More Mobile Phones than Lavatories for a Booming India

Dean Nelson, Telegraph (London), March 14, 2012

More Indians have access to a mobile telephone than a lavatory, according to the country’s latest household census which reveals a nation more concerned with consumer goods than essential services.

The census covers the last decade in which India’s economy has soared to become the second fastest growing in the world after China with sharp increases in the number of people who own televisions, cars and motorbikes.

But it has also revealed the scale of poverty which remains in millions of homes without electric lighting, access to clean water and dependent on cow dung fuel for cooking.

According to the findings, the number of homes with a lavatory of any kind jumped from 69 million in 2001 to 115 million in 2001, 16 million fewer than the 131 million homes which now have a mobile telephone.

In the 89 million homes which have an inside water closet—up from 34 million in 2001—only 11 per cent of them are connected to a piped sewer system.

The number of Indian families without access to any lavatory and forced to use open ground instead increased from 122 million families in 2001 to 130 million last year—almost half of the country’s 1.2 billion people.

The latest survey indicates the continuing use of ‘night soil carriers’ with 794,000 households using humans to remove their waste.

India’s Registrar-General voiced concern that Indians appeared to regard mobile phones a higher priority than basic sanitation and rejected suggestions that lack of government investment was to blame. “It is not a question of investment in the sector but of the mindset that needs to change cultural and traditional reasons and lack of education seem to be the primary reason for this unhygienic practice. We have to do a lot in these areas,” said C. Chandramouli.

He said the overall picture, however, showed significant improvements in standards of living throughout the country.

The number of homes with electric lighting jumped from 107 million in 2001 to 166 million in 2011—67 per cent of all households. Families without any lighting at all, however, increased from 614,000 in 2001 to 1.1 million last year.

Computer ownership was not recorded in 2001, but in 2011 15 million homes had a computer, 7.7 million of which also had access to the internet. The number of families with a television almost doubled from 60 million to 116 million in the last ten years.

Car ownership more than doubled from 4.8 million to 11.5 million but the rise in the number of homes with a motorbike or scooter was even sharper, up from 22.5 million in 2001 to 51.8m in 2011.

Those living in *pukka* or solid buildings increased while the number of those sheltering under thatched, grass or bamboo roofs fell from 53 million in 2001 to 37 million last year. The popularity of mud and cow dung flooring, which has antiseptic properties, increased in the same period by two million homes.

Sociologist Professor Vinita Bhatia of Xaviers College, Mumbai, said the victory of consumerist priorities over basic needs was in part the government’s fault.

“The data validates the perception that Indian society has become more consumerist after liberalisation of the Indian economy. If India’s are not spending on fulfilling their basic amenities, it’s a joint failure of the government and the society,” he said.

The poor expect the government to provide basic services like clean water and electricity, which they do not have the means to acquire, he said. But many were simply prepared “to sacrifice basic amenities for something which gives them an upper edge in consumerist society,” he added.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Reminds me of a humorous wooden plaque that a neighbor of mine back in the old neighborhood had inside his unmentionable room:

    Moving this inside took most of our dough.  This empty bucket isn’t just for show.  Please insert a nickel before you go.

  • This is just like the yoooths that where fighting over $200 sneakers.

  • I guess that by having a cell phone the poor Indians feel that they have something even if they do not have indoor plumbing or electricity in their homes.

  • Billy

    In India – unlike China – waste is not neatly recycled.

    However, given financial and family realities, any sensible Indian would choose a mobile
    cellphone  over a flush loo.

    Yapping noisy messy democratic India is a dynamic powerhouse and a vile heap of filth simultaneously.

    China is neater and cleaner but also a cruel horrible despotism.

    • The_Bobster

      You don’t know China very well. On the plus side, it looks like they may finally be cleaning up their mess.

      http://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/AJ201203190112

      “There is solid evidence from China, the United States and even Malaysia, that the processing of rare earths contaminates the environment and endangers health,” said Ronald McCoy, president of Malaysian Physicians for Social Responsibility.

  • Pat

     After the start of the Iraq war we had a large amount of Iraqis appear in our city centre (South West U.K.) .  In a very short time they all had mobiles which were in constant use.  I used to wonder how they could afford them.  As immigrant/asylum seeker/refugee (legal or illegal)numbers have begun to rise it is noticeable that ALL have access to this means of communication – probably encouraging  the relatives….!

  • I think what you’re missing is your own selection bias.  You’ve met only a few Indians, by definition, only a small fraction of all Indians.  And I think you’re assuming the intelligence of the few Indians you have met are the only reason why tech jobs are being outsourced to Bangalore, when the real reason is they work cheaper.

    The first two Nigerians I ever met were both calculus teachers/professors I had.  But that gives me no delusional attitudes about Nigeria itself.

  • Indians are the new muds that Jew-controlled Hollyweird pushes on White countries.

    They are all geniuses, funny and charming, who wouldn’t want these delightful “Asians” taking working class jobs and sending the upper classes to steal college slots and white collar jobs?

    Makes me sick. Indians are borderline morons, smelly and ugly, imported and alien competition, and I for one hate ’em.

  • Well, that comment smashing Indians as highly overrated, misrepresented-by-upper-caste parasites barbarians and morons lasted about 10 minutes. Oh, there is no truth that I would not…blahblahblah comment deleted.

    :p

  • The only reason that tech jobs are outsourced to the Indians is because they are willing to work cheaply than Americans do.