Posted on October 31, 2011

Blair Defends Opening the Door to Mass Migration and Says It Had a Very Positive Impact on Britain

Kristy Walker, Daily Mail (London), October 29, 2011

Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.

The former prime minister said it was ‘right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain ‘stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.

His comments come just days after official figures revealed that the population is expected to soar by the equivalent of a city the size of Leeds every year for the next decade.

A defiant Mr Blair insisted his party’s policy on immigration was the right one. He said: ‘It’s been a very positive thing and there is no way for a country like Britain to succeed in the future unless it is open to people of different colours, faiths and cultures.’

Under Labour, up to 5.5million people born outside the UK arrived as long-term migrants.

Between 1997 and 2010, around 2.3million left the country, meaning the UK population increased by around 3.2million as a direct result of foreign migrants.

In an interview with Eastern Eye newspaper, Mr Blair said: ‘The vision of a country of different cultures and different faiths mixing together is the right one.

‘That is not to say you don’t have problems at certain points, but those problems are to be overcome without losing the essence of what has actually allowed this country’s people to get on and do well.’

His comments were branded ‘shameless’ by critics and are set to fuel claims that the huge increase in migrants under Labour were due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to change the country.

Two years ago, Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, said that Labour’ s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to ‘open the UK to mass migration’.

He added that Labour wanted to rub the ‘Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

Mr Blair added that the anti-immigration debate was one of the ‘past’. ‘I think the majority of people in Britain today are not prejudiced and can understand the benefits of migration.

‘I think what people worry about is where they feel there is no control over who comes in and there are no rules governing who comes in or not, and that is a different issue altogether.

‘It would be very unfortunate if by putting those rules into place, we view that immigration was a somehow bad thing for the country, because it is not.’

Tory MP Priti Patel, said: ‘As the daughter of immigrants, there is no question that those who work hard and make a positive contribution do enrich the fabric of our society.

‘But what Tony Blair has failed to recognise is that while he was in power, he opened the floodgates of mass and uncontrolled immigration which has left a damaging legacy in our towns and cities.’

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said: ‘This is completely shameless from the Prime Minister who brought more than three million immigrants into Britain in the teeth of public opposition.’

Fellow Tory MP Dominic Raab added: ‘These comments are naïve if not reckless. Tony Blair has left Britain with a legacy of uncontrolled immigration that has put huge pressure on public services and undermined community cohesion’.

60 responses to “Blair Defends Opening the Door to Mass Migration and Says It Had a Very Positive Impact on Britain”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Except he never told the British people he was going to do it when he was running for office. He never informed the British people he was going to race-replace them. Now FOURTEEN YEARS AFTER the fact he ‘defends’ his decision.

  2. danjack says:

    i bet tony blair lives in an all white gated community. the politicians that destroy a country and its culture should be dealt with accordingly, up to and including a trial in front of the peoples tribune and swift capital punishment.

  3. Pat says:

    Click on ‘original article’ and read the best rated comments. I have no idea where he gets the notion we ‘understand the benefits of migration’ Delusional.

  4. Byron says:

    Interesting. When Britain had an empire the sun never set on and ruled the seas, they were doing it wrong, and now that most of the country is a broken unemployed slum, they say they have finally figured it out? Interesting.

  5. Question Diversity says:

    Here’s another one – Tony Blair keeps saying that diversity is a strength, but won’t tell us why or how. Maybe he means that diversity is a strength for the future of his political party.

  6. June says:

    I thought Tony Blair had more sense that that, although I should have known that he and his buddy, George W., must have discussed how they could replace American and British citizens with the poor of third world countries. Some kind of death wish for their nations, I guess. I wish someone would explain to me how importing poverty and cultures diametrically opposite from their own is ever good for any country.

  7. Anonymous says:

    QUISLING Defends Opening the Door to Mass Migration and Says It Had a Very Positive Impact on Britain

  8. Anonymous says:

    1875 – England was 98% Western European and the most powerful nation on Earth. The “sun never set on the English Empire.”

    2011 — England has imported millions of alien, Third-Worlders, and a has now become a third-rate has-been, rapidly plummiting into economic, social, military, and cultural decline.

    2011 — China refuses to import Third-World foreigners, remains 96% Han Chinese, and is rocketing upwards toward economic, cultural, scientific, and miltary world dominance.

  9. BannerRWB says:

    “The vision of a country of different cultures and different faiths mixing together is the right one.”

    – Ha! Excellent sub-title. I actually laughed when I read it.

    “…by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.”

    – Britain will only succeed in destroying itself and removing the British people from the world stage. Granted, I guess the far-left, anti-White, anti-Western Communists in power today would see that as a success.

    “Tory MP Priti Patel, said: ‘As the daughter of immigrants, there is no question that those who work hard and make a positive contribution do enrich the fabric of our society.”

    – Only in the sense of enriching Ms. Patel’s ethnic group. Anything that is considered “positive” for a society can be gained through means other than immigration. When immigration is used to justify societal enrichment, the part such advocates leave out is the death and destruction of the original society.

    – And lastly: “That is not to say you don’t have problems at certain points, but those problems are to be overcome without losing the essence of what has actually allowed this country’s people to get on and do well.”

    – The problem will be Civil Warfare as the indigenous Britains attempt to take back their Island. I guess you could call that one way to overcome the problem of immigration and retain the essence of your nation. It seems a better option though, would be to avoid immigration and not risk losing your country to being with.

  10. A Comment from Australia says:

    Mass migration, perhaps this is that grinning galah’s own weapon of mass desruction for poor old Blighty!

  11. Anonymous says:

    Tony Blair has defended Labour’s controversial mass immigration policy by claiming that Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people from different backgrounds.

    The former prime minister said it was ‘right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

    Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain ‘stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.


    That moron always reminded me of a wimp and a sell out. Please Mr. Blair explain just HOW have migrants made Britain stronger? You can’t because it is a total lie. Migrants are DESTROYING Britain just like they are every White nation they have invaded with help from you TRAITORS! I am sure there is a special hell for you when you leave this earth.

  12. John Bell in England says:

    “Britain cannot succeed unless it opens its borders to more people of different backgrounds.”

    Now I understand why Britain failed to create an empire on which the sun never set, how she failed to invent the industrial revolution – it was because her population was all white and British! That’s why she lost two world wars, because she lacked the “strength” of the ethnic chaos (sorry,”diversity”) she now enjoys.

    Thank you for enlightening us, Mr. Blair. To think that right-wing commentators used to say that you had no sense of history!

  13. Anonymous says:

    This is Blair’s shameful legacy.

  14. The g Factor says:

    I wonder if the five people killed in the riots in August would agree with Blair? No doubt as Britain’s population gets darker (and duller) such violence will increase as will the proportion of the economically useless who end up on welfare.

  15. Anonymous says:

    The man is a traitor. I would like to see him charged as such.

    It has always bemused me why he has such a good reputation in the US. Not only has his party ruined the UK they did it in purpose!

    I speak as a man from the north of England who lives in a traditional Labour voting area.

  16. Seneca the Younger says:

    “Mr Blair added that migrants had made Britain ‘stronger’ and said those calling for greater curbs on foreigners entering the country were wrong.”

    Everyone liberal says this but cannot give a simple answer as to how it makes a nation stronger. Anyone with a brain knows this is untrue.

    Can anyone on here please tell me “how”?

    By that I mean can anyone post a answer from a liberal when you asked them how.

  17. Istvan says:

    Mostly because the British people have been conquered and enslaved. Pull down the Union Jack, send the royal family packing, the UK is history!

  18. Anonymous says:

    “Mr Blair added that the anti-immigration debate was one of the ‘past’. ‘I think the majority of people in Britain today are not prejudiced and can understand the benefits of migration.”

    Funny how history moves from the past to the present and leaves even people stuck in their notion of the present behind. Blair is the enemy of whites, the enemy of Britain and all that is British and even European. His example proves that Orwell was right; he used and is using words to deny force an artificial, unnatural surreality to be taken as normal, or right. The imbecility of his remarks are only too obvious.

    Older liberal celebrities are coming around. Robert Plant, the famous front mag of the rock band, Led Zeppelin divorced his long time Pakistani wife and now makes Grammy winning records that are decidedly Western, and even sometimes a Gospel song. Even Paul McCartney seems to be letting on that the old England was preferable, as Mick Jagger seems to be flying the flag as well.

  19. Anonymous says:

    What easy lies. Does this multimillionaire live in a mixed neighborhood with 3ird world immigrants?

  20. Snowhitey says:

    Blair is a globalist and globalists want to eliminate sovereignty and create a one world government which will eliminate all borders whether they are geographic, ethnic, cultural, or religious. Once you understand this mindset – and they are the ones in control – everything will be crystal clear. One world government = one world people (for us, not them).

    Ron Paul is our only chance to stop them. If he doesn’t win, we’re all doomed to either a long and bloody revolution or total enslavement.

  21. Anonymous says:

    No Mr. Blair, it plainly creates chaos. The only ones who benefit are power-mad, super-wealthy Leftists and their third world shock soldiers.

  22. Anonymous says:

    I long to see the day this filthy traitor and war criminal faces justice.

  23. ice says:

    “The vision of a country of different cultures and different faiths mixing together is the right one.”

    Well, Bozo, why don’t you give a speech listing every “benefit” you lyingly declare diversity gives to your country?

    I’ll tell you why you won’t. Because there are no benefits, only dangers, chaos, mayhem and constant turmoil between the bickering tribes. Diversity is so much a weakness only an imbecile would like it.

    You and other moronic factions wanted to multiculturalize the country, because the population wasn’t growing fast enough to produce the consumers and tax units you and your greedy geeks needed in order to increase your power and wealth.

    And just as much to blame are the seditionists, because they wanted to see White capitalism destroyed, and of course there’s the rainbow crowd who live in the Twilight Zone where the fairies dwell and they’re just oozing with so much love and tolerance they can hardly contain themselves.

    And how about the anti-nationalist crowd who think fractionalizing society will assure there will be no more nationalism by just one portion of the population, thereby making it safe for them and their idiot heirs? I wonder how pleased they’ll be when the third world hordes are climbing over the walls of their gated communities wanting what they have and determined to get it at all costs, while evening their ethnic scores with paybacks?

    What do you think of your failing EU now that it is on the verge of collapse? It didn’t turn into the economic powerhouse that would rule the world, did it? Instead of a conglomeration of multicultural hordes who flinch when you and the other power elites crack your slavish whips while you collected your ill-gotten gains, you have nations that are fraught with rioting, inner turmoil and no-go zones.

    Bray on, fool. Your streets are often filled with rioting and racial hate and every day brings the possibility of murderous bombings and attacks on the civilian population.

    It will be armed civil upheaval soon on a grand scale and, afterwards, if you and your ilk are not brought to trial for your crimes against humanity it will be one of the greatest miracles of the 21st century.

    Just like you do with your inner circle of despicable friends, you’ll make everybody’s list at party time.

  24. Frank says:

    Blair’s comments are absurd on their face. Why did 2.3 million leave? Was it perhaps because they did not want to be in the midst of the mess Britian is becoming? Blair should read Buchanan’s new book, Suicide of a Superpower.

  25. Whirlwinder says:

    Blair is a blithering idiot. If Britains immigration nightmare has made that country stonger, he is using different definitions than everybody else. How much welfare money goes to the Muslims in his country? How much damage have Muslims done to the economy of England? Everybody is safe to walk about anyplace in England, especially the ‘no go’ zones where even police and firemen do not go.

    And talk of stopping immigration is rooted in the past. What an idiot. That issue is on the frontal lobes of every God fearing Brit in the land.

    Once the socialist politico’s finish off England and Islam is running the show, maybe then the socialists will look around and say that multiculturalism and pandering to Islam was not such a good thing. But then it will be too late for England and for European civilization, for Islam is very good about wiping away a nations cultural history.

    Good luck England and start looking around for some leaders like Geert Wilders who want to preserve Europe.

  26. Eric says:

    I wonder how many blacks or pakistani muslims live in Tony Blair’s neighborhood? Oh, I see. Diversity is only good for people that can’t isolate themselves in multi-million dollar estates.

    People like Tony Blair are the enemy of Western Civilization and should be tried and punished.

  27. Anonymous says:

    It’s still illegal for the monarch to be a Catholic, marry a Catholic or baptize their children Catholic. If heirs to the throne marry Catholics they must renounce their claims to the throne before the marriage. This applies right down to #200, such as 3rd cousins who realistically have no hope of inheriting.

    If Britian is so diverse, tolerant and multicultural perhaps they should stop discriminating against Catholics in this way. Surely it is against freedom of religion to disinherit a person should he or she decide to attend one Christian church rather than another?

    And forbidding someone to marry someone of another brand of Christianity. Surely that is against the universal declaration of human rights and thousands toleration statements over the years.

  28. Brian says:

    Can he show the British people a single figure showing that society has been in any way improved by large scale migration?

    School test scores, welfare figures, crime statistics?

    And can the British people have a referendum on whether its been a success?

  29. kgb says:

    Oh, look! London’s still smoldering from race riots this past summer.

    Bravo, Mr. Blair!

  30. Jim says:

    Why do they always fail to explain extactly in concrete terms waht these benefits are. They can’t because there are none.

  31. Andromeda says:

    I enjoy studying history. One of the downsides is I have a better idea of what is being lost in the world as the Western European nationstates are overrun by immigrants who don’t assimlate and overwhelm and destroy the host culture. It brings tears to my eyes to think that this is the way the mighty British are set to disappear. I can’t write what I want to say to Blair and the others who did this to such a great and formerly enduring people. They survived as a people for millenia and THIS is the way they go out! I have no words.

  32. white advocate - Canada says:

    How could he know that immigration has been overall positive? He shut down contrary opinions. He intimidated the public with threats. He left a legacy of institutional law enforcement. He never had the slightest intention of monitoring his experiment at mid-way points. He has been a revolutionary from the start. Don’t expect him to change his opinion now. How can he?

  33. rockman says:

    the empire was not founded on immigrants being in Britain. the great indian mutiny of the Bengal Army was based on the Indians feeling that a different caste of Sahib had taken over from the founders of the empire. the sahibs were pencil pushers and politicans instead of soldiers of fortune. Blair is a politician who lacks common sense and respect for his countries future and respect for the white race. the resulting stupidity will again create a bloody and violent result.

  34. Anonymous says:

    Long term genocide makes UK strong…. like africa.

    Mr Blair said: ‘The vision of a country of different cultures and different faiths mixing together is the right one.

    This is nothing more then a fascist ideology. Point to one historical example that worked. zero.

  35. HH says:

    This is more proof that there are forces and individuals who actively seek to DESTROY historically/formerly White nations. What Blair says is demonstrably fase across the board – in fact, glaringly so! Yet still, those of his ilk continue to promote a clearly disasterous and destructive ideology for their own people, their own countries. If this is not conscious, intentional evil, then the term has no meaning whatever!

  36. Elitist says:

    Most people in Europe realize that uncontrolled Third World and Muslim immigration has been an absolute catastrophe.

    Low fertility rates in Europe led to dropping populations, the elites wanted to make up the difference with anybody who happened to be available.

    Since millions of people are desperate to get into Europe in order to escape the failed societies that produced them, it was a perfect match.

    Based on the PSYCHOTIC CULT of race denial, it never occurred to anyone that Somalians and Pakistanis might not fit perfectly into European society.

    A good illustration of the principle that:

    denying race difference is relatively harmless when it functions as a HYPOCRITICAL LIE and when disadvantaged minorities are kept to a minimum.

    But as soon as it morphs from a HYPOCRITICAL LINE to a PSYCHOTIC DELUSION, it must inevitably destroy the affected society.

    The behavior of blacks and Pakistanis, of Muslims in general, and other minorities in England has been so unspeakably, hideously, cataclysmic we awful that ordinary English people are now race realists to a man (But are afraid to say so publicly for fear of legal sanctions).

    It is only the privileged elites like Blair who are locked in the fun house of pure craziness.

  37. Russ in tthe South says:

    British Pakistanis can re-connect with their nationalism by simply visiting Pakistan. Pakistan’s culture remains intact.

    British Nigerians can re-connect with their nationalism by simply visiting Nigeria. Nigeria’s culture remains intact.

    The indigenous British people’s culture is being destroyed, however, by the immigrants’ foreign cultures.

    Tony Blair should be hanged for treason. He is doing the same thing Joseph Stalin did by flooding the Baltic countries with Russians to destroy the Balkan cultures during the 1940s.

  38. Uniculturalist says:

    I would suggest that posters now go to the article about “Poppy-Burning Muslims” posted immediately below this one and read through it.

  39. John Bull says:

    In Mr Blair’s utopia one man “of colour” has made it into The House Of Lords

    Right now I believe he is in prison serving time for fraud.

  40. Harry Galland says:

    white immigration is one thing, third world immigration is something else alltogether.

  41. Seek says:

    The silence of the Monarchy, as always on such matters, is deafening. Why doesn’t Her Royal Majesty the Queen, just for show, do an Enoch Powell imitation?

  42. Anonymous says:

    Tony Blair is either a naive idiot or a total sell-out (maybe both) if he believes that mass immigration had a positive impact on Britain. And like every other diversity cultist, he won’t give a rational reason as to why it was good for Britain.

  43. Anonymous says:

    “41 — Seek wrote at 12:33 PM on November 1:

    The silence of the Monarchy, as always on such matters, is deafening. Why doesn’t Her Royal Majesty the Queen, just for show, do an Enoch Powell imitation?”

    The last monarch who asserted himself on any issue was James the second around 1688. The aristocrats who ruled England ran him out and put a Dutch prince married to one of James 11 daughters on the throne.

    20 years later they scrounged around Europe and put not heir number 1 or 2 or even 10 on the throne. They put heir number 54 on the throne, George Guelph of Hanover. Much of his attraction was that he never learned English so was a totally ineffective ruler.

    Henry V111 was the last assertive King of England who ruled and did what he wanted. His son Edward was a puppet of the Seymours and the puritians. Mary Tudor was put in place and run by the Howard Dukes of Norfolk. Despite all the glorious regina nonsense, Elizabeth Tudor was a puppet of the Cecil family, first William and then his son. They went from middle class attorneys to the Lords Burgehely as reward for putting her on the throne and running the kingdom for her.

    The monarchs are nothing but actors whose lines are written by the real rulers and whose every move is choreographed and directed. Learn your lines, be on time, hit your marks, do what the public relations people tell you.

    She and her family would turn muslim and wear burkhas is told to do so.

  44. Anonymous says:

    The first group, the caribbean blacks have had had 60 years to adopt to civilization. They are the most criminal and lifelong benefit ethnic group in the country.

    Some muslims openly advocate conquering the country from goverment supported mosques. These imans live their entire lives on generous goverment benefit.

    Cherie Blair comes from an ultra left working class Liverpool

    background. The hard left wing of the labour party was heavily involved with the russians and communists. She is exactly the sort of person the communist affliated labour factions of the 1960’s selected and sent to university hoping she would make useful connections and rise to a useful position.

    She had a lot to do with Blair’s position on immigration. Of course she, like the American democrats destroyed the native working class.

    Partner working class traitors with the upper and even lower middle classes who loathe the English working class and it is a perfect recipe for race replacement.

  45. John L. says:

    Mr. Blair says the immigration debate is over “it is a thing of the past”. The ruling elites always do that. They present immigration as a fete accompli, and they close off discussion that way. They also always present multicultural problems as minor and solvable. Maybe this is charactersitic of elite in the Anglosphere? Maybe, Mainland Europeans are more realistic?

  46. Rhialto says:

    Tony Blair has been his wife’s hand puppet for many many years.

  47. David Ashton says:

    Two brief quotes may interest Americans still bothering to study the history of Britain, or what remains of it.

    (1) “Had [Churchill] continued in office beyond April 1955, legislation [to curb “New Commonwealth” immigration] would have been introduced far earlier than it was.” – Ian Gilmour, “Whatever Happened to the Tories” (1997) pp.79-80.

    (2) “Great Britain is far weaker than in the bright dawn of 1997, while Blair himself is pitifully diminished…. For all his parade of religious zeal, he seems incapable of contrition. A man who has apologised for everything from slavery to the Irish famine says that he ‘will never apologise’ for what he has done in Iraq, and to his own country.” – Geoffrey Wheatcroft, “Yo Blair!” (2007) pp.153-154.

  48. Netzach says:

    Blair is an unmitigated idiot of the very worst kind – a high IQ one. Unlike he thinks, besides a pretty abstract level there’s not much point in talking about immigration as such. Immigration is always some group of people arriving into nation, and since the people of this Earth are so very diverse, one must always look like what the immigrants are like and how they’re going to fit in. Now, of course some immigrants have been a blessing for Britain. Indians for one have thrived mightily. Some others are a mixture of good and bad, and quite a few are massive net negatives. Blind refusal to admit this diversity and employ ruthless selectiveness while admitting people in has led to the current situation where the harm done by immigration hugely outweighs the good. People like Chinese, Jews or Germans you can let in pretty freely without too much concern, but when talking about Africans or Arabs, you need to be very careful about selecting only the best. Even then you don’t want to take in too many, at least not as long as US gangsta culture and Islamism remain such powerful cultural influences.

    That’s a pretty good essay about UK immigration policy and British Indians. Fittingly, it’s titled “The Dumbest Immigration Policy”.

  49. BannerRWB says:

    15-Anon: “It has always bemused me why he has such a good reputation in the US.”

    – He doesn’t really. It is just a made up reputation being printed by the anti-White U.S. media. Or, it could be the fact that he is rather youngish looking and has decent hair, both of which score quite high on the American reputation meter.. even though they are not at all related. Otherwise, other than the few pro-White Americans who see what is going on, most of us, unfortunately, just don’t care.

  50. margaret says:

    Constantinople fell to the turks because of their cannons, the biggest and most effective in the world. Those cannons were developed, cast and managed throughout the conquest of the renmants of Greece by a Christian Hungarian traitor, a 15th century Tony Blair.

    The Greeks knew the city would fall within a day. They held a midnight mass and prayer vigil in Santa Sophia. Here is a Greek folk song commenmorating the service.

    The Turks gave the Christians limited freedom of religion. The Muslim ruled English goverment will not do even that. Christianity will be abolished as just another evil manifestation of White privilege and responsible for all the wrongs of the earth.

    The Last Mass in Hagia Sofia, the haunting Greek folk song about the ceremony that was actually held at midnight, May 28, 1453, two hours before the final Turkish assault began:

    God rings the bells, earth rings the bells, the sky itself is ringing,

    The Holy Wisdom, the Great Church, is ringing out the message,

    Four hundred sounding boards sound out, and two and sixty bells.

    For every bell there is a priest, and for every priest a deacon.

    To the left the emperor is singing, to the right the patriarch,

    And all the columns tremble with the thunder of the chant.

    And as the emperor began the hymn to the Cherubim,

    A voice came down to them from the sky, from the archangel’s mouth:

    Cease the Cherubic hymn and let the sacred objects bow;

    Priests take the holy things away, extinguish all the candles;

    God’s will has made our city now a Turkish city.

    But send a message to the West, and let them send three ships:

    The first to take the Cross, the second to remove the Gospel,

    The third, the finest, shall rescue for us our holy altar…

    The Holy Virgin was distressed, the very icons wept.

    Be calm, beloved Lady, be calm and do not weep for them;

    Though years, though centuries shall pass, they shall be yours again.

  51. Wild Bill says:

    The White Race and only the White Race is a threat to the holders of global power. We are the ones that created and developed the technology they use to enslave us. Step and fetch it Blair and his fellow travelers know this.

    The statement: *diversity is our greatest strength* is actually an incomplete sentence. It lacks only this: *for the complete destruction of the White Race*.

    In reference to Great Britain it is obvious that the royal family are hostages to these same genocidal powers. Surely anyone with real heritable monarchical power would stop the loose cannons like Blair, Cameron, Majors, Goldstein, Rothschild and Warburg. But they have no power… hence they go along with the agenda: genocide the White Race the only people that can challenge them.

    Blair is no more important than Bill Clinton in the great scheme of things. There is an endless line of applicants for their jobs… such is the shame of our Great White Race.

    Whether or not the defect in Blair/Clinton is a real weird inferiority complex one might wonder how it was not assuaged with the normal growing up process… surely at their level they have more sex opportunities than viagra has pills and surely they have everything else money can buy so what is it that causes them to use every breath to genocide our Race?

  52. anonymous says:

    Wait, it gets worse. Female succession to the British crown means the crown princess can marry an African or South Asian. End of the British monarchy as we have known it.

    Impossible? All it takes is for Elizabeth to die (she’s 87), Charles to die relatively young(he’s 62) and Wills to die young in an accident or of a disease, and Kate’s daughter is the Queen of England, if she has a daughter before a son. Prospective regent: Princess Diana’s brother Charles Spencer, Earl of Spencer.

  53. Anonymous says:

    Maybe Blair is just trying to defend himself, knowing that he has made a horrible mistake. I can imagine him at the liberal cocktail party, “Well it’s not that bad, we have some interesting restaurants and music, etc.”

  54. Anonymous says:

    Britian’s fall continues. Brazil is very diverse, but the goverment does not cater to the lowest of the low as Britian does.

    Brazil to overtake UK as sixth-largest economy

    Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:53:20 PM · by BufalloSoldier · 3 replies

    Telegraph ^

    The Latin American giant’s GDP for 2011 is expected to hit $2.44 trillion (£1.51 trillion) compared with $2.43 trillion for the UK, the latest monthly forecasts from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) show. This will see Brazil, which last year overtook Italy to become the world’s seventh biggest economy, move up one more place to sixth with the UK falling to seventh. Robert Wood, the EIU’s chief economist on Brazil, said the country’s surge up the table owed much to a growing consumer class and a booming trade relationship with China, based on the Asian giant’s need for commodities such…

  55. Sylvie says:

    This man (?) is nothing but a soul-less vacuum. A destroyer of his own kind, his own country. He was the boss of the destroyers, and now the totally bereft weasel-dog is attempting to justify to himself his revolting policies that he knows are or were destructive to the British people.

    I take back some of what I stated in the previous statement though, I called him a ‘weasel-dog’, I don’t know much about weasels, but I’m sure they are more useful to the world that ‘Mr’ Blair. As for dogs? I like dogs, Mans’ best friend and all!

    A worm? They are useful too. I’d say ‘maggot’ is more suitable.

  56. Jason Robertson says:

    Saturation point already with immigrants to Britain, 80% of them from outside Europe.

    As for the Chinese contribution, many Chinese restaurants are staffed by “undocumented” workers brought in by snakehead gangs and forced to work in poor conditions at illegally low pay rates – Details in The Times (London), November 2, p.23.

  57. Deniz says:

    Brazil to overtake UK as sixth-largest economy


    Both countries are quite diverse but Brazil and other south American countries are ruled by racially conscious whites and they have no intention to give their power up. They are mostly very rich, too.

    On a racial basis, Southern Brazil (e.g. Rio Grande do Sul) is the whitest part of the country (with huge numbers of Italians and Germans) and not surprisingly the powerhouse, being much more close to Uruguay and Argentina than the “diverse” regions of Brazil.

    Perhaps the British and Americans should learn how to rule a diverse country from their southern European kinsmen who have extensively dealt with non-whites during their history before they lead their countries to a complete collapse…

  58. Bon, From the Land of Babble says:

    The former prime minister said it was ‘right’ that the country was made up of different cultures and faiths mixing together.

    The last traitor was hanged in 1946 (Lord Haw-Haw) for treason, for siding with the Nazis. Blair must have been thinking ahead because he repealed the death penalty in 1998. He also incorporated The Human Rights Convention into British law and relaxed immigration policies which opened the door to mass Muslim immigration.

    Blair’s regime ADVERTISED for foreign immigrants in one of the most hostile, anti-White countries in the world: Pakistan.

    The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled ‘Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants’ which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.


    * MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathizers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as ‘a swamp of Jihadis.’

    * Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: ‘The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.’

    England sacrificed over 900,000+ in WW I and another 388,000+ in WW II for THIS?

    Alex Henshaw, a test pilot during WW II who survived the war, said the following before he died in 2007:

    I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.

    Unbelievably, earth-shatteringly, beyond-words betrayed. The word betrayed hardly conveys the absolute irreversable evil Blair set in motion upon Native Born Britons.


  59. Laager says:

    Am I imaging things or is there a link between the following events?

    In the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s we grew up in a world where western politicians via The Cold War were constantly fighting that evil bogey – Communism

    Russia and eastern block Communism collapsed of its own accord in 1990 about the same time that Nelson Mandela was released and all Apartheid legislation was abolished

    Now what?

    There were no more common enemies for the west to unite against and justify maintaining their armies, air forces and navies

    Along comes 9/11

    Hey presto!

    Blair and Bush create a new bogey and terrorise the world into mobilising against a new enemy – The War on Terror

    Not only that Blair tours Africa and returns to the UK declaring a War Against Poverty

    How does he set about fighting this war?

    He starts importing the poverty into the UK

    Now he constantly defends his actions

    How a supposedly educated person like him can make the public statements he does is plain astonishing.

    Clearly he is a puppet on a string dancing to someone else’s tune to achieve some unknown agenda.

    The NWO perhaps?

  60. Who Run Bartertown? says:

    Some decades ago lumpenproles in Old Blighty undermined, by the use of vile language, an all-too-legitimate charge against Great Britain’s Fabian establishment; in more refined hands, their pet slogan might well have been formed into something like this: “If you want a savage for your neighbor, vote Labor”.