“Underrepresented” In Virginia

John

Rosenberg, Discriminations, Jul. 8

The University of Virginia Cavalier Daily reports

today that next fall’s entering freshman class is “more

diverse” than last year. By that it means next fall’s

freshman class is 10% black, compared to 9% last fall. (Similarly,

Hispanics increased from 3% to 5% and “Asian and Asian Americans”

increased from 13% to 14%. A chart in the print edition showing

last year’s numbers does not appear in the online version.)

The increase in minority acceptances

at the University is contrary to results seen at peer institutions

such as the University of Michigan and University of California

at Berkeley, both of which experienced decreases in minority acceptances.

. . .

“This year there was more

money available to do more traveling and reach out a little more,”

[director of the Minority Outreach Office Valerie] Gregory said.

“We made more high school visits and the money allowed us

to visit New York, Philadelphia and some other areas that typically

have high minority populations.”

UVa, I’m sure, has no idea how

many Jews, Mormons, or Pentecostals there are in the entering class.

But if, in the interest of “diversity,” it did track such

numbers, I wonder if a director of “Outreach” would feel

so free to say she got extra money to visit New York and Los Angeles,

where many Jews are known to live, as well as to rural Alabama (or

even some hollows in the nearby Blue Ridge) where born again Christians

have been known to congregate.

But even without any concern for religious

diversity, all is not well at Mr. Jefferson’s university: “Women

comprise 54 percent of the class for the second year in a row .

. . .” Still, I doubt whether there are any plans to institute

admissions preferences for the underrepresented males, to visit

areas or schools that typically have high male populations, or to

interview a disproportionate number of males in hopes of attracting

more of them. I’m sure such behavior would be regarded as discriminatory.

Meanwhile, across the commonwealth

in Fairfax County, the highly selective Thomas Jefferson High School

for Science and Technology continues to be the subject of intense

debate over its unrepresentative student body. (See here

and here

for some background on this debate.)

TJ attracts around 3,000 applicants

a year from Fairfax and surrounding counties. That number is winnowed

down to 800 semi-finalists, from which a class of 400 or so is ultimately

selected. The school used to “consider” race until lawyers

told them to s several years ago. As a result, the Washington

Post reports

today, “[l]ast year, the student body was about 1 percent black

and 2 percent Hispanic.” You can predict the response:

A proposal to diversify the student

body at the elite Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and

Technology by giving less weight to applicants’ test scores

is on the Fairfax County School Board agenda for the first time

tonight . . .

As usual, diversity is not what is

at issue here. A correspondent cited in one of my posts above who

is a recent graduate of TJ wrote that in his class of 400 there

were 139 Asians. Severely limiting the number of Asians would allow

TJ to provide much more “diversity” than putting a thumb

on the admissions scales to admit a few more blacks and Hispanics.

And since the Supremes have given the green light to discriminating

to produce “diversity,” why don’t they do it?

I wonder if the quaint old principle

that discrimination on the basis of race is wrong still lives on,

even among some educators.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Comments are closed.