat, along with Jewish support for Social Democracy and feminism, did more to turn German workers, shopkeepers, bureaucrats, and, ahem, art students into anti-semites than did Jewish wealth. Oh and don’t forget the old stab in the back myth, largely discredited by documents unavailable to the inter-war German public.

          • Daisy

            In Germany most jews could have been more aptly described as upper middle class. There wasn’t much of a middle class in Germany and whatever one there developed struggled mightily to remain so throughout the first half of the century. Judaism is jewish nationalism; there is no real seam demographically or chronologically between the two ideologies. What did feminism do to the german people to turn them ‘anti-semite'(a term I refuse to recognize outside of quotes from others)? I’m truly curious not just adversarial.

          • Skincognito

            Jewish women stormed the academy and professions. This was largely a result of their “upper” middle class status, as well as a multi-generational reduction in Jewish birthrates. As Jewish families became smaller, men simultaneously out-married and converted more frequently than women. The tenaciously traditional Jewish marriage market thus forced many younger daughters to fend for themselves in a highly competitive, rapidly developing, technologically advanced economy. A visible minority of Jewish women succeeded. Therefore, similar to the US in the 60’s, radical opposition to traditional gender roles came to be, with some reason, associated with the tribe.
            I’m neither a woman-hater nor an annihilationist anti-Semite.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Hear hear!

            I admit that the Nazis had the coolest uniforms ever. I also concede that the Soviet communists were equally odious, a fact often ignored. Currently reading “Koba the Red: Laughter and the Twenty Million”, by Martin Amis.

            As a former lib-lefty sympathizer and excuse monger, I bought into the “Nazis worse than Commies” dealio once as well, but abandoned that quaint notion long before reading Mr. Amis’ book. I blame both the evil monsters, both “the little moustache” and “the big moustache”, for our people’s plight.

            The “big stache” represents the worst of totalitarian, mob rule egalitarianism. The hypocrisies of the red abomination exceeded those of the little ‘stache and have been far more destructive in the big picture, on a daily basis. A bloodthirsty, smiling hypocrisy, a wolf-in-sheeps-clothing spreading big, sweet, pollyanish lies that result in genocide. The little stache, in many ways, simply shocked otherwise sane white folk like my dad (who SAW it, deniers) into becoming racial suicidalists – though not my old man. He voted for Nixon, har har…educated me as best he could during my lib-lefty/totalitarian democratic indoctrination known as ejucayshun. Oh, and he (litle ‘stache, not pops, heehee) tried to exterminate white Jewish people and picked and chose which Slavs were OK and which were to be exterminated based on the desirability of their real estate and willingness to serve. Backed up by the junk race science of the time, more ideology than fact, as opposed to real modern science.

            A failed artiste or a failed priest? Little ‘stache, big ‘stache… Which abomination was worse? What does it matter? Both are far more culpable in setting the conditions for White Genocide than the most obnoxious PC duckspeaker.

            But I gotta say, in their professions of do-gooding and their obnoxious warping of language, the liblefty white genocidalist owes more to the big ‘stache and his ilk. Cultural Marxism at it’s most simperingly obnoxious and simply noxious…

            But don’t dismiss the evil, destructive, stupidity of the little ‘stache and the stupid self loathing his actions resulted in.

            You know…looking at the history…even if yer a Jew hating true believer Nazi…how can you not see his role in the defeat of the 3rd Reich? How many hundreds of thousands (millions?) of high quality German troops were lost due to encirclement as a direct result of little ‘stache’s profound hubritic ignorance of military science and irrational “fight to the last Aryan” orders during the prosecution of the shameful fraternal waste?

          • Wayne

            America was tricked into WWI by a lie. How many More lies and half truths surround those wars? Note: Hitler was democratically elected by the German people. The Germans, not, the Nazi Party, was a belligerent during that war. To say otherwise is like saying the Republican Party invaded Iraq. The German people had been humiliated in WWI on account of America’s interference. They were also blamed for the entire war and pay for everyone’s damages. Read Keynes The Economic Consequences of the Peace. To add fuel to the fire the Weimar Republic was leftist, anti-German and corrupt, add in an endless barrage of Commie propaganda and a boycot of German businesses in Germany and you may begin to get the picture. Now add on a horrific bombing campaign and blockade that reduced the population to starvation and guess what? Germans are going to eat first and the others when they can. Look up pictures of Andersonville and you will see Union prisoners of war in as sad a shame as any from WWII–not because Confederates were evil, but simply that they had no food.

          • Daisy

            The Nazi party was semi-democratically elected by the german people but only as a plurality of I think 37%, never by a majority. Shortly thereafter Hitler murdered both Rohm and Strasser. Strasser is credited with actually making the Nazi party a semi-populist movement; without his guiding ideology there was no party. Hitler killed Nazism and just co-opted the name. Which is not to say Nazism was ‘good’ just that your account of how Hitler gained power is not accurate. He also burned the Reichstag to force the government to cede complete power to him, according to most historians; I don’t consider that ‘democratically’ elected.

          • Runciman

            The Nazis did not like the Poles and were killing and enslaving them – not at the same percentage as the Jews perhaps but they still managed to kill 3 million of them in 6 years and the Poles are fair and blond to a great degree but they were considered sub-human slavs.

          • Der Typ

            I’m right there with you Wayne. A good deal of American intransigence through misguided moral crusading helped set the stage for a lot of the problems of the last 100 years, Hitler just being one of them. WW1 is the gift that just keeps giving. Any sensible historian writing about the problems in the Mideast today would do well to start with WW1.

          • PesachPatriot

            A good place to start with the problems of the middle east is probably isaac and ishmael, or possibly even cain and abel…the area between morocco and india is hopeless…there is absolutely nothing to be gained by studying the history of that part of the world….nothing but violence and massacre for 20 centuries straight occasionally interrupted by trade and prayer….I do agree that problems caused by WWI and its aftermath have a lot to do with the state of the planet today.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Is that why you refer to light skinned blacks as “high-yellow” and “redbone”? Is that why blacks sold each other into slavery? Are some blacks mo’ betta than others?

          • Cherry Bomb

            You’re not talking about a race problem you’re talking about a White problem. You want Lebensraum in this country for Africans and Asians at the expense of my ethnic group,. You consistently identify my ethnic group as the main obstacle to the implementation of your weltanshauung.

            Third Wave, you are an anti White psychopath trying to justify to us your sick, genocidal hatred of the White race.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You are assuming that you are talking to people that subscribe to your interpretation of a white supremacist.

            But to answer your question, yes, all whites are not equal and some national groups irritate others even when they are the same race. So what? Europe was usurped by Christianity and that caused the civil wars you are going on about. It only proves that Christianity is evil, not whites. Whites lived pretty peacefully until Christianity entered and took over by coercion and force. It came from Rome as a weapon to reconquer it after the Fall. But Rome was more a Mediterranean culture and Empire than a European one then. The rest of Europe was a pretty peaceful and happy place before that. Europe became an eventful place after Roman, Christian conquests, Islamic invasion, Hunnic invasions, Genghis Kahn, and of course the continual North African slave raids that went on up to the mid 19th century.

            You are using propaganda and rhetoric from the 1930s or earlier in a very narrow and ignorant way. A fuller view of comparative world history shows Europe and Europeans to be the most incredibly remarkable people of all time and it will be a huge loss and sign of world wide demise when Europeans are gone.

          • Andy

            That is silly. Pre-Christian Europe was full of warrior cultures. Noble in their own way, but hardly “peaceful”. They could probably have used a little of our easygoing-ness, and we could certainly use some of their courage and fire.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            That is a very real part of it, to be sure. But Hitler as the way was a bad choice. The man who translated Mien Kampf into English predicted what Hitler would do in writing, in 1938. He just missed on the extent of it. Hitler made it very clear what he intended to do and fighting communism isn’t a good enough excuse. Communism was being fought all over Europe and in America, too. In fact, as you know, Herbert Marcuse and Emanuel Cellar fled Germany in 1938 and continued their Frankfurt School scheming here just as if they were still in Germany.

          • blight14

            You are correct Wayne…..And I believe we all know that the term ‘commie’ is code……

          • MarcusTrajanus

            I wouldn’t call invading other nations, kidnapping civilian citizens of those nations, shipping them off to concentration camps and murdering them “defending their borders, language and culture from commie elements within”.

          • Daisy

            Interesting the while almost no european male could have been considered ‘civilian’ somehow jewish males were. You probably believe that the jews were forced to leave their homeland; they were not.

          • Wayne

            What about the Balkans? It was part of Serbia for near 700 years, Serbians were driving a competetive tribe out of their historic lands. What would you do?

          • third wave

            The Balkan people are all white. Can’t all whites just get along?

          • Wayne

            Not when their lands are invaded for no reason by hostile Arabs and Turks, of which theAlbanians surrendered. Are you stupid?

          • third wave

            Arabs and Turks are classified as Caucasians anyway. You need to read up on anthropology..

          • wayne

            So now we see you true colors, Mr. Anti-white. Turks are Asiatic, just ask one. Arabs are semites, just ask one. We’re talking whites here, but you know that are are being dishonest, aren’t you, Anti-white?

          • Triarius

            Arabs are Semitic Caucasian and Turks are Central Asiatic. Nice try.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Arabs and Turks consider THEMSELVES caucasian. That doesn’t mean WE do. You need to read up on Yakub and Rapist Cleaver

          • Cherry Bomb

            What freaky anti-White cult got its hands on you?

            You’ve spent so much of your life listening to and actually believing the crap that Mommy Professor puts out that you’re beyond seeing what’s in front of your face.

            Only those who have OUTGROWN their Mommy Professor “education” can see the obvious.

            You are just SILLY!

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Turd world is willfully ignant

          • Tom in MI

            Yes, whites have committed atrocities. You mention the Nazis, I’ll also add the Communists. Asians have also committed atrocities–Ghengis Khan and Pol Pot, for example.

            Whites and Asians have also built great civilizations, blacks have not.

          • third wave

            Just google Great Zimbabwe kingdom.

          • Wayne

            Oh, God, Anti-white, now you are just being stupid. Where are all those African philosophers, poets, historians and lawmakers? I’m not trying to run anyone down here, but get real!

          • TeutonicKnight67

            A cluster of mud huts with dung for mortar? Please make it stop! My sides hurt from laughing!

          • eduard

            The third world savages did not build Zimbabwean whatever. It was the Dravidians from India that came to delve for gold who built the so-called Zimbabwean Ruins. There is a researcher called Hromnik, who wrote a book on the subject. Look at Africa, there is nothing but destruction. The negro is a destructive race.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Detroit. That is your White-free fantasy.

            Look at what that anti-white utopia has become! How did you become an anti-white if I may ask and would you wish that Asian and African countries opened their borders and their current majorities become minorities?

            You can name specific countries if you wish.

          • Mentious

            Why just google it, typical knave? Go find it and live there!

          • Andy

            You can’t. There are several “keys” to the ruins (human beings who say only they have the spiritual power to let anyone enter). The Zimbabweans will not allow the precious evidence of their superiority to be overrun (or studied in depth). There’s a series (instant streaming on Netflix) about African kingdoms. It’s strongly Afrocentric and some of the best proof that most sub-Saharan Africans were not capable of building civilizations that there is. From exclaiming over the ingenuity of people who *may* have knocked two rocks together, to oohing and aahing over the magnificence of a long stretch of sand with a rock in the middle, to proclaiming that a dilapidated (though originally reasonably well-built (by black Caucasoids of the Horn)) structure “shimmers”, to announcing that grotesque, frighteningly unrealistic artwork from the Sahel peoples (influenced by Arabs and Horners and marginally cleverer than most black peoples) compares favorably to Michelangelo, the host never lets a moment pass without a laugh.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Giving every unhappy African a one-way ticket back to Da MuddaLand would be far cheaper than the long term expense of having them here…not to mention the greatest gift we could ever leave our children.

          • Garrett Brown

            Now that’s funny! The great kingdom made of wood and poop! Haha!

          • Andy

            The skeletons that were excavated at Great Zimbabwe have proved that the rulers were not Bantu. It is possible they were Khoisan, although before there was great political pressure to assign them a black African race most people thought they were members of a group no longer extant in southern Africa (possibly not modern human, either). The Khoisan did not live in that area during that time period, they were regularly dominated by the Bantus rather than the other way around, and there are no other examples of them building such structures, so I see them as very unlikely candidates for the builders of Great Zimbabwe. My best guess is that they were Arabs, who often traded along the African coast, although there is certainly not enough evidence available to prove their identity conclusively.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            I take it back troll. You’re clearly not a Culture Destroyer. You are one of their brown puppets.

          • Triarius

            Whites commit crimes, but not even close to the rate of most minorities. You name one serial killer, look up the “Terror of the Andes”. Everyone is capable of atrocities.

          • third wave

            I could name dozens of other depraved whites, but I want only one to make a point. Whites are not some angelic race, contrary to what some people on here believe.

          • Triarius

            And I could names dozens from each race, too. Who here claimed whites are perfect. I’ve never read that on here ever.

            Your strawman arument is old and run its course, you just shout Nazis are bad and whites aren’t perfect. Who claims otherwise?

            You sound like a minority with a chip on his shoulder and jealous of whites, btw.

          • third wave

            Why would I be jealous of whites? You are the one who seems to have some issues. What makes you feel superior to blacks or any other race?

          • Wayne

            Because our people built the civilizations your turd world ancestors could not. You envy us because of what our race and its civilization has achieved, and what yours has not. Moreover, you know we are the true people of color, endowed by nature with blue, green, brown, grey eyes, brown, red, black, and blonde hair and every shade in between, and skin from alabaster to bronze, and freckles. We are well endowed, and should be proud of our genetic heritage.

          • Garrett Brown

            Well said Wayne.

          • Cherry Bomb

            You are childish and silly. You are using a device created by Whites.

            Anti-Whites like you would never screech at any non-White racial group, that raised the issue of their genocide. Youu only ever screech at white people, when we raise this issue, to try and intimidate and silence us.

            As an anti-whites, can you please explain how you came to hate whites so much? Can you tell us why, you don’t want white people to ask questions about your demand for our genocide?

          • Andy

            Oh no! The internet was invented by a Nigerian, Phillip Emeagwali! He said so himself.

          • Dennis

            So did Al Gore! LOL!

          • Who Me?

            Cherry Bomb, Anti-whites hate white people so much because they are jealous. Jealous people often have no rational basis for their hatred. Many emotions are unreasonable and irrational. Add to that that in many cases you are dealing with people who are unstable, easily swayed by emotion and there is no explanation for the way they think and act.

          • Mentious

            The facts.

          • Garrett Brown

            We are superior to blacks in intelligence, not moral being or anything that has to do with emotions. Just the same as Asians are superior to us in intelligence. There is no supremacy here, the honest have no need for racism.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            Fine, we are the worst race that’s ever existed. You and all blacks and browns should make an effort to move as far away from us as you possibly can. Maybe you could move to another planet with the help of all those black rocket scientists.

          • Andy

            Third Wave, objectively speaking whites are cleverer, more capable, and less violent than blacks. However, it is completely normal to feel a kinship for your own race. I do not objectively think my family *better* than others (although, like my race, it is above average in intelligence and below average in violence) but I do love them more than strangers. Love your own people and culture. Celebrate their accomplishments. Just pull back every now and then and realize whites have the same normal impulses, and to be honest, a bit more to celebrate.

          • Triarius

            Lol, really? Whites are smarter, better looking, capable of inventing the wheel, able to feed themselves, land on the moon, etc. I have no issues, tbh, but I thank God every day I am not black. Why do blacks in America make fun of darker skinned blacks? I pity you, I really do.

          • Luca

            IQ and culture. I am Mediterranean-White, but I know that Ashkenazi Jews and Asians are generally smarter. I admit it, and I don’t make up fairy tale excuses to deny it. So why do blacks and liberals deny that Sub-Saharan blacks are at the bottom of the IQ ladder? If i admit that others have higher IQ averages how can be I be claiming superiority? I’m not, I am claiming “reality.” We know the pecking order. But to have others claim they are equal and oppressed is bull scat. They have lower IQ’s and higher rates of rape, murder, and other crimes. These are indisputable mathematical, scientific facts and the avalanche of propaganda stating otherwise is disgusting and dishonest.

          • Daisy

            I don’t make up anything akin to a fairy tale to deny that ashkenazi jews are generally smarter. They simply are not and unearthing that truth was no fun.
            I saw no difference between whites and jews having lived around them all my life, and knowing how they compared SAT-wise, IQ, etc. This is just some myth people want to believe.

          • Runciman

            Whether it is IQ, creativity or ambition (all of which may be inherited), I find that Ashkenazi Jews are on average more successful than non-Jews. I do not attribute it to some conspiracy which I find absurd – I find it attributable to IQ, creativity and ambition. It does not affect me in the least.

          • Daisy

            Did you have to grow up around a plurality of them all the while scoring higher grades, SAT’s and IQ? Have you ever studied the mechanics of the Israeli Lobby? Are you white and female? Start with Kevin MacDonald…
            People who love jews should be volunteering to go fight in the wars they drag the US into. Same people are free to go live amongst them but you are not free to force them or their minions on me or other whites so I don’t see how you have any problem if you don’t need to invade other whites’ space.

          • [Guest]

            >>>What makes you feel superior to blacks or any other race?

            This familiar diversionary, propagandistic statement would transform itself into a reasonable question if it were directed at blacks. We find in that demographic some of the most grandiose self-delusion imaginable.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            We’re not angelic?Then why do you and your parasitic brown brethren follow us wherever we go with your hands out for more freebies. We make – you take. We build – you kill. We employ – you destroy.. All we want is to be left alone. When we move away from you stay away from us. Pretty simple really. Even you should be able to grasp that,

          • Cherry Bomb

            Well, that is exactly what a SOCIOPATH would say.

            You anti-whites keep using history to justify White genocide. When are you going to get it through your thick heads that you cannot use history to justify genocide.

            Nothing justifies genocide.

            Being a psychopath does not obsolve YOU of the very serious crime of justifying/promoting the genocide of my race.

            All that remains is for you to tell us HOW you came to be so anti-White.

          • Mentious

            We don’t need to be “angelic” or even “superior.” We just need to survive. You have issues with that young genocidalist?

          • Andy

            Of course there are dozens of depraved whites. It’s a matter of rate and percentages. The US white murder rate, for example, is between 1.3 and 3 per 100,000. The black murder rate is 26. Mass/spree killings are committed by whites at about their percentage in the population. Serial killers (I have heard but not verified the data myself) are more likely to be white. Serial killers have to be smart, so it is unsurprising that whites are overrepresented (IQ 100 vs. 85 for blacks).

          • Andy

            I researched serial killers. They are not more likely to be white (slightly less likely), although few non-whites have racked up huge numbers of victims. My source, however, was faulty. It did not include some serial killers with significant numbers of victims.

          • Alex

            Is Democratic Republic of the Congo still rape capital of the world? How’s Liberia doing nowadays? Did Jeffrey Dahmer teach them cannibalism? Nope, just came naturally to them.

          • Cherry Bomb

            And if you think one genocide deserves another, are you advocating eliminating any non-White groups from the Earth for what they`ve done throughout history, or are you ONLY justifying the genocide of whites based on one-sided history?

            Do you ever think you’ll ever give up the genocide of the White race as your life’s goal?

          • Mentious

            For every Jeffrey Dahmer (an extreme thing to cite), you could find 1000 Jeffrey Dahmers and worse in the annals of Africa. You are such a mendacious little troll.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            If blacks had the technological and organizational capabilities of 1940’s Germans they would have killed a lot more people during their own genocidal wars. There is simply no comparison between black and White crime rates, even in places where there are few blacks they are overrepresented in crime rates, and the places where they are a majority are without exception hellholes.

          • Ed_NY

            What about the remarkable achievments of Idi Amin, Papa Doc, Baby Doc and many other blacks like them. Are they something to be proud of? I think not!

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Word! Black Power Yo!!

          • Andy

            We can name shocking acts of depravity by whites because they took place in civilized societies, with police to stop them, publications to report them, and a populace that would be shocked by them. Within the US, serial killers are mostly white – because our country is mostly white, and serial killers have to be clever to get away with it for long. Only 15% of blacks have an above-average IQ. 2% are bright enough to go to college.

          • Luca

            You are comparing lunatics and war criminals to the everyday Sub-Saharans. Unfair comparison but still no contest. Idi Amin, Thomas Lubunga, Macias Nguema, Mengistu Haile Mariam, Darfur, Somalia Sudan, 1804 Haiti Massacre, Zanzibar revolution, Hutu vs. Tutsi genocides, Congo Civil war, Rwandan genocide, etc. etc. etc. Ad infinitum.

            Now as far as cannibalism goes Dahmer was a deranged lunatic and there was the Donner party incident. I can’t go into African cannibalism here because I doubt the servers have enough capacity and I don’t want to shut down this website.

            Do some research on your own and don’t just read what the left-wing media and universities are spewing. You’ve been spoon-fed propaganda.

            Also, stop embarrassing yourself with puerile anecdotes that you are trying to pass off as examples or comparisons.

          • Juxtaposedhearts0

            Liberia as well in the cannibal category

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Oh, don’t forget “general” Butt Naked in that beacon of freedom and hope, Liberia. He’s a preacher man now and appears to be doing his best to keep fellow 85- IQ subSaharans from savaging each other (good luck with that, Butt Naked!), but the point is that cannibalism and all sorts of other shocking savagery are so common in that benighted hellhole…not really so shocking for the race realist…

            Butt then…that’s kind of the point you are making, isn’t it? Whites are held to a higher standard of behavior even by the liblefty duckspeaker. When a black or whatever does something abominable, such is so common, so easily and reflexively ascribed to evil whitey somehow, yet when a white goes there it is immediately puked up as an example of how we’re all alike, not as a natural reaction to all powerful environmental factors. It’s evil when whitey does it, consequence of evil whitey when Butt Naked does it…

            Here’s an educational look at the reality…

            http://tinyurl.com/buttnaked

            Just another day in deepest, darkest…

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Lanza was the son of a single mother, raised in a society where white boys are suppressed and on the bottom of the respect ladder, the line for benefits, etc. That most white shooters fit this description is no accident. He and they are the results of 40+ years of Liberal culture going out of control via Feminism and other special interest groups, but most of all, single FEMALE parenthood.

          • blight14

            Or Haiti/Chicago/Detroit/etc…….it MAY be a demographics issue!

          • Andy

            I researched this, actually. 72% of mass/spree killings with more than 5 deaths (or else a huge number of injuries) since 1990 have been committed by whites. That’s approximately our proportion in the population for those years, but we may be (very) slightly overrepresented. (And the sample size is obviously not extremely large.) Asians appear to overrepresented as well. My suspicion is that this is because the data I looked at includes only successful mass/spree killings. It takes intelligence and planning to kill a lot of people before being stopped.

          • guest

            You must know that the FBI classifies Hispanics and Arabs as “white”. If you don’t believe me, look at their most wanted list. It’s almost comical who they list as “white”. When you correct for misclassification, the number of white criminals is reduced sigficantly.

          • wayne

            Turd Wave: Less than 5% of the population does over 50% of violent crimes. Why?

          • third wave

            Did it ever cross your mind that maybe it could be cultural, or are only whites afforded that explanation? Are you saying that white people are naturally kind and peaceful?

          • Triarius

            Considering they created democracy, the concept of freedom, liberty, free choice, freedom of religion, pursuit of happiness, and abolishing slavery worldwide I can confidently say we are more peaceful than any other race, Yes.

          • third wave

            Some whites. The Nazis and Bolsheviks were white as well. What good did they do?

          • Triarius

            The US got a lot of its technology from the Nazis. We never would have got to the moon or satellites if it were not for Nazis. This changed the world forever. What good has blacks done?

          • third wave

            What have you personally done to advance civilization?

          • wayne

            What have you? But it really does not matter. We whites have the right to exist as whites in the lands our fathers built for us. We owe nobody an excuse and we don’t ask permission. Same as every other peoples on this Earth.

          • third wave

            Whites are nothing special. We all bleed the same, then die after a short time on Earth. We should treat each other as individuals — not as members of races.

          • Wayne

            Are you saying that from the comfort of the Western nations my ancestors built? Would you rather be in Haiti? Whites are 10% of the worlds population antiwhite, that makes us kinda rare and special already. But besides that, your family is nothing special, you should treat everyone as individuals, and that means no special treatment for mom, dad, brother, sister, etc. Is’t that what you want?

          • I always find it interesting when a African says things like (Whites are nothing special” while living in nations such as England or France. Hell, the European is very special. In fact so special that black Africans risk their very LIVES fleeing Africa in makeshift rickety rafts to hopefully wash up on the coast of Europe. Let that fact settle in. The African is so incapable of building or creating conditions that are conducive for a decent life, that he has to risk his life to live in a nation that is populated, and governed by White European men. That really says it all. Period. End of story!!!!!!!!!!

          • T6

            By that logic, Europe should’ve advanced on its own to this date without the need to conquer and colonize other lands, but surely that didn’t happen. Also by your logic, Europeans shouldn’t have risked their lives fleeing their native crime-free nations to other lands such as The Americas. Why were the European merchants searching for other markets in other continents, if they were quiet satisfied within their own countries?

          • Pat

            Because people always want more. They were driven by ambition for more wealth, greed if you like. They did not arrive with their hands out expecting it all for free, which is largely what happens now.

          • Bernie

            Both Europe and North America managed to have the most dynamic and advanced societies in the world. Peoplefrom all over the world want to live in societies the white people created.

          • Wayne

            T6: Whites colonized continents seeking trade. Remember that Islamic conquest of previously white Anatolia, and the rest of the Levant prevented whites from trading with The East. Hence our great white explorers began searching for a new route and stumbled upon the Americas. Their travels took them around Africa and to the Southern Seas as well, all for commerce. Colonies and trading posts were set up in mostly sparsley populated areas. An exception was Mexico and Peru, but even there ther was no manufacture worthy of trade, so raw materials were extracted. Likewise the barbaric practice of sacrifice was put to an end. Everywhere our white ancestors went they took Western civilization. The Spaniards erred greatly by mixing with the locals and their civilization suffered due to it. Our Anglo-Saxon forebears did not, and today Canada, US, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand are the envy of the world…except South Africa that has fallen a victim to diversity and democracy..

          • jay11

            Remember that the Turks were a small group and they invaded Anatolia and put themselves on top of the governmental pyramid, and also the majority of people in Western Turkey today are actually what is known as ‘Turkecized Greeks.’ Some ‘Turks’ are whiter and genetically closer to ancient Greeks than many darker skinned Greeks in Greece! I have met many a Western Turk who was as white as snow.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Did you swallow a TV? Geez Anti-White get some new material. Even by normal Anti-White standards, you are one really sick indoctrinated “social construct”.

            Yeah, third wave is a bit of a maniac isn’t he? We already know he is anti-White, because he keeps telling us so.

            All that remains is for her to tell us HOW she came to be so anti-White.

            Perhaps when third wave gets well again, he will write a tell all book, about the anti-White cult and how it sucks impressionable kids in and turns them against White people.

            Third Wave has a fixation on Whites as killers.

          • Perhaps turd wave will spare us his simian scribbling.

          • Mentious

            Bor-ing. Race is beautiful. Nobody wants your ideal dimensionless world.

            Rats also bleed red blood “the same.” Try some other mindless slogans.

          • Joseph

            It is entirely appropriate for him/her to mention “bleeding” when blacks are part of the conversation. They cause most of it.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Experience and wisdom shows that this is naive and opens those who practice this up to abuse, mostly due to their race by others who love to pretend to go along with the notion, as long as they are receiving the benefits of your naivety.

          • Anders

            Oh-oh, looks like we’ve got an idealistic college kid here. Maybe an overgrown college kid that’s read a out-of-date manual on how to be an ‘anti-racist’.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Good. He/she/it is welcome. Highly welcome. Please, let’s have at it with him/her/it!

            I WELCOME real debate. The Truth is on our side and all we have to do is present it effectively. Eventually he/she/it will either go away in a huff or stick around giving us an opportunity to beat up on a false ideology with…

            Science, which is like reality…RACIST.

            So hit us with the lib-lefty college race ideology, guy! Welcome and give it yer best quacking!

            Freedom of speech – not allowed in a democratic totalitarian society such as ours if against acceptable ideology. Except anonymously…

          • blight14

            Why the *&^% are you here?

          • Luca

            They all go away quickly when confronted with uncensored realism.

          • ograf

            good luck with that. Think much?

          • You seem to be implying that since whites are nothing special and are the same as others, that therefore whites should give their lands away to others. Why aren’t other peoples told that they should also give their lands away? We haven’t been allowed to vote on whether we want to give our lands away. That we haven’t been allowed to vote is clearly gross.

          • Triarius

            Judging blacks on an individual level still makes me want to avoid the vast majority and negates the few positive ones.

          • Thor Bonham

            We only judge on the content of their character .. How about you ?

          • Joseph

            You are fishing in the wrong pond. Talk to the BET crowd. Be sure it is in a well-lighted public area or via network though. Your amazing sociological problem-solving skills are wasted here where there are so few criminals.

            About 6% of the US population are responsible for 47% of the homicides, not to mention the rest of the violent acts. Hint: they’re not Nazis.

          • [Guest]

            >>>We should treat each other as individuals — not as members of races.

            I’ve heard that pronouncement made, in one variation or another, for decades now. Approximately 100 percent of the time, it’s directed at white people. But those who truly believe that sentiment rather than only mouthing the words as part of a mantra or catechism would oppose each and every movement designed (supposedly) to advance colored people and each and every quota, set-aside, preference, and “diversity” goal designed to promote colored people.

            So, do you confront participants in black-rights movements with the same dictate—that people should be treated as individuals and not as members of a race?

          • Cherry Bomb

            I have not seen ONE post where you actually debate the topic. NOT ONE.

            What do you think the thousands of readers who come here and read your post think about you, and your political view if all you can come up with is personal attacks, harassment and total lack of respect? Do you even care about that?

            Now, if you want to have a REAL debate and look at the FACTS, I’m all ready to debate with you, but you have to stop with this childish behavior, third wave.

          • Mentious

            The motivation of Pro-Whites defend their people — the others — rather than crowing about themselves. We are family. We don’t need your self-centered worldview.

          • It does not matter what he has done personally. He is proud of the accomplishments of his ancestors and his racial kinsmen. That is 100% healthy and natural. It is that same sense of pride that makes Africans talk about how they invented the high five, or peanut butter, etc. If the poster is of European heritage, then he has every right to wear the accomplishments of his race on his sleeve. All groups do that. Of course we have different rules, for different races.

          • Bob

            I’m not black.

          • Triarius

            What have you done? At least I hold the genes to make a person that is capable of changing the world for the better.

          • Bill

            What have YOU done to do so?

          • Felix_M

            The Nazis might also have prevented the Marxist-Leninists (who we know from history were bigger savages than the Nazis ever were), from getting to power in Germany and establishing a toehold into Western Europe.

          • Skincognito

            Most powerful Bolshies weren’t White, in fact the Great Georgian essentially formalized a pogrom against the Tribe in the ’30’s (before the Machtergreifung der NSDAP). Beria remained Stalin’s court Jew, but was strategically eliminated before Great Russians could begin to reclaim their nation.
            Beria was also a serial rapist. Jews aren’t White. ‘n Abend.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You’re not scoring any points with this non-white Bolshevik argument. Can’t you do better than that? Jewish is a religion and ethnic group. Some Jews are black, East Indian, etc., and also white. You ought to read up on recent genetic research. Many Germans have a tinge of “Jewish” dna in them it turns out.

          • HamletsGhost

            Jews were vastly overrepresented in the roster of Bolshevik mass murderers. It was a more or less acknowledged fact of the time. Since then it’s been sent down the memory hole.

          • Cherry Bomb

            If you have paid anything for whatever education you have you may want to see about getting a refund.

            But my point here is not to discuss whatever thinking skills you rely on. I am going to try and help you out a bit. You clearly got ripped off when they told you you were learning critical thinking.

          • Mentious

            The Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement. Not “white.”

          • blight14

            See, now you’re reverting back to pesky facts……that’s akin to stating that our utterly corrupt media is the way it is due to ‘liberalism’……

          • JohnEngelman

            Most of the leaders of the Bolsheviks were Gentiles.

          • Luca

            While Jewish leaders were represented in numbers disproportionate to their population. Between 1917 and 1919, Jewish Bolshevik party leaders included Grigory Zinoviev, Moisei Uritsky, Lev Kamenev, Yakov Sverdlov, Grigory Sokolnikov, and Leon Trotsky. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism

          • David Ashton

            Not in Hungary – now why was that?

          • JohnEngelman

            The Marxian idea of life in the classless society after the Revolution is similar to the Jewish idea of life after the coming of the Messiah. There will be economic abundance, personal freedom, and no poverty, crime, or war. This is why Marxism was often appealing to Jews who lost their religious faith.

          • David Ashton

            I have agreed with you previously about this as one explanation for the attraction of Jews to communism. But you denied any leading influence of Jews in the initial communist leadership. This is particularly relevant to the Red Terror and persecution of Christians.
            Regarding this Hungarian example, I quote from Istvan Deak, in Jonathan Frankel (ed), “Dark Times, Dire Decisions: Jews and Communism” (Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Jerusalem University/OUP 2004, p.44), “Note that 31 of the 45 (in some accounts, 49) of people’s commissars and three-fourths of the 200 most important functionaries were of Jewish origin, and that real power belonged to Bela Kun and some of his equally Jewish companions…. Furthermore, because the zealous intellectuals in charge of religion and culture threw themselves mindlessly into curing the populace of the disease of religiosity, their regime came to be associated with godlessness and immorality.” There is more, but you automatically prefer to blame “white Gentiles” for anything untoward.

          • Cherry Bomb

            “While Jews played a ‘quite conspicuous’ role in the Russian and German communist revolutions, their role in Hungary became central…. Out of 49 People’s Commissars there, 31 were Jews….Statues of Hungarian kings and heroes were knocked off their pedestals, the national anthem outlawed, and wearing the national colors criminalized.”

            — Solhenitsyn’s “During the Civil War” Chapter 16 of 200 Years Together

          • NeanderthalDNA

            That’s an interesting take. I’ll have to check that out.

            I’ve always ascribed it more to the fact that Jews were a stateless nationality for centuries, often thereby seen as a dangerous population of aliens in the era of uber-nationalism. The internationalist ideology of the the hard left held understandable appeal to many Jews for thereby OBVIOUS reasons.

            Unfortunate. Most Jews are White and prefer the company of whites, the civilization of whites, are part and parcel of the civilization of whites, like it or not.

            Science = search for Truth. Not a tool to support ideology, as nazi, commie, and modern democratic totalitarianists use it.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Should Jews be considered Whites?

            “Jews typically do not identify with the people and culture of Christian Europe and its offshoots; traditional Jewish attitudes conceptualize Judaism as separate from White, Christian society; partly because of their lack of identification with non-White Christian culture, Jewish groups have led the campaign to remove Christianity from the public square

            There is a long history of very mainstream Jewish activism and identity that sees Christian Europe as an evil outgroup responsible for a long history of persecuting Jews; an important aspect of Jewish self-conception in America.

            Jews are a relatively powerful group that has often been in competition with non-Jewish Europeans

            Jewish ethnic activism typically excludes non-Jewish Whites and favors Jews, as in the appointment of Elena Kagan and the Jewish campaign to increase Jewish enrollment in Ivy League universities.

            As a result, the distinction between Jew and non-Jewish White is of considerable real world importance.”

            http://www.theoccidentalobserv

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Please post a more complete link.

          • Cherry Bomb
          • Cherry Bomb
          • PesachPatriot

            I lost my religious faith a long time ago…probably around the age of 10 when I first read about WWII…hard to believe in a loving omnipotent deity who supposedly chose you to receive His divine wisdom after I looked at those pictures…Still, there is nothing appealing about marxism to me….I read Das Kapital and even as a teenager I thought it was ridiculous…marx never even held a real job in his life, yet expected to fundamentally change all that was known about human nature and national economics at the time…my wife is also not very religious, but she still enjoys deluding herself with the idea of humanities basic goodness and decency even though every history book ever written and the 6 o’clock news proves otherwise….too bad for a few million russians, chinese, vietnamese and koreans marxism/leninism/stalinism/maoism didn’t really provide economic abundance, personal freedom and an end to poverty, crime and war….I think capitalism has obviously had some better results but it is almost as destructive to countries and peoples as communism, but in different ways….

          • JohnEngelman

            The best articulation of the Marxian ideal of the classless society that I have encountered is John Lennon’s song “Imagine.”

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v_KhSSho8M

            In his life John Lennon demonstrated why the classless society was an unlikely ideal.

            The song includes the lyrics:

            Imagine no possessions
            I wonder if you can
            No need for greed or hunger
            A brotherhood of man
            Imagine all the people sharing all the world.

            But John Lennon died a very rich man. He did not share what he had with the rest of the world.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Not true. Jews were absolutely at the forefront of the communist revolution in Russia. The revolution and new communist government were financed by an American Jew, Jacob Shiff:

            “[After the February Revolution, Schiff wrote,] ‘I was always the enemy of Russian absolutism, which mercilessly persecuted my co-religionists.’ Schiff was quick to provide credit and financing for the new Russian government. Later in emigration, the exiled Russian right-wing press published investigative reports attempting to show that Schiff actively financed the Revolution itself…Still, the known and public acts of Schiff, who had always been hostile to the Russian absolutism, had even more effect than any possible secret assistance to such a revolution.”

            –Solzhenitsyn’s “The February Revolution”: Chapter 13 of 200 Years Together

            “Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries etc. — with respect to both general Jewish membership and Jewish presence among the leaders, greatly exceeds the Jewish share in the population of Russia. This is an indisputable fact; while its reasons should be debated, its factual veracity is unchallengeable and its denial is pointless.”

            — Solzhenitsyn “During 1917″: Chapter 14 of “200 Years Together”

            During the 1930s, the person in charge of the deportations was an ethnic Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, nicknamed the “wolf of the Kremlin” because of his penchant for violence:

            “There was no shortage of Jewish names among the top Bolsheviks.”

            “Jewish involvement in the horrors of Communism was also an important sentiment in Hitler’s desire to destroy the USSR and in the anti-Jewish actions of the German National Socialist government. Jews and Jewish organizations were also important forces in inducing the Western democracies to side with Stalin rather than Hitler in World War II.”

            — Solzhenitsyn’s “During the Civil War” Chapter 16 of 200 Years Together

          • NeanderthalDNA

            “Jewish involvement in the horrors of Communism was also an important sentiment in Hitler’s desire to destroy the USSR and in the anti-Jewish actions of the German National Socialist government. Jews and Jewish organizations were also important forces in inducing the Western democracies to side with Stalin rather than Hitler in World War II.”

            — Solzhenitsyn’s “During the Civil War” Chapter 16 of 200 Years Together

            I wonder why?

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Which is why so many slavic people WELCOMED the Nazis when they invaded.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            You aren’t proving anything except that the white race isn’t perfect. The actual number of Nazis and Bolsheviks was pretty small, they just got power when there was a huge opportunity to seize power and most people are followers that just want to survive. Besides, national socialism and even communism were valiant attempts to solve some basic human problems. Because white nations and whites are as powerful and intelligent as they are, when things go well, they go well in a big way and when things go wrong, they go wrong in a big way. Compare that to the continual, dismal slop-hole that Africa is without whites, what a mess everything from India to Syria is. I don’t care what anyone says about India, I would NEVER want to live there. We could talk about China and East Asia, where the annals of cruelty have no match in history in any dimension you care to think of.

          • blight14

            There is NO comparison between the two……the latter were/are the most vile creatures to ever draw a breath….the descendants of the latter continue to curse all of humanity to this day….

          • Umm, be a little more careful, logically and structurally, when you make statements about the Bolsheviks.

          • Triarius

            Never did I claim all whites were like that Strawman. Can you show me where democracy and abolition of slavery existed in the non-white world before whites?

          • Luca

            Oh ye of little intelligence, listen closely. Do not compare what Whites do during a time of war with what blacks do during a time of peace in everyday life. Then, in your quiet moments, read a book on math and discover what averages are. Blacks are far more likely to commit crime in any city, in any country, in any time in history then Whites..again..on average. And these average numbers when compared are astronomical.

            And speaking of war: Very few people venture into Africa to record accurately the number killed every single day in the course of regional warfare being conducted throughout southern Africa. Africa is a cesspool of rape, murder, starvation and disease. Always was, and always will be, with or without any White intervention of any kind. I wonder why that is?

            Wake up and stop regurgitating Leftist propaganda. Use your brain and think for yourself.

          • Joseph

            It is my understanding that the correlation between the black population percentage and violent crime rate is .77 Maybe someone can point to an original source.

            Now of course, in the liberal calculus we cannot possibly conclude any causal effect. It may be that crime CAUSES black people. They may spontaneously generate at scenes of violence the way that flies appear from decaying food.

          • Der Typ

            That 2nd paragraph is a work of art! I may have to borrow it in the future.

          • Joseph

            Ridiculous denial of physical realities necessitates ridiculous metaphors.

          • David Ashton

            Here are some thoughts (new to some perhaps on this site):
            1. Fascism, communism, liberalism, capitalism and so on all did some good things and some bad.
            2. There are good and bad in all races.
            3. No individual should be ill-treated just because of his race or faith.
            4. Some ideologies, races, nations, religions and individuals have more achievements to their credit than others.
            5. To assess these issues you need to do some research on a thorough and careful scale, being ready to change your mind if the evidence turns out differently.
            6. In debating these issues you need to start with agreed definitions.

          • Curious Observer

            Whites are more peaceful than any other race?

            Really?

            Ever heard of World War 2 (50 million), WW1 (17 million), Napoleonic Wars (10 million), Thirty Years War (8 million deaths)…. The incessant warfare endemic during the Medieval era?

            Please review history and behold the bloody legacy of European peoples.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Maybe you should read some more history yourself. Genghis Kahn slaughtered millions, wiped out entire peoples as did other Central Asian warlords in the past.

            Europeans have the most complete history and chronologues of all peoples. What they have done has been far more consequential to the modern age than any other race. But this doesn’t mean that other races or groups are nicer or less murderous. I’d say they are more so, especially today, but certainly in the past and violence is a big feature of most non-white cultures today.

          • Garrett Brown

            Mao? Pol Pot? Worst genocides in the 20th century. Only thing that comes close was Stalin.

            Now, go review history.

          • Andy

            Groups with more advanced technology (whites and Asians) have more shocking wars, of course. But warfare was endemic among blacks and American Indians as well.

          • Triarius

            Jewish and Chinese Communism wiped out way more. Add in Ghengis Khan, the man who held the record before the industrial revolution and still in the tens of millions, Tamerlane, Ottomans, Umayyad, Almovads, etc. It is not really close.

          • Joseph

            Ever heard of E. St. Louis?

          • wayne

            Race is a very big part of culture, Anti-white. Race does not equal skin color, llike the silly leftists repeat over and over and over…

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            More so than any other race today.

          • Garrett Brown

            Why does it happen in different countries then? The cultures in Canada, Australia, Great Britain, and France are the exact same? Surely not.

          • Garrett Brown

            Much more peaceful than the race you’re defending, that’s for certain.

          • blight14

            White people are the greatest gift in the history of the planet…..

          • DT

            White people are more like a curse for non-whites with few added advantages (which is not required for basic survival). If there is a general treaty signed by the whites and non-whites, that the white nations will not interfere with the non-white nations for the next thousand years, then I think, us non-whites, will rather stop using or boycott all white inventions (which we rightfully paid for and made your countries wealthy due to that). Of course, this again is just a dream that won’t ever be possible because of the liberals and free-loaders in white and non-white races.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Amen!

          • Thor Bonham

            Yes, I think that’s exactly what he is saying .. Post a link with a white flash mob attacking patrons in a downtown of any city … Prove me wrong ..

          • Bill

            No, he’s saying that whites are generally civilized and law abiding. Blacks have NEVER been that, and still aren’t, even when they are living HERE. Please try to not use the obvious lefty tactic of quoting one or a few exceptions to prove a point particularly when the statistics overwhelm your argument that blacks are “no worse than us”.

          • Felix_M

            Ignore turd wave. She’s writing from hasbarat central and just paid to distract you.

          • Joseph

            Yes, but it’s entertaining like shooting fresh cowpies with a BB gun from a distance.

          • Triarius

            Whites are as civil as ever, and what does some libtard with a chemical imbalance in New England have to do with a country in Europe strawman?

          • third wave

            Germans were supposed;y civil as well, yet they committed barbaric atrocities under the Nazis. White Germans are not that different from white Americans.

          • Triarius

            Lol, sure thing. More Germans and Ze Nazis. Broken record.

          • third wave

            I could also mention Soviet gulags, Yugoslav ethnic cleansing and white American serial killers and mass murderers and so on.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Stop your anti-White rants.

            Are you an anti-White, self hating White or a non White?

            The USSR had “democracy” “elections” and “human rights” laws. That did not mean the people were free.

            Hitler is still Hitler even with his name spelled backwards (RELTIH).
            You anti-Whites want a world with no White people in it.

            You are no different from Hitler who wanted a world with no Jews.

          • Mentious

            A disproportionate number of that rarefied category — rare serial killers — who you think are “white” are actually, um, Red Sea Pedestrians. Didja know, memeblock?

            And possibly the worst serial killer in America, Coral Eugene Watts, was a black. He was so prolific he even murdered my high school girlfriend, Sue Searles. (Held her head in a pot planter full of water to make sure she was dead.) She was a gorgeous Irish redhead with flashing eyes and porcelain skin.

            You have a meme-collection instead of a brain, I notice.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Blacks commit serial atrocities in our streets every single day.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            And I’m sorry about Ms. Searles by the way.

          • Andy

            I’m sorry – what are you trying to prove? Some white people do bad things? I’ll concede that. But when you compare groups’ violence, you compare rates (preferably under the same conditions). If you are justifying genocide against them, you are justifying killing off the whole world. People don’t gather on this site because they think white people are perfect. This site exists because we live in a society (which whites built) in which whites are maligned, slandered, assigned blame for all the evils of the world, discriminated against, and allowed to be the victims of racial violence. If it were not for being told my ancestors were scum and that I was born guilty, I probably never would have looked into racial differences with more than a passing intellectual interest. Our government and media is against us, so we need to look out for ourselves as a race.

          • Mentious

            Actually, the German work camps were far more hospitable and humane than the camps run by, say, the Jywish Commuists in Russia. No comparison.

          • Garrett Brown

            Over 480 black on black deaths in Chicago alone last year. How many white on white deaths nation wide by guns?

          • Joseph

            If the “minorities” in this society continue to antagonize and parasitize whites as in Germany it may unfortunately happen again too except the Americans won’t come to save their bacon because it will *be* Americans responding to atrocities.

          • PesachPatriot

            very big difference between white germans and white americans. White germany was pretty much 90% german with about 10% jewish population in 1930…white americans in the late 19th century basically were nice enough to allow more or less the whole rest of the world to come and take part in the industrial revolution and rising living standards. Their reward has been to be told that immigrants shoudln’t have to learn english and that two negative events(slavery and indian unpleasantness) make up the entirety of american history. You are a big shot keyboard internet tough guy 3rd wave, but we both know you would rather walk through a rural all white community in the south full of “rednecks” than through the south side of chicago at 11PM. Because Germany was and is a civilized country they felt badly about what happened after the temporary madness passed….no one in rwanda, zimbabwe, somalia or the sudan feels the slightest twinge of conscience about the horrors they have committed.

          • Alex

            That was a sad fluke.
            How many blacks get killed by their own kind, barbarically, every day in America? Just black people being black, still as barbaric as ever. Can we say it’s cultural, yup, sure can. Just a violent culture that can never manage to function in a civilized manner, only destroy.

          • Cherry Bomb

            When did you first start hating Whites?

            Anti-Whites like you routinely associate collective guilt to White children for things that happened thousands of miles away, and hundreds of years before those White children were even born.

            Stop with the childish behavior. I actually felt sorry for you when I read your post. Can’t you understand how normal people see you as just a brainwashed Anti-White idiot?

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            Your focus and proportions are perverse and off target. Lack of education and use of cliche’s doesn’t make an argument or case. Too much suffering makes people cruel while too little makes them arrogant. The correct balance might make them wise. Your nazi/Lanza allusions have a common root there, if anywhere. But you cannot discount and staggering, far and away white,European civilization has done for the world. That far outweighs the nazis and Lanza’s in white world history.

            Lanza all the white “shooters” in recent history have been products of single parent (usually mother), or neglected circumstances. They are a product of the society that Liberalism has created, but now doesn’t want to deal with, meaning – take responsibility for, but it’s as clear as a summer day for anyone paying full attention.

            As for Nazism, they were created by abuse, too. But I’m sure that’s too much to wrap your head around.

          • Felix_M

            We don’t have collective guilt in the west. For that you should be grateful. Otherwise, you’d be punished for the crimes of Lloyd Blankfein et al.

          • Ah, the “old White people are evil” meme.

          • Angry White Woman

            “Studies” have shown that even newborn white babies are racist. So would you advise that all white babies that smile at pictures of white people or turn their heads away at pictures of blacks should be killed? Well, why not, after all they are evil racists who will grow up to maybe hurt the delicate feelings of some precious non-white…. You anti-whites sicken me.

          • Anonymous

            Adam Lanza ( no relation to Mario, who’s real name was Cocozza) is the product of our education system.

          • Luca

            And our culture of psycho-meds pill pushers.

          • Daisy

            There is an increasing amount of evidence that Lanza didn’t act alone or possibly not at all; check memoryhole.com. I initially rejected this idea as someone who doubted many claims about the Sandy Hook incident but even a skeptic of skepticism has to wonder when you study the whole thing.

          • saxonsun

            We know whites have done bad things…duh. We are still the best human evolution has to offer.

        • Triarius

          Most Nazis were Protestant and Stalin killed more than Hitler could ever dream of. What’s your point? And don’t get me started on that liquidated crap.

          • third wave

            My point is that people should be less focused on race, and just treat everyone on their own merit. Just being white does not automatically make someone a better person.

          • Triarius

            I agree. But that will never happen in a multiracial society. Never. The US will Balkanize, we cannot coexist, it is human nature driven by self-preservation. I can admire and appreciate a different race that lives in a different country and doesn’t destory my neighborhood.

          • wayne

            But it does make them diffetent, and their civilization that they and only they created is the envy of the world. Just ask all your dusky hordes trying to escape the dumps their races built. Western civilization can only be maintained by whites, Mr. Anti-white.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I belong to a genetic/cultural tribe. I love my tribesmen and wish to be ruled by them and live among them. I believe everyone should have that right. Begone you Anti-White bigot.

          • Daisy

            The liberals don’t treat people on their merit; blacks and browns are systemically favored for their race in education, employment, and even the criminal courts which refuse to prosecute hatecrimes against whites. Yet most racially motivated hatecrimes are committed by blacks against whites. Just being black doesn’t make you a better person, although it might make you a more successful bully.

          • Skincognito

            Wie Herr Praesident Obama schon gesagt hat: can’t we walk and chew gum? I’m a White Nationalist, a Catholic, a revisionist, a patriot, an animal-lover, a father, a worker, a grad student . . . Must I continue?
            You’re clearly a racial alien or a race traitor. ‘Raus.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Ja Naturlich! Raus!

          • JohnEngelman

            third wave,

            I have never seen your posts before on American Renaissance. I hope you keep posting.

          • whiteyyyyy

            That’s odd, I was wishing the 2 of you would run away and marry each other.

          • Garrett Brown

            Of course you do anti white, of course you do.

          • JohnEngelman

            My admiration for Jews and Orientals does not mean that I am anti white. I am anti white bigots.

          • David Ashton

            Do you admire “Nordic Gentiles” at all (other than yourself)?

            You prefer a multiracial USA in which the whites have a zero population growth and breed with other races, and you welcome China overtaking the West.

            Do you also want your “racially superior Jews” to run the world as well as the lands between the Mediterranean and the Euphrates? This is a serious question.

            You seem less of an “anti white-bigot” than an “anti-white bigot” or you wouldn’t be so enthusiastic about contributions from “third wave”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Yes.

            Yes.

            Sort of.

            I welcomed third wave because I welcome diversity of opinion.

          • Skincognito

            You have a quasi-sci-fi obsession with IQ, yet you support the Dysgenic Party. I find it hard to square that circle, unless you really have a utopian vision of a gray Herrenvolk telepathically and technologically lording it over a brown Unterklasse. No thanks.
            Also, when I think “Ashkenazi,” I think “ADL” before “IQ.” Please define “anti-White.” I think this high IQ censorship/extortion racket fits quite nicely.

          • Juxtaposedhearts0

            Also known as anti white

          • Mentious

            It’s also possible, and logical, to evaluate black merit as a group, and treat them accordingly.

          • MarcusTrajanus

            No, we tried doing that and it’s leading to our demographic demise. If we don’t want to be swamped by the teeming masses of the Third World we need to start thinking tribally, like they do. The anti-Whites know the power of tribalism and racial consciousness, that’s why they encourage it amongst non-Whites while trying to ban it amongst Whites.

          • Andy

            If we treat everyone on their own merit, you understand, hugely disproportionate numbers of blacks and Hispanics will go to jail, fail out of school, and fail to find work. They will be poorer and less educated than they are now. Now – I think this is a perfectly reasonable way to run things (although private citizens should be able to do as they like with their businesses). We just need to be honest with ourselves and each other. Black students do poorly on tests because their IQ is a full standard deviation below that of whites, not because invisible white racism infects the tests. Black people go to jail more because they commit more crimes, and it is wise to be wary in black neighborhoods, even though there are many blacks who are perfectly nice people. It is to be expected that blacks will make up a good percentage of those on welfare if we keep our current (destructive) welfare policies. A good portion of blacks are not bright enough to make it on their own in a first-world society. My attitude toward the two percent of blacks capable of succeeding in college? Let ’em in! The 50 black geniuses born each year in the US? Celebrate them. Just acknowledge that white geniuses will outnumber black geniuses 400 to 1, and it’s because we’re judging on merit.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            The only point here Miscreant is that you are not welcome among us, physically, socially or here in cyberspace.

          • Joseph

            Again, you major in the minors. NOBODY is more all-consumed by race than black people -at least American blacks.

            Race is the core of their existence and whites are forced to accept this at our expense while remaining silent on any aspect of white interests. What if we just used the same standards for all of the measurements?

          • Katherine McChesney

            Hitler was a catholic.

        • TeutonicKnight67

          Of course many Nazis were devout Catholics. That’s because many Germans at the time were devout Catholics. Are you saying that because devout German Catholics supported their own country and people in war that they are hypocrites? As far as my feelings go…well, I FEEL you are an anti-Catholic troll who is here to be a fly in the ointment. It’s a known fact that far more millions of Europeans were slaughtered and starved under the Marxist Bolsheviks of the East. They just took their time doing it. Oh and we all know which religious group started THAT movement now, don’t we? Why don’t you just come clean with your Cultural Destroyer self.
          Furthermore, I fail to see how my desire to be led by members of my own race in all areas of society; political, religious,military etc. is equivalent to Nazism.

          • third wave

            I am more concerned about deeds than by professed belief and ceremony. I would prefer an altruistic atheist as my neighbor than a pious but hypocritical Christian. Just remember the parable of the Good Samaritan. How does being a white Catholic make you superior?

          • Wayne

            Teutonic Knight: please note that this anti-white Turd Wave does not really care about your religion, it is the white part that drives him batty. He would never ask a Jew, Muslim Arab, or Indian Sisk what made them better, would he? No, his hatred is reserved for whites and whites alone. Only whites, according to Turd Wave, should feel constant shame.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Thanks Wayne! I was getting to that! And as for you Turd Weave, being a white Catholic doesn’t make me a better person you cretin but I am certainly better than you. Take your brown sympathy show elsewhere and go back to the pseudo-libtard intellectual ghetto that you were spawned in. I assure you, not a single tear will be shed by my fellow whites when you leave.

          • whiteyyyyy

            Hey asshole, where in your twisted mind did you get the idea that Whites(real Whites) OWED you an explanation for anything. Take your anti-white garbage elsewhere. It’s always the nazis with you clowns, no pol pot, ida amin etc.

          • third wave

            Calm down, man! There is no need to turn red. I am just telling it as it is.

          • Daisy

            Just insert the word jew in the above for a more accurate depiction of reality.

        • dhs

          I am not a fan of the Germans, and I have no sympathy for National Socialist policies. Nevertheless, the fact is that brutal conflict between organisms has been going on for several billion years; nothing new except the more effective killing technologies available today. In any event, I prefer Nazis (or Communists or Muslims) to masochistic self-hating liberals.

        • Cherry Bomb

          Ding, ding, ding, there it is! Third Wave, you anti-Whites are so predictable (note to self: find out from my bookie in Vegas what the odds are for the anti-White to play the Hitler/Holocaust card in the first 5 minutes.)

          Where would you anti-Whites be without Hitler and the Nazis, lol? Stuffed.

          • third wave

            There have been many other savage whites, but you you’ve got to admit that the body count that they piled up is kind of hard to ignore.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            You’re correct. Because we actually have written records and history. It’s easier not to have a body count when you leave your dead where they drop and let the animals eat them.

          • Daisy

            One main difference with some analogy to the Third Reich is that Hitler tried, with the jewish zionists, to arrange for the jews to have somewhere to go and carry themselves, but the majority of jews didn’t want to leave. If European people were allowed to live by themselves in the homelands they’ve fought for and built, they would be thrilled.

        • Felix_M

          No one perfected the idea of “the master race” as well as the “chosen people.”
          Read your Old Testament. Still few mentions about love and compassion and then only for the its own members. Guess which religion’s message still trumpets its members being the greatest that have ever lived?

          • David Ashton

            And gets bouquets from the “anti-racist” John Engelman.

        • Joseph

          We’re feeling pretty good about it right now.

        • David Ashton

          Benedict did not liquidate millions of other white people.
          Nor is he a pedophile.

          Some Catholics sympathized with National Socialism because of its “practical” Christianity in ending unemployment and social welfare projects, and its anti-Bolshevism, but the Nazis engaged in a low-level persecution of Catholics in Germany and Poland, nothing like the Communist persecution of all kinds of Christians in the USSR and elsewhere.

        • guest

          I don’t love Ratzinger either, but he did not support the nazi regime, even as a child. He refused to participate in the Hitler Youth, which brought hardship to him and his family. He had no affection for the nazi regime, as they murdered his 14 year old, retarded cousin. Ratzinger was conscripted as a child soldier into the Luftwaffe, but he deserted as soon as he could. As I said, I don’t care for the guy, but calling him a “nazi”, is completely false. Some liberal journalists tried to do this, only to be humliated by the facts.

      • Felix_M

        I heard they’re going to make a movie about the life of Benedict XVI. Denzel Washington is going to play Cardinal Raztinger.

        (Just kidding).

        • MikeofAges

          Why not? Costume character, you know.

      • Pelayo

        I agree with you 100% also with Marcus Trajanus. I would rather see Pope from South America. As for you Mea Culpa, Ego te absolvo a peccatis tuis per omnia saecula saeculorum.

      • Dude

        Aryan Jesus is a silly fantasy too.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          On a certain level, yes, though…

          I suspect the “Semitic” ancient Jews had a lot of “Aryan” genetics in them at one point. Many Hittites and later Persians, Greeks and Romans flowed through the area in days of yore to an extent that Jesus may well have been a red haired descendant of at least some non-Semites. Think of poor ol’ Uriah the Hittite.

          I wonder and leave to science just what the ancient Semite looked like, was, before massive Islamic importation of subSaharan slaves and interbreeding with same. I don’t really know, though find it highly plausible that the current Arab is both darker and, adjusted for factors still being studied, had a higher average IQ as well. But again, science…

          • Dude

            Maybe you’re right. Jesus:

          • AnalogMan

            The Moslems castrated their slaves. We should have done the same. Yes, their average IQ has declined, but you could attribute that to 1300 years of marrying their cousins.

        • Exoplanet Finder

          Whatever Jesus was, part Semitic, part Divine, part Indo-European like King Tut or part ‘Other’, were he filling out a census form, when he died and rose again, he became the white God of Europa. He is white in our paintings and sculptures. He is of us, he is one of us, he is one in being with us, for by intertwining himself with us, he made the white race, the evolution that produced the white race, or whatever way you want to think of it. The Father was and is white, Jesus was and is white, and the holy ghost is, well, white. The Spirit of white humanity dwells in our bones, and is divinely inspired by that Spirit. When you put a red cross on a white field, that is our blood, and our God. As we crucify our civilization for the sins of the world, as we abandon our God, remember that miracles happen, and therefore, they will happen. It isn’t like we didn’t abandon him once before.

        • Jon

          The idea of diving the world between “arabs” and “europeans” is ludicrous. The people’s of the north African nations of Moroco, Tunisia, and algeria are much more genetically similar to Italians than italians are to britons.

          • Dude

            What does this have to do with my post?

      • My diocese just got rid of the negro bishop that was “awarded” us. During his time, a flourishing diocese fell into disrepair and much like the magjic negro pretending to be the US President, all I recall of him is his vacations. In the meantime the socialists went wild, taking over every diocese administrative office. His one fabulous attempt to pay off the lawyer bills and rulings for damages by the court for the abuse of children and others was a bust. Under cover of a “building fund” most families in the diocese were sent bills from $5000 to $25000 under the guise of building churches for the poor migrants and blacks. When I called and got someone in the diocese that either accidently or on purpose told me that the money demand was for the court settlements, that did it. The word got around like wildfire and for once we demanded an end to these shananigans. Well he got ill and we got a younger white priest that has his mind on spiritual matters and not “social justice”. I’ll not stand for another one as pope and will walk, including my donations.

        • Brian

          Your story sounds a little too contrived to be believable.

      • Black Dynamite

        Sinner & a bigot.

    • Mike Lane

      I agree. Even though I’m Catholic I refuse to take any orders, or live by any code or doctrine set by some Sub Saharan African. I’d rather stay home than go to Mass.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        I’d rather join my Eastern Catholic brethren. They don’t seem to deal with this nonsense.

        • Skincognito

          Excellent point. It pains me to observe the extent to which Solzhenitzyn’s spirit and reason are embedded within modern Eastern Rite nations, while Western critics of modernity are left in the lurch (pun intended). If you’re not familiar, check out the writings of K. Pobedenostev (sp). He frequently reminds me of a cross between Bismarck and Buchanan.

      • Joseph

        Hmm…a Black Mass.

    • Veritas_lux_mea

      As conservative as the Catholic Church is on things like gay marriage, abortion, women priests, etc., I would be surprised to see a black pope in the near future. Even though they would never take a publicly conservative stance on things like immigration or other racial issues, I have a hunch that the white leadership’s conservatism extends here as well. Then again I may be wrong.

      If it does happen though, seeing a black standing on the balcony overlooking St. Peter’s Square would sicken me beyond words. As you said, the ultimate humiliation.

      • brengunn

        I agree. There’s no chance they’re going to elect a black Pope. That job is white European for the foreseeable, then maybe, maybe, it will go to a white Latin American, but an African, no way. The Catholic church doesn’t think in the same way as the Western political establishment, so pc appointments aren’t likely high on the agenda.

        I’m not religious myself though I am from Catholic stock, the thought of a black Pope is more incongruous than a hip hop prezident.

        BTW, I thumbed you down by accident, sorry.

        • MarcusTrajanus

          I think you can thumb-up to remove the thumb-down.

          • You click the thumb-down again to reverse a a thumb-down.

          • Garrett Brown

            Or thumb up, as he said.

        • Daisy

          I was raised sorta catholic; my parents took us to mass on Sundays and had us confirmed, then became Christmas and Easter Catholics, then just stopped altogether. I personally despise the Pope. I wouldn’t mind if they appointed a black one and the catholic europeans went protestant.

          • brengunn

            Why not go the whole hog and toss all the Abrahamic religions out the window. It’s all fantasy anyway.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        An absolute calamity for The West. Perhaps its death knell.

    • Bernie

      Yeah, it will likely be a white man from Argentina or Brazil.

    • liberalsuck

      When African tribes elect white men, I’ll consider a black pope. When the Nation of Islam gets the same condemnation from the liberals as the Mormon church does, then I’ll be happy to have a discussion.

    • JohnEngelman
    • JohnEngelman
      • Joseph

        Are you passing out The Watchtower now?

        • David Ashton

          I think poor old Engelman might be losing it a bit with these Sunday School youtube offerings – but an improvement on his Maoist “East is Red” video.

    • John

      It’s certainly not hard to imagine a Black “Pope”. He would merely be the latest affirmative action joke in the mass insanity masquerade led by sick-in-the-head White leftists. It would also fit the current anti-White trend that is relentlessly pushed by self-loathing White leftists and egalitarians.

      Consider the facts. We see idolation and adoration of a two-term Black “President”, who is in fact an illegal alien African Muslim who has written and spoken extensively about his deep hatred of Whites. We see a Latino “Congressman” who is already being pushed by the leftist media as the “savior” of the Republican Party. Many in the media are also heaping Republican praise on Indians Piyush “Bobby” Jindal and Nimrata Kaur (Nikki) Randhawa Haley, and Latina Suzanna Martinez. Whites are not even in the topic of conversation in the Republican Party.

      There are plenty of White idiots on the right, too, who enabled Blacks and Browns. Both Bushes demanded Black Secretaries of State who later turned on the RNC, and Reagan, of course, championed mass amnesty for illegal Mestizos who overwhelmingly vote against the RNC every chance they get.
      Politics are only a game of subterfuge anyway. The outcomes are pre-decided by the owners of the world’s central banks, who also own all governments around the world. Whites are quite willing to be the apologetic doormats. Utterly sickening.

      • Joseph

        Is there some dominant “suicide gene” with partial penetrance among whites -maybe a neanderthal legacy?

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      I, like you am not a believer. However, I also realize what it means to have an institution that actually has a sovereign presence in Europe suddenly have a non-European head. It would be another sign of Western decline. But the Catholic Church has brought it on itself, like much of the Western leadership has with too much corruption and general misrule for a long time. Don’t you notice how when whites become undisciplined and sloppy, the next thing that happens is non-whites are taking “it” over? It’s as if it is a set sequence in social/civilization decay.

      • David Ashton

        Some good sense here. The Second Vatican Council was a turning point. In my previous Christian days I was going to write a novel in which the ecumenical bureaucrats of the churches went totally liberal as the transitional superstitious gloss on the New World Order, and Catholic and Protestant true-believers buried their old hatchets and formed a dissident remnant minority….

        • Katherine McChesney

          That’s already happened. All of it.

    • Mentious

      “I’m an atheist,”

      Oh, yes, so trendy. Just admitting you have a failure of both introspection and imagination.

      • MarcusTrajanus

        It has nothing to do with being “trendy” or lacking “introspection and imagination”, I just have never seen any evidence that would convince there are such things as gods (or fairies, ghosts, etc.). I have lots of imagination, actually, but I don’t confuse my imagination with reality.

        • Mentious

          Oh, but you are so properly trendy.

          No, you never even investigated the many definitions of God, much less introspected about anything. For example, the Vedantists define God as bliss (ananda), and through introspection, more of that bliss is perceived thus God is increasingly perceive. But what could a hip, trendy, non-introspective, unimaginative person know about such things?

          Or other systems define God as the very faculty of imagination itself (Pure Consciousness), and state that imagination (experienced as real during dream states or inwardly while awake) finally becomes “real,” but that transient externals are not, in final analysis, “reality.” Rather, that faculty of imagination is more of a reality. Those religious systems propound the theory that all externals start as imagination; that the Imaginer (sometimes identified as the sense of “I”) — is that which is called God.

          But how could a trendy, kosher, unimaginative fashion-atheist be expected to have that God (i.e. — an imagination)?

          I only wrote the above to show what an (id–t) you are, and that indeed, you have never introspected enough to have an opinion about religion, plus don’t have adequate imagination to comprehend pure Imagination itself. (or God, according to the Yoga-Vasistha, etc.)

          • MarcusTrajanus

            Sure, I’m “trendy”. It’s not like your “ideas” are the same nonsense promoted by the like of Oprah, “The $ecret”, Deepak Chopra and other such purveyors of mainstream New Age “spirituality”.
            Sure, you can redefine “god” as “bliss”, or “imagination”, or “a sock”, then call anyone who doesn’t believe in gods an “id–t” (please, if you are going to hurl insults at least have the courage to write them down completely).
            If you haven’t run across religions focused on fairies and ghosts your decades long “research” has been very, very shallow.
            I’d gladly use my time studying something as useful as bicycle repair instead of trendy New Age and pseudo-Hindu mumbo jumbo.

          • Mentious

            Sure, I’m “trendy”.

            Yes, that’s clear. Atheism is the latest fad.

            It’s not like your “ideas” are the same nonsense
            promoted by the likes of Oprah, “The $ecret”, Deepak Chopra and other
            such purveyors of mainstream New Age “spirituality”.

            Why should you get your ideas about religion from Oprah Winfrey and Deepak Chopra? Again, you show that your lack introspection and have never studied the subject of religion or God. (Just like the typical modern fashion-atheist, I would add.)

            Sure, you can
            redefine “god” as “bliss”, or “imagination”,

            It was you who try to redefine religion as being about “ghosts” or “fairies.” If you think God as bliss or consciousness are my original ideas, rather than ancient religious ideas, it confirms that you lack introspection and study of the things you opine about. Never mind actual study or effort. (Why should you know about God without effort?)

            The definitions of God as “bliss,” or as “consciousness” are very old and pre-date Christianity and Oprah Winfrey. You didn’t even know this much. These are not
            “redefinitions” but very old definitions. Your definitions of God as “fairies” and “ghosts” is, in fact, an attempt at redefinition. And I would also note, half-assed and absurd.

            “then call anyone who
            doesn’t believe in gods an “id–t”

            Those are idiots who make pronouncements of God without even having studied the many definitions of God from various religious heritages, indeed. I did not call you an idiot because you stated “I don’t believe in bliss” or “I don’t believe in consciousness.” You never made such statements. You are addled.

            “(please, if you are going to hurl
            insults at least have the courage to write them down completely)

            I thought I presented by insults well enough. But here:

            You’re an idiot.

            Like that better?

            “and
            pretend he’s really saying he doesn’t believe in bliss, or imagination.”

            The issue was that you are unaware of most definitions of God, and believe that God is defined as ghosts and fairies. We never got into your beliefs, so how could I question them? The issue was your lack of knowledge as you practice fashion-atheism. Practitioners of the Yoga-Sutra define God as the inner heard sound of Aum that arises through the stilling of the mind? Have you heard it? No, stick with things you are actually interested in.

            “Classic bait and switch.”

            Nothing was switched. See above. The focus remains, front and center, your lack of religious knowledge. Do you also opine about the relative benefits of woodworking and lathe bits while knowing nothing about wordworking and lathe bits? Why be as absurd in your discussion of religion?

            If you haven’t run across religions focused on fairies and ghosts your decades long “research” has been very, very shallow.

            No, I’d say your study of religions based on fairies and ghosts, implied in your statement, shows that you are, again, an idiot. Who would be interested in such a religion? What can the study of transient perceptions do for a man? Most men who sincerely study religion have already arrived at the conclusion that transient perceptions are of little value. No, I have never run across any religions centered on fairies or ghosts, and would not be interested in studying such.

            I’d gladly use my time studying something as useful as bicycle repair instead of trendy New Age and pseudo-Hindu mumbo jumbo/

            The more accurate statement would be that you are more interested in bicycle repair that you are in the ancient religions, the Upanishads, the Vedas, or the various ancient definitions of God.

            (I left out a number of other definitions from the religious past.) if “creativity” is mumbo-jumbo to you, or too abstract, and “consciousness” is mumbo-jumbo, by all means, stick with bicycle repair. Religion, the mind, etc. are not subjects for you.

            But the ugly thing about you is that you are interested in neither: You have have no interest in the study of religion, or in bicycle repair. Every word you speak is insincere and false.

    • Anders

      As someone from a Catholic family that lost his faith in my early teens, I’ll say this:
      Another nail in the coffin. Could be the final nail. The final nail for most European Catholics. Bring on the end, bring in the new. It could be for the best in the long-term.

      • David Ashton

        I know how you feel. If God exists, I hope He sorts it out.

    • saxonsun

      Not Catholic either but I’d hate to see this. After all, it’s still Rome, it’s still Italian and it’s still white.

  • Jeff

    When I saw the news of the pope resigning, I knew I would be seeing this topic on Amren. When Pope Benedict was elected there was talk at the time of an African pope. This time I’m sure there’s more serious talk of an African pope.

    I hope it happens. American and European Catholics will be forced to pick a side: join the African church or have a schism. It will also be hilarious to see all the Vatican’s assets go under African control, and see if our liberal American Catholics will continue donating money.

    That’s going to be great having an African man tasked with stopping sex abuse scandals and enforcing celibacy!

    • Katherine McChesney

      Perhaps he would practice ‘down low’.

      • Runymeade

        Your comment is blatantly disrespectful. No one should mock a minister or any religion in the manner that you have.

      • Gay Black Man

        You do know there are more closeted gay White men on the “down low” to use your term, than Black ones? Don’t you? I can tell you this from personal experience.

        • Strong and Rugged

          Hey you Black fag, suck my proud White dick!

          • Gay Black Man

            You are a sick, twisted degenerate! In fact , anyone who would post such a despicable comment is sub human! You are a disgrace to the human race!

          • Daisy

            Gay Black Man, I agree that comment was offensive, but from my own personal experience – which takes into account a vast array of white and black people – it does seem to be that more black men are on the ‘DL’ than white, which is why it’s a black-originated expression.

          • Dean

            Likely true. To be sure there are a large number of closeted gay White men who are married, but there are also many more White men who are open about their homosexuality given the fact that our culture is more accepting of gay and lesbian lifestyles than Black culture is.

          • Gay Black Man

            Daisy and Dean. Both of you are correct to some degree.

          • Nate_Higgers187

            The only subhumans on our planet are blacks, and to a lesser extent, hispanics. Nice try though. We are the White Gods that mercifully keep you worthless creatures alive.

          • Gay Black Man

            Your comments demonstrates just how worthless you are.

          • Strong and Rugged

            Oh by the way queer boy, I will let you can suck my balls too! LOL!

          • Heath

            You are obviously mentally ill.

          • Beverly

            He is obviously mal-adjusted and vulgar to say the least.

          • Garrett Brown

            And this one. remove it

          • Strong and Rugged

            If anyone should be removed it is that Black homo who has the nerve to post on a site designed for White people. He should stick to posting on Black sites or gay sites with his fellow fag brothers!

          • Sue

            I am a proud racially conscious White person, but I have to admit that in my several years of posting on AMREN, I have seen very few, if any comments as a disgraceful as yours. I agree with Gay Black Man. Your comment is disgraceful!

          • Juxtaposedhearts0

            Remove this comment mod, this kind of stuff doesn’t need to be on this site

          • David Ashton

            Agree – the whole lot.

          • Garrett Brown

            Comments like these are unacceptable on this site. I vote to have it removed.

          • Regina

            Indeed!

          • Garrett Brown

            Moderation on this site is absolutely horrible… As I said yesterday, remove it.

          • Who Me?

            That was unnecessary and disgusting. (And you might take into account that some of us are ladies of an age to be offended by such language.)

          • Gay Black Man

            You are vile, disgraceful human being. You are despicable!

        • Nate_Higgers187

          Terms such as homosexual, heterosexual, those are terms for human beings only, they don’t apply to subhuman blacks. Negroes will literally screw anything they can insert their penises into, animals, infants, etc. They gang rape goats to this day in africa, to slow the spread of AIDS, and they actually believe that raping an infant can cure them of their AIDS.
          AIDS, by the way, was caused by africans raping primates out in the Congo, hence why it is a sexually transmitted disease.
          This is why negroes don’t mind at all going to jail or prison; there’s plenty of drugs and sex with the other downlow bucks, plus that free room and food they cherish so necessarily.

          • Kevin

            Nonsense

  • I don’t know. I’m not a fan of conspiracy theories, but- why suddenly all the talk about black Pope ? Most Catholics are either whites or Latinos, and black cardinals are not prominent in any way. Sounds like a liberal wish. They hate the Church, but would very dearly see a black person in a position of authority.

    As they say, there are only two universally recognized global positions of authority: the Pope and the US president.

    • Thomas Katt

      The liberal craving for a black Pope was evident when Benedict was selected. While the conclave met, the airwaves full of the “pageantry” and “solemnity” of the proceedings, while speculation on which Negro would be the next Pope was rife.

      When the announcement came down – an old German gent – a conservative at that! And – Heavens to murgatroyd – a former Hitler Youth! – suddenly we started hearing about sex abuse scandals again.

      They aren’t holding out much hope, though. Most of the Cardinals were appointed by Ratzinger, and the rest elected him. So change is not likely.

      Thank God.

      TK

      • rebellisMMXII

        Thank you for that last paragraph regarding the Cardinals.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        God Be Praised!

    • MarcusTrajanus

      There was the same talk when the last Pope died. The globalists/internationalists can’t wait to see this happen.

      • Room101

        The PTB should really rock the boat and install a Chinese pontiff.
        Hilarity ensued…

    • jay11

      That is a good point, there are not many black catholics, hardly any save for a few small pockets. There might be more asian catholics. I wonder if all those popes for the last 1900 years would approve. How would Pope Gregory feel or Clement or the pope who called for the crusades.

      • Alex

        @ Jay 11,

        We’ve had Syrian popes and a North African (probably Roman stock), St. Gelasius, so I bet in the fullness of time we will probably have an Asian pope (either an another Arab or East/ South Asian), but really who knows?

        I remember reading how there had been talk in the Vatican recently on how to proselytize the Muslims, but it does make sense, the Turks and Arab Muslims took what was ours. The pope personally gave money to restore a basilica, I believe, in Algeria.

    • brengunn

      It’s not a conspiracy, Liberals just want to foist black leaders on all institutions. The curious thing is, once elected, if elected, they would have to resume their position of vilifying the Pope’s conservative views of contraception, female clergy, aids etc.

      • Joseph

        No, if they got their way we’d have a “black progressive” pope calling for ordination of lesbians as priests performing “gay” marriages and completely fluid immigration to white countries who have “disproportionate wealth”.

        • Sam

          Actually we already have a number of White ministers and politicians doing the same thing.

    • Mentious

      Next thing you know they’ll be gossiping that Morgan Freeman might be the next pope.

      • David Ashton

        Well, they’ve got a cross between Father Divine and Denzel Washington as Hocus Potus. Engelman says he expected FDR to be resurrected – shape-shifter.

  • Ed_NY

    Though I am not a Catholic, I would hate to see a black pope. I don’t have much hope left for this world and a black pope would only reinforce my pessimism. I am tired of this black worship garbage and it’s apparent that the new world order is well on its way to reality.

    • Ed_NY

      My wife is Catholic and our children were raised Catholic. The wife says if the church chooses a black pope, she will no longer attend or donate to the Catholic church.

    • Katherine McChesney

      If it were a black, they’d have TWO black popes…one dark skinned and Superior General Adolfo Nicholas of the Jesuits.

    • C_C_Conrad

      “…and it’s apparent that the new world order is well on its way to reality.”

      You might be wrong on that, at last I hope so.
      The NWO crowd should have all ready put their plans into effect, but they have failed. In fact they are losing ground – fast. Consider,
      Golden Dawn.
      Front National in France.
      BNP.
      The myriad of pro-white web sites that did not exist a few decades ago.
      The hundreds of pro-white books that are now on the market.
      The new pro-white book distributors.
      The internet radio programs.
      Youtube programs.

      No don’t quit now that WE are on the move.

      ………..

      Jack’s War

      https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

      • Ed_NY

        Well CC, I really hope you are right. Time will tell.

      • Pelayo

        I hope that he’s right as well; for the sake of our little ones and those to come.

  • AlfredWClark
  • Tim

    Well, I couldn`t call my self an American my whole life. Why did I think that Catholicism would be any different…

  • Puggg

    Not a Catholic here, but the Catholic Church is too historically important to the history of Western Civilization to sully like this.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    I’m an atheist as well and it still amazes me how someone considered the “closest” to an imaginary being can hold so much power. If there was a god, I would think he would be smart enough not to need some 80 year old translator…he would just speak to everyone himself. Not only are religions (especially Islam) completely corrupt, their beliefs have zero evidence. I would encourage more whites to be atheists, because it makes it more obvious that genetics is everything and puts more pressure on black criminals to be responsible for their own behaviors.

    • Oh, shut up ….

    • Mike Lane

      There isn’t absolute PROOF. There is plenty of evidence, though. All I’m saying is there is a difference. But I don’t want to get into any religous argument. The last thing racially conscious whites need is to blast each other over their faith or lack of.

      • LastBastionOfHope

        I don’t care who believes or who doesn’t. My race always comes first of course.

        • C_C_Conrad

          What you are seeing here is just another inconvenience. Who cares if the Catholic Church falls, they’re not on our side anyway. Read the following books, Foxe’s book of Martyrs & The Bad Popes By E. R. Chamberlin.

          The real problem is genocide and how WE are going to stop it.
          Don’t wait time on the inconveniences, see >
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIxEVhCXlX0
          ……….
          Jack’s War
          https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

          • Katherine McChesney

            Foxe’s book is revealing. There are wonderful YouTube videos by a gentleman who calls his site BibleorTraditions. They pertain to Rome, ‘her’ history, the present and future.

            You might want to read a book from the 1800’s by Charles Chiniquy, a priest, named “Fifty years in the ‘church’ of Rome’. It involves a lawsuit wherein Abe Lincoln defended him against slander and attempted theft by the Jesuits. It’s a slow read but meaningful.

      • Room101

        Well said. These last 100 years all the churches or their government-counterfeits seem to want to do is get white people to kill each other.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        well said Mike! Let’s focus and stay on track!

    • Triarius

      While I am an atheist, you cannot deny the impact the church has had from a societal standpoint. Most of the West’s laws, morals, and codes of ethics come from religion and I would not trade it for the world. To say” who cares?” shows how dumb you are. Christianity, especially Catholicism, shaped our civilization and brought us out of the darkness more than once.

      The decrease of religion will increase the decay of our society due to lack of morals.

      • LastBastionOfHope

        Yes it has given us some good I cannot deny. However, morals do not come from a book thousands of years old. They are innate. Monkeys have morals, as do elephants. Research has shown the proof. Have you ever seen the video of a soldier’s funeral? His dog hung his head in sorrow and laid under his casket where no one else was around. Basic morals are innate like killing, but different cultures can affect the moral codes. For example, in black neighborhoods, you are not supposed to call the cops if you witness a crime to avoid being a “snitch”. That is moral there, but not moral in white neighborhoods. They understand that deep down they should call the cops, but their culture is against it.

        Religion probably helped us identify morals, but they did not come from religion. To say humans need a thousands year old book to tell them it’s bad to kill people is pretty absurd. Religion was once needed and indeed helped culture, but it’s now obsolete IMO.

        • Triarius

          You are confusing morals with emotions and altruism with the animal comparison. And yes, we do get morals from books thousands of years old. Morals are simply laws that are not enforced on a legal level, like adultry, lying, and coveting. And the “no snitch” thing is not a moral, it is the absene of one, or a code of community at best.

          Take a look divorce rates, embezzlements, etc. to see that we are a decadent society in the last days of Rome. We do not need to believe in God, exactly. But we do need the teachings to hold together the moral fabric of society.

          • LastBastionOfHope

            You honestly think the Bible is what’s holding back people from committing crimes? Also be mindful that racist anti-white groups like the Black Hebrew Israelites use the Bible AGAINST white people, interpreting it a particular way. Moving away from religion means moving closer to empirical data and genetics holding more weight. Moving from subjective to objective will help us expose blacks for what they really are.

        • Alex

          @ LastBastionOfHope,

          Nobody can talk more eloquently and gracefully about moral law, man and religion than C.S. Lewis, particularly in Mere Christianity. If you ever want a mental sparring partner on that issue, he is the man to read. He was an atheist at one time as well, so is not ignorant on its logic.

    • concernedcollegekid

      I want to agree with you because I’m also an atheist, but “secular societies are among the least efficient societies ever at turning resources, of which they have a lot, in to offspring, of which they have very few”. (This is a quote from Jonathan Haidt that might not be verbatim but I think I came close. He was talking about the Scandinavian countries and how ethnic Scandinavians don’t have enough children of their own to sustain their type of society.)

      Also, another quote from him: “One of the great challenges in modern life is getting men to support women and children, and secular society does a disastrous job of that.”

      For secularism to work in the long-term, you need some sort of way of having secularism without having too much feminism (and without too much tolerance of alien cultures, meaning immigration). With too much feminism, not enough intelligent babies are born. The thing is, I’m not sure if feminism and secularism can be separated. I say this as a young atheist woman who is concerned about the dysgenic effects of feminism and careerism in women. I think that religion and respect for tradition in a society might simply be necessary to make smart women in the society have enough babies.

      • C_C_Conrad

        On the subject of feminism I would like to recommend another book, Revolution From Above, you’ll be surprised.

        …….

        Jack’s War

        https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

      • Triarius

        Well said.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Bravo!

      • whiteyyyyy

        Great comment, atheism looks good on paper. Religion has it’s drawbacks but ultimately seems to contribute more to stable societie’s than atheism.

      • Daisy

        You seem to have a neurotic need to control what other women do with their lives.

        • concernedcollegekid

          You’re right, I should probably get to a psychologist pronto; my post was nutso, derived from a perverse desire to control other women, and not at all grounded in reality. My true motivations for visiting this website have been revealed!

          Hopefully you detected the sarcasm in my previous paragraph… do you disagree that dysgenics is a problem in modern society? I am not against “equity feminism”, which is the type of feminism that affords women equal rights to men. I just think that an unfortunate side effect of feminism is that smarter women are the most interested in having careers, which tends to make them have fewer children. I have no intrinsic desire to block any women from doing whatever they want; I just think the dysgenic side effects of feminism and secularism will be very obvious over the long term. I’m not sure what can or should be done about this problem, to be perfectly honest.

          • Daisy

            I guess then I’d just wonder why there’s this need to group all ‘equity for women’ issues as somehow a root of the problem. Feminists get such a bad rap on here, and while I can’t disagree with a lot of the complaints against them, it seems to ghettoize all women who just want a reasonably balanced life into some anathematized category. Nor do I have any solution to the problem of low birth rates. I’m just not sure feminism is the source of it.

          • concernedcollegekid

            I see where you’re coming from and thanks for the civil reply. For me, I sort of started seeing feminism as a problem when I started seeing young women who looked like they could use another couple tens of thousands of years of evolution walking around with multiple tiny children in tow, combined with the fact that I hang out with people older than me and know quite a few very intelligent (liberal) women in their 30s and over who have no kids and probably never will.
            No, I have no desire to stop women from having careers. I am just afraid of the long-term effects of these patterns I see, and it has been shown in countries like Mexico that introducing women’s lib drastically reduces the birthrate (which in their case was good). The thing is, I think that feminism could maybe work in an all-white country because if the birthrate isn’t high but there also are no foreign immigrants who breed like rabbits, then I guess that might be ok. If, say, Sweden had a slightly shrinking population but was all-white, that might not be a bad thing.

            I’m not exactly a white nationalist but I really think that minorities are roadblocks to feminism and liberalism actually potentially working in white countries. Liberalism, I suspect, can work, but you have to not be liberal about race, or it doesn’t work.

            I guess I don’t know all these things for sure; they’re just speculation.

            Yeah. Those are my thoughts that might potentially be somewhat contradictory with my first post but whatever.

          • Cherry Bomb

            Don’t get sidelined. Our major problem isn’t feminists. It’s the hoards of nonwhites that are colonizing white homelands. Populations under duress do not reproduce. We are being taxed to death to pay for a replacement. There is a major war against the white race being waged by a global enemy who wishes our eradication. Feminism is merely a minor symptom of the larger issue.

            Japan’s population is shrinking drastically but no one is demanding that they import tens of millions of high-fertility africans and mestizos to “do the work the Japanese won’t do” and make the Japanese a minority in the country they created and founded. Only whites are required to ceded their homelands to colonizers.

            Our enemies will stop at nothing until we are genocided off of the earth. This is what we whites must concern ourselves with.

      • Joseph

        “…Scandinavians don’t have enough children of their own to sustain their type of society.”

        That is only true because they, like we have to be fecund enough to provide an actual productive workforce to generate the wealth required to support the imported freeloaders in a socialist system.

        If the US got stuck at a population of 180 million who were 91% white there would be no problem. The same is likely true of Sweden et.al. who now welcome in boatloads of vagrants to achieve some E.U. agenda.

  • wattylersrevolt

    Well, if the Pope is African, he will most definitely be adamantly opposed to legalized homosexual marriage..so far so good.

    The downside:he agitates for wiping away the borders of America..like all other Popes. But with an African Pope…well, put the coin in the machine:Jesus is black and Jesus wants unrestricted nonwhite immigration. So a black Pope will be used to delegitimize Native Born White American racial politics-grievances. The African Holy Father is channeling Jesus after all.

    I am socially and culturally very conservative. But I do not believe for one second that there is a supernatural being present in any Catholic Church..or in of the nutty Evangelical Palaces. If the iron age Jew was God and present in Church…well,you would be so overwhelmed that you and your fellow Christians would no longer make Sports Entertainment your Religion..which you-they most definitely do.

    Is an iron age beleif system relevant to European Racial survival?

    Why did Jesus make salt walter crocs?

    I normally wouldn’t raise these uncomfortable questions..but the Catholic and Christian Churches are in bed with the very very evil Corporations with regard to race-replacement.

    Considering what’s comming down the road for millions of Native Born White Americans, My prediction is that millions of Native Born White Americans will abandon the Christian Churches.

    Do you Catholics out at there-I’m an ex-Catholic-really believe that a supernatural being is present in Church?
    By the way, if the Polish Pope was really channeling Iron Age Jesus…he would have denounced George W Bush as a the incarnation of Satan for inviscerating the bodies of thousands of muslim children on the basis of momumental lies.

    l

    • Owen

      As a gay atheist libertarian and race realist I just want to say that gay civil marriage is what we want and we could care less if any particular religious faith is opposed to gay marriage. if you belive in the American tradition of freedom and the Constitution (especially the First and Fourteenth Amendments) then you support civil marriage for all.

      • George

        Hey, Owen! You are correct.
        If someone is opposed to gay marriage, he shouldn’t have to be in one.

        Likewise, a religious organisation is always free to decide whom to marry or not. The Church of Rome does not marry divorcees, unless an annulment is granted, nor will they marry a Papist to a non-Papist if the non-Papist won’t agree that the children be raised Catholic. (This, incidentally, is why the Settlement Act forbids those in line to the British throne from marrying a Catholic. It would be an impossibility for one of ‘those’ to be head of the Church of England).

        This is an important point: NOBODY has the right to demand a marriage from a Church of Rome priest if they don’t qualify or agree to the conditions set by that body.

        A civil marriage is a contract between two consenting adults. If they wish a religious ceremony and find someone willing to perform it, more power to them. All marriage is, as R.L. Stevenson wrote, is a sort of friendship recognised by the police. A *true* social conservative is laissez-faire about an individuals private relationships.

        • Katherine McChesney

          Annulments are a joke. Then the ‘divorcee’ would be a whore and her offspring bastard children.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Not true sister. That is a misinterpretation. Annulment does not say -contrary to popular belief- that the marriage “never existed”. Therefore the children would not be “bastards”. On a lighter note, feel free to refer to my former spouse as a “whore”.

        • Civil marriage is two perverts wanting tax breaks for sticking their tongues into each other’s anus.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Subsidized depravity. That’s all.

          • Owen

            If my considerable tax burden supports straight people then its only fair that your taxes go to gay folks too. Of course as a libertarian I dont think that the government should be involved in anyones marriage nor do I believe that anyone should have their earnings confiscated via taxation.

          • David Ashton

            Government may have to be involved if children are involved in any way.
            Of course, the notion that “sex” has something to do with reproduction is a bit old-fashioned!

          • George

            It’s about being able to have the same right to pass on one’s estate to one’s partner. It’s about medical decisions. It’s about benefits entitlement at work.

            What it is NOT about is hyperbole.

            You’re usually on the mark, r j p, but on this, we clearly disagree.

        • Daisy

          I support gay rights but have no indulgence for their need to get married in anyone’s church or place of worship. The gays should be fighting to strengthen civil unions. I believe in the separation of church and state but the gays obsessing over the ‘M’ word do not.

        • IstvanIN

          A civil marriage is a contract between two consenting adults.
          A homosexual sexual orientation is a naturally occurring phenomenon in a small percentage of the population. Gays should not be unduly discriminated against. Society would be better off if gay men could form stable, monogamous relationships. Here, however, is the problem: once we redefine marriage as being a contract between any two adults, rather than a man and a women, what is to stop a Muslim from demanding that he be allowed to marry two or three women? Or any other combination of consenting adults? This is a case of the slippery slope, “gay marriage” may not be the end of the world in and of itself, but what it leads to is what worries me. I am not anti-gay in any way but I vote “no” on same-sex marriage,

          • David Ashton

            There are also current demands for polygamy, incest and zoophilia.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Morally I do not support civil marriage for anyone by a man and a woman.

      • a multiracial individual

        They claim to have White interests at heart. However, their agenda is bogged with strange concerns that automatically alienate approx. 5-10% of the White population. Very strange.

        • whiteyyyyy

          95% should bend to accomodate 5%. That’s the tail wagging the dog, that’s why the west is screwed. Trying to accomodate every minority group with a grievance.

          • a multiracial individual

            The 95% does not suffer in any way whatsoever by allowing gays to get married.

          • whiteyyyyy

            They devalue the institution, if gays can get married then they push to adopt kids. It means gay marriage is on a par with heterosexual marriage. It’s a deliberate and calculated insult to heterosexual norms.

          • a multiracial individual

            How is equalizing gay marriage to heterosexual marriage an insult to heterosexual norms? You and your ilk are the ones that are doing the insulting by insisting that gay love be subordinate to heterosexual love (for no solid reason at all). That’s what this is really about, no one is trying to lift homosexual love ABOVE heterosexual love. Of course you are trying to keep homosexual love BELOW heterosexual love aren’t you?
            Adopt kids? Perhaps you think a child is better off in an orphanage than with two middle class gay parents?

          • David Ashton

            In the UK the proposed “gay marriage” is altering existing matrimonial norms on consummation, adultery as grounds for divorce, the terminology of mummy and daddy, religious liberty, etc. So it is not “equality” but a reduction.

            In any event, there is a difference between a hawk and a handsaw when it comes to physical copulation, so “equality” is ipso facto a contentious aspect.

            In Britain we have civil partnership contracts for loving homosexual partners, who are free to call their ceremonies “weddings” etc. But historically marriage exists to sanction and support males in caring for their own children and the women who bear them.

          • wattylersrevolt

            Homosexuals believe they have a “divine” right to lecture heterosexuals as to what they should find repugnant and not repugnant. Well, I don’t recognize that “divine ” right. We find homosexual marraige to be disgusting and that’s all there is to it. It offends our social and cultural sensibilities. That’s the harm. Bu the harm will go way beyond that. Just go ask the heterosexaul San Diego firemen who were forced by their bulldyke superior under the threat of dismissal to march in the San Diego Gay Pride March.

            The Iranians and Ugandans have a very sensible policy on how to deal with homosexuals.

            Nothing should be conceded to the filthy homosexuals. They did that in the UK and look what happened:call Pete Townshend a degenerate homosexual pedaphile and there is a very high probability that you will be arrested for a hate crime.

            By the way, it is not a coincidence that the filthy homosexual pedaphile Pete Townshend calls himself a neocon these days…why not? David Cameron,the Kenyan Foreigner, and the very very nasty Bulldyke Hilary Clinton are all on board with bombing the Orthodox Christian Serbians should they ever prevent a Gay Pride from taking place downtown Belgrade…this has already happened. You filthy stinking degenerates…it is just what you creatures are…and this is why we don’t want you in the Boy Scouts.

      • Every Amendment after the 10th is unconstitutional.

        • TeutonicKnight67

          That’s correct!

      • David Ashton

        It is quite possible for an atheist libertarian to oppose government legislation, as in the UK, designed to redefine marriage and parenthood in detail. Other than that, as they say in the old English comedy films, “Carry on Felching!”

    • Katherine McChesney

      I’m in a politically incorrect church not aligned with ecumenism.

  • Katherine McChesney

    Prepare for Petrus Romanus.

    • Malachy is not more reliable than Nibiru.

      • Katherine McChesney

        I didn’t refer to Malachy. His books are good reading. But, Petrus Romanus comes from the Vatican. Centuries ago they planned in advance the names of their popes. Papal history also coincides with prophecy in Revelation.

        • David Ashton

          This is sufficiently interesting and relevant to this thread for you to expand on this is in concise detail with documentary references.

  • Francis Galton

    Per the liberal zeitgeist, “making history” always trumps “being qualified.” Perhaps one day the sarcastic rhetorical question “Is the Pope Catholic?” will lose its meaning–Pope Muhammad or Pope Rajavi could be in the works.

    • Robb

      LOL! Complete with photoshopped baptismal records, no less.

    • Joseph

      At least the bears will still $#!+ in the woods.

  • NorthernWind

    As a person who was raised Catholic (but who has lost his religion), I would laugh to death if the next Pope was from Ghana or something. Imagine the potential for scandals that would be created.

    Whatever happens, the Catholic Church has declined significantly in the past 30 years or so. The current Church isn’t worthy to be in the same lineage as what came before.

    • Mike Lane

      Vatican II is the problem. Just read Populorum progressio by Pope Paul VI.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Also, Rerum Novarum.

      • Lisa

        Vatican II and the Novus Ordo mass are heresies. I belong to a Roman Catholic Church that recognizes Pope Pius XII as the last pope. The modernists are all part of the new world order. The local modernist “bishop” in my town is part of the Industrial Areas Foundation. If the modernists select an African witch doctor it will just add to their 55 years of evil

        • TeutonicKnight67

          Please tell me you are near NYC! I need to find this church of yours!

          • Lisa

            I am in Lubbock Tx but our priest belongs to a Franciscan order in Rochester where they have a church too. You can learn more at franciscanfathers.com if you want.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        An absolute disaster for the Universal Church and The West!

  • I’m not a catholic because I never did believe in a lot of their practices. It is still a business, so will this black pope bring people together, or will he drive them away? These pedophile priests are already doing a good job of doing that.
    I’m 45, and I remember older guys telling altar boy jokes even back in the early ’70s.

    • Skincognito

      Ex-altar server here. No funny business in my parish, but at the risk of over-generalizing my personal experience, I was trained and interacted almost exclusively with a MARRIED permanent deacon. He was a cool, pious, essentially blue-collar guy. He smoked, imbibed and trained us kinda like a soccer coach. None of us primarily Mick kids ever detected any sexual tension from this normal, working-class, hetero, Italian-American. Clerical celibacy should be reconsidered.
      In the Middle Ages, itinerant priests were often accused of bedding adult women. If pedoes really have infiltrated the Church, then they should be promptly investigated, prosecuted and executed by secular authorities.

      • Daisy

        The funny business I witnessed under the ‘leadership’ of the jesuits at a jesuit college consisted more of hetero-abuse of women. By 1995 Georgetown University’s administration was found to bear responsibility for the rape of some of it’s female students in the DC courts. More of this abuse was directly acted out by male students but orchestrated by the jesuit-run admin.

        • Skincognito

          That’s truly sad. All rapists should swing. I wasn’t defending promiscuity, let alone rape, by priests. I was simply pointing out that the apparently well-established trope of the pedo priest is rather new. He who cannot control sexual urges is more beast than man.

          • Daisy

            It was more assaults, harassment, stalking behaviors by male students but fully ordained and licensed by the jesuits who couldn’t really gestate that women could reject men. In the same year a lawyer told me about the precedent set in the DC courts regarding Georgetown the assistant dean of students told me a woman couldn’t be stalked by a male student; it is assumed there that all women crave male attention because they think god is male . It is also a huge problem that many of the priests are homosexual. The combination was lethal. to this day I think that if there were straight men in power – even all or mostly men – at least *some* of them would have prevented some of the extreme misogyny. Trying to repress sexuality, perhaps especially male, causes all these perversions.

        • Katherine McChesney

          Charles Chiniquy exposed this behavior as far back as the late 1800’s. He said they used confession to say filthy things to women.

  • Tom Iron

    I’m pretty much disgusted by this talk of a black pope. That doesn’t mean I want to see a latino pope either. If one is put in there, I’m directing my wife to cease our yearly contribution to the diocese. I don’t care if she gives to the parish, But nothing will go to the diocese.

    • MarcusTrajanus

      The two Latin American candidates mentioned are Whites. A Brazilian with a German surname and an Argentinian with an Italian one. Do you have a problem with Latin American Whites?

      • TeutonicKnight67

        I certainly don’t. As long as they aren’t Jesuits.

    • It’s OK with Latinos if they’re White.

      • Room101

        I nominate George Zimmerman the First, for Pope.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        The word Latino itself is a farce. Shouldn’t Italians be considered the original Latinos? A white person who speaks Spanish is not a “Latino”

    • Katherine McChesney

      A portion of the money that goes to the parish, also supports the diocese.

  • Socal LoCal

    Next Pope? Cardinal Odilo Pedro Scherer of Sao Paulo.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      From your mouth to God’s ears my friend.

  • One thing is certain: if these were ordinary elections, New England would elect a black Pope.

  • mrcan

    historically there have been popes from many countries…..including france, England and Germany. in time practicality prevented peoples from around the world becoming pope…in addition to the fact that they would have to leave their home country which would have been a big sacrifice. maybe Obama could be pope and president at the same time. he could herald in the NWO.

  • Thomas Katt

    The Tribe at NPR will not be happy unless the next Pope is a lesbian Jewish atheist with AIDS.

    Is Elena Kagan available? She could moonlight.

  • mrcan

    a black pope may curtail the spread of radical islam to sub-Saharan Africa….allowing the west to have access to the resources…

    • Triarius

      Whites will never go back to sub-sahara Africa. And a bunch of blacks turning to Christianity in the face of Islam will only create more refugees the whites will be forced to take in. You wouldn’t turn away a fellow Christian brother and his 8 starving children, would you?

      Let them practice voodoo and rot.

      • George

        Persecuted African ‘Christians’ or persecuted African animists have the same claim. Granted, most people will feel more sympathy for the Christian, of course, but ‘most people’ aren’t members of Canada’s Immigration & Refugee Board, or other such bodies in the INS. These review panels generally take a dispassionate view of the facts in an individual case, and, to them, persecution is persecution.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Yes! For the love of God! NO MORE HAITIS!!

  • mrcan

    meaning if a black man is elected it will be for economic gain

  • GM (Australia)

    Position Vacant: CEO For the worlds largest Multinational Organization.

    Duties: Preside over a complex organization which is facing problems that include sexual scandals and a serious decline in numbers in its core business, both of which are threatening this organizations very existence..

    Qualifications: Highest level Theological Degrees, must be fluent in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Also English and at least 2 other modern languages. Highest possible level skills in Management, Diplomacy, Finance & Education as well as expertise in the preservation of historic buildings and traditions.

    Salary: Nil, but all expenses will be provided.

    Personal: Candidate must be male and single with impeccable references.

    I suggest that they should be looking for a young university educated professional, not an old man nor an AA appointee from the 3rd world.

  • Don’t forget that popes in past two or three centuries have been intellectuals & theologians. Last two popes were polyglots, Christian religious philosophers & men with a wide spectrum of interests, from history to biology.

    Frankly, I don’t see a black in such a context.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      Good point Bardon, The intellect required for the task is very rare among sub-saharans.

    • Joseph

      Why not? They make them geniuses by proclamation and appoint them professors at universities.

      • Vatican is not the US.

        • HamletsGhost

          When the pope apologized to the Muslim world for the crusades, it seems to me the differences are inconsequential.

  • Lygeia

    If this happens, I am converting to Orthodox Christianity.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      I second that!

  • Blaak Obongo

    But…how could Hollywood go on mocking Catholicism — as it has done for decades — if the Pope was a negro?

    That’d be Racist, after all.

  • C_C_Conrad

    They might as well have a black Pope, for all the good the Christian Church has been for white people.
    ……..
    Jack’s War
    https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

    • Katherine McChesney

      There are Christian Churches, not the ecumenical ones, that are majority White. In my church we might have two black members out of nearly 3,000. members. We are politically incorrect and don’t commune with evangelicals or any in the World or National Council of Churches. Ecumenism has destroyed the church.

      • C_C_Conrad

        They may be mostly white but for me there are ONLY two groups, pro-white & pro-white-genocide. Is the church that you speak of pro-white?

  • blitzen51

    I am Catholic my entire family is and has been Catholic b ut if they elect a black pope I am gone. Blacks destroy everything they touch, What Nero and the Inquisition couldn’t do Rufus the first will surely do!!!

    • Room101

      Rufus the First, LMAO!!!

      • Katherine McChesney

        Rufus I….Hilarious. Why not Shitavious I?

        • I am so glad my continued you of his name on this and other sites has made him “an example”.

    • Church of Bob

      Well put.

    • Joseph

      The papal “bling” alone is sure to draw them out.

  • jay11

    They will probably pick a ‘white’ latino from Argentina or something. I am not catholic, so I don’t care who they pick, but I think a lot of catholics might be bothered by a black pope. Jammie Fox called Obama the lord and savior, now with a black pope they will be able to cement their lock on heaven!

    • MarcusTrajanus

      No need to put ‘white’ in ‘quotes’.

  • jay11

    I wonder if there would be some big push to get catholic misisonaries and all the mother theresa types to go to the inner city ghettoes and african countries to ‘serve’ god’s new elect people. Most protestant churches rolled over and became slaves to black culture and the idea of blackness as closer to god some time ago. Forget about the federal government spending trillions on black causes, the protestant churches spend huge sums also. Now the golden treasure hoard in the vatican will be sent to Detroit, Chicago, the Congo and other places to feed the poor and save the souls. Maybe they will bring rap into the inner city churches like they have mexican folk music in the latino catholic churches.

    • Katherine McChesney

      The Southern Baptist church sold out. They elected black Fred Luter as President of the denomination. He has ties to Jeremiah Wright. Of course all the pandering whites didn’t do their research. They’re just losing members and saw this as a way to raise their membership.

      • Bad_Mr_Frosty

        Like everything else in the West, it’s the people in charge, not the rank and file. The churches, the Republican party, the schools, the media, they all drift left while their bases either stand still or drift right. The class tensions are heating up as much as race tensions in the West.

      • Joseph

        I suspect that with a large Tx. contingent that the SBC is also welcoming in more “natural Republicans” as fast as they can wade across.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      “like they have mexican folk music in the latino catholic churches.”
      …and sadly some white parishes as well. My own included. I can’t put into words how utterly infuriating it is for me to listen to Pan De Vida! We were sold a bill of goods with Vatican II. If I have to attend Mass and listen to a foreign tongue then by God let it be Latin! No country or ethnicity can claim it as their own and it would thus be truly “universal” as intended. Instead we are treated to Mariachi Hymns and lectures on “welcoming the immigrant” or “ALL God’s children” or “The Holy Family were illegal immigrants to Egypt” blah blah blah. What rubbish!!

  • As I understand it, most of the African bishops are very conservative. The liberals may be in for a shock. As for the Latin American clergy, until recently they have been drawn from the “pure Spanish” community who totally disdain those of mixed blood.
    I noticed on the local news this evening, they were doing interviews in an Hispanic neighborhood here in Chicago, and the only ones who were strongly for the election of an Hispanic pope were a couple of priests with very German names. The Hispanic people seemed more, “We’ll take what we can get.”

  • bigone4u

    Black Pope? Watch the media kiss the ring andthen kiss his rear end. If he can deliver the Mass as a rapper, whoa, the media will crown him ruler of the universe. I view it as a matter of individual conscience whether whites would want to leave the church. I predict that at least a few will do so.

  • Observer

    Thank God I’m an atheist. Xianity is down for the count.

    • mrcan

      down yes! but not out!

    • George

      The Pope is going to resign. I don’t blame His Holiness.

      I’d quit my job, too, if my Boss never showed up.

  • Katherine McChesney

    Went to the original article. All those priests look like girly men.

  • a multiracial individual

    Jesus was a first century Palestinian Jew. He was not White or Black. He was probably brown.

    • Katherine McChesney

      I believe he was olive complexioned.

      • Skincognito

        Roman imperial documents described him as having rosy cheeks and blue eyes. Sorry, citation lacking.
        The entire Eastern Mediterranean was much Whiter at the time. but even if Christ was olive-complected, fair Celtic and Germanic Christians built the West. It is the loss of our civilization that is to be lamented at the specter of a black pope.

        • David Ashton

          The two “Roman” documents (Lentulus and a Pilate report) usually cited are not genuine, though the former may contain a trace of ancient tradition.

          However, it is quite true that the eastern Mediterranean, especially Galilee, was then “whiter”. Blue eyes were common. Also, Jesus was greeted as “son of David” who was blond. The two genealogies in the NT are not literally accurate. Muslim tradition holds that Jesus was white.

          • Daisy

            I have always assumed that occasional fairness in that area comes from the Crusades, or Viking raiding, temporary colonizing. What sources do you recommend for someone interested.

  • George

    Benedict XVI retires, citing a lack of strength.

    I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me. (Phillipians 4:13)

    Someone’s lying.

  • Black and Proud

    Goodness knows I will shout for joy if the next pope is Black!

    • edwina

      trust me, goodness doesn’t know squat.

    • Joseph

      So then, the race of the pope is very important to you. Why is that?

  • Goldfinger

    Look at the bright side. This gives us a break from media speculation that the next James Bond will be black.

  • StillModerated

    They’d better ask this African some really tough questions. Is there any history of diddling teenaged boys hiding in the closet? How many paedophile priest scandals has he swept under the Ghanian rug? Are homosexuals born that way, or did they choose the lifestyle?

    Maybe a simple IQ test can make this a no-brainer on the rejection end of things.

  • rpooleva

    There is a difference between race realism and racism. These comments disgust me. Those of you who are Catholic both amaze and disgust me. The pope doesn’t have to be white any more than he had to be Italian. Black societies may be a mess in a general sense but there are individual blacks with more intelligence that the whole lot of you combined. For shame!

    • MarcusTrajanus

      Are there more than one person posting as “jay11”? All your other posts sound pretty “racist” to me.

    • Triarius

      Black societies are always a mess because the common denominator are blacks. Put blacks in Detroit and you get Little Haiti, put blacks in the Vatican and you get Nuova Voodoo.

      If you were a real Catholic you would want the tenants of the church upheld, this will not happen with an African. He will preach tolerance and accepting Africans into Europe and politics, NOT religion.

      Since when does Chistianity have anything to do with multiculturalism? You are a failed Catholic because you are holding libtarded politics above religion. I quit Catholicism when they started preaching about open borders.

      I do, howeve, think we need the Christian moral code to follow if you read my posts below.

    • TeutonicKnight67

      What disgusts me is pompous, condescending people like yourself who feel white Catholics should be forced to accept a sub-saharan as their spiritual leader. The fact that you have indicated that you are NOT Catholic only inflames me more.
      The entire reason this news is important to AmRen is that the Catholic Church has been the backbone of The West for two millennia. It has NOTHING to do with the religious aspect and EVERYTHING to do with our Culture. Yes there are individual blacks that are highly intelligent but Black societies are a mess for one reason and one reason only – BLACKS!

      • rpooleva

        I am catholic and I won’t be forced to accept anything, black pope or gay marriage. But I would accept a black pope if that’s what the conclave decided. There is no reason the pope could not be a black man. Individuals are not the same as a society or a racial group. Be as inflamed as you wish, you’re not advanced enough in reading comprehension to discern that I never said I wasn’t a catholic and I’m not concerned with your emotions.

    • Thor Bonham

      You can always try the huffpo if you don’t like what you read here ,Mr high and mighty ..

    • Nate_Higgers187

      The odds of a negro being more intelligent than an average human White is less than 3%, statistically speaking. Nigroes are two whole standard deviations below Whites IQ averages.

      • Cannot Tell

        Actually, when you control for environment, it’s a one standard deviation difference.

      • David Ashton

        This may not apply to these two black bishops, though.

  • Unperson

    When it comes to Aids [Ghana’s Cardinal Turkson keeps true to the Catholic teaching on contraception but conceded that condoms could be used by a married, faithful couple where one partner is infected.

    Not even Pope yet and already degraded, devolved African norms and expectations are creeping into the highest levels of the Church. White clergy generally do not have to concern themselves with questions like whether a married couple might be exempt from the No Contraception rule because one of the partners has AIDS, since white married people with AIDS are almost nonexistent — whereas in Africa this is of course a common problem.

    Also: when the Pope selection process is over it’s RC tradition to release a cloud of white smoke from the Vatican’s chimney. If a Diversity Pope is chosen this time, will they send up a puff of black smoke instead?

  • IstvanIN

    My fear is that a black Pope would cause even more white people to abandon the church. Not to mention blacks and Hispanics always seem to add various aspects of primitivism in their version of Christianity. I would like to see a Pope who is a strong leader of European peoples who would help give us a sense of survival again.

  • Reginald

    A Black pope is long overdue.

    • Thor Bonham

      Trolling,eh ? It won’t get you anywhere on AmRen .. We see right through you libtards..

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Personally, I think the next pope should be Jewish.

    • PesachPatriot

      I’d take the job if it was offered…hope they would be ok with a married pope with a kid…I would very much enjoy owning a sweet house in rome, a cellar full of fine wine and walls covered in beautiful artwork….I’m glad I don’t have any emotional investment in who is the pope one way or the other.

  • James L.

    How credible is the rumor that right after selection of the new Pope, the Vatican will remain

    the magnificcent artistic creation and accessible as such, ibut that the Pope and the Holy family and the physical governance of Christendom will be relocated to Jerusalem?

    • MikeofAges

      It’s a theory. Postulated as something that could happen if the St. Malachy prophecy is fulfilled. The prophecy is disavowed by the Vatican, but many accept it as authentic to the extent that it was authored by Malachy. The prophecy outlines the fate of the next 112 popes. The next one will be the 112th, called Peter the Roman.

  • I hope they succumb to the pressure and choose a negro pope, as it will signal the beginning of the end for the church.

  • Chris

    This would seem to be a dilemma for the Left. On the one hand, they would celebrate a black pope. On the other, they typically don’t like religion and a black African pope would not be possible without there having been European colonization in Africa. Can’t wait for the spin on this one.

  • The Vatican houses so much of the history of white civilization that I would be really nervous if a black were put in charge of it all.

    • Beloved Comrade

      What isn’t sold off when donations dry up will be burned to put an end to White history. Isn’t that the point of having a black or other non-white pope?

  • Hopefully, this will signal to pro-White Whites that _all_ institutions in the Western world are corrupt, including the Church, and they will stop reflexively defending the Church as if being the keepers of the sacred office of Saint Peter given by Jesus Christ Himself would protect the Church from being taken over by universalism and democracy.

  • steve7789

    Thankfully, the Catholic Church in Africa is losing out to Protestants and Muslims so I wouldn’t expect them to domnate any time soon.

    • George

      The Church of Rome is losing market share in Central America, as well.

  • KenelmDigby

    You’ve heard of the ‘Black and White Minstrel Show’, now we’ve got the ‘Black and White Pope Show’.

  • Garrett Brown

    Further proof civilization as we know it is over.

  • Felix_M

    The world (or at least Western civilization) must be at an end. Otherwise, you’d never have seen Obama in the White House, a woman as Sec’y of State and the talk of a black Pope. I could even take an East Asian Pope seriously, (not one that’s Filipino). But a black Pope, no way.

    • Beloved Comrade

      The world is not at an end. It means our mortal enemies have won.

  • I have little interest in the Pope or the Christian faith these days, aside from tipping a hat to various cultural heritage artifacts in this country and picking and choosing some of the virtues and values.

    However, like many others here, I am more interested in how the development of this story is going. Also, like many others, they correctly say that Liberalism is the new religion and the all important issue nomatter what happens.

    It seems to me to be a sign of mental derangement on the part of liberals and wider society, that the first thing to enter their minds when the Pope resigns is whether the new Pope could be black. It really must be getting to the stage of a recognised mental illness.

    I am currently sat listening a radio debate whilst at work, discussing the Pope. Again, the idea of a black Pope is being pushed – along with “modernisation” of the Catholic faith.

    By this, they are talking gay rights, women bishops, the issues over contraception and divorce, tapping into the (brainwashed) youths to bolster the faith and make it ‘relevant’ to their lives and issues.

    In other words, a Church of Orthodox Marxism/Communism in all but name.

    The only good thing I heard was the possibility of changing attitudes to contraception in the third world. Amen to that, as the devout may say.

    • Beloved Comrade

      If you are in England, you have far bigger problems than who is the next pope, my friend. White native Britons will soon be overlorded by a muslim majority and under Sharia law. Frankly, I don’t think they’ll allow you and other Whites to live there; that is if your new masters allow you to live at all. Same thing here in the US eventually. I say this with a heavy heart and worry about you and others, friend, stay safe, the fate of your country is at stake. I know you know this and see it all around you.
      The evil, White, traitorous leders who ruined your beautiful country with massive non-White immigration (Mr. Blair, Mr. Brown, et. al) should be hanged over the Thames river for all to see.
      This is what your ancestors did to the treasonous and they were right.

      • Nate_Higgers187

        I can promise you one thing: us Whites here in America will not allow it. Ever. We will all die before we let that happen.

        • edwina

          are you serious or a troll?

          • Beloved Comrade

            He’s serious. It’s about time whites showed some backbone. Otherwise we are sheeple led to slaughter.

          • storibund

            Guest is a troll.

            And a wannabe agent provocateur.

            S/he’s kind of amusing to read, tho 😉

        • Garrett Brown

          I guarantee you’ll be one of the first to give up.

      • Yeah, I cannot say we have much of a rosy future here the way things are going.

        I am sure we all know what it is like when you are racially aware and have to deal with the issues of what is happening and also with the saturation and mechanisms in play in society which render the masses either ignorant, apathetic, or just plain selfish in their hedonism to care – or of course, vocal opponents of what we nationalists would desire.

        I am sure it is the same in the United States and indeed every formerly ‘white stock’ nation, either in the European homelands or in the Occidental world such as Australia, New Zealand, America, Canada, and so on.

        I am sure my list of traitors would span quite a few weeks worth of work at the gallows, or nearest street lamp. Primarily it would be Labour party operatives and their handlers pulling strings, but the Conservatives are just as guilty.

        But I do not really hold out for such things, revenge is a dish best served cold – via pulling some kind of revolution out of the hat and scuppering their plans.

        Well, something like that.

        Given that we have ‘lost’ three major cities already to majority non-British stock, and that another two are likely to be added to the list within the next decade, it is fair to say we have forcibly been incubated a nightmare child.

        The state of nationalism in this country at the moment is pathetic. We have silly parties that cannot rise to the challenge, pushing out the same antics and same material which only helped it to have been greatly swept away as a force in this country.

        We have since had several micro-parties that will take decades to build up properly, along with fake nationalists who are only against Islam and nothing else, all of which bicker and argue with each other.

        We have what used to be called the ‘loonies’ creeping out of the woodwork since the collapse in politics, who are no doubt correct in their beliefs but seem to have no clue at all how to present National Socialism or other interests to the ‘normal’ public. (And some rather dubious people who just like to rant and make grand statements of ‘wanting their country back’ and all the other pie in the sky tough talk, again a recipe for disaster with anybody deemed ‘normal’).

        Many have lost faith in party politics, especially as we are running out of time. We feel there is no point arguing over road holes or putting the waste out weekly instead of fortnightly, mending the local park lights and whatever else – as we feel our nation is slipping away too fast to bother with such small fry work to catch peoples trust and attention.

        Storming the streets is not likely, since if people in this country cannot be bothered to put an “x” next to a ballot paper, I doubt they are up for rampaging down the streets in some kind of massive uprising for their race. There seems no appetite at all in this country for a “Golden Dawn” – at the moment.

        However, barriers are being broken down. More and more people seem to be talking about the way things are heading, when once they wouldn’t. Whether that manifests itself into anything useful, I don’t know.

        Nobody knows quite what to do, especially in isolation. Myself, I am getting sick of it all and my role is simply trying to live a ‘nationalist’ life and uphold my virtues and values in my day to day existence and interactions.

        I know what the score is, so when decisions are having to be made in this country or when the lines are more sharply being drawn in the sand, I know which side I will be favouring. There is little more I feel I can be doing, especially with the diabolical state of affairs in nationalism here at the moment.

        This is a short 3 minute video I made – which is not an easy watch, but designed to make a point. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-bQKmdtd9U

        Thanks for caring about us and our plight here, and I share a similar heavy heart and concern for the United States. I have always taken an interest in the American fight with this issue.

        May good luck and a hand of intervention (along with whatever we can muster for ourselves) be with us.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Ireland and Scotland are suffering also.

  • D

    No need to worry, there isn’t going to be a black Pope, not in a Billion years. They’ll pick an Italian.

  • khazars jefferson and madison

    Its not named White Man Religion aka christianity for nothing you know birthed in caucasoid Europe and headquartered in caucasoid Europe with its martyred founder a caucasoid Shem race jew who was messiah.
    Roman emperor Constantine converted his entire western world empire to the new universal empire and put together and canonized as one Book the the ancient jewish Torah and the new christian writings of the ancient jew Shemites/Semites of the chosen blessed Shem race that included white Europeans, white Jews and white Arabs wrote it all down over a period of 2500 years that began in the wild after Moses who was raised 50 years in the Pharoah palace as his grandson was revealed a jew and rescued his 2 million Shemites out of slavery after 400 years and back to their land of milk and honey called Israel.

    Keep the Pope white for White Man Religion and not some African Hamite. Sure the Constantine approved 2nd Book calls for White Man Religion to go unto the 4 corners of the earth and spread the Word but never says the 3 New World Order races were to mix or that the other 2 Japheth and Ham races, especially the cursed Ham race, were be removed from their natural assigned home continents.

    Being the supreme genetically superior blessed chosen race the Shemite caucasoid whites are required to to adhere perfectly to the Book as instructed since where much is given much is expected and they are held more responsible than the other 2 inferior races and given divine intervention to defeat their enemies.

    We know the evil pc age began 500 yrs ago with the discovery of the western hemisphere and introduction of Hamite slaves who were never supposed to be removed from their assigned continent in the jungles of the dark continent called Africa and especially the bought up rejects off tribal chiefs shipped to the west by the millions. Clearly this proven by what has occurred since doing this since before the west was opened all of Europe and its glorious grandiose cities built by white Shem slave labor and maintained for 1000s of years.

    The blessed chosen white race has failed its Creator and evil allowed to prosper by disobedience and failure to be wise as serpents as warned 2000 years ago. I am not mocked and vengeance is mine as the white race is being severely punished by its creator who did not want to revert back to a single human mixed race that failed miserably and had to be wiped out in order to form 3 NWO new races with the 3 sons on Noah on 3 remote geographical continents thus the Ham cursed race cannot be blamed for the catastrophe that was created soley by ignorance and disobedience that the ancient jews clearly warned about in Genesis who were all killed and taken up in AD62 after being used for the Messiah and mission accomplished although some escaped and mixed with the mongoloids to make the khazars who pose as ancient jews but are imposters and fakes.

    Obviously such insightful knowledge is way over the head of Jeffersonian traitors like Jared Taylor with his limited Yale liberal education but it is factual and accurate. Technically todays so called jews are really muslims in disguise although both are blood brothers from 4000 yrs ago anyway both from gentile pappy Abraham. The ancient white Shem race jews were the real deal and specially chosen to write all this and play their role. Jew is not a race but a subsect of the collective blessed chosen Shem white caucasoid race.

  • mobilebay

    I just read that an American tourist, who was in St. Peter’s Square in Rome when the Pope’s announcement came, said he was excited to think that we might have a Pope from a third world country. Why? Do we not have enough third world people here? A Pope from that background may urge that the US take in the few that have not made it here yet.

  • Beloved Comrade

    Let the Catholic church go non-white. When the money dries up from white donors the church will go out of business. They’ll be having a fire sale before too long of their art and other treasures and real estate within a year or two. The archdiocese of Los Angeles had to pay out $660 million to make the pedophilia problem go away. There is far more to come.

  • Thor Bonham

    If it happens I’m out of the catholic faith and the church as well.. There definitely has to be a line drawn somewhere, and this is it..

  • Henceforth, the Sunday collection will be known as the “gibs me dat”.

  • Joseph

    Yes, of course, and a black pope will be lauded as the brightest, humblest, most pious, most charismatic, most popular pope in the history of the church -and a hell of a good basketball player.

  • Hm..there are universal & there are ethnic religions. Christianity, especially Catholicism, is universal; so is Islam and, in its own way, Buddhism. On the other hand, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, most Hindu religions are ethnic, more or less.

    I guess the healthiest way is to have a universal religion with “ethnic departments”. In this specific case, a black person to be elected the pope should have the requirements: an intellectual giant with true spiritual charisma & impeccable moral rectitude.

    Hardly possible. I suppose only affirmative action could accomplish that. And I doubt cardinals are much into preferential treatment, American PC variant.

  • IstvanIN

    If, as some think the next Pope is the last Pope, and we are heading into dark times, perhaps a black Pope would be appropriate.

  • Nate_Higgers187

    Putting a n1gger into the position would be one surefire way to convert as many religious people to Atheism than I’ve ever even considered before. Everyone knows n1ggers can’t be religious, they aren’t human beings and therefore do not possess souls.

    • Pelayo

      Why is it that if you use the numeber “one” in the dreaded, “N” word, it passes muster? IF they can call us “crackuhs”, “honkeys” etc. and even call publicly and on video for the extermination of us and of our babies and the rape of our women, why can’t we call them the DREADED “n” word?

      • IstvanIN

        This web site is supposed to be a little classier than most. Using the N-word with a 1 in place of the i is still low brow.

  • Just- to have a black speaking Latin, if it’s not hilarious, I don’t know what is …

  • White One

    I am White, Norwegian and Scottish. I am a Christian but not a Catholic. I am a strong

    believer in British Israelism, that means I believe what the Bible says about the lost

    tribes of the house of Israel. Those people were and are Caucasians.So of course

    I do not believe a Negroe should be Pope. I only consider people descended from the

    lost 10 or 12 tribes that left Israel many centuries ago and that crossed the Caucasus

    mountains these people. Also called Israelites. All others are exluded this includes Negroes,

    Asians/Orientals,Jews,Indians,Latinos,etc. I do believe they are people too and created by

    the same God and can also be saved, but I do not believe they are Israelites. God chose

    Caucasians to spread Christianity and to be the most powerful in the world. That is why

    Whites founded the great European nations and later the US the number 1 superpower,

    that is why every major piece of technology that exists today was invented by these same

    people. Whatever you call us Whites, Caucasians,Israelites,Pilgrims,Europeans etc.I believe

    we are the same people and are God’s chosen. There is a reason why we have done so

    much, and now today there are many who hate us for it and want to destroy us.They should be content being what they are, but if they are not let them be miserable by themselves they

    do not need to drag us down with them.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Fair enough. I approach it from a different perspective but the end result is roughly the same.

  • Fr. John+

    Only one man can be pope. And it’s not a black man.
    http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/bishop-williamson-for-pope/

    But, of course, in this era of cultic idolatry of the Black Man as the Noble Savage, it would only be the last, ultimate curse of YHWH God on the Roman Communion, for ‘trading in her blessing for a mess of multicultural potage.

    http://cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/heart-and-soul/

  • JJCULLEN

    More Catholics will leave the Church. they can’t afford it, I’ll go back when the Latin Mass is reinstated

  • JJCULLEN

    More Catholics will leave the Church, I’ll return when the Latin Mass is reinstated

  • guest

    The Catholic Church should have treated the pedophiles with an iron fist. Instead they only offer weak apologies and excuses. They give more energy to covering up the scandals and protecting the abusers. This is old news, but it always looms over us like a dark cloud. Politically, the church supports amnesty, massive third world immigration, and the islamification of Europe. They should take a strong stance against this decay and invasion. Instead, they support it. The church does the opposite of what is decent and good, and they disappoint us at every turn. They are weak, perverted, and out of touch with reality. I am not an atheist nor a Catholic basher. Most churches are similar.

    • OK, I’ll paste two good comments from an intelligent black Episcopalian, re priest celibacy & pedophile scandals:

      1.
      Check out stats for married people committing sex crimes. It’s much
      higher than for priests. Even from an outsider’s view (albeit an
      outsider with a lot of insider friends) priests are simply too busy to
      have a wife and kids. He is married: to his parish. My priest-friends
      wake at five or six, pray two of the “hours” in their breviary. Shower.
      Prep for mass. Say mass. Eat breakfast. Pray mid-morning prayer. Go to
      hospital, nursing home, or jail. Prays noontime prayer. Eats lunch.
      Goes to the parish school to listen to everyone gripe. Checks the
      balance sheets and other documents. Prays mid afternoon prayer. Attends
      a meeting. Then does marriage counseling. Then prays evening prayer.
      Eats dinner. Attends more meetings or works on his sermon for Sunday.
      By about 10 pm things settle down. He prays night prayer and then tries
      to sleep. By the way, throughout the day he’s also dealing with phone
      calls and drop ins who are convinced that they are the center of the
      universe and he must drop everything just for them right at that
      moment. So he goes to sleep late at night, and at least two or three
      times a week he gets called at 2-4 a.m. to a hospital or home because
      Grandma is dying and needs last rites. He still needs to get up at the
      normal time because he has 7 a.m. Mass no matter what.

      These guys don’t need a wife, they need amphetamines.

      2.
      I’m reminded what Pope (Pius VII???) said to Napoleon when Nappy said
      he would destroy the Church: “Not even the clergy has succeeded at
      destroying the Church.”

      There is the recognition within the Church itself that there are
      priests and bishops that are awful. Few other institutions can claim to
      be as self-critical as the Catholic Church. However, as bad as many men
      have been, it is the Truth that remains the same.

      Those who say, “The Catholic Church cannot teach the truth because it
      has so many bad people” need a logic course. A is A is true whether
      Gandhi or Jeffery Dahmer says it. So, if what the church teaches is
      true, then a 2-3% of priests who are scum doesn’t matter.

      Some were and are, but you are correct to point out that the vast
      majority of cases were ephibophilia not pedophilia, and that it was
      overwhelmingly males being abuse. So a grown man preying on teenaged
      boys sounds a hell of a lot like homosexual recruiting.

      When I was a teen and college student I got hit on regularly by gay
      men, many of whom tried the physical “you know you want it” (i.e.
      coercion or attempted rape). Thank God I was strong enough to fight
      them off. The sexual harassment I experienced in college was awful and
      the administration laughed it off. I should have sued.

      Anyway, the number of priests who commit sex crimes is minuscule.:
      about 2-4%. Allegedly straight men commit it much more often,
      especially boyfriends of single mothers and step-fathers.

      I’m still waiting for the numbers of public school teachers and
      politicians to come out. It would make the priest scandal look like
      like Sunday School. But the government won’t let it come out. After
      all, undermining faith in the Catholic Church is #1 priority for Uncle
      Sam. No split loyalties allowed.

  • Sand dollar

    Jesus never advocated a hierarchy, a flag, or a country based on them.

    The vatican is all of these things.

    It’s time for the pope to step down and admit that for all of the vaticans efforts, it has mislead and mis-informed its followers.

    Many catholics engage in pre-marital sex, drugs, and abortion, in part, because the catholic faith does not teach its practicioners to think. Only to follow.

    • Wake up, Reformation is over. Geez …

      • NeanderthalDNA

        I got the barbarian’s conversion to Catholicism years ago when I married one. They wanted me to go through a year of catechism classes, etc., until I basically said I’m marrying her regardless, so either convert me or don’t.

        Went to a wonderful Catholic high school after years of being the big white kid who rumbled with the Blacks at Africanized ejucayshunul gulags. Was able to learn finally. Lots of respect for the church and many of the priests I’ve known, including the one who converted me.

        Too heretical to cleave to any one belief in my heart, but then Paris is worth a te deum after all, eh?

        • Heheheh…Henry of Navarre school, I see ..

        • Cherry Bomb

          Survivor of catholic school? I’ve heard many stories of child abuse from lapsed Catholics in my social circle and from ex-catholic in-laws. One told me about a priest who slammed a window on his hands breaking the bones. It was HIS fault, not the priests and he got it double at home after his hands had been taken care of.because the priests and nuns were ALWAYS right no matter what. He still has problems with his hands to this day and the scars to prove it and he’s 60 years old.

    • David Ashton

      Jesus reportedly appointed apostles, an hierarchy of sorts.

  • Fr. John+
  • how long before the boys choir is replaced by a hootin’ and hollerin’ black gospel choir?

  • Pelayo

    While so many people are wasting time and energy Jew bating, Afros are murdering, raping and otherwise assaulting Whites (including Jews. Channel Yankel Rosenbaum and ask him) at an ever increasing rate. If we were to get rid of all the Jews, would Afro-criminality suddenly end? Would we safer in our schools, streets, homes and everywhere else than we are now?

    Some people feel confident demonizing Jews (yes many of them are disgustingly “left”) because they know that they have nothing to fear from gangs of Jewish “youths”. Can anyone cite a recent case where a person was raped or murdered by Jews whom they didn’t know while engaging in every day activities? We’re not counting Murder Incorporated. Louis Buchalter, Abe Reles and Dutch Schultz and Ben Siegle are gone.

    • Beloved Comrade

      Who is demonizing and dehumanizing whites in the media? Who publishes black music that overtly calls for the raping and killing of whites? Who pushes “black achievement” onto our children and down our throats? Blacks? Hint: it ain’t blacks OR whites doing this.

      You need to look at who was behind the so-called civil rights movement, the school integration issue, the open borders movement. Who founded and funded the NAACP? Again, it wasn’t whites OR blacks who did this. It isn’t blacks who are destroying white civilization, they don’t have the power, money or intelligence to do this. It isn’t blacks who are stopping whites from speaking out against their own displacement and dis empowerment.

      You need to read this cover to cover, every word of it and then comment: http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf

    • Murder Inc. was mostly Italian, as I recall.

      • David Ashton

        Does that make you guilty of “anti-Italicism”?

        May I refer enquirers into the “multicultural diversity” of Murder Inc &c to such books as Martin Short, “The Rise of the Mafia: The Definitive Story of Organized Crime” (London: Blake, 2009)?

    • Jackryanvb

      I agree we have little to fear from rampaging mobs of Jewish youth. Unfortunately we do have legitimate fears that Neo Con Jewish Congressmen like Eric Cantor are joining Lib Dem Jewish Congressmen like Cohen, Levin, Jewish Senators like Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer to give full amnesty for 11-20 million non White illegal aliens and then implement some program to bring iin the entire non White third world. That’s the rap on the Jews here in the USA – successful, bright people who for some strange reason have a messianic mission to replace the awhite American population with the non white third world. Powerful Jewish pols like NYC mayor Bloomberg go so far as to welcome mass Muslim immigration in to the USA, supporting the rights of the Muslims to build a Mosque on Ground Zero to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the 9-11-01 Muslim terrorist attack. Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492 in large part for doing the same thing, aiding and abetting the Arab Muslim Moors’s side against Spanish Whites.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Bing bing bing bing! A hearty AMEN there.

      The black is the genetic ethnicity that most threatens all civilization and any diversion from that fact is a distraction and ultimately a waste of resources. Islam? Yes, another menace, but an ideological menace (or “theological” if you like) that has enabled and glorified miscegenation with low IQ subSaharans for centuries. Liblefty cultural Marxism is a recent phenomenon with similar aims to be sure.

      Look at the sad, humiliating, story of the Island of Hispaniola, how the western Dominicans, admittedly rather hopelessly interbred already, endured an unimaginable occupation by Haitian negroes for some 20 years before throwing them out. Profoundly scarred them and rightfully so. Ultimately it came down to tiny Haiti, with over a million r-style breeding Africans being thrown out by around a hundred thousand largely white led mulattoes followed by over a century of denial of African miscegenation and encouragement of white immigration on the part of the Dominican Republic. Looked it up on Wiki. The list of battles and combatants was “darkly” hilarious. Where figures are given of number of combatants one notices a strange phenomenon…Haitian numbers…

      http://tinyurl.com/bfxj4oz

      invariably exceeded the Dominicans, yet the Dominicans routed them over and over and over.

      To this day Dominicans are some of the most anti-“black”…mulattoes and blacks you will find. The cognitive dissonance is rather funny and I have hard time not feeling some warmth to many of the Dominican real life Ruckuses I’ve encountered.

      Many, of course, poisoned by liblefty race canon, are no better than the Haitians, but still a fascinating lesson in race reality…

    • Daisy

      It’s not really the non-jewish side that does most of the ‘bating’ unfortunately. Do you know who started the NAACP? That’s my answer to the first paragraph’s questions.

      Does it only matter when a jew rapes or murders a person they don’t know? I was jumped my first semester in college by a 6’5″ jewish male who was friends with a woman I’d just met in my dorm and went out with one night. I didn’t really know him nor was I on a date with him but he seemed to feel entitled to open the door of my room and hold me captive under him on MY BED and try to force me to kiss him and do god knows what else. I resisted, blacked out, and then ran out when someone knocked and he got up to open the door. He had stalked and tried to assault a blonde blue eyed nordic polish girl at his boarding school. This redheaded blue eyed then just-turned-18-yr-old-sexually-inexperienced girl found him disgusting and seriously traumatizing. I also had to deal with heinous attacks from males that were directly orchestrated by jewish girls. Invasiveness and physical violence are hardly uncommon in jewish people particularly when it comes to the shiksas they hate. Ever read Philip Roth?

      Females of my tribe(s) are only safe around their own men as far as I can see, or at least as a general rule.

      • PesachPatriot

        This is pretty awful…I’m sorry this happened to you and the guy who did it needs a second bris….I will admit to getting in a few self-defense fights with other guys(they put hands on me first) in school before I turned 18 but the very idea of putting hands on a woman in an uninvited manner was repugnant to me….I have never heard of jewish girls getting their men to attack non-jewish women….most of the jewish guys I know would call a woman who asked them to assault a gentile female either crazy or retarded and then laugh at them. Men assaulting women is a pretty serious crime here and not too many jewish guys would last a day in an american jail. I know words from a stranger over the internet mean little, but you have my sympathies and condolences….

  • scutum1

    The election of a black pope will be the final nail in the coffin of the American Catholic Church. We have a very large interdenominational church in our community. It has grown by leaps and bounds over the last 10 th 20 years and is now one of the largest churches in our area. Most of it’s parishioners are ex-catholics. A black pope will just accelerate this process, leading to the eventual total collapse of Catholiism in America. While it is vary cache to be politicallt correct, even the most liberal whites know that the majoirty blacks are incompetent. Even blacks refer to the talented 10, which is a reference to those blacks that are able to compete intellectually with whites and asians.

    • Sloppo

      I always thought the Catholic doctrine that “the pope is perfect” was one of the most obvious errors of the Catholic belief system, especially if you look at Catholic history. On the other hand, if they try to float that kind of idea in Mexico with a black man as the pope … I think it will become very interesting.

      • Cherry Bomb

        LOL, papal infallibility is an error. So is the abberation of lifelong celibacy.

  • Felix_M

    Question: How will all those good Catholc Mexicans react when they find out they’ve got a black pope?

  • Sloppo

    I think an African pope would be as strange as a Swedish man at the top level of the Voodoo religion. If it happens, I kind of wonder if central America might have their own Protestant Reformation. I’ve noticed that most of those guys REALLY don’t much respect for Africans.

  • They wont stop until they take the place of our own people in our own societies

  • Michael Mason

    Surely Catholics wouldn’t be that stupid. I think more people would really start to doubt a church if it started using the same low tactics as the democratic party. If either one of them did become the pope, it could possibly serve some good purpose; showing white people that there really isn’t a culture that is uniquely ours anymore. That everything has been stolen.

  • jay11

    This is quite amazing. I have seen it mentioned on three liberal websites that now that the pope’s office is vacant, now is the time for a black pope. Lots of discussion in those articles and the libs were talking about progress, blah, blah, blah.
    My question is this: why is that when anything opens, any office or important job of any kind, why is that libs and blacks automatically assume that it MUST be filled by a black, or it will be a racist plot if it is not. The idea seems to be that blacks are naturally supposed to fill those jobs but for the evil whities who manoever them out.
    Isn’t this racism to say a black must fill the job?

  • Anon

    Is no one suspicious that, for the first time ever in modern history a pope is stepping down, and it just so happens that a black is being considered as his replacement?

    The catholic church was never the church of Peter. But it was, for many centuries a legitimate form of Christianity. To see such stark evidence of its take over by anti-christians is disturbing.

    You must understand that Christian religious doctrine, no matter the stripe, predicts the end of the world (as we know it) as anti-christians wrest control of the world away from Christianity. Is this true? As a Christian, I would say, probably. But I have been witness to real supernatural events in Christianity and know this part of the religion intimately. Something, no one outside the religion would consider credible.

    But also understand that there ARE large numbers of people who formally embrace anti-christianity. They don’t identify themselves as such….yet. They also don’t admit that they are united as a force….yet. What they do, however, say, behind closed doors that they AGREE with the end of the world sentiment. Specifically, they plan on wiping out between 90% and 99% of the world’s population and forcing some sort of “global plantation” system with themselves as the masters. The rank and file, of course, have always been the first on the chopping block, so to speak, historically in all previous attempts to actualize the cause, but still, they never see that. What’s important is they are religious fanatics….exactly what the accuse the Christians as being. A strange thing to be, for an atheist, as most of them are. Of course, what they actually are, are luciferians. A few will admit this. But ALL are willing to jump into the meatgrinder and end our way of life for little or no reason.

    Their obvious success in what should be a bastion of Christianity is warning that we are at a cusp of such events. No matter your belief, it is a giant warning sign.

  • Jackryanvb

    Could Amren try to post something positive?

    Maybe something from Russia, international all White juniors hockey tourney, something positive, anything positive.

  • MikeofAges

    Reportedly, African Catholic Catholic churchmen very frequently have wives (maybe multiple) and families. Can’t say about these two cardinals, but it could be an issue. Don’t think it will happen in any case.

    • America First

      The old question is, “In Africa, how does one tell a bishop from a priest?”
      Answer: The bishop has only one wife.

  • Kevin Vail

    OK the writer of this article didn’t do his research. Not only has there been “non-European” popes before, they were African. There were at least 4 popes of Berber stock, from pre-Islamic northern Africa (same racial group as Augustine of Hippo, arguably the most important Christian theologian who ever lived).

    • IstvanIN

      Not all Africans are Negroes. North Africa’s native population is Caucasian, and was probably a lot whiter prior to race mixing by the Arabs.

      • morrisminor

        They were more Mediterranean than Aftrican

  • BellaCosa

    I dunno, I think I could get used to a Pope Trayvon I.

    • IstvanIN

      Trayvonius, lets go all the way and Latinize it.

  • Fed Up

    I think the best candidate for the papacy would be one Jeremiah Wright! (kidding)

    Given the rate of people deserting the Roman Catholic Church, a black pope would simply hasten the death of that venerable institution. But if they do elect a black pope, it could be seen as caving in to a form of extortion or blackmail.

  • rebellisMMXII

    Ghanaian Cardinal Peter Turkson seems to be actively campaigning to be elected Pope. Now I’m getting even more sick…

  • aass222333

    Let us face the facts: Most white people no longer believe in God. And it was never the case that Catholicism was intended only for Europe; all the races–white, black, red or yellow–are answerable to God. White people have abandoned the faith, so the Church has abandoned white people. How is that difficult to understand?

    And before anyone goes on about how liberal the Church is, let us remember that if the pope were in charge, Europe would not be on the way to having a predominantly Arab-Muslim population right now. Pope Pius XII, for instance, demanded that the U.S Army not bring black soldiers into Italy during WW2. The Church would have always wanted to give Africa foreign aid or something, but North America and Europe would look very differently right now had their inhabitants not disastrously embraced the modernist heresy, and instead remained or became Catholic.

  • Gibbon

    Best not to over think this…um. Nietzsche- “God (Christianity) is dead.” Time to put our big boy pants on.

  • marcion

    This maybe something to finaly force whites to wake up?
    “In the extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit
    Peter the Negro, who will pasture his sheeple in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills [i.e. Rome]
    will be destroyed, and the terrible judge will judge his people. The End.”

  • Observer

    Why not a Negro Pope ? The Southern Baptist have shoeshine boy in charge – he receives a “Great Commission” !

  • morrisminor

    it’s all a stupid scam anyways

  • Tired

    First of all, am I the only one who thinks these black catholic officials look RIDICULOUS in traditional European catholic garb? They look like monkeys in human clothing.

    Second, I am not catholic, but I am COMPLETELY against a black pope. The Vatican is a treasure of Western civilization, last thing we need is some African destroying renaissance art and destroying relics so he can get extra money (as all black government officials eventually do).

  • Katherine McChesney

    The Irish Savant has an interesting slant on this:

    http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2013/02/an-african-pope.html