Federal Court: DOJ Must Reimburse South Carolina for Voter ID Folly

J. Christian Adams, PJ Media, January 5, 2013

A federal court has ruled that South Carolina was the prevailing party in the unnecessary Voter ID litigation, and therefore the Justice Department is liable for paying the state’s costs. South Carolina spent $3,500,000 to obtain federal court approval of the state’s Voter ID law as non-discriminatory under the Voting Rights Act. The lawsuit was made necessary only because of the political and ideological radicalism of Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez and his deputy Matthew Colangelo.

PJ Media had this exclusive report detailing that career Voting Section employees, including Voting Section Chief Chris Herren, recommended that the Voter ID law be approved in the first place by DOJ after a careful written analysis inside the Voting Section. Documents prepared by the career staff urged Perez and Colangelo to grant administrative approval to the South Carolina Voter ID law—but they refused. Their refusal was, in part, designed to energize a moribund political base heading into the 2012 election. The cost to the American taxpayers for their stunt will be significant.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson’s office was quick to respond to the court’s ruling late yesterday:

“The state Attorney General’s Office blamed the U.S. Department of Justice for the high cost of the case. They accused the federal government of delaying the case by 120 days by filing numerous frivolous motions, including challenging the 12-point font size on a document the state filed.

“The Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., bears responsibility for the litigation costs,” said Mark Powell, Wilson’s spokesman. “The decision was so emphatic, even the Department of Justice and Interveners did not appeal it. South Carolina was forced to pay a hefty price because a handful of Washington insiders refused to do the right thing.”


All of this raises the question—will Perez and Colangelo be held accountable for what amounted to an expensive use of the Justice Department to energize President Obama’s political base? As we now know, there was no merit to the objection. A federal court approved the law. The many career staff who looked at it said the South Carolina law did not discriminate.


But Perez and Colangelo don’t worry about the butcher’s bill. They use the power of their DOJ office in an ideological crusade. Unless their own pocketbooks or reputations suffer, they will continue to behave the same way.


Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Michael_C_Scott

    The last paragraph in the redacted version here is the telling one; the taxpayers always lose in the end.

  • The__Bobster

    Will the ACLU pay? They were the ones fighting voter ID in Pa., so I’m sure their little ratlike fingers were in this mess, too.

  • ArmenianWN

    Anti-Racist is a codeword for Anti-White. If blacks don’t have the intellectual ability to acquire photo-ID, they shouldn’t deserve to be able to vote anyway

  • Those cronies were appointed by somebody who was elected by certain people. Perhaps it’s time we hold voters accountable for the criminals they elect. No more anonymous ballots. If you vote for a corrupt politician, you share some of the responsibility. If that politician appoints corrupt officials, those who voted for him should bear the costs. Secret ballots might work in a homogenous society but as soon as diversity rears its ugly head, voting becomes a farce. In that case, there needs to be voter accountability – at the very least.


  • rebelcelt

    The people who instigated this will no lose a dime out of their pockts. The Obama Administration does not mind spending your money.

  • joesolargenius

    Voter ID law was passed because we are concerned about mass voter fraud committed by groups of organized illegal aliens .