Are We Equal?

Walter E. Williams, Creators, March 25, 2013

Are women equal to men? Are Jews equal to gentiles? Are blacks equal to Italians, Irish, Polish and other white people? The answer is probably a big fat no, and the pretense or assumption that we are equal—or should be equal—is foolhardy and creates mischief. Let’s look at it.

Male geniuses outnumber female geniuses 7-to-1. Female intelligence is packed much closer to the middle of the bell curve, whereas men’s intelligence has far greater variability. That means that though there are many more male geniuses, there are also many more male idiots. The latter might partially explain why more men are in jail than women.

Watch any Saturday afternoon college basketball game and ask yourself the question fixated in the minds of liberals everywhere: “Does this look like America?” Among the 10 players on the court, at best there might be two white players. {snip} Professional football isn’t much better, with blacks being 65 percent. In both sports, blacks are among the highest-paid players and have the highest number of awards for excellence. Blacks who trace their ancestry to West Africa, including black Americans, hold more than 95 percent of the top times in sprinting.

{snip}

A more emotionally charged question is whether we have equal intelligence.

Take Jews, for example. They are only 3 percent of the U.S. population. Half-baked theories of racial proportionality would predict that 3 percent of U.S. Nobel laureates are Jews, but that’s way off the mark. Jews constitute a whopping 39 percent of American Nobel Prize winners. At the international level, the disparity is worse. Jews are not even 1 percent of the world’s population, but they constitute 20 percent of the world’s Nobel Prize winners.

There are many other inequalities and disproportionalities. Asian-Americans routinely score the highest on the math portion of the SAT, whereas blacks score the lowest. {snip} Pima Indians of Arizona have the world’s highest known diabetes rates. Prostate cancer is nearly twice as common among black men as white men. Cervical cancer rates are five times higher among Vietnamese women in the U.S. than among white women.

Soft-minded and sloppy-thinking academics, lawyers and judges harbor the silly notion that but for the fact of discrimination, we’d be proportionately distributed by race across incomes, education, occupations and other outcomes. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere, at any time, that proportionality is the norm anywhere on earth; however, much of our thinking, many of our laws and much of our public policy are based upon proportionality’s being the norm. {snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • a multiracial individual

    Williams is a realist. He knows who Murray, Jensen, Rushton, etc. are. Hell, he might even read Amren! Hilarious.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      He knows of AR and the NCF and Jared Taylor. He is the only person who has ever hosted the Rush Limbaugh show to have mentioned all three by name behind the “golden microphone.”

    • SargeInCharge

      Williams is indeed a realist. He’s also incredibly honest and points out the racial double standard against whites. I’ve posted a Williams article here before (linked) where he discusses how vast black-on-white crime is in comparison to the reverse, and he reams out the media for covering-up black on white crime.

      http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/williams081899.asp

      • pcmustgo

        Wonder if he has a white wife

      • NeanderthalDNA

        I have ZERO problems with blacks like him. Admire his dedication to a truth that must be rough for an outlier. Hail Ruckus.

        • a multiracial individual

          It takes much courage and honesty to be a NAM realist.

  • [Guest]

    The concluding words are the kicker: “Maybe this vision is held because people believe that equality in fact is necessary for equality before the law. But the only requirement for equality before the law is that one is a human being.”

    So there are two different ways in which we can speak of equality. In the first sense, it’s absent and cannot be manufactured. Inequality is natural and unchangeable, and to pretend otherwise is foolish. In the second sense, it’s a worthwhile goal.

    Nowadays, in an attempt to achieve the impossible (the first form of equality), we’re wildly distorting the second form through quotas, set-asides, diversity goals, political correctness, and so on, ad nauseam.

    I think that’s just about where things stand.

  • MikeS

    Are we equal? Reality and common sense say – No, not even close.

  • Funruffian

    We can all collectively agree that Blacks rank the lowest on the Bell curve of Intelligence. But as far as identifying which group is the most intelligent gets very fuzzy. As far as Nobel Laureate Jews I would be tempted to believe that is caused by their wielding power in politics. Of course it takes intelligence to achieve such a status, but there are other social and political variables that contribute to them winning so much in proportion to their population.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

      I’m going to have to jump in here and say I don’t agree with the jewish Nobel nonsense. Saying a lot of jews win Nobel prizes is akin to saying that a lot of jews win Academy awards. Lots of jewish Oscar winners. The reason for that is because they hand them out to their own kind. I have no problem with that, since each tribe should take care of its own members. I care about mine. You guys can all have awards. Here, have an award–

      http://www.trophies2go.com/images/productimages/Perpetual-Fantasy-Gold-Tone-Loving-Cup.jpg

      • Paleoconn

        Agreed

      • Barrack Osama

        It’s going up on my mantelpiece.

      • David Ashton

        Certainly true of the Hollywood Bagelfest. Look how the brilliant, beautiful and exceptionally hardworking British actress Naomi Watts has been shut out continuously for years.

      • Runciman

        Jews do not award the Nobel prizes, Swedes do. Ashkenazi Jews are extremely intelligent, and this is reflected in psychometric testing and by the fact they succeed in every endeavor they undertake. They came to the United States poor – not rich, uneducated, not educated, yiddish speaking not english speaking. And yet within a generation, they were amazingly successful not in ‘awards”, which are meaningless, but in life. Ashkenazi Jews are the only immigrant group in US history to master English in the immigrant generation, not the first born generation. Ashkenazi Jews are the only example on earth of a people re-creating a spoken language out of a dead but written language – Hebrew. Imagine if a group anywhere on earth decided to make Latin a spoken language again of a whole nation. This is an insanely difficult task – before it was done it would have been considered impossible. There is a reason for all of this and it has nothing to do with political power. It has to do with intelligence and drive.

        • Jim Danforth

          Not quite true. Several Nobel judges have remarked on the incredible pressure from Jewish groups, and in the last decade or so, Asian groups, to award prizes to individuals. Go ahead and google it. Some of the judges have quit because of this. I mention this partly because I watched two Jewish researchers blatantly steal the work of a non-Jewish researcher at UCLA (medical research). Everyone knew they did it, and the Jews themselves seemed to revel in it. It was disgusting.

    • WorthPointingOut

      It’s not really politics. If you keep up with science or study it, or if you have a career in the field, then you know that when it was given (specifically in medicine, physics, and chemistry) it was deserved. Whether the founding of the chemical industry (Adolf von Bäyer), making acrylic (Otto Wallach) or discovering nerves send chemical-electrical signals to communicate (Otto Loewi)… But those are just trivial.
      The real picture emerges when we consider some of the most important discoveries of the 20th century. Relativity (which GPS would not be accurate without it because Einstein postulated that there would be a gravitational redshift, therefore satellites account for Earth’s gravity affecting spacetime–just one thing out of his illustrious career), penicillin (Ernst Chain) possibly the most significant advancement for medicine. And more important in medicine was Paul Ehrlich, responsible for understanding immunity, diseases, and how to treat them in the first place. And thusly, the first antibacterial.

      And Rosalind Franklin for insights into DNA and how it is responsible for what we find it does. And on a similar note, André Michel Lwoff, Francois Jacob, Arthur Kornberg, etc. for their work in genetics.
      Even if we pretended it was all politics, then we would have to suppose that these people didn’t possess merit of their own. Or that Jews are not also overrepresented as doctors, surgeons, dentists, optometrists, engineers, chemical scientists… Useful jobs that do not warrant a Nobel prize, but at the same time do require intelligence and competence. Of course, due to over representation, as many are quick to point out, Jews are also overrepresented in some negative aspects of economics and banking. Which is just something emergent of general ability. And of course this shouldn’t make us forget that there are good and bad everywhere. Haym Solomon, member of the New York branch of the Sons of Liberty, financed the colonies against the British and is responsible for most of the funding America received in her split–negotiating weapons to colonists from France and Holland. His interest rates were below the market standard, and he never wanted repayment–due to his ardent patriotism. Great/influential American right there.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

        You can’t deny that there have been jews in history who have been the salt of the Earth. I’m a Christian, and I worship a Jew, who happens to be Jesus. I am a big fan of Him. I know that many White nationalists try to say that Jesus wasn’t/isn’t a Jew, but that is preposterous. Jesus was circumsized in the Temple on the 8th day by Hebrew parents. The Apostle Paul, another Jew, was so respected by God that he was allowed to write ONE HALF of the Bible. Amazing fellow. I wish I was a tenth the man he was.

        But, and this is a big but, those Jews of ancient times– where are they hiding? What we have in this country, what we have to deal with on a daily basis worldwide are the godless jews. The synagogue.

        http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-06-24-graham-tapes_N.htm
        My quarrel is with them.

        • WorthPointingOut

          True on Jesus. The Last Supper was Passover. And Jesus was circumcised. Jews in the New Testament never thought or considered that Jesus was a Gentile. It didn’t factor into their reasoning. Among Christ’s opponents, this was not even suggested as a way to discredit him. It says something that among even those who may not have believed

          Good points. I think you’ll find there are differences between Israelis and liberal Jews in America though. And also that the negative ones are the most vocal and present in our public consciousness. We don’t often hear about the Jewish doctors, scientists, soldiers/tacticians that continually make positive differences every day. We hear more about troubles on Wall Street, and degeneration in media is ever-present in front of us (which are arguably a minority of Jews. Your typical Jewish service will have more doctors and hardworking people in it than people who run media conglomerates).

          God says that the path to goodness is not paid in fame and notoriety though. Goodness is pursued for its own sake.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            I agree with you that we hear about the ones who have negative influence, but my point being that their influence is disproportionate to their numbers. To be perfectly honest, when I was younger, I loved the Jews. I really did. But after a lifetime of witnessing what the bad ones can do, I am no longer their biggest cheerleader. It’s amazing how many times I’ll hear about a bad policy, a crooked law, a criminal who scams millions or billions, and why does it have to be a Cohen, a Kohanim behind it? Porn, the evil Fed, politics, Hollywood, media– for me to point out the big MSM networks are jewish-controlled shouldn’t be news. A lot of men wearing turbans own 7-11’s and a lot of blacks play basketball, too.
            I’ll put it this way, let’s say you have a box of candy, and the first few pieces are delicious, but let’s say you have a chance, 1-in-10, to pick up a chocolate with pus in it, after a while– you just sit the box down and walk away.

          • WorthPointingOut

            Good points, and certainly a sobering analogy. What I can say is that sometimes I wonder if we shouldn’t redefine some aspects of what it means to be a Jew. At least when we are distinguishing good Jews from bad Jews. How God-fearing or moral are these pornographers and fed bankers? Wouldn’t really surprise me if they were outright Atheists. Can we say they are still Jews from an ethnic standpoint? Perhaps. Does that make them good Jews? Not technically, or at least not according to Judaism.
            Einstein believed in God (http://www.christianpost.com/news/book-confirms-einstein-s-belief-in-god-26742/), and he has described everything that happens in the entire universe short of past the event horizon of a black hole. Even Niels Bohr, the second greatest influence on Quantum Physics and Physics, still was morally Jewish even if an Atheist. We find that the “bad” kind of Jews are the ones that abandon this theosophy completely. Such as Karl Marx, who actually mocked Jews on many occasions.
            As a Christian I personally believe that we wouldn’t be dreadfully better without Christ. Most Jewish crime pales in comparison to the absolute corruption of Rome (also multicultural). Mercantile usury and pornographic hedonism would be tame in pre-Christian Rome. The Jewish matter seems to be a very complicated one. I strongly recommend you read this though, it has helped me consider this topic in better light: http://www.biblebelievers.com/misc_periodical_articles/mbi_001.html

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            You are a fine man, to be sure. take care.

          • brengunn

            but let’s say you have a chance, 1-in-10, to pick up a chocolate with
            pus in it, after a while– you just sit the box down and walk away.

            That analogy works for every racial group, the only difference being that when you judge a member of your own group, you treat them as an individual rather than an outsider who is part of a larger group.

            That being the case, you have to judge other groups on how many bad eggs there are and weigh it against the good eggs. As much as I disagree with Israeli policy in Palestine and the power of the Jewish lobbies in the West, on the whole, the Jews are a great people.

          • Morris LeChat

            The thing is that intelligence is not the same thing as wisdom. I would say that what excess intelligence they have is rather offset by a lack of wisdom. To many jews, they don’t even understand that statement because they do not have any wisdom at all. This is why they pursue such insane political agendas that in the end always backfire on them. Their history is cyclical this way. Jewish defeat, jewish success, jewish pursuit of certain absolutely insane agendas, and catastrophic jewish defeat again. Look at the current state of affairs of Israel. It’s domestic and foreign policy is suicidal at times.

          • David Ashton

            The Fourth Gospel has a different take on the Jewishness of Jesus, which is why some critics consider it antisemitic and “therefore” untrue. The earliest Jewish sources regarded him as a mamzer.

        • JohnEngelman

          Jews worship God in their synagogues.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            Hi John, thanks for the thumbs down. FYI No one was harder on the Jews than Jesus Himself. He called them snakes, murderers, vipers and the Children of Satan. He said their Father was the devil. Not all Jews, just the ones who HOUNDED HIM TIL DEATH. They didn’t go away, John. We still have to deal with that group today. They run the porn industry, confiscate our wealth, hypnotize the masses with their “entertainment,” and on and on. The Synagogue of Satan. I didn’t make that term up myself.

          • JohnEngelman

            Christianity began as a Jewish sect. Jesus’ arguments were with scribes and Pharisees not Jews.

            In Romans 10:12 St. Paul wrote, “For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.”

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            That’s so funny, it’s not even worth a reply. But I am a generous man. The men told Jesus their Father was Abraham, and He said their father was the devil. They were jews. To be specific, John, they were the jews who were trying to kill Him. The verse you mention above deals with God-fearing, Christian Jews. Notice these jews in the verse you chose “call upon Him” (The name of Jesus.)
            What you refuse to accept is that jews can be wonderful, but also satanic. They can bless, and they can be a curse. You don’t recognize the pain they have brought to so many over history? During the Holocaust did God punish them for no reason? Why was their Temple destroyed? Why were they scattered? Because they were “superior?” Will the Antichrist chew them up and spit them out in the (near) future because they are heading in the right direction?

          • Funruffian

            Christianity was grafted into Judaism. Unfortunately, for the Christians, the two were co-dependant on eachother. Neither of them could exist or be validated without acknowledging the history of the other.

          • JohnEngelman

            Why is that unfortunate for the Christians?

          • Funruffian

            Because Christians have to rely on the legacy of Judaism in order to validate Christianity. I myself would rather be independant of Jewish history, but in order to be a purist Christian, i must accept that legacy.
            You see, as Christians, we believe our gifts are in heaven. Material possessions are merely temporary and will never grant us salvation. Orthodox Jews don’t ascribe to a heaven or an afterlife. They beleive in perpetuating the DNA of jews on earth. And since they don’t belive in a heaven, where is the incentive to want to be a person of goodwill and spirituality?

          • PesachPatriot

            I’m not super religious but I have been friendly with some very orthodox people…concepts of heaven and hell do exist in orthodox judaism and those places are known as gan eden and sheol respectively….the majority of the old testament and the talmud texts deal with commandments and prohibitions on earth, not the afterlife….the heaven concept is almost the same as the christian one, eternal glory in the presence of the divine….the hell concept is a little different though in that hell isn’t seen as a permanent place of torment , but atonement for misdeeds committed on earth….I am personally pretty agnostic when it comes to religion….no one has ever come back and told everyone else which religion was correct and what happens after death….none of us, even the biggest religious fanatics really knows what happens after we take our final dirt nap.

          • Morris LeChat

            Well, they thought Rabbi Nachman would, but he dissappointed them

          • David Ashton

            See also I Thessalonians 2:14-16 (an earlier document).
            Many Jews see a difference between themselves and others.

          • josh

            Jews are monsters:if you consider white peoples lives to be worth anything. Odf course if you DON”T then YOU rae the monster.

          • JohnEngelman

            First of all the Ashkenazim are Caucasians. Second, they do not threaten the lives of white Gentiles.

          • cecilhenry

            If you believe these things you are either very naive, or very Jewish.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am most definitely a Judeophile.

            If I am naive, what don’t I know? I do not pretend to know everything, but I think I am fairly well informed.

          • David Ashton

            Too many prominent Jews noticeably welcome immigration and oppose white “nativism”. This is what you do not know. Their reasons are explicable, but equally the facts are undeniable.

          • JohnEngelman

            You and others here seem to assume that all Jews are leftists and that all leftists favor unlimited immigration to the United States.

            Paul Krugman is my favorite columnist. He teaches economics at Princeton. He won the Nobel Prize for economics in 2008. He is also Jewish. This is what he wrote about immigration: “Democrats are torn individually (a state I share). On one side, they favor helping those in need, which inclines them to look sympathetically on immigrants; plus they’re relatively open to a multicultural, multiracial society. I know that when I look at today’s Mexicans and Central Americans, they seem to me fundamentally the same as my grandparents seeking a better life in America.

            “On the other side, however, open immigration can’t coexist with a strong social safety net; if you’re going to assure health care and a decent income to everyone, you can’t make that offer global.”
            http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/the-curious-politics-of-immigration/

          • JohnEngelman

            While I support more restrictions on immigration than currently exist, I do not think that those who favor fewer restrictions are less moral than I am. I think that decent people are on both sides of this issue.

            Nevertheless, I am sympathetic to those who are sympathetic to poor immigrants. I am not sympathetic to Republican businessmen who favor more immigration so that they can become richer by reducing wages and raising prices.

            I am also not sympathetic to those who are motivated by hostility toward anyone who is not a white Gentile of European ancestry. Good people and bad people are on both sides of the immigration issue.

            The tragic history of the Jews has probably taught them that they are safer in a multi racial and multi ethnic society.

          • Sal

            Except for their endless pushing of insane immigration policies. Nearly every Jewish figure in the media, online or in office stands on the wrong side of this issue. So you’re wrong.

          • Morris LeChat

            So does the Catholic church and so do the Evangelical Christians.

          • Morris LeChat

            Yes, they are caucasians, some are indistinguishable form the “aryan” ideal, and since the mixed marriage rate for jews is 70% that is becoming more common every day. And yes, they are not a threat to the lives of gentiles, but the political agendas they pursue are a threat to themselves and gentiles. Unlike others, I do not attribute this to malice.They are smart, but not wise.

          • Morris LeChat
          • a multiracial individual

            You have met Ashkenazis that actually believe in God? I am a bit shocked.

          • David Ashton

            We never guessed – until you enlightened us all, we supposed they just went there each Saturday to play cards or have Christian babies for lunch.

          • Morris LeChat

            The synagogues where they eat lobster and cheeseburgers at their functions. Different Jewish denominations have completely different ideas of what God is and what Judaism is. I was at two Purim carnivals this year. One, in a Chabad house, was the traditional reading of the Megilla. The meaning of the Megilla was straighforward. It was the story of the book of Esther and how she thwarted Haman’s plan to have every jew in the Persian empire killed. It’s moral message to those present was simple and clear, the jewish people defeated an enemy that threatened their survival . The parallels to the present world were straight forward as well, one could substitute Ahmadinejad or bareback obsamma for hamman. Then there was another Purim carnival at a reform synagogue where almost all of the people are of mixed parentage, Jewish Irish, Jewish Polish, English, Italian etc. There was a teenage boy dressed as a female cheerleader, complete with lipstick and makeup. There was a completely weird telling of the megilla, in English, where it was turned into a rather bad sript of a broadway play, along the lines of “Rent” with several bad songs, or “musical numbers”added throughout. Then when wrapping it all up, the narrator tied it all together by saying the ultimate message of Purim is that there are always people discriminating against others in this world and it is the purpose of Judaism to right that wrong. My thought was “but it is the white people who are being killed, discriminated against, abused, stripped of equal rights before the law. This is being done for the most part by Jewish persons just like the female narrator, who are in positions of judgeships, government, media etc.” They are the persecutors who are wrapping themselves in the sanctimony of moral righteousness!”

          • PesachPatriot

            That is the strangest purim I ever have ever heard of…the second one,not the chabad one….my parents belonged to a reform synagogue when I was younger and there were quite a few mixed marriage congregants but the ceremony was basically like the orthodox one except the boys dressed up as pirates, cowboys or movie monsters and the girls were princesses and cheerleaders….

          • Morris LeChat

            yes, I was shocked when I saw the cross dressed cheerleader. The second Purim carnival was about a week after Purim. I do not know if they had a real reading of the Megilla and this one was more of a fun thing. It was fun in fact. Of course I had no idea that the woman intended to slip in the liberal agenda at the end. Up to that point I was thinking “oh god, everyone wants to be in show business. They are trying hard but this is rather trite”. Then she slipped in the zinger at the end and I was rather disappointed. Some where along the way, around about the late sixtes, many Jewish congregations confused Judaism with the civil rights movement. They began to see the purpose of their religion to be that they are crusaders to make sure no one was mean to anyone anywhere. This has been like bad parenting, like those parents who indulge any whim and desire of a child because to do otherwise would upset them. What this has brought on our country has been a permissiveness and openness that has been ultimately very destructive. An openness whose logical end is open borders and the destruction of the country. I do not think the intention of all this was malicious, I think it has been foolish, misguided. If we treat the majority of such liberals as enemies that need to be punished, they will only dig in their heels more and become more destructive. At some point I hope we can get the misguided liberals to see their mistake and I hope there is enough Christian Charity around to forgive them once they see their error, but only when they do see it and come around.

          • Guest

            The synagogues where they eat lobster and cheeseburgers at their functions. Different Jewish denominations have completely different ideas of what God is and what Judaism is. I was at two Purim carnivals this year. One, in a Chabad house, was the traditional reading of the Megilla. The meaning of the Megilla was straighforward. It was the story of the book of Esther and how she thwarted Haman’s plan to have every jew in the Persian empire killed. It’s moral message to those present was simple and clear, the jewish people defeated an enemy that threatened their survival . The parallels to the present world were straight forward as well, one could substitute Ahmadinejad or bareback obsamma for hamman. Then there was another Purim carnival at a reform synagogue where almost all of the people are of mixed parentage, Jewish Irish, Jewish Polish, English, Italian etc. There was a teenage boy dressed as a female cheerleader, complete with lipstick and makeup. There was a completely weird telling of the megilla, in English, where it was turned into a rather bad sript of a broadway play, along the lines of “Rent” with several bad songs, or “musical numbers”added throughout. Then when wrapping it all up, the narrator tied it all together by saying the ultimate message of Purim is that there are always people discriminating against others in this world and it is the purpose of Judaism to right that wrong. My thought was “but it is the white people who are being killed, discriminated against, . IOf the moderator, deletes this again, I want to know why. Engleman is the moderator and he is NOT behaving ethically!abused, stripped of equal rights before the law. This is being done for the most part by Jewish persons just like the female narrator, who are in positions of judgeships, government, media etc.” They are the persecutors who are wrapping themselves in the sanctimony of moral righteousness!”

        • Funruffian

          Jesus was a Judean, but not necessarily a Jew. There is new evidence through historical findings that there is and was a difference. Jews are Semetic people as are Syrians, Lebanese and other people near the epicenter.

          • David Ashton

            Jesus was a Galilean and may well have had non-Jewish ancestors.

      • Tom Iron

        yeah – what he said…

    • Garrett Brown

      Engleman and his girlfriend do not appreciate this post.

      • JohnEngelman

        That is because it is obviously not true.

        Most people allow their likes and dislikes to influence their judgement of what is true and false. I do it too, but I try not to.

        Nevertheless, the love I have for Jews, Judaism, and Israel makes it easy for me to recognize that the Ashkenazim are the most superior racial group in the world.

        • Garrett Brown

          I know you’re in love with me, but please. Stop stalking me, it’s creepy. And what he said is in fact true.

        • josh

          Yes the monster loves its own people…of course jews love their species. Thats how theyare able to so wantonly destroy,destroy,destroy. Jews are scum,John. Superior? Which is superior? The AIDS virus or the bloodstream? BTW Einstein was am fraud,it is said!

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            No, Albert Einstein was a genius. But he is propped up as the smartest man who ever lived. He was not. A matter of opinion. I would choose Newton if I had to pick. Or maybe Maxwell. All great men. None any better than the other.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Einstein called Maxwell a “genius.” High praise, considering the source. But, Maxwell was very insightful, to have thought of the notion that disparate forces might actually be one and the same, and in the case of electricity and magnetism, actually proving that they are. It was because of Maxwell’s supposition that disparate forces might actually be the same that we’re currently on the path to a unified particle theory (string theory) which will be a Rosetta Stone to solve a lot of mysteries.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            And Newton stood upon the shoulders of giants. (shhhhh- don’t tell anyone all of those giants were White)
            Our little secret

          • convairXF92

            Yeah, Einstein had his girlfriend (later his wife) doing a lot of his mathematics–and thinking–for him. A Hungarian edition of the Einstein general-relativity paper lists “M. Marits” as coauthor. That’s the Hungarian spelling of (Mileva) Maric’, his Serbian wife.

          • Morris LeChat

            Einsteins Theory of Relativity is related to patents that he was working on at the time. He took ideas that others were working on and expanded them.

          • JohnEngelman

            How do Jews destroy? They benefit every country they live in with their superior intelligence. A country cannot have too many people with genius level IQs.

          • Sal

            So by pushing multiculturalism and diversity in every Western society they inhabit (I’m not talking conspiracy theories, I’m talking about their disproportionate representation in the media and academia) they are benefiting society?

          • JohnEngelman

            Those who are most vigorous in advocating fewer restrictions on immigration are not Jews as a group, but the business community. More immigrants mean more consumers and more job applicants. This means higher prices, lower wages, and higher profits.

            Jews earn ” their disproportionate representation in the media and academia” with their superior intelligence.

          • David Ashton

            Leftist Jews have strongly supported foreign immigration from the foundation of the CPUSA to the present time.

            The problem is not IQ but how it is used.

            Antisemitism is a complex issue, and you might look at relevant writings from Jews like Bernard Lazare, Benjamin Disraeli and Albert Lindemann, or even (given your Biblical orientation) Shlomo Sand. While waiting for such books from your local library make a start with Abraham Yehoshua’s “Attempt to identify the root cause of antisemitism,” Azure, no 32 Spring 2008, available on the internet.

          • Morris LeChat

            media and academia are not places of brilliance, they are places where mediocrity are celebrated.

          • Morris LeChat

            Jews were instrumental in the civil rights movement. This is becoming more and more evident every day that this was an intentional strategy of destroying the US. YOu have also NEVER, NOT ONCE, answered those who claim that jews lobbied to change the immigration laws for this country that have led to the white majority being disenfranchised and the country being radically altered, which can rightly be called destruction.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews were prominent in the civil rights movement. So were white Christians like the Rev. William Sloane Coffin, Jr. This was not “an intentional strategy of destroying the US.” It was an intentional strategy of extending to Negroes rights that had been granted them a century earlier in the 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.

            I regret the black response to the civil rights legislation. I do not regret that legislation. Nor do most whites. The civil rights legislation enacted into law during the 1960s is a settled issue.

            The Immigration Reform Act of 1965 won in the Senate by 76 – 18; it won in the House of Representatives by 326 – 70. The Congress at the time was not dominated by Jews.

          • Morris LeChat

            http://archive.jta.org/topic/jews-and-civil-rights

            The civil rights movement is becoming increasingly recognized as what has undone this country. You can not give political power to people who are not worthy of it. The country will always assume the character of the LOWEST who are allowed to participate in it’s governing. What has happened in the US is exactly that form of transformation. There was much debate in the Jewish communities during the 40 and early fifties about the wisdom of participating in and helping the civil rights struggle. For the most part, Those who favored the civil rights movements won out. Your problem is that it is widely perceived by the vast majority of white people that jews and the civil rights movement are one and the same. This is so because the Jews themselves have been actively putting this idea out there.

          • Morris LeChat

            A snippet from the page I linked

            “. American Jews were involved in civil rights, in fact, out of narrow Jewish self-interest. Indeed, it was Stephen S. Wise, the great American Jewish leader — and one of the founders of the NAACP — who made the case repeatedly over the years that civil rights was not only a Jewish issue, but that it was the quintessential Jewish issue.”

            Jews founded the NAACP, they funded the whole thing in the beginning. You can name one or two Christians that were pulled along but it does not change the fact that the stream and current were created and maintained in the beginning by jews. You can petulantly give this post the negative vote, but you are just plain wrong. The civil rights movement was started and maintained by jews.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the 1960s most of us who supported the civil rights movement were motivated my moral considerations. We did not like for blacks to be discriminated against.

          • Morris LeChat

            Without the jews forming the NAACP, without jews telling blacks to do start pushing the issue at every little opportunity, without jews using the media to dramatize every little push, every little lunch counter sit in, every little bus incident, without jews organizing the blacks and getting them to demonstrate with their jewish cameraman there to film it and the reaction, without all of that, no one would have been motivated by any moral considerations. The jews manipulated the whole thing. There was no moral outrage amongst whites until the jews started their campaign. They were the ones that wrote and produced the movies and shows that ERRONEOUSLY portrayed black people and made them sympathetic figures while making white people villains. You think you are in control of what you think is moral, you are wrong, you and so many others were merely programmed. If you had grown up in the twenties or thirties your moral outlook would have been totally different.A number was done on you, and on the rest of us.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

          Superior? That’s what rubs my fur the wrong way, John. I joke sometimes that my own people, the Scots, are superior, but its only that- a jibe. I’m impressed by a lot of folks- The French, the Germans, the Icelanders and on and on and on. Who runs the Fed? Who owns the media? I tried to find an article from Ben Stein a few years back, unfortunately it has been disappeared to radio islam but you get my point.

          http://www.radioislam.org/medias/hollywood/hollyjew2.htm
          So what about them is superior, exactly? I think they are superior at getting us all into trouble.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ of any ethnic group known.
            They average around 112-115, well above the European norm of 100…

            Their numbers among prominent scientists are roughly ten times greater than you’d expect from their share of the population in the United States and Europe. Over the past two generations they have won more than a quarter of all Nobel science prizes, although they make up less than one-six-hundredth of the world’s population. Although they represent less than 3 percent of the U.S. population they son 27 percent of the U.S. Nobel prizes in science…

            American Jews are also over represented in other areas, such as business (where they account for about a fifth of CEOs) and academia (where they make up about 22 percent of Ivy league students).

            – Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending, from “The 10,000
            Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution,” Chapter 7:
            “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts,” pages
            188, 189, 190.

            http://www.amren.com/ar/2009/05/index.html

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p208/redlevel42/Picture9.png

            When I think of the great men of history, John, I think of Edison, Armstrong, Von Braun, Copernicus and on and on and on. I’m afraid my mind isn’t flooded by the many contributions from your jews. At least not positive ones. Besides, Amren is a place to speak of pleasant things.- White things. Let’s focus on ourselves and our own problems. We have not a few.

          • JohnEngelman

            The high average IQs of the Ashkenazim were an ironic response to European persecution of the Jews. They were not allowed to own land, or to practice most trades. They were allowed to be money lenders because of Christian strictures against usury. They were also allowed to become merchants. These are fields that require superior intelligence.

            Jews who did not have enough intelligence for these fields left the faith, or they were unlikely to have children.

            Occasional pogroms also placed a premium on intelligence. Jews had to live by their wits.

            It was not until after anti Jewish persecution lifted that is became obvious that Ashkenazi Jews tended to be more intelligent than white Gentiles.

          • Funruffian

            Intelligence? Sure. Moral superiority? Doubtful.

          • JohnEngelman

            By what objective criteria are Jews less moral on the average than Gentiles?

          • Funruffian

            I am so elated you asked me that! Thanks for opening that window of opportunity. The criteria would be based on Christian mores: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. (2) Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor. (3) thou shall not kill.”
            There, I just illustrated 3 examples of how many of the Jews are guilty of sin according to The Ten Commandments and the teachings of The New Testament. Morality is always subjective depending on where it is derived.

          • Morris LeChat

            The Talmudic tradition has unfortunately created a mindset where one can use convoluted arguments to justify just about anything. There are Jewish lawyers who make a living out of civil lawsuits. They destroy businesses and raise the costs for everybody by such tactics as finding a handicapped ramp that may be 1degree steeper than the law allows. They then get a handicapped client who has never been to that store, and never intends to go there, and sues the establishment in this handicapped client’s name. I’m sorry, but this is extremely immoral, unethical, dirty, but you can say that the jew lives by the law. The jew makes a living with the law, this is for sure. There are many variations of this game, the lawyers just pour through the laws and see where the opportunities to make money are. One Jewish individual , John Stossel, has written about this, and he finds this immoral as well.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those are unsubstantiated assertions. I like facts that can be documented, using credible sources.

          • Morris LeChat

            No those are NOT unsubstantiated assertions. The name of such a “lawyer” was proclaimed quite loud and clearly on the Michael Savage show. You go through his archive. It is a KNOW FACT that jews DOMINATE the class action, civil lawsuit field. John Stossel is not a fooled either sand did not make up the story. YOu have PROOF of the ethical failings of the Jews. you just refuse to accept it.

          • JohnEngelman

            Do you actually think Michael Savage is an authority on the absolute truth?

            If it “it is a KNOW (sic) FACT that Jews DOMINATE the class action, civil lawsuit field” quote a credible study on the subject.

            There are only three ways Jews differ from white Gentiles: they have a different religion; they have much higher average intelligence; they tend to be more successful because of that higher average intelligence. No, we are not equal.

          • Morris LeChat

            The question is does such an individual at the lawyer exists. His existence does not depend on Michael Savage. Michael was only reading a story that had been published somewhere. LIke I said, you go research it yourself. I do not need to footnote everything.

          • JohnEngelman

            When you slander the Jews I think you do need to document your assertions.

            When praising the Jews I document my assertions, usually from articles I have found on this website.

          • Morris LeChat

            it is not slander,it is the truth, there are many jewish lawyers making obscene livings doing obscene things with the law. If it is true it is not slander. Why do you think one has to have rose colored glasses on, that unless one sees every jew as good one has to see every jew as bad. There are scoundrels amongst them.

          • PesachPatriot

            This upsets me to no end….laws should be followed by the spirit, not the letter…there are numerous places in the OT which say this too….if a country has a law which says “stealing from stores is forbidden” that doesn’t mean stealing from houses and garages is ok. Staying away from lawyers is something i learned early in life. I also dislike the financial wizard types at goldman sucks who figure out a way to steal a nickel from everyone in america via computer during stock trading hours…no one on main street ever notices or cares when they get their quarterly reports on their 401K but it adds up to billions for american financial firms at the end of the year….its not just goldman either….basically every “respectable” bank and financial institution in this country(and probably europe and canada too) does the same thing.

          • convairXF92

            >Jews who did not have enough intelligence for these fields left the faith

            Or they became musicians. This would also happen with Jews who had a more “right-brained” intelligence rather than classic Jewish verbal-logical prowess. Jews even teamed up with Roma Gypsies to form klezmer bands that played at weddings, both Jewish and Christian, all over central-Eastern Europe. (Great album-cover photo on Muzsikas’s *Maramaros* CD: barefoot gypsies in rags, playing along with Hasidim in black hats and coats.)

            Some centuries ago, a rabbi named Baal Shem Tov realized that there was too much pressure on the typical Jew to have a Harvard-level (or let’s say Salamanca-level) understanding of Torah and Talmud. So, he designed a new form of Judaism where one could be a good Jew by singing and dancing. This is how Hasidism began. (–>Has anyone done a study of verbal IQ, or secular academic accomplisments, of Hasidim vs. non-Hasidic Ashkenazim? Wonder if the Hasidic average IQ is noticeably lower. I think Hasidim have traditionally married only among their own kind.)

          • Morris LeChat

            Gentiles with higher intelligence were also likely to be attracted to others they could have a descent conversation with for a change. So the process fed on itself.

          • Morris LeChat

            Jews have not produced many visual artists. I think Chagal is very overrated. Grosz was good. Their numbers in this field though seem rather low. Two of my favorite artists do happen to be Jews though. Mort Drucker and Al Hirschfeld.

          • Anonymous

            Then you have no clue of the history of science. Go read up on modern physics, you will find that Jews are highly over-represented- Einstein, Boltzmann, Bohr, Born, Pauli, Feynman, von Neumann, Hans Bethe, Szilard, Oppenheimer, and so on. The Manhattan project would have never happened without European jews.

          • saxonsun

            Correct about modern science.

          • David Ashton

            Jews are particularly good at physics, astrophysics, mathematics and medical research. Einstein was preceded by Poincare and hyped himself up.

          • convairXF92

            There was a Hungarian aspect to this too, possibly due to tensions and pressure in post-Trianon Hungary. Pre-WWI Hungary, shaped like a huge groundhog with nose in Romania and tail going down the Dalmatian coast, lost everything except its rump, as a result of its defeat in that war. The bitterness and shame in rump Hungary led to the highest suicide rate in the world. One could make it big, or risk being pushed into the abyss.

            Von Neumann, Wigner, Szilard, Teller, and the other Hungarian physicists and mathematicians from that era grew up under this pressure. Such is the likely reason for the disproportion of Hungarians in mid-20th-c. mathematical sciences.

          • Morris LeChat

            mVon Neumann, Wigner, Teller, those are German names.

          • convairXF92

            “Teller” is Hungarian — I think it has a long-vowel accent on the second “e”. There are lots of Hungarian names–and even Hungarian words–that look Germanic or even English. (The statistical distribution of vowels and consonants in Hungarian–ignoring things like umlauts–seems closer to that of English than does that of most other European languages.)
            Neumann is Ashkenazic Jew. The “von” was originally “margittai” — a title of nobility awarded for achievement, named after some Hungarian royal woman named Margit. The margittai was granted to scientist Von Neumann’s father.

          • convairXF92

            Ashkenazic high IQ is verbal-logical IQ. They lean toward fields demanding verbal logic and deduction, or other “left-brain” skills. Abstract algebra and theoretical computer science fit the Jewish mind very well. Note that much of the “everyday” work of a scientist is logic, calculation (or making deduction from others’ calculations), and sequential thinking; the work leading to a Nobel might require years of this type of sweat. The Einsteins with extreme right-brain skills are outliers even within the Jewish community.

          • JohnEngelman

            Why are Jews so successful?

            Richard Lynn, The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement, Washington Summit Publishers, 2011, 408 pp. soft cover $39.00, hard cover $60.00.

            The Chosen People: A study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement is the most recent work of Richard Lynn dealing with group differences in IQ and their ramifications. As in all of his previous work over the past decade, he substantiates his arguments with huge quantities of empirical data. He advances his positions dispassionately and lets the facts speak for themselves, which they do in impressive, nearly irrefutable fashion…

            Professor Lynn begins by pointing out the extraordinary success of Jews in almost every field. In the 19th century the restrictions that had prevented most Jews from advanced nonreligious study began to be lifted in most of Western Europe, and by mid-century, “people began to observe that Jews were outstandingly successful…

            The development of IQ tests confirmed the impression that Jews were unusually intelligent, and Professor Lynn’s extensive review of the literature indicates that Jews in the US have an average IQ of 110 compared to 100 for other Europeans…

            The largest portion of Prof. Lynn’s book deals with the performance of Jews (mainly Ashkenazim) in just about every country in which they settled. The most striking finding is the very great similarity of Jewish achievement everywhere. Without exception, Jews outperform their non-Jewish neighbors by very large multiples…

            Having established with extraordinary diligence the success of Ashkenazi Jews, Professor Lynn addresses the question of the origins of these Jews’ high intelligence. He dismisses environmental explanations on a number of grounds…One is left with genetic explanations…

            One prominent theory is that Jewish practices and customs had a eugenic effect. This position is taken by Kevin MacDonald in his book, A People That Shall Dwell Alone. Perhaps the most important of these customs was the high status accorded to religious scholars, which meant that wealthy men encouraged their daughters to marry scholars and their sons to marry the daughters of scholars…

            Gregory Cochran, Jason Hardy, and Henry Harpending have proposed a second explanation in their paper, The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence. They argue that around the 13th century, European Jews were restricted to only a few trades. This was largely because of their exclusion, for religious reasons, from the guilds that dominated Europe’s economy. “Jews were allowed to be money-lenders, to open banks and charge interest on loans, which were prohibited for Christians, to work as tax collectors and import-export merchants, and to deal in second-hand goods as peddlers.” In most of these occupations, with the exception of peddlers, “Jews would have needed strong verbal, mathematical and reasoning abilities to assess risk and make calculations.” And since such occupations allowed for a better standard of living, those who engaged in them were more likely to assure the survival of their offspring and the passing on of genes that promote such abilities…

            [Editor's Note: This article first appeared in the November 2011 issue of American Renaissance.]
            http://www.amren.com/features/2011/12/the-chosen-people/

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            John, don’t ever get the impression that I don’t like having you around, because I certainly do. You are, if nothing, constant as the Northern Star. May I ask you a question? Please be honest because I am honestly curious. Everything comes from somewhere– where does your love for the jews, specifically, where does you love for the Ashkenazi come from? For that matter, where did you come from, I mean, are you part of this group yourself? If so, by all means be proud of that. I am a Scot. Each of my 4 grandparents came from different Scottish tribes. I am proud of that. I think we are wonderful creatures. I am proud of our many accomplishments. Your turn.

          • JohnEngelman

            My ancestors are German, English, and German speaking Swiss. The English are descended from three German tribes: the Angles, the Saxons, and the Jutes.

            I was raised as an Episcopalian, and am a traditional Episcopalian, using the 1928 Book of Common Prayer.

            There were many Jews in the neighborhood I grew up in, so I feel comfortable with them. They were good people.

            I particularly became attracted to the Jews when reading The New English Bible. At the time I was also reading about the Apaches. It occurred to me that the Israelites and the Apaches were similar. Both were tribal confederations surrounded by powerful enemies, but they managed to survive. Both believed in one god.

            When I got to the New Testament I saw Jesus and his disciples as Jews in a Jewish setting.

            Since then I have read the Bible including the Apocrapha in six additional English translations. When I read the Bible I like to listen to Jewish music, and the music of Johann Sebastian Bach.

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xje4OYalB5Q

            Although I do not keep a kosher kitchen I prefer to buy food that is kosher certified.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            Thank you of your honest reply. I enjoyed reading it.

          • Diamond_Lil

            Wow, seriously, John? Ever ask yourself why the Jews in power want to eliminate the White Europeans in their own countries. Don’t give me the Bible read their Talmud.

          • JohnEngelman

            Jews in power do not “want to eliminate the White Europeans in their own countries.” It is almost embarrassing for me to have to point out something so obvious.

          • Morris LeChat

            Not all English are descendants of Anglo Saxons. There are many descendants of Normans as well. There are some descendants of Danes as well.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Normans and the Danes are Germanic.

          • skara_brae

            Jasbo. “Scottish tribes”? Clans you mean.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

            clans, tribes, families, groups, sub-groups, septs– all one big happy family. Tribe is a word I’ve been using more lately. I like it. When times get hard, we get tribal. It has a primitive connotation to it as well. I like that.

            I suppose I got turned on to the word after watching the movie “300.” It is used in a wonderful and inspiring way at 58 seconds into this clip:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NV9DSykTbo

          • David Ashton

            Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” also outlines some of the less positive impacts of Jewish intelligence on modern non-Jewish societies. Even peddlers require wits – maybe this is part of the “problem”: outwitting other people, cunning as a necessity for survival. “We never feel secure until we are supreme” (paraphrase, Rabbi Hugo Gryn, Auschwitz survivor).

          • Morris LeChat

            The intellectual movements of the early 20th century were dominated by jews. These movements have done great harm to society and this country. From socialism, to Freudiansim etc.

          • Morris LeChat

            Jews higher scores in the IQ tests are due to higher scores in math and verbal areas of testing. So, they can talk you out of your money easier than others can.

        • dhs

          Superior, in what way! Jews have high IQ’s; perhaps higher than Asians. But that is only one catagory. They are not physically, socially or sexually superior to all other groups . In fact, often they are inferior. In particular, Jewish men are great at financial manipulation, but poor at female manipulation.

        • Schlomo Goldstein

          Oh John, you big schlub you! I think I love you all-ready!

    • JohnEngelman

      Oh blah. Claiming that Jewish intellectual distinction is due to anything other than high average IQs among the Ashkenazim is like attributing lower average black IQ scores to white racism.

      • MikeofAges

        And drive. Locate and read the Thomas Wolfe passage “the promise of America” One American public college, Brooklyn College, has produced more Nobel Prize winners than any undergraduate college in the world. Several public high schools in New York City are within the top ten in secondary and prep schools worldwide in producing Nobel Prize winners. Your lame-brained Cartesianism, while it bloodlessly accounts for part of the reason, that is true, speaks not at all to the power of the human spirit or the guiding hand of providence. A bunch of middle and lower income Jewish boys (some of whom actually did grow up in “steaming tenements”) who wore cheap white shirts and rode subway subway cars and city buses to public high schools and suffered harassment on the street, wrote their names in the stars.

        There are some things the world will see only once, and never again.

      • MBlanc46

        Absolutely.

      • Northman

        High IQ and a low sense of morality is the scariest combination one could imagine.

        • JohnEngelman

          If there is any evidence that Jewish businessmen are less honest than Gentile businessmen I have never encountered any.

          Everything I have read tells me that Jews are just as moral as white Gentiles.

          • MikeofAges

            Caveat emptor, bro.

          • David Ashton

            Jews have good and bad people among them, like other groups.
            OT prophets had a lot to say about the bad ones.

          • Morris LeChat

            John will not see the bad, he has created an idol, a graven image.

          • Morris LeChat

            Yes, The culture of wall st changed dramatically when the old wasp establishment and it’s values were replaced buy the jews. Lehman’s anyone? The old yankees did not have outlandish salaries while shareholders suffered and companies were looted. There has been a HUGE cultural shift on Wall st. It is very corrupt now. The culture changed from one where those at the top felt like responsible stewards to now, where those at the top seek to loot as much and as fast as they can. Goldman Sachs is the worst of the lot and it has infiltrated and corrupted the government. Like I said before, they may be smart, but they are not wise.

          • JohnEngelman

            The American plutocracy has always been pretty immoral. During the late nineteenth century, when most Jews were impoverished immigrants, they bought state legislatures with campaign funds. Then they would use the National Guard to crush strikes by shooting strikers.

          • Morris LeChat

            The character of wall st drastically changed when the old wasp establishment was displaced by the jews.Pointing a finger elsewhere does not change that fact. Jews as a group, will do things that christians just would not do, such as to exploit the laws of this country in ways I have already stated.The whole point of Williams’ article is that groups are different, now you only claim positive differences for jews, while everyone else notices there are negatives as well. NO christian lawyer would even think of destroying or laying a heavy burden on a small business just because a handicapped ramp is 1 degree too steep. The law profession is FULL of jews that will do this. Just look at the TV adds for ambulance chasers, all jews. Yes, jews are over represented in many professions, some of the very slimy and rotten. Yes, Williams is right, some ethnic groups must own certain dysfunctions, jews on this and others.

          • PesachPatriot

            wall street was a moral sewer from day one….it was always attracting “smart” people who would use any legal means to screw main street simple people out of hard earned money, securities fraud happened in the 1800’s too….charles ponzi was italian, not jewish….i dislike goldman sachs probably just as much as you do but every other major financial institution in america engages in pretty much the same business practices….When you have trillions of dollars of other people’s money(who you will never see or have to explain yourself to) flying at the speed of light through super computers things will start going downhill quickly…

          • Morris LeChat

            I am talking about lawyers, lawyers who exploit the law in unethical ways.

          • PesachPatriot

            Oh ok…i thought the topic had changed to the culture and business practices of wall street….there plenty of shyster lawyers but there are also plenty of non-jewish ambulance chasers too….if every last jew in america packed and left for israel there would still be plenty of questionable legal practices…..i think it all stems from people’s word of honor meaning less and less down the decades….90 years ago most business in america was done with a handshake….in this day and age everyone needs binding legal documents and signatures in triplicate….the problem with every legal system, in every society that has ever existed is that eventually people will find ways to circumvent its original intent….it seems like the less justice the more laws are necessary….If every big money civil trial involved trial by combat like in the middle ages there would probably be a lot less frivolous law suits.

          • Morris LeChat

            So the world only exists for you if it is in a book. A person can control what you believe by controlling what gets printed. Well, now, did that thought wake you up yet?

    • MBlanc46

      Power in politics doesn’t get you a Nobel in physics, They’re just smarter (on average).

    • brengunn

      That’s moving the goal posts. All the evidence suggests that blacks are on average less smart than whites, everyone here believes that despite it being an unfashionable, even dangerous belief. The evidence also points to higher Jewish intelligence, that is clear in all facets of life from science to politics, to discount it would be an emotional response. Not only that, it’s contradictory.

    • Andy

      There may be truth to that, but Jews do score higher on intelligence tests, and achieve at levels that would be predicted based on their average intelligence. Jews, who are only 2% of the US population, should be about 13% of the geniuses, and the higher up the intelligence scale you get the greater a proportion they’ll be. They will be 25% of Americans with IQs over 160 and 43% of Americans with IQs over 180. It is therefore not surprising that they should make up a large proportion of Nobel Laureates based on merit alone.

      • Wayne

        Is Obama Jewish? He won the Nobel prize. Now tell me the Nobel Prize is not put politics.

      • Morris LeChat

        The question then is do the benefits outweigh the costs. If they have destroyed this country with their political agendas, is that worth having twice as many people with IQs over 180?

  • bigone4u

    Promoting blacks and Hispanics who are unqualified by intelligence or other abilities imposes a significant economic cost on ALL of us, even if our own bosses are not affirmative action promotions. Bad decisions, lack of innovation, cronyism, and laziness begin to infect an affirmative action organization, including the whites who work there. As those organizations’ efficiency plunges, costs rise, which are to some extent passed on to consumers. It’s like a hidden Affirmative Action tax. Government, of course, is the worst offender when it comes to hiring unqualified blacks and Mexicans. Thus, literally, our taxes are higher than otherwise because of racial preferences.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

    The big kicker, statistically-speaking, comes when you figure that the majority of violent crime in this country is caused by blacks. Then you narrow it down and factor out black women, and calculate that the majority of violent crime is committed by black males between the ages of 18- 49. If memory serves that group makes up 2% of the US population, but they cause the MAJORITY of violent crime. Every time I see that, my jaw drops. Stunning.

    • MBlanc46

      The latest figures that I saw were black males 16-36 at 3% of population commit 36% of crime.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

        Taken from Amren itself:

        http://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime/

        “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.”
        Amazing

  • Jss

    This conversation is one where I always like to use the K9 analogy. They are all “dogs” right? Why isn’t there an equal distribution of poodles, chihuahuas, pugs, and pit bulls amongst police dogs and guide dogs? After all for the most part they are just as similar on the genetic level as humans are. I’m not a qualified expert but I have even heard Jared Taylor say they are more similar then humans.

    But no. We are honestly supposed to believe that humans are the only group on this whole planet that have no sub groups or breeds what so ever. And that’s coming from modern academia. Which is why in my opinion modern politically correct science is the new Catholic Church here to excommunicate anyone who dares question the official dogma of the new god known as diversity.

    • Puggg

      They don’t use pugs, either. I should sue.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

        They don’t use grumpy cats either, which is sad–

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INscMGmhmX4

        In case anyone was wondering, this one happens to have a form of feline dwarfism, which is why his face is all sqooshed up. He’s loved by millions,so who cares.

        • Puggg

          That cat has the most pug-like facial appearance of any cat I’ve ever seen.

        • Oil Can Harry

          On behalf of multiculturalists everywhere I condemn Grumpy Cat for her white fur privilege!

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Unless you are non-White or a non-White country, then diversity is pushed aside with a laugh.

      • betsy

        only because whites have allowed it.
        the chinese, who have little creativity, would never tolerate the beginnings of the junk we put up with.–

    • CaptainCroMag

      I’m not a qualified expert but I have even heard Jared Taylor say they are more similar then humans.

      Yes, different breeds of dogs are more genetically similar than different human races. The reason being is that when we breed dogs for specific traits, we aren’t changing their genes, we are only changing which genes get expressed. Different human races, on the other hand, have accumulated mutations on their DNA for tens of thousands of years, so when we look at the DNA of a Bantu compared to the DNA of a Swede and count the differences, we see that there are more changes to their DNA than between a Great Dane and a Chihuahua, which have only been separate breeds for a much shorter time.

      • Jss

        And yet not even the most committed diversity monger would claim dog breeds are social constructs. Thanks for the info.

        I wish I had the brain to reasearch these kinds of things for myself but I know my own limitations. I have found though that most people my age who claim to know “race doesn’t exist” don’t understand biology either but being pseudo intellectuals are to stuck up to admit it.

        • George

          When speaking with them, the dogs analogy is more than enough to prove your point.

          If you want a dog, you select the right breed for the task at hand. Will he be a hunting dog? Do you want one that’s good around your children? Do you want him to guard your junk yard? Sniff for illegal narcotics? Help the blind guy get around town without wandering in to traffic? Deliver casks of brandy to stranded Swiss? A lap dog for a small apartment in a city centre?

          When you know what you want, you can then select the right breed. It’s no different from humans. If you want to develop a cure for cancer, you get a white, a jew or an asiatic. If you want to someone catch an oblong ball thrown at great distances, to the cheering of thousands, you get a black.

          In any event, the training required for the different fields of endeavour are markedly different. We spend more attempting to educate blacks and hispanics to white norms, with reduced outcomes. The sooner we recognise the futility of this, the better off society will be.

          • Wayne

            Ask the libtards and colorblind Republitards if they are walking down the road and see a Rottweiler coming towards them if they react differently than they would for a beagle. Then hit them over the head with stereotyping and ignorant prejudice based on the color of their fur.

  • Paleoconn

    Black men can speak the truth.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    Nobody really thinks we are equal; it is all just a plan to destroy White people and their Western Civilization cultures. This is the main reason why Liberalism is so dangerous… it pretends to take a moral high ground while it really is acting out genocidal evil.

    • Tucker

      To paraphrase an observation I’ve seen made by a prominent voice in the pro-White movement, if we are willing to take the most drastic and extreme measures in order to eliminate termites which are threatening to destroy our house, then should we take any less drastic measures to deal with liberals and/or RINOs who are threatening to destroy our entire nation and any hope for a future for our race?

      • Andy

        Because liberals are human and termites aren’t.

        • Tucker

          Sidestepping the question is not the same as answering the question, Andy.

          Truly, this is perhaps the greatest and most critically important issue that faces White European people – not only here, in this nation – but also around the entire White Western world. What do we do about and with the race treasonous White elites who have joined forces with the Cultural Marxist non-white aliens and who are helping them to destroy their own people and the first world caliber nations which were the by products of the talents of White European people?

          Personally, I would place letting them off the hook for what they’ve done off the table completely.

  • Whites Only

    Like “Hispanics”, there isn’t really such thing as racial “Jews”. They are nothing but a bastard group who are clearly mixed with White Europeans and only require the mother line to qualify as a Jew (what a joke !) :

    “The researchers were able to estimate that between 35 and 55 percent of the
    modern Ashkenazi genome comes from European descent”.

    Source: Analysis of Ashkenazi Jewish Genomes Reveals Diversity, History (ScienceDaily.com, August 2010)

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100826141331.htm

    • Runciman

      Everyone knows the Ashkenazi founding population consisted of Jewish men from the Middle East (traders), a few Middle Eastern women and for the most part European women. DNA testing has long established this. After the initial founder group was established, the Ashkenazi married among themselves for over 1000 years, producing a 10- 15 point rise in IQ from gentile Europeans, and perhaps 25 points from the Middle East or even perhaps 40 points from Africa. They are extremely intelligent and have channelled their intelligence into productive occupations. They have drive. It would seem that they are intermarrying now in the US, thus probably producing a diluting effect. The murder of the Ashkenazi Jews by Hitler probably deprived the world of a tremendous amount of scientific and medical discovery, if they would have produced at the same rate as their cousins, which is by any measure outstanding. I sense some people here do not regret this, although it might have saved the lives of them or their families. I certainly regret it as I would regret the loss of any high IQ group. The world does not need more low IQ violent peoples. We all depend on those with IQs over 130 to make the world progress.

      • Morris LeChat

        Jews do not, and never did have a monopoly on people with high IQs.

        • Runciman

          Of course Jews do not have a monopoly on high IQ. Whoever says that certainly does not have a high IQ but due to the way the distribution works, the number of genius IQs among 12 million Jews (above 150 IQ) is equal to the number found in hundreds of millions of White Gentiles. (and I don’t find Jews any more or less moral than White Gentiles). There is also a matter of ambition and creativity which they also seem to have. That is a population worth having. Of course, it is only beneficial if used in high productive occupations, as the Jews do in the US and seem to be doing in Israel and maybe elsewhere. I went to Australia recently and visited Monash University and I was told Monash was Australia’s greatest general, I looked him up and found he was a Jew. How peculiar is that? They certainly all are not debating religious law.

          • Morris LeChat

            well, we have hundreds of millions of white gentiles, If the jews are hell bent on destroying white America then why do we need the Jewish geniuses?

  • Garrett Brown

    One of the few blacks I truly respect and listen to, you can guarantee Williams is a realist, and a Libertarian!

    http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/13/walter-williams-americans-misunderstand-the-point-of-the-second-amendment/

  • guest

    Williams is one of the few people in the world to state the obvious – equality doesn’t exist. It never has and it never will.

  • JohnEngelman

    It says bad things about the intellectual environment in the United States that only a black man can say in public what nearly everyone privately knows to be true.

    • josh

      And whom do we blame for that? The “superior” species you love so much!

      • JohnEngelman

        One of the men who wrote “The Bell Curve” was Jewish.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jasbo.adink Jasbo Adink

          John, you talk about IQ and potential. You remind me of the negro woman, when asked about her murderous son who claims he was a scholar and a gentleman with his whole life ahead of him. I’m talking about true accomplishment. Heroes. Men you pattern your life after. You can worship whomever you like. Some White people worship blacks who can toss a basketball really well , and with great accuracy. This does not impress me. You’re going to have to do better.

          • George

            I don’t always agree with John, but his original comment is spot on the mark here.

            Most people (liberals especially!) are aware that there are racial differences. Most of these people at least suspect that the differences are somewhat innate. No amount of conditioning, education, or special social programming can change it. You can give countless hours of tutoring, one-on-one attention and remedial training to a mentally-retarded person; even at the cost of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, at the end of the day, the person is still retarded. It still won’t function at the same level as a normal human.

            The same holds true with blacks and hispanics.

            The problem is that we whites must be polite and politically correct. Whites cannot address the elephant in the room. In mainstream outlets, or the workplace, we simply are unable to discuss racial differences openly and frankly. Workplace harassment charges can cost one his job, his career or his fortune. If one seeks elected office, such comments are political suicide. If one owns a business, speaking the truth can land one afoul of the DoJ or EEOC and open the door to massive lawsuits.

            Such is the nature of what is wrong with our present age.

    • MikeofAges

      Actually, only those who cross into the world of the criminal psychopath can speak some truth and potentially be heard. Theodore Kazcynski. Christopher Dorner. Lyndon LaRouche. Others have their own additions to the list, depending. What does that say about America and the West generally?

    • Morris LeChat

      because a jewish lawyer would sue the white guy who said it

  • josh

    THis is the vision of YKW;they want “equality”. All are equally submissive to THEM. Before you call me a nut,consider:What is their position on immigration? Their position on miscegenation? Gay marriage? Aff action? NO ONE squeals louder than they at the thought of their privileges being denied,yet they have created a nation where white man face discrimination (‘scrimination) EVERYWHERE! From the Army to the Navy to GE to NBC to IBM to the NFL to the SPCA!!!

  • MBlanc46

    But this is quite off the point. “All men are created equal” has always meant “equality before the law”. No rational person has ever denied the obvious differences in abilities between individuals, and more and more people are accepting the real differences between groups as empirical data become available.

  • Tom_in_Miami

    “Jews are not even 1 percent of the world’s population, but they constitute 20 percent of the world’s Nobel Prize winners.”

    I wonder if they include the feel good Nobel prizes such as “Peace.”

    • Funruffian

      i worked with Jews ■
      in another field, IT in NYC. Let me tell you the simple secret of their success.
      They hire each other. They fire future competition for positions they covet. They
      smear opposition. They steal ideas like its money. If you complain about any of
      it, they play victim, as they fire and blacklist you. Kind to each other, spiteful
      to others. Read (God vs. Satan Untold Story), from a IT worker I know. He guessed
      all their brain and group secrets. Except he allowed Hollywood rip him off.

      “A careful study
      of anti-semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many jews,
      who do not adequately
      realize the irritations they inflict.” – H.G. Wells (November 11, 1933)

  • Hal K

    Williams has that “protective coating” that allows him to get away with stating the obvious.

  • Hal K

    Wikipedia says “Williams believes programs such as affirmative action and minimum wage laws set up to aide minorities have, in fact, been harmful to them and stifled their ability to advance in society.”
    I wonder if he would want to reconsider this. If there really are innate differences in inteligence then there is a good case to be made that affirmative action has helped blacks.
    This notion that affirmative action harms blacks doesn’t do whites any good. No one is about to do away with affirmative action because it “harms blacks.” Whites will have to stand up for their own interests if the they want to do away with affirmative action.

    • MikeofAges

      The problem with affirmative action is that policy elements were built into from the beginning which were intended to affirmatively harm others. The Affirmative Action system took control of many matters which had no bearing on the simple issue of outreach to minorities or even the inclusion of women. The legal theory affirmative action is based on is the application of anti-trust law to population group. Whites are treated as a monopoly entity subject to onerous penalties as long their “monopoly” behavior continues, as measured by disparate impact. As America turns into a “majority minority” nation, by the measure of disparate impact the situation will only grow worse, and whites, from this point of view, will be considered deserving of yet more onerous treatment. Name for a political system which treats the individual as having rights only as member of a corporate entity. It’s called fascism. Want a slogan? “Fight Affirmative Action Fascism”. Sounds a little leftist though. But why not adopt their playbook?

      • Hal K

        But why not adopt their playbook?

        Conservatives have been trying to oppose the left in every possible way that doesn’t include explicit white identity politics, and it has never worked. They call liberals “fascists” and “racists” already.

        I don’t think the “legal theory” of affirmative action really matters, because it is not at the root of the problem. What we need is for whites to start standing up for their interests. They haven’t been doing this, which is why anti-whites have had a free rein to come up with whatever legal justification they need to discriminate against whites.

        • MikeofAges

          White identity politics would promote us and our interest in access to education and to the right to start and pursue careers. Yelping about what the other guy gets and not demanding anything for ourselves is not much of a program. Nothing for everyone will never be very popular as a political agenda.

  • cecilhenry

    No were not equal.

    But some are more equal than others.

    There;s the problem.

  • MobyWhite

    Even the ADL and SPLC admit we aren’t all equal every day the don’t sue the NBA for lack of Jooish players.

  • JohnEngelman

    Watch any Saturday afternoon college basketball game and ask yourself the question fixated in the minds of liberals everywhere: “Does this look like America?” Among the 10 players on the court, at best there might be two white players.

    – Walter E. Williams, Creators, March 25, 2013

    When I watch a white basketball player, even if he is obviously good at the sport, he makes it look difficult. I want to say, “Isn’t that inspiring? Just think of how hard he trains: hour after hour, day after day. But it sure pays off, doesn’t it?”

    When I watch a black basketball player I want to say, “That looks pretty easy. Maybe I should get a job doing that too. Then I remember how difficult basketball was in gym class.

  • Felix_M

    And so long as we’re pushing affirmative action, we need to start applying it to the NBA, NFL, AFL etc…I want to see more Asians on the basketball court and on the football field.

    • a multiracial individual

      Asian females are 2.9% of the America population, yet 0% of the NBA, MLB, and NFL. That is racist and sexist.

    • MikeofAges

      Stop wallowing in that garbage. Try saying this instead, “Whites are 50 percent of the poor people in America. How about getting more of them into graduate and professional school?”

      As long as you can’t define your issues, you’ll alway be treated like a rube.

  • Bzzz

    Whites are more likely to be racist than any other race. Whites are more likely than other races to attribute their failures to bad luck and their successes to sheer hard work, intelligence and determination. Whites are more likely to be race-obsessed than other races.

    • http://www.facebook.com/juan.outtamany Juan Outtamany

      unfortunately for whites, whites think that by helping others… society will improve. it always bites them in arse.

      Stoopid white peeple

    • brengunn

      Whites are more likely to be racist than any other race.

      How do you know this? Is there any evidence?

  • Tucker

    “Take Jews, for example. They are only 3 percent of the U.S. population.
    Half-baked theories of racial proportionality would predict that 3
    percent of U.S. Nobel laureates are Jews, but that’s way off the mark.
    Jews constitute a whopping 39 percent of American Nobel Prize winners.
    At the international level, the disparity is worse. Jews are not even 1
    percent of the world’s population, but they constitute 20 percent of the
    world’s Nobel Prize winners.”

    The one aspect to this particular “phenomena” that Walter Williams disingenuously chose to leave unmentioned – is the well documented history and tribal solidarity-oriented behavior of this particular ethnic group.

    Recently, Professor Kevin MacDonald (on his The Occidental Observer website) has been doing some excellent critical analysis of some assertions made by Ron Unz that there are some very significant disparities, with regards to the percentage of racial representation at the top level colleges (Harvard, Yale, etc.), which have traditionally been the institutions which have churned out the so-called ‘elites’, who tend to then worm their way into the top rung leadership positions in most of the major and most influential (and usually powerful) positions in our Western society – where they then are able to dictate policy, which is always virulently anti-White and thoroughly Cultural Marxist in orientation. MacDonald takes particular note of the incredibly obvious preponderance of ‘ethnic networking’, whereby this 3 percent group will work together as a tribal entity to give their own group’s members a strategically placed boost – while at the same time, seeking to create obstacles that can circumvent the opportunities which might otherwise be available to their ethnic/racial competitors. Read: White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic-Germanic people of European descent.

    Also, if one cares to revisit the findings that appeared in the excellent book by Richard Lynn, IQ and the Wealth of Nations – one will discover that the average IQ of the nation of Israel was determined to be rather modest and landed in the mid-90 range. Thus, this often touted and greatly exaggerated high IQ level that we are constantly having rubbed in our faces – usually by the narcissistic, obnoxiously conceited, egotistical loudmouth spokesman / B.S. artists who are all members of this same group and who never seem to tire of beating their chests and patting themselves on their back – is actually only applicable to a relatively tiny subset of this demographic group.

    In other words, all of these Nobel Prize winners is actually not an indication of some kind of natural gift of superiority, but are instead an illustration of how ethnic networking can guarantee that a game can be rigged. It also helps to prove that resorting to cheating and using dirty tricks to ice out your competition really has, in today’s America, become the name of the game.

    • brengunn

      It’ only the Ashkenazi that have the elevated IQ. Other ethnic Jews which make up a substantial amount of Israel’s population have normal IQ for that region.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-McConnell/563448640 Michael McConnell

    Blacks, in America or not, never built a true civilization. In fact, it is just the opposite. They drag down civilization to their level. No place on earth is better off because of a negro population.

  • NorthernWind

    Just one thing, I am skeptical about Jewish achievement ever since reading Ron Unz’s article (The Myth of American Meritocracy). Non Jewish Whites (60-70% of pop) make up less of the Ivy League school enrollment than Jews (2%) of pop. They are overrepresented in terms of merit which suggests some kind of favouritism for Jews. Asians are also underrepresented in terms of merit.

  • betsy

    we’re so screwed we leap to praise any black who is partially receptive to our demise.

  • SFLBIB

    Re: “There is absolutely no evidence anywhere, at any time, that proportionality is the norm anywhere on earth; …”

    Yes, there is. It is in the minds of “soft-minded and sloppy-thinking academics, lawyers, and judges.” I would add race hustlers to that list.

  • Morris LeChat

    It sounds like Walter Williams is getting dangerously close to admitting that blacks are incapable of self government and civilization. He and Pastor Maning, are two of the few black voices saying what so many people know to be irrefutable. Manning comes right out and says it, Willimans beats “arown da bushes”. The evidence for this fact of life is everywhere where there is a black community. The evidence is in the history of every city in America that was built by and flourished under white people but destroyed once the demographics shifted and the population became black. Blacks are a violent, criminal, hostile element. So much so that that without the protection of restrictive covenants along with a willingness on the part of the whites to be brutal towards blacks, just a few black people start a process of social disruption, crime and intimidation that results in an almost total flight of the white people to get away from blacks. The reality is that whites either live in fear of blacks or blacks live in fear of whites. This is the way it always has been and always will be.

    For white people, civilization comes from WITHIN. IT seems they are hard wired that way. Almost all white people are hardwired to be moral, to consider certain things right and certain things wrong, and they will accept some behaviors in themselves and others and they will NOT accept certain behaviors in THEMSELVES as well as others. Blacks on the other hand, seem to be totally lacking in the morality department. They only understand brutality and punishment. Blacks will lie with an ease and a vehemence that white people just can not fathom. The advent of security cameras and tapes has given proof to this as this evidence is the only thing that can make a black person give up this game. Only when THEY are forced to watch THEMSELVES on the tape do they stop lying. It does not matter if they are aware of the tape and are aware that others have seen it and that they are talking to those others. It is only when THEY THEMSELVES are forced to watch the tape that they become silent, and often times, not even then. This contrasts sharply with whites, who simply can not lie like that because they have an internal morality that also manifests as a conscience and shame. Blacks do not have self awareness, therefore, they can not feel shame. They go to lengths and do things that make civilization completely impossible. It is only when each individual regulates his own behavior that civilization can exist. Without that inner morality of each person, the only kind of society that can exist is one where there is always a brutal ruler that is willing to instantly brutalize any individual that gets out of line. Such societies are what is created in every area where blacks exists. What happens in the areas like chicago and detroit is a never ending, violent struggle to exert brutality against others.

    Since this is the only way blacks function, it is impossible for whites to deal with them as equals. It is foolish to let them vote and have any part in running things.Every city that has been taken over by blacks is a financial failure. IT is a place where violence is rampant , where businesses can not function. Those places become a wasteland where the black community slowly destroys everything they inherited. If it wasn’t for the redistribution of money from white taxpayers to those collecting welfare or collecting workfare by being a government employee in do nothing jobs, the process would be much quicker than it currently is.

    The civil rights movement was a disaster for this country for the very reason that not all people are equal. Without being subjugated by a white society that is willing to be as brutal and “unfair” as necessary, blacks will run wild, and white people will live in fear of them. I can only wonder if the red diaper babies who funded and ran the civil rights movement all the way up to the 70s knew this. I can only wonder if what has transpired was intentional.

    Detroit was a beautiful city. Among the many wonderful things about it was a department store called “Hudson’s”, which was one of the biggest in the whole world. It existed and thrived in Detroit when Detroit was a white city. IT thrived even though it had one of the most liberal return policy of any department store ever. here is a snippet from the wikepedia page on Hudson’s and this policy:

    “Hudson’s was known for customer satisfaction and its liberal return policy and would even pick-up merchandise that customers purchased years earlier, but never used. In 1952, Hudson’s total sales were $175 million however it issued refunds totaling $25 million. Store executives felt this was a small price to pay for customer loyalty.[3]”

    With a white population made up of individuals each with an internal morality that made them limit how much they would take advantage of this opportunity, Hudson’s could thrive.
    The Wikipedia article gives a rather telling insight into what the REAL reason for the failure of the downtown store, and ultimately the whole chain was. It is surprising that such a politically correct online publication is willing to even hint at it, but the truth is so undeniable that it does, here is the snippet:
    “…………………. the downtown store still accounted for half of Hudson’s business in 1961 but demographic changes continued to erode sales.[4] Store officials expressed an interest in closing the store as early as 1971 citing $9,000,000 in pilferage ”

    For the blacks who overran Detroit, a liberal return and refund policy was just not enough. They just walked an astounding amount of merchandise right out the doors.

  • Morris LeChat

    There are people who mistakenly believe that people succeed or fail in life based solely on IQ. I remember hearing that the BIGGEST predictor of future success, according to studies on children about 30 years ago is something else. It is the ability to delay gratification. Children in the study were presented with a bowl of candy or marshmallows and told that if they did not eat any of those in that bowl, they would get a much larger amount later on. The lengths of time that each child resisted having any of the candy in the bowl was recorded. Some children held out to the end. It was found that this was a very precise predictor of how successful each child later went on to be. It may be that the ability to delay gratification is tied to IQ, but there are those who have high IQs that are not successful, and it is most likely that they are unable to resist their impulses. IQ is important but it is not the whole story.

    Minorities exist in precarious circumstances. There is always the threat of external danger. This makes minority communities much more tightly knit. People in minority communities have pressure from other members of that community in regards to their personal choices. They are not as free as the members of the larger host society are to make their own choices. They must act as the are pressured to or face ostracism where they will be totally alone against the host culture.

    With white people, the situation of being an insular minority seems to lead to a stronger group, with higher IQs and levels of success. This is not something that is peculiar to Jews. There is a group in Russia called “The Old Believers”. They resisted liturgical changes that happened in the Russian Church at the command of one of the Tsars. IN a few generations they became a tight knit, insular group, that were very successful in business and industry.

    Of all of the dysfunctions of the black population, the most profound one is their impulsiveness, which leads to high crime and violence levels. They suffer from impulsiveness to the point that civilization is not possible. They blame “ray-cism” for their situation, but it is not racism at all, it is their own disfunction, born of an extremely impulsive nature that is responsible for their circumstances. Unfortunately, others have blamed white people for the circumstances of blacks. They see the reaction that whites have to the nature and actions of blacks and they consider that a cause, not an effect. The measures whites take to protect themselves and create a world they wish to live in is blamed for the nature of the world that blacks live in. Nothing could be more wrong. Williams is correct, we are not equal. When you force whites to treat blacks as equals, the whole society devolves to the nature of the most inferior.