What Kind of People Have We Become?

Jeff Randall, Telegraph (London), January 30, 2012

Between Christmas and New Year, the 70th anniversary of an event, which in no small way helped change the course of history, passed almost unnoticed. On December 26, 1941, less than three weeks after Japan had attacked Pearl Harbor, Winston Churchill addressed both branches of Congress in the United States. The prime minister, who was in Washington to agree military strategy with President Roosevelt, used the invitation from Senators and Representatives to excoriate the Axis powers and pose a simple question: “What kind of people do they think we are?”

This wasn’t Churchill’s finest oratorical effort, but it was clever. As well as denouncing the forces of darkness and the enormity of their aggression, it was an invitation to ordinary Britons, suffering the horrors of war at home, to reflect on the challenge ahead. He was, in effect, asking fellow citizens: “Of what are we made?”

Seven decades later, one wonders how the great man would view the kind of people the British have become. What has happened to the freedoms and independence for which he urged us to fight? It’s hard to imagine our wartime chieftain being anything other than dismayed by the erosion of sovereignty, capitulation to the “equalities industry” and enslavement by debt. We have lost control of domestic borders, ceded legal primacy to Europe and allowed the Storm Troopers of political correctness to stamp their corrosive version of right and wrong on British law.

For evidence of our self-inflicted abasement, look no further than this month’s ruling from Europe’s Court of Human Rights that Abu Qatada, a radical Islamist preacher, regarded as one of al-Qaeda’s main inspirational leaders in Europe, cannot be deported from Britain to his native Jordan because his trial there might have contained evidence obtained by torture.

According to a recent government report, some 3,775 former foreign prisoners, who were in line for deportation by the UK Border Agency, have been released from custody and are living here, most thanks to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a family and private life. A Nigerian rapist was due to be sent home after losing a series of appeals in British courts over his jailing for an attack on a 13-year-old girl. But Strasbourg’s worthies insisted that they must protect the culprit’s “social ties” with Britain, which had blossomed while he defied expulsion.

Are we really powerless to resist this nonsense? It would seem so.

One reason is the complicity of Britain’s home-grown human-rights obsessives and jackboot egalitarians who, in the words of sociologist Peter Saunders, professor emeritus at the University of Sussex, “seek nothing less than hegemony for their moral values and beliefs”. This requires the unconditional surrender of adversaries and the criminalisation of those who dare to oppose. It’s a war of attrition through relentless assaults on popular consciousness by masters of subversion.

Their goal, according to Prof Saunders, is “eroding the ideals of independent thought, self-reliance and personal responsibility and replacing them with the language of thought-crime, group rights and equal outcomes”. This is modern Britain, where a foreign-born paedophile cannot be put on a plane back to Pakistan but traditional Christians are arrested for disobliging comments on homosexuality—a triumph of intolerance over faith.

After 13 years of the Brown Terror, during which reckless state borrowing and out-of-control consumer debt masked economic and social failure, the Coalition is trying to reverse a pernicious tide of grievance culture and something-for-nothing expectations. George Osborne claims: “We are reducing welfare entitlements, imposing new conditionality on benefits and capping overall awards.” That, at least, is the aim, but an insurgency of human-rights lawyers, grandstanding bishops and professional do-gooders is defending every ditch. Only this month, a Romanian living in the UK, who claims to make a living selling the Big Issue, but qualifies for more than £25,500 a year in benefits, was told by a court that she was not receiving enough. Despite objections from the local council, she was awarded an additional annual housing allowance of £2,600. Chancellor, please take note.

Do not conclude, however, that the immigrants are to blame for this mess. Who among us faced with a choice between penury in a Bucharest rat-hole and £500 a week in handouts plus a subsidised home would not be on the train to London? The only surprise is that so few are already here.

What’s more, the influx of foreign workers is forcing us to confront a problem which those seeking to blame high levels of unemployment entirely on public-spending cuts would rather ignore. Why does London have the highest rate of youth joblessness in the country when so many services in the capital are underpinned by newcomers?

Last week, Pret a Manger, which pays above minimum wage, admitted to the London Evening Standard that only 19 per cent of its payroll is British (in London the figure is far lower). Are we really saying that our education system is so poor and work ethic so diminished that Britain can no longer produce staff suitable for a sandwich shop? That is the conclusion of many business folk to whom I put this question, though they prefer sanitised phrases such as a “deficit of lifestyle skills” instead of the less euphemistic “welfare addiction”.

Given that 70 per cent of Britain’s state-educated pupils do not even take GCSE history, never mind pass it, one can bet confidently that the majority of young people trying to enter a difficult jobs market will never encounter the Churchill question: what kind of people do others think we are?

Perhaps that’s a good thing. The answer is deeply discomfiting.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Anonymous

    The above artice explains – accurately, concisely, succinctly – the true situation in Britain today.

    To the question “What kind of people do they think we are?”

    Answer: I know that international opinion about Britain is pretty mixed. Colonialism (yawn) etc. This question is actually unimportant compared to the more pertinent “Of what are we made”?, or “What kind of people have we become”?

    Answer: Britain, and her people, have become Nihilistic, Materialistic, Welfarist, Multicultural, Egalitarian, Politically correct, Politically weak, Uneducated, and Complacent.

    That’s all you need to know about Britain. I love being British, I just don’t like Britain much these days.

    But what would I know ?, I just “want a coup with a minority of White men who agree with me, and set up a right wing dictatorship” (or something like that).

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    I have a pretty good way with words, but I’m at a loss here.  This article disturbs me for some reason, as if I was looking at a picture and there is just plain something wrong with it, something out of place, one of these things is not like the other.

    The only thing I can come up with is that all the modern day problems with Britain that Randall lists aren’t happening in spite of the British effort in WWII, they’re happening as a direct consequence of the Allies winning WWII so decisively. 

    He might as well have written, “we jumped in the ocean, and for some inexplicable reason, we got wet.”

    • Anonymous

      It seems a lot of the psych-warfare used to demonize the Germans transformed into decades of propaganda used to demonize and guilt trip all whites. Hitler’s regime took racial consciousness to a state sanctioned extreme and we’re paying for it today.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent post QD..i am at a loss for words as well.The only thing i could proffer as to ‘the cause’ of why this has happened to the British without using a feather to plow through a forrest would be to direct one to an audio broadcast called “Our Cause” by the late Dr.William L. Pierce (1976/09/25)which was pertinent then and pertinent now and pertinent in the future..http://natallsac.com/audio/dr-william-l-pierce-broadcasts-speeches/

  • Anonymous

    I suppose this is close as they will come because he never quite mentions that it’s a native White Briton vs. Other problem. He makes hints at it, but he’s trying to suggest it’s more of a cultural or political ideology of the Left problem, not specifically racial.  He may be arrested if he did.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JBFGOQQ2RC5YQ6YOCSUPJQGN2U AvgDude

    White marxists are suicidally hell bent on eradicating whites from the planet.   And they’re succeeding so far. 

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Seven decades later, one wonders how the great man would view the kind of people the British have become.

    The British have become a different civilization.

    What has happened to the freedoms and independence for which he urged us to fight?

    Britain’s Cultural Terrorism is the result of the Marxists’ long, planned march through the institutions. Their aim:  the total annihilation of British Western society and culture through the destruction of traditional communities, the industrial base (compare once-great Britain’s modern industry to that of Germany), educational system, the marginalization of religion, a disappearing middle class and a working class forced into unemployment (through importation of low cost labor).  
    This along with government-induced ethnic cleansing of native born Britons through massive Third World immigration:

    Demographers predict the indigenous population will become a minority before 2060, with the young suffering that fate even earlier. Feminist ideology has dramatically decreased the indigenous demographic whilst the Islamic population is doubling every decade through continued immigration and high birth rates.

    –Paul Weston, How to Destroy a Country

    80 percent of new legislation is enacted in Brussels via twenty-seven un-elected Kommissioners. Destruction continues as the United Kingdom has been broken up into 12 regions overseen by appointed ministers; the word “England” has been removed from EU maps.

    Modern Britain is the end result of a carefully planned, deliberately engineered marxist hegemony carried out and imposed by hard leftists and socialists. 
    Bon

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/7RORAJVG7LJJZECDJIILHJBE7U So CAL Snowman

      I would say the EXACT same thing applies to the USA.  Excellent comment!

  • http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=1097046039 REGVLVS

    “Romanian”… (rolls eyes). Raise your hand if you know what “Romanian” means in Western European domestic news reports. If you guessed “gypsy”, I applaud you.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XUNMZOUALEHPCGRP3L4UACGK3M Jerry

    Hitler killed millions of white people – Polish, Czechs, Russians, Ukrainians etc