‘A Cry for Help’: Prince Charles’ Extraordinary Verdict on Gang Culture as He Meets Riot Victims

Rebecca English, Daily Mail (London), August 18, 2011

Prince Charles claimed yesterday that many of those involved in last week’s riots had joined gangs as ‘a cry for help’.

He made clear his belief that many of Britain’s social ills could be put down to a lack of ‘self-confidence and self-esteem’.

Asked for his thoughts on what lay behind some of the troublemakers’ actions, he said: ‘Half the problem is that people join gangs because it’s a cry for help and they’re looking for a sense of belonging.’

He and the Duchess of Cornwall toured several of the worst-hit areas in the capital yesterday, meeting householders and businessmen devastated by days of violence and looting.

The prince’s views were contrasted with those of many he met, who blamed the troubles firmly on an increasing lack of discipline and respect among young people.

Charles said he believed schools shouldered part of the blame. ‘There are not enough extra-curricular activities–organised games or other kinds of activities to tire them out. You have got so much energy and aggression at that age.

‘Young people need self-confidence, we have to motivate and encourage them and give them responsibility.

‘We should have national community service to give all sorts of opportunities. All we have been doing is dealing with the symptoms, not giving the opportunities.’

Police have said that 25 per cent of those held after the disturbances are linked to gangs.

Charles’s contribution to the increasingly heated national debate on the causes of the riots came during a discussion in Hackney, east London, with young businessmen and women who have been helped by his charity, the Prince’s Trust.

Although many of those present expressed their gratitude to the prince for coming, their views were notably less sympathetic towards those responsible.

One man said: ‘Young people are getting far too much . . . they expect everything to be given to them.’

Natasha Faith, 25, who has a jewellery business in Forest Gate and also met the prince, said: ‘Respect has to be learned. Young people were obviously lacking that in the riots.

‘They had power but no respect.’

Laura Rennis, 26, who is setting up a holistic therapy centre in Edmonton with help from the Prince’s Trust, told Charles: ‘Everybody wants to be famous rather than successful.

‘They ought to be offered positive models, young people doing (good) things rather than (news about) Cheryl Cole’s new house.

‘I am sure David Beckham is lovely but you have to get young people thinking there is more to life than just kicking a ball.

‘The same angst and fire people had in their belly when they were rioting needs to be directed . . . direct that fire please.’

Charles and Camilla interrupted their annual holiday in Scotland to fly to London for the day. They began their tour in Tottenham, where the violence began.

The duchess said she had watched the ‘senseless’ events unfold with a mixture of horror and disbelief.

‘It is absolutely terrible. We were watching it on television and I had to pinch myself. I just couldn’t believe my eyes. It was so senseless. I could not believe it was happening in this country.’

She patted one Afro-Caribbean woman on the arm and said: ‘The next few months will be hard but stick together. Show that spirit of true Britishness that is so important.’

The woman replied warmly: ‘Oh we will, we will. We are British through and through. The way people have pulled together to help us has been inspiring.’

Charles was particularly taken by the stories of several families who feared that they would not be covered for the damage and loss by their household insurance policies.

He asked his private secretary to make a note of their details. An aide said: ‘He was struck by this very same problem after the floodings a couple of years ago and wants to see what he can do to chivvy them up. He strongly believes businesses should pull together at times like these.’

As well as making a personal donation of a dozen food processors to families who have lost their homes and belongings in Tottenham, the Prince’s Trust is making an extra £2.5million available to help disaffected young people get on their feet.

Later in the day the couple travelled on to Croydon where they saw some of the fire-ravaged homes and businesses in London Road.

Sherrilyn Miller, a retail manager, said: ‘I have lost everything I own in the world, including the only photograph I had of my dead father.

‘My neighbour even lost his wife’s ashes and has been asking the rescue workers to see if they can find them.’

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Anonymous

    “‘We should have national community service to give all sorts of opportunities. All we have been doing is dealing with the symptoms, not giving the opportunities.’”

    Why not send your brother Edward’s children and your sister’s and your grandchildren to a national service Job Corps scheme with them, Prince Charles?

    Well, he shows his age. That is the same sort of rot taught in colleges 50 years ago when he was of college age.

  • Ronald

    One has a better understanding of why Britain is in such a sorry state when one realizes insulated “out of touch” fools such as this are running things. Is it any wonder why the colonies revolted against British rule?

    Ronald

  • Anonymous

    That’s exactly where he’s wrong. They are oozing with self-esteem and self-confidence. What they will never have is self-RESPECT, which actually cannot be faked. This is a key difference that most people seem to gloss over.

  • Justified Contempt

    Who needs self-esteem when you can have loot instead?

    Plato’s Republic deals with justice and injustice rather thoroughly. These concepts are hard enough for us to understand, so let’s not expect the UK to do much with them either. “Sensitivity” is a religion, not national security.

  • Anonymous

    I get sick of hearing people talk about self-esteem like everyone should have it. Self-esteem should belong to those that are esteem worthy. In my experience, the average frumpy schmuck on the streets has way too much self-esteem. I would even say that the less worthy of self-esteem someone is, the more they tend to have it. Whereas some of the more intelligent people I know tend to be less self confident. It’s like Bertrand Russell said “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.”

  • Tim Mc Hugh

    Prince Charles reminds me of a Highway To Heaven episode strangely enough. It`s the one where the bulding contractor has a King Arthur complex and spends his corporations resources on building a castle. His sons and businees partners sue him in court to take away his assets. He tells Johnathon (Micheal Landon) that he does not want to fight, does not want to act, and cannot bear the thought of fighting in court. Johanthon tells him gently, “Your Highness You do not have to fight.. But if you will not act then you may no longer be King…” Charles moment of decision is coming and it appears to me he is unable to confront it and he sould no longer be King…

  • Anonymous

    How does that line in “Far and Away” go? Captain Moonlight!!!

    It’s coming Prince, so you better pull your head out of the clouds.

  • Rhialto

    Another Charles, Charles I, King of England, King of Scotland, and King of Ireland, was executed for high treason. His actions were far less damaging to the English than the current Charles, heir apparent to the U.K. throne.

  • Anonymous

    Since the London Uprising uprose, some AR commenters have asked “Where is the Queen in all this? Shouldn’t she be making a statement or condemnation of some sort?”

    The Queen’s silence has been bad, no question. But Her Majesty’s lack of pronouncements on the matter is not as bad as these traitorous statements by her idiot son Prince Charles. This man must never be King — if for no other reason than he clearly doesn’t like England very much. He is a disgrace to the Monarchy, and to the nation he supposedly serves.

    In the whiter, saner, safer Britain of 40 years ago, some local satirists nailed “the Prince Charles type” both accurately and hilariously:

    http://goo.gl/ca0Hb

    “What a great twit!”

  • canada guy

    And let’s not forget that this was the same man who watched the Trooping The Colour by the Brigade of Guards some years ago and complained that he saw nothing but white faces in their ranks.

    Here’s a thought, Chuck…sell that lavish estate of yours and give the money to all those poor black people. They will be extremely grateful, for a week or two, and you and your Mrs. can go back and live in St. James Palace.

    Charles once described himself as “a bit of a twit”. The Queen was overheard to say… “Charles is absolutely hopeless!”. I could not disagree with either of them.

  • sbuffalonative

    These people live in their insular little world and all they know how to do is parrot what they’re heard ‘the experts’ tell them. They can’t and won’t think outside the box because they only repeat what they hear.

    Self-esteem issues. Nobody cares about them. Poverty. Wash, rinse, repeat.

  • Anonymous

    The British will lie to themselves even as someone kicks down their front door. They have lost all sense of reality, all the sense their ancestors had when they created that nation. England is lost because its people are no longer capable of thought. It saddens me to see, the origin of many of my ancestors, of my tongue, and of my culture as a “WASP” American finally fall.

    I look back at the history of that land. The same land that defied so many invasions, the land that continuously protected itself even in the face of near defeat is the same land that will fall not to armed guards, but to violent immigrants who burn their very capitol to the ground as they watch. Nothing symbolized this more than a great historic building in London that had survived the blitz being burned to the ground by violent immigrant rioters.

    I feel many things when I see our cousins fading into non-existence across the Atlantic. I’m a young European, watching as the legacy and civilization I was supposed to inherit is taken from my very hands. It is up to awake whites like me and you to build something new for our descendants. Our ancestors carved a civilization out of the frozen land of Europe; they defied the Persians, the Huns, the Muslims, the savage tribes of the Americas, and the odds that worked so feverishly against them. It is in our blood, in our genes to build, to create, and to defend ourselves.

    Soon the only Europeans left will be the Europeans who refused to assimilate to primitive cultures, who refused to breed outside of our race, who lacked the same destructive attitudes people like Prince Charles have, and who keep a close eye on non-whites around them. From them will a new future be carved.

    I fear the world will grow dark soon, but from that darkness, we will shine a new light.

  • Anonymous

    Can’t wait to see the day that Buckingham Palace is converted to a mosque.

  • SF Paul

    Seems to me that it takes a lot of self confidence to riot and loot. I know I would have a hard time getting over being paranoid about stealing and destroying. It is lack of respect for others that is the root of it, of course that is black culture.

  • Jeddermann.

    “‘We should have national community service to give all sorts of opportunities.'”

    They tried that with universal military conscription during the era of the Kray boys. English gangsters who did such mayhem while in the military that they were kicked out.

    Giving these rioters some option of national service will not work. The personalities of the rioters was more or less set for ever when they were around the age of five years old. ONLY minor modifications can be made from this point and the future is grim.

  • white advocate – Canada

    Prince Charles is guilty by omission. He could have said something. Deep inside he knew something terrible was going on as vast new populations came in. He knew he didn’t look like them. He along with other important people could have stopped it. It needn’t have gotten this bad during his watch. He felt threatened by political correctness so he stayed quiet. Guilty – but his role was minor. If you want a big villain go to Tony Blair. He didn’t start this march to disaster but he pushed hard for it. Surely, again asking for honesty, he must have had forebodings. What were they? What did he think might go wrong? How does that differ from the actual riots that just happened? Speak up Tony!

  • Istvan

    His son, William, will never be King. Unless Charles abdicates shortly after taking the throne, such as after his mother’s funeral and an appropriate period of mourning, the UK will be too diverse to have a white monarch by the time he passes on. Or a white PM. Or white anything.

  • HH

    That’s right, there’s only one solution – dissolve the anachronistic Monarchy, and give away the loot from that vast fortune to all those poor, suffering non-white “youths” Charles. You can then live right along side them and be enriched by their vibrancy, etc.

    When you and your families stop dwelling in inherited castles and manor-houses, living lives of impossible luxery, THEN maybe your opinions on these matters will have perhaps an ounce of credibility.

  • Anonymous

    When I was little, it crossed my mind that it would be wonderful to be a princess. I remember thinking that marrying Prince Charles would be my best shot to achieve my “fairy tale”–thank God my simple, childish wish was not granted. He turned out to be a hideous, brain-damaged, slobbering, supercilious twit, didn’t he now?

  • NBJ

    I’ve never heard such out of touch comments! It’s just unbelieveable to me but typical of what we always hear the elite spout, and those people should have given him an ear full of reality. And by the way Charles, all the things you have suggested have been tried time and time again here and America, and it does not work!

  • Fr. John

    “Charles said he believed schools shouldered part of the blame. ‘There are not enough extra-curricular activities—organised games or other kinds of activities to tire them out. You have got so much energy and aggression at that age.”

    What? Midnight Basketball??? Again????

    I, as a died-in-the-wool, love-all-things-Anglican, cry-at-Parry’s-Jerusalem sort of guy, find this man a complete idiot!

    Moreover, as Andrew Fraser’s new book, ‘The WASP Question’ called her, ‘Elizabeth the Useless’ isn’t much better. I thought we were in trouble, when I read that the ‘Royal House’ had had both boys of Diana’s circumcised by a mohel (Jewish rabbi trained in this [ugh] ‘procedure’, and thought, For the love of GOD, why?

    As bad as Elizabeth II has been for the C of E, Charles as ‘defender of the Faith’ would lay it to rest… forever. And would earn the seventh level of Hell. I now understand he’s been living near that address, for some time….say, about 31 August 1997?

  • Anonymous

    #15: “Giving these rioters some option of national service will not work.”

    It seemed to work for Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. Depends on how you apply it.

  • millie

    “She patted one Afro-Caribbean woman on the arm and said: ‘The next few months will be hard but stick together. Show that spirit of true Britishness that is so important.’

    The woman replied warmly: ‘Oh we will, we will. We are British through and through. The way people have pulled together to help us has been inspiring.’”

    What the heck is wrong with Camilla? Saying this to an “Afro-Caribbean” person? Spirit of true Britishness indeed!

  • Pilgrims Pride

    HH at 3:47AM on August 20 exclaimed,

    ” …dissolve the anachronistic Monarchy, and give away the loot from that vast fortune to all those poor, suffering non-white ‘youths’ …”

    God forbid.

    As a cradle Episcopalian aghast at the siege and sacking of my family’s ancient religion, I’ve had reason enough to follow the careers of Elizabeth and her idiotic son Charles (who would, he tells us, be “Defender of Faith” absent the definite article one usually associates with Christendom).

    Believe you me: absent the monarchy England will fall into the sea within a single parliamentary election cycle. I say this as a republican from a long line of republicans, Patriots and Dissenters who had little love for King — but much love for God and Country be it England or America.

    It is not hard to understand Elizabeth’s seeming inaction against the hordes. She was a little girl during the Second World War and no doubt bears the scars of war’s horrors as do most of her generation. Peace at any price is a bargain to such as her.

    But her son, Charles the Feeble Minded, is another story altogether. He seems to be their version of our own George W. Bush. Affable, likeable by all accounts. Entertaining in private. But somewhere along the way he lost his power of thought, perhaps for the same reasons as Jorge the Frat Boy.

    “This too shall pass” but it will take diligence and fortitude.

  • Anonymous

    Poster # 12 “The same land that defied so many invasions,”

    What invasions? The last invasion was 1066.

    There have been no invasions since. The only attempted invasion was by the Spanish Armada which was destroyed by a hurricane, not the English navy which was almost non existent at the time. Contrary to popular myth, the English fishing fleet and merchant marine had nothing to do with repelling the Spanish Armada.

    King James second, the lawful King of England managed to land in Ireland after he was overthrown by his Dutch nephew with the help of English traitors.

    The French did manage to land in Ireland around 1799 but left without a fight because the Irish were not prepared to rise against the English.

  • Margaret

    Charles’ sister and his 2 sons spend half their time in Africa slobbering over and feeding African children who soon grow up to be priapic gun toting mass murders, gang rapists, torturers and slavers if they are boys. If girls they soon grow up to be rape victims and slaves of the men and soon produce more thugs, murderers and rapists.

    I have many English relatives. I and my American family have spent plenty of time in England.

    Believe me, the English despise Americans. They consider us stupid and dumb, low IQ to begin with and totally uneducated even if we have a PHD from Harvard or even an English university. We are evil racists who enslaved and oppress the blacks.

    Try telling them that slavery was established when we were an English colony by Judges appointed by the Crown colonial governors and legislatures elected by English subjects and immigrants. Tell them the slaves were brought over by English slavers on English ships.

    They actually don’t believe it.

    My kids were doing some school work in the TV lounge of an English hotel. Some guy who was trying to chat me up saw what the kids were doing. He commented that it was far in advance of what was taught in English state schools. Then he said “of course the black kids don’t learn the same thing do they?”

    Yes they do I told the pompous liberal. Same curriculum mandated by the state and federal ed departments. Same books. Same lesson plans. Same teachers from the same teacher’s training programs.

    He said he believed me, but only because the lecherous creep was waiting for the kids to go off to bed so he could try to seduce me.

    There is nothing Whites can do to the reverse anti White progrom. But at least we White woman can avoid consorting with the enemy, not only lecherous blacks but lecherous White liberals.

    One of my favorite things to do when some guy comes on to me is to ask if he approve of affirmative action. Since I am a woman they usually say yes thinking that since I am a woman I am part of the anti White male coalition.

    Then I really let them have it. I would never touch a White man in favor of affirmative action or any anti White movement. They are as much our enemies as blacks.

  • Anonymous

    “He and the Duchess of Cornwall toured several of the worst-hit areas in the capital yesterday, meeting householders and businessmen devastated by days of violence and looting.’

    Too bad those small businessmen and householders can’t vote when Elizabeth dies. According to English small business owners, the police stood by while the small shops were looted but protected the big department stores.

    Defender of the Faith.

    Henry 8 should have got rid of that title when he founded the Church of England. That title was Defender of the Roman Catholic Faith. It was awarded to Henry 8 in the 1520’s by the Pope because Henry 8 either wrote or commissioned a book refuting Luther.

    The book was apparently very intellectual, relying on philosophy and theology to make the point. Some think that Saint Sir Thomas More actually wrote it.

    The Queen was probably told by her overseers to keep her mouth shut about the riots. She might say something in her Christmas speech, some mealy mouthed it was a White riot statement.

  • Anonymous

    ““‘We should have national community service to give all sorts of opportunities.’””

    Like the American Job Corps perhaps? Where women employees must go everywhere in groups of 3 to avoid being raped?

    Where women have to work in groups of 3 inside locked offices to avoid being raped? Where 100 percent of inmates were sent by the criminal court system, go to Job Corps or go to state prison? Where 100 percent already have at least one felony conviction?

    Here is one reason why the entire restaurant and hotel industry has turned to Hispanic illegals. The only vocational course taught in Job Corps is culinary and hospitality (hotel) work.

    Who would you rather hire to work in your restaurant non felonious hispanics or at least hispanics who have enough sense not to rape and assault your customers or the feral felons of Job Corps?

    Just what a hotel needs, lots of black rapists working as janitors and other employees. Ever noticed that most hotels from the cheapest to the most expensive always have some black woman employees but never, never black men? Wonder why? It is called rape liability.

  • Anonymous

    “‘Royal House’ had had both boys of Diana’s circumcised by a mohel (Jewish rabbi trained in this [ugh] ‘procedure’,”

    Almost all American boys are circumcised. But in the hospital where they were born by an interning MD of whatever race or religion that happens to be on duty at the time. Couldn’t they find an English Dr to do it? Isn’t circumcision a sort of Jewish baptism for boys?

    What do home birthers do about circumcision? Probably their pediatrician when they are about a week old.

    Are most Englishmen circumcised? I always thought not.

  • Anonymous

    Charles should remember that the upper class liberals are the ones who want to abolish the monarchy. They are very quiet because it is rather a hopeless cause. But they are well prepared and if there is ever a realistic movement to abolish the monarchy they will come out in force.

    It is the middle class householders and small businessmen who support the monarchy.

    There is a wonderful satire of the monarchy “The Queen and I”

    The monarchy is deposed quietly and the entire family having no skills has to go on welfare and be treated like the average benefits lay about.

  • Anonymous

    Growing up in London during the 60s until the 80s,there was something instilled in many of that generation, we didn’t have great youth facilities,we didn’t moan about having too much energy and not enough imagination. Sure the streets were perceived to be safer, but there were no gangs holding society to ransom. This is about a section of society with no moral sense and no direction because they’ve never heard the word ‘no’ before. So,we have this obsolete royal, who has shadey morals himself, spouting off about schools not providing enough ‘games’. He’s scraping the barrel trying to gain popularity and is clueless as to a solution. Until a culture of taking responsibility for your own actions exists, you’ll just get endless social experiments and advice from people like this and his wife [what qualification does she have ?]. One question,how do you make the rent,Charles ?

  • Anonymous

    I worked at a low income school in Los Angeles that had plenty of after school activities for students. We had every club imaginable, and we had club days after school at the beginning of every term so that the clubs could advertise to new members. We also had sports teams, everything from swimming, to dance, to football. Many of my students in a gang didn’t join any of them, and in a complete contradiction to Charles’ claims, I had a few members of the basketball team or the football team who also belonged to a gang. The problem has gone beyond being a self-esteem or access to more wholesome activities things; it’s become a culture and a lifestyle in many families in the inner cities. I’ll never forget a colleague who returned from a parent meeting where the parents weren’t angry their son had joined a gang, they were angry he had joined the families’ rival gang!

  • Anonymous

    I looked at the video. The expression on the Duchess’ face was priceless. You could tell she was trying to look like a supportive politicians wife, but she seemed to totally disapprove of his nonsense.

    Speaking of the Queen, where does she get off not allowing the wives of her sons and grandson to use the title Princess?

    According to all English law, protocols, customs and the official regulator of titles, the College of Heralds, a married English woman takes her husband’s title.

    A married English woman’s title is not the the Queen’s perogative to bestow, like Mrs., Senora, Madame or Frau, it comes with the marriage.

    It is totally ridiculous that the College of Heralds allows the Queen to withhold the titles that the wives are entitled to by law, custom and ancient protocol.

    An Earl’s Mother does not tell her son and daughter in law that the daughter in law cannot be a Countess. A Baronet’s Mother does not forbid her daughter in law from using the title Lady.

    What’s with the Queen? I understand she was insanely jealous of Margaret Thatcher, maybe she is insanely jealous of any prominent woman.

  • Question Diversity

    Charles said he believed schools shouldered part of the blame. ‘There are not enough extra-curricular activities—organised games or other kinds of activities to tire them out. You have got so much energy and aggression at that age.

    In other words, he wants British schools to become the focal point of organized athletics and team sports in the lives of young Britons, just as it is in the United States. Of course, (sarcasm) That has worked out so well in black areas. (End sarcasm)

  • whiteraven

    “Prince Charles claimed yesterday that many of those involved in last week’s riots had joined gangs as ‘a cry for help’.”

    He really should button his lip, because every time he opens his mouth he reveals to the world what an out-of-touch fool he is, and even though that’s par for the course, regarding British royalty, it’s getting to the point where there are serious discussions as to whether or not the entire bunch might amount to nothing more than inbred wusses.

    Personally, I think he would be better off getting a job at a car wash in Newark where he can get a better understanding of what the real world is all about.

  • Morton

    I think I have what might be a very good idea for dealing with these energy filled young lads.

    Put chains on their legs so they don’t get lost and let them pick up trash along the highway or breaks rocks into smaller pieces to be used in landscaping?

    How about a nice room that holds two people each with it’s own restroom. I would put bars on the windows and doors so no vicious white could come in at night to disturb them. How about free meals and an oversize yard for these kids to work in?

    I would call it Kamp Korrection or Happy Time black Resort?

  • John Bell in England

    James the First, ancestor of the Prince of Wales,was described as the “wisest fool in Christendom” and the Prince is very much his descendant – often very right and at other times a complete buffoon.

    As for Elizabeth the Pointless, words fail me….

  • Anonymous

    The Western World needs people like Elizabeth I, our Founding Fathers, Founders of the Roman Empire, the ancient Greeks, etc. to revive the spirit and genius of the white race. Perhaps the competition from China will re-kindle that energy and drive.

  • GetBackJack

    The British royal family is part of the problem. They’re parasites living off the public trough yet immune to the very policies they help institute behind the scenes. Do not think for one moment these people still don’t control a good part of the British empire.

  • Ciccio

    #26. You are quite wrong about slavery being established when the US was a British colony. The first slaves were landed by the Dutch when New York was still called New Amsterdam.

  • Anonymous

    I thought people joined gangs for protection when authority figures have lost all credibility or control. Like in a riot situation.

  • Anonymous

    This is but another sign of a vast disease that has fallen EVERYONE in power across the Western World:

    The disease is that the powerful are afraid of the mob. They are afraid for two very simple reasons, although those reasons yet very different;

    Reason #1: The mob has money to spend, and elites want that money: commerce, plain and simple, they’ll take money from ANYONE.

    Reason#2: The mob can up-end commerce by not playing nice. Thus, the mob will NOT be put down, so long as an acceptable modicum of commerce can be sustained; keep the money flowing. Casualties be damned, just keep the money flowing in the right direction.

    It is GREED that makes this daft Prince, all the silly Senators and Presidents appeasing the mob…ditto cops, mayors, councelthings, editors, blowhard news personalities…no one would dare risk their job, or buck the chamber of commerce platform. Is there anything so craven as a chamber of commerce??????

    Just don’t rock the boat! If we beat thugs down, we will have lawsuits and more violence. Coddle them, maybe they can be placated for a few years…the cycle continues, but winds tighter and tighter each time, from the mere pressures of exploding population. Soon, maybe, the mob will realize it need fear nothing. I think the third worlders are close to that point.

    Luckily they are dumb as rocks, and usually over- play their hand, and end up dying like flies.

    It may only be the utter stupidity of the browns that will thwart the utter destruction of the Western World. Because the guardians of the west have laid it bare for plunder.

  • nokangaroos

    Ah, and to think that British Common Law would still allow for treating every last participant in the riots as accessory to murder (all five of them) which, of course, is what they should do.

    But upholding the law is the very last thing on their minds. Sound familiar?

    (#29 Anonymous … last time I heard, something on the order of 70% of American males are genitally mutilated. I need not explain the reasons. -As for me and my house, I would disown both my prospective wife and prospective sons.)

  • kgb

    I’ve long wondered if Prince Charles had the mettle to be more than an ornamental King of England. Now I know he does not. He is, for one thing, absolutely clueless about how blacks ruin the learning environment for whites.

  • Fr. John

    Anonymous 5:48 noted: “Almost all American boys are circumcised. But in the hospital where they were born by an interning MD of whatever race or religion that happens to be on duty at the time. Couldn’t they find an English Dr to do it? Isn’t circumcision a sort of Jewish baptism for boys? What do home birthers do about circumcision? Probably their pediatrician when they are about a week old.”

    It IS true that most American males are circumcised NOW, but that was not the NORM, before the 1920’s. I FOUGHT – literally had to scream- with the nurses and the attending physician THREE SEPARATE TIMES, at my first child’s birth, that I would NOT have this barbaric ritual performed on him, with NOT ONE OUNCE of scientific/hygenic merit- and I succeeded.

    I have written on this very important (and psychologically damning practice) over at my blog. For the record, I include the link, merely as an FYI.

    http://goo.gl/Lxcg6

    One does not need to ‘bend the knee to Baal’ if you just stand for your history, culture, and race. Charles seems to have forgotten all three.

  • Anonymous

    “One of my favorite things to do when some guy comes on to me is to ask if he approve of affirmative action. Since I am a woman they usually say yes thinking that since I am a woman I am part of the anti White male coalition.

    Then I really let them have it. I would never touch a White man in favor of affirmative action or any anti White movement. They are as much our enemies as blacks.”

    _______________________________________

    Thanks, Margaret! I feel the same way! Or any White man that hangs with blacks, or even has a black “friend”. Liberal White men are the essence of a wimp and brainless too boot. Liberal White women are so far gone there is no hope for them. They all disgust me. That goes for the racially unaware Whites, liberal or conservative.

  • Black Swan

    The monarchy is deposed quietly and the entire family having no skills has to go on welfare and be treated like the average benefits lay about.

    When whites become a powerless minority in England do you think the new Moslim overlords will respect the monarchy? Agree to pay their stipends and upkeep on their “homes?”

    The monarchy represents whites and white history in Britain.

    They will receive the same treatment that their relatives the Romanovs received in Russia! An end will be put to their line so it will never rise again.

    Demographics is destiny.

  • Anonymous

    The monarchy represents whites and white history in Britain.

    They will receive the same treatment that their relatives the Romanovs received in Russia! An end will be put to their line so it will never rise again.

    Demographics is destiny.

    *********************************

    Very true..history is repeating itself. Whites do not seem to learn from their own history.

  • Anonymous

    I loved what Tony Benn MP said when Princess’ Anne’s first child was born; “another lifelong benefit baby.”

    Supposedly that was one reason the Queen hated Margaret Thatcher so much. Thatcher was against affirmative action and the welfare system. When Thatcher talked about affirmative action, she didn’t mean black bus drivers so much as the people who got high level jobs and positions like governor of the Bank of England due to family background and connections. It was an attack on hereditary privilege such as the monarchy has.

    AS far as welfare goes, well the only difference between taxpayer supported Buckingham and several other palaces and a council house is size. Child benefit, the only difference is the amount, several million a year per child for the monarchy vs a few thousand per kid a year for the masses.

    The other reason ER2 hated Thatcher is because Thatcher worked her way up through the political ranks and ER2 was lucky to be the oldest child of the right family.

    My English relatives are low level aristocrats and upper level gentry. They and all their friends despise the monarchy. Many are Republicans. They still call the royals the krauts.

  • Anonymous

    40 — Ciccio wrote at 12:16 AM on August 21:

    #26. You are quite wrong about slavery being established when the US was a British colony. The first slaves were landed by the Dutch when New York was still called New Amsterdam.

    #40 Sorry. The first Africans who became slaves were landed in Virginia in 1619. New Amsterdam was founded in 1625. The first African slaves landed in New Amsterdam in 1626.

    America had slavery from 1619 to 1864. All the colonies but New Amsterdam were English from the start. New Amsterdam surrended to the English in 1664, after only 39 years after its founding.

    Every colony has slavery but Georgia. 12 of the colonies were English from the start. The 13th, New Amsterdam became English in 1664. Have you forgotten that all the colonies but New Amsterdam were English?

    I cannot therefore, agree with your statement that the Dutch established slavery in the English colonies.

  • Anonymous

    That self esteem nonsense was invented by intelligent upper class psychologists and psychiatrists.

    They thought that if they were criminals in prison they would feel low and worthless. They failed to realize that they were quite different from the blacks who like prison life.

    There was a study of high school students a few years ago. Turned out that blacks, especially ghetto types who got bad grades and were always in trouble had the highest self esteem of any racial or economic group.

    Back when the Judges still allowed psychiatric testimony I remember every psych report stated that the black criminal was “non verbal.” We all know how loquacious blacks are, babble blather and blither even if they have no one with whom to talk.

    They just grunted at the psychiatrist, so the psychiatrist reported that the black criminals were non verbal.

    The only reasonable thing the Judiciary has done for the last 70 years was to ban psychiatric testimony on the grounds that both psychologists and psychiatrists could not be expert witnesses

    because they knew no more than the average person.

  • Anonymous

    It IS true that most American males are circumcised NOW, but that was not the NORM, before the 1920’s.

    Fr John. I was told that circumcision became popular when home birth was replaced by hospital birth. The hospitals insisted on it because they could charge an extra fee.

    I remember when my son was born in 1968 the circumcision was $45.00 added on to the bill.

  • Anonymous

    So much for King Arthur rising in the hour of his country’s need.

  • Jack in Chicago

    I am descended in part from Russian royalty… we never had such weakling royals. Our last Czar and his children were brutally murdered by Bolsheviks, but none too the Red’s/mob’s side. French royals were also much braver and more decent than this pathetic Brit, twit prince.

    Here’s looking for some Scottish strong man – a corporal like the Corsican Napoleon with the spine to shoot in to the mob… later we can make this Scottish strong man Emperor of Britain.

    Don’t look for great leadership in the high families, the high churches in these brutal latter days.

  • Anonymous

    47 — Black Swan wrote at 10:34 AM on August 21:

    “The monarchy is deposed quietly and the entire family having no skills has to go on welfare and be treated like the average benefits lay about.

    When whites become a powerless minority in England do you think the new Moslim overlords will respect the monarchy? Agree to pay their stipends and upkeep on their “homes?”

    The monarchy represents whites and white history in Britain.

    They will receive the same treatment that their relatives the Romanovs received in Russia! An end will be put to their line so it will never rise again.

    Demographics is destiny. ”

    Except that the Windsor Royal line is so intertwined with other royal families genealogically, some of them living in Australia, Canada, and even the U.S., that there will always be a blood successor. Unless of course, the search for them goes international.

    As dorky as this event was, it is important to understand that the royal families hands are tied in political matters. Their main work is to remain popular enough for the monarchy to survive, so they sound pretty dopey at times. But don’t kids yourself, if the tide turned, the royals would join in with a vengeance.

    As long as there is a British Royal Family continuity, Britain might be saved. If and when it is extinguished, and age will be over, and it will never return. What happens to Britain will eventually happen throughout the West, which is why we must all support the BNP and the EDL as much as we might, even if it is assiduously.

  • Pat

    No. 25 – Anonymous. History being as they say ‘somebody else’s best guess’, I take issue with your account of the attempted Spanish invasion of England in 1588. The wind indeed played its part, but the Englsh ‘fleet’ (indeed shambolic) knew how to use it and were much more manoeuvrable than the grand Spanish vessels, they also outgunned them and with the use of ‘fire ships’ caused the Spanish to miss their intention of taking the Isle of Wight. If I remember from school the storm also saved the Spanish from running aground in Holland. I have seen an exhibition of personal artifacts from sunken Spanish vessels off the Irish coast which they were forced to navigate around to get back – brings it all home I have to say. Five minutes walk down from Plymouth Hoe where Drake (Vice Admiral of the English ‘fleet’) played his ‘game of bowls’ another ship left in 1620 bound for the New World. Who will remember that one in a hundred years time?

    Also to all commenters who are wondering why the Queen does not issue a statement. This is not her ‘job’. She is Head of State and if anything the mouthpiece of the elected Government. Any monarch who voices any personal opinions on things political is on the slippery slope – Charles could be our last.

  • browser

    “The monarchy represents whites and white history in Britain.

    They will receive the same treatment that their relatives the Romanovs received in Russia! An end will be put to their line so it will never rise again. Do you think the new Moslim overlords will respect the monarchy?”

    ____________________

    The current wimpish, self-serving monarchy no longer represents anything but itself. It serves no useful pupose. To heck with the British people and British history! The royal family will do ANYTHING necessary to remain in power. If Moslems become dominant, I would not be surprised to see the royal family convert. They will be the first to lead the parade. Self-preservation has become their sole concern.

    The same can be said about the other Euopean royal families. The Dutch and Swedes will have converted even before the British.

  • Michael C. Scott

    The good news here is that Charles will never sit on the throne. His grandmother Mary lived to be 100, so Elizabeth II is likely to be Queen for a very long time to come.

  • Anonymous

    The Royals (and the brit Upper classes and aspirational upper classes) LOVE all things third world. I’m British, and have seen a zillion news reports of the Queen visiting Bongo-Bongo land to watch some folk dancing whilst Prince Phillip (who i somehow think does not share the enthusiasm) accompanies her. Upper class brit kids ‘travel’ (or have family homes and links to ex-Commonwealth places). This comes down to scoring drugs off the local dealers, so they have no problems with similar kinds when they are in the UK. I genuinely doubt Camilla cares about the third world the way Charles does; she looks more interested in gin and horses. But if they don’t have kowtowing fuzzy-wuzzies out there, then they have even fewer peasants to rule, and the point of their existance is redundant. Charles is hapless british liberalism embodied – except he, of course, wants to rule it all (hardly liberal).

  • Black Swan

    Also to all commenters who are wondering why the Queen does not issue a statement. This is not her ‘job’. She is Head of State and if anything the mouthpiece of the elected Government. Any monarch who voices any personal opinions on things political is on the slippery slope – Charles could be our last.

    Yes, you are correct given the current PC Reign of Terror that has descended over England and the US. However, there were things QE II could have done to prevent the inevitable.

    Read here:

    Elizabeth the Useless, by Dr. Sean Gabb:

    When the politicians begin to abolish the rights of the people, it is the duty of the Monarch to step in and to rebalance the Constitution.

    That duty has been apparent since at least 1972, when we were lied into the European Union. Elizabeth the Useless should have acted then. There have been many times since when she should have acted. At all times, she could have sacked the Government and dissolved Parliament without provoking riots in the street. So far as I can tell, she has acted only twice in my liftetime to force changes of policy. In 1979, she bullied Margaret Thatcher to go back on her election promise not to hand Rhodesia over to a bunch of black Marxists. In 1987, she bullied Margaret Thatcher again to give in to calls for sanctions against South Africa.

    Certainly, I have never seen evidence that she has lifted a finger to defend the rights of her English subjects. In my view, that abolishes my duty of allegiance to her or any of her likely successors – who are equally useless.

    browser writes:

    The royal family will do ANYTHING necessary to remain in power. If Moslems become dominant, I would not be surprised to see the royal family convert. They will be the first to lead the parade. Self-preservation has become their sole concern.

    I hadn’t thought of that and I believe you have an excellent, valid point. Their wealth will be greatly reduced, however, if not outright confiscated. They will be under the thumb of whichever Moslem ruler takes the throne.

    When has the British Monarchy ever given a rat’s *** about the “little people?”

    Except that the Windsor Royal line is so intertwined with other royal families genealogically, some of them living in Australia, Canada, and even the U.S., that there will always be a blood successor. Unless of course, the search for them goes international.

    The Russian monarchy never rose again even though they were related to many of the ruling houses of Europe. All of those countries you mention, Australia, Canada, the US are going the same way as Britain, are headed down the same path of nonwhite rule due to disparate birth rates between whites and nonwhites and continued massive nonwhite Third World immigration.

    Remember what happened to the Russian people? They were genocided, just as white South Africans are being genocided as I’m writing this. This will be the fate of all whites in their homelands unless things are turned around NOW (and it may be too late already).

    BTW: Whites DID NOT commit suicide in any of their own homelands, these things are being done to them by very powerful outside forces.

  • Anonymous

    The Kinks, Living on a Thin Line, 1984

    “All the stories have been told

    Of kings and days of old,

    But there’s no England now.

    All the wars that were won and lost

    Somehow don’t seem to matter very much anymore.

    All the lies we were told,

    All the lies of the people running round,

    They’re castles have burned.

    Now I see change,

    But inside we’re the same as we ever were.”

  • Bill Harzia

    God bless you, Margaret.

    And to all the white “males” reading this, get in shape. Learn to fight. And learn to defend the few remaining Margarets of the world, so that you may reclaim the title, White Man.

  • Guilty Liberal

    So, we have a president, in the United States, who lives like a king, and a king, in the United Kingdom, who acts like a politician.

  • Anonymous

    “In 1979, she bullied Margaret Thatcher to go back on her election promise not to hand Rhodesia over to a bunch of black Marxists. In 1987, she bullied Margaret Thatcher again to give in to calls for sanctions against South Africa.”

    Thanks for reminding me. A relative by marriage worked in the foreign and colonial office for 35 years. The Queen used what is called the secret service fund. The only power the monarchy has is control over the hundreds of millions in the secret service fund.

    That fund was started by Elizabeth 1 and Walsingham. it has been ongoing ever since. The monarch can use it any the monarch sees fit. It has been used to support royal mistresses in royal style, to prop up the Bank of England, to harass the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and many, many things.

    It was pretty widely known at the Foreign and Colonial office that Elizabeth funneled millions to Mugabe and Mandela to end White rule in Rhodesia and S. Africa. She was advised that White rule would end anyway and why not get it over with.

    But the decision to use the secret service fund was hers and hers alone. Without that money, Rhodesia would have remained Rhodesia for a few more decades.

  • Mrs. Victoria

    Poster #50, In 1619, Dutch slave ships in the Caribbean sold slaves to the English (actually traded for goods). Therefore, the Dutch are partly responsible for slavery in the colonies.

  • White American

    As Morrisey has said in the past: ” The royal family are irrelevant.” They are merely a symbol of what once was the mighty British Empire. All the wealth went into their pockets and the pockets of the upper class. You would never know, just by looking at the present-day Britain, that they ever were mighty and a force to be reckoned with. May God help them for they are doomed. The writing is on the wall.

  • Anon

    Poster 60, read Savitri Devi. A brilliant and very eccentric woman, but remarkably prescient in her writings. Read what she has to say on what these powerful world forces are. No naming names, but they are among the most powerful, elite and sinister characters in England and the rest of Europe. They are the shadow players, in politics and finance. And they are your beloved President’s right hand men and women.

    For god’s sake white people, wake up and smell the coffee. You are being disenfranchised and misgenated out of existence, and the process is speeding up. Fight back. Better fight back than roll over and die. You have everything worth fighting for and defending. Call on your Viking ancestors to give you strength.

    And I am not white, but it’s such a tragedy that I cannot keep quiet.

  • Anonymous

    59 — Anonymous wrote at 12:34 PM on August 22:

    The Royals (and the brit Upper classes and aspirational upper classes) LOVE all things third world.

    Ever been in London during the annual commonwealth conferences ?

    It is otherwise known as the cannibals and kleptomaniacs convention. Head of the Commonwealth is ER2s only real power.

    As English monarch she is basically an actress who must memorize her lines, hit her marks and do what the director says.

    But as Head of the Commonwealth she thinks she still has some sort of power. The pictures are hysterically funny. There she sits surrounded by the worst black and brown monstrous dictators on the planet.

    And believe me, she loves it.

    M15 (FBI), special branch of city police and diplomatic liason are very busy during the cannibal and klepto convention handling all the rapes, drunks, druggies, evading restaurant bills, shoplifting and other un diplomatic behavior commited by these heads of failed disfunctional states.

  • gb

    To the posters on slavery in the now US:

    Aaah but you’re all wrong. 1581 there were African slaves in St Augustine Florida. I win! HAHAHAHAH.

    We Southerners are the best historians.

  • Poster #50

    65 — Mrs. Victoria wrote at 6:10 PM on August 22:

    Poster #50, In 1619, Dutch slave ships in the Caribbean sold slaves to the English (actually traded for goods). Therefore, the Dutch are partly responsible for slavery in the colonies.

    Mrs. Victoria if you had actually read my entire post you would have seen that I began by writing about the English, not the Dutch attitudes towards Americans and their holier than thou posture re our racial problems.

    I wrote that when answering English,not Dutch people critisizing America I told them that it was the English who legalized slavery in America.

    Carribean nations are not part of America so it is irrelevant that the Dutch brought slaves to the Caribbean. Many European countries participated in the slave trade.

    But my post was only about responding to English, not Dutch people when they call Americans racists because we have to deal with what the English goverment did 1619 to 1775.

    My post was not a discussion of the slave trade in general. It was a response to English, not Dutch accusations of American racism.