Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Press Release, Jan. 30, 2006
CHICAGO, January 30, 2006Earlier this month, DePaul University shut down an affirmative action bake sale protest, and is now investigating a student organizer for harassment. DePauls latest offense against liberty follows its 2005 dismissal of a professor for arguing with pro-Palestinian students and its censorship of students peaceful protest of controversial professor Ward Churchill. With this incident, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is intervening at DePaul for the third time in less than a year.
DePaul cannot seem to resist punishing its students and professors for expressing their political viewpoints, stated Greg Lukianoff, FIREs interim president. Fighting repression at DePaul is becoming a full-time job.
DePauls latest foray into censorship began on January 17, when the DePaul Conservative Alliance (DCA) held an affirmative action bake sale at a table in the student center. Affirmative action bake sales are a widely used form of satirical protest against affirmative action. Organizers display a menu on which black and Hispanic students are charged lower prices than Asian and white students for the same items. The bake sales are intended to spark debate about affirmative action policies, not to raise revenue. At DePaul, the protest did just that, drawing a crowd of people who argued about the issue vehemently but peacefully.
Less than an hour into the sale, DePauls dean of students ordered the DCA to shut down the protest. University spokeswoman Denise Mattson told the student newspaper that the location of the protest was inappropriate, even though the university allowed a PETA table protesting the use of fur to be set up in exactly the same place a week later. On January 20, undergraduate Michael OShea, who led the protest, was informed that he was under investigation for violating DePauls discriminatory harassment policy. OShea met with administrative investigator Cynthia Summers on January 24. In a chilling e-mail exchange, Summers answered OSheas question of exactly why the bake sale was being investigated by saying, [t]here is no because for the investigation that is pre-determined.
If DePaul cannot even describe the supposed problem with the protest, why is it conducting this absurd inquisition? asked FIREs Lukianoff. The mere fact that a protest might upset people does not make it harassment. DePauls abuse of a harassment policy to engage in political persecution must end.
FIRE wrote DePaul President Dennis Holtschneider on January 23, saying that the shutting down of the bake sale protest, as well as the harassment investigation of OShea, indicate a dismaying disregard for freedom of expression and open debate at DePaul. FIRE also pointed out DePauls dismal record of support for free expression, and noted the Catholic universitys promise that [s]tudents have the right to their own ideas, beliefs and political associations. Students have the right to ask questions and express their opinions…. Yet even after drawing nationwide scorn for dismissing a professor for his views and tearing down Republican students flyers, DePaul continues to claim that it absolutely firmly believes in free speech for students and that giving students the opportunity to explore different point of views is what the university is about. Holtschneider has yet to respond to FIREs letter.
Every time DePaul is caught abusing the free speech rights of its students and faculty, it responds by saying how much it really adores free speech. Well, FIRE and the public are having a hard time believing that. DePauls illiberal actions speak far louder than its empty words, concluded Lukianoff.