Posted on April 21, 2011

Nigeria Election Riots: How Leaders Stoke Muslim-Christian Violence

Maggie Fick, Christian Science Monitor, April 20, 2011

In anticipation of the results of Nigeria’s remarkably smooth presidential vote over the weekend, angry young men took to the streets across the country’s mainly Muslim north on Monday with knives and clubs.

Despite the fact that international and domestic observers said this was the first relatively free and fair election since the tumultuous country moved beyond military rule 12 years ago, someone had convinced the mobs that the election had been rigged in favor of incumbent president Goodluck Jonathan, a southern Christian.

Protests soon turned deadly, with churches, mosques, homes, and businesses set ablaze in the northern cities of Kaduna and Kano. In Kaduna on Tuesday, Christian neighborhoods were targeted, and known supporters of Mr. Jonathan’s ruling People’s Democratic Party were burned alive and hacked with machetes. Reprisal attacks by Christians quickly followed. More than 200 have been killed, according to one local rights group.

The Muslim-Christian violence underscores a bitter reality: The age of “do-or-die” politics and “thugs-for-hire” patronage networks is not dead in Nigeria. And although Nigerian politicians do have the power to tamp down local rivalries that quickly morph into brutal religious violence, more often than not, these leaders do the opposite.

On Tuesday after his official defeat in the presidential race, after dozens of people had been killed and more than 10,000 displaced, popular opposition leader Muhammadu Buhari characterized the violence as “sad, unfortunate, and totally unwarranted,” but issued no direct appeal for calm. “We have commenced consultations at the highest levels to recover your stolen mandate,” Mr. Buhari said Wednesday.

For his part, Mr. Jonathan told CNN on Tuesday that the violence was “not spontaneous” and thus was a planned disruption, though the president said he didn’t want to accuse anybody. Jonathan also said the “crisis” was linked to the festering problem of jobless, hopeless young masses in both northern and southern Nigeria.

How religious violence pops off


Aside from the latest wave of violence in the north, the country’s Middle Belt region–where the mainly Muslim north meets the predominately Christian south–has become a case study in how Nigerian politicians fuel religious violence.


Over the past year plus, since several massacres–of Muslims by Christians and of Christians by Muslims–killed hundreds in January and March 2010, whole communities in Jos have displaced themselves out of fear of further violence.


Fanning the flames

Despite the divergences in the various accounts of how Jos came to be an epicenter of horrific violence over the past decade, many residents pinpoint an issue that drives the conflict: the “‘indigene” concept, which has become a discriminatory, state government-enforced policy.

The Muslim community, which makes up the majority of the population in the northern part of the city, accuses the state government of consistently denying the Muslim community their basic rights as citizens on the basis that they are “settlers” in the state, and therefore not so-called indigenes privy to citizen rights.

Mohamed Lawal Ishaq, a lawyer and a member of a Muslim affairs council, says that–like all Muslim residents in Jos–his children are unable to enroll in public schools because they lack indigene certificates, despite the fact that they were born in Jos, as were there parents.


‘Delivering’ the Muslim vote?

Ishaq’s council seems to be playing a political game of its own, however. He said his council is currently “in negotiations” with several opposition gubernatorial candidates, suggesting that the council is capable of delivering the Muslim vote in the state governor race on April 26.

Although Ishaq says imams in Jos are continuing to call for the community’s youth to remain peaceful during the tense elections period and its aftermath, the fact that the Muslim council is clearly using its religious authority to play politics indicates the ease of religious mobilization for political gain in the polarized society.


The governor, an evangelical Christian who received a divinity degree from a Nigerian theological college after he retired from the Air Force in the early 1990s, is unequivocal about defending Christianity as the religion of his state. “As a result of the failure of the Muslim jihad here [in the 1800s], they still think they can get [Plateau state] back to Islamicize,” he told the Monitor.


Since Governor Jang’s election in 2007, the crisis in the Middle Belt has worsened. With each new, major wave of violence–notably in 2008 and 2010–resentment between Muslim and Christians over the killings has increased, until finally reaching its current apartheid-like state in the city of Jos.


Running for re-election in the April 26 elections with the campaign slogan of “REDEMPTION 2011,” the current governor is not publicly seen as taking the initiative to embrace the Muslim community who he views as “settlers,” despite their two century-long history in his state.


Meanwhile, the Muslim community is busy rallying its own support base, largely behind opposition candidate Pauline Tellen–the current deputy governor who has fallen out with Jang over the crisis.


8 responses to “Nigeria Election Riots: How Leaders Stoke Muslim-Christian Violence”

  1. Seneca the Younger says:

    “In anticipation of the results of Nigeria’s remarkably smooth presidential vote over the weekend, angry young men took to the streets across the country’s mainly Muslim north on Monday with knives and clubs.”

    This is democracy done right in a Muslim country.

    If you are still the minority vote and you do not win, you riot. Muslims cannot grasp the concept of democracy. They think if they vote, their official should win no matter the vote count. the mentality is “I voted for him, therefore he should be elected”.

    And this is a double whammy because they are Muslim and black. Of course the UN will support the Muslim side, they don’t care about popular sovereignty either.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Is racial, ethnic, or religious diversity EVER a strength, or does it always, always cause problems such as conflict, war, and genocide?

    Let me think . . Living peacefully with my kin in a boring, homogenous society vs. living in a vibrant and colorful diversity society and being burned or hacked to death. It is so hard to decide.

  3. Kingoldby says:

    Sad fact. Wherever you get Muslims you get trouble.

    Everywhere in the world where you get Muslims mixing with any other population at all, you get what is ineffect ‘ethnic cleansing’ as the Muslims progressively drive out the non Muslims and impose their rule.

    This is true in Africa, it is true in Asia, it is true in India, it is true in Europe. It is true wherever you have Muslims.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Muslims or Christians, it doesn’t matter when they are Africans. Africans are Africans and will alwaYS behave as such. An African “Christian” is a joke. They’re still practicing voodoo under the more respectable trappings of Christianity. It looks more modern that way. Ditto with Muslims. Look at this killing that’s presently going in Ivory Coast. They’re also ostensibly Muslims vs. Christians, but it’s really just tribal. Always was, always will be. Who cares?

  5. ranger says:

    “Political opponents burned alive and hacked with machetes.”

    This would sound newsworthy and abnormally brutal, but in Africa it’s the norm.

  6. SKIP says:

    AS IF muslims need an excuse to hack people apart or burn Christians alive….Let’s see proof of Christians doing that, always have to toss in the qualifier that “Christians are doing it too” It wouldn’t surprise me if this is the sort of conduct we get from muslims in America if the Obamuslim is not re-elected and the Obamuslim will be the Dems choice because they KNOW they dare not deny a BLACK and a MUSLIM. Remember, thou shalt not ‘outrage’ blacks or muslims or they will riot, burn, loot, rob, pillage, murder and rape…as usual.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Islam’s bloody borders. Muslims always have the greatest difficulties living in peace with non-muslims. This is the very nature and core of their cult.

  8. Kenelm Digby says:

    The fact is that Nigeria cannot organise *anything*, not even the smallest public gathering, let alone an election, without the accompaniment of violence, bloodshed and death.

    For some inexplicable reason violence always stalks any mass gathering of Nigerians in the same way smoke always accompanies fire.’Psychic instability’ is the correct word to use (the sad fact is that Europe or rather Europe’s lickspittle politicians are accepting Nigerian immigrants by the million).

    The ‘Miss World’ organisation once had the poor judgement to stage their pageant in Nigeria.Believe it or not, Nigerians even managed to accompany that harmless and innocuous gathering with bloodshed on a mass scale.