The Name’s the Same in R.I.

Brian MacQuarrie, Boston Globe, November 8, 2010


By a ratio of nearly 4 to 1, voters opted last week to retain the name enshrined in the colony’s Royal Charter, despite opponents who argued that the centuries-old wording conjures memories of Rhode Island’s major role in the American slave trade.

“It was political correctness taken to the nth extreme,” said Jeff Britt, 42, of Warwick, who voted not to amend the state constitution to call Rhode Island simply that. “It was inane on its face.”

But to supporters, a vote to lop off “Providence Plantations” would have helped erase a connotation of slavery and a reminder to minority residents that Rhode Island’s early wealth was rooted in trans-Atlantic trafficking of human beings.



Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Comments are closed.