Why I Feel Free to Be Honest About Race

John Craig, Just Not Said, October 17, 2014

Insightful reflections on a 30-year friendship with a black man.

This blog is obviously blunt about racial issues, more so than is generally considered good manners. In polite society, people simply do not speak honestly about race and IQ, or race and crime, and so on.

This is particularly true of people who come from my type of background. I went to an extremely liberal secondary school, and attended an Ivy League college where the vast majority of professors were liberal. I’m half-Japanese and half-white, so it would be silly for me to subscribe to any sort of racialist ideology due to ethnic loyalty. And, as a halfbreed, I’m less naturally inclined towards racial partisanship.

But a good part of the reason I feel free to speak honestly on such matters is that I’ve had black friends, one in particular, and I’ve found that they are generally far more outspoken about race than most whites would ever dare be.

A lot of white people will claim to have had black friends. You know, the fellow on their soccer team they’re friendly with at the games. The coworker with whom they’ve had a couple of meals and with whom they’ve shared a few jokes. The friend from high school whom they smoked marijuana with. But the odds are they weren’t quite comfortable enough with each other to be completely honest about their opinions on race.

I had a close black friend, let’s call him George Smith, for 31 years, from 1981 to 2012. We even roomed together for two years back in the mid-80’s before we each got married. I’ve written about him before, in The coolest guy I ever met. Every word in that post is true: he was, unquestionably, incredibly cool. To this day, if George’s name comes up for some reason, I tell people, you’d have to see him to believe him. And the people who’ve met him never disagree.

But, in a sense, the post linked above was also a whitewash: I didn’t mention his attitudes about race and politics. (I suggest you read that post before you read this one.)

What I will say in this post will make him sound worse than he is (just as the post linked above probably made him sound better than he is). You may even wonder why we stayed friends. But he was a good friend over the years, extremely enjoyable company, and he did me many favors–more on that later.

When I first met George, he said several charmingly self-deprecatory things about race. But I learned fairly quickly that that was something he did for whites he first met, and that he was in fact quite partisan on all matters racial and political. Looking back, I should have called him on some of the things he said. But, while never a liberal myself, I had always been taught that “racism”–only possible in one direction, of course–was the worst sin one could commit. So I was always careful, especially early on, to watch what I said.

George felt no such compunctions. He would uninhibitedly say whatever came into his mind about race or politics. He wasn’t the kind of guy who would constantly invoke racism as an explanation for every black dysfunction. But he said all sorts of things that he would undoubtedly have construed as despicably racist had the equivalent sentiments come out of a white person’s mouth.

Once when we were watching television in 1982, a couple of Reagan Cabinet members were shown walking into the National Cathedral. George said, “I hope a bomb goes off.” My guess is, were George to hear a similar sentiment voiced about Eric Holder or Barack Obama, he would immediately think, what an ugly racist.

One time, referring to Castro, he said, “Fidel’s okay by me.” I’d heard pro-Castro sentiments from some of the knee-jerk liberals I’d gone to secondary school with, but was surprised to hear it from George. I wondered, but did not ask, what he would think if Reagan had put his political opponents in jail for criticizing him.

Once, shortly after I met him, he said, “I know if I ever met William F. Buckley, he’d beat me in an argument. But still, I’d know I was right.” At the time, it occurred to me that George was giving away more than he intended with that statement: it was essentially a confession that with him, politics was less a matter of logic and more one of belief–of being a True Believer, so to speak.

Later on, when we were rooming together, I would occasionally hear him yell out while watching a boxing match on TV, “Come on, beat that white boy!” I didn’t say anything at the time, but years later, when I no longer felt obliged to censor myself, I asked him what his reaction would have been had I yelled out, without knowing anything about the boxers other than their races, “Come on, beat that black boy!” He replied, “I don’t know. You should have done it, it would have been an interesting experiment.” I said, “We both know exactly what your reaction would have been. You would have bristled and thought, what a horrible racist.”

George always rooted for blacks over whites. In 1999, we went to Seville to watch the world track and field championships. While there, we happened to meet Roger Black, the great (white) British 400 meter runner. George, in public mode, told Black that he had been rooting for the British 4 x 400 runners over the boastful Americans in 1996. As we walked away, I scoffed, what a bunch of crap–when was the last time you actually rooted for a white guy over a black guy? George just shrugged, tacitly acknowledging the lie.

George liked to bet, and I had one big advantage over him: I knew he would always be willing to place a bet on a black over a white, regardless of whether the black should be favored.

Once, when we were rooming together, he came back from a business trip to Tokyo, and remarked, “I don’t find Japanese women attractive. Flat chests, flat asses, bad teeth…..nah, not attractive.” (I suspect part of the reason he said this was because by this point it had become painfully obvious that in all the time we had spent chasing girls together, I shown no interest in black women, and he was, at some level, getting back at me.) My initial reaction to his statement was, well, tastes are subjective, I can’t blame George for not finding Asians attractive, especially since I don’t find black women attractive.

But, it’s one thing to not chase after a racial group, another to spell out exactly why one finds them unattractive. I never would have dreamed of saying to George, “You know, there’s something about that really dark skin that I just find sort of alien. And frankly, those wide nostrils and thick lips and prognathous faces don’t do a thing for me.”

One time when we were at a party in the mid-80’s, someone told George that the Japanese were really racist against blacks. Upon hearing this, he muttered, “Pin dick motherfuckers.” I don’t really blame George for saying this: lots of people, when insulted, lash out with the most scathing physical insult they can think of.

But I also don’t really blame angry whites who–after, say, witnessing the latest riot–use the most scathing physical insult they can against blacks: calling them apes. But George, of course, would be horrified and infuriated to hear any white refer to blacks that way, no matter the circumstance. In fact, I remember him once bitterly explaining to me that calling black people monkeys was an insult whites sometimes used. (As if I might not have realized that.)

In 1988, we got together for dinner one night with our wives in Manhattan. The subject of politics came up, and both George and his wife said they planned to vote for Jesse Jackson. This was after it had come out that Jackson had boasted to a black audience that as a young man he used to spit in the food of white customers, and after he had referred to New York as “Hymietown.” This didn’t seem to trouble George or his wife.

Four years later, when I said to George and his wife that I was going to vote for Pat Buchanan, his wife said, “That’s racist.” It occurred to me later that Buchanan had, to my knowledge, never said–or done–anything as ugly as Jackson had. But both George and his wife seemed blind to this double standard.

In 2001 I introduced George to a friend of mine who’s a famous sportswriter. One of the first questions George asked was, “Why doesn’t someone write a book about racial differences in athletic ability? Take the NBA, for example, it’s 75% black. Now I’ve heard all the explanations for why that’s so–blacks aren’t allowed to succeed elsewhere, basketball is a big part of their culture, and so on–but that gets me to maybe 25, 30%. But 75%? There are just obvious differences in ability.”

I agree with George completely on this: how could anyone with an open mind look at track, or football, or basketball, and come to any other conclusion? And that’s the right way to examine any the issue: look at the facts first, and then come up with a theory to fit those facts. The wrong way, of course, is to come up with some politically correct theory that attempts to explain away group differences, and then scramble for the few facts which buttress your theory while willfully ignoring the vast majority of evidence.

But if looking at the facts is acceptable when it comes to racial differences in athletics, why not for differences in intelligence, propensity for violence, and everything else? Yet I remember George on occasion bristling when I would broach these topics. (In fairness to him, there were also times I would broach those topics and he would discuss them calmly.)

Some might say that athletics are one thing, but intelligence is a more sensitive topic which should be handled delicately. But even there, George had no inhibitions about voicing his opinion, as long as he was on the winning side. Once over the phone he gave me a two minute speech about how women were less logical than men. He said, I’m not saying this about all women, and I’m certainly not saying all men are logical, but all my life I’ve noticed that women are just on average less logical.

Again, I agree with George completely; that’s been my experience as well. But if one is willing to express an opinion on such differences between the sexes, then one shouldn’t object if others notice similar differences between the races.

On a couple occasions, George seemed mildly offended if I hadn’t heard of somewhat obscure black cultural figures from the past, like bandleader Cab Calloway. There are plenty of cultural figures I’m not familiar with; but George would never have been touchy about me not remembering, say, white bandleader Artie Shaw. And if a name like Lena Horne or Paul Robeson came up, I knew I could always count on George to talk about how great they were.

Recently, I wrote a post about who I thought the greatest composer of the twentieth century was. I asked various people, including George, their opinions. I knew ahead of time that George would name a black: sure enough, his choices were Stevie Wonder and Elton John.

Once during that trip to Seville in 1999, he pointed out Regina Jacobs, the 1500 runner, who was standing on the track across the stadium. When I said I couldn’t recognize her, he shook his head and said, “White people always have a hard time telling black people apart.” I replied, “It’s not racism, it’s eyesight. Here I’ve been asking you what the scoreboard says all evening long, but when I can’t make out someone’s facial features from a hundred yards away it’s racism?” George immediately acknowledged that I was right. When I added, “Stay vigilant though. You’re doing a good job,” he laughed. But similar statements would crop up from time to time.

It wasn’t as if George lacked a sense of humor, or couldn’t take a joke. Once, when we were rooming together, he came back from the dry cleaner and said something to the effect of, those stupid Chinese launderers lost the button on my shirt. I replied, “Just be thankful the dry cleaner wasn’t black. You’d have gotten your shirts back still dirty.” He laughed at that too.

But the spin was always there. George actually referred to the pestilential squeegee men as “entrepreneurs” once. Technically, what he said was true: these guys did have their own “businesses.” But the same could be said about any other variety of panhandler. Calling them “entrepreneurs,” a term which usually evokes the likes of Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, was typical spin.

One time George expressed the opinion that it was unfair that black guys got sentenced to 15 years for robbing a bank of a few thousand dollars, while white guys who embezzled millions would only go to jail for five years or so. I pointed out the big difference: a bank robber threatens to shoot people if they don’t hand over the money, whereas embezzlers don’t employ violence. George replied, but what if a guy went into a bank without a gun? I said that’s ridiculous: bank robbery doesn’t work without the threat of violence, otherwise, why would the tellers hand over the money? At the time, I thought, but did not say, how typical of the way George views such issues: he sees only what he wants to see.

Another time George grumbled, all the white people who are for equal rights now [i.e., are against affirmative action], where were they back in the 50’s? I thought, but did not say, you could just as easily say, all the black people who were for equal rights back then, where are they now?

George had a tendency to take every argument we ever had about race back to the 1950’s, and would somehow always end up relating it to Jim Crow. Even if it had nothing to do with that.

Once I suggested to George that he might consider moving to Connecticut; I knew he wouldn’t do it, but I figured it was a friendly gesture. He replied no, that he would never move there, since it was “too white bread.” That, of course, just means “too white.” It’s perfectly understandable that he would not want to live somewhere where he’d feel out of place. But I can’t imagine ever saying to him that I would never move to his particular neck of the Hamptons because it was too black.

In 2001, we went to Las Vegas and stayed at the Bellagio (George was a “whale,” and treated as such by the hotel staff.) At one point we were chatting with one of the hosts there, a black man, and George casually mentioned that he used to be a card counter. Later on I asked George if he thought it wise to tell a Bellagio host that he had been a counter, given that all of the major casinos guard vigilantly against them. He replied, almost scornfully, “No black guy would turn in another black guy for card counting.”

He was right, of course. But if blacks have such racial solidarity, to the point of almost being conspiratorial about it, why shouldn’t whites feel the same way?

George was quite successful, and was a generous donor to a number of causes. But, as you might guess, those causes followed a distinct pattern. He gave $50,000 to his mother’s alma mater, a historically black women’s college. He gave $200,000 to his children’s prep school, but made sure the money was earmarked for minority scholarships, which, in the area he lived, meant black kids. He gave money to his own college, but that money too was earmarked for minority scholarships. George would never have given similar sums to, say, Indonesian tsunami victims, or to poor whites in Appalachia.

I have nothing against anybody wanting to help his own people, and I applaud George for his generosity. But again, if this is your attitude, you shouldn’t object if whites want to help their own, too. I have no doubt that if anyone suggested we honor Cecil Rhodes’ original stipulation, that the scholarship he endowed be exclusively for young white men, George would be appalled.

I remember thinking, way back in the late 80’s, if George were white and he thought the way he does, he’d be the most racist guy around: he believes in his race’s superiority (at least on the issues he brings up), he spins every racial situation he discusses, he gives money only to causes that benefit blacks, and he even vocally roots for his own. I couldn’t think of a single white person I knew who did all four of those things. It only gradually dawned on me that George was the most racist person I knew.

And, if you do or say all of those things while simultaneously accusing others of racism, it seems particularly hypocritical.

The examples I’ve used make George sound worse than he is. We were friends for 31 years, and these are some of the most egregious examples of his hypocrisy that I can recall. If you know anyone for 31 years, you’re bound to see some misbehavior, no matter how decent they usually are.

In fairness to George, I brought up things he didn’t like on a number of occasions, and he usually took them in stride. If I talked about race and IQ, he wouldn’t get angry. (Generally he would just shift the subject slightly, or talk about how IQ wasn’t the main criterion for such and such a job.) Once I mentioned to him that I had read in a book (Race, by John Baker) that of the hundreds of traits in which either blacks or whites were closer to gorillas, on only one of those traits (hair) were whites closer. He didn’t even act offended at that.

But I never had the consistent, overweening animus that George did. And I would generally only bring up these things in response to an argument he would start.

George was in fact a very good friend to me. He went out of his way to give me stock advice, sometimes staying on the phone for an hour at a time explaining the merits of various investments. Some of the advice he gave me was good, some of it bad, but it was always given in a spirit of friendship. When we were younger, George was a great wingman: he would always talk me up to girls, and even set me up with several women. At various times he invited my family to stay with his family at his brownstone in New York City, at his house in the Hamptons, and at his apartment in Europe. He was always nice to my children, always solicitous of my wife, and unfailingly friendly and respectful to my parents.

He was also more fun than anyone else I’ve ever known. He was witty, handsome, urbane, and charming, and I always knew that wherever we went would be a party. No one has ever been better company.

Our friendship ended two years ago, because of this blog. In particular, he took offense at the post about Obama being gay, though I’m sure if he looked around more he’d find plenty of other things he’d object to.

But, if you refer to Japanese as “pin dick motherfuckers,” you ought not to complain when people refer to blacks as “gorillas.” If you describe exactly why you find the women of another race unattractive, you ought not to be offended if someone does the same to you. And if you are willing to analyze why blacks are better at certain sports than white, and even suggest to a sportswriter you just met that someone write a book about it, you ought not to be offended when others analyze cognitive and behavioral differences the same way.

I never considering ending the friendship because of the various things George said. But he ended it because I became almost as outspoken as he is.

When a white mentions racial differences, the media invariably attributes it to “ignorance” or “racism.” Of course, no one would ever attribute the kinds of things George has said to “ignorance.” And in fact, there’s nothing ignorant about George, who is far, far smarter than most whites I know. If you doubt that, consider his pre-1995 adjustment SAT scores of 722 verbal and 774 math. And his Chemistry AT of 800 at age 14, and his Physics AT of 800 at age 15.

But even though George’s test scores and intelligence were way above average, his basic attitudes about race were similar to those endemic in the black community–even if he generally expressed them in a more sophisticated manner.

I occasionally ask myself, how would I feel if I were black? What if I knew that the majority of people who met me automatically viewed me as potentially dangerous and probably stupid before they even knew me? What if the burden were constantly on me to prove otherwise? I have to admit, I’d probably become resentful too. But I think–I hope–that I’d be honest enough that part of that resentment would be directed toward those of my brethren who made whites feel that way about blacks.

I don’t blame George for being resentful. But I also don’t blame whites for being resentful about the double standard which says it’s okay for one group of people to speak their mind, but not another.

Bear in mind, George isn’t some uniquely hypocritical guy. He’s just a creature of his time, and can’t see past the double standards encouraged by our liberal media, with their constant, unrelenting focus on white racism, and their willful blindness towards any other kind.

I’m not a liberal. So, back in 1981, I didn’t enter the friendship thinking, how wonderful that I now have a black friend. I merely thought, wow, is this guy cool. I also never saw our friendship as being affected by this country’s long and complicated racial past. As far as I was concerned, we were simply two guys with overlapping interests and similar senses of humor, and neither of us owed the other anything but friendship. Which meant that the same rules applied to him as to me.

Had I never known George, I wouldn’t have thought much differently about race; my knowledge of race and IQ was gained way back when I was 18 and 19, reading about the subject in the psychology section of my college library. It quickly became apparent that the nature camp had the facts on their side, and the nurture camp was composed mostly of wishful thinkers. (Which made it all the more amazing to me when I met a black as brilliant as George.)

In the end, George’s net effect on me was to make me every so slightly more open to the possibility of high-IQ blacks. And to make me far more outspoken.

Before any white liberals who happen to be reading this accuse me of being “racist,” please ask yourself this: have you ever had a black friend who was comfortable enough with you to be as unguarded as George was with me?

And to any blacks who happen to be reading this, ask yourself this: are George’s attitudes all that different from your own? If not, please take a hard look at yourself before you accuse me–or anyone else–of racism.

I came by my attitudes the honest way: by hanging out with people with opposing attitudes, listening to them with an open mind–and then seeing their hypocrisy up close, repeatedly. I saw it from a close friend, I’ve seen it from acquaintances, and I’ve seen it in society at large.

And now I’m too old not to be honest about it.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

John Craig
John Craig blogs at: Just Not Said
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    In polite society, people simply do not speak honestly about race and IQ, or race and crime.”

    Yeah, because in ‘polite‘ society, there are nothing but wimps and wusses.

    • dd121

      The left has carefully crafted that subject to be taboo.

      • me

        To sum up the article:
        Whites suffer from misplaced altruism and denial.
        Racist=Whites. Only Whites can be racist.
        Racist is a word used to vilify, silence, oppress, punish, displace, and genocide White people.
        Negroes are not your friend. They may feign friendship if outnumbered by Whites, or if a White person can do something for them, or to get what they want. But Negroes are NEVER a White person’s ‘friend’.

        • Yancy Derringer

          Perspective.

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          Exactly. Never. I have none, and want none.

        • ElComadreja

          Never befriend them and never turn your back on them.

  • pcmustgo

    This covers my favorite topic, interracial friendships. I also learned the hard way about being “friends” with Blacks. I had many in my life and many Black roommates as well. I also had a close black friend, an artistically, musically and intellectually gifted “Oreo” (who lives in a very white part of the country and only has white friends and only dates white women) where our friendship ended over Obama, namely him removing comments I had made about Obama from his facebook page (I don’t tolerate that type of censorship), him accusing me of being a racist/nazi for disliking Obama, and accusing people of only disliking Obama because he’s a smart “n-word”. He also said he preferred the city he lived in because “it’s pretty white”, then later lied to me and said he never said that, and that he wanted more diversity in his city.

    Black women friends would make sexually competitive, bizarre, random (from out of the blue) and crass remarks to me about white women being sluts, jealous of black women dating white men, etc.

    I used to do my best to be colorblind in everything and now I just stick to whites. I’ve given up. I too have documented pages and pages of nasty and painful racial experiences, many among “friends”.

    George sounds like a real jerk for wanting someone to “beat the white boy” and calling Asian men “pin-dicked”. I would have walked away from the friendship right there. Blacks are so sexually crude like that.

    The Asians aren’t saints either. Expect them to always put their asian friends first. A good chunk of unassimilated immigrant types with no personality or passive-aggressive personalities and secretive resentment of whites as well. I also think this author is in denial about Asians ethnic chauvanism too… how many asian-americans root for the lone asian actress, athlete, musician , etc? Some of this is understandable and just a minority thing.

    • pcmustgo

      My intelligent black male friend was also in denial about black dysfunction and responded to one of my questions to him about that with a below-the-belt non-answer that “whites have a melanin deficiency”.

      • pcmustgo

        Oh, I forgot to add the creepy, random, hateful “eye-rolls” I would get from black female friends, often while they flashed a big smile at me.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      “how many asian-americans root for the lone asian actress, athlete, musician , etc?”

      I see this quite often around Asia with Korean entertainment, which is also very popular among Asian Americans: generally speaking Koreans are fairly disliked across Asia as rude, crass, drunk, loud nuveau riches types (think of Chinese on steroids if you can conjure such an image at all), still boats of Vietnamese, Indonesians, Chinese, Japanese etc really dig the k-drama and k-pop thing.

      Once an Asian tv exec explained bluntly to my face the reason behind it:” People here are sick to see faces like yours (I’m a blue-eyed kinda Polish-looking Italian, so I’ve been told at least) on tv”

      • Sick of it

        Was the t.v. exec Chinese? Sounds like one of their blunt comments.

        • SlizzardAjeosshi

          Yep excellent observation indeed: the guy was a Thai citizen of Chinese ethnicity

    • TruthBeTold

      George was a jerk. The author just doesn’t want to see it or admit it. He wants to believe George was cool. Maybe he just wants to convince himself that he had a true black friend.

      • winn sutanto

        George does sound like a racist asshole. If I have a friend like that, I will break up our friendship so long time ago.
        Friendship is built on mutual respect. The author got out of his way to be solicitous to George, but George does not seem to bother to reciprocate.
        John Craig, don’t be sad. George is a racist asshole. Your life will be MUCH better without this racist asshole as your friend.
        Come to think of it. He was never really your buddy to begin with.
        Good decent man will never treat his buddies the way that racist asshole George treated you. GOOD RIDDANCE once and for all.
        And I also find it revolting that a highly educated and highly intellectual black guy like George having a ghetto-like mentality.
        DISGUSTING DISGUSTING DISGUSTING.

        • winn sutanto

          And also John Craig. Will this racist George be your friend if you were a pure blooded Japanese??

    • WR_the_realist

      I think it’s normal for Asians to root for the Asian guy. The real question is, why don’t white people root for the white guy? A certain degree of ethnocentrism is normal for everybody, it’s only condemned for whites.

      • B.A_2014

        I always cheer for white men and women. My friends aren’t progressives but they still think that it is strange that I want white people to do well against other races. I always say to them that all other races cheer for their own race. This usually shuts them up.

        • me

          Your friends are idiots…..no offense!

          • B.A_2014

            Don’t worry, I agree!

      • Different Asian nationalities tend to detest each other.

        • me

          Chinese and Japanese HATE each other.

          • Garrett Brown

            Japanese and Koreans hate each other.

        • thomasdosborneii

          And, interestingly, one place where all this plays out is in “diverse” Hawaii. I was given a lessen about all that by a friend who was half Japanese, half Chinese (and he told me about all the hell of running that marriage through the two families), whose home is Hawaii, and how beyond the tourist scene that most visitors experience, it is apparently a real racial snake-pit.

      • Bantu_Education

        On the rare occasions I watch a soccer game – usually about every 4 years at the World Cup – I always back the side with the most whites. This obviously excludes my home country (England) so this means probably Holland and Germany, both of whom trounced “diverse” teams. I was especially thrilled when Germany thrashed Brasil 7-1 – the latter side being so arrogant about their supposed superiority and their home country advantage. On a footnote – many years ago Pele predicted that an African country would win the WC before 2000 – well, despite the best efforts of FIFA they still haven’t got past the quarter-finals despite having many individually brilliant players. Soccer is a team sport and Africans want to be prima donnas. They need whites to keep them in line, discipline-wise.

        • Garrett Brown

          Brazil also suffered from an extremely aggressive wing that got hurt from guess what? Playing too agrressive (which on a swarm team like brazil to play even more aggressive than your team mates is crazy) and a complete A hole in Silva who committed probably the most foolish penalty in WC history to get his second yellow card and be excluded from the game with Germany. I still believe Germany would have won if Brazil’s two bed players were actually in the game, but for the reasons they were not I was ecstatic at the complete dominance Germany showed.

          • winn sutanto

            Without White Portuguese populations, Brazil will just be another backward primitive black African nations.
            White Portuguese are the ones that built the infra structure of Brazil.
            White Portuguese, until this days, are the ones that are able to manage the economy of Brazil.
            Blacks in Brazil are just almost as backward as Blacks inside the Kalahari desert.

          • Garrett Brown

            What does this have to do with football?

          • B.A_2014

            There are plenty of German and Italians in Brazil. Imagine that country without the non white rabble. The white man would make it a paradise on earth.

  • IstvanIN

    How could he be friends with such an obnoxious, hateful fellow unless he, too, had some animosity towards his White half?

    • pcmustgo

      Some people are desperate for friends. I too tolerated a lot of BS from friends of all races, including whites, because I was scared of being even more alone and didn’t have many friends. In my later 20’s, I grew a backbone, took no more abuse, and began avoiding non-whites as friends just to head off any problems and at least avoid the extra racial drama interracial friendships bring. The relationship between this half japanese guy and george just expose the general problem with interracial friendships of any kind- not being able to be fully honest with that person of another race without offending them.

      • Sick of it

        “The relationship between this half japanese guy and george just expose
        the general problem with interracial friendships of any kind- not being
        able to be fully honest with that person of another race without
        offending them.”

        Another very real problem is that most black men are far more extreme in their beliefs than George. I’ve known black guys who can appear perfectly reasonable, stay quiet in class, study hard, etc…yet they talk like Black Panthers in private.

    • dd121

      Makes me suspicious of just how great their friendship was.

      • TruthBeTold

        The endless fawning is sickening. The author is in some kind of denial about George.

        • dd121

          There’s something suspicious about this article but I can’t quite put my finger on it. Just how did the author happen to know George’s exact SAT scores, for example. I don’t know any of my friend’s scores. It’s just fishy.

          • HE2

            Easy, dd. Blacks are strangers to the truth who cannot stop aggrandizing their accomplishments.

            They are the most grandiose of any race I have met.

            The article is fishy to me, too.
            The author is at odds with his White self, in my view.

          • dd121

            I was in the same office (not worked with) a black guy who had a mail-in Phd from a fake university. All of his black friends called him “doctor”.

          • HE2

            Yes, dd, that is what I mean.

            They will say or or do anything.
            One of O.J. Simpson’s friends said of him, “he would rather lie than eat, and he loves to eat.”

            We see the negro braggadocio game played out over and over by black trolls on our race realism blogs.
            There is a recognizable expressive formula they all seem to follow.

            Gratefully, most of us have graduated with advanced degrees in experiential negro-ology and see through the deceit.

          • TruthBeTold

            I agree. It’s very formulaic. We’ve seen it before with other such articles. It almost covers all the bases very neatly.

            And as I said, the author keeps denying he’s leftist but if he didn’t say it even once, it’s exactly how I would have described him.

          • pcmustgo

            Well. those SAT scores were self-reported, I’m sure.

          • dd121

            I don’t think I ever met a black or hybrid who had those kind of scores. Statistically, it should happen, though.

          • ElComadreja

            It sets my bulls**t detector off too.

          • Bantu_Education

            I agree, lets go over to his blog and ask him.

          • thomasdosborneii

            I don’t even know my own! I mean, I knew them once when I was in high school, but that was very very very long ago and utterly irrelevant to me, now.

        • thomasdosborneii

          I got tired of reading his first essay, because I actually couldn’t stand his black friend. Whatever was supposed to be “cool” about him sure didn’t appeal to me. Anyway, “cool” means “black” to me, as in “Kool” cigarettes, which once upon a time (and maybe still) was the number one cigarette brand among blacks. So the very word “cool” means to me that the person is black. So if the author wanted a “cool” friend, it had to be black.

          • TruthBeTold

            I read half of the first article and then stopped.

            The author, for some inexplicable reason, just seems to believe George is ‘cool’.

            It’s almost like the author never met a black man before George and became fascinated by him.

            As I said, I don’t see anything unique about George though the author does. George seems to be a racially conscious black man. The only difference is that George seems comfortable speaking his mind to the author. I suppose that’s the fascination. George is ‘cool’ because George says things to the author that other blacks keep to themselves.

    • TruthBeTold

      He tells us. George was cool. George was his cool black friend.

      The author makes numerous excuses for Georges’ opinions. He excuses everything about George because ‘he’s the coolest guy he ever met’.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      Interesting point. Remember back when Mr. Craig stated that “George” was “far, far” smarter than most whites he knows. I perhaps might fit that category, with getting only a cumulative SAT score of 783. But I taught myself to be bilingual in Spanish and now assist Spanish-speaking customers in my job from everywhere in Latin America, including taking a course on the side in use at MIT. I wonder if “George” could teach himself another language and actually make a living doing it?

      • ElComadreja

        I’m sure he’s fluent in ebonics.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Just about all of them are fluent in Ebonics. On occasion when I hear a black say the word “ax” for the word “ask”, I say, “Ax”? Do I find that at Home Depot or Lowes?

    • libertarian1234

      “Obnoxious and hateful” certainly are right on the mark.

      “In constant turmoil” probably can be attributed to him also.

      Who could stand to be around somebody like that?

  • pcmustgo

    He is right that most white liberals have never had a real black friend. If they did, and if they had many, like me, and if they drowned in diversity in general, like me, they would no longer view Blacks as angels. They would realize blacks are just as capable of evil as whites, if not more prone to it.

    • Sick of it

      Their random acts of violence against even friends ARE rather appalling.

    • TruthBeTold

      I believe the author is wrong on two points (at least).

      1) He’s not a liberal. (He sure seems that way to me).

      2) That he and George were ever really true friends.

      It seems to me that the author put more into the relationship for some reason; or that reason being that the author thought George was ‘cool’.

      • A friend is someone who will spend a day helping you move, or who will bond you out of jail. He is someone who will stick up for you when you are not around or ask you for advice when he’s in a jam. Friends are the part of your family that you weren’t born with.

  • Luca

    It took him 31 years to realize it’s basically impossible to be friends with a black. I’m glad I found out earlier in life.

    Reminds me of an analogy from the movie, “When Harry Met Sally”. Harry’s motto was: “…men and women can’t be friends because the sex part always gets in the way.”

    In this case: blacks and Whites can’t be friends because the “race” part always gets in the way.

    And I think that is a natural thing and therefore a good thing.

    • M.

      Upvote, but not for “natural therefore good” part.

    • TruthBeTold

      Good catch with the Harry/Sally ‘race’ getting in the way.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      Thirty-one years is a long time to live in a racial-fantasyland. I learned at age 19, and have never looked back since.

    • Garrett Brown

      There had to be some sincerity there. They wouldn’t have lasted for 31 years if they weren’t true friends. I think they truly believed in each other. Like many long term relationships, they literally “grew apart”.

      • Luca

        No, I think John was just tolerating George, enabling him and making excuses for him for far too long.

        • Garrett Brown

          For 31 years?! No way.

          • Luca

            Anyone who is friends with a negro for 31 years is invoking some extraordinary form of inappropriate tolerance to make it last that long. Some people just have a problem with ending a relationship.

          • Garrett Brown

            Seems like they both tolerated each other just fine, then the Negro just became too brainwashed to eve fathom having a friend who wasnt black. Bearing in mind both of them were already quite brainwashed.

            It’s amazing what the media can do to a brain.

        • bilderbuster

          I think John had a “Man Crush” on George.

          • thomasdosborneii

            Ooh boy, was I ever thinking that, too!

  • pcmustgo

    As I grew more racially bold in life, I DID tell black “friends” I didn’t want to move to or hang out in black neighborhoods because they were more dangerous and because as a white person, I would be more of a target. He should have to.

    re:

    “Once I suggested to George that he might consider moving to Connecticut; I knew he wouldn’t do it, but I figured it was a friendly gesture. He replied no, that he would never move there, since it was “too white bread.” That, of course, just means “too white.” It’s perfectly understandable that he would not want to live somewhere where he’d feel out of place. But I can’t imagine ever saying to him that I would never move to his particular neck of the Hamptons because it was too black.”

    • thomasdosborneii

      Is there a portion of the Hamptons that is black?

  • Blacks have their uses as friends. They can teach you so much that is culturally enriching:

    twerking,
    ebonics,
    jenkum
    chimpouts
    flash mobbing

    I’m sure there’s more but since I’ve never had the desire to be friends with a creature so different from me, I don’t know what else to add to the list. Without a black friend to teach me, my twerking ability is nonexistent. I think I’ll go kill myself.

    • baldowl

      They are useful study subjects. Just don’t take on too many subjects at one time.

      • There’s always going to prison if one wants a heavy course load in those subjects. When I was locked up, my major was in scrounging.

        • baldowl

          Indeed. I passed the time taking notes on their behaviors, chronicling some of the stupid things they say. A favorite quote was a complaint I overheard once at breakfast: “Dey always be givin’ me too much grits, yo. Dey always be givin’ me too much grits.”

  • I spent most of Thursday picking up trash on the interstate highway. It was hard work. This was because I said something over the telephone that someone else didn’t like. Unusually, we were a mixed-sex road crew. I’ll do it again next Thursday and the one after that. We had one of the bosses take a picture of a beautiful spider in her web. I found a quarter, so I actually got paid.

    We were not allowed to talk to members of the opposite sex except for strictly work-related reasons, and preferably not even that. That seems reasonable.

    I suspect that since we were all adults, this was some sort of experiment.

    • B.A_2014

      Do you live in Saudi Arabia?

      • Colorado, but we are under Department of Corrections rules.

        • B.A_2014

          Sorry I forgot your back story lol

        • Julius Caesar

          So Michael, since I am relatively new to the site…I always hear about this “back story” of yours. Think you could fill me in sometime?

          • I am a convicted federal felon on the Terrorist Watch List. My FBI file says happy, fun things like “firearms expert”, “explosives expert”, “chemist” and “ex-mercenary”. I make fishing tackle and write naval history articles for a living.

          • B.A_2014

            The terrorist watch list?

            Do you think they’ve followed you onto Amren lol

          • I don’t care whether they have. The things I write here used to pass for common sense when I was growing up, and I am also not about to be arrested for making fishing tackle (the splitting bamboo woke us up again with loud cracking sounds last night). One of the things I appreciate the most about this site is that it is moderated, so on the occasions when I get a bit out of line, the comment is edited or deleted.

          • Julius Caesar

            Impressive. A man of many talents.

          • meanqueen

            Now who sounds like a totally cool guy! LOL!

  • SlizzardAjeosshi

    “calling black people monkeys was an insult”

    To apes

  • newscomments70

    As a teenager, I made friends with a black/mixed race teenager. I thought it would be hip, interesting, like the popular TV shows at that time. He was always nice to me, but he turned out to be a violent criminal and robbed one of my older friends. Needless to say, I kept a distance after that. My next black friend was only an acquaintence. He was from the South Bronx. He told me that most blacks don’t like whites and I should stay the hell out of black neighborhoods for my own safety. He rolled his eyes, “Stay out of South Central (LA), don’t be naive!”. Now that is a useful, honest friend.

    • John R

      At least that black guy gave you honest advice. He probably saved you a lot of grief, and possibly, your life.

      • newscomments70

        I agree, and I often repeat his advice to liberal females who think it is “cool” to strut around various urban jungles.

        • LexiconD1

          I didn’t think it was ‘cool’. I thought about the money I need to support my son, as a single parent. But, I get your drift.

      • LexiconD1

        Ahhh, I worked South Central LA (now called South LA) for years as a soda merchandiser/salesman. I’m a white female who drove a red convertible. I got pulled over regularly by the police, and asked “What are you doing in this neighborhood”, never got a ticket though. Eventually, they started to just wave at me, when they saw me. Once I went on vacation, and they called my boss to ask if anything happened to me.

        Anyway, moral of this story is…I saw things in this area I only saw on television or at the movies before. Blacks selling their stolen copper wire, people sleeping on the streets, gun fire/shoot outs between gang members. One story really stuck with me. I was taking a break at one of my stores, located by the Coliseum, this little old black lady was dress only in her nightgown (and it was a cold rainy night). I walked up to her and asked if she was okay. She started crying and told me that her GRANDDAUGHTER kicked her out of her own house, after stealing and cashing her social security check (it was the beginning of the month). I got the store manager, and we gave her something to eat and some hot coffee, and then we called the police.

        When the police arrived, they took my statement, then informed me that this is NOT uncommon for the area.

        I woke up more that day, than any day before or since.

        I’m thankful every day I have a new career, far away from that.

        • me

          You’re lucky that your misplace altruism didn’t get you killed.

          • LexiconD1

            “Altruism?”

            Not really, it’s human compassion. Well, that, plus a ARMED guard who watched the front of the store. I’m not crazy now…

          • ThomasER916

            “human compassion”

            There’s no such thing. That’s the delusional thinking that got us here in the first place.

    • B.A_2014

      I would never befriend a black person. I had a roommate a couple of years ago from Burma. He was the son of a high ranking military man and went to school with the children of the Burmese generals. I was very fond of him. He knew my beliefs and he shared many of them. I still wouldn’t go out of my way to befriend a non white. My close circle of friends are white and when they jokingly say to me they are bringing a non white friend over to watch the fight, I tell them if they do I will walk out and never speak to them again.

      • newscomments70

        I used to befriend blacks to emulate what I saw in the media. I now avoid them. If I am forced to interract with them, I will try be civil, but i will never get close. There are some hard-working blacks who work hard, pay taxes and cut their lawns, but the violent criminal “youths” always come with that.

        • winn sutanto

          I am an Asian-American. I was naturalized to become US citizen in 2006. I love USA with all my heart and my soul
          Currently I live in Indonesia, the country where I was born but I will return to the States 2 years from now.
          Being physically outside United States make me realized how much I miss my life in America.
          I used to work as a messenger in New York city.
          I lived in New York area for 15 years.
          Seldom I got a racist discrimination treatment from white people.
          For me white people are cool. They are confident about themselves economically. So they do not have to give other people of other races a nasty treatment.
          Blacks and latinos that I met inside the church are wonderful.
          They are truly my brothers in Christ.
          But outside the church, I encountered lots and lots of violence within Black and Hispanic communities.
          Once accidentally I found myself in the midst of the crowds on Puerto Rico day parade.
          I could not believe what I saw.
          I never saw that large number of young people behaved like animals.
          And 99.99% were either Blacks or Hispanics.
          My time in New York was not an unhappy one.
          But when I return to the States in 2016, I will move to Hawaii.
          I lived in Hawaii in the entire year of 1998.
          Life is enchanting over there, even though it is very difficult to get by because it is very expensive.
          So long ghetto-like New York.
          Aloha Hawaii

          • newscomments70

            Thank you for your response, I enjoyed reading it. I’ve had similar experiences in New York. I’ve met amazing people of all races in Manhattan, but witnessed the bad side of the city as well. Enjoy your three jobs in Hawaii, but it is a beautiful place.

  • dd121

    I think I would trust George about as much as I would trust Colin Powell. A lot of Republicans learned this lesson about blacks after he jammed the stick into their white eyes for the 100th time.

    • John R

      I don’t agree with everything commentator Michael savage says, but he did comment on how ungrateful Colin Powell was. Everything Powell got, Savage noted, he got because of Republicans. And this is how he repays them? “Niggritude.”

      • Sick of it

        Colin has been quite niggardly with his gratitude.

        • John R

          Hey, where is the moderator? He said “niggardly”! Didn’t someone get fired for saying that? LMAO

      • dd121

        Of course the Republicans are silent about this total betrayal by Powell but we all know how he reverted to his black roots. For the same reason I wouldn’t trust Ben Carson either.

  • SlizzardAjeosshi

    The article was lengthy but interesting and so are the comments for a person like me who grew up in Italy where i came of age in the late 80’s/early 90’s.

    At the time immigrant communities were already visible in most urban areas but they were honestly a non-issue.

    None of us had ever debated the possibility of an interracial friendship (let alone a relationship) simply because that possibility wasn’t there.

    At the time in Italy virtually all immigrants were socially so unbelievably below even the poorest Southern Italians to render the chance for any meaningful social interaction virtually nihil. Basically it was a human group almost entirely made up of scruffy, single guys of undefinable age slaving all day in almost prison camp-like conditions.

    As much as i try i can’t really guess with any degree of accuracy what it means to grow up in a diverse society where different races hold a significant amount of political and economic power.

    Honestly I could never be a white nationalist but i do respect and admire American white nationalists because well it must be a pretty rough path to walk in a country that is only 60% white

    • Sick of it

      Don’t worry, Southern Italy is working on making things even worse over there.

      • ghettovalley

        Whites need our own Israel, so to speak. A place where we can ensure the survival of our genes and culture.

        • ThomasER916

          Whites need to know that Israel is part of the problem, Israel is in every one of our countries.

          • ghettovalley

            I simply mean that we need ethnically homogenous country with strict immigration that looks out for our own and no one else.

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        Indeed, last time i was in Italy (Xmas 2013) it looked pretty sad. Still there’s a fundamental difference: immigrants there don’t hold any significant political power.

        Sure leftoid parties elect their token negro among their Congressional ranks but the naturalized population is still very small though, this people get their ticket to a free ride in parliament thanks to the native constituents. Even 1.5 and second generation immigrants are generally not citizens: they don’t vote and they’re not politically organized such as in an Anglo-Saxon country.

        I’m not discounting the problems generated by those aliens, particularly in a weak economy such as Italy, but i believe the order of magnitude of chaos exponentially increase when other races grab the opportunity to politically organize across their own ethnic lines.

        That’s why i strongly believe a multi-racial democracy is the most pernicious form of government ever.

        Qatar manage to do just fine with an enormous amounts of immigrants in their country, vastly exceeding the number of natives, because foreigners have absolutely ZERO rights. At the opposite end of the spectrum well you get Lebanon

        • KenelmDigby

          Don’t worry they soon will be organised, and they soon will have political power. The left-wing party will rely on them as a vote farm and pander to them.
          People in the UK back in the 1950s had the same attitude. Now look where the UK is now.

    • SentryattheGate

      85-90% white population in the 1960’s, then the flood of Third World immigration has reduced us down to 60%, and to less than 50% by 2040 or so. And this is being done to us w/o our consent, and with our tax money paying the way for the invaders! People here are constantly told that we’ve always been a diverse nation; that’s not true (the diversity was among very similar groups; all white, Christian backgrounds, Europeans) NOT like the DIVISIVE diversity that is forced on us since the 60’s. Hispanics have MOST of the Western Hemisphere, have ruined it mostly, and now want North America! And they dare call us Racist!

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        ” And this is being done to us w/o our consent, and with our tax money paying the way for the invaders!”

        Indeed that’s another reason why i believe a (limited) democracy is tolerable only in a +99% mono-ethnic society.

        The problem with the voting process is that most people seem to care only about 1 or 2 urgent issues (generally concerning their short-term economic needs), while discarding the big picture.

        I have known personally many people who were strongly and vocally opposed to immigration but still, year after year, kept voting for the same corrupted open borders leftist parties because well they wanted to secure their generous civil servant compensation packages.

        The white vote has been largely bribed into docility across the Western world for the past few decades

        • SentryattheGate

          Oh, yes, I agree with you on all your points! Re. gov’t. workers, in the US, the growth in gov’t. jobs(and their salaries too), has outpaced private sector jobs. Plus, now that the gov’t. has made it mandatory to have a college degree (and also run the student loan business), it is offering to reduce or forgive college debt, if you take a job in gov’t.! Funny how that’s works out so well in their favor?! And, no doubt, they will favor minorities in hiring.

          • Sick of it

            A perfectly qualified white person will be lucky to make it past the first round when applying for a federal position.

          • ThomasER916

            This is how the Culture of Critique is turning America into Zimbabwe.

        • Viking_61

          Oy Vey!

  • Samuel_Morton

    An excellent essay by Mr. Craig. He points out the obvious double standard stacked against whites, and provides great examples.

    The moral of the story of course is that, in our current world diversity just cannot work. Here is an intelligent, successful black man, about as far an outlier on the right side of the bell curve as they come. But his ability to think logically on the subject of race rivals that of a five-year-old. He spent his entire life being coddled and spoonfed half truths by the liberal media, that he believes them without question. Add to that the anger and resentment that comes from these never ending excuses for black dysfunction, and it’s not hard to see why even the most intelligent to blacks are incapable of getting along with whites.

    • In other words, this relatively intelligent, apparently successful black guy still can not think critically for himself.

      • Luca

        Most of his intelligence and success was probably created through the magic of Affirmative Action and/or a good amount of European DNA..

  • M&S

    Not to be rude but, buddy, _you_ were the wingman. The ‘safe’ (neutered, it’s obvious in every excuse you open a paragraph with) Asian American Male whom the black guy could drag along as a walking tagline to parties _because_ white women run from Asian males even more than blacks:
    “See girls? I’m safe with the poodle but do you want to be with him? No? Then I guess you have only one choice remaining.” Wink-nudge, badoompt.
    With this kind of dominant/sub relationship, there can only really be one way out for the underdog and that is passive aggressive resistance play to a snapping point as the resentment is revealed in a control phase (the ‘censorship’ thing) whereby the talk-back sub doesn’t get his chance to defend his ego and finally figures out how little control he has.
    Blacks are really good at playing the game of friendship to trust to exploitation to aggressive control and for a nominally smart man, you sure took the long road to understanding this.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      Aka with friends like this etc. etc.

    • John R

      Great analysis. Blacks aren’t book smart, but they do have “street brains.” And they know how to get over on people. He was probably playing some kind of con game with this Asian guy. It is sort of like a mild form of the “protector” role dominate blacks play to insecure young Whites in prison.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        And it took 31 years to realize this. I wonder why Mr. Craig couldn’t have spent most of these years cultivating worthwhile white friendships.

        • pcmustgo

          He should have walked away when George said Asian men have small penises. Even if it’s true, that’s like a knife to the stomach of an asian male.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            I wonder how George knew that Asian men had small penises? Maybe George is a sexual pervert. However, my half-Korean cousin who prefers white men was being pursued by an all-Korean guy one time. Without going into detail, she told me, yes, they have small penises. I take my cousins word for it, so I assume it’s true.

          • Ultimate187

            Guys who talk about penis size like the way you’re doing are usually insecure about themselves. At least that’s how it comes off to other people.

          • HE2

            Ultimate, the same could be said for the millions of women who have breast implants.

          • Ultimate187

            Actually it can’t. Most women with breast implants do it for functional reasons (e.g., after getting mastectomies for breast cancer to preserve femininity, to reduce pain, etc). This is different.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Wow. Insecure. Fascinating. Nothing intelligent to convey on the subject matter, just ad hominem attacks. Now, do you have anything intelligent to contribute to the conversation? Just FYI…

          • One of my white college girlfriends had slept with a Japanese guy once, and she said he was hung like a hamster. That said, “for instance” is not proof.

      • winn sutanto

        Once again. Mr John Craig is not a pure blooded Oriental.
        He is a Eurasian. And because he is half white, he must have good amount of Caucasian physical characteristics.
        Even partial Caucasian physical characteristics will be more than enough for him to compete physically with handsome black George

        • John R

          For most women, yes. But any White female that is in to “coal burning”, no. Yeah, some women are into black guys. I know, sick.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      “Blacks are really good at playing the game of friendship to trust to exploitation to aggressive control”
      ….great psychological dissection. However, how would you explain the fact that “George” ended the friendship? This seems to undercut the “aggressive control” part of your statement, or did you just mean this in a general sense?

    • Ultimate187

      M&S, I seriously doubt your interpretation. Have you actually seen John Craig? The guy doesn’t look Asian.

      • My daughter is half Japanese, but aside from the epicanthic eyefolds, she looks so much like me that we joke about wondering who her mother was.

        • Ultimate187

          “Aside from the eyefolds”? Dude, for Asians that’s their main distinguishing feature.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          With the holiday season coming up, keep your eye out for a movie on the Hallmark channel called “The Three Gifts.” Dean Cain, who plays the character “Jack” in the movie, is half-Japanese.

          • winn sutanto

            Dean Cain who also played as Superman on 1990’s tv series does have a Caucasian-like facial feature.
            He would not be chosen to play as a Superman, if he has strong Oriental facial feature.

          • HE2

            winn, Dean in only one quarter Japanese.

            The IMDb photo looks as if he could be mistaken for Amerindian, Latino or Hawaiian.

            His ethnicity is listed as Welsh, [one quarter] Japanese, French-Canadian and Irish.

          • winn sutanto

            Now that explains why Dean Cain has strong handsome Caucasian-like facial feature.
            How about Bruce Lee?
            Was he one quarter white or one eight white??

          • throttler

            One quarter.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      I would love to be a fly on the wall if the original author were to find and read this discussion of his blog post…!

      • Bantu_Education

        He’s probably one of the commenters here….

    • winn sutanto

      But Mr John Craig is not a pure blooded Asian.
      He is a Eurasian.
      I assume he has enough of Caucasian physical traits to make himself look different with the rest of pure blooded Oriental.
      Even partial Caucasian physical characteristic will be more than enough to compete with handsome black George

  • SlizzardAjeosshi

    In all fairness the most laughable part of the article was the story about George picking S. Wonder and Elton as the greatest composers of the 20th century

  • Earl P. Holt III

    Most nigros are easily drawn to Marxist politics because they couldn’t distinguish Karl Marx from Groucho, Zeppo or Harpo…

  • drattastic

    Sounds like Craig’s “friend” George ended the friendship because John Craig told the truth and the truth set Craig’s mind free.

  • Massif1

    George hates white people and has property in Europe. Couldn’t find anything nice in Zimbabwe?

    • Ultimate187

      Who cares, it’s all going to be Ebola land soon anyways.

      • tlk244182

        I’m not so sure. Seems to have fizzled in the last few days, certainly on this side of the Atlantic.

        • me

          Sources?

  • 4321realist

    Describing this character as really “cool,” I think is way off the mark. It makes me wonder what this writer thinks is cool.

    He’s the average disgusting black, full of anti-white hate and animosity, who has no business in a white society. His entire thoughts and actions center around race 24/7 to the exclusion of everything else.

    And he’s just one more darkie who proves that integration has been a terrible mistake.

    • shatwood

      You’d really have to read the first article, “The Coolest Guy I Ever Knew” to get a senses of what he means about being cool. George does come off as a very cool guy while reading that post.

      However, after reading THIS post, George no longer comes off as “Cool” or even decent. More duplicitous than anything else after reading the first linked to post and then this one.

      • thomasdosborneii

        Well, If “cool” is being a gambler and a card cheat and a person proud of bedding and abandoning as many women as he could find. . .

  • John R

    Seriously, why would any non-black person have a black “friend.” I have dealt with, and been polite to, a lot of black people. I have to be. But I am proud to say, NONE of my best friends are black.

  • Zimriel

    “It occurred to me later that Buchanan had, to my knowledge, never said–or done–anything as ugly as Jackson had.”

    Apart from getting suspended from Georgetown for brawling with cops, apart from supporting Kurt Waldheim, apart from that Bitburg thingy… If we’re bringing Jackson’s “Hymietown” into this, then I’d call this contest a complete wash.

    Now, we could argue that the Right needs more people like Buchanan (or Jackson); I’d take that argument seriously. But if we’re comparing one to the other, I think we’d need different examples.

    • Evette Coutier

      You didn’t include Jackson’s other criminal activity like when he was busted for looting and criminal trespass.

    • The Bitburg cemetery is a war grave. From 1943, the Waffen SS started using conscripts, and was awarded priority for recruits who were over 5’9″. Had I been born in Germany or Austria in 1926 instead of Ohio in 1966, I might well be taking the big dirtnap at Bitburg right now.

      Soldiers are soldiers and dead is dead.

  • TL2014

    Couple thoughts:

    1) George is apparently part of the talented tenth. Even without affirmative action, he seems to be quite successful, thus likely resentful and eager to prove his cred to fellow blacks. Too afraid of being labeled as acting white.

    2) There is a quote from the play “Race”, which goes something like this: “as a black living in America I feel like I’m wearing an ill fitting shoe”. Well, that feeling must be quite ubiquitous and reflect the intuitive grasping that one lives in a society with which one is civilizationally incompatible at a very basic level. The higher one’s cognitive ability, the sharper the sting must be.

    3) the race realist community must find a way to identify and foster a charismatic black leader who will articulate and further the idea of mass repatriation to Africa for the benefit of all involved. Despite the fact that material life is much easier here, I’m quite certain that the benefits of repatriation outweigh the ongoing mutual malaise associated with the black minority’s life here in this country. It would be best for most blacks and whites if we parted ways…

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      “Even without affirmative action, he seems to be quite successful, . . ”

      How can one ever know?

      • TL2014

        SAT scores were provided.

        • pcmustgo

          self-reported

      • The first part of solving any complex problem is separation of variables. With affirmative action being the law of the land here, separation of variables has obviously not been done.

        • mikekingjr

          Concur.

  • Evette Coutier

    In the final analysis life is a genetic competition. This was true at the dawn of life on earth billions of years ago, and nothing since then has changed. This is the law of nature. Like it or not, if whites lose it is because our genetic strategy lost to a better adapted alternative strategy. If we win the genetic competition it is because we are the most well adapted. As of this point in time it is evident that the black genetic strategy fails in every cultural environment where it exists, even when carried by other races. If we are to lose it is because groups like the Chinese are actively looking to reproduce improved offspring through intelligent genetics. Whereas whites in America are degrading their genetic traits via interbreeding with blacks and Hispanics. Let’s be really honest about race. If this trend continues we lose.

    • LHathaway

      Only a woman could say ‘in the final analysis life is a genetic competition, say, “whites in America are degrading their genetic traits via interbreeding with blacks and Hispanics” and then say that this means the asian strategy is winning and the black strategy is losing.

      • Evette Coutier

        How is this inaccurate? Chinese are breeding intelligence. Whites mixing with blacks reduces white intelligence. Pure black genetics consistently under performs in every culture, and has excessively violent behavior. The overall increase in black/ white inbreeding is still 15 points below white intelligence. It’s not enough improvement to allow them to compete intellectually against other races, and they retain the violent behavioral traits. How is this incorrect?

        • LHathaway

          If, in the final analysis, life is a (Darwin style) genetic competition (which is surely where you are coming from even if only for the purpose of sounding offensive), how is black-white inbreeding causing blacks to lose? White numbers are dwindling, black and hispanic numbers are increasing. YOU are the one who described it as a Darwin style competition (again, it won you no points for manners, perhaps ‘authenticity’).

          • Evette Coutier

            I am going to disagree with you. You are being over sensitive if you take my beliefs in Darwin as offensive. I welcome your comments, observations, and insights. But I see evolution as a fact. I don’t accept the notion that any honest discussion of facts is offensive.

            I said black/white inbreeding causes whites to lose. It certainly does benefit blacks in terms of cognitive ability. However, I also noted that the pure genetic strategy of blacks is a failed strategy. Look at Africa. That’s not the same as a black/white strategy. But it’s still a losing strategy too. Breeding with whites does not raise black abilities high enough to be competitive, and it integrates other problematic black genetics into the equation.

            Why is an honest conversation on genetics bad manners?

          • ThomasER916

            You need to realize that LHathaway has routinely defended the Culture of Critique. The moment a White defends the Culture of Critique they will invariably be anti-White. They will always attack, demean, and beleaguer Whites that seek racial unity, harmony, safety, and prosperity.

          • Evette Coutier

            I’ve not read it. Should I?

          • ThomasER916

            I’m not talking about the series of books, I’m talking about the people that shall not be named.

            However, you need to read the series. It’s important to not only understand evolutionary psychology but the people that created the mess we’re in today. It gives you an insight into group psychology and how Whites are individualist by nature – our greatest strength (why Whites created the scientific method) and greatest weakness (the inability to think racially).

          • Evette Coutier

            Thank you. I will read the series.

          • Kenner

            I cannot understand the reaction a couple of posters have had to your reasoned and intelligent posts. I don’t think they can be reading them all the way through.

          • Evette Coutier

            Thank you. I appreciate your kind thoughts. I think that the issue of genetic realism can be very emotional at times. Sometimes those emotional filters cloud our vision.

          • LHathaway

            haha, good one. You bested me in your earlier comment.

            Going on about ‘the people who can’t be named’, however, just loses you some of the goodwill you built up. At least, to 90 to 99% of the public, I would imagine.

          • mikekingjr

            Go away.

          • LHathaway

            You know, I read your comments again, and I wondered if perhaps you did Not mean Darwinism as in last man standing/sheer numbers (which, by the way, whites are losing) but obviously now you did. I think Darwin’s ideas can be presented in an offensive way. You find it much more effective if you just imply you are ‘offensive’?

            Your post covers two different manifestations of diversity. Black/white interbreeding simply creates more blacks (which is of greater interest to me) and a separate point (which is what you meant, apparently, with apologies) that diversity favors whites because whites are more intelligent, and thus multiculturalism spells a victory for whites (you somehow seem to ignore birth to death affirmative action policies).

            Evolution, change, is likely a fact. I’m not sure why you’d be proud of it or so insistent in holding this banner up so high. The obvious evidence is that is whites who are inferior.

            Like so many things, like nearly everything, it’s not a surprise someone is our society holds completely backwards beliefs. In fact, everyone seems to.

          • Evette Coutier

            You interpretation of my comments is incorrect. In fact the conclusions you draw make no sense at all. Moreover, I can so no objective or point in your comments. What are you trying to achieve?

          • LHathaway

            Whatever thing you were trying to point out. . . I wanted to interject and also point out that. . . even going by your own Darwin inspired model. . . whites are not winning by way of multiculturalism or interbreeding. Whites are losing to the point that if present trends continue there will be no whites at all. An ultimate defeat, at least from the point of view of Darwin. That was all I wanted to point out.

            I have to admit, I hit you with an elbow or two, pointing out that you may sound a bit insensitive in your comments (at least I imagine you must sound insensitive to the ear of normal folks who may tune in). I sound very insensitive too! Being honest used to be a virtue. I’m not sure sounding insensitive has ever been considered a virtue. I do apologize if I’m wrong about that.

            Come-now. . do you ever wonder if half the folks who post here owe their true allegiance to an organization like hate-watch? There would be no other place they would rather monitor, and influence. I certainly wonder if that is the case. For the most part, many of them may as well. I have no illusion about the folks who run these kind of web-sites, either. Honestly left the building a long time ago. In fact, it’s never been in the building.

            I’m certainly not afraid to talk about it.

          • Evette Coutier

            What I find confusing is that you took what I said as support for multiculturalism. Nor did I suggest that ethnic inbreeding was a successful Darwinian strategy. I said the exact opposite concerning blacks and whites. I did not address any other racial inbreeding. In the case with blacks the factual evidence is so conclusive that there is no rational debate. Their genetics are not suited to modern life in white cultures. Anyone who cross breeds blacks is permanently handicapped their future generations. In fact if you are an objective evolutionist, the conclusion that interracial mating with blacks is a bad choice is unavoidable.

            I’m not concerned with sensitivity on these issues. Sensitivity belongs with private matters. In my mind your personal life is off limits. But we are ultimately speaking about science. Our issue is the science of human genetics and their historical, cultural, and human impact. Science should never be a sensitive topic. It should always be out in the open. It is the multiculturalist who try to silence honest conversation on the topic of race and human genetics. I don’t buy into the notion that there is bad knowledge. Right and wrong is a human concept that applies to people.

            I’m am sure hate watch visits this site all the time. So does other groups like the NSA, FBI, and other big brother groups looking to fulfill their political masters wishing to crush any dissent. The history of government is filled with political leaders abusing their power at the expense of free thinkers. But this group is a collective of law abiding folks who are civil. Until the thought police pass laws outlawing the first amendment, we are not committing any crimes. Moreover, I would encourage outsiders to post here. If what we said was factually wrong, then it would come out. But with the debate that I’ve seen, I’ve seen no compelling evidence that counters what is generally the premise of this website. That our facts hold their own is the key indicator of the truth we speak. If they didn’t I would not be here.

            I cannot say I’m jaded about the folks here. Given the price that Jared must have paid for being a race realist public figure, he has more than proven to me his genuine commitment. I’m not always in agreement with the takes I read here, but I don’t question his veracity. He’s doing more than his fair share for the cause. But even that is not an issue for me. If someone is trying to misdirection the narrative, long term that will become evident and we can disregard their folly.

          • LHathaway

            This is what you said,

            “if whites lose it is because our genetic strategy lost to a better adapted alternative strategy. If we win the genetic competition it is because we are the most well adapted. As of this point in time it is evident that the black genetic strategy fails in every cultural environment where it exists, even when carried by other races. If we are to lose it is because groups like the Chinese are actively looking to reproduce improved offspring through intelligent genetics. Whereas whites in America are degrading their genetic traits via interbreeding with blacks and Hispanics. Let’s be really honest about race. If this trend continues we lose”.

            I was responding to, what, again, appeared to me (and it turns out to be true) sounded like Darwinism and then a claim that blacks are losing this contest. They didn’t lose in the Caribbean. The didn’t lose in most every big city in the US. They aren’t losing in Brazil. They aren’t being dispossessed in Africa. I see at the end of your post you say that if this trend continues we lose. I didn’t see that. I reacted too quickly, perhaps.

            Our genetic traits are not being degraded because, for the most part, those of mixed race are no longer white. This is an additional way we are losing by numbers. I would say, in my opinion, non-white genes (preferably the better or the best ones) would improve whites. The challenge is to accept non-white genes and still stay mostly white. Ignoring this, I would say strictly from a physical standpoint, white genes are greatly improving in NA. Or they should be. We are a culture obsessed with physical fitness and strength (probably to encourage white women to have children with non-whites) and so white women, even who marry white men, are picking the largest and strongest white men. Since there is so much immigration of non-white men, too, white women are really picking the cream of the crop of white men. From a numbers standpoint this isn’t good. But from a quality standpoint this is good. At least if you want future generations of whites to be bigger and stronger. Perhaps in the future, through sperm selection and egg selection, such a natural selection process wont be so necessary.

          • Evette Coutier

            I believe Darwinism is fact. But I see a number of issues that people misunderstand when addressing adaptive evolution. First, population is a measure of genetic success, but it is not the only measure. Moreover, many highly populated species have gone extinct. The correct understanding of genetic success is the ability to adapt. And I specifically said that in my commentary. I don’t have a crystal ball, so we must use the best predicitive value evidence we have to determine long term assessment of genetic traits. But that evidence must be measured against the environment with which we live in. Our reality is that humans are overpopulating the planet beyond the earth’s maximum sustainable yield. Resources will dry up. Epidemics will become more common place. The division between those with access to resources, quality medical care, and the ability to survive will be defined by intelligence. There will be a simple division between populations, the cognitive elite and the rest. Blacks are in the bottom class of every society in the world, and black nations are at the bottom of every nation. The best evidence is that they will be the first and the worst to suffer from epidemics and food shortages.
            To have an honest discussion, we need to assess what the nature of genetic reality is. If we inbreed with blacks, and they survive, our genetics are passed on to subsequent generations. This holds true for any racial mixture. In a sense, genetic purism may be a failed strategy. There is much to be said for having your genetics in every pool. This is a genetic strategy that has existed and is successful in populations. However, there is a competing strategy that also work in evolution. Numbers don’t always win. I’d note that there are no dinosaurs on the planet, but there are sharks (which existed before the dinoasurs). Our premise as genetic realists is that higher quality genetics will ultimately win out over greater numbers. You might call it the shark vs. dinosaur strategy. If we are wrong we lose. If we are right we win. It’s that simple.

          • Evette Coutier

            I should mention one more thing. I’m not a bigot. Facts are not racist or bigoted. We have allowed the left to redefine reality as racist and bigoted. I do not and will not accept this. Facts by definition not bigoted. I refuse to allow the diversity propagandist to define me based on lies and their political agenda. If I am on a side, I am on the side of objective reality. Clearly, I’m not always right. However, the goal is to honestly, and With integrity, seek the most accurate facts we can. Multiculturalism has defined fact racist. I proudly say, “Bunk.” If I am in agreement with race realists, it’s not because I am on their side. It is because they are factually accurate in their assessment of race, intelligence, genetics, and cultural preservation. Clearly, it is in our self interests to preserve the white race. From a genetic perspective, it is the most important objective we can have.

          • ThomasER916

            I am a bigot.

            So what?

          • Evette Coutier

            Ok.

          • mikekingjr

            So am I.

          • ThomasER916

            It’s about damn time Whites stopped caring what anti-Whites think. It’s that stuffed-shirt etiquette that has stagnated Amren and capitulated to the Culture of Critique. Being a “bigot” is good for Whites, as is being a “racist.” I’m glad you embraced bigotry.

          • Evette Coutier

            Thomas, I could not care less what anyone thinks of me. If you read my posts here, or on other sites, you will note that I consistently post facts that are considered very racist. I also say things that people here don’t like, not to stir trouble, but because there is a need to have an honest chat. I regularly say blacks are violent and stupid all over the internet and in the real world too. But this is a fact. Bigotry implies ignorance and a disregard for facts. The reality is the bigotry is on the side of the multiculturalist. Their anti-white pro-black agenda is devoid of rational thought, factual evidence, and is driven by the hatred of white males. If I hate anyone it is the whites that betray their own people. They are responsible for the real harm done to white society. They have set the conditions in white society that permits blacks to do damage. In a real way addressing the blacks is treating the symptom and not the root illness. I think it’s time to direct our energies repairing white people’s indoctrination.

    • ThomasER916

      What will save Whites is culture, going “Amish” and pro-White at the same time. This will allow Whites to act in their collective racial self-interest while giving Whites the “free speech” and “freedom” they always wanted.

    • mikekingjr

      Give up to genetic competition and you lose. So give up Evette. You sound like a loser to me.

      • LHathaway

        The last white left on Earth having an IQ of 200 is not a victory for whites, it is the chronicle of how the last white on Earth spent his last day.

  • TheCogitator

    I’ve had black acquaintances, but never a black friend. I don’t think I’ve missed anything.

    • Sick of it

      I had a black roommate who was the worst of a quite horrible series of roommates. We almost got into a rather violent altercation.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      I’ve black acquaintances, no black friends. As child and going to school with all whites, blacks were merely a concept, a curiosity. They actually drew your interest. Now that I put up with them daily at work, at the store, everywhere, I can’t stand the sight of them on some days.

      • mikekingjr

        You are the Hathaway here who makes some sense.

    • TheCogitator

      Maybe I should add, I’m a son of the segregated South. I never had a black in class until I got to collage at a southern university, but they were few and far between. When Dixie was played, everyone stood and cheered. I don’t know, but I guess they don’t even play Dixie anymore. It sure as hell has gone downhill, in the last 50 some years.

      • 1G25

        That America you and I grew up in is gone forever.

        Gone with the wind.

        • me

          Gone with the ‘humanist’/socialist/globalist agenda

          • mikekingjr

            see above.

        • mikekingjr

          Maybe not. Refuse to give up!

          • 1G25

            Not giving up, amigo… working hard as I can toward secession. See the “Texas Nationalist Movement.”

          • mikekingjr

            Thank you. Will search for it.

  • Luca

    “And in fact, there’s nothing ignorant about George, who is far, far smarter than most whites I know.”

    I wish the author would encourage “George” to get a DNA test. He sounds a bit like Henry Louis Gates, about 60% White but runs around all day talking about how black he is. Even your average, every-day, African American with an IQ of 84 has about 20% non-African DNA.

  • LHathaway

    “What if the burden were constantly on me to prove otherwise (I’m not dangerous or a criminal)?

    What fantasy land is this guy coming from? Do you mean to tell me, regular folks have gotten tired of black criminality and seeing Them as victims?

    It’s nice, for the most part, reading this ‘AmRen style’ expose uncovering the reality that blacks are encouraged to be as race conscious, and as racist, as possible. It’s all part of fighting stereo-types and discrimination.

  • TruthBeTold

    The author goes out of his way to fawn over George but I don’t really understand why.

    I see nothing unique about George (other than he earned a lot of money for a black man). His opinions as a black man are consistent for a black man; racial solidarity uber alles. The author seems surprised by this. He seems to have limited associations with blacks. Is this his only black friend?

    The author seems to be looking for logic to explain Georges’ views and opinions; as if George could be reasoned with and that George could learn to see his inconsistencies and biases.

    Bear in mind, George isn’t some uniquely hypocritical guy. He’s just a
    creature of his time, and can’t see past the double standards encouraged
    by our liberal media, with their constant, unrelenting focus on white
    racism, and their willful blindness towards any other kind.

    The author goes to a great effort to make excuses for Georges’ views. The author claims he isn’t a liberal but he is. He’s doing what liberals do when it comes to blacks; making excuses.

    I appreciate the private stories the author shares but it’s really nothing I didn’t know. Blacks will defend blacks regardless of the facts. Ferguson is only the latest example.

    • Evette Coutier

      Even if blacks are bright, they retain an excessively tribal mentality. They are always black first. This is true even in mixed marriages. I’ve seen black men put race before their white wives.

      • B.A_2014

        There is taxi driver in my part of town. He’s from Nigeria. We call him Keithiopian (his name is Keith obviously.) He once said to me and my friends, pointing to a picture a white blob, “I never love her. African men don’t love.” I can’t say if this is true or not but it shocked my libtard ex friends. They were even more shocked by his racial beliefs. I was told by two friends that when they first got him as a driver on seperate occasions, the first thing he did was tell them his wife was white but the morons still thought Keith was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Another black guy I knew (I can’t even recall his name) bought his way into my circle of friends with drugs. Those of us that didn’t want him hanging out with us got drunk one night and started singing johnny rebel songs. He left the club that night in tears and we have never seen him since. The druggies within our circle of friends were not in the least bit happy and it created tension among us for a couple of months.

        • ThomasER916

          Kevin MacDonald PhD, who is banned from Amren by the Culture of Critique, had pointed out that “love” is a White and Western concept. No other race has “loved” more than Whites. The same with monogamy and homeschooling. These are the domains of Whites and only Whites.

      • HJ11

        Whies need to retain an excessively tribal mentality. We need to start keeping our kind first and foremost in all things and in all ways.

        • Evette Coutier

          Agreed.

        • benvad

          It’s not in Jewish interests that’s why it’s stamped out, consistently.

          • HJ11

            Not in my world or among my kind of Whites. We care as little for what Jews think as we do about what any other non-Whites think.

            We’ve left the White herd.

          • benvad

            Good for you.

      • thegodsofeden

        And vice versa, black women will put race and racial issues before their white husbands.

        • Evette Coutier

          Black children put race before their white parents. I’d point out that Obama outted his white mother for being racist in his book. That fact alone should serve as a warning to whites where they stand with blacks.

      • ThomasER916

        Negroes, like the Culture of Critique, have a toxic tribal mentality. They’re never to be trusted in a position of power over Whites. Ever. They could not create America, Australia, or Canada in a million years but they could turn it all into Detroit overnight.

        Whites created Rhodesia.

        Negroes and the Culture of Critique turned it into Zimbabwe.

        This is not an accident. There are limits to the benefits of tribal mentality. Whites don’t have enough, Negroes have way too much.

        • Evette Coutier

          It is a trade-off. The price blacks pay for their tribalism is group think. We pay the price of a lack of loyalty for our independence.

      • mikekingjr

        Their wives were stupid for marrying so. Said wives deserve what they get for marrying so. No sympathy here for mudsharks, Grow up Evette. Do your best to educate your sisters.

        • mikekingjr

          you are wasting time preaching to the White choir.

    • mikekingjr

      The author caused me to fall asleep. I thank him. I needed some sleep just then.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    I work and am cordial with numerous black people. The other day I was mocking Chris Brown for parroting Louis Farrakhan’s assertion that ebola was created and spread by whites to depopulate Africa. Several of these black coworkers didn’t see the humor in Brown’s suggesting whites created ebola to depopulate Africa. Some even agreed that it was possible and even likely. These black people are attorneys.

    I wanted to say, “You have to be kidding me. Do you think that if the white man wanted to depopulate Africa he’s spend billions devising and spreading a disease that could possibly infect him too? No, if the white man wanted to depopulate Africa he wouldn’t spend billions, he’d save billions. That’s because the only thing keeping Africa afloat is Western aid and medicine (and Chinese investment.). If you were to take away the billions in Western aid and medicine to Africa, and Africa would depopulate quick.”

    In any event the interaction is an example that black people certainly aren’t shy about sharing outlandish, negative views about whites; and it shows that believing these outlandish views is not relegated to the least intelligent and least educated blacks.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      Farrakhan and Chrissy the biaatch-slapper, the 2 intellectual pillars of the black community

    • mikekingjr

      Bravo, Sir! Well stated.

    • TonyWestfield

      Frank, your co-workers are not aware that they are the puppet masters of killers, rapists, and robbers. The brainy stratum consists of public and private voices, the former consisting of people who write books and appear on television; the latter includes your co-workers, whose voices may not have a mass-distribution forum, but they do plenty of talking. This brainy stratum creates and circulates the myths that take up residence in the minds of the criminals who tell the myths to themselves (they repeat them endlessly) and thereby justify their criminal motives and deeds. Even the perpetrators of the Wichita Massacre thought they were just getting even, and they walked away from the atrocity thinking that the books were still not balanced, i.e., they would be justified doing even MORE atrocious harm. If you or I believed the myths that the other side believes, we would feel justified responding vengefully to all the harm that we believe is being done to us: “They” created and introduced a lethal contagion in order to wipe “us” out. In our world, Frank, a person who entertains such wild, paranoid fantasies is considered mentally ill. On the other side, an abundance of wild, paranoid fantasies is the norm, as exampled by your associates at the water cooler. The brainy stratum provides the rationale to perpetrators of headline atrocities such as Wichita or Knoxville. The brainy ones also provide a rationale for those who commit the more pedestrian, daily crimes that threaten our communities and erode our peace, e.g., the guy who robbed a gas station last week in the town next to mine and fired his weapon at the attendant–all for a couple hundred bucks–oh, and you can guess the “background” of the perp and the victim. Multiply by tens of thousands, and you get the picture of America in our age, crime driven not by necessity but by a story in the perpetrator’s head.

  • pcmustgo

    Speaking of my close black male friend I lost due to the Obama election, and this guy also breaking up with George due to Obama, and Blacks and their racial solidarity, I think even many white liberals notice how Blacks like Obama in a “different” way than they do. My friend was incapable of critisizing Obama. Like Obama sh– golden bricks. Like worship. Like repeating mindlessly Obama campaign slogans like Hope and Change. I once went into an office where some black receptionist had several pictures of the Obama family printed out and hung up all over her cubicle. Many years after he was elected.

    It’s like cult hero worship to them.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      And the truly sad and scary part is this Obama worship cult rests entirely on a”stick it to YT” base. Blacks do not particularly like Obama when another “more black” option is available.

      He’s perceived as still too white i guess ?

      • mikekingjr

        Do not hang around any blacks so have not observed anything such as this. Do any of them really express the too White not black enough sentiment??
        I’m asking you: What do they actually say? I figured ALL blacks were so overjoyed to have this president in office that no discontent would EVER be expressed since there could not possibly be a better CINC to represent THEIR interests in US government. Would you please provide quotes or something to back up your assertion? I find it incredulous that any of them would be dissatisfied with the anointed black king.

        • mikekingjr

          Unless they did not receive their obamafone.

      • thomasdosborneii

        I don’t think they allow themselves to be dissatisfied by him. If Obama doesn’t achieve something that they expected of him, what they say is that he has too much opposition, whether it be Republicans in Congress or the system of over-riding white privilege still operating everywhere that even a President, a “black” president, has to deal with nothing but obstacles everywhere he turns.

    • thomasdosborneii

      The election of Obama to the Presidency was like the coming of Christ, to them.

  • CT

    I too have had a close black friend. We used each other for various things but it was always a means to an end. He used me to take him places and score weed. I used him to score weed. We would hang out listen to music and most times go our separate ways after a couple of hours… Eventually, the pleasantries stopped and he got a car. We grew up and moved on with our lives. Race was never discussed. Yet we knew we had different opinions about it. Most black acquaintances appreciated the fact that I was white and didn’t pretend to be a “brotha”…. but when a few of them got together the tribe mentality kicked in and I was ostracized for being a cracker. I soon realized I was a novelty to them. In a way, they were to me as well. What turned me against them was the coolness of being a criminal and the swarm on white sluts that would put out for the blacks. It was a sense of accomplishment for them to bang a white chick. It was a strike against the crackers. As I grew into my early 20s I soon realized we were not the same and never would be. It’s better to speak the truth than to lie about it. You get respect from both sides.

    • benvad

      Who cares for their “respect” I’d rather they’d fear us again as they used to.

  • mael

    I try not to hate… I really do. But some people make you hate them…. Over and over again. In every city, and in Europe as well. They always look the same.. Why is that?

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      Because they are naggers?

    • dd121

      Why waste all that energy trying “not to hate”. Just let your feelings flow naturally. It’s very liberating.

      • mikekingjr

        Concur. Healthy to blow off steam every now and then.

  • pcmustgo

    I’m also amazed he thought he could be honest with a black about Race and Intelligence/IQ. I had a perfectly reasonable, high IQ, private school educated, attractive (she was extremely light skinned, had model looks, looked more mulatto/hispanic than Black, got tons of attention even from white men) crumple into tears when the topic of black single parenting somehow came up. She literally denied the fact that 70% of blacks are born out of wedlock and said not all statistics are true, and there’s no way social scientests could know or determine that fact.

    In the most minor racial infractions can enrage/piss off Blacks. Let alone bringing up race and IQ, lol…

    Try accidentally mentioning Bed-Stuy or Harlem (or any black hood) is a “bad” or “dangerous” neighborhood and watch them flip.

    • pcmustgo

      Black female friend I meant to say. From an upper middle class background. Literally descended from the New Orleans “Mulatto Elite”.

  • KenelmDigby

    I doubt if ‘George Smith’ actually exists or existed outside of the writer’s imagination.

    • dd121

      That’s a very good point.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    I can sum the article up in 4 words: “George” is a nagger.

  • Robbie Cheney

    Something tells me this story is fiction.

    • Tarczan

      An 800 AT chemistry at 14 and an 800 physics at 15 is what told me.

  • HJ11

    The writer says he is half Japanese and half White. He is mistaken. He is not White at all.

    One cannot be half White. One is either White,meaning one has two White parents, or one is non-White.

    • If one regresses your argument back through more generations of ancestry, anyone in North America with the slightest trace of American Indian ancestry is completely nonwhite.

      • HJ11

        Why, yes, and if one regresses even further we’re all related to apes. So what?

        The point of evolution is to change from what was, into something new. It takes two White parents, in the here and now to produce a new White.

        Are any of us pure White? Probably not. But, as we continue to breed White and only White we purify. It’s a little like distillation. Keep distilling and you get a purer and purer product.

        • Ultimate187

          Here’s why you might be confused with his reply. MCS is a hedger and considers himself non-white because of his 3/16 native heritage (which he uses to justify himself marrying a Japanese woman). You said half Japanese-half White people aren’t actually White though, and he’s not pleased with it because he really, really wants them to be.

        • One of my Chinese friends in Australia once said “You can dilute it out all you want, but you can never get rid of it all.”

          I am mainly Celtic, and these are not people noted for tanning in the sun. I have very fair skin, but tan readily until I look like a brown-haired Pakistani. It is quite obvious to me that Something Else is at work. I wear a broad-brimmed hat during the summer months here, just because I do not want to look like a Pakistani.

        • HE2

          HJ, there are quite a few of us on AmRen who report 100 percent North West European genome scans.
          I am one of those, as are my children.

          We had the firstborn scanned because my German born ex-husband’s father was a product of Hitler’s lebensborn program.

          Sure enough, they selected a pure German in this case.

        • HJ11

          Further…and if we could, and if did, mate with apes, we would devolve, just as if we mate with non-Whites we fall off the White trajectory of evolution and devolve into other than White.

          Whites must mate only with Whites if we want to remain White.

          • HE2

            Whites must mate only with Whites if we want to remain White

            I am stridently of the same view.

            That is, if you want your grandchildren to look as you do.

      • Ultimate187

        Translation: If my half-Japanese, half-White kids can’t be white, then no one can.

    • Ultimate187

      Michael Scott is offended. You basically said his kids aren’t White.

  • Cecil Henry

    Why were you friends with this guy??

    I mean why??? I listen to what people say and do.

    Sounds like a friendship of expediency. Quid pro quo.

  • The Final Solution

    I have never had a black friend in my entire life and never will. I do not feel anything but pride in that fact. Why would I want to have black friends? Why do people feel like we MUST have friends of another race? Stick to your own. What white person can relate to these negroes?

    • My best friends consist of Scot-Dane, a German-Polish-Ukrainian-Scot and a Scot-Irish-Amerind. One might detect a theme here.

      • Ike Eichenberg

        Sounds like you prefer a blended scotch over a single malt.

      • benvad

        Ulster Descenter Philia.

      • thomasdosborneii

        I dare say so, Michael Christopher SCOTT!

    • benvad

      I know a few from my work but I’d never go and have a drink with them because frankly speaking I have no interest in their world. Much the same as I have nothing in common or any interest to converse with feminists, gays or adolescents.

      I’m not against them but they’ll never be in my inner circle. They have their own issues and I have mine.

  • pcmustgo

    EYEROLLING is a “hostile act” according to psychologists. It’s the equivalent of randomly giving your friend the middle finger right in their face.

  • wak

    Just another example of the “Morally Legitimizing Negro” phenomenon. The author feels he can be candid about race because of his freindship with MLN. Without the MLN the author runs the risk of being called “racist.”

  • newscomments70

    That is quite common. I recenlty read an article about a successful black male surgeon who brutally murdered his white girlfriend in some kind of lover’s quarrel. I think she was trying to leave him. I do not have the ability to be a surgeon. That black male was more intelligent than I am, but the genetically-inherited predisposition to violence is hard-wired. It doesn’t matter how intelligent they are. The danger of extreme violence will always be there.

    • me

      If you sincerely believe that, answer something for me:
      If you had the choice between an Asian surgeon, a Negro surgeon, or a White surgeon operating on a loved one, who would you choose?

      • newscomments70

        the white or Asian…but I would choose the rare black surgeon over me, because I was never trained in that area.

        • me

          Not me. I’d rather self-operate. Less chance of dying because of Negro hate. “So sorry, Mrs. Whitey. He seemed to be making such a recovery. I tried to save him, but…”

          • newscomments70

            I know many are AA stereotypes, but I would choose Ben Carson over me.

          • me

            All righty, then!

          • bilderbuster

            Even if I told him you post here?

          • newscomments70

            yes, probably, but I would try to avoid the situation. I admire Ben Carson’s intelligence and success but I don’t believe he is a true conservative. I have seen him thanking race hustlers for their “import work” in the civil rights struggle.

      • winn sutanto

        Don’t be silly. Choose the most competent one without regard of race, ethnicity, or gender.
        When you get yourself on surgery table, you want the VERY BEST surgeon to operate on you.
        Choose the VERY BEST, nothing but the VERY BEST.

        • me

          No, thank you. A revered elder of my family worked for the WHO for many decades, as a professor of medicine, training student ‘doctors’ all over the continent of Africa. Lots of horror stories around the dinner table. Affirmative action may be okay for a bureaucrat, but not for someone who will kill me because he or she is an A A ‘doctor’.

    • thomasdosborneii

      O.J.

  • Bardon Kaldian

    Blacks can’t go beyond race. Maybe one in 1,000,000 – although I doubt even that.

    • LHathaway

      yes, and when what we need is a world where it is Whites who can’t get beyond race.

    • HJ11

      Genes are us. We should not try to go beyond race, especially if we are White.

      Instead, we should have race first and foremost in our mind all day long.

      And, we should ask of everything: Is this good for Whites or is this neutral or is this bad for Whites. Then we should always do what is good for Whites and not do what is bad for Whites.

    • silviosilver

      That is not a criticism of them. Why should they “go beyond” race? The problem is not that they care about their racial interests; the problem is they do it extremely irrationally. An even bigger problem is that so many whites care what blacks think.

  • LHathaway

    Not to play ‘bossman’ our own funny and polite poster, but a jury did declare OJ innocent. Our justice system declared OJ innocent. You have to be a pretty mean person to see 2 million men in our prisons and then be angry 1 was declared innocent. I have to admit, I paid very, very little attention to the case and the trial, so it didn’t much interest me and I wasn’t emotionally caught up in it. Frankly, in my opinion the whole thing was likely a Complete fabrication with the likely end result being less white girls sleeping with black men (and the increase in ‘immigration’ from overseas making up for this ‘loss of black male sleeping partners). The most interesting comment I heard came from a friend telling me that on one of those ‘Maury’ style talk shows a racist guest said he was glad OJ killed her for her dating a black man.

    • mikekingjr

      I quit reading your posts after this one. Maybe I’m stupid, OK, but you are incomprehensible. All due respect.

      • LHathaway

        Thanks for letting us know, you’re either a liar, or you have great respect for the incomprehensible. I strongly suspect the first. Maybe they’ll create a block feature for you.

  • mikekingjr

    What a tedious read to conclude what I could say in two paragraphs. Appreciate the author’s desire to be thorough, but as a former Chief flight instructor of mine was fond of saying, this guy is “wordy if not verbose”.

  • mikekingjr

    A litmus test to be sure.

  • propagandaoftruth

    I have a great “bad smile” that negroes fear.

    The bad smile is far worse than a scowl.

    • me

      Game Face. Negroes are used to pusses looking at the ground when a Negro does it. Negroes are always taken off guard by a White man doing it right back.
      1 Negro=Negro backs down
      2 Negroes=Probably will back down
      3 Negroes=pack of hyenas. Shoot or run.

      • propagandaoftruth

        You want them to think “dat White Man crazy”.

        Blacks are freaked out by Goths, silly as that sounds. The evocative mumbo jumbo of the KKK was a pretty crafty way of striking fear in the hearts of negroes – designed by White Men who understood how to brain staple a mumbo jumbo black brain.

        I like to intimate that I’m a Satanist to my black co-workers.

  • Bantu_Education

    “as a halfbreed, I’m less naturally inclined towards racial partisanship.”

    So why does Obama, Halle Berry, Harry Belafonte, in fact virtually every celebrity half-white, half-black, self-identify as “black”?

    • Garrett Brown

      I guess it only applies to the Asian half breeds? *shrugs*

    • thomasdosborneii

      They do to the extent it gets them the goodies of affirmative action or votes from blacks or black audience members or other privileges. I honesty don’t think Obama truly self-identifies as black. The man so much thinks he is welcome in the “country club”…playing golf, hobnobbing with Hollywood blue bloods such as George Clooney, taking “selfles” at Mandela’s funeral with Denmark’s female Prime Minister, Helle Thorning Schmidt (he loves those blondes!). There are even rumors that after he leaves the White House, he plans to live in one of the most old-money small towns in the South (that, as far as I know, still has at least one gorgeous upper-class neighborhood that still has covenants against selling to blacks). In other words, he thinks he can “pass” anywhere and is quite willing to.

  • Bantu_Education

    Having now read the article in its entirety, and hearing about George’s high SAT scores, his good looks, his apparent wealth, and yet his barely suppressed resentment against whites, I’m wondering just how “black” George really is.

  • LHathaway

    Many white face a racial awakening with scars, contusions and scabs.

  • stonepillow

    I shouldn’t have read this piece, not because I don’t agree but because as a white of a certain age I am soooo tired of discussing this crap.

  • HE2

    Still, I think the eye roll signals impatience more than aggression.
    It seems to say, “are you stupid?”

    I get the eye roll from people whose speech I cannot understand and more than one repeat is necessary.

  • Alex Dihes

    This account is too boring, too long. I do not take that “George” for real. To emphasise his position the author laced the glass full with a stupid black with white IQ and added it toooooo much.

  • slobotnavich

    This may be the best and most thoughtful essay I’ve ever seen in my long life on the core elements of black-white relationships. Individuals of greatly varying intelligence normally can get along and even become close friends. With groups, however, sharply varying levels of intelligence usually become a source of friction and distrust. At the highest levels of human intelligence, Ashkenazi Jews are hugely over-represented, and often resented, for their high levels of achievement. Their success is often believed to be a result of their “sticking together” (to the disadvantage of gentiles) or to just plain sharp and clever dealing, when the simple truth of the matter is that they’re simply, on average, smarter than your average goy. Smart people generally do better in life than less intelligent people. Blacks, at the diametric opposite of the intelligence spectrum as Ashkenazis, have, on average, markedly lower IQs than Euro-whites and much lower than those of Northeast Asians, the latter to the profound outrage and horror of many Euro-whites. We may all be created equal in the eyes of God, and we may all have equal rights under our Constitution, but we’re not all created equal in terms of either physical or intellectual ability, either as individuals or as groups, whatever EEOC or the federal government wants us to believe and demands in terms of obeisance to their dictates.

  • benvad

    Why is being offended is viewed as a capital crime.

    • mikekingjr

      No one has the RIGHT to NOT be offended.

      • ThomasER916

        Especially Jews.

        This comment will be deleted and sent to the same location as Kevin MacDonald.

  • mikekingjr

    She’s indoctrinated. Do not be offended.

  • ThomasER916

    So why do you associate with her?

    Are you desperate? Or just a sell out with no sense of identity or pride?

  • RHG

    Well “George” is just typical of every black person I have ever met. They demand absolute love and devotion for the black race from other races while having no problem feeling entitled to the double standard i.e. “black privilege” of being able to spew out the most racist things about other ethnic groups without the worry of repercussions for saying these things out loud.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Reading this article and the associated articles, it sounds like “George” was high yellow: checking the “African” box, but having a significant European DNA booster shot. Obama, the half-breed and octaroons like Holder and Jarrett play that same game of working both sides of the fence. I’ve never met a diversity darling who ever acknowledged their diversity tailwind, mystery meat or otherwise.

  • Douglas Quaid

    Which can be updated to the 21st century, “George Zimmerman, innocent or guilty?”

  • disqus_irCdmAu8It

    Having spent 38 years in the military/civil service, th emost racist people I have ever met, bar none, were African-Americans. They even hate one another. Lokk how they murder each other.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    All of these insights are interesting, but every one of them has occurred to each of us who calls himself “conservative,” and did so decades ago…

  • Raymond Kidwell

    This really seems like a backwards article. Yes of course there are racist black people, but this sort of implies all blacks are racist or something to that effect. It seems kind of odd to write a really long article about a racist black friend and then to write it in such a way as if this revealed some secret the author never knew about blacks. I’m glad he opened the author up to the possibility of high I.Q. blacks.

    Articles like this one confirm the liberal’s idea of some ignorant white racist who is stuck in believing non-whites are inferior and thus want to oppress everyone. It actually falls into the “liberal” (also conservative) narrative that non-whites are all being oppressed by racist whites. Meanwhile whites are the ones being discriminated against legally and illegally. They are the ones being subjected to abuse, treated less than human, not given the full protection of the law etc.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      When I poach Liberal websites, I point out the Marxist techniques. The most common is to project an exception as a rule. For example, over at Rolling Stone this anti-West freak Armenian Semite woman, Anita Sarkeesian, is groaning on about oppression in the computer game industry, of all places. She points out anonymous blog comments, which could easily be generated by her or her hate group, then projects these isolated events as a mass conspiracy. Standard Marxist tactics. Sheryl Sandberg is doing the same thing with the phony war-on-women. It’s what Semites do. They are natural subversives. Mark Zuckerburg, even worse.

      Khazars all.

      http[colon]//www[dot]rollingstone[dot]com/culture/features/anita-sarkeesian-gamergate-interview-20141017

      http[colon]//en[colon]wikipedia[colon]org/wiki/Khazars

  • crockadoodle6

    The author is channeling Mark Twain. Hunk and Jim. Both stories are fiction.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yes, there certainly aren’t any card counters from the Congo, at least.
      An octaroon could have such a bio as this creature labeled, “George”.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Get a load of this white guilt freak.
    .

    • Viking_61

      The cops should Baker Act that psycho.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        There is clearly a damaged gene or a virus within Whites that causes White guilt. I think the Left wants to steal as much of America as possible–and as quickly as possible–just in case they find a cure.

        • ThomasER916

          I actually blame the Church for breeding Pathologically Altruistic Whites.

  • What is it call when truth becomes taboo……..

  • thomasdosborneii

    Just like Michael Brown, they absolutely think that the two races should trade places, “Black on the top, White on the bottom”, that that is what is fair and “justice”.

  • Person of Whiteness

    I think the male murder rate is about 7 times the female, and the black American murder rate about 40 times the Asian American. I don’t know if the sex differences are the same between the races though.