Posted on August 6, 2007

Vick Dogfighting Case Opens Up Racial Divide

AP, August 3, 2007

The difference between those sporting Michael Vick jerseys and those urging his swift conviction on dogfighting charges is glaring: Vick’s supporters are mostly black; his critics are mostly white.

The racial divide emerged early in the case against the Atlanta Falcons quarterback, apparent at rallies filled with cheering—and overwhelmingly black—Vick supporters and at anti-Vick protests that are noticeably white.

Vick’s opponents say the evidence against him is overwhelming. For many black supporters, that judgment evokes uncomfortable questions about race and guilt in America.

“White folks ‘been grindin’ on an ax  . . . and that ax ain’t got sharp enough for them,” said Earnest Hardy Sr., who called the case a witch hunt targeting a successful black man.


In the rural county split 50-50 between whites and blacks, the case quickly took a racial bent. At the county courthouse, angry letters urged that whites “take back their town.” Critics accuse the commonwealth’s attorney, Gerald Poindexter, of stalling an investigation to protect one of his own.


Hardy suspects that Vick—famous, rich and black—is just the fall guy behind bigger issues.

“A hundred-million-dollar black man?” he huffed. “They can’t stand it.”

His view is reflected from the Newport News region where Vick was raised to Atlanta, where a rally supporting the former Virginia Tech standout drew several hundred fans, but barely 50 whites, said Gerald Rose, with Atlanta-based New Order National Human Rights Organization.

Rose said the outcry stems from what he said is Vick’s premature conviction in the media—not support for dogfighting. But he said the case also awakens anger over a perceived smear campaign targeting famous black men from Kobe Bryant to Michael Jackson.

He argues black men who stumble draw excessive scrutiny and especially harsh public judgment.

“It’s been too many cases involving African-Americans (where) they got through the court of law, they’ve been found not guilty, but damage has been done,” Rose said.


Tempers flared at Vick’s July 26 arraignment in Richmond, where outside the courthouse blacks and whites debated everything from animal rights to slavery.

“It’s racial profiling,” said Bill Brown, a Richmond store owner who held a sign urging Vick’s fair treatment. “We’re always trying to brush everything up under the rug when it comes to racial things.”

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, leader of the most vocal Vick protests, says the issue isn’t racial.

“We’re reacting very strongly to this case because Michael Vick is someone who’s a hero  . . . If this were Peyton Manning or Brett Favre, we’d be out there,” spokesman Dan Shannon said.

Vick’s case is a “crack in the dam” of American racial tension, explained Jeff Menzise, assistant director of the Race Relations Institute at Fisk University in Tennessee.

Whites, he said, may have underlying anger at blacks they feel constantly play the race card. Blacks, meanwhile, may feel whites rush to judge black suspects, but are more lenient to white ones, Menzise said. A case like Vick’s offers a vent for those frustrations.