Frightened Men Love Mitt Romney

Mark Morford, San Francisco Chronicle, October 24, 2012

These are the facts you don’t want to know. This is the hard data that can make you cringe, that can despoil the soul and make you wonder at the sad state of the modern world, and gender politics, and the tragically deceived hearts of (ahem) men.

All that progress! All that supposed enlightenment! All that push and desire, that evolution and that open-hearted possibility! And for what? For naught! For shame!

Maybe I was just blocking it out. Maybe I just didn’t want to recall just how wide, how gnarled, how ugly was the gender gap in the last presidential election, when fully half of American men for some godforsaken reason clung to McCain while a huge majority of women understandably wanted Obama, and it was all tied to an antiquated idea that the modern male still hadn’t evolved much beyond his own chauvinistic posturing and the hollow, old-school, might-makes-right machismo McCain so wobblingly represented.

This time, I thought, must be different. This time such a sharp disparity simply cannot exist, particularly given how much the times have changed, given how far we have come, given how it was Obama who nailed bin Laden, Obama who ended a miserable war in Iraq, Obama who is a badass at hoops and Obama who ordered Somali pirates taken out, etcetera and so on, all of which, if nothing else, should appeal well enough to the base macho demographic. Not to mention how Mitt Romney is about as virile and appealing a male presence as a petrified snail.

Really, how could any semi-enlightened male worth his Detroit auto bailout possibly wish for a vacuous one-percenter like Mitt Romney, a guy who would just as soon lay them off as sell them to China for scrap?


I have been proven wrong. Leave it to Nate Silver’s harrowing analysis of the current gender gap in this election (see chart) to slap away any notions of gender equality, the idea that the men and women of America might, just might, have found some semblance of parity, and progress, with the only extant difference being education, intellectual attunement and economic concern.

Not even close. Here is your brutal nutshell takeaway: If only women voted, Obama wins in a landslide. If only men voted, Romney wins in a landslide. (Taken further: if only Latinos, blacks, celebrities, college grads, professors, scientists, poets, Burning Man attendees, book readers, trees, oceans, major cities or college towns of America voted, Obama nails it wholly and true. If only rich CEOs, gun owners, upper managers, oil companies, rednecks, shut-ins and guys who think Muslims are terrorists, Mexicans are lazy house painters and feminazis are ruining porn voted, Romney is a mutant and faraway god).

All of which leads to the most depressing conclusion of all: older white males remain the most terrified, lopsided, confused demographic in all of America, perhaps even more acutely—and more embarrassingly— in this election than any other in modern history.


Is this time any different? Is this election’s standard-model, white-male dread more pointed and true than ever? Maybe.


Nevertheless, the gap is as wide as ever, and the weird knot remains, as petrified and impossible to untie as ever. The good news is, the roles are changing rapidly, the next generation is coming fast, terrified old white guys are a dying breed. The bad news is, with so much at stake this time out (Supreme Court nominees, gay marriage, energy, health care, et al) the evolution of the species can’t come fast enough.


Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • And if there were never any “terrified old white guys”, today the world would look like (pick any sub-Saharan african country) pre-1600.

    • The__Bobster

      Wer’re not frightened; we’re pissed off and ready to raise hell.

    • San Francisco..isnt that the town that basically got RID of its blacketty-blacks? Didnt the homosexuals respond awfully negatively when the blacketty-blacks shot down gay marriage? I smell hypocrisy,markie Mark.

      • You are right, the black population in SF plummeted, and so did the city’s crime rate. What was the city’s response? The board of supervisors created a committee to study ways to lure blacks back to the city!!!

  • Puggg

    But what is Willard Mitt really going to do for those frightened men?  They/we need something more than just a simpler personal income tax deduction system.

    • His biggest contribution will be getting rid of Obama, who will then be free to go back to Chicago politics,  organize the Occupy movement, play golf and give Chris Matthews a few more thrills up his leg.

      • Puggg

        You apparently don’t read Hill Buzz. Kevin Du Jan has it all figured out that some billionairess Obama flunkie is essentially buying him a beachfront mansion near Honolulu. I’ll believe it when I see it.

  • There is a reason why women and blacks weren’t allowed to vote. That really worked out well for us.  Yea for us.

  • Ulick

    “The good news is, the roles are changing rapidly, the next generation is coming fast, terrified old white guys are a dying breed.”

    And there we have it — Leftist ideology in a nutshell.

    The “good news” is that white men are old and dying.

    The “good news” is that the next generation (comprised of more minorities than whites) is coming fast.

    Now imagination if an author wrote: “Blacks and Hispanics commit far more murder and rape than white people. The good news, though, is that black and Hispanis murder numbers may even be greater if Hispsnics and blacks, in particular, did not have far more abortions than whites.”

    The media would be discussing racism for an entire week.

    • I live in Los Angeles (but not for long,) and a few moments ago I was driving along listening to the radio. This ad comes on–

      It is an ad from “Michael Diamond Plumbing,” and he claims in the ad you won’t get a “Bubba.” It makes me want to slam my fist through the radio every time I hear it.

      here is Mr. Diamond-

      Oy vey he has a lot of chutspah! I bet he watches Call of the Wildman, Swamp People, Lizard lick towing, Hillbilly Hand Fishin’, “Redneck Rehab,” “My Big Redneck Wedding,” “Rocket City Rednecks,” “Redneck Island,” “Duck Dynasty,” “Bayou Billionaires,” “Moonshiners,” “Lady Hoggers” … etc.

      But thank goodness, we can see a little reality and watch Morgan Freeman teach us about Quantum Mechanics–

      •  Ah yes… Morgan Freeman, the sentient being of Quantum Theory. I can only assume that all the qualified White guys must have been a little too busy.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        I agree.  Once you hear Mike Diamond’s mother, though, all of it should make sense.

        But I am MORE offended by the constant commercials promoting “California Fresh”  — California state’s EBT card.    The state is BROKE yet more are being encouraged to sign up for food stamps??  And these commercials air on so-called conservative 640 during John & Ken’s show.


        Image:  Food Stamp Nation

        • Yes, California is going the way of Detroit, FAST. It’s a shame, too, because she was beautiful at one time. It’s such a huge, populous state, though, and when she falls– it’s going to hurt the whole country.

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

             Don’t you realize that California’s current failing trend IS hurting the rest of the country?

  • I nominate the guy for this years “our own worst enemy” award. This guy is right up there with louis farrakhan and rev pfleger when it comes to “YT is the devil” ideology, only he narrows it down to white men.   We all know that mexicans and blacks are not the biggest threats to our survival, it’s all the Mark Morfords out there who are the enablers and abettors that work against the best interests of the country. This is the kind of guy who wants to send your kids to a 90% black school,  but would never consider sending his kids to one.  Does anyone here sense that we are in a war, and a large number on our side are openly hoping we lose?

    • humptydumpty

      Sir, when the sh*t hits the fan, the race traitor whites will be the first the blacks will turn on. They’ll be dead and won’t even be in the eqation. It’ll be us against the blacks and hispanics. Of course, the Asians will line up with us. All we have to remember is, good position, good breathing, trigger squeeze, 6 o’clock bull and one round, one k*ll, and we’ll be fine. 

  • Up to my neck in CA

    “when fully half of American men for some godforsaken reason clung to McCain while a huge majority of women understandably wanted Obama.”

    Notice the words used “godforsaken and clung” when talking about men and “understandably” when mentioning woman.

    Translation: Men are dumb and racist, woman are enlightened.

    • bluffcreek1967

      Good point. The writer not only has an anti-White bias, but also an anti-male bias as well!

      • 5n4k33y35

         Pssst… Mark Morford is a homosexual. That’s why he hates white society.

        • Liberalssuck

           Most gay men I have met were anti-white/pushed white guilt.  They think they are such victims because most people don’t find their bedroom practices normal or healthy.

          • Their bedroom practices aren’t normal or healthy. An objective examination of the epidemiological record can prove that.

            Example: Anal cancer among gay men is %700 of what it is for the population at large. If that doesn’t tell you something, nothing can.

  • Francis Galton

    Let’s see, terrified old White men are replete in bucolic rural areas, tidy suburbs, and sleepy small towns.  They are virtually non-existent in Detroit, Camden, Baltimore, DC, Atlanta, Memphis, St. Louis, and so on.  Do you see a pattern, here?

  • Biff_Maliboo



    It’s the white males that are frightened and irrational.

  • MekongDelta69

    A hundred thousand to one that Mark Morford of the S.F. Chronicle is gayer than a three dollar bill.

    Any takers?

  • MekongDelta69

    A hundred thousand to one that Mark Morford of the S.F. Chronicle is gayer than a three dollar bill.

    Edit: Try registering to comment on the S.F. Chron. site. Go ahead. Just try if you’ve got a few hours to kill. If you’re successful, let me know.

    • deep_enough

      I think you can make that a million to one… 
      From his facebook “Personal Interests”: sex toys and “sacred geometry ecstatic love sublime raunch decent mints occasional naps fine bedsheets good lighting ongoing shimmering humming thrumming sticky lickable palpable divine connection”

      And from his HuffPo bio: “He believes in divine mystery, good lubricant and beautifully designed small European cars. And dogs. And trees.”

      • The good news is that the new Gallup poll reveals that gays are only 3.4% of the population.  That includes the ‘L’ , ‘B’ and ‘T” too.  They’re quite drunk with power at the moment, but they might wake up after an election someday, and  find out it wasn’t so smart to throw stones at 97% of the population.

        • IstvanIN

           GLBTXYZ thinks that diversity are their friends, they are embarrassingly stupid.

    • toldev

       Your first hint would be that he writes for the S.F. Chronicle. That paper is referred to as “that gay rag” in some circles.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    This is the most hateful, vile, ignorant screed that I’ve read, well, all day! 

    As far as  hate, the author should be an expert at it, for if he looks in a mirror, I suspect that he’ll see plenty of it looking back at him. “Terrified old white guys are a dying breed”? Can anything be more hateful than celebrating the physical extinction of a whole class of people?

  • JohnEngelman

    I am a frightened older white male. I am scared of what will will happen if the Republicans sweep the next election. Tax cuts for the rich will increase the national debt. The voters should have learned that by now. Reductions in government spending and employment will not lead to a robust job market.  The voters will learn that if a President Romney gets a Republican Congress.  
    George Romney got rich producing cars and jobs. His son has gotten richer proving that he meant it when he said, “I like being able to fire people.” 
    George W. Bush did this country much harm as a compassionate conservative. Mitt Romney will do the country more harm by being what he is proud to describe as “a severe conservative.” 

    • RisingReich

       Please put the pipe down, John.  Seriously.

    • NM156

      Increases in govt. spending have only resulted in the transfer of borrowed money to a few sectors with no multiplicative effect on the economy. Keynesian monetary policy won’t do anything to a dying industrial giant living on pent-up wealth, private debt, and public debt. This economic malaise has no cure and can only get much worse. Real estate and the service sector cannot replace industry. And that is the end of that!

    • Did all that Kool-Aid you drank taste good?

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

       Hah, the sooner this house of cards collapses, the sooner we’ll have the reckoning that’s been coming for decades, maybe ever since Reconstruction.  After all, what is so sacred about the Union?  The world would be better off without the US as a superpower and liberals would agree with that part, at least.

  • RisingReich

    My father is an OLD German.  He’s not terrified – he’s agitated. 
    Not to worry, his son is pissed off and ready for the revolution.

  • bluffcreek1967

    That’s a very good point. It’s so obvious that there’s an anti-White agenda on the part of the MSM and newspaper writers/commentators nationwide. They don’t even try to hide it. They are blatant about it – and no one even questions it!? Yet, if these same sort of terms or expressions were used against Blacks or any other “minority,” there would be an endless chorus of voices demanding that the person be fired!

    The reason they get away with it because Whites are not unified, they have no sense of racial cohesion or White pride – and the liberal, anti-White crowd knows it.

  • bluffcreek1967

    Yes, when things get really bad, the feral Blacks will turn on the do-gooder, self-hating Whites and sodomize them just like the Muslims recently did to our foolish Ambassador in Libya.

    • IstvanIN

       I don’t think it is fair to call the ambassador foolish.  He knew something was up, reported and Obama let him get killed.

      • bluffcreek1967

        That’s not why I referred to him as foolish. He was foolish because he thought he could ‘work with’ and ‘guide’ the savage Muslims in Libya to democracy. The ambassador actually thought the Muslims liked and respected him and this explains why he felt so comfortable in their presense. He naively thought he could be Obama’s ‘agent of change.’ But this foolish liberal failed to understand the nature of Muslims and how deep their hatred for American runs. And so, when given the chance, the savage Muslims rear-mounted this foolish man and did to him what every fanatical Muslim dreams of doing to each one of us. It was tragic and sad, no doubt. But his efforts in Libya were fruitless and symptomatic of how liberalism makes people who are relatively intelligent do some of the most insane things.  

        • IstvanIN

          I though ambassadors like Stevens were career service employees from the state department who were assigned different countries, not volunteers?

          • bluffcreek1967

            He was appointed, but it did not occur in a vacuum. He was already conversant with Muslims and their religion and, if my reading of him is correct, he was quite eager to ‘help’ the so-called ‘Arab Spring’ in Libya. It doomed him.  

        • 5n4k33y35

          bluffcreek1967 wrote: “And so, when given the chance, the savage Muslims rear-mounted this foolish man and did to him what every fanatical Muslim dreams of doing to each one of us.”

          Yeah, you’re probably a homosexual. You really want to believe that happened. I don’t like fags.

          • bluffcreek1967

            In spite of your ad hominem and rambling post, it is more than probable that Ambassador Stevens was sodomized by the angry Muslims. This practice is not merely done by feral Blacks, but also by Muslims as a means of degrading their enemies. We must not forget that they did the same to Gaddifi of Libya before and after he died. This has nothing to do with any “hate” or “deception” on my part, but is something reported by many news outlets at the time.

          • 5n4k33y35

             That’s your homosexual fantasy, not reality.

    • 5n4k33y35

      The Ambassador was not sodomized. He was taken to the hospital where he died.

      You do a disservice to men in general, in your enthusiasm to portray Muslims so badly.

      Would YOU want to sodomize him? Neither would 97% of other men. Nor would they allow it to be done in their presence. (Maybe I’m being presumptuous to suppose you wouldn’t.)

      • Ambassador Stevens was sodomized both before and after his death. It is quite common in the Muslim world to defile the object of your hatred before and ater you kill them.

        • 5n4k33y35

          All they did was repeat the allegation without any proof. FrongPageMag is a crapzine.

        • 5n4k33y35

          That link to Front Page Mag contains no evidence of sodomy. I already saw all those photos on weeks ago. Those are pictures of a rescue effort by volunteers.

      • bluffcreek1967

        Again, in spite of your ad hominem and rambling post, Ambassador Stevens was more than likely sodomized by the angry Muslim mob. I don’t in any manner do a disservice to men in general by pointing out the savagery of Muslims. Such homosexuality, especially with young boys, is quite common among male adherents of Islam. We must never forget how primitive these people are, especially when it comes to devotion to their pedophile prophet. Again, this is not a matter of being mean spirited in our “polite society.” Rather, it’s simply telling the truth about the Muslim religion. I would respectfully urge you to read more about the true nature of Islam from informed authors if you have not done so already.

        • 5n4k33y35

          You have no evidence. You just repeat the same baseless allegation.

          Within every society, there are men who are not straight. They are small minority. Those who are homosexuals are an even smaller minority.

          I’m sick and tired of Feminists, fags and dykes setting the agenda for everyone else.

          I guarantee those guys did not sodomize the Ambassador, and it makes you sound like a homosexual for being so irrationally attached to the idea that it was done.

        • I cannot recall ANY “gay rights” group condemning Jerry Sandusky for his actions, can you? They were stone dead silent. Come to think of it, f the ambassador was gay, where TF is the gay outrage against Muslims over this? Where are the gay voices screaming about serving in the military, now?

          Do you get the feeling that some gays are beginning to understand that life in the Middle East for gays isn’t like going to a glory hole in San Francisco?

          • 5n4k33y35

            LGBTs would have us believe Jerry Sandusky was straight.

            There’s a case to be made that Ambassador Stevens might have been gay. Apparently he was never married at age 52.

            There is no evidence whatsoever that he was sexually assaulted alive or dead. It’s clear that BuffaloCreek doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

  • bluffcreek1967

    What is with this anti-male mentality that’s permeated so much of our public discourse? Anything that’s connected to being White and male is seen as backward thinking or just plain evil. Men bad, women good. The common assumption seems to be that women are the smarter gender, they are more perceptive and more rational, and if women were not so kept down by men, the world would be a safer and more beautiful place. Hogwash and pickle juice!

    I love women and I admire many of them greatly. In many ways, they help balance men and both genders were meant to work together in harmony. But I must say that women frequently allow their emotions to cloud their thinking and they are often guilty of falling prey to religious and political con-artists! It’s not that men aren’t deceived, but there seems to be a higher rate of women who fall into this category. The deep in-roads that liberal-marxism has made into our country has been, to a great degree, the result of far too many soft-minded, gullible women.

    I know this isn’t popular to say, but the tremendous contributions that men – particularly White men – have made to the world cannot be denied. Men are far from perfect and we have made our fair share of mistakes. But it is because of the strong leadership, intelligence, forethought and courage of White men that this world has become a better place – and we must never forget this.    

    • 5n4k33y35

      You can’t really accuse others of having an “anti-male mentality” when you yourself are so quick to assume the worst about your fellow man because he is of another religion or race.

      Contrary to what you said, those guys rescued Ambassador Stevens, took him to the hospital, and their thanks is to be denigrated as ghoulish homosexual rapists. You can’t posture as a men’s rights advocate when you defame your fellow man. You are a Feminist.

      It is possible for an MRA to be bigoted and chauvinistic without being a lying, dishonorable scoundrel.  Condemning Good Samaritans and volunteer first responders as homosexual sodomite rapists is pathetic. You’re as bad as any Feminist. You’re on the level with Andrea Dworkin.

      • bluffcreek1967

        Sir, you need to discuss with your physician about lowering your medication dosage because your incoherent ramblings are getting the better of you.

  • San Fransisco is a city unto itself. It is the liberal embodiment of what conservative are denied; their own city run by their own values. You can have a liberal city but you can’t have a conservative city.

  • Puggg

    By “men,” Bathhouse Mark means “white men.”  I wonder why he didn’t say it more often than he did.

    If only “rich CEOs, gun owners, upper managers, oil companies, rednecks, shut-ins
    and guys who think Muslims are terrorists, Mexicans are lazy house
    painters and feminazis are ruining porn” voted, Mitt Romney would have been too liberal to win the Democrat nomination.

  • Mercerian Jed

    “Terrified old white guys are a dying breed.”

    What happens if they don’t die off fast enough?  Will their votes not be counted because they are “living too long”?   Will the Obamacare Death Panels target them for “denial of medical service due to outdated Whiteness”?

    What if their White daughters refuse to breed with buck nasty n’gro voodoo Diversity, but choose to make Whites Only babies instead?  Will these daughters be deemed “shameful reminders of historic injustices who deserve to die faster”?

    God knows, unlike when we weren’t imagining 9/11 before it happened, now that we’ve had Obama for four years, we just can’t stop imagining the Diversity horrors to come… the reality of White minoritization under BRA Diversity is begining to sink in and make a difference to how we think about everything.

    Considering giving money to a school, church, or civic organization? It will go to Diversity. Don’t Give, Ever Again!

    • Liberalssuck

       Until and unless whites take charge and fight hard everytime, all the horrific things you mentioned that could happen to whites will happen.

      • Mercerian Jed

        Obamacare forces us to pay for more black doctors who will be steeped in anti White privilege hatred. What kind of care will they give Whites when they believe that Whites are supposed to support healthcare, not receive it?

        But what color doctor will these BRA Diversity doc send their own children to when the need an operation to remove a brain tumor?

  • Mark Morford is a homosexual who lives in SF. Enough said. His view is diversity for thee but not for the Castro.

    • Liberalssuck

       As always, ask these self-hating whites where they live.  Chances are, it is in a rich white neighborhood far away from the diversity they push onto the peons. 

  • Sun

    Oh how I’m getting sick of white men pretending their superiority by mocking the group they belong too.

    I say San Francisco Chronicle needs more diversity, especially in the writing department. I’m sure Mark would be glad to give up his position in the name of progress.

    The evolution of the specie can’t come fast enough, Mark. 🙂

  • deep_enough

    The gender difference is a little more subtle than that, I believe.  

    The #1 issue for women, according to every poll I’ve seen is the “women’s health” code-phrase for abortion.  Which is also what the allegations of Republican “War on Women”  are really about.  An astounding number of men just don’t seem to get that, or the implications.  I don’t think (white) women understand the implications either, they’re only voting their own immediate personal self-interest.

    But the hard fact is that White South Africans basically committed suicide by refusing to allow abortion — the black population mushroomed to a size that forced and end to white rule, and the consequent collapse.  Oddly, again, one of the first things the black rule did in (for) SA was legalize abortion.

    The same thing is true in the USA.  The Romney/Ryan stance on abortion is, in practice, flat-out racial suicide for whites.  The road to hell, as they say, is paved with good intentions.  I say its built by principled idiots.

    There have been, according to the usual sources, about 13 million black abortions since Roe v Wade; without which the black population would now be around twice what it is. The hard fact is that blacks and whites just do not behave the same, and that goes for reproductive behavior as much as any other.  Expecting blacks to be sexually responsible is as absurd as expecting them all to learn calculus in high school.  

    The black/white(European) ratio in this country was 1:10 50 years ago, now its 1:6 (more like 1:5 if you count only those under 60 or so)and dropping fast.  Without RvW, that ratio would be more like 1:3.  You think it’s bad now?  

    I would suggest that from the perspective of preservation of the white race (as opposed to the economy, say) in this country, Obama is the far better choice.  Weird but true.

    • 5n4k33y35

      Yes, but the Republicans can’t overturn legal abortion.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      Here’s a link to a think tank (more conservative) article about the earlier claim that abortion has made a difference in crime stats.

      I agree with you, but even more that women on welfare should submit to sterilization after the second child (probably too liberal).  We just don’t need more blacks, period.  But that crime stats are affected is the question and it’s funny that libs are using that argument when it rather admits that blacks are often the automatic perps of crime.  Poor whites still don’t reflect the same failure rates.

    • TeutonicKnight67

       So how exactly is infanticide conducive to the White Race? Please go rent the film Idiocracy on netflix!

      • Persephone Gray

        This is a eugenics question. It’s a question of quantity v. quality. Does it serve us better in the long run to have as many whites as possible, though many may be bordering on cretinous, or fewer whites of reasonable intelligence and sound body?

  • JohnEngelman

    Rich Democrats are generous, because they support economic policies that result in higher taxes for them.  
    Like most low and middle income Republicans you enjoy identifying with rich people. That does not make you one of them. It does not make them identify with you. 

    • 5n4k33y35

      You’re right about Romney, but if he turns out to be as bad as he has told us he is going to be, he’ll be a one term president himself. Our only way to send negative feedback is to not reelect any incumbent. First Obama gets shown the door.

      • JohnEngelman

        President Obama made mistakes on the economy, but it is gradually improving. The international situation has greatly improved under his leadership. 
        Mitt Romney has nothing to offer the economy but tax cuts for the rich and cuts in domestic spending. The only people who will benefit from that are those who are rich, and the rather very small number of everyone else who has the talent to become rich. 
        A President Romney will talk about reducing immigration. Nevertheless the employers and investors he cares about benefit from the depressing effect on wages a high rate of immigration causes, so I doubt he will do more than talk. 
        On a personal note, I have been the victim of too many black criminals to have illusions about the Negro race, but I do not dislike someone simply because he is black. 

        • Puggg

          President Obama made mistakes on the economy, but it is gradually improving.

          I hear the echoes across the canyons of this improving economy all the time with the same refrain:

          Would you like fries with that?

        • David Ashton

            Well, you won’t mind about immigration so long as it all comes from the populous Far East, or have to had second thoughts?

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

           You’re speaking in cliche’s.  Read up on the present economic predictions.  Whoever becomes president next will likely have a recession on his hands.  Anyway, third quarter was not good and even though the fourth ought to be better, next year looks grim.  It won’t take much more pressure for things to begin to unhinge in a big way.

    • toldev

       Rich Democrats do not support policies that result in higher taxes for themselves. The support higher taxes for the “rich” which to them means a person who has a full time job making minimum wage.

      I would suggest that you read “The Big Ripoff” by Tim Carney. It is told from a libertarian perspective but does give good insights into the mindset of the ultra wealthy left. The ultra wealthy left has the same mindset with taxes as it does diversity: High taxes for thee but not for me.

      I agree with you that Romney will do damage to the country if elected. However, he will do less less damage than Obama. It just comes down to a choice of the lesser evils.

      • Liberalssuck

        Since Ron Paul didn’t get it, I will hold my nose and cast my ballot for Romney.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

         For me it comes down to the fact that after the second debate, there were hundreds of tweets and online threats to assassinate Romney as well as threats of nationwide riots should he win.  So I am going to hold my nose and vote for Romney.  I might be able to get rich, even by a gold brick falling out of the sky, but I cannot change that I am a white man.  It’s come to that.

    • Liberalssuck

       Rich democrats are generous with other people’s money, aka (white) taxpayers money.

  • Just what you might expect from a typical self-hating, emasculated White male from Frisco, the most appallingly liberal rat warren in America. Made me think instantly of Bill Maher, that insufferable liberal jerk.

    There, folks, is what this nation will look like someday — the WHOLE nation, not just “Soul Francisco” — if Obama gets back in for another term.

  • Indeed. Pride goeth before a fall; an Obama victory (God save us from that) would be followed, I predict, by, shall we say, some very unpleasant times. And I mean unpleasant FOR Obama and his minions — not BY them, despite what they think.

    • 5n4k33y35

      You’re right. Obama is stuck with the progressive coalition. He began his journey in a cul de sac, and that’s where he’s been the whole time. He would have to do a 180 degree turn to get moving.

      The progressive platform is a cruel joke. It’s pitiful that any man should have to make the case for all the ridiculous ideas of Progressive doctrine. 

  • bluffcreek1967

    I happen to agree with you. The men I had in mind in my prior post were men such as America’s founding fathers and other noble White men who helped build  great societies throughout Western civilization. The men of today, in comparison, do not even come close (although there are a few out there). On the whole, however, White men have abdicated their leadership role in the family and in other important realms. And so, yes, most of the blame rests on us.  

  • Bad_Mr_Frosty

    We White men suffer from institutionalized racism. Our “admirable traits” have been made illegal. Most men are too busy to take up a cross and launch a crusade. Childless liberals, gays and feminists have plenty of time to launch crusades. 

    All this nonsense requires massive amounts of very expensive social engineering to make it work. Once the anti-White male system collapses, the natural order of the universe will be restored.

  • Net_Drifter

    I think one thing this guy is doing is assuming a  lot about young/younger white mens’ attitudes. There are white men Obama’s age and younger who are not mesmerized by him and have no trust in him. Many of the youngest voters are in his camp but they often lose interest quickly in…anybody.

  • bubo

    Yeah but he’s cool and progressive and has tatoos and wears hipster hats and votes D and lives in Frisco.  Basically he considers himself, “the right kind of white.”

    • 5n4k33y35

      Mark Morford is a fag.

  • Persephone Gray

    Actually, I think there was a study not too long ago showing that conservative Republicans read far more than other political demographics, so this guy’s clearly just blowing wind out his backside.

  • Persephone Gray

    Your last two sentences ought to be printed on t-shirts and bumper stickers. They lightened my heart after reading too many depressing things tonight. Thanks for the reignition, Fr. John+.

  • ViktorNN

    Say what you will about the two party system, about Dems and Repubs, about the role of money in our political system, about how in a real sense voting is an exercise in futility…

    Aside from all that, to vote Dem as a white male is to vote for one’s own disappearance. It’s to vote for less for your white family. It’s to vote for less whites. Literally. Morford is stupifyingly oblivious of this fact.

    Given all this, if you’re going to participate at all (another can of worms), voting GOP is the bitter pill that a white male must swallow. Sometimes it’s a harder choice to make than others, but the alternative – to vote for one’s own extinction – simplifies things quite a bit.

  • 5n4k33y35

    Mark Morford is an obnoxious homosexual. Of course he hates the White Patriarchy. 

  • I swear to insert deity of your choice, people are so deity-damned transparent.

    Many left wingers suffer from a bizarre form of persecution complex.  That is, they constantly fear (at best) or actually want (at worst) to be persecuted by their political opponents.  The worst kind of left wingers in this regard are the ones who engage in behavior that used to be deemed “immoral.”  I happen to think that these kinds of left wingers are projecting, because they fear the kind of persecution which they subconsciously know they want to do on us.

    Incidentally, this is why these poverty and defamation groups we all know and love so much are like, well, poverty, a vexing social problem we’ll always have with us.  You see, they’re like those obnoxious sores one gets in inopportune places on one’s anatomy if one contracts herpes.  One could take drugs to get rid of them for awhile, and they’ll indeed be gone for awhile, but the underlying cause, the herpes infection, is still there, which guarantees that the sores will eventually pop up again.  Likewise, we could find some legal pretext to drive the ADL and SPLC out of business, but the underlying infection, the paranoia/persecution complex of left wingers, is the herpes virus in this metaphor that’s still there.  Eventually, other “sores” with fancy titles and 501-c-3 status will pop up again.

    What’s this Mark Morford screed all about?  It’s easy — He fears that Mitt Romney will shove a Book of Mormon in between he and his boyfriends while they try to do that which Lev. 18:22 prohibits.

  • Kingfish555

    I am an old white guy and I am scared.  We have it all,,, the money, the brains, and the ability to get things done.  But we wont fight . Why is this,,, we just let the unwashed hoards take everything from us a little at the time. We have to stand up and fight back,,, but we wont.  Maybe it has something to do with being of English heritage and values.  England ruled the world about a hundred years ago and just gave it away peice by peice until now its just another bankrupt country.  White males must change and take back what we fought for or its curtains for us in 50 or so years, if that long.  My question is,,, why wont we stand up ad fight???   KF    

  • Yep white males are a dying breed—which also means white females are too–but as they die off,so does America. I used to take creatures like this Mark Momford,yoga teacher,who calls Obama a “Lightworker” seriously! I cant believe how stupid I was!! These cranky,I presume gay,white males LOVE to trash OTHER white males.pulling out that cat-o-nine tails and applying it–how else-liberally to our backs.I’d be proud to be scourged by this yoga teaching lightworking piece of excrement.But why is he allowed to live so freely and happily in MY country????

  • Liberalssuck

    Whenever a white person criticizes another white for being a racist, say this to them, “Oh, so do you live in a black neighborhood?  Ever send your kid to a majority black school?  If not, why do you judge other whites?  Maybe you hate me because I reflect something about you that you do not like.  Or you are just jealous because I have the guts to say what you don’t.”

  • Liberalssuck

     His article is a more watered down/less genocidal version of Tim Wise’s “An Open Letter to the White Right.”  It’s amusing watching how angry these anti-white leftists are lately.  They know people are waking up and aren’t buying their nonsense anymore.  They see their gravy train is getting derailed and they are scared.  All their calls of violence against whites or saying “Your day is over!” is fear coming out of them.  It’s called projection.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Just read that screed!  It hardly lets up for a minute.  No one can possible claim that this is an unbiased article.  It is so full of venom.  This is why the SF Chronicle hasn’t been taken seriously outside of the SF region for decades.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     The meek will never inherit the earth, they will be killed and survivors ruled by the not-so-meek.  Better get over that righteous sounding Bible drivel because the white warrior will inherit the earth, not by praying but by his might and will.

    • JasonVinland

       I agree, this meek sh** is killing us.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     Yes, the mud mobs will go wild once the white man is finished.  They will self-destruct at a faster pace than they do now.  The Western World will look like South Africa and Zimbabwe.

  • This guy probably writes his columns between fisting sessions.  SanFran is known for its outrageous S&M backrooms- as anyone with a mind will understand.

  • Marc B.

    Blacks are shuttled out of cities full of gentrified, leftist Whites via Section 8 vouchers. Every time I see projects getting torn down, I know that they are sending these violent loafers and thieving malcontents to a neighboring working class area (usually majority White) so that urban whites can remain DWL’s.

  • TeutonicKnight67

     As a militant White man I can attest to that! Gun shows are virtually diversity free. I feel perfectly at home there among my own kind. Newsflash Libscum: we are legion. Your leftist  nonsense cannot last much longer.

  • 5n4k33y35

    That was done at the behest of American Feminists who created the rape hysteria about Gadhaffi with false accusations of mass rape, involving distribution of condoms and Viagra.

    The origin of your claim on Muslims can be traced back to a paranoid, conservative homosexual, reporting a rumor from an individual Serbian regarding Muslims.

    I know where your ideas come from, but you don’t. You’re way down the line, a mere pawn repeating what someone else said.

    It’s barely even worth debating a stooge who is nothing more than a repeater of a particular narrative.