Wisconsin Judge Orders Deadbeat Dad of Nine (With Six Women) to Stop Procreating

The Smoking Gun, December 4, 2012

Meet Corey Curtis.

The Wisconsin man, who has fathered nine children with six women, was ordered yesterday to cease procreating until he can support his numerous offspring.

Corey Curtis

At Curtis’s sentencing yesterday for bail jumping and failure to pay child support, Circuit Court Judge Tim Boyle told the 44-year-old Racine man that his frequent breeding was to be curbed as a condition of his three-year probation term.

Curtis owes about $90,000 total in back child support and interest to the mothers of his children. Pictured in the above mug shot, Curtis will have to wipe out that debt before he can add heir number ten, ruled Boyle.


Previously, a Kentucky judge ordered a deadbeat dad (12 children with 11 women) to refrain from having sex in an attempt to keep him from adding a 13th dependent. The country’s most famous deadbeat dad, Tennessean Desmond Hatchett, has fathered more than 20 children (with 11 women). But Hatchett’s procreation rate has slowed significantly over the past 40 months due to the convicted felon’s status as a ward of state’s Department of Correction.


Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • [Guest]

    The fact that the American justice system has resorted to all manner of lunatic distortions in an attempt to deal with African behavior indicates that the African mentality is incompatible with Western society.

    That’s moot, of course, given that we’ve entered the glorious new age of BRA.

  • I take Tim Boyle for an oblivious dullard, even if he did find some politician or electorate fool enough to make him a judge to give him a black robe, a gavel and a government paycheck.

    Going to make this Bellcurvius wear a condom? Going to watch him apply the latex to his shaft every time he wants to get his freak-a-lik on? Because we certainly can’t tell him to stop having sex; that would be like asking him to stop breathing.

    • Joseph U

      Why NOT just tell him to stop breathing; would solve all of the potential issues.

  • Seek

    This sort of breeding, by the way, was a lot more common among blacks in the days of yore. The father of the late boxer, Sonny Liston, for example, had 29 kids — 16 with his first wife and 13 with his second. Birth control and self-control apparently have little in common with one another.

    • ATBOTL

      You used to always her about blacks who were “one of thirteen children.” It was a stereo type.

      That’s how we got over 30 million of them from just 500,000 Africans.

      • IstvanIN

        I work with blacks in their 50s and 60s who have 8-12 siblings.

        • i am

          You work with blacks? You must have a government job.

      • God bless America…..

      • God Bless America, and he did say to “be fruitful and multiply”?

    • That is why Evander Hollyfield has to fight. To support his kids and to pay of his debts. I saw him on television and he claimed that he was broke.

      • i am`

        Blacks are always broke and whites have to work to pay their bills.

  • cecilhenry

    Well, I know a few ways to STOP the procreation.

    Get serious about the issue judge.

  • So CAL Snowman

    The liberal response : Why should only RICH people get to have kids?

  • bluffcreek1967

    Oh, I see, the judge “ordered” him to stop breeding! Oh, yeah, that’ll really work!? The same judge (or others like him) probably “ordered’ Corey Curtis to stop doing all sorts of things throughout his years in the penal system – but that apparently never worked! I’m sure Mr. Curtis laughs and snickers when the judge’s back is turned.
    I won’t say what my job is, but I know these judges very well. They’re not only weak, but they don’t live in the real world of the average guy. Everything about them – their work as judges, their homes, their gated communities – is protected and they’re closed off from the rest of society. They only come into contact with their beloved ‘minorities’ when they have to momentarily face them in court (surrounded by armed deputies). But by then, the criminal ‘minority’ standing before him has been cleaned up, taken a shower, wearing a suit and appearing humble and contrite. The ‘soft’ judge considers this and ends up giving the criminal either no sentence or a light one. Or worse, he adds another “probation stipulation.” Those of us who know how stupid and ineffective it is ridicule it as “double-secret squirrel probation”!
    And the women judges? They’re the worst! I don’t care anymore if it sounds sexist. Women just shouldn’t be judges. I grant there are exceptions, but on average they are very soft on criminals. They are overly emotional and they get easily swayed by emotional appeals. They are optimistic of human nature rather than having a realistic view of it – which means they give the same damn criminals chance after chance because they ‘feel’ he can ‘change.’ Most are Leftists to the core. Because they have been deeply influenced by modern feminism, they are deeply suspicious of White males – yet, strangely, they will bend over backwards to empathize with Black males who are repeat offenders!? In court, you will see these same women judges gesturing and nodding toward the criminal ‘client’ and his sleezy defense attorney to show how ‘understanding’ they are. They want to show how they can ‘identify’ with the perp and are able to display ‘compassion’ toward him. Unless you see it on a daily basis and recognize what a circus our criminal justice system has become, you might not understand.
    The truth is, our judges are weak in handing out judgments because they are liberals. They don’t understand the nature of the Black man because they don’t actually have to live among them; they don’t have to deal with them extensively on a personal basis; and so their views of Blacks is colored by political-correctness and multiculturalism.

    • This judge seems to be an egalitarian SWPL dork who assumes that every black who goes in front of him is merely an SWPL white person with a darker tan. Therefore, he projects himself onto him, and assumes that they’ll comply with any order he makes. In spite of my other comment in this thread, of course Boyle won’t follow Curtis around to monitor his sex life or prophylactic use — Boyle is oblivious enough to believe that Curtis will obey.

  • Skincognito

    NBC’s article on this story reports that the judge may have said he wished he could sterilize this doting father. If this is confirmed, I expect his Honor’s head will soon be rolling.

    My entirely unscholarly, politically untenable proposal is that in exchange for EBT cards, recipients should be required to dispose of their DNA on a thrice daily basis at government depositories. Obviously this policy need not be race-specific, for we all know who would participate at a rate disproportionate to their actual percentage of the general population. Of course the Hitler Schnitt works just as well and is probably cheaper and more effective, but it offends certain interested parties. I would propose a Swiftian solution, but based on their odor, I suspect black children are not very tasty. Oh well, more potential astronauts, physicists, chemists and presidents.

  • You Are Now Enriched

    This story vindicates and redeems Margaret Sanger.

    • David Ashton


      Who has the right to reproduce more and more children they cannot and will not support? Who has the right then to abandon their mothers and neglect their own offspring? Who has the right to take money from those who look after their children to pay for their own uncontrollable vice? These children are all too likely to reproduce their “father”‘s habits and/or join gangs if they too are males. There have to be effective painless medical methods to prevent this social and racial menace, as happened in previous periods and places. It can be done on the demerits of the case without color prejudice and without threatening the marriages and families of hardworking poor people, or the accidentally unemployed or injured. Seen as cruelty to children the issue may even persuade a few liberal do-“gooder”s to support judicial sterilization.

  • Angry White Woman

    What the heck ever happened to the saying most of us here were raised with? You know the one that says, “If you can’t feed ’em, don’t breed ’em”? I personally think all the dusky brethern and sisters ought to be forcibly sterilized after their second child unless they can prove they are in a stable, committed, MARRIED, relationship with each other and at least one of them is gainfully employed, and they are not on welfare, food stamps, section 8, etc. etc. etc. Of course, that is “racisss” because getting married and being responsible for yourself and your family is a “white thing”. Why support yourself when the gov’t will do it for you–and if it don’t you can whine and riot… (The same stipulations need to apply to the lazy white trash that practice generational welfare, too.)

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    Dysgenics is destiny

  • IstvanIN

    A condition of welfare should be mandatory sterilization of both mother and father. And the mother only gets welfare if she and the bio dad get sterilized, regardless of marital status or living arrangement. One child, need welfare, that is your last child, and then only if you assist the authorities in finding papa and he is found and he is the bio dad and he gets the snip.

  • Dr. X

    Unfortunately, there is simply no way the judge can enforce this order, and there’s no way it would withstand an appeal if the judge tried to enforce it. Some lawyer, probably of a non-Gentile lineage, from the ACLU would give the “father” pro bono counsel and have the judge’s order voided on the grounds that it violates the black “father’s” constitutional rights.

    The United States is now in a perverse and untenable situation: the Bantus have an absolute constitutional right to impregnate as many unmarried women as they can, and there’s no legal way to stop them. But the taxpayer has an absolute obligation to support each baby and each unmarried mother on welfare. The only options left are a) dictatorship, in which one’s breeding patterns will be ordered by the government, or b) taxpayer revolution. Neither is very appealing.

    • JosephU

      We are indeed however, suffering for the sins of our collective fathers who decided that importing these people would be “good for the economy”. Well, look how much we spend just on mugshots alone so somebody could have cheap cotton in 1850.

      The law of unintended consequences strikes again.

  • Michael Ryan

    ive said for years a condition of welfare is a positive id an father he then gets three choices military jail or paying back the state that will solve many problems simultaneously and ought to be politically viable

  • Michael Ryan

    and a birth control implant while on wefare

  • Howard W. Campbell

    This clown is probably lauded in his community while the Duggar’s are reviled by many. At least the Duggar’s are not public charges.

    • Also, the Duggars have no debt. They own a couple of commercial properties that pay them rent each month. They also shop at thrift stores for clothing and shoes.

  • Joseph Usario

    Surgical intervention.

  • neuter these guys ! It works with dogs and cats.

  • SLCain

    This man would never be able to legally earn enough to support nine children. By the looks of him, he wouldn’t even be able to earn enough illegally to support them. But I’ll wager that those kids are getting fed none-the-less. So who’s supporting them now?

    The beginning of the solution to this problem is to eliminate all of these government subsidies which pay the dregs of society to reproduce – no TANF, no WIC, no Head Start, no SNAP, no nothing. We need to get full-up Dickensian on them: He who shall not work, neither shall he eat. We need to stop paying the black ghetto “community” to spawn little thuglings.

  • Castration, geldging, “fixing”…need I say more ?

  • jeffaral

    What about chemical castration?

  • Remove his testicles…period !

    Just like we do to pets and farm animals…

  • ageofknowledge

    I would bet money he lives off them. It’s his racket and the taxpayers foot the bill as usual.

  • lupin

    I watched this article for the last couple of days–it got relatively little attention, compared to others about Chinese industrial espionage or thuggish athletes. Yet this article addresses the issue that makes the biggest difference for the future of America: our current policy subsidizes the reproduction of the most irresponsible losers. Roll the future forward 50 years and what do you think we’ll see? A significant chunk of America will be the descendants of people like Curtis and Hatchett.