Principal Removes Bellview Holiday Giving Tree

Hannah Guzik, Ashland Daily Tidings (Ashland, Oregon), December 4, 2009

Bellview Elementary School Principal Michelle Zundel has removed a holiday giving tree at the school after a family complained that the tree was a religious symbol.

The move has upset dozens of parents who say the tree was not a religious symbol, but a way to celebrate the holiday season and help those in need.

After removing the tree, Zundel created new guidelines this week for school-sponsored holiday displays–effectively banning holiday trees, Santa Claus figures and Dreidels, which are “legally categorized as secular,” she said. She plans to hold a meeting to discuss the guidelines Tuesday from 7:15 to 8 p.m. in Bellview’s conference room.

{snip}

Zundel said Thursday that she removed the giving tree because it offended a few students who do not celebrate Christmas. Three or four families have told Zundel they found the display offensive, she said.

“These children felt somehow less welcome at their own school, having that symbol so prominently displayed,” she said.

Zundel acknowledged that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that holiday trees are not religious symbols and that they can legally be displayed in schools. However, she said she felt that the Bellview tree symbolized Christmas, and should be taken down in the interest of maintaining religious neutrality at the school.

“Because we have compulsory attendance in our schools, we need to be more sensitive than the law requires,” Zundel said. “The displays promoted by a public school should be religiously neutral.”

The organizers of the second annual giving tree program said they were not promoting religion or Christmas with the tree–they were trying to help needy students and spread holiday cheer.

“There’s nothing religious about it,” said Allison Hamik, a Bellview parent who helped organize the giving tree program. “We didn’t put religious symbols on it.”

Hamik said she has spoken with more than 100 Bellview parents who are upset by the decision to remove the tree.

{snip}

Zundel, who assumed her position at Bellview this year after the previous principal was laid off in a round of budget cuts, said she initially allowed the display to go up because she wanted to maintain tradition.

But after hearing from the family who was offended by the display, she had a change of heart and decided to take it down. The family who complained did not respond to a request to be interviewed.

{snip}

Although the giving tree was not specifically called a Christmas tree, Zundel felt that it was a religious symbol.

“An evergreen tree decorated with lights and ornaments, I think in our culture is the definition of a Christmas tree,” she said. “When your family does not have a tree in the house, it becomes a religious symbol.”

{snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Comments are closed.