Possible Immigration Rift for Obama with Democrats

Julie Pace and Erica Werner, ABC News, August 16, 2014

President Barack Obama is facing potential rifts with members of his own party in tough re-election contests as he barrels toward a fall fight with Republicans over his ability to change immigration policies.

If Obama takes the broadest action under consideration–removing the threat of deportation for millions of people in this country illegally–the short-term risks appear greatest for Senate Democrats in conservative-leaning states. Weeks before the November vote, they could find themselves on the hot seat for their views not only on immigration but also on Obama’s use of his presidential powers.

Wary of what could be coming, some of those lawmakers have said Obama should act with caution.

“This is an issue that I believe should be addressed legislatively and not through executive order,” said Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., one of the top targets for Republicans trying to retake control of the Senate.

Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., another vulnerable incumbent, said in a statement that he also is “frustrated with the partisanship in Washington. But that doesn’t give the president carte blanche authority to sidestep Congress when he doesn’t get his way.”

{snip}

A coalition of advocacy groups, in a letter to congressional Democrats on Friday, said immigrant families should not have to wait until after the November elections for relief. The organizations said any attempts by Democrats to delay or dilute administrative changes “will be viewed as a betrayal of Latino and immigrant communities with serious and lasting consequences.”

{snip}

A spokesman for Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., declined to say Friday whether Schumer still believes Obama should act by October, as Schumer had said before. A spokesman for Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat, said the timing of executive action on immigration was up to Obama. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s spokesman had no comment on timing.

Still, Obama looks determined to move forward on his own despite the political risks for Democrats.

{snip}

The exact contours of Obama’s plans remain unclear.

Advocates and lawmakers who have talked with administration officials anticipate that he could expand a program that granted work permits and deferred deportation to more than 700,000 immigrants brought illegally to the U.S. as kids. It could be extended to include parents of those children, as well as parents of U.S. citizens, or potentially others–groups that could add up to perhaps 5 million people.

During a news conference this month, Obama was not specific on his immigration plans. He did say that in the absence of congressional action and in order to address the crisis involving unaccompanied youths, he had to shift resources on his own and exercise prosecutorial discretion.

“I promise you the American people don’t want me just standing around twiddling my thumbs and waiting for Congress to get something done,” Obama said.

{snip}

Republicans have tagged Obama as an “imperial president” who goes around Congress rather than working with lawmakers, and House Republicans have moved to sue him over it. The prospect of the president making a unilateral move on a contentious issue such as immigration has Republican consultants salivating.

{snip}

Also problematic for Obama: His apparent plans to act on his own authority come after years of saying that he did not have the legal justification to proceed without Congress.

“If, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing them through Congress, I would do so. But we’re also a nation of laws,” he said in November. A heckler had interrupted a speech he was giving in San Francisco, prodding him to halt deportations, which have reached record highs on Obama’s watch.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • JackKrak

    The Dems know it’s short-term risk for long-term reward. Yeah, a few unlucky ones will take the hit this year but in 20 years when President Hernandez eliminates the two-term limit by executive decree and announces his bid for another four years, they will look back and laugh at how nervous they were about the 2014 midterm elections.

    • Spikeygrrl

      In 20 years nobody will remember 2014, or be able to read anything anyone might ever have written about 2014 which by some credulity-straining stretch still will not have been whisked down the leftist Memory Hole.

      “But…but…but…we have always been at war with Eastasia!”

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    I’m surprised the NYT, WSJ, Mark Zuckerberg and others have not yet suggested that the failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform caused Ferguson. Even though (and I’m serious) Rupert Murdoch did tweet that Ferguson is the reason why we need to “fix the schools.”

    • propagandaoftruth

      Shhhh shhhh shhhhh! Lie to them, Barry, until after the election. You know how this works…

  • serious123

    Come on folks. We all know Obama is going to nothing before the election. We cannot be so lucky as to have him declare amnesty before the election.

  • IstvanIN

    A coalition of advocacy groups, in a letter to congressional Democrats on Friday, said immigrant families should not have to wait until after the November elections for relief.
    They are correct, they must be deported today.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      IstvanIN and Usually Much Calmer should not have to wait until after the November elections for law enforcement.

  • http://saboteur365.wordpress.com/ bigone4u

    Can Obama spare the time away from the golf course to take action? Surely not. The man has his priorities. Plus, he’s got two more years after November to destroy the country.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    That’s another thing. What kind of immigration treachery has happened behind our backs while we’re all paying attention to FerguStan? For all I know, Obama could have granted executive order amnesty and citizenship to the whole damned world.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      I was thinking that over the weekend.

      Even if he didn’t do anything. . . all those people didn’t disappear but we sure forgot about them.

      • mobilebay

        BHO is probably dancing with joy over the happenings in Ferguson. Takes out minds off the immigration problem. Come to think of it, I did see a picture of him boogying on Martha’s Vineyard.

    • Spikeygrrl

      I posted that on another board a few hours ago. Look, squirrel!