Belafonte Blasts ‘White America’ for Black Gun Crimes

Michael Thompson, WND, February 13, 2013

Harry Belafonte, entertainer, long-time left-wing activist and admirer of Third World dictators, inserted himself into the national debate on gun control when he claimed “white Americans” who agitate for gun rights are ignoring the black “river of blood that washes the streets of our nation.”

The actor was on hand to be honored at the 2013 NAACP Image Awards when he asserted in his acceptance speech that the “group most devastated by America’s obsession with the gun is African Americans.”

“Although making comparisons can be dangerous, there are times when they must be noted,” he said. ‘America has the largest prison population in the world. And of the over 2 million men, women and children who make up the incarcerated, the overwhelming majority is black. We are the most unemployed, the most caught in the unjust systems of justice, and in the gun game, we are the most hunted.”

Belafonte continued: “The river of blood that washes the streets of our nation flows mostly from the bodies of our black children. Yet, as the great debate emerges on the question of the gun, white America discusses the constitutional issue of ownership, while no one speaks of the consequences of our racial carnage.”

{snip}

Belafonte failed to mention that a disproportionate share of gun violence in America is black-on-black. FBI and crime data from major city police departments show it’s black people “hunting” other blacks that largely comprises the “river of blood” flowing in American streets.

{snip}

In 2006, Belafonte called then-President George W. Bush “the greatest terrorist in the world” when he was part of delegation with actor Danny Glover and Cornel West to visit Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

He praised Chavez, saying, “No matter what the greatest tyrant in the world, the greatest terrorist in the world, George W. Bush says, we’re here to tell you: Not hundreds, not thousands, but millions of the American people … support your revolution.”

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Triarius

    Blacks are illegally obtaining handguns from other blacks and then going and shooting blacks because some different blacks shot their black friends, and then they go to a prison filled with blacks.

    Count how many times the word “white” is in that sentence.

    • 1stworlder

      Yes but they need someone to make the guns as they couldnt make a weapon more complex than a spear.

  • Puggg

    The actor was on hand to be honored at the 2013 NAACP Image Awards when
    he asserted in his acceptance speech that the “group most devastated by
    America’s obsession with the gun is African Americans.”

    Then bring back the Jim Crow laws that disarmed blacks.

    Watch the Banana Boater’s head explode when you propose that.

    • Svigor

      African-”Americans” are the group hit hardest by open-borders and low-skilled immigration, too, but don’t hold your breath waiting for Uncle Tom Bellafonte to speak truth to THAT power.

      • Puggg

        But are they really that “hard hit?” Or rather, do they interpret that they’ve been hit hard? Some do, but most blacks are like QD said a few days ago, happy they no longer have to work and happy that Barack Claus is there with a welfare check. And as long as the EBT card refills, voulez-vous les bon temps roulet! And roulet those doobies they will.

        • Svigor

          The Mexicans scoop up all the low-skilled jobs and lower wages for same, which is all blacks are qualified for, so yeah, Mexican illegal infiltration hits blacks the hardest. That they’re too dumb to know it doesn’t change the fact.

        • Cherry Bomb

          Blacks are rapidly being driving out of their homes, schools and neighborhoods by THEIR replacement population from south of the border. Not that there is anything wrong with this and you’ll get no sympathy from me.

          Don’t look now, blacks have been thrown under the bus by their open borders politicians who tell them their failures and violence are due to whites. There will be no place for blacks in the NWO; Chinese and/or Mexican overlords are not going to play Santa Claus to blacks, load up their EBT cards, pay for their “Obamaphones” or fund their welfare lifestyle at the expense of their own people.

          For blacks, there will be no “voulez-vous les bon temps roulet” in new Amerika, it will be “tant pis.”

          • Puggg

            You expect most blacks to think ahead like that? Then you’re a racist.

            Point is, that’s in the future. Now is now. The EBT card keeps filling up now, so it’s all good. And…I think they renewed “Hot Ghetto Mess” for another season. You need to start thinking more black-like.

          • GeneticsareDestiny

            This is the exact reason most blacks have no strong opinions on immigration whatsoever. The negative effects it will have on them do not happen today, or tomorrow, but a decade from now. Your average black does not have the IQ necessary to think and plan that far ahead.

            Some of them are vaguely pro-immigration simply because it fits in with their general worldview of “Whatever is bad for whitey is good for us.”

      • Gerónimo Anónimo

        I respectfully disagree. Remember when the old defense for the illegals is that they did the work that “Americans” don’t want to do. Translate “americans” to mean “Blacks’

    • Pelayo

      Hide dee daydlee Blaaahck teenageaah! Daylight cawn anhnd me wahn go home!

  • 48224

    Okay then, I vote we ban guns to blacks only. Who will vote with me?

    • crystalevans

      Would not do any good. What they would do is go down south to states like Georgia, which has liberal gun ownership laws, buy them there and sell them in the inner city. Haven’t the politicians figured this out yet?

      • Joseph

        Yes, they have figured it out and have for years used this as a reason to regulate guns statewide and nationwide. Remember the complaints about how “easy” it was for people to get guns in Virginia and smuggle them into Baltimore, D.C. etc?

        What they conveniently ignore is gun crime rates in places like Haiti and Mexico which have severe gun controls. Haiti is an island and they still can’t keep guns out. We can’t even keep Mexicans, 100 lb freon cans or tons of dope out of the US. Imagine the value of smuggled semi-auto rifle parts to the damned drug-thugs if “assault rifles” were banned. Not to worry though, Sharpton’s sermon a couple weeks ago was about how no one need those semi-auto rifles because we have the police and military to protect us.

    • StillModerated

      A black with a gun is an automatic felon which must be shot on sight. Blacks lack both the self-control and the discipline to shoot well.

    • concernedcollegekid

      Everyone knows that liberals want to disarm blacks and conservatives want to arm themselves against blacks, but nobody will say it.

      • Svigor

        I don’t really think this is true. Libs want to disarm red-state, conservative, White, law-abiding gun owners. That’s the demographic profile of the overwhelming majority of the people who buy semi-automatic rifles with detachable box magazines. And that’s the profile of the exact guns they always grab for first.

        On the other hand, libs love their handguns, the primary weapon of the urban dweller, both the SWPL looking to defend himself against blacks, and the black thugs looking to murder blacks. Nobody’s even mentioned banning handguns, despite the fact that they dwarf semi-auto rifles in terms of the number of murders they’re used to commit every year.

        No, I think libs don’t like the idea of red-staters having all that firepower. And they know how much confiscating those rifles would piss off red-staters, whom they hate and fear as mortal enemies.

        • Joseph

          The “assault rifle” is only the thin edge of the wedge. You can be damned sure that handguns are just further down the list. They are already much more strictly regulated even now. Handgun Control Inc. just changed their corporate name but not their objectives and neither have any of the other liberals. They are just working smarter to get it done piecemeal. Look to every other English speaking country for the program to follow.

          • Svigor

            True, they want them all, eventually, but they’re ignoring blacks as if they aren’t part of the equation. Note how the issue of “gun violence” only comes up vis-a-vis mass shooters and rifles. They ignore the trainloads of bodies provided one at a time by handgun-wielding blacks in urban areas.

          • gemjunior

            You’re dead center on this – it’s a slippery slope. I have this argument all the time with stupid white people who think we should all hold hands under the rainbow and nobody should ever be churlish and shatter the pretence by telling the truth. They say “But WHY would anyone need these assault weapons blah blah blah hunting bla bla baaa baaa. I know you know what I’m talking about here. We need to absolutely dig our heels in here and not give an inch, not one jot. Because if we do it’s over, and everything else is just a matter of time until we are using plastic forks in special “reparation camps”. We must hang on to this, because if the libs have their way here we are FINISHED. Not only as a country but as a race. The only thing we have going for us that still scares these tyrants is guns. They know that as long as most White men are well-armed, they have no chance. So you are absolutely right on this and you should spread your opinion far and wide, hoping it reaches more people and shakes them up a bit.

        • concernedcollegekid

          Hey, I never said liberals ONLY want to disarm blacks. I think liberals think the more people they disarm, the more they will Stop Murder. But liberals are definitely fully aware that a black gun-owner is, statistically, more likely to be dangerous to them than a white gun-owner.

          • Svigor

            They only seem to want to disarm whites. The closest they’ve come to banning blacks’ favorite murder weapon is to talk about a ban on high-capacity mags. Blacks won’t care, they’ll just start buying 10-round .45s and .40s.

          • dukem1

            Plus the thing is – whatever type of law banning whatever type of weapon is passed, whites are the only ones who follow the law. Ergo, any restrictive gun laws passed serve only to restrict gun ownership by whites – i.e., the disarming of the white population.
            Now, whoever could benefit from that?

          • Joseph

            -After the background check, of course.

          • Mote

            Buying? Buying, you must be kidding.
            They buy guns in the same manner they buy everything else, wake up.

          • Joseph

            …”But liberals are definitely fully aware that a black gun-owner is,
            statistically, more likely to be dangerous to them than a white
            gun-owner.”

            No, their version of this fact is: “poor people with guns are more likely to be dangerous becuase poverty breeds violence” as if black and white crime rates cancel on both sides of the equation. Race nulls out.

            All misbehavior of blacks is attributed to:

            A. Racism

            A.1 Poverty due to racism

            A.2 Lack of education due to poverty

            A.3 Lack of “opportunity” due to lack of education

            A.3.a Violence due to lack of opportunity for legitimate income

          • Michael_C_Scott

            O.J. Simpson.

          • Joseph

            I’m offering my analysis of the *liberal* reasoning.

            MY reasoning is much simpler: blacks behave according to innate programming which is incompatible with white society.

        • NM156

          No white, urban, SWPL lefty in Chicago that I’ve known in two decades of adulthood has owned a handgun, including hipsters living on the leading edge of gentrification in neighborhoods where a pitbull ripping someone’s face off at a bus stop wouldn’t get a look.

      • HenryHolliday

        Liberals want to disarm everyone except liberals.

      • fakeemail

        Liberals don’t want to disarm blacks. Most blacks don’t obtain guns through legal means and thus would not be stripped of them by the government. Anarcho-tyranny.

      • Joseph

        This is how you know that you live in a closed society and/or police state; everyone is afraid to say publicly what the whole audience knows to be true.

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        I would like to think that suburban liberal women love “gun control” because it’s a form of secret dog whispering for black control. And Steve Sailer thinks the same way. Of course, Steve Sailer is convinced that every hung toenail is a message from the great progressive beyond spirits communicating secret messages that doctrinaire liberals really do “get it” about race.

        The problem is, the best program to disarm blacks by far has been vigorous enforcement of the Federal law that disallows convicted felons from owning firearms, (“felon in possession,” it’s called colloquially). These kinds of vigorous enforcement programs that involve cooperation between U.S. Attorneys, sometimes the ATF, sometimes the FBI, and almost always the relevant local cops, exist because the evil hated NRA helped design them. And every time, guess who is in the background whining that these enforcement putsches exist and want them dismantled?

        Black politicians, and a throng of doctrinaire white liberals, especially journalists, in general.

    • Joseph

      Why should we whites even debate this constitutional stuff? Lets just ignore the 13th and 14 Amendments and stop wasting time with these freeloading criminals.

      • Joseph

        “Why should we whites even debate this constitutional stuff? Lets just
        ignore the 13th and 14 Amendments and stop wasting time with these
        freeloading criminals.”

        -Since Banana Man thinks we whites are wasting time considering the constitution, that is.

    • Tom Iron

      Sir, get this “voting” idea out of your head. That time is long gone. Other methods have to be used now.

    • John

      Freedom in civilization is meant to be enjoyed by intelligent people who are able to behave in a civilized manner. Blacks are simply incapable of enjoying freedom in civilization, much less meeting the responsibility that comes with a civilized way of life.

      Instead, Blacks belong free and unencumbered by the rules and laws of civilization. To state it succinicty, they belong in the jungles of Africa. Africa is where nature designed them to function naturally. In civilization, Blacks are like fish out of water and the results are predictable and disastrous for everyone involved.
      President Lincoln and Congress had the right idea when they began The Liberia Project to repatriate all Blacks back to Africa. Failure to complete that project to totality in the 19th century has led to the collapse of America here in the 21st century.

    • Joseph

      Most are probably already “prohibited persons” anyway. Wouldn’t matter; just another law to ignore.

    • George

      Too simplistic, sadly.

      Most blacks killed in Chicago last year was killed by another black who was using an illegal handgun. A blanket ban has no effect on individuals who are no respecter of the law or of other persons.

      There’s still a way to use ‘disparate impact’ to advantage, though. Make the use or possession of a firearm in the commission of an offense a separate offense, with a minimum 10 year incarceration. No parole, the charge may not be dropped as part of a plea bargain, and the sentence is to be served consecutively with any other jail time.

      Caught speeding, and the cop finds an illegal gun in your possession? $50 fine and 10 years. Rob a store whilst waving a gun? 5 years for the robbery, then 10 for the gun. Tacking on an extra (full) dime will ensure that the potential cost to the criminal to use a firearm is too high. They will, therefore, be much less likely to use a firearm. As members of their gang, neighbours, associates, etc, start going away for lengthy stretches, they will be less likely to carry, as well. The end result would have the effect you’re advocating.

    • Cherry Bomb

      I vote we ban blacks.

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      Most blacks who want guns don’t qualify to purchase them legally anyway, because of prior convictions for robbery, assault, rape, etc. Guns are already effectively banned to blacks. They just purchase them illegally instead.

  • nobody special

    “. . . [H]e claimed “white Americans” who agitate for gun rights are ignoring
    the black “river of blood that washes the streets of our nation.”

    No they don’t. Most wouldn’t dream of living in a community with anywhere near a black majority population and quite a few have moved out of such places.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      Quite a few moved out? Most of these areas were “no go” regions for whites. The new idea of gentrification sees some liberal whites move in and then move out, after having a few bullets whiz past them or getting their head punched while walking in their neighborhood.

      • HenryHolliday

        Lib yuppies are capable of understanding black criminality only when it hits them in the face, literally.

        • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

          Yeah, and they deserve it. They’re the first to condemn us for being “racist.” I laugh everytime I hear or read another news story of these pc-wimps getting healthy shot of race realism. LOL

  • http://twitter.com/AgentAxis D.B. Cooper

    As I said many times, the white liberal is 1,000 times more deadly than a black activist.

    • BellaCosa

      The white liberal is a far more monstrous figure in the moral sense as well, in my opinion, because he could do otherwise but consciously chooses not to.

  • The__Bobster

    This YT-hating Bantu makes no sense. How does keeping guns out of the hands of law-abiding Whites keep them out of the hands of the non-law-abiding Bantus? It’s not YT who is going into the inner cities and gunning down the mudflaps.
    _______

    http://www.infowars.com/belafonte-put-obamas-critics-in-gulags/

    All who oppose the agenda of Barack Obama – or rather oppose the agenda of his
    globalist handlers – should be rounded up and imprisoned, singer and “social
    activist” Harry Belafonte recently told the ambulance chaser Al Sharpton on the death merchant General Electric’s network, MSNBC.

    • Joseph

      “It’s not YT who is going into the inner cities and gunning down the mudflaps.”

      No, but it limits the “business opportunities” of the more adventurous blacks who might range further from their enclaves to have lots of armed white people who do not appreciate having swarthy entrepreneurs imposing diversity on them at knife or gunpoint. Some of them shoot back and they don’t miss nearly as often. More white privilege to be defeated.

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

      “How does keeping guns out of the hands of law-abiding Whites keep them out of the hands of the non-law-abiding Bantus?”

      No use trying to figure out or argue with Black ‘logic.’ Not if you value your sanity.

  • Francis Galton

    Here’s the REAL problem: the Constitution was written with White European proclivities in mind. It was not written to account for Africans and their high time preferences, aggression, and lack of internal loci of control. Nowhere is this more apparent than with the Second Amendment.

    Blacks as a group are clearly incapable of responsible gun ownership. Look at Sub-Saharan Africa. Look at Inner City America. Those areas are no more awash with guns than are Switzerland or Rural America, and yet gun violence is orders of magnitude higher in black areas than in White areas.

    I don’t think there’s any real solution to urban gun violence, aside from either a massive surveillance/police state, or else a regression to Mogadishu levels of violence. The reality is that blacks are at odds with White European culture and standards on a whole range of issues. Period. Coddling them only makes it worse.

  • Katherine McChesney

    One.trick.pony. How can these white women he marries sit back and listen to his hateful rhetoric? Oh, I guess it’s because of the size of his….banana boat. I bet he lives off their wealth.

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      I hate to think that so many white women only find a man’s worth in his… “banana boat” and are willing to take so much abuse. But stats says it’s true. Even Tiger Woods’ Swedish wife recently tried to make a deal; she’ll come back, but he pays big bucks if he strays again, which he will. But to me it’s bestiality.

      • Katherine McChesney

        I agree. I know my comment was crude, but I think that’s the only thing the majority of black men have that attracts white women. But then there are some women who are attracted to violent men. Could this be a factor? I’d imagine Harry has a cruel aspect to him.

        • Guest

          I am all for objective facts that can’t be argued such as blacks make up 14% of the current population. However, the size myth has never been proven and there has never been evidence to support this. The truth is that according to the law of averages, the overwhelming majority of all men are average and then you have your rare exceptions being small and rare exceptions being big. It’s just a myth created from porn that uses the same 3-5 black pornstars in every video all of whom obviously are hung being in the industry. The biggest penis in the world belongs to a doofy-looking white man. Look it up. The vagina before having a baby can only comfortably fit about 5-6 inches. What I hear from women is that the thickness is most important which makes more sense than having an extra 3 inches sticking out of you that can’t even fit or feel. It’s also a burden for black men because this myth is so common and white women have sky-high expectations that they often can’t achieve nor can any man other than maybe a porn star.

          The biggest thing with white women and black men is 5 letters: M-E-D-I-A. Hip hop is the most listened to genre by youth today featuring almost exclusively black thugs, so white women sing their songs, watch their music videos, and see that black men are perceived as “cool” and have “swagger”. They also see them all over the TV in football and basketball and they assume they are the best athletes in the world. Women have always been very shallow and they love the power and status an athlete has…most tend to be black in the major televised sports. For some, it’s just like wanting to try a new flavor…these white girls from the 95% white suburbs often see black men regularly when they first go away to college. It’s a novelty thing. For others, their main purpose is to show off how “anti-racist” they are. “Who can be less racist” is the most popular game in America among white youth today. White girls are the winners of that game. Some of them have white guilt and just feel like it’s their duty to give back. For others, they have major daddy issues. I know a girl who had a really strict father who couldn’t stand black people. She grew up and only dates black men now. She is overweight and has a dyke haircut and literally hates her own race. It’s the old “get back at daddy” routine.

          Mostly though it’s the media. Commercials portray white men as bumbling idiots who are out of shape with beer guts, losing their hair, short, and ugly. Black men are portrayed as big, strong, dominant, sexy, handsome, velvet-skinned, athletic, powerful studs. White women buy into this, only to get raped, murdered, abused, or abandoned after having his kid. Also, like other white men have said…once you go black, we won’t take you back. No more consistent income, no normal marriage with kids and a father, no nice neighborhood, no nothing. When a white woman goes black then tries to come back, it’s like an animal in the wild rejecting its young because it has a different animal’s scent on it. So white women, I ask you…what’s more important: the curiosity of black genitalia that turns out to be average most likely, or the security and well-being for the rest of your life?

          • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

            “The biggest thing with white women and black men is 5 letters: M-E-D-I-A. Hip hop is the most listened to genre by youth today featuring almost exclusively black thugs, so white women sing their songs, watch their music videos, and see that black men are perceived as “cool” and have “swagger”.”
            I wish them many good beatings. And as aggressive as many Black males are, sooner or later, “da nigga” gives it to them. Now that’s “cool.” LOL

          • Michael_C_Scott

            White dudes got a bad rap in this respect. The first time my now wife and I wanted to, she said it was “takusan”, so we settled for a lot of petting and kissing first. What they say about what Scotsmen have hanging under their kilts might be true.

          • http://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/ban-blacks-african-americans-japan/wVYZcsfT “Furious” George Rockwell

            Size really doesn’t matter. A White dude with a concave fellow could still have a small harem in an Oriental country if he so desired. Black men of all calibers are promptly rejected. Luckily for me, life will end one day.

      • Svigor

        What “stats” are you referring to? The one where blacks are 12% of the population, but only 2% or less of them are married to or breeding with whites? Or the one (GSS) where fewer than 3% of blonde and redhead women report having ever had sex with even one black in their whole lives?

        The salient thing about black men and white women is how seldom they pair up.

        • BellaCosa

          Yeah I was about to say the same thing. Anecdotally – for whatever it’s worth – most of the rare black male/white female couples you see (in America, at least) involve a fairly average or decent looking black male and a waddling white redneck woman (who probably gets very little attention from white men to begin with). In Europe, unfortunately, I don’t think the trend is quite as rigid. I can’t speak on the strength of any statistics about Europe, but anecdotally, I’ve seen many more well-to-do, attractive European women paired with silly-looking black African pathogens than I care to remember.

          • Joseph

            “I’ve seen many more well-to-do, attractive European women paired with
            silly-looking black African pathogens than I care to remember.”

            I’ve noted this also and seen them on college campuses similarly mismatched -though probably not married, likely just fornicating. It seems to be some sort of trendy thing like having an exotic pet. It is completely baffling from the outside (as a white male).

          • Daisy

            I get the sense some white women have bought into these romanticized glamorized black male personae that the media creates. I also suspect that some feel disaffected from white men and imagine black men to be more benevolent or something. What’s odd is that it’s not difficult to pick up a fair amount of real objectification coming your way from them as a white woman. Even in seemingly ‘upscale-ish’ areas I’ve heard pretty aggressive comments from some, although my state features a landscape that changes quickly. I’ll get perverted redhead comments from complete strangers that I rarely get from white males and never from my own ethnicity just sitting on a park bench in mid-afternoon.

          • PesachPatriot

            I am sorry people are so disrespectful to you…I will admit to finding to red hair attractive, but even before I was married I would not walk up to a stranger and make suggestive comments. I know gun laws in NJ suck, but I hope you have some pepper spray or a pocket knife considering some of the experiences you have mentioned here.

          • Daisy

            If I weren’t in NJ I’d get a gun, although depending on where I’d go I may or may not need one. Obnoxious comments barely register with me given my overall life’s experiences; it’s just odd that more white women don’t pick up on
            the attitudes many blacks evince. But they also may not feel comfortable even voicing dismay in our PC society. I”m only realizing this in writing about it but it might be my hair color brings out some of this behavior, and the lack of respect for white women in general in their culture unleashes the outrageous comments.

          • PesachPatriot

            Have you considered a rural part of pennsylvania? They are one of the more pro-2nd amendment states in the northeast…most of rural upstate NY is pretty good too.

            I think disrespect for women is reprehensible behavior no matter the color of the man doing it….I was never much of a ladies man before I was married, more of the painfully shy type, but so many young guys today just think of women as another video game or disposable amusement facilities….It doesn’t help that so many young women are attracted to “bad boys” instead of the nice, quiet respectful guys who have jobs and stay out of trouble. Stay safe up there, even though we may have started off on the wrong foot I enjoy your posts.

          • Daisy

            I rented a friend’s vacation home in Pa, for a steal, for around six months and it was like going back to the home I either never had, or sort of did as a kid. Just pure peace, at least comparatively. Unfortunately there were no lucrative jobs to be found out there. Seems like unless one telecommutes all the jobs are in areas where my ethnicity is in a minority and that teem with hostile diversity-mongering. I noticed in college that nicer boys became the fought-over ones, although ‘bad boys’ still harassed quiet girls. The US is a woman-hating country, but men in Pa did seem very courteous and respectful I must say.

          • PesachPatriot

            I don’t know how you feel about pets, but maybe a big mean scary dog would be the best protection for you….aspiring rappers and athletes are generally hesitant to get anywhere near white people walking dobermans, german shepherds, rotweillers or pit bulls…If you raise one from a pup they will be loyal best friends who will always protect you….No one needs a concealed carry permit for a dog either.

          • Joseph

            “I’ll get perverted redhead comments from complete strangers that I
            rarely get from white males and never from my own ethnicity just sitting
            on a park bench in mid-afternoon.”

            White men, at least in the good ol’ days, were taught some boundaries in social interactions and have internalized values. Moreover today, a white is probably more likely subject to some harassment claim than in many of the situations in which they are likely to encounter white women so even some of the bad actors are likely to curb their aggression somewhat.

            I am intrigued by the mating dynamic that exists wherein (some) women seem attracted to complete wastrels who are rude, abusive, shiftless characters. There is an attraction to risk-taking males which seems in some cases to override care-taking males. There is some indication of this in the animal world also where a female of a species will pair with a care-taking provider male BUT will be copulating on the side with a fleeting risk-taking male -the animal equivalent of the one-night-stand.

          • Daisy

            I’ve noticed this trend in women too, although a study I came upon recently found that women tend to marry men they feel they can dominate. That is, they perceive themselves to be in contro; it didn’t conclude that they necessarily are. Yet it’s obvious through life experience that females find risk-taking males sexually attractive. I think the most well adjusted people find mates who express a balance of both qualities and that the males who go off half-cocked in the manner of risking things rarely get the same ‘play’ or admiration from women who’ve matured. One can still observe the dynamic in adults though. I’ve noticed men find women who embody some risk-taking perhaps in different ways sexy, or at least ones who radiate internal strength. Sadly, emotional independence in women seems to come across as both alluring but also very threatening to many men. White people would be surprised at how often red hair is seen as ‘exotica’ by POC. I had to fight off a hispanic neighbor in an apt. building who felt compelled to tell me incessantly that my ‘exotic’ red hair made me ‘hot stuff.’ Why do men think they can annoy women into digging them?! I had to remind him that, “my people don’t find me exotic.” a) I have a people who do not objectify me and b) they will beat you up if you continue. Northwestern and mainland european males don’t care about red hair. They either like it with a sense of affectionate familiarity or not, or are just peacefully indifferent which to me is comforting.

          • Joseph

            In my (guess) red hair is “very white” racially. Because red hair is the product primarily of pheomelanin rather than eumelanin, most people with genuine red hair are typically pretty pale complexioned unless they are very heavily freckled. There is I think, an unspoken attraction to the “whiteness” as well. These other races know that hooking up with whites is (typically) socially “moving up”

            You have to admit too, that red hair is fairly uncommon in the population which also makes you a particularly valuable trophy. Now carrying this to extreme -say albinism, is *not* socially desirable because this is not a normal variant but a genuine (often pathological) genetic defect (a freak) and this seems to be recognized innately by most people.

          • Angry White Woman

            I’m with Daisy on this one. As a natural redhead, I’ve heard some amazingly uncivilized comments of an extremely personal nature coming my way. I have always lived in predominately white areas, and most of the comments seemed to be directed my way from white jackasses. Total strangers, yet! They vary from the (relatively) benign, “Hey, Red! Does the carpet match the drapes?” to the truly horrid. These comments can be directed at you when you are doing nothing more provocative than grocery shopping or playing with your child at the park. I’ve never understood the mentality that makes a person think that it’s somehow okay to talk that way to a woman who has done nothing but cross their path wearing her God-given red hair. I’ve heard blonde friends gripe about how “Blonde jokes” offend them, but they always have to admit they get off easier than us redheads. As I’ve aged, thankfully I’ve heard less and less of this, but I know it’s still out there, because my (30+ year old) red-haired daughter still hears it directed at her on a regular basis.

          • Daisy

            What ethnicity are the rude and crude white guys? My own experience was that my own ethnicity of northwestern european males *tend* to show some favoritism of both blonde and redheads with some feeling particularly impressed with red hair. I think it might be related to Joseph’s theory about the extreme fairness of redheads’ white skin seeming particularly compelling and I suspect this comes from mainland euros just liking their own fairness in general, as it’s a trait which lent some evolutionary benefit at a certain point. But I have to say my ethnic group has treated me better overall as both a redhead and to some degree a fair haired female. So it’s surprising but not shocking if some of our own ethnic group of men were that obnoxious and fetishising of your hair. I do get the distinct sense that some other races, like here the hispanics, view me as a curiosity . Could be a trophy thing or maybe some male drive to explore and conquer whatever femininity has to offer. I was horribly attacked sexually by some sicilian and southern italians who considered red hair unattractive as a young girl. They’re the only ethnicity I’ve sensed real attacks from. The french supposedly don’t like it as they’ve always tried to repress their celtic roots.

            Mostly I’ve noticed that blonde and redheaded women just get treated crappy, in terms of attracting aggression and resentment, etc. This is from other ethnicities and races; blacks really target us very specifically in all the mixed group environments I’ve been in. And when our own ethnicity is in a minority even if the plurality is italian or jewish or something we still face heightened danger. I’ll say it again: real blonde and redheaded females are only safe in a majority of their own ethnicity.

          • BellaCosa

            Yeah I’ve seen that occasionally (usually it involves a college athlete), but honestly not as often as I might have expected.

          • Joseph

            Certainly not as often as portrayed on TV where all of the white women vie for the attentions of the dusky god.

          • ncpride

            I used to think that was true, but over the years, I’ve seen with my very own eyes that is not the case. I’ve seen, more times than I care to count, beautiful White girls with blacks. And these were not ‘redneck’ women, but Southern gals who could have had their pick of any White man.
            I’ll NEVER understand the how’s or why’s they make such choices, however, down South here, once they go black, the White men really DON’T want them back.

          • bubo

            Yeah, I can tell you it’s not the case anymore. Not just good looking, but well to do white girls are bedding down with thug blacks at alarming rates.

          • BellaCosa

            I can’t say I’ve noticed that happening. But I’m obviously sorry to hear if that’s the case.

          • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

            F*ck-’em (not lierally)…they’re scum. However, the real blame for this is the Jewish-owned and controlled entertainment media who is at the forefront pushing to to glamourize Blacks, their cRap anti-culture and interracial sex.

          • Diamond_Lil

            The “why” has a lot to do with YKW-run t.v. and movies.

          • BellaCosa

            Really? That’s not been my experience (even in NC) at all. Although I should have qualified what I said before – I do know of some otherwise attractive white women who have dated or been with blacks, but they’re almost always really loose/whorish types.

          • saxonsun

            I live on the Upper East Side in NYC–there are good-looking white women with black males here. And yes, breeding with them.

          • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

            Tragic…but that’s the choice these losers made. I spit at them and wish them many good beatings. LOL

          • dukem1

            I think you’re on to something.. Sort of..Certainly some part of the black male population should be sort of commended for taking an interest in those great big, fat, ugly white chicks they go for…But I don’t think you should say they are rednecks…moron-icity comes from all corners…

            Don’t these black dudes realize how skankadelic their thick white baby mamas are?
            (Rhetorical query – I know.)

          • Daisy

            So they’re not rednecks but big, fat ugly white chicks…too skanky for black dudes. Well folks we have some answers here.

          • dukem1

            I don’t know where you live where this is rare.
            And, Mr. – or Ms. moderator – I enjoy and appreciate this site. But cut me some slack! I live in the world!…It’s just gross!!

          • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

            but anecdotally, I’ve seen many more well-to-do, attractive European women paired with silly-looking black African pathogens than I care to remember.”
            Interracial oddballs. I blame it on the non-stop race-mixing propaganda they’re subjected to in the media, etc. Sooner or later I bet many of these mudsharks realize that they f***-up. Then it’s too late, for no decent, self-respecting White man, especially if has mulatto children, will have anything to do with this race-traitor trash.

      • Joseph

        She’s a skank just like Kardashian and the rest of these tabloid whores. It is difficult to decide who is worse: the lowlife blacks or the lowlife whites who attend them.

    • Daisy

      I think it’s more his wealth than his whatever that attracts them to him, which is just as appalling. No one could pay me to listen to that crap. Where did white people’s self esteem go.

  • PesachPatriot

    This clown is becoming exceedingly tiresome….Mr. Belafonte is rich beyond the wildest dreams of most mortals…if he dislikes the 2nd amendment or the good people of the american firearms industry please feel free to take your money to the socialist paradise of your choice…North Korea, Cuba,China, Venezuela and many other places probably have laws more to his liking….Guns are not the problem, the mentality that says its perfectly ok and “gangsta” to shoot someone dead for their sneakers, wearing the wrong color on the wrong block, a 20 dollar drug debt or their chain is the problem….

  • Luca

    Yo, Harry, over in Liberia they have a totally black-run society. They were never colonized by Whites and there are no Whites in power. In Liberia, no citizens may lawfully acquire, possess or transfer any firearm or ammunition. You couldn’t ask for a stricter gun law.

    But, lo and behold Harry, somehow those sub-Saharan cousins of yours are up to their antics again: rape, murder, genocide, atrocities of all descriptions, slaughter, cannibalism, disease and a totally dysfunctional society.

    Please Harry, what is the explanation? Curious minds need to know.

    • NYB

      Africans are shooting each other in the Congo and Uganda, chopping each other up with machetes in Rwanda and Burundi, and killing each other with rocks in Kenya and Somalia.
      It’s not the guns that are the problem, Harry.

      • LaSantaHermandad

        Send them more machetes.

      • saxonsun

        Oh now, don’t you know that’s the legacy of the dirty white imperialist scum.

    • Pelayo

      Harry,
      Why don’t you either leave this horrible country or kill yourself. You became rich due to the stupidity of the brain dead White people who bought your records; who never knew how much you actually hated them. Do the honorable thing and place a plastic bag over your head and sing “Brown Skin Girl” at the top of your lungs until all the air is exhausted.

    • Cherry Bomb

      He doesn’t have to go that far. He can go to Chicago which has the same conditions as Liberia.

  • Bill

    So it’s OUR fault blacks don’t honor and abide by the Constitution and the Ten Commandments????? Figures……

    • guest

      Some people just have no sense of personal responsibility.

  • Jss

    Well Harry I’m furious at the “devastation” you Africans are causing all over Europe and America. I swear you Africans might as well be a biblical curse. Personally I would rather have the literal locust then you and your kind. Indeed if I had to pick between Attila the Hun and your people I would say you are the scourge of God.

    I do hope one day though that Harry’s fear is justified and that Whites realize that we are being wiped out on the land of our ancestors and we can again exercise our God given right to defend ourselves. Sadly it has already come to rivers of White blood shed by blacks, and one of the only thing blacks seem to ever fight for is the right to live with Whites. But I cant think of anything more worth fighting for, a diversity free future, a non vibrant Whitopia where none of us feel shame or care at all what Africans think or want.

    • Katherine McChesney

      ‘…a biblical curse.’ The curse of Ham. They would serve all other races. It appears to be set in stone considering their centuries of ineptitude.

      • Jss

        I would say these days it’s Whites who are expected to serve every other race on the planet until we are extinct.

        • Joseph

          Exactly. I would ask who is “serving” whom?! We have to PAY to be endangered by these malefactors.

        • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

          Well, those who ‘expect’ that from me have a big surprise awaiting them.

  • StillModerated

    Hey Mr Tally Man tally me banana. Sure Harry, we’ll never forget you. Or better yet listen to his song extolling the intelligence and work ethic of the bantu in the song: There’s A Hole In My Bucket.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Terrible song. But not as bad as “Kumbaya”.

      • PesachPatriot

        Did belafonte really write the kumbuya song? I always just thought it was some old hippy folk song.

        • Katherine McChesney

          No.
          Origin: Africa.

          It just popped into my head.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    Belafonte has always been an anti-white, pro black activist. Why he thinks I should care about his people shooting each other daily is beyond me.

  • The Last White Man Standing

    A better solution to the “gun problem” would be to ban blacks. The crime and murder rates would fall dramatically. In addition, banning blacks would solve many of America’s economic woes. Things in this country would only get better.

  • Dave4088

    Another stupid, uninformed comment from a brainless black bigot. Most blacks killing and dying as in Chicago obtain their guns ILLEGALLY on the black (oops) market and care nothing for the white man’s gun laws. We already have 20,000 gun laws on the books, yet this hasn’t stopped blacks from killing each other.

    • Svigor

      Belafonte has big, fat mouth, even for a black boy.

  • Joseph

    When will this imported fossil be placed in the Museum of Black History -or is it Hysteria?

  • MekongDelta69

    Ahh – another outburst from Harry ‘Day O’ Buffoonafonte.

    How many black on black murders have there been? Oh yes – it was posted yesterday:
    279,384 black murder victims (by blacks).

    He’ll keep rambling and babbling until the day he dies.
    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=837

  • kjh64

    Seeing as how all of these Blacks shooting each other get their guns illegally, what does the issue of gun rights have to do with Black shootings?

    • LaSantaHermandad

      It has nothing to do with anything! The object is to render all Whites defenseless against the Blacks who will have their guns.

  • http://twitter.com/seedymedia r j p

    In a just world, white’s would make sure everyone knows how to download an MP3s from a torrent site instead of iTunes to ensure Harry Belafonte never receives another royalty check in his life.

  • rebart

    This anti-American, anti-Constitution, America-hating POS who is everything he is because of America, needs to find another country to live in—South Africa, maybe, or how about Kenya? What a disgusting, racist pig.

  • HenryHolliday

    Yo Harry:
    Daylight is coming; you’ll be wan’ go home.

  • http://www.awpn.net/ Celestial Time

    Get rid of a specific 13% of the population, you immediately get rid of roughly 70% of the murders and violent crimes.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002454802929 John Smith

    Well, I’m certainly not debating anyone. I’m not sure why any gun owner would “debate” anyone interested in disarming them. The hoplophobes can talk all they want. No one is going to take any firearm I own. Now, or ever. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

  • libertarian 1234

    Blacks are the curse of mankind.

    Everywhere they go they create nothing but trouble and are a burden to the country they’re in.

    Take a look at this link. The video was on the O’Reilly Factor tonight.
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/14/Exclusive-Judicial-Watch-USDA

    This is a mulatto hired by the community organizer to propagandize employees. He’s teaching hate, plain and simply: (Talking to employees of USDA) “I want you to say that America was founded by outsiders – say that – who are today’s insiders, who are very nervous about today’s outsiders. I want you to say, ‘The pilgrims were illegal aliens.’ Say, ‘The pilgrims never gave their passports to the Indians.”

    Judicial Watch says this is just one outrage of many that has been occurring since this comunnity organizer has been in office.

    It’s going to get worse now. Be prepared.

    • Mike

      This yokel ought to be told that the people who landed at Jamestown and Plymouth were lawful English settlers who were royally chartered to colonize His Britannic Majesty’s dominions overseas. They did not have to present passports to the Indians, who were subject peoples under both English law and the law of nations.

      • PesachPatriot

        Its a lot simpler than that…no one had passports back then white, indian, black, asian or other…for most of recorded history most people never traveled more than 30 miles from the place they were born….the concept of passports and the things that make them necessary like planes, cars, trains and ocean liners, are all products of euro/american civilization.

        • Cherry Bomb

          Also such unfortunate things as EBT cards, Section 8 housing, Head Start, school lunches, AA preferences.

          I’m sure blacks think those things will be provided for them forever by whoever is running the US and Europe in the future, Moslems, Chinese, Mexicans, at the expense of their own people, of course. Not to fund the black welfare state is racist and bigoted, everyone knows that. I’m sure the Chinese, Moslems and Mexicans will cave in to screaming black activists that threaten to riot if their demands are not met…right?

          Try calling Chinese, Moslems and Mexicans racist and bigoted and see how far that gets.

          • PesachPatriot

            The Chinese, Moslems and Mexicans are the most enlightened and tolerant peoples in the world when it comes to respecting african-americans…sorry I couldn’t say it with a straight face….I was discussing the EBT cards, Section 8 etc with a friend once and he said it would be worth the taxes paid for it if they would just stay in their neighborhoods and keep their crime to each other. Luckily here in florida this is generally the case…yeah a few have jobs at wal-mart or target or cleaning dishes, but the really troublesome ones stay in their own hoods which are easily avoidable and kill each other over sneakers and rap beefs.

      • Cherry Bomb

        No one had passports because none were needed. There was no country here until WHITES created it.

        That jerk in the video needs to be reminded that it was WHITES who freed the slaves at great cost of life and treasure.

        He can take comfort in the fact that we Whites are a world minority now and when we’re gone, blacks will be at the mercy of overlords they’re not going to like, most likely the Chinese who are busy colonizing Africa. The Chinese have always known how to deal with complainers…

        • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

          “That jerk in the video needs to be reminded that it was WHITES who freed the slaves at great cost of life and treasure.”

          Yeah, and remind him of the White genes he inherited as well. Speaking of which, has anyone ever noticed that mulattoes and countless variations of such seem to be the most militant Blacks, exceptions notwithstanding?

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            The psychology of mulatto blacks basically boils down to this:

            “If I can’t be purely white, then nobody else should be allowed to be purely white.”

            Speaking of obnoxious mulattoes, if you’re in St. Louis, you may notice that Lizz Brown is back on WGNU.

      • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

        The Indians had no concept of what a passport was much less what continent these warring hunters and gatherers resided on. This is “the house that White man built” and angry, anti-White, militant marxist mulattos and other White haters can go screw themselves.

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

      “I want you to say that America was founded by outsiders – say that – who are today’s insiders, who are very nervous about today’s outsiders. I want you to say, ‘The pilgrims were illegal aliens.’ Say, ‘The pilgrims never gave their passports to the Indians.”

      F*ck YOU is what I’d say to this anti-White bastard’s face. I mean it. Today’s “insiders” built a First World civlization where there was NONE including law and order, which today’s “outsiders” clearly are in violation of.
      Can you actually believe such Soviet-style pro-illegal alien brainwashing is going on in what used to be the good ol’ USA?? I knew a second Obama term would be bad, I just didn’t expect it to be bad so quickly.

  • http://twitter.com/AFreespeechzone A Freespeechzone

    Who the hell cares what a black ‘has-been’ who is and has been consumed with hate for Whites all of his life–and wants to blame the White gun-owners for the violence in the black community.

    This hateful, intellectual fraud needs to look at the facts that black on black crime is encouraged by their culture.

    As usual, facts never matter to a hateful bigot….especially if that bigot is black.

  • Mike

    When something like 55% of the homicides in the U.S. are committed by blacks, it’s obvious that what we need is not “gun control,” but rather negro control.

    As has been pointed out, the marked difference between Chicago’s and New York City’s violent crime rates is not due to gun laws (both cities have strict ones) but rather to New York’s “stop and frisk” policy. This of course targets blacks and Hispanics disproportionately, because they are most often the ones acting suspiciously. When Al Sharpton protests it as “racial profiling,” that is almost enough to persuade one that it is 1) appropriate, and 2) working. And, as a matter of fact, it is!

    It could be even more effective if combined with a more vigorous application of capital punishment, its expansion to cover rape (as it once did in something like 17 states), the reintroduction of corporal punishment for certain crimes (it works very effectively in Singapore), and of prison sentences “at hard labor” – on the chain gang from dawn till dusk – rather than indulging felons in prisons with law libraries and gyms, to enable them to become cleverer and stronger criminals.

    As for Belafonte – isn’t he Jamaican? Go home!

    • LastBastionOfHope

      And due to the fact that many white kids from suburban NYC are moving into the city! I don’t know if I told you guys this, but Columbia University is located in Harlem and white people actually DOMINATE West Harlem now. Many white Columbia students rent there, as well as professors, and many other recent graduates who just got their first job. It went from a place where rent control was used by everyone ($200/month) to a place where it now costs $2,000/month to get your own apartment! That’s because the neighborhood is getting much safer and the economy is booming with nicer stores and cafes opening up for the white college students. You can even google it…black people see whites taking over Harlem and boy are they PISSED! Funny though, because they had no problem taking Brooklyn from the Italians in the 1970′s and 1980′s.

      Speaking of Brooklyn, the same gentrification is happening there too! Williamsburg especially. A major influx of college educated white youth are now moving in, the crime goes way down, and it becomes a decent place again. It really is amazing what more white people moving in can do for a neighborhood. Real estate prices soar, new luxury stores open up, crime goes WAY down, etc. I was in Williamsburg recently and encountered an older white man at a bar. He looked at me and said “…Italian?”…I guess he knew because of my black hair, olive skin and darker features. I said “yes” and he began talking to me. We somehow got to talking about how Brooklyn has changed, and he says to me: “We are taking the neighborhood back! It’s a great thing.”. What a great feeling it was. Blacks are being priced out of Manhattan and Brooklyn very quickly. In fact, to be able to live in Manhattan in your own apartment or house with no roomates, you essentially have to be rich or very well off. Those old ghetto rent control crackhead apartments are being refurbished and flipped for $2,000/month each to educated white people. I love it.

      • saxonsun

        A newspaper once interviewed an old black man who said that because whites were coming back things would be good again. They know.

      • Duncan

        Ah.. there is nothing better than a Negro Free Zone.

      • Duncan

        Ah.. the sheer joy and safety in living in a negro free zone.

    • Duncan

      We need certified Negro Free Zones.

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

      “When Al Sharpton protests it as “racial profiling”

      Uppity loudmouth…Mr. Tawana Brawley hoaxster! (1)

      So-called “racial profiling” is criminal profiling. PERIOD.

      If this so-called ‘activist’ (more like agitator) were a White man, he’d still be serving time in prison for inciting Roland James Smith, Jr., during a series of protests back in 1995, who ended up walking into Freddy’s Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all the black customers to leave, spilled paint thinner on several bins of clothing and set them on fire — a fire that resulted in killing 7 people plus Smith.(2)

      (1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley_rape_allegations
      (2) http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/03/when-al-sharpton-incited-massacre-at.html

    • Pelayo

      I think his roots are in Martinique. Probably not much difference.

  • Cherry Bomb

    “While no one speaks of the consequences of our racial carnage.”

    Wrong, idiot. It’s shoved down our throats constantly by the news media, unlike black-on-white carnage.

    So according to this demented old communist, We Whites must have our 2A rights stripped from us because blacks can’t stop themselves from shooting each other.

    “Belafonte is no stranger to controversy, recently advocating that critics of President Obama should be thrown in jail: ”The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a Third World dictator and just put all of these guys in jail,” he said to MSNBC’s Al Sharpton.

    Harry Belafonte makes a great case as to why gun ownership is so important.

    • Joseph

      With any luck at all, he’ll be fully introduced to the joys of diversity by one of those for whom he does his grandstanding and we won’t have to hear from him anymore.

      I expect however, that he doesn’t spend any time whatsoever around these poor victims of white oppression, just the white oppressors themselves where it is safe.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    “We are the most hunted.” BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE!

    Can blacks ever make up their minds? First we try to help them and say how bad their neighborhoods are, how they don’t know how to raise children, and how violent their areas are, then we get called “racist”. Now, they beg for help from us? Which is it…would you rather us be “racist” and tell you about your obvious problems in almost every aspect of life, or ignore you and let you continue to live your ghetto lives?

    Wtf does he want whites to do? It’s 100% a BLACK problem. They cannot even attempt to fix ANYTHING about their culture until they admit they are total failures and take personal responsibility (easier for a fish to breath on land than that happening). How is white america responsible for black culture problems like gangs, black on black violence, robberies, thefts, stabbings, 75% illegitimacy rates, no fathers, valuing going to prison over going to college, etc.?

  • George

    Mr. Belafonte, I’ll tell you what.

    We’ll stop the debate on the Constitution immediately after the repeal of the 13th-15th Amendments.

    We’ll solve the problem blacks in America face by allowing you, personally, to choose which black-run country to send them. YOU can be the new Moses. YOU can lead them to your chosen promised land.

    • JohnEngelman

      George, do you want to restore slavery in the United States?

      I do not. However, if the Constitution is on the table I would like to repeal the Second and the Tenth Amendments. The only one of the first ten I have any real enthusiasm for is the First. I would like for that to be interpreted in ways that would allow restrictions on campaign financing, pornography, and the burning of the American flag.

      • PesachPatriot

        John, I like you as a person, but the Constitution does not need to be screwed around with….the first amendment should cover pornography(something everyone looks at but few admit to) and flag burning…I despise flag burners and I always treat the stars and stripes with the respect it deserves, but freedom means the freedom to do controversial, unpleasant things…the 2nd amendment is a vital and necessary part of the preservation of individual freedom in our republic…the founders made it number 2 for a very good reason.

        You will never be able to repeal it without bloody armed conflict….most gun grabbers don’t own any….people who like the 2nd have lots of guns and ammo if the sales of the last 4 years are any indication. The tenth amendment is also good and necessary as a counterbalance to the present dangerously out of control federal government. I would like an amendment added that forbids politicians from locking up american citizens from growing and enjoying fun plants on their own property.

        • Joseph

          “I would like an amendment added that forbids politicians from locking up
          american citizens from growing and enjoying fun plants on their own
          property.”

          Look, no such amendment is needed. The document already inhibits the fed gov. from doing most of what they do now. There is no legitimate constitutional authority for national drug laws anyway -this would be like some idiotic marriage amendment we keep hearing about. If they ignore the clear meaning of the document as it is they can surely ignore any other version of it.

          • PesachPatriot

            I guess we will have to respectfully agree to disagree on this one…I always joke around that if George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were alive today they would be cellmates in federal prison as drug kingpins because they both grew hemp on their farms. It probably should be left to individual states under the tenth amendment to determine drug law policy and people can vote with their feet on which state has the best one. You’re probably right about the uselessness of Constitutional debates now…the rulers of this country have no interest in adhering to some ancient document anyway…America hasn’t even had a Constitutionally declared war since WWII…and a certain private bank based at 33 Liberty street in NYC has been violating the coinage act of 1792 since 1913. Stay warm up there in Canada.

          • Joseph

            “I guess we will have to respectfully agree to disagree on this one…I”

            I don’t know what we’d disagree about -from your response.

            ??

          • PesachPatriot

            Oh sorry…I guess we’re disagreeing about plant legalization on a national level via a constitutional amendment….canada has much more sensible laws on this subject, but then again canada doesn’t have a multi-billion dollar private prison industry always hungry for warm bodies either. I like your guys national anthem too.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Maybe we should have a different drug policy. But the reason so many “Americans” are in prison is because so many blacks and Hispanics commit violent crimes. Prisons are NOT overflowing with people who got 20 years for having a doobie.

          • Joseph

            This should be left to the states, if at all. Murder, for example, is not even a federal crime as this is not an injury to the operations of the fed. gov’t (unless on fed property or a fed. employee) WHY then, does smoking pot rise to the level of a federal issue?! It really does not. They just assume extraconstitutional power and make it so -I honestly think to control the market and further insinuate themselves into the affairs of individuals. BTW- I don’t even smoke but I can read and reason adequately.

            The fed. constitution is not a document creating or “allowing” any right to the people whatever and this is explicitly stated by the authors -that no rights whatever issue from the constitution, that they predate and in no way depend on that document for their existence. We are endowed with them by our “creator” in their words, “the natural rights of man” if you will.

            If such a thing were to be conceived, it would be a permission list for some limited number of behaviors “granted” by the gov’t. The entire concept of the US constitution is that it *restricts* what the federal gov’t may do and prescribes very limited general powers to that entity and the structure of the enumerated powers of the executive, legislative and judicial branches.

            All powers or limitations not specifically enumerated belong to the people, or the states as would be appropriate to the circumstance under consideration (i.e. the freedom to travel would obviously not be a state prerogative, but individual. The authority to tax would be a state prerogative, not individual) rather than the converse of “permitting” certain actions to the people. There are just some few general principles which were deemed by all of the ratifying states to be so vital to liberty that these were *explicitly* included so that no misinterpretation of the concept would be possible like freedom of speech, assembly, religion, etc.

            This is why I say that there is no necessity of any alteration for such “allowance” in the constitution. The congress needs to disband the entire DEA and rescind all federal drug prohibitions as I do not believe that they have legitimate constitutional authority and it was never deemed thus until recently in history when there was much power to be accrued and money to be made in “drug interdiction”, “law enforcement” and “corrections” for victimless crime.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Murder, for example, is not even a federal crime

            It is if the Feds can find some sort of Federal object or interstate hook.

            WHY then, does smoking pot rise to the level of a federal issue?

            The excuse they’ll give is interstate commerce. They’ll presume the cannabis resin was transported across state lines. If you can find some way to keep the commerce totally in-state, they’ll still find a way to make an interstate commerce issue. If your restaurant gets its salt for the table top salt shakers from another state, then your restaurant is engaged in interstate commerce, so you have to abide by Federal civil rights laws.

      • George

        My personal belief is an end to all affirmative action. Individuals will be able to rise to their own level of competence, and nobody will be forced to hire minorities just to fill a quota. Minorities who are able to function in an advanced society will be recognised for their own merits. Those who can’t will not be placed in positions where they are unable to do the task at hand.

        Abilities & aptitudes should be the consideration. Having a proper high school diploma is one of those factors. A person who drops out of high school has shown a lack of foresight and an unwillingness to make an effort to learn the skills necessary to function at a basic level in our society. Even if kids don’t learn much in high school these day, sticking it out shows a basic work ethic, which is relevant to ALL businesses.

        My personal belief that diversity for diversity’s sake is wrong. Schools that recruit large numbers of blacks to meet this goal end up with black-only dorms, and the blacks self-segregate. Colleges and universities that receive public monies should be disbarred from using race (along with back-door means, such as zipcodes or topics for admissions’ essays).

        Here’s where I get a bit wishy-washy:

        Slavery is an inefficient economic system. It is not an absolute evil, but it is usually immoral. Slavery was practised by every human society since the dawn of time. Mankind is naturally hierarchical — I, for one, am a staunch supporter of individual citizens’ rights, but also a loyal subject of my sovereign, Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada. So I can’t, and won’t, categorically label slavery as ‘wrong’, but it is unpractical in advanced societies.

        • Cherry Bomb

          Don’t forget to add that it is WHITES and ONLY WHITES that put an end to slavery. This is my message for “Black History Month”

        • JohnEngelman

          George,

          Where I disagree with some of the posters here is that I think diversity is a good thing, but only if it is earned and voluntary. I have a high regard for Orientals and Jews. I am pleased that so many do well in the United States.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Without the Second Amendment, the First and Fourth are dust in the wind. Look at the gross restrictions on politically “incorrect” speech in Britain and tell me that Western governments won’t do this to disarmed populations “for their own good”.

        • Joseph

          It is the same in all of these P.C. Euro countries. People have gone to prison for “hate speech” and it is coming here. Canada has this type law now also. We are the last holdout and you are right, when there is no fear of an armed uprising by whites we will go the same way. Even though we may not go home with a meal out of such an event, they know we’ll get a sandwich and “they” don’t (yet) want to chance it.

          Most of the jackass Brits who post anything spend their time bitching about how backward and violent Americans are -like a whole nation of Piers Morgans. They fail to identify *which* Americans are violent, just like they do at home.

          Also, our constitution was specifically intended to contrast with what the founders had left -in significant ways. Britain does not have such a “bill of rights” nor any presumption of innocence. We are not “subjects” of a monarch (at least officially).

          There are a few conservatives (like Nigel Farage) who are British nationalists and point to the REAL problems of race, internationalism, etc. but there seem to be few. It is a castrated nation -as we are becoming, it seems from here. They think that invading Moslems and all sorts of various flavored imported misfits are just swell. Having a gummint camera every 30 yards or a terror bombing from time to time is just the way life should be in a civilized country -at least they don’t have guns. If you point out that *whites* here have about the same violent crime rate as any European country, it is ignored or you are just called a racist, redneck cowboy or treated to various other perjoratives, never refuting the facts from crime stats. It always comes down to guns are the issue.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            Britain does not have such a “bill of rights”

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689

            It inspired the Virginia Charter of Freedoms which in turn inspired our Bill of Rights.

            But Official Britain today acts like the 1689 Bill of Rights does not exist.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        If the first ten amendments are on the table, I will fight until I am killed, after first sending my mother, my wife and my daughter to safety in Japan. In such a war here, I would never be afraid, so long as they were safe, and I would never surrender. I would certainly never ask for mercy or try to surrender, and would grant it only under direct orders from an officer.

        “Try and push me back from here, General Woundwort.” Thlayli saw the Black Rabbit of Inle and lived. I probably would not, but the deal with that sort of critter is that one never expects to survive, and if one emerges from the experience, one is a bit “different”.

        I don’t quite like folks burning the flag of the federals, but I would never tolerate the burning of the BFoNV in my presence.

      • http://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/ban-blacks-african-americans-japan/wVYZcsfT “Furious” George Rockwell

        The Second protects all others. I advise you to read Starship Troopers, particularly the dialogue of Lt. Col. Jean V. Dubois (RET).

        • JohnEngelman

          Most democratic countries get along fine without anything equivalent to the Second Amendment.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            Like Britain and the restrictions on free speech there?

            You’re being dishonest again, Mr. Engelman.

          • JohnEngelman

            Not really. You are just being obtuse. The British electorate places less value on freedom as an abstract than the American electorate.

            On the other hand, the political system in the UK is more democratic than the political system in the United States. Political campaigns are short, meaningful, and inexpensive. Laws therefore are more consistent with the popular will. Restrictions on gun control and hate speech have broad popular support.

          • PesachPatriot

            I would rather be up to my elbows in hate speech and handguns than live like the brits, totally disarmed and under control of a monarchy and a financial tyranny that puts the scum lords of wall street to shame….The only gun control necessary in america is steady trigger fingers. I have said before on this forum that any american citizen who desires strict gun control should move to NYC, DC, Chicago, Los Angeles of San Francisco. People who appreciate the 2nd amendment can live in Florida, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Minnesota, Montana, Colorado or any other state with pro-2nd amendment policies…..I like you mr. engelman but if the brown matter was making contact with the rotary device I’d rather have mr. scott on my team. I think a quick trip to visit my kin in the old time sacred sandbox would make a 2nd amendment believer out of you in a very rapid manner.

          • JohnEngelman

            The murder rate in the United Kingdom is 1.2 per 100,000 people. In the United States it is 4.8. This does not include the number of accidental fire arms deaths.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

          • PesachPatriot

            Most civilized democratic countries like the EU, Canada, UK or Australia aren’t the size of the lower 48….police cannot be everywhere at once to protect everyone. Just remember, when seconds count the police are minutes away. They seem to be very good at locking up 16 year old kids for pot possession or middle aged men and women who drove home from the bar after having a few too many beers…they aren’t very good at dealing with violent inner-city street gangs….If you are the victim of a home invasion the only thing cops can really do is draw a chalk outline around your body and fill out a report on it.

  • bigone4u

    Belafonte, your people are responsible for their problems, not me and my people. And day-oh to you, pal. Get back on your banana boat and take your white wife with you, you hypocrite.

  • LHathaway

    Belafonte is right. It’s an invention they’re not ready for yet.

    • Michael_C_Scott

      In Rwanda, spears and machetes were used to murder most of the 500,000-1,000,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu victims in the 1994 genocide.

      Guns? Heck; they’re not even ready for sharp objects.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    I am all for objective facts that can’t be argued such as blacks make up 14% of the current population. However, the size myth has never been proven and there has never been evidence to support this. The truth is that according to the law of averages, the overwhelming majority of all men are average and then you have your rare exceptions being small and rare exceptions being big. It’s just a myth created from porn that uses the same 3-5 black pornstars in every video all of whom obviously are hung being in the industry. The biggest penis in the world belongs to a doofy-looking white man. Look it up. The vagina before having a baby can only comfortably fit about 5-6 inches. What I hear from women is that the thickness is most important which makes more sense than having an extra 3 inches sticking out of you that can’t even fit or feel. It’s also a burden for black men because this myth is so common and white women have sky-high expectations that they often can’t achieve nor can any man other than maybe a porn star.

    The biggest thing with white women and black men is MEDIA. Hip hop is the most listened to genre by youth today featuring almost exclusively black thugs, so white women sing their songs, watch their music videos, and see that black men are perceived as “cool” and have “swagger”. They also see them all over the TV in football and basketball and they assume they are the best athletes in the world. Women have always been very shallow and they love the power and status an athlete has…most tend to be black in the major televised sports. For some, it’s just like wanting to try a new flavor…these white girls from the 95% white suburbs often see black men regularly when they first go away to college. It’s a novelty thing. For others, their main purpose is to show off how “anti-racist” they are. “Who can be less racist” is the most popular game in America among white youth today. White girls are the winners of that game. Some of them have white guilt and just feel like it’s their duty to give back. For others, they have major daddy issues. I know a girl who had a really strict father who couldn’t stand black people. She grew up and only dates black men now. She is overweight and has a dyke haircut and literally hates her own race. It’s the old “get back at daddy” routine.

    Mostly though it’s the media. Commercials portray white men as bumbling idiots who are out of shape with beer guts, losing their hair, short, and ugly. Black men are portrayed as big, strong, dominant, sexy, handsome, velvet-skinned, athletic, powerful studs. White women buy into this, only to get raped, murdered, abused, or abandoned after having his kid. Also, like other white men have said…once you go black, we won’t take you back. No more consistent income, no normal marriage with kids and a father, no nice neighborhood, no nothing. When a white woman goes black then tries to come back, it’s like an animal in the wild rejecting its young because it has a different animal’s scent on it. So white women, I ask you…what’s more important: the curiosity of black genitalia that turns out to be average most likely, or the security and well-being for the rest of your life?

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

      “Commercials portray white men as bumbling idiots who are out of shape with beer guts, losing their hair, short, and ugly. Black men are portrayed as big, strong, dominant, sexy, handsome, velvet-skinned, athletic, powerful studs.”
      Yeah, the all-knowing, suave, cooll, magic Negro…unlike real life. LOL
      This is part of the ongoing War Against Whites (WAW). It has never been so blatant or regular. I rarely watch TV but when I do I can’t help myself and yell at the TV soon as I see it.
      “White women buy into this, only to get raped, murdered, abused, or abandoned after having his kid.”
      “You reap what you sow.” Ask me if I feel sorry for ‘em?

  • what a shocking accusation

    Well hell yes. Whitey is always the blame for blacks killing blacks and everything else. Thats why it was a horrific mistake for whites to buy those millions of rejects off African tribal chiefs and make slaves out of them in the west and refuse to admit their mistake early and correct it by sending them all back.

    Belfonte or other blacks would never blame their own race even though he is half white like his hero in the WH. You are dealing with a genetic mistake with all blacks whether they are full black or mixed black. They are all the same. They hate whites.

    • Cherry Bomb

      He also marries White

    • Duncan

      They are jealous of the white race.
      They hang around whites like vermin does to a dumpster.
      Whites produce and invent all that is ever worth having.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-McConnell/563448640 Michael McConnell

    Blacks will do anything possible except blame themselves -and their gross lack of morals, for their own problems. Non-blacks are not going into the inner city filth, commiting crimes and then leave. They act like spoiled children who get caught doing something wrong and then blames others for their own actions.

  • shmo123

    I say send Calypso Harry back to the same island he came from on the same banana boat he arrived on.

    • Joseph

      I say we put him and his little friends on a Carnival cruise ship with an engine due for overhaul and give ‘em an Italian captain.

    • Cherry Bomb

      Unfortunately, he was born in the US.

  • Kunta Kinte

    Harry, Harry, Harry, you poor simple fool. Do you think you would be living in a mansion if you were in Africa? Of course not and how did the white man harm you? By buying millions of your records? I guarantee it wasn’t your darker brothers, they don’t buy they just, oh well you know.
    Harry did you fall on your head while waiting for the tallyman to tally your banana’s?
    I say we brought your kind here and we OWE you a FREE one way ticket back to Africa if that is what you want, but your American Citizenship which you disrespect will be gone forever too.
    I don’t blame these low IQ fools I blame the ignorant whites who make them rich only to have them spit in their face.

  • Michael_C_Scott

    Since it isn’t OUR guns that are killing them, the simple solution is to make it illegal for blacks to have guns. The problem is that murder is already illegal, and that doesn’t seem to be stopping them. We can’t blame poverty; O.J. Simpson was filthy rich and killed two people; I guess we can’t blame guns either there, as he carved them up with a knife.

    What this Belafonte dope is really saying is that the availability of guns – even other people’s guns which must first be stolen or otherwise illegally obtained – makes it impossible for blacks to avoid committing murders. Boiled down, his whining to the government is best summarized as “Sabe us, Massa! Sabe us fom dem guns!”

    Having to listen to these idiots’ public blithering is becoming really tiresome.

    The delicious irony here, though is that Belafonte, as an actor has made a career working for a movie industry that has spent decades glamorizing the criminal misuse of firearms, and he’s simply too stupid to see this contradiction.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      Boiled down, his whining to the government is best summarized as “Sabe us, Massa! Sabe us fom dem guns!”

      They say they oppose slavery, but in a lot of what they do, they beg us to put them back into slavery. Then again, since so many of them go to prison, because they deserve it, it makes you think the 13th Amendment was a halfway practical joke.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Exactly; Big Government is the new “Massa” from cradle to grave.

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.pierce.779642 John Pierce

      “What this Belafonte dope is really saying is that the availability of guns – even other people’s guns which must first be stolen or otherwise illegally obtained – makes it impossible for blacks to avoid committing murders”
      This clown wants White people, law-abiding firearms owners, thank you, disarmed so it will be easier for his Black “brothas” to rob, rape and murder them, especially when the next riot starts, with illegal firearms they possess which all the gun restriction laws and outright banning of guns will NEVER disarm them, for criminals will always be able to obtain firearms through a black market source.

  • HadEnough

    “while no one speaks of the consequences of our racial carnage….”

    Well, let’s see. More intra-black carnage = fewer Negroes left = peace and quiet for the rest of us. That’s not difficult to understand.

    Seriously though, Belafonte, like all Negroes, simply assumes it to be the bounden duty of whites to save blacks from themselves — and without our even getting credit for doing so. Instead, we just get more heaps of abuse from the gibs-me-dat brigade. The average Negro should seriously draw a deep breath and ask himself exactly why the rest of America — make that the rest of the world — should give a damn about them.

    • Do they make good neighbors? No.

    • Do they make law-abiding citizens? Laughable.

    • Do they invent useful things? Not unless you’re really, really in love with peanut butter.

    The simple fact is, these people serve no useful purpose on the planet. So, Mr. Belafonte, why should be speak out about your idiotic brethren’s “racial carnage”? It’s your problem, not ours.

    • Duncan

      Peanut butter is a recipe and not an invention.
      Even so, the pre Columbian Peruvian Indians actually are credited with that peanut preparation.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Amerinds did all sorts of cooking with potatoes, so I imagine they were the first at potato chips as well. Frying thin slices to force the water out and then salting them would make potatoes long-lasting, high calorie trail food for hunting or raiding expeditions, right? Amerinds were certainly quite good at making precisely those sorts of food. It’s known they dried potatoes, ground them to powder and then used the potato flour for cooking.

  • Duncan

    Blacks should be only allowed to have single shot muzzle loading black powder guns like a Civil war era percussion cap Springfield rifle that fires a lead .58 caliber minie ball type bullet.

    But they would only be allowed to fire it if they only held it sideways so they can look extra cool.

    • Michael_C_Scott

      No.

  • Prof. Jon

    Just genius.

    Let us take Chicago’s restrictive gun laws and apply them to the whole nation.

    How’s that working, Chicago?

    I lived there for years, by the way.

  • SintiriNikos

    No fan of W myself, but we don’t air our dirty laundry in front the likes of pigs like Hugo Chavez.

    But then I bet Belafonte never considered himself an American.

    Mr. Belafonte, black-on-black crime is your problem, figure it out for yourself. We are too busy trying to figure out another of your problems, black-on-White crime, which I’m sure you deny even exists. Without our guns, the latter problem would be a much, much bigger one than it already is.

    Harry, molon lave, mofo!

  • anarchyst

    A “gun ban” protects NONE. These anti-gun bastards want them all. They don’t care if they “get them” a little at a time. In the past, “bolt action rifles” were considered “sniper rifles” by the anti-gunners. Pistols were considered “Saturday night specials”. “Assault rifles” are simply semi-automatic rifles, no different that any other non-black rifle. We have allowed the enemy to define the (nonexistent) problem. Remember, it’s not about “guns” but “control”. “Those who pound their swords into plowshares will (be forced to) plow for those who do not”.
    Another note” The term “Saturday night special” was actually originally “n!ggertown Saturday night special” as first used by the anti-gun movement in the 1950′s. They had to “clean it up” to make it appear non-racist.