Amid Controversy Public Univ ‘Proud’ of Campaign Teaching Students White Skin Is ‘Unfair’

Oliver Darcy, Campus Reform, February 15, 2013

In a statement released Thursday, the University of Wisconsin—Superior stood by its sponsorship of a controversial messaging campaign aimed at teaching student it is “unfair” to be white.

“The goal is to promote racial justice and greater understanding of the thorny, persistent issues about racism,” read the statement released by the school.

{snip}

As Campus Reform has previously reported, the controversial project, named the “Unfair Campaign,” aims to teach college students that “systems and institutions are set up for [whites]” and as such are “unfair.”

Posters produced by the group feature a number of Caucasians with slogans such as “is white skin really fair skin?” scribbled in marker across their faces.

{snip}

In mid-2012, the University of Minnesota—Duluth dropped their partnership with the Unfair Campaign and labeled the project “divisive” and “alienating,” after a Campus Reform investigation brought unwanted national attention to the school.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Jss

    How can skin be “fair” one way or another? Skin is skin is skin. No what isn’t fair is teaching children that because of their white skin they are inherently morally inferior to anyone who isn’t white. The scum who who are abusing young white children by teaching them they are morally inferior are the same people who support someone like Chris Dorner or Abu Jamal.

    The people who peddle this propaganda are the White races mortal enemies. I don’t say this lightly but Whites who support this kind of abuse of our children need to be strung up from the nearest lamp post.

    • liberalsuck

      I hate the people (who are white or look white) who peddle this far more than I hate the New Black Panthers or La Raza. These bastards demoralize our white youth and enable those savages. A 100 liberals are far more dangerous than 1000 black militants.

      • Where are you?

        Where is the radical conservative Christian politician that can exploit all this with great eloquence? Is he out there just waiting, he will have an army the day he elaborates his plan to take back this country from gangstas, islamists, black panthers, illegal aliens, gay marriage types,etc…

        • Be patient

          He’s coming, history shows we are indeed oppressed as whites, and someone always emerges at a time of such need. You are right, if he is full of candor, he will have an immediate affect.

    • Veritas_lux_mea

      It’s already a foregone conclusion that we will become a minority in the
      country we founded and built into the world’s great superpower. As if
      this isn’t enough, at the same time these people feel the need to engage in
      anti-white discrimination, indoctrination, and psychological warfare like this to slander, belittle, and brainwash whites into hating themselves, and non-whites to hate whites. It’s character assassination of an entire race.

    • Anders

      idi Amin’s and Robert Mugabe’s black skin was and is rather unfair. Just ask some of their suffering countrymen and women.

      • Jss

        The majority of their countrymen would rather starve under Amin and Mugabe then officially have a non black in charge. In a way I think that’s natural, to prefer your own even if it means starving. On the other hand Africans are not consistent at all, they kill all the White farmers then complain when Whites don’t send them enough food and free stuff. That’s why I will never respect them in any way. Not to mention the Ian Smith regime was pretty begin over all, and if anything I’d say the Whites had more right to Rhodesia since they were the ones who built the country up. And of course the White Rhodesians would have kept their country if Whites had any sense of solidarity what so ever and weren’t the worlds biggest suckers for public opinion and trendy self loathing.

        But yeah I weep for how skin color adversely effects the NBA, NFL, the careers of the Obamas, the hip and or hop industry, college admissions for minorities, getting any sort of government job, work place promotions, etc etc.

        Yeah all you non whites, America is an oppressive country infested with White privilege, please, please, keep out. You will be much happier with out all our racism holding you back. We just don’t deserve all your vibrancy and whatever other non tangible, invisible benefits you bring.

        • C_C_Conrad

          People have a right to a land if and only if THEY CAN TAKE IT AND HOLD IT. That’s nature’s unbreakable law. There’s a reason that I keep adding the link for Jack’s War below.
          …….
          https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

      • Katherine McChesney

        Wasn’t Idi Amin a cannibal? African cuisine.

        • David Ashton

          I think he used a western fridge, or was that Emperor Bokassa?

    • Felix_M

      It’s time to fight back. Teach your kid the greatness of western civilization. If he wants to see what Latino or African culture left on their own achieve, go to South America or West Africa.

    • sbuffalonative

      Stereotyping is wrong. (*except when you stereotype whites as evil and undeserving).

    • C_C_Conrad

      They are pushing white GENOCIDE. Once you understand this everything else falls into place. These genocidal creeps started out by saying that we should not judge blacks by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, OF COURSE NOW, WE CANNOT JUDGE THEM BY THE CONTENT OF THEIR CHARACTER EITHER. But now our skin is unfair??!!
      Also – “(who are white or look white)” they look like us, but, have nothing in common with us.
      A few very useful links,
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIxEVhCXlX0
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x23XuWn28FI

    • AnalogMan

      “Fair” has several meanings. It means (a) pale, light in colour; (b) just, equitable; and (c) beautiful. I don’t think that’s fortuitous.

      Remember when one would compliment someone by saying “You’re a White man”, or “That’s White of you”? We need to reintroduce these expressions in our conversations.

      • Unperson

        For the past several years, when someone offers to buy me a drink or otherwise do me a solid, I’ve taken to thanking them by saying “Mighty white of you.” The reaction I usually get — even from from my non-racially-aware friends — is a knowing chuckle that seems to say, “Oh, you racist rascal, you!”

        Of course, you have to do this selectively and with some care. If you use this line on the wrong white person, it can go very badly. But overall I recommend it as a device for throwing a small wrench into the machinery of the Multikult. Most of our people haven’t heard anyone associate Whiteness with Good (instead of pure, unadulterated Evil) for many years; whites under 35 or 40 may be completely unfamiliar with the concept that Whiteness could have any positive connotations at all. A simple, innocuous phrase like “Mighty white of you” can kickstart some dormant caucasian brains into working properly again.

  • bubo

    This might sound harsh, but if these indoctrinated fools all of a sudden started committing suicide en masse I would go grab some popcorn.

    • The__Bobster

      I’d sell ticket on PPV.

    • gemjunior

      Is there any hope?

    • Tom Iron

      At some point, that may occur. But I don’t think there’d be as many suicides as you’d think. I believe many of these kids aren’t as stupid as they let on. They know full well this is all baloney. It’d be only the “true believers” who’d be slitting their wrists.

  • Enar_Larsson

    What’s actually unfair is that at least since 1965, and arguably for much longer, entire departments of the federal government have had the explicit purpose of transferring wealth and opportunity from whites to non-whites. You can talk about implicit–and hence, unprovable–bias until you’re blue in the face but it is the explicit bias that is really disturbing.

    • The Worlds Scapegoat

      Actually it was since a little before the civil war (1850?). It is a group of people that run (puppet) the government to transfer white wealth into their pocket, while transferring enormous amounts of debt into our pockets. The name of the group is well known, but it can’t be mentioned.

      To find out who is in control; find out who you can’t speak out against.

  • JohnEngelman

    It continues to surprise me that this kind of thing gets any traction 37 years after the end of the War in Vietnam. That war pushed white liberals to the left, but the persistence of black social pathology and the enduring race gap in intellectual performance ought to have caused attitudes that were fashionable back then to become unfashionable.

    During the 1960s and 1970s white liberals went out on a limb to help blacks. Blacks cut off the limb. The New Deal coalition that made the Democratic Party the dominant party in the United States was destroyed by the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968, and by more durable increases in black crime and illegitimacy. Race wrecked liberalism.

    • The__Bobster

      Once liberal dogma is established, it’s hard to change it, no matter how evidence there is to the contrary. Just look at the Head Start program, a proven failure.

      • JohnEngelman

        This can be said of reactionary dogma as well. 33 years since Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign of 1980 most Republican politicians still think, or at least pretend, that tax cuts balance the budget.

        • The__Bobster

          You just did.

          • JohnEngelman

            Explain how.

        • jambi19

          Welcome back Mr. Engelman. Having not seen you around for a bit I was hoping all the Engelman bashing did not chase you off. Though both of us definitely do not agree on 100% of this issues I appreciate your input. I enjoy the cognitive arguments and back and forth banter here at amren.

          • JohnEngelman

            jambi19,

            Thank you for your concern. It will take more than a little Engelman bashing to chase me off. The only poster here who gives me a challenge is David Ashton. The others are embarrassing. I feel that I deserve a better quality of adversary.

          • Daisy

            John, do you not realize that most people just skim past your incessant repetitive self-referential spamming? You’re being ignored and disdained rather than deferred to. For eg, you asserted at one point that jewish people bred for intelligence and that’s the reason why they carry so many genetic defects when I confronted you with the basic fact that any fertility clinic requires an entire panel of testing for jews compared to only one for the rest of the population. You then posted some jewish pseudo-science; Tay-Sachs, an admittedly jewish disease that coincides with inbreeding, has not been proven to confer immunity or protection from typhus. Jewish people have tried to *propose* and insist this, but no scientist of any respected merit has ever validated the assertion. So in the ghetto allegedly the Tay-Sachs helped jews stave off typhus, but a certain element of french canadians also carry the gene in higher frequencies yet they never lived in ghettos although they are known to have inbred.

            People just think you’re ridiculous and they don’t bother parrying your insipid linking to spurious erudition. I feel that I deserve a higher quality of proof to further engage in debate.

          • JohnEngelman

            Daisy,

            Your insults are getting tiresome.

            You do not seem to understand my explanation of how and why the Ashkenazi Jews average the highest IQs of any racial group. Rather than once again excerpt from the following book review that appeared on this website I ask you to read all of it.

            The title of the book review is, “The Chosen People: Why are Jews so Successful?” It was originally written for American Renaissance.

            http://www.amren.com/features/2011/12/the-chosen-people/

          • Daisy

            I’ve studied a lot of the ‘literature’ John and I’m using that basic fact to make a point; jewish people have massaged the facts of science to try to argue against the reality that they inbred. Jewish self-appointed sociobiologists try to assert some specious claim that Tay-Sachs conferred protection from typhus yet they are the only ‘scientists’ claiming this. This attenuated and unsubstantiated argument is typical of jewish ‘scholarship’ regarding the ugly truth that they inbred. I don’t resort to personal invective and then pretend I’m above it; when I asked if you were autistic in some capacity, I was 100% sincere and not ‘insulting’ you.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            Wow, I didn’t think of that. He does seem autistic.

            Asperger syndrome is characterized by qualitative impairment in social interaction, by stereotyped and restricted patterns of behavior, activities and interests. People with Asperger syndrome often display behavior, interests, and activities that are restricted and repetitive and are sometimes abnormally intense or focused. People with autism have social impairments and often lack the intuition about others that many people take for granted.

          • David Ashton

            This thought occurred to me too.
            Almost all Engelman’s many contributions are repetitive not only in content but identical phrasing. It is like reading stock responses printed out from a machine. The times he quotes Rushton and Lynn on Jews and Chinese, and Jared Taylor on Black crime, while ignoring their other views, and failing to engage with any qualifications proposed by readers, are becoming irritating. He also has an unduly high opinion of his own debating ability and an assumption that other people are impressed by his own personal experiences.

          • a multiracial individual

            It is highly probable that medieval Ashkenazi genetic isolation created a whole host of conditions. I am not sure about John, but I don’t recall anyone ever saying that Ashkenazi genetics were free of liabilities. If I am not too mistaken, Ashkenazis have lower spatial abilities. Which would explain their lack of representation in sports. Tay-Sachs is of course another Jewish condition. Of course, none of this changes the fact that during that 1,000 year period of genetic isolation the Jews catapulted one standard deviation above the surrounding European population in average IQ.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews were placed in a situation where they had to very quickly evolve in the direction of superior intelligence. As a result they picked up some dangerous genes that are dominant for superior intelligence but recessive for various genetic diseases.

          • Daisy

            ‘Picked up’ is a convenient euphemism for inbreeding. ‘Placed in’ is a nice one for invading. Your main thesis is full of holes and hiding behind the passive voice doesn’t fill them.

          • JohnEngelman

            Why are you so concerned with inbreeding? The Ashkenazim have remained fairly genetically distinct since the fall of the Western Roman Empire. What matters is that they are the most talented and accomplished racial group in the world, even more so than Orientals.

          • jambi19

            Engelman, did you ever consider Jewish cultural superiority for their success? You beat the IQ argument over the head a lot. I know one is reflective of the other. Also another reason why so much genetic information is known about Jews also is reflective of the prevalence of Jews in the practice of medicine. Jewish doctors tend to care for Jewish patients, tend to study Jewish patients, and also tend to do research on Jewish patients. Jewish finance and influence in public/private institutions would allow these things to happen. Like I said: cultural superiority.

            Lastly it seems there is a high rate of inbreeding in the Ashkenazi. The tay sachs/BRCA mutations is strong evidence of this:

            “Given that until recently, both religious and political factors helped to ensure that Ashkenazi Jews married other Ashkenazi Jews, millions of people may be able to trace their ancestry directly to these founders. Thus, even if just a few founders had a mutation, the gene defect would become amplified in the population.”

            textbook bottleneck effect

            citation:

            http://www.genetichealth.com/brov_gen_dis_in_ashk_jews.shtml#Anchor4

            Just step back and think about it Engelman, Why are the facial features of ashkenazi so distinct and stereotypical? How many of your JAP friends repeat “I am only marrying a jewish man.” This cliche was repeated to me ad nauseum growing up.

          • Daisy

            How do you connect spatial abilities to athleticism? I was a highly accomplished athlete yet my performance IQ lagged behind my verbal very high one, as is not uncommon; most people’s brains favor one side although marked disparities are usually symptomatic of emotional or cognitive (or both) dysfunction.

          • Tom in MI

            Years ago I read an article in a now defunct science magazine about a researcher who went into the Appalachian region to investigate stories about inbreeding among poor whites. He had heard stories of marriages between brothers and sisters but couldn’t find any evidence of such unions. He only found occasional marriages between first cousins.
            Surprisingly, the author went on to say that the most inbred people in America are Jews.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I went to school with someone like you. He wasn’t a dumb kid, but he certainly wasn’t as smart as he believed himself to be. Maybe he was trying to compensate for something. People started ignoring him and he continued to live in his little ignorant bubble. It must suck to be you.

          • a multiracial individual

            The recent zealous and cowardly calls for Johns’ excommunication have raised a question in me for the moderators.

            Dear Moderators,

            It is my understanding that you guys are given a general outline of what is, and what is not, acceptable material to post on this site. Would it be dreadfully inconvenient, or inappropriate to post those guidelines on the site so that we can make use of them when typing our posts? It would save you guys the hassle of deleting many comments that posters would otherwise consider borderline in appropriateness. It would also assist in quelling the cries of people who have had their posts deleted.

          • JohnEngelman

            a multiracial individual,

            Thank you. I would certainly like to know what the limits are. Is it a violation of accepted practice when I quote Jared Taylor and articles I have found on this website in order to explain my admiration for Jews and Orientals?

          • a multiracial individual

            One of more disturbing features of posters here is how little regard they have for the works of Rushton, Lynn, Jensen. They display their ignorance by arguing that different races are different species. This hideous insistence is not supported by any biological scientist I know (including the gentlemen mentioned above). Unlike them, I do not fear opposing views and will not flag such a comment unless it is excessively crude.

          • JohnEngelman

            The haters have never read those works. I love American Renaissance. Unfortunately it attracts a few posters who are motivated by hostility to anyone who is not a white Gentile, and anyone like me who does not share their bigoted prejudices. Some of these posters have several identities so they are not as numerous as they seem.

          • a multiracial individual

            Another canard I keep hearing is that race and crime are correlated even AFTER one corrects for IQ. That is to say, an IQ 90 Black man is still more likely to commit crime than an IQ 90 White or Asian man. I have yet to see any data that supports this. Of course, even if that were true, that minute increase could be attributed to the cultural differences liberals argue.

          • JohnEngelman

            According to Professor J. Philippe Rushton blacks have more testosterone than whites, and this is an additional factor predisposing them to crime.

            http://archive.org/stream/RaceEvolutionBehaviorabidgedVersion/REB_djvu.txt

            Gary Gilmore was in and out of reform school and prison ever since he was fourteen years old, but he had an IQ of 134.

          • concernedcollegekid

            Well, I think it is obvious that gender and crime are still correlated after one corrects for IQ. I would guess that this is testosterone-related. So, maybe if it is in fact the case that a 90-IQ Asian man is less likely to be a criminal than a 90-IQ black man, that disparity is also testosterone-related. I don’t know any more about the data than you do though – it would be interesting to see a study about this.

          • Daisy

            Testosterone levels are not tethered to DNA in men; studies show that depressed males often have lowered levels but when returned to emotional normalcy they hormonally rebalance. This is why I have never understood the concept of high testosterone as a function of DNA other than in terms of the Y chromosome. Further, this seeming myth bolsters the rape is a crime of horniness myth, which is pure fiction.

          • jambi19

            I can infer what you are trying to say, but your statements are completely wrong. DNA, hormone metabolism, environmental and behavior are very much related. They are in fact very tethered together. Biochemistry is a complicated field:

            http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Hormones-that-Affect-Gene-Activity.topicArticleId-24594,articleId-24547.html

            This article is merely a footnote in the realm of biochemistry. I hope I didn’t sound rude. I want to make sure we are on the same page.

          • Daisy

            I meant linearly tethered as opposed to geometrically. The key words you used are environmental and behavior. We could be on the same page.

          • concernedcollegekid

            I see your point. I just think it’s obvious that blacks are physically more masculine than whites who in turn are more masculine than Asians, and I thought that perhaps more masculine races might be more crime-prone independent of IQ in the same way that men are more crime-prone than women independent of IQ. I don’t know if testosterone is what causes the blacks>whites>Asians hierarchy in terms of masculinity, but I do think it’s visually obvious that such a hierarchy exists.

          • Jefferson

            I am sure you can find plenty of low I.Q Asian people, especially in rural China, Vietnam, and The Philippines for example. But their per capita murder rate would still be nowhere as high as in South Africa and Detroit.

          • Daisy

            Using the word ‘haters’ isn’t an insult, John? Tiresome…

          • IstvanIN

            We are not bigoted for wanting to preserve our race. You want to preserve your race, which I assume is Chinese Jew, and I have no qualms with that.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am a Nordic Gentile. My ancestors came from England, Germany, and Switzerland.

          • David Ashton

            Possibly IstvanIN was being sarcastic about your declared preference for the Jews as a “biologicaly superior race” and for the Chinese as being the most desirable mates for “white Gentiles” and immigrants into “white Gentile” homelands (as distinct from the territory between the Mediterranean and the Euphrates, which you think God has specially bequeathed the “superior and splendid race”, which you “love” above white Gentiles from England and Germany).

          • David Ashton

            I don’t recall many posters who argue that different races are different species. The races are subspecies; this used to be regarded as normal biological terminology (e.g. Theodosius Dobzhansky). So far as we know, all human races can interbreed, but this does not mean that no crossings are biologically problematic. See the reading list on race I provided in an earlier threat (search index).

          • a multiracial individual

            I would not say that it is the norm. Although I do encounter some people here that do not consider Blacks to be human beings. They usually cite the reason for this belief to be because Blacks have an average IQ between 70-85. I then usually ask them if a Black with an IQ of 130 is a human being, or conversely, is a White with an IQ of 70 not a human being? If you will look to my correspondence in the article regarding the kid that got shot and killed in St. Louis (2/20/13) you will see that I had a run it with such a person.

          • David Ashton

            You are absolutely right about this “per capita” IQ comparison.
            However, the average IQ levels of races are different, and there are considerable other “subcutaneous” differences. West Africans have more self-specific gene-clusters than North Europeans or East Asians. Nevertheless, all humans deserve to be treated as humans, even though some race crossing should be avoided for social and biological reasons. We have laws against incest without supposing that members of the same family are not human or should not be treated with respect (until they initiate force or fraud against other humans).

        • jambi19

          “Reactionary”. That term always interests me because of its condescending context. In politics reactionary is the antonym of the word “radical” which is a term used to describe non-traditionalist agitators. Reactions/reactionaries in the study physics and chemistry are preceded by an unstable radical. Radicals are the molecular culprit in human pathology. I am starting the understand that the same applies to politics.

          • JohnEngelman

            jambi19,

            Many in the United States who call themselves conservatives can more accurately be called reactionaries. They do not wish to conserve the status quo. They wish to restore a previous status quo. Many in the Republican Party have not yet accepted the basic reforms of the New Deal.

            Since Barry Goldwater received a well deserved landslide defeat during the presidential election of 1964, reactionaries have learned that a frontal assault on popular middle class entitlements will fail, so they dishonestly promote the revenue building benefits of tax cuts with the hope that eventually the national debt will get so high that domestic spending programs will become politically vulnerable.

          • jambi19

            Interesting. It seems that in your conspiracy theory you describe the left as the reactionaries. Take for example the lefts wants to maintain the “New Deal status quo” correct? Entire institutions across all disciplines today actively campaign to maintain the liberal zeitgeist we are in. A zeitgeist and paradigm hellbent on my dispossession. Political rhetoric and terms have always been circular and subjective in reasoning anyway so I will run with this. You are the reactionary attempting to maintain the status quo. A Free Enterprise Republic IS a radical idea indeed. HBD is also a radical idea thanks to the political witch hunts by the leftist demagogues whom desperately need it suppressed. There was a time when education campaigns about “white skin is unfair” and “white privilege” were radical. Now campaigns such as this are the status quo.

            “Inferiors revolt in order that they may be equal,
            and equals that they may be superior.
            Such is the state of mind which creates revolutions.”
            - Aristotle

          • JohnEngelman

            Throughout history there has been a general movement from right to left. Serfs had more rights than slaves. Employees had more rights than serfs. Strong unions gave those employees even more rights.

            The movement has not been continuous. The development of slavery in the New World was a major setback, but the slavery of the Roman Empire was not revived in Europe, nor was the serfdom of the middle ages.

            What many in the Republican Party would like to do move backwards to the laissez faire of the nineteenth century. I would like to move forward to the social democracy of Scandinavia and the British Commonwealth.

          • dd121

            I predict you won’t get many takers on this site.

          • Luca

            Today’s slaves are called “Taxpayers”

          • David Ashton

            Serfdom was revived in the labor camps of the USSR and China.

          • Luca

            In 1964 LBJ won the sympathy vote tied to the coattails of a murdered JFK whom the general public adored. He portrayed Goldwater as a warmonger which is now ironic. Had the country known the long-term effects of his BS War on Poverty programs and the quagmire he created in Vietnam they would have never voted for him. Emotional votes trump reason every time. The demise of this country can be attributed to LBJ circa 1965 -1969.

      • a multiracial individual

        A feel good lie is always going to last for a very long time. I am a bit agnostic about whether or not all lies will eventually collapse because they become unsustainable. It would be wonderful if that were so.

    • David Ashton

      But the New Left have been quite happy to use race for revolutionary purposes.
      Is it really necessary to provide documentation again, for you to ignore?

      • JohnEngelman

        Unlike “cultural Marxism,” the New Left was a movement that actually did exist. The only popular issue it had was the War in Vietnam. Most male college students did not want to fight in it. Their families, and girl friends did not want them to either.

        President Nixon crippled the New Left when he ended the draft in 1973.

        At a retrospective meeting of New Left veterans during the early 1980s Jerry Rubin said, “We are refugees from a future that never happened.”

        Bill Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dohrn – who was also in the Weathermen – said, “One of the first things you learn when you get very far from a university campus is how utterly irrelevant the white left is to the lives of most Americans.”

        Mark Rudd, a prominent member of the Students for a Democratic Society at Columbia University said, “The War in Vietnam drove us crazy, but where we were really wrong was in imagining that a revolution in the United States was even a remote possibility.”

        • David Ashton

          Your personal Vietnam experience, yet again.
          Either the same old record you keep playing gets stuck in the 1960s or you need to go and get some new ones.
          It really is too tiresome, once again, to describe events and document the facts on the New Left mutation into what is quite properly called Cultural Marxism since the end of the Vietnam war, and the effect on students and minorities rather than on “most Americans” of yesteryear, since you persistently ignore the “race, gender, class” themes in the universities, the media and politics.
          However, I may make a patient effort to set it all out once more, when time permits.

          • JohnEngelman

            Do you work for a university? Do you have friends and/or relatives who are so employed, or who are students in universities? If the answer/s to those questions is “Yes” you probably have more insight into what is going on in academia than I do.

            I suspect that what you call “cultural Marxism” is less of a force on universities than one may suspect from reading articles and comments on American Renaissance. In the United States most academics do vote Democrat, but they are motivated by issues like the growing income gap, environmental problems and things like that.

            I doubt that very many are consumed by a white liberal guilt complex that they are trying to spread to their students. My sense of things is that most white liberals with any kind of power are quietly aware that what Charles Murray and others say about racial differences is true, but they try not to think about it.

          • David Ashton

            I graduated from Oxford and London universities, and have friends and relatives who move in similar university circles; I was a secondary school teacher in three different areas of England over about 30 years altogether. I retain Fellowship of the Royal Anthropological Institute (until someone spots my posts on Am Ren and demands expulsion, as happened to Prof. Ruggles Gates).

            I keep abreast of much academic publication, books and articles, particularly in social sciences and history, which are still saturated with deconstructionism, anti-”racism”, “feminism”, anti-colonialism, neo-Marxism, etc. But it isn’t better in the USA where much of this stuff originates.

            In the UK we have a PC immigrant-focused orientation at school level, which the present education minister Michael Gove is trying clumsily to correct to some extent, against resistance from the Guardian-reading establishment and other government ministers, and which dates back to the organized subversion of our National Curriculum Councils set up ostensibly also to curb the leftist trends themselves.

            I have watched the “race, gender, class” obsessions of the neo-Marxists starting at local government level in the UK (mainly education) rise up and spread out through the political system here to become “equality and diversity” legislation that has then been pushed downwards from central government onto the populace below.

            There is signs of a similar process with Obama.

  • Tom Iron

    I’m sure even some of these seemingly stupid White kids who’re going along with this stuff are hiding their true feelings. Every so often as in some of these beauty contests a good young American girl will blurt out her decent upbringing. There are some real good young White people out there I think. A lot more than most people think and when the time comes, they’re going to show what they’re made of and the the stinking fedgov and their lousy supporters better watch out.

    • concernedcollegekid

      Pretty much everyone who knows me in real life would be completely, utterly shocked if they knew I even looked at a website like this… I’m a very nice college-age girl from a SWPL family. My Facebook friends list is 90+% liberals. I come here to vent because I don’t know who to talk about this stuff with in person. It’s dangerous. I’m afraid of accidentally confiding in the wrong person and regretting it.

      I hope there are more like me than I think there are. I keep quiet off the internet for now. But at the end of the day, I will stand up for the beliefs that led me to amren. I will not remain loyal to a country whose government wants to tell my future children than they are guilty of anything just because of the color of their skin.

      • Bad_Mr_Frosty

        I wish there was a White Student Union or something similar when I went to college. I really didn’t enjoy hanging around with the girls at my school. They were all about helping staving kids in Africa and jumping through hoops to prove they weren’t racist. I’m sure there were at least a few that were proud of being White and loved European culture, but there was no way we could overtly share our common interests.

        I know it’s tough right now, but you’re simply ahead of your time. They can only hide the truth for so long.

      • OnGuard

        There’s a “model of education” being taught now (K-12, all courses), called “anti-racist’ education, based upon the premise that all non-whites are held down academically and economically by whites. I worked at one of the universities that developed it; I volunteered for their race study circles. I opposed their main arguments, saying that different races have their own subcultures in America. Not all subcultures value education as much as others, and I quoted some surveys. A black teacher, an African immigrant, pointed out that his regular students, mostly black, did not care about their education, slept in class, did not do homework, worked after school for a car instead. When he asked them why the school’s IB (advanced)program was all Asian and white students, he asked if it was beyond “black genes’ capability”? He had his black students get to know the IB students; they learned that the IB students were focused ONLY on getting good grades: no sports, no partying, no dating, no job after school, no sleeping in class. Yet the University heard none of that—it was the evil white race that held all others down!

        • concernedcollegekid

          And things like that are why I’m on this site. I’m “learning” all sorts of stuff in college about how evil and oppressive white people are, but my high school was about 25% black and it was completely obvious to me that those black students’ problems were not my fault or the fault of “slavery” or of other white people. Most of the black kids were just not very smart, always acted on impulse and had no self-control, and were downright rude by white standards. It was known that many were illiterate, and white parents rather than the black kids’ parents seemed to be the ones who saw this as a problem. The black kids as a group had no respect for order for the sake of order or for obedience for the sake of obedience. Yes, there were exceptions. Over the course of my life I have had one close black friend and a handful of black acquaintances I have had congenial, enjoyable relationships with. But exceptions are exceptions.

          I’m no Stormfront WN, but society desperately needs to admit that there are worse things than whites speaking up for themselves as a group, and we even more desperately need to admit that many minorities, especially blacks and Hispanics, will never be able to assimilate into Euro-American culture for biological reasons. Eugenics, not education, is the way to a higher-performing populace, and majority-nonwhite America will be a disaster. An absolute disaster. We are a European culture, we have a right to exist, and diversity needs to be selected for its ability to successfully “do” our culture. Diversity for diversity’s sake is BAD.

          No doubt readers of this site will lambast me for having non-white friends as they often do when I bring it up, but I just want to know how it got to the point where a “hate site” is one of the only places where I am able to express the things I just wrote. I’ve never treated anyone badly because of their race. I’m a completely nice and normal person. Just… wow. It never ceases to boggle my mind what passes for “hate” and “white supremacy” these days. Pretty much anything said by anyone winning an argument with a leftist, as the saying goes…

          • a multiracial individual

            Hey man I am barely removed from my undergraduate education, so I was subjected to a good amount of this stuff as well. Although, since I am only partially white, my view will be somewhat different than yours. Of course, my professors appeared to be more “anti-Western” instead of overtly anti-White. I guess if there was one thing that you should learn is that being a racially conscious person does not require that one hold an intrinsic animosity toward other groups. There is nothing wrong with having friends that are out-group members. You will not ever be forced to choose allegiances at gun point. Despite what many people on this site say, a “Racial Armageddon” is never coming. They are going to have to figure out gradual, civilized ways to reach their goals.

          • Tom Iron

            Sir, while we don’t know each other and you seem a decent enough person, I think you’re very wrong about what’s coming. I think there is going to be a race war and it’ll be for all the marbles, so to speak – no holds barred. You’re free to post on any site you like, but when all this gets rolling, choose your own people and I give you the same advice I’d give anybody, don’t try being neutral. That won’t work. Be faithful to your own. We are not your people. Take care sir.

          • a multiracial individual

            Actually I changed my mind. I think there might be some serious clash between Islam and the West.

          • PesachPatriot

            There has been serious issues between Islam and the West for most of my lifetime, starting with the iran hostage crisis in 1979….They would never mess with Russia and China the way they do with the Europe,Canada, the UK and the USA…they see our values of tolerance, inclusion, diplomacy and civility as the mark of over-civilized pansies and take advantage of it. The very ideas of women’s rights and peaceful turnovers of power between different political parties are laughable in riyadh, kandahar and damascus. The only rule in the part of the world is every tribe vs. every other tribe with no quarter given….the history of the arab israeli conflict is a brutal and sorry one indeed, but is easily exceeded in depravity by the viciousness of muslim vs. muslim conflicts.

          • Guest

            I don’t mean to be pedantic, but what is your racial background comprised of other than white European? I only ask because if it’s African, you’d be the first mixed black person I’ve ever seen who has any sympathy for his white side.

          • a multiracial individual

            Yes, I belong to the three major races. I resemble Andre Ethier in appearance.

          • Katherine McChesney

            I’ve seen you repeatedly refuse to admit your racial background. Why do you do this? Are you ashamed?

          • Ulick

            Shelby Steele is mixed black & white, and he will generally side with the white perspective.

          • a multiracial individual

            Please forgive my gender assumptions.

          • concernedcollegekid

            Haha lol no worries I am a pretty far from being an easily offended feminist. I would say that in how I choose to live my life, I am probably pretty much like you. I don’t have an intrinsic aversion to non-whites at all; I just notice certain patterns. I have some sympathy with the more white-rights-oriented posters on this site though because I think they have a right to get what they want. I think they have a right not to have even “good diversity” forced upon them, although I am personally fine with “good diversity” and am friends with a lot of it.
            I’m only 21 so I don’t have a really solidified set of political beliefs at this point except that I’m a race realist and probably a libertarian. I don’t expect to “win all the arguments” on this site and never change my mind about anything. I often write and think things that I notice are inconsistent. At this point, diversity in Europe gets to me more than diversity in the U.S. does, but I still think of the U.S. as a country that should stay majority white and based on European norms.
            Soo yeah.

          • brengunn

            You’re clearly a very thoughtful person and have not allowed yourself to be pulled along with the tow of popular opinion nor jumped into bed with the hardcore racists as a reaction.

            Recognising racial differences and acknowledging their biological causes doesn’t mean we have to turn into hate mongers. It doesn’t mean we have to jettison our liberal values or friends(though that may be tricky). I disagree strongly with our current victim fetish and constant blaming of whites but I’m comfortable around people of any colour as long as they’re not criminals or violent.

            TBH, I still struggle with some of the issues you raise. The climate in the real world is so oppressive that I often dare not share my views.

          • GerónimoAnónimo

            “II disagree strongly with our current victim fetish and constant blaming
            of whites but I’m comfortable around people of any colour as long as
            they’re not criminals or violent.”

            After having several up close awakenings I don’t feel comfortable in the company of Blacks other than a choice few whom I’ve known for years. Otherwise I tend to be cautious and prepared because they’re extremely unpredictable.

          • LastBastionOfHope

            I don’t think anyone will bash you for having non-white friends. From what I understand, it’s the notion of freedom of association that’s important. So under that notion, you fit right in. If whites want to live near hispanics, then fine. But it should also be fine if whites want to stay only near other whites. Same goes with friends. If you want to befriend a black guy, by all means go ahead. If an asian wants to befriend you, by all means go ahead. But if someone wants only white friends that should be respected.

          • concernedcollegekid

            Right. I have sympathy with actual white nationalists because I DO think they should be allowed to get what they want even though I personally don’t want to give up my non-white friends. I think it is unfair to malign people as bad people for preferring to associate with their own race. I don’t think my having non-white friends makes me a better person than WNs; it’s just my personal preference.

          • David Ashton

            A pretty good statement, which I hope “college kids” and recent graduates can and will share across our Euro-American world.

      • Alex

        I can relate to what you are saying. I also generally feel people out, but can usually find some way in which the issues discussed in this forum impact them. Not everyone will get the message, but it does seem that there are a lot of people who genuinely are living in the fantasy land and appreciate it when someone points them in the right direction (I know I did).

        All you’re doing is connecting the dots that they might not see, but can see are valid.

      • pcmustgo

        I’m an ex-liberal myself… yeah, 95% of my friends are liberals too… they’ve come to accept me. Most know all of my views because of my facebook posts. They can take it or leave it. I tolerate them and they tolerate me. I’m self-employed though, so I can afford to be that open about it. And college kids are a little too young and into theatrics to understand this. I bet your white liberal friends won’t be too far to the left on Race by age 30…

        • concernedcollegekid

          “I bet your white liberal friends won’t be too far to the left on Race by age 30…”

          I completely agree with you there. I know a lot of them think “political correctness” has gone too far in some cases and make fun of it, but are too caught up in their own lives right now to think that critically about race and research it like I have. Personally, I just find race as a topic interesting due to the taboo around it I think. I started researching race and IQ because I knew I wasn’t supposed to because I knew what I’d find. Nothing I found ever surprised me.

          I just hope the shameless leftist, anti-white, anti-male bias in college is secretly pushing more people my age to the right than it appears to be. I guess we’ll see in a decade or two.

          • Felix_M

            Parodying political correctness will be all the rage within the next five years.

            People are sick of the hypocrisy of the left, of the destruction the Israel lobby helped cause with their support for the wars in the ME, of seeing their country given away to illegal aliens. Blowback is coming.

          • David Ashton

            Well done, young lady. Keep doing the research – there is a lot out there on “our side” if you look for it. I have a short race-realist book-list on a previous thread (see index).

      • LastBastionOfHope

        Let me be the first to congratulate you on taking the first step. No one would know about me either being in New York where you can see the Empire State Building from some areas. Being that close to NYC and having these views is very dangerous. I think you will see on this site that it’s a very intellectual setting not designed to name call, but rather to vent and discuss topics that we sadly cannot in public without being fired from jobs, kicked out of schools, and alienated by family members. Keep up with the site!

      • Tom Iron

        Good morning Concerned, I read all your posts here. Don’t worry about who is a racial realist and who isn’t. Just go about your business and you’ll be fine. As has been said, by age 30 or so, college concepts will seem like a dream not just to you, but to many/most of your contemporaries. As far as having black friends, that’ll seem like a dream as well. They’re never in your life after college, or whatever it is you’re thrown together about when you’re young. In my own case, they never come to our unit reunions each year. After college, your affiliation with them will end. If you work with blacks, you may have an occasional group lunch with them, but that’ll be it. You won’t be pals with them. Also, it’s been said here that there won’t be a race war. I disagree completely with that. We’re already in the begining phases (somewhat like “Bleeding Kansas before the Civil War) of it now. One good point to remember is you’re with us. Don’t try to sit on a fence of some sort when this get’s started rolling. You will be eaten up if you try. You and the men your age will be the heroes and heroines of your age. Take care and have a good day.

      • Sloppo

        I used to worry about whether or not my liberal friends and acquaintances could handle the truth. Now, I don’t so much. I believe many of our biggest problems are caused by us allowing ourselves to be intimidated into going along with political correctness, which is pretty much the same as pure dishonesty. Sometimes people get angry when they hear the truth, but I feel better about just being honest.

      • Ulick

        I think there are a lot of people like you who bite their tongue in both their public and even private life regarding race, and then come to sites like Amren to vent and see what’s really going on in the world.

        The funny thing is that if you mentioned this site to your friends you’d get the standard “those are a bunch of dumb, redneck racists” before they ever read a single comment here. The truth is many people here grew up in bastions of liberalism (like me), and many currently live in a liberal locale (like me). Plus, as far as Amren “racists” being dumb, I routinely read comments here that are filled with better logic, greater foresight, and better appreciation of history than on the comments I see on Liberal sites or the arguments I hear from Liberal college students.

    • LastBastionOfHope

      Tom, as a twentysomething let me tell you that you are 100% correct. Many of us grew up being force-fed anti-white propaganda in the education system, but trust me…at the end of some diversity lectures and rants from professors, we leave and talk about how ridiculously anti-white they were. I know I had to take a diversity course taught by a French professor, and after almost every class I heard some white girls saying “I feel like crap now! All she talks about is how racist white people are” to which I joined in and said “She’s from France what do you expect? That was a load of BS” etc.

      Many of us are lurking out there…on youtube the mantra “Anti racist is codeword for anti white” has reached MILLIONS of young white people and it almost always gets a ton of thumbs up. In college there was a program to show inner-city black high school kids how nice our campus and facilities were in an attempt to motivate them to want to do better and attend. They even got a free lunch in the cafeteria at the end of the tour. Keep in mind this is a private college that accepts 28% of its applicants. It’s very competitive. The actual students of the college would be eating and out of nowhere a group of 30 LOUD, ghetto black kids walk in. You could tell by the college student’s faces that they were thinking something like “Yeah as if they belong at a school like this” or “Why are they even here? Get out of our school”.

      All in all, even at very liberal colleges, trust me when I say we, the white youth are aware of what’s going on. We are too intelligent a race not to notice. The key is to talk with your friends about this stuff. Then they talk with others about it, and so on. This discussion needs to become normal first, then it can be talked about publicly, then it can actually receive media attention, and finally we can actually DO something about it. I do my part in bringing up all the anti-white propaganda both to my family and my friends. You would be surprised how many people agree with us on this site but go through life as the average Joe keeping quiet about it.

      • brengunn

        on youtube the mantra “Anti racist is codeword for anti white” has reached MILLIONS of young white people

        That mantra is usually typed in by gibbering idiots on youtube, I would much rather see cogent arguments used than have these ideas represented by cheap sloganeering in capital letters. Any validity it may have had has been lost to it’s mindless repetition by cretins. Honestly, I’d rather hide my beliefs in the main stream than have to hang out with those fools in real life.

        • Daisy

          That kind of sloganeering actually works in the US, oftentimes better than arguing cogently, although some of both yields the best results.

          • Nathanwartooth

            I would have to agree here.

            Most people don’t have the energy or good logic to read and be persuaded by a good argument.

            This is why slogans work so well.

        • Wayne

          You’re full of it. The left has been “sloganeering” for 50 plus years now because it works. Companies pay for 30 second soundbites in advertising because it works. Sounds like you just have a problem with the message–like it’s too hard to refute.

  • The__Bobster

    Wisconsin appears to be the center of the loon universe.

    • Tom Iron

      It would be very hard to beat out where I live, the People’s Republic of New Jersey…

      • The__Bobster

        NJ is corrupt. Wisconsin has Mad Town. I’d avoid both.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Hey The People’s Republik of Soviet California disagrees.

      • jane johnson

        Florida

  • bigone4u

    I am more and more starting to feel like a Jew in Germany in 1935 or so. Anyone else starting to get the feeling?

    • RisingReich

      You are not the only one.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Yeah but the difference is that we are not guilty of trying to subvert an entire nation and impose communism on the populace.. NO sir I feel more like a Russian Kulak or a supporter of the Tsarist autocracy aka a White Russian. Stop with this Nazi stuff, it only empowers the false narrative and feeds into the false history and reality of the world today.

      • brengunn

        You say that as if the White Russians were saints. They got what they deserved when the Bolsheviks murdered them in the streets of St.Petersburg.

        • jambi19

          Sounds like something Che Guevara or a feminist university professor would say.

          • brengunn

            I wouldn’t let no inbred mutts rule over me, that’s got F all to do with feminism. I’m a republican. And had I lived back then, I would have been a bolshevik.

          • jambi19

            “”I will not pretend, if I had to choose between Communism and Nazi-ism, that I would choose Communism.” -Winston Churchill

          • brengunn

            He also thought ordinary people were too stupid to have the vote.

            Clearly a very witty man but a moral authority by no means, and I hate to see him held up as so.

          • Daisy

            He said atrocious things about the Irish, who rewarded him by refusing to allow the brits to use at least some of their ports in WWII.

          • brengunn

            He’s not really a man I respect, too much. He gave some cracking speeches, though.

            What’s with the name change? Are you undercover now!?

          • Daisy

            No redhead is ever undercover except in her homeland. I think disqus just gets temporarily confused.

          • Angry White Woman

            We redheads have the whitest of all white skin. We also usually can’t tan. Freckle yes, or attain a semi-permanent faint pink glow after repeated sunburns, yes, but tan–no, it just doesn’t happen.

          • IstvanIN

            he could have saved many British lives by taking the peace offer extended by the Germans, which included keeping the empire. Maybe the Irish were right.

          • jambi19

            Sounds like Winston Churchill was a race realist.

          • brengunn

            Yeah, what’s that supposed to mean? Think you’re better than the Irish, do you?

          • Daisy

            When it comes to white skin the irish will kick some serious butt. Ain’t nobody whiter than me. Now we are both guilty of the high crime of linguistic perverseness according to some posters’ grammatical puritan decree.

            I love my people.

          • brengunn

            Now we are both guilty of the high crime of linguistic perverseness according to some posters’ grammatical puritan decree.

            I can’t see the comment. Has it disappeared?

          • Daisy

            I came before the Inquisition on a recent thread. I find myself in good company on this one.

          • Ulick

            Churchill was a race realist. He urged his countrymen to “Keep England White”…

            http://davidmartin-hamilton.blogspot.com/2009/03/sir-winston-churchill-keep-england.html

          • Will White

            The republican party is a horrible alternative to the white guilt philosophy.race realists must realize this soon.plus they have way too many religious nuts.that certainly does not help our cause.it dumbs us down.

        • Kblankenship7

          I am glad you wrote “murdered” because that is what they did. Lenin, Stalin and the whole lot deserved to be executed. I would provide a more lenghty reply, but what you have written has made me so angry that I am afraid of what I might have said. If you really believe this, then you are a supporter of the most genocidal regime to have ever ruled in Europe. Your precious Bolsheviks murdered not just the Tsar, his wife AND children, but millions of hard-working peasants and factory workers. You should be ashamed of yourself. Your statements are so morally repugnant, so supportive of the genocide of European men women and children it makes me sick. Scheiss linke Bazille!

          • brengunn

            Why does being an opponent of monarchism and the White army mean I support genocide? In 1917 there was no way to tell that Stalin would seize control of the party and start his pogroms. The future of the party was very much up in the air, with different factions and ideas competing for leadership, especially after Lenin’s death. Being Red, then or now, is not tacit agreement with genocide.

            Your precious Bolsheviks murdered not just the Tsar, his wife AND children

            I feel for any human that has been killed but the monarchy set up a system where the children of Kings had to be killed to prevent any future claim on the country, no figurehead must remain for which an army can be raised. They were hoist by their own petard!

          • Wayne

            Mensheviks or Bolsheviks–yes, lots of choice and ideas there, Mr. Bolshevik. The ethnic Russian people were victims of a sick, destructive ideology that they did not create. Even Churchill said that sending Lenin to Russia was like sending them a pox. Lenin and Trotsky hung out in Western Europe and New York, only returning to seize power.
            If you add in Pol Pot and Mao, Communism has been the most wretched curse on humanity EVER. Nazis were Angels compared to these bastards.
            BTW, care to guess how many ETHNIC Russians were in the squad that Mercedes the Czar???? Answer: None.

          • brengunn

            What is this constant Winston Churchill fetish? I don’t care what he thought, he’s not a man I respect. Great public speaker yes, but also a drunken yob, wife beater, and patchy leader whom history has treated overly kind. He was a man with utter contempt for the ordinary people of his country. I do not regard his opinion of communism nor much of anything else, as valid.

            Lenin and Trotsky hung out in Western Europe and New York, only returning to seize power.

            Again, so what? Lenin and Trotsky’s behaviour does not represent the whole Bolshevik movement, so I don’t accept the slander. If you asked me my personal opinion about them, I would agree that any revolutionary that waits on the sidelines while others fight has lost a lot of my respect. Though having said that, Stalin was a blood thirsty revolutionary and a very effective guerrilla tactician but also happened to be a monster in power, too. So, maybe it’s best to let the politicians be politicians.

            I don’t know what you’re alluding to, when you keep mentioning ‘ETHNIC’ Russions, can you enlighten me?

          • David Ashton

            The whole Bolshevik movement? Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Dzerzhinsky, Uritsky, Radek, Litvinov, Joffe, &c?
            Churchill’s periodic drunkenness has no bearing on his well-informed and well-written historical writing. His policies from the mid-1930s onward can be criticized; e.g. by Patrick Buchanan in his recent study of WW2, and by David Irving in his first book in this statesman’s war, but Churchill was right, not wrong, in opposing non-white mass-immigration into Britain.

          • brengunn

            The whole Bolshevik movement? Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Dzerzhinsky, Uritsky, Radek, Litvinov, Joffe, &c?

            Someone must have fought the revolution, it didn’t fight itself.

          • David Ashton

            Just a few names other than Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, whose behavior you absurdly ruled out. Of course, many people fought on the Bolshevik side and others against them. The Bolsheviks offered the false promises of “peace, bread and land”, and what Churchill called an “impossible utopia”, and backed their armies with the Chekist terror.

          • brengunn

            The Bolsheviks offered the false promises of “peace, bread and land”, and what Churchill called an “impossible utopia”

            What revolution has not had to come to terms with reality? Even democratic politics is based on unattainable policy in election years, it’s reasonable to excuse it in a time of civil war. It seems to be a natural human inclination.

            Despite that, Soviet Russia did reach many targets. The massive wave of industrialisation was unparalleled in history at that time, bringing Russia from the czarist agrarian backwater it was, to an economic competitor with the Western countries. Had they remained a monarchy, they would have languished in backward peasantry and royalist pomp, been consumed by the Third Reich in 41/42 and ended in a worse state than they ever were under the Bolsheviks.

            I don’t agree with the bloodshed, the hunger or the terrors but these were not the preserve of the Bolsheviks. In the previous century, Britain let a million Irish die in an avoidable famine that seen another million leave the country. Two million people! In Ireland!

            BTW, I’m by no means a hardcore Bolshevist though they do have my sympathies.

          • David Ashton

            Actually there was rapid industrialization starting under the Tsar. There was no need to massacre his family and servants. I take no pride in British misbehavior towards the Irish, nor in the nonsense about modern “democracy”, but that does not mean I need endorse the way in which Stalin industrialized. Professor Sutton of the Hoover Institute proved how much the communists depended on western aid and technological transfer, legal and illegal, throughout the Soviet period.

            “Bolshevism cannot escape responsibility for unleashing the fratricidal civil war that devastated the country…thirteen million people were killed, died of hunger or emigrated….for the mass execution of clergy….the merchant class, the true intelligentsia, the community of scholars, scientists and artists….concentration camps, including camps for children….poison gas against peaceful civilians….the meat-grinder of Leninist-Stalinist repressions in which more than twenty million people perished….waging genocide against non-Russian citizens…’ &c – A. N. Yakovlev, “A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia” (Yale UP 2002) pp.237-8. The author, an architect of perestroika, is a leading authority on political prisoners in the USSR and their rehabilitation.

            Note that Lenin explained in 1919-20 that the Third International of
            communist movements was to assure world victory for revolution, the method was “civil war” not only in Russia but developed countries of Europe, and the most practical system to secure “proletarian” domination was the Soviet “dictatorship”.

          • brengunn

            There was no need to massacre his family and servants.

            As I said in a previous post, there was every necessity to kill his family. The servants should have been spared.

            that does not mean I need endorse the way in which Stalin industrialized

            Likewise. My approval of the Bolshevik revolution and the theories that inspired it, are separate to the crimes done in Communism’s name. Besides, everyone knows the Russians are animals, then and now.

            the most practical system to secure “proletarian” domination was the Soviet “dictatorship”.

            Totalitarianism is the great crime. And in that sense, Communist states are tainted because they tend towards Totalitarianism. But, lets not throw the baby out with the bath water, there are many sound principles we should keep.

            I, myself, believe in social democracy, my instincts are naturally liberal though I feel to enforce my beliefs on everyone would be wrong. Part of the reason I have ended up here, is the suspicion and repression of any other opinion, than that deemed acceptable by the powers that be. Even innocuous, non-violent, unemotional statements about race are heresy. That to me is unacceptable.

          • Daisy

            Is it that bad in Ireland? In the US white people on the right will talk behind closed doors, but the American left is pretty totalitarian so even in privacy it’s difficult to find anyone who will even whisper, which is the chief reason I disaffected from it.

          • brengunn

            No, Ireland’s not.

            I live in England and my circle of friends is much more liberal than the average man in the street, so I have to police my conversations for fear of being ostracized. The depressing thing about it is, on most other things I’m with them, their taste is attune to mine and I love their company. OTOH, I don’t feel to comfortable in conservative circles on most everything bar this and some issues I have with feminism. I take solace from the fact that I’m making my own mind up about things rather than blindly following because of group pressure.

            In Britain now, on a national scale the conversation is pc or nothing. Especially from anyone on the left. It’s just not right.

          • Daisy

            I suffer similarly. Hatred of whites is so extreme on the left in the US, though, that I broke off contact with most of my lefty friends, at least as intimates; I’ve lived too much direct experience of it to remain complicit.

            So Ireland isn’t as bad, hmm. That’s what I would have thought for some reason(s). It’s tragic that England is so repressive and parochial. I loved it when I visited years ago, but I’m not shocked that british colonial guilt is so stifling. In the US at least whites redeemed their colonial sins; the colonized peoples of the British empire largely freed themselves.

          • David Ashton

            Social democrats of the democratic kind have been among the first victims of the communists, and a few of them among their ablest opponents. I do not share the blanket total hostility of some posters against all neo-conservatives with socialist backgrounds and Jewish heritage, who have recently, perhaps belatedly (for whatever reasons, such as the Islamic threat to Zionism) have attacked communist totalitarianism, but also the “race, gender, class” ramp. Google “Irving Kristol.Communism” for useful sources.

          • David Ashton

            The Lenin period was bad enough. Consult his theoretical writings before and after the Bolshevik coup and the suppression of the Constituent Assembly. There are several recent biographies of Lenin that document his ruthless terrorism. For a brief understated introduction, see the first four chapters by Nicholas Werth of “The Black Book of Communism” (Harvard UP, 1999), and for the general context of Marxist-Leninist criminality, “The Red Holocaust” by Steven Rosenfielde (NY Routledge, 2010).

          • Kblankenship7

            You should read Solzhenytsin. Have you read his Gulag Archipelago? Have you read Koestler’s Darness at Noon? It is very hard for me to restrain my anger at your approval of an inherently genocidal system. i have never asked this before anywhere I have posted, but I will now: How old are you?
            I ask this to perhaps give you the benefit of the doubt, i.e. you are a young person with little exposure to the truth of the genocidal nature of Bolshevism. How old are you? Do you have a conscience? Even the Red Chinese let the last Emperor Puyi live. Your approval of murder is sickening. I hope you are a young person with some chance of gaining a sense of morality.

          • brengunn

            I just told you I don’t believe in genocide but you glossed over that so you could be filled with a warm feeling of righteous anger and indignation.

            i have never asked this before anywhere I have posted, but I will now: How old are you?

            I don’t understand the question. Are you saying that an adult cannot make a logical decision and choose Bolshevism over Monarchism? We hear plenty of blathering about Marxist academics on here, I don’t suppose they are all children, too.

            I explained a reasoned defense of the deaths of the Czar, his wife and children. They died because of a construct they, and their ancestors, foisted on the people. They created the rules which led to their demise and in that sense, their deaths were justifiable. However, on a human level, I feel sad that anyone has to die in the name of war.

            Your approval of murder is sickening.

            Your moral outrage is boring.

          • Kblankenship7

            Your lack of morality is boring…all too common throughout history. You must hate Europeans if you are pro-Bolshevik. Just a few million murdered…mir ist uebel,

          • brengunn

            You must hate Europeans if you are pro-Bolshevik.

            The British let over a million Irish starve to death in an avoidable Famine. Another million had to flea the country to avoid starvation. I believe in British parliamentary democracy, am I pro-famine?

          • Kblankenship7

            My concern is not for English, Irish, Manx, etc. You are the Bolschewiki apologist. Why do you interject some events occuring in England and Irland. I hate any extermination of European people. irish people are wonderful, Cumbrian people are wonderful, Manx people are wonderful. Do you think Ullyanov and Dzugashvilli cared for Celts? Wahnsinn, such men would murder Celts with impunity if had gotten that far. Ich scheisse auf Bolschewismus. Bolshie hate europa. Rebuttal? What has englische policy to do with Dzhugaschvilli and Ullyanov killing to do?

          • brengunn

            You are the Bolschewiki apologist. Why do you interject some events occuring in England and Ireland.

            I was extending your analogy to expose it’s lack of logic.

          • Kblankenship7

            Please separate Bolshevism from mass-murder logically, i.e without resort to fallacies of logic. Please separate Bolshevism from mass-murder historically.
            And don’t tell me I’m Irish this or that. Focus on the topic at hand, the actual historical Bolsheviks. Give it your best try. Also, how old did you say you are?

          • brengunn

            And don’t tell me I’m Irish this or that.

            That wasn’t idle chit chat. I was pointing to the fact that it’s possible to believe in a philosophy whose adherents have done despicable things, without condoning said atrocities .

            In truth, the Bolsheviks were murderous but had it not been Stalin that ascended to the throne following Lenin’s death, history would have been very different, with not nearly so much bloodshed. Had Trotsky’s two party system system been implemented we could be talking of the Great Bolsheviks, Saviours of Europe!

            Also, any Western perspective of Russia has to take into account that Russians are savages, death has less significance in their society.

            how old did you say you are?

            I didn’t say.

          • Kblankenship7

            The philosophy necessarily results in coercion and murder. You play a game of “what if”, but can’t defend what actually happened. Russians are not savages. That is an absolutely silly remark.
            You can’t defend an ideology of mass-murder, so you play a game of “it would have been different if…typisch linke bazille.

        • Wayne

          So, did the Jews get what they deserved????

        • David Ashton

          Disgusting comment. Not only murdered in the streets, but had their eyes gouged out. Some were flayed alive in Cheka dungeons. This was reported at the time to an incredulous world, and has very recently been carefully “re-documented” by scholarly researchers.

          • brengunn

            Not only murdered in the streets, but had their eyes gouged out. Some were flayed alive in Cheka dungeons.

            Such is war, David.

            Signed……Comfortably off, suburban, white Westerner!

          • David Ashton

            Street attacks on individual nobles was murder pure and simple, no better than poor blacks mugging rich whites. During the civil war there were indeed atrocities on both or more accurately all sides, and civil wars in backward countries can be more savage than international conflicts. Despite their humanitarian propaganda, the Bolshevik leaders encouraged murder, and in the case of the Kronstadt uprising and the liquidation of so-called kulaks, their victims were often humble workers and peasants.

          • brengunn

            Street attacks on individual nobles was murder pure and simple, no better than poor blacks mugging rich whites.

            I disagree. Mugging is an apolitical act done for monetary gain, only rarely having racial hatred as a primary motivator. Aristocracy attacks during an uprising have a political motive and are therefore, if not just, then understandable.

            This is a pattern of history played out over and over again. The upper classes get what they want for centuries and every so often the peasants revolt and make them pay with their lives. Things then return to normal. Neither position is a moral one.

            It raises interesting questions about the overlapping of race and class in multi-racial societies, though. If the hereditarian view is true, there will be a permanently disenfranchised lower class of a darker hue, without the bonds to their ‘betters’ that usually hold homogenous societies together. That is a problem.

          • David Ashton

            Stolypin had already started substantial land reform which worried Lenin because it would reduce peasant support for the Bolsheviks. What is this “two party” system of Trotsky who defended terrorism more explicitly than Lenin?

          • Kblankenship7

            It is not war to attack unarmed civilians. Bolshies failed despite the blood they spilled. Your side lost in actual history.

    • Julius

      Black people have always felt like Jews in Germany. The fact is that we wear the star of David on our skin.

      • Sloppo

        That’s terrible! Do you suppose black people feel that way in the 50 or so countries where your people constitute close to 100% of the population and political leadership? Perhaps you could relocate to one wonderful places and stop feeling so oppressed.

      • PesachPatriot

        The jews in germany(or poland or hungary or romania for that matter) weren’t flash mobbing wal mart, robbing liquor stores at gunpoint, forming street gangs,or killing each other over sneakers and bling …the jews in germany also knew how to operate a belt and behave themselves in school. The awful racist country of the USA has provided trillions in food stamps, section 8 housing and, free cell phones. There was never a jewish president of germany…america has now elected a partially black president twice. If you are truly unhappy here in the US feel free to catch a flight to haiti, jamaica, or any of the black run paradises in africa. No one has held you guys in chains in the cotton fields for 150 years, you are free to leave at any time you wish. I’m sure you know that black people in america have the highest standard of living anywhere on the planet.

      • Liberalsuck

        How do you think whites feel in predominately black environments where we get beat or killed simply because we’re white? How do you think whites in South Africa who are getting killed by blacks feel? How do you think whites feel when by law we have to give you people our jobs, support your kids, let you date our daughters, etc? how do you think whites feel when we can get thrown in jail simply for defending ourselves against black criminals? How do you think whites feel when they have bent over backwards for blacks for over 50 years now only to be hated?

        • Katherine McChesney

          Julius is just another ‘entitled low information voter’.

      • Katherine McChesney

        The black race are in no way similar to Jews. Like them or not they moved on from the past and became productive people. Something your race cannot claim. The problem with them is that they support your lazy a$$.

    • Daisy

      Because I am not a jew and have milky white skin and light orange hair I have had ‘the feeling’ for a good, I don’t know, 20 years. Where the H have you been?

    • pcmustgo

      I am half jewish and yes, I have said this for awhile now… Hitler’s brownshirts are in poetry cafes in NYC screaming about getting revenge on whites.

      • PesachPatriot

        I’m sure the good old boys of georgia, tennessee, wisconsin, minnesota, texas, wyoming and montana are terrified of NYC coffeehouse tough guy poets….The first poet who gets ambitious, drives over the GW bridge and tries to act on his stupidity will probably come down with a very serious case of lead poisoning.

      • PesachPatriot

        I’d take poetry reciting badasses with a very big grain of salt….If any of these wannabe Che Guevaras eve left bloomturdistan and went west of the GW bridge and ran into some good old boys out in Pennsylvania or Texas their fair trade organic coffee would be staining their pants very quickly. They would probably be afraid just being in the woods alone at night.

    • http://www.facebook.com/allan.foster.370 Allan Foster

      I got that feeling when Harold Washington was made the Mayor of Chicago.

  • gemjunior

    “systems and institutions are set up for [whites]” and as such are “unfair.”

    It would not be unfair if all you non-whites weren’t here. See, the reason that you think systems and institutions were set up for whites and as such were unfair, is because they were set up for Whites, by other Whites. And it was all normal and wonderful and fine until some mad destructive instincts (which are perceived as fairness by Whites, and are adaptive when used solely within White society) allowed you to come into this most productive place in the world, hang up your hats, and then tear it down literally and figuratively. This crazy instinct, which your races are not sophisticated enough to understand, caused all you non-whites to assume that these things are yours, and they are for you. Because you have an insane sense of entitlement. Go to Mexico and South America and Africa and build institutions of law, learning, justice, production, etc., and when we whites come and nag you that you’re racist and complain that “these African systems were set up for Africans” you can see how sick what you are asking is. Not that I would ever really put my big toe anywhere near the place, but just for arguments’ sake.

  • http://twitter.com/seedymedia r j p

    What’s really unfair is Affirmative Action?

  • Barrack Osama

    Just another anti-white propaganda piece. Nothing to see here.

    You know, Paul Kersey of SBPDL was gathering money to put up a pro-white billboard based on this Unfair crap. What ever happened to that idea?

  • jambi19

    From wiki the 2010 census numbers for the city of Superior, Wisconsin.

    The racial makeup of the city was 91.5% White, 1.4% African American, 2.6% Native American, 1.2% Asian, 0.2% from other races, and 3.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.4% of the population.

    For some reason the places that aren’t very “diverse” or “vibrant” very often are anti-white (Madison, Wisconsin, San Francisco and all of New England)

    • Jefferson

      That is because they feel guilty for living in a city who’s racial demographics is not as vibrant as that of Baltimore and Detroit for example.

      Most White liberals will watch a show like “The Wire” for example, and wish that their own neighborhood was as “vibrantly diverse’ as the neighborhoods that you see in that show or in “Menace To Society”.

      • brengunn

        Most White liberals will watch a show like “The Wire” for example, and
        wish that their own neighborhood was as “vibrantly diverse’

        Jesus, they’d have to be dumb as a box of rocks.

    • CharlesFinley

      I like the part where the others are some kind of hyphenated AMERICANS, but WE are merely “White”.

    • The Last White Man Standing

      I believe this is because they haven’t “benefited” from the joys of multiculturalism or diversity. The only knowledge they have about blacks or hispanics is what they get from the corporate media. They are constantly indoctrinated with how racist Whites are , and how oppressed the minorities are. Those of us who live in integrated cities like Philly, Camden N.J., or Detroit know there is no joy at all in either multiculturalism or diversity. We also know that contrary to popular belief, the plight of blacks and hispanics is because of their genes, not because of White racism. They are who they are no matter where they live.

      People who live in lily White areas and preach for social justice and equality should be forced to live areas like Compton, West Philly, or anywhere in East St Louis for at least a year. Then we will see if they still believe in nonsense like White privilege or equality for all.

      • rick

        “People who live in lily White areas and preach for social justice and equality should be forced to live areas like Compton, West Philly, or anywhere in East St Louis for at least a year. ”
        Fit ‘em all with ankle bracelets… it could be done. It might even make for an interesting reality show.

        • brengunn

          I’d watch it. I hope they make that show.

    • gooberboy9999

      It’s easy to be tolerant when you don’t have to actually deal with the people you tolerate.

  • Jefferson

    The anti-White University Of Wisconsin needs a huge dose of urban inner city “diversity”. Flood that university with tens of thousands of Blacks from East St. Louis, Compton, the south side of Chicago, East Oakland, Opa Locka, Liberty City neighborhood of Miami, etc. Put their money where their mouth is.

  • Andy

    Sorry to rant but WHITE PEOPLE ARE AWESOME. They are smart, beautiful, artistic, curious, pensive, determined, and brave. I am PROUD of my white skin. I am proud of my English, German, French, and Scottish ancestors. I am proud of my wonderful white family that eats white food, reads white literature, and engages in white activities like working and not killing people. STOP SLANDERING MY PEOPLE. Stop indoctrinating our children with self-hatred.

    • brengunn

      What’s white food, Andy?

      • concernedcollegekid

        Cock-a-leekie soup, maybe. Or lutefisk.

        • dukem1

          Lutefisk! Only a white chef could figure out how to prepare a dish using lye as an ingredient.
          Now, the why of it…that needs its own website!

      • Skincognito

        Haggis!

        Great post, Andy.
        Cheers.

        • IstvanIN

          Sounds about as tasty as headcheese. There are some peasant dishes I am glad we finally left behind.

          • brengunn

            No, it’s actually quite tasty. It’s like a spicy black pudding. Yum yum!

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

            We only left it behind because of displacement by other ethnic foods as those groups arrived. There is nothing wrong with headcheese. They put those same things in hot dogs.

      • The Ice Queen

        Lefse!

        Oh, and don’t be sorry Andy. Rant all you want!

        • Gereng

          ..Lefse is NOT easy to make. Delicious to eat. In southern Oregon where I spent my teen yrs, most Oregon folk back then were of scandinavian origin. Few if any negroes and maybe 3 or 4 Mexicans in a high school of 1000 students. No riots, no one shooting kids, no student rapes, no one trying to burn down the school, no gangs. Good WHITE chow on the caf menu.

          • The Ice Queen

            You are right, Lefse is not easy to make, but it is worth it. Homemade Lefse fresh off the griddle with butter and sugar is absolutely delicious. I learned how to make it years ago, but it did take a few tries to master it without getting flour all over the kitchen as if a tornado ripped through.

          • Gereng

            A scandinavian ladies club in Klamath Falls OR still makes Lefse for major holidays..I think it is sold as fund raising activity.

      • bigone4u

        White food is tasty, nutritious, and appetizing. It is food prepared in a safe, clean kitchen by white persons who have washed their hands.

      • robinbishop34

        French?

        • brengunn

          That’s really what I was asking, does he mean Anglo-Saxon slop on a plate or the more refined continental fare.

          • Pat

            Rather have Anglo Saxon slop than witchetty grubs, deep fried tarantula or various ‘bits’ of monkey.

          • brengunn

            What the hell is going on? Commenter’s names keep mixing up and changing several times. Is anyone else seeing this?

          • Daisy

            That happens fairly often when you try to almost ‘chat’ with another poster; maybe it’s also affected by high traffic volume. Sometimes if you close the window and come in again it gets cleared, or maybe go on another thread and come back..

          • brengunn

            It’s mad. So far in this thread Daisy, I’ve had you say that you’re ’100% Irish’, that you love your ‘English, German and Norwegian’ skin and that you wear a ‘yellow star’ everyday because you’re ‘black’!! I thought I was losing my mind!

          • dukem1

            Bush meat!!!

      • Felix_M

        What’s white food, Andy?

        I’ll tell you what it’s not: Something out of a care package paid for by white people.

        • hastings88

          Any white ethnic cuisine: French food, Italian food, Polish food. The Anglo-American contributions are so commonplace we don’t think of it as ethnic: steak and potatoes, for example.

          • dukem1

            Exactly.
            If you want a steak, you must first figure out how to raise a steer.

            Potatoes? Gotta figure out how to grow them..

            I like cheese – all kinds – they say the French have like 500 kinds of it…Is there any kind of sub-Saharan cheese?..Is there 500 kinds of it?…noop.

            White food is the food that by and large feeds the entire world…Food that can be produced, repeatedly, efficiently, and in a way that produces surpluses to feed those who haven’t figured out how to feed themselves…

            Cripes! Now that I’m thinkin’ about this, even KFC was invented by a white guy…

            White people rock!!!

          • Katherine McChesney

            Did you know that there’s a black rumor for years that Sanders stole the recipe from his black maid. Isn’t that hilarious? Phooey.

      • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

        There is an incredible amount of “food” that is ethnically European. Most Americans have come to view German and French variations as American food. Stews are typically Scottish and Irish in origin. “French fries are called Pomme Frites in not just France, but all over Europe (fr-pomme de terre = apple of the earth). Barbecue, however was being done by natives here when the Colonists arrived and was learned from them.

        • Pat

          In Britain French fries are chips. What you call chips are crisps. ‘Two nations divided by a common language’ – George Bernard Shaw (I think).

    • guest

      I also love my white European heritage and I will never apologize for it. I could never fall to the level of mentality of these anti-racists by hating myself and my race and I’m not so naive to think that these programs really promote “racial justice”. They are really anti-white and only spell trouble for whites.

    • Felix_M

      Andy, I have never been as proud of my whiteness and Graeco-Roman heritage as I have been these last few years as I see it assailed by the forces of ignorance and darkness.

  • sbuffalonative

    Soooo, they’re judging WHITE people by the COLOR of THEIR SKIN?

    • Will

      check this out

      The Smoking Gun

  • dd121

    Are any of the marxist professors asking the white students to volunteer for extermination since their existence is so unfair? Don’t laugh, it’ll happen.

  • Conan

    Hopefully this will blow up in their faces the way the unfair campaign in Minnesota did.

    • ncpride

      It will only when we let them know exactly how we feel about it. E-mail them, or phone them, but every AmRen reader needs to let them know how sick we are of this nonsense, and we’re not gonna take it anymore.

    • Liberalsuck

      I have a feeling it will. In fact, all of this anti-white BS will eventually have a nasty backlash on them soon. It will happen when they least expect it.

  • Token Finn

    They make you go to jail or pay fines for criticizing character and telling facts about race that were known hundreds of years ago but it’s state of the art for them to hate skin colour? The one thing they accuse white nationalists of doing but which was never done. Can they keep track of their own fallacies?

  • concernedcollegekid

    “The goal is to promote racial justice and greater understanding of the thorny, persistent issues about racism”

    You know what’s a “thorny, persistent issue”? Genetics, that’s what.

  • Bob

    A group of white students needs to file a discrimination lawsuit against the University.
    I’m pretty sure they would get their education paid for and this BS would end.

    • liberalsuck

      That and threaten you will withdraw from the school and not spend another dime there. Always threaten them with loss of money; since that is how they have threatened us all these years to get what they want out of us. Fight fire with fire.

  • libertarian 1234

    Any whites going along with this kind of nonsense are complete imbeciles. It’s no more than an anti-white hate campaign.

    It’s also a lesson in psychological brainwashing, just like Jonestown was where they drank the kool aid, because they had been conditioned to do so. This kind of mindset tells us also that, with the right input, there are some in society who can be effectively trained to hate themselves, their families, their people, and feel good about it all.

    That’s valuable information to know in order to keep those types out of any future sovereign area that might be acquired later on after secession.

    Those that can be duped so easily are worthless to a well-informed society.

  • al sharpton

    i feel intense anger when i see or encounter blacks anywhere in my environment

    • Alex

      I know what you mean brother. Whenever I’m around any I feel the same way I did when we rolled out of the gates in Afghanistan, just completely on edge and ready to go. Stay alert and stay alive :) I never let my guard down around them.
      They just muck up everything and ghetto-ize it.

  • Ralph

    Anti-White scum like those who are pushing these hate programs against our people will keep it up until Whites start screaming out against this subtle genocide. If we don’t, we’ll keep getting pushed to the back of the bus.

    Trust me, I do my small part to make noise about crap like this, but more need to jump in and stop just observing from the sidelines.

    Also, we have to stop letting our weak-seed fellow Whites dictate the agenda to us. They use their White skin to make it seem that all Whites are like these weak-seeds. Screw them.

    • ncpride

      Exactly! E-mail, phone or contact this University any way ya want, but let them know we are sick of this anti-White nonsense.

      • NaiveWhiteGuiltLibtard

        I called them and left a message telling them that the “Un-Fair Campaign” subtly encourages violence against whites, and that if they can’t recognize that fact then they are extremely naive.

      • liberalsuck

        I would write this to them, “You anti-white advocates can keep calling us ‘white supremacists’ and ‘racists’ all you want, but the fact of the matter is lots of white people are sick and tired of your liberal anti-white agenda. You wouldn’t dare publicly insult blacks or Latinos or Asians the way you are whites. You know you couldn’t stand the backlash and your career would be over.”

  • prettycelticwarrior

    This garbage makes my 100% pure Irish blood boil! White, Irish, beautiful, Intelligent and very proud of it! Irish,

  • MekongDelta69

    The most racist people on earth are blacks, who are enabled and encouraged by their self loathing, guilt ridden, leftist handlers.

    But blacks’ IQs are so low, they don’t even see it. Plus the fact they love lording their benighted status over whites.

  • drofmanythings

    It is now The University of Wisconsin-Inferior. I dare a white University flaunt itself as superior.

  • brengunn

    Having to read nonsense like this brings out a murderous rage in me.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    The anti-white movement in America is the biggest, most obvious effort in American history that remains underground and out of the spotlight.

  • pansy

    The only thing this campaign does is make me feel sorry for the sad souls who agreed to appear in it.

  • HamletsGhost

    Another reason why our universities need to be shut down. Who else would use their own money to pay for this bilge. Public education is just public indoctrination.

  • THE MAN

    The continued war on white people perpetrated by the” academian nuts “. They have liberal arts studies ! Do they have conservative arts studies ? The only privilege I have by being white is to pay for the 1000 government programs they have for blacks to keep them from failing . Wherever you live in areas with more blacks the taxes are higher ,everything is more costly . The only thing that doesn’t go up in large black concentrations is the value of your home . Every service in these areas are taxed to the maximum because of how much it costs just on a daily basis to maintain some level of service .They overwhelm everything in the community with their constant needs and pampering .Schools have to go down to smaller ratio’s so they can learn which costs the system additional positions for teachers .We have to pay for psychologists ,social workers and pretty soon we will have to pay for them to have father figures .Not to mention breakfast, lunch and eventually supper . Plus security ,metal detectors , camera’s. The damage that is done to the school everyday that must be repaired is it any wonder that schools can’t buy books .Our state pays the schools for every kid that is in class on a daily basis .So it is pretty hard to suspend any of these disrupters because the schools loses state money everyday that kid is out of school .

  • http://twitter.com/AFreespeechzone A Freespeechzone

    Too many self-loathing White, so-called academics, encouraged by radical minorities, do not believe in equality whatsoever—only payback, retribution and punishment of Whites.

    One day–’equality’ will be served on these White, self-loathing professors…..think they’ll think it’s justified?

    I, for one, will NEVER acknowledge dogma that seeks to punish and destroy MY race…

  • gooberboy9999

    “The goal is to promote racial justice and greater understanding of the thorny, persistent issues about racism,”

    By telling whites how evil and racist they are?

    Yeah, that won’t back fire at all! Idiots like this do more for our cause than we ever could on our own.

    • Wayne

      Notice how it is no longer about equality anymore, but social justice. What this means is taking from whites and giving to non-whites. Nothing more.

  • LHathaway

    The ‘Unfair campaign’ that about says it all. young whites are probably too scared to notice it’s a joke.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    ’Unfair Campaign,’ aims to teach college students that ‘systems and institutions are set up for [whites]’ and as such are ‘unfair.’

    This is TERRORISM against young White people.

    We have had 50+ years of government codified and sanctioned overt discrimination against Whites in the form of AA, quotas and preferences.

    Yet if Whites ask inconvenient questions or object to this White-hating, one-sided narrative we are ostracized, singled out for ridicule and scorn and called every name for racist and Nazi.

    Young Whites who object are BEATEN DOWN with words carefully honed to shame and demonize anyone who questions the anti-White narrative. In schools and colleges NO DISCUSSION IS ALLOWED regarding the issue of White displacement and anti-White discrimination.

    I couldn’t have said it better than Free Speech Zone: This is NOT about creating “equality” with Whites; it is about White displacement, payback, retribution and punishment against Whites and only Whites — until we are stripped of our homelands, wealth, culture and finally genocided.

    Bon

  • 1776is1984

    what self hating tards!

    “is white skin really fair skin?” Yes iit is!, its also very beautiful and enjoying to look at! esp pale!

  • The Ice Queen

    This nonsense drives me nuts. No apologies here for my white skin, and very pale white skin at that. English, German, and Norwegian, and feeling really good about it. If someone doesn’t like it, pick a bone with God.

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      My Celtic flesh is White as snow and I love every inch of it.

  • Lou406

    the “Unfair Campaign,” aims to teach college students that “systems and institutions are set up for [whites]” and as such are “unfair.”

    This nation and it’s institutions were created by Whites. Who should they be set up for, Eskimos?

  • LastBastionOfHope

    the “Unfair Campaign,” aims to teach college students that “systems and institutions are set up for [whites]” and as such are “unfair.”

    It’s hysterical how quickly you can call BS on this statement. Africa is set up for Africans and all the power to them. Mexico is set up for Mexicans and all the power to them. Japan is set up for the Japanese and all the power to them. A white America is set up for white Americans…OMG RACIST! SO UNFAIR! As Lou406 said, who should they be set up for?

    Ever watch Animal Planet and see the natural habitats for different animals? Let’s take a bear’s den for example. Bears set up their habitats for themselves and other bears. They are not set up for dolphins. Is the bear just racist against dolphins, or is it just set up for bears because bears created it? This stuff really is comical and I can see a comedian talking about it.

  • Vanessa

    I don’t give a damn about what is “fair” to the whole wide world. I’m only interested in myself first (survival instinct- can’t help it), then my family, then friends, then my white racial family, and finally “world humanity” in that order. Our people need to stop being so concerned about being moral and ethical at any cost, that is folly. I’m not advocating going out and lynching everyone who’s not white. I’m simply saying we need to look at every issue and decide what’s right or wrong based on whether it serves our interests and accept that there’s nothing wrong with it. If we don’t look out for our own interests who will?

  • Felix_M

    As Campus Reform has previously reported, the controversial project, named the “Unfair Campaign,” aims to teach college students that “systems and institutions are set up for [whites]” and as such are “unfair.”
    Yeah, and in Mexico they’re set up to favor Mexicans, in China the Chinese and in Africa Africans.
    Are people born this stupid or do they have to work at it?

  • Fr. John+

    “In a statement released Thursday, the University of Wisconsin—Superior stood by its sponsorship of a controversial messaging campaign aimed at teaching student it is “unfair” to be white.

    “The goal is to promote racial justice and greater understanding of the thorny, persistent issues about racism,” read the statement released by the school.”

    Pardon me for saying so, but that is utter Bullshit. After watching the ‘rent-a-mob’ crowd trying to bully sane Wisconsonians in the Governor’s recall over forced unionism, this bastard excuse for an institution of higher learning (and, as a university professor, I know my own ilk in this!) is the viper’s den that the Governnor should go after- NEXT!

    Get RID of all those useless, antisocial, marxist tenured professors, and replace the ENTIRE ‘Diversity department’ and ‘Women’s/LBGT/Black studies departments with something WORTHY of the Taxpayer’s already overburdened pockets!

  • GerónimoAnónimo

    I found it pathetic that these students and some adults would participate in this self flagellation. IT goes to show the diabolical program of conditioning to which our youth has been subjected.

    We can only pray the they eventually will come to their senses without a rude or tragic awakening as suffered by Eve Carson, Amy Biehl, Channon and Christopher et al. Unfortunately their awakening was short lived.

    • Katherine McChesney

      There’s quite a difference between Eve, Channon and Christopher and the Amy Biehl story. I know it seems cold of me but I have no empathy for Amy Biehl. Her decision to interfer in black politics caused her death.

  • Djangotamer

    I am shaking with rage regarding this insulting farce of a campaign…no more words.

  • The Worlds Scapegoat

    It is unfair being born into a society where everyone hates you because of your skin color; it is unfair have to pay everyone else’s way through life; it is unfair to get sent to the back of the line every time someone new shows up even though you were their first; it’s unfair being blamed for every one else’s problems and inability to succeed; it’s unfair to be held accountable for thousands of years of some other countries failures when neither you nor your ancestors where ever present in that country.

  • Will White

    No room for agnostic Race Realists on AR huh.the multiracial person can get on here,and I get scrapped.

  • Mariner33

    Why not clean house with these Marxist/Communist/Alinsky slobs in positions of authority in these public supported universities???? Start with the college president and go right through the faculty and regents. Make the choice of curriculum under control of the President and his minions, not the faculty. That’s the way it used to be. The faculty taught what it was given.

    • David Ashton

      You need an alliance between patriotic, intelligent parents and patriotic, intelligent academics. There needs be a nationwide coalition against the tenured “race, gender, class” ideologists.

  • Will White

    Monica Crowley is on fox news right now talking about this garbage.she did a Horrible job!that is whats wrong with the republican party,among other things.we need a Real counter to the sickening white left.one who gets to be on tv for a change.

  • Al Gator

    This “white privilege” invention is just more fartgas from the “fear whitey” crowd. They suffer from terminal white envy. Western civilization brought the whole world with them into modernity. Some people just CAN’T reckon with that, and the hatred rots their stomachs.

    ( I trust some clown will claim this was achieved on the “backs of slaves.” Balderdash and Falderal!)

    So, this whole infantile “white privilege” nonsense was cooked up by those same white hating racists and other assorted bigots, to excuse and explain away certain people’s INABILITY to produce and achieve.

    When I point out that Japan never “suffered” from white privilege, I get blank stares. Then I remind folks, the Japanese went from stone cold feudal to taking on the greatest power on earth, in less than 100 years. From the Meiji restoration in the mid 1860′s to Pearl Harbor wasn’t even 100 years.

    Japanese attitude? If white folks can do it, so can we. The Emperor decreed that Japan will be a mighty power, and just damn, look what they did. And that was IN SPITE of some of the most harsh racism at the time that anyone could ever imagine.

    If you CAN’T MAKE IT, don’t blame whitey, just go look in the mirror.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

    I have a memory from high school that haunts me now and then, of this very mute (White) boy in my class who was short of stature, who always had his head pointed to the ground and whose low confidence made him a target of the (also mainly White) over grown jocks in my class for bullying. Until one day, when we were all in the locker room getting changed for PE (physical education class in case you guys call it something different) and this poor kid took off his top to reveal multiple red belt marks (back story his father was a alcoholic), well I still remember the hangdog looks of regret, horror and shame on the faces of some of the bullying jocks who also saw the same thing (to their credit, most of this boy’s school bullying stopped then, with his prior attackers even becoming his defenders).
    Sometimes when I think of the idea of White privilege, the image of this boy pops into my mind along say with those of the spoiled brat, offspring of the actor Will Smith.
    You get the point.

    Having White skin color certainly doesn’t guarantee the owner a golden run.

  • Simonetta

    This very issue was “confronted” to me recently when the restaurant next door sponsored their annual Native American PowWow in their parking lot. For an entire Sunday, from 11am to 8pm, the Indians sat around the parking lot and pounded a big loud drum and chanted ‘hey ya, hey ya, hey ya aah…’. After about an hour everyone in the neighborhood had a splitting headache. The smart people took a drive for the afternoon or put in earplugs.
    I went over and talked to the pounders and they told me that this is what their culture had been doing for thousands of years and the chanting was a prayer to the Great Spirit for prosperity. They invited me to join for a while, but my prayers are somewhat quieter (family Quaker background).

    Then I started to think about ‘my’ culture. I’m German/English/Irish background (like most Americans) so I can only claim the great Italians like Michelangelo, Raphael, and all the other Ninja Turtles as cultural ancestors in the pan-European sense. {the ‘Simonetta’ avatar is a reference to Simonetta Vespucci, the most beautiful woman in history} But culturally, 500 years ago they were a long way above mixing dirt and buffalo blood to do finger painting on cave walls. And Mozart and Bach were a lot more advanced musically 200-300 years ago than the HeyYa drum bangers.
    Cultures are not equal. While yes, every culture contributes something to the world, some cultures don’t really contribute very much at all. Never have; never will.

    Now if I can just convince the restaurant next door to have the city symphony come play in the parking lot for a Sunday afternoon….

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

      Irish/Scottish/German background here.
      I’ve had similar thoughts about the ‘indigenous’ people (who’ve only been here for 700yrs) that I’ve positioned myself and my family close to here in NZ, in an attempt to escape multicultural Australia.
      Likewise their primitive warrior culture is revered and thanks to political correctness is enjoying a revival with lots of public money being spent on them having multiple radio stations + their television channel etc, it’s mandatory for all NZ school children to learn their language and likewise popular youth culture is littered with their angry faces popping up in locally produced hip hop videos flashing LA style gang signals which somehow links to their cultural pride.
      Whenever NZ is represented in anyway on the international stage as part of showcasing ‘our culture’, we have to endure these overweight topless men, adorning facial tattoos poking their tongues out and bugging their eyes to look ‘fierce’, while dancing around and generally being threatening with a big wooden spear, to represent our 21st country which is embarrassing to say the least.
      See mickey mouse receiving “the honor “http://tinyurl.com/aeuosyg.
      Of course after the progressives have edited out all the cannibalism (which occurred as recent as 150 yrs ago), the inter tribal genocide, the infanticide (still rampant) and all the misogynistic cultural double standards etc (so many areas left out here), the Maori start to look like the Navi off Avatar.
      All this happens while we Whites get told that that we have no culture, as we drink wine, beer, tea or coffee in our colonial designed houses, after going to a English style school, as defined by our English style Parliament (political structure) as we watch rugby or cricket to unwind.
      Getting back to what you’re saying, I wonder to myself regarding the revival with this primitive local culture, whether in a 1000 yrs when we’re flying our cars to Mars and beaming ourselves to other solar systems whether these proud primitive cultures are still going to beating their drums, with painted faces and poking their tongues out and waving their spears at new guests.
      I mean when are they going to evolve for goodness sake.

  • Will White

    There is NOTHING,that the white left wont do to raise black,and Hispanic self-esteem.

  • Bill

    They can do this, you see, because by and large the only blacks in Wisconsin are to be found in Milwaukee. Most of the satellite campuses have very few blacks. The main campus also has few blacks, but more so than those outside Madison. Now, IF they were located in Milwaukee, where even the BLACK chief of police tells them to get their own guns, 911 calls will go unanswered and police will NOT show up in time, and blacks act like blacks world wide there, then maybe this kind of treasonous, ridiculous, anti-white garbage would be objected to by white students on such a campus. However, do you notice WHERE these kinds of courses are always pandered? Elite, mostly white, liberal campuses. Reality seldom finds its way in to ivory towers. Indoctrination trumps reason, safety, and reality.

  • Katherine McChesney

    I love being White. My roots are English, Scotch-Irish and French. History has shown that my culture has contributed more to the human race than any other culture. We’ve never lived off the government, but have paid our taxes and been independent. We would never let the past rule us like blacks and hispanics do. This is why we thrive. We move forward while black and hispanics stay rooted in the past.

  • David Ashton

    Some of us used to read sad tales about little black girls who tried to scrub their skin black.
    Some whites today won’t “black up” but choose to commit race suicide instead – how sad is that?

  • Mike123456789123456789

    University of Wisconsin – Superior must be full of bigots. Anyone who puts their race before American should leave the country. I have a good friend from Ghana and he is the first to tell people he is an African American because he is a naturalized citizen and that if you were born here you are just a American no other race.

  • SintiriNikos

    Man, I’m almost happy my kid is not university age. I wonder what universities will be like when he eventually goes to school. Can it get any worse? I’m thinking all this hocus pocus will have been exposed for the bullshit anti-White racism that it is, and things will get a little bit saner. Or am I dreaming? Seriously, though, this folly isn’t sustainable, is it? Sound minds will prevail in the end. i can’t help but think that in some future, we will all watch tapes and photos and read articles from this precise point in time, and get together in groups and laugh at all of it, or at least wonder how the hell could our civilization have reached such a nadir. Or just brush it off like it didn’t really happen, and all the article and photos and videos were just satire and parody. I don’t know what to think anymore.