Los Angeles: Geert Wilders Speech Explains Europe’s Situation

Brenda Walker, VDARE, June 12, 2013

The Dutch freedom-fighter Geert Wilders (pictured) visited southern California last weekend to deliver a speech at an event titled “Europe’s Last Stand?”

Wilders analyzed the history and wrong ideas leading to the current liberal dislike of national sovereignty among European liberals, namely their belief that Nazi fascism was caused by bad patriotism.

As it happens, liberals believe that if they can just find the perfect construct of government, then utopia will result, so they keep plugging away, trying to find the secret recipe. California liberals, for example, have led the charge for diversity being the highest good, which if somehow turned into a principle of governance, then everyone can live happily in a multicultural Eden.

The California experiment has not been encouraging, from the liberal viewpoint, if honest. The Golden State gets less like paradise and more like Babel every year, with its growing population of diverse residents.

Geert Wilders is a great friend of national patriotism, and would probably agree with the 2003 remark of Czech President Vaclav Klaus: “You cannot have democratic accountability in anything bigger than a nation state.”

The unaccountable European Union is the real problem with government in Europe, Wilders believes, which doesn’t allow the Netherlands to protect itself by keeping out hostile Muslim immigrants. Disconnecting from the giant EU PC nanny state would allow more freedom of the people.

At a time when Washington’s super-sized digital snoopocracy feels threatening to Americans, we should all pay attention to Geert Wilders’ wise observations about patriotism and the nation-state.


The Resurgence of National Pride and the Future of Europe

Dear friends, thank you for inviting me to Los Angeles. I always like coming to the United States. There are many things that I admire Americans for. One of them is that they are unashamedly patriotic.

The American Freedom Association has asked me to speak to you about the future of Europe.

Click here to watch an interview with Geert Wilders on June 9, 2013
Click here to read the speech in German on PI-news.net

Europe is in a terrible state. Bit by bit, European countries are losing their national sovereignty. The economy is in shambles. Islamic immigrants riot and terrorize the many locals. And when people’s throats are slit in the streets, while the murderers shout “Allahu Akbar,” the authorities appease the killers and declare that Islam has nothing to do with it.

Europeans feel that the gap between them en those who rule them is growing. Many no longer feel represented by their politicians. There is a complete disconnect between the people that truly rule Europe and the people that live in it.

The blame lies to a large extent with the European Union and the weak leadership within the European countries which have signed away their national sovereignty. The EU cannot be compared to the United States. Europe is a continent of many different nations with their own identities, traditions and languages. The EU is a supranational organization, but its leaders aim to turn it into a state. To this end they are destroying the wealth, identity and freedoms of the existing nation-states of Europe.

Before I elaborate, let us take a closer look at the terrible mistake that Europe made.

Following the Second World War, Europe’s leaders mistakenly thought that patriotism was the cause of the war.

All over Europe, not just in Germany, but everywhere, they equated the defense of national identity with extremism.

Politicians told the electorate that the nation state was dangerous.

On the rooftops of Europe’s parliaments and official buildings, they flew the EU flag next to the national flag, as if the nation is nothing but a province of a Pan-European empire.

On the number plates of European cars, they put the EU flag instead of the national flag, thereby forcing people to drive around with the symbol of their subjection.

They signed away their national interests for the goal of so-called Europeanization.

Such policies could never have been possible if the ruling elite had not fallen for the ideology of cultural and moral relativism. Patriotism, which is a virtue, came to be seen as a vice.

Today, the citizens of Europe are reaping the bitter harvest of this arrogance, this refusal to stand by the ancient nations of Europe, the mothers of modern democracy, the guardians of our liberty.

The EU stands for everything that is wrong in Europe.

It is a gigantic undemocratic transnational monster.
It issues legislation permeated with cultural relativism.
It meddles in the everyday lives of millions of people.
It has opened Europe’s borders to uncontrolled mass immigration, mostly from Islamic countries.
And it has deprived Europe’s parliaments of a huge amount of their legislative powers.

The European Union has brought one-size-fits-none policies that have resulted in economic disaster. It has led to growing tensions between the nations of Europe. It has led to the loss of democracy and liberty. Because the premise on which it was built, was false.

Robert Schuman, one of the EU’s founding fathers, said that the EU’s aim was – I quote – “to make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible.” – end of quote. But the idea that Germany, France, Britain and other nations in the past went to war because they were sovereign nations is simply ridiculous.

As I tell my audience whenever and wherever I speak in Germany, it was not German patriotism that started the Second World War; it was Hitler’s vicious totalitarian ideology of Nazism.

It was not German patriotism that caused the holocaust. German patriots, such as Count Stauffenberg, fought Hitler. “Let the world see that not all Germans are like Hitler; that not all Germans are Nazis,” he wrote in his diary the evening before Hitler’s hounds executed him.

Likewise, it was not Russian patriotism that sent people to the Gulag; it was the Soviets’ vicious totalitarian ideology of Communism. Russian patriots, such as Alexander Solzhenitsyn, stood up against the Soviets.

Nevertheless, the proponents of the EU keep pretending that without the EU, the Germans, the French, the British, the Dutch and the other nations of Europe would go to war again. The European Union has even been given the Nobel Peace Prize for the achievement of preserving peace in Europe – an achievement that is according to me NATO’s rather than the EU’s.

My friends, no-one knows this better than American patriots such as you: True patriots are always democrats. Because true patriots love their people and their country. You do not want your nation to be invaded by other countries. But neither do you want a totalitarian ideology, such as Communism or Nazism or Islam, to rob you of your own identity and enslave you.

Patriots want their country to be free. But people only care about the freedom of their country if they love it first. That is why one of my heroes Ronald Reagan said in his Farewell Address that we have to teach our children what our country is, what it stands for, what it represents in the long history of the world. Reagan said that Americans need – I quote – “a love of country and an appreciation of its institutions.” – end of quote.

Patriotism is not a totalitarian ideology aiming for world control; it is love of one’s own country and identity – and as such it is the strongest force against totalitarian ideologies aiming for world domination.

Love your country, appreciate its national institutions. As long as you do this, your country will remain the land of the free. But if you fail to do so, you will lose your freedoms. That is the lesson that we, Europeans, have learned the hard way after the past six decades of experimenting with EU transnationalism.

And the worst thing, my friends, the worst thing is that we could and should have known better.

In her last book, Statecraft, Margaret Thatcher wrote – I quote: “That such an unnecessary and irrational project as building a European superstate was ever embarked on will seem in future years to be perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era.” – end of quote.

My friends, let me tell you about the terrible consequences of this folly.
The Europeans set out to build a political tower of Babel.

In 1957, six European nations, including my own, the Netherlands, signed the Rome Treaty. They committed themselves to the formation of – I quote from the Treaty’s preamble – “an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe.” – end of quote.

From the original six, the European Union’s member states expanded to 27 nations today. Nations as diverse as Finland and Portugal, Ireland and Bulgaria, with their entirely different languages, cultures, traditions, habits and mentalities, were forced by their political leaders to adopt the same economic, fiscal, social, security, and foreign policies.

These policies are drawn up by the enormous, ever expanding bureaucracy of the so-called European Commission in Brussels. It issues laws – so-called “directives” – that the member-states are forced to implement in their national legislation.
As a national legislator in the Netherlands I daily experience how little we still have to say about our own fate. We are expected to rubberstamp legislation made behind closed doors in Brussels.

Both the EU Council of Ministers and the European Commission negotiate in secret and then emerge to announce their agreement and present it. That is how the system works. And we are not allowed to ask questions.

Those who dare think differently are labeled enemies of European integration. They are the so-called Europhobes.
The former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky calls the EU the EUSSR, because of its striking similarities to the former Soviet Union. He compares the European Commission to the former Soviet Politburo and Brussels to Moscow before the fall of the Iron Curtain.

Two weeks ago, I went to Prague and met with Vaclav Klaus, the former President of the Czech Republic. President Klaus speaks of Europeanism as one of the new and dangerous ideologies that have supplanted Socialism.

During his ten years in office, President Klaus refused to fly the EU flag over the Czech presidential palace. He points out that the EU is – I quote – “based on big and patronizing government, extensive regulating of human behavior and large-scale income redistribution. It shifts government upwards, which means to the level where there is no democratic accountability and where the decisions are made by bureaucrats appointed by politicians, not elected by citizens in free elections.” – end of quote.

The EU supranationalism has brought the once prosperous, sovereign and free nations of Europe economic misery, a loss of national identity, the demise of freedom and independence.

17 of the 27 EU member states have even been so foolish as to dump their national currency. By adopting the euro, the common EU currency, they joined the so-called eurozone.

Strong and solid currencies that were the pride of their nations, such as the Dutch Guilder and the German Deutschmark, were sacrificed on the altar of European unification. The then German Chancellor Helmut Kohl sold this project to his people as – I quote – “a matter of war or peace.” – end of quote. The euro was presented as – I quote again – “an angel of peace.”

But what did this angel do to us?

All the countries that joined the euro lost the power to adjust their currency to their own economic needs. They have destroyed their economies and have doomed their people to rising poverty and unemployment.

They all suffered as a consequence. They all have to share the burden of other countries, even if the latter are suffering from self-inflicted policies, corruption or fraud, like in Greece.

Last year, my party, the Dutch Party for Freedom, commissioned a study by the renowned independent British bureau, Lombard Street Research, into the cost for the Netherlands of the euro so far.

The study found that, since the Dutch introduced the euro, the growth of consumption spending no longer matches the growth of GDP, as it did before we joined the euro and as it still does in all the countries that kept out of the eurozone. The cost was a huge loss in consumer spending.

The study showed that continuing to uphold the euro would cost the Netherlands billions of euros. The Eurozone is a huge transfer zone, whereby taxpayers in our country are forced to subsidize other countries. The rising taxes have pushed our country, the Netherlands, into economic recession. Unemployment has grown to over 8% – the highest in decades.

And the countries that receive our taxes have no chance of recovery. They have no chance of economic growth within a monetary union where the currency is too strong for them. Millions of people are losing their jobs as a consequence. Countries such as Spain are doomed with unemployment figures reaching almost up to 30% today.

EU countries have also lost sovereignty over their own national budgets. The European Commission – not our national government – decides how big their deficits and national debts are allowed to be. It imposes austerity measures. But at the same time it demands ever larger sums to be transferred to Brussels or to so-called rescue operations for the euro and to bail out countries, like Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Cyprus.

Last month, the EU decided to raise its budget. My country and the Dutch government opposed this decision, but we were simply overruled. We have no veto right. Now we are forced to pay even more to Brussels. While government expenditure cannot be slashed by cutting the sums demanded by the EU, the Dutch government has raised taxes dramatically. The impact has been devastating. Higher taxes have resulted in less government income and have led to a contraction of the economy and a rise in unemployment.

The same phenomenon can be seen all over Europe. The growth of expenses and taxes, the inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the stifling bureaucratization – all this is leading straight to economic collapse.

But there is worse. EU member-states no longer control their own borders.

Immigration policies are decided by the European Commission and the cultural relativists who are in charge there. The current European Commissioner overseeing immigration policy is Cecilia Malmström, formerly a left-wing kind of hippy politician from Sweden. Third-World immigration has turned Sweden into a nightmare, with immigrants frequently rioting in major Swedish cities such as Stockholm and Malmö.

Mrs. Malmström is forcing all EU member states to follow the Swedish example.

Last year, I wrote her a letter. “Not one single Dutchman has voted for you,” I told her. “We do not know who you are. We do not want to know who you are, but you force your ideas on our people. We are suffering from your absurd refusal to allow us even the slightest restriction to our immigration policy. You do not even want to limit the number of partners that one is allowed to bring into the Netherlands! We urge you to cease your activities and give us our sovereignty back,” I wrote.

Needless to say that I am still waiting for an answer from her, despite the fact that I am an elected politician, accountable to the voters, while she is not. That is why she can afford not to answer a parliamentarian.

Millions of non-Western immigrants are flooding into Europe, predominantly people from Islamic countries. The Pew Research Center estimated the number of Muslims in Western European countries at 18.2 million in 2010. It expects that this number will rise to almost 30 million by 2030. The Netherlands will see its Islamic population grow from 5.5 to almost 8%, Britain from 5 to 8%, Sweden will even see it double from 5 to 10%, and France will see a rise from over 7 to over 10%.

A demographic catastrophe is about to happen.

During the past three decades, so many people rooted in a culture entirely different from Europe’s own Judeo-Christian and humanist tradition have entered Europe that its heritage, its freedoms, its prosperity, and its culture are in danger.

The signs are there for all to see.

Look at the names people give to their children. Mohammed is today the most popular name among newborn boys in many French, Belgian and Dutch cities. Mohammes is even the most popular name among all newborns in England and Wales.

Look at Europe’s inner cities. Visit Europe and you will see that they have come to resemble Northern Africa and the Middle East. They have become areas ruled by Islamic Sharia law. Only last month, a Dutch newspaper reported that a neighborhood barely two miles from our parliament building in The Hague is now a Sharia zone.

Islamic areas also border the EU headquarters in Brussels. And less than 10 miles from Westminster, the mother of all parliaments, a British soldier’s throat was slit by Islamic murderers.

Paris, the capital of France, is surrounded by largely Islamic suburbs. And so are other cities. The French authorities have even drawn up a list of 751 so-called “sensible urban areas,” where it is dangerous to go, especially for native Frenchmen. These are the lost territories of the French Republic, even though a staggering 5 million people, or 8 percent of the total French population, live in them.

Even soldiers are no longer safe in Europe’s streets, as the recent horrible events in Britain and France have shown. But neither are Jews. Anti-Semitism has risen, and keeps rising the more Islamic immigration we get.

Indeed, my friends, after Nazism and Communism, another totalitarian ideology is threatening Europe: the evil ideology called Islam.

In Europe, we are experiencing that the more Islamic a society becomes – even when the majority of Muslims are moderates – the less free and tolerant it will be.

Atrocities, similar to the recent bombing in Boston, where Islamic immigrants massacred innocent onlookers at the marathon, occur in Europe as well. In my own country a few years ago, Theo van Gogh, a film maker critical of Islam, was butchered in the streets of Amsterdam.

Today, hundreds of young Islamic inhabitants of our countries have flocked to Syria to wage jihad there. They will return as experienced jihadists, trained in urban guerrilla warfare. But while you in America are still able to do something about it, while you can control and close your borders, while Congress can vote legislation to protect American citizens, we in Europe have been robbed of this possibility by the European Union.

And there is not only the threat of terrorism or violence; there is also the phenomenon of non-violent jihad. The rise of Islam means the rise of Islamic sharia law in our judicial systems. In Europe, we have sharia wills, sharia schools, sharia banks. In Britain, they even have official sharia courts.

Europe is gradually Islamizing. People who criticize Islam, such as myself, are threatened by Al Qaeda and dragged to court by Islamic and leftist groups. There is not just me, there is the journalist Lars Hedegaard, the author Salman Rushdie, the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, and many others.

We criticize Islam and we will keep on doing so, because it is a dangerous ideology. It is intolerant, it is violent. And, worst of all, it cannot be reformed. It cannot because it believes that the Koran is a book written directly by Allah himself. And it cannot because it calls on Muslims to follow Muhammad as the role model for their personal life. There could not be a worse model than this man, who was a warlord, a terrorist, and a pedophile.

While most Muslims are moderate people, those who think that they have to follow Muhammad’s example are not. That is exactly the reason why the more Islamic a country becomes, the more unfree and violent it will be.

Europe needs to be protected against this new totalitarian threat.

That is why I say: No more immigrants from the Islamic world! My party wants to close our borders to immigration from Islamic countries.

And ever more people support us.

A poll, which we commissioned ten days ago, shows that 77% of the Dutch do not see Islam as an enrichment for our country, 68% say there is more than enough Islam in the Netherlands already. A majority of the voters of all the major parties in my country – even the voters from leftist parties – agree with these two principles.

The poll also showed that 55% of the Dutch want a stop on immigration from Islamic countries, 63% want no more mosques, 72% see a relationship between Islam and the recent terror attacks in Boston, London and Paris, 72% want a constitutional ban on Islamic Sharia law.

Ordinary people in Europe want three things.

One – They want their politicians to tackle the problem of Islamization and mass immigration. They want to control their own borders.

Two – They want to restore their national sovereignty. They do not want their countries to become provinces of a pan-European superstate.

Three – They do not want their money to be used to pay for mistakes made elsewhere. They do not want a transfer union where they have to pay higher taxes to bail out other countries, whose leaders were either corrupt or incompetent.

Poll after poll show that ordinary Europeans do not want their democracy to be subverted. Last April, a pan-European poll showed that a clear majority of the population in the major EU member states no longer trust the EU as an institution. Even in Germany the number has reached almost 60%.

This week a Gallup poll showed that for the first time in history in the Netherlands as many people want to leave the EU as stay in. A few years ago, this was unthinkable.

The strength of Europe is its diversity. Europe is not a nation; it is a cluster of nations, bound by a common Judeo-Christian and humanist culture, but with different national identities.

Last January, British Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a speech in which he said that the EU needed to change.

He spoke about “the lack of democratic accountability,” “the excessive regulation,” and everything that is wrong in the EU. And there are many things I agree with, but I do not share his belief that the EU’s nature can be changed. Mr. Cameron believes that the EU can be transformed into – I quote – “a more flexible, adaptable and open European Union.” – end of quote. I do not believe this. If an organization has as its explicit goal that it strives for “an ever closer union,” it simply cannot start moving in the opposite direction and relinquish the powers it has already acquired.

We can see how the mechanism works in the way in which the EU deals with the eurozone crisis. Rather than turning away from the destructive path that has so far been followed, Brussels is using this crisis to enforce an even tighter control over the member states.

The European Union simply cannot be democratized because the whole structure is built on a negation of democracy. As President Klaus pointed out, there can be no European democracy because there is no European demos – no European people. There can only be various European democracies – plural! – in the various European nations. What the EU does is destroy these various democracies.

And, hence, my party’s position is very clear. We opt for an exit from the European Union. We want the Netherlands not just out of the Eurozone, but out of the EU altogether – including the so-called Schengen area, the group of 26 European countries that have abolished passport and immigration controls at their common borders. We reserve the right to reinstall random border controls.

We want to retain our independence. We want home rule! We want to be the masters in our own house! We want to be the masters over our own borders. We want to be the masters of our own money. The Party for Freedom wants the Netherlands to leave the EU and join the European Free Trade Association EFTA.

But here is the good news, my friends. As I have already indicated, public support for the EU is growing thin by the day.
For months now, my party has been the biggest in the polls.

And we are not the only one.

In Britain, UKIP, the United Kingdom Independence Party, which wants to lead Britain out of the EU, has come second in many by-elections and local and county elections during the past two years. It is polling an average of a quarter of the votes. And it is growing.

In France last year, Marine Le Pen scored 18% in the presidential elections. She has now overtaken President François Hollande. She opposes the EU. And her popularity is growing.

In Germany, it is still considered far too politically-incorrect to reject the EU. Nevertheless a new party, the Alternative for Germany, wants to take the country out of the eurozone. And its appeal is growing.

In Italy, both the country’s largest party, Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement, and the the Lega Nord, the largest party in the North, want a referendum on a return to the Lira, while the Lega Nord has called the EU a failed project.

In Portugal a book advocating quitting the euro has become an instant bestseller. A proposal that was taboo until recently is now discussed openly, with the country’s Chief Justice personally coming out in support of eurozone exit.

All over Europe, anti-EU feelings are growing. All over Europe there are patriot parties that reflect the resurgence of national pride in their countries, whether it be the Netherlands, Britain, France, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Austria, Italy, Flanders, the Czech Republic, Germany, and the other nations currently trapped in the European Union.

As I said, here is the good news.

Europe might be on the verge of a fundamental change for the better. We seem to be on the eve of a major and truly historic event. In Europe, the time is ripe for a glorious democratic and non-violent revolution to preserve our national freedoms and restore our sovereignty.

Exactly one year from now, the 27 member states of the European Union will be holding elections for the European Parliament.

People are finally ready all over Europe to rebel in the ballot box.
They reject the transfer union. They no longer want to pay for corrupt states.
They reject the supranational experiment of the European Union.
They are ready to cast their votes for a restoration of national sovereignty.
They are ready to defend their own cultural identity.

All they need is decent political leadership able to lead their nations out of the EU and towards a better future.

America’s first president George Washington has shown that when courageous and democratic politicians are available to lead their country, they can lay the groundwork for a lasting democratic framework that guarantees freedom and prosperity for centuries to come.

My friends, my party in the Netherlands and several other parties in other European countries are preparing themselves for next year’s electoral landslide.

We can feel the heartbeat of the New Patriotism in Europe.
Winter is over.
Spring is coming.
The European Spring is upon us.
And we are getting ready for it.
We are aware of our historic task.

That is why I am especially happy to be here in California today. Because the great inspirer of our upcoming democratic revolution, is one of yours. Your hero, my hero, Ronald Reagan! – who in his presidential Farewell Address said that the achievement he was most proud of in his entire presidency was “the resurgence of national pride.” “The New Patriotism,” as he called it.

Next year’s European elections offer a unique opportunity to liberate the nations of Europe.

Next Spring’s European elections offer a unique chance to correct the fatal error made by previous politicians who sold away their taxpayers’ money and their national sovereignty to Brussels and delivered their countries to the evils of mass immigration and Islamization.

As a European politician, I am fully aware of my duty to grab this chance. The European elections next May must deal a blow to the parties that sold us out to the EU. Not just in the Netherlands. But everywhere in Europe.

That is why I do what is in my power to forge an alliance of democratic parties standing for the restoration of the sovereignty and freedom of their nation. I want to bring these parties together in a common endeavor to defend our identity and our values. I do not know whether I will succeed, but I am trying. It is my conviction that we have to work together. Because we are all in the same boat.

My friends, it is easy to despair. Time is running out for Britain, for France, for Germany, for the Netherlands, for all the other great nations of Europe. The present situation in Europe is bleak. If we do nothing, it will become even bleaker. If we do nothing we will be swept away by economic and demographic disaster.

But it is wrong to despair. The present is bleak, but the future looks bright. Because the future depends on our actions. We are the actors on the stage of history. That, too, is a lesson from Ronald Reagan, who said: “We need to act today, to preserve tomorrow”.
I went to Paris recently to talk to Marine Le Pen and see for myself who she is and what she stands for. She is not her father. She is not anti-Semitic. She cares about France, its identity and its sovereignty.

I went to Prague to talk to President Klaus.
In the coming weeks and months, I will try to see as many patriot leaders in Europe as possible. And I always ask them for their views on Israel. Because Israel is the litmus proof.

The Jewish people did exactly the opposite of what the Europeans did after the Second World War. They drew the right conclusion. They realized that without a nation-state of their own there could be no safety for their people.

Without a nation-state, without self-governance, without self-determination there can be no security for a people nor preservation of its identity. This was the insight that led the Zionists to strive for the re-establishment of the state of Israel. Theodore Herzl said that there had to be a Jewish state in order to ensure – I quote – “a new blossoming of the Jewish spirit.” – end of quote.

Indeed, a soul needs a body. The spirit of a people cannot flourish outside the body of the nation-state. The nation-state is the political body in which we live. We must preserve and cherish it. So that we can pass on to our children our national identity, our democracy, our liberty.

My friends, what we need today is Zionism for the nations of Europe. The Europeans need to follow the example of the Jewish people and re-establish their nation-state.

And that, my dear friends, is why every patriot, apart from being a democrat, by definition also has to be a true friend of Israel. A patriot cannot be anti-Semitic.

My friends, the great Zionist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky said about the Jewish people: “We do not have to apologize for anything. We are a people as all other peoples; we do not have any intentions to be better than the rest. We do not have to account to anybody. We are what we are, we are good for ourselves, we will not change, nor do we want to.” – end of quote.

And so it is. For all the peoples. We do not have to apologize for being good to ourselves. We do not have to change if we do not want to change.

The peoples of Europe resent the permanent alienation of power from their nation-states. They care about their nations because they care about democracy and freedom and the wellbeing of their children. They see their democratic rights and their ancient liberties symbolized in their national flags. They are proud of their flag. And as long as their pride lasts, they will have a future.

Let us emphasize this commitment to the resurgence of our national pride with a symbolic gesture. Let us do so by endorsing the Jewish nation-state and move the embassies of our countries from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Let us fly the flags of all the free and proud nations of the world over embassies in Jerusalem, the only true capital of Israel and the cradle of our Judeo-Christian civilization.

Israel deserves our support. Not only because it is the frontline against the totalitarian threat of Islam, but also because it shows how important it is for a people to have its own homeland.

My friends,
Today, a new threat is confronting us. But history shows that we can withstand it if we stand together.

We need an alliance, not only of patriots in Europe, but also an alliance between America and Europe.

We need the help and support of American patriots such as you. Such an alliance brings out the best in us, and allows us to beat the totalitarian menace.

This was proven by the alliance between Roosevelt and Churchill in the 1940s.
It defeated Nazism.

It was proven by the alliance between Reagan and Thatcher in the 1980s.
It defeated Communism.

Today, Islam is a threat to all of us, to Israel, to Europe, to America. But together we can withstand it.

And we have to stand together or we will be defeated. We have no other choice.

As the great Margaret Thatcher said:
“Defeat – I do not recognize the meaning of the word.”

And neither should we!

Thank you.

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Manaphy

    This is a very important speech and article because what is currently happening in Europe with Islam is going to happen to us if the Rubio-McCain-Schumer Amnesty bill passes. If you don’t think that we are going to get flooded with tens of millions of Muslims then you are sadly mistaken. Only our situation will be much worse considering that we will also have a huge amount Latinos and Blacks in the mix as well.

  • Jefferson

    The irony that an even called “Europe’s Last Stand” took place in Los Angeles, a city that today is less than 30 percent White.

  • David Ashton

    Jews who seek a nation state of their own are as fully entitled to do so as anyone else.
    The problem with post-1947 Israel has been its location and its impact on pre-existent Palestinian Muslims and Christians, and on nearby states. There is no going back for Israelis, but the question now is where Palestinians, Arabs and other Muslims are going, especially after the disturbances in Libya, Syria, Turkey, Iraq and Afghanistan.

    It is important that Jews, philosemities and pro-Zionists should help ensure that Europe, north America and other “western democracies” do not get lumbered with refugee Muslim millions from the Middle East. They should look into the pressures on Australia, Iceland and other countries, and either exonerate Zionists allegedly involved, or stop these developments in their tracks. Jews opposed to multiculturalism must clearly oppose Jews who support it, both privately and publicly.

    As for the EU, we need a union of Europeans – for the defense of the European “race” as well as its inherited culture; this is not only compatible with patriotism and sovereignty, but required by it. Europe is also a source of food and raw materials for all its component nations, especially in the forthcoming crises of supply and Afro-Asian overopulation.

    • Morris LeChat

      sounds like a just and fair solution to me, give the moslems Israel and get them out of Europe

      • rightrightright

        No. The Muslims have messed up every country they rolled over. They shout loudly but that is no reason to give in to them.

        Next on their agenda is the (re)conquest of Spain. I would rather they continued to fixate on Israel. The Israelis can out-think them. Long may they continue to do so.

        • Morris LeChat

          give them israel, don’t let them have anything else.Europe did not crumble when the Crusader Kingdom was lost.

      • David Ashton

        I didn’t say that Israel should be handed over to the Muslims.
        But I do agree that Europe, North America and Australia should not be handed to Muslims either.

    • Kevinberger

      My view on an united Europe is in the line of “You must all hang together, or assuredly you shall all hang separately”; having said that, the problem with the EU is that it is but a relay in the global order that is killing us all – speaking of White Nations, here. The issue is not with an European project, quite the contrary, it’s with which interests the current EU is serving, and how.

      Right now, it’s mostly a technocratic project, aimed at being but a satrapy writ large, either too much, or not enough.
      My uninformed 0.02, FWIW.

      As for Wilders, shorter speech : “yadda yadda Churchill, yadda yadda Europe, yadda yadda the Jews, yadda yadda Israel, yadda yadda Israel yadda yadda Israel, yadda Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel,…”.

  • Wayne

    It wasn’t the “leaders of Europe”, Mr. Wilders, it was America at the barrel of a gun.

  • Kronolog

    The EU in itself is hardly the problem: the real problem is the decadent political class, which in turn is a consequence of the decadent population of the various countries that make up the union. Blaming the union – or, for that matter, the “Jerries” – is simply a way to reflect our own guilt and shame unto others.

  • SoCal LoCal

    I am sorry I missed the speech, as it was nearby.

    Patriotism in Europe was never the cause of misfortune, patriotisms were. Europe has always suffered from disunity and thrived in its absence. The Old World needs a source for greater unity like that once provided by religion. If it had such then both lack of cohesion and cultural ennui could be overcome. Too bad the warrior faith that gave us Charles Martel has degenerated to a lavender mob.

  • The__Bobster

    Even soldiers are no longer safe in Europe’s streets, as the recent horrible events in Britain and France have shown. But neither are Jews. Anti-Semitism has risen, and keeps rising the more Islamic immigration we get.

    I don’t care a whit what happens to the people who bought the muzzies to Europe. Let them stew in their own juice.

  • The__Bobster

    A lot of them were just useful idiots. Fifteen years ago, I had a French co-worker who thought the EU was the solution to all of Europe’s problems and that it would be good for the nation states to disappear.. He also believed that immigrants had the same crime rate as natives.

    I did my best to deprogram him and a few years later, with Paris in flames, he admitted that I was right all along.

  • sbuffalonative

    Following the Second World War, Europe’s leaders mistakenly thought that patriotism was the cause of the war.

    Had Germany been a ethnically pure nation, there would have been no ethnic tensions in the country. One could argue that ‘multiculturalism’ incited some to act who never would have acted out and who only acted out because differences in groups caused conflicts.

  • sbuffalonative

    The EU (like the UN) is the least representative pseudo ‘government’ we have.

    Do we get to vote for our representatives in the UN or the EU? Do they campaign on issues we can debate and discuss? No. These people are nominated by a second party without our input or consent. They have no responsibility to anyone. They are petty dictators and they bypass the will of the people.

    The UN and EU need to be abolished.

  • jackryanvb

    I like Geert Wilders – opposing the worst Muslim immigrant terrorists, sexual groomers, women abusers is simply good propaganda. Virtually all Whites oppose bad Muslims, all except complete idiots, traitors and crazed Jew haters. Tell White Texans that when the Muslims takeover they will not be ably to eat pork BBQ or drink a beer.

    • sbuffalonative

      I like him too. I’m just waiting for ‘the car accident’.


    • Wayne

      I definitely oppose Muslims in the West, Jack. But they did not invite themselves. And exchanging Muslims for Christian Africans and Caribbeans is not one wit better.

      • jackryanvb

        My point is to make bad Muslim immigrants the main propaganda enemy, the reason to strictly control all non White immigration.

        Stop being so honest and fair, go with what works, what reaches the hearts and minds of our people.

        • George Wallace said that you have to put the crumbs down to where the ducks can get to them.

          A certain other well known right wing leader said that you have to have an enemy you can see.

          Muslims are the ideal hook for the average white person in Europe to get into immigration patriotism and in turn racial and ethnic nationalism, because Muslims are by far the most ostentatious-obnoxious-problematic bloc minority in many European countries. There’s something about some nasty non-white Muslim beheading a white man with a meat cleaver that drives the seriousness of the problem home.

          Because of the growing Muslim population in America and their increasing terrorism, from WTC 1 to 9/11 to Fort Hood to the Boston Massacre, they can be used as a similar propaganda hook here, too. However, for some time to come, our own domestic blacks plus the Chicano-Mestizo underclass we’re importing (“We’ll find a place for you,” Rand Paul said AGAIN today), will be better selling points than NW-immigrant Muslims.

          • AutomaticSlim

            W-immigrant Muslims are just as bad as NW Immigrant Muslims.
            The Tsarnaevs were Ws…

          • Marginally, mixed with central Asiatic.

      • DaveMed

        “…But they did not invite themselves…”

        I have no idea what this means. Muslims have been trying to invade Europe for over a millennium.

        See, for instance, Charles Martel.

    • curri

      You’re giving the rank-and-file left way too much credit:


      From the outset, social workers failed to regard the teenage girls being passed around for sex among a gang of Asian men as victims.

      That was despite more than 100 reports of abuse from the victims, health workers and elsewhere linked to men working in taxi and takeaway businesses dating back to 2004, and involving children as young as ten. Instead the girls were treated as their attackers treated them, ‘like prostitutes’.

      Victims as young as ten were seen as ‘making their own choice’ and ‘engaging in consensual sexual activity’.

      In one case a parent making a complaint was told his daughter was ‘hanging out with a bad crowd’.
      As a result of this catastrophic dereliction of duty, information was not systematically passed to the police, and the terrified victims were left at the mercy of a gang of violent sexual predators.

      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209724/Wholl-blame-Not-single-social-worker-sacked-teenage-grooming-scandal.html#ixzz2W2hBWJNA
      Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  • “Let them eat cake”, say the political leaders of Europe. The common serfs are too primitive to manage themselves, and cower in total fear once you call them that “R” word.
    The common European is so narrow minded, that he either embraces diversity without question, or thinks the real enemy is the foreigner himself.

    Even the most right wing nationalists in Europe haven’t grasped the concept of removing politicians who allow foreigners to enter their country.

  • Talltrees

    “Robert Schuman, one of the EU’s founding fathers.”

    “the proponents of the EU keep pretending that without the EU, the Germans, the French, the British, the Dutch and the other nations of Europe would go to war again.” Uh oh! Another holocaust.

    Shuman – German found frequently among the Pennsylvania Dutch.
    Schuman – German Jewish

    Is Geert Wilders a bit naive?

  • NeanderthalDNA

    “As I tell my audience whenever and wherever I speak in Germany, it was not German patriotism that started the Second World War; it was Hitler’s vicious totalitarian ideology of Nazism.”

    Totalitarian, pseudo-scientific, histrionic, psycopathic, hypocritical…probably more responsible for misguided White guilt than any other individual ever. Ultimately incompetent. Second greatest mass murderer of White people ever, behind Uncle Joe…

    Good to hate them both, not to score points with the antifa slimeballs, but because they rank among the top betrayers of their race, each for his own abominable reasons. Big moustache and little moustache.

    Well that was then and this is now. Time for Whites to stop hating ourselves and feeling guilty to darkies because of two slimeballs who mass murdered a bunch of WHITE people. Amazing, but times are changing. Old die out of and young are born into…

  • anton drexler

    “Poll after poll reveals that Europeans do not want their democracies to be subverted.” Amen, Geert, though to Hell with democracy if it destroys our people. The congenital pessimists on the race realist-right forget the degree to which ordinary, hard-working European and Euro-American people are resistant to omnipresent
    Leftist and Judaic propaganda. The truth about race is so obvious that only Ivy League elitist, with their intellectual Jew-Jitsu, can deny it. White people are terrified into silence by our current masters, but in silence, a revolution is growing. Do not give in to the Marxist myths that great men do not exist. One great man supported by our people can topple the tyrannous beast of egalitarianism and multiculturalism.

  • Talltrees

    For those of you who didn’t see this and those who did, it’s worth seeing again.


  • Talltrees

    There’s one bright spot. The Irish, Canadians, and Polish still want to come here. They haven’t been allowed. That might change.


    • AutomaticSlim

      Are you sure the Irish, Canadians, and Polish don’t want to send their Africans here? Just being a citizen of a first world country should not be enough.

      The requirement should be that they are members of the historical ethnic group of that country. Wouldn’t want Nigerians from London coming here as Englishmen.

      • Talltrees

        Wouldn’t that be horrible? It would be a good way for these countries to get rid of their non-Whites and our stupid legislators would fall for it.

        But, doesn’t seem to be the case. The White Irish want to come as guest workers. Polish as tourists without VISAs, and Canadians extended stays.

        As for the Irish, it means less non-Whites as guest workers, I hope.

        “An Irish-American group, working with the Irish Embassy, hired former Representative Bruce Morrison, Democrat of Connecticut, to help push its cause, arguing that changes in immigration law decades ago created an unfair barrier to citizens of Ireland in gaining access to the United States.”


        Even the Irish see that our 1965 Immigration law is unfair to Europeans.

        We need to get other European groups to do this. There’s German American National Congress (DANK), Swiss American Club, National Italian American Foundation (NIAF), Danish American Heritage Society, French American Foundation, and so on. Couldn’t find a British organization?????

        • gemjunior

          Even the Irish see that our 1965 Immigration law is unfair to Europeans.
          And the great irony is of course that these stupid Irish think the Kennedy’s were a good representation of them. Drink-swilling, poxy hypocrites whose money was made illegally. Ted Kennedy – enough said. The ones that are alive today (thank God there aren’t many) should hang their heads in shame or catch a bullet and end their harmful-to-everybody-else little ‘dynasty’….

  • Romulus

    Oooh! A rousing emotionalist speech meant to awaken europe from their decades lond stupor of sexual depravity,kumbaya, drug use, and partying. I could’ve done without the slobbering over the tribe. The historic patriot europeans are caught in the middle between the tribe and their cousins,who of cousre share A common ancestry. Jeez, really? Who the heck does wilders think is responsible for the rise of the commie/ socialist, humanist,sexual and social revolution in america and europe. Pleeeeease! was he in a coma for the last 8 decades. My conclusion is that by assuming the moral high ground by equating European national sovereignty to Israel quest for the same, will lesson the glow of impropriety. For Europes sake, they better get their act together. Ironic that America is headed down the same path that Europe is now trying to get away from.

  • White Mom in WDC

    Exactly. Spread the love for other whites. I am so over diversity. Familiarity breeds contempt. I liked seeing them on TV here and there, but not right next to me

  • White Mom in WDC

    I really have begun to despise the third world. Those people will never change. I remember in 1985 there was the song ‘Feed the World’. Why? The title should have been ‘Wear a Condom’. Third worlders are so narcissistic. They pop out ten kids without blinking an eye and then wonder why they are poor. Duh? White people who make efforts to procreate responsibly are indentured servants who work to pay for Mohammed’s brood.

    Sorry, not on my dime Abu Mohammed Turd.

  • Sick of it

    Read the New World Order by H.G. Wells. In this book, published in 1940, Wells called for an end to national sovereignty as one of the major forces of destruction in the world. He called for collectivization worldwide. This has been planned for a long time, with the ultimate purpose of ushering in a one world government.

    • rightrightright

      HG Wells was a Fabian, as is David Cameron. The symbol of the Fabians is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, literally! Their purpose is to achieve radical change incrementally so that the populace doesn’t notice what is happening.

      • Sick of it

        They’re pushing things so fast now that it should be obvious even to the average man. Personally, I’m not a fan of the Fenian socialists either…they claimed to support the people of Ireland against the British Empire while essentially burying them in European socialism. Having black Africans come to Ireland and marry Irish girls doesn’t seem like a very Irish thing to do.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    I refuse to not hate White traitors and dangerous fools.

    • Jotun Hunter

      you loathe hitler for mass murder – I’m afraid as our days darken the willingness to murder may well wind up on the menu. And I wouldn’t label him incompetent, after somewhat single handedly taking on the entire world. What he is in the modern context is what the celebs call a ‘PR nightmare’.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        “What he is in the modern context is what the celebs call a ‘PR nightmare’.”

        Ha ha! Indeed, to some extent I heartily agree, considering nothing more than the body count of Caucasians compared to big moustache.

        Hitler was eminently competent at gaining and wielding power, at the political side of things but it all came to naught when he started interfering with his best generals. Millions of highly trained, well equipped German soldiers were wasted because of that man’s hubris and military incompetence. Furthermore I might argue that he was ignorant of some of the most basics of grand strategy that any veteran player of Risk, or Diplomacy should know – got too big too soon, took on too many enemies at once.

        But yeah, according to numbers, history has been a tad unfair by placing him after Stalin on the “big White bugaboo list”. Not fair! what does a guy have to do to win this game, eh? commit 10 times as many murders rather than 3 or 4 times as many? (6 million est – little moustache, 20 million est – big moustache).

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Furthermore Hitler misdiagnosed the greatest threat to progress and Western civilization when he singled out the Jews. SubSaharan Africa and her children have always been the White Man’s suicidally foolish death wish and doom. The place should have been quarantined a century ago and and preserved in its savage, pristine, natural state without our foolish meddling. Hitler actually allowed his Jew hatred to influence him to admire the highly Africanized religion of Islam and it’s Africanized followers.

          Sounds like a dangerous ignoramus to me.

  • AllSeeingEyeSpy

    “without a nation-state of their own there could be no safety for their people”

    Whites in North America are the new jews. In the USA anyway, all problems in the world, past, present and future, are seen as caused by white men. Whites will continue to be the new jews when we form our own new independant country.

  • It’s unnatural for people who speak different languages to be forced together. That is the LAST WORD on this topic!

  • Morris LeChat

    Europe had an inferiority complex . It saw the US, as a large country, with a powerful economy and it was made up of people from all over Europe. They thought they could just erase their nationalities and be like the US. They were wrong. First of all, Europeans that came to the US assimilated into a dominant English speaking, American culture. Erasing national borders did not erase nationalities, nor did it create one universal culture with one first language. Secondly, the nations of Europe had all developed as separate economic entities while the US started out as one entity that expanded. To take 26 separate economies and merge them into one giant one was sure to have profound, devastating effects everywhere. It was always sure to do a great deal of local damage while promising an eventual greater good. How can a greater good be created out of 26 economic disasters though? What they wanted to create required a starting point that was a blank slate. They found out that that would mean creating a blank slate, destroying every country in Europe, like bombing a city to total ruing in order to change the street pattern.

  • Lop_Eared_Galoot

    One of the reasons Europe is the way it is is because they think that City States (as the feudal inheritance of pre-gunpowder, pre-steam, pre-telecoms limits of control _through language and taxable currencies_) are the same as Nation States.

    They aren’t and the U.S. treating each of these mini-countries as though they were our equals because they were the point of departure which our culture _ran away from_ has furthered that spoiled view of themselves as being more than very minor powers.

    Hitler, for all he was a fool with way too many inherited 19th century understandings of cultural as genetic proofs of our people’s ‘superiority’, at least understood that Europe could not stand as a grouping of mini-states whose /diversity/ of selfish local interests kept them firmly second rankers in a coming industrial competitive age of massive resource requirements that could only be controlled by those who could afford to make equally large investments in buying them through trade or militarily domination.

    That is why he wanted Africa and Russia. That is why he was /successful/ in dominating a divided Europe that had become lackadaisical in their nationalist belief in an ability to defend themselves against anyone ‘their size or smaller’.

    By attacking Europe’s critical transport, electrical generation and rectification infrastructure and further gutting their access to externally imported industrial resources (hello Sweden, Switzerland) through credit banking as much as physical embargo, WWII could have been won in months rather than years. All without gutting the population as industrial heart of Europe. EVERYONE who has studied WWII history sees it for what it is: an attempt to maximize cultural damage through prolonged meatgrinder attrition.

    Don’t believe me? Ask why the French penetration of the West German border regions near the Ruhr were stopped before they went 60km while the Germans were ‘busy in Poland’. Ask why, when we had total penetration of the German comms network and could SEE Citadel coming as the German stipping of the Western Front for Kursk yet instead of using the opportunity to gain a foothold in France against a non-existent ‘Atlantik Wall’ chose to march up a mountain range called Italy and stop at the foot of a bigger mountain range called The Alps.

    And the reason was that a Europe that could no longer feed itself could not hold onto it’s foreign colonial wealth base and so would be subject to long term dependence upon U.S. ‘Marshall Plan’ assistance for both rebuilding and physical protection as -we- did the globetrotter trick of international capitalist corporatism.

    While it is true that only nations (as blood lines willing to interbreed and thus reallocate pie slices of the good life) can make a go of nation-statehood, the underlying reason for this action is one of scalar economics, not supranationalism, patriotism or the infringement upon state-rights. If Europe wants to return to a City State level of purchasing power as isolated economies, they should have their stupidity as clannish pride pointed out to them and then be shooed on their merry way to eternal second-world status REALIZING that the Asians will supplant the Americans as we supplanted Europe on the global resource market stage and so they will in fact be -third rate- powers. Enjoy your currency’s power then my friends.

    The bitter irony here and the one leg that Europe has to stand on in terms of a betrayal of trust is that inviting in the unwashed masses of another ‘nations’ (from Latin ‘Nascere’: to be born, it has nothing to do with geographical state boundaries so much as the environmental separation of genelines which arise within them) population.

    Especially one as generally stupid and incorrigibly violent as that of the Middle East.

    You cannot improve genes by social means, certainly not in a useful period of political experimentalism. The reason why people have such strong reactions to differences in skin color and general appearance is that these ‘outsider’ indicators are the key means for a pre-DNA aware society to defend it’s ever-downselect optimizing gene pool from contamination by the very kinds of outsider driven “We want some of that!” envy as would destroy the speciation optimizations altogether.

    This is inherent to a scientific understanding of the culturation base that is Islam. Look at Mohammed and SEE the Middle East. As a land where an itinerant preacher could not find an audience with the teachings of Christianity as a wealth-sharing, socialistic classism, approach to living. But a bandit leader who advocated that all who were on his side had the right to rob anyone who wasn’t. In a resource impoverished landscape of sun and sand, this is license to ‘make wealth’. And 100 years of genocidal warfare later, what is now Saudi Arabia didn’t have a single Jewish or Christian gullible-idiot community left in it. More importantly, _at a Genetic level_ Mohammed executed what is called a ‘Sweep’ which is to say socially advantaging a single genetic variant (that of immediate and unrelenting violence for power) into group Selection.

    And the rest, as they say, is history. From India to Spain across nearly a Millennia of time, stupid thuggery outran intelligent design in -preventing- the advance of higher civilization.

    I mentioned that this was Ironic. And here is why. Hitler saw this. He saw it as the end of the European nation as a collective of white genes with conceptual brilliance as their social Selector. And using means no different if rather more technologically advanced than Andrew Jackson’s Trail Of Tears drive of violent aboriginal primitives into exile, he tried to create a Nation State of Europe. Whose combined industrial and breadbasket (Ukraine) conditions would match that of the United States as a free standing country whose gravitasse would subsequently let it exist, free from threats, as an equal -buyer- on the world resource market.

    And the EU, through it’s fear of being labeled Nazi has betrayed the NATION of Europe as peaceable, vulnerable, whites. Into a condition where, the only way to cleanse the body of Europe of the violent contagion that is Islam is to allow and endorse, across the breadth of the Continent EXACTLY the same techniques as Americans used against Indians and Hilter used against his Untermenchen Slavs and Jews. To force the exile of these unwanted non-national euro transplants back to their racial homelands.

    In this, it is likely unwise to use the words ‘European Spring’ in reference to what will be a long dark night of European culturally necessary brutalism. Because you see, what happened in the Mediterranean had nothing to do with making the Arabs free. And everything to do with undermining the states surrounding Israel as a functional Arab National Coallition. The Arab Spring was the breaking of their unified identity as threats to the one Mediterranean power that the U.S. sponsors. A European Spring must be the restitution of national (as genetic) predominance over Europe -whether the U.S. approves or not-.

    That Europeans are still so afraid of ‘the rumor of Hitler’ as ethno genocide as to almost certainly fail in this undertaking is a given for why their failed spring will turn into a year of no summer.

    Geert Wilders is foolishly using socially manipulative ‘rally to me, to me!’ imagery he doesn’t understand the necessary progression from as a continuation of crusade against the demographic-change threat to European genes that underlies the convenient markers of low social index, high violence, insular separatism that SWA immigration provides.

    And whites will vanish as a culturally and racially distinct people, in Europe as the globe, because of his careful-PC mistaken beliefs are those by which we think racially what we would never dare to speak or act upon. In our own interests as a born nation.

    • Morris LeChat

      what a load of BS

  • Morris LeChat
  • MBlanc46

    “You cannot have democratic accountability in anything bigger than a nation state.”

    I’d say, “anything bigger than a small city”. That might even be too big.

    • Ella

      Democracy would work great in New Hampshire or Norway being more homogenous, small communities. They have a common culture and history so it creates more care and compassion for others.

      • MBlanc46

        It’s hard to engage in a common enterprise, which is what democracy/self-government is, unless there is some sense of common identity.

        • Morris LeChat

          As common identity fades away in this country, I feel less motivation to obey laws, work, pay taxes etc. Let’s face it, when one sees the nation as an extension of one’s family, then one is emotionally invested in it. When it is an alien or hostile entity, one has motivation only to do harm to it, or leech off of it.

          • MBlanc46

            You and a lot of others. As more and more people circle the wagons around themselves, community dissolves.

  • Political parties in Europe also have a lot more control over who does and does not get to be part of the party than American parties. Racial-ethnic nationalists who try to “work within” the lamestream conservative parties are soon made and kicked out. Meanwhile, Jesse Jackson could run for office as a Republican, and if he wins the nomination and then the election, there’s nothing any group of party managers can do about it.

  • Ella

    I think having two layers of govt. must be a political nightmare for the EU “citizens” along with crippling taxes. I think America may be further down the path of self-destruction than Europe for two reasons: 1. our demographics and 2. cost of military / welfare budgets. I said enough.

  • AllSeeingEyeSpy

    Wilder’s makes a good argument, and he’s doing more than any of us are doing but he needs to recognize that the only political, economic or social arguments that are relevant are racial. It should be about race, first. That’s how all the races that aren’t white see it, and how they continue to be encouraged to see it. They win nobel prizes for it.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    Hitler considered most NW Europeans to be Aryans and was greatly disappointed (and prophetically distressed) when Britain refused to bow out and come to an understanding.

    The self serving hypocrisy and pseudo-scientific rational for his policies in E. Europe and Russia, however, evince precisely the weakness of his intellect, vision, and character that condemns him even more than his treatment of the Jews, logically speaking. Croats (SLAVS) OK…descendants of Goths or something…Poles (SLAVS) subhuman AND occupants of primo real estate, like the Russians…yet in both Poland and occupied USSR, racial hygiene officials spent much time and effort using highly questionable “science” to determine who was Aryan enough to keep, who was not (those not being used as slaves).

    Certainly Stalin had a higher body count in his (longer) career and I would argue that in terms of moral depravity was worse. I think that beyond the specifics of wartime alliances and results, Hitler (the loser, certainly) is rated higher on the evil whitey scale because he arose in Germany, arguably the most accomplished and civilized segment of an accomplished and civilized subregion (Western Europe, Europe in general).

    As Jotun Hunter pointed out above, Hitler was a PR nightmare compared to Stalin with his fashionable socialism. The body count was not the only competition in this pageant of shame…

  • Fr. John+

    Meh. It’s a lot of ‘blah-blah,’ and not much more.

    When Wilders says that “German Fascism wasn’t to blame for WWII,” he conveniently forgets to blame the British Crown, and the French envy, in imposing the horrendous ‘reparations’ after WWI, that led to Weimar, that led to Hitler. He says ‘anti-semitism’ is on the rise, when he conveniently forgets to mention that Israeli academics now show there is no true ‘Judea-ness’ is any Jew living, via DNA analysis, cointinuing to ‘guilt trip’ Christendom, thereby. He says France has ‘no-go zones’ where Muslims reside, without pointing out that the nihilism of Camus and J-P Sartre only laid to rest the remnant Catholicism of a country whose ‘Reign of Terror’ is so well chronicled by Burke, that there was no ‘counteractive’ faith that once stopped Islam at the Battle of Tours!

    WIlders forgets to mention the ‘international bankers’ who lay behind the Euro, while Rothschild, Soros, and others of that tribe continue their laundering, unabated.

    If Wilders was a little more truthful, and a little less a liar, I might believe him. In this, he reminds me of Obama, at each and every campaign promise. Somehow, all this ‘hope and change’ don’t register with me, anymore… and I can’t figure out why…

  • WR_the_realist

    Unfortunately our own federal government is now very much like the EU. It too refuses to control our borders. We do get to elect our politicians, but it’s as fake as professional wrestling.

  • foundingstockcracker

    Undeniable, and was there a group that pressed for multicult. and degeneration? No wonder Wilders hates Nat. Soc. so.

  • Paleoconn

    He lost me with his multiple Judeo-Christian and Israal references. Does he not know or does he disingenuously ignores that what passes as patriotism in Israel is racism in White countries? He also seems to have a man-crush on our Ronny, but isn’t Ronny the guy who gave us amnesty in ’86?