Posted on February 11, 2010

Race & Gender of Judges Make Enormous Differences in Rulings, Studies Find

Edward A. Adams, ABA Journal, February 6, 2010

A judge’s race or gender makes for a dramatic difference in the outcome of cases they hear–at least for cases in which race and gender allegedly play a role in the conduct of the parties, according to two recent studies.

The results were the focus of a program about “Diversity on the Bench: Is the ‘Wise Latina’ a Myth?,” sponsored by the ABA Judicial Division at the ABA Midyear Meeting in Orlando on Saturday afternoon.

In federal racial harassment cases, one study found that plaintiffs lost just 54 percent of the time when the judge handling the case was an African-American. Yet plaintiffs lost 81 percent of the time when the judge was Hispanic, 79 percent when the judge was white, and 67 percent of the time when the judge was Asian American.


A second study, looked at 556 federal appellate cases involving allegations of sexual harassment or sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The finding: plaintiffs were at least twice as likely to win if a female judge was on the appellate panel.

University of Pittsburgh School of Law Professor Pat K. Chew, who co-authored the racial harassment study, said she found “the rule of law is intact” in the cases she reviewed. Judges–no matter which side they ruled for–took the same procedural steps to reach their decisions, she said.


Pressed on whether the rule of law could actually be considered intact when outcomes varied so much depending on the race of the judge, she replied: “It’s always made a difference who the judge was. We’ve long known, for instance, that a judge’s political affiliation makes a difference.”

Judge Carol E. Jackson of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri said she was heartened that diversity has crept into the federal court system, where today 20 percent of judges are women and 15 percent are members of minority groups.

“It’s important that different voices are being heard,” she said.


[“Myth of the Color-Blind Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Harassment Cases,” by Pat K. Chew and Robert E. Kelley, can be downloaded as a PDF file here. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts,” by Jennifer L. Peresie, can be downloaded as a PDF file here.]