White Man: Why Are You Giving Away Your Country?

Christopher De La Viña, American Renaissance, April 23, 2015

A Hispanic student wants to know.

As a child in public schools and now as a graduate student in history, I have learned one thing to be true about the United States: It is a white country. The founders were white, white men established its core principles and political system, and white men and women built the nation into what it is today.

Even before I became aware of the importance of race, I never thought this was “racist” or unfair; it was simply a fact. America has always been a white country and always should be. Why, then, are white people giving away their country?

Immigration and assimilation

My maternal great-great grandfather had a saying in Spanish about the immigrants who began coming to the United States after the 1960s. In English it would be: “Their stomachs are in America, but their hearts are in Mexico.” This perfectly sums up the attitudes of immigrants from most Third-World countries.

Immigrants are pouring into the United States, not for the American dream, as many politicians, both Democrat and Republican, like to say. They are coming to exploit our economy, with no intention of embracing the culture, adopting the language, or considering themselves American. When asked, most will say they are proud Hondurans or proud Nigerians–proud nationals of the country they came from.

When I lived for a time in a border city, I saw how many American citizens were really nothing more than anchor babies, born in the U.S. but living in the neighboring Mexican city their wholes lives. They had American birth certificates, but they were wholly Mexican. They had no allegiance to this nation; their stomachs were in America, but their hearts were in Mexico.

Unchecked immigration should by far be white America’s most urgent concern, but for white politicians, getting elected to another term is more important than securing a future for whites. Both liberal and “conservative” white politicians and pundits take a soft stance on immigration, careful not to offend anyone or to appear “racist.”

Only whites are afraid of being called “racist.” The Japanese don’t care what non-Japanese think of their immigration policy, and Mexico does not hesitate to deport Central Americans. Only in white countries are people afraid of name-calling.

Politics

Whites continue to elect politicians who do not represent them. As a Hispanic, I cannot understand this. There is not one white congressman in Washington today who actually looks out for whites, at least not openly.

If I were a Hispanic activist or a member of La Raza, I could run as a pro-Hispanic candidate, exclusively on the issues and concerns of the Hispanic community. I would probably win, especially if I lived in a border city or border state. However, if a white wanted to fight for the issues and concerns of white people, he would be branded a “white supremacist.”

The double standard in American politics is obvious. White politicians have to represent everyone of every race, but non-white politicians can openly represent only their own people. No one seems to find this strange or unfair.

So I repeat my question to you, white people: Why do you continue to vote for moderate Republicans and “conservatives” when they do not care about you? The average American politician would much rather win an election with a million Hispanic or black votes and zero white votes rather than lose with ten million white votes and not a single non-white vote.

Some white Americans still hold the belief that mainstream conservatives will one day advocate for white interests, but the truth is that politicians will continue to pander to non-whites, particularly Hispanics. Politicians do not care about your vote; they care about my vote. Your vote will matter only if you start running pro-White politicians who are willing to fight the establishment.

Culture

Culture sets nations apart and gives its people an identity. The European-influenced culture of the United States is disappearing under the weight of immigration. Indeed, America is experiencing a rapid Hispanicization.

You white people now have two options: You can go along with Hispanicization and eventually become a minority whose ancestral culture is erased and replaced, or you can stop Hispanicization and help keep America the way it has been essentially since the days of the first permanent English settlement in Jamestown.

I have grown up around Hispanic culture, and as rich and vibrant as it can be, my ancestors left Mexico for a reason. I am at least a sixth-generation American, so I can be sure my ancestors did not leave Mexico to take advantage of American welfare. The system that can be so easily exploited did not exist then, and the American dream actually meant something. My ancestors understood that American culture was far superior and offered more than the culture of Mexico.

Today, even third- and fourth-generation Hispanics have not fully abandoned their ancestral ways. Spanish is the dominant language even for many who have been here for several generations.

Many expect society to learn Spanish, and it is clear that Spanish has become a second unofficial language in America.

Many Hispanics still do not value education. I am lucky to have a family that does value education, and I attribute that to both genetics and at least a century of assimilation. Half or more of the Hispanics I know don’t care about education, and many end up in gangs. This seems to be particularly true in Southern California.

There is no greater culture in the world than European culture. I can admit it because it’s true. I enjoy living in a First-World nation shaped by people of the same stock as George Washington, Ben Franklin, Beethoven, Picasso, and Galileo.

Have whites decided that their people and cultures are no longer worth fighting for? Is Guatemalan or Ethiopian or Vietnamese culture better for America? Whites must believe this, because why would they otherwise let a great nation’s culture be replaced with that of Third-World immigrants?

Whites

I cannot understand whites. Time and again, I see white university students who are happy to watch not only their nation but their genes disappear. They say they would be happy not to have children or to have children with non-whites.

When I try to talk about race with my white classmates or coworkers most are totally apathetic or sometimes even hostile. Blacks and Hispanics are much more race conscious. They know race exists, and that they have interests as a race. Whites are uncomfortable even talking about race and may try to scold me when I say something honest about it.

Sometimes I meet a white person who appreciates my understanding of white interests, and, even if he does not fully understand the implications of race, he is at least not ashamed to be white. This is a good sign for white people, but these people are rare.

America cannot survive without whites. It will not survive when whites are a minority. If any remnants of Western Civilization are to persist on the North American continent, white people will have to begin to care about the future of their people. My people cannot accomplish what yours have accomplished in the almost two and a half centuries that the United States has existed.

Only crazy or highly indoctrinated people would hand over to immigrants the nation their ancestors built. I don’t think you whites are crazy, nor do I think you can be so easily brainwashed.

So, why are you are giving away your country?

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

About Christopher De La Viña

View all posts by Christopher De La Viña
Christopher De La Viña
Mr. De La Viña is a Texan of many generations, and plans to pursue a Ph.D. in history after he finishes his masters degree two years from now.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Cannot Tell

    Wonderful article. Maybe the author and I should start a club for non-whites who are supportive of white nationalism.

    • propagandaoftruth

      I bet this guy looks pretty White. 6th generation assimilated Hispanic?

      Yeah, and I’m 1/64th hiSPanIC Jew (Sephardic), so guess I’m not White either, LOL!!!

      Hace un mez que estaba trabajando como un negro y estaba echando porquerias de palabras en puro Castellano. Jueputa maroches ingratos brutos! Entro el policia, el official Rodriquez. Dejo una propina para la cocina de cien porciento el precio del producto.

      Creo que Oficial Rodriguez es Cubano. Jueputa negros, eh?

    • pcmustgo

      allies… The Left calls friends of “People of Color” “Allies” “White Allies”… We need “Brown Allies”.

      • Speedy Steve

        … or do we?

        • BlueSonicStreak

          They would help, yes.

          Not sure where some people get the idea that FEWER allies is better than more. Especially when they are being imported to be voters…

          • Cindy

            It amazes me that people think we’re in a position to be picky. It’s perfectly acceptable, even encouraged, to be anti-White. I consider anyone who wants to further White Nationalism an ally. I don’t care about their race, religion or political beliefs, all that matters is that they want to further the White cause.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Agreed. It’s like being put up against the wall and being fussy about who is standing beside you before you put the blindfold on. It’s absolute nonsense. We need all the help we can get.

            If people needed more proof, then they just need to look at the success or failure of various “social justice” factions. For decades, fanatic radicals have insisted that “POC”/gay people/women/etc. don’t NEED the help of whites/heterosexuals/men/etc., because working with your “oppressors” always results in you just being oppressed differently.

            They were clearly always wrong, as the history of all civil rights movements should show. The ideas of those particular radicals never spread as far (even amongst their own) as the people willing to work with others and be less ideologically “pure” as a movement.

      • TrueNorthFree

        Personally, I have no great dispute with Hispanics. They share a European heritage and they are predominantly Christian.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Especially Chileans, Argentines and Uruguayos share European civilization. A cursory look at programming from those countries shows little, if any diversity so celebrated here.

    • Paleoconn

      You have good company in the likes of Razib Khan and Walt Williams and Tom Sowell.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      What are the chances you would actually do something like starting a club who supports white nationalism.?

      • BlueSonicStreak

        It’s not even a matter of starting it, it’s a matter of getting them to come.

        Cannot Tell might well start said club. And obviously people HERE like the idea. But I suspect the potential non-white membership could be counted on the fingers of two hands without leftovers.

        • DonReynolds

          Sounds a bit like Helter Skelter.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Apologies, but I don’t know what you mean by this. Can you explain?

          • DonReynolds

            Charles Manson had his own prediction, he called Helter Skelter. (This was the reason for the murders by the Manson family.)
            The murders would be blamed on blacks, which would trigger a race war and the blacks would win that war, but find out quickly that they could not run a modern society……and the Manson family would come out of hiding to run things for them.
            Yes, I know…..he is still locked up.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Very interesting, thank you.

            I admit I don’t see a connection to a club for pro-white non-whites. When I googled the term, I did come up with Manson’s name, but didn’t see any relation.

            It is interesting info, though. Manson was imprisoned well before I was born and I know very little about his crimes; he was more sort of a boogeyman figure when I was little, I guess.

          • DonReynolds

            You may be able to read the Charles Manson story with both eyes open. My own generation could not.
            He is locked up in prison for life for murder and he never killed anyone. It is a dangerous idea to pin crimes on people because they told other people to do them.

      • Cannot Tell

        The chances are very high. I plan to do it someday.

  • how about this

    “Time and again, I see white university students who are happy to watch not only their nation but their genes disappear. They say they would be happy not to have children or to have children with non-whites.”
    “Sometimes I meet a white person who appreciates my understanding of white interests, and, even if he does not fully understand the implications of race, he is at least not ashamed to be white. This is a good sign for white people, but these people are rare.”

    In other words pride is rare among White Americans today. They don’t even have enough self-respect to want to pass on their genes. A total lack of pride is not psychologically healthy. You would think that a society so obsessed with feelings would recognize this.

    • David Ashton

      They are told that passing on white genes is an evil Nazi idea, the Reductio at Hitlerum with a vengeance.

      • how about this

        Yeah the attitude towards Nazis is strange. Nazis were also in favor of vegetarianism, environmentalism and socialism but I don’t see people condemning those things as Nazi ideas.

        • John Smith

          The Nazis were left-wing, but the Far-Left always uses the canard that they were far-right.

          • Ograf

            The Nazis were right wing, as were the Italians under Mussolini, The communists were left wing. One of the Nazi’s biggest hatred was of the communists. fascism vs communism , After WW1 they fought in the streets of Germany for power. Believe me I am not anywhere near the left. I also hate communism with a passion, as opposed to the president of the US who seems to embrace it.

          • John Smith

            And the Bolsheviks hated the Mensheviks, but they were just different stripes of left-wing ideology.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Correct. Socialism represents the total state, total government. Hitler took control of the press and favored gun control. Idiot America is still intent on believing that Hitler was a right-winger who was just the opposite of Communism. Of course, they had much, much more in common than not.

          • JohnEngelman

            Definitions of words are conventions, rather than absolute facts.

            If you define the left as “big government” and the right as “limited government” than the Nazi movement was left wing.

            I define the left as dedicated to the ideal of equality, and the right as dedicated to the ideal of inequality, be it of birth, wealth, race, or another characteristic. By that definition, the Nazi movement was right wing.

            Germans who were rich before the Nazi takeover remained rich, unless they were Jews or enemies of the regime. Russians who were rich before the Communist takeover lost everything.

          • anony

            “I define the left as dedicated to the ideal of equality,”

            What kind of equality?

          • JohnEngelman

            Economic, mainly. Nevertheless, no one on the left advocates equal incomes. We advocate a reduction in economic inequality, because we see little moral significance in the vast amounts of economic inequality.

          • dmxinc

            The Left believes in economic equality?

            There you go again John. The Left believes in dragging the masses down economically to “equality” but certainly not themselves.

            How can you keep falling for this propaganda?

          • DonReynolds

            Nothing says economic equality like universal poverty….which is the only thing the Left can possibly offer. But no one tries to sell universal poverty…..they pretend that we can all become wealthy by robbing everyone who has more than we do. It has been tried several times in history and each time it failed to create utopia or a wealthy society.

          • DonReynolds

            Equality is a myth and a lie. It has never existed anywhere (or at any time), not in nature or by the laws of man or God. I seriously doubt it will ever exist, but egalitarians are willing to burn the entire world trying to achieve it.

          • DonReynolds

            Historically inconsistent, John.
            The Nazi Germans were all about equality and fostered the idea that rich capitalists and workers were equally German. The Nazis despised the Junker (Prussian) cast system, the aristocracy, and the idea of landed nobility. They were Leftists. Party favorites were fetted and petted, whether they were Communists or Nazis. Fascism was perfectly happy to work through rich capitalists. Wars can be very profitable for some. The primary difference between communism and fascism is private property. The former does not admit it exists (since it has be expropriated by the state) and the latter believes it exists to serve the needs of the state, but they can keep the profits.
            A fair comparison would be the British system (of inequality) or the American system (of inequality) as examples of right wing.

          • cherrie greenbaum123

            He does what his handlers tell him to do. He’ll walk off the stage in 2016 with plenty of shekels in his trouser pockets, much like the Clintons. Bought and paid for by the Saturday Worshiping Finest.

          • LHathaway

            “He’ll walk off the stage in 2016”

            Will he? That remains to be seen.

          • DonReynolds

            He can walk out of the White House on January 20th, 2017, or be carried out by an angry patriot mob. Either way, he goes.

          • Ograf

            Very well put cherrie greenbaum, You have a way of saying in a few words what I would expound on ad nauseam.

          • InAFreeCountry

            Have you ever looked at the Horseshoe Theory on the political spectrum? It postulates that far-left or far-right regimes are closer to each other than they are to centrist governments due to authoritarianism. For a modern example, look at North Korea, it shows examples of both.

          • bv

            Rubbish! They were both Socialists it’s just that heather of the two were international socialist and the other was nationalist socialist. Both were busybodies to say the least.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            You hit the nail on the head. This needs to be emphasized in World History classes, but even the teachers are too dim to know, or care, about it.

          • Ograf

            I can always tell the uneducated ones , they are thrown by the word socialist, so be it. Perhaps they were aliens also.

          • anony

            Yes. I look at all political systems as mechanisms for attaining power. The attainment of power is the central goal obviously, and idealists always become disenchanted when they realize that they have been “used” by the power hungry who believe in nothing but power.

          • fed_up_white_guy

            The National Socialists embraced many of the same economic and social principles the Communists did, the major difference being that while Communism is Globalist at its core, National Socialism is Nationalist at its core. The split in global politics today isn’t really Left/Right, it’s Nationalist/Globalist.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            The Nazis weren’t “right-wing.” That’s decades old propaganda from the mainstream media, as well as the culture of both traditional liberalism and conservatism. The Nazis were national socialists with globalist territorial ambitions like the Communists, though they call Communism “international socialism.” The political spectrum in this case from far left to “far right” is entirely socialist, sometimes called the “Fabian Socialist’ model. It is false, it is a lie, that Nazis were ‘right wingers” whose ideology some Republican conservatives secretly harbor.

          • Bob Wallace

            The Nazis were left-wing (Nazi means National Socialist) and anyone who supports them even today is a fool

            .

          • Ograf

            The Nazi’s were right wing, and the communists were left wing. Today liberals are left wing, as are commies and all the brain dead people who embrace multiculturalism and diversity. The National part of National Socialism meaning one nation, one people, is what the U.S. could use a great deal of. Today the combined forces want us to be 3d world and show no nationalism or patriotism. The socialist in National socialism isn’t to be confused with left wing socialism. Some of the principles of National Socialism should be supported, and if you think only a fool supports nationalism, perhaps you should look in the mirror as you are learning the meaning of the word National, Nationalism. You are probably one of the liberal crazies who brought us Hussein Obama.

          • David C

            Study what Nazis stood for you fool.

          • Canadian Friend

            The nazis were left wing,less to the left than communists but still to the left, why else did they call themselves the national socialist party??? socialists are not right wing.

          • Ograf

            Read, the socialist label was used as a marketing ploy. The word National Socialists made it right wing as nationalism constituted one race, one people, patriotism, and some extreme right wing attributes.
            Frankly I am tired of this topic, All I know is what my political Science prof taught me and from the tons of literature I was required to read. Call the what you want. A rose by any other name. Also the U.S. certainly could use some nationalism now. The left wing’s job is to not allow that to happen with their diversity and multiculturalism. A diverse Nation is an oxymoron.

          • Publius Pompilius Quietus

            The National-Socialists (Nazis) were right-wing reactionary authoritarians. The Nazi ideology was based in a rejection of egalitarianism and democracy; hence their support for eugenics and a one-party state.

          • John Smith

            Left-wing ideologies reject democracy too, in practice, while projecting a sham version, same as the Nazis. Germany was fairly egalitarian, in practice, thanks to the Nazis, and the social classes interacted more under their rule. Conversely, communist/socialist countries eventually create an elite that is fairly divorced from those who are on the bottom. The two things that separate Nazis from other left-wing ideologies seem to be nationalism and retention of private property, so long as it can be utilized in accordance with the wishes of the state in a planned economy.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Yeah, although a Marxist/communist society may be bounded by national borders, the impetus to proselytize and spread is only temporarily halted at these artificial obstacles to world class unity and conformity.

            Yes, there are many historical sticking points and oddities. Most colonial NATIONALIST independence movements of the mid-late 20th century were Marxist in outlook but…national liberation struggles. They were in part Marxist because of ideological proselytizing and the convenient circumstance of the cold war.
            In ideology as well as practice, the longest surviving “communist” regimes long ago morphed into something more akin to “national socialism”, or as in N. Korea, “national communism”.

            I question the true Marxism of those who eschew global domination (or liberation as they see it) and other than the Islamists, the most global hegemonic aspiring group I see today are the Marxist governancies of the West.

          • Silly Frog

            Help me with this, I see anarchist as the farthest of the right that you can go, no government. The conservatives in the U.S. are to the “right” smaller government etc…I don’t believe authoritarian is a strong right or far right ideology.

          • Publius Pompilius Quietus

            The state is a mechanism. The state can be used for right-wing or left-wing purposes, so there are right-wing authoritarians (e.g., Nazis) and left-wing authoritarians (e.g., Communists). Truthfully, authentic conservatism has very little indeed to do with the size of government. Rather, authentic conservatism has to do with preserving tradition, hierarchy, and order in society.

          • Silly Frog

            There is some merit in your explanation, thank you.

          • Ograf

            Also nationalism, which if I am not mistaken by its very name promotes one people, one culture and one race.

          • DonReynolds

            The USA has had a good deal of nationalism, but was never a single culture or single race. I seriously doubt anyone could maintain an argument for very long that Americans were one people…..just depends on how long they can hold their breath.

          • LHathaway

            Actually, when the Soviet Union broke up, many of those interested in communism or sympathetic to it became Noam Chompsky style ‘anarchists’. Mostly it’s a play or a way to maintain some kind of moral superiority. In a revisionist kind of way, they actually pretended to be on the side of solidarity and freedom movements in the former iron curtain. How is that for gall? I’m sure many of them were sincere and just interested in human rights. Before the Soviet Union broke up you would see the A, with a circle around it symbol, on graffiti here and there in Europe. There was even a song, ‘I want to be anarchy’.

            Some of those on the far right, too, claim to be, or are called anarchists of a sort. On these very pages posters will go on about the evil of government. I don’t know if they are anarchists but I suppose one could call them that.

          • UncleSham

            Conservative means small government in the U.S. because that is our tradition. The freedom vs tyranny political spectrum is unique to America. Nationalism vs internationalism tends to be a more relevant political spectrum for Europe. There is a lot of confusion in America about if the National Socialists in Germany were Left/Right because conservatives prefer to use the American spectrum and liberals prefer to use the European spectrum. This allows both sides to accuse each other of being “nazis”, while believing themselves to be honest, and being incredulous of the other sides accusation.

          • B B

            this is for all of you gentlemen commenting here. i love that you are all smart, and know about this stuff, instead of memorizing the NFL
            stats. thank you. reading this, is how the next of us learn.

          • Brother John

            Exactly. The model of “Socialist = left, Fascist = right” works only in Europe, where there is no Freedom option.

          • The All Seeing Bry

            Fascism was a necessary evil to defeat communism.

          • Northern American-Nationalist

            Interesting thought.

            It makes me wonder if liberal democracy was the necessary evil to defeat communism.

          • DonReynolds

            One of the persistent problems with the Libertarians, who claim to be “conservative”, is their decided lack of nationalism. Libertarians would be perfectly happy with no national borders or nation states in the least. This puts them pretty firmly in the anarchist camp. Having Libertarians running for public office is much like atheists starting a new church.

          • LHathaway

            “Nazi ideology was based in a rejection of egalitarianism and democracy; hence their support for eugenics and a one-party state”.

            That doesn’t necessarily makes sense when it come to eugenics. For all we know, they intended to make everyone all the same. This may have been a rejection of outsiders, but everyone being just the same, or very similar, is not a rejection of egalitarianism is it?

          • Publius Pompilius Quietus

            The goal of eugenics is to improve the gene pool. That requires a basic admission that some people are of higher quality than other people, which is fundamentally anti-egalitarian.

          • LHathaway

            Once their work is done, we will all be of equally perfect quality . . . or perfectly equal. Work with me on a little bit on this one . . .

          • JTK

            Sounds to me like Left -Wing authoritarians of 70 years ago.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            How about we just stick the Nazis on the left hand side of the Fabian Socialist political model and call them “left-wing.” Then stick the Communists on the right and call them “right-wing.” They’re all equally evil, all equally socialist. All equally authoritarian. And the whole rotten Fabian socialist model is still socialist.

            And speaking of Eugenics, the U.S.S.R. promoted eugenics from 1920 to 1940, even before Hitler and Nazis came to power.

            The Russian Eugenics Society, was established in 1920.. However, Bolshevik activists in the movement tried to translate eugenics into social policies (among them, sterilization) and in 1929, Marxist geneticist Alexander Serebrovsky was stimulated by the forthcoming Five-Year Plan to urge a massive eugenic program of human artificial insemination. With the advent of Stalinism, such attempts to “biologize” social phenomena became ideologically untenable and the society was abolished in 1930. Three years later, however, a number of eugenicists reassembled in the world’s first institute of medical genetics, created by Bolshevik physician Solomon Levit after this return from a postdoctoral year in Texas with H.J. Muller. Muller himself moved to the Soviet Union in 1933, where he agitated for eugenics and wrote Stalin in 1936 to urge an artificial insemination program

            Source: U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health. Genome. 1989;31(2):879-84.

          • InAFreeCountry

            They were both. With both Stalin and Hitler, the political spectrum wrapped around like a ribbon, and “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and
            from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was
            which.”

          • TCA

            Not impossible at all. Stalin and the Bolsheviks were pigs. Hitler and the National Socialists were fighting to preserve Western Civilization.
            The world ended in 1945, with the defeat of Western Europe.
            The right-left paradigm obscures the fundamental one: Jew-Gentile.

          • Randall Ward

            Or maybe in WWI.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Well the World didn’t end, but the mud people and tribe won.

          • B B

            wait. please explain; right-left / jew-gentile. thank you.

          • Garrett Brown

            Fox News watcher commenting on national socialism lmao

          • Garrett Brown

            Wrong again John.

          • Guest

            I don’t know what John said but I’m highly confidant you are correct. So thumbs up, brother.

          • JohnEngelman

            Calling his party “the National Socialist Party” was a marketing ploy on Hitler’s part. He knew that socialism was a popular ideal in Germany. Nevertheless, Germans who were rich before he came to power remained rich, unless they were Jews.

            Real socialists raise taxes on the rich. Communists take everything they have.

          • John Smith

            “There is no license any more, no private sphere where the individual
            belongs to himself. That is socialism, not such trivial matters as the
            possibility of privately owning the means of production. Such things
            mean nothing if I subject people to a kind of discipline they can’t
            escape…What need have we to socialize banks and factories? We
            socialize human beings”.

            In place of ordinary profit incentive to guide investment, investment
            was guided through regulation to accord with needs of the State.
            Government financing eventually came to dominate the investment process,
            with the proportion of private securities issued falling from over half
            of the total in 1933 and 1934 to approximately 10 percent in 1935–1938.
            Gargantuan tax rates – at times reaching levels such as 98%, – on
            profits limited self-financing of firms.
            The largest corporations were mostly exempt from taxes on profits, but
            government control of these were extensive enough to leave “only the
            shell of private ownership.”

          • WR_the_realist

            The Nazis were socialists. Socialists believe in government control of the economy and the Nazis certainly did. They were National Socialists and saw themselves in competition with International Socialism. I don’t like government control freaks of any sort.

          • JohnEngelman

            Under the Nazis the rich stayed rich. That is what mattered to them, and why most of them supported the Nazis.

          • WR_the_realist

            You seem to think that socialism is incompatible with some people being rich. Nonsense. Plenty of rich people are socialists because they know that if the government controls the economy they will still control the government.

          • JohnEngelman

            Rich socialists are motivated by noblesse oblige. That is “the inferred responsibility of privileged people to act with generosity and nobility toward those less privileged.”

          • WR_the_realist

            Rich socialists may be (in part) motivated by noblesse oblige. But they stay rich after socialism is imposed and taxes hit the 50%+ level for the middle class. Only in your fantasies do socialists ever actually go after the rich.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Let’s see… George Soros, The First-Mulatto-In-Chief, and now Hillbillary now running for President, the “broke” former first lady whose “charitable” foundation is now reportedly worth $500 million from IRS data from 2012, only $75 million of which was spent on charity and another $135 million spent on travel and employee salaries.

            Far from decrying “capitalism” these scrooges have profited nicely on the backs of the system that allows them get filthy, obscene rich. Although not a one of them has ever created a product worth importing or exporting that anyone ever wanted.

          • Brother John

            The difference is one of degree.

          • Bossman

            Not true at all. Hitler hated Jews because he saw them as the chief proponents of liberalism, international communism and equality of the races and sexes. Hitler was what could be called an extreme conservative and very puritanical when it came to matters of sex. He was an extreme fascist and racist.

          • John Smith

            How does one become a “conservative” when they re-make society to their own ideas? Communism vs. fascism seems like a distinction with only a moderate amount of difference. One takes complete control of your property and the other tells you what you can do with it. The lebensborn program would seem to contradict your assertion on prudishness. Hitler also befriended known homosexuals, until they became inconvenient to his needs.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            Oh, my goodness…so much wrong, and so little time to straighten it out…

            The Jews historically have favored capitalism, and anti-capitalism and anti-Semitism have often been linked. Hitler was no conservative in the sense you imagine it to mean, though you hint that “right-wing” American conservatives have much in common with Hitler. Btw, Hitler parents were second-cousins, his father was 52 years old when he was born, his mother was 28. No wonder Hitler was so screwed up.

          • Brother John

            Yes — yes! — and now, I want you to post that everywhere you go. This needs to be clearly understood. The problem is, the Reds infesting the State Department metastasized across the education system in order to paint the right-wing as “Fascist,” to the point that it no longer has any real meaning.

          • Northern American-Nationalist

            You’re right about the canard, but the rest depends on what political spectrum you’re using to measure the given ideology.

            The Nazis and Stalinists were both leftist in an economic sense (to very different degrees) but the former was rightist in a social-cultural sense while the latter was leftist (at least theoretically or early-on in their histories).

            Expanding further, on a 3-D political spectrum model, where the third axis (no pun intended) could stand for state power, their glaring similarities as socialists are on full display as both Nazism and Stalinism call for a totalitarian state with exceptions dictated by prevailing technology and human acquiescence.

    • TrueNorthFree

      Pride in white people?
      We have been thoroughly mind programmed (indoctrinated in school too) that any hint of pride in being white is akin to wearing a KKK hood and burning crosses. Most whites feel shame and guilt about being white and having “privileges” that other races don’t have. This has been very deliberately indoctrinated into whites.

      • B B

        i recently understand, as an aside, that all high schools in the US will shortly
        be receiving their free copy of the movie “SELMA’ for everyone’s viewing
        pleasure and cultural edification, courtesy of Paramount Pictures and the
        NAACP.

        • SoulInvictus

          You know what Chinese, Indian and Japanese schoolkids won’t be doing… watching Selma in their classes.

          • B B

            true that! but you do know on the days this film is shown in the
            culturally enriched high schools, there will be more white children brutalized and despaired by the royal black lord despoilers
            who’ve ruined the entire country….. media, if it bothers to cover it, will call them ‘fights, and flaps…’

      • SoulInvictus

        This is why I get irritated when people here downplay the role of media and institutional propaganda, as though it’s merely whites whining about victim-hood. Even non-whites recognize the brainwashing and its cumulative effect, even if they don’t know the source of it.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      There is nothing in this world, repeat, NOTHING in this world, as beautiful as a white baby.

      • Guest

        I see lots of cringeworthy comments on this forum, but yours…

        • Kenner

          Stop cringing. Stop!!

        • Speedy Steve

          Poor dear — getting the vapors.

          • B B

            maybe one of the many, many splendid negro doctors on TV
            can help our guest.

        • Bartek

          Take your mind out of Hollywood’s gutter for a moment and you might understand what they meant.

        • TrueNorthFree

          I totally agree with Kenner. Don’t cringe. Don’t apologize. Don’t bow and scape and feel bad because you love your own people.

        • gemjunior

          Because you are under the control of Big Brother.

      • anony

        The most beautiful thing to a White woman is a White baby; the most beautiful thing in the world to a White man is a White woman.

    • pcmustgo

      White bashing is EVERYWHERE… even white conservatives post #whitepeopleproblems and #whitewhine on facebook… poke fun at whites. Poetry readings, don’t even get me started!

      • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

        I wish that someone would do that in front of me. You’d probably hear about it on the news.

      • The All Seeing Bry

        Most “conservatives” have fallen into the leftist trap.

        The trap: Claim “conservatives” are racist so they deny being racists, and try their absolute best to be color-blind.

        So now 90% of “conservatives” are color-blind. Which begs the question, what are they trying to conserve? I always though it was a people/culture which in turn meant the White race…Apparently along the way they forgot they were trying to conserve something.

    • OhWow

      Years and years of liberal indoctrination promoting white guilt will do that.

    • LHathaway

      No, our society is dedicated to punishing feelings. They can actually prevent them, this way, with such punishment. Only certain folks are encouraged to express their feelings. As for us, only certain feelings allowed.

    • Rob

      Yahoo has a lot of articles about white women not having kids for various stupid reasons and they try and make these race traitors as heroines rather than ashame them. So that makes many more white women not want to have kids.

      • how about this

        People are more likely to regret not having kids or having too few than to regret having them or think they had too many. Even if they have no concern for the well-being of the White race I wish they would at least think of their own happiness. Being told that the traditional means of being happy are all a conspiracy to oppress them doesn’t help, I suppose.

        • Rob

          I agree. I read an article of people not having kids and leading a so called ‘Organic’ lifestyle, but when they are in their 50s and too late to have kids they regret their silly decision.

    • DonReynolds

      My father’s side of the family is English and my mother’s side of the family is Scottish. Both sides of the family still says they married outside their race. I continued with the same evil practice of marrying outside my race by marrying a cute Swede, and we had six children…….four lovely girls and two boys. I figured there was already enough Viking blood in both the English and Scottish bloodlines that I could claim a tall blonde Viking for a bride. (Smile)

  • Alexandra1973

    In 7th grade Spanish–back in 1985–we were told that Spanish was the USA’s second official language, or something to that effect.

    30 years ago, people.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      I had years of Spanish education as a child and am proficient. Alas, some nationalists tend to associate only Mexican immigrants with the language. It is a beautiful European language that is worth learning.

      • Alexandra1973

        I like learning languages myself, I had both French and Spanish in the 12th grade–voluntarily.

        It’s just that Spanish is what’s spoken (or a variation thereof) by the invaders.

    • nordicman

      and then they will fight over the growing muslim population who wants Arabic. This country is breaking apart and into a civil war in the very near future. I hope all the whites reading this are prepared.

      • Bo_Sears

        The other possibility is that as pluralism morphed into multiculturalism, and that morphed into multiracialism (where we are now) which will fall apart into multinationalism. If we have any smarts, we will be prepared with seed institutions we can grow into a new nation ourselves. Far more likely than an armed insurrection, just be prepared for either option, and hope that when the US falls, we can create a new nation for the health and education of our children and grand-children.

  • MekongDelta69

    White men aren’t giving our country.

    Leftists are..

    • JimmeeCrow

      But many White men have acquiesced to it , no?

      • TrueNorthFree

        Far too many have been brainwashed that to be pride in being white or to support whites in any way at all is “racist”.

        • nordicman

          But, that’s their fault for being so stupid and being so weak-willed to allow these Marxists to brainwash them. Why didn’t these white parents years ago take a strong stand against Marxists? “Oh, we’d lose our jobs!” Cowardice. You could try to brainwash the other races to hate their race, to sacrifice the interest of their own race for others, but they would not fall for it or tolerate it.

          The question is why are whites still allowing this? Why are you still allowing yourself to be pushed around?

          • BlueSonicStreak

            I don’t know about your parents; but mine ARE Marxists. Started sitting me down to tell me how bad white people are when I was 6 or 7.

            That’s about the same age you really start getting indoctrinated into a religion, right? Some people convert, but ultimately…how many convert from a religion they were taught from school age or earlier?

    • Ed

      Same thing.

    • JohnEngelman

      The most powerful constituency in favor of more immigrants is the business community.

      • John Smith

        But they aren’t the most vociferous.

        • JohnEngelman

          They are the ones who get their way. After Republican politicians are finished making noise on this issue they will remember who they get their campaign contributions from.

          • UncleSham

            You may be old enough to remember the Democrats as the party of “the working man”, but the Democrats of today are the party of the Blacks and the homosexuals.

          • JohnEngelman

            Who does the Republican Party benefit?

          • UncleSham

            Corporations, mostly.

          • JohnEngelman

            And the one percent.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            I’ve benefited nicely from Republican policies, and so has my family.
            Have a nice day.

          • JohnEngelman

            Good for you. Incomes for most Americans have stagnated or declined since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.

          • Samuel Hathaway

            The Communist Party U.S.A, it’s probably safe to say, is a dedicated Democratic party constituency.

        • InAFreeCountry

          The Republicans let the Democrats be the “bad cop” and still get what they want in the end, making a show of crocodile tears.

          • isabel matos

            Amen.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          The Chamber of Commerce wants cheap labor. The Democratic party of course, wants cheap votes. The later is permanent and more enduring, and irreversible. Wages rise and fall, but the barbaric, freeloading, mooching hoardes voting Democrat to bleed the white taxpayers dry are here to stay.

      • Speedy Steve

        and the unions.

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      Who are “leftists”? White race-is-a-social construct egalitarians and far-right minority tribal warriors (far-right in a race-is-all, La Raza sense). Think egalitarian Rachel Maddow and “I have only one loyalty, and that’s to the immigrant community” Louis Gutierrez.

      • nordicman

        The leftists want communism and racial white guilt politics and to wipe out the white race and the nonwhite voting bloc, while the “conservatives” want the cheap labor, the military industrial complex. Both are funded by the same ‘tribe’ of people.

    • Silly Frog

      I always vote, try to get regular messages to my elected officials and engage those around me in polite, yet determined conversation (debate) about living in and supporting a western civilized nation. At the national level we are not represented. Preparing to address a long series of grievances as I stand beside my brethren is also a regular hobby.

    • Speedy Steve

      Hill and Knowlton; selling American by the slice. Now we find out that our fearless wannabe leaders have sold uranium mining rights to Vlad Putin.

      • Bartek

        So what? Better Russia than multicult Europe, China, or Japan.

    • nordicman

      I’m a white man BUT it is white men who are allowing this. Who was it that caved into the demands of feminists, the “J” people, blacks civil rights agenda? White men. They were in congress and could have easily told them all to take a flying f–k. But they didn’t. It’s white “republican” men passed and created affirmative action and, recently, just voted to confirm another black militant attorney general, Loretta Lynch. I’m sorry, but I just have no patience for this victim thinking and complacency amongst whites anymore. We have power. We are letting the others push us around and take everything away from us.
      If the bully in school kept taking your lunch money, he didn’t stop until you stood up to him. Same with our enemies. White men need to be MEN again and stand up for our race, our families, our nations.

      • Standup Broad

        Thank you sir, concise and, sadly, all too true.

    • WR_the_realist

      Nearly every Republican who calls himself a conservative is also giving this country away.

  • David Ashton

    “The Founding Fathers” – Dead White European Males, a racist, sexist, transphobic picture.
    “Todos somos iguales” – a You Could Have Fooled Us picture.

    Your 24 April News Items add up to a real picture, a Dorian Gray portrait of an America in mortal peril.

    • Alexandra1973

      “We’re all equal!”

      “We know. That’s why we don’t want you greaseritos here!”

  • Young man, you are merely witnessing the wages of “rights” and equality obsessed proposition nation democratic republicanism. We white people are giving away “our” country because we don’t think it’s “ours” to begin with. We think, or we have been told over and over again, that the country is a proposition or a creed, and should not be thought of as having any blood and soil implications, because, well, Nazi Hitler Auschwitz. White politicians care more about their short term electoral prospects rather than the long term survival and prosperity of their people because democratic republicanism and the constant mania over and worship of voting and elections necessarily begs that actual and prospective politicians think no farther ahead than the next election cycle. In other words, it doesn’t behoove them to do anything to benefit the time in which they will no longer be holding public office.

    • TCA

      If we are to survive, all of today’s politicians, of both parties, with hardly an exception, must be imprisoned or shot.
      In my schooldays, studying history, I remember being appalled by the various purges and their ruthlessness, executions by the hundreds and even thousands.
      I was much younger then.

      • nordicman

        Yep. Even Rockwell said “The way to the palace leads through the dungeons. The way to the White House leads through the jail cells. All through history this has been true.” Name any great revolutionary cause that our people did (Arminius, Franco, Martel, Vlad the Impaler, etc) that didn’t use violence to fight for their nation, their people, Europe’s survival? They didn’t win by passing out pamphlets or simply complaining about it online.

  • Illidan Stormragge

    White people have little pride today and don’t know their history.

    • Jason Lewis

      We’ve gotta change that.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      Oddly, our lack of identity is a consequence of our success as a civilization. That is, for the past centuries, white people have run the world. We Westerners feel so secure that no one can harm us, whereas most non-white have suffered colonization or pseudo-colonization. Most non-white nations therefore are rightly suspicious of racial outsiders.

    • nordicman

      White people in America you mean. The whites in Eastern Europe and parts of Southern Europe are more proud of their nationality, race, history and are fighting back harder against this genocide more than Americans, Brits, Swedes, French, Germans, are. I have faith that all the white race from America to London to Russia to Germany to Spain to Poland to Slovakia to Ireland, etc, will collectively fight back and turn Europe around. We always wait until the “11th hour” to fight back.

      Whites are slow to anger, but we get very ferocious when we have been pushed too far. History has proven this to be true.

  • Truthseeker

    This article has Henry Wolff listed as the author. Is that a mistake?

    • Red

      I think he posted it on behalf of the author.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      Beneath the title, the author attribution is to Christopher De La Viña.

  • Truthseeker

    I like to hope that the White race is currently going through a winnowing process. The ones who are proud of their race and culture enough to preserve it will carry it on, and the ones who are ashamed of their race will die out with their suicidal mentality.

    Maybe in the next generation we’ll start to see some restoration of racial pride. Hopefully the hatred toward us will only become more naked, and the White children who grow up surrounded by it will get angry enough to rebel against it.

    • John Kar

      “The ones who are proud of their race and culture enough to preserve it will carry it on, and the ones who are ashamed of their race will die out with their suicidal mentality.”

      You do know that these white lilly liberals who praise cultural enrichment are also the ones living in upper middle class, 99% white neighborhoods and will also marry whites?

      • phillyguy

        And all the lily white liberals and other leftist freaks will be tuned in to “Bruce Jenner-the interview”, that’s how sad our once great country has become.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          We know that you will not be tuning into this “man becomes woman” freak show as I will not be either. Never heard of Bruce Jenner anyway, except that he had been in the Olympics at one time, but this latest, well, you get the point why it deserves no further comment.

        • Who Me?

          That Bruce Jenner bs is the craziest thing I’ve heard of in a long time. It’s just disgusting and I try not to pay it any attention, but it’s right there on my front page every time I turn my computer on in the morning. He married into that Kartrashian bunch, and it probably drove him completely rough the bend, is all I can think of that would excuse his stupidity.

      • nordicman

        And these softy liberal whites aren’t going to survive. They are the weakest of our race. Unless they wake up and think like us and want to work with the white nationalist movement, I want nothing to do with them. The strong white men (and women) of our race that stood up and fight back weren’t the softy, liberal, cocktail drinking whites. They were the working class, strong whites that fought back.

        • Standup Broad

          Unfortunately, the blue-collar Whites all wanted “a better life” for their offspring and, as a result, their children and grand kids are now wusses with degrees but no real life skills.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            Some of us realize how much we were cheated out of by not being taught the things our parents and grandparents know. I was taught NOTHING, but it’s never too late to learn. And I am making a point of teaching it to my kids. Be frugal, live simply, garden, cook for yourself, raise your own animals, learn how to fix things…and learn how to solve problems!

      • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

        But they have two kids, at most. Usually one. So they don’t reproduce, and hopefully are in the process of eliminating that suicidal altruism gene.

  • John Smith

    Whites are afraid of being labeled as “racist” and tend to believe the message that standing up for their race is “racist” after being bombarded with that message in media and at school. Groups like Amren, NAAWP, etc. get labeled “racist” or “hate groups” and it sticks – poisoning the well. The Left has produced a climate of fear for whites attempting to stand up for their own interests and the damage is probably not going to be undone until it’s too late and American society collapses under the weight of minorities.

    • Jason Lewis

      Spot on. Being labeled racist or just the accusation can mean loss of employment. It’s a great tactic of the left that have worked well.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        Hence the need to hit back with charges of libel and slander. As well as being racially targeted and bullied merely for being white, those who carelessly slander others need to be called into account.

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      The communist Soviet Union looked invincible 30 years ago. The USSR would never fall. The multi-culti ideology of today seems just as firmly entrenched.

      • LAGERTHA

        Whites will find a way. I have lived in California for 50 years and watched the death-spiral, especially after the ’86 Reagan Amnesty. The interesting part of this process, no matter how un-nerving, is that California Whites are finally starting to circle the wagons! Places like Mill Valley(North SF Bay) actually state on their online site that the city is a reflection of European heritage with British, German and Italian people. I just about fell out of my chair! It is worth noting that the per capita income in Mill Valley is one of the highest in the nation. Money can even buy the right to be White! Ha!

      • nordicman

        Good analogy! I heard Kai Murros say that once comparing the nonwhite/Islamic invasion into white lands today to how the Marxists thought the USSR/communism would go on forever and ever. Go onto Youtube and listen to his speeches and podcasts. He’s very good and inspiring for our people!

    • nordicman

      For NOW, these Marxists are winning. But even their façade is getting hard to maintain. Even the regular whites are waking up more and more. Whites don’t need to be afraid of standing up to people who will hate us no matter what we do.

      • Cindy

        I appreciate your positive attitude and I have 100% faith in White people.

  • JohnEngelman

    Today, even third- and fourth-generation Hispanics have not fully abandoned their ancestral ways. Spanish is the dominant language even for many who have been here for several generations.

    – Christopher De La Viña, American Renaissance, April 23, 2015

    My father and his parents were born in the United States. Nevertheless, my father learned German at home, and only learned English when he went to school. Dad told me this was true of other German Americans in his part of Iowa.

  • Petronius

    Nothing can stop the decline, once the will-to-live is gone.

    The very essence of the Liberal Death Wish is the Liberals’ desire to change the demographics in Western countries by a program of race replacement: replacing the hated, indigenous, white Christian populations through a multi-pronged program of open borders, mass migrations, amnesties, guilt-mongering and victimology, racial preferences and universal anti-white discrimination.

    Thus when given the alternative between supporting our race and civilization, on the one hand, or, on the other hand, supporting foreigners, migrants (documented or undocumented), terrorists, criminals, perverts, communists, jihadists, and other enemies, the Liberal will always side with the latter groups.

    Liberals will always find a reason or excuse to support any enemy, group, criminal, force, ideology, or cause that threatens to harm the West and, in particular, the white race, which is the genetic transmitter and tangible representative of Western Civilization.

    This hatred of all things Western explains the Liberals’ century-long love affair with communism and Marxism. Hence also their current flirtation with the ayatollahs, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, et al.

    So yes, send us your crazy Chechnyans with their pressure-cooker bombs. Send us your savage Africans with their meat cleavers. Send us your Saudis with their box cutters. Send us your French-Algerian Kouachi brothers with their AK-47s and your MS-13s and your drug cartels. Send us more enrichers. We want all the immigrants we can get. Because we in the West have swallowed the Liberal Death Wish hook, line, and sinker. And because the Gang of Eight tells us the results will be deficit neutral (as if anybody still cared about deficits).

    So here come Chuckie Schumer, Marco Rubio, John “comprehensive reform” McCain, Dickie Durbin, and the rest of the Gang, ready to twist the knife in a little deeper, twisting it deeper into the belly of Western Civilization, here and there slicing off a thick slab of juicy meat, and ready — eager, actually — to prepare the feast, to cater it, so to speak, and act as waiters . . . “Here’s a tender piece, sir.” All in Nahuatl, or Aymara, or Urdu, or whatever, the college language courses and travel abroad paying off at last.

    “I call an animal, a species, an individual depraved when it loses its instincts, when it chooses, when it prefers what is harmful to it.” – Nietzsche, “The Antichrist”

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      Some great lines, but tides turn…fight on.

    • Spikeygrrl

      … (as if anybody still cared about deficits).

      Please, PLEASE tell me that was sarcasm?!?!

      • Petronius

        In his day, Petronius was considered the master of satire and sarcasm.

  • Lion’s Mane

    “I cannot understand whites. Time and again, I see white university students who are happy to watch not only their nation but their genes disappear. They say they would be happy not to have children or to have children with non-whites.”

    =================

    Whites have been endlessly taught to hate themselves. 95% of Whites will believe whatever authority figures tell them, as they are not independent thinkers.

    And what have they been told since the Second World War? That Whites are guilty of more evil and wrong-doing than any other race.

    This ceaseless indoctrination is very powerful. That’s the reason that any message that is favorable to the survival of Whites is met with such hostility by the intellectual and political élites. The élites are out for REVENGE against people of European descent on account of colonialism and, especially, their own purely selfish interests.

    ‘Humanists’ and other liberals now claim that the erasure of racial, religious, and cultural identity will ‘make this world a better place.’ (Those who don’t believe this go along with it to avoid the destruction of their careers.)

    Paul Kurtz: “The highest good, as I see it, is intermarriage between people of different ethnicities, races, religions, and cultures.”

    • Petronius

      “Mistah Kurtz — he dead.”
      – Joseph Conrad

  • Jason Lewis

    Slicing Amercia into 3 or 4 countries will eventually be the only option.

    • nordicman

      Yes, but whites even then will need to fight to maintain it. What makes you think 20-30 years from now our racially conscious white heirs won’t have to fight military, nonwhites from coming in and killing them and taking over? They’ll have to fight then. Every generation of whites needs to be strong, smart and be prepared. We can’t sit back on our laurels. That’s why and how we got into a situation like this.

      • Jason Lewis

        Hard when 50% of our people could care less. Some even applaud losing the country.

        • Who Me?

          I got my hair cut yesterday and listened to my long-time (30 years) beautician bitching and moaning about the “tragedy” of her youngest daughter having lately married one of “those horrible White supremacist types that runs around with a Confederate flag in the back of his pickup”. (Other than that he seems to be a wonderful young fellow…) I just about said something, but like any other good little sheeple, I didn’t say a mumbling word.

  • Luca

    Notice the last photo, notice the nice red shirts and nicely worded signs. This tragedy is being perpetuated by the Communist party and their radical allies in the left-wing of the Democratic party.

    All this noise about ..”Well republicans want cheap labor” is just noise. Who says only republicans are employers? Who says employers benefit that much when they can move their businesses overseas? Is the labor really that cheap when we have a myriad of labor, health, safety and tax laws?

    It is clear to most, that the Democrats are the biggest engineers of this immigration disaster and while employers or republicans may get some side benefit, it is nothing compared to what Democrats are doing to totally destroy and take over this country.

    I disagree with the propaganda spouted here and elsewhere that the republicans are the biggest benefactors of this tragedy.

  • IKUredux

    Any language that has to employ English to talk about technology, or, actually, ANYTHING, is an inferior language. That’s right, English rules the world. When in doubt, a Spanish speaker or a French speaker has to resort to an English word. And, this is not due to the British empire. Nope, it’s because of America. You remember America, dontcha? That once great country that invented modernity and technology? You know, THAT America? But oh, were gonna let in all these illegal dumb asses from around the world. Yeah, that will keep this country competitive. Why not stop speaking English, this country will not have anybody to invent anything anyways. In which case, Spanish will be perfect. No need for English anymore.

    As a matter of fact, why not just go with Ebonics, with a Spanish flair?

    • Nimadan

      You ever hear the phrase, “post-american america?”

      It was coined by H. Millard in his book ‘Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion: messages of ennui and meaning in post-american america”.

      You can get a used copy on Amazon for $9.50 .

      • IKUredux

        No. I will check it out. Thank you.

  • Jaggers

    Okay, so hispanic kid tells Amren readers about stuff they already know about, such as double standards for white people, etc. Is it just for the novelty of having a minority say it?

    • Reynardine

      Though I agree with you about the regular Amren readership, articles like this are mighty useful for converting others to our point of view. Whites tend to ignore other whites when they speak of preservation, but minorities asking the same sorts of questions elicit strangely accepting mental states from the unawakened.

      • InAFreeCountry

        Maybe that’s why I like Thomas Sowell so much.

      • TCA

        You make an important point.
        I habitually forget that I was a liberal once, reading articles like this one (which I now find tedious) with fascination.

    • listenupbub

      Yes, it is. It is more powerful when a minority says it. It is confirmation that our arguments hold water, and that we are not making excuses out of psychological illness like a bunch of feminists.

      • Who Me?

        And also because a non-White CAN say it without being tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail as the old saying went–i.e. loss of job, home and possibly family or even life.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      I think Reynardine is right: non-whites saying it holds more sway with the majority of racially sleeping whites than having a white nationalist say it. There was a time when I would have NEVER listened to a “white racist” say anything. The first person to introduce some race realism and pro-white ideas to me was black. And I ONLY listened because he was black.

      So yes, I do think that articles like this, written by non-whites, can potentially be very powerful and persuasive tools.

      One major flaw in something like this is that more liberal whites will be aware of the concept of an “uncle Tom” or a “race traitor,” and may perceive authors like this one to be…that…and dismiss them as also “white supremacist.” So articles like this one may work better on people who are more moderate (or less committed) on racial issues.

    • DaveMed

      To be perfectly honest, I don’t think that this was written by a non-White Hispanic. It seems that it was written by Henry Wolff – an editor on the site.

  • TrueNorthFree

    “Sometimes I meet a white person who appreciates my understanding of white interests, and, even if he does not fully understand the implications of race, he is at least not ashamed to be white. This is a good sign for white people, but these people are rare.
    America cannot survive without whites. It will not survive when whites are a minority. If any remnants of Western Civilization are to persist on the North American continent, white people will have to begin to care about the future of their people.”

    This article could be used as a manifesto for what we whites need to start doing. We must begin educating others about the massive “diversity + multicultural” brainwashing that has been dumped on whites for decades. This is going to be hard, because any mention of race by a white person results in vitriolic knee-jerk accusations of “racism, zenophobia, fascism” etc.

    The author asks why we are giving our country away? I believe it is the heavy indoctrination that whites have endured for decades. I truly do not believe that whites would have tolerated the massive browning of our countries a century ago – it would have been unthinkable.

    • Bartek

      People adopt philosophies that allow them to engage in the behaviors they want to engage in.
      The majority of whites adopt liberalism,nihilism, and sterility because they want to remain perpetual teenagers.
      Their ‘careers’ just replace school and provide income to buy toys.

  • Caucasoid88

    It’s a combination between hostile elites and pathologically empathic whites. The hostile elites know pathologically empathetic whites exist, and they form specious policies that are ostensibly good but in reality bad. Ironically, brown-washing of Western culture is ostensibly “good” for these elites in the short-term, but will be progressively horrible for them in the long-term. But they’re sociopathic enough not to care even about their generations down the line. That’s pretty much what I’ve taken from all of it.

    • TrueNorthFree

      good points, good analysis! “Brownwashing” – I like it!
      If we can understand and articulate the root causes behind this disturbing trend, we can begin to find ways to fight back (and by that I mean with words and with PR)

    • Exuberant Auditor

      No emotion has been more tapped into and stoked in white Americans than that of guilt. Fueling the sentiment of guilt has been the Left’s most potent weapon in the brownification of America because it basically disarms many gullible whites of their will to resist disposession. Constantly talking about the Indians, slavery, and racism has unfortunately left many white Americans with a mentality of “we had it coming”, and that numbs their natural instincts of reacting to invasion with hostility, if at all.

      Emphasizing the good things white Americans achieved and done to the world and to people of color, their hard work, suffering, as well as putting many questionable acts of our ancestors into their historical contexts are crucial in counteracting this Leftist assault and instilling a sense of pride and desire of survival back into white Americans.

      • Caucasoid88

        Totally agree.

  • Glen

    “So, why are you are giving away your country?”

    Because we are brainwashed, crazy, and scared to death of a tiny, highly ethnocentric minority that “look white to me.”

    • TrueNorthFree

      Personally, I am not scared of that tiny minority. I am a strategic thinker.
      In my opinion, I am far more scared of the billions of bloodthirsty, fast breeding Muslims who can’t wait to impose their own special tribal brand of “diversity and multiculturalism” on my country.

      • SentryattheGate

        What do you mean; “that tiny minority”? Latinos are the largest minority in the US since 2005, with Central and South America next door. Obama is flying them in c/o the taxpayer! 10 of the 12 worst criminal gangs according to the FBI are Latino! Don’t discount the threat they present! Muslims don’t belong here either!

        • TrueNorthFree

          haha – Latinos are definitely not a tiny minority, but in the grand scheme of things I would rather deal with their culture (as it is European based) than Muslim.
          Whites are demographically doomed, we are facing a non-white racial tidal wave.
          I am a strategic thinker so I am pondering how we whites might best proceed with strength once we lose our numerical majority.

  • TrueNorthFree

    “Why is it that neither White Leftists, Liberals, Christians, Atheists,
    Conservatives or Libertarians will speak out and openly fight for the
    explicit rights of White people ?
    The only identity group on the planet that is not allowed to organise to defend its interests.” (quote from Dan O’Connor)

    • CVB

      Because being a “white” is a separate category from all the other categories you mentioned. What you said can be applied to any other race.

    • Lion’s Mane

      Other races are allowed to belong to every category you have listed. Race, being biological, is under attack BECAUSE there are many people who, for different reasons, hate White Europeans (REGARDLESS of which ideological groups they may subscribe to).

  • Bartek

    I think the one of real problems is we assimilated too much.
    I’m really not ‘white’, I’m a Slav and frankly I have about much in common with a Spaniard or an English person as I do an Nigerian or an Indian.
    I heard my grandparents and other relatives speak their native tongue fluently and regret to no end that I was not raised bi-lingual. If the ‘whites’ that were not from the UK would have retained their mother tongues they would have unity and and increased chance of staying unique and politically unified.
    One of the reasons the French have FN and the Germans have PEGIDA is that they still share a common culture/ethnicity and relate and identify with each other.
    The only ‘culture’ generic ‘whites’ have is the trash Hollyweird has fed them (including multiculturalism, feminism, and social ‘justice’).

    • IstvanIN

      You are White, or a European-American. The problem isn’t that we assimilated, it is that we didn’t form a clear, New World ethnicity called American that every White immigrant would be expected to assimilate into. We have too many people who still refer to themselves as “Hyphenated-American”. We have too many White Americans who consider themselves part of the grievance industry. I hated it when the late Governor Cuomo moaned and groaned about the discrimination “Italian-Americans” suffered. He never considered himself fully American, as I and my family do. And this is true of many Americans, people who are hyphenated but have no real connection to the old world, having never been to Europe or speaking anything but English, but they still hyphenate.

      Maybe the country is physically too big to have developed a singular Anglo-American culture coast to coast. Up until the mid-twentieth century there was little immediate connection between the various regions of the US. Immigrants could continue many of their native cultural practices because they were surrounded by mostly their own. Newspapers, mail, telegraph and telephone do not have the same impact as movies, television and the internet. TV began in earnest around 1948, then came the 1965 immigration act, giving TV too little time to act as a unifier of the nation and culture, rather it became a tool to subvert the culture and people.

      No, my friend, the problem is that we didn’t assimilate as Americans.

      • Bartek

        I’m definitely not an Anglo, nor do I want to be one.
        The fact that I speak a foreign language rather than my mother tongue isn’t something I’m thrilled about, it is something I am ashamed about. I speak English more or less a result of the social oppression forced upon my ancestors by the Anglo in the USA.
        My ancestors were driven out of their homelands by wars fomented by the same crowd of schemers who foment the wars today. My ancestors served a purpose (provided labor, and diluted the original anti English colonial demographic) and that is why they were compelled to come to this place. Much as the current crop of migrants serve their purpose in the schemers scheme.
        When I look at the mess Heart Cellar, welfare breeding, and and unguarded border created I can say with no hesitation that I have no desire to be an ‘American’ or a generic ‘white’ with no culture or identity speaking a foreigners language.

        • IstvanIN

          Then leave if you hate America, its culture and its language. I am sick of “white ethnics” who hold grievances against this country, who resent the oppertunites provided, the graciousness of allowing non-Northern European people to emigrate to this great nation. I am extremely thankful that my forebears were allowed to emigrate from the Hapsburg Empire to the US before the Great War. I am grateful that my family was allowed to become Americans. And we assimilated. We all speak English and America’s history is our history. Do I have an interest in Hungary, absolutely and have since I was a kid, it is my family’s beginnings, but in reality I am no more Hungarian (other than genetically) than the fully assimilated American of Polish, German or Czech decent. I believe our Anglo-American founders were among some of the greatest thinkers of all time, and certainly more far thinking than any man, or woman, alive today.

          Go, please, you are no more helpful to our survival than Bill or Hillary, or Jeb, or Juan McCain or Lindsey Graham. You are a big part of the problem.

          • Bartek

            Genetics, ethnicity, and culture are far more important to me than
            transient economic ideologies and contrived ideological Nation States
            I believe the oligarchs that founded this Nation were self serving
            manipulators that sowed the seeds of this Nations destruction with their progressive liberal ideologies that were born of their personal greed more than anything else.
            If the immigration laws (the cold war was rather inhibiting) were the same in the 1980’s as they are now I would have left. I have no great love or attachment to the USA. The worse this dumping ground gets the less I care about it in any fashion.

          • IstvanIN

            What has happened post 1965 has nothing to do with our founders. Our founding documents were forward thinking and probably unmatched in defining the limitations of government control over the people and how our rights are conferred by God and not men.

            The fact that politicians have perverted our Constitution and failed to heed the warnings of our founders is not the founders fault.

          • Bartek

            The founders of this Nation were progressive liberals.
            Their excessive radical ideals led to the mess we all find ourselves in now.
            Modern representative government is just a tool for the financier class to dominate governance and destroy/take over natural ethnic groups, their cultures, and their territories.

          • Who Me?

            The founders of this nation began a nation that, following their ideals led to the greatest, richest nation on this earth. One that people of every other nation want to get into. Those precepts lasted over 150 years. The fact that the last 50 years have seen the absolute ruination of this nation has nothing to do with what the founders set up, but the drastic refusal to adhere to the principals those founders set in place.

          • Who Me?

            There are already far too few “Whites” on this planet. Whites comprise about 5% of the world population. We need to come together and fight for our right to survive as a race and save our national conflicts for later. If we start to divide among ourselves (a mostly practical impossibility for Americans, anyway) we will all perish. Remember the old saying, “If we don’t stand together, we shall all surely die together.” That means all of us, whether we are Irish or Russian or Dutch or Italian or some other member of the White race. We are still white. The other races let their skin identify them racially, we should do the same. Don’t let someone use the “divide and conquer” tactic on us. We are smarter than that.

    • Diversity Heretic

      I’ve often had thoughts along the lines of your comment. Was the problem in the U.S. the lack of a definitive North American-European identity and culture? (I think Slavs do have more in common with Spanish and English people than they do with Nigerians and Indians; Polish and Romanian migrants within Europe are not nearly the problem that Arab and sub-Saharan Africans are, although fear of being branded as racist keeps the European ethno-nationalist parties from pointing this out too explicitly.) Personally, I think that the U.S; was “on the cusp” of creating a North American-European identity in around 1960. It would have been a matter of two to three more generations without mass migration, and/or with small amounts of migration confined to western Europe. The black population could probably have been managed, although it is increasingly obvious that African-Americans are unassimilable. But changes in immigration policy and in attitudes toward blacks dysfunction ended the experiment. Chinese historians in 2070 will be arguing vigorously over why a prosperous, reasonably coherent society went mad in the 1960s.

      • I am curious. I’ve heard that there are popular pressures in China to permit more freedom and diversity. Do you think the catastrophy of the US is currently becoming evident to the Chinese leadership? Or is the whole world still under the sway that “the more migrants from 3rd world countries: (a euphemism for more blacks), the more diversity and betterment?

        I wonder if the Chinese military believes that stuff our admirals quote “that our greatest strength is our diversity”.

        I think these things will become increasingly evident in the future but I wonder about currently.

        • Bartek

          I wish I could find the source, but I read once that Nigeria and China made a deal. China would get a discount on oil if they took in Nigerian colonists. After two years the experiment ended, China expelled the Nigerian colonists and decided they rather pay the full price for the oil.

      • Bartek

        I totally agree with what you say. If Heart Cellar, legalization of hormonal birth control, deindustrialization/mandatory college childhood extension, and Lyndon Johnson’s black breeding program wouldn’t have happened “American” would have become a Nationality/Ethnicity of its own.
        The process definitely was happening and was almost complete. It was a goal that was being achieved by design (immigration used to be based on ability to assimilate).
        Considering what happened in the 1960s it is too bad ‘whites’ went along with the assimilation program. We would be stronger in this setting with our own ethnic groups which had actual cultures and meaningful identity.

    • throttler

      Slavs are white.

      • Bartek

        Hmmm, I have been told I was really Eurasian by ‘white’ people even though I am much fairer than most ‘white’ people.
        I used to take it as an insult, but now I think they probably have a very valid point.

        My main point was ‘white’ identity is probably a social construct.
        We were better off when we identified with our ethnicity rather that our race.
        ‘White’ groups that identify with ethnicity instead of the ‘white race’ display greater cohesiveness and enjoy more cultural support and in many cases still seem to manage to procreate at above replacement levels. (Jews, Italians, Irish, etc.).

    • I’m Slavic (Polish) & am an ex-pat living in Brazil. We have 2 families we are freinds with. One is Spanish, one is Brazilian. They are very much like us. I don’t have any English friends although I’m familiar with much of their history back to to reign of Henry VIII (1509) I think.

      My grandparents came to the US from Poland ca 1905 so I guess they spoke Polish fluently. I was quite young when they passed away.

      I am really working hard on learning Portuguese so it’s never too late for you to learn Polish. I don’t really need to read Polish to collect old Polish coins as all the inscriptions are in Latin: just like the other European countries.

      • Bartek

        The Poles submission to Rome/West and admiration of the Holy Roman Empire planted the seeds of their destruction.
        Poles desire to be “western” have brought them to the brink of permanent annihilation.
        They are probably not the best example.
        Strong ethnic affiliation is a better survival strategy than generic ‘white’ identification.

        • Lion’s Mane

          “Strong ethnic affiliation is a better survival strategy than generic ‘white’ identification.”

          Can we not have both? At least in Europe? I think that the scientifically-charted genetic Family Tree of Europeans would help us get a little perspective on this.

          • Bartek

            That is a terrible concept and will lead to the same culture-less, disunity ‘white’ Americans are stuck dealing with.
            A compartmentalized Europe based on National ethnicities is more resistant to invasion, poor governance, and mass migration schemes than a unified EU.
            As for your ‘scientifically charted study’, I notice that Europe’s scientific community also likes to show how everyone around the world is really so similar and crows about Europeans being brown skinned less than 10,000 years ago.
            Taking away our ethnicities is just another step in the process of making us all compliant global citizens with the same masters.

          • Lion’s Mane

            I did not mean to promote the kind of policy you suggest. I support traditional independent ethnic nations. But the claim that Slavs are somehow “not white” is something I, and many others here, disagree with.

          • Bartek

            That was something I have been told personally on a number of occasions by Western Europeans. Personally I thought that was odd, but perhaps if white meant Anglo Saxon to them, they has a point.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Nordicists also seem to have a tendency to deny that Slavs and Mediterranean whites are white. I’m not too clear on why they also think this, other than accusations (sometimes quite vague) of mixing with other Eurasians and a kind of ethnic supremacy.

            But I disagree that other races have more “group cohesiveness.” I think it only looks that way to people in the West. Live amongst them in their own countries, and I’m sure their internal demarcations would become more obvious.

      • Rob

        Why did you leave the US to live in a non white country. Come back and fight for the US and for white Americas.

        • Bartek

          Brazil is about as ‘white’ as the USA, lol.
          Actually Southern Brazil is pretty ‘white’ when compared to the North and the large costal cities. Probably whiter than much of the USA.

    • Lion’s Mane

      For “Slavs,” I have found this:

      “Occupying eastern and southeastern Europe, they are usually divided into the East Slavs (Ukrainians, Russians, and Belarusians), West Slavs (Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, and Wends), and South Slavs (Bulgarians, Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, and Macedonians).”

      And:

      “The Slavs are an Indo-European ethno-linguistic group living in Central Europe, Eastern Europe, Southeast Europe, North Asia and Central Asia, who speak the Indo-European Slavic languages, and share, to varying degrees, certain cultural traits and historical backgrounds.”

      Do you expect us to believe that Tchaikovsky, Dvořák, Tolstoy, Pope John Paul II, Chopin, Dostoevsky, and the people of the Ukraine are NOT White and are not part of White Western Civilization?

      Go to the NNDB website of biographies. Every one of these persons is likely listed as racially or ethnically WHITE.

      • Bartek

        No they are not ‘white’ like the Western Europeans who created the term ‘white’. And I could care the least how English speakers use the term that they created for their own purposes.
        Of course we are all racially Caucasian but we went our seperate ways long ago.
        The West is self destructive and is doing nothing but draging my people down with it.
        I am not ethnically a generic white, I am ethnically an Eastern Slav.
        The Ukraine is not the heart of Europe is part of the Russian Mir.
        Slavs have their own civilization that is Eastern not Western, Slavs would be better off taking pride in that heritage instead of admiring the very insitutions and concepts that have brought about the decline and fall of the West.

        • Lion’s Mane

          I think it’s admirable for Slavs to take pride in their heritage. I’m all for it. Also, I don’t want ANYONE here to admire the ruinious things you decry. But our common Caucasian racial heritage should be a sufficient basis for us to work together.

          According to the late Alan Watts, “the West needs a new religion.” There’s much I could say about the problems of ‘Western religion’ today, but I think I’ll steer clear of the controversy for now.

          • Rob

            TO me an Eastern European and Russian are all white. They are not negros or non whites. So Bartek needs to cut the nonsense.

          • Bartek

            It isn’t nonsense.
            I am attempting to make a point that ethnic identity is more cohesive, definable, and defensible then generic ‘white’ identity.
            Lets face it ‘whiteness’ is an outgrowth of the US governments assimilation policies prior to 1965.
            ‘White’ has no historic precedence outside of the USA.
            Quite recently people still referred to the German race, or the English race, etc. People in the UK felt separate from Europe as did the Scandinavians.
            Homogenizing us as ‘white’ has not given us greater group strength it has simply destroyed our former unity and has left us politically and culturally powerless.

          • Lion’s Mane

            I don’t advocate the American model in Europe. There is truth in what you’re saying. The breakdown of ethnicity in the U.S. facilitated the loss of racial identity that we are undergoing today.

          • Lion’s Mane

            You do have a point. I don’t entirely dismiss what you’re saying here. I’ve long said that the breakdown of ethnic immigrant communities in the U.S. in the last century opened the door to the mixing of the races in the present.

          • Bartek

            That is just a slippery slope to global citizenship.
            I don’t have a common European heritage I have my peoples unique heritage. I could give two hoots about the Magna Carta, or the Spanish Inquisition.
            I have recently seen ‘white’ people laying claim to a human heritage when they study Asian martial arts or whine about ISIS destroying Persian statues. Just as absurd of a claim as European heritage.
            Caucasians do not need to work together as much as they need to care about and defend their own individual ethnic identities and territories. That is the time tested method that worked for us for 1,000s of years.

          • Lion’s Mane

            If you care ONLY about your own people’s unique heritage — which probably would not exist without a broader European heritage — then why are you posting on AmRen? Hitler set Whites back (and lost the war) because he cared ONLY about the German nation and wanted to dominate all the others in Europe. And there’s nothing wrong with learning any martial art. That doesn’t convert a White into an Asian, anymore than an Asian becomes White when he learns to play the harpsichord or reads Shakespeare.

          • Bartek

            I don’t care if you learn an Asian martial art, but that doesn’t make that art part of your cultural heritage.
            I have read Shakespeare, but I would never claim his works were part of my personal cultural heritage.
            Such thinking is part of the global citizen one world government ideology we are being indoctrinated with by our ruling class.
            Europe was doing just fine before the EU, now it is in the process of destroying itself even more than Hitler managed to accomplish. That wouldn’t be so easily accomplished if all Europeans cared about their generic European heritage. The only defense we see is localized and based on historical ethnic groups. The UK had BNP, the French have FN, the Greeks have Golden Dawn, etc.

          • Rustler

            Whether people here at Amren agree with this view or not, they have to admit that “white nationalism” has not made any progress at all in America after 25 years. We’ve lost ground both in terms of having less influence in the mainstream and a weaker organizational infrastructure of our own than we did when Amren started.

            White nationalists in America need to start talking more about strategy and tactics. What are we gonna do? Spend the next 25 years promoting IQ studies and complaining about blacks?

            I think we need a new approach and we should be looking at what nationalists in Europe are doing.

          • The problem is “white nationalism.” Nobody is really loyal to their entire race, that is, “race” as defined by entire continental groupings. That, and the essence of “white nationalism” seems to be that white people in democratic republics are one day going to “rise up” in the democratically republican sense to take political power all while motivated by pan-racial loyalty. Which is really pie in the sky. On top of that, in the real world, “white nationalism” these days is little more than bitching about Jews on the internet.

            Ethnonationalism and anti-democratic-republicanism (hereditary monarchy, maybe, if not as a placeholder for a better paradigm) is the wave of the future.

        • Lion’s Mane

          “Thank God that Russia is attempting to resist domination and destruction by the self hating, self destructive Western European ‘white’.”

          I agree. This is a very important and vital step in resistance to liberalism and the NWO. I want to preserve all peoples and ethnicities and cultures in Eastern and Western Europe.

        • Rob

          TO me an Eastern European and Russian are all white. They are not negros or non whites. So Bartek you need to cut the nonsense.

          • Rustler

            You need to realize that white Anglos are seen by everyone as a sinking ship.

            Non-Anglo white people who want to survive are increasingly asking themselves if they can afford to have their people associated with the larger white/Western group that is killing itself. Maybe better just to declare themselves a unique, separate group(like Jews do) and ditch the baggage of “white”/Anglo culture which seems to many people to be doomed at this point.

            This may sound crazy to some, but this kind of thinking is spreading rapidly.

            We are seeing the collapse of whiteness in America. Expect more and more white looking people here to dissociate themselves from whites and choose to identify with European ethnic groups instead. It’s inevitable that a group like “whites” that does not stick up for each other will lose members.

          • “The flight from white.” — Sailer

    • Lion’s Mane

      (1) I think you should still learn the language of your grandparents. There are language programs available.

      (2) While it is true that we Americans are force-fed the Hollywood culture, I don’t think this needs to be our authentic culture. I know that I don’t consider this to be my culture!

      I can’t post them here, but numerous Western European folk songs are the same music — the same melody and style — in multiple languages. A song that starts out in Italy, for example, will make its way into other Western European countries. It will be sung and loved in German, French, Dutch, etc. versions This has been the case for hundreds of years.

      Who did Chopin learn from? In addition to his native Polish culture, he studied the music of Bach and Mozart (and others as well, of course).

      I see no reason to believe that the music of Russian composers, for example, is not part of the “Western” musical heritage — every bit as much as is the music of Mozart (who, by the way, liked to compose “Italian” operas). Western European classical composers and musicians have always borrowed from each other. Who won the Tchaikovsky competition in Moscow — an American by the name of Van Cliburn.

      There’s a saying: Magna Europa est patria nostra. To the extent that individual European countries have inherited the philosophy and learning of Ancient Greece and Rome, they are culturally related.

      This doesn’t mean that I advocated the American-style melting pot in Europe. This would be a tragic mistake.

    • Rustler

      Bingo. Anglo-Saxon culture(ie capitalist anti-culture) is the biggest problem. Non-Anglo whites are showing a lot more will to survive.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      My background is half-Slavic and half-Western European (mostly Dutch). If I’m not “white,” what the heck am I?

      When I was little, my parents used to joke that I am “mixed.” With what you are suggesting though, there is truth to that. Outside of a pan-racial white identity, I don’t HAVE an ethnic identity to return to. Many people whose families have been in North America for generations are in a similar position, as the European settlers and immigrants to Canada and the US have mixed together.

      I do agree that I don’t want “global citizenship.” One of the things that convinced me of the merit of white nationalism is that our individual, unique cultures are under attack. I absolutely want the different European peoples to protect their respective heritages. I think that will definitely give people more to fight for than a vague pan-racial sense of solidarity.

      But the “white” construct is almost certainly here to stay, and it is likely to be the only ethnic identity for people who have essentially been culturally severed from the motherland.

      I would prefer to have been born in Europe, to a specific peoples. But I wasn’t. And where I am, “whites” are all essentially indistinguishable from each other. Splitting us up makes as little sense to me as banding all together evidently makes to you.

      American blacks, incidentally, have this same dilemma, having been severed from THEIR mother cultures. They have been forced into the position of having a pan-racial black identity, and they do have SOME group cohesion – particularly when facing opposition. That is the most important time to really band together, and more specific group identity can be hammered out later.

  • cherrie greenbaum123

    Well, ahem, WE aren’t giving our country away. It’s a certain group, who SHALL REMAIN NAMELESS (given the fact that censors have a finely tuned ear for protecting TWMNBN), are in the process of giving plentiful shekels for those who denigrate white, Christian people.

    • Speedy Steve

      Reptilian shape-shifters with money names!

  • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

    I wish I had an answer for this man. It infuriates, baffles and sickens me to see whites doing this. It is not their place to give away MY country, and then tell me I am wrong for protesting! Especially when they have no children. They should be tried for treason and receive the fate of traitors.

    • Petronius

      Nuremberg established the precedent that leaders of a nation can be held individually accountable for their government’s policies, and be penalized as common criminals. This may include the sentence of death by hanging, a form of execution normally reserved for the lowest class of criminals.

  • Sean Fielding

    Why, oh why?

    The perennial question throughout 25 years of Amren. Still searching for the elusive answers a quarter-century later. Hand wringing that’s exactly how one expects the beaten to behave.

    The justification for this website is its introductory value. Any reader who has been here regularly more than a few months is either a self-hating masochist or should have had his fill of this cringing stuff and be ready to move on.

    Seek answers at TOO.

    • InAFreeCountry

      I disagree. I think many here want a political solution, and hope one still exists.

      • Bartek

        The only solution to this would involve actual active resistence, and I don’t mean foolish, distracting, blame displacing politics.
        We (and our rulers) know contemporary, soft, passive, responsible whitey isn’t up to that task.

      • Sean Fielding

        There is no political solution. What is happening in America today is the latest, most subtle phase of a race war that goes back to Weimar, to the Bolsheviks before that, to the decay phase of Austro-Hungary before that, to the Polish-Lithuanian regime and its tax farmers in Ukraine before that. And Amren and what it represents lacks the will and insight to even recognize the racial enemy, let alone fight.

        JT himself has no real idea what he is up against – acts as if the whole problem will go away if we just shake hands like Southern gentlemen – there’s your political solution. In America, the enemy has taken over or bought off the entire Academy starting with the Ivy Leagues, the banking industry that can push a billion people further into debt slavery at the touch of a button, all significant mass media, the major lobbyists and financing of both parties, defense policy – everything.

        Sure, they’ll give half that back just as easily as WASPS gave it up. Like gentlemen. Sure.

        • Bartek

          Even though you will get deleted, what you say has much truth.
          But it fails to address why the various European gentiles in the West proved to be such easy marks, ripe for the picking.

          • Sean Fielding

            The flaw too has been well explored at TOO: it runs along the lines of ‘pathological altruism.’ Once upon a time, that concept strongly influenced a whole phase of Amren’s existence also, the ‘IJ’ phase.

            But there is little of practical value to be gained from concentrating on the flaw. It is an inevitable adverse effect of the altruism that is a key component of White achievement. Without it, we would not be White.

            The only solution is recognition of the real enemy and complete separation from them. With all their self-anointed accomplishments, they should be able to flourish on their own, but two millennia of attempts to do so have always been met with ‘let us in to live with you, you horrible White racists.’ Odd how that works with them, isn’t it?

            The most recent major attempt spanned 12 years near the middle of the 20th century and resulted in the eventual complete demoralization of the White race; what we are living through presently. Now that’s power.

            However, I see signs that the tide is approaching a turn.

    • too ?

      to͞o/
      adverb
      adverb: too
      1.
      to a higher degree than is desirable, permissible, or possible; excessively.”he was driving too fast”

      • Sean Fielding

        The Occidental Observer

  • OhWow

    Great piece. The answer is because our society is now setup where whites are branded as racists whenever they even DREAM of being an ounce semiconscious about race. Think of the whack-a-mole game. Whenever a white person begins to say “hey wait why are we allowing our country to be taken over?” and his head just barely peaks out, it gets smashed back in its hole by PC culture enacted by liberals.

    It’s the absolute fear of being branded “xenophobic” or “racist”. It’s really amazing how well it’s worked. Sad, but amazing. The white race as a whole has been completely silenced (save for .00000000001% of whites on here). It’s so obvious that we are right too. But it doesn’t matter in this day in age. Japan is the perfect example. NOBODY questions Japanese diversity. NOBODY calls the Japanese “racist”. They are allowed to be. I think tons of whites know this, but are just too afraid to say it. It’s social suicide especially if you are in the under 30 crowd like me. You are not seen as “cool” or “normal” at a young age with these views. Since my generation is way more liberal, you will be called “racist” quicker than you could say the word “illegal”. You may meet some white men in the under 30 crowd who share these anti-immigration views, but with same-aged women, not a chance. I think I met one white woman who had the same anti-immigration sentiments. The rest have fallen for the emotional piece as women are naturally inclined to do. “Oh, but they are just poor people trying to find a better life!”. Women work off emotions. Men work off logic and facts. There are exceptions obviously but these are the rules.

    I agree with this author. It’s just shocking when you consider how rich our culture and accomplishments are, yet we are so fast to just let it get taken away. I’ve noticed that I get more respect from minorities being a proud white person who doesn’t want to live near illegal aliens or other minorities than a liberal living in a utopia. Especially blacks. They respect tough, alpha-male attitudes even if they see them as bigoted. Not soft liberals who weigh 120 lbs and wear peace shirts. I wish that one day whites wake up and this can become mainstream.

  • Exuberant Auditor

    No emotion has been more tapped into and stoked in white Americans than that of guilt. Fueling the sentiment of guilt has been the Left’s most potent weapon in the brownification of America because it basically disarms many gullible whites of their will to resist disposession. Constantly talking about the Indians, slavery, and racism has unfortunately left many white Americans with a mentality of “we had it coming”, and that numbs their natural instincts of reacting to invasion with hostility, if at all.

    Emphasizing the good things white Americans achieved and done to the world and to people of color, their hard work, suffering, as well as putting many questionable acts of our ancestors into their historical contexts are crucial in countering this Leftist assault, and in instilling a sense of pride and desire of survival back into white Americans.

    • Who Me?

      This, plus years of being taught to “champion the underdog”, “don’t be a bully”, “love everybody”, “walk a mile in their shoes”, “turn the other cheek” etc. etc. etc. Those are underpinnings of White, American civilization and culture. They will also be the death of White civilization and culture, and eventually the total and final death of the White race.

  • LHathaway

    “GOP, do you want our vote” . . . is that Really the right time to ask the question?

    • InAFreeCountry

      The hispanics are very good at playing one side against the other and watching them dogpile to give them what they want.

    • Speedy Steve

      Just once I’d like to see a Republican candidate say, “we are the party that will defend the White people.”

  • Chasmania

    We’re not giving it away. It is being chipped out from under us by a variety of forces that have been at work since the 19th century.

    One of many reasons its still continuing today when all one has to do is watch the news or simply look around is the short term risk and rewards of defiance.

    Open and active defiance of the Feds policies today could mean risking prison and financial hardships with little hope of any short term reward. Not many are willing to risk the well being of their families in that light. Political gains are difficult and at best nebulous in todays political climate. Who out there is willing to risk their life being ripped apart when the deck is stacked against you so heavily ?

    Action ( demonstrations, etc…) taken must be taken by a group large enough to mitigate that risk. It’s much harder to arrest or audit 500 thousand or a million than just the few or one. To make that happen takes leadership and a willing group. People willing to set the countries well being before their families comfort.

    • Vyncennt

      “We’re not giving it away. It is being chipped out from under us by a variety of forces that have been at work since the 19th century.”

      I disagree. YOU are not giving it away. I am not giving it away. Many of the people we both associate with are likely not giving it away.

      Yet….

      ….many who look just like us are happily giving it away, have been for some time now, and appear unlikely to cease any time soon.

      You do not “take” from a heavily armed, incredibly rich, highly intelligent super majority. You can only receive and make use of what is offered.

  • The Skeptic

    The chances of finding a “white ally” is slim, but there are people like Dr. Thomas Sowell and Walter William, who share many of your positions on border security, affirmative action etc. out of their commitment to principles (rule of law, sovereignty, free markets, etc.)

  • Speedy Steve

    Only in white countries are people afraid of name-calling.

    Whatever happened to the expression: sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me?
    Gawd, we’ve become a nation of weaklings and sissies. Toughen up, KwaMerika!

    • IstvanIN

      Actually afraid of losing their jobs, businesses, homes, families, and lives.

  • TruthBeTold

    There are many reasons for our current plight but I will give you one.

    I’m not overstating this. I believe Millennials are a real danger. They are the avant-garde of the American ‘Cultural Revolution’. Just look at their role in electing the first black president simply for being the first black president. They take great satisfaction at bucking the ‘old racist white establishment’.

    Mocking Christians for ‘believing in fairytales from an old book’ is becoming increasing pervasive on any message forum on any subject.

    Millennials believe they are ‘the future’ and they’re throwing their political weight around by hoping on the trending social media idea of the moment (gay rights, transgender rights, black lives matter, etc).

    Some will change as they grow up and have families. If they put their kids in public schools in urban areas, they’re going to quickly get a taste of the demands made by minorities. At first they might think minorities have a point but the demands will become increasingly absurd.

    I don’t know what the future holds but the ideas and ideals of the Millennials are a clear and present danger. They are the avant-guard of the progressive left. They are the classic ‘useful tools’. They have no idea what championing absurd ideas today are going to have on their future and the future of their children.

    • Rustler

      Wrong. Most white millennials voted against Obama. Obama did win the early baby boomers, the people who came of age during the anti-war protests of the 1960’s did.

      Stop blaming kids for what your generation did.

      Millennials, including pro-white ones, will enjoy seeing fundamentalist type morons who “support Israel,” support corporate anti-worker policies, and deny that race exists being persecuted by the people they helped bring into power.

      • TruthBeTold

        Perhaps I should have added to my description of Millennials as the ‘shock troops’ of the ‘progressive’ movement; much like Mao used the youth of China to overthrow the old order and traditions to create a new China.

        Adding that caveat, we’re both correct. It is the ’60’s counter-culture ideology of the older generation who are putting their plans into action. But they are using Millennials to advance their goals and ideology and social media is the new Little Red Book.

  • AmericanCitizen

    The Left, largely through controlling academia, has convinced an entire generation of young adults that the white race is the cancer of history and needs to be replaced. It doesn’t take much to convince blacks or hispanics of this idea, but the crowing glory of Progressives is the ability to convince young whites that they need to be the last generation of “establishment” whites. Our youth have been taught and believe their destiny is to lose demographic control of America and no longer reap the benefits of “white privilege”.

    Again, to put it plainly, the younger generations are taught and accept that it’s time for whites to descend to minority status and forsake the old ideals that founded this country. That’s why American History is taught as a litany of white abuses and crimes that only now the enlightened can apologize for and atone for by ceding the country away to anyone who is non-white.

    But hey, don’t forget, Diversity is Strength!

    • Rustler

      I’m sorry your view is not accurate. This is the movement conservative line. It’s all the fault of the left. Reality check: Corporations and billionaires have far more power than leftist groups do. The real problem is that we have a treasonous right in America that is based on capitalist/classical liberal ideology. It has no place for race in it’s explanations for things

      White millennials voted for Romney and against Obama at a higher rate that some age cohorts of the baby boomer generation did. We need to stop this blaming the young nonsense right now. The generation that is in their 20’s has zero responsibility for what has happened. How can you expect white 20 year olds to “stand up” to the establishment when rich white guys, corporations, the military, the police, Republican politicians and the neocon media are all against them?

      It’s the older whites who failed back in the 80’s and 90’s when they allowed amnesty for illegal aliens and the big increases legal immigration that happened under Reagan and the first Bush. Pat Buchanan tried to fight in 1992 and again in 1996, but white male conservative baby boomers wouldn’t follow him.

      • I’ve done my fair share of picking fun of millennials, but really, all they’re doing is regurgitating what they’ve been taught, largely by their parents’ generation, which is the baby boomers. And the baby boomers learned what they did from their parents’ generation, the “Greatest Generation.” This is a multi-generational mess.

        I reject the fairy tale reading of history that we were living in some sort of utopia and paradise until at some indeterminate point after JFK’s assassination, some random guy didn’t want to go to Vietnam, so he burned his draft card and let his hair grow long.

      • Weisheit77

        I voted for Pat twice. It was the first vote I ever cast at 18. I’m still proud of it.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      As other people have said, this final development is new enough not to have had full impact yet.

      But I do believe you are correct about the ideology; and that much of my generation believes it is the last of the “old guard,” and is thankful for that. I can testify that the only thing I was consciously taught about whiteness from the cradle onward was that we are uniquely evil, and the world would be greatly improved by our passing from it.

  • nordicman

    That’s pretty bad when members of a different race care more about your race than you do. I admire the few nonwhites (blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Middle Easterners, etc) who genuinely are concerned about our people and who are against political correctness far more than I do the braindead, traitorous whites.

  • Cecil Henry

    I;m not okay with it. I’m strongly opposed and have been since I saw it starting as a teenager in the late 1990’s. This trend is not new.]

    We aware whites are mad as hell. This is Genocide. And we are not being represented. Enough.

  • Randall Ward

    On of the best articles ever on this web site. Direct and to the point.
    The most important thing the author left out was the fact that the USA was a Christian nation when the Whites built it. A Christian sees the world in a different and better way than the heathen. White people steeped in Christianity built this Country.

    • Bartek

      Christians are Christianity are a large part of the problem.
      Modern Christians pick and choose their doctrine and use it to justify white genocide via refugee relocation agencies and aid to Africa.

      • Rob

        Not me. I am Christian and I do nto give my money to support projects in non white places. So not all of us are like that.

        • Bartek

          I wasn’t speaking in absolutist terms, the problem is popular Christian doctrine and organized religion supports and encourages open borders, mass migration, and multiculturalism.
          After all Christianity is a universal religion for all ethnic groups that is constantly seeking fresh converts.
          You are a minority in the Christian faith if you believe otherwise.
          Having another peoples ethnic god foisted upon us was a disservice in the long run and just another one of the thousand cuts that is contributing to our demise.

    • Rob

      In one way I have to agree with Bartek. Christianity is no longer a bastion of western civilization.

      • Randall Ward

        It may seem that way to you where you live or by reading the MSM. But without Christianity, Whites would be just another barbaric race. Through the Holy Spirit, once Whites accepted Christ; our world changed for the better.
        Stalin, and Hitler, showed what a white world without Christ is like and the USA is becoming more and more like National Socialist Germany, in every way.

        • Rob

          I agree with you. Christianity made western civilization. What I was saying is that chruches have been hijacked by cultural marxists and now they are no longer bastions of western civilization.

        • Guest

          And perhaps like the other ‘barbaric’ races we would be in ascendancy instead of decline.

        • Weisheit77

          I wish we were luck enough to be like NS Germany.
          These problems would be solved very quickly.

  • Alexander Baron

    So much for “White” supremacy; blacks especially know which side their bread is buttered. Liberals will be the death not only of the white man but of everyone else. If they had their way, the millions of “asylum seekers” clamouring to get into Europe now would all be granted access. A proper solution would be to stop admitting them and for our governments to stop meddling in places that are no business of ours. We can trade with countries like India, China and even black Africa without this “diversity” madness.

    • Weisheit77

      Steve Sailer has been having some good posts recently exposing the Sisyphean task of Europe adsorbing Africa’s problem.

  • sam sneed

    “we are all the same” uh no. You dont have a 180 iq. Also, the areas your people inhabit ijn number are trash strewn and stinky. My people make beautiful towns and churches.

  • sam sneed

    The problem is the use of the word WHITE. that is a SLAVE word they ABUSE us with. We are not WHITES. That is a color. I am a europanic American, not a skin color. Hispanic has the same problem – there is NO SUCH THING. You are a guatemalan or mexican or brazilian. You are NOT a hispanic.

    • Bartek

      Obviously the terms the ruling class provides are their tools not ours.

  • Rob

    There are some hispanics that support white interests. Not only that even some middles easterners and asians support white interests. I know a hispanic girl that is pure white, she told me that she hates the black and latino cultures because they are very vulgar. Just look at their dances and their way of interacting. Very sexual. She is dating a white American and not some negro and even though her mother is dominican (white) she will never date or marry a negro dominican.
    So these people know what truly is good and it is western civilization.

    • IstvanIN

      The non-Whites who support us, or at least our nation as it was, are those who realize, just like the black supporters of Rhodesia and South Africa, what will happen when we are toppled from control. There are people who know a good thing when they have it and how fragile that good thing is. Who, with any brains, wants the grand-kids to live in a giant El Salvador?

      • Rob

        Or a Haiti

  • rentslave

    David Duke and Hal Turner tried,but the $aturday People locked them up.

    • Rodney S

      Hal Turner was an FBI informant.

      • Rustler

        As was so obvious to many.

  • gemjunior

    Ask Tim Wise and his circle of friends.

    • Rob

      Tim Wise has made a career by selling white hatred.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    “So, why are you are giving away your country?”

    The super altruism of the Western European, the same super altruism that created Western Civilization, is easily exploited by cultural Marxist pirates.

    ‘Convictions are prisons’. –Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

    Probably the most fatal of the western convictions was ‘…to give a person the benefit of the doubt.’ ; the essence of ‘…innocent until proven guilty.’

    • Bartek

      Almost all of the ideology from the enlightenment that we have been trained to identify with is fatal. If this is what liberty is all about we were fools to give up our kings.

      • Rustler

        Exactly. Liberalism, in the sense of “classical liberalism” that American conservatives worship is what is killing us.

  • Epiminondas
  • Paleoconn

    Answer: because suicide is preferable to being called a racist.

  • listenupbub

    Agreed.

  • mikey7777

    yea well you know we are all done when Bruce JEN ner has become our new and greatest poster child and declares I am a REPUBLICAN lmfao!

  • listenupbub

    Christopher, I know I can’t expect you to do anything for any race but your own, but if you have it in your heart, please do your part to fight against the destruction of the white race.

    I do not want the destruction of the hispanic race, and I would want to stop those who would. The same with the Asian race. So please stop those who are destroying our race.

    (by race I mean not only phenotypes but culture)

  • Shadrach

    If only more Whites thought like this person, our nation and perhaps many other White Nations would be saved from destruction.

  • Rodney S

    Why is Christopher De La Viña in my country? Answer: Because the USA will soon be dissolved and become part of the North American Union. Duh.

    • IstvanIN

      It sounds as if his family has been here for a number of generations, perhaps even as far back as when the Spanish Crown had the southwest, which would make him pretty darn American. Not all Hispanics are anti-American.

      • Who Me?

        And he asks the “White people” a good question, BUT notice that he STILL says “you White people” and “your people”. And places a sharp divide between “his people” and “White people”. This shows that for all his 6 generations and over a century in the U.S. he still thinks of himself as somehow other than “American”. The only reason this is a good thing coming from this person is because absolutely NO WHITE PERSON can dare to say it.

        • BlueSonicStreak

          I’m not sure I agree that’s what his word usage is showing. He is clearly concerned for the future of America, and puts that above Hispanic immigration. That certainly shows more loyalty to America than the world’s Hispanics to me. The Hispanics currently pouring over the southern US border have no such loyalty to America, and don’t care at all that they will change America’s fundamental character.

          I also thought we rather wanted a sharp divide between whites and non-whites. He is well within his rights to consider himself proud to be part of a different peoples, and I would encourage it.

      • Rodney S

        Then why does he refer to the USA as “your country”?

        • IstvanIN

          Probably because he is addressing White people.

  • DelmarJackson

    Why do whites let this happen? Because they have an astounding array of extremely powerful groups who are in favor of it happening. It is done for profit, power and punishment.
    look at who is against us.
    Bilionaire open border globalists
    leaders of all churches and synagogues
    academia
    labor unions
    news media
    big business corporations
    slave owning class of millionaire farmers
    leadership of both political parties
    environmentalists and green party
    Hollywood
    Ford Foundation
    ethnic advocates
    foreign governments
    the UN
    they have all the power,money and influence.
    We have one senator, Jeff sessions, a handful of Congressman, a handful of writers that have been banned from MSM, a few tiny websites like this one and vdare, Numbersusa, CIS, FAIR, Laura Ingraham on the radio, a few people that make YouTube videos, and that is about it.
    We have the few people that are awake and not afraid of being smeared, and they have all the money and power and influence.
    If the recent college report that found we are now an oligarchy and no longer a democracy, that all of our truly important policy is decided by rich globalists, if that did not did not cause an uproar, I think they may be putting stuff in our water, as what else is there to make someone mad enough to do something?
    nbody voted for the 1965 immigration Act that opened the flood gates. it was all a lie, everything the proponents said would never happen came true, and all the warnings of the critics also came true.
    Also, when citizens of California passed proposition 187 to end jobs and benefits to illegals, it passed overwhelmingly, and then an activist commie judge over ruled the wil of the people. We did not give the country away, it was stolen. And immigrants did not take it from us, it was billionaire globalists and cultural Marxists working together that took it from us and gave it away, for profit, power and punishment.

    • WR_the_realist

      No doubt about it, we are outgunned. We have pea shooters, they have nukes.

  • 1776commence

    What a well written and incredibly honest article! Great Job!

  • CM732

    There is no way the US will become white again without a Civil War which would be impossible for white people to win.

    The idea is similar to Muslims wanting to establish an Islamic Caliphate in the middle East which also has no chance of ever becoming a reality.

    The country like all western countries is already gone. The only thing left is our race, we need to be able to freely be proud of our identity and look to build on it in positive non-violent ways. It is the only way we will survive.

    • Rustler

      Defeatist nonsense.

      • CM732

        I call it honesty. Can you please outline an alternative?

        • Vyncennt

          An ocean separates us. Leave them alone. Completely alone. Detain/deport or exterminate any who come to our shores. This is a viable alternative.

          • CM732

            What about everyone that is hear? Most white people me included think people of other races deserve to be fairly treated. What about them?

          • Vyncennt

            Deport the illegals. Let the rest stay without special protections or benefits. The chaff will filter itself out in a generation or two.

          • Who Me?

            “Deport the illegals”
            *******************
            Yes, I know I’ve said it myself many times, but we all know that’s is NOT EVER going to happen, not in a million years. This country is never going to get enough voters to approve it, nor enough tax money to do it. The only way to even approximate getting rid of them is by an unspeakably brutal civil war, after which the world will never again be the same, and I don’t know if any of us would come through it able to look at ourselves in the mirror. That may be the only way we can survive, and if so, we may do it, but it won’t be easy and it won’t be pretty.

          • Who Me?

            Then treat them fairly. Really. No special set asides, no affirmative action, no special tuition grants or race based scholarships. An educational system and a work force based on merit and performance alone. A “work or starve” social system.

          • CM732

            Yeah I agree with that.

    • Rob

      It will never be non violent. Thinking that way is foolish. I bet you are a troll. I do not like conflicts, but sadly if whites have to clean up shop, it will have to come through battles

      • CM732

        Battles we cannot win. Fools like you will get me and my race killed.

        • Rob

          The what do you suggest we do??? Feel free to give ideas. Hopefully good ones and not foolish Mahatma Gandhi or hippe ideas troll.

          • CM732

            We become like the Jews. A highly successful and united minority that has survived for 2000 years. We need to gain financial and political power through hard work and intelligence combined with helping each other achieve success and our freedom.

          • Rob

            LOL. Thanks for proving that you are a troll.

          • CM732

            Can you form an argument for that?

          • Rob

            Read what you have written and who we say we should be like.

          • IstvanIN

            We are not united.

          • CM732

            Now you know the problem, how can we fix it? I think we won’t be united until we purge the racists from the race realists.

          • Lexonaut

            They understand force. The British knew this, and so does former Congressman Tom Tancredo, who suggested that we announce we are prepared to nuke the Grand Mosque and Kaaba in Mecca if they do not leave the west alone.

            We could show our resolve by picking a lesser site, ordering it to be evacuated, and then hitting it with a tactical nuke regardless of world opinion and regardless of whether the orders to evacuate had been obeyed.

          • Lexonaut

            Yes, folks, nuclear war. It stopped the Japanese and it can stop the Radical Islam death cult. If they still won’t stop, use of nuclear weapons can make it entirely feasible to rid the earth, in fairly short order, of the 100 million or so people who are either causing the trouble or supporting those who cause it.

          • IstvanIN

            Nuclear war would only be “practical”, so to speak, if we still have atomic bombs such as those used against Japan. Modern nuclear weapons that make places uninhabitable for thousands of years and spread radiation all over the globe makes the cure worse than the disease.

          • Lexonaut

            “Modern nuclear weapons that make places uninhabitable for thousands of years …”

            I don’t understand that remark. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were multikiloton fission bombs. The modern multimegaton thermonuclear warhead is fission-fusion-fission, with most of the energy release coming from fission. Otherwise they are identical in their thermal and radiological effects, just on a much larger scale. They don’t spread lethal radiation all over the globe, and they don’t make places uninhabitable for thousands of years.

          • IstvanIN

            If nuclear war is as “safe” as atomic war was 70 years ago why all the brouhaha over Iran getting the bomb? And radiation does get kicked up into the atmosphere and spread all over the world.

          • Lexonaut

            The brouhaha over Iran getting the bomb is because I don’t want them killing us. Do you imagine that their ICBM program is for the delivery of medical isotopes?

            We could stop Iran in one night by mounting a massive special forces and cruise missiles raid to knock off the leadership, but we’ve lost the will to do that kind of thing. And anyway, stopping Iran is not the same thing as stopping ISIL. The Iranian people are, or were, civilized and westernized. When it looked like they might overthrow the regime themselves, we walked away and abandoned them to their fate.

            Yes, radiation does get kicked up and spread around. It doesn’t follow that we’re all going to die, or to get cancers, or to give birth to monsters.

          • IstvanIN

            They were becoming Westernized under the Shah, or so it seemed. I believe the Shah westernized too quickly and that led to his family’s downfall.

          • Rob

            I agree with you on this one. Still be careful when you comment on my comments.

          • Lexonaut

            What do you mean “be careful”?

          • IstvanIN

            Gandhi won because he fought the British, who were pretty much done for anyway. Not a good model to follow.

        • IstvanIN

          Our government probably has ways of destroying people we haven’t even heard of. Remember, every war we have lost since the 1950s has been because we didn’t fight to win.

          • CM732

            Forget war. That is just a tool people in power use to destroy us.

    • Lexonaut

      “The idea is similar to Muslims wanting to establish an Islamic Caliphate
      in the middle East which also has no chance of ever becoming a reality.”

      It’s here now and ISIL is very, very real. The question is whether its metastatic growth is going to be stopped and then reversed by the west. The answer is going to continue to be no as long as we keep overthrowing the governments that were holding Radical Islam in check.

      • CM732

        ISIL are a problem that can be solved by a big bomb. It is easy. I think they want war an instability in the Middle East.

        • Lexonaut

          “ISIL are a problem that can be solved by a big bomb.”

          I basically agree. See my replies to one of Rob’s posts.

      • IstvanIN

        Yes, our penchant for overthrowing stable governments that we don’t like but haven’t harmed us has caused much grief.

    • IstvanIN

      We could win a civil war but it would be very bloody.

      • CM732

        No we could not win a civil war unless you could get close to 100% of whites to agree with it which won’t happen.

        • BlueSonicStreak

          I just had a conversation a few days ago with a guy who said he is on the liberal side “because it is winning” even though he doesn’t entirely disagree with white nationalists. He said quite baldly that he would be willing to swap sides the moment the liberals weren’t the winning side anymore.

          I think there is a strong tendency in people to want to go with the crowd and not be associated with a losing minority. I think if we were really pushed into some sort of civil war, there would be more converts to the “white” side than there currently appears to be.

          But I agree that I don’t know if it would be everyone, or even winning numbers.

          • CM732

            We don’t need or want a civil war to stay as a group. We do need to treat others how we want to be treated.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            I don’t WANT a war…

            I am realistic enough to know that disputes between peoples over land (which is essentially what this is) have historically not tended to be settled via political niceties.

  • Rustler

    The real problem, as the author notes, is the inability of white people to see racial conflicts for what they are. Whites to explain racial issues away through every conceivable non-racial angle, rather than just talk about race directly like blacks, Hispanics and other non-whites do. This “colorblind” nonsense is what is killing us. That’s why conservatism and libertarianism are dead ends.

  • Rob

    He cites Picasso as one of the great white people. Picasso was not a great painter. In fact he ruined art and made it bad with his trash art. My 4 year old nephew can draw better pictures than Picasso. True art is from the renaissance era when artists actually knew how to sculpt and draw things as they were. Not like Picasso and other so called modern day artists that just draw a square and a circle and splash some paint and call it ‘Modern Art’

    • Lexonaut

      “True art is from the renaissance era when artists actually knew how to sculpt and draw things as they were.”

      We have photography for that today, and 3D modeling. These technologies have liberated artists beginning with the Impressionists.

      Art is what good artists say it is, not what you say it is. You’re qualified to say what you do and don’t like, but quite obviously you know almost nothing about art including having no idea where Picasso’s second phase art came from.

      • Rob

        I guess you are a lemming. Maybe not all of Picasso’s art is trash, but most of it is not like true art. So before you comment, think about it. You will not win any fights with me.

        • IstvanIN

          I suppose it comes down to a matter of taste. I find Picasso’s weird stuff goofy. On the other hand I like Thomas Kinkade. The experts, who will gush over a canvas covered with paint-balls, hate Kinkade. And while I don’t own a Kinkade I have purchased them as gifts for my mother, sister, sister-in-laws and daughter and they all love them. Whenever I can find a Kinkade greeting card for mom I buy it. To each his own.

      • IstvanIN

        Photography and painting are not exactly the same thing. Photography can be either utilitarian or artistic, depending on the composition, but a painting always has a bit of the artist’s soul in it. The two are different and, even when used for a realistic purpose, such as the official portrait of a governor, a photo doesn’t take the place of a painting.

        • Lexonaut

          Photography almost killed the portrait painting market. My point is simply that representational art is part of art but not the defining part. The young Picasso was a well known and excellent representational artist, but he got bored and decided to come up with his own version of seeing the world the way the Ancient Egyptians did. I don’t happen to care for his work but never in a million years would I claim that it isn’t art, and anyone who does knows nothing about art.

          • IstvanIN

            Inexpensive photography made it possible for people to have pictures of loved ones without the expense and time it takes to get a portrait done, sort of like email versus postal mail. There will always be a need for physical mail, it just won’t be as necessary. Sort of like color film and digital storage have made painted color pictures unnecessary. My baby portrait is a photo where the color was painted on. Very common in the 1950s when color film turned purple rather quickly. Technology makes older forms less neccessaary fro the mass market but not obsolete.

          • Lexonaut

            I don’t disagree — and by the way I’m a sometime amateur fine art photographer … who comes from a family of painters.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      Picasso was not a great painter.

      …Really?

      Okay, here is Picasso drawing things “as they are.”

      When you understand the rules…yes, you CAN break them.

      • Rob

        Probably, but your comments like I have seen are illogical and silly.

        • BlueSonicStreak

          …What? What’s illogical and silly? You have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • IstvanIN

      I never understood his art but I will admit that neither I nor my 5 year old grandson could do this. Do I care for Picasso, no, but I do appreciate art like that of Van Gogh, which isn’t exactly realistic but more impressionistic. You can tell what Van Gogh was painting even if it wasn’t strictly realistic. Picasso just doesn’t do it for me, too weird.

      • Rob

        I agree. I guess Picasso had some good art, but sadly his trash art is being promoted.

  • UncleSham

    White people are driven by ideology. We will fight and die for our beliefs, but we are not driven by our biological instincts to the extent that most humans are. If the dominant ideology of the day says that suicide is righteous, then most Whites will kill themselves. Whites are not especially easy to brainwash, but once we are convinced of something we will cast aside all opposing considerations in pursuit of it.

    Whites need an ideal to pursue. When people claim that White racial consciousness is more dangerous than other types of racial consciousness, to an extent, they are correct. Most Whites will not bother with a cause until it becomes an epic contest of good vs evil. This makes it basically inevitable that we end up taking things too far.

  • WR_the_realist

    A great article. The tragedy is that it is appearing only here, on an official “hate” site.

    Politicians will not read it. Our overlords in the mass media will not read it. The average American white person will not read it.

  • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

    I’m always amused that the people who revile National Socialism are the ones who know nothing about it. Never read Mein Kampf, couldn’t tell you a thing about any of it other than “6 trillion killed, Hitler is baaaaaaad”.

    • Samuel Hathaway

      There were another 5 million Europeans killed under the Holocaust, but the Jews have so monopolized the entire issue, the others seemingly don’t warrant any attention.

      • JohnEngelman

        Jews were specifically targeted by the Holocaust. Arguing otherwise is considered to be a mild form of Holocaust denial.

        • Samuel Hathaway

          Er, uh, excuse me…. Mild or otherwise, Holocaust denial is not part of the thinking of those who wonder where the attention is on the other 5 million killed, the gypsies, for example. Of course, Jews were the main targets, which as a matter of common sense, we all know.
          And of course, the “holocaust” if you want to use that term, of the

          Communists who starved to death 6 million Ukraines from 1932-33.
          There’s been plenty of silence (denial?) on that one.

          • Ograf

            The so called “holocaust” is and has been nothing but a cash cow, and they keep digging for more money more money. i’m done with this thread,

          • anony

            The 6 million number of Jews killed has been greatly reduced to date. The number of Ukrainians has been greatly increased.

        • anony

          Is “holocaust denial” a disease?

    • JohnEngelman

      I have read Mein Kampf. It is on my desk as I write. I have also taken a seminar on Das Kapital given by the Washington, DC chapter of the American Communist Party.

      Communist dictatorships were not what Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels advocated.

      One cannot argue that the problem with Adolf Hitler was that he never lived up to his ideals.

  • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

    Yet those well-educated and affluent Americans care nothing for their fellow citizens who aren’t so blessed. We need ditch diggers and janitors, and why not employ Americans in that type of job, and pay them a living wage instead of letting them get welfare and importing hostile and incompatible foreigners? My WHITE ancestors built this country specifically for their posterity (their white descendants) and if those well-educated and affluent Americans don’t know this, then perhaps they aren’t as well-educated as they think. What do we owe the foreigners? We can’t and don’t even take care of our own!

    • JohnEngelman

      I see immigration as an economic problem because it raises the population. More people depress wages. It does not matter what race they are.

      Nevertheless, I like the diversity immigrants contribute, so I am ambivalent on the issue of immigration. I am ambivalent on lots of issues. Ambivalence prevents fanaticism.

    • JohnEngelman

      I have known good people and bad people of all races. I like the good people, and dislike the bad people, regardless of race.

      More immigrants mean more job applicants. More job applicants mean that it is harder to get a get a job; they mean that you are paid less if you get the job; them mean that it is easier to lose that job. It does not matter what race the job applicants are.

      • Samuel Hathaway

        More immigrants also means more competition for the immigrants, legal and illegal, who are already here, as well as the scary possibility that there will no jobs at all to be applied for, either.

        • JohnEngelman

          On a number of occasions I have expressed my ambivalence about immigrants. I enjoy the cultural diversity they contribute, while acknowledging that a high rate of immigration has economic, environmental, and social costs.

          A high rate of immigration interferes with nearly everything else liberals want to achieve.

      • Who Me?

        John, you keep thinking that until you come to this agricultural area and learn that the foremen of the large orchards and other growers travel across the border and contract with their counterparts down below the border to bring in entire crews of low-paid workers, (undocumented to a man) to work the season, ostensibly to return after the growing season. Which they almost never do, or only to pack up the wives and kids and drag them back up here to get on welfare. Then they repeat the same process the next year with new farm laborers.

  • B B

    so…….how is it the US wound up during white war 2 on the side of the communists, who a few short months (?) later became our worst arch-enemy? who set that up?

  • B B

    excellent post. and yes, you can’t go a day in the US without hearing the word nazi. somebody’s sure gotten a lot of traction out of it,
    applied however indiscriminately they choose.

  • Light from the East

    As far as I am concerned, the political “far right” in the West means “center right” in the Asian countries. If a politician in Asian countries advocates the idea like some Swedish politicians do, he is suspiciously considered a “traitor” and won’t get any support from the general public.

    The current liberal atmosphere in the West is far from normal for a country to ensure its sustainability. Everyone accepts it as normal because people are used to being brainwashed by media.

    WWII surely implanted a deep scar for most white people and it has a huge psychological impact on the liberal movement later on, but think about it – almost no white people care about the lives of other white people. The majority of total casualties of WWII is white, but the fear against the fascist government drove white people to care about people from other races, who have little things to do with white people. The guilt and fear is the main force for the whole liberal movement going crazy. Negative emotions never make things better and always let you head into the wrong path.

    White people are the minority of the world and some still think whites should be the minority in their homelands. If white people disappear, it will be a huge loss for human civilization.

  • historian5931 .

    We are not giving our country away. Yes many whites are blinded by political correctness, but it is our Zionist/globalist controlled government who are giving our country away. There was a time when non whites were not eligible for immigration into the U.S. The government under strong Zionist influence changed that law to allow for the current massive invasion that is making us a minority in our country. This decision was not left up to white men or women and if it were it wouldn’t have happened. Even today if immigration was left up to a vote by the people, most whites would not have more non white immigration. But the will of whites means nothing because we are not represented by our government. Our government really serves Zionists and other special interests, not whites.

  • David Ashton

    “US citizens” may be “equal” under the law. Mexicans are citizens of Mexico.

  • because we are not in control of america–the multi-national corporations are in control. And they want more workers and more consumers so they can get more profit.

  • AmericanCitizen

    Read it weeks ago, but thanks for the tip. A Prog today is not the prog of 1910 anymore than a 1910 Democrat would embrace Obama today.

  • Vyncennt

    I wonder if the author of this piece realizes he has asked the wrong group of readers that rather interesting question….?

  • White Man: Why Are You Giving Away Your Country?
    Giving? More like Given.

    • IstvanIN

      We, or our parents/grandparents, were the vast majority when all the nonsense began so we deserve the bulk of the blame.

  • Susan

    Whites must stop over-reacting to being called racist. It’s not wrong to be a racist, to be white and prefer to live and work among whites. We must stop defending ourselves because we’ve done nothing wrong. Everyone has preferences and prejudices about EVERYTHING! I prefer whites to all other races. I’m a racist. So what? We’ve allowed government, idiot white liberals, & nigras to beat us up with that word. And now it’s white privilege. Someone’s always going to keep us whites tangled up in this race name-calling mess if we don’t stop reacting to it.

  • Edward Conley

    Wow.Thanks for your honesty. I pray that America wakes up from this nightmare before it is too late.

  • armchair_warrior

    Saddest thing is they are exporting this dumb idea to the rest of the world!
    Oh you can’t exploit country a cause that’s racist!! and other bs. It’s in state of nature.

  • TrueNorthFree

    Sorry, this post is off topic!!
    I just spent some hours perusing Jared Taylor speaking on Youtube. I am a life long lefty progressive who recently “woke up” after reading about the Rotherham rapes. I must say that after watching just a few videos of Jared Taylor on Youtube I am in awe of the man.
    There is a Youtube video of him speaking eloquently to an extremely hostile majority-black audience at Towson University and he pulled no punches. I was shocked at the hatred the crowd openly displayed toward whites. Yikes!! The next step in my de-programming is watching every Jared Taylor video on Youtube.

    • Sean Fielding

      Wonderful! When you are ready, start working to convince the young.

      • TrueNorthFree

        Frankly, I am terrified to speak out publicly in my personal life. Just daring to mildly question the standard “multi-culti” dogma means you are immediately branded a hatemonger and worse.

        For now I will gather information and become informed.

        • Sean Fielding

          For sure. ‘When you are ready’ can be a long time.

          But eventually, you will be surprised to find you are ‘the one who says out loud what so many others think.’

    • Cindy

      I’ve watched several interviews of Jared Taylor too. The hosts always embarrass themselves by trying to make Mr. Taylor look like a hateful person. This always falls flat because it’s simply not true. It’s obvious that Jared Taylor is motivated by love of White people, not hatred of non-Whites.

      • TrueNorthFree

        ” It’s obvious that Jared Taylor is motivated by love of White people, not hatred of non-Whites.”

        That is extremely obvious whenever he speaks but what I find so fascinating is that the simple act of publicly stating you love white people is apparently a reason to call someone the most vile names. When I watched that Towson Univ. video Taylor was not saying anything hateful, but he was being treated in a very hateful way by the majority African American crowd. Since when did it become “hate speech” for whites to publicly say they prefer the company of your own kind???

        • Hank Richter

          My goodness, you say “African-American”? Sounds like your deprogramming still isn’t finished lol.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      Hey, TrueNorth! I woke up from the left recently too. The Rotherham scandal was unspeakable; but at least there may be a slim silver lining to it if it wakes up many whites.

      I admire Jared Taylor greatly. He’s an example of what white nationalism should strive to be.

      Looking at your username, are you Canadian by any chance? If so, I would also recommend checking out eurocanadian[dot]ca, which I recently discovered myself. There are some good articles there, and more focus on Canadian issues.

      • TrueNorthFree

        haha – the “True North Strong and Free” clue that only a Canadian would recognize… 🙂

  • Sean Fielding

    You’re wrong.

  • Samuel Hathaway

    “We Are all the Same.”

    No, we are not all the same. That’s just an anti-white slogan, a classic bait and switch tactic for whites to be lulled into ceding more of their society to those who have no business being here.

    Moreover, “We Are all the Same” is also code for amassing political and cultural power at the expense of whites. When you are excluded from the benefits afforded the Hispanic hordes, and when you tell them you have the right to share in those benefits by telling them, “We are all the Same, see what kind of reaction you get when you show up in the name of your own race, just like the Hispanics are doing.

  • Hispanics are not a real race. They are what everyone becomes who mixes.
    I have not problem with Blacks. I have not problem with Whites. I do have a problem with mixing.
    Hispanics are the only genetic racist in the world. They will genocide all Blacks, all Whites, and all Asians within 500 years.
    Hispanics are the worst invention ever invented.

    • Hank Richter

      Well, there you go, piss off a guy that’s actually writing an article in favor of us.

  • Who Me?

    Yes, nice little song, but did you notice that EVERY SINGLE IMMIGRANT PICTURED in the entire video was WHITE? The White immigrant coming over on the boat and disembarking at Ellis Island is no more. Now the average immigrants are planeloads of Somalis (and other Africans) and vans driven by paid coyotes, crammed to the gills with Central and South Americans, swarming across the southern border, and NONE of them are White.

    • JohnEngelman

      As a race realist I readily acknowledge that people of some races tend to be better able to contribute to modern civilizations than people of other races.

  • Mr. Platinumberg

    It has a lot to do with a topic that AmRen studiously avoids…

    • Hank Richter

      Oh brother, not this again.

  • BlueSonicStreak

    I don’t think you whites are crazy, nor do I think you can be so easily brainwashed.

    Well, if the author has the time or inclination to follow our comments – and that quoted line wasn’t mere rhetorical flourish – by now he should know that most of us disagree. We CAN be brainwashed that easily. We have been, and are currently.

    There are many people here who seem to have been conservative their whole lives, unlike me. I do not think those people fully appreciate the emotional distortions of the left, which get worse the closer you get to its radical core.

    Whites on the left are not ALLOWED to have (or even much be aware of) normal human emotions like pride in your people, or anger at our mistreatment. That sort of thing is castigated as “reinforcing white supremacy,” and that’s mean to non-white people! You don’t want to do THAT…do you? You’re a bad person if you do…

    This is what you will be told as you enter the gates of liberalism. If you accept that idea, it gets worse and worse from there. You cannot be angry on your own behalf, because that is white supremacist. But you also cannot be TOO angry on behalf of the Colorful Ones, because that is “appropriating” their anger. Ditto sorrow. Guilt and shame are actually out too – contrary to popular belief – because they are “unproductive.” Goodness me, you don’t want to be an UNPRODUCTIVE anti-racist…do you?

    Of course, you’ll probably feel guilty anyway, so then you get to be guilty for feeling guilty, which is a nice paralytic cycle.

    Anxiety is welcomed, though! Being anxious makes you hyper-alert. You’ll catch the tiniest expression of racism better that way!

    You may have noticed that the farther to the left someone goes, the more they get really emotionally whacked-out – wildly overreacting to small things, but having inappropriate or no reactions to things that would normally produce simple but powerful responses. Everyone is increasingly like this farther and farther to the left, but whites are the worst. That is the obvious and expected result of suppressing normal emotions, and living in a state of numb emotional dissociation from the suffering of your people – when those emotions DO come out, they’re expressed in a way which is totally “off.”

    I recently saw a YouTube video of Anderson Cooper on one of those “discover your heritage” shows. He was told by the black host that one of his ancestors was a slave owner who was attacked and brutally murdered by a rebellious slave. Cooper’s reaction was ecstatic glee and a bit of giggling. Even the black host recoiled slightly and said, “That was your ancestor.” Even non-whites recognize there is something abnormal and wrong with the way whites have been trained to react to our own demise, individually or as a group.

  • dd121

    That’s the song this choir sings every day. Hope the tune catches on.

  • LeonNJ

    I enjoyed reading this, unfortunately. I’m a pessimistic person at heart so I fear the worst outcome for everything. We have a voice in fantasy, which I view as being the Internet. We have a voice on blogs, websites and YouTube comments, but that doesn’t create anything in reality. Our politicians don’t fight for us, and we all know that. So I see a dark future ahead. Since we don’t see any action now to change things, do we expect that change to magically arrive in 10 years from now or 20? Doubt it. The America of 2050 should might as well arrive next week, since the battle to fight against it is hardly being done. I honestly don’t know what to do.

    • Hank Richter

      Well, you can always hope there will be a tipping point, but the real problem is things I see even in my own relatives, they don’t like many of the things that are going on, but they really won’t do anything about it either.

      I just think of my uncle who sent both his kids to U of M, an incredibly left wing college, now he’s shocked that his kids are calling him racist and all that, I mean, whites are actually PAYING to have these colleges brainwash their kids.

  • anony

    ” Making it illegal in Europe to even ask questions indicates that there’s a massive cover up going on–”

    That single fact has launched me onto a research project into the “causes” of WWII.

    WWI and WWII, it seems to me, were the two most important “historical” events of the 20th century. It would behoove all who want to understand what is happening now to unravel the true causes of those two events.

    The fact that it is illegal in Europe to ask questions about one of the most important events of the century strikes me as criminal. It is certainly totalitarian and unacceptable.

  • dmxinc

    Our bastardized political system of “winner take all’ is partly to blame.

    We have no voice with this two party system. The Liberals go hard left and “Conservatives” straddle the fence so as not to offend anyone.

    Anyone who wants to fix this mess can’t even get a seat at the table.

    Add to that the media and education establishments brainwashing of our citizens and you have a perfect storm for the destruction of our nation’s future.

  • FloridaGal2005

    Whites aren’t blind, they’re cowards.

    • Holden

      No, Whites aren’t cowards. They’re afraid. A great thread by the late Lawrence Auster delves into this very issue:

      www[dot]amnation[dot]com/vfr/archives/021671.html

      • Sam Seller

        Problematically, for us to fight back, we would have to assemble secretly and make plans to grow our organization with secret membership. We would probably need to invest in polygraph technology to ensure that our leaders have not fallen victim to the ambient propaganda. National intelligence can quite literally read your mind, and they are looking for assemblies of white or american nationalists in order to infiltrate, impoverish, or otherwise destroy those organizations.

        White or even American nationalism would need to be conducted in secrecy, and the latter would require extensive lie detection hardware.

        Even creating a secret support group for the social and financial victims of ethnic separatism would go a long way towards improving our lives. If we had someone to talk to, in person, whom we could talk to without endangering ourselves, this would be good.

    • David C

      Right you are

  • RiceEssence

    It isn’t white people’s country no matter how entitled minded white people are. White people need to learn to adapt as minority as they always have been, or cease to exist.

  • Elie Challita

    You’re not talking about race, but about cultural assimilation.

    I’ll be the first one to say that immigrants coming into a country should learn its languages and follow its laws. If they wish those laws to reflect their own cultural beliefs more closely, there’s a democratic process for that.

    But how in holy hell does race have anything to do with this? The US has always had a changing culture, and there is much more cultural difference between New York, San Francisco, and Chicago than there would be between London, Birmingham, and even Edinburgh. And that’s part of the charm.

    On a different note, why would having Spanish as a second language be a problem, as long as one is reasonably proficient in English? Nobody ever suffered from being bilingual.

    The problem with saying “Whites First” isn’t that you come off as racist: It’s that it is essentially meaningless, even without the historical implications of the word. Hispanic communities across the US have very similar issues even when they’re geographically distant. So do black communities, especially the overwhelming majority of black communities in poor areas. What do all people of Caucasian descent have in common all across the US, except for a certain lack of melanin?

  • Hispanic is such a meaningless word. Those that describe themselves as such are usually white. Mexican as in brown people are really just American Indians, native American or whatever PC word you choose. But I suppose that using such an irrelevant word protects you from being fired, isolated, sued, or whatever punishment libtards demand.

  • RaySist27

    Whites, as a race, have a disease. That disease is called liberalism. It’s a suicidal way of thinking that has poisoned the White mind. Most diseases are fought, contained, and eliminated. But liberalism is actually spread. The people who spread this disease infect our White children, effectively making the disease permanent within the its victims. I got lucky, somehow I developed an immunity to the liberal poison. Unfortunately for my race, far too many of us have succommed to the disease. If we don’t find a way to stop it, liberalism will be the death of the White race.

  • DonReynolds

    I can see some of your confusion, and if you lived in the border area, you should already recognize it.

    It is not about WHITES, not even in Texas, but that is a good place to see it closely.
    It is about ANGLOS and GERMANS……not WHITES. (Even in Europe, the division is the same.)

    When you lived in the parts of Texas settled by Germans, maybe you noticed a Lutheran church at one end of town and a Catholic church at the other end. Germans and Mex did not have a problem and have lived alongside each other for generations. All those Mexican beers are lager beers, brought to Mexico by German immigrants. Same stuff. Plenty of Roman Catholic Irish in Mexico too (Fox, former president of Mexico, uses an Irish name) and on the Texas side of the border too. None of these are Anglos.
    What you call WHITES are really Anglos. They never made peace with the Comanche in Texas…..the Germans made a separate peace with the Comanche and settled in Comanche territory. The Alamo was about Anglos…..so was San Jacinto…..so was Texas Independence, and Stephen Austin, and Sam Houston. Those were Anglos and it is still the Anglos who settled the United States and completely dominated this country before my lifetime. (The guys on the money…..yeah, those are Anglos.)

    So with part of the confusion cleared up, the question remains the same only slightly reworded……”Why are the Anglos giving away their country?”

    They never knew that they were. After being the founding stock of this country, they let in the Germans, and the Jews, and the Latins (yes, that also includes Italians), and the Poles, and the other East Europeans. Why? Because when this country was built, it was built by muscle and sweat…..there was an unlimited amount of work to be done and not enough hands and strong backs to do everything that needed to be done. Even after industrialization, it still required millions of laborers. The Anglos did a good job of including non-Anglo Europeans into their language, culture, laws, and customs for about two centuries. People were assimilated and when the Anglos became a minority (already), then Anglos no longer decided who would be invited into the United States. So now the European majority drives the nation and they have invited the world to join the party. (There seems to be plenty of food and room.) But some of the newcomers do not want to assimilate…..so they don’t……but at 16% of the population (half of whom are illegal aliens), the hispanics are in no danger of becoming a majority.

    As an Anglo, I do not feel like I am giving away my country. That happened long before I was born.

    • Harry Savannah

      Your explanation is asinine. As late as the early 20th century whites of all “nationalities” were desirous of maintaining a “European” (white, obviously) racial and cultural (which cultural dimension – true – itself was largely English in cast) homogeneity or at least firm hegemony. Something (and I confess I presently don’t know quite what) was causal of WHITE political traitors to proceed to bring in masses of non-Protestant (99% Prot. – 1789), but, much worse and even suicidally, great numbers of utterly alien, hostile, malevolent, subversive Eastern European Jews in the mid and late 19th century respectively. With this, in addition to (and through use of) a large, vastly burdensome black African population already in place an early (white) national death was assured.

      • DonReynolds

        Not sure what you think is asinine, Harry.
        White is by no means a single ethnic group…..not in this country and not in Europe.
        In colonial times, Roman Catholics were only allowed to live in Maryland. Later, Maryland was replaced by Pennsylvania. The big Roman Catholic influx started during the Irish Potato Famine and continued for decades. Catholic Italians started arriving mostly in the 1880s. But even still, the USA is still a Protestant country.
        In 1960 the US Census reported that 90 percent of the population was white, but elected the first Roman Catholic president.
        The European conflicts and divisions are brought to our shores in ships, unchanged and perfectly preserved. Yes, we still have them with us today.

        • Harry Savannah

          White is by no means a single ethnic group…..

          Did I not say as much?:

          As late as the early 20th century whites of all “nationalities” were desirous of maintaining a European….

          I’m sorry Don, not to be condescending, but I find your prose to be…unclear.

      • Mark Caplan

        Long before the Roman Catholics and the malevolent, subversive, etc Jews came here, there was the exclusively Protestant movement to free and extend equal rights to all the African slaves.

        At the time, in 1860, African slaves comprised 59% of the population in South Carolina, 53% in Mississippi, and roughly 50% in Florida. Louisiana and Alabama were 46% African slave; Georgia, 42%; North Carolina, 34%; and Virginia, 32%.

    • Jon

      William G Simpson said the said the same thing that the great wave wrecked the country because 23 million Eastern and Central Europeans flooded in with idea and govt completely different from what the founders set up. He also said there was no way to full naturalize and assimilate that many people and this is where a lot of the socialism and communism came from. It was given away long before my generation was born and one could say it started after the civil war.

  • Mark Caplan

    According to the Pew Research Centre, among Americans age 0 to 9, non-Hispanic whites comprise 2.8% of the total US population while Hispanics comprise 5% of the total. So the Hispanization of America is already baked into the burrito. Before most of us even knew what happened, we’ve been refried.

    On a positive note, if whites were half as smart as AmRen cracks us up to be, this takeover of the world’s greatest superpower by an impoverished joke of a country could not have happened.

    • Harry Savannah

      Your point is well-taken. Let’s be rational about this. Europeans (whites) have created the loftiest, most UNIVERSALLY DESIRED CULTURES AND COUNTRIES IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD. So what accounts for the madness, the mental illness (that you imply is stupidity), that would cause whites to docily, willingly expose theirs, their women’s, their children’s throats to the knife. It would be 50 + years of Jewish 24/7/365 hypnotizing, mind-controlling, brainwashing propaganda emanating from ALL establishment institutions. However, their willing part is to their everlasting shame. The remnant that is left of them will curse their vile, worthless, infamous names. Mine will KNOW that I was not one of these shameful, accursed, cowardly whites but TOOK AN UNCOMPROMISING STAND.

      • Mark Caplan

        I wish you luck, but I don’t see how a handful of patriotic stalwarts at this point can turn the tide.

        I’d blame the Catholics at least as much as the Jews. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which led directly to the nation’s destruction, was sponsored by one Jew and two Catholics. Catholicism is just as internationalist in outlook as the so-called Internationalist Jew. When Catholics came here by the tens of millions in the mid to late 1800s, they set up separate school systems, colleges, churches, hospitals and cemeteries, which they maintain as a separate country within a country to this day.

        • Harry Savannah

          You will get no quarrel from me vis-a-vis RC. As I said (implied) something very wrong was going on when this exlusively Protestant nation (99%) simply “let-in” a massive wave of RC. That is, the “powers” permitted them to come. The great dilemma of the ages: traitorous, acquisitive, lying whores (politicians) are given said power. All the more so in a “democracy.”

  • Fr. John+

    “My maternal great-great grandfather had a saying in Spanish about the immigrants who began coming to the United States after the 1960s. In English it would be: “Their stomachs are in America, but their hearts are in Mexico.” This perfectly sums up the attitudes of immigrants from most Third-World countries.”

    And the position of most stupid American Whites in this food chain? Somehwere around La Raza’s posterior, it would appear. Which reminds me of the good old days in Californication during the last ‘big’ drought. “If it’s brown, flush it down.’

    Truer words were never spoken, White Man. Non-whites, “Raus!”

  • ricpic

    The sickness started in Europe after WW II. All that destruction was blamed on whiteness, Nazi ideology and white racial pride, by the emerging ruling class. Europe, or at least its ruling class, has been trying to rid itself of its white guilt by committing suicide ever since. The anti-white ideology was an easy sell to much of the American ruling class. Probably because, for largely snobbish reasons, the American ruling class takes its cues from the European ruling class. And even though most ordinary Americans sense the catastrophe up ahead the ruling class has been able to impose its anti-white ideology by simply leaving the floodgates of the 1964 Immigration Act open. And of course by labeling any opposition to the deliberate destruction of whites and white culture as…bigotry. That silences most opposition because being labelled a bigot is the kiss of death in terms of both career advancement and social standing.

  • Jon

    U spoke the truth because it is a total brainwashing is what happened. It all happened after WWII as ricpic said because before WWI White controlled more than 90% of the world and after WWII we gave it all away. White did not protect their family and let them be brainwashed by the school system. I was in Mexico and could see how the Spanish are responsible for 90% of the culture just as Spain and Portugal built South America but gave it away. The whites in the USA have become zombies and our leaders will always betray us but they keep getting elected. I am glad U spoke the truth and yes 3rd world people can never maintain a 1st world society. Bad Eagle wrote that non-whites should never be allowed to rule over white society because it spells disaster.

  • Alan Martin

    for the same reasons russians stood on breadlines, dreaming about blue jeans and all the while extolling the evils of western capitalism…. indoctrination is a hell of a thing.

  • burgundywhip

    America is not a “white country”. In fact, the only place white people can claim as theirs is Europe. You people cause the most destruction throughout the world . Far more than anyone else today or in the past, yet you look down on others whose history have been erased with yours , stealing and killing for others resources. This is is why people hate you, and even then, its far less hate than what comes from the ” superior ” (lol, skin cancer and weak genes) race, white people.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      You seem to have missed the very simple explanation at the start of the article. The author gets it – why are you having so much trouble?

      It is, indeed, a white country. North America may not be white SOIL (yes, that would be Europe), but America is (or was originally) a white COUNTRY. It was built from the ground up by whites. It is culturally European. It is nothing BUT white. And when it ceases completely to be culturally white, it will fall as a Western nation.

      The claim that we have caused the “most destruction” is grandiose. Whenever I ask people to back that one up, they either get vague on the details, or they apply temporal handicaps – only going back a few hundred years. They deny or do not know the genocides, imperialist empires, etc. that were not ours. Other people in the past did not have the advantage of some of our advances, however, which has made much of the difference in the past few hundred years. Had it been other people to develop the technology first, the past few hundred years would have belonged to another group. (As if other peoples were SHY about conquering others when they had the chance! Ha!)

      I used to believe what you have said, but I have woken up to the fact that I have been lied to on a grand scale. There are no peoples whose hands are clean of blood.

      People hate us because they do not know their history. People hate us because they are envious. (Like you, I would suspect. “Weak genes”? What are you smoking?) People hate us because we are not of their tribe, and they prefer their own – and that’s fair.

      But no, the idea that we are the most hateful is itself a sick, hateful lie. Look at the destruction of our countries! We have spent decades groveling, and trying to make amends – something NO OTHER PEOPLES have ever done, to the best of my knowledge. And look where it has gotten us! You hate us all the more because you perceive you can keep pushing us. No more. Why should we care what you think? You have given us no reason to care, and keep failing to give us reason to care.

      Go on, come to sites like this with your flailing attempts at guilt trips. It’ll work on the liberals, but it won’t work here.

      • burgundywhip

        I’m not having trouble at all. I understood completely, just wanted to say that I f*cling hate you walking, talking cum stains and I hope you all die of prolonged sun exposure.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      Did you really not think that last comment would be removed?

      Do you realize you sound like a small, denied child wailing to their parents, “I HATE you! You ruined my life!”

      You have no power here. We do not HAVE to care about you. Some of us used to, and stopped when we realized we were spoiling you. You don’t deserve to live in the riches of a white man’s country until you can understand what you were given.