Police Searching for Suspect After Beating in Jennings

Dan Greenwald, KMOV, July 19, 2013

Police are searching for a suspect after a man was beaten while walking to a bus stop Thursday afternoon.

21-year-old Zack Finkelstein was walking to a bus stop so he could meet his grandmother for lunch when someone beat him. The incident occurred on Hord Avenue. His brother David, saw him immediately after the incident.

“When I saw him at first, I just thought I need to get him better,” David Finkelstein said. “If he needs to go to the hospital, I need to know he’s alright.”

David said Zack was randomly targeted after someone said “hi” to him while he was walking to the bus stop.

St. Louis County Police describe the suspect as an African American man in his 20s or 30s, six foot three inches tall, weighing 280 pounds and has a scruffy beard.

{snip}

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Puggg

    Thanks to AmRen for going with this story.

    What amazes me is that there are still white people left in Jennings, especially young white people.

  • AutomaticSlim

    6′ 3″ 280, huh?
    Mr. Finkelstein is lucky to walk away from this one.

  • Nick Gherz

    Why can’t Wise Tim get his smug face rearranged by one of these feral beasts?

  • Creepy as a cracker!

    Sounds like a civil rights violation to me. I sure hope the Justice Department thoroughly investigates this one.

    I can dream, can’t I?

    • JohnEngelman

      “I have a dream that one day,” black criminals will be put in prison and kept there until they are too old to endanger anyone.

  • [Guest]

    This act of black savagery is “random” in the same way that bad economic news during the administration of Barack Hussein Obama is “unexpected.”

    • JackKrak

      and “surprise” bestsellers from conservative authors…..

  • ncpride

    Now would be a good time for Governor McCrory to go ahead and sign that new gun law into effect, allowing North Carolinians to carry concealed in many more places.

  • robinbishop34

    A Jewish kid on foot in Jennings??

    • Puggg

      My bet: UMSL student who’s not from St. Louis who thought he was getting a good deal on an off campus apartment.

  • Spartacus

    “Zack Finkelstein…suspect as an African American man…”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    This certainly cheered me up 🙂

  • Luca

    Mr. Finkelstein just got a lesson in race realism. After he’s had a few days to reflect on the events he’ll probably abandon his liberal leanings. Some folks just don;t see things right away.

    • AutomaticSlim

      You mean disappoint and embarrass his parents by voting Republican?
      Could that even be possible?

    • JohnEngelman

      Becoming a reactionary on crime and punishment should not make one an economic reactionary.

      • Luca

        Blacks are coddled by the left for their voting skills. Black crime is a by-product that liberal politicians, media, judges, and lawyers are willing to tolerate because the ends justify the means.

        Coddling and pandering to blacks is an obscenely expensive endeavor that tax payers continue to fund.

        When one sees the correlation between liberal social/political policies on race and crime and how these policies are perpetuated and funded, the blinders start to come off, The dots become connected.

        Black crime is just the tip of the liberal iceberg, after awhile you start to realize what is below the waterline.

        • JohnEngelman

          There are economic and social issues. Within each there are additional divisions.

          Criminals have taught me to hate criminals and to want them to suffer.

          I do not see why my hatred for criminals should make me favor tax cuts for the rich and reductions in Social Security and Medicare payments.

          • AutomaticSlim

            “Social Security and Medicare”

            I wish I had been given the choice to opt out of both of those things from the beginning. Americans did just fine prior to FDR and LBJ. Everyone should be responsible for their own well being. I am not, and should not, be forced to be “my brother’s keeper”. H*ll, I don’t even have any brothers.

          • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

            We weren’t forced to be our ‘Brother’s’ keeper, there is no “forcing” necessary in that respect…we were forced to be the Negro’s keeper.

          • kjh64

            I have no problem with medicare and social security taking care of our elderly. The elderly, the “truly disabled” and children with NO parents should in a healthy society, be taken care of. There are those who can’t take care of themselves. I don’t want to take care of racist Blacks, Mexicans, foreigners and irresponsible young people.

          • AutomaticSlim

            Well, I want to be able to keep at least 90% of what I earn.
            I am the one who gets up at 5:25 every morning…

          • Luca

            I’m sorry you don’t see.

            Liberals are feeding, breeding, housing, busing, relocating, and protecting the very criminals you hate. They do this with the People’s tax money of which they will never have enough.

            I hope this adds clarity.

          • Jackryanvb

            Liberals in New York City have brought the Black welfare underclass birth rate to sub replacement levels, liberals are good on abortion policy for the underclass.

          • Luca

            Abortion is voluntary and temporary, if they really wanted to make some headway, if that were truly their goal, they would offer sterilization in return for the benefits they now get.
            A reduced birth rate for blacks is an unintended, uncontrollable side effect. Those rates are subject to change depending on the woman’s decision.

        • kjh64

          Actually, I disagree. It has nothing to do with liberalism or conservatism but just the fact that it is (many) Blacks being well Black, it’s what too many do.. The best thing would be separation.

          • Luca

            Blacks are enabled by the social programs engineered by leftists. Years ago they were under more control and the dysfunctional rates and statistics we see today were much better. Liberals have exponentially exploded the normal/natural problems associated with blacks.

      • MBlanc46

        I don’t consider demanding civilized behavior to be reactionary.

        • JohnEngelman

          I am reactionary on many social issues. I regret the sexual revolution. I think the moral ethos that existed in the United States during the 1950s was superior to what has existed since. Back then love and marriage went together like a horse and carriage.

          • MBlanc46

            That, I suppose can be seen as reactionary. Having been at least a bystander at the sexual revolution, it seems to me that most of the people who were making it didn’t expect it to turn out as it did. My view is that feminism, which was the driver of the revolution, is the outcome of enduring female attitudes coupled with technological change, and it’s not going anywhere as long as technology makes it possible for women to support themselves. You’d better get used to it.

          • JohnEngelman

            From the beginning part of the feminist movement opposed pornography, especially Playboy. Some even disliked Cosmopolitan.

            The leaders of the feminist movement like Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem were women with fancy college degrees who resented that they were expected to stay home and do housework while their equally well educated husbands had careers that were intrinsically enjoyable.

            If the economy had continued to enable most men to support several children and wives who did not work the feminist movement would not have gotten very far.

            Most women who work do not do it to achieve liberation and fulfillment, but because they need to.

          • MBlanc46

            Women sure do hate porn. It threatens their monopoly. I don’t know that I buy the idea that women entered the labor force because they were forced to (that’s the idea of my mother’s generation, not my wife’s). Rather than being an effect of men no longer earning enough to support a family, I think it’s the cause.

          • JohnEngelman

            Most women do not even enjoy looking at photos of nude men. The market for that is almost exclusively of homosexual men. Lesbians seldom enjoy looking at photos of nude women.

            Man are far more likely to enjoy casual sex with multiple partners than are women because during human evolution promiscuity has more frequently been a workable reproductive strategy for men than women.

          • MBlanc46

            I’m pretty much in agreement about both of those statements.

          • kjh64

            Not true. More men can’t earn enough to support a family for two reasons, firstly because businesses outsourced a lot of our jobs and secondly, our country has been flooded with cheaper foreign labor.

            Many women hate porn, not because it threatens any “monopoly” but because it causes many men to neglect their marriages and families. Porn should be banned as a threat to the family and violent porn is linked to an increase in sex crimes.

          • MBlanc46

            Great. Let’s have censorship. More power to the state. And the outsourcing has been a significant factor only in the last couple of decades. The stagnation in men’s real wages began in the 1970s when women began to enter the labor force in great numbers.

          • kjh64

            No, the sexual revolution wasn’t caused by “feminism” but by the immorality of men. Men created the “double standard” where they not only gave themselves permission but actually championed sexual immorality and promiscuity for themselves If men had held themselves to the same sexual standards that women were held to, there would have been no sexual revolution.

          • MBlanc46

            Strictly speaking, it was women, not feminism, that caused the SR. Feminism is merely a political expression of women’s attitudes. It wasn’t about the double standard, which I think most women favor, but it was about loosening the bonds of marriage.

          • Creepy as a cracker!

            I was born in the 50’s. My mother was a stay at home mom as was every other mother in the neighborhood. Families were intact. In fact, the term single mother or single father was unheard of. We didn’t lock our doors and dad left the keys in the car. We all played little league baseball & peewee football along with being Cub Scouts. Schools were fine and most everything else was peachy creamy. It was a winning combination. Look at what this country has become, it is disgraceful!

          • Yale2001

            Those were good days, but we have been taught and sold into a liberal mindset that has destroyed our country. We all used to feel every action had a consequence and our goal was to give more than receive. I was raised to be a benefit to society, friends, family and America. Now everyone just wants to take.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the 1950s one third of the workforce belonged to unions. Except in 1950 when it was 88 percent, the top tax rate never declined below 91 percent.

          • Would these be the same unions that overpriced many of their members out of the job market because the union leadership had somehow convinced itself that Japan and western Europe would never recover from World War Two, that an auto industry wouldn’t be established in Mexico or Brazil, and which never imagined that the huge production of “Liberty” and “Victory” ships during the war would leave the developed West with a glut of commercial shipping that would last 20 years and blow the bottom out of the US merchant shipbuilding industry?

            Or do you mean a different set of unions?

          • JohnEngelman

            When labor unions were strong most Americans thrived.

            Those who blame labor unions for the growing income gap argue in effect that if American employees accepted third world levels of poverty they would have more jobs.

  • JohnEngelman

    When I walk down streets of the predominantly black and extremely dangerous city where I live I periodically look behind me. I always carry pepper spray.

    • Creepy as a cracker!

      Pepper spray is good but a gun is better, just ask GZ.

  • Jack Burton

    If that Jewish victim walked around with a shirt on as tight as his brother had on in that video then no wonder he was attacked.

    Like other animal predators, blacks can sense fear and weakness. Scrawny, effeminate Jews are prime targets.

  • 1XXX

    Whites need to re-program themselves to deal effectively when facing black violence (or any violence for that matter).

    It’s not that difficult to look inside and reactivate the internal warrior your ancestors depended on for their survival. Blacks don’t have any special fighting powers: their tactics are infantile and their bones break the same as anyone else. They’re simply aggressive, nothing more – they’re willing to be violent. You only need to accept that when it starts they have to be put down – your singular focus. Bodies need to be broken. Start with “The Book of Five Rings” and “The Art of War (Sun Tzu)” to get your mind right. Train using clubs, knives, swords, etc. to gain the sense of a fighting spirit. Above all else, learn to think strategically.

    • IanJMacDonald

      Obtain a concealed carry license. Buy and practice with a sidearm that you like.

      • 1XXX

        Yes indeed, firearms are a valuable component of this.

      • Yale2001

        I agree. You will pay a heavy price defending yourself (look at Zimmerman), but I would still do it in a second.

      • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

        I carry a 230gr bone breaker

    • Romulus

      Brains always beats brawn, but brains and brawn together,…. Priceless.

  • Funruffian

    I am always on guard when dangerous looking Blacks come within my comfort zone. Since they are known for sucker punching when you are not looking always keep them in the corner of your eye when you are alone.

    • evilsandmich

      dangerous looking Blacks

      As opposed to the non-dangerous ones.

      • Funruffian

        Those elderly obese mammies don’t scare me much. Although unsightly, they pose a small chance of a threat.

  • AngloCelt

    Finkelstein? So he hails from the constituency which is most active and vocal in promoting diversity and racial equality. Oi vey, welcome to reality.

    • Romulus

      That is exactly what i thought! Notice that of all the victims of black aggression, the one picked for your viewing pleasure is one of the tribe!! Masters of media manipulation, they are. I reiterate, when the SHTF THEY will follow usas their pukped into the same category. Lets hope this time they are truly on our side and not as a survival mechanism.

      • Romulus

        For some reason I can’t get the edit to work to correct my typing.
        It should say “follow us as they get lumped into”

        • AngloCelt

          I’m very interested as to why the original comment was deleted.

          • Romulus

            It is because of the “their “infleuence.Either the mods are worried about the tribes influence in media that would draw their attention(negatively) to this site or some have infiltrated amren. No matter which it is, one of two possibilities must be correct.

  • An actual physical description? Wow! If they’re not careful, the Jennings police department might look as if they’re actually trying to solve crimes instead of simply pretending to be busy.

  • Please, everyone, hold your hysterics. This was not a case of Knockout King or Polar Bear Hunting. This was just a simple incident of Jew Jabbing.

  • Creepy as a cracker!

    How come the Detroit City Council has not passed a resolution against the vicious crime perpetrated by Lavere? Where is the US Justice Dept. on this case? The government won’t protect Whites from black criminals. Whites are going to have to stand up and protect themselves.

  • Yale2001

    Just think. If this guy kept beating on him, and Zack attempted to defend himself, he would be a racist criminal. Poor Zack would spend the next year in court and there would be riots all over the country.

  • Who Me?

    He was attacked by a “man” 6’3″ tall and weighing approx. 280 lbs. It figures that this was a savage Bantu. Most white men that size are very gentle because they know their size gives them a huge advantage over smaller people, and being civilized humans they don’t want to inadvertently hurt someone.
    This won’t make a racial realist of young Zack Finkelstein. He’ll just justify it to himself and others by saying it was a “random” attack, or “there are bad apples in every barrel”. or same other such nonsense. After three or four more such attacks (if he survives them) he MAY become enlightened. I’m not wishing it on him, just know how this usually works.

    • MBlanc46

      “This won’t make a racial realist of young Zack Finkelstein.”

      I’m not so sure about that. Who was it who said, “A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged”?

      • Jackryanvb

        That’s a good quote.

        Unfortunately too many of America’s “Conservatives” just care about Black crime in Manhattan, Cambridge MA, Hollywood , they’re “Neo Conservatives” for open borders immigration to the US and endless US wars for Israel.

        • Puggg

          You know, I did find it strange that the same people who couldn’t want to get David Dinkins out of office as Mayor turned right around and voted Barack Obama for President twice. I wonder if instead of John McCain and Mitt Romney, if Obama in 2008 and 2012 faced a Rudy Giuliani type who openly campaigned against violent crime and did some dog whistling (please, don’t, I can hear those things!) about race, if New York City voters still would have voted Obama.

      • Jack Burton

        It’s not enough. For those like Jews and liberals, they need a lot more deprogramming for it to sink in. One attack is not enough. He needs to attend a majority black school, live around them for a few years. If that doesn’t set him straight nothing will.

        In general there are two reactions to trauma like that, either they develop a battered White syndrome, a feminine reaction to coping with abuse, and attempt to empathize with their aggressors, or the more masculine and appropriate response which is to see the enemy for what they are, stand up for yourself and fight back.

  • saxonsun

    Why wonder? These stories are deliberately ignored.

  • Jackryanvb

    Blacks will almost always try to start some conversation before they attack.

    Never engage in talk.

    Try not to show fear or initiate a confrontation.

    Stay calm and confident without being arrogant.

    Always have some type of weapon, don’t try to fight bare footed, hand to hand.

    Blacks tend to have concrete skulls, but weak shins. Kick with strong shoes to the shins.

  • 1XXX

    Before they can begin training the body they need to find a reason to live beyond comfort and pleasure. Then they need to find some courage.

  • Jackryanvb

    Agreed. Pat Buchanan and Jack London should be our models, not idiot Libertarians.

    • AutomaticSlim

      Do you believe that Pat Buchanan supports higher taxes and entitlement/social programs?

      Pat is actually in line with Libertarians on some issues, especially foreign policy.

      • Jackryanvb

        AutomaticSlim Jackryanvb • 17 minutes ago −
        Do you believe that Pat Buchanan supports higher taxes and entitlement/social programs?

        Jack replies:

        Yes. I believe Pat supported social programs like Social Security for poor and working class White Americans. And Pat despises the un patriotic wealthy in this country who outsourced most of our manufacturing jobs. Pat opposed NAFTA.

        Pat despises money changing international bankers of a certain ethnic group almost as much as Jesus Christ.

        • JohnEngelman

          I agree with most of your statement. However, why are Gentile international bankers worse than Jewish international bankers?

          • Jackryanvb

            I think you mean the reverse.

            The prevailing wisdom indicates that International White gentile bankers/ financiers never funded Jewish Bolshevics as did the likes of Jacob Schiffs, the Warbugs, Rothchilds. Billionaire White Gentile bankers in Switzerland tend to support the Swiss People’s party that works for strict Swiss immigration laws to keep out Muslim terrorists, the diseased hordes of Black Africa. The evidence is overwhelming that Jewish international financier George Soros funds open border immigration destroyers in the US and generally funds cultural Marxist causes that undermine and destroy White civilizations.

      • JohnEngelman

        In one of his books pat Buchanan wrote about how investors close factories and destroy neighborhoods and said, “Conservatives should ask themselves what they are trying to conserve.”

      • Puggg

        Pat Buchanan supports higher taxes? Where and when? That’s news to me.

        His tax policies are basically in the Reagan-Laffer mode, even if many of his other policies aren’t. Though Reagan, mainly on Buchanan’s counsel, did sign on to more trade protectionism than he otherwise would have if left to his own inclinations.

  • kjh64

    Women have not been duped by anything. Money equals power, the power to make decisions about one’s own life I don’t know of any women that want to be financially dependent on men as that has been a disaster for women as either too many men abused this or if a man died, women were left unable to fend for themselves.. It’s a great thing that all people can be financially self- sufficient if they need to. Both sexes can and should have the ability to do what they want with their lives and be financially successful.

    If a woman doesn’t marry or marries when she is too old to have kids, then that is because she didn’t want kids or marriage, it has nothing to do with “feminism”. However, most women want kids, more so than men.

    Women were duped, not by feminism, but by the male view that what men did was all important but what women did wasn’t. Having kids is VERY important, instead of looking to what men did as being superior, women should have exalted and held what they did in high esteem. Today, now that women have choices, more and more do.