Posted on March 10, 2008

Obama’s Black Support Shows Its Limits

Charles Babington, AP, March 9, 2008

Barack Obama would not be leading the Democratic presidential race without the enthusiasm and high turnout of black voters.

They spearheaded his comeback win in South Carolina, where Obama trounced Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards with the backing of four out of every five black voters. They provided his margin of victory in many other states, and will play a key role in Tuesday’s primary in Mississippi, where Clinton is the underdog.

But Obama’s campaign saw the limits of black support in last week’s losses in Ohio and Texas, which kept Clinton’s campaign alive. And the role black voters will play in the next big contest, Pennsylvania’s April 22 primary, is unclear.

Moreover, some analysts think it’s possible Obama’s heavy black support is nudging some working-class white Democrats into Clinton’s camp. If true, it could be an important factor in a contest that remains remarkably tight after a year of campaigning.


But Clinton won nearly two out of every three white votes in Ohio, and 56 percent of those in Texas, where she also ran well among Latinos. Strategists are pondering the results, wondering if Pennsylvania’s demographic similarities to Ohio will deliver another important win to Clinton in six weeks.

Ronald Walters, a University of Maryland political scientist who tracks racial trends and is writing a book on Obama, thinks Obama’s strong support from blacks made it easier for some whites in Ohio and Texas to vote for Clinton.

“There’s some of that,” Walters said in an interview. He pointed to exit polls from Ohio, where 62 percent of all whites lack college degrees and many are anxious about their jobs in a weak economy.

“This is a racially sensitive group,” he said, referring specifically to whites who earn less than $50,000 a year and did not attend college.


Ohio exit polls support Walters’ view. Eighteen percent of white Ohio voters said race was an important factor in their decision, and of that group, three in four voted for Clinton.

In general elections, which pit Democrats against Republicans, the racial sensitivity of white voters has been pronounced and well-documented for decades. It’s a chief cause of the realignment of the South, where blacks remained intensely loyal to the Democratic Party as whites moved to the GOP by the millions.

In the intraparty world of Democratic primaries, however, racial divisions are much less prevalent, and hard to measure. Many white Democrats, especially in the South, tend to be liberal, racially tolerant and usually happy to join blacks in opposing Republicans.


Bositis said it was unclear whether Obama’s black support is driving some working-class whites into Clinton’s corner, but he noted the steep drop in Obama’s share of the white vote in Ohio compared to Wisconsin. One possible factor other than race, Bositis said, was Clinton’s strong support within the Ohio Democratic establishment, starting with the governor.

One thing is not in doubt: Obama’s candidacy and the closeness of the contest are triggering record turnout among black voters. “In many states, the black vote has doubled,” Bositis said.

Similar turnout in Philadelphia’s black neighborhoods could help Obama next month. But he would have to make deeper inroads into Pennsylvania’s white electorate than he did in Ohio if he is to avoid another solid defeat.