The Sequel to ‘Suicide of a Superpower’

Ilana Mercer, World Net Daily, November 3, 2011

Whites will become a minority in 2042 and will fall to 46 percent of the population by 2050, comprising only 38 percent of U.S. population under 18. So writes Patrick J. Buchanan in his formidable new book, “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”

Every immigration worrywart recalls the “astonishing episode” Mr. Buchanan recounts next. In 1998, Bill Clinton brought tidings of “their coming minority status” to a “largely white student body” at Portland State University.

“In a little more than 50 years,” rejoiced President Clinton, “there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through a demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.” Taking their cue from their “enthnomasochistic” president, the students erupted in cheers.

“Ethnomasochism,” laments Mr. Buchanan–who is surely one of the great patriots of our time–is “the taking of pleasure in the dispossession of one’s own ethnic group.” It is “a disease of the heart that never afflicted the America of Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, or Dwight Eisenhower.”

In this writer’s latest book, the example of post-apartheid South Africa is used to deconstruct the effects of such a shift in a country’s majority/minority power structure.

{snip}

In 1994, South Africa’s Europeans forfeited control over the state apparatus. They ceded mastery over their destiny and vested their existential survival in a political dispensation: a liberal democracy.

In a needlessly optimistic assumption, whites imagined that blacks, too, would be bound by the same political abstractions–they expected them to relinquish race as an organizing principle, in favor of a constitutional design.

Instead of political partners, South African whites got masters.

{snip}

South Africa’s political eunuchs are particularly vulnerable within a democratic political dispensation for the very reason the descendants of America’s founders will be fair game: their history on the continent.

Remedial historical revisionism notwithstanding, South Africa–with its space program and skyscrapers–was not the product of the people currently in control. Rather, it was the creation of British and Dutch colonists and their descendants. For what they’ve achieved and acquired–and for the sins of apartheid–South Africa’s pioneering people are the objects of envy and racial enmity.

Unless they fight it, a similar fate awaits the descendants of the (slaveholding) founders of America.

{snip}

South Africans vote almost exclusively along racial lines. {snip}

As illustrated in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa,” democracy is especially dangerous in ethnically and racially divided societies, where majorities and minorities are rigidly predetermined and politically permanent.

{snip}

Thirty years on, when the Rubicon is crossed, most Americans will be poorer, less educated and more welfare-dependent. One party will represent this majority. This party will serve as an instrument of perpetual oppression of the minority by a politically powerful majority.

Like South Africa, America is destined to degenerate into a dominant-party state.

Sadly, “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa” is the sequel to Patrick J. Buchanan’s “Suicide of A Superpower.”

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • ice

    “No other nation in history has gone through a demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.” Taking their cue from their “enthnomasochistic” president, the students erupted in cheers.”

    Isn’t it amazing that they have not only been defeated in a non-military way they are cheering about it?

    Is this a case of the manipulators being so brilliant or their victims being gullible and naive….or is it just plain stupidity?

  • Anonymous

    ‘Ethnomasochism’ among whites is explainable.

    The typical ethnomasochistic white is a liberal who has turned away from spirituality.

    In his need to exalt something, he turns to liberalism as a religion. His newfound religion needs a powerful symbol of sacrifice and forgiveness, and he himself steps in, volunteering his race for martyrdom.

    Among some white fundamentalist Christians, ethnomasochism is popular. They want to be Christ-like, offering to put their race on the cross to forgive the world its sins.

  • Ferd

    We will be very much like Brazil, I think. The blacks overwhelmingly dominate the population in South Africa and that will not happen in America.

  • Anonymous

    It is a misconception that whites will be a minority by 2042 or 2050. It is caucasians that will be a minority by 2042 or 2050. Whats the difference? Well, caucasian is a much wider group than white, it includes the big brown swath of IQ 90 people encircling the globe. All these people count towards the caucasian – not the white – majority if they immigrate here or are born here. It doesnt mean that they are white.

    But what does that mean for the white America population? Well, for starters, the 50% mark will be reached much earlier. I would say its reached now or just about to be reached now. Among the young whites have been a clear minority for some time. People of undiluted north European descent have been a minority in America for a long time. By 2050 whites will be 20-25% of the American population, depending on population growth.

    See this back issue of Amren for more about the statistical tricks used to inflate the white numbers: http://www.amren.com/ar/2002/01/index.html

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous wrote: “Among some white fundamentalist Christians, ethnomasochism is popular. They want to be Christ-like, offering to put their race on the cross to forgive the world its sins.”

    I concur, wholeheartedly. I recently severed all communications with one of these kinds of suicidal white nitwits, who flat REFUSED to ever take her own race’s side in ANY conflict or on any issue that even remotely had an ethnic competition aroma attached to it. These people are exactly like the cult that James Jones convinced to commit mass suicide, and those whites among us who are sane, race realists need to shun these dangerous zombies completely. Exile them from your family and from your circle of friends, because they will get you killed.

  • Anonymous

    America isn’t becoming South Africa, its becoming Brazil. In many ways, America has already become a larger version. Very high levels of racial mixing. A large, growing black and brown underclass with a smaller white elite. Incredibly high income inequality divided along racial lines. A looming colored majority.

  • john

    I heard a bizarre radio ad several times recently,sponsored by the South African tourist industry. A (white) man and his wife blather on in joyful praise of the wonderful time they had in SA; massages, safari,etc. And the people! So warm and welcoming! So, there must be SOME white people being allowed to step in and fix things up a bit. Vacation in SA? Um, I’ll take a pass. Remember “To Serve Man” best Twilight Zone episode ever!

  • Aaron from Rhode Island.

    As a Jewish Person myself. I have always been curious why are we Jews listed as White in the European sense when we are clearly Middle eastern? Lets take a short history lesson: First of all the real Jewish people of the Bible are by no means white, they would have been swarthy brown-olive skinned people – Mizrahi Jews ( Jesus was one of them). The Mizrahi Jews fled to Baghdad (Iraq), Persia ( Iran) and Southern India ( Bene Yisraeli/Meneshe)…a few are believed to have migrated to North East India and into China – Kai Feng Jews. Still others migrated to Ethiopia – Falashas. And of course the vast majority migrated to Europe ( Sephardim & Ashkhenaz). But here lies the dilemma- Ashkhenaz Jews are basically Asiatic or at best Eurasian and NOT European. They have DNA related to both Asian dark skinned Mizrahis and Central Asian Khazars (Khazaria was a kingdom which included modern day Kazakisthan, Krygistan, Turkmenstan, Crimea, Uzbekistan, and parts of Ukrania)- all these nations except Ukraine & Crimea fall under Asia.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

    It maybe true that down the generations many Jews did intermingle with European gentiles resulting in lighter skin tones and more western look. But that still does not negate their true ancestry. Unless of course they were white gentile converts. By definition, Jews should not be termed as white. We are a distinct ethno-racial group. I personally, believe in the preservation of each race be it white, black, Oriental etc. I also believe that each of our cultures are unique and need to be respected for its unique attributes without needless inter-mixing or looping as one whole entity. That is true diversity!

  • Anonymous

    One crucial factor is not considered. What about race mixing?

    In SA, blacks and whites don’t mix.

    In America, there will be a George P. Bush generation. A lot of Americans will look like W.’s nephew that is of white and Hispanic ancestry. People of this background will simply be counted as white in increasingly complex and ethnic America.

    For a website obsessed with race mixing, it shows a real lack of analytic depth to not catch on to this angle.

  • McGillicuddy

    Anonymous post #4, you are pulling numbers and theories out of thin air. The government acknowledges the awkwardness of Hispanic classification (mestizo should be an option, but I also understand wanting to know how many consider themselves Hispanic), and so they also keep track of the total of non-hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, etc.

    According to the 2010 census non-Hispanic whites are 63.7% of the population. I understand that middle easterners are counted as white, but their numbers are small, if they and Jews are both subtracted, our numbers are still around 60%.

    I have no idea why you think otherwise, or why you think that in a little more than a generation, the number of middle easterners will as large as the number of whites, but this kind of irrationality gives us a bad name.

  • Russ in the South

    The percentage of whits in the U.S. popuulation is shrinking by 1/2 of 1 percent per year. Here is the past and the future if nothing is done–

    1960- “Mayberry America”– whites are 90% of the population

    1970- Whites are 85% of the population

    1980- Whites are 80% of the population. America elects Ronald Reagan, the last conservative president

    1990- Whites are 75% of the population

    2000- Whites are 70% of the population

    2010- Whites are 65% of the population

    2020- Whites are 60% of the population. A candidate getting 80% of the white vote will still only get 48% of the total vote.

    After this point there will likely be no more white presidents.

    2030- Whites are 55% of the population

    2040- Whites are 50% of the population

    2050- Whites are 45% of the population

    2060- Whites are 40% of the population. Blacks will be about 14% of the population and Asians will be about 8% of the population.

    Hispanics will be 38% of the population.

    2070- Hispanics will be the largest population group. Whites will be 35% of the population.

    2080- Whites will be 30% of the population

    2090- Whites will be 25% of the population

    2100- Whites will be 20% of the population. Hopefully, by this time someone will take pity upon whites and put them on reservations where they can be in control of their own culture and laws. Ideas for these areas would be Appalachians area and/or Upper Rockies. White folks do well in mountainous areas.

    2140- Essentially no more whites.

  • GetBackJack

    I am still shocked that so many whites don’t see the real reason for a lot of what is going on today. Especially, when it comes to the treatment of whites who are not powerful, extremely wealthy, or influential.

    First of all, whites are where the liberty movement originated and is reinforced. So, when you attack whites, you stifle the liberty movement. Blacks and other minorities – where in the U.S. or abroad – love the power of the State. So, that also reinforces what is going on today. The real people behind the push to abandon whites in Africa were the globalists. Part of the reason was to go after Africa’s resources by causing mayhem and bribing corrupt leaders. The real colonists don’t have a new face, so to speak, just a new method.

    I suggest all my whites brothers and sisters do a little digging into history. The people I suggest you dig deeper on are:

    Cecil Rhodes (and his Round Table which has morphed into today’s Council on Foreign Relations (which, by the way, is a private corporation and not a government agency, yet, Hillary Clinton has publicly commented that that is where she gets her marching orders)), Henry Kissenger, and David Rockefeller, et al.

    This is where you must begin to understand what is going on around the world today. History has all the answers. Unfortunately, most of us don’t know history.

    The reason why liberalism, socialism and communism are pushed and supported today is because they help facilitate the push for globalism. In the end, that is the target. Globalism, where everyone is a slave but the people in charge. And, you and I are not going to be the people in charge.

  • Anonymous

    #10 I do not believe official US government statistics. They are as massaged and adjusted as Soviet 5 year plan fulfillment statistics, that is, they have little more than a superficial connection to reality.

    If you take a look at the census form, it basically dumps everyone who is not in an official non white into the white group. Suppose Middle Easterners are 4% of the US population, as you say. How many north Africans are there? How many Pakistanis? How many gypsies? How many Armenians? And how many half Arabs are there?

    How many of those “whites” are high yella blacks? Make an estimation, and you will find that people of undiluted European descent cannot possible be more than 50%. And of these, people of undiluted north European descent cannot possibly be the majority. I would like to point out the example of Argentina, where 90% of the people considers themselves white, but only 40% have a genome that is free from non white genes. I think USA is similar, there are plenty of mystery meat out there that is counted as white and that counts itself as white because it isn’t black or Asian. I am not surprised when I see Americans claim that “Persians are white!” or “Armenians are white!” which I suspect is because they have never seen a large group of actual white people in real life . Their very ignorance reveals how little contact with actual white people they have had trough their lives.

    As a curiosity, I can mention that there is actually a guy who makes money off composing accurate economic statistics for the American economy, because companies need such to properly forecast demand. If you take a look at his numbers and compare with official USGOV numbers, you realize that America is much much worse off than the official numbers say, and that his numbers nicely tally in with the deindustrialization (and the expected drop in GNP that accompanies it) that has been going on since the early 90’s. Since his business have been around for several years now, I guess there are people willing to pay for good, accurate numbers. Here is his site. http://www.shadowstats.com/

  • Anonymous

    “As a Jewish Person myself. I have always been curious why are we Jews listed as White in the European sense when we are clearly Middle eastern?”

    Aaron, on the racial day of reckoning, anyone noticeably lighter than Obama is going to be targeted as “white” no matter what. Anti racist dorks claim to be “Italian” or “Irish” or “Jewish” or whatever, not knowing that the Diversity sees all of those groups as white oppressors and will treat them accordingly when given the chance.

  • Anonymous

    “Among some white fundamentalist Christians, ethnomasochism is popular. They want to be Christ-like, offering to put their race on the cross to forgive the world its sins.”

    _________________________

    First off, I am a Christian but not of the kind that we see today.

    This is why I have been saying for years that the Christianity preached today is almost Anti-Christ like. It most certainly is anti-White to the core. They will have our blood on their hands if we allow their blasphemy/lies to continue unabated. I know the Church was infiltrated a long time ago by the enemy, yet try to tell that to these brainwashed sheep.

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous 4: Are you suggesting only “people of undiluted north European descent” count as White? Being of very much “diluted” North European descent (“diluted” with Southern European, that is), I still consider myself White and a full heir of Western civilization.

  • John

    America’s future (in two decades) will be some thing between Brazil and Haiti politically, socially, and economically.

  • Mike H.

    So I guess the only real question is, where are all of our leaders? I don’t mean Republican shills like George W. Bush or Dick Cheney, I’m referring to people who understand the importance of race and are willing to stand up for what they believe in, public opinion be damned. People like Jared Taylor, James Edwards and so on.

    The only thing that will save us is separation, backed up by the threat of violence. Live in peace as a minority among the non-whites? Yeah, you can sure see how well that’s worked out in South Africa or Rhodesia.

    We should be buying up land and having like minded individuals settle there, so that when the inevitable happens we’re ready and prepared to defend ourselves, instead of divided and ripe for the slaughter. Remember, paranoid people are those who have imaginary threats against their lives – pick up a history book and you’ll be quick to see that this clearly isn’t the case in America, where the threat is anything but imaginary.

    If it weren’t for my complete lack of charisma I’d be tempted to start a movement myself.

  • Anonymous

    #14 wrote Aaron, on the racial day of reckoning, anyone noticeably lighter than Obama is going to be targeted as “white” no matter what.

    That’s sort of wrong. In the future USA, Mexicans will dominate over blacks. That which will take down whitey will not be a big black Haitian style uprising, there are not enough of them and wont be unless there is an influx of hundreds of millions of African blacks during the next 30 years, it will be a lose coalition of Mexicans, blacks, Asians and all kinds of mystery meat voting themselves to whiteys money. At the forefront of this will be the ethnic group currently dominating American media and controlling the most powerful political action committees. Aaron has nothing to fear. To put it simply, it will not end with a bang but a whimper.

  • Anonymous

    Instead of wondering who has a certain G Nome and what it is that constitutes “White”, taking this fatalistic acceptance of our own demise i.e. the extermination of us “crackers and our little babies” and wondering when all White women will have been raped and impregnated by Blacks it would be well for us to begin a campaign for our own survival.

    First, speak out publicly about your concerns. Let the politicians know that WE were the ones who made this country what it is. While we sit here and type our feelings, they are continuing their rampage.

    Maybe we should begin coming together based on our geographic locations and form cells in order to plan our strategy and to coordinate with AMRENERS all over the world. Many of our posters are living in other countries.

    Boycott all entertainment and sports that is dominated by Blacks. Stay away from all events that attract substantial numbers of Blacks. Cease to frequent Demand that our representatives hold town hall meetings where we can demand that they fight for our interests as White Americans.

    Second, Stop the Jew baiting. They are also White people in spite of what a few whackos on this site keep carping about. More of them each day are beginning to see the error of their liberal bent and many more have never been liberal.

    Third. Many Asians are victimized daily by Blacks. They aren’t in toto our enemies.

    How many of us are murdered and raped by Jews and/or East Asians daily as compared with the predations by Blacks?

    Let’s focus on the real enemy.

    Fourth. Arm yourselves. If you never owned a gun invest in one or more and in as much ammunition as you can afford and learn to become proficient in its safe use. We can count on increasing widespread violence against us despite the results of the 2012 election.

    Don’t compare the USA with SA. We Whites still are larger in number than are the Mandinkas. The Boers, few in numbers, surrendered willingly. We haven’t and if we want to survive, we’d better never.

  • Anonymous

    I would like to be optimistic but this process of decline has been going on for nearly 45 years since the 1960s. Some younger people might find it hard to believe now but the US was the most advanced society on Earth until about 25 years ago. It had the highest standard of living, the best schools, most technologically advanced, excelled in most industries and loaned money to the rest of the world. It was a safe, prosperious and a super majority Christian nation. I suppose every great nation eventually falls. It happened to Rome, France, Great Britain, Spain, etc., but it seems as though the US’s time was not nearly as long as these other empires. Logic dictates that everything that has happened since the 60’s needs to be undone in order to restore everything. That means for starters ending abortion, striking down Brown vs The Board of Education, flushing the Civil Rights Act, deporting all illegals and cancelling the green cards of millions of legal immigrants. Sadly, I don’t see any of this happening.

  • Anonymous

    9 — Anonymous wrote at 5:16 PM on November 5:

    One crucial factor is not considered. What about race mixing?

    In SA, blacks and whites don’t mix.

    In America, there will be a George P. Bush generation. A lot of Americans will look like W.’s nephew that is of white and Hispanic ancestry. People of this background will simply be counted as white in increasingly complex and ethnic America.

    For a website obsessed with race mixing, it shows a real lack of analytic depth to not catch on to this angle.

    ———————————————————

    Actually no, people that are mixed can choose whether to check the box for caucasian or the box for hispanic, for example. The government doesn’t make that determination for the individual. Considering that there are affirmative action perks in *not* checking the box for caucasian and that in doing so you are giving the government an excuse to discriminate against you, I’d expect people that were mixed to not identify as white at least as far as how they present themselves to the government is concerned and how they want themselves counted statistically by governmental bodies.

    Also, despite the liberal sheen the media puts on its presentation of American society, interracial marriages still only account for less than 10 percent per annum. And that’s the percentage the liberal press likes to use, so you can be assured the real percentage is lower. Look around…do you see, in your experience and the people you know personally that 1 in 10 marriages are interracial? Maybe in metropolitan liberal hubs, but not elsewhere. I’d have to say that doesn’t fit what I personally see. What I’ve seen is much lower than that. I’d estimate no more than 5-6% tops and I live in a racially diverse area.

    This commenter’s opinion that the article reflects a “lack of analytical depth” is interesting as well because he attributes the lack of analytical depth to the “website” and not the writer of the article. The website being responsible for posting the article, not writing it. What was he saying about a lack of analytical depth again? Look no further for that than your own reflection in the mirror, my friend.

    Maybe this commenter should stick around long enough to learn something.

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous wrote: “Among some white fundamentalist Christians, ethnomasochism is popular. They want to be Christ-like, offering to put their race on the cross to forgive the world its sins.”

    To get a deep understanding of this problem, follow the Cambria Will not Yield blog.

    http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com/

    This gentlemen has the clearest idea and most educated response to what is wrong with the church as it tolerates liberalism.

    Christ is replaced with black-worship, as crazy as that sounds. It is the main way Christians are deceived by the devil and the reason facts about blacks are treated as heresy and ignored.

  • Anonymous

    Census Bureau data is misleading. As someone has already stated, they count Middle Easterners and North Africans as White. But on a more positive note, they also count anyone regardless of citizenship status who is in the country at the time of the census count. That means millions of people on temporary visas, illegal aliens, foreign students and even visitors are tallied into the population totals. I think the only way to get an accurate picture of the demographics is to look at the electorate broken down by race. Whites are about 75% of voters in the country. Blacks and Hispanics make up 11% and 10% respectively. Their numbers are lower than their share of the population because of incarceration or not having citizenship. Even in California where the White population is about 42%, Whites make up 65% of voters. We could easily restore our demographics back to 1990 just by removing all illegal aliens. Cancelling all green cards and sending legal immigrants packing would further restore the normal demographics.

  • Anonymous

    #12 Jack: You must have read, “The Insiders” by John McManus.

    There are also websites worth visiting such as http://www.freedomforceinternational.com and http://www.informationclearinghouse.com . These will keep you up to date on what is going on, and who is behind it.

  • Anonymous

    Second, Stop the Jew baiting. They are also White people in spite of what a few whackos on this site keep carping about. More of them each day are beginning to see the error of their liberal bent and many more have never been liberal.

    ————————–

    What exactly is Jew baiting? Saying anything that could be seen as negative, even if factual? Isn’t that like saying do not “bait” any other race because it may be negative or factual?

    Aaron, Poster #8 above may disagree with your assessment that he is “White”.

  • Fritz

    We had better start closing ranks and forming power blocks to defend ourselves soon. We need a national organization or coalition of organizations whose purpose is to defend the rights of Whites, plain and simple. The time for pontificating about our delema is past. We better start doing something. We better get a plan.

  • Anonymous

    The Boers lost their country in 1902.

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p–5_Benson.html

    The capitulation in 1994 was engineered by you Americans the CIA and the IMF.

    http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2011/11/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-34_751.html

    Research the real reason behind SA’s collapse yours is on its way.

  • Anonymous

    #20 You are not pro white, you are anti black. Its a world of difference being pro white and being anti black. These non white ethnicities you mention have their own agendas and goals and these are not necessarily to the benefit of white people in America or elsewhere. You are only focused on being anti black.

    If you were pro white you would realize that these others are a source of corruption and dissonance in our society that we could do well without.

  • South African

    “The Boers, few in numbers, surrendered willingly” – due to a carefully prepared propaganda onslaught. The voters were being lied to. There was treason on a huge scale, much of which still has to surface. I certainly did not vote for this to happen, and would have gone to war had we been given the chance to do so.

    Here is an attempt to explain the treason, and by no means it covers all aspects and would need some peer reviews:

    (Three sections)

    http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2011/11/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-34.html

    http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2011/11/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-34_06.html

    http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2011/11/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-34_751.html

  • Anonymous

    Take a look at what this David Horowitz has to say about Ron Paul. Horowitz is a neocon and a real hater. Never could stand that guy and his wimpy whining voice. People like him is one reason White America will fall. Thank God most of the comments were on the right side and could see what this half black hater really is.

    http://goo.gl/felLY

  • GetBackJack

    #25

    Actually, I’ve never read the book or was aware of those websites. Thank you.

    I follow Bob Chapman and subscribe to his newsletter, The International Forecaster (after listening to him for months on the Internet):

    http://bobchapman.blogspot.com/

    Bob is a former U.S. Army inteligence officer who also owned a brokerage firm. He not only provides factual geopolitical information and advice, he understands the global markets and what is going on. He knows and understands history. I urge all Amren posters to listen to some of his podcasts and then decide for themselves (you really have to listen to 2-3 at a minimum). I also urge Jared Taylor and his staff to listen to him if they doesn’t already do so. You will never look at the world the same way. And, this is what we are really up against. It’s not just a white man’s problem.

    I also follow Joel Skousen but to a lesser extent.

  • Question Diversity

    31:

    I read Horowitz’s little hissy fit slash screed. His entire case that RP is “anti-Semitic” is that RP wants to end all foreign aid to the I country (and all other countries, he should know). Rand Paul has specifically proposed ending foreign aid to I and I alone, though we all know he wants to end all foreign aid in the long run.

    A fair number of people who consider themselves Pro-I, both Jewish and Gentile, advocate ending American foreign aid to I, because it creates a dependency culture and restrains I’s internal affairs to the whims of Nobel Peace Prize seeking American politicians. Note that I’s behavior pre-Camp David was way different compared to after 1979. Also they argue that a first world country like I doesn’t need to be on the international dole. IOW, it’s the lamestream conservative argument on domestic social welfare spending applied to geopolitical affairs, yet the same people who agree with the former logic can’t grok the same logic applied to foreign aid.

  • Anonymous20

    30 — South African wrote at 6:20 AM on November 7:

    “The Boers, few in numbers, surrendered willingly” – due to a carefully prepared propaganda onslaught. The voters were being lied to. There was treason on a huge scale, much of which still has to surface. I certainly did not vote for this to happen, and would have gone to war had we been given the chance to do so.

    Here is an attempt to explain the treason, and by no means it covers all aspects and would need some peer reviews:”

    South African,

    I sympathize with what you say and apologize for using the adjective “willingly” but

    there wasn’t much choice. As for going to war you would have probably had NATO troops landing in SA to wage war against YOU. Human rights violations seem to be intolerable only when perpetrated against non- Whites and Muslims as witnessed in Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Kosovo.

    The fact that South African Whites cannot get asylum in the US is proof enough.

    I’ve been involved in more than one heated argument over the plight of the SA Whites and have sent images of the raped, mutilated and murdered women. The response was “How dare you send me those hideous pictures”. I’ve lost the friendship of a few colleagues.

  • Incognito

    The capitulation in 1994 was engineered by you Americans the CIA and the IMF.

    The capitulation in 1994 was engineered by the American government and the British government, not by the American or British people.

    We American whites were fed little news and what was reported was highly biased against the whites of SA. The Internet has shown us that it was all lies. To this day, black violence against whites in SA or the US is not reported by the media.

    The government and people are not the same thing. Yes, the same forces are bringing us down as well, Britain first, then the US.

  • Anonymous

    Poster #11 gives a breakdown of future demographic changes that I believe is well reasoned and accurate. I think about this sometimes and it vexes me to no end. I’ll be an old geezer when the tipping point is reached, and I feel bad about it in advance.

    Some important issues I think about are:

    1) if whites are a minority everywhere, what will hold the ‘united’ states together?

    2) When latinos and cartels inherit control over nukes and other powerful weapons, what will happen?

    And 3) Will there be any safe place for normal white americans who continue the traditions and cultures of our forefathers, especially since so many whites among us have gone black (wiggers, hoochies, etc)?

    They will come for our wealth, as they are doing now with the help of the young white leftists (occupy wall street, social justice, white privelidge, etc). So I recommend buying physical gold, platinum, copper and silver and hiding it for your descendants.

    Also buy rural forest and farmland and learn how to be self-sufficient – skills you can pass on. You don’t have to actually move right now, but just having the land will come in handy in 20 years for you and yours. Follow the ideas of poster #20. We have no choice but to wait out our dispossession. (White law enforcement and government goons will not help us when we are being forced into poverty.) At least be prepared so it will go easier on your descendants.

  • Anonymous

    28 — Anonymous wrote at 4:36 AM on November 7:

    The capitulation in 1994 was engineered by you Americans the CIA and the IMF.

    http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2011/11/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-34_751.html

    Research the real reason behind SA’s collapse yours is on its way.

    Poster 28 is absolutely right. It was America that was behind the destruction of White S. Africa.

  • Anonymous

    8 — Aaron from Rhode Island. The pre 500 BC Jews and their ancestors who moved to ancient Israel and Judah were not dark skinned Arabs. The dark skinned arabs did not arrive on the southern shores of the Mediterranean until 650 AD.

    No one really knows what the Jews, Egyptians, Assyrians, N Africans looked like before the arab invasions of 650 AD. Of course some Arabs drifted in before 650 AD. There were plenty of black slaves in the area. The ancient Middle Easterners might have been very dark. They might have looked very European. No one knows.

  • Ferd

    I remember at the time reading in the news that US armed forces stationed in Africa were put on alert the night before the South African elections, presumably to intervene in South Africa if the election went the wrong way.

  • Aaron from Rhode Island

    To # 38 Anonymous who wrote:

    “No one really knows what the Jews, Egyptians, Assyrians, N Africans looked like before the arab invasions of 650 AD. Of course some Arabs drifted in before 650 AD. There were plenty of black slaves in the area. The ancient Middle Easterners might have been very dark. They might have looked very European. No one knows.”

    This is the most likely look of Jesus Christ, based on the typical physical features of the brown skinned Mizrahi Jews ( even found today in abundance in Israel, Iran, India and other parts of the Middle East). This was recreated by the finest archeological experts in the western world – sure does not look remotely white or European to me.

    http://goo.gl/pveyw

    The fact is, Mizrahi Jews are the original Jews of the Bible before some went to Khazaria & intermingled with the light skinned Eurasian Khazars, plus add to this fact that most of them would further intermingle with even lighter skinned people from Northern, Central & Western Europe. Thus you get the rather light skinned western looking Askhenazi Jew – BUT, that still does NOT make them white European. No more than President Obama being white because he has got a white parent and thus his obvious European heritage.

    Moreover, as a geneticist myself, it is fairly obvious that Jews have a common ancestry through their RNA haplotype – thus a “white” Jew, Brown Mizrahi Jew (Israeli/Iraqi/Syrian/Yemenite/India), Kai-Feng Jew ( Chinese Jews) & Black Jews of Ethiopia share the same RNA and even susceptibility to similar genetic diseases such as Tay–Sachs disease (abbreviated TSD, also known as GM2 gangliosidosis or Hexosaminidase-A deficiency). Perhaps there are some who would like to classify themselves as white. But the vast majority of Jews in the west would much rather prefer to maintain their own distinct ethno-racial heritage.

    We are one people, distinct from white Europeans. We are NOT white in the European sense. We are Middle Eastern or to be precise west Asian. However, we do assimilate very well.

    http://goo.gl/ZeRlq

    The word white is very ambiguous. Who is white? Can I call a white skinned blue eyed light haired man from the middle east, North western India, Iran, Turkey, Central Asia as white?

    Here are some examples of such “whites” – if you strictly classify people on the basis of their physical traits alone – white skin, blue eyes, blonde hair – nordic/alpinie appearance:

    http://goo.gl/GcjEx

    I prefer the term European i.e. European American, European Australian, European Canadian etc. Thus the very concept of a pan-“white” cause would be absurd as opposed to a pan-European cause. And as I’ve said before, each race has the right to preserve their own unique ethnic heritage. We can all maintain a unity in diversity by preserving our own stock first.

  • South African

    Living in the multicultural South Africa. Picture galleries from the southern suburbs of Johannesburg:

    http://www.looklocal.co.za/looklocal/content/en/joburg-south/joburg-south-galleries

  • Anonymous

    #34 Anon20: If you lost the friendship of several Whites that you had to heatedly debate over the plight of White Boer South Africans, after sending these sanctimonious idiots the proof of gruesome torture murders that have taken place there, since the ANC have taken power, then you didn’t lose much at all. You obviously upset their delicate sensibilities. Tough!

    Good riddance is more like it. Just wait until one of these geniuses gets beaten, or their wife or daughter is raped by the blacks or browns, and you will hear a different tune from them.

    It’s sad that it actually has to come to that before most of these diluted people begin to wake up.

  • Bebe

    42 — Anonymous wrote at 11:34 AM on November 9

    Good riddance is more like it. Just wait until one of these geniuses gets beaten, or their wife or daughter is raped by the blacks or browns, and you will hear a different tune from them.

    *********************

    Problem is that from what we see and read, most White victims or their families do not wake up and realize that it all boils down to RACE. Many even claim it (the crime) wasn’t racial to begin with! They don’t have a clue even when they become the victims of black or brown crimes against them. This is the sorry mindset that too many Whites have in today’s world. Nothing to them is worse than being a racist or a realist.

  • Dylan Lowe

    Isaiah 40:17 declares: “All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.”

    Empires rise and fall, and all historical great powers have been witness to such a law of history.

    America is no exception to this rule.

    Sooner or later, America must give way to another superpower, which is the inexorable fate of the United States.