Most Murder Victims in Big Cities Have Criminal Records

Michael Thompson, WND, March 4, 2013

A review of murder statistics across America shows that in many large cities, up to 90 percent of the victims have criminal records.

WND previously reported that gun murders in the U.S. are concentrated in big cities that typically have the strictest gun-control regulations.

The gun-murder rates in those cities are comparable to the rates in some of the deadliest Third World countries, the report said.

Now a WND review of a number of cities with high gun-murder rates shows a clear majority of the victims had criminal arrest histories. In some cities, it’s as high as 91 percent.

The 2011 Milwaukee Homicide Review Commission is a review of police data compiled from Wisconsin’s largest city.

Milwaukee, with a population of just less than 600,000, is 40 percent African-American and 37 percent white. The 2011 Homicide Review Commission reports there were 86 homicides that year, with 93 percent of the suspects black males.

Overall, the homicide rate was 14.5 per 100,000 residents, and the nonfatal shooting rate was 79.5 per 100,000 residents. However, when broken down by race, “the homicide rate per black residents is 27.9 per 100,000 compared to 9.7 per 100,000 Latino residents and 1.7 per 100,000 White residents.”

The report concludes that “of the 2011 homicide victims, 77 percent (66) had a least one prior arrest and of the known 2011 homicide suspects 90 percent (74) had at least one prior arrest.”

Similar trends were found for nonfatal shooting victims and suspects.


In 2011, there were 199 murders in New Orleans. Of the victims, the New Orleans Times- Picayune reported, 64 percent had a prior record.

In early 2012, after pressure put on the police by murder victims’ families in New Orleans, the police department stopped revealing whether or not the murder victim had a prior record.

“Crime in New Orleans: Analyzing Crime Trends and New Orleans’ Responses to Crime,” an examination of 200 criminal homicides in New Orleans from April 18, 2009, to May 11, 2010 by Charles Wellford, Brenda Bond and Sean Goodison, showed that 90 percent of the homicides were committed with a firearm.

Of the 200 victims, 91.5 percent were black, 5 percent were white and 2 percent were Hispanic. Only 51 percent of the homicides—102—were solved by the police, with 97.1 percent of the known first offenders being black.

Though data is no longer published in Baltimore, USA Today reported in 2007 that 91 percent of the then-205 murder victims in the city between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31, 2007, had criminal records.

A WND review of the Philadelphia Police Department Murder and Shooting Analysis for 2011 shows a similar pattern to that of other large cities in America—a majority of the murder victims have prior records.

In Philadelphia in 2011, of 324 murders, 81 percent (263) of the victims had at least one prior arrest; 62 percent (164) had been arrested for a violent crime prior to their murder.

Seventy-nine percent (242) of the murder victims were black. Of the cases solved (176), 82 percent of the murder offenders were black.

In Newark, N.J., long considered one of America’s most dangerous cities, 85 percent of the 165 murder victims between 2009 and 2010 had serious arrest histories.

Anthony Braga, a professor with the Rutgers-Newark School of Criminal Justice, told the Newark Star-Ledger that 85 percent of 165 murder victims in Newark between 2009 and 2010 had been arrested at least once before they were killed.

Those victims, he said, had, on average, 10 prior arrests on their criminal records.

A WND review of the Chicago Police Department Murder Analysis reports from 2003 to 2011 provides a statistical breakdown of the demographics of both the victims and offenders in the 4,265 murders in Chicago over that time period.

Of the victims of murder in Chicago from 2003 to 2011, an average of 77 percent had a prior arrest history, with a high of 79 percent of the 436 murdered in Chicago in 2010 having arrest histories.

For the same 2003-2011 period, blacks were the victims of 75 percent of 4,265 murders. Blacks also were the offenders in 75 percent of the murders.


Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    *shrugs shoulders*

    No great loss…

    • JohnEngelman

      Unfortunately in neighborhoods where criminals kill criminals it is uaually the case that criminals rape, mug, and rob at gun point those who obey the law.

      • MekongDelta69

        And that’s exactly why I said “No loss at all” if all those thugs were greased. That just means there are slightly fewer “thugs o’ colored crayons’ to keep on keepin’ on.

        • JohnEngelman

          I agree with you that the murder of a criminal is no great loss. The point I was trying to make is that when the murder rate declines it declines along with the entire rate of violent crime.

          Another way of putting this is that when the murder rate in a city is high, the city is dangerous for non criminals. When the murder rate in a city is low, the city is safer for non criminals.

          • YngveKlezmer

            Absolutely correct. Or, we could say, a city with a low murder rate is safer for Whites. Yes, the lion’s share of the murder victims are Negroes, but Whites are still victimized by Black criminals, and this happens far too often. Any White person that has been in an all Black or majority Black neighborhood can feel the danger, and usually avoids such neighborhoods, wisely, so as to avoid becoming a victim. Blacks are predatorial, and become more so as their numbers increase. Whites do not move out of cities that are going Black out of racism, as the Liberals like to claim. We move because we are scared for our safety.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Yes. Not very discerning, these folks.

  • So? This means that there are still a lot of murder victims who have no criminal records, many or most of those are white. It does not comfort me that most “big city” (read: black) homicides are black thug on black thug, because even if you discount them, you still have a black murderer rate way higher than the white murderer rate.

    • LaShaniqua

      Welcome to the Land of Reality, QD. NO, most of them (murderers) are NOT White. Glad you finally got here. Feel free to open your eyes and observe what’s actually happening in today’s world. YES, we all have to suffer a black murderer rate higher by WAT FAR than the Latin / White / Asian murderer rate, by some insane proportion. It’s simple statistics. Ask yourself why our cities have been emptied, emptied out . . . . . it’s NOT random . . . .

      • I had that figured out a long time ago. The then-Police Chief of St. Louis City noted that 75% of city homicides had suspects and victims that had “similar life histories,” which was code for black thug on black thug, which is further code for “white people shouldn’t worry about black crime.” I multiplied the city’s per-100k homicide rate by 25%, and found that the city’s homicide rate was STILL 2.75 higher than the murder rate of the suburban county to the west, (which had a lot of blacks, even then), and tens of times higher than other St. Louis area suburban counties.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Wow, imagine what the black crime rate would be if not for the high black murder rate!

    • Luca

      Wow, imagine what the crime rate would be if not for blacks.

      • KERBLAM! Truth bomb.

      • blight14

        Some have suggested that an earlier discovery of synthetic fibers would have greatly benefited the United States…..I concur…..

      • Tim_in_Indiana

        Goes without saying. Duh.

    • HamletsGhost

      “Aside from the murders, DC has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.”

      Mayor Marion Barry

      • That should probably be “BECAUSE of the murders DC otherwise has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.”

  • So in this case, justice delayed is not justice denied.

  • However, when broken down by race, “the homicide rate per black residents is 27.9 per 100,000 compared to 9.7 per 100,000 Latino residents and 1.7 per 100,000 White residents.”

    Which is why the DOJ loves to lump the stubbies in with the Whites.

    • Jefferson

      The per capita murder rate in White America is only 1.7 per 100,000. Yet the libtard media would have you believe that school shootings are an epidemic in White America that happens almost everyday.

      • StillModerated

        Think about that remark: when YT goes on a shooting spree the body counts are staggering. The minorities should be terrified of the day when several million Whites snap at once.

        • Tom_in_Miami

          What I can’t figure out is why when whites snap and break out the assault rifles, they seem to target whites. Is this actually the case or could it be that the whites going crazy just get the MSM coverage?

          • American Patriot

            Hmmmmm, Sandy Hook, Aurora………….all the way back to Columbine mass shootings by ‘lone crazied shooters’ simply reek of government funded/executed black op.

          • ken

            You are right.

            The earliest “white guy gone berserk and shooting white folk incident” was the Austin University shooting by Charles Whitman in 1966.
            Why was there no incident like that before in America.

            Angry or psychotic people and guns have always been around in the USA.

          • HamletsGhost

            Before the 60s, psychotic people were locked up in mental institutions. Now they are free to walk the streets, sleep in public libraries and babble incoherently at passers-by. From time to time they’ll break the routine with a random murder.

          • ken

            That and the slap on the wrist for criminals.
            The powers that be in the west all follow the same rule book whether it be the USA, UK, Canada, France etc.

            My theory is that they want terrorism in the streets.

            I remember when the mentally ill were not roaming the streets, then they emptied the mental asylums with the excuse of cost cutting and or the “human rights” chestnut starting around the late 1960s early 1970s in most North American cities.
            Most of these ex mental patients were harmless enough but a nuisance to normal people going about their daily business.

            A lot of them starved or froze to death on the streets so it was and is a very inhumane way to get rid of them. They are a great danger to themselves.

            An other factor to consider is seeing these ragged street people babbling to themselves, sleeping on the street and trying to find food in trash bins in all the major cities is an inducement to the normal working stiffs going off to work every morning to keep working for fear of ending up like these real life unfortunates roaming the streets.

            Keep working.
            Pay your taxes.

            It is better than a billboard for mind control by the powers that be.

          • ken

            These shootings do not have anything to do with mental patients being on the street but a lot to do with mind controlled patsies for government induced psyops, usually young Whites males or Asian males or Arab males.

            There are always a long history of SSRIs prescribed to these so called shooters and there are always reports of more than one shooter at each event then it is hushed up by the news media.

          • HamletsGhost

            Most of the school shootings of the last 20 years happened at the same time that SSRIs were dispensed like Halloween candy, mostly to boys who were too fidgety in their seats for the teachers’ comfort.

            Now we are creating crazy people after the old-school crazies have been released into general society. Add on the feral blacks that have unleashed on formerly quiet prosperous white communities and we have the toxic witches brew we live in today.

          • ken

            Yes, SSRI medication has a lot to do with these shootings.

            SSRI medicated people are more prone to mind control as all these fluoride based chemicals have that effect on the brain.

            SSRI medication “constipate” the brain with serotonin and that has the effect of removing the mind’s moral and ethical governor in the long term it seems.

            Dr. Ann Blake Tracy has lots to say about SSRI medication and it is scary stuff.

          • YngveKlezmer

            Also, Black crime remained within the Black community, which was seen appropriately as a scary place where a White person did not belong. The Black community was known to be a place of violence and depravity, but Whites knew that it was pointless to try to civilize them, so a hands off approach was taken by police, unless something major occurred. The current approach of White police wasting their time trying to civilize the ghetto was seen as pointless.

          • YngveKlezmer

            Because before that, Blacks were properly seen as an inferior race, and not only properly segregated, but also systematically avoided by us as much as possible. Also, our European culture was still mostly intact, most unsullied by the influences of Black culture. The greater the influence of Blacks and Black culture on us, the greater the level of discord and disfunction in our White communities.

          • ken

            You are right.

            That is why when you see that old newsreel footage from the 1950s, that is suppose to be inflammatory in this day and age, of a southern White man saying that: ” rock’n roll was a communist plot to bring the White children down to the level of the ‘nigra”, then you realize how right on target he was.

            He was also right.

          • YngveKlezmer

            My Grandparents used to tell how Elvis’ music, in their estimation, was Black style music, and how his lyrics, and especially his suggestive hip movements on stage, had introduced a Black style sexuality to White kids in the late 50’s. While I didn’t completely comprehend their point as a kid, I now understand what they meant in a very complete sense.

          • There have always been examples of psychotic white people going berserk with firearms. I can remember a case of a distrubed vet kill people at random in Camden NJ in 1946.

          • YngveKlezmer

            True, no doubt, but let us not forget that these types of crimes have always been very rare in our European societies. Jack the Ripper was surely an Englishman, and surely a monster. The fact that he was considered a monster by almost all English men and women, though, is a testimony to the decency and high morals of the society he came from.
            With regards to African countries, my guess would be that plenty of Jack the Ripper types have managed to live lives even more evil than his in those lands, but have never even been noticed amid the endemic violence and depravity of those societies. In a country such as the Congo, where cannibalism is still commonplace in the 21’st century, serial killers and other psychopaths are likely to go unnoticed.

          • Luis

            As Charlie Chan would say, “Contradiction, please”.

            In 1944, in Camden NJ, of all places, an ex-WWII veteran named Howard Unruh, randomly shot and killed 16 people with a rifle on the city’s streets. He was caught and eventually placed in a mental hospital for the rest of his life, after being found unfit to stand trial.

            Unruh’s mark of 16 killed in one day, stood until James Huberty killed 21 people in that McDonald’s in San Ysidro, CA in 1986.

          • brengunn

            You’re a bit of a loon, ain’t ya!

          • toldev

            Maybe it is just that even crazy whites do not want to be around blacks.

      • YngveKlezmer

        Those of us who have passable critical thinking skills know that this is not the case. As tragic as school shootings are, we know that they are, thankfully, very rare in White schools. In Black schools, a shooting is just another day in the ‘hood, standard procedure for Negro “youfs”.

      • bubo

        That’s interesting. So if my city of around 1 million were all white our total should be around 17 murders.

        Unfortunately my city is around 35 percent black and our total is usually over 100.

        • Jefferson

          Your city is 35 percent black, how black is the neighborhood where you live in ? Is it as black as the city as a whole or less so ?

    • YngveKlezmer

      How much of that 1.7 per 100,000, I wonder, comprises either 1) Arabic Muslim store owners shooting Blacks who try to rob them 2) Wigger boys. White youths who act and talk like Negroes, are embroiled in rap culture, and who deal and use drugs are culturally Black, so they are temporarily non-White. More than a few of these slime commit Negro style crimes. 3) Hispanics being mis-labeles as Whites.

    • saxonsun

      Love the word “stubbies.”

  • WmarkW

    In America,
    1.5% of homicides are part of a mass killing of five or more victimes
    3% are committed with an assault weapon
    5% are by perpetrators with a diagnosed history of mental illness
    45% are by African-American males 17-34, primarily in poor urban neighborhoods were drugs and gangs are common, and two-parent families rare

    • edie

      I would have guessed the 45% was closer to 70%

      • JDInSanDiego

        You’re right but the remaining 25% are done by black males aged 12-16 and 35-70.

    • Whirlwinder

      Please give a definition for “assault weapon”.

  • brengunn

    As I said to someone today that said ‘crime stats are racist propaganda’, just look at the photographs of murder victims and the people who killed them. They’re all black and that’s about as objective as you can get!

    • LaShaniqua

      Thugs killing thugs is generally not a problem – it’s virtually inevitable; good luck doing ANYTHING to try to diminish it; it happens every day in absolutely every urban hellhole everywhere in the US; we just need to make sure there are no/few instances of thugs killing innocent White people – blameless White, Asian, and Hispanic men, women, and children with no involvement in the normal thug drama and lifestyle. Sorry, but that’s exactly where we’re at at this point.

      • YngveKlezmer

        You are right on the money. Innocent victims are where the tragedy lies, and racial segregation is key in preventing these innocent victims. Call me callous, but I really could care less about Blacks killing Blacks. It is endemic when we do not intervene. If most Blacks really were peaceful and decent, as Liberals insist, and didn’t want to live in a state of constant violence, they would make moves to remedy the problem.

    • toldev

      I have noticed that the media is now omitting photographs of black murder suspects. For a long time, the media has been leaving the suspects race out of the description when the murder suspect is still at large. Now the TV news often doesn’t show a picture or video footage of the suspect when the suspect is arrested. Instead, the news program will show footage of the murder scene or something else. It seems even just reporting the facts is now considered “racist propaganda”.

      • StillModerated

        My local paper – The Fredericksburg Free-Lance Star used to publish Crime Beat every Wednesday. People used to avoid the streets (diverse neighborhoods) and times that crimes happened, to be honest it’s not that hard to figure out. So they dropped that section and published the Grand Jury indictments instead. There were large quantities of names which made people laugh their heads off: Dwantrey, Trevyaun, Amfernee, Laqueesha, etc. which caused people to shout out, “extremely guilty.” And now the indictments are no longer run, even on the website.

      • liberalsuck

        They don’t want white people to wake up and they think we aren’t onto their agenda by now. Hard to believe they’re that stupid, or maybe they’re just arrogant.

  • bigone4u

    Blacks may start by assaulting each other, then turn to murdering each other, but in the end their ” kill whitey gene” wakes up and its whiteys turn to die. That’s why all black crime must be taken seriously and punished harshly. Of course, if they could just be walled off in their own areas ….

    • StillModerated

      they could just be walled off in their own areas ….

      LIke Africa.

      • freddy_hills

        …or Detroit.

    • Brian

      I’ve long thought that US blacks wouldn’t just be safer and cheaper to look after, but actually happier and healthier, if they were kept in stainless steel cages with regular cleaning and controlled doses of healthy feed.

  • IKantunderstand

    Well, we are headed in the right direction, at least. A dead criminal is cheaper than a live one. Hasta La Vista, baby.

  • And most murderers have criminal histories too …

    The USA is soft on black crime.

    • bubo

      I’ve tried to get black apologists to explain how the U.S. justice system can be unfair and overly harsh to black men yet still allow them to roam free and kill. Literally every urban homicide offender has a very lengthy criminal record. No answers, except that I am a racist.

      • YngveKlezmer

        As Jared Taylor says, name calling is the answer we get from our opponents when they know they have lost the argument.

  • APaige

    “gun-murder rates in those cities are comparable to the rates in some of the deadliest Third World countries” that is because the people are ‘comparable’-as in mostly the same DNA. If race is a social construct, why is it that blacks commit such higher crimes in EVERY society where they live?

    • YngveKlezmer

      Exactly!!! The racial demographics are similar to an African country, so the levels of violence are as well. We racial realists know that this is more evidence of the Nature factor in Negro violence. Not one of these Milwaukee Negro “youfs” has ever experienced any real discrimination in their lives. Coddling by Liberal Whites, caution and/or avoidance from sensible Whites, and realistic fear of their violence from sensible Whites. It amazes me how Blacks think a “thug” is the greatest thing in the world. Just more evidence that Negroes are more likely than other races to have a violent disposition.

  • TheCogitator

    Surprise, surprise, we have criminals killing criminals. But when blacks prey on whites, I wonder how true this is?


    • freddy_hills

      I suppose it depends on whether the perp and victim knew one another and the nature of the relationship. If it was a random stranger the victim probably had a clean record. If they knew each other then I’m sure some of the victims were innocent. Though one would expect that a white person who hangs around with criminals probably has a record, too.

      • TheCogitator

        I doubt that most of the whites killed by blacks knew them. Blacks are predators.

  • whiteyyyyy

    That old saying must have some truth then. “let the scum kill each other off”. Those old racists knew what they were talking about. If they have 10 priors just call it an act of god, dont waste time and good money looking into it.

    • YngveKlezmer

      They were right, you better believe it. Those good old racists were sensible people, and the world was a better place when they were the generations making the decisions, and leading the way. The 1990’s, when the Baby Boomers started to enter middle adulthood and gain positions of influence in society, were the advent of the Left Wing Liberal as we now know that creature. Not to pick on Boomers, but they are the first generation where Whites not being racial realists became mainstream. With the older generations, racial realists were the norm.

  • John R

    I read stories like this, and my reaction is that I am sick and tired of hearing “most crime is black on black.” Yes, Whites do kill other Whites, I will admit. But under what circumstances? Lover’s quarrels? Disputes between neighbors, or between family members, or cases where two people have a beef with one another? Or, maybe in some stupid barroom brawl situation. And Whites are AROUND other White people nearly all the time. Now, what about the White people that get killed by blacks? I think you’ll find that in nearly all cases THERE WAS NO PROVOCATION WHATSOEVER and that they did not even know each other! Yes, a little over half the victims of black killers are black, but so what? I am surprised (maybe not much, though) that nearly half their victims are WHITE!
    Conclusion? There are two types of people for Whites to fear: People that we know, and who may have a motive to kill us, and ALL BLACK PEOPLE.

    • Loulynch

      I love robbing white people. There’s something about seeing a white man die that makes me smile on the inside

  • Loulynch

    Why do white people smell like bolongna??

    • StillModerated

      Why do black women stink of urine?

      • Loulynch

        Why do white women smell like minority semen??

        • freddy_hills

          They don’t. You’re just smelling the fluids some down-low bro shot up your nose..

        • 1proactive2

          You would know what that smells like, I’m sure. Now go wash out your mouth before you splash some on your keyboard.

      • Loulynch

        Why do white women smell like minority semen??

      • Loulynch

        Why do white women smell like minority semen??

    • Alex

      How come blacks are so stupid and generally act like chimpanzees? Why do they look like monkeys too? It’s funny to watch how you people scratch your head like your cousins in the zoo.

      Every time a black person starts talking to me and I watch them it makes me think of Curious George speaking.

      • Loulynch

        I’m not black you honky. Why do white people look like bald cats with thumbs

        • LaShaniqua

          Sure you’re not, you scum-sucking loser. What you are is an oxygen bandit taking valuable resources from people who can actually do something productive – you clearly can’t.

  • Loulynch

    Los blancos gusta al chupal beacho

  • Angry White Woman

    Talk to any cop in a big city, s/he will tell you they see the same cast of characters week in and week out, One week they will be offenders, the next week they will be witnesses, the next they are victims…same faces, different role.

  • Loulynch

    Whydo white people tan when all they really do is get pink?? White women are disgusting when they get old. White little boys act like faggots, & little white girls love black cock

  • Howard W. Campbell

    Back in the late 90’s, Indianapolis had over 100 murders. A fair amount of this was due to a crack epidemic that showed up about 10 years after most of the US. There were a few domestics and a random murder of whites here and there, but for Indianapolis in that era, the 1.7 per 100000 is probably a little high. Last year, there were 112, and if you google 2012 Marion County Indiana homicide map, you will see that the bulk of these murders are in predominantly black areas. A great example of murder victims with criminal records is Larretha Draughon. She was a basketball star at Northwest High in Indianapolis (a 90+% black inner city school). Around the time she graduated, she was arrested for attempted robbery and spent time in the joint. Later on, she was featured on Oprah and heaven only knows how many people went out of their way to help her. She was killed when she participated in a fight between 2 groups of women and someone pulled out a gun and started firing. I guess prison didn’t teach her to avoid the bad apples.

  • sbuffalonative

    A few years back, we had an incident in a bar in which 8 people were shot, 7 died.

    The Buffalo News ran a piece that 7 of the 8 victims had criminal records.

    That’s all the blacks needed. The story switched from blacks killing blacks to a racist white newspaper reporting dirt on victims.

    The editor at the time, Margaret Sullivan (who has since moved on to the NYTs) had to venture into black territory to apologize.

  • JackKrak

    That’s strange, watching shows like Law & Order for years taught me that most murders are committed by white members of high society & when the cops arrest a black it’s because he was framed by someone who looks like the guy on a Monopoly board.

    • saxonsun

      Yes, there are NO black criminals in the world of television, as we all know!

  • stupid media libs

    Obviously those homos in the media are slow to catch on being little office boys who sit around and think of something cute or cliche to type being far removed from the scene and reality so they ignorantanlyy cant realize that criminals killing criminals is a win win for them and society especially when they kill each other at the same time. Gangs killing gangs is good. Blacks killing blacks can not be taken as a negative. Worldwide is the same for drug wars in Mexico where cops love it when 50k have killed each other taking them off the streets etc.Muslims killing muslims is good.

    Sometimes all you have to do is sit back and grab a box of popcorn and watch the show that is much better than fake hollywood trash plus no phony pc stars in the real world to save the day.

  • American Patriot

    In truth thugs killing other thugs is generally a Good Thing. The down side comes when decent people get caught in the thuggie crossfire. Best way to personally avoid such a sad outcome? NEVER EVER EVER !!!!!! venture into a venue where significant numbers of negroes are likely to gather. Doing so is hardly a great inconvenience as the places that sort congregate are hardly of much worth to good folks anyway.

  • MBlanc46

    It’s gangbangers killing gangbangers (and the occasional four-year-old girl just standing in her living room when hit by a stray bullet). Young black males (and, to a lesser extent, Hispanic males) like to shoot at each other. That’s pretty much the long and the short of it.

  • Fed Up

    The unspoken assumption is that the murder victims are Blacks. The reality being that those victims were gang members, were in prison at the time of their murder, or sometimes even killed while committing their crime(s).

  • Scott

    But in each case, the victims were turning their lives around.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    I wonder if this is related to two phenomena I’ve heard recently.

    1. Apparently the number of incarcerated black males has actually decreased over the last decade, contrary to liblefty histrionics.

    2. Crime rates have been going down for a while, but many charge this is simply a procedural phenomenon – a result of what departments claim and how it is counted (less crime = more money…what?).

    So…perhaps this is simply a bizarre return to the good old days when whites understood that these people slaughter each other – especially in their enclaves – at a rate so prodigious that it…

    a. acts as a form of population control and

    b. would require so many resources to treat them like whites that it would flood the legal system and bankrupt the courts.

    And of course they were correct on both counts. An r-style breeder naturally lives an r-style existence – no duh? Funny how the cultural Marxist of today vocally opposes anything like this yet tacitly accepts with his actions and even his solutions.

    And in the big picture the race baiting liblefty NEEDS this “human tragedy” to support the race baiting industry, to ensure that black’s status as permanent wards of the state remains permanent – since this is ALL evil whitey’s fault of course…somehow…whatever…

    For evil whitey, the new Jew, it’s a mixed bag, like so much in this cascading Caucasian Kristallnacht of racial scapegoating… Like when some fine young Treyvvon Martin idiotically and semi-purposely scoots in front of my speeding car on his possibly stolen bike forcing me to slam on brakes and almost have an infarction…I envision having run him over and thereby saving society a ton of welfare and criminal costs, but on the other see my life going down the drain, especially if the kid turned out to be a rare atypical type.

    So don’t feel bad about not feeling bad about this, peckerwood. Just remember that you will pay regardless and that you are now a minority.

    • acts as a form of population control

      It won’t.

      I’ve cited this hypothetical before here, and I’m sure everyone is getting tired of it.

      Let’s say there are 10 people on Earth, all can reproduce. 9 are women and one is a man. There can be nine new human beings on Earth every nine months. Reverse the situation, nine men and one woman. This means you only can get one new human being every nine months.

      The greater percentage of your population that are women of reproductive age, the higher your population growth rate can be. That women of reproductive age are the genetic bottleneck to human procreation is duh news to everyone here.

      However, black crime doesn’t lead to blacks committing self-genocide because the perpetrators are mostly men and the victims are mostly men.

      Let’s say in my hypothetical population 10 world that it’s 5 women 5 men. One of the men gets angry with and murders the other. Leaving 4 men and 5 women. Does this mean that there still can’t be five new people every nine months? No.

      • HamletsGhost

        Women are the bottleneck in every population. That’s why having women in combat is a stupid idea that only modern liberals could cook up. Humans have been engaged in warfare since time immemorial, and populations increased steadily through all of it.

        It may seem cruel, but more good is accomplished when a Sheniqua is killed in the crossfire of these gang wars than any number of Dantwans.

        • Except that doesn’t happen often enough to make a big enough difference.

          Think: Depo-Provera as a condition for gibsmedat.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        That’s a good question real sociology could study, the population effects of black, r-style breeder violence on population growth and compare such to money spent to police and judiciate such behavior.

        Which is impossible because modern American sociology is unfortunately an ideologically corrupted psuedo-science and the question is politically incorrect regardless of the answer.

  • TonyWestfield

    Joe Biden and the Democrat cabal are on to something with their touting of “smart gun” technology. We can reduce murders in America by 50% if we put gyroscopic technology in every handgun so that the weapon fires ONLY if it is being held straight up and down (not sideways).

  • HamletsGhost

    This article is very useful ammunition to use against pompous twits like Pierce Morgan who trot out the “11,000 gun murders in the US” pap after Sandy Hook.

    Leave aside that homicide and murder are not synonymous, the murder victims are very often criminals themselves and would have just as easily been the murderers if they were quicker on the draw.

    If these figures can be extrapolated to the rest of the USA, then approximately 7,000 of national murder victims can be charitably declared to be “extra-judicial executions.”

    It’d be great if the NRA sponsored a study that would collect all the city data to give a national figure. It’d make a great sound bite to use on CNN.

  • Michael_C_Scott

    This is not rocket science.

    People with criminal histories are usually the ones who are out at night, for other criminals to prey upon. The rest of us have jobs, or at least our own children to watch during the day.

    Their acquaintances are usually other criminals, who each have enemies who are also habitual criminals.

    They’re likely to use drugs, and both the people who use drugs and those who sell them are amoral and untrustworthy.

    No thanks; I’ll stick with woodworking in my basement in the evenings, and welding in the garage.

  • HKwills

    And yet the constant blather from the media is about “gun crime”. The most salient fact about “gun crime” is that it is a racial minority phenomenon. The left is correct: what is needed is control; minority control not gun control. The confiscation and removal racial minorities.