“Regional Equity”—Obama’s Coming War on Whitopias

Jesse Mossman, VDARE, September 27, 2012

Paul Kersey recently reported on VDARE.com an emerging trend: for white suburbs to secede from larger urban jurisdictions and so form, in effect, whitopian enclaves.

But he did not mention that there are powerful forces on the other side pushing back hard—using a concept called “Regional Equity.”

Americans can be forgiven for not being familiar with Regional Equity. I had not heard the term myself until just a few weeks ago, when I caught Stanley Kurtz on the radio talking about his new book: Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities.

Put Regional Equity into a search engine and the language of thecollectivists surfaces: transportation equity, environmental equity,healthcare equitysocial justice, smart growth, and especially,sustainable communities.

The essence of Regional Equity is the use of centralized political power make things equal over regions—disregarding jurisdictions.

President Obama is very much on board with the Regional Equity movement. The White House website says:

“President Obama will also take a regional approach that disregards traditional jurisdictional boundaries [my emphasis—JM], setting policy that takes into account how cities, suburbs, and exurbs interact. President Obama’s urban policy agenda will use this integrated approach to enhance economic competitiveness, sustainability, and equity in our cities and metropolitan areas.”

Furthermore, PolicyLink (a pro-minority think tank run by a woman graduate of Howard University who describes herself as “national leader for social justice and equity”) states:

Under the Obama administration, a framework of regional equity has been a driving force behind the larger federal partnership for Sustainable Communities made up of HUD, the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The partnership has now issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for a new Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Program (SCRPG) that will formalize as federal policy the very strategies that equity advocates have been seeking to advance at the community level for years. [The Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Guide | How to Link Equity to Each Rating Factor PDF]

In the past, secession could work—boundaries meant independence from the predatory desires of larger neighbors hungry for the resources and lifestyles of more prosperous suburbs.

But now, like a Black Hole whose irresistible gravity swallows nearby stars, central cities, using the doctrine of Regional Equity could suck the cash from prosperous suburban cities, impose onerous laws, and even force them to become more diverse—negating the very reasons for moving to these former enclaves of sanity and safety.

Let’s look at how this Regional Equity Doctrine is going to impact ordinary Americans.

Before I was married, I lived in Seattle—famously a relatively benign environment compared to the majority minority cities in other states. However, there were several nearby murders, many burglaries, and I witnessed wads of cash handed to a car full of blacks in a parking lot.

I wanted a safer environment for my precious wife. I was also concerned about rising taxes. I therefore not only moved out of the city, but crossed the border into a neighboring county—putting yet another jurisdictional boundary between our home and the problems of Seattle.

Once that would have been enough. But not if Regional Equity becomes the rule.

In my case, I first began to understand the reasons for white flight while attending the University of Michigan. Friends there told me that they had to pick up their son from the local high school every noon and take him home to use the bathroom. This was necessary because blacks occupied the school restrooms and robbed white kids who entered. I also heard complaints about white girls being manhandled on the school buses. The school administration was too liberal and too cowardly to do anything to protect the white students.

That is when I realized the truth: whites were not fleeing blacks because of some irrational racism. They weren’t afraid that the color would rub off. They simply wanted their families to live without fear of crime and intimidation.

Of course, the Left resents white flight. I recall a college professor lecturing on the immorality of whites fleeing cities and depleting the tax base. (Ironically, the professor herself had fled a grim industrial town in Britain for the sunny skies of New Mexico.)

Back then this was just typical kneejerk Leftist collectivism—I never heard a label for it.

Urban planners have long had little use for property rights—they just get in the way of their grandiose plans. In college, I had an instructor who had worked on the Chicago 21 Plan. The city government wanted development and certain favored developers wanted to develop land owned by a railroad, but didn’t care to pay the going price. The plan called for the city to “assemble” the land—planner euphemism for “steal”—thus allowing the developers to obtain the land at the price they, not the owner, wanted.

I asked the instructor didn’t he think it was wrong to take private land for the use of another private business. He replied that it just depended on which side you were on—an echo (no doubt unconscious) of Lenin’s notorious Who/Whom formulation.

Of course, the Supreme Court has since approved exactly this kind of nullification of property rights.

Every American who feels secure in having escaped the city should be aware of these new efforts to bring the very people they escaped from to their town.

Thus Diana Novak wrote recently of the Chicago suburbs:

“In 2010, Highland Park, Glencoe, Lake Forest, Kenilworth, Northbrook, Northfield and Wilmette all were cited by the Illinois Housing Development Authority as among the 49 Illinois communities with less than 10 percent affordable housing. According to the Affordable Housing Planning and Appeal Act, all such communities must submit a plan for how they will incorporate affordable housing to the Illinois Housing Development Authority.”

[Diana Novak, Affordable Housing in Northern Suburbs, Chicago Tonight, April 6, 2011

The whole Regional Equity movement reeks of the very attitude Obama has towards small business: “You didn’t build that.” There is a jealousy of the prosperity achieved in white and Asian suburbs and a denial that that prosperity was earned by hard work and sacrifice.

The Regional Equity movement is redistribution of wealth onsteroids—it is not just wealth that it seeks to redistribute, but entire life styles.

In fact, we have heard the agenda of Regional Equity before—it is the UN Agenda 21, applied locally. As Phyllis Schlafly writes:

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive master plan to reshape and control the U.S. while locking us into the clutches of the U.N. under the innocuous phrase ‘sustainable development.’” [UN Mischief from Durban to Rio, Phyllis Schlafly, Townhall, November 29, 2011]

Schlafly further points out:

“Advocates of Agenda 21 talk about the three E’s of sustainable development: economy, equity and environment. Equity means replacing our American constitutional system with central planning and social justice, which is a code word for redistribution of wealth, abolition of private property rights and giving favored corporations tax breaks, grants, and use of eminent domain.”

Schlafly adds that “Agenda 21 wants to herd people into crowded communities with limited housing space and limited parking spaces.”

Fundamentally, Agenda 21 and Regional Equity are soft totalitarianism—the subordination of nation-states and local governments to an overarching, Leftist, agenda.

No-one can predict just what stand Mitt Romney will take on Regional Equity (as usual). But there is no doubt about the position of Obama.

Americans—especially in the whitopian suburbs and exurbs—better be paying attention.

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • jedsrael

    Create Regional Equity by Deporting the White Girl, because we need to make room for all the Mexican Dreamers who will renew our economy:

    1.  Georgia College student faces deportation to England on 21st birthday, leaving family behind

    2. The State Economic Benefits of Passing the DREAM Acthttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pohttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pophttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=phttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgthttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#whttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act—or DREAM Act—would provide a pathway to legal status for an estimated 2.1 million undocumented youth currently living in our country. For the nation as a whole, passage of the DREAM Act will add a total of $329 billion to the economy by 2030, support the creation of 1.4 million new jobs, and generate more than $10 billion in increased revenue for the federal government.But since DREAM Act beneficiaries are distributed unevenly across the nation, certain states will end up with an even greater economic boost. California, for example, the state with the largest number of DREAMers—more than 550,000—stands to gain almost $100 billion in economic activity, while Texas stands to gain more than $66 billion.But even states with fewer DREAMers benefit significantly by passage of the act. Maryland, with close to 36,000 DREAMers, gains almost $5 billion in economic activity, which will support the creation of over 19,000 new jobs. No matter how many or how few DREAMers per state, all 50 states and the District of Columbia will benefit economically from passage of the DREAM Act.popgt=pop=popoppRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpyDREAM Act—would provide a pathway to legal status for an estimated 2.1 million undocumented youth currently living in our country. For the nation as a whole, passage of the DREAM Act will add a total of $329 billion to the economy by 2030, support the creation of 1.4 million new jobs, and generate more than $10 billion in increased revenue for the federal government.But since DREAM Act beneficiaries are distributed unevenly across the nation, certain states will end up with an even greater economic boost. California, for example, the state with the largest number of DREAMers—more than 550,000—stands to gain almost $100 billion in economic activity, while Texas stands to gain more than $66 billion.
    But even states with fewer DREAMers benefit significantly by passage of the act. Maryland, with close to 36,000 DREAMers, gains almost $5 billion in economic activity, which will support the creation of over 19,000 new jobs. No matter how many or how few DREAMers per state, all 50 states and the District of Columbia will benefit economically from passage of the DREAM Act.popgt=pop=popoppRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpyRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpy
    2. The State Economic Benefits of Passing the DREAM Act

    http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pohttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pophttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=phttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgthttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#whttp://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act—or DREAM Act—would provide a pathway to legal status for an estimated 2.1 million undocumented youth currently living in our country. For the nation as a whole, passage of the DREAM Act will add a total of $329 billion to the economy by 2030, support the creation of 1.4 million new jobs, and generate more than $10 billion in increased revenue for the federal government.But since DREAM Act beneficiaries are distributed unevenly across the nation, certain states will end up with an even greater economic boost. California, for example, the state with the largest number of DREAMers—more than 550,000—stands to gain almost $100 billion in economic activity, while Texas stands to gain more than $66 billion.But even states with fewer DREAMers benefit significantly by passage of the act. Maryland, with close to 36,000 DREAMers, gains almost $5 billion in economic activity, which will support the creation of over 19,000 new jobs. No matter how many or how few DREAMers per state, all 50 states and the District of Columbia will benefit economically from passage of the DREAM Act.popgt=pop=popoppRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpyDREAM Act—would provide a pathway to legal status for an estimated 2.1 million undocumented youth currently living in our country. For the nation as a whole, passage of the DREAM Act will add a total of $329 billion to the economy by 2030, support the creation of 1.4 million new jobs, and generate more than $10 billion in increased revenue for the federal government.But since DREAM Act beneficiaries are distributed unevenly across the nation, certain states will end up with an even greater economic boost. California, for example, the state with the largest number of DREAMers—more than 550,000—stands to gain almost $100 billion in economic activity, while Texas stands to gain more than $66 billion.
    But even states with fewer DREAMers benefit significantly by passage of the act. Maryland, with close to 36,000 DREAMers, gains almost $5 billion in economic activity, which will support the creation of over 19,000 new jobs. No matter how many or how few DREAMers per state, all 50 states and the District of Columbia will benefit economically from passage of the DREAM Act.popgt=pop=popoppRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpyRead more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/09/30/2196729/georgia-college-student-faces.html#storylink=omni_popular#wgt=pop#storylink=cpy

  • MekongDelta69

    Leftists want YOU to live among blacks, while THEY live in safe neighborhoods.

    Why? Because they’re morally superior to you (in their own little minds) and deserve nothing but the best.

    One major attribute you HAVE to have as a leftist – being a complete and utter hypocrite.

    • jedsrael

      That’s why all police and security forces will soon be black. 

      White police can’t be trusted to protect the White elites who made lower middle class Whiteness a living hell of ugly and dangerous Diversity.

      • Do not forget the anchor babies of illegal invading mestizos. They will have no
        problems enforcing post White privilege law.

      • TeutonicKnight67

         That’s what I’ve been saying. The police are NOT our friends! The emasculated white police of today who target their own will soon give way to General Urko and the Gorillas of Ape City, who will not suffer the same self-loathing and continue to persecute us. Euros of the world unite!!!

        • General Urko–okay, that’s funny. On a completely unrelated note, here is a video taken a few hours ago of a black cop punching a lady in the face:

          http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/breaking/Police-Officer-Hits-Punches-Woman-Philadelphia-172092861.html?dr

          • jedsrael

            http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/19660095/man-says-park-atlanta-officer-criticized-mitt-romney-bumper-sticker

            Man says parking officer criticized Mitt Romney bumper sticker

            ATLANTA – 
             
            An Atlanta man says a parking officer criticized his Mitt Romney bumper sticker and then slapped a ticket on his vehicle. The Georgia Republican Party is incensed about the incident and is urging Mayor Kasim Reed to speak out.

            The motorist admits that he was illegally parked, but is upset over the ticketing officer’s reaction to the bumper sticker.

            “I overheard her say that, when she saw the sticker on the back of my car, the Mitt Romney sticker, ‘Oh, I’m definitely going to give you a ticket now,'” he said.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Killadelphia is a lost city. Any white that remains there is insane. That said, I’d like to point out that the “victim” was not white and probably an “undocumented immigrant” that didn’t belong here anyway. If I were in a foreign land and didn’t speak the language, the LAST thing I would do is mess with the local police. Then again, that would require common sense and self control.

          • 5n4k33y3s

            After all the instances in which blacks posture as the champions of women, and you’re going to pass up a chance to condemn a black cop who brutalizes a woman, just because that woman isn’t white enough for you to care?

            Weak. I’m about the worst chauvinist you can find, but I’ll condemn that cop, instantly. He is a pig.

  • I’m grateful I had the opportunity to tour England in the 1970s when it was still England. 

    Now I need to visit a few white American towns. They, too, will soon be gone. 

    • jedsrael

      Secession: At Some Point, The Hat Runs Out Of Rabbits

      http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/secession-at-some-point-the-hat-runs-out-of-rabbits/#comment-32665

      White Americans will never try Secession again, because:

      1. Discussing it in public will get you added to the SPLC Hate Watch list, which means your employer will get a nasty letter from the ADL that gets you fired for offending the J-words, which means Holder’s My People will never be charged with a crime for violently unburdening your of your criminalized racist unearned White privilege.

      2. Saint MLK criticized the segregationists whos “lips are dripping with nullification,” which pretty much but the death sentence on discussing nullification, the first step toward secession.

      3. There is no where to seced to:  even if half the states say they are seceded, the UN will invade and conquer, invited in by Obama, and crush the “forces of hate and exclusion who are trying to segregate themselves away from enriching global Diversity and much needed immigration of colour.”

      4. Any horror story you can think of is true.

      • This is misinformation. This list is designed to discourage us.

      • 5n4k33y3s

        Territorial secession doesn’t matter as much as personal, psychological secession, and cultural secession. It is a developing trend, thanks to the digital network, that we can extricate our minds from a shared media space which is unfavorable to our interests as white people. Once again, our technology saves us from doom.

        • jedsrael

          That’s why plans are in the works to censor the shared media. Just as White students can’t really speak their pain in school, soon none of us can online, except to be tracked, monitored, and eventually thrown into an Obama Auschwitz for retraining and enrichment.

      • ed91

         I’m not real worried about the UN invaded and doing much damage…………
        they’ll be spending most of their time looking for white girls to party with and playing computer games.

        White woodsmen would clean their clock in heart beat.

  • RHG

    “I recall a college professor lecturing on the immorality of whites fleeing cities and depleting the tax base”.
    _______

    Since when did it become the “moral” responsibility of whites to stay in dangerous areas so they can have their pockets picked by the government in order to give it to blacks who do nothing except whine about not having enough handed to them? 

    • Marc B.

      I’ve heard the term “abandoned” used by bemoaning news reporters, as if Whites leaving a declining area is the same as leaving a baby in front door of church. I think that’s what could be described as the soft racism of low expectations, but I have a distaste for the R word unless it is used in jest.

      • 5n4k33y3s

        Yeah, boo hoo. This game of cat and mouse has gone on too long. It’s time to change the rules of the game.

        People should have a policy of a gun in every home. White progressives complaining about guns don’t understand. Freedom comes from guns. No guns, no freedom.

  • And so it was in the Soviet era, the Party elites did not stand in bread lines, they did not wait for housing, they drove in limosines and ate caviar.  The very thing our forefathers warned of us is happening before our eyes and under our watch.  When the takeover is complete the liberal elites will live in gated communities preaching to you the wonders of sending your children to diverse ghetto schools which you must pay for with your ever increasing tax burdens. Seems to me in the history of our country there was a time when this was not tolerated. And even though the Tories outnumbered the Patriots, what allowed the patriots prevail was not their numbers, but their actions.

    “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

  • tickyul

    Urban Americans are the Demorats Stormtroopers. To do their job most efficiently…these Stormtroopers must live among Whitey.

  • That is when I realized the truth: whites were not fleeing blacks because of some irrational racism. They weren’t afraid that the color would rub off. They simply wanted their families to live without fear of crime and intimidation.

    The great lie of the left has always been that ‘racism’ was the result of ignorance.

    The truth is racial awareness is the result of experience with blacks.

  • libertarian1234

    Regional Equity will be just another hare-brained scheme by these pro-black racists to try to elevate blacks economicially, just as integrating them into white neighborhoods was sup0posed to make everyone love each other and get along, but had the reverse effect.

    Whether it’s Michelle Obama pushing for better nutrition, because some crazies on the left declared that I. Q. differences were nutritionally and environmentally based, or Obama and the other black leadership thinking that giving blacks money is going to change them into counterparts to middleclass whites, all of it amounts to nothing more than efforts in futility, because blacks can never rise above the point at which they are right now, which is not as evolved as the rest of humanity.

    Every single scheme devised to improve black behavior, intelligence ability and responsibility has failed miserably.  And Regional Equity will fail as well.

    • Sloppo

      This stuff isn’t supposed to elevate blacks and make us get along better.  The people who initiate these programs intend to destroy our civilization, racial identity, and cultural identity to make the global government easier to sell.  People who live in a world of violent chaos with no racial and cultural ties will usually be open to the idea of trading their freedoms for an all-controlling global governance which will take the measures necessary to make life tolerable.  When we have prosperity and enjoy strong ties to our own racially and culturally homogeneous communities, we will not want to be ruled and controlled by some far away group of strangers who do not care about us.  

  • RisingReich

     I myself also feel this sadness.  In response I feel I must toil in some small way everyday to introduce people to Nationalism, and to dispel myths about The Reich and squash smears of the German People.

    The poor People of Germany are being smeared as we speak by Globalist Communist newspapers, media, and government that is pro Euro at the expense of the German People’s money and culture (read Islamic invasion).

    It’s unfortunate but honorable all at the same time that the German Reich is synonymous in most American’s eyes with Nationalism.  Usually, the first step is to decouple Nationalism from the ‘evil Germans’ and explain what a Nationalist is first.  Once that is done, all of a sudden the German Nationalist isn’t so ‘evil’ anymore.

    I really, really wish the Reich was around for me to go home to.  Things look to be getting very ugly, both here and in Germany.

    This is the shot across the bow, that there is NO WHERE FOR WHITEY TO RUN TO.  ‘Racism’ will be quashed anywhere it is perceived to flourish.

    •  From the Kitman Blog

      ” Interesting left-wing documentary about the german social-democrat,
      Thilo Sarrazin, who whent on an anti-PC rampage about a year ago with
      his brilliant book .”

      “Deutschland Schafft sich ab” (“Germany does away
      with herself”.) The book sold over a million copies.

      ”It is truely a “no holds barred” account of the likely cultural- as well
      as genetic consequences of the insane current immigratio policy,
      destined to kill off the existence of Germany, in any meaningful sense
      of the word, within a few decades. ”

      kitmantv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/sarrazins-germany.html

      • Sherman_McCoy

        Even if you don’t speak German, hop onto Amazon and buy a copy to support Thilo.  I know, he belongs to the SPD and is a Socialist.  But Socialism seems to have worked fairly well in Germany, at least, until the parasites were invited in.

    • 5n4k33y3s

      “THERE IS NO WHERE FOR WHITEY TO RUN TO”

      Since when have white men had to run away from conflict? What can you say to someone who is inclined to panic? Don’t wet your pants?

      I’m not feeling racial anxiety at all. I’ve never felt less anxiety about race. I’ve never felt less anxiety in general.

      In the present social climate, if you’re hoping to be persuasive, be directly confrontational not fearful.

      There’s too much immigration. Okay, then be confrontational with progressives and Feminists. They’re more scared than anyone else. It should be a piece of cake to make them comply with our demands.

      It’s a worthy goal to keep your identity and salvage the vision of a unified German society, but Hitler has no place of honor.

      His heart was full of fear. He was a coward who sought to terrorize society into submission to his will. Understanding Hitler’s failure is precisely how the unity of the German society is restored.

      • RisingReich

        My point saying there is no where to run is to get people to be more confrontational about it.

        To try to salvage Hitler’s image is not my intent and I’m certainty not silly enough to try.

        I do agree with you on one thing, understanding the Third Reich’s ‘failures’ might be the key to to a German revival.

  • RisingReich

    “Disparate Impact”, “White Privilege”, and now “Regional Equity”.  All BS concepts dreamed up by the goons at SPLC, NAACP, ADL, and such to fool Whites into thinking ‘it’s the civil thing to do’.

    Most of the still plugged will nod,agree and violently respond if you dare test their ‘reality’.  The ‘agents of the system’ whom engineered the attack from within will all cheer with glee.

    • 1911ThePunisher45

      Till the money runs out… 2013 it all goes down the drain. I hope you’ve prepared friend, this will soon be no country for cowardice. Only starvation and hysteria.

      • ed91

         I am very familiar with fasting.  Just did a three day one.

        bring it on.

        Though I have to admit, many have much more fat stored than I.

  • IstvanIN

     Have taken over.

  • Marc B.

    The way this is done locally is by forcing a merger of various counties into Metropolitan government. It was done in Nashville, which has a large multi-county metro area. Memphis is also a likely target, especially, if the courts deny the suburban schools from having their own local districts on the grounds of them being in violation the Civil Rights Act, because it would certainly create defacto segregation. If that happens, the prosperous residents will slowly trickle out of the county and the upscale suburbs will not be repopulated with Whites.

  • LBJ started it.

  • What are we going to do about this?  

    • ed91

       Gee Rita, I don’t know.

      What do you think we should do?

  • 5n4k33y3s

    I actually didn’t know anything about his early military career. It just seemed like a nice thing for me to say.

    Kind of like the way everyone declared suicidal terrorists to be cowards after 9/11.

    I figured he was cowardly just because he appeared to delight in terrifying others, which is something cowards tend to enjoy.

    • ed91

       Maher said the terrorist on 9-11 were heroes like you implied.

      Do you have a lot of ideas and opinions you share with maher?

    • 5n4k33y3s

      ed91:

      Suicidal terrorists are generally not considered to be cowards, as they are not lacking the courage to face death. Bill Maher was right about that. Neither was Adolph Hitler a coward, according to accounts of his military service in WWI.

      You can be honest enough to that admit your enemies aren’t cowards, that’s being objective. Or else you can be like an flaky new age spiritualist, repeating mantras which bring you comfort. I suppose you prefer the latter. I don’t care.

      je suis paganism:

      Every military commander uses fear to defeat their enemies. In Adolph Hitler’s case, fear was inspired by the brutality of his forces, and also his oratory style. Adolph Hitler relied on fear.

  • 5n4k33y3s

    I think if white progressives knew what atrocities they’d suffer if there were no armed white civilians, they would change their opinion, just based on racial self-interest.

    They don’t understand that the masses of non-whites whom they consider to be decent folks, actually have very little restraint, and they would eventually rationalize the slaughter of defenseless whites.

    There is no need to ascribe malice where ignorance would be a sufficient explanation. Most gentile white progressives are ignorant.

    Jewish progressives who espouse anti-white rhetoric probably tend to know better. Actually, they’re ignorant too.

    Who would they expect to defend their Jewish enclaves without guns? White gun-grabbers are just dummies. I can’t see any other explanation.