U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow urged President Barack Obama not to grant temporary amnesty and work permits to millions more illegal immigrants via executive action, asserting Obama’s timing could not be any worse for American workers, especially black Americans.

In a Tuesday letter to Obama, Kirsanow emphasized “the disastrous effect of illegal immigration on the employment of all Americans, but particularly black Americans.” He also said that the “proposed executive order is unfair to people who are attempting to immigrate legally.”

“Any grant of legal status will serve as a magnet to prospective illegal immigrants and further depress employment opportunities and wages for African-Americans,” he wrote. “Given that the labor force participation rate is at an historic low, the unemployment rate is 6.2 percent, and there has been a precipitous decline in household wealth, the timing for such a grant of legal status could not be worse.”

{snip}

He noted that nearly half of Black and three-fourths of illegal immigrant Hispanic males do not have an education beyond high school and, as a result, “illegal immigration has a disparate impact on African-American men” who would directly compete with illegal immigrant Hispanic males for scarce jobs.

“Granting legal status to millions of people who are in the United States illegally will continue to depress the wages and employment opportunities of African-American men and teenagers,” he wrote. “It also will depress the wages and employment opportunities of African-Americas [sic] going forward.”

{snip}

Since “disparate impact theory holds that a facially neutral policy can nonetheless constitute unlawful discrimination if it disproportionately affects a particular group,” Kirsanow wrote that Obama’s “proposed executive order will do just that.”

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    Kirsanow: “illegal immigration has a disparate impact on African-American men…”

    Another leftist who couldn’t care less about White people.

    ““Granting legal status to millions of people who are in the United States illegally…”

    Ahh – NOW they’re ‘illegal.’ When they affect Whites, they’re just “poor chilluns escaping from ‘war-torn poverty’.”

    • ncpride

      Excellent point. It’ll be interesting to see which pet minority wins out here…..my vote is on the illegal aliens.

      • GeneticsareDestiny

        I agree. I think Obama cares more about hurting whitey than he does about helping his fellow blacks. He’s always been insecure about whether he’s “authentically black” enough.

        He’ll side with the illegals on this. Siding with them speeds up the destruction of the historic American nation (aka white America) and helps to increase the chances of the U.S. becoming a de facto one party state. Meanwhile, if he sided with the blacks, he’d gain nothing. They already like him and will continue to vote Democrat no matter what.

        Siding with the illegals is a win-win for both Obama and the Democratic party, while siding with the blacks is an insignificant win coupled with a huge loss.

        • Rhialto

          True enough! The Obama Mama hated White men more than she loved Black men. She indoctrinated this attitude into Barak Hussein while he lived wiht her in Indonesia.

      • kikz2

        they’ve got the numbers…..

      • LIBERTYSINCURSION

        Yup, mine too! I believe Obama, Holder, the NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus are far more concerned with weeding out White America’s power. How do they do that? They flood our country with as many “people of color” as they can in order to dilute the White vote. I mean just think about it. For every Illegal “Person Of Color” to be given citizenship and the right to vote. Means that every Illegal Alien turned instant citizen’s vote is basically a nullification of an actual citizen’s votes. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, we are witnessing the biggest robbery in human history.

        • benvad

          Since white people who vote Democrat wanted to expunge themselves from their so called historical racist past by voting for this Marxist. I also see the blacks cutting off their nose just to spite whites. Really it’s quite pathetic.

          When the blacks are being racially cleansed, I’ll be on the sidelines laughing at their dilemma.

          I know I’ll get displaced but the thought of seeing them persecuted gives me pleasure.

          • LIBERTYSINCURSION

            Of course they’ll eventually turn on their White enablers, just as they did in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe and South Africa.

          • benvad

            Now that is the sweet sound of revenge.

    • Manaphy

      I don’t know if this is a popular position on Breitbart (I assume it isn’t), but frankly, I don’t give two sh!ts about black “workers”.

      • Martel733

        I guess you have never had to spend more than 1/2 hour a shift fixing the mistakes each affirmative action worker makes.

    • Professor Blodnock

      The poor Black precious dears, they are the most important people in American despite the fact that they compose about 13% of the population. One would think that without them the nation would collapse, when its quite the contrary. The blacks should have been repatriated to Africa in 1800.
      Now the illegals pose a threat to the wonderful hard working Blacks,
      now what the blacks have been doing to the whites will be done to them.
      The have sown the wind and now will reap a whirlwind.

      • Nancy

        Lincoln never intended for the Emancipation to result in equality for the blacks. He was always in favor of repatriation; in fact, that’s how the whole “ending slavery” thing got so much support in white circles. People were told that once they were freed, the blacks were being shipped off.

        Talk about a “bait and switch”…

      • Augustus3709

        What are you talking about. The blacks gave 400 years of high quality free labor. The White House was built out of cotton and sugar. That’s why it’s white. You need a refresher in African Studies.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    So? When will black people stop voting for amnesty politicians?

    • JackKrak

      The 1st of Never.

    • Whitetrashgang

      When white people do.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        Well in fairness, we can point to Dave Brat beating Eric Cantor.

        AFAIK, there is not one instance where black people in a black district turned out a black immigration-enthusiast incumbent and replaced him or her with someone who is an immigration restrictionist.

    • TruthBeTold

      When their black leaders tell them not to (which will never happen).

    • Martel733

      when amnesty politicians stop offering mo free stuff at YTs expense.

  • UncleSham

    “disparate impact theory holds that a facially neutral policy can nonetheless constitute unlawful discrimination if it disproportionately affects a particular group,”

    Every law will disproportionately affect a particular group to some extent. Every law has costs and benefits. What disparate impact theory means is that every law in this country must benefit non-Whites at the expense of Whites in order to be legal.

  • Ed

    Oh well they voted for it.

  • D.B. Cooper

    How are WE going to pay for these illegal aliens? I mean, we MUST send them to school, set aside jobs, and Section 8 housing? I know! Let’s cut the funds from people who tend to not vote democrat! Conservatives, if the names on this list are in your state, remember them come election time.

    • Jim Davis

      Well, can’t say I have much love for most veterans either. They fight all these stupid wars that cost us trillions and gain us nothing, I don’t buy into that silly blind patriotism of many on the right, NeoCons are just as bad as Marxists in my book.

    • Sick of it

      Sadly, Landrieu is likely to be replaced by a liberal Republican from California, if replaced at all. I would have preferred Hollis, but he dropped out. The Chamber of Commerce wins again.

  • ncpride

    As per usual, it’s ALWAYS about those poor, helpless blacks. For a people who claim to be so proud and equal, they sure can’t seem to do a darn thing without special treatment and handouts from whomever, and wherever they can get them. Pathetic.

  • Lee_CPA

    You want to end illegal immigration? END WELFARE.
    .
    When I was growing up, the road gangs, the construction laborers, all the occupations that required low skilled, low intelligence workers was done predominately by blacks.
    .
    Then came LBJ’s Great Society and welfare. Blacks quickly learned they could make more on welfare than working and guess what, that’s exactly what they did. Somebody still has to do the work, so enter the illegal alien.
    .
    Then, in our infinite wisdom, we call the offspring of the illegal alien a “citizen”, who is now eligible for all the welfare and other government giveaways. The result is that these children of illegals are not going to work so we allow even more illegals into the country.
    .
    Just like the blacks, the hispanics vote as a block and they vote for their ethnicity. Hispanics are quickly replacing blacks as the predominate minority and most have little use for blacks.

    • Bossman

      There will always be illegal immigration as long as the USA remains the premier nation in the world and the USA Dollar remains the reserve currency for the rest of the world. Every country that is doing well is attracting immigrants both legal and illegal.

      • kjh64

        There will always be illegal immigration until the USA stops allowing it or until the USA becomes the 3rd world , which will happen if we don’t stop illegal or legal 3rd world immigration.

      • Marc Zuckurburg

        You just might be the smartest person here, other than me.

        We both know that comprehensive immigration reform is where it’s at.

        • Bossman

          I do feel like the smartest person in this forum. I see you’ve the picture of a deadly virus. All the more reason to know who is coming in and that requires new immigration strategies that makes the USA strong and safe. You should note that most of the deadly viruses are coming from Africa and Asia.

          • kjh64

            We don’t need new immigration strategies, we just need to secure our borders and enforce the immigration laws we already have.

          • Jim Davis

            Yep, we have so many laws in the country no one even knows them, so everyone’s always like “we need new laws” when if the laws were being followed there wouldn’t be a problem in the first place.

          • Sick of it

            Darn that African TB…

          • Martel733

            Low IQ patients make TB worse. By not taking the drugs correctly they create drug resistant diseases.

      • Martel733

        Every nation with a welfare system & weak borders is getting flooded with the turd world.

  • John R

    Of course this amnesty hurts black workers the most, but, so what? The Democratic politicians know full well that blacks will NEVER defect and join the Republicans for this, or any other reason. Why? Their hatred against us Whites is so intense that they would NEVER unite with us Whites on ANYTHING. How do blacks think? As long as “YT” does not like too many brown people in the country, then I am all for them coming here, even if it hurts me and my “fambly.” Blacks are just too blinded by their own hatred against us.

    • cherrie greenbaum123

      Black workers is an oxymoron.

  • Bossman

    Many economists and research groups have said that a general amnesty would be good for the economy and would create more jobs. People in the shadows would feel more confident to spend more and make long-term investments.

    • kjh64

      False, Amnesty of 40 million poor, unskilled people would cost the American taxpayers trillions, cause more and more illegal immigration, cause massive poverty and this country would go broke, be overrun and become the 3rd world. People illegally here should “live in he shadows” as they are engaging in illegal behavior and don’t have a right to be here. Better yet, they should go home. Then they won’t be “in the shadows” anymore.

      • Bossman

        Multiply 40 million by a thousand Dollars fine for each person; that already is a lot of money right there.

        • ncpride

          LOL…. yes, criminals and drug cartel, gang bangers will surely be lining up to pay their fines. A thousand dollars per person is a drop in the bucket compared to what it would cost this country. Why you are under the illusion these people will be able to maintain our way of life here is beyond me. Demographics is destiny, and that’s a fact.

        • adplatt126

          In the short term, maybe there would be a boost to the economy in a gross sense (not necessarily in a per capita one). In the long term, the expense of the changing demographics will harm the economy. If adding Mexicans rendered a nation rich, Mexico would be Norway and we’d be fleeing there.

        • Vyncennt

          Multiply 40 million by 0.6 (the approximate welfare enrollment percentage of immigrants), then multiply THAT number by the average lifetime cost of welfare benefits (use Google…I’m too tired from working 7 days a week to support those who do not) ….

          …then minus off your 1000 bucks per immigrant. We’ll act like they’ll all pay it, too, just for sheets and giggles.

          I love math.

          • Bossman

            Most people who go on welfare are native-born. Most of the indigent are also native-born. Most immigrants are able-bodied and in the prime of their working lives.

          • Vyncennt

            Would you like to do your own research or would you prefer I do it for you?

            (hint: 57% of immigrants are on welfare.)

    • Marc Zuckurburg

      Make my immigration reform comprehensive, please!

      • 4321realist

        Notice he has a hairstyle that was typical of the ancient Roman Emperors.

        I wonder if that indicates an affliction of megalomania.

        And I wonder if he prefers wearing dirty T-shirts to show his disdain for white Christian businessmen whose attire consists of suits and ties?

    • Alexandra1973

      Just because they say it doesn’t make it true. If they did say it.

    • ncpride

      What people in the shadows? What a joke.

    • adplatt126

      No, not many, a few, and they are all overlooking essential externalities (crime rates, second-generation immigrant trends in employment and education, etc) for ideological reasons, to serve ideological purposes. A recent report on the same issue by British economists which came out at about the same time, concluded that third world immigration does not actually do any good to Western economies. and given the climate of fear, intimidation and the extensive totalitarian PC regime, you can count on it that this study failed to consider many factors which reality doesn’t, and the consequences are indeed very bad overall, but the authors can’t really say that. From a civilizational, cultural, moral, quality of life, human development perspective, the data is quite abundant and quite clear: multicultural societies suck or at the best constitute a short term orgy of chaos and a liberating lack of social order, before they collapse and devolve into block voting, government corruption, sectarian violence, widespread mistrust, etc. To preserve them, given that they are naturally unstable everywhere, societies must obliterate all of their traditional mores and morals, so as to be able to coexist as a society and maintain some level of unity and normalcy. Often this is still insufficient and a totalitarian police state naturally arises to preserve order where moral order has been eliminated for the sake of tolerance and coexistence. Which is what we have here.

      • Bossman

        The USA has always been a multicultural society with a dominant Anglo-American culture. Personally, I want the USA to remain a predominantly Anglo-American country but we do need to come to some kind of arrangement with the Hispanic neighbors. Isolating Latin America from the USA is just out of the question.

        • adplatt126

          I’m pretty sure your first sentence, describing America and a particular form of supposed multiculturalism, strongly contradicts elite understandings and conceptions of modern multiculturalism. If society is dominated by one ethnic and cultural group, then there is no vying for power, there is far less internal strife, there is no Civil Rights Commission or Civil Rights Laws, there is no need for the total ideology of diversity mongering, and its concomitant totalitarian police and surveillance state and PC regime. In multiculturalism, that is as it is understood in the modern world, all cultures allegedly exist in harmony and are considered equal according to our rulers and even members of particular cultures. Any member of any culture around the globe, pretty much no matter how barbaric, is paid deference by everyone else and is permitted entry into the nation on the grounds that its core tenets are essentially morally equal to the ideals and values of Westerners. If you want America to remain a predominantly Anglo society, your ideas make no sense, because they won’t lead to what you claim to desire. Stop supporting amnesty and a path to citizenship. “Isolating” (keeping their own people there where they belong) Latin America worked fine before after all… but nobody is proposing “isolating” Latin America in an economic or cultural sense. This is hyperbolic propaganda on your part. What we’re talking about is preserving, no rescuing America and its civilization. Our obligations to foreigners should not outweigh our obligations to our own people, to posterity, and to salvaging our own civilization. With miscegenation, third world immigration, the combination of anti-discrimination laws and the culture war being waged against white Westerners, all of which constitute a coercive though predominantly bloodless genocide, Anglo culture will not survive. Indeed it is already gasping its last breaths.

        • Martel733

          America was over 90% white when the people that walked on the moon became adults. Now with affirmative action we cant even put some into space despite having more computing power in a cell phone than the world did when YT walked on the moon.

        • Vyncennt

          “Isolating Latin America from the USA is just out of the question.”

          It was not out of the question in years past. You are simply purposely refusing to ask the question.

          • Bossman

            The USA has never isolated Latin America. It has exploited Latin America but never isolated it. The USA helped Latin America to fight the Spaniards and other colonial powers who wanted to gain a foothold in the Americas.

          • Vyncennt

            The U.S. also restricted immigration into our country at one point. Meddling in other countries affairs does not equate to inviting 10% of their populations into our country.

    • Martel733

      Even 4th generation Hispanics are way behind whites & Asians on all merit based assessments.

    • Dave West

      The only thing that immigration is going to increase economically is an increase in GDP for a certain period of time, the GDP is a meaningless measure when it come to evaluating quality of life; which I can guarantee you will not increase with increased third world immigration. India has the 10th largest economy in the world, higher than probably more than 100 countries that have a higher living standard than India.

  • Conrad

    They always ignore the poor whites that are negatively impacted by immegration. Just like the brain dead whites that do everything that they can to “Save Africa.” Of course that means black Africans, but the poor whites in Africa (Zimbabwe & S. Africa) get nothing. Not even a thought.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      Poor whites are the elites’ most despised demographic. They carry the sin of white privilege, but they don’t have enough money to donate millions to flashy liberal political campaigns, which means they can’t expunge themselves of their sin (which is what rich whites do).

      Also, they tend to be disproportionately conservative, and being conservative (even a normal mainstream conservative) is an even worse sin than being white. To the elites, it’s like tattooing “I’m a massive racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted jerk” on your forehead.

    • Martel733

      Whats even funnier is when they talk about how gays are rich and successful I know they are not including the crack ho trannys Marion Barry got caught with.

  • Manaphy

    Actually, it could be worse for black workers, considering that there is no such thing as a black worker.

  • 4321realist

    “Timing of Obama’s Amnesty ‘Could Not Be Worse’ for Black Workers”
    He’s right, of course, but expecting an arrogant black who is delusional to employ sound logic only results in disappointment.

  • Evette Coutier

    It must be the white in Obama to cause him to put politics before race.

  • none of your business

    The US Civil Rights Commission once put out an official statement that the 14th amendment did not apply to Whites.

    • A Freespeechzone

      Give it a generation or two and that just might happen–the demographics then will be even more Anti-White.

  • JohnEngelman

    Every now and then a flash of insight. A high rate of immigration, even legal immigration, interferes with nearly everything else liberals are trying to achieve.

    • LHathaway

      Depends on what you think liberals are trying to achieve!

      • JohnEngelman

        The liberals I know are trying to achieve a reduction in economic inequality and a cleaner environment. A high rate of immigration, especially illegal immigration, interferes with that.

        • Martel733

          They say blacks are equal but don’t live near any either right?

          • Nancy

            Exactly. There’s a proposed zoning change in our high school district because developers want to build apartments. All the surrounding neighborhoods are already up in arms about it, and have “No Apartments” signs up everywhere.

            Funny…but I’m fairly certain that the Disingenuous White Liberals also live in these neighborhoods, and it’ll be a hoot to see how they turn themselves in knots at the Zoning Meeting trying to make their anti-apartment position not seem “racist”.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            They’ll do it the way white liberals almost always find a way to be racist (in a good way) without seeming racist.

            Mark me, someone will find an endangered species of some sort right where they want to build the apartments.

            Thinking I’m kidding? There’s a proposal in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. to build a light rail line between mostly black Prince Georges County and majority white Montgomery County. And wouldn’t you know it, there’s a species of endangered shrimp in the way.

    • Dave West

      It also adds insult to injury when they blame the republicans, white people, etc. for all their “projects,” many of which are doomed to fail for the reasons you just listed. Not that republicans don’t place blame in misguided places either; politics in America has literally come down to who can complain the best about the other side.

  • none of your business

    The League of the South has scheduled “immigration hurts southern workers” marches for
    late August and September. The League is White, but maybe some southern blacks who are not total idiots about immigration should join in.
    Maybe I’ll email him about the League of the South demos and ask him if he wants to join the marches.

  • Augustus3709

    Don’t fret White folks. These types of statements must be archived and readily presented as precedent.

    If it’s ok for other races to be vouched for, than it’s also ok to vouch for White people.

  • superlloyd3 coon

    “disparate impact theory holds that a facially neutral policy can nonetheless constitute unlawful discrimination if it disproportionately affects a particular group,”

    This is the quintessential, cultural marxist dictum that is destroying the West. Inclusion, Diversity and Equality of outcome are paramount whilst merit, justice, fairness, ability and the pursuit of excellence (the values of European civilisation) are consigned to history.

    Absurdly, no proactive, discriminatory intention or action has to be proved for a neutral, meritocratic policy to be unlawful if a particular group faces disparate impact, even though that group may have been given preferential treatment at many or all stages the policy covers. Failure is not the fault of the individual. The individual doesn’t count only the group and all groups are equal. Hence, all individuals are equal and equality of outcome for all groups (though some more than others) must be crudely engineered by tyrannical fiat.

    However, disparate impact is, by its application, selective and discriminatory as it’s only applied to negroids, latinos, LGBTs, women, the handicapped etc. with the most stupid, criminal and useless demographic treated as the most important group.

    Prima facie, Obongo faces a dilemma between the competing claims of negroids and mestizos. However, this is easily resolved when one sees that his primary objective is the final and irrevocable destruction of white, christian, european, first world America.

  • none of your business

    JohnEngelman • 14 hours ago
    “Every now and then a flash of insight. A high rate of immigration, even legal immigration, interferes with nearly everything else liberals are trying to achieve.”

    That statement contradicts every post you have made since you began posting on this site. You constantly tout legal immigration of asians to replace every American STEM worker. You even applaud the legal immigration of Vietnamese and Cambodian dishwashers with IQs in the 90’s.

    You have made it obvious that your dream is a Silicon Valley,San Jose, San Francisco and San Mateo County totally cleansed of Whites (like yourself BTW) and replaced by asians and indians. You might not be an ADL troll. You might be working for the TECH company CEO’s who have hired nothing but non White immigrants for decades.
    If you actually knew any asians which I doubt, you would know that this “Whites should welcome the asian invasion because both have higher IQs than hispanics” is insanity because asians will never form an alliance with Whites. They might be against affirmative action in university admissions but not because it affects Whites and asians, only because it affects asians.

    • Who Me?

      So, maybe he’s learning something by hanging out with us “racists”. Give him awhile–he may yet come around!.

  • kikz2

    i freakin love it.. i hope they enmasse end up hating him, and his moose. i hope they get things thrown at them in public.

  • Jim Davis

    I don’t let people off the hook like that. If I needed college money and I became a hitman for a drug cartel to pay for it would anyone buy that excuse? How is being in the military any different?

    Let me state so there is no confusion, I am not opposed to any nation having a defensive force and using that force for defense, but that is not what our military does, it is so corrupted by banks and military contractors there is no honor in serving in America’s armed forces.

    • http://www.antenna.com Wholly Unconvinced

      “I don’t let people off the hook like that. If I needed college money and I became a hitman for a drug cartel to pay for it would anyone buy that excuse? How is being in the military any different?” What a delightfully ignorant statement. How is it any different? Oh I don’t know, how bout in the military if you “fail a hit” you aren’t executed immediately after? How about joining the military is legal, while being a “hitman” is not? How about roughly 70-80% of military jobs have nothing to do with direct or indirect combat? How about a huge majority of people who join the military do so at the age of 17 or 18 years old, wellll before they’ve had time to develop a “realist” worldview, and they join either a: because it’s a family tradition, b:.out of a misguided sense of tradition, c: because, Thanks to the downward spiral of this country, it pays better than any job they can get out of high school (IF they can even find a job) and of course, d: to pay for college, which I guess you could just as easily do as a “hitman”.

      It really gets irritating, the few morons like you who take a self righteous stand against the kids who join the military today, the kids you say “Well, can’t say I have much love for most veterans either. They fight all these stupid wars that cost us trillions and gain us nothing” because they choose what stupid wars they participate in? Because fresh out of high school, full of today’s 360 degree assault of brainwashing from the media and school itself, they got tricked into thinking they were doing something good, for America, or their family, or themselves?

      You and the others like you, with your disparaging comments about veterans are absolutely pathetic. You think you’re better than them? They’re kids, they didn’t know any better, but again, like Mo, they DID something which they thought was right, and then they, a lot of them real warriors, who are now race realists from seeing how incompetent blacks and brown’s are from being forced to live and work with massive numbers of them daily, and then you mighty warriors of the internet, tapping deftly away at your keyboard, condemn them as if you’re somehow wiser, nobler men. Just like the Vietnam vets who were discarded and spit upon by worthless idiots who got to stay high and mighty on the sidelines, condemning a war none of them got to “pick” and spitting on the soldiers who fought in it. The soldiers who watched friends die horrible deaths, and learned, much faster than you or your kind, some hard truths about the world.

      What a joke you, and the few who think like you are.

      • Jim Davis

        I am a veteran dumbass, and I’m not “holier than thou”, I try to help people not make the same mistakes I made. You say it’s “legal”, so to you legal=right? Do you know what site you’re on? There are many “legal” things that most of us here have a problem with.

        You’re comments about people being young are somewhat valid, however you miss the point: WHY do people get blindly patriotic? Why do people naively go into the military? Because of people like you who fill their heads with that nonsense.

        BTW, I train at the Fighting Pit in Romulus 4-6 days a week, I’m far from a keyboard warrior, and anytime you’d like the address you can come on down and step in the ring with me, don’t worry, it’ll be clean, man to man, 1 on 1, and you can tap out whenever you like and I’ll shake your hand afterward for having the guts to get in there with me, maybe you’ll be calmed down by then and we can go have a drink.

    • Martel733

      What about a medic, a nurse, a supply clerk, air traffic controller or a mechanic? Those are jobs that could count on a resume after someone got out.

      • Jim Davis

        So that’s justifies being an accomplice to murder? There are plenty of other ways to get a career, and look, I was young, dumb, 18 once, I actually went in the Army after high school not knowing any better.

        I tell you tho, when Clinton sent me to Haiti back in ’95 I stood there and said to myself, “Wait a minute, why am I here? If Clinton says so I have to start killing these people or be killed or wounded myself? For what? Who are they? What have they done to me?”

        Needless to say, I didn’t re-enlist, nor do I suggest it to anyone else, especially now, I’ll fight for my country, but I won’t fight for politicians, bankers, and military contractors.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    The fleas are fighting over the dog’s corpse.

  • benvad

    That’s genetic not financial.

  • chuck_2012

    yes it will be a problem for most blacks as the incoming Hispanics begin to challenge for all sorts of low end jobs. The fact that make me shake my head is that this new group of immigrants are hungry, upwardly mobile and will quickly surpass blacks for a position on the socioeconomic scale. A recent article mentions that black children are at the bottom of the achievement in English, Math and Science and that non-english speakers are quickly going past them. As usual it will take massive infusions of cash ane resources to bring them up to speed yet, hispanics, will take what is given and make the best of it. Blacks need to work and learn or stand aside while those of superior intellect surpass them. Its nothing new though for those who recognize African Americans for what they really are.

  • WR_the_realist

    Illegal immigration has negative disparate impact on blacks, working class whites, and middle class white taxpayers. So Peter Kirsanow got that one third right.

  • Pro_Whitey

    Check it, the mean white score for the poorest whites is just about as high as the mean black score of the highest income blacks.

    • Martel733

      Yea 3 points difference between the richest blacks and poorest whites. That’s less than 1/3 of a percent.

  • Vyncennt

    You had me at, “Bossman is entitled” …..

    =)