The Academic Equivalent of Twerking

Rubbish masquerading as scholarship.

This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X.

There is a scholarly journal for everything, and this one is Community College Journal of Research and Practice.

A few days ago, it published an article called “Three Decades of Campus Racial Climate Studies.”

It claims to be a review of “30-year trends in the study of campus racial climates.” It says it covered 140 surveys that included 383,650 students going all the way back to 1992.

The result? “The consistency of findings about . . . frequent encounters with racial stress, stereotyping, onlyness, tokenization, microaggressions, and racism cannot be overstated.”

White people are as bad as ever.

“Onlyness,” by the way, is when there are just a few BIPOCS somewhere — like in the library, I suppose.

So, what are the trends. Are onlyness and tokenization still devastating? Astonishingly, there are no data — no trends — at all in this paper. When I clicked on a link to download the Excel file, all I got was one row for each of the 140 studies, including number of subjects polled and their races.

This entire “research” paper is a list of papers! How can you claim to find “trends” and not include a single data point?

If you want to submit a study to this journal, it says it has to “be rigorous and reflexive methodologically” and “offer original insights.” Only then will it “undergo a double anonymized rigorous peer review process.”

Experts in the field will no doubt check it for original insights.

What a joke. There’s no evidence the authors even read the 140 papers they listed.

This bosh has already made the news: “What 30 Years of Campus Racial Climate Research Can Teach Higher Ed.”

“Across three decades of research . . . negative experiences that students of color face remain stubbornly consistent. . . . [They] often encounter racism in their day-to-day lives.”

Will the New York Times chime in?

When I said this article is only a list of articles, I was wrong. Look at the full title: “and 25 new directions for future research.”

Twenty-five new ways to measure white racism.

For example, what’s the racial climate of online learning? “It is possible that students experience racism in those spaces in very specific ways that have not yet been discovered.”

Be the first to find them.

Or, ask BIPOC alumni how nasty white people were back in their day. Or ask BIPOCs if they’re getting the brush off on Jack’d, Tinder, Bumble, and Grinder.

How much do statues of white people on campus terrify them?

And that’s just four of 25 new fields of research. Enough to keep armies of anti-racists busy. After all, “until racism and its residual effects are permanently eradicated from U.S. colleges and universities, there will always be a need for rigorous campus racial climate research.”

First author, Shaun Harper, is at USC Rossier, and you can see his fancy titles, including “chief research scientist.” He lists his grants, including one here from Bill and Melinda.

He has picked up $13 million over the years, for what looks like the same so-called research countless times: equity for blacks, or how to turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse. I wrote to ask if Prof. Harper had any real analysis of the 140 studies but got an auto-reply because he’s on sabbatical. Rigorous research is exhausting.

Here’s the other author, Oscar Patron, of Indiana University.

Critical race. Systems of oppression. That means you, whitey. All he writes about is “Latino males,” “Queer Latino men,” “gay Latino collegians.” I wrote to him for data but got no reply.

The only thing either of these clowns is fit to do on campus is push a broom. They are part of the hideous, expensive, anti-white cancer that infects nearly every campus in America.

What they do is the academic equivalent of twerking on a police car.

Is that too harsh? No. Not harsh enough. Nearly everyone in America would say those women are flouting civilized standards. Shaun Harper and Oscar Patron are flouting academic standards just as recklessly, spitting in the faces of institutions that pet them and coddle them. They are pushing their plan of racial conquest, all in the name of anti-racism, poisoning the minds of white students. And unlike the degenerates on the police cars, we pay them to do it.

If Donald Trump wants to eliminate this rubbish, he’s still got a long way to go.