America in 2034

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, June 20, 2014

Local communities are finding their own way.

Every weekday for two weeks–from June 9 to June 20–we have run essays by race-realist commentators on the future of American race relations. Specifically, we asked them to imagine what America will be like 20 years from now. The ten contributors to the series, whom we published in alphabetical order, are:

John DerbyshirePaul GottfriedGregory HoodJoseph KayPaul KerseyTom KuhmannGavin McInnesFred ReedRichard Spencer, Jared Taylor.

Our final contributor is American Renaissance editor Jared Taylor.


I don’t completely rule out a sudden, Soviet-style implosion by 2034, but it’s unlikely. The laws of physics will eventually destroy our profligate, corrupt, unnatural system, but it will take more than 20 years. Two decades seems like a long time, but if we travel the same distance back in time, we are in the year The Bell Curve was published. Has that much changed since 1994?

There is therefore the all-too-dreary possibility that 2034 will be only a more haggard and desperate version of 2014, but let us set that possibility aside and assume that current trends have led to colorful consequences. That would mean that the United States kept stumbling down the road to nowhere, but that the absurdities of the system have reached the point that groups, communities, and maybe even counties and a state or two to are trying to go their own ways.

By 2034, the Hispanics who have continued to pour into the country have captured several state and local governments. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus is the single most powerful voting bloc in Washington, with a huge influence on Democratic Party policy. Cesar Chavez’s birthday is a national holiday, and Dolores Huerta’s birthday is a holiday in Western states.

Large parts of the Southwest are slightly up-market extensions of Mexico. Anyone who does not speak Spanish has a hard time getting a job. “Bilingual” education means students can graduate from high school without learning English. The US is not yet officially bilingual like Canada, but that will come.

The old black-brown coalition that made the Democrats the perpetual ruling party now survives only at the highest level: The presidency alternates informally between blacks and Hispanics. Locally, the two groups stay out of each other’s way. Hispanics have no patience for hard-luck stories about slavery and Jim Crow, and what used to be MLK libraries and Malcolm X Elementary Schools now have Hispanic names. Even the most hopped-up blacks realize there will never be reparations for slavery.

Marijuana and amphetamines are legal, and enforcement is spotty for other drugs, so Mexican gangs–which operate with increasing boldness in the US–have switched to kidnapping, protection rackets, and voter intimidation. Where they are most active–mainly in California and Texas–they have driven out all blacks, and whites have moved out voluntarily. White liberals–of whom there are still plenty in the media–occasionally deplore segregation, but most Americans see it as the best way to avoid friction.

Gangs

There is still a substantial white elite that praises “diversity” programs but quietly subverts them so that their own children can get ahead. The middle class continues to shrink.

Chief Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently upheld a new interpretation of the White Privilege Tax, finding that the intent of the law was to assess tax not only on the basis of race but on privilege, meaning that Asians must also pay. She has also ruled that Asians do not contribute to “diversity” and therefore cannot be beneficiaries of “affirmative action.”

The federal government has been saved from default only by sharp cuts in social security payments. The Hispanic Caucus explained that it was immoral to tax a largely black and brown work force to pay for the comforts of aging oppressors.

It is widely understood that the Capital cannot continue to be named for a slave-holder, but no one can agree on a new name.  The government-appointed House of Many Colors Committee is studying a new paint scheme for what is still the White House.

Science has not been kind to the regime. In 2024, the Beijing Genomics Institute officially announced that it had isolated the alleles that code for psychological traits, including intelligence and diligence. It also announced that these alleles are not distributed uniformly in all population groups. The American media were unable to suppress these findings. In 2030, several Ivy League schools plus MIT and Stanford announced the Genetic Equality Initiative, whose goal is to find ways to distribute desirable alleles equally in future generations.

They will get there before we do.

They will get there before we do.

As the Beijing findings became widely known, they met with two sharply different reactions. The ruling elite insists that racial preferences must continue: The genetically disfavored deserve a leg up just as much as the poor deserve welfare. Genes are a lottery, and the state must correct its unfair results. Government, universities, and large corporations therefore still pursue “diversity.” Ordinary whites and Asians resent this more than ever, but the Sotomayor court has struck down all “level playing field” ballot initiatives and legislation.

Indeed, it was the Supreme Court’s rejection of such legislation that led to sharp resistance in Maine and New Hampshire. In a recent joint press conference, the governors of both states announced that they would defy the Sotomayor ruling, and challenged President Latavious Jackson to enforce it.

This is only the most prominent example of increasingly explicit rejection of the multi-cult regime. Voluntary segregation has led to communities that are self-consciously white. They elect sympathetic city councils and school boards. As soon as public schools switch to a Euro-centric curriculum, non-whites move out and more whites move in.

Low crime rates, good schools, and high levels of community involvement make these towns attractive to couples with children. They also run retirement homes, known for polite, caring staff that attract elderly baby-boomers from more “diverse” areas. These towns are scattered and isolated, but some see them as the beginnings of what could become autonomous areas.

Meanwhile, in Europe, explicitly nationalist parties have formed governments in three countries, and are in coalitions in five more . . .

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Jared Taylor
Jared Taylor is the editor of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • AmericanCitizen

    Barring a natural disaster or economic collapse this is probably an accurate scenario. Whites are not going to stand together and overthrow the government under the current conditions. Realistically the government and police are armed to the teeth and already consider right-wing groups domestic terrorists. Hispanics are a growing population that multiplies and will keep growing and gain political power. There is no reason to expect the American black to suddenly develop a work ethic, family bonds, or a stable community with positive values. Blacks will live off the system like they do now, a surly underclass that luckily is too lazy to riot (unless above mentioned disaster or economic collapse happens). Whites will survive, like the last Romans before the empire collapsed. We’ll remember what was, and sadly what could have been without the pervasive liberalism that destroyed traditional mainstream American culture.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      That is assuming the ruling elite or the brown hordes do not try what the Bolsheviks did. If so, whites are going to attack the ruling elite. With millions trained in the use of complex and fearsome weaponry such as man-portable air-defense missiles, the ruling elite would in that event start a war they cannot win. Same with the Hispanics. Blacks however, will find themselves killed off, the anger towards them among whites has been festering for decades now.

    • Barbara Jeremy

      my&nbspbest&nbspfriend’s&nbspstep-aunt&nbspΜ­­­­­­а­­­­­­κ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­ѕ&nbsp$­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­63/հ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­υ­­­­­­r&nbsp­ο­n&nbspthe&nbspс­­­­­­օ­­­­­­Μ­­­­­­р­­­­­­υ­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r.&nbspShe&nbsphas&nbspbeen&nbspwith­ο­ut&nbspa&nbspј­­­­­օ­­­­­ƅ&nbspf­ο­r&nbspfive&nbspΜ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­հ­­­­­­ѕ&nbspbut&nbsplast&nbspΜ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­ո­­­­­­τ­­­­­­հ&nbspher&nbspinc­ο­me&nbspwas&nbsp$­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­13659&nbspjust&nbspW­­­­­­օ­­­­­­r­­­­­­κing&nbsp­ο­n&nbsp

      the&nbspс­­­­­­օ­­­­­­Μ­­­­­­р­­­­­­υ­­­­­­τ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­r&nbspf­ο­r&nbspa&nbspϜ­­­­­­℮­­­­­­W&nbspհ­­­­­­օ­­­­­­υ­­­­­­rs.&nbspFind&nbsp­Ο­ut&nbspM­ο­re,…C&#97&#x73&#104&#83&#x74&#111&#x72&#101d&#46&#x43&#111&#77

      ✪✪✪ �✪✪✪ ✪✪✪ ✪✪✪� ✪✪✪

    • Nevsky

      I’m not so certain there will be any whites left. Lately I have a hunch that Americans whites that try to form their own communities will still allow non-whites to live amongst them, and overtime become more mixed, slowly. Seeing Clive Bundy, who for a while I thought was a symbol of white Americans, praising latino immigration and pal with black ranchers to show how non-racist he is helped illuminate that future for me.

      If white Americans can form a real ethnic identity and resist mixing, then great. If not, then white Americans will be joining the Scythians, Tocharians, Indian Aryans, and Egyptians in the list of extinct white civilizations.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yes, I agree, all the panelist sounded the “doomed” alarm. I would have liked to have seen at least one sub-title that read: “The inevitability ends”.

        Followed by excerpts like, “…Jefferson County, seceded from state, then quickly from union, causing a domino effect amongst other counties ripe for secession like West Maryland and North Colorado.

        When the Marxists who had overtaken the U.S. government mobilized to destroy the secessionists, Vladimir Putin threatened to vaporize Phila-delphia, Baltimore, and DC. The anti-white Marxists backed-off. That caused a further explosion of secessions encompassing a third of the land mass of the former United States.

        Feminists like Sheryl Sandberg and other traitors like Mark Zuckerberg were either thrown or jumped out of 20 story high-rises…”

        That’s my hope by 2034. Maybe that’s just me. <;-D

        • Nevsky

          If any of those breakaway republics would establish themselves as ethnostates exclusively for white Americans, then that’s my dream come true. If that doesn’t happen, then maybe Europe is the better option.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            The commenters on Michelle Malkin’s message-boards, which are about as Right as mainstream conservatives get, are utterly Leftist when it comes to race. They will never make any progress against the Left because they’ve allowed them to set the ground rules. Their beef is only with illegal immigration, not invasion of White lands by non-White hordes. Bring up any race realism over there and they’ll hound you worse than any Kos kiddie or PuffHo moonbat.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Probably has more to do with Michelle Malkin’s racial mix than anything. Malkin is bringing in the fringe Asians. She has her purpose.

            For that reason, in the European-American ethno-states, there will have to be a 95% European, 5% “Other” quota formula. We will have to reward our partisans.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            That is a good strategy. The marginal mixes would be competing for entry and giving up all kinds of ungodly intelligence about how bad the anti-white movement really was. 100% European ethno-states would shut down the intelligence stream.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Exactly right. You need partisans for intelligence–to keep your enemy closer. They could tell you how bad morale is getting, for example, amongst anti-secession units.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            I’d say about 90% of her commenters are White, maybe a couple Hispanics…hardly any Asians, but quite a few Englemen. I agree she has a role to play, and any woman with cojones enough to skewer both the Left and RINOs has my respect. But if her followers are going to be our fellow foot-soldiers in the fight…watch your back.

          • Sick of it

            Never trust someone with such lukewarm beliefs. And rather than watching our backs, we should push such people to the front. In reality, though, I would expect 99% of such people to stay behind and do NOTHING while we fight for their survival.

          • Mergatroyd

            That’s a difficult dilemma. Who to trust. That’s why in the old days it was family and tribe, as it will be again. There are many untrustworthy whites among us who will be happy to betray us and until and unless we can band together on ethno-centric lines only as blacks, Mexicans and Jews do, then we are doomed.

            Our enemies certainly know this and do everything they possibly can to prevent us whites from organizing ourselves along racial lines. Notice any hint of white organization and they scream “Nazi” get the government after us and go after our jobs.

            Sam Francis certainly learned that lesson when he attended an American Renaissance conferences and was fired from the Washington Times.

          • Sick of it

            Definitely. I keep getting chewed out by various liberal veterans who say they’d prefer foreigners to me. How can they be patriotic if they prefer foreigners to Americans? That’s a rather anti-American point of view. America isn’t the entire world. The American people(s) are not from all over the world.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            They might stop yelling “nazi” if you stopped sounding like one.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            For as many overt traitors there are against their race and culture, like the Washington Times did to Sam Francis, there are 10 traitors who tune out and operate with their heads in the sand.

            Traitors because they’re passive cowards. For every anti-American traitor who stabs Uncle Sam in the front, there are 10 who stab him in the back by doing nothing.

            Most white retirees, for example, flush with retirement money, just sit & spin, hoping their compound walls are high enough. Cowards!

          • DonReynolds

            Correct.
            Put the diehards in the last line of defense and tell them to shoot any who approach……regardless of uniform or flag.

          • Sick of it

            That’s very old school, Don. I like it.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            A good plan. 5 percent quota would allow a smattering of hard-working Asians to stay, those with a pro-White view, but not allow any problems with Asiatic hordes from Southeast Asia that open massage parlors. As far as Negroes, though, no Negroes should be allowed. That 75 percent rule should apply as well, so no Mulattoes either.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, with the advent of affordable DNA testing it would be straight forward. Other requirements might be percentage of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. I’m about 5% total.

            After the analysis of the Bonobo chimp DNA, it looks like Africans and Europeans are actually a different species. A technical line for species classification was crossed in the Bonobo analysis.

            The only caveat with that latest Bonobo analysis is that, when black & white are mixed, the baby isn’t born sterile like is the case with when species try to mix.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Malkin is Filipina, I think.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Ayup. That’s what it says on Wiki…

          • Fathercoughlin

            And the jews? The rage filled jews who sputter about this and that being “too white”,( a dog whistle for genocide),will they be allowed to live among us as they will be furiously clammering to do??

          • Sick of it

            Separate nations are necessary for separate peoples. Especially when group interests are always in conflict.

          • Mergatroyd

            Especially when resources such as living space and water are in conflict.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I saw a piece a couple days ago on a home in central California where the (white) family has been having their fence broken down at night and unknown people stealing water from their well.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That’s why the brown invasion is coming from places like India. They are land-grabbing. They overpopulated the areas they are from. They lack European-American nation-making abilities.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Pro-White Jews like Robert Weissberg would of course desire to live amongst us, and would be an asset. We both know, though, that Pro-White Jews are rare birds in America. The typical Leftist Libtard Jew would elect to stay in diversity hell with the Blacks and Browns. No White Libtards being welcome in a White ethnostate should be our policy.

          • Mergatroyd

            nope. They have a homeland for themselves that is guarded with nuclear weaponry. They expel blacks from their lands and are using DNA to determine who gets to live on “their” land. No extreme will be spared to protect their land and they have the Sampson Option if they’re threatened. Look it up, at who their nuclear weapons are aimed at.

            They’ve sworn if they go down, so will as many of us that they can take with them. It’s to get US to protect THEM and fight their wars for them. I say enough.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            They know how to protect their interests, culture, and racial genetics. We should follow their example.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            That is too simple and humiliating for too many of these fantacizers here.

          • Sick of it

            “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”

            These tribal savages are a danger to the entire world. I’m utterly amazed at how stupid people can be, defending those who wish to annihilate them.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Don’t worry, the ISIS forces have taken control of the Jordanian border. Your dreams are almost about to come true.

          • Sick of it

            My dreams? I figure if you’re so pro-Jewish, this would be your dream as well as theirs. I think nuclear weapons should be destroyed. Nuclear facilities should be destroyed until we develop clean fusion.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You have visions of grandeur, like many posters here.

            But how could I hope for the destruction of Israel if I were so pro-Jewish? You make no sense.

            You sound like a No-Nukes liberal, so are you? More nations than Israel have threatened the world with destruction, but no nation but Israel has been so threatened with eminent destruction so continually. Israel and Jews are smart enough to know that they are hated by many world wide. What do they have to loose, especially at the time of Dyan’s pronouncement?

            I am a pragmatic race realist. You appear to be a rabid Jew hater. I don’t care for any religion or its culture, and I don’t like the exclusive attitude of Jews. But I also KNOW that Israel is a legitimate state voted into existence after WW2 after having been driven from it by the Romans in the Second century and wrongly persecuted by Christians for more than a thousand years.

            The funniest thing about his is that dimwit whites like you don’t understand that your type made Jews your enemy. Then, you complain that they are against “whites.” Luckily, Judaism is more about justice and law than Christianity. So Jews are not as rabidly hateful of “whites” as you are of them. But you can hardly complain about those that are without being a hypocrite because “YOU” started it.

          • Sick of it

            They started it centuries before I was born. They started it by abusing a young child who was accepting of others regardless of their origin. You think I’m stupid? You cannot even conceive of what we could due minus the shackles of liberalism and judaism.

          • http://fascistech.com Fascistech

            Jews are the ones with the attitude problem. Nobody likes Jews because they are parasites. Jews are parasites because their scripture instructs them to be parasites.

            As a religion Judaism is not like Christianity and Islam. As a race, jews are conniving despicable parasites. And you’re probably one of them.

            Mark my words. Jews are going to be put in their place this century. Jewish arrogance has been revealed and soon every white society will be well aware of what the filthy sneaking conniving jewish scum have done to Europe.

            Before I listen to a jew try to assert social rank over a white man who wants only to be among his own kind, I will warn the jew, soon you will have no more white men to protect you as you spit venom at reasonable upstanding whites.

            I say this, as a man who cares about some individual jews, however I despise the jewish society overall. Your era of jew supremacy by victim grievance mongering and deception is almost finished.

          • DonReynolds

            This country will not be one of the most powerful militarily when it divides into three or more separate republics….which is fine by me since I have no desire to waste blood on foreign fields, while our own country is overrun.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Well, general mergatroyd has spoken. Now, line up your little toy solders and let’s make it happen!

          • Sick of it

            I wouldn’t trust a modern Jew. Not a single one. In another time, another place maybe, but not today.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Some Jews are normal people. Many have been taught since birth to hate and fear whites. ANY Jew who is uncomfortable with a white majority and seeks to undermine it in ANY way – up to and including voting DemonCrap – gets a one-way trip to Israel!

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Nonsense. Where do some of you people get your guesses? Jews are taught to hate whites since birth? Most Jews ARE white, as white or whiter than many posting here, I’d bet. You cannot get your head out of the 14th century. This is the fatal error of whites.

          • scottthestrategerist

            No, it really isn’t. Jews are behind Communism and socialism, which were nothing more than mass murder of whites and ethnic takeover by Jews. Jews push for civil rights and nonwhite immigration in order to swamp whites. Jews push for miscegenation to breed whites out of existence, telling them stupid things like, “Race doesn’t exist,” and, “We all bleed red.” Yes, we all bleed red, as to lions and tigers and bears. Bleeding red is proof you’re from earth, but not that you’re a member of a particular race or species. This is why Mr. Spock has green blood. Jews, through the false science of psychoanalysis and their takeover of the legitimate science of anthropology, have classified ANY expression of white identity – up to and including love of your own parents and family – as a mental disease. They do this because they feel threatened by any collective white interest and thus give us the false choices of hyper-individualism, or in other words, caring about no one other than yourself, and humanism, or classifying all of humanity as part of the in-group. They exclude all sense of balance by damning as mental illness white preferences for our own race, nation and even family. Jews do this because it’s good FOR THEM and classify “good” as what’s good for them. They’re the perpetual minority and they feel they survive better when whites are weak. No, not all Jews feel that way, but as a person who has known MANY Jews, I can tell you that MOST of them feel that way. We just can’t have a hostile group living amongst us. The vast majority of Jews need to leave white countries and go to Israel. There they are the majority and can live any kind of life they want. Just don’t try to destroy white countries or do ANYTHING to diminish whites. That’s my sole demand.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Read the works of Dr. Kevin MacDonald, a professor of evolutionary psychology at CalState Long Beach. I’m reading “The Culture of Critique” right now, and he’s also written “A People that Shall Dwell Alone and “Separation and Its Discontents.” Read these works and you’ll understand why Jews do what they do. I’m not “guessing.” As for Jewish involvement in Communism, the evidence is well collected in Dr. Duke’s work “The Secret Behind Communism.”

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            So now David Duke is called “Dr.” Thanks for the morning belly laugh. David Duke’s psychotic obsession with Jews as the pariah of the ages is perhaps not amazing, but such people are not exactly unbiased sources for historic reliability, not even a little.

            Communism was practiced by the early Church. That’s right, and it’s in a real and universally accepted, authority, Edward Gibbon’s, “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Christians practiced it throughout the middle ages and into the 20th century. St. Francis was one as well as all most of the orders and later protestant sects, including the 17th century Diggers and even the Quakers, etc. In fact, the Puritans in Massachusetts were organized as a collective until the young men revolted and demanded a larger share of their own production because they felt they worked hardest and supported the majority. That is where the idea and the phrase “Earn your own keep” originated. That combined with the dour, “if you smile it must be a sin,” to create a really severe and unhappy American root that I am sure people like you ultimately have in your “cultural” influences.

            But it is a fact that Marx was a Christian and reading the words of Jesus, when he condemned his followers for not sharing, condemned the rich, gathered all the food together and divided it, and knew actual Church history, regurgitated it as a wider social system aimed at creating a better world for the majority of people who were the ones supplying the grist and blood for the brutal rise of the Industrial Revolution. If you like your 40 hour work week, breaks, vacations and benefits, thank Marx.

            As far as Jews in communism goes, there were even more Christians involved. But it just makes sense that a system that sought so much more justice for everyone and also promised to end persecution of Jews and others would attract Jews, even if it meant doing away with organized religion. (Note that in the USSR, Jews remained Jewish and Christians remained Christians unless they were official party members. When Stalin reopened the churches and allowed Christians to return to the Church, there were plenty of Russian Christians around to go in. Similarly, when Jews were finally allowed to leave the USSR, they were still Jewish in religion).

            But David Duke and his ilk may soon get their wish. The ISIS is in control of the Jordanian border as I write this for days now and Israel is on a war footing, already having responded to a strike from Syria. What I wonder is what you and David Duke and all your fellows will blame your chronic failures on once the Jews aren’t around to blame?

          • scottthestrategerist

            Look, Jew, I get it. You hate whites and want to distract them. I don’t care what the early church did. We’re talking about modern Communism (capital “C”) as promulgated by the Jew Karl Marx. That Communism is Jewish. Dr. Duke is a doctor because he has a doctorate. But thanks for giving me my afternoon belly laugh at your IGNORANCE. You think distraction and name calling are a substitute for evidence. You’re wrong. Nor do we need Dr. Duke’s works because he really just collected in one book what was already out there. The actual criticism is how little new he said. But since you hate him so much, you can read “Controversy of Zion” by British journalist Douglas Reed. Of course, you won’t read it and I’m really speaking to those who are reading this debate. No, what you’ll do is say there’s something wrong with me for caring about the issue. “Why are you obsessed with Jews???” I’m not. I care about those who are seeking to dispossess, disenfranchise and destroy whites, as they have been actively doing for over a century. This is why the vast majority of Jews need to be in their own country.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You get nothing. You will be laughed out of every attempt to save our race. You missed on on even the low end of the white IQ average. You have to call names because you haven’t any real arguments or debate skills.

            I have news for you, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was debunked thoroughly and long ago. What you imagine as proof only illustrates your poor education and lack of ability at objective research and frank honesty. This stuff is so easily shot down that no one on any side of the issue with any intellectual honesty will listen to you.

            A doctorate in what? He is a past Grand Wizard of the KKK and while I have defended the original KKK often on this and other posting boards, Mr. Duke is hardly a valid or objective source of information on the subject. Try correlating his bs with any other number of recognized sources. Or just try to learn something about those protocols or even the real Nazis who admitted that the Jews in Germany and elsewhere didn’t even have so much as a phone tree for communicating among themselves.

            I bet you don’t even have blue eyes. Well, I do. When the SHTF, I will be ready for you as much as I am ready for the mud people.

          • scottthestrategerist

            I have a genius IQ. My eye color is irrelevant and it shows that you have no argument if you think this is a winning point. I’ve never read the Protocols, they don’t contribute to my thinking and Dr. Duke is about to release a book about them in which he forthrightly states that they are not actual minutes of a Jewish meeting. You’re engaging in misdirection and distraction. The issue is not the Protocols, but Jewish involvement in movement after movement after movement to weaken and destroy white society. Why? Because, as the perennial minority, Jews believe (perhaps rightly) that ANY expression of white interest hurts them. You also do what Jews ALWAYS do in these arguments, to wit, you use strawmen and name calling and then think they are substitutes for evidence. The reason why you do this is that you have no real arguments. The fact is that Jews are heavily involved in (1) Communism and Socialism, which rob and murder whites (and anyone else unlucky enough to be subjected to them!), (2) the psychoanalytic movement, which tells whites that they’re insane for having ANY collective interest, up to and including loving THEIR OWN FAMILY, (3) promoting nonwhite immigration, even when they ADMIT it’s bad for whites (but opposing it for Israel), (4) abortion, as it kills non-Jews before they’re ever born (but making it practically impossible for a Jewish woman to get an abortion in Israel), (5) promoting miscegenation for nonwhites (but discouraging it for Jews), so as to breed whites out of existence, which they readily admit is the entire purpose of the enterprise, (6) promoting homosexuality because homosexuals don’t reproduce while, for what it’s worth, the Torah prescribes the death penalty for homosexuality, and (7) promoting gun control to disarm whites so we can’t fight back if we ever get fed up, while large calibre weapons are carried openly in Israel by its citizens. NONE OF THE ABOVE COME FROM THE PROTOCOLS.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You sound just like a genius, really you do.

          • http://fascistech.com Fascistech

            Exactly. Jews are obsessed with Europeans and they accuse Europeans of being obsessed with them. These scoundrels wheedled their way into Europe and then left it in ruins.

            Polish proverb: The jew cries out as he strikes you.

          • http://fascistech.com Fascistech

            Jews are not white. Tolerance for jews among us is the only fatal error of whites.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Actually, I’ll concede more than you. I’ve seen some Jews who are clearly white. Nor do I condemn everyone with one drop of Jewish (or black) blood. The issue is that, so long as Jews see themselves as a group apart from, and hostile to, whites, then they cannot be a part of our society. I don’t care if they believe in Jesus. They can believe in anything they want. Just don’t try to destroy white people or countries. That’s my ONLY issue.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            At federal agencies and contractors, that statistical subterfuge by the grievance industry occupation government allows for Semites like Jews and Armenians to be listed as “white”, which ultimately is designed to displace actual “white” people like western Europeans.

            Probably less than 25% of “white” people remaining in those places meet the traditional definition of “white”. And most of those are GIP: Grievance Industry Party (Democrat race traitors) like members of the Feminist Nation and LGBTQ Nation.

            There truly is systematic white genocide taking place.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            About as reliable as having Catholics in control. Not too far off would be the revival of inquisitions and the reassertion of medieval doctrines.

          • scottthestrategerist

            See how he shows his antiwhite bias? If Jews are expelled, then we’ll have “the revival of inquisitions and the reassertion of medieval doctrines.”

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Very funny. The Medieval period wasn’t so good for whites of any stripe, except for those who ruled and not even always so good then (See Richard the Third, Edward the Second, John Lackland, etc. But I am cousin to the present day Earl of Stradbroke and a direct descendent of a noble who is on the Falaise Roll. I bet you don’t even know what that is!

            I never said either of the things you claim. But the Reformation occurred principally because of the corruption of the RCC and the Renaissance that occurred depended upon the trade routes and banking system that Jews introduced into Europe.

            Christians in America in the 19 century were still killing one another over religious differences, so it isn’t much of a stretch to imagine what would happen if people like you were left unopposed.

            I’ve been posting on this forum for many years, and while no one would say that I am a lockstep conservative, no one but a wild eyed, freshman, resorting to name calling because of a lack of material, knowledge or maturity could accuse me of that. But this is why people like you must be either educated or controlled by your betters. The way forward is not by the way back.

          • Mergatroyd

            Can’t agree. Those 5% or .05% would betray us in a heartbeat. Ask the British. When they were in India, they were convinced that a small percentage of Indians were completely trustworthy as employees, civil servants, ahams, etc. They were the very ones that opened the gates to their ethnic kin to slaughter whites.

            Family and racial ties are far stronger than employer-employee bonds no matter how strong and trusting.

            Oriana has the right idea in South Africa. Complete separation of the races, all labor done by whites. Comply or be expelled, it’s that simple. They’ve learned a hard lesson or two about trusting blacks in their households as cooks, maids, gardeners, etc. only for those trustworthy blacks to turn around and slaughter them.

            There’s a far less chance of a white laborer killing his employer than a black laborer.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            But did you know that in Oriana, they still go out to serve blacks, being good Christians? They undo with one hand, what they do with another because of that sick, self-destructive religion.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Well, I don’t think the biggest problem from nonwhites is massage parlors! I wish that was all we were up against! I’ll take massage parlors over violent morons any day! (Full disclosure: I’ve never been to a massage parlor, but did see a chiropractor years ago.)

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Did it have a happy ending?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I was referring specifically to Southeast Asian immigrants. Massage parlor/sex trade issues. This is nothing compared to Mexican drug cartels and violent Negroes, true, but still not something we’d want in a White ethnostate.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Well, no kidding! I’m just saying let’s start with the worst of the worst and work our way down.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Read my other posts. I already stated that No Negroes should be allowed in White Ethnostates, and that includes no Mulattoes, Quadroons, or even Octaroons. As far as Hispanics, anyone with AmerIndian blood must be genetically tested. If they have more than 25 percent AmerIndian descent, they should not be allowed. As far as Judaism/Islam, no practicing Jews/Muslims allowed, as no Synagogues/Mosques will be built. This homeland should be culturally European. Christian moral values should prevail. Marriage between a man/woman, homosexuality viewed properly as deviance.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            So now we know, your head isn’t on straight.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            I would raise the bar as high as 98%, no actually let’s say 99%. That’s the percentage of natives you can find in Japan and Taiwan, which are doing just fine. Korea has a population of immigrants exceeding now 3% of the total and they are already battling with some of the problems the West face everyday (HK and SG show higher figures but they’re in a special situation).

            The 10% of non-Han in China are a royal pain in the derriere to deal with, even for a crushing, immensely popular ultra-nationalistic government like the local commie party.

            And i would say make Islam illegal

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Interesting observations.

            That 5% would be a “diverse” mix who would probably instinctively engage in “multiculturalism” within that 5%. It wouldn’t be 5% tribe or 5% Chinese or 5% Korean. It would look more like the U.N.

            Kind of like every high technology hell-hole I’ve ever worked in for the last 20 years.

            The diversity darlings at defense contractors all hate each other. It’s only the government that keeps them together, with their AA handouts.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            What’s your waist measurement? Just wondering….

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If the 5 percent were Orientals friendly to our cause, I don’t think there would be any problems. A total and complete ban on Negroes, and possibly a ban on Mestizoes with any more than a quarter AmerIndian descent would work well. White Hispanics are mostly racial realists.

          • IstvanIN

            I disagree that a European-American state should allow even 5% non-Whites. It should be all White, remember, allowing the tribe to immigrate and giving rights to blacks started the downhill slide when combined they were maybe 12% of the population. It would have to be all White with a nominally Christian culture (I personally have no problem with atheists, agnostics and assorted fringe Christian groups like Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons, or even the rare European Pagan types, as long as they understand we are a mainstream Christian society that allows freedom of Christian sect or no belief). I would allow no Jews, Muslims, Budhdists or other non-Christian beliefs, we have enough diversity of belief among Christians and atheists without creating a cauldron of alien beliefs.

            As for who is White, I disagree with the poster who was OK with 75% non-White. That would mean someone who has one black grandparent. I am not an absolute purist, I feel that is probably unreasonable for people whose families have been in the US for hundreds of years. A percentage of American Indian blood doesn’t bother me since American Indians are native to the US and this is the US and not Europe. I would think the European DNA one would have to have to live in a White Ethno-state would have to be 90% plus. Anything less than that would cause the person to have divided loyalties, and we have had enough of that. In fact, as White people, we have more than enough naturally occuring diversity than we need!

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            Why can’t we just re-enact the old naturalization act of 1790? First, the white ethnostate must be 100% white. Native Indians can remain in America as long as they stay in their own nations. Second, the US should only admit free white persons of good moral character, which means that they can’t have radical political views like anarchism, Marxism, antiracism or multiculturalism.

            Furthermore, if Christianity is going to survive, it needs to be reformed. Maybe its theology must be replaced with an Afrikaner-style Calvinist theology, where racial hatred and apartheid from nonwhites are celebrated as Christian virtues. This reformed Christianity must be bigoted, intolerant and uncompromisingly racist and those Christians who refuse to accept it must be kept out.

          • Bossman

            This reformed Christianity must be bigoted, intolerant and uncompromisingly racist. Well then it wouldn’t be Christianity but something else. As to what it could it be I’ve no idea at this time what religion would be suitable for the white man since all the old Greco-Roman gods were mostly perverts.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Maybe that’s why the founding fathers were freemasons.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Freemasons were imbued with the spirit of the Age of Reason, which was exploding in the 18th century. This allowed them to be deists and embrace the growing knowledge of science and reason at the same time. But it made them impatient. George Washington used to show up occasionally at church services. He almost always showed up late. When the minister chided him for that, he stopped coming altogether.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, the freemasons were more in sync with science–and would be race realists today. I consider myself a deist. Thomas Jefferson was also a deist. George Washington was indeed very careful not to publicly (and privately) hype traditional religion.

            Science needed to lead the way from that point forward.

            Founding fathers who were Freemasons:

            Arthur St. Clair – General, Revolutionary War
            Benedict Arnold – General, Revolutionary War
            Benjamin Franklin – Signer: U.S. Constitution; Signer: Declaration of Independence
            Benjamin Lincoln – General, Revolutionary War
            Daniel Carroll – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            David Brearley – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            David Wooster – General, Revolutionary War
            Edward Hand – General, Revolutionary War
            Elias Dayton – General, Revolutionary War
            Frederick W.A. von Steuben – General, Revolutionary War
            George Walton – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            George Washington – Signer: U.S. Constitution; General, Revolutionary War
            George Weedon – General, Revolutionary War
            Gunning Bedford, Jr. – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            Henry Knox – General, Revolutionary War
            Hugh Mercer – General, Revolutionary War
            Israel Putnam – General, Revolutionary War
            Jacob Broom – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            James Clinton – General, Revolutionary War
            James Hogun – General, Revolutionary War
            James M. Varnum – General, Revolutionary War
            James McHenry – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            Jethro Sumner – General, Revolutionary War
            John Blair – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            John Dickinson – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            John Glover – General, Revolutionary War
            John Greaton – General, Revolutionary War
            John Hancock – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            John Nixon – General, Revolutionary War
            John Paterson – General, Revolutionary War
            John Stark – General, Revolutionary War
            John Sullivan – General, Revolutionary War
            Jonathan Dayton – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            Joseph Frye – General, Revolutionary War
            Joseph Hewes (Howes) – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            Marquis de LaFayette – General, Revolutionary War
            Mordecai Gist – General, Revolutionary War
            Nicholas Gilman – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            Otho H. Williams – General, Revolutionary War
            Peter Muhlenberg – General, Revolutionary War
            Richard Montgomery – General, Revolutionary War
            Richard Stockton – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            Robert Treat Paine – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            Rufus King – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            Rufus Putnam – General, Revolutionary War
            Samuel H. Parsons – General, Revolutionary War
            William Ellery – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            William Hooper – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            William Maxwell – General, Revolutionary War
            William Paterson – Signer: U.S. Constitution
            William Thompson – General, Revolutionary War
            William Whipple – Signer: Declaration of Independence
            William Woodford – General, Revolutionary War

            .

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            The Freemasons were a big subject of study for me for years. My father was one, in fact. (Many WW2 generation males were FM as well as the women in FM’s Eastern Star auxillary). When I was living in Slovenia, I helped the official State Librarian write the first book on the subject to ever be allowed in that part of the world (the Catholic Church (and so the Hapsburg Empire) and the communists banned any FM activity or literature (mostly because it was born in Protestant regions and was anti-RCC in its roots). I am credited in the forward by the author as a contributor. (The book is in Slovene).

            FM began in the 17th century chiefly because of the endorsement/involvement of King Charles the Second. He was a young king and a curious one. He was attracted to the primitive experiments in scientific reasoning that a little group of outcast eggheads were doing. They belonged to a club. The club was a quiet brotherhood of the inheritors of Knight’s Templar lore which had imported to Europe many ideas of the intellectuals of then Muslim, but ultimately Greek schools of Philosophy and Egyptian mystery schools). Repressed by the Church in 1307, they had hid (mostly in Scotland). King Charles favored them and established The Royal Society. By the 18th century the resultant growth of progressive and development of scientific methodology led to the notion of a nation based on reason since they considered, true justice would have to follow. I have a book that shows that during our Revolutionary War, many times, British officers that were FM broke off pursuits. There are even factual incidents where a FM field shrine was captured and the materials returned to the American side with notes that demonstrate a the recognition of a higher purpose. Therefore, it is postulated that FM on both sides conspired to see the Americans win. Not only that, the French king was interested as were many French nobles. France went broke and suffered a bloody revolution because King Louis XVl bled the treasury to support the American fight for independence and the establishment of a “New Order of the Ages.” We all know about Lafayette. Washington would not have won against Cornwall if not for his help in getting the French fleet to trap his army’s seaward escape.

            But you probably already know this stuff. I am posting it in hopes that a few others that constantly argue that America was established as a Christian nation will get some better perspective. Today, these FF’s would in my opinion, be philosophical atheists. FM today only requires a candidate to admit ONCE that there is a God and acknowledge his “fatherhood.” I met many intellectual atheists at the lodge I visited and almost joined in 2000. What I find ironic is that Christian groups lately have gone overboard in attacking FM. It is ironic because these people are usually Bible Belt Southerners, who have forgotten the vital role FM played in their own communities, providing for example a second lodge for a certain group that defended them after the CW, and that Albert Pike, the giant of American FM in the 19th century was a colonel in the Confederate Army. The American center of FM was in Charleston, South Carolina from the colonial period through to the 20th century.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Great stuff!!

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            No, instead we have real human perverts in robes.

            The only religion for whites would be based on ancestry “worship” or reverence. Combine that with some Viking spirit and Celtic agrarian practice and you’ve got a form that would preserve the race, bind us to our lands and prevent any more outside religions to invade.

          • IstvanIN

            I don’t think the church has to teach racial hatred anymore than they need to teach that diversity is good. Did Jesus teach either? Religion, while an important part of our culture, should not trump common sense laws.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            What Jesus taught cannot be ascertained with any great degree of accuracy because of the questionable historical reliability of the gospels. For one thing, these aren’t even contemporary firsthand accounts of the life and teachings of Jesus. This is further compounded by the language of the gospels, a bastardized version of Greek that is often ambiguous in terms of meaning, allowing for many possible interpretations.

            If a white ethnostate is to allow Christianity to survive in its midst, WNists should use it as a vehicle for enhancing white racial self-preservation. That’s why I suggested that all Christians embrace an Afrikaner-style Calvinism. According to Afrikaner Calvinist theology, the Voortrekkers and their descendants in Africa were predestined to eternal salvation, whereas kaffirs and other coloureds were predestined to everlasting punishment. Apartheid was an institution divinely ordained by god, arising from conditional election by race.

            Promoting an official white “racial” version of Christianity would serve as an effective barrier to the degeneration of the religion into mainstream Christianity, an insane love-and-peace cult that preaches absolute biological equality between human beings.

          • jayvbellis

            Those who think like us have been trying to come up with a pro White version of Christianity for a long, long time, without much success.

            The key villain here is St. Paul, the former Jewish Pharisee Saul of Tarsus who brought in most everything Jewish ethno centric in the Jewish Old Testament then added a universal, race denying slave mentality that under the new Judeo Christian faith there would be no Greeks and Jews, men and women, slave and free, just those who have accepted Jesus and been saved.

            This same mentality is strongly at work today getting White Christians in Oregon to go off to Haiti, save the Blacks then adopt the poor Black children, teens and bring them back to Oregon.

            The Japanese, having never accepted the gospel of Saul/St.Paul to preach this race denying faith to all nations, the Japanese don’t try to make poor Black Haitians in to Japanese.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            You’re right. Christianity cannot be saved, although many have tried. Chamberlain’s Aryan Christ was one such attempt. The religion is, as you pointed out, too contaminated with Jewish universalism to be anything more than a dangerous, race-denying force among whites.

            That the Japanese were able to stamp out this evil, murderous faith of Christianity reveals their nobility of character and high general intelligence. One of the shoguns even described Christianity, originally spread by 16th century Portuguese missionaries, as a devilish or Satanic religion. Realizing how dangerous this barbarian religion was, the Tokugawa shogunate persecuted its adherents to such an extent that the faith was never seen or heard of again until the coming of the Americans in 1853.

            The complete destruction of this race-denying creed probably did much to save the Japanese from the “white man’s disease,” the pathological altruism that is currently menacing the white race and western civilization with total annihilation.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You ought to cease your Japanese worship for a bit and focus on Western resistances to Christianity, even though it’s a good example of a people who value themselves first. Study Nietzsche for example and all the myriad of Western philosophers and thinkers who have long decried it as dangerous to the mind and to the West.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Christianity is based on Judaism and focuses on a Jewish savior. If you are one, you pray to him. I don’t share in this Jew hating frenzy of these phoney nazis, but I know that it isn’t the real culture of whites, but was forced upon us by politicians and then through violence.

            Rediscovering ancestry worship, Celtic agrarian spirituality and the courage of the Norse gods is what whites ought to doing. As for hating everyone not white, it’s a waste of energy. Do what you do out of love of your own race, not hatred of others.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You are right, what Jesus taught is questionable. In fact, there is a growing library of scholarly research books on the likely fact that he never actually existed. See – “Nailed, Ten Christian Myths that Show Jesus Never Existed,” by David Fitzgerald.

            But it is also silly to pretend that this mythological “hell and heaven” exist and that this fiction of Afrikaner Calvinists is based in sanity.

            The problem is that Calvin was not really a Christian, as were not many of the Reformers. They were unable to completely break away from Christianity because they like the Afrikaners and likely you, were born into it, brainwashed from birth. (Oh, that was tried on me, but I am one of those Ubermench that Nietzsche wrote about). I have long thought that the problem is that most whites are hung up on the word “Christian.” It conveys some magic to them. They really think they can be saved when they hate blacks, Jews and others? They really think such a thing as being saved from “sin” is real? What they are missing is the recognition of a far older spirituality, the one that used to make them as fierce in their defense and it made them in their convictions of courage and love their ancestors (let alone remember them).

            Christianity tells you to give up the world. It tells you to be a sheep and follow the good shepherd. But I wouldn’t trust any religious form or leader who told me to give up my survival instinct, let alone my will and my mind.

            White people, snap out of it, before it’s too late!

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree. Racial hatred and racial pride are two different things. Churches would not need to preach hatred, but rather reinforce loyalty to one’s heritage. Churches inculcated loyalty to one’s heritage until recent years. Catholic masses in Polish, Lutheran services in German, etc. A disinterest in non-White cultures would reinforce the right attitude amongst parishioners.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            No, you’ve got to remake the entire form back to its origin. Bring back the Holy Oak of Thor, bring back the courage of the codes of the Norse. Bring back the agrarian spirituality of the Celts. And revere and remember your ancestors. I know mine all the way back to the 9th century and I’ve met Norwegian people who know theirs back to even earlier. How far back can you trace your white line?

            Christianity tells you to forget about all that, because only Jesus matters. Only your salvation(from what) matters and you must follow the shepherd like good sheep. You can never retain a shred of Christianity and be free of it’s contradictions that will confound white separatism every time.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            But it’s not really our culture, but impressed upon us from the outside. Let me remind you and others that Jesus was a Jew and his story was all about Jews and their expectations. Also, Paul was first a Jew named Saul, who saw a chance to start his own religion by usurping a little Jewish sect. I’ve always thought it hilarious that so many Jew haters are Christians (or think they are).

          • Sick of it

            What you’re saying re: Christianity isn’t necessary, but we do need white Southerners to reclaim their ethnic identity and that would pretty much have the same effect. All one has to do is talk with people of various races in the South to see who is and is not a Southerner. White people are Southerners and virtually no one of another race feels the same way (American Indians being an exception). Their blood is too different. Their culture is too different. Their origins are too different.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree as far as the AmerIndians. They already have reservations. Only White folks who have a small amount of AmerIndian descent and want to live in a White ethnostate, such as Michael Christopher Scott. No full blood AmerIndians allowed, only folks 25 percent or less AmerIndian. The only folks allowed not at least 75 percent White should be Orientals loyal to our cause. No Negroes should be allowed whatsoever, even quadroons or octaroons.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            Why do we need Orientals? If we let a few in, then everybody has to come in, including loathsome blacks and mestizos. Let them stay in their own countries where they belong.

            Only cowards, traitors and parasites immigrate.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            You are right. We certainly don’t “need” Orientals, and so much as a single Mulatto would be too many Negroes.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Like every white who came to America?

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            Ah, but these whites were colonizers and settlers who came to found and build a country, not “immigrants,” or should I say parasites, who only showed up after all the hard work was done.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            My point in posting my previous is to evoke this response for you in order to point out that Indians feel that it was the same as you describe these later immigrants. The point is that your response can be easily deconstructed by Liberals. You’ve got to have a better response than that.

            My usual response is that up to the turn of the last century, civilization was still expanding. Amerinds were living in the stone age without even the knowledge of the wheel. White Europeans spread over the globe, but in every instance and at no little cost to themselves personally, brought a result of better living standards to much of the world. No other racial or cultural group has ever attempted to do things like end slavery world wide (that credit goes to the British, not Americans).

            But we must understand that that period represents a separate historical epoch which is over. What we are dealing with now is the implosion of civilization. The most productive way to resist is not to merely repeat simple defenses to people with ready responses that only lead to a deadlock via the usual sloganeering and condemnations that cannot be politically argued, but actually a radical self-assessment and re-invention based on historical facts, not conservative political mythology. Things will never go back to how they were, history shows that. If whites are to survive, they must advance themselves into a new understanding that will work best if we take the best from our real history and deep culture, not the obsessions of fevered fanatics that can’t break with long failed formulas.

          • Grantland

            Unfortunately the Afrikaner Calvinism is very pro Zion.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I don’t trust Calvinism either. Presbyterians are one of the worst denominations as far as Negro-centric mission trips. All churches, though, need to be purified of this scourge. Culture focused Lutheran and Catholic churches would be a good start. These worked well for many years, and are still less obsessed with Leftist goofiness these days.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Nope. get rid of the name “Christianity” and you can get a start. You must base your new religion on the ancient reverence of ancestry. Turn the churches into Holy Oak groves and reverse the insult of “St Boniface.”

          • http://whiterabbitradio.net/ ArierHase

            I like your thinking.

          • IstvanIN

            Thanks I try to combine being humane and fair with common sense. Besides when did Jesus say you had to literally sacrifice one’s own family, tribe or nation for someone else?

          • Sick of it

            When the evil people want to destroy our family, nation, and race, perhaps we should do the opposite of what the evil people tell us to do. Come out from among them (and I’m sure you know what all that would entail).

          • Terra Magnum Imperium

            I sacrifice myself, to myself, to save you from myself…
            The Vampire Cult aka Christianity like any religion is a relic of our ignorant past creates more problems then they solve.
            Modern philosophies which incorporate reason as a core tenant like Objectivism or Humanism, would be more helpful in maintaining Scientific and technological supremacy. Faith should be placed in our race period.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Which is why ancestry is the best basis for white spirituality/religion.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Here is where; Luke 12: 51 – 53;

            You have to take the Bible literally or not at all.

            Jesus is alleged therein to have famously proclaimed that you must love your enemies, do good to those who persecute you, and when assaulted, turn the other cheek (ask for more). Early Christians not only believed this literally, but literally did it, believing that martyrdom would guarantee a seat among the “Elect.”
            Not only that, but he pointedly said that his words were for everyone, not just the Jews. He later said that his words and guarantees were chiefly for non-Jews everywhere (rejects his own blood and heritage).

            Since Jesus alleged says that you must be sheep and child like in your acceptance of the faith he professed, interpretations aimed at excusing one passage or another, or explaining away an obvious contradiction is a sin against him and God. Therefore, drink the whole thing down on don’t put it to your lips, because he also supposedly said, “I wert that you be hot or cold, for the lukewarm drink shall I spew from my mouth.”

            But none of this matters nor is the Bible relevant to any modern people for; Mathew 24:34;

            “Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, until all these things be fulfilled.”

            That would have been the years 80-100.

            He also is “recorded” in the Gospels to have proclaimed that when the enemy encircles the Temple set to destroy it, this was the hour of his return. During the War of the Jewish Revolt, less than two decades after the events alleged to have occurred were to have transpired, the Roman Army not only encircled the Temple, God’s most holy center on earth, but they entered it performed sacrilege on the altar and set it on fire. During the next revolt, the second century Bar Kochba Revolt, the Romans completely tore it down, laying a fine foundation for the Muslims to build their Mosque upon centuries later.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I do as well. We should specifically eschew notions such as “into all the world” in our churches. We should replace these with song lyrics such as this: “carry me home to see my kin”. Churches need to get back to a kith and kin focus.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            These are the types of forward-looking debates we should be having. The Left has a false, parallel narrative. The babble on with their rhetoric regardless of facts and truth. We should have our own parallel narrative as well. If we are background noise, they are background noise.

            Having said that, I think having 100% European ethno-states would blind us. We need partisan spies bringing us intelligence, them knowing their reward will be citizenship among the great nation-makers.

            The tribe would take advantage of a mass secession opportunity by secularizing even more. This because a mass secession environment would be chaotic and the tribe knows enough to circle the wagons in such periods.

            We would just have to be hyper-vigilant on the 95% low water mark.

          • refocus

            By making high quality embryos available to all that are willing to carry them the necessity of hard core weeding out of inappropriate DNA is obviated. Thus we get to keep an ally vs creating an enemy. It makes the plan easier to sell too.

          • IstvanIN

            So you want non-Whites to act as incubators for White embryos?

          • SoulInvictus

            Sorry, but no. Loved your original post, but first it’s 5%, then it’s 10%. Then the weak willed cave over time and it’s the US failed experiment all over again.
            If absolutely necessary, then the 5% get no voting rights. Ever. Otherwise they and their fellow travelers will grow the number all over again.
            If it’s going to go violence, blood, and secession, better to draw the hard lines and make it worth it. Maybe when europeans aren’t a single digit percentage of world population that could be reconsidered, but not for a long, long time.

          • Anna Tree

            Agree. We can have guest, but guest shouldn’t set any rules. And of course we invite them and we do so only to those who are friends and can do no harm to the Family.
            That will be the goal of the new Orianas, to set clear rules that mistakes of the past are not done again.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If that 5 percent was exclusively Orientals, I don’t think we’d have any problems. That would be just enough to be allies with the Oriental nations, so as to maintain positive trading relations, and needed military alliances that we might need.

          • SoulInvictus

            Engelbert, did you get a new screen name?;)
            I lean more towards, I’m fine with the 5% of any stripe if they have no voting rights, and their admission is restricted to the best, brightest, and most beautiful.
            Something along the lines of a more strict version of Australia’s immigration policy. I still say it’s asking for more of the same problems though. Let them go home and improve their own lands.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            That’s funny!! No, I am certainly not Engleman. I don’t view Orientals and Jews as our superiors. I’m trying think realistically about White ethnostates, as I’m an ardent secessionist. In this day and age, we would need trading partners and allies beyond just other White ethnostates. Blacks and Browns are our mortal enemies. Oriental countries are prosperous, safe, and clean. A White person can live in these countries and walk around safely. Jared Taylor lived in Japan, and speaks of this. Orientals are race realists, by and large, who would be good Allies. The point I’m trying to make is that we will need Allies, and it would be a darn good idea to be Allies with Japan and China. In a war situation with them as our Allies, we could swiftly put Blacks and Browns in their place with minimal loss of life. Over in Europe, our best Allies would be in Eastern Europe. We White Nationalists simply need Allies, and Orientals as our Allies would allow us to wield a military presence.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Ha-ha-ha! Rabbi Engelbert and his Asian/Tribe fetish.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I would also like to see a “household” vote. Married people tend to beat-up on individuals, especially with education referendums. My recommendation to young people who don’t plan to marry or have kids is to buy a house (if you must, “Going Galt” is a better idea) in a town with a lousy school system.

            The “soccer moms” and “override moms” slaughter you with teenage daycare programs in those education towns. That’s a manifestation of women getting the vote. Individual households can’t compete with those two parent vote hybrid.

            I don’t think the founding fathers could have anticipated the two-vote-households and the bullying effect it would have on individuals. If so, they would have amended the constitution from the get-go.

          • Grantland

            Marriage, family and children should be encouraged, – so I can’t agree.

          • Grantland

            mithril

            Though the coals were red
            The reflection shed
            A brighter shade
            Of silver

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Sovereignty of multiple Eurocentric nations within North America means the end of baby-making machines. Whether it’s the country of Jefferson (formerly Jefferson County, CA) or the country of North Colorado (formerly 7 northern CO counties) it will only be the managed percentage that matters.

            A European low water mark should have been set during the Hart-Celler 1965 negotiation.

            Falls below 80%—->STOP.

            The Marxists have been waging population warfare against us. Euro-centric sovereignties with fixed low water marks castrate that attack method. If you control the percentage, numbers mean nothing.

            That will allow the European-Americans to return to one of many bedrock, nation-making tenets, in this case: sustainable families. When the 95% mark is hit, all “Other” immigration stops.

            They can make as many babies on the jungle side of the fence as they want—->it won’t matter.

          • Grantland

            You sound like a ‘bot.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            ?

            Should I Google that or will you help me?

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Andy? Andy? Andy??!!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I reconsidered. <;-D

          • Mergatroyd

            Wait until the SHTF, there are life or death battles over resources and watch how people divide themselves up.

            Hence the expression, “trust no one.”

            It must be white only and no others. Period.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            We have a tough crowd here. <;-D

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Indeed!! Soullnvictus thought I was Engelman with a different screen name, LOL, due to my stance on up to 5 percent of our population being Orientals being a good thing. I got a good laugh out of this, but it also shows that we are a tenacious group with little stomach for non-Whites. I thank God that we are!!! This gives me hope in the survival of the White race. If we can muster a group like this here at AmRen, in 20 years, Secession of White ethnostates may well have occurred, or be a serious political issue in America. White Leftists will be fighting and reviling us all the way, irrationally defending the Blacks/Browns who would just as soon kill them, so it will not be an easy road. Those of us on here have the courage, though, to take the road less travelled.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “…White Leftists will be fighting and reviling us all the way…”

            Without ever knowing why. Ask them simple questions and watch their Libatrd heads explode:

            “…Is it because the parasites don’t want the host to get away?…”

            “…If your spouse hated you, would you force him/her to stay married to you?…”

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            In an ideal world, heck yes, 100 percent White. This is the real world, though, and White Nationalists cannot afford to be lone wolves. The Leftist Whites will be our mortal enemies. They will remain loyal to their beloved Blacks/Browns, and will view us as “evil racists”. As such, we will need Allies. Israel is too small, and too full of anti-Goyim prejudice to be our Ally. They will leave us hanging. The Oriental lands are where White Nationalists will be respected, not reviled. We will need such Allies for trade/military alliances.

          • Grantland

            “Us, us, us.” You are a Jew, are you not?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I’m an eighth Ashkenazi descent, yes, but this is ancestry. Lifelong Lutheran, never set foot in a Synagogue. The last descendants who practiced Judaism were in the 1800′s in Germany. I’m about as Jewish as Michael Christopher Scott is AmerIndian. Other than that eighth, I’m a quarter Swedish, the rest German.

          • scottthestrategerist

            Some Jews were good, and so Hitler made them honorary Aryans. “I will decide who is an Aryan.” Certainly we could extend that to Chief Justice Clarence Thomas, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Allen West, etc. :)

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, and Thomas Sowell. Even Montel Williams is coming around.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Of course Herr Hitler did this. It is highly unlikely that he did not have a large percentage of Ashkenazi descent. He also didn’t truly care about preserving the Teutonic sub-race of Caucasians. He had no trouble sending Germany’s young men to die killing fellow Teutons in Holland, had no compunction about dropping bombs on English Teutons, and had no problem sending young German men to kill blond haired, blue eyed Balto-Slavic Poles, women and children included, who resembled his “Aryan” ideal.

          • scottthestrategerist

            That bothers me A LOT. I’ve flirted w/ some WWII revisionism and I do NOT cheer when the Germans kill other whites, including the English and Russians. I don’t want them to die! I want them to live! This is why Communism had to go, and if the Russians of today want revenge on the descendants of those who murdered 110 MILLION of their ancestors, far be it from me to stop them. But the time has come for whites to stop going to war w/ other whites! There aren’t enough of us left for us to be killing each other anymore, especially for the benefit of our treacherous elites!

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            You feel the same thing I do about this. Hitler viewing Slavic Europeans as UnderMenschen, and sending German soldiers to kill 4 million Poles, points to Herr Hitler having been a Juden Schmalzekoupfen.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            With the proviso that they also look more white than not or look totally white Select, select.

          • Mergatroyd

            Then they will be left behind. Let them suffer the fate that awaits them at the hands of their non-white overlords and overseers. Like all useful idiots, they’ll be the first ones shot, maybe believing all the way to the end that they were “noble” and deserved what happened to them.

            Unfortunately, there are many whites like this; they’ve been brainwashed by the media and schools into thinking the most virtuous, moral thing they can do is to help with the genocide of their own race, the white race.

            Time to leave them behind and move on. If we don’t save ourselves and provide a homeland and resources for our white children, who will?

          • Sick of it

            Said people ensured that France was flooded with third world immigrants…and now they are leaving France.

          • gemjunior

            Shetland Islands, or Orkney Islands. Perfect. That’s where I’m headed if all my American brethren continue to lie to themselves.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Excellent place!! As long as the natives do not become brainwashed that Dontavius and Shaquila can fit into their society if properly inculturated, they will stay nice. Whites who are realistic about Negro sociopathy, but believe that it is learned, not genetic are the folks who adopt Negro babies, and try to raise them in all White environments. Negro behaviors have a genetic base. This is why no Negroes should be allowed in a White ethnostate, and this includes no Mulattoes.

          • Terra Magnum Imperium

            If not the US maybe Manitoba or Saskatchewan both have large amounts of land and a low population density but quite cold…

          • gemjunior

            It’s ok, we can handle the cold. It stimulates us to be better and better.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Not for long–to hear Al Gore say it.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Euros have two edges on North Americans. First, they are living in their indigenous lands where they have thousands of years, so they have a greater affinity for their lands as their own. Second, most Euros today have seen through the Christian epoch and take it with a grain of salt or not at all. Most Euros actually recognize their older spirituality; many rural areas still have old May Day festivals and other non-Christian parades and practices based on a far older and more directly native spirituality that binds them to their lands further.

        • Marc Zuckurburg

          Nobody’s going to throw me off the top of a building.

          Everybody loves ole Marc-y-doodle.

          I hired a polling firm and they told me I had a 98% approval rating.

          • Nevsky

            I’m sure back in the mid-2000s Tom Anderson of MySpace fame also thought he was invincible. Amazing how quickly things change.

          • Marc Zuckurburg

            That’s because I had nothing to do with MySpace, so of course it was doomed to fail. This is why you should seven come eleven on comprehensive immigration reform, even though it seems to be dead. The reason it’s going to happen is because I want it.

          • Berkeley Guy

            You’re always I riot. Thanks for visiting. We need more satire here.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            How hard is it to remove those dots? Is it part of your health plan?

          • Nevsky

            I have seen the light. I am definitely evacuating the country so that an immigrant can take my place. He’ll be a lot more productive than me. I’m not cut out to work in the glorious world of cubicles envisioned by gurus such as yourself.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            I bet they got a good bonus for that?!

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          Ha-ha-ha!! Quite the page turner! I spit my beer all over the keyboard on the cankles section. I don’t know if cankles are her problem. Looks more like chafing.
          I see where you’re going with this. Something on the order of National “self-actualization”. Conceptualize. Visualize. Act.
          It would definitely be raining traitors if Americans got out of their DOOM & GLOOM box, self-actualized, and acted. We indeed need to see examples of how we rescue western civilization.
          The only sad part about seeing Jefferson County, CA, West Maryland, and North Colorado becoming American again is the loss of such areas like Mississippi, and becoming Nigeria. Maybe future generations will get those areas back. Probably after our time, though.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yikes. One more lubricant for the dresser drawer. How do you keep track??

            Yeah, that IS the sad part of taking back America. Large swaths will have to be temporarily written off. The nation-takers inside will have to tear each other limb from limb first. Kind of like using a coffee grinder. Grind and look. Grind and look. Yup–their done.

            Mississippi, half of Texas will be lost for generations, 3/4 of California–not a pretty picture, but revolution ain’t for sissies.

          • Sick of it

            They will only be lost if we allow them to be lost. It’s a matter of methodology and dedication, not inability.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Temporarily “losing” territory is good Fabian strategy. Let’s beat them the way they beat us.

          • gemjunior

            Wow. She’s actually not that bad at all. One bag for her face. Or even half a bag, everything is ok but her face. “butta-face” LOL.

          • Grantland

            You’re a sick puppy, boy. Seek help.

        • WR_the_realist

          Well, I’m afraid that scenario doesn’t score high on my “realism” meter. Putin is a Russian nationalist, not a white nationalist. If America collapsed I’m sure his reaction would be, “Good, the Americans aren’t going to get in my face anymore.”

          The U.S. military would be used against any groups trying to to break away from the country (ask the Confederates about that one). There would probably be a few defectors but most of the American war machine would stay loyal to the pod people in Washington, D.C., who pay them their salaries and give them all those cool.toys to play with.

          Think about your stereotypical right wing, conservative American. He is an ex-Marine. He regularly does target shooting with his AR-15, and hunts deer and elk. He fears no burglar, bar fight, or bear. What is he most afraid of? Being called a racist. He will give up anything to avoid that dire fate.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            All true, but the pent-up anger is hidden well by the stoic European-American. They will anger in a flash. Timing will be everything. A disaster will be the necessary catalyst, granted.

        • gemjunior

          “(her cankles were more than could be borne)”

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Fixed it. Thanks. No just me dreaming out loud. <;-D

          • gemjunior

            Well it was pretty good! Honestly, that’s why I thought it might be from the novels by Covington. Though now that I think about it they were probably published before Putin came onto the world stage so that could have gave it away if I’d been paying attention. Maybe you should start writing some stuff. We need all the help we can get to draw the right people (whites who are sane) and save the country.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Thx. Depending on the disaster, man-made or natural, hundreds of scenarios are possible. The key is to be prepared. European-Americans are planners and are wired for delayed gratification.

            I would like to see a “When the meteor hits” contest. Have Jared pick 10 places in the world for an impact point, and we’ll blog the out-come.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Find a good ghost writer and go for it, dude!

        • jayvbellis

          Have you read the White racialist Secession fantasy novels by h Covington? The Brigade is the best.

          Www dot northwestfront dot org

          • AndrewInterrupted

            gemjunior just mentioned Covington. No I haven’t read him.

            One of the more extreme books I read recently in that genre was Kyle Bristow’s ‘White Apocalypse’. He has potential, but he rambled heavily in places, and over-did the violence. Beating the Left will have to include producing as few martyrs from the Left as possible. No enemy exploits their (phony) martyrs better than the GIP (Grievance Industry Party).

          • AndrewInterrupted

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            I read a copy of that out of the local recycle bin. If Kyle had had a good ghost writer that could have become a cult classic. So close, yet so far.

          • SoulInvictus

            Make them all martyrs and there ceases to be a problem.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Have a geneticist create a version of the Ebola virus that only devours people with less than 2% of the Neanderthal gene.

        • Garrett Brown

          They’re all realists, not fantasists. You would never have gotten that article because they all know that will not happen. We as a whole are cowards, therefor we will be destroyed through demographic genocide.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Damn you, GB!
            I will have you peeling potatoes for this one!

        • scottthestrategerist

          I think you’re on to something. Putin may help us because (1) a white nation would be a natural ally to him and (2) the corporatist United States is his No. 1 Enemy. Britain and France helped the South, and would have done so overtly if not for the slavery issue. France helped us win independence. We may have to look for foreign allies. Indeed, even the Muslims might be allies since a white nationalist confederacy would have no interest in invading the Middle East, and would be noninterventionist and end the “special relationship” with Israel. We could create so many problems for the USG that it would have to let us go, especially if we said, “Let’s split the country so you can run your half your way – without us bothering you, and we’ll run our half our way, without you bothering us!” Today they’d scream. Tomorrow they may be grateful for the proposal.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          Don’t get too lost in fantasy.

      • Mergatroyd

        Remember that not all whites are worth saving, especially the Cliven Bundy types. Unfortunately there are many like him. For a white community to succeed it must be for whites only, whites must do all their own work without black or brown labor. All of it. This was South Africa’s downfall, I believe, allowing blacks as laborers to be in their homes and communities.

        Many whites are ignorant, apathetic and small-minded and will pull the rest of us down.

        We are better off without them.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        Again, I ask why must you wait for collective action? If you gather with a couple other white identity families then you have created your own little diaspora. Why must the whole nation do it for you to do it? Whites will be reduced to a tiny Jew like population- a small community that holds racial purity (at least in some form) to be important. The rest will be blended into the melting pot. I’m not even sure that these groups will be 100% pure. They may assimilate some Jewish or East Asian elements, but at least if they have some idea that its important to maintain their distinct culture and genetics they can mostly stave off the huge racial change that will occur in the grand children of most.

      • scottthestrategerist

        That’s the key. We must be overtly and PROUDLY racist, as I have become, AND we MUST MUST MUST use evidence-driven arguments to explain why we are and must remain white. I convert conservative whites within minutes by explaining the racial differences in IQ tests, which I then attribute to brain sizes. Then I discuss minority crime. Then I bring in majority-black cities like Detriot, Camden, Birmingham, Gary, etc. Then I mention ancient Egypt, which was white-white, like us. That’s all it takes. Then they just need a battle plan. If they’re young enough, I tell them to have at least three children with a white mate. If not, then I tell them to instill these values in their children and grandchildren. For this to work though, WE MUST HAVE EVIDENCE-BASED REASONS!!! “Just because” won’t hold up over time and won’t stop our children from being converted into multicultis by the —- in the schools and the enemedia.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        That’s going to take legal work, but it’s also going to require whites to stop mythologizing about themselves.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      I agree. Many a White Octogenarian will be able to look back, with exceedingly clear memory, at what we had back in the 20′th century, and how we went wrong. Bill Clinton will be seen as a key White enabler of the errors which wrecked our great land. If he is still puttering along, he may come out and endorsed Merlin Miller types of figures, apologizing to fellow Whites for his ruinous Liberal naïveté that was a cornerstone of our demise.

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        And good ole Ronnie, slowly but surely, will stop being revered as the God of conservatives

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          The late George Wallace should be revered as a folk hero by Whites, as well as the late Strom Thurmond. They made a true effort to form a political party that defends the interests of White working people.

    • Alhacen

      Rising Hittler from America is needed now!

    • Fathercoughlin

      Yes those damned “liberals”!

  • Publius Pompilius Quitus

    “Science has not been kind to the regime. In 2024, the Beijing Genomics Institute officially announced that it had isolated the alleles that code for psychological traits, including intelligence and diligence. It also announced that these alleles are not distributed uniformly in all population groups.”
    ———————————————————————-
    Sadly, considering the erosion of the Western World, it will certainly East Asian nations which will be the leaders of science in the future. Taboos placed upon science have always stunted advancement, and racial taboos are no different. What would all of Europe’s scientists of the Renaissance and Enlightenment say?

    • Jacobite2

      Get real! Enlightenment scientists based their entire philosophical system on the belief that humans were born completely tabula rasa — without any instincts at all. Because this is so completely wrong that it makes phrenology look like Nobel-Prize stuff, the term Enlightenment scientist is a contradiction in terms.

      • MBlanc46

        Which scientists are you talking about?

        • jane johnson

          NOT Descartes, Franklin, or Newton!

          • MBlanc46

            I suspect that the poster is referring to philosophers, such as Locke, not scientists.

          • jane johnson

            Some philosophers were also scientists, and J2 seems to be saying that those who were based their philosophies on the epistemological concept of tabula rasa, which is a theory of knowledge, and has very little, if anything to do with hard science. The three philo-scientists I mentioned did not espouse the theory, however one cares to classify it. Anyway, J2 is clearly not a fan of the so-called Enlightenment, and neither am I.

          • MBlanc46

            You might be attributing more knowledge to this individual than he has.

          • Fathercoughlin

            Bonnie Franklin and Wayne Newton?

          • jane johnson

            Nope. Aretha and Fig.

        • Jacobite2

          Scientists who accepted Enlightenment thought. From 1750 to 1950 or so.

          • Publius Pompilius Quitus

            I place it from 1600 to 1800.

          • Jacobite2

            The natural and predictable spawn of the Enlightenment was Leftism in every form. I wish you were correct, but I still seem to encounter Leftism almost everywhere I turn. I do claim that the end of the Enlightenment was about 1950, because that is when Carleton Coon, Watson and Crick, Lorenz, and other scientists of evolution finally crushed Enlightenment Environmentalism as a respectable scientific movement. Politically, it’s still going strong, but only as a dogma.

          • propagandaoftruth

            It was after Hitler’s PR/moral nightmare that pure 100% nurture became mandatory ideology, thence “fact”.
            Up until then many respected scientists espoused ideas that are remarkably similar to what real science is coming up with every day right now. Sure, they got lots of specifics wrong (something we here should always remember – we are not gods) but…
            They got the gist of it. Then Hitler + a century or three of slow eloization/bad Christianity/Marxist slow rot combined to…
            Impel White people to act like suicidal, masochistic, histrionic, fantasy ridden, idiots for a few decades.

          • TheHBD

            Excellent summation

          • Jacobite2

            The uses the Left were able to put the Holocaust to is problematic. But the Enlightenment’s extreme environmentalism was causing trouble from the get-go. The Enlightenment thinkers were the first instance of a mass rejection of Human Nature and of the resulting limits on the manipulation man’s societies. The Enlightened Ones wanted to re-make man to their superior specifications. They worshipped Reason and denied humanity as it was. In this, they gave birth to all forms of Leftism. The Enlightenment entered history in the guise of the French Revolution, with a vengeance.

          • propagandaoftruth

            I agree, but I reject neither the totality of the Enlightenment nor of Reason.

            Heady stuff, though, especially in the minds of the grown up children we all ultimately are, who transform castles in the sky into reality, you know?

            The euphoric godhead of the subtle lie of limitless possibility/potential, juxtaposed with the limits of human lifespan and capacity, the Lennonesque urge to create a God-less, Devil-less, brutal-Nature-less heaven on earth – the primal impetus to all destructive sophistry – was indeed largely pioneered by the Enlightenment.

            But so was the scientific method and mindset, the ultimate tool for finding Truth, which is the only anathema to the poisons brewed up during that intellectual period.

            What is needed now is not an “anti-enlightenment” but rather a balancing, contemplative yet rapturous “Dark Enlightenment”.

          • Jacobite2

            Intellectualism was only waiting for the Enlightenment to tear down all the walls of reality/Human Nature that stood in the way of untrammeled imagination. I haven’t done any reading on this, but I have an idea that the Enlightenment’s basic un-reality might’ve been connected with the prosperity that enabled intellectuals to live entirely unconnected to everyday life. That, at least, would be an explanation of the obvious detachment from normal human existence that had to underlie all their ultra-environmentalism. I see this especially in our Founding Fathers. They were instilled with Enlightenment thought via education, but were also men-of-affairs as planters or farmers. They had an ideology, but also tempered with real-life experience of other people, which counterweighted that philosophy. Later in the 19th Century, bien pensants could ignore the hoi polloi and dream their dreams (and try to force us to live in them).

          • propagandaoftruth

            In terms of the American intellectual tradition, I detest Thoreau in general, see him as emblematic of the bad traditions of the Enlightenment.

            Emerson I respect. “The American Scholar” is a masterful essay I took to heart some years ago when “helping” my too-young girlfriend write an essay on it. Very funny story there, by the way, no time to tell now, lol…

            Regardless I wrote that girl a pretty jam up paper and came to love Emerson.

          • Jacobite2

            Read Thoreau and Emerson in high school (obviously many years ago). Recall not much of either. That New England Puritan heritage always rubbed me the wrong way (the Radical Republicans during the War Between the States, and then the far-Leftists after WW II). Living in the Boston area for a while verified my opinions. Most alien to a Mid-Westerner. I’m much more the Walker Percy type.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. Hitler threw off any sense of looking honestly at racial traits that have genetic basis. It was thanks to his insanity that the Leftie Libtard cult of Whites, who want to insist that all human behavior derives from nurture, and insist that any realistic looks at nature as influencing behavior are “racism”, was formed. Whites looking honestly at Negro behaviors, and engaging in an honest dialogue about this reminds Libtards of Hitler. This is highly irrational, as an honest dialogue about racial differences in behavior will not reflect poorly on the Semitic sub-race of Caucasians. Negro and AmerIndian racial traits would be appropriately addressed, something which needs to happen in the West. Negroes have had behavioral issues throughout human history. Before WWII, Whites were pragmatic about these issues. To pretend that much of the problem behaviors of Negroes was not genetic was considered stupid and self destructive for Whites. Our leaders were all proud racial realists, and the White who denied the realities of Negro behavior was considered a rube.

          • Fathercoughlin

            Blame it all on Hitler!

          • propagandaoftruth

            Why not? He don’t care. He’s dead.

          • propagandaoftruth

            The Amerindians are interesting. Recent revelations regarding them being up to a third “Caucasian” from the get-go make me wonder about whether some, like the inhabitants of Europe-like regions may have been…a little “whiter” genetically? The civilized tribes picked up on the civilized thing pretty quickly and there was a huge exchange of genes there once Europeans and Amerinds came into contact.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            This is true. The Cherokees were a far cry from the violent, Negro-like Atzecs and Mayans. Just as Arabic Caucasians are a far cry from Slavic/Teutonic Caucasians.

          • MBlanc46

            1950? Roughly, late 17th through the 18th century.

          • Jacobite2

            As respectable science, Enlightenment Environmentalism has been dead since DNA was described. As a political doctrine, it is still justifying totalitarian social destruction today. The USA is ground-zero for Enlightenment thought: men, women — no differences except those ‘socially constructed’. Once you believe that there are no instinctive human behaviors, you can dream up any kind of society you’d like (and they like extremely weird kinds).

          • MBlanc46

            British empiricists certainly beat the “all knowledge comes from experience” drum (although in Hume you do find a nod to evolution, even before evolutionary theory was fully formulated), but Kant, the ultimate Enlightenment philosopher, showed as conclusively as things are ever shown in philosophy, that that view was untenable (or perhaps Hume showed it and Kant showed why Hume got into the pickle he was in).

          • Jacobite2

            For me, modern philosophy ended when Mr. Johnson kicked the rock and said, “I refute Bishop ‘How do we know that anything we see really exists?’ Berkeley, thus!”

          • MBlanc46

            It seems to me that you’re giving just when things got interesting.

          • Jacobite2

            You’re obviously an intellectual. I will deal in realities, but draw the line at navel-gazing. If reality does not exist, what are we supposed to do about it?

          • MBlanc46

            Philosophy certainly isn’t for everyone. For the record, Berkeley wasn’t claiming that nothing was real, quite the contrary. His argument was that only God could keep the cosmos in existence.

          • Jacobite2

            Don’t talk to me, straighten out Samuel Johnson. Hmmm, I see Berkeley embraced the Mohammedan idea of a constantly-creating Allah.

          • MBlanc46

            It’s occurred to me that you might also be thinking about Rousseau, not that he was a scientist of any sort. Of course, with him, it’s original nature that’s inherently good and society that is corrupting.

          • Jacobite2

            Rousseau, first of all, was a major-league a**hole. He fathered a number of bastards and tossed them into orphanages without a blink. In my estimation, that’s where every Leftist begins — with a weirdo or alien who can’t fit in to normal society. His own special touch was to pen his auto-biography and frankly admit to his numerous kinks. Anyhow, we have a freak who is excluded from society. Bad. Man is a social animal and life as an outcast is not fun. Make no mistake, what’s really wrong with society is that they look askance at J.J.’s life-choices. So, let’s destroy normal society — they can’t expel us if we level them first. Next thing you know, you have the French Revo. Rousseau projected himself onto Natural Man. rather than trying to understand how humans might have lived in pre-agricultural times. I’d guess that he wasn’t so crazy that he really believed they lived like he did, but then, he might have been.

      • Publius Pompilius Quitus

        The theory of Evolution hadn’t yet been published at the time, so it’s
        understandable why many in the Enlightenment were uninterested in Human instincts. But it is truly absurd to say “Enlightenment scientist is a contradiction in terms.” Actually, the Enlightenment was the period that astronomy, chemistry, and physics all ascended to be widely studied sciences. The Enlightenment was an era, unlike others, where reason was a virtue. That led to modern liberties, such as pluralism and secularism. And indeed it led to the so called Rationalization of Nature, which says human nature and history can be calculated. That isn’t so different from seeing the genetic component to human behavior. All further scientific discoveries flowed from the science of the Enlightenment.

        You can disagree with all the ideas of Enlightenment scientists—it is of little concern to me—but saying that it was a time of ill-science is false. It was instead the most scientifically literate period that the world had experienced since the Romans. On the other hand, the West will
        collapse because of ethnic displacement, so the only advanced people left to do scientific discovery as such will be the East Asians; by which, I mean the Japanese, Chinese, and Koreans. Russia and Eastern Europe might also survive to do so.

        • Jacobite2

          Evolution is irrelevant. Any normal, and normally-observant, person will observe Human Nature in operation everywhere he looks. Aesop’s Fables are just as instructive as any book by Lorenz or Tiger. Enlightenment thinkers were unable to see Human Nature in operation because they were blinded by their dogmas (i.e., there is no Human Nature; man is born a tabula rasa). For Enlightenment thinkers, Reason wasn’t a virtue; Reason was a Goddess to be worshipped (as in the French Revolution, the first attempt to put the Enlightenment into large-scale practice). Fantasizing that Reason could govern the affairs of men (no Human Nature to gum up the works), Enlightenment wierdos were free to let their imaginations run wild with hyper-rational plans for re-ordering human society. The Enlightenment was the Golden Age of Utopianism, because simply manipulating man’s environment would alter his behavior without any limit. All Leftist/Utopian planning was absolutely dependent for it’s validity on the faith that human behavior was completely plastic and entirely determined by the environment. Leftists are still pushing their extreme Environmentalism (in the face of all scientific knowledge of brain science) to this day. Like the Enlightenment, Leftism must be in constant revolt against biological science, in order to maintain the relevance of their environmentalist behavioral theories. Today’s Leftists not only reject modern brain-science, but deny evolution itself (i.e., the S.J. Gould school that denies that any human evolution has occurred in the last 60,000 years). Enlightenment thought not only denied that Human Nature, or any instinctive behavior, existed, but also denied that race or ethnicity could be of any importance. The most advanced Enlightenment/Leftist thought today also denies that there are any inherent differences between the sexes. From Locke on down, the fount of all wisdom is that every human behavior is strictly socially determined (the fount of wisdom and the rationale/justification for their totalitarian social experimentation). Yes, these guys are reeeel scientific, all right. Just ask the greatest Enlightenment thinkers of them all — Stalin and Lysenko.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Rousseau was the root of far more evil than he is credited with, though bless that wicked ol’ gadfly Voltaire for seeing through the great proto-LIBTARD of all time.
        Rousseau, Marx, Boas, Freud, Rand – mental poison and the mandarin Pharisees of messianic democratic totalitarianism, in my not so humble opinion…

        • David Ashton

          Ayn Rand had serious ideological flaws but was “democratic totalitarianism” really among them?

          • propagandaoftruth

            David, how are you doing, sir?

            1. I don’t totally condemn the entirety of the intellectual output of any of those above.

            2. When I was a liblefty I hated Ayn Rand heartily for many reasons, legit and not. One reason was that her philosophy was an effective tool against my intellectual tribe, I’ll admit. After my Dark Enlightenment, I still count her amongst the great troublemakers and propagators of what the Zoroastrianists called the “Druj” (wrong, error, lie, bad, evil, hard one to translate).

            Now Nietschze I hate only because of the spelling of his name. If Ayn had hewn closer to her inspiration…well, guess we wouldn’t have “Objectivism”, would we? Neetcha, now, that guy busted out some seriously brutal, ugly, disturbing, troublemaking…

            Truth. Dangerous stuff, as is objectivism, to unready/never ready minds. Not unlike “messianic democratic totalitarianism” which encompasses as it’s libertarian/capitalist fountainhead much of the spirit of Ayn Rand’s ideas.

          • David Ashton

            What attracts in Rand is “heroism” plus “productive achievement”.
            She was inspired early on by Nietzsche among others. I have a great admiration for him, and incidentally Zoroastrianism. More on this if you wish to pursue it.

          • propagandaoftruth

            I used to hate Nietzsche (Really?! A “t” followed by three other consonants sandwiched by an “h”? Needs to be Anglicized…) but came to love him.

            When I was a messianic democratic totalitarian, I had to have real, human…witches. Servants of the evil one or ones who impeded all proper and “good” progress. N was a perfect intellectual bête noir and Ms. Rand an easily lampoonable target as imperfect intellectual heir to Mr. N.

            But then one semester as I was subtly and slimily trying to propagandize a certain student who showed potential and always asked my advice concerning a certain young lady he fancied (but who didn’t return his affection)…

            I was running down N, philosophically during a lunchtime discussion/debate with the kid when I downloaded “Thus Spake Zarathustra” and began to read it aloud to him. I much prefer the archaic translation to the other and I don’t care about the specifics, you know? It rolled of my tongue and into both our brains over the course of the month we ate lunch and philosophy. Helped my professional image when the new headmistress popped her head in once too, lol.

            Regardless, the more I read, the more we both wanted to hear, and it was indeed dark and beautiful, stark, heroic, coldly comforting. Sublime.

            “Thus spake Calverthustra”, he whispered to me in an assembly once when the dean of students was laying down the law one day…

            The nerdy boy never got the girl, that girl, but he did join the Marines, fought and survived, and today he is a man.

          • David Ashton

            Thank you for that story.

        • Mike Lane

          In all honesty, aside from her disregard for the importance of any cultural/racial solidarity, I think Ayn Rand has more to offer a right wing cause than anyone else. She even postulated her arguments in clear prose. Most of the things people argue against her are based on false representation of her ideas. I’m just wondering what your primary fault with her is.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Think I answered that below. I do like some of her stuff, actually a lot…

            The non-theistic Satanists who worship Atheismo, God of Atheism, threw a little mumbo jumbo on top of Objectivism and started a fun religion based on it. Lots of dark wisdom there. Those guys once included among their beliefs/credos the notion that scientific research should be directed to perfecting human-like robots that would serve in the pleasure domes of worthy Satanists (and anybody else who wanted them too) as slaves and concubines or something.

            And who can argue with that, eh? Pfff! I’ll take a pleasure dome and a few robot slaves, sure! I’ve got some specific models in mind right now…

            But anyway I prefer the philosophy of her mentor, Neetcha, though I like her fiction. Most of it.

        • Jacobite2

          Rousseau provided the road signs leading to Leftism, but Voltaire broke down the gates that left people standing in the street.
          The only alternative to Leftism is a normal, traditional society.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Voltaire picked apart precisely that of Rousseau which has caused the greatest mischief, though, that horrible, hippy dippy, goody two shoes, dreamy eloi worship of natural stupidity and atavism. As well as a faith in “everything gonna be alright-ism”.

          • Jacobite2

            Again, the only alternative to Leftism is traditional, normal human society (AKA, the Right). Voltaire worked to undermine traditional French society, in its religion, traditions, mores and customs. Don’t tear down the fence and then gripe about the straying cattle.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Yes, but there were stupid, atavistic, counterproductive aspects of that old regime which deserved to be lampooned and undermined.

            My view of “conservatism” is not “reactionism”, but rather an embracing of gradual, necessary, change in such a way as to minimize the trauma inherent in the process.

            Too reactionary an approach engenders opposition and clever, troublemaking sophists are ever ready to ensnare vulnerable minds, hence the ugly stepchildren of the Enlightenment.

            But lies cannot be forever effectively opposed by lies, and as I said, the Enlightenment produced the only ultimately effective weapon against it’s monstrous progeny – the scientific method and mindset.

          • Jacobite2

            Thomas Aquinas set the stage for the scientific method in reconciling Aristotle with Catholicism. Enlightenment apologists like to claim credit for modern science, which the timelines of scientific inquiry don’t support. And, again, the very foundation of Enlightenment thought was erroneous, and pretty obviously erroneous at that, which is a problem with their narrative. Human society cannot exist without ethnic solidarity, and a common shared religion, language, culture, etc. Very un-Enlightened, but nothing else has ever worked, works today, or will ever work. Human Nature; it’s a b*tch.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Freud’s ideas were not, in my opinion, mental poison. He never addressed racial issues, as he lived in an entirely White society in Vienna, Austria. He was Jewish, but never expressed any noxious anti-Gentile sentiments. He honed in on the basic drives behind human behavior, but did not analyze the particulars, or especially the traits of any group. Had he lived in America and been exposed to Negroes, I think that he would have theorized that the Negro race is less capable of controlling ID urges, and is characterized by an inability to develop a Super-Ego, whereas for Whites, healthy Super-Ego development is the norm. His theories, without the hysteria caused by Herr Hitler, Would have fueled copious research into pre-frontal cortex development differences among the races in the modern era. Most likely, Negroes have a less developed pre-frontal cortex than Whites. This is the most sensible and likely reason for their pervasive and on-going degeneracy as a race. If this were scientifically studied and validated, racial realism would be the ideology held by all intelligent Whites. Leftist fallacies on race would quickly fade into obscurity.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Exactly. Inaccurate tabula rasa psychological theories fit perfectly into the Leftist narrative. The Left has used these obviously unreliable theories to brainwash the masses into a nonsensical racial egalitarianism. If Herr Hitler had never come to power in Germany, I suspect that this cockeyed egalitarian philosophy on race would have never gained any type of following in the West. Racial differences in human behavior are too obvious to deny. Whites who deny them have either had too little exposure to Blacks/Browns to see these differences, or are too intent on believing the Leftist narrative to allow truth to enter their minds.

        • Jacobite2

          Where today’s West really deviates from the Nazis and other upholders of normal Social-Animal behavior is that they do not actually promote racial egalitarianism. They give quick lip-service to that, but when you get down to the details, they hate the West/Europe/Christendom with weirdly unique extremism. No equality here!! Recall one of the rules of Social-Animal behavior — dominance is 100% zero-sum. No ties; no neutrality. You win or you lose. So, racial equality can never exist, even in theory. And it doesn’t. We find that there are only two possible alternatives in our Kultukampf — pro-West, or pro non-West.

    • Bossman

      Let all these boring sexless East Asians work their tails off producing nice gadgets while we in the Western world lie on the beach enjoying the scenery. East Asians, no matter how intelligent they become, will always be boring.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        East Asians are more boring than Whites, and less creative. I agree. Unlike your Bronze race, though, they have a strong moral compass. Asian men do not think that constantly harassing women is a joke, as men of your sociopathic Bronze race do. Men of your sociopathic Bronze race were not allowed to sit on the beach making filthy comments in Spanish to beautiful White ladies in the good old days. If your Bronze race is so talented, why do they create societies wracked by violence and run by drug cartels?? I much prefer those boring, crime free Asian societies, where such behaviors are not acceptable. Asian societies have not produced the music culture of White societies, but neither have your Bronze societies. By the way, I do not consider Argentina a Bronze society. Argentina is mostly White European. The Bronze societies resulted from Europeans foolishly miscegenating with the barbaric AmerIndian natives. Argentina does not fit this description.

    • bilderbuster

      More like ” Studies have proven that Chinese students between the ages of 5 – 10 years old are now out scoring adults in all nations in IQ abilities and their scores continue to rise”.

    • Alhacen

      Racial taboos in scientific research were set after the horrors of WW2 where more than 60 million humans died by the hands of humans which shared similar ideologies like people on this site.

      • Sick of it

        Considering that radical Marxists East and West pushed for said war, why would it be blamed on race realism? Race realism was the norm in all of the countries involved in WWII.

        • Alhacen

          Yeah, I know all that. Forced sterilization of “life unworthy of life” etc etc. Race realism is a con word for scientific racism.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Exactly. My opinion is that Herr Hitler was a goyim hating Ashkenazi who wanted to see Teutons and Slavs killing each other. He did nothing to help America with our Negro problem, or help Europe deal with Arab Islamists and African Negroes who are now wrecking Europe.

          • Sick of it

            I’ve read variations on that theory. It’s hard to say, but possible if rumors of his ancestry are true. Especially the family from which he is supposedly descended (the Rothschilds).

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I would definitely believe that he was descended from Rothschilds. If so, he was likely part of a Rothschild plot to bring Germany down.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Exactly. Hitler caused the West to go into panic mode regarding anything even remotely pointing to the genetic superiority of Northern Europeans, even if it is realistic. If Herr Hitler had had a clue, Germany would have sent crooked bankers/businessmen to the gas chamber, as these were the folks destroying Germany. Germany would have helped the Slavic nations to do the same. Hitler was no White Nationalist. He was a race traitor who caused 4 million Poles to die, and sent German soldiers to kill Slavic Europeans that would have welcomed German soldiers with open arms, had they been helping them to break the stranglehold of criminal, mostly Jewish bankers and businessmen on their lands. No White Nationalist sends White blue-eyed Europeans to kill other White blue-eyed Europeans while allying himself with Arab Muslim scum.

        • Alhacen

          Slavs (Poles and Russians) were regarded as Untermensch in the Nazzi ideology. That is the trouble with White nationalists / race supremacists. Once they start believing their own racial-nationalistic lies, it ends nowhere with White skin color. For your information Muslim “scum” in the Balkan (Bosnians, Albanians) is also White. Muslim Persian-Turkic-Kurdish people in Central Asia (Turkey, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan) and the Middle East (Iraq, Syria and Iran) are also considered racially white, even if they are not from Europe. Many of them have blue-eyes and White skin tones. See how absurd you sound?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I’m very much aware of Arabs being Caucasians, and that Bosnian Muslims are Slavic Europeans whom the Turks tried to make culturally Turkish, thus their being Muslims. I’m also aware of Race and Religion being two different things. Ashkenazi Jews are also Caucasians. Herr Hitler was at least part Ashkenazi descent, short and stocky with dark hair, making his considering the Slavic people UnterMenschen especially hypocritical and ridiculous.

  • JohnEngelman

    As the Beijing findings became widely known, they met with two sharply different reactions. The ruling elite insists that racial preferences must continue:

    - Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, June 20, 2014

    The ruling elite will be almost exclusively white (I am of course including Jews as whites), Oriental, and East Indian. For these, racial preferences have been a constant impediment as they achieved their positions in the ruling elite.

    Affirmative action made it more difficult for them to get into the best universities. They got into those schools, but they had high school friends who did not, and who they knew were more intelligent than blacks and Hispanics who did.

    For these members of the ruling elite affirmative action was a barrier as they rose in the academy, journalism, corporations, and especially in the government.

    • propagandaoftruth

      I so need to win the lottery. The big one. $200,000,000 would be a nice start up for the American Phalange.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        But if came into $200 million but you had no Neanderthal DNA, your first inclination would be to augment your shoe game.

        • propagandaoftruth

          Zing! I love my Neando DNA and my pasty hide and my beautiful extended family and our heritage. Yup, squirrel away my nut, secure possible asylum with Vlady Putin, and use the rest to start a revolution.

    • Fair Dinkum

      Yes, the ruling elite will be almost exclusively white, but it will also be disproportionately Jewish, as it is today. Like it or not, many Jews are strongly prejudiced against white gentiles, and many Jews in the ruling elite will work as hard as they can to keep affirmative action and other anti-white policies in place.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        The ruling elite will eventually be almost exclusively Hispanic, probably mostly castizo with a sprinkling of token indio-mestizos, as their numbers are growing more explosively than any other demographic in the US. This may not happen in 2034, but it will happen sometime after. They may not have the brains, but Hispanics are more dominant, machista and aggressively territorial than all other groups, in addition to having numbers on their side. Because democracy is a numbers game, they will easily translate their massive population growth into a string of electoral victories that will turn the White House into the Brown House. The US Congress will eventually become a castizo and indio-mestizo-dominated institution.

        • Bossman

          I believe you but for slightly different reasons. I may be wrong but I believe so-called Hispanics are a new emerging American race that is neither completely European nor African or Native American but a combination of all these groups. And at this time in history, they’ve got the numbers on their side.

          • Kenner

            Not the IQ numbers.

        • Sick of it

          The ruling elite in Mexico would be welcomed by the ruling elite in America. They might even attend synagogue together.

          • propagandaoftruth

            The ruling elite in Mexico are white and run the place.

            They don’t sneak over the border. They get passports and usually return, or stay and are White here as well.

            Guillermo del Toro

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            The Mexican criminals I knew in prison looked nothing like Mr. del Toro.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            I remember during a holiday in Paris in the mid 90′s, before i moved to the US and before i had any swell-defined opinion of the Mexicans, meeting a group of young Mexican tourists who asked me to take a pic of them.

            I remember clearly noticing how some of them looked Southern Europeans, some others instead simply generically white.

            I also believe most readers here will not be surprised to hear that Mexicans who can afford a vacation in France were of such ethnicity

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            Those were the whiter Mexicans who have the money to travel and no arrest warrants chasing them. They were likely less Injun than I am.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. Those tourists were probably full-blooded Caucasians from the ruling elites. You see clearly the difference between the AmerIndian Browns from down there, and the Whites. Whites down there brought and maintained European culture. What remains is a bastardized version of European culture, where there is some decent folk music and cuisine, but drug lords run whole provinces with a reign of terror. Life in parts of the Islamic world is more safe and peaceful than this.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Look at Mexican TV, soaps, commercials (not too long now, hurts the brain as much as English versions) and you see the old Castillian/mixed gringo creole rulers of Mexico and all Latin America.

            If anything, many of these Narco Kings represent a non-White revolutionary challenge to the ruling White elite, a modern sort of depraved resurgent Aztec-ism, bloody and barbaric. Certainly the Hispanic White is a HARD MAN, and has done what has had to do in order to protect his and his own.

            Crème rises to top, mud sinks.

          • Tarczan

            Watching the World Cup is very interesting from a race point. The fans of most S. A. teams have a strong European mix. Some of the teams,like Argentina look mostly European.

          • Ringo Lennon

            People claim that Puerto Ricans look white because they’re not mestizos. Mostly Spanish. Is this true?

          • propagandaoftruth

            Some Boriquas (PR’s) are very White, like the Sheen (Estevez) clan, who were really Galician Spaniards.
            A substrata of Carib Indians, some early and later Spanish and…
            Heavy Negro mix too. The more Negro in the Boriqua, the more black they act in general. My ex wife, a Costa Rican, held especial disdain for most Boriquans, lol. HATED when people mistook her for…

          • propagandaoftruth

            Argentina is actually a great source of hope for our people. Nice mix of Spanish, Italian, German, English, Slavic…White mutts. Low number of blacks and natives. I’ve known some Argentines who had refreshingly acceptable racial views.

            The further south beyond the equator you get, the whiter you get. Imagine that?

          • David Ashton

            Che Guevara was an Argentine with racial views, wasn’t he?

            Incidentally, I read that Allende and Castro were both keen on eugenics in their early days. I am not a fan of the mason or the murderer myself, however.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Che was a white boy, yep. Isn’t it almost always some brilliant misguided white who stirs the pot?

            Che, like many messianic whites, was ultimately a traitor to his own.

          • David Ashton

            Yes.

          • Martel

            Ecuador and Honduras both have many black players(mostly), but the audience consists mostly out of European descendants or light mestizos.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Therein lies the irony of the suicidal Jewish Leftie Libtards. Most of the Brownies are far more anti-Semitic than White Americans, and far more likely to Pogromize American Jews. Towns like Monsey and Kiryas Joel, NY, American Shtetls of sorts, are far more likely to thrive, and live in peace with neighboring communities, when those communities are White. Do Jewish Lefties really think that Browns will treat Jewish people better than Whites? Libtards are indeed an irrational group.

      • JohnEngelman

        First of all, Jews are white. Second,. Jews are not hostile to white Gentiles.

        • Martel

          The historical record disagrees with your last sentence. The fact that nearly all movements attempting to push whites out of the power-structure have been organized and financed by Jews adds to the suspicion. Someone on Amren claimed that the man who designed Common Core, who did so to combat “white privilege” as he admitted on tape, is Jewish. I don’t know whether it is true, but it would hardly surprise anyone.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews are usually attracted to the political left. This is because no matter how rich they get they remember the poverty of the shtetls, the ghetto, and the lower east side of Manhattan. That in turn is one of the reasons I admire them.

          • Martel

            You made this motivation up. Admiring Jews simply for being born as Jews doesn’t make sense.

          • Fair Dinkum

            Jews are attracted to the political left because the ideology of the left provides convenient rationalizations for deconstructing and dismantling Anglo-American society, and for that matter, Western civilization in general.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are incapable of perceiving of any honorable motives in those you disagree with.

          • IstvanIN

            If they remember the poverty of the shtetles they must get a natural high from having murdered the Christian Czar, his family and nation.

        • silviosilver

          They have a pronounced tendency to be hostile to white racial interests. Because this virtually never translates to face-to-face hostility against individual white gentiles it is difficult to detect and easy to obfuscate, but it is certainly there. Though the reasons for this tendency are ‘structural’ more than anything else — in their eyes, Jews have little choice but to take the positions they do — it does place Jews in an adversarial relationship with racial reality.

        • Fair Dinkum

          Yes, Jews are white. They also have a long history of conflict with both Christians and Muslims.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews have a long history of being persecuted by Christian and Muslim religious bigots.

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          No, Jews are not white. White = European. Jews are Middle Easterners.

      • Ron Cheaters

        I can imagine a backlash against the jews if and when the economy truly collapses. I see the collapse within the next ten years. Followed by another 10 years trying to put the pieces back together. This will enrage a lot of people who have worked all their lives for nothing.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Yes they do. They are suicidal, as the non-Whites they support do not care about them, or preserving the traditional Jewish culture. The Holocaust made many Jews anti-White, and many are still living this twisted illusion that, somehow, they are going to benefit by supporting non-White interests and the destruction of White societies. Truly insightful Jews know that true preservation of their culture will come from supporting White culture. Jews are a White ethno/religious minority group. Unfortunately, Jews like Robert Weissberg, who see this essential reality, are few and far between.

        • SlizzardAjeosshi

          I completely agree: i think, in this day and age, being a left-wing Jew is something close to a mental disease. Many Jews need to wake up and grow up

          Thanks for the tips !

      • Alhacen

        Jews do not belong exclusively to the white nordic master at all. Jews are from all ethnicities and places of origin.

    • ViktorNN

      I disagree. In 2034 the ruling elite of the U.S. will be looking much more like today’s multinational ruling elite – it will be multiracial and include exceptional blacks and hispanics.

      The main difference between the ruling elite now and the one in the future is that there will be ever fewer whites.

      The reason for this is that anti-family and anti-natalist cultural pressure targeted almost exclusively at white populations will take their toll with great effect. We already see that upper class whites in blue area have below replacement level birth rates. As this continues – and there’s no reason why it won’t – there will simply be fewer upper class whites in total and as a percentage of the population.

      Some groups of wealthy non-whites do trifle around with upper class white suicidalism – but not to anywhere near the same extent as whites. When push comes to shove wealthy non-whites still understand the importance of family in maintaining and growing wealth.

      Without a white racial awakening, by 2034 whites will be increasingly marginalized in the upper classes in N. America and in any white country where mass immigration of non-whites is happening today.

      • JohnEngelman

        The elite are not anti family. They have low rates of divorce and illegitimacy. They have fewer children, but they have better children with high IQ’s that they are able to provide well for, and send to elite universities.

        • Jotun Hunter

          that’s right – those elite universities are churning out modernist crackerjacks just full of manly, faustian enterprise. Soon as they graduate they are primed with the skills to continue exposing ‘privilege’, expanding equality, exposing gender-math bias, and producing newer, more innovative versions of farmville.

          • JohnEngelman

            I detect the scent of sour grapes. It has never been as important as it is now to have a professional degree from an elite university. Those with such degrees do not expose privilege. They enjoy it.

            Of course, those with the powerful degrees are disproportionately Jewish and Oriental. They earn their degrees, and their incomes.

            Don’t worry about what people are taught who get degrees in black studies, Hispanic studies, and women’s studies. Those degrees are wastes of time and money.

          • Berkeley Guy

            I was often silent in my envy of those who had college degrees, especially advanced degrees in the hard sciences, while I was making a six-figure salary. I quit that job and took a huge risk in enrolling at a community college, not knowing if I had the ability to transfer to somewhere very selective like UC Berkeley. Instead of turning me into a modernist crackerjack, I have maintained a liberal view on abortion and have moved far to the right on issues such as gun control. I consider myself more right-thinking now than when I first enrolled. Being exposed extremely liberal ideas (some of them fantasies) has allowed me to better understand my position in the world.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            Philosophy is one of the few liberal arts disciplines that requires a high level of g-factor intelligence to do well in. On tests of reasoning, philosophy majors do better than hard science majors, but the same as physics/math majors.

          • Berkeley Guy

            This. PhD–Doctorate of Philosophy–is labeled as such for a reason. Learning to take an integral is not too difficult, but questioning its usage or what is entailed by its methodology with reference to infinitesimals, understanding how such concepts can be extended or generalized to other mathematical formulae requires refined habits of reasoning.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree. Jared Taylor is gifted in logical reasoning. He can see connections that most fail to see without the help of someone like him. His abilities to employ logic are stronger than those of any American President in the last 100 years. Lincoln and Jefferson seem to have had such abilities.

          • Berkeley Guy

            One need only look at some of the books that Jefferson, and somewhat less Lincoln, were reading. Euclid’s Elements and other mathematical and philosophical works in general will develop and refine reasoning abilities.

          • Jotun Hunter

            but you must admit, the majority (currently) do fall in line with the liberal ideas they are exposed to and land on their feet as ‘modernists’, or ‘post modernist crackerjacks’ to be pedantic.

          • Berkeley Guy

            Unfortunately, there are many who do, I say with shame for us. Too many do not question the status quo at places like Berkeley out of peer pressure or fear.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ha, nice try. As it happens I have my own ‘elite’ degree and work in probably quite a similar area as yourself, from the sounds of it. Unlike you I just think it’s all an incredibly stupid waste of time. I suppose that could technically still fit the label ‘sour grapes’. Virtually all universities are now a ponzi scheme, and unless you are studying a hard science like engineering or medicine you are likely not just wasting your time, but likely stunting the hope for any real learning.

            Your perspective is fixed, unwaveringly, within the confines of a contemporary, corporatist, american viewpoint. A jew with a degree is still not an idealist, and will likely wind up a banker,not a rocket scientist. The asian will wind up working for a white man with creative ideas.

          • Berkeley Guy

            I somewhat disagree. But you could make a good case for it all just being a waste of time since the tuition is so high now. Really, we could just read the books by borrowing them from a library (or the 5th version of a textbook instead of the outrageously-priced 12th version) and form study groups locally with little to no cost. I enjoy my education, but I have thought a lot about how much of it is way, way, overpriced. Shakespeare did not need to attend a writer’s workshop or some Ivy League school to become a good writer nor did many others. Bach didn’t need Juliard, and Plato didn’t need NYU. It is probable that what I am doing is a waste of time not because of what I am learning but because I could have learned nearly all of it for free though it would most likely take much longer.

            The textbook scheme is widely regarded as a dirty joke, and it may be that most of higher education in America is wasteful. Whatever the case, we definitely know that it is not even attempting to be optimal, and a conversation about this is long overdue.

          • Jotun Hunter

            yes, I agree. Especially in the age of the internet, the main part of doing great things, is to do them. It is the work, often undertaken alone, in the dark, or even in poverty. The education seems to have almost become the goal itself now, to attain the piece of paper then slide into these modern corporate office jobs where all inspiration and originality is slaughtered, ritualistically, in democratic board room meetings of pushy women and beta morons parroting buzz words and tripe.

          • Berkeley Guy

            I understand you, sir. I have attended public schools all my life, and have been bused to all black schools when I was 12-16 in Boston. The daily abuse only made me stronger, in the long run. Rather than being blinded by it all, I have slowly woken up from being a sleepy-head. It may not be as bad as we sometimes think it is. Probably there are others out there like me, who understand but keep silent about such matters.

            A little tidbit of goodness for you: it could be the case that globalism, instead of reducing and stalling the growth of our culture, will allow it to flourish in even more places than it does now. It could be that people who parrot buzz words give birth to such children as us. My parents were not like me–hope springs eternal.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Attending school with Blacks made many of us into racial realists. That was certainly true for me. Over time, experiences with the Negro race have reinforced my beliefs that their behavior mostly results from nature, not nurture. So many Blacks go around in a perpetual state of contention, despite constant pampering by Whites. I’ve come to the conclusion that the Negro race generally has less pre-frontal cortex development than Caucasians/Orientals. I wish that this would be studied scientifically, but know that no such thing will happen in the current Leftist political climate that prevails in the West. Leftists are extremely closed minded. They do not want scientific reality getting in the way of their Liberal fantasy.

          • DaveMed

            Lots of the professors in my school – both MDs and PhDs – are Jews.

          • Hallie Eva

            Mine too, DaveMed. As well as ex-husband and my associates in the software/scientific world.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ah… the software world. Well there’s no doubt they are smart. It’s too bad they are also rats.

          • Jotun Hunter

            and are you saying they are examples of jews that are idealists for not becoming bankers? or typical non-idealists because they are peddling marxim in schools?

          • DaveMed

            I’m saying that generalizations to the effect that Jews with degrees are not idealists or that Asians are uncreative don’t hold water in the real world.

          • Jotun Hunter

            do they not? do you think asian ‘creativity’ is equal to whites? They are fantastic at working on things providing you have invented them first. jews are responsible for movements like post modernism and marxism, which are positively anti-idealistic.

          • DaveMed

            It is true that, on the whole, Europeans and European-Americans have been more creative. However, this does not practically translate to the statement: “The asian will wind up working for a white man with creative ideas.”

            Equally susceptible to contradiction by reality are statements such as: “A jew with a degree is still not an idealist…” Many MDs and PhDs in the hard sciences are idealists, and Jews are disproportionately represented in those fields, as well.

          • Jotun Hunter

            well regarding the asians I’m exaggerating of course – it goes without saying that while those of us here advocate for acknowledgement of ‘group behaviour’, this comes at the expense of recognizing the individual, for the reason that idiotic modernism insists that we ‘do not generalize’ at all cost, because it ‘isn’t nice’. My and others freewheeling anti-pc statements are freeflowing generalizations based on group behaviour and history, because it is true, and because it is fun. Not all asians will work for the white man. But many will, directly or not, and many more will use and develop ideas borne from a white mans creativity. Regarding the jews, many have a kind of idealism, often they are poisoned then by their own ingroup/outgroup instincts, poisoned in the sense that they work actively against us and are an enormous danger. Jarod Taylor himself has admitted as much, though I believe he still feels overall they can be coerced into joining with us.

            But frankly this is one website where I shouldn’t have to defend my sweeping generalizations. The creative asians in your class likely seem moreso than historically because the whites are now so downtrodden by well meaning egalitarianism as to be too mortified to make any of the glorious, destructive acts of creativity he has shaken the world with in the past. That would require a will to self-determination at the expense of others. He won’t come back to that now until the others have pushed him too far, lets hope it won’t be too late then.

        • ViktorNN

          Any population group which isn’t reproducing at above replacement levels is in some fundamental sense anti-family and anti-natal.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Exactly. Affirmative Action has functioned as discrimination against intelligent Whites (Jews included as Whites), and intelligent Asians. Only Blacks and Hispanics benefit. Even Caucasian Muslim immigrants do not benefit. Arabic Muslim immigrants probably face the most actual discrimination of any non-White group in America. I’m not a fan of Islam by any means, but it is obvious to me that race is a far more important concern in behavior than religion. Catholicism did little to civilize South American AmerIndians, and Churches in Black neighborhoods do little to make Blacks truly decent. Yet, in St. Louis, Bosnian Muslim immigrants have revitalized a neighborhood that they have made safe and clean.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        The Bosnians in St. Louis, many of them, look Teutonic. Remember, the Bosnians are historically speaking not Muslim by way of free will.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Exactly. They are fellow Teutonic/Slavic Europeans whom the Turks tried to make culturally Turkish. Fortunately, genetics seems to have prevailed with them.

    • Alhacen

      The ruling elite will be almost exclusively white (I am of course including Jews as whites), Oriental, and East Indian

      All Jews are not white. Majority of Jews in Israel are not white. Go there and see for yourself.

      • JohnEngelman

        What you say is true. Nevertheless, nearly all Jews in the United States are Ashkenazi Jews.

        • Sick of it

          You are correct re: more recent immigrants and their descendants. Many of the old Jewish settlers in America, however, were Sephardic Jews. You don’t see many around today, as most of their people became Christians. They chose a better way.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            A better way is right. Many German Jewish immigrants to America became Christian once here, and planned to become Christians once in America. Part of their motivation was escaping the prejudices Christians had against Jews, but they were also motivated by a deep and abiding love for Germany, and a desire to be part of German American communities. Many German Jews also had a large percentage of Teutonic genes, as could be seen by the prevalence of Blue Eyes, light hair, and being rather tall.

          • Grantland

            What utter nonsense.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            This is not nonsense in the least. This is what occurred during late 1800′s immigration to America. There is nothing wrong with the Ashkenazi gene pool. Jews who view Gentiles as Goyim do so because this is taught in Judaism, not because of something that is genetic. Ashkenazim are closely related, genetically, to Southern Europeans and Arabs. A person who has Ashkenazi descent, but is Christian, is just as White as an Arab Christian. Religion is cultural. Race is inborn. Arab Christians have never been a problem in America. Jamie Farr and Danny Thomas were Lebanese Catholics. German Americans who have some Ashkenazi descent from several generations ago, and are from families that have been Christian since the 1800′s, have also not been a problem in America. Such folks are more likely to be race realists than some Irish descent Libtard who has no family based knowledge of why Jews and Muslims are reviled in certain parts of the world.

          • Grantland

            All kinds of Jews “convert” (and/or change their names). Like the Catholic Madeleine Albright. Chameleons.

          • Guest

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            German Jewish immigrants, in the late 1800′s, who chose to become Christian upon settling in America, were not chameleons. They usually were short with dark hair, and often had large noses. People frequently thought they were Italian or Greek, due to their looks, and fiery temperaments. Many of them came here with a love of Germany in their hearts. They wanted to be part of German American society, not Jewish society. They were choosing to leave Judaism behind, not plotting to destroy Christian America.

          • Grantland

            There are no German Jews. There are no There are no Russian Jews; there are only Jews who happen to live in Russia. There are no American Jews – there are only Jews who happen to live in America. Always and everywhere, without exception.

            Every Jew in a position of trust or responsibility in any nation outside of Mordor (Yitzreal) is a traitor, ipso facto. Every nation that allows Jews to take control is doomed to exploitation and then slavery, without exception.

          • Sick of it

            Madeleine Albright likely had ancestors who popped off the boat in the 1920s. A different breed entirely.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. This is when many of the hard core Gentile hating Jews came, many of them from Russia. Grantland obviously can’t be reasoned with, though, on the Jewish question. Grantland seems to think that all Jews are insane, power craving megalomaniacs who want to rule the world.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    “Sharp cuts in Social Security”

    There are a million things before now that have happened that white people should have revolted over in reaction. But if there is actually a serious proposal that next year’s SS checks are even $1 a month less than this year’s, the 65+ crowd will literally start a revolution.

    Where I think Jared Taylor’s predictions are most correct is that de facto racial localities and virtual cantons will start springing up among whites. I don’t know if it will be in New England, but I think they’ll break out somewhere.

    • Malgus

      Would be nice to see that happen… power flowing back to the individuals and states/commonwealths… probably a pipe dream, but hope springs eternal.

    • So CAL Snowman

      The Geriatric Revolution! All rascals on deck!

    • Sick of it

      The old folks were marching on Washington not too long ago…and then quietly went back home. Our future lies with the youth, so we must share the truth with them and prepare them for a better way of life.

      • Martel

        The old folks marched home because their attempt at a revolution made absolutely no sense strategically.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Yeah, but I have this idea of some sort of “grey hundreds” if it all DOES really go to hell in a hand basket.

        Bunch of old farts and biddies popping caps and going to Valhalla like toothless but heroic lions.

        My old pops, he was a WW2 vet. I took care of him when he got Alzhiemer’s and remember once toting him out to the VA obnoxiously early one morning (to wait hours, of course – the military, duh gubbamint). So Pops looks around and in a loud, clear voice says to me,

        “Why there’s nothing but a bunch of old coots and old biddies here!”

        Got some chuckles for that…veterans, you know, “greatest generation” style…

        But Pops would have loved to go out holding a barricade for his loved ones. The Grey Hundreds.

      • SoulInvictus

        Old people are the only thing more untouchable in the US than blacks.
        Never put much thought into it before, but no one would dare hose down hordes of elderly with rubber bullets and pepper spray. They’d be pretty effective for mass protests.
        Plus they have all the money and get more leniency on “racism” (barring instances like the Clippers guy).
        (And if they use that crowd control gas that makes you poop yourself, a lot of them are um.. already prepared. That’s hardcore prepping.;)

        • SlizzardAjeosshi

          “Old people are the only thing more untouchable in the US than blacks”

          This makes America sound a lot like…Europe. I wonder how long it’s gonna last though.

          So far the democratic party (and leftist types everywhere in the Western world) have been staunch defenders of the SS system.

          I think their love for big government has trumped any other consideration: i wonder how long it will take before TPTB notice, as Jared has pointed out, that SS is inherently racist and a clear expression of white privilege.

          By the way i’ll join the chorus in saying this was so far my favourite essay in an already remarkable series

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Old people made themselves temporarily “untouchable” because of their majority vote, which they are losing. With their minority vote, so will go their “untouchable” status.

            I give you the recent VA scandal, for example.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            In 20 years, that voting bloc will still be huge, and seniors will be predominantly White by a long shot. Whites will be the majority amongst seniors for many decades. Generation X is White by a large margin.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Social Security will be alive and well in 20 years. Generation X is predominantly White by a large percentage, as are Baby Boomers. Blacks love any sort of hand out, so they are more likely to complain if Social Security is revoked. Ditto for the Browns. Taxes wil be higher, with fewer services resulting for working Whites, but Social Security will be alive and well.

    • MBlanc46

      As one of the 65+ crowd, I’m pretty confident that nor such revolution would occur. Unfortunately, a revolution is just what we need.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Can you tote and fire a gun? If wheelchair bound, would you be adverse to rigging your wheels with an MG, some light armor and a dead man’s switch in case you wish to go out in style while holding a breach?

        I’m younger but I think about these things.

        • MBlanc46

          The issue is what I could or could not do, but what white Americans are going to do in the near- or mid- term. And I’m afraid that is very little, and certainly nothing violent.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Near term, far term, reminds me of the expression, “ahorrita” in Spanish, specifically in Costa Rica. “In a little bit”, which could mean a few minutes or…uh…hours…days?

            I really need to win the mega millions and start an organization. I think I could start a revolution through perfectly legal means…with $200,000,000 dollars.

            Hey…let’s all promise to do that if any of us win…just call me up if you win it – I got ideas.

          • Whitetrashgang

            That’s the thing if a pro white party came to my door and asked for 5 grand to help white people I would give it no problem. We need a professional pro white party and there is none.

          • propagandaoftruth

            I’m serious. I’d squirrel away my nut, give Amren a nice gift, ask JT for some advice perhaps, and build the organization that will start a revolution.

          • MBlanc46

            It’s a promise.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            “Certainly nothing violent”?

            I used to know the guy who wrote the poorly-written pamphlet that inspired Timothy McVeigh. Some of if the ideology I tried to teach the “author” went into the creation of that “book”, but he had turned it upside-down, along with any skills at spelling, grammar and punctuation.

            I urged him to finish college – he had started at Rochester Institute of Technology – but he wanted to be the Great Revolutionary Hero, and tried to organize a four-man fire-team as a “militia” in the Denver area. So far as I know, they all pleaded guilty. I am not certain, as I was living Sydney, Australia at the time, and my mother sent me the newspaper articles.

            Please understand that the people who advocate violence almost always want to lead from behind: “You go do this, you go do that; I’m more of an ‘idea guy’.”

          • propagandaoftruth

            The revolution need not be much more violent than it already is. We should certainly prepare for it to be violent, but even so, sometimes a vicious bark obviates the need for a bite.

          • MBlanc46

            I’m thinking of mass action. Manning the barricades sort of thing. But even when you consider the actions of individuals or small groups, the Tim McVeys and Unabombers are so few as to be statistically nil. When you hear of a older white guy getting violent, it’s almost always the “going postal” route.

        • SoulInvictus

          Hilarious… elderly wheelchair mini-tanks.
          You could call them the “silver panzer” division.
          Operation Slo-mo Blitzkrieg.
          The French would still surrender.

          • Kenner

            SEALS on wheels.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Hey, I’d volunteer to have experimental cyborg crap implanted for that matter, HA HA!

            But yeah, one man tankettes all rigged with dead man’s switches…just don’t startle gramps before the battle, you know…

          • SoulInvictus

            And armed with those catheters and hip poop bags, they’re a formidable biological threat I wouldn’t mess with either.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Mummy wagons…lichmobiles…exploding coffins…

            Yeah, bio-warfare. Survival can get dirty…

          • ThomasER916

            Catheter Claymores

  • JohnEngelman

    I may be overly optimistic. My predictions have been wrong in the past. Nevertheless, I continue to believe that as the Nazi movement and the Holocaust fade from living memory there will be more of a willingness to accept scientific evidence in favor of race realism.

    I am confident that as time goes on the scientific evidence will accumulate. Additional efforts to bridge the race gap will fail as obviously as No Child Left Behind did.

    • Berkeley Guy

      That the emotional appeal of WWII will have less clout is already established, and I agree that its silencing effects will diminish. Also, as Whites statistically make up less and less of the population, then less of them will feel that they have an advantage and will feel less engaged unless they were sufficiently exposed to White Privilege conferences when young.

      But what about the effects of Jim Crow and slavery? Does not what you say, that is a trend of diminishing returns for those who believe they are victims, also apply to grievances from other points in history? It may be that there is some general effect here that perhaps someone will apply a term to, having noticed that cultural grievances must fade with time.

      • JohnEngelman

        Political activists will usually have one or two issues they feel strongly about. On the basis of these they will decide that they are right or left, and adopt other issues in the agenda.

        During the late 1960′s and early 1970′s the War in Vietnam was an easy issue for the left to use for recruitment. It was an expensive losing war fought with a tough resourceful enemy in which the rewards of victory and the penalties of defeat were imperceptible. Vietnam was unimportant to America’s security or economy.

        Young whites who became “radicalized” so to speak because of the War in Vietnam usually forgave the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968. Young whites have less of an incentive to overlook black shortcomings now.

        • Berkeley Guy

          I never thought about how the war could be a recruiting tool until last semester. Took Phil of Society with Searle. He discussed the Free Speech Movement on campus, where he was a key figure, and said that he and others like him had always lost as undergrads when they moved for changing X. He said that it was not until the changes being pursued on the Berkeley campus were aligned with the war in Vietnam (even though they had little or nothing to do with the war) that the FSM finally attracted enough attention. After that, some people understood that the outrage and sentiments concerning Vietnam could be used as an issue magnet.

          • Martel

            “An SDS radical once wrote, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution” from Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution by David Horowitz.

          • JohnEngelman

            If it had not been for the War in Vietnam, the New Left would only be of scholarly interest.

            From the time President Johnson sent American ground troops to Vietnam in 1965 to the Tet Offensive in 1968 these were the consensuses on universities: the War in Vietnam is justified; the draft is justified, as long as I keep my student deferment; the War will be over by the time I graduate.

            By discrediting the last consensus, the War in Vietnam changed the other two. The New Left suddenly had a moral reason to do what most male college students wanted to do anyway, which was to avoid military service.

        • WR_the_realist

          I am a mixture of right and left. I am strongly pro-environment, and anti-war. But I don’t think the government should be our mom, that’s not what governments are for. I am against illegal immigration and think legal immigration should be sharpy cut. I am in favor of gun rights. And of course I am that most evil of all human types, worse than mass murderers and child rapists: a race realist. I regard both parties as horrible.

          • Mary

            I feel much the same. It’s a lonely place to be.

          • Martel

            It is truly the primary objective of this movement to make sure ”race-realists” or European nationalists no longer feel like this.

          • propagandaoftruth

            I’m kind of…obverse to you. I come from a long line of entrepreneurs, rogues, and proud civil/military servants (of king and country, great and humble).
            You know, there was once a Camelot-like time in this country when in order to combat corruption, graft, and cronyism – and to assure the best and brightest were placed where their skills and talents could best serve the People who paid their salaries and their NATION. People took civil service exams for hiring, for promotion…
            Dams were built, bridges and highways laid out, vast land reclamation projects that benefited millions for decades were carried out by a hard working, conscientious, talented, MERITOCRATIC civil service.
            I like good government. I like a solid social safety net. I also like the option to engage freely in business and to associate as I choose.
            I think almost all political acrimony in this country is largely the result of our race ideology and its failure to adhere to reality.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            “I like good government. I like a solid social safety net”

            I second eevrything you said and this line particularly: there’s indeed good government and bad government.

            The pro-free market in me though tends to think that, past a certain size of the public sector (let’s say for simplicity sake 25% of GDP), the quality of public governance tends to display a severely negative and highly linear correlation with its own size.

            I’m not into libertarian fantasies but something tells me that public expenditures eating up more than 40% of GDP are somehow one of the major forces behind the empowering of black lesbians and the funding of white privilege conferences.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Re your second paragraph: Even in the best whitest countries, I agree that government can and in some instances has gotten too big, and in some of the cases where it has, it has been corrected.

            Re your third paragraph: That’s not just a libertarian fantasy, even the other side’s dependents and mooches recognize that. For instance, here’s a part of the article from Inside Higher Ed about the crackpot tinfoil head left going bonkers over the Koch brothers donating a ton of money to the United Negro College Fund (a story that AR covered):

            ***

            Marybeth Gasman, a professor of higher education and director of the Center for Minority-Serving Institutions at the University of Pennsylvania, has written several books about black colleges and philanthropy, including Envisioning Black Colleges: A History of the United Negro College Fund (Johns Hopkins University Press).

            She said that she didn’t doubt that many individual students might benefit from the scholarships and that the UNCF “does need money” to help its member colleges. But she said that it was “wrong” to take these funds.

            Koch organizations have been “deeply affiliated with the Tea Party,” which has repeatedly tried to undermine the interests and political activities of African Americans and institutions that support them, she said. “I think it is very, very important to think about who you are taking money from,” she said. “Yes, that money can do a lot of good for students. But it allows that organization to have quite a bit of influence,” she said. Letting an organization like Koch have two of five seats on a selection panel “is not something we should be O.K. with,” she said.

            To the extent the Koch organizations want to significantly reduce the scope of state and federal governments, they have the right to promote those views, Gasman said, but she asked if the UNCF should be associating with Koch in light of these efforts. Programs such as Pell Grants, student loans, Head Start and others have helped countless Americans, of all races and ethnicities, she said.

            And these programs — endangered by the Koch political agenda of shrinking government — “have built the black middle class” and will contribute to the advancement of black students who are still impoverished, she said. This gift allows the Koch organizations to look good, and “there is too much at stake to take money from them,” she said. “I feel like the UNCF is getting into the position of being a puppet.”

            ***

            Admitting what we all know, that the “black middle class” is a big welfare gibsmedat.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Yeah…I think that there is an optimal functional mix of capitalism and socialism somewhere.

            That mix is ever changing, however, based on innumerable variables including current economic conditions, national character, and on and on. Now a FUNCTIONAL, sane, moderate, democracy should be able to respond, alter, and adjust itself. Heck, even try a little experiment here and there, keep it if it works, ditch if not.

            The US used to function a lot like that prior to “minority privilege”. There was a Camelot. It wasn’t perfect, but it was better.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            An optimal functional mix of capitalism/socialism. Exactly. This is indeed what we need. Canada and Western Europe have this. If they could use some pragmatism in controlling immigration, they would maintain an amazing quality of life.

          • Sick of it

            That sounds like an ordinary American position on things. We were isolationists until after WWII. We were literally dragged into both world wars by leaders who falsely ran on the peace ticket.

        • Berkeley Guy

          Why was your original comment above, the parent of this thread, deleted?

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Not Disqus, moderators.
            Image is a weapon and ours should be polished every day.

      • Fair Dinkum

        Many people are easily convinced that they are victims, and cultural grievances can last for centuries. Distance in time means little to such people.

        • Berkeley Guy

          Those who consistently believe they are victims will probably end up being victims of learned helplessness–their situation is perceived as being thrust upon them by others and there is some conspiracy to keep them oppressed. Are those people who devalue themselves really threatening? I doubt. Such people usually seek escape through entertainment or promiscuity or other degenerate activities. Furthermore, even if grievances last centuries (I’m still super duper sad about Genghis Khan), then the emotional appeal of the grievances fade. People grow tired of listening to complainers, especially when so many programs and so much money has been allocated toward fixing problems without good results.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Sorry Charlie, but the “Nazi movement” is not going to simply fade from living memory. In fact, the “Nazi movement” is steadily picking up speed here in the states and especially in Europe. “Mein Kampf” continues to be one of the most downloaded e-books in the Western world. As the truth about FORCED multiculturalism and diversity begins to see the light of day in the Western world, people are beginning to understand the truth about National Socialist Germany. The Muslim and African takeover of Europe has led many ethnic Europeans to openly question why their ancestors fought against Hitler in light of the present day invasion and conquest of Europe by violent, non-White third world peasants.

      • Berkeley Guy

        Who in the world could ever read Mein Kampf? I saw it in a used bookstore when I was about twenty and picked it up to read the first few pages of the first chapter. I could not believe how childish and whiny the first paragraphs that I read were. Good literature exists that would help cleanse an entertainment-addled brain, but that silly book is not one of them. That said, I did read Sun Tzu’s Art of War, and found that book even more silly (since I actually read most of it). “If your enemies are in the East, then you must go to … wait for it … the East to get them.” I don’t know how people could think that either mustache-man or Tzu could be good writers. I really hope that you are chastizing people who would waste time with such literature and pointing them toward better reading material.

        • So CAL Snowman

          I thought I knew it all in college too.

          • Berkeley Guy

            Except I don’t, even if you did. Nor did I when I plucked that book from a shelf 8 years before enrolling in college. I’d rather read Dr. Seuss than mustache-man, so your Harry Potter reference doesn’t hit hard enough.

        • Löwenmensch ᛟ

          What is childish and whiny?

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            He is a conflicted Marine with Passover Syndrome. That’s quite a few sessions there.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yeah, he’s a bit of a liberal troll.

        • Martel

          The Art of War is complete trash, you are right about that. I have not read Mein Kampf as of yet, but plan to in the future. I heard Hitler had quite a few interesting insights concerning propaganda, I’m also interested in how he viewed the Jewish question. The current narrative is false, that much is clear, it requires us to pretend that the Jews were victimized by bigoted Europeans time and time again, while it is said the Jewish communities in Europa did not contribute to these conflicts in any way or form.History tells us this is incorrect.

          • RisingReich

            There were many party members who frequently expressed the following belief “the past is true and the present is false”…

            Sound familiar?

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            The stirrings of German anti-Semitism was happening before Hitler came to be born.
            Anti-Semites Petition” of 1880 (presented to Bismarck) which complained about
            the very economic domination that so troubled him. The Petition, which quickly
            won 225,000 signatures, stated:

            Wherever Christian and Jew enter into social
            relations, we see the Jew as master, the indigenous Christian population in a
            subservient position. The Jew takes part only to a negligible extent in the
            heavy labor of the great mass of the nation. But the fruits of his [the
            German’s] labor are reaped mainly by the Jew. By far the largest part of the
            capital which national labor produces is in Jewish hands. . . . Not only do the
            proudest palaces of our large cities belong to Jewish masters whose fathers and
            grandfathers, huckstering and peddling, crossed the frontiers into our
            fatherland, but rural holdings too, that most significant preservative basis of
            our political structure fall more and more into the hands of the Jews. . . .
            What we strive for is solely the emancipation of the German Volk from a form of
            alien domination which it cannot endure for any length of time

          • Martel

            Didn’t Wagner sign this petition?

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            From what I read he didn’t. Although he had a strong dislike of them

        • JohnEngelman

          I have read Mein Kampf. In Volume I, Chapter II, “Years of Study and Suffering,” Hitler wrote, “I saw the only distinguishing mark in their strange religion. The fact that they had been persecuted on that account turned my aversion against unfavorable remarks about them almost into aversion.”

          Hitler did not begin to hate the Jews until he failed in his efforts to become an artist and an architect. Living in Vienna he saw many Jews who were successful artists and architects. He resented them.

          • Martel

            “Hitler did not begin to hate the Jews until he failed in his efforts to become an artist and an architect.”

            This is what they told me in elementary school. I always laugh when I hear it now, naturally this is just post-war propaganda. After victory it is necessary to prevent an enemy from capturing the imagination of the people again by turning him into a fool. No one should support this notion, regardless of their view of Hitler, it insults the intelligence of everyone who hears it. I know you tend to have difficulties analysing qualitative data, so this shouldn’t surprise me, but I like to see better from anyone I have discussions with from time to time.

          • JohnEngelman

            You have not read Mein Kampf. I have. I know what I am talking about. You do not. Like other anti Semites Hitler expressed his hatred for Jews, but he did not justify it. It was clearly based on envy.

          • Martel

            I do know what I am talking about, I can give countless examples of Jewish prejudices, fears and ethnic activism causing tensions with the natives(and vice versa) You are ignorant of these facts, and will remain so because you consider Europeans a morally inferior people, therefore you are not interested in reconsidering your obviously wrong views on the Jewish-gentile relationship throughout history. I don’t see why reading Mein Kampf is relevant, do you really think this book is the reason why Germans believed the international Jewish community to be disloyal, as had been proven in many jewish-gentile conflicts throughout Europe, throughout History?

          • JohnEngelman

            When have I ever said that Europeans are “a morally inferior people?”

            I never have. I do admire Jews for many reasons, including their biological superiority.

            Even Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, Volume I, Chapter XI, “Nation and Race,” “The intellectual abilities [of the Jews] were schooled in the course of centuries. Today the Jew is looked upon as clever, and in a certain sense he has been so at all times.”

          • Martel

            You make this claim in various forms continually. In our discussion here, you place the blame of the many incidents of ethnic conflict between Jews and European gentiles solely on the European gentile. Believing this requires a view of the European gentile as a morally inferior people. A short time ago, you said there wouldn’t be any racial problems without blacks and whites. There are many examples where you make statements which would make Tim Wise blush.

          • JohnEngelman

            Anti Semites are evil. Fortunately, there are few anti Semites in Europe. That is why European Jews have been able to excel intellectually.

          • Martel

            A recent study pointed out that “anti-semitism” is actually quite prevalent in Europa. Any sensible person would obviously state that there is no such thing as “anti-semitism”, but it does indicate that many people are aware of Jewish ethnocentrism. Unfortunately, because we have to regard the Jews as a morally superior people in the media(and here if its up to you), we cannot discuss these issues sensibly, this exacerbates such tensions, obviously.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Barbara Spectre is pure genius

          • El_Baga_Doucha_Libtard

            What I’m about to say is purely anecdotal, but I have often been shocked at how anti-Semitic my European friends are. I have found the exact opposite of what you said to be true.

          • El_Baga_Doucha_Libtard

            Can you explain “biological superiority?” I’m pretty sure that not many Jews have ever broken any sprinting records. If we are talking about athletic ability, I think the West Africans are probably “biologically superior.” If we are talking about complaining about the weather or sending food back to the kitchen because it’s over/under-cooked, then I think the nod for being “biologically superior” goes to the Jews.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            No he thinks jew are semi-divine, like Pharaohs.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Oh really, so how did he feel about the German-jews that were in his gov’t? What about his friend Emil Maurice who had minor jewish blood, that was granted Honorary Aryan status. Hitler didn’t envy anything, he wanted to expel the full blooded jews from German lands and make Germania rise to global superiority.

          • silviosilver

            I too have read Mein Kampf and this is an immense mischaracterization of Hitler’s views. Whatever role resentment played in the formation of his views – for you it is axiomatic, others of us are not so sure – his justifications were those typical of the pan-German movement and Thule Society. Regardless of their truth value, these views were nuanced and reflective rather than spiteful or bitter.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            jews are not successful artists, they specialize in degenerate modern art.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews excel in every field that requires intelligence and creativity.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Did you learn that in the Babylonian Talmud?

          • JohnEngelman

            The biological superiority of Ashkenazi Jews is amply documented in many locations, including American Renaissance.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            So how many jews are in SEAL Team 6?

          • JohnEngelman

            If you know, tell me.

            The Israeli Defense Force is one of the strongest military forces in the world. Considering its size, it is probably the strongest man for man.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Is that why Hezbollah beat the IDf in 06?Because they are the strongest

          • Martel

            As Löwenmensch said, Hezbollah turned out to be tactically superior to the IDF. IDF soldiers where shooting at eachother at certain moments during the skirmish.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            I’m surprised Israel didn’t drop a nuclear bomb on Lebanon. The IDf are masters of warfare against Palestinian civilians nowadays.

          • Martel

            Supposed higher average intelligence doesn’t support a subjective claim such as “biological diversity”. This is based on your odd world view, mixing hatefulness against white nationalists while in fact supporting Jewish and Asian nationalism & ethnocentrism.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            I think John is a Hasbara agent

        • guest

          The following are two passages from Mein Kampf.

          “All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, where as in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. Schopenhauer called the Jew “The Great Master of Lies”. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.”

          “With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.

          For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone.

          And so he tries systematically to lower the racial level by a continuous poisoning of individuals.

          And in politics he begins to replace the idea of democracy by the dictatorship of the proletariat.

          In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial and brutal fist.”

          Does this not perfectly describe what the Jews have wrought over the past 75 years? Dead on the money.

          • JohnEngelman

            First Hitler acknowledges the effectiveness of a big lie. Then he demonstrates that effectiveness by condemning the Jews.

            By no criterion do Jews tend to be morally inferior to white Gentiles. They to tend to be biologically superior.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Yeah the jews big lie is the Holocaust Hoax

          • JohnEngelman

            If the Holocaust did not happen every survivor of a Nazi death camp and every soldier who liberated a Nazi death camp conspired to lie about what was happening int he camp. That does not pass the laugh test.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            No the soldiers seen bodies of starved and diseased people, the effects of a world war. There has never been a soldier who seen these so called ‘gas chambers’ . Only conniving jews are the eye witnesses.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have talked to American combat veterans of World War II who told me they saw gas chambers.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            That is a lie

          • guest

            Wasn’t there someone who was jailed for seven years for writing a book questioning the official Holocaust narrative? In it he wrote of forensic tests done on the walls of those “gas chambers” that revealed no evidence of chemicals ever being diffused. That they need a law prohibiting investigation practically guarantees they’re hiding something.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Bet you didn’t learn how Jews ties pregnant Russian women to trees, raped them, then bayonetted them in the belly. There was no doubt Jews directed and carried out the murder of tens of millions of Slavs, that is why I think they deserved what they got in WW-II.

          • silviosilver

            American troops never entered eastern Europe, which is where the gassing are alleged to have occurred.

          • JohnEngelman

            Dachau was liberated by the Americans, so that is probably what they were talking about. I talked to them a long time ago. If they did not mention gas chambers, they certainly did mention lots of dead.

            I have talked to two death camp survivors, but they did not tell me which camps they were in.

          • Martel

            Hitler “the angry painter” does not pass the “laugh test”, but still you believe in it.

          • guest

            Also, wasn’t WWII a war after all? Are people not supposed to be killed in war? Why this special designation, “holocaust?” It was a war, people died, what do you expect? Would you be pleased if they were blown up with grenades instead of gassed? What difference does it make?

          • guest

            The big lie of our age is the S.J. Gould and Co. “race doesn’t exist” joke that has somehow managed to hypnotize the entire world.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Yes people are easily duped. You see how easy it is psychological conditioning of the young and weak minded

          • guest

            It appeals to the “deeper strata” in man that the master of lies targets and exploits as A.H. illustrated in the passage I quoted.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            The big lie is believing in a person who got crucified will wash away your sinful behavior. Dark marks on your soul will not wash away

          • Martel

            ” biologically superior.”

            Subjective claim.

            “By no criterion do Jews tend to be morally inferior to white Gentiles”

            You claim the opposite continually. By whitewashing history and placing all blame for Jewish-gentile tensions on European gentiles you again make it clear that you believe European gentiles are morally inferior.

          • JohnEngelman

            When I say that the Jews are biologically superior, I mean that they have the highest IQ averages. That is easy to prove. Europeans as a group are not morally inferior. Anti Semites are loathsome and vile.

          • guest

            Asians tend to have higher IQs than whites, but whites have achieved immeasurably more. Jewish IQ is disproportionately verbal – good for writing NYT editorials critiquing white privilege, not so much for sending men to the moon. Anyway, IQ is one metric of what can be called superiority, it’s not the whole shebang.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            Which Asians, tell me these smart ones in Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Myanmar, Mongolia,. You people like to select certain Asians out of their whole and lump Europeans together to achieve effect. To many times I have seen this on AR.

          • guest

            I actually agree with this. I’ve also seen compelling arguments that the IQ results we have from the fair skinned East Asians we erroneously lump together as “Asians” are taken from the cream of the crop.

          • Löwenmensch ᛟ

            They fix the figures for their anti-White agenda, don’t believe the hype. If they want to take East Asians then compare them with Scandinavian people

          • Martel

            Higher average Intelligence does not indicate “biological superiority”. Jews are physically unimpressive, and have not build anything impressive outside of the facilities developed and provided by European gentiles.

            You continually claim Europeans are morally inferior, but pretend otherwise when pressed. Anti-semites are aware of Jewish ethnocentrism, but sometimes respond overly harsh or unintelligently to this phenomenon. I prefer anti-semites over those who wish ill on Europeans or care more about the ethnic interests of other ethnic groups, individuals such as Tim Wise or someone like you.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That is the central point I drive home with the Rabbi. He is fixated on the crystallized intelligence that IQ tests measure. He is tone deaf in every other metric.

          • guest

            He demonstrates its effectiveness by condemning Jews? Huh? He is illustrating Jewish mastery of the big lie and condemning them *for* it.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Do my eyes deceive me!? Rabbi Engelman was moderated?? What the??

          • guest

            Looks like most of the comments I posted last night were moderated. Maybe we should start competing for prizes to have the most comments moderated on one thread. It seems whoever tells the most truth would win so it would encourage a lot of well researched, insightful posts.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            You should start by establishing an AmRen identity. “Guest” doesn’t cut it. Put both feet in the water. The water is fine.

          • guest

            Touche. Is this censorship the work of someone at AmRen or Disqus?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            AmRen. DISQUS stays out of content. The AmRen moderator has many toggles made available by the DISQUS interface in which to treat you, but DISQUS doesn’t have the manpower or the mandate.

          • guest

            Interesting. I wonder why the Jewry would be such a touchy subject around these parts.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’ve had many comments survive in this area, some that didn’t. This is a race realism site. As I’ve said many times before, if you ask 10 Jews if they are a race or a religion–you will get 10 different answers. So, when you hug the “race” side of the category, your posts tend to survive, this being a race realism site and all.

          • guest

            They’re a race in my book-distinct from whites and historically the arch enemy of whites. I’ve heard that Jared Taylor considers them white, though maybe he just doesn’t want to court opposition from them at this stage of the game, what with all the power they wield.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Well, we bring up the recent South Africa example from time to time. Whether Jews consider themselves white or non-white is irrelevant to Black South Africans.

            The Israelites tried that Mike Wallace trick: “I’m not white, I’m Jewish” and they still found a Black boot in their collectives arses.

            You can’t choose your nickname–or your color.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        After the violent collapse of the totalitarian Mass Third World Immigration and Multiculturalism regime in the US, I think future historians will see Hitler as an early pioneer in the struggle against globalism and internationalism. If Hitler won WWII, the world be a much better place than it is now. Europe would have still preserved its European character and western civilization would have survived to reach even greater heights than ever before. The transformation of the western democracies into third world hellholes will force everyone to re-evaluate Hitler in a favorable light.

      • SlizzardAjeosshi

        The New Right movement in Europa has been able to crack through the ranks of the mainstream electorate when they toned down a lot their anti-Jewish rethoric. Some of them (Strache, Wilders, Farage, etc, as of lately even Marine Le Pen) have become vocal Israel supporters.

        This is may due to a simple tactical consideration: most Europeans don’t give a rat’s behind about the Joos, they simply have no opinion of them, good or bad.

        At the very same time being obsessed with the aforementioned Jews lead you, more often than not, on the barricades with a motley alliance of unsavory characters: the dread-locks sporting, pot-smoking leftist “students”, the banlieu imams and the Dieudonne’ of this world.

        Allow me to say this is somewhat kinda comical for a supposedly racialist front and definitely not a good way to win the support of most normal people of European ethnicity for whom the Jewish control of banking, media, academia etc. is some vague notion while they have to contend everyday with Moroccan gangs in the subway.

        Allow me a final, personal note: it may be probably to my quarter of Hungarian Ashkenazi ancestry (which made me look much whiter than most European Mediterraneans) but i believe even if i was 100% gentile i would refuse to fight any war against blue-eyed central European Ashkenazis on the same side with Greeks (a parasytical population of Middle Eastern and Northern African descent whose only goal in life is living off the German penny), Iranians, Algerian youth from the Marseille suburbs etc.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          The Jews are the balkanization model. They’ve been invisibly balkanized for 25 centuries. But, if they can balkanize, so can we.

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

          At the very same time being obsessed with the aforementioned Jews lead you, more often than not, on the barricades with a motley alliance of unsavory characters: the dread-locks sporting, pot-smoking leftist “students”, the banlieu imams and the Dieudonne’ of this world.

          I presume you are continental European, because it’s mainly there were the unhealthy obsession with Jews lands one on the hard to extreme left and certain undesirable non-white groups. It’s totally different in America, it’s the province of relatively desperate and fringe white people on the hard to extreme right.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            Yes sorry my family come from the North East of Italy (originally, but i was born and grew up in Milan), i try to keep comments about European issues to an acceptable minimum being this an American community.

            Sometimes though i just feel the recent European nationalist rise has been quite misunderstood

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I feel the same. I’m an eighth Ashkenazi descent myself, the rest German/Swedish. Like yourself, I’m proud of my Ashkenazi descent. To me European Jews who are anti-White, these days, are suicidal, and are not seeing the big picture. White Nationalists who are constantly on a rampage against Jews, though, are also myopic. Blacks have always been a problem, and do not pay that much attention to Liberal Whites. Blacks are also very anti-Semitic, and this is fueled by their jealousy. Blacks also hate Arabs, but Arabs do not tolerate B.S. from Blacks, and Blacks know this.

      • JohnEngelman

        I have read Mein Kampf. I have quoted it on American Renaissance. It is interesting. It never taught me to hate Jews. Like other anti Semites Hitler expresses his hatred of Jews without justifying it.

        If one feels something strongly it is easy to overestimate the number of people who feel the same way. It is easy to under estimate the difficulty of converting others to one’s persuasion.

        The neo Nazi movement will never attract the best whites for this reason, articulated by Eric Hoffer in his book The True Believer: “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

    • Löwenmensch ᛟ

      Americans were race realists after WW2, segregation was still in effect, sterilizations of the mentally ill was still taking place. It’s not a matter of faded memories of NS Germany, more like getting rid of the Marxism that the Soviet Union infected America and others with.

      • Sick of it

        Unfortunately, we had our first Marxist immigrants in the 1840s. They started up their newspapers all over the country. They weaseled their way into positions of power. They even helped to create the Republican Party. They pushed us into a Civil War fought for the benefit of any number of foreign peoples, but certainly to the detriment of America and Americans. And there was “Reconstruction”…

        • JohnEngelman

          Sir:

          We congratulate the American people upon your re-election by a
          large majority. If resistance to the Slave Power was the reserved watchword of your first election, the triumphant war cry of your re-election is Death to Slavery.

          From the commencement of the titanic American strife the workingmen of Europe felt instinctively that the star-spangled banner carried the destiny of their class. The contest for the territories which opened the dire epopee, was it not to decide whether the virgin soil of immense tracts should be wedded to the labor of the emigrant or prostituted by the tramp of the slave driver?…

          The workingmen of Europe feel sure that, as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working classes. They consider it an earnest of the epoch to come that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln, the single-minded son of the working class, to lead his country through the matchless struggle for the rescue of an enchained race and the reconstruction of a social world.

          - Karl Marx congratulating President Abraham Lincoln for his reelection on behalf of International Workingmen’s Association, the Central Council:

        • Jesse James

          I just read “Lincoln’s Marxists” by Al Benson and Walter Donald Kennedy, a very interesting account of the many veterans of the 1848 failed socialist revolutions in Europe who fought for the north during our Civil War. Definitely food for thought and though I knew that the 1848 uprisings had occurred and that many foreign born Europeans fought with the northern armies, I had never put two and two together and realized how active radical socialist were in the destruction of the South.

          • Sick of it

            Dig into the whacky beliefs of various abolitionist groups. Dig into the suffragettes. Dig into the background of the abortionists. Man, history is an open book, but people don’t read enough.

      • LHathaway

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but segregation only ever existed in parts of the deep south?

        • Sick of it

          People up North were not very fond of blacks until relatively recently. They could obtain lucrative work, but they weren’t exactly going out for a beer with the guys, etc. That includes the old free black communities (often segregated after a fashion).

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            That is true. Here in the Midwest, Black populations were small until after WWII. Negroes are a problem group. There is an overload of crime and violence wherever they live in large numbers. Even when they are not violent, Blacks tend to be very unpleasant company. They complain horribly when they have to work, find it entertaining to maliciously mock others, and are usually angry about trivial things that do not upset Whites. Whites who are around Blacks very much usually end up dreading being around them.

    • Martel

      The fading memory of the second world war will also allow a more reasonable reading of the events preceding and during the second world war when it came to tensions between the internationally oriented Jewish diaspora and the native Germans.

      • JohnEngelman

        There has never been any legitimate reason for anti Semitism.

        • Martel

          If you ignore all evidence to the contrary, you could make that argument. For example, the Bela Kun government in Hungary was completely run by Jews who obviously gained these positions trough their ethnic networks. I completely understand Hungarians for distrusting the Jewish communities, who have historically been internationally oriented and placed the interests of the diaspora above national interests. Another example is British Jews supporting armed struggle against British soldiers in Palestine. Naturally many Englishmen were upset over such disloyalty. This does not mean I wish to see such tensions, but those who place the blame of the countless conflicts between Europeans and Jews solely on the Europeans expose themselves as biased and bigoted.

          • JohnEngelman

            On several occasions I have documented that while secular Jews did have an attraction to Marxism, they were in the minority in the Soviet Communist Party. No dictator of the Soviet Union was Jewish. Bela Kun’s father was a secular Jew. His mother was a lapsed Protestant. Bela Kun was killed during Stalin’s purges.

          • Martel

            I was not impressed by your “documentation”. Whether Jews are secular or practising makes no difference, many Jewish leaders have stated that they consider Jews a specific race or an ethnic group, which can be confirmed by DNA analysis. Stalin indeed destroyed the Jewish networks which clearly supported jews over gentiles, while keeping up the pretence of fighting against “antisemitism”. Naturally there is no such thing as “antisemitism”.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am not surprised that you were not impressed. You are immune to facts you do not want to believe.

          • Martel

            Did you mean to reply to your own comment?
            I accept all facts, its you who claims Jews and Asians are morally superior, and that without blacks, only whites would cause racial problems. Your documentation was as biased as always, you still claim that “racial consciousness” is declining, while this is physically impossible as many studies suggest, but also opposed by data on segregation. You have ignored this since our first discussion because it conflicts with what you want to believe.

          • JohnEngelman

            The increase in the approval and practice of interracial marriage gives tangible evidence that racial consciousness is declining in the United States.

            Cheerios did not run their advertisement of a bi racial couple to “brainwash” the public. Cheerios ran the advertisement to sell Cheerios. I am confident that General Mills did focus groups that demonstrated that most Americans would find the advertisement appealing.

            ———-

            according to data from Ace Metrix, Americans like the ad. In fact, “Good for Your Heart” (called “Just Checking” on YouTube) tested the highest of six new Cheerios ads this year and garnered attention and likeability scores 9% and 11% “above the current 90-day norm for cereals.”…

            According to Ace Metrix, the ad — created by Saatchi & Saatchi, New York — “appealed to all age/gender demographics with the exception of males over 50.”

          • Martel

            You still repeat your claim about interracial marriages. The fact that a small portion of the population intermarriages, where statistics show that they have a much higher chance of divorce, does not take away from the fact that the general population prefers segregation. This isn’t a cultural phenomenon, it is caused by the same natural processes which have a negative long term effect on interracial marriages, that is, people look for partners with a similar genetic profile as a study recently posted on Amren clarified.

            The commercial was created with the intention of the media hype which followed, or they simply were lucky that the media needed another story about non existing racism. Naturally many people who believed half the country was up in arms overe a multiracial commercial where inspired over this milestone in race relations, as the media treated it. It has probably been the only cereal commercial which got national media attention which explains the higher ratings. Is this you trying to ”document” something?

          • Jotun Hunter

            engelman feels empowered by the television because it currently reflects his own tunnel-vision liberalist views. But not to worry, times are changing, the lie of equality is running its course, and I can feel the backlash happening. He will have to alter his views or fall behind the times – I’m guessing a guy like him will then have to change his tack, as steadfast and monotonous as he seems, as he can’t bear to not be a part of ‘popular opinion’. He’s too modernist, too american, and his view of history too skewed by both those factors.

          • JohnEngelman

            “The lie of equality is running its course,” along with growing evidence of the truth of this statement by Jared Taylor, “I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any
            measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.”

            The East is not Red, but it is where the future is.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I see no reason their immediate and distant future will be any different from their past. And if it is, for any reason, it is only for the reason of our weakening through a self-hating, suicidal malaise, and not because we were conquered by external forces. But even then, I am certain they have their racial limitations. Though they can get by ok – they won’t be living in mud huts at any rate.

            It is only the equality lie that keeps the white man down – for now.

            China remains a polluted, emotionless hell-hole of knock-off, throw-away western ideas.

          • JohnEngelman

            When China wakes up the world will shake.

            - Napoleon Bonaparte

          • Jotun Hunter

            that was over 200 years ago. Even their political system is a derivative of ideas produced by the jew Marx. If the west hadn’t interfered japan would have dealt them the death blow, and for what it’s worth, between the asians, the chinese are infinitely inferior to the japs.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Especially when America hands them the keys to the city.

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            Living in China with a professional job or a reasonably successful business is the closest thing you may find on Earth approaching the the Land of Milk and Honey the immolating Mohammedans seem so eager to reach.

            It’s very easy and tempting to forget your roots around here

          • Jotun Hunter

            For what reasons exactly? Chinese pussy on tap? cheap post modernist dwellings and endless ‘chinese food’? ive been there myself a few times, korea too… again I found japan infinitely better. it is not possible nor desirable to ‘forget your roots’, a man is but an extenuation of his lineage and people. If it seems an easy thing to forget, again you can thank the unnatural and collapsing illusion of decadent modernity. when push comes to shove and we are living on ‘prison rules’ the chinese will not count you amongst them

            their art and music and literature, even the golden age stuff, does not strike a chord with me in comparison to western art history, and from what ive seen a good few chinese might agree themselves.

            It seems (like the arabs did over their idiotic ‘spring) they have themselves swallowed the western liberal media buzz that they are up and comers, and are frantically studying/imitating western classics, but beyond the likes of yo yo ma not to much avail…

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            For what reasons exactly? Chinese pussy on tap? cheap post modernist dwellings and endless ‘chinese food’? ive been there myself a few times, korea too… again I found japan infinitely better

            The reasons you mention are just side effects of a general motion: it is the excitement of watching an Empire reborn and being in the center of a money utopia, made of low to non-existent taxes, a 24 service economy, wild consumerism to the point of intoxication, infinite, childish “new bully in town” arrogance. A rerun of the 80′s on steroids.

            I know i’m not one of them: next year my contract is over, i cash out and then me and wifey will decide what to do next.

            I agree Japan is way more cultured, but also way more boring and stagnant. Tokyo is for the most part an oldish (60′s to 80′s), surprisingly not too prosperous city.

            I am in Asia for the gold and the thrills, the k-pop and the stock options, not for the damn Kabuki.

            If i wanna see old and cultured i go back to my gramps house in Northern Trentino

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            PS

            Chinese music and literature are a joke, their paintings and sculptures (particularly Tang era) are beautiful

          • Jotun Hunter

            That may be so – but even then would you say they really compare in beauty to the entire european canon of painting/sculptural style? that is before the jews ruined western art with post modernism… which now also infects china (good old conceptual wei wei)

          • SlizzardAjeosshi

            But even then, I am certain they have their racial limitations

            A complete lack of curiosity for the world mixed with an overbearing sense of entitlement and an excessively strong belief in their own manifest destiny

          • LHathaway

            Basing your adherence to white nationalist philosophies on their successes and acceptance by whites across the world, and by the acceptance of these ideologies by whites across time is simply insane. It also ignores the current fact that only ‘victims’ and underdogs have moral capital in today’s society. Instead of using this to your advantage (for indeed white nationalism and white rights ideologies are persecuted) you would claim everyone in history has been a white nationalist. This is also insane. But it’s no more insane than railing against jews and expecting new adherents to your cause or sympathizers. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the last person and the last group that railed against Jews were the Nazi germans and they ‘killed 6 million jews’ exterminated them as no other people have ever been exterminate. More like the ideology of killer Jeffrey Dahlmer carried out on a national and official scale.

            Now, whites in the US are racially conscious, as they were not before 1990 or so, and perhaps as they have never been. These feelings will find expression, these long persecuted ideas will likely be given voice. We see the beginnings of white student unions, and if they continue it will be evidence those in power are being forced to live up to their own ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ agenda.

            I generally enjoy reading many of your posts, Mr. Martel, but when you go on about jews and also display such a backward understanding of current realities, I can only assume you’re completely uneducated or unread (aside from books printed inside nazi germany – and only certain books at that) or I assume your purpose is not to elicit sympathy at all but instead it’s opposite.

          • propagandaoftruth

            I think defending Nazis, Nazism, Jew Bashing in extreme forms, regardless of the “secret covered up reality” or even regardless of the eminently legitimate point that the commie body count dwarfs the Nazi body count…
            Well I don’t really care. Nazism and extreme anti-Jewism are PR nightmares and ultimately it comes down to something akin to this anyway…
            How many millions of productive citizens less does one have to slaughter than someone else in order to be OK morally? That’s a pretty weak point to argue from if you ask me.

          • LHathaway

            Jews slaughtered millions of people?

          • propagandaoftruth

            No, got slaughtered. I guess any surviving group has had to slaughter at some point to survive, especially when the alternative is annihilation or slavery.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            They killed tens of millions ruling the Soviet Union. This is not racist hate, this is fact. Learn Ukrainian, Polish, Lithuanian, Latvian and Romanian history between 1917 and 1945 and you will understand why they helped the Nazis massacre them.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ah engelman, once again, if only we could bask in the 24-hour glory of your perpetual truthyness. You have your finger… on the pulse!

          • IstvanIN

            Bela Kun is a very dirty word.

          • SoulInvictus

            As is Genrikh Yagoda (Yenokh Gershevich Iyeguda).

          • propagandaoftruth

            Yes, but the Gabor sisters were undeniably hot were they not? I loved Eva, thought she was gorgeous and funny on “Green Acres” – a show ahead of its time in many ways.

            I love White diversity.

          • IstvanIN

            I would hardly put the Gabors in the same category as the very evil Kun.

          • propagandaoftruth

            The Gabors were Jewish? Hmmm…

            I loved Eva’s coffee and her negligees…

            Half Jewish.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          Here’s one, the Jewish engineered famine called the Holodomor against Ukrainians. Here’s another, the murder of 100 million Slavs and other people in Central and Eastern Europe.

          • JohnEngelman

            On many occasions I have pointed out that secular Jews were always in the minority in the Soviet Communist Party, and that no dictator of the USSR was Jewish.

            The Jewish – Bolshevik connection was a lie of Nazi propaganda.

      • David Ashton

        Although many Jewish academics had a preference for “environmentalism” and “egalitarianism” long before the Nazi period, the WW2 catastrophe stimulated their postwar efforts in that direction, e.g. Otto Klineberg, Marie Jahoda, Leon Kamin, Steven Rose, Jared Diamond, &c &c &c. A change came when they realised that their own Ashkenazim scored well on IQ & other criteria, and the “undeveloped” nations disliked Israel, &c. Nathaniel Weyl (Gentile mother) led the way, and has been followed by Michael Levin, John Glad, &c.

        Hitler’s tragic combination of (now dated) Social Darwinism and the most radical form of antisemitism (provoked by the role of Jews in communism, banking and the vice trade) itself triggered hostility from Jews in general,
        which in turn fed into the Nazi ideology like a self-fulfilling prophecy; for example, the Untermyer Boycott movement.

        The historic phenomenon of “antisemitism” went through several phases, from classic times, through the clash with Christianity, then the “racial” reaction after Emancipation, and finally today anti-Zionism. The persistent feature throughout has not been “innocence” or “guilt” on either “side”, but ethnic friction with the main feature in this case being the predicament of a talented people without a normal territory spread across the societies of other peoples with their own territories.

        This is a subject of immense complexity and sensitivity with fools rushing in where angels fear to tread, but it would do all participants in serious debate to read at least the studies (albeit imperfect) by Bernard Lazare, Albert Lindemann and Norman Cantor (among Jews), and Kevin MacDonald and Richard Lynn (among non-Jews).

        The “Holocaust” is another, though related, matter. AR is not the best place for a discussion of the events of 1941-45, except in so far as it can be said that the persecution and death of Jews at Nazi hands, whatever the scale or circumstances, are used today to promote anti-racism, non-white immigration, minority favoritism, refugee admission, and multi-culturalism – except in Israel itself. White Gentile “guilt” is currently being “reinforced” in pseudo-scholarly studies that accuses the western Allies of being promoters, sympathisers, bystanders or collaborators in the “Holocaust”, if only by not doing “enough” to rescue the Jews and/or resettle them in Palestine.

        • Martel

          An accurate synopsis.

      • LHathaway

        “when it came to tensions between the internationally oriented Jewish diaspora and the native Germans”.

        ‘tensions’. . you’ve been reading too many American newspapers. . you’re getting ‘good’.

    • WR_the_realist

      I would say we’ve tried hard to bridge the gap for over 40 years now. That has not brought about the slightest bit of sanity on the issue. I see no reason to believe that another 20 years will make any difference.

      • JohnEngelman

        No Child Left Behind was the most public effort. It has failed publicly. I think it will be a long time before politicians are willing to sponsor another effort of this kind.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          “It has failed publicly.”
          –JohnEngleman

          It has failed spectacularly.

          • JohnEngelman

            Liberals still say that No Child Left Behind was badly designed and inadequately funded. I wonder if many of them really believe that. I wonder if anyone else does.

            The truth is that No Child Left Behind achieved none of its goals. Black academic performance did not improve at all.

          • Jotun Hunter

            I thought you were a liberal. If not, what exactly do you call yourself? You certainly vote liberal. If so, you should refer to people who are ‘too liberal’ for you as progressives or just cunts or something. Otherwise you are being misleading/hypocritical and it damages your endless claims as ‘holder of ultimate facts’.

          • JohnEngelman

            Generally speaking I am liberal on economic and environmental issues. Back in the day I supported the civil rights movement, but I have become disenchanted with it.

            I believe that genes are considerably more important than anything else in determining not only ability levels, but also behavior. Consequently, I believe that racial differences in average IQ, and rates of crime and illegitimacy are innate.

            I am aware of the role emotion plays in political opinions, so I love facts that can be documented.

            I am ambivalent about many things. Ambivalence prevents fanaticism.

            I am convinced of the assertions of race realism, but I think of race realism as a scientific theory, rather than a movement. I am not a white nationalist. I am not any kind of a nationalist. I am fascinated by other cultures, but I do not think they are of equal value.

            The last thing I appreciate that came out of the American black culture is the soul music and the Motown Sound of the late 1960′s and early 1970′s. I think rap music is ugly and morally depraved.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            There are times and places where fanaticism is required, otherwise the alternative is death, enslavement or extinction.

          • JohnEngelman

            That attitude by extremists in the anti war movement during the War in Vietnam discredited the entire movement, and prolonged the War.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            What lies ahead will be far worse then the chaos of the 1960′s, it will be more akin to the 1460′s in Romania. That is where either you are a fanatical warrior for your people, or you die along with your family, people and nation.

          • Jotun Hunter

            well I can’t fault you here for not giving an honest sounding answer. Nationalism is a necessary element in the existence of nations.

        • LHathaway

          “it will be a long time before politicians are willing to sponsor another effort of this kind”.

          haha you’re funny. Everyone on this sites seems to be insane, actually.

          Also, am I ignoring the fact no child left behind is still funded?

        • WR_the_realist

          Sure, every public school teacher knows what a train wreck No Child Left Behind is. But can you find a single congressman, in either party, who voted for it and will now advocate to repeal it? Also, if congress ever does get around to repealing it, they will do so only if they can replace it with some other program that will “close the gap”. Of course that new program will be a failure too.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am more optimistic than you are. Gradually War on Poverty programs have been scaled back. So has forced school busing. The Supreme Court recently made a decision against affirmative action. When affirmative action faces a popular referendum it loses.

            I do not believe the delusions of genetic egalitarianism can forever distort public policy.

    • SlizzardAjeosshi

      Sorry if i repeat myself but…from your mouth to God’s ears John

  • MekongDelta69

    The only thing that has kept us from being a third-world cesspool (after 50 years of Marxism shoved down our throats), is that we had a ‘base’ start of approximately 200 years of what used to be considered ‘normal.’

    If we had just become autonomous in 1976, instead of 1776, we’d be no different than every other hell-hole on this planet.

    • LHathaway

      Liberals themselves are doing quite well. I believe Seattle, arguably the most liberal city, likely the city with the most white liberals, is well-ahead of the rest of the nation economically.

  • Evette Coutier

    Nice article, Jared. You have a singular wit in your prose.

  • CallahanAuto

    I appreciate that Jared Taylor had a little fun with this, mixing some optimism and lampooning in with his forecast. Sometimes I have to remind myself to be a happy warrior. It’s easy to get down.

    • propagandaoftruth

      Count small victories as personal triumphs. Never lose the sense of humor. That’s the true living form of Death.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      After the Zimmerman verdict came in, Jared Taylor wrote,
      .
      Jesse Jackson fretted that “blacks are under attack,” and said that Martin was “a martyr, murdered, and martyred.” This was the nonsense that sent crowds of blacks and pea-brained liberals into the streets, wearing hoodies and brandishing Skittles.
      .
      I LOL’d so hard. The man has a way with words.

  • http://saboteur365.wordpress.com/ bigone4u

    A new winner and still chamption, Jared Taylor.
    This one had me laughing out loud, as it reads like a dystopian satire. Good satire must have the element of truth in it or it’s not funny. The Sotomayor SCOTUS and its rulings such as a White Priviliege Tax are a touch of genius. Having the Sotomayor ruling that Asians must pay the tax is a nice touch, very subtle.

    President Lativious Jackson? Nearly spit my coffee out! This piece is so much better than the junk pushed out on Saturday Night Live and other assorted stupid TV shows. JT missed his calling as a comedy writer.

    As to what to rename Washington, in JT’s spirit of speculation, by 2034 it has been renamed Kingtown on MWF, and Chavez City on TRS. Alternating Sundays go to each name. The Black and Hispanic Caucuses worked out that deal.

    The only place JT let me down was leaving out the LGBT … (whatever new letters they keep adding) “community.” Where are the reparations for trannies? What has Sotomayor written in her rulings about them? Can we marry our dogs yet? Has man/woman marriage been taxed out of existence. And what about the white children in schools? What new equality measures have been imposed on them?

    But I’m quibbling. The absurdity of these times carried forward by JT is great stuff.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      As for Lativious Jackson, go back 20 years instead of ahead. Who in 1994 thought that the President in 20 years would be named Barack Hussein Obama?

      All I worry about is that JT just gave the left some new ideas.

      • Hallie Eva

        The irony of this country hunting down and executing Saddam Hussein in 2006, only to turn around in 2008 and elect as president, a man raised by Marxists to hate America and its values, one with an Islamic name, Barack Hussein, was not lost on me.

        • Sick of it

          Was it irony? Saddam Hussein kept the Jihadist nutjobs in check. He kept people similar to Obama’s brother in check.

  • Berkeley Guy

    Note that many in China have discussed the Beijing Genomics Institute as possibly being the place where the alleles for abilities in mathematics, but Mr. Taylor has noted that they found the alleles for key psychological traits. There is current research showing that success and probably income is correlated not only with cognitive ability but also with what some are calling “grit.” As more is understood about the brain, I expect emotional intelligence (or whatever new term they use in place of it) will have just as much validation in research in twenty years as IQ does today as a criterion and predictor.

    • JohnEngelman

      They will find crime genes too. Guess which race will have the most of them.

      • Berkeley Guy

        It may be that more alleles are discovered that are correlated with inhibition such that people are less likely to act on increased levels of epinephrine or testosterone. A lack of such alleles may also be correlated with violent, promiscuous, or otherwise impulsive traits.

        • JohnEngelman

          The longer a race has been civilized the lower its crime rate is. This is because throughout history the criminal justice system of civilized counties removes those with criminal inclinations from the gene pool.

  • Borachio

    I am a bit more pessimistic. The inconsistencies between our society and human nature are now so significant that almost any major insult could trigger a collapse.

    Higher-IQ groups produce few children, while the stupid and shiftless breed like rabbits. It’s been said that to destroy a country, one should corrupt its women, and feminism has done a good job of it. The intelligent women who should be a pillar of our society are now hate-filled termagants dedicated to destroying the civilization we’ve inherited, oblivious to the fact that its probable replacement will be much less sympathetic to “womyn’s rights.”

    Low-IQ immigrants from barbaric countries continue to flood across our border, demanding welfare, health care, and special privileges at the expense of the dwindling white population. Whites are exhausted by the strain of supporting barbarian immigrants and our own beloved African-American wards, while simultaneously trying to avoid being murdered by them. Our “elected representatives” do only harm.

    As befits an increasingly violent and barbaric society, the rule of law is almost unknown even now. Justice is, as Thrasymachus said in Plato’s Republic, “nothing but the interest of the stronger party.

    Our current situation makes the last days of the Soviet Union look good. It wouldn’t take much to bring it down on our heads. I hope that I’m wrong.

    • Jacobite2

      Intelligent women aren’t much different from low-IQ women. This is because our emotions stop developing at about 6 months of age and remain infantile the rest of our lives. Women don’t think, they feel. After your basically accurate description of the USA today, I wonder why you hope your prediction of imminent demise is wrong? Sounds like the natural course of events to me.

      • kjh64

        This is utter nonsense. I mean really absurd.

        • Ike Eichenberg

          Can’t tell your gender by your name, but from a male perspective I agree intelligent women and low IQ women are not comparable in this regard.

          I can’t tell if the poster has never been in a trailer park or never been out of one, but intelligent women can be brutally cold and calculating.

          • jane johnson

            Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel: Cold and calculating when making tough decisions in service to the best interests of their countries
            Hillary Clinton: Cold and calculating when making “hard choices” in service to her own best interests
            The difference is integrity, or lack of same.

        • Jacobite2

          Voting statistics don’t lie.

    • kjh64

      Equal opportunity aka “feminism” for women hasn’t “corrupted them” nor are such women “hate filled”. Give me a break. There are FAR more men that hate women than the reverse. The men are the ones that run things mostly and it is their corruption that has caused this damage.. Men, namely in business and politics, have been corrupted by the desire for cheap labor and votes, which is why the mostly male politicians in congress have wanted open borders. Men imported Blacks for slavery for cheap labor. Don’t forget that Marxism was created by males ie. Karl Marx.

      • Sick of it

        Women voted these people into office.

        • Anglo

          I didn’t vote for them.

      • Sloppo

        Trying to figure out who hates who the most is pointless, but about seventy two percent of divorces in the United States are initiated by women. Many American men are afraid to marry an American woman as a result of this trend, so they either don’t marry or they marry a foreigner from a more family-oriented culture and less feminism.

      • LHathaway

        That’s insane. The only thing true in your statement is “There are FAR more men that hate women than the reverse” and that’s likely only because they have reason to.

        I need to have this catch phrase pre-typed out. . how about ‘Stop the insanity’?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Bravo! Borachio.

      I’ve been making similar comments here at AmRen over the last several months. The Feminist Nation has long since aligned with the LGBTQ Nation and both have aligned with Peter Brimelow’s ‘…minority occupation government…’. I was person-ally persecuted by that amalgamation (and their poodles) for 10 years at a defense contractor recently. This new three-headed beast I call “…the grievance industry occupation government…”.

      But, the anti-white minority thugs are just using those two groups as ‘useful idiots’. The guns will be turned back toward them after the first shots are fired. Hispanics hate Blacks, but they especially hate feminists and gays. The feelings among Blacks toward Hispanics are also mutual. They are the strangest of bedfellows; a most fragile and unholy alliance. ‘…The enemy of enemy is my friend…’—yes but, that prophet left out: “only for so long as my enemy is strong”.

      Once ‘useful idiots’ are no longer needed—out they go. The feminists and their LGBTQ allies with their zeal–their employment sleaze, media lies, and general duplicity, to “…end the patriarchy…” will have replaced the natural order, the high IQ, benevolent, honorable, white patriarchy with a low IQ brown one—and their jungle rules.

      Not castle law, jungle law.

      Be careful what you wish for, Marissa Mayer and Sheryl Sandberg.
      They will do more than “Ban Bossy”.
      They will ban you.
      .

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        Another home run. That is an accurate caricature of the hateful Sandberg. It’s hard finding one of the upstart feminist yahoo, Mayer. I will keep looking.

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        grievance industry occupation government
        .
        Needs a catchy acronym, how about GRINDOGOV?

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Actually I’ve been working a similar abbreviation jingle. They regularly refer to the Republicans as the:

          GOP: Grand Ole Party,

          so I decided to name the Democrats the:

          GIP: Grievance Industry Party.

          Since the minority shake-down component expanded to include the other false victim groups such as the Feminist Nation and the LGBTQ Nation.

          GOP=US, GIP=THEM

      • Sick of it

        These two women have something in common other than feminism, but we aren’t allowed to say it…

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Index finger to mouth: Shhhhhhhhhhhhh.

    • ViktorNN

      I’m far from a feminist, but I would point out a couple of facts in defense of white women:

      1. Most white women vote for the Republican Party.

      2. Some of the segments of society where the traditional family is strongest are in the white upper middle class where white women tend to be more highly educated.

      These two facts alone suggest to me that if white women are undermining the white race, it’s got to be a small minority of lower class white women doing all the undermining – and this strikes me as very improbable.

      If you’re looking for a minority of women with undue cultural influence I suggest you look at a group of women that appears white to many, but which has demonstrated plenty of anti-white hostility over the past century.

  • So CAL Snowman

    “Two decades seems like a long time, but if we travel the same distance back in time, we are in the year The Bell Curve was published. Has that much changed since 1994?”

    Obviously Mr. Taylor does not get out to California very often.

  • Hal K

    Voluntary segregation has led to communities that are self-consciously white.

    This would be a huge mental and legal step. I don’t think the U.S. government would accept it without major changes. The key to white dispossession is making sure whites don’t have anything explicitly for their own group. Once a significant number of whites start thinking outside this box all bets are off.

    Look at it in terms of phase transitions. Once conditions reach a certain critical point, things can change much more rapidly than one might have thought possible. I think the emergence of explicit white identity politics will be a phase transition.

  • DaveMed

    If current trends continue, the one bright lining I see is that those in higher education need not worry all that much about Latino/Hispanic demographics.

    I believe there are more Blacks in my class than Latinos/Hispanics.

    Asians are a far greater threat in that regard. Specifically, Indians and Arabs*. They are far more ambitious.

    *I don’t include East-Asians because, while they are not White, I believe that their intentions are more benign.

  • Jim

    “President Latavious Jackson”

    I like you, Jared. You’ve got a good sense of humor.

    • Sloppo

      I chuckled a bit to myself when I read that too, but at the rate we’re going, in twenty years I think this country might be mentally prepared for a leader like President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.

  • Georgia Boy

    I’m no multicultist but I’m nothing if not a pragmatic man. Most companies in my industry have operations in Mexico, including the one I work for. So learn Spanish it is, I have to support my family. It is coming along well, and I should make it to fluency in a couple more years. At least I’ll be one of the white men who appears to be diversity-goal compatible, and get the jobs over my equally hard working white het cis male colleagues. There aren’t too many American born whites in my field who speak any language other than English.

    • kjh64

      You will get dibs on the jobs over only English-speaking Whites as long as there is no Hispanic competition for your job or any jobs you may have in the future.

  • De Doc

    LOL @ President Latavious Jackson. That reminds me of Mike Judge’s film, ‘Idiocracy’, where the US president was portrayed as a black ex-pro wrestler by the name of “Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho” – maybe he’ll be the crossover Black Hispanic politician to unite the blacks and browns of the future America!

  • Martel

    Just now reading about blacks in Ecuador demanding reparations and affirmative action. One thing I know about 2034, is that blacks will be in the same position they are now. For those interested:

    “Afroecuatorianos: Reparaciones y acciones Affirmatives” by John Sanchez(pdf)

    The abstract opens with the following statement:
    “Las reparaciones constituyen un eje estructural de las demandas del movimiento afrodescendiente en Latinoamérica. Se trata de un tema al que se le reconoció su importancia dentro de la III Cumbre Mundial contra el Racismo, la Discriminación Racial, la Xenofobia y otras Formas de Intolerancia, celebrada en 2001 por las Naciones Unidas”

    Afroecuatorianos constitute about 7% of the population in Ecuador.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    I’m surprised that Mr. Taylor, considering his tech background, almost completely left out the effect technological advancements will have on the future (aside from mentioning genetic research).

    As some of the other writers have touched on, I believe that drones and increasingly tiny videocameras will lead to a broadening of the political correctness police state.

    Meanwhile, advancing technological entertainment options will allow people to withdraw even more fully from reality, just as it has been shown that today, people in diverse neighborhoods tend to watch more television and volunteer less.

    What’s more, increasing automation, including driverless cars, could lead to a huge unemployment problem, with manual labor being replaced by technological jobs for which it will be impossible to train blacks and Hispanics. This will lead to a huge class of the permanently unemployable, along with the social and political pressures that will arise from such a situation.

    • Sick of it

      Tim, tech fields are already full of idiotic Indians and Hispanics. These people will push for diversity no matter the consequences.

      • Tim_in_Indiana

        True, there are a lot of Indians in the tech field, but I’m not so sure about Hispanics. Plus, you have to separate out true Mestizos of the kind who are immigrating to the US in droves from those who merely have Spanish-sounding names, or who are Castilian Spanish.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yes, an immigration moratorium is prudent without bringing race into it, given the huge unemployment possibilities from automation alone. That’s why I refuse to use self-check-out. It deprives a high school kid of a job.

  • Bossman

    In all these articles about the next 20 years, nobody mentioned the coming demographic crisis that the futurists are talking about. The story goes something like this: The surge in birthrate following World War II and the increase in life expectancy will create a large aging population, increasingly out of the workforce but continuing to consume, therefore workers will be needed to fill their demand. By 2030, all the advanced countries may be competing for immigrants.

    • Martel

      Naturally this is absolute nonsense.European birthrates could have been stimulated by subsidizing childcare and propagating family life and it would have been a lot cheaper. A study from England pointed out that many English women want more children then they currently have but cannot afford it.

      • Sick of it

        They’re spending too much on third world babies, courtesy of “their” government.

        • SoulInvictus

          Another thing that came to mind after our last discussion here about the lack of viable mates… that it’s a two edged sword in the destruction of whites.
          Not only is the family unit and white genetic integrity screwed by leftist indoctrination, but the scarcity of non-obese, non-insane women makes for even more animosity among competing males.
          Very difficult to have a unified group when they’re striving against each other to mate. I imagine we’ve all seen a group of friends self-destruct over a decent looking temptress. Then extrapolate that effect over an entire population and society.

          Never pondered that end of it before, but I bet it contributes significantly to the isolationist attitude of a lot of white men.
          Have a few good friends stab you in the back over a woman and you learn your lesson.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            “Very difficult to have a unified group when they’re striving against each other to mate.”

            It is also very difficult for us when the men scream about the women and the women scream about the men in a giant version of ‘Uproar’ because we are frustrated, because we are too few. But we gotta get a handle on that, folks.

          • SoulInvictus

            I don’t necessarily disagree, but I’d be interested to hear how you see “The scarcity of viable mates can also pit the quality men as a group against the quality women as a group”.

            It would seem to be a buyers’ market for quality women.
            Supply & demand and all.
            Attractive, level headed white women would seem to have the least cause for frustration of anyone in the US.
            That among many other things leading to additional tension and the tendency of hostility towards white women as part of the problems at hand.

            The “I keep editing this” part made me laugh. I do the same thing, usually ending with deleting it to save mods the trouble.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Oh, I’m pleased to engage you.
            I’ll give you a careful reply by day’s end.

          • SoulInvictus

            See that you do, very carefully. Totally kidding.;)
            I can only speak from my own experiences, so I wouldn’t presume to speak to what this whole cultural and demographic transition is like for women. On one hand it would seem to be completely in the favor of quality women, but if white men are even more neutered than I perceive (likely biased by living in the South), then I could understand how it might be equally difficult to find a husband of value as well.
            In my own dating experiences, I have noticed a trend of northern and midwestern women opting for mates from the South despite great distance. So maybe that is a telling thing I wasn’t interested enough in to consider previously.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I was wondering where you were! (I also pegged you to be under 35 when *that* question presented in my mind.)

            I am in the Midwest. I had a conversation with a friend the other day about a woman his cousin is dating and he said she was “Wisconsin cute” – she’s plump. I agree with you that a mate should be fit, that’s paramount. Not just not obese but fit. Mr. Wolff wrote a piece about diversity in the greek system earlier this year and simply showed a photograph of of a co-ed fraternity and let the implication say it all for him and it struck me. Fit is an amorphous quality for me but I know it when I see it.

            Many of the women from the Midwest* are bigger than women from other regions and it is not necessarily a bad thing if I keep in mind that their forebears worked and survived a cold winter. They may be very fit. None of this matters if you don’t like they way they look, however.

            This is not your careful reply.

            *Actually from there- transplants like me do not get a pass.

          • SoulInvictus

            “Wisconsin cute”, definitely stealing that one.
            They also seem to be more deceptive about their …”Wisconsin cuteness” and well, everything else.

            The last two misadventures I had up that way both ended up with an unpleasant WC reveal that was in no way reflected in what were apparently very dated pre-fat pictures. Both in states bordering Wisconsin funny enough. Ended up deducing one was married as well (outstanding…) and after the second encounter, swore off any form of internet romance for my own well being and sanity.

            The women here can be very beautiful, up to about age 22. At that point, the fried diet, lack of exercise, and usually a child or three, has completely wrecked the real estate. As I’m not in the sub-22 market anymore, that’s problematic. Led to me staying with a moderately sociopathic, but very attractive, ex for way too long.

            That you * footnoted your post gave me a chuckle.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Thank you for being willing to entertain this.

            People mate for procreation, sharing of burden, companionship, and sex (and for tax or legal purposes sometimes, but that’s outside this discussion). Someone else even said that last time (Magician?). You have to be attracted to someone for the option of sex to have value and you have to be compatible for the sharing of burden and companionship to have value. And those
            things are very particular to the two people in the match in question.

            So, you might list a bunch of criteria that are important IN GENERAL (and you did) and another that are important to you IN PARTICULAR (and you did), but there is also a list of soft criteria that someone has to meet enough of to make you interested also, no? Let’s say, for example, that you like t, u, v, x, y, & z. If you meet a woman with everything but y, you can overlook it, I’m guessing. But what if she has none? And only a, b, c, d, e & f, which don’t appeal to you at all on a base level, but are nothing you can find fault with? Don’t mate with her, you will not be happy and neither will she, when she could be making someone who wants a, b, c, etc. happy.

            As an example, Oh, I like the symphony and hiking as activities and I like clever and excitable as qualities in men. Now, I could see myself being happy with a guy who doesn’t like the symphony or who wasn’t terribly clever, if he had enough of the other qualities to fill a basket. I can’t like a guy with none of the soft qualities. I doubt you are that indisciminate either. If all you wanted in a mate was the qualities you listed, you would not meet my definition of a quality man. You discern between people and take different pleasures in individuals accordingly, surely. I’m going to assume that you do.

            There is in combinatorics something called Montmort’s Matching Problem. Men attend an event., check their hats, the hat tickets get lost, and the hats are randomly distributed at the end of the night. The likelihood of a particular man getting his own hat back decreases with the number of men at the event. This is also sometimes stated differently as a careless secretary inserting letters in envelopes preaddressed (letters in their proper envelope=men with their own hats) OR as couples attenting a party and pairwise dancing randomly (couples dancing with each other =men with their own hats). Lets mashup the first and last and say that when the couples are matched, they leave and the dance starts again with those left. I don’t believe in soul mates (there is no ‘your’ hat) and neither do you (or any of the people chiming in on this discussion, I reckon), but there are only so many women at a party you might want to leave with, no? So, you’ll take any hat at the end of the event, as long as it’s acceptable, or you’ll leave the dance when you get paired with an acceptable mate. If there are 2N people at the party, there are N women, and there are say, O women you even condsider ‘danceable’ (are not old or obese, have good attitudes) and P women that you in particular want to dance with (are submissive in the Christian sense, intelligent, without dependency issues). So there are N hats, O hats that will fit you ,and P hats that you’d actually like to wear. The likelihood of you randomly pairing with a hat you’d like to wear. . . is dependant on how large N is and how large P is. If N is large and P is small, you will dance with a lot of duds or end up holding useless hats. This is the world. It is the same for men and women.

            You think that there are more quality men than women-even if that were true (and that it may not be is another conversation), it is still frustrating to be confronted with a bunch of ugly hats that don’t fit. I don’t at all mean to sound preachy, but I think you have a different idea of what it is like to live as a woman than Courtney and I seem to have. A women can’t just grab any hat she wants, that’s not how it works. She also can’t sit in the middle of the floor and cry until someone hands her the perfect hat. There are perogotives of the fairer sex but they have their limits, particularly if she has standards for modesty of her own behavior.

            Now, we are not at the mercy of fate quite as much as this example has us, but I think it is a pretty useful model. Yes, but Usually Much Calmer, in real life, men choose the women that they want to dance with, its not random, and the quality women are identified by the quality men so everything is gravy for the quality women. SoulInvictus, the quality women are identified by EVERYBODY and N is very large. N is huge and P is very small. Look around. P is tiny. That’s what I’m saying. And you want women who are attractive but we want men who are stalwart, and that takes orders of magnitude more time to suss, even if it is still a very quick read.

            ‘Uproar’ is one of psychologist Eric Berne’s ‘games’- it is people picking a fight to get the intimacy of fighting (which when you think about it, is very satisfying) when they cannot get healthy intimacy in their lives. Uproar is a patterned dysfunction. I am trying above all else with these responses to prevent Uproar in this community. Antagonism between white men and white women ONLY hurts us.

          • SoulInvictus

            Whoa, ease up on the hostility. Again, teasing.;)
            Damn, you weren’t kidding around about a comprehensive response.
            First, I have to get the puerile jokes out of my system.
            “for the option of sex to have value”- Pretty sure it’s established at $250+ per hour.
            “Montmort’s Matching Problem”- I think he’s on Game of Thrones.
            “P is small…P is very small…P is tiny.”- Tiny P’s, never a happy thing for either party.

            Alright, I’m better now.
            That may be the most …analytical? post I’ve ever read on this site. Someone enjoyed statistics class, a lot.

            “I don’t believe in soul mates (there is no ‘your’ hat)”

            That’s kind of sad. Realistic, but still sad. Also removes the possibility of divine intent or intervention. I’ve seen some unusual twists of fate in my life, so I can’t rule that out completely. Kind of kills some of the poetry in life to remove that dream entirely.
            Nature likes symmetry, music, chemistry and physics are filled with compliments and perfectly matched, harmonic dancing pairs irresistibly drawn together, who am I to say it isn’t designed that way throughout.

            “a, b, c,…x,y,z”
            I don’t think I neccessarily have “x, y, z” hard criteria beyond the reasonable basics I mentioned in that post a while back. They’re about as complex or unreasonable to me as preferring your mate to have two functioning legs. Some of my soft criteria? are more nuanced maybe than they would be for others, like say my perception of voice, teeth, and scent. Grating voice, meth lab dental work, or a natural scent that doesn’t send a spark, and I’m not sticking around to explore further.
            I’ve also seen the power in the attraction of opposites, so a lot of it varies considerably depending on the personality behind the traits. I’ve known a girl for a while that fits almost every checkbox I put on paper previously, but her personality kills attraction to the point I couldn’t stand being in the same room anymore.

            “If N is large and P is small, you will dance with a lot of duds or end
            up holding useless hats. This is the world. It is the same for men and
            women….A women can’t just grab any hat she wants, that’s not how it works.”

            And that is where I fundamentally disagree. N is exponentially larger for women as the …dance partners are almost 100% compliant for consideration as a partner so long as you’re minimally attractive. That’s a low hurdle to clear…
            Whereas N is a minefield of endeavoring to incite, inspire, and elicit partners for men. That’s just the natural order of the sexes so I won’t whine about that. But the modern world and leftist thought has compounded that tenuous situation massively.
            So in short, sure you have to sift through more duds. But you have the capability to more easily sift through them as was always the case, and you’re not fighting uphill through those infected with toxic levels of feminism, career over family drives, accepted lesbianism, societal push for miscegenation (much fewer men go that route), and the many other social ills we now face as obstacles to the mating ritual.
            Or as you would put it, P is now microscopic for us whereas men aren’t all that different from what they were 50 years ago (from my perspective and geographic region anyway), so your P is basically the same as it always was. Larger really, because the P you consider acceptable is actively searching, ravenously starved for your demographic of the N.

            “You think that there are more quality men than women”

            I don’t think there are necessarily. But then I have a fairly low opinion of humanity in general. I don’t think the men are that great, but rather that women as a whole have almost entirely collapsed short of even the most minimal standards of what a suitable spouse was only a generation or two ago.
            And so they are reaping the rewards. Later entry into childbirth, later marriage, sickening rates of STD transmission, sterility, pathetic divorce rates, and record numbers of children without father figures. They’ve joyfully bought into the lifestyle pushed as admirable by the left, and show no sign of relenting.
            The men may indeed be neutered and of low caliber as well, but as we’re now entering the second or third generation of men widely raised by single moms (and the majority of divorce is initiated by women) then they can again, for the most part, blame themselves.

            “‘Uproar’ is one of psychologist Eric Berne’s ‘games’- it is people picking a fight to get the intimacy of fighting”

            Funny that a man would invent that, as it’s almost purely a female tactic in relationships.

            “Antagonism between white men and white women ONLY hurts us.”

            Couldn’t agree more. It’s probably easy, as some of the very few women present, to take comments like mine above as a personal “this means You”. I think you, having made your way to company and topics such as this, should infer a “present company excluded” whenever any frustrations with the degraded state of white womanhood are being vented.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            What a nice conversation! Like you, I am pleasantly surprised that it happened in the ether. Thanks, SoulInvictus.

            I in no way take this stuff personally, rest assured.

            My purpose was threefold: to moderate the frustration of the men who visit this site toward white women in general; to prevent harsher comments that may drive younger female visitors away (are there any? I don’t know, but if they come I want them to stay- but maybe they will anyway and it would serve them well to hear men’s complaints, dunno); to prevent an unnecessary and harmful disunity among us.

            Finally, I have to note that you and I have very different strategies for meeting people which is an observation that can serve my position or yours, funny enough. I go out in my town and I talk to strangers, I would not consider using the internet. Either quality women are more constrained in their behavior then YOU think, or your scarcity is more dire than *I* think. Food for thought.

            Thank you again for a very civil and fruitful discussion.

            Oh! and one last thing about appearances: I could not agree with you more. Jettison that ‘shallow’ bit. Your eyes are smarter than you know, heed them. I would go even further and suggest that clumsy people are bad bets, too (hit me like a bolt of lightning when I read it in the Bell Curve). There is not much middle ground, indeed.

          • SoulInvictus

            Glad you’ve enjoyed it.
            ” have very different strategies for meeting people”
            I think maybe you missed the other post where I wrote about swearing off internet romance (with good reason). It was never my focus, and supplemental as I imagine it is for most people in the market that get jaded. But it lends itself too much to deception and loony toons women
            Have a great week. I am going to Disney World right now with my daughters, so I know I will.:)

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Enjoy, new friend, enjoy!

          • Usually Much Calmer

            I hope you and your girls are enjoying the vacay.

            I reach out again only to call your attention to a post on Rational Male this morning that compliments our discussion, which you may find further food for thought.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Someone who stabs you in the back over a woman was never your friend to begin with. Your point is very true, and that is why the relentless promotion of miscegenation is ongoing, the promoters of this know it is turning white men against each other.

          • SoulInvictus

            They do seem to be amazingly capable at knocking the pillars out from under a society.
            When you look at all the things that are crumbling, the church, marriage, culture, patriotism, masculinity, civility, homogeneity… it’s hard to conceive it isn’t intentional.
            I’m never quite sure if this is being done by people that genuinely think they are advancing humanity or if some loose affiliation of groups similar to the KGB is purposefully destabilizing the West.
            Likely a mixture of both. Watching the show The Americans makes for an interesting take on all that from a cold war Soviet perspective.

          • Sick of it

            When a race of men thinks of themselves as the only people worth living, they will strive to destroy all others in their greed and arrogance.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      There is no demographic crisis. Those are all globalist lies. The truth is that there is no connection between population growth and economic prosperity, or else Africa and the Indian subcontinent would be the most economically and technologically advanced regions in the world. There is no competition for third world immigrants, just the controlled demolition of the west you see all around you.

      • Bossman

        Well, either they are wrong or you’re right. But still I would rather listen to them. Many of them have done a lot of research before they came to their conclusions.

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          What research? I have challenged immigration enthusiasts on many occasions to show me just one study proving the benefits of third world immigration. I am still waiting for that evidence.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Importation of third worlders is genocide against our race, because they prevent whites from having children in a multitude of ways. Driving down wages and housing prices up for example. Sucking white taxpayers dry by the social welfare they consume for yet another example. Preventing births within a group is genocide, under the UN’s own definition.

      • Sick of it

        General Assembly Resolution 260A (III) Article 2:

        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
        (a) Killing members of the group;
        (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
        (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

        All of the above have been practiced against white Christians in the United States.

  • JohnEngelman

    For Germany, therefore, the only possibility of carrying out a sound territorial policy was to be found in the acquisition of new soil in Europe proper…

    If one wanted land and soil in Europe, then by and large, this could only have been done at Russia’s expense.”

    - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Volume I, Chapter IV, “Munich”

    • silviosilver

      Hitler was not initially dogmatically anti-Russian. Although there is plenty of evidence that he considered Slavs an inferior breed he once considered an alliance with Russia. This, however, meant seeking territories overseas which would have put Germany into conflict with Britain, which Hitler wished to avoid. But then you have read Mein Kampf so I’m sure you know all this.

  • Löwenmensch ᛟ

    Oh don’t act sanctimonious, America was Indian and Europeans wiped them out and resettled it. Who are you to judge? Europeans have been killing each other for thousands of years, are you suggesting Hitler started warfare or just ignorant of history?

    • Jotun Hunter

      sanctimonious melodrama is his speciality.

  • Tarczan

    I doubt Social Security or any federal programs will be cut. The money will just be printed (digitized). This will lead to super high interest rates and massive inflation. As a guess I would say it would be about twenty years until the mother of all collapses.

    • Robert Haschberg

      Money is printed every day, learn how a debt-backed currency works.

  • Löwenmensch ᛟ

    Another thing, the Soviet Union exterminated millions of non-Russians and resettled it with their Slavs. Ever heard of the Povolzhye forced famine, Tatarstan forced famine, Ukrainian Holodomor?

  • Anglo

    I live in the hot, humid deep South; and it’s hard for me to imagine long, cold winters; but if that’s the way it will be, I’ll head for the Appalachians.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      I’d rather live with the severe winters that Russia and Ukraine experience than sweat like a pig most of the time down here in the browning South. Being covered head to toe in wool and wearing heavy boots is not much of a tradeoff for a land where darkies do not want to go.

      • Anglo

        I understand. I don’t even own a heavy coat; it sure would mean a major wardrobe change. LOL!

      • Sick of it

        Some of us are so used to the climate here that extreme cold environments would kill us. We’re the survivors of people who planted roots in the South 400 years ago.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          I find the heat here very oppressive, and I have nearly passed out, or worse at least once every summer. I work in heat that makes people collapse and then end up in hospitals. Given the choice between sub-zero cold and bundling up, and sweating pounds of water every day, I’ll take wearing the woolen winter clothes and the Russian ushankas over feeling like a baking pizza every time I board my ship to start my work day.

  • TruthBeTold

    This sounds like the outline of the dystopian novel I keep thinking about writing.

    My only qualm is that whites might be permitted to have their own areas.

    In my dystopian novel outline, forced integration takes on new meaning. Neighborhoods down to individual streets have quotas. It even extends to forced marriages outside of race; no one will be permitted to marry someone of the same race; miscegenation as law.

    Of course, I’m considering a truly radical future beyond 2034.

    The current trends do not look good but things can change slowly or quickly; darkest before the dawn and all that.

    Until then, spread the message.

    • LHathaway

      “Until then, spread the message”.

      What message is that?

      • Usually Much Calmer

        My personal message is: ‘There are gross aggregate differences between groups in many cognitive and social metrics which are highly correlated to economic or other performance outcomes. Therefore, disparity between groups is inevitable.’

        I repeat it as often as I can.

        • Kenner

          Very catchy.

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Sarcasm or no? I can’t tell.

            It is obtuse enough to slip into someone’s thoughts without setting off the ‘racist’ alarm.

  • ViktorNN

    I enjoyed Jared Taylor’s 2034 essay the most. Lots to respond to, but I’ll leave it to one observation.

    Whites in the U.S. face a future where two distinct pressures will be acting on them, shaping who they will ultimately become, or whether they will continue to exist at all in N. America.

    As Taylor points out, the great white middle class that had its heyday during the mid 20th century is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. Whites are being squeezed up into the upper middle class, or down into a growing, vast underclass.

    Those that are squeezed up tend to be the most educated and live in blue states. They tend to identify as liberal, Democrats, and progressives. They’re the ones poised to thrive in the Democratic Party-dominated future. By most measures we would think of them as the winners.

    The thing is, they’re not reproducing themselves. In fact, a white culture that’s anti-family and anti-natalist is a real thing that’s widespread and growing. Not only that, but whites are slowly but surely defecting from the Democratic Party. By 2034 it’s very likely that whites will be one minority among many in the Democratic Party. Given all this, whites will likely become marginalized and ultimately blended out of the upper classes.

    The most fecund whites are to be found among poorer whites in red state areas. These are the whites that are reproducing at above replacement levels. Like Orwell, we might be tempted to look to the [white] proles for salvation.

    The thing is, this group will be subjected to relentless pressure to mix and become culturally and biologically indistinguishable from the brown tide which is engulfing them.

    At the top, whites are pressured to not reproduce themselves. At the bottom, whites are pressured to brown themselves out of existence. Obviously I’m not optmistic.

  • LHathaway

    “As soon as public schools switch to a Euro-centric curriculum, non-whites move out and more whites move in”.

    This is a fantasy that doesn’t jib with current trends. If you can call hightlighting the accomplishments and trevails of women and people of color (and encouraging racial solidarity in them) while whites only are being taught to be conscious of their evil and the hipness of people of color, if you can call that euro-centric, than yes, K-12 education is eurocentric. All schools become less-and-less Euro-centric as time has gone by and this has only increased as, and at schools where diversity has increases. The fact whites are decreasing in number hasn’t made them victims, and in need of Euro-centric community centers, yet.

    If such a thing would occur, this would likely attract more diversity. People of color (at least blacks) would rather ‘integrate’ a poor white community than an upscale one (aside from the benefit of relatively lower rent). As it has been for the whole country, so has it been for communities. As it is now, whiteness attracts people of color.

  • Annabelle Pettyjohn

    you drop a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will of course frantically try to
    clamber out. But if you place it gently in a pot of tepid water and turn the
    heat on low, it will float there quite placidly. As the water gradually heats
    up, the frog will sink into a tranquil stupor, exactly like one of us in a hot
    bath, and before long, with a smile on its face, it will unresistingly allow
    itself to be boiled to death.

    Version of the story
    from Daniel Quinn’s The
    Story of B

  • Kai is your guy

    What of the military? If it’s handed over to the Mestizo population, they would use hard force against those Whites seceeding. What to make of all of these weapons of mass destruction?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      There would have to be a strategic alliance made with a white nation like Russia.
      A ‘…mutually assured destruction…’ threat that is “understood”.

  • Bossman

    Hispanic influence will grow but the USA and North America in general will remain the premier region of the world. There’s no country or group of countries that can replace the USA, at least, not for another 100 years or more.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Because of immigration-fueled population growth and their higher fertility rates, Hispanics will eventually come to dominate North America, but the region will become just another third world backwater in the process. Once the North American continent has become fully Hispanicized, it will be easily replaced by China or Russia.

      You seem to think that the US becoming an impoverished, possibly war-torn third world nation is a good thing.

      • Bossman

        I don’t think that it is a good thing. What I think is that it is not going to happen any time soon. All the experts are on my side of this issue. As to why this is so will require you to do some serious reading. In the meantime, I recommend that you read a book called The Next 100 Years by Dr. George Friedman.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        N. America will be swept aside, literally by China if America ends that way. Russia, not so much unless they intend to attack with nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction. China would once whites lose their grip on the continent invade and ruthlessly exterminate the Hispanics, blacks, whites and even Asians already here and take over. They will have the capacity to do it soon.

      • jayvbellis

        Hispanics are the majority in LA. Yet, Hispanic presence in Hollywood is nill.

  • Evette Coutier

    Immigration is about profit. Business has figured our taxes will not be lowered, so to increase profit they must cut labor cost. It’s all about money. Always follow the money. You want to make predictions, watch money patterns first.

  • Rodney S

    Hopefully, I’ll be gone by 2034. In the meantime, enjoy the decline.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    I really enjoyed this article. Very good. I disagree with the trend (although this is one possible scenario). America has become decidedly less politically correct in some ways since the 1980s. Affirmative Action has been challenged and in many cases struck down in the courts. Michigan banned affirmative action in schools. Czech republic I believe it was made affirmative action illegal in its constitution. The Bell Curve has gained some acceptance among mainstream academics. White Nationalism, while marginal, is on the rise. At the same time we see the opposite pole increasing: a black president, growing liberal absurdity etc. The nation is polarizing. You will see considerable push back from anti-PC people. Look at Europe. In 1990 it would have been unthinkable that nationalist parties would be winning elections. I think one thing is right- for the sake of survival Asians and Whites will be allied. I’m not sure that hispanics and blacks will align since they currently hate each other and kill each other. Maybe on some political level they might both vote democrat though. A lot of hispanics voted in Obama simply because he was a democrat. One thing not considered that I have seen are the huge numbers of white-asian mixed people who are entering the traditionally white elite. I would see it polarizing into an asian-white tribe and the hispanic-black-liberal white tribe.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Now I get it.

    Jared Taylor is turning into me.

    Save yourself and your sanity, JT. Don’t read my comments. You’ll also be saving the world; one of me is all this world can handle.

  • LHathaway

    lol, sounds like a twisted version of ‘Soylent Green’. Good to see new twists can be added to an old tale.

  • Usually Much Calmer

    Leave out Brat.

    Nothing against him, but it is pragmatic top think about politicians the way you might think about a new steel alloy: You know how you think it should perform, you know you want it to perform (any why you invested in it), but only testing lets you know how it does perform.

    When people are lauded before they have done anything (Obama’s Peace Prize comes to mind), it messes with them. Give the dude a chance.

  • refocus

    Bravo Mr. Taylor…

    But it looks to me like Camp of the Saints….

    vty,

  • Peter Connor

    Sotomayor can barely write a complete sentence, so I rather doubt she will make Chief Justice. They will get a competent hispanic for that.

  • Peter Connor

    JT has missed the possibility of more federally subsidized blockbusting against any “privileged” community. Fact is, we have to stop immigration before they actually get control of things.

  • Usually Much Calmer

    Yes. No one relishes this discussion but yes, this ugly fate looms (perhaps not the breeding in captivity part, but the sexual exploitation for sure).

    Linda and Peter Biehl seem to think of their daughter as an offering by which they may assuage their guilt and Amanda Kijera seems to think along similar lines about herself. It will take less than we’d like to think, in part because we really don’t like to think about this. But wishes aren’t horses.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    Even in 2034, I highly doubt there will be a “White Privilege Tax” with that name. The Left has been babbling about a Wealth Tax for decades, which would amount to the same thing. The present day increase in inheritance taxes is a step in the direction of such a Wealth Tax, and falls mainly on Whites. Even when Whites are a minority, we will still be a plurality for a while, and I don’t think an explicitly racial tax will fly until next century perhaps, if we make it that far.
    .
    There’s also a fair chance that the United States will morph into a Mexico-style society – a vast underclass of Indios and Mestizos ruled by a no-nonsense White (Criollo) minority. How long that sort of society would last is an open question, since this new United States wouldn’t have a northern dumping ground for its undesirables, and it wouldn’t have a wealthy neighbor upon which to leech. Both Mexico and the former United States might then descend into Bolshevik-style violence, but that’s many decades away. The wild cards are our precarious economy, and of course, our own efforts to wake Whites up, which may have drastic effects long before 2034.

    • Peter Connor

      Well, the middle class will be bankrupt by 2034, so there won’t be a wealth tax, since the upper class controls things…

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Bolshevik style violence is coming to the U.S., and it won’t be decades in the future either.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    They look white to black South Africans, too. Just ask the Jews who had to flee.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    What happened to poor Annabelle??

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Not sure. She spoke of the boiling frog theory. Not much else.

  • Anglo

    I’ve been to Mt. LeConte, but it was in summer.

  • DAWNOFNEWDAY

    Oh, we’re already on the way right now. I suspect by 2016 we will be in a civil war or racial war of some kind. Look at how angry and how bad things have been getting since Obama’s re-election. Look at the constant anti-white rhetoric, with whites pushing back harder, the flooding of more nonwhite/illegals with states fighting back, etc. Buckle up and hold on tight.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      From your keyboard to God’s ears.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    This scenario sounds pretty realistic. I hope he is right, that White communities will have become more racially conscious, and will be focused on preserving our quality of life. I also hope he is right that White Senior Citizens will gravitate to such communities, where there will be quality retirement services with excellent staffs. These staffs will be composed of younger Whites who care about their elders, and a sprinkling of young Asians. I’ll be one of those elder Whites, so I’m certainly hoping for such sensible things to occur, and such a spirit of racial realism to be prominent, in 20 years, amongst Whites.

  • Löwenmensch ᛟ

    America 2034, the national debt stands at 900 trillion dollars.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yeah, that’s a good guess.

    • Magician

      At the moment it is 17.5 trillion dollars and if I expect it to increase by 1 trillion per year, then I expect it will be more like 37.5 trillion ;)

  • Robert11110

    I think it is more plausible that a significant portion of the white population in this country will emigrate. I, myself, have been scouring travel videos looking for a greener pasture to retire to in the next decade or so. In fact, looking at how different white Americans look these days compared to what I remember 30 years ago, that population transfer may have already been well underway for years. I see a whole lot less blond and red hair or blue eyes. I am not against Southern Mediterraneans either but these people don’t even look like that. I don’t see a lot of faces I remember and I am seeing facial features that I don’t recall ever seeing before. Lately it seems a lot of white Americans look less European than they used to. You have nearly 80 million baby boomers who are set to retire over the next few decades, most of them being white. That is about a third of the white population in the country growing old and being past their prime. Couple that with sub fertility rates and the picture doesn’t look so rosy.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      The Marxist occupiers just got out in front of that. They saw Americans escaping and started writing laws. There is some new law now that will make it difficult, if not impossible, to collect a SS check if you are an expatriate. No white people get out alive, or at least with their shirt.

    • John Yaeger

      I agree. America will turn out like South Africa. When whites have lost political power sufficient to ensure their security, you’ll see white flight like you’ve never seen it before. Either that, or the country will fracture along ethnic lines. Of course, secession would rely on collective action, and I see little evidence of ample white solidarity for that to occur. Most likely they’ll just trickle out of the country as individuals and families.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    I can’t imagine your Dad would approve of the Schvartze taking over by virtue of Affirmative Action induced pampering. That was what made America great in the old days. Guys like your Dad worked hard, persevered, and built a good life for themselves. Few Blacks seem willing to engage in such hard work and sacrifice.

  • Robert11110

    This article sounds like it was written by an asiaphile. I don’t believe China is a leader in science and technology, let alone genetic research. Such discoveries are likely to happen in some European capital. People were worried about Japan back in the 1980s but it declined in importance. That doesn’t mean the US will still have the largest economy. If Europe manages to stay together, and I absolutely hope the nationalists succeed in destroying the EU, Europe will be the financial hub of the world and the euro will be the world’s reserve currency. It is likely the US economy will continue to falter leading to huge military budget cuts and removal of American troops out of Europe. It is also likely that as Europe shoulder’s its own defense that it becomes a significant military power as well. Russia is also rising on the horizon. Once in demographic free fall it has now posted population growth and has now surpassed America’s fertility rate. It’s economy is also growing at a brisk pace and it’s role in world affairs is likely to increase. America in 2034 compared to many other places on the globe, is going to look shabby.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    True, but they had one thing we don’t. Unity for one. There was another thing they did not have, and that’s traitors in their midst. Unfortunately, we have little unity amongst ourselves and a lot of traitors in our midst.

  • Sick of it

    Jan Brewer has consistently backed down on enforcing immigration laws in her state.

    • Puggg

      Be fair here, the Supreme Court took away a lot of the enforcement parts of 1070.

      • Sick of it

        The Supreme Court cannot make the laws.

  • jayvbellis

    Pretty good.

    Maybe include a few more positive trends. Best parts of US Cities getting Whiter. Whites gentrifying Harlem, Fort Green Brooklyn and Wasgington DC.

    That’s also the trend in France. Central Cities are a White, safe, prosperous -Blacks and Muslims are pushed out in to industrial suburbs, which are tuned in to ano Go Zons for Whites except heavily arms White military.

  • Demo P. Seal; PouponMarks

    I think there are remedies for Whites, and later Asians to maintain their voices, but to do so will require rethinking and retooling the way we think about voting. One man-one man will not be viable for much more time. Many political and social economists have flagged this criterion as a terminal disease that kills cultures and nations. Lee Kwan Yew posited the potential necessity of “weighted” ballots, in order for the State to maintain rational policies endorsed and approved from a majority rational and patriotic.

    Middle Class, those who need to work to live, do not live off of trust funds or dividend interest, or collect any government benefits, should receive more votes per person, e.g., 2 or 3. “Rich”, or those who can live off investments exclusively, one vote. Those that receive gummint assistance or welfare get one vote allotted.

    A country cannot survive on a dependent class being in the driver’s seat and controlling the direction of the State. And as recent history has shown, neither the elite/wealthy, whose political economic agenda is toxic for national sovereignty and the greatest good for the greatest number.

    Please refer to my post on this same web site, five days ago on Disqus for an interim solution, a bridge toward a permanent fix, as mentioned here.

  • knuckledragger

    …or…maybe its high time for strong White men to grow beards and start neck-stomping the “people” we all know deserve it.

  • Magician

    It is irrelevant to this thread or us Americans in general but,

    The German Big 3 (Audi, BMW, Benz) are about to move their production assembly line jobs to Eastern Europe.

    trefis[dot]com/stock/dai/articles/243873/shifting-production-to-central-and-eastern-europe-could-boost-profitability-for-german-automakers/2014-06-20

    The article reads that workers in Eastern Europe only get paid 30% of what workers in Germany get paid.

    And of course, it means a lot of locals in Germany will lose their jobs. I am not sure what to say. If you were the CEO of Audi or BMW would you rather keep the jobs in Germany or shift the jobs to Eastern Europe?

    • Martel

      Many German eyes may become opened to the negative effects of globalism.

  • Terra Magnum Imperium

    Just watched Stossel today and they had a segment on designer babies aka eugenics.
    The British are for it but the in USA it is mostly still illegal. The show also posted a survey from the Pew Research Center: (Ability to) alter the DNA of Kids to produce Smarter, Healthier, or More Athletic Offspring: 66 % change for the worse, 26% Change for the better. The ignorance in the USA amazes me Eugenics is the way to the future also I am curious how everyone on Amren would vote. Oh yeah, Skin color tone is one trait that can be modified by the way…

    • Martel

      Eugenics may solve the few disadvantages which miscegenation has, the ”skin color tone” option would also eliminate the incentive for many whites to care about the continued existence of a visibly unique people, their own that is.

  • http://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/ Reuben H

    I hope your optimism turns out to be correct Mr. Taylor.

  • jayvbellis

    I politely request that Mr. Taylor and others try to be a bit more optimistic and not put out the idea that everything is hopeless. Our situation is like the broken Fellowship of the Ring at Helm’s Deep.

    There are some good signs for our people.

    Communism fell in Eastern Europe. Most all those White people there who look like us are no longer our enemies (couldn’t really see why the Russians were our enemies in the 1980s when Reagan signed amnesty and gave military support to nasty throat cutting Jihadists in Afghanistan, same ones we’re fighting now).

    How great was that all White Winter Olympics in Putin’s New Russia, Old Russia restored?

    Other good signs. New York City was taken back from the hell of David Dinkins Al Sharpton’s hell. Look at all the Black African dictator mayors that have departed Coleman Young in Detroit, Marion Barry in DC being the worst.

    Also, the media. In the 1970s there were just 3 Lib anti White TV networks, PBS and UHF stations. The anti White powers that be could make the whole nation watch “Roots” now that’s impossible with 800 (bad) channels. Also, the whole zeitgeist of Black urban race riots, revolts just isn’t here anymore. Look at how the planned Trayvon Martin rebellion never got going.

    Can anyone think of any other positive things going our way?

    Hockey has never been more popular.

  • Mergatroyd

    Excellent article, except I’d like to add two things:

    1. There will be land confiscation and redistribution from the “white colonists/interlopers” to the “rightful owners,” i.e., Central Americans and Mexicans. No different from what happened in the USSR, South Africa and Rhodesia.

    2. They will kill us whites off once they get the opportunity. With full government and UN complicity.

  • scutum

    I have been predicting a future like this for some time with just one caveat. Mr Taylor forgets how quickly a nation can collapse once the tipping point is reached. No one was predicting the unraveling of the Soviet Union when it ocurred. In fact it took all of the major western intelligence agencies by complete surprise. I believe that the sequence will begin with the loss of reserve currency status for the dollar. This will result in a severe economic contraction
    that will provide the tipping point that will lead to the nations collapse. The government will try to contain the resulting upheaval, but this country is to big and now to diverse for the fed to put the genie back in the bottle once it gets out.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    She is Filipina. Don’t know if that qualifies as “North East Asian”?

  • Goldcoaster

    I have a very difficult time believing that Texans are gonna surrender their state to the mexicans.
    there will be another alamo first.

    • jayvbellis

      Texas gave us LBJ and George Dubya Bush.

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    I can’t believe this will happen. Whites are already being told that any community where they are a majority is “too white.”

    My prediction is that by 2034, most white people will not recognize that they are white and indeed, most will be of mixed race, but still somewhat white. I also think that an economic collapse is likely in the next 20 years and it will be a dozy this time, enough to set off a world wide crisis that will trigger many wars and other violence. Disease will spread like wildfire (see ebola outbreak “out of control” in Nigeria right now), and hospitals will run out of anti-biotics and room, so the afflicted will be instructed on how to care for the sick at home and many will simply die there. The markets will collapse and panic will spread. SHTF type scenarios will break out. Diversity comes home to roost. The National Guard will try to keep order and finally the armed forces will take part. North Korea or Pakistan or maybe some other nuke nation will get twitchy and a bomb will go off. No one will be able to stop the dominoes.

  • jayvbellis

    There was a problem of this kind for a bit with Russian and Ukrainian girls,after the Soviet a union fell, broke up. But, this problem has been addressed by nationalist forces, our guys now running things over there.

  • DonReynolds

    I have already looked into my crystal ball and seen the future. It was easy to focus on the one landscape feature that stretched from horizon to horizon……graves. Millions and millions of holes dug in the ground and left open. I could not see into the bottom of the holes, so I cannot tell you who was in them. No doubt there were enough for everybody who needed one. That, boys and girls, is what the next 20 years brings.

  • Demo P. Seal; PouponMarks

    I think there are remedies for Whites, and later Asians to maintain their voices, but to do so will require rethinking and retooling the way we think about voting. One man-one vote will not be viable for much more time. Many political and social economists have flagged this criterion as a terminal disease that kills cultures and nations. Lee Kwan Yew posited the potential necessity of “weighted” ballots, in order for the State to maintain rational policies endorsed and approved from a majority rational and patriotic plurality.

    Middle Class, those who need to work to live, do not live off of trust funds or dividend interest, or collect any government benefits, should receive more votes per person, e.g., 2 or 3. “Rich”, or those who can live off investments exclusively, one vote. Those that receive gummint assistance or welfare get one vote allotted.

    A country cannot survive on a dependent class being in the driver’s seat and controlling the direction of the State. And as recent history has shown, neither the elite/wealthy, whose political economic agenda is toxic for national sovereignty and the greatest good for the greatest number.

    I personally believe that the USSA is headed toward a South Africa existence. The latter had the chance to segregate the country to exclusive White enclave. The balance of global power will shift back to the Orient, where it was before the Rise of the West. Homogenous societies run the best. Singapore is dominated by the ethnic Chinese, and always will be, and therefore runs as a racial homogenous country; plus it strongly maintains a meritocracy.