Gurkha soldiers challenged the British government Tuesday over what they charge are unfair restrictions on their right to remain in the country for which they risked their lives.
The Nepalese soldiers, who have served with the British Army since the early 19th century, are suing to be allowed to settle in Britain.
Currently only those who retired after 1997, when the Gurkhas’ base was moved from Hong Kong to southeast England, are automatically granted the right to stay. The government has argued that some of those who retired before 1997 have only weak links to Britain and must have their cases reviewed individually.
Speaking before London’s High Court, the Gurkhas’ lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, said the settlement restrictions ignore “the special debt this country owes to all Gurkhas, past and present, whatever their brigade’s location, and whatever their date of discharge.”
About 12,000 foreign and Commonwealth personnel serve in Britain’s armed forces. Some units, such as the Royal Irish Regiment and the Royal Gurkha Rifles, have histories that stretch back to the days of the British Empire.
The Gurkhas are also engaged in a separate legal battle over equal pension rights: Gurkhas who retired before 1997 receive only a quarter what is paid to those who retired after that time.