Netanyahu’s Speech Insult to Blacks

DeWayne Wickham, USA Today, March 4, 2015

On the eve of his ill-conceived address to a joint session of Congress, Benjamin Netanyahu told cheering delegates at the annual meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee that he’d come to Washington to make his case against Iran, not to disrespect President Obama.

But, in fact, he has managed to do just that. The Israeli prime minister’s decision to bypass the normal diplomatic protocol and accept a Republican invitation to address Congress on Tuesday is a personal affront to America’s first black president.

{snip}

“This is a real in-your-face slap at the president, and black folks know it,” Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., told me. “He (Netanyahu) wouldn’t have done it to any other president.”

When I asked Clyburn, the third-ranking Democrat and highest-ranking black in the House, why the Israeli prime minister would be so disrespectful of Obama, he responded: “You know why.”

I think I do. By agreeing to sidestep normal diplomatic channels to address Congress, Netanyahu has become an instrument of a Republican Party that has shown an unbridled, personal disrespect for Obama, his wife and children since this black family moved into the building many Republicans apparently think is literally a white house.

{snip}

By plotting with Republicans to take his differences with Obama to the floor of Congress, [Netanyahu] has angered some black leaders like no Israeli leader since former Israeli foreign minister Moshe Dayan publicly disparaged the intelligence of blacks in the U.S. Army. Back in 1980, Dayan questioned the ability of the U.S. to respond militarily to Middle East trouble spots because the U.S. Army had too many black soldiers “who have a lower education and intelligence.” The U.S. Army, he said, needed “better blood and brains.”

{snip}

Netanyahu may not have set out to offend Obama’s black supporters, but that’s certainly been the result. “Hell will freeze over before I attend” the prime minister’s address, Clyburn said a few days before Netanyahu arrived in Washington. Other black legislators, including Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., who chairs the 46-memberCongressional Black Caucus, and Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., the legendary civil rights activist, announced weeks ago that they would boycott Netanyahu’s speech.

{snip}

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dd121

    You knew the left was going to turn this into “racism”.

    • dukem1

      Back when it was affordable, I used to like USA TODAY,,,,Mainly for the box scores and movie reviews…That stuff is available on the net nowadays,…so, I’m to take from this article that Black Americans now have their own foreign policy?
      Watched about 10 minutes of this speech and was reminded of a high school speech class assignment…”A speech to inform.”
      Which it did…To anyone unawares of the threat a bunch of rabid Mohammedans with an atom bomb might pose to the western civilization that has provided DeWayne a soapbox to whine about how his guy got disrespected.
      I’m ambivalent about Israel, but it is an ally and, by and large a safe haven for Western-compatible values in an otherwise hostile part of the world.
      President Obama has time and again shown himself to be way in over his head when it comes to foreign policy.
      Who got a “slap in the face?”…Uniformed dumbbolinas….
      DeWayne, if the shoe fits, wear it.

      • Bo_Sears

        The problem underlying this fuss is the monstrous civil war fought between the heirs of Jacob and Esau. This has lasted more than 2000 years and moves the killing & fighting grounds from place to place. Nowadays the children of Jacob have facilitated the movement of the battlefield to Europe by encouraging (not exclusively) Esau’s genetic & spiritual kids to move to Europe with entirely predictable consequences…perhaps to set up Europe’s Jews to flee Europe for Israel or to ravage & pillage the battlefield cultural and historical treasures of Europe. (Yes, Iran is not a lineal descendant of Esau, but it is a spiritual one.)

        Whatever the issue is, we really need to ask ourselves how many young American men and women we will accept to die on the beaches of the Black Sea and the Mediterrean Sea, and how many is it okay to spend the remainder of their damaged lives in the tender care of the VA. It isn’t Israel’s or Iran’s interests that should determine our involvement, it should be solely about America’s interests.

        We need to get out of the way of the Esau & Jacob civil war, and let them fight it out.

        • KyraNelson

          I think you are confusing Esau with Ishmael. Esau is “Rome,” e.g., Europe. Ishmael are the Arabs, and their conquests, the other zillion muzzies.

          • Bo_Sears

            Esau was a twin to Jacob who cheated Esau out of his inheritance. But we can work with Ishmael and Isaac as symbols if you like. The point is that an ancient controversy in one family continues to this day, and is a civil war in which we should not be drawn under any circumstances.

            Lets look at the impending war from the point of view of Americans killed or impaired, not from the point of view of ancient conflicts.

        • LHathaway

          Thank you for elevating the commentary to the year 1,000 BC. Other than that bright-spot, your post was just confusing.

          Some *sarcasm* there. . .

          You know I love you, man, I just couldn’t help myself. Can you forgive me?

          • Bo_Sears

            See “Jacob-Israel vs. Esau-Edom: Roots of the Middle East Crisis” for a look at this 38 centuries’ old feud. Published 2012.

            Discourse never needs forgiveness as it enlightens all of us.

          • Bo_Sears

            Or check out “Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews” by Albert Lindemann. Published 2000.

        • Hammerheart

          Bravo. We need to consolidate and dig in for the defense. It may be boring and inglorious, but it is essential. The leftist rainbow coalition banner will tear each other apart.

        • Nancy

          But remember the description of Ishmael, Abraham’s first (illegitimate) son who is considered by Muslims to be the “real” receiver of God’s (Allah’s) blessing, not Isaac. Ishmael was the father of the Arabs:

          “He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.” (Gen 16:12)

          Yeah…I’m not interested in any of Ishmael’s descendants having nuclear weapons, particularly not that Crazy running things in Iran.

          • MrC

            You had it right until that last sentence. Ishmael is not the mythological ancestor of all Muslims, but rather of Arabs specifically, and the Iranians are not Arab. They are Persian (an Indo-European group) with Turkish and Arab and a few other admixtures at various levels in various parts of the country. If it were not for Islam, the Iranians would be much more like other Indo-European civilizations rather than like their barbarous Middle Eastern neighbors.

          • Nancy

            No, you’re right…I know Ishmael is not the father of the Persians, but ideologically they are all in the same boat: they hate the descendants of Isaac, and refuse to believe it was he, and not Ishmael, that received the blessings of God. In fact, they think that it was Ishmael, not Isaac, who Abraham carried up to the rock on Mt. Moriah and almost had to sacrifice. (Hence the reason they built that big, gold Dome of the Rock around the supposed rock where it happened. I’ve been inside it…ain’t nothin’ but a great big rock in there.)

            It’s no coincidence that all the countries, with the possible exception of Russia, that Jesus fights against in end-times eschatology are ALL Muslim. Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Persia, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey…so ideologically, Ishmael represents their forefather much like Abraham represents the father of Christianity (even though he’s not the genetic forefathers of many Christians).

            That’s all I meant. And though I believe the prophecy that says a Russia/Iran coalition will be destroyed when it tries to attack Israel, I still don’t want Iran to have a nuke. After all, America doesn’t enjoy that ancient prophetic guarantee of protection that Israel has.

      • LHathaway

        I think their printed paper folded but US today maintains online content.

      • dd121

        I too am ambivalent about Jews and the Jewish state. I know they’ve done a lot of really nasty things to the Palestinians and other Arabs of which a small part is reported here, but at the end of I’m not prepared to cut them loose and see a genocide against them. That’s what Obama and the left is enabling.

        By electing the communist/muslin Obama I don’t even know what this country is anymore.

        • archer

          I would cut them loose and be done with it. We are being played for suckers, there will never be a 2 state solution because Israel wants it all. We’ve been engaged in this so called “peace process” for many years now, the camp David accords were signed in ’78 if I remember and nothing has changed. The Palestinians are holding on to less land than before and Israel has killed many of them in the years since. As far as the Arabs driving them into the sea, that’s not going to happen while Israel has nuclear weapons. There are conventional weapons that would make life untenable for Israel, but they aren’t being used, to sum up I think Israel is it’s own worst enemy.

          • meanqueen

            No, it’s the Palis who “want it all.”

          • archer

            They had it all but we wrote a check they had to cash.

          • Gunter Mabuse

            How many Jews have the “palestinians” killed? None, right?

          • archer

            very few in comparison, but that’s beside the point, if you are that concerned I suggest you enlist in the IDF and leave the rest of us out of it. As I stated this “peace process” has been dragging on for too long, we tried, we failed for one reason or another, time to throw in the towel and let them work it out.

        • John Doeman

          What about the nasty things they have done to us? Speaking of American Jews, we have abortion, pornography, “racism-antisemitism”, hate-speech laws, multiculturalism, relativism, mass-immigration from the third world, lowering of moral and artistic standards. revision of our history to make us hate ourselves–all of this is heavily, though not exclusively, driven by Jews. Speaking of Israel, we have 9/11(which was retribution for our support for Israel), the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (the war in Iraq was driven by Zionist-neocons who dominated the Bush presidency.

          • Gunter Mabuse

            Bill Clinton is a jew? Is that what you are telling us? “we have abortion, pornography, “racism-antisemitism”, hate-speech laws, multiculturalism, relativism, mass-immigration from the third world, lowering of moral and artistic standards. revision of our history to make us hate ourselves.” Why are you calling Bill Clinton a Jew? He and his wife propagated all of this. Please stop the hate speech, calling Bill and Hillary “Jews.”

          • archer

            They weren’t called neo-cons then, but you could include the Roosevelt administration and our entry into ww2 on the side of the biggest mass murderer up until then, uncle Joe.

        • meanqueen

          What nasty things have Israelis done to Palestinians? It seems to me that they’re always bailing out the Palis and helping them. Did you know that even after starting the Gaza war, Hamas leader still sent his granddaughter to Israel to have life saving surgery? And the Israeli doctors saved her, as they save Palis and terrorists all the time? I read the Jew hatred on this site and just shake my head. Would White Nationalists run to aid the negro thug in his time of need? Well, that’s what the Israelis do for their enemies. I wish they weren’t so kindly and I don’t agree with that approach but you have no call to claim Israelis are being nasty to Palis when quite the opposite is true. The ONLY time Palis get hurt is when they start a war and force Israel to defend herself.

        • KyraNelson

          The “Palestinians” and Arabs did a lot of really nasty things to the Jews, starting centuries ago. The Arabs & the mufti of Jerusalem ( great pal of Hitler) were building extermination camps in the Middle East during WWII. All those fabulous things we have been seeing so clearly since 9-11, the some-odd 22,000 muzzie terror attacks against dhimmi, and infidels, ISIS, etc.- you think this is something new? Take a minute to learn some history of the region before ’48 & you’ll see the bigger picture.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Blacks are so self absorbed. They see virtually every issue through the prism of the civil rights movement. In their view, the jews are the white man; the arabs or the so called ‘palestianians’ are the black man. Obama sees it the same way.

      • ElComadreja

        Yet the American Jews enable them whenever possible.

        • KyraNelson

          You know nothing about American Jews if you say that. The orthodox, and we are legion, don’t buy into any of this leftist BS. Our politics are as conservative as they come. But most of us keep to ourselves.

          • meanqueen

            That has been my experience with the Orthodox Jews that I’ve known. A lot of Jew haters here who can’t or won’t make distinctions. So much for superior white IQ.

          • ElComadreja

            Seems like you have some hate issues yourself there, meanqueen. Pointing out that American Jews overwhelmingly support liberal policies means I hate them? I don’t know if you’re Jewish but I’ve got news for you if you are. You’re white. A Semitic Caucasian at the very least and blacks make no distinction between you and the rest of us. Smarten up. If you’re black disregard that since you’re incapable of smartening up.

          • meanqueen

            No, you misunderstood me or are not familiar with my posts here. I TOO hate liberal leftist Jews and I AGREE that most American Jews are in this category. They are complete idiots. What I object to are the Klan people here who go on and on about the evil Jews who have so much power and control the world. It’s completely ridiculous. A liberal Jew is just like a liberal gentile – my libtard Jewish neighbor isn’t scheming to take over the world any more than my libtard gentile neighbor. In other words, I hate the liberalism, not the ethnicity, but that’s not what you see going on here in the comments from Jew haters who are so focused in on conspiracy theories that it’s embarrassing. Klan talk only makes us all look stupid and no successful person wants to join a group of people like that, even if they might agree with some of White Nationalism’s stances. And, to reiterate, there ARE politically conservative Jews, many of which are Orthodox/religious, but not all, and some of them are here on AmRen. No I’m not Jewish – 98% Northern European by DNA study. I know conservative Jews are not a large group, but they do exist and they are vocal. There are historical reasons why the majority of American Jews vote liberal even when it’s against their own best interests, but we can’t solve that problem. All liberals no matter their ethnicity will eventually have to face the consequences of their stupidity. I don’t single out Jews for hatred like the Klan does. For that matter, I have no issue with black people who have strong morals and are decent people. I do believe that whites are in danger of becoming extinct and have a right to preserve our heritage, but I stop way short of asserting that every Jew around the neighborhood is in on the scheme to take over the world.

          • ElComadreja

            I’m sorry. I did misunderstand. We actually agree on most points. I believe decent blacks with strong morals are a small minority these days but I blame their white enablers for that as much as I blame them.

          • ElComadreja

            What you say about the Orthodox is true. However they are not the majority of Jews in America. The majority of Jews vote Democrat and liberal. Sorry but it’s the truth. I used to be in the bizarre position of defending Israel to my late liberal Jewish brother in law and the majority of Jews I’ve ever met were as bad as him.

          • meanqueen

            Well thanks for trying anyway (with your BIL) since I think Israel deserves to be defended. I know plenty of Jews like him. They are infuriating. But when I express my frustration with them here, I try to make sure I acknowledge that I know good Jews who support our values. It’s not “hate” to disapprove, I understand that, however some commenters here are pretty clear that they admire Hitler. Pretty egregious, don’t you think? I will never publicly support any organization that allows members like that to go unchecked.

          • ElComadreja

            Once again I apologize for jumping the gun the other day. We’re actually in agreement on things. I was feeling curmudgeonly I guess, lol. BTW I’m of German decent on my mother’s side and no fan of Hitler. Greek on my father’s (The ElComadreja thing is a private joke).

          • meanqueen

            No problem at all. I enjoy being able to have a discussion where both sides are listening to the other, and this has been interesting.

  • Don Eladio

    Does that include blacks in…

    N igeria?
    I vory Coast
    G hana
    G uinea
    E thiopia
    R wanda
    S omalia?

  • Lewis33

    “Iran will have the by bomb by 1999.”- Benjamin Netanyahu 1992

    Netanyahu’s speech is a insult to American’s intelligence.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Eventually Iran will get the bomb. No one predicts right all the time. The real fun will start with the arms race in the middle east, or when terrorist groups get a nuke. Do you really think it’s so far fetched?

      • The big question then will be:

        Then what?

        There’s a part of me that thinks that getting a nuke will turn Tehran into good cowards, like what happened to me when I got a carry permit and started carrying. One hopes that once they know they’re in the nuclear club, they’ll cut out all the 12th Imam talk.

        But then, I have to remember that Iran is now a good ole democracy, thank you Jimmy Peanut.

        I’d feel a whole lot better if the Shah was still running Iran.

        • Screamin_Ruffed_Grouse

          I do have a hard time believing that the Ayatollah & company simply to have them, rather than use them.

          • Petronius

            I have to agree, Grouse. And it’s not just the Ayatollah’s threats. Thirteen centuries of experience with Islam shows us it’s a warrior religion. Besides, according to their beliefs they can’t lose. Mohammed promises paradise for those who die in battle, and booty, concubines, and slaves for those who do not. It’s a win-win religion.

          • You dont think they could manage to scrape together enough money to just BUY one if they wanted to just nuke somebody that bad?

          • Screamin_Ruffed_Grouse

            I don’t know. What does a nuke cost? How easily could a pre-existing one be obtained without anyone noticing? Who would sell it to them?If they could do that, why haven’t they done so already? If they have, why not make it public (keeping it secret makes no sense if you have a neighbor who wants to attack you with or without one)?

        • Spaniard in LA

          If Mohammed Mossadegh would have never been overthrown perhaps things would be different.

        • NoMosqueHere

          Ok, but I presume you’re not an islamic maniac.

        • Lewis33

          Best case scenario if they get nuclear capabilities is that it would make our leaders think before jumping into the sandbox over things that don’t concern us. Between a nuclear Iran and fracking we could go back to good old, red blooded, American isolationism.

          • Another thing. I don’t think Iran is that close to getting real nuclear ordnance, and even they get it, they’re still yet even more distant from an intercontinental delivery system. Just for the sake of pure altruism, I’d rather Iran in its current state, run by the Ayatoldyouso Kockamamie (h/t MCS) not go nuclear, or a Shah-type figure return to power, in which case they can nuke up all they want. However, it is of no immediate import to us where we are.

        • Nancy

          I dunno, QD…my brother’s gf is from Iran, and she and her family were forced to flee when the Shah was ousted. Her dad was on “The List” of the Shah’s supporters that can never return or they’ll be executed. Anyway, her family feels quite certain that, if they had one, Iran will use a nuke to eradicate Israel, as they (Iran) really believe they have the ability to “usher in” Armageddon.

          Many Christians also believe we’re in the End Times; however, they don’t believe that man has the power to “force” God’s timing like that nutball over in Iran seems to believe. There’s nothing more dangerous than someone with a big weapon who thinks that, by using it, he can usher in Heaven.

          • Nancy

            Iran’s banner downtown, reminding everyone of their Ultimate Goal for pursuing nukes. (That’s the Muslim Mahdi leading the charge.)

      • Lewis33

        Pakistan is both nuclear capable and overflowing with insane Muslim terrorists, yet it doesn’t seem to be a problem.

        • evilsandmich

          I have to wonder about the quality of their refinement process though. I know the word is that the NoKos have run into this and although they can crank out dirty bombs left and right, a reliable fission bomb escapes them. Back to your point though, a running theory is that Iran talks up a big game about nuiking the Jews so as to distract the kooks to their east who they need the real deterant for. Not sure about the wisdom of that strategy, but it fits nicely with Saddam’s strategy of faking WMDs to the west so as to scare the Iranians. All politics is local as they say…

          • MikeofAges

            I have thought about this myself. Consider the nuclear neighborhood Iran lives in. Nuclear Pakistan and nuclear India to the east. Nuclear China over the Himalayas. Nuclear Russia to the north. Nuclear Israel and nuclear America may be literally further from their minds than they let on.

            Rebuilding Persian grandeur may be a bigger motive than any other, although don’t forget, Iran has surrogates and clients fighting for them all over the Middle East and North Africa.

          • Nothing like a bunch of relevant facts, as given in your first paragraph, about so many of Iran’s neighbors having the atomic bomb, quite relevant. Thanks. The second paragraph is a statement that is a real possibility, though impossible to tell how much a motivation for Iran, but impossible that it is not a motivation to some degree. Matches very much up with very long history, especially in that part of the world.

        • Oldcorporal

          That’s because Israel is far away. And India, which is close by, has its own nuclear weapons. Of course, so does Israel, although they won’t acknowledge it.

        • And lots of people lose lots of sleep that that overflow of insane Muslim terrorists will flow its way into having total power, which means a nuclear football. At the moment, Pakistan’s executive leadership, while hardly friendly, is hardly insane either. Pakistan’s deep state is insane, they’re the ones who stuffed OBL away for a decade. But as far as anyone can tell, the deep state is nowhere near the nuclear football.

        • Irish

          Pakistan is a cancer..The Taliban was quite literally formed there..And of course Usama bin Laden was living in a house, in a well to do neighborhood less than a mile from Pakistan’s equivalent to West Point for years and the Security Forces knew nothing about it.

          • KyraNelson

            I think of Pakistan as more of a leaking ostomy bag, but cancer is a pretty good descriptor.

        • Blackfish

          The same can be said for the nutty North Koreans who regularly threaten – in the harshest terms – South Korea and Japan but then do very little

      • ElComadreja

        Not only isn’t it far fetched, I’m amazed it hasn’t already happened.

      • Seriously, no offense, but I really don’t care if the terrorists get a nuke. As long as it doesn’t happen for a couple of decades. By then, America will not be America anyway, and the West won’t be the West. Sorry to be so pessimistic.

    • Sue

      Thank you.
      Israel’s Mossad Contradicted Netanyahu’s Claim on Iran Nuclear Program

      . The revelation is part of a trove of
      leaked cables obtained by Al Jazeera and shared with The Guardian
      newspaper that shed a startling light on the behind-the-scenes workings
      of Mideast politics for a period from 2006 until December 2014. One
      secret cable reveals that Mossad said in late October 2012 that Iran
      had not begun the work needed to build any kind of nuclear weapon.
      Instead, the Islamic Republic’s scientists were at the time “working to
      close gaps in areas that appear legitimate such as enrichment
      reactors.”

  • Luca

    Yes, did you notice all the looting and protesting going on over Netanyahu’s speech? The blacks were really glued to the TV and listening to every word he uttered. They are so politically savvy.

    I doubt they even know who Netanyahu is and I guarantee you they couldn’t find Israel on a map.

    • Ron Cheaters

      Netanyahu beez a sneeze?

    • evilsandmich

      Given a map they’d probably point at New York

      Bada-bing!

    • Oldcorporal

      But they could find Selma; or Harlem; or Ferguson …

      • Luca

        I doubt it.

      • Irish

        I doubt it..Not one with just the shapes of the States anyway.

    • Dr. N Seagoon

      They could not even pronounce his name. Netanyahu “insulted” these poor sensitive dears and they plan to boycott his speech, who cares.

      • Luca

        They’ll probably think it is an exotic, progressive, Swahili name and will start naming their kids “Netty-yahoo” Jones.

        • Dr. N Seagoon

          It goes with Sharrew , Tumbsrt and Trvoil to name a few.

    • Richard Roelofsen

      How many Americans (white, black and mestizo) can find the US on a map let alone Israel. You are really overestimating the ability of Americans here. By the way what was your take on a foreign leader speaking to the US Congress urging them to take action against a third country for his country’s sake. Surely that should worry you more than anything?

      • Luca

        I think most Americans can find the US on a map, especially those who can think for themselves.

        I assume you are talking about Netanyahu. He didn’t ask us to do anything for his country’s sake. He thank us profusely for our past support and warned us that a nuclear Iran would be a threat to the whole world. Considering they have a ballistic missile program I tend to agree with him. He also said if Israel has to stand alone it will.

        The only thing he was ‘urging’ was that a better deal should be made. I hope he makes the same speech throughout Europe, they are in a lot closer range of Iran’s missiles.

        • Richard Roelofsen

          I think you overestimate the ability of the average American:

          https://www[DOT]youtube[DOT]com/watch?v=C2wP-5L2EY0
          Anyway that’s not really relevant.

          He didn’t ask anything you said? You agree with his assessment? How about his assessment in 2002 that regime change in Iraq would have ‘I can guarantee, enormous positive reverberations in the region. It could create an implosion in a neighboring regime like Iran.’

          http://www[DOT]c-span[DOT]org/video/?c4529120/netanyahus-expert-testimony-iraq-2002

          Do you agree with that assessment as well? How about the billions of USD in military and economic aid that Israel gets from the American taxpayers. Is that what you would call standing alone? I could list the countless attempts by Israel to steal sensitive US military secrets. I could mention the victimization campaign throughout Europe (especially Germany), that reminds one of the cries of American Blacks about slavery, but it seems you would still blindly follow the Israel first mantra. Wake up and see who the real enemy is my friend. Don’t fight the symptom, but fight the true cause.

          • Luca

            I said Americans who can think for themselves. Of course there are many illiterate fools out there especially the “Occupy” and ghetto crowds.

            I agree, Iran should not go nuclear. I believe Netanyahu overstates his case, but his premise is basically sound. Iran’s regime is run by religious fanatics, they would have no hesitation in using nuclear weapons or sharing them and they will start a middle-east arms race if allowed to run with free rein.

            So you believe Saddam was a trustworthy boy scout, a model leader and he would never at any point have endangered the region? I believe he was a megalomaniac. If he had nothing to hide, why did he run the inspectors out of his country? My guess is, he clandestinely exported his weapons out of his country like he did in the first Gulf War.

            I understand the enemy you are eluding to but I have a different view. You would like to believe that Jews are the real enemy. I prefer to say liberals are the real enemy because liberals come in all stripes. I realize that there are disproportionate numbers of Jews in high places, they exert influence and are rabid liberals, so I am not blind. But Jews in Israel is a good thing, it is appropriate, much like Africans in Africa, it’s where they belong and would be the best suited.

            Israel is the only reliable, stable ally in the region, so I agree in giving them aid. How much is up for debate. But look at all the money we give to unstable fanatics who hate us, like Pakistan.

            The true enemy are liberals, regardless of race, religion or ethnicity. If there were no liberal Jews there would still be plenty of Liberal Whites, blacks, Catholics etc.

          • Richard Roelofsen

            Iran is under constant inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). There are cameras with 24 hours live feed to the IAEA headquarters in Vienna in their enrichment facilities at Natanz and UCF in Isfahan. Iran is signatory to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), unlike Israel by the way. Iran already has plenty of options to hurt Israel without having to resort to Nuclear weapons. Iran’s proxy in Lebanon (Hezbollah) humiliated Israel in it’s 2006 campaign.

            Saddam was no boyscout, but he protected his christian minority of Assyrians Armenians and Chaldean (more than one and a half million people in 2003, and only a small part left today thanks to the war you supported), and most importantly he did not posses nuclear weapons.

            In fact he ended his nuclear program in 1991. Don’t take my word for it, read the Duelfer report of the Iraq Survey Group. They were tasked with finding whatever Saddam had in 2003. They looked for more than a year and a half! and did not find anything significant. Chemical stockpile destroyed in 1991, biological weapons program halted, and most of those weapons by the way had to do with his rivalry with Iran.

            What UN weapons inspectors were kicked out? Surely not the ones in 2002/2003. Your reasoning is so flawed and based on fiction that one does not know where to begin. No wonder you support action against Iran, since you are one of the few here on amren (and indeed one of the few in the US) who still believe the Iraq war was a good idea.

  • superlloyd

    Whinging, idiot blacks complaining about disrepeck an’ sheeIt to de blag main. These self centred clowns make me laugh at their patheticness.

    • Don Eladio

      I think it may be DISHrespeck…?

  • Red

    Blacks like DeWayne and Clyburn obviously don’t realize how pathetic they sound. Their sense of inferiority is always out in the open for all to see. It certainly confirms they know a natural equality of races does not exist.

    It must be hell going through life like that.

    • ElComadreja

      Every time they look in a mirror must be hell.

  • That’s the only gripe against it, that Netanyahu was showing up their Head Negro In Charge. And his whole interest is that he wants a “peace deal” with Iran so that he can win a Nobel Peace Prize, one that he actually “earned,” not the first one given to him on the come.

    Really though, Net undercut his whole reason for being here when he said that Israel can take care of Iran all by itself. Okay, then, why don’t you? And why are you bothering us?

    Bad scene on both sides.

    • evilsandmich

      Rumor was that if Israeli jets tried to sneak into Iran over air space protected by American forces that Obama was ready to order them to be fired upon. Such a speech will probably have the desired effect of freezing Obama’s desire in that department. Of course the real issue is why we’re even in such a position to get imbroiled in such a mess to begin with.

      • A rumor I don’t buy, because I don’t think Obama, not even Barack Obama, is that haughty.

    • dd121

      It wasn’t widely reported widely (can’t make the marxist in chief look bad) but he told them if they tried, he shoot them down. Does that sound like our relations with Israel under the muzzie in chief have deteriorated?
      On a different note it’s amazing that Jews support Dems with millions in contributions and 80% or so of their vote. The neo-con Repubs are their real friends. Maybe they’re not as smart as we assume.

  • MekongDelta69

    James Clyburn is one of the original black racists we’re so ‘lucky’ to have in Congress:
    http://www[dot]discoverthenetworks[dot]org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2496

    Same with John Lewis:
    http://www.discoverthenetworks[dot]org/individualProfile%5Bdot%5Dasp?indid=1302

    And, of course, the idiot from the leftist USA Today isn’t showing his ‘color(s)’ either…
    /sarc

    • And the same low IQ congoid that thinks Guam is going to tip over.

      • Whitetrashgang

        Well I think it depends on how many obese women go to the beach.

      • John Smith

        Hank Johnson.

    • CookBookFloozie

      He’s black. Born 1946.

  • Truthseeker

    With Blacks, everything is about Blacks, apparently.

    • Whitetrashgang

      Including black holes,and black wall tires.

      • dukem1

        They are very niggardly with sharing the fruit of their supreme intellect.

        • Irish

          Careful now, that adjective got a former D..C. Mayor in hot water..Apparently those Objecting thought he ment something else..

          • Blackfish

            A word we all learned many years ago when studying for the SAT. Blacks have a hard enough time conjugating simple verbs.

  • I’d give just about anything to be a fly on the wall and hear what Netanyahu actually thinks about Obama and an overwhelming majority of black people and their behaviors.

    Whatever the pinnacle of perfection, harmony and a rational and logical mind happens to be in this universe, I don’t think I’m going too far out on a limb when I say that black people are about as far away from that point as you can get. From a reason and logic standpoint, the lowest rungs of society are reserved specifically for the black psyche.

    • Zimriel

      Based on how fast he showed the sole of his boot to the illegal-immigrants who tried to swarm into Israel, I have a strong hunch at what Bibi thinks.

    • Bo_Sears

      Ask Mitt Romney, they were college roommates.

      • Blackfish

        You’re making stuff up.

        Netanyahu worked at BCG when Romney was there. They were not roommates

    • Irish

      Ask the Ethiopians being held in detention centers in the desert for reprocessing back home..

      • Richard Roelofsen

        There are no Ethiopians being held in detention centers, I don’t know who told you that. There are only Sudanese and Eritreans being held in the desert. The Sudanese because they are mostly muslims from western Sudan (Darfur) and the Eritreans because they are Orthodox Christians fleeing indefinite military service.
        Ethiopian Jews made ‘aliyah’ thirty years ago and number more than a hundred thousand. They were brought ‘back’ by the Israeli government (Menachim Begin, Yitzak Shamir) in the eighties and have been cuddled as Israels favorite minority ever since. There are numerous of Ethiopian jews that have served in the Knesset as parliament members, military officials, cabinet ministers etc. They are not really persecuted. The only ones suffering true persecution by the Israeli government is the white taxpayer in the US. And let’s not forget the Germans who are blackmailed into feeling guilty about the events of 70 years ago.

        • Irish

          Type the words( Isreal deports Ethiopians) into the little Google box, you’ll get headline after headline. .Plenty of stories of Anti-Ethiopian/Black racism in Isreal too..Housing, jobs, arrest, you name it.

          • Richard Roelofsen

            The first article that comes up is: Israel’s new tactic, Classifying Eritreans as Ethiopians to deport them.

            It’s true that they discriminate against the Ethiopians minority Jews. There was a story last year about Ethiopian blood donated to the blood bank being thrown out and yes housing discrimination etc.

            But overall they are seen as Jews. They are equal by the law. They serve in the military. They serve in the Knesset. Not even the most ardent right wing Israeli would contemplate holding Ethiopians in detention centers. Such a politician would simply see his political future vanish in front of his eyes.

  • There’s a part of me that thinks maybe “the tribe” will take out against blacks for this. But then I wake up to my senses and remember that the tribe isn’t as unified as some of us would like to think.

    One example is found in this article: Net spoke to AIPAC before he spoke to Congress. AIPAC isn’t the powerhouse it used to be, because younger liberal Jews and their leftist non-Jewish allies now have a new lobbying group, called J Street, which lines up well with the liberal parties in Israeli politics.

    • NoMosqueHere

      And more than 70 percent of secular or reform jews intermarry with white gentiles. They don’t want to be jewish anymore or burdened with all the political bleep associated with Israel. They worship at the church of liberalism.

      • B.A_2014

        Those white gentiles marrying Jews are likely to be the white elite and their children will probably identify as Jews since being a member of a victim group is all the rage nowadays.

        • NoMosqueHere

          The children will more likely become buddhists.

        • meanqueen

          Statistics don’t bear that out. Children of intermarriage more often than not don’t identify as Jewish. For one thing, it’s just too hard to be Jewish and for another, being Jewish is not victim-y enough to be “all the rage.” Jews are too successful and too white. The liberals are opting to intermarry with blacks now, or become homosexuals. That’s where the victim status gets the biggest bang for the buck.

          • B.A_2014

            Statistics? Forward a link please.

          • KyraNelson

            I’m your link. I’m telling you, intermarried Jews as a rule do not raise their children as Jews. They may have a bar mitzvah party if their mom is Jewish, and that’s where the buck usually stops. Judaism is not synagogue-centered. It is family centered. It is transmitted by the parents, growing up in a Jewish home. I was raised as a secular, liberal Jew. Most of my family are intermarried. I tossed out the Kool Aid and became orthodox and politically conservative. Being “victimy” doesn’t really enter into it. We like to move on- living well is always the best revenge.

    • archer

      They started the NAACP, the first 3 presidents were not black, they started the ANC in Africa, a eastern European named Slovo and his cronies were responsible for the commie take over of South Africa. Mandela was just a front man.

  • ZB01

    I don’t think this has anything at all, in the slightest, to do with race. I think it’s a major policy difference between two world leaders: President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu. I do think, however, that the Israeli Prime Minister’s speech is inappropriate to the the office of the Presidency….but I think that that would equally be the case if the President were as White as ivory or dark as night; male or female. What I don’t think is the case is that it has anything to do with race.

    It does seem odd, to me, at least, that a foreign leader would address our Congress (reprehensible as they are) and bypass the Oval Office. But I would say the same thing if Reagan, Bush, or Nixon were President.

    Overall Verdict: Another black non-sequitur for another non-issue: “racism”.

    • Blackfish

      The legislative and executive branch are co-equal under our constitution. Did you think it was a problem when the Congress censured President Bush?

      • ZB01

        When President Bush was censured, did that involve a foreign Prime Minsiter conducting the procedure before Congress?

  • John Smith

    Everyone knows the Tribe doesn’t care for blacks beyond the ability to exploit them for their own ends, and precisely because they’re stupid.

    • Zimriel

      The blacks, or the Tribes-men who think exploiting them is a viable long-term plan?

      … I guess that depends on one’s definition of “stupid”: being born to a low IQ through no fault of one’s own, or being intelligent enough to know better.

  • Screamin_Ruffed_Grouse

    As if he needed Net’s help for that.

  • Chip Carver

    All of this is just show for the public. Obama and Bibi work hand in hand.
    Agreements can be made with Iran, and then when it’s finally time to march in, it will be claimed those agreements were violated by Iran.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Obama is a pro muslim third worlder. Are you serious?

      • Strike_Team

        Look at what “his” administration actually does rather than some of the ridiculous rhetoric. Obama’s administration is no different from any other over the past 5 decades. Obama being anti-white fits in quite well with everything else going on.

    • Spaniard in LA

      Agree! War with Iran would be a bloodbath.

  • Caucasoid88

    Yo he be dissin’ my homie. I guess every single criticism that is unique to Obama is racist, since he is the only black president.

    • need to reword as ff:
      “since he is the only black president..

      These people never use helping verbs.

  • OhWow

    Snow is racist.

  • A Freespeechzone

    Negroes are ALWAYS offended!

    Frankly, I don’t give a damned.

    • Speedy Steve

      And always complaining!

  • Johann Wald

    BB has been talking this trash since the early 90s. He’s perfectly happy to have the US go to war and have our young men and women fight and die for Israel, both then and now. “1992: Israeli parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his colleagues
    that Iran is 3 to 5 years from being able to produce a nuclear weapon
    – and that the threat had to be “uprooted by an international front
    headed by the US.” Quote from an article at the Christian Science Monitor’s website entitled “Imminent Iran nuclear threat? A timeline of warnings since 1979.”

    • evilsandmich

      In fairness, that anti-PLC virus that they wrote along with the spate of assassinations have kept the Iranian program pretty crippled

    • bv

      If PM BB wants to fix their problem well then by all means go for it. Don’t ask for Americans to spill their blood to do it please spill your own sons blood.

      We won’t interfere either way but I wish you luck and hope you succeed.

    • meanqueen

      Where are you getting this nonsense that Israel wants the US to go to war for her? Israel has a strong military and can defend herself. Allies should stand by each other.

      • Johann Wald

        Why don’t you ask none other than Carl Bernstein the same question? Follows is what he had to say about US military involvement in the ME. “This was an insane war that brought us low economically, morally. We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. “It was a total pretext! It’s inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world. “Maybe I can say that because I’m Jewish. To bring about a certain result in the Middle East..” “Maybe I can say that because I am Jewish. Speaking on MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough show. In 1992 Israeli parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his colleagues that
        Iran is 3 to 5 years from being able to produce a nuclear weapon – and
        that the threat had to be “uprooted by an international front headed by
        the US.” He said the same thing before Congress this week. I couldn’t help but notice there were no IDF fighting and dying in any of the US’ military excursions in the ME. Gee, fancy that. Call it “nonsense” if you will, but try that trick on someone less informed in the future if you want to get away with it.

  • Oldcorporal

    DeWayne Wickham is and always has been one of the cry-baby Negroes who are always wanting to scream, “RACISM! RACISM!” at every excuse, no matter how flimsy. And his using James Clyburn as an “authority” on whether Netanyahu was “disrespecting” Obama or not, is a sick joke. Wickham and Clyburn are like two sides of the same coin. They see “racism” behind the door, under the bed, and in the woodpile. They are paranoid.

  • libertarian1234

    Dewayne? And writing about blacks/race? Gee, I wonder if he’s black.

    These people are completely wrapped up in race to the exclusion of everything else. I’ve never read anything from any of them that concerns anything other than something involving race or personalities.

    I’m guessing if they reported on the current state of affairs in the Middle East or the history of jihad or Islamic conquest or the procedure required to develop uranium to the point where it is weapons grade material, or the ideas and concepts bantered back and forth between the founders, or anything else involving abstract concepts, etc., they’d come across like grade school children.

    They write about race, because they can’t write about anything else that requires anything but shallow thinking. And even that is full of silliness and nonsensical thinking.

    Probably the weenies at these news outlets think by allowing them to have a voice……even if it’s a biased, ignorant voice……it will keep them from rioting and killing people.

    Yes, I truly believe that. And I also believe that these Dewaynes….. or whoever….. do more to incite black hatred and violence via what they write than if they were given no voice at all, because every last one of them is filled with anti-white hatred.

  • De Doc

    Negroes have learned that they can and should complain against anyone who criticizes them regardless of whether it has racist implications or not.

  • WR_the_realist

    I don’t think Netanyahu gives a damn whether the president is black or white. His criticism of Obama is not that he’s black, it’s that he’s slightly less belligerent than John McCain would be. How dare Obama not start a war with Iran! Everybody knows that the most important thing for Americans is to bomb Iran into the stone age, so that Islamic State can take over, as it did in Iraq and Libya, and is doing in Syria.

    • bv

      This frankly speaking is Israel’s problem and I’m not getting our boys involved. I don’t care to do the Gulf Arabs bidding or Israel’s. Let the Semites unite to deal with Persians, this isn’t the Europeans people’s fight.

      • WR_the_realist

        I agree. But if you don’t think Israel is America’s most important issue, you’ll be called a Nazi.

        • bv

          I have nothing against them or their Arab cousins but my concern is my people not theirs.

          The State of Israel is not an American State it’s an independent nation with its own interests that are not of my concern.

          • WR_the_realist

            Like Ron Paul I think we should treat Israel like a normal country. But that’s enough for some of the more ardent Zionists to label me an anti-Semite, as they have with Ron Paul.

            I think we should have diplomatic relations with any country that will have diplomatic relations with us. Diplomatic relations isn’t some seal of approval for a country’s policies. We had diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union throughout the cold war. It’s usually better to talk over differences and try to reach some sort of compromise, rather than jump into war. That’s the purpose of diplomatic relations.

          • bv

            I don’t want to rule or influence Israelis NOR do I want them to do likewise to me.

        • meanqueen

          Wrong. Israel just wants to be able to defend itself without being ganged up on. Israel doesn’t need the US to fight for her. Are you aware that Obama threatened to shoot down Israeli planes if they try to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities? What kind of ally does that?

        • bv

          Being called racist or nazi only works if you’re simple minded to be swayed by leftist tantrums.

  • Alexandra1973

    The author’s first name is DeWayne. Wonder what race he is?

  • Duke56

    Is there anything that doesn’t offend blacks?

    • Dr. N Seagoon

      I cant find it, they are unhappy and need to be pacified like a cranky child.
      What a sad lot!

    • Luca

      Money. White peoples’ money and lots of it.

    • Speedy Steve

      My experience with Africans is that they don’t want equality. What won’t offend them is for YT to worship them, or perform fellatio on their pathetic infected genitalia.

      For that reason the only thing I detest more than Africans is the leftard who kisses black rear.

      • Duke56

        And the entertainment media who glorifies them… ever see a rocket scientist in a movie who wasn’t black? I don’t mean the stupid white ones who screw everything up… I mean the one no one would listen to, who kept his cool, and saved the universe. And then there is the ‘news’… it’s laughable. A heinous crime is committed, plenty of witnesses, suspect on the loose, and no description of race. I always say to my wife, “one guess”. Actually, at that point, it’s not a guess. The mainstream media is the enemy. Not the only one,of course.

      • Blackfish

        Correct. They want “reparations” so they no longer have to work and “Justice” which means blacks are not prosecuted for the crimes they commit.

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    This shows that Semites hate negroes, but pretend to like them just so that they can use them to destroy western civilization. After all it was the semites that brought them to America as slaves.

    • bv

      Did they? We have a lot of finger pointing to do at ourselves. Plantations weren’t owned by Jews last time I looked.

      • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

        Correct, but the slave trade was dominated by the semites. Plantations were owned by whites. look it up on youtube and on the internet

  • bv

    Boo Hoo!

  • Alden

    Jews hate and detest religious conservative White Protestants. But they are the only Americans who are totally for Israel right or wrong forever and ever Amen. Take a look at theconservativetreehouse for the religious White conservative Protestant take on Netanyahu’s speech. More than 300 absolutely worshipping adoring comments. One stated that Netanyahu was the second coming of Jesus. Another wished Netanyahu were the President of the US. Many wrote of converting and migrating to Israel. Naturally there were numerous quotes from the Torah.

    • Speedy Steve

      Sickening isn’t it?

      • meanqueen

        What is sickening, truly sickening, is the number of supposed White Nationalists who hate Jews so much that they stand with barbaric Islamists. Talk about screwing yourself.

        • Speedy Steve

          I used to be a 100% pro-Israel protestant Christian. Then I met a Palestinian Orthodox Christian from Ramallah — a town that in 1967 was 80% Christian — while volunteering for Pat Buchanan in 1992. She told me the real deal. Her house was bulldozed by the IDF simply because she was Christian. The state of Israel pits the Palestinians against each other. Bethlehem and Ramallah are now about 20% Christian.

          • meanqueen

            Speedy Steve, the Christians are diminishing in number because Muslims persecute them, not because of Israel. Many Christian and Muslim Arabs are actively trying to get INTO Israel, to live, because they know that life is better there. Palestinians are pathological liars. The woman you mentioned didn’t get her house demolished because she was Christian – it got demolished because someone in her family committed a terrorist act. That is the only reason houses get demolished by the IDF.

          • Speedy Steve

            You’re wrong. The Israelis harass church-going Christians by setting up road blocks on Sundays. A 7 mile drive can take 2 hours. The secular Israelis want to get rid of the Church of the Sepulchre because of the Holy Fire.

    • For the most part, yes. From what I understand, right of center Jews in Israel are happy with American evangelical Christians and their steadfast support of Israel, but still harbor in the back of their minds some level of suspicion. Liberal Jews, Israel, here, or anywhere, absolutely hate them.

      But this is more of a cautionary tale comment. I keep hearing over and over that we need “name the Jew,” “expose the Zionist.” Okay, so we name the Jew and the non-Jewish sycophants of the Jews. Then what? The Jew and their non-Jewish allies will get a whole lot of political support, and you’ll wind up the crackpot. All you had to do was read those 300 comments to find that out. We’re living in 2015 USA, not 1935 Germany.

      • KyraNelson

        Please don’t mistake suspicion for hate. Yes, we’re “suspicious” because underneath all that support for Israel is a very strong desire to “convert” Jews to Christianity. It’s just annihilation by another, more civilized name.

        • meanqueen

          True. White Nationalists don’t want to be “converted” to libtardism so there should be a natural support for Israeli Jews who just want their nation to remain intact and without interference or conversion.

    • KyraNelson

      I’m wondering exactly which Jews you’re referring to because in all my 57 years, secular and now orthodox, I never met a single one who hated and detested religious conservative white Protestants. I’m sure they exist, but it’s an annoying generalization. We Jews do get a kick out of those weird TV preachers like the Bakers and Ernest Angly. They’re a hilarious bunch of shysters.

      • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

        Yeah, but you semites just hates whites and western civilization, but pretend to love negroes to use them to destroy the white race. Yet you want to live in western countries and then trash it.

      • meanqueen

        One doesn’t have to be Jewish to appreciate the hilarity of Bennie Hin! He’s my favorite. “Satan be gone!”

    • meanqueen

      You are subscribing to the stereotypical libtard lefty American Jew, of which there are many. But Israeli Jews and conservative/religious Jews are not as you describe. I know you want to hate Jews, as many here do, but maybe you wouldn’t if you knew the difference.

  • shawnmer

    This isn’t worth comment.

  • Alden

    They won’t. The blacks are still their storm troopers against the White goyim.

  • LHathaway

    I’ve been saying this for years now. They don’t want us to speak. Anything we might say could be offensive. No, everything we say is insensitive, it is only a matter how offensive. It is only a matter of degree. It is not as if I watched the film ‘Planet of the Apes’ and stole this idea. I noticed this myself, and then noticed it reminded me of this film somewhat.

    I imagined Obama himself was above this kind of primitive and retrograde intimidation. Guess not.

  • TL2014

    Some of us realize it very clearly. Not enough of us, that is true. I try to educate as much as I can.

  • JackKrak

    Nothing to see here – just the Resident Black Man on the staff of another “news” outlet keeping us up to date on blackness, what it means to be black and how his blackness affects his black nature and its view of the reality of being black.

  • B.A_2014

    Why is this warmonger given such a platform in the U.S. He wants you to do the heavy lifting. All this from the leader of the only nation that refuses to confirm its nuclear arsenal, even though the dogs in the street know how many nukes the Israelis have.

    • The Dude

      The U.S. has no lessons to give to other countries about warmongering, even less so to countries surrounded by hostile peoples wishing to see it off the map.

    • Fredrik_H

      I wonder if it was some other small country somewhere else, would the US population see the absurdity of it all?

      Imagine if the king of Thailand flew in regularly to Washington to scold US politicians about not attacking, let’s say Japan….

  • The Dude

    The base tribalism and self-centeredness of some black folks is disgusting. This is not about you!

  • Light from the East

    Jews vs Blacks? A chance for us to exploit?

  • Augustus3709

    The sun is setting on the African American race. As much as we rightly talk about the existential crisis of the White world, with the ongoing tidal wave of central American immigrants into the US, blacks will be squeezed out of the opportunities they had.

    Blacks could have lived in paradise here, being the White man’s sidekick, but instead they fell for the radical leftist trap, wanted impossible “equality”, fell for every trick and bamboozling, the utterly failed “integration” agenda, the welfare state, feminist “sexual liberation” which undid hundreds of years of moral progress.

    They had their chance and they blew it. Go and cry a few tears by the new MLK monument, before it’s replaced with a poncho and sombrero.

    • Marilyn

      I just read an article that Michigan state did some kind of research on ‘colorism’ which is a new term for black Americans that have ‘racist’ thoughts as to how dark or light skinned one is. A darker skinned girl feels a lighter skinned girl is prettier and lighter skinned males are ‘pretty boys’ and darker skin males are ‘ rugged’. Apparently this is going on in the Detroit area. Probably elsewhere too

      • Augustus3709

        They are a mixed race as it is, and many prefer greater White admixture. It’s not surprising. Many of them talk about the desire for lighter features and softer hair.

        The black comedian Cris Rock once made a joke on David Letterman that for a White person to be attractive, they “needed a little bit of black in them.”

        I remember thinking, what a racist statement, only a black person could get away with that. Must be that Colored Privilege.

        But in truth it’s ridiculous statement. It’s like saying, for a black person to be attractive, they need “a whole lot of White in them.”

        • Marilyn

          Oh wow ya Chris Rock… Not surprised. It seems they can get away with saying anything…it’s crazy

  • Hammerheart

    Jews have just been kicked off the diversity train.

    You can’t rally a bunch of unlike cultures and religions under the ‘democratic rainbowtopia banner of diversity’, give them a common enemy in the white man, and expect them to play nice with each other forever. What is especially problematic is that you have aggressive groups like black males and Mohammeds grouped up together with hopelessly passive groups like the LGBTs and radical feminists. Leftist infighting and cannibalism will be an important component of our survival.

    • meanqueen

      Israeli Jews are not like libtard leftist American Jews. Israeli Jews were never on the diversity train.

  • ElComadreja

    Blacks are paranoid and totally defined by race. Who cares what these mental midgets think?

  • WhiteVeinKratom

    ““Hell will freeze over before I attend” the prime minister’s address,
    Clyburn said a few days before Netanyahu arrived in Washington. Other
    black legislators, including Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., who chairs
    the 46-memberCongressional Black Caucus…”

    Question: Who chairs the Congressional WHITE Caucus???

    We know the answer.

  • Bob G

    A true statesman and leader B-slapped the child king. I loved it. Netanyahu is truly the Winston Churchill of modern time. God Bless Israel.

  • So the Israelis have offended blacks before?

  • “why the Israeli prime minister would be so disrespectful of Obama, he responded: “You know why.” Israelis really have better things to do than worrying about offending blacks. It seems to me that a legitimate concern about a nuclear Iran is driving their diplomacy. If blacks want to get in a huff over the wrong motive then let them.

    It’s stuff like this that is encouraging. Eventually blacks will do something stupid, like trash another city when the weather turns warmer, which will help awaken white awareness.

    I’m going to write my congressperson (a Democrat & a Jew) and harang them about the evils of immigration while at the same time professing my support of Israel.

  • Richard Roelofsen

    So the PM of Israel comes to DC at the invitation of the US opposition leader to undermine the US president and ask congress to escalate tensions with a third country (Iran) so that his own country (Israel) can benefit. And mister Taylor and amren somehow managed to find an irrelevant article that links blacks to it? How about mister Taylor giving us insight into how he really feels about the charlatan and hypocrite Netanyahu using US congress as an election campaign stop. How about amren sharing their thoughts about how they feel about the subservient behavior of US congressmen towards a foreign leader that wants the US to fight it’s wars for them. As if the US hasn’t done enough for Israel. As if the US taxpayers don’t already provide billions of USD to Israel annually. As if the US doesn’t have to deal with countless ‘Americans’ with dual (Israeli) citizenship that steal classified military secrets to benefit their true homeland. Even when blacks have nothing to do with the issue at hand mister Taylor still managed to get them involved by referring to some vague article by this dewayne character. How about mister Taylor come clean and give us his insight into a possible war with Iran. How about he gives us his view on Netanyahu’s prediction that a war against Iraq would have a positive impact on the Middle East region.

    In short, why do you speak daily about the symptom (blacks), but remain silent about the true cause?

    • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

      yes the semites are worse that blacks.

  • meanqueen

    “mentally insane psychopath”? Are you a Muslim?

  • The All Seeing Bry

    I love the Congressional Black Caucus. Run along and play in the corner while the adults talk now.

    • AmericanCitizen

      They wouldn’t be able to follow the speech anyway.

      • Richard Roelofsen

        It seems that from your comments both of you haven’t been able to follow the speech. The leader of a foreign country comes to the US and urges US congressmen to take action against a third country for his country’s sake. How much more proof do we need to understand who the real culprit is here. Who the real enemy of whites is here. It’s surely not blacks. The loyalty of christian Zionist whites in the US towards Israel is sickening, but the blindness of white nationalists towards Israel is more than sickening, it’s upsetting and proof of a naivety in the movement. Know your enemy people!

        • AmericanCitizen

          I follow these events closely, and agree that Iran has been six months away from a nuclear weapon since 1988. A lot of crying wolf comes out of Israel.

          • FransSusan

            The US has more nuclear weapons than anyone else and has used nuclear weapons more than anyone else.

      • IstvanIN

        You should have heard Hank Johnson’s little speech on Netanyahu’s address, the man is truly illiterate.

  • Whitetrashgang

    That’s not a plus.

  • Musashi5000

    Yeah, everything is about black.

  • You get a thumbs up for the excellent first couple paragraphs, despite the extremely demeaning last one, where you disparage the young men who volunteer, not to be “used as cannon fodder” but for a huge multitude of reasons, many of which are rather noble, and all of which are typically amplified by the fact that they are young and unaware of “the big picture”.

    Your post started off so well, uniquely fresh and intelligent… and then it swung round at the end to the typical “i’m going to bash servicemembers, people who, still believing in SOMETHING, were willing to put their lives on the line for that something.” Which, coincidentally makes those Rambo film brainwashed kids immeasurably “better” than you, who fight bravely from behind your keyboard.

    Theres an awful lot of servicemember bashing here at times, so you’ll find yourself in good company, I suppose. But I really, truly cant understand the why of it. You all seem to assume that because these kids, many fresh out of high school, were tricked into joining the military of a country that has turned on them means that they’re stupid, or bloodthirsty, or gullible, etc. etc. But they’re not, they are merely the end product of their country failing them, deceiving them, leading them astray with whispers and false promises.

    Many of them join because they live in a majority white, diversity free area, and they grew up loving their town, and their people, and their family. And they join because they want to keep that, because they’re willing to fight for that, because, despite not fully comprehending what it means, they’re willing to die for that. Of course, the second they get to basic training, and are surrounded by diverse acum from around the country, they get a hard dose of the world outside their idyllic hometown.

    The above is one possible scenario. There are probably a million more, and the vast majority of them are not “timmy watched rambo, and wanted to grow up one day to kill hundreds of people just like him, so timmy, despite being almost mentally retarded, joined the Army Infantry! Then timmy was shot in a foreign land. Gosh, timmy sure was a brainwashed idiot, wasn’t he? Hahaha, im glad i’m not as dumb and gullible as him!”

    (To be clear, you weren’t nearly as rude and insulting to our young men and women in the military as most I see here, but you are the proverbial straw which broke the camel’s back this time, as I typically hold my tongue till I boil over. But seriously, pick someone else as a scapegoat other than teenagers who obviously weren’t taught the realities of the world we live in by their parents. Please?)