Sociopath Alert: Barack Obama

John Craig, Just Not Said, April 13, 2015

The two surest signs of sociopathy are serial killing, and pathological lying.

Barack Obama obviously has no personal taste for killing. (Yes, over 300 children have been killed in drone attacks he’s ordered; but every wartime President has the blood of collateral victims on his hands, and it’s not really a reflection of their personalities.)

But Obama does have that other dead giveaway of sociopathy: constant dishonesty.

If you point this out to Democrats, they will almost always respond by saying that Bush lied too. When you ask what Bush lied about, they’ll always give the same answer: those weapons of mass destruction.

But that was a mistake, not a lie. The CIA, and every Senator at the time believed that Iraq had obtained enriched yellow cake uranium, and also that it had biological weapons. Those fears, of course, turned out to be unfounded.

But–and this is the more salient point here–the fact that Democrats always point to this same “lie” when asked about Bush’s dishonesty is actually indication that Bush was, by and large, relatively honest.

When talking about Obama’s lies, it’s hard to know where to begin. The logical place is probably his first Presidential campaign. Think back to a couple of his more well known claims.

Obama said that his would be the most transparent administration in history. It has of course turned out to be the opposite. The way he got Obamacare passed was through back room machinations, with the Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Kickback, the buying off of the AMA and AARP and big pharma. It was also an exercise in obfuscation, as Jonathan Gruber has famously pointed out.

And at the same time Obama was promising transparency in his administration, he made sure that none of his own school records would ever be released.

Obama also said during that campaign that there would be no more business as usual–meaning, no more earmarks–during his administration. But as soon he got into office he pushed for the stimulus bill, a 787 billion dollar spending package that was basically noting but earmarks desired by Democratic congressmen.

This brings us to another lie of the 2008 campaign. Obama portrayed himself as someone willing to reach across the aisle. But when Republicans were completely excluded from the crafting of the stimulus bill–which was unheard of for a bill of that size–they complained to Obama. He dismissed them with the words, “I won.”

In 2008, when Obama’s connection to Jeremiah Wright first surfaced, and the videos of Wright thundering “Goddamn America” emerged, Obama, who had attended his church for 17 years, and who had been married by Wright, disingenuously said, “This isn’t the Jeremiah Wright that I know.” But Wright, a black nationalist, had not suddenly changed his stripes.

In 2008, Obama also gave that famous speech about race, where he talked about “the greatness and goodness of our nation,” and in which he said that the “Reverend Wright’s words were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity.” But once in office, Obama–and his minion Eric Holder–fanned the flames of all sorts of racial flareups. Obama instinctively sided with Professor Henry Gates against the Cambridge police officer, and with Trayvon Martin against George Zimmerman. (Remember, “If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon?”)

Of course, there are many politicians who make campaign promises that they are unable to keep. But usually it’s because they can’t get their bills passed, or they meet up with other unforeseen circumstances. But in Obama’s case, it’s a little different: he has run an administration which is the polar opposite of what he promised back in ’08.

Even worse, Obama also lies freely about past events, saying things he knows to be false.

Obama claimed that Fast and Furious was a “field-initiated program begun under the previous administration.” That was simply not true. It began in the fall of 2009.

Obama’s most famous lie is probably, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” Obama knew from the start that his plan would force some to change doctors.

Obama lied, on multiple occasions, about Benghazi.

When Obama was asked about the IRS scandal, before the investigation was even complete, he said that there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” there. It’s hard not to hear echoes of OJ Simpson pleading, “Absolutely, 100% not guilty” to his ex-wife’s murder. Or of Bill Clinton wagging his finger and angrily declaring, “I did not have sex with that woman!”

It is a uniquely sociopathic trait to be so emphatic when lying.

In 2012, it emerged that an Obama operative offered Jeremiah Wright $150,000 simply to remain silent for the rest of the campaign season. Wright refused. Subsequently, Obama personally showed up to ask Wright to be quiet. Wright refused again, and later told the following revealing anecdote about their meeting:

Barack said, ‘I’m sorry you don’t see it the way I do. Do you know what your problem is?’ And I said, ‘No, what’s my problem?’ And he said, ‘You have to tell the truth.’ I said, ‘That’s a good problem to have. That’s a good problem for all preachers to have.

It is in keeping with Obama’s character that he would see honesty as a “problem.”

So far, this post has read like a political screed: all of the lies listed were political in nature, i.e., made for the sake of furthering Obama’s political agenda, either directly or indirectly. And all politicians are spin artists, though most are not as blatantly dishonest as Obama. (For a more comprehensive list of Obama’s lies, look here or here.)

But Obama is dishonest about other things as well. One of his biggest cons is his marriage. I made the case back in 2012 that he is a homosexual. He got married at age 31, in 1992, because he was ambitious and wanted a beard to make him more palatable to the electorate. This is an on-going charade. (I have nothing against gays; only against con men.)

Even Obama’s accent is phony. As I said in 2009:

Listen carefully to Barack Obama, and what you’ll hear is a faint southern (whitish) accent, located roughly midway between a northern white (non)accent and a black accent. It’s not quite black enough to scare the white electorate, though it does have a tendency to turn several shades darker when he’s speaking to an all black audience. But it’s not white enough to make him sound like a Tom or an effete Ivy Leaguer, either.

So the question becomes, just where did he acquire this quasi-Southern accent? Did he get it from his Kenyan father, who disappeared from his life when he was two? From his Kansan mother? From his Kansan grandparents, who raised him whenever his mother went gallivanting around the world? From his schoolchums in Indonesia? Or is that the way they speak at Punahou, the exclusive Hawaiian prep school he attended?

One can’t help but suspect that his accent, like everything else about him, was carefully constructed for maximal electoral value.

Listen to this compilation of Obama’s empty campaign promises on Youtube, you’ll see that he has that other identifying characteristic of sociopaths: he lies with full throated assurance. Most liars give themselves away by a certain hesitance, or shame-facedness. Not Obama: he delivers his lies with the bold conviction that only a sociopath can.

Part of every sociopath’s makeup is a healthy dose of narcissism. At Harvard Law School, the other students coined a new word, the Obamamometer, to measure how transparently a student had curried favor with a professor. Think about that: in a school where huge egos and outsize ambition are the norm, Obama’s were so egregiously so that even the other students were repulsed.

Obama’s self-regard is such that he once told an aide, “I think I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m a better political director than my political director.”

Generally, when someone advertises his conscience, it’s a fairly sure sign that he doesn’t have one. For those of us who aren’t sociopaths, we’re not really aware of our consciences, certainly not as a separate entity. They’re just part of us, built into our wiring, and we’re no more conscious of them than we are of the way our nerve endings are connected within our brains.

Sociopaths don’t feel shame, and therefore don’t have the same kinds of brakes on their personalities that most of us do. As a result, they often feel compelled to advertise their innate “goodness.” They’ve heard of consciences, but don’t really have any instinctive feel for how they work, and are thus more likely to refer to them as a distinct part of their personalities.

With that in mind, listen to this quote from Obama’s second book, The Audacity of Hope:

I find comfort in the fact that the longer I’m in politics the less nourishing popularity becomes, that a striving for power and rank and fame seems to betray a poverty of ambition, and that I am answerable mainly to the steady gaze of my own conscience.

Not only does Obama talk about his conscience, he attributes a steady gaze to it.

In 2013, Obama said, “Kindness covers all of my political beliefs. Empathy, the idea that we have a stake in each other’s success, is what gets me up every single day.”

In other words, “I do what I do because I’m a kind and empathetic person.”

(The same rule that applies to prison pen pal advertisements applies to politicians: people who actually have those qualities don’t feel obliged to advertise them.)

George Will himself said in 2012, “Obama’s intellectual sociopathy–his breezy and somewhat loutish indifference to truth–should no longer startle.”

(Question: how can one be an “intellectual sociopath” without being a sociopath?)

Another sociopathic trait is disregard for rules. There has certainly never been a President who has abused executive orders that Obama has. (It’s never before been invoked for such an issue as sweeping as immigration reform.) Obama has also used executive privilege to prevent Congress from forcing Eric Holder to produce documents related to Fast and Furious, a purpose for which that function was not designed.

Yet another sociopathic trait is lack of shame. One would think that Obama would feel at least a little embarrassed about taking as many lavish vacations as he has, and playing golf as often as he has, and throwing as many celebrity-studded parties as he has. But, embarrassment doesn’t seem to be part of Obama’s emotional repertoire.

The one incident which probably best illustrates Obama’s character is one which took place in 2007. Thomas Sowell describes it thusly:

A classic example [of Obama’s phoniness] was his speech to a predominantly black audience at Hampton University on June 5, 2007. That date is important, as we shall see.

In his speech–delivered in a ghetto-style accent that Obama doesn’t use anywhere except when he is addressing a black audience–he charged the federal government with not showing the same concern for the people of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina hit as they had shown for the people of New York after the 9/11 attacks, or the people of Florida after hurricane Andrew hit.

Departing from his prepared remarks, he mentioned the Stafford Act, which requires communities receiving federal disaster relief to contribute 10 percent as much as the federal government does.

Senator Obama, as he was then, pointed out that this requirement was waived in the case of New York and Florida because the people there were considered to be “part of the American family.” But the people in New Orleans–predominantly black–“they don’t care about as much,” according to Barack Obama….

Why is the date of this speech important? Because, less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida…

The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007 shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 Senators who voted against–repeat, AGAINST–the legislation which included the waiver.

For Obama to rile up his black audience that way by telling them that Congress discriminated against them when in fact it didn’t–and he himself was one of the few who actually voted against them–demonstrates a level of perfidy that only a sociopath could reach. It was dishonest, disloyal, impulsive (in departing from his prepared remarks), contemptuous (of his audiences intelligence), divisive, and utterly shameless. Sociopaths delight in spreading discord, and as Sowell points out, that was a large part of Obama’s function as a community organizer.

The most interesting question about a sociopath is always, how did he get to be that way? The usual explanation for most is that nobody loved them when they were children. Obama never really knew Barack Obama Sr., who married his mother bigamously, telling her that he was divorced when he wasn’t. He disappeared from Obama’s life when Obama was two. (Obama only saw his father once after that, briefly, at age ten.)

Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, willingly gave him up for extended periods twice before he was sixteen. (He was left in the care of his grandparents.) This would seem to demonstrate a lack of maternal instinct. Obama himself has described her as “difficult,” which in this case seems to be code for “overly self-involved and unloving.” By his own admission Obama kept contact with her to a minimum from the time he was 20 until he was 30 (she died when he was 32).

A person who grows up never knowing his father, and not loving his mother, tends to end up “loving” himself. But it’s a strange, twisted sort of love that makes him feel he’s not answerable to other people, and doesn’t need to speak to them honestly. It allows him to think he’s fooling them even when he’s not. And because he senses that he doesn’t have the same internal moral compass as others, he’ll talk about his “conscience” and his “empathy” in an effort to convince them that he does.

Many of those sociopaths end up in jail. Some end up as CEO’s. A few have even ended up in the White House.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • No Mo

    All politicians are pathological liars.

    • Deacon Blue

      ^^^^^Indeed this is true.

    • Luca D.

      But Obama has raised the bar into the stratosphere.

      • SirMarlowe

        You said it! Obama’s biggest lie is that the Kenyan Goat Herder is his
        biological father. Essentially, Obama’s whole existence is based on abuse and lies: his grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, insisted that his daughter be named after him – Stanley Ann Dunham grew up hating her name and hating her father and, evidently, hating White men; Lolo Soetoro, who stood about 5’ tall. When her parents insisted that she move with them to Hawaii in 1960, after she had graduated from high school on Mercer Island in Seattle, she grudgingly went; but she started skipping her college classes and visiting Frank Marshall Davis. She posed nude for him and then had sexual intercourse with him. If she could defiantly have sex with Davis, a 55-year-old, married, Black lecher, well, she could have also been having sex with the Black, African, Kenyan Goat Herder during this same time-period. The Goat Herder lied But it was Davis who evidently impregnated her. Circumstantial evidence of this is the fact that Ann thought it was important that the young Obama visit Davis frequently; why else would she have her son visit a then 65-year-old, divorced, sex pervert and notorious communist, beginning in 1970 when Obama was ten years old?

        Incidentally, according to Jerome Corsi, the Goat Herder may not have even seen the infant Obama before Ann left for Seattle where she attended college for one year before returning to Hawaii in the summer of 1962.

        It is possible that the Goat Herder briefly saw Obama as a toddler when Ann returned to Hawaii, but there is no evidence of this. The Goat Herder
        matriculated at Harvard in the fall of 1962. If he saw the toddler Obama at
        all, it was only briefly.

        In order to get to the truth of who Obama’s biological father is, all that is needed is Obama’s DNA. If the Goat Herder is his biological father, then Obama’s DNA would have to have the genetic markers of the Luo Ethnic Tribe of West Kenya. If those markers are not present, then it would be clear that Frank Marshall Davis is his biological father.

        • Luca D.

          IF… they ever examined his DNA he would lie about the results, or deny he ever had a test. Since he covered up his school records, he’d certainly cover up his DNA results.

          • SirMarlowe

            Not if you were the one to have secured his DNA material, my friend. “They” would not be the ones to examine his DNA, “We” would be the examiners. And the Truth would be published far and wide.

          • mobilebay

            I’ve wondered why no one has come forward to this day. If 1/10 of what is stated in the article is true, then many people would have been involved in Obama’s life and not stepped forward to tell the truth. Why? You can’t pay off so many people to keep quiet. What about classmates, teachers, neighbors, relatives, friends, etc.? Why hasn’t someone spoken up?

          • SirMarlowe

            Spoken up about what? Can you be specific?

          • Jacobite2

            Well, maybe they want to stay away from Fort Marcy Park.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            He has closed his college records from Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law…

        • Earl P. Holt III

          Frank Marshall Davis was a whole lot more than just a nigro lecher: He was a communist and Soviet spy, in addition to being the baby-daddy of the Anti-Christ…

      • Phoenixian Westernia

        @ Luca D.
        No, even, further. He raised the bar to infinite and beyond, that’s why illegals receive more rights and are given more privileges than native born Americans.

    • InAFreeCountry

      But Obama is a liar’s liar. He puts even Billary to shame.

    • JohnEngelman

      Politicians need to lie in order to be elected. They need to make unrealistic promises.

      • Luca D.

        A politician is someone who must secure money from the rich, votes from the poor based on a promise to protect them from each other. (paraphrased)

      • Samuel Hathaway

        The best campaign slogan I can think of is, “I DON’T MAKE PROMISES, I DELIVER RESULTS.”

        • JohnEngelman

          Median income adjusted for inflation declined under the presidency of George W. Bush. It has declined even more under the presidency of Barack Obama. It may well be that historical advantages have ended for the United States, and that we have entered a prolonged period of economic decline that neither party and no politician can reverse.

          Be skeptical of any politician who clams that his or her polities will lead to economic growth. Economic growth cannot be predicted. Instead, look to see if specific policies will benefit you or not. A flat tax and a national sales tax will raise taxes for most Americans. There is no reason to suppose that either will generate enough economic growth to counteract their regressive nature.

          Be skeptical of talk about entitlement “reform.” It means reductions in Social Security and Medicare payments.

          Be equally skeptical about talk of immigration “reform.” It means more immigrants. When someone says “Immigration is good for the economy,” ask “Whose economy?” Immigrants compete for jobs, and depress wages. In a declining economy more immigrants mean lower wages and higher prices.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            I’ve become skeptical, all right. About the economic decline, AL-Jazerra had a program about the minimum wage and mentioned that the U.S. is now a low-wage economy.

            Interestingly, the hapless Herman Cain, who ran for the GOP pres. nomination was mentioned in the program, as he was some sort of President of some restaurant association, working behind the scenes to keep wages low. He was willing to promote a slightly higher minimum wage for restaurant workers but not to raise any wage for waiters and waitresses who earn only $2.13/hr. before tips. He also had that silly “999” plan that never seemed plausible to me.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Republican Party has an affirmative action policy for black presidential candidates. A black conservative who has succeeded in any field that is not obviously illegal and who can speak correctly will be taken seriously as presidential material.

          • Blackfish

            Also true for the Democrats!

      • “Politicians need to lie in order to be elected. They need to make unrealistic promises.”

        Maybe this should be characterized as “election realist,” to use a term that should be understandable to American Renaissance readers.
        Both the right and the left both have places where they substitute fantasy for reality.
        I don’t say this to challenge the right in its most underlying assumptions, which I believe are true. I just make the statement in order to motivate the right to make its logic even stronger.

        • JohnEngelman

          Republican politicians claim that economic policies that have the obvious effect of benefiting the rich will benefit everyone else in equal measure and pay off the national debt. No amount of contrary experience can disabuse low income white Republicans of that fantasy.

          • ricpic

            An economy is not a zero sum game. A rising tide DOES lift all boats. But those crafty Republicans will never pull the wool over your gimlet eyes!

          • JohnEngelman

            There has usually been more economic growth, and more jobs created per year under Democrat presidents.

            Also, if you cannot afford a boat, you will drown in a rising tide.

        • Jacobite2

          Republicans don’t exactly lie, but they do refuse to accept any suggestion that they might try to stand up for US whites (i.e., Americans). It’s odd that the Dems are openly, loudly, and proudly the party of blacks, Mexicans, Jews, Asians, Pacific Islanders, and any other aliens around, yet the GOP avoids the only racial group unrepresented (and still a majority of voters). Ask a GOP candidate what he thinks about racial set-asides or affirmative action, and you’re David Duke. I wonder if there has ever before in human history been such an incredible situation?

  • TomIron361

    Is the president a pathological liar?

    I don’t think the word pathological needs to be in that sentence. He’s black, therefore it goes without saying, he’s a liar.

    • Oil Can Harry

      Black preachers are also dishonest. That’s why I don’t believe Rev. Wright’s self-serving story about how Obama told him he (Wright) was just too darn honest for his own good.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        The ultimate dishonest “preacher” was MLK. The whole rotten corpse of these so-called black preachers is sickening, from MLK on down to Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the Reverend Wright. Ever seen those congregations they preach to? All the hollering and whooping it up? I can’t think of anything more degrading on a Sunday morning that listening to their anti-white, racist tripe and then using the Bible to justify it.

  • MekongDelta69

    Q. “Is the president a pathological liar?”

    A. YES. Hell YES.

    • anony

      Politician: If his lips are moving, he’s lying.

  • Robert Binion

    “Grubered” may enter the lexicon and I would love to see a politician address every male reporter as “Brian.” Oh, and if you were to drop your hat, Obama could tell a lie before it hit the ground.

    • bilderbuster

      If Obama’a around and you drop something, make sure to squat when picking it up.
      Bending over near Bath House Barry is to be avoided.

      • Oil Can Harry

        Nope. I hope you won’t mope and instead learn to cope with never dropping the soap in front of that mulatto dope.

        • bilderbuster

          Is that you Jessie Jackson? lol!

  • dd121

    Craig isn’t the first person to notice. Obama seems to lie even when it would benefit him more to tell the truth.

    • bilderbuster

      Clinton just couldn’t help himself either.
      Sometimes the lie would just pop out.

    • Light from the East

      “Obama said that his would be the most transparent administration in history”
      I think Obama is at least honest and transparent about one thing – his attitude of anti white, anti laws, and anti America.

  • Chip Carver

    The politicians are controlled by sociopaths. The politicians are sociopaths themselves, which is what makes them such great puppets.

  • Johann Wald

    Obongo is a Negro. With him and other select minorities, lying is Job 1. Why does this come as a surprise?

  • NoMosqueHere

    Obama doesn’t need to be a liar. The media lies for him.

    • bilderbuster

      That still doesn’t stop him.

    • Canadian Friend

      They both lie.

      The main stream media helps Obama tell lies and then they help cover his butt when he is caught lying.

    • Hammerheart

      Amazing how Barry treats the media with absolute contempt yet the usual liberal echo chambers trample over each other to praise his divinity.

  • Cindy

    Obama comes across as a sock puppet to me.
    If the teleprompter said “Oops, I just crapped my pants” he would read it out loud with just as much conviction and sincerity as he reads everything else.
    Is the man even interested in politics? Or the world? Or anything that’s not sports related?
    He’s definitely gay, he can’t stand Michelle or her family, and he’s indifferent to his daughters.

    • Tarczan

      Wouldn’t you love to have a candid talk with the Secret Service agents guarding him?

  • MrBiIIGoode .

    Obama is black, enough said.

  • DonReynolds

    The question is not whether Obama has provided us with false information (see how nice I am?). I still wait for the day when the first bit of information he has provided is not proven to be absolutely false. Yes, if he said it… must be false…..because it always is.

    What we are left with…..very honestly… whether he knew the truth but refused to say it (for whatever reason)…..OR…..he never knows whether it is the truth or not, but just wants to say it anyway….maybe because of his audience. That would be a matter of competence.

    If he knew what he was saying was false, then yes, he was lying. But we must take it a step further…..did he have a reason for lying? A diplomat, by definition, is a man chosen to lie for his country. Lawyers are also known as “paid liars”. Yes, it could be a matter of occupation. Politicians win elections by being convincing liars. We have a liar’s contest every two years and the best liars run the government.

    More disturbing, to all of us, would be the case where Obama does not realize that what he is saying is false information, but he wants to say it anyway. In which case, he falls into the same category as a used car salesman. He just wants to make a sale and sell the audience on what the teleprompter says is a great deal.

    You decide. My head hurts.

  • Mack0

    He was fatherless and motherless for much of his life. His grandparents used their considerable financial means to indulge his every whim. They were attempting to compensate for Obama being abandoned. From an early age Obama developed a strong streak of narcissism and self-importance. His narcissism only continued to grow because of the fawning idiots who fed his considerable ego.

    • Jason Lewis

      Not in every case but many who are raised by their grandparents turn out this way. Probably from being spoiled.

      • John Smith

        Since they were Marxists, it isn’t like they gave him a moral compass to work from.

  • Eagle1212

    It’s a simple concept we always knew all along since this joker was elected in 2009.

  • disqus_mfERPWUv3H

    I Timothy 4: 1-2

    4 But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron,

    • Samuel Hathaway

      It’s become abundantly clear that “Multiculturalism” is the most deceitful, bait-and-switch doctrine that has wormed its way into every facet of society. there is seemingly no escape from it. It is the civil and societal cult that imposes itself on schools, businesses, traditional religious institutions, everything.

      • disqus_mfERPWUv3H

        Samuel your description is chilling and describes to a “T” what state we are in.

  • John Smith

    If this told me anything new, I might have been surprised.

  • Tarczan

    The change in his voice is so obvious, and so provable. He adopted that stentorian, stacatto style of speech about 2005. I find it very irritating; before that he had a normal speech pattern. Why the Repubs didn’t make something of it amazes me, I guess once again they were afraid of being called racist.

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    “The two surest signs of sociopathy are serial killing, and pathological lying.

    Barack Obama obviously has no personal taste for killing. (Yes, over
    300 children have been killed in drone attacks he’s ordered; but every
    wartime President has the blood of collateral victims on his hands, and
    it’s not really a reflection of their personalities.)”

    #1) Serial killing is not a sure sign of a sociopath.

    #2) Obama is most likely a sociopath (socialized psychopath). At the least he is just an ordinary psychopath.

    #3) Bush is/was as big a liar as Obama, and has killed more children in Iraq and Afghanistan than Obama. Israel is still the leader in lying and serial killing.


  • WR_the_realist

    Yes, Obama is a sociopath. Yet a regular poster to this site has voted for that sociopath twice.

    Me, I don’t vote for sociopaths. When the choice was Obama vs. McCain I voted third party.

    • ElComadreja

      McCain wouldn’t have had a race card to play or a sycophantic media.

      • WR_the_realist

        We’d be in an unending war with Iran right now if McCain had been elected.

        To the mass media, being a frothing at the mouth war monger is much better than being pro-whiite.

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    delete duplicate

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    And how does Obama differ from Bush beside the parasites he panders to?


    • Alexandra1973

      I dunno, he’s a mulatto…? LOL

      • Katherine McChesney

        And a homosexual.

    • Spikeygrrl


    • Tarczan

      Bush was misguided on some things, such as Islam and race, but he was a patriot who meant well. Obama hates this country and is happy to damage it as much as he can.

  • Alexandra1973

    I understand having a conscience can get in the way of having a successful political career to begin with.

    • AmericanRemnant

      I think not having one is a prerequisite.

  • Biff_Maliboo

    The too-convenient death of his grandmother in Hawaii still puzzles me.

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    I was referring to the pathological liar part.

    Why do you continue to support the crook, and why to you Bush supporters always like to use that excuse (he is no longer in office)?


    • pennawhytmn

      Why is it that every time someone makes a derogatory remark of any severity, does an Obamanite mention George Bush? All comparisons aside, is it just assumed that is one does not like BarrackI Obama, that he or she is a blind supporter of Bush? I never quite understood this. I can completely understand the ignorance of large groups of individuals hailing the first and last Black socialist president. I get that. But I just cannot grasp the assumption that one who doesn’t blindly idolize Obama must idolize the President before him. I personally did not think George Bush was even remotely a good president as he gave into socialist ideology far too often, yet others are certain I am ready to defend and justify everything he did. With all that being said, George Bush was a very competent President who ruled far more objectively and equally over all citizens.

      • Why is it that every time someone makes a derogatory remark of any severity, does an Obamanite mention George Bush?

        Democrats are just acting out of party loyalty, blacks are acting out of racial loyalty. But there’s a propensity for some people reading these words to so genuflect, because they somehow have it in their heads that Obama secretly has it out for the Jews.

  • Wolfram_Wolfram

    Truth is for the few.

  • bubo

    Of course Barry Soetoro is a sociopath. But then again so was W and Clinton. The better question would be who the last non-sociopath President was.

  • Phoenixian Westernia

    > “Is the president a pathological liar?”

    Is he? Nah, it can’t be. He’s a saint who promised change ….. which never happened. lol

  • Phoenixian Westernia

    Obama was never the first black, but rather the first Mulatto President. Therefore, Libtards should really get their facts straight if they’re to talk about race.

  • LHathaway

    “It is in keeping with Obama’s character that he would see honesty as a “problem.””

    I would have guessed the issue here is that Obama thinks ‘whites are racist devils’ is what Reverend Wright must say if he is required to speak the truth.

    Kansans speak with a slight Southern accent. At least they used to.

  • InAFreeCountry

    I consider Jeff Sessions a public servant, not a politician.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      The late North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms and Congressman from Idaho, Helen Chenoweth, were both public servants, not politicians.

  • Spikeygrrl

    “For those of us who aren’t sociopaths, we’re not really aware of our consciences, certainly not as a separate entity. They’re just part of us, built into our wiring, and we’re no more conscious of them than we are of the way our nerve endings are connected within our brains.”

    With respect, I must strongly disagree. Who among us has never wrestled with his own conscience (“I really want to do A, but I need to do B instead because B is morally the right thing to do”) ?

    Writ large, the struggle to pull one’s everyday words and actions into compliance with one’s moral code (conscience) is a difficult but mandatory task one must complete — or at least start on — in order to become a moral adult. Anyone who claims he has NEVER colored outside the lines is
    – still a moral child
    – lying through his teeth
    – a sociopath who has no conscience to wrestle with…
    …or some unsavory mixture of all three.

    • Lexonaut

      You tell ’em, Spikeygrrl.

      If you’ve never stumbled into major temptation and wrestled with your conscience as a result, then you don’t have a conscience. The trick is not to avoid temptation but instead to conquer it.

      • Spikeygrrl

        Agreed. Just like someone who has never been afraid cannot be described as “brave.”

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    Edward John Smith has been dead for over 100 years. It is pointless to continue to blame him for the sinking of the Titanic. Hitler has been dead and WWII has been over for 70 years, but he and Germans still gets blamed for everything bad that happens in the US. All you have to do is listen to any of the right-wing nut-job radio personalities (Rush Limbaugh, Sham insHannity, Weener Savage, Andrew Coulter, Mark Lavin, etc), and you will here things like “it just like the Nazis” or “it just like Adolf Hitler.” I was unaware that Hitler and the nazis threw people into gas chambers because they texted on their cell phones while driving.


  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    Here is a picture of a compulsive liar and serial killer. The only difference between him and Obama is the Republicans love this guy, and think his lies and killings keep us free.

  • slobotnavich

    Cutting right to the chase, Obama is a black (well, light brown) Bill Clinton. Both are pathological liars and both have strongly sociopathic tendencies. While both are described by their admirers as “brilliant,” both have only somewhat above-average IQs of around 110-112. Both are physical cowards who have never played any contact sports and both would soil themselves if ever exposed to real physical danger, and finally, both are married to loud and domineering women, with the hapless Slick Willie getting the worst of the two.

    • Alexandra1973

      We know for sure that Hillary Clinton’s a woman, though. Michelle Obama…a lot of people aren’t sure about that one.

      It wouldn’t surprise me if the rumors are true.

      • slobotnavich

        You’re probably right about Hillary being a woman. I’ve never heard of man flying a broom.

  • Hilis Hatki

    Having taken a good look around… Obama is just like most of people.

    • Lexonaut

      About five percent of the population lack consciences.

  • Ohmy!

    Obama’s pathological lying was the tip-off for me, causing me to conclude that this current President is a sociopath.

    • Lexonaut

      Both Clintons are also pathological liars and narcissistic psychopaths. They often do well in politics and the upper levels of business because they are wolves among sheep.

      People with consciences usually cannot believe that other people who seem nice on the surface may actually be extraordinarily dangerous if you cross them in some way or are not useful to them in some way.

      • Ohmy!

        Having had personal experiences with actual sociopaths (a family member and past co-workers), I know about the disorder, having studied it. I agree with everything that you said.

  • Rhialto

    I think the article does not give adequate credit to the Obama momma, Stanely Ann Dunhum Obama Soreto. From his birth until he was 10, his mother was the major factor in his intellectual and spiritual development. According to his bio, she got him up at 6 A.M. to teach him English. This enabled him to have native fluency in the language that he would need for his political success. She also taught him that White men and Western civilization were evil and well deserved to be destroyed. She wisely returned Obama to the U.S. when he was 10, so he would not grow up as an Indonesian, but as a hyphenated American.

    Let’s give credit where credit is due.

  • “A person who grows up never knowing his father, and not loving his mother, tends to end up “loving” himself. But it’s a strange, twisted sort of love that makes him feel he’s not answerable to other people, and doesn’t need to speak to them honestly. It allows him to think he’s fooling them even when he’s not. ”
    Hmmm…sounds like the personality trait that is all too common among male blacks today.

  • Easyrhino

    Obama is a 5 star liar no doubt but anyone who thinks that the WMD fiasco was merely a mistake instead of an orchestrated lie Is the world’s biggest idiot

  • Whirlwinder

    Simple answer. Muslims are the chief of all liars in the whole world. In fact, they are commanded to lie by their Koran. So, is the Muslim-in-Chief a Muslim? Follow his actions.

  • slobotnavich

    Actually, you’re selling poor old Adolf short. He was awarded the Iron Cross 1st Class for bravery in WW I, something extremely rare for a mere enlisted man (a corporal). He was a battlefield messenger, a rather hazardous undertaking and was wounded at least once. The much-reviled Hermann Goering was a highly decorated fighter pilot, though he became a bloated and almost comic character in his later years. By contrast, our current president, while commander-in-chief of all our armed forces, likely couldn’t even qualify for a “confidential” security clearance, let alone Top Secret. Nor could Bill or Hillary Clinton, though the ghastly cawing and screeching old bat has at least an outside chance of being our next president.

    • Tarczan

      If Hillary is elected do we still have to see those horrible fluorescent pant suits?

      • slobotnavich

        God, I hope not. Even a staunch Democrat shouldn’t have to witness such a ghastly spectacle – the only thing worse would be having to see Hillary in a short skirt. That would make even a man marooned alone on a deserted island for twenty years run for cover.

    • Jacobite2

      Forget all that! Hitler was pro-German in Germany. O’bwana is anti-white in a still-white USA. He represents a race that is only 13% of US population. He is the exact opposite of Hitler. Because every Leftist hates America, they never point this out. But they do try to compare Rightists with Hitler and, to the extent that Rightists are always the defenders of the existing society, there is a connection.

      • MikeofAges

        He represents a race that is only 13 percent of the US population? Represents? Represent? Who does he represent? He collected support from of a lot of elements, but who does he represent?

        • Jacobite2

          He represents Africans-in-America. He was supported by all groups united in wishing to destroy American (Euro-Christian) society.

          • MikeofAges

            Good point, and it may be very true. Another idea is that he represents the “Third Culture” concept. That is a large reason why all new jobs are going to immigrants.

          • Jacobite2

            “Third Culture”? We’re on our 5th or 6th in the US already. American/European, African, North Asian South Asian, Amerind, and Jewish. And two is too many.

          • MikeofAges

            “Third Culture” has a specific meaning. It refers to the idea of individuals who have been raised in two or more linguistic cultures. The argument is, these individuals then regard themselves as having something in common with each other regardless of what their other-than-English speaking culture is. Native born white Americans can insinuate their youth into the Third Culture concept by having them spend time abroad during their upbringing. Barack Obama clearly is Third Culture under this definition. White Americans, except for that effete minority who cultivate a culturally “enriched” upbringing, not only do not, but cannot fit into this concept. White American clearly are being berated over this failure and have been for a long time. This is why new hires today all are immigrants, regardless of their origins. Either that or whites deemed able to fit into the Third Culture concept.

            Interestingly, the only native born persons who are regarded as Third Culture who are not bilingual are those underclass blacks who successfully navigate their way out of the ghetto or the backwoods. Maybe, for these survivors, there is a point. But the point, for us, is, we live here. We should have rights in our own society.

          • Jacobite2

            Thanks. I have never heard of this theory before, which bothers me some. Things that I know about are bad enough without worrying about unknown unknowns. Right off the bat, I’m suspicious of this “Third Culture” idea because it seems that it (at least as you set it out) fails to mention the one-and-only, original, accept-no-substitutes, Third Culture — i.e., the Jews. You hardly need to Google ‘Hollywood stereotypes of Christians’ or ‘latest ACLU lawsuit’ to know that they’re working away 24/7 to debilitate American culture.

      • slobotnavich

        Well put.

        • Jacobite2

          Thanks. The failure of Americans to grasp this beyond-obvious fact never fails to amaze me. For a population claiming to live in a democracy, the fact that government is acting against the interests of the majority of US citizens would seem to be an important point.

          • slobotnavich

            Just got done reading quite a few of your posts and couldn’t help speculating, “Did I write this?” Great (if sometimes deranged and contrary) minds think alike.

          • Jacobite2

            Thanks very much. I think I’m mostly just reporting on what I see happening. No great mind there. Except that so many in the US keep on admiring the Emperor’s New Clothes. Orwell said something like: in a time of lies, telling the truth is a subversive act. I’m banned for life on PJMedia.

          • slobotnavich

            Truly, there is nothing so hotly denied as an unpleasant but thoroughly self-evident truth. I almost feel a certain pity for modern liberals, secretly knowing the truth but having to hold their “minds” in a sort of state of desperate suspension and denial. In a sane world they’d all put to the sword or burning state, or, being a humane and rather kindly old fellow, perhaps I’d settle for submission to a frontal lobotomy, after which they could while away their days harmlessly, drooling and soiling themselves.

          • Jacobite2

            Kevin MacDonald discusses the question of whether serious Leftists (he’s discussing Jews) are lying, or whether they are self-deceived. When people exist in a hermetically-sealed environment, such as US Jews do, self-deception isn’t that difficult. I’d say they were all lying, because nobody admits that Leftism is simply an alliance of societal outcasts united to destroy the existing society. They lie about their real goal — throwing out baloney about utopian societies to replace the existing ones. Utopia isn’t a real goal, just a distraction to fool the dupes and explain why they have to destroy existing society.

          • slobotnavich

            Liberals always lie about their goals, which is total control of the peasants, umm, I meant workers, “for their own good.” Contemporary liberalism is a quest for power and total control, neither of which they could gain by legitimate means. These people are intellectual perverts, and it’s hardly any accident that their occasional successes in gaining power are always accompanied by mass murder and the total eradication of freedom. The wildest estimates of Nazi crimes pale into insignificance when compared to the body counts racked up by Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. And these weren’t battlefield deaths – they were simply the mass-murder of unarmed and helpless people merely suspected of not sharing the perverse Marxist ideology.

          • Jacobite2

            Remember that power and control, like money, are only tools, not ends in themselves. Rightists seek power out of greed (and lust, perhaps). Leftists seek power out of envy and a desire to destroy existing society. In a nutshell: a Rightist wants a fleet of new Mercedes; a Leftist wants YOUR car(s).

          • Jacobite2

            BYW, that desire to destroy existing society is the reason for the mass murders. Humans are social animals, by hard-wired instincts. The only way to destroy any society is to kill a critical number of its members.

    • Ohmy!

      God forbid that Hillary becomes our next President.

      • slobotnavich

        Don’t worry about it. Her broom’s already running low on fuel and will soon flame out. Willy will be heart-broken, his last shot at the White House interns gone forever.

  • slobotnavich

    It would be pretty hard to surpass the Clintons when it comes to lying, plus they’re at least marginally a little smarter than the current Buffoon-in-Chief.

  • Snazzy Snook

    I guess you didn’t read the article and feel compelled to comment on the title alone, eh ?
    Go back and read the article, it blows your theory out of the water very early in the story ..

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      I read the article

      “If you point this out to Democrats, they will almost always respond by saying that Bush lied too. When you ask what Bush lied about, they’ll always give the same answer: those weapons of mass destruction.

      But that was a mistake, not a lie. The CIA, and every Senator at the time believed that Iraq had obtained enriched yellow cake uranium, and also that it had biological weapons. Those fears, of course, turned out to be unfounded.”

      A mistake is not a lie: They believed it. BAHAHAHAHAH. Why are we still there? Is it because Obama is keeping the lie about Iraq and Afghanistan afloat? What about the Iran nuclear bomb lie?

      Always an excuse (a lie) with the Republicans.

      Sounds like the Salem witch hunt. They believed the woman they toured and killed were witches, so it was OK to torture and kill them.

      Here is something for the Republican/Israeli worshipers:
      “Republicans by a ratio of more than 2-to-1 say the U.S. should support Israel even when its stances diverge with American interests…”

      Republicans support Israel over the USA.

      F*(# the Republicans. They should move to Israel.


      • Jacobite2

        Bush’s excuse was worse than a lie — it was needless stupidity. We ended hostilities with Iraq with a cease-fire agreement. Sadam violated terms of this agreement. Guess what? The firing resumes! No need to come up with stories, true or false — they weren’t necessary to justify hostilities. The wise man never says more than necessary under the circumstances.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        A couple of points:

        1) They DID find chemical weapons in Iraq, but that chicken-shit Bush refused to announce the fact. Bush assumed the mantle of “leader” of the GOP, and then refused to play offense or defense, while the other team ran up the score with the aid of the refs, sports journalists, and anyone else who was willing to pile-on;

        2) I believe many WMD were secreted out of Iraq and into Syria during the the six month build-up prior to the invasion of Iraq. Leave it to the Bush Administration to fail to consider this possibility.

  • ricpic

    Hitler had a very close relation to his mother. He also saw himself, fiercely, as Germany’s savior. You don’t have to be pro-Hitler to see that he had positive connections, on both the personal and political levels. With the possible exception of his relation to his daughters Obama has no such positive connections. It is the extremely cold aura he gives off that is so terrifying.

  • Jacobite2

    Our consciences and characters are shaped by experience and training. But every human is born with his personality. Sociopathy is simply a birth defect. The usual description is that a sociopath is a person who ceased psychological development at the level of a six-month old.

  • The man lives in a separate reality – a fantasy land. Lying is not really lying from his perspective. What happened? In truth, BO was a one stand that went very wrong. He could not bear to admit his father callously abandoned him from birth. No one wanted him. G-Ma and G-Pa got stuck raising him. A child will always blame themselves when a parent behaves badly, AND, the people who do the hard work of child rearing are typically despised – its the discipline. To shield himself, and not face his parent’s disregard, white racism was blamed as causal for his father’s absence of concern. So… Racism made his father go back to Africa. Racism made it impossible for his father to care for him in a more meaningful manner. He convinced himself the racism fantasy was true – that was preferred to admitting Dad simply did not care. If not for racism, his father would love him, would have done more, would have… The depth of fantasy is likely deep rooted and colors all he does. The father (who was likely paid to come visit) saw him one week his entire life. Rev. Wright cemented this fantasy. So, it is really lying if you believe the premise that causes the lying? Hmmmm?

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    “But if you objectively study the biography of the pre-1939 Hitler,
    you’ll find that Obama has many of the same personality traits. Both
    were losers before entering politics.”

    That is pure idiocy. It must be wonderful living in your own delusions. It is people like you who have made this world the toilet bowl it is today.


  • Earl P. Holt III

    I’ve been saying it in unequivocal terms for 6.5 years: Obama is a Pathological Liar by ANY clinical definition…

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    “Obama’s most famous lie is probably, “If you like your health care plan,
    you can keep it.” Obama knew from the start that his plan would force
    some to change doctors.”

    “Read my lips…” Bush #1


  • Jack Burton

    #noshit #theskyisblue #wateriswet #blackscommitcrime

  • Wolf

    Truth is for the few.