Dear White People

Gillian Schutte, Thought Leader, January 2, 2013

I have decided to start the New Year with a letter to you all. It is a letter that implores you to wake up and smell Africa with a fresh white nose.

Before you get angry and defensive, think of this letter as a crash course survival kit for navigating a new reality, and please be assured that if you take heed of the call in this letter your life will change in miraculous ways. Once the blinkers are off the world is a much more colourful and celebratory place to engage in.

Let me begin by wholeheartedly apologising for what my ancestors did to the people of South Africa and inviting you to do the same. I reject their legacy as much as is possible and, as you already know, have made it a life mission to deconstruct the phallocentric white view of “white as right” and the misguided precept that white is central to all reality.

I reject the discourse of white domination but I acknowledge that I was brought up in this construct. Though my single-mother household was never economically privileged we were privileged by virtue of our skin colour and my mother was given assistance by the state that a woman of colour was denied.

I call on white people to reflect on what it means to be born into unearned privilege, to excavate our long history of racist exploitation and assumed superiority—to acknowledge that this is what we were taught and then to reject it wholly.

I call on white people to acknowledge that whiteness has become invisible to us and we no longer recognise it for a discourse that perpetuates the dehumanisation of black people in ways so subtle that they appear normal.

I call on white people to admit that the rainbow nation is a myth and until we truly are able to recognise the humanity of all people we cannot claim to be post-racist.

I call on white people to acknowledge how white supremacy continues to play out in the media—in representations of blackness—in the constant accusation that black people are racist when they speak their truth.

I call on white people to recognise the black-bashing trend of our media, which is largely white owned, and to put an end to this dehumanising and destructive infantile idiocy.

I call on white people to recognise that by jumping in on national debates that do not concern them they are usurping a platform for authentic black voices to air their grievances about our leadership. You may have noticed that the black voices we need and want to hear choose to disengage because they are skaam to share the podium with a lot of cacophonic white outrage about the same topic but from a white racist perspective.

White people please just shut up for once and listen. Not everything is about white people being accused of racism. Sometimes it is about the black middle class and whether or not they have adopted vile white practices.

I implore you, white people, to listen to black voices calmly and not to react defensively to every outrage a black voice presents.

I call on white people to accept that they are not the only race that is entitled to rage, to hurt, to pain, to anger.

I call on white people, to recognise that they fear the emotions of black people—that it is this fear that makes them shut down black voices and defend themselves from the suggestion that they are complicit in the continued oppression of black people.

I call on white people to recognise that we have all been taught (in varying degrees) that black people do not have the same emotions and psychology as us and that this fallacy is built upon the double-edged sword of domination and fear. To dehumanise a people is to exploit them with no guilt. To recognise their collective pain is to admit the guilt thereby see the humanity.

I call on white people to recognise how whiteness has unconsciously used blackness as a conduit for its own darkness and unacknowledged savagery.

I implore white people to get over their fear that black people are out to slaughter them in a wholesale genocide of revenge. It has not happened yet and there is so much evidence that it will never happen in a country that has built its economic policy on global standards that favour whiteness and rely on the middle class as a buffer zone between the people on the ground and the elite corporate and political class. Just get over yourselves. White people of middle class are still safer than people living in townships.

I call on white people to work on a strategy to lessen the growing gap between rich and poor because, white people, it is the poor who are really suffering in this country and it is the poor who are the wretched fall-out from a more than 360-year history of white domination, slavery, subjugation and theft of livelihood.

I call on white people to understand that poverty and unemployment are social conditions. By renaming them “laziness”, “lack of ambition” and “stupidity” you are furthering your own illogical delusions that whiteness has nothing to do with the untenable conditions that most black people are forced to live in. These are not inherent traits of being black, as many of you are fond of saying. These are the social consequences of a brutal colonial history and current globalisation—coupled with weak anti-the-poor leadership.

And please white people, when you feel compelled to criticise Zuma, as we all do, please ensure that you are critiquing him for his favouring of white corporates and the white middle class over poverty issues—for his pro-capitalist stance and his failure to deliver to the poor—for his patriarchal utterances that threaten to usurp women’s rights—rather than obsessing over his penis, his wives, his second-language command of English and using him as a scapegoat for all your fears and negative unconscious stereotypes about all black folk.

Oh and one more thing … asseblief white people, from well-meaning liberals to white supremacists—just stop telling everyone who is not white how to behave, what to think and when to say what. By trying to control the public agenda you are participating in your own imagined oppression and avoiding the possibility that we are all human and can co-exist very nicely.

Be grateful that you are still welcome in a land that was stolen.

And stop bitching and telling black people to get over their history. Goddammit—if those things had happened to white people there would be an entire world domination film industry built upon the “legitimised suffering of white people” so why will you not understand that colonialism was a holocaust of epic proportions and it will take many, many more decades for the pain to subside.

Instead of defending your privileges by denying them and nursing your guilt through misguided outrage—why not get your hands dirty while helping to restore this country to a space of dignity and respect for all.

Try now to reconsider the possibility of the healing potential of apologising collectively and genuinely for the wrongs our history has perpetrated against the indigenous people of this land.

Oh ja … and white people, please try not to respond negatively and vilely to my letter because I will never stop pleading with you to get over yourselves and get with the current programme. It is as easy as the blink of an eye.

Yours sincerely,

Settler Sister

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Brian

    “Wake up and smell Africa…”

    Now there’s a good way to lose your audience right from the get go. Ughhh.

    • David Ashton

      We had a group of Jamaican girls who went on a trip “back to the African homeland” and returned to comment on its universal stench; they were accused of “racism” too.

  • pcmustgo

    Some Afro-centric Black Guy just made a movie called “Dear White People” that’s about an Angry Black Woman on a mostly white college campus, full of eyerolling and the like, demonizing whites, etc.

  • anmpr1

    When someone describes themselves as a feminist activist working against a “phallocentric culture,” and then I look at their photograph and can’t exactly determine their gender due to their being overweight, and having a a butch haircut, I immediately suspect that what we have is an example of a white man hating lesbian.

    • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

      NAILED IT!!!

    • Xanthippe2

      Bet she works for a non-profit or university and is much demanded (and well paid) as a speaker. Also bet she lives in a well-fortified “nice area.” Probably has almost no contact with regular Blacks — and is secretly glad of it.

      • JohnEngelman

        Affluent whites come into contact with few blacks. These few are usually exceptional or they occupy subordinate positions without resentment.

        Gillian Schutte should talk to some whites who cannot afford to live in well fortified safe areas.

        • http://twitter.com/baldowl baldowl

          –or directly to the blacks who vex and prey upon those whites, for whom she obviously has nothing but loathing.

          • JohnEngelman

            While she is at it she should talk to black crime victims and ask them if South Africa has gotten safer since the end of apartheid.

      • Liberalsuck

        As I’ve said before on Amren, if we get a chance to publicly debate these anti-white cretins or if you come across a self-hating white person, always ask them the majority racial makeup of where they live. If they say it is mostly white, tell them to quite calling other white people ‘afraid of blacks’ or put them on guilt trips if they themselves aren’t willing to live around blacks. Tell them to look at the black on white violence statistics before they open their ignorant mouths. Tell them the only white people who like blacks or Mexicans live in predominately white environments.

    • LaShaniqua

      Actually, she has a picture of what is presumably her family – black man, biracial child – lamenting the death of their dog and how white South Africans value their dogs more than they do blacks. I just hope the South African medical system has good psychological services, because someone this delusional, this self-absorbed, this much in denial to reality, is clearly going to need help.

      • Gerónimo Anónimo

        There was an article two years or so ago about three Bantu youths who gang raped a female German Shepherd and so badly injured her internally that she had to be put down. Dogs don’t rape people.

        “White people please just shut up for once and listen. Not everything is
        about white people being accused of racism. Sometimes it is about the
        black middle class and whether or not they have adopted vile white
        practices.”

        You mean vile practices such as raping infant girls or Invading homes and raping and mutilating the females of any age while their men are forced to watch?

        The Bantu and the Boers arrived in that area at about the same time. The Bantu/ Zulu did a pretty good job on the Bush people who were there first.

        Amy Biehl came there to help the poor downtrodden Bantu who in return beat and stabbed her to death while she begged for her life.

        ¡Coma mierda y muérase !

        • African

          This comment is narrow minded and shallow!!!

          • eduard

            The path of truth is narrow and your IQ is shallow.
            None is so blind that do not want to see, none is deaf that do not want hear.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jessica-Bates/100000284781928 Jessica Bates

      Yeah, my gaydar is pretty good, and it’s buzzing. Just another Communist Lesbian Witch. Probably owns some amethyst and goes skyclad.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

        She’s one angry bull dyke.

    • Nate Miller

      Actually she is not bad looking, if you consider the fact that she is old and has cut her hair short. I bet that back in the day, she would be considered attractive and appealing but for her idiotic politics.

      • LaShaniqua

        Check out the more recent pictures of her on her website. Let’s just be charitable and say that she has not aged gracefully . . . no, let’s be honest and tell the truth, that she’d lose a beauty pageant to a hagfish. Except that a hagfish actually serves a useful purpose, is rational, behaves in a manner that at least shows some intelligence and self-awareness, and isn’t bent on suicide. My sincere apologies to the hagfish community for the comparison.

        • Liberalsuck

          I’ve noticed the white liberals (or those who look white but aren’t) who rip on white people as part of the career generally aren’t very good looking, generally aren’t accepted by most white people, generally couldn’t make a living outside of pushing liberal agendas, etc. Having known they are pathetic people to their core, these liberals find people they find inferior to champion for because it makes them feel better about themselves.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      I’m thinking coal-burner.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

      Yup, and she’s got a vee-jay-jay like a black hole that swallows everything that comes into a mile of its gravitational tide.

    • tjspoker

      Too funny, my sentinments exactly! The evil white man becomes sour grapes that steer the course of their lives…..sad people .

    • michelle

      nice try at dismissing her valid points… fear of lesbians is just another problem with sexist men… not all lesbians hate men — not even some of the more radical ones…but a lot of men fear them because they speak out despite their voices being buried throughout history…it is a phallocentric culture, like it or not… you know it and so do i so let’s stop pretending. you don’t need to be afraid of a woman just because she is capable of thinking critically your unearned privilege is part of the problem

  • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

    Denial is a psychological phenomenon. The letter’s tone reminds me of abused women who refuse to admit the severity of their dilemma, resort to making excuses and self-blame, and spend the rest of their lives in abject misery.

    • http://twitter.com/baldowl baldowl

      Stockholm Syndrome

      • edwina

        and throw in some feminine insanity for good measure

        • Jackryanvb

          Agreed.

          Maybe this crazed, confused White girl would be better off living under the Taliban forced never to show her face or speak in public.

          Freedom really is meant for everyone, certainly not this woman.

  • http://twitter.com/baldowl baldowl

    Settler Sister either has never actually been subjected to true blackness or she is actually black herself, one.

    • http://twitter.com/baldowl baldowl

      Okay, so she’s not a dark-skinned black.

    • JohnEngelman

      She makes me think of Tim Wise.

    • gemjunior

      I was thinking that myself. Wondering if she is really a black person masquerading as white. If she is white I wonder why she hates her people so much. Or she was paid a massive amount of money to write this about her ethnic kin on behalf of savages who wish her dead and will kill her violently given half the chance. And this person is like Amy Bielhls and her stupid parents – disgusting. We know how black men feel about lesbians – they have a special “treatment” for it known in the civilized world as gang-rape.

  • Francis Galton

    Sigh…where does one even begin with this?

    Perhaps we should start with one of Gedaliah Braun’s many gems in his book “Racism, Guilt, and Self-Deceit,” about his experiences in Africa generally, and in South Africa specifically:

    “During the month I spent in South Africa in January 1986, I took every opportunity to ask blacks what they thought about black vs. white rule (etc.). Almost without exception they said they did not want black rule and for the same reasons: the white man was cleverer and more honest.

    “The most memorable conversation was with a young woman taking a computer course in central Jo­hannes­burg. At first she expressed a noted hostility towards whites, saying she hated white peo­ple. All whites? I asked. No, just the Boers (Afrikaners). All Boers? No, just those who hated blacks. So what appeared an extreme view turned out to be quite reasonable: hating those you think hate you.

    “Nevertheless, there was this antagonism towards whites and so I said to her, ‘You must be anx­ious to see an end to white rule’. Her answer? ‘No way!’ She didn’t want black rule? Not at all. Why not? Her answer, al­most word for word: ‘The white man knows the difference between right and wrong and will usually do the right thing. The black man also knows the difference but will usually do the wrong thing!’. And as I heard these words I knew I would not soon for­get them.”

    –Gedaliah Braun, “Racism, Guilt, and Self-Deceit”

    Despite being somewhat disjointed and in the style of a stream-of-consciousness, the book is a real eye-opener, and it should be required reading for any racial realist (if you haven’t read it yet, get it…now!)

  • Stentorian_Commentator

    Where do you start with such dreck? She preemptively shoots down any attempt to resort to facts, because she has imposed a non-negotiable ready-made answer to any objection. And that magic white privilege that allows whites to build prosperous societies and simultaneously denies prosperity to blacks. It’s useless to respond.

  • dd121

    You’re all wrong. This was obviously written by a 3rd grader.

  • http://twitter.com/AgentAxis D.B. Cooper

    I don’t do not care if she is a butch lesbian or not, but I’m not listening to, nor reading, one more word she has to say until she has completed her 10th year living in some. any, african paradise.

    • IstvanIN

      I read, quite a while back, that there was a conservative lesbian who said thank goodness for men, she was complaining how women sit around discussing their feelings while men go out and do things, her point was that was how we got things like houses and running water. I wish i could remember her name.

      • StillModerated

        It may have been Florence King. She’s pretty conservative.

      • Owen

        Tammy Bruce

      • Unperson

        Might you mean Camille Paglia? Although not a conservative, she is not a typical leftie lesbian either. More of a loose cannon, really, with ideas that are all over the map. And she does have a quote to the effect of “If women were in charge we’d all still be living in grass huts.”

  • TeutonicKnight67

    I’m sorry folks this went right over my head. It’s so ridiculous that I thought it was satirical. He/She can’t be serious. Right?

  • MekongDelta69

    Dear Gillian,

    I have a ‘white phallocentric’. What now?

    She’s absolutely obsessed with race and sexuality (and all the rest of the usual idiocy that comes with leftist insanity):
    http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/author/gillianschutte/

    • Morris Thecat

      She hates her father, or father and then ex husband.

  • David Ashton

    Cultural Marxist “deconstructing” her own identity and making a career out of it – just look at that biography and not just that face. Parachute her into Soweto and see what she thinks about the “colonially oppressed” penis.

    • Wim Kotze

      Actually she did get herself one of those “colonially oppressed” penises, and this bleat is only a ill-considered attempt to justify that blunder.
      However, judging from her blatant lie that: ” my mother was given assistance by the state that a woman of colour was denied”, she is beyond redemption.

  • cecilhenry

    Whatever.

    Absolutely ridiculous arguments with no connection to reality, even in her own country.

    She wants someone to be impressed— not me.

    Her values are contemptible.

  • Joe Sanchez

    I can’t figure out whether she wants me dead or wants to show me the light of “tolerance.”

    Who would have the patience to even argue with this vile, senile, wicked woman?

    This entire thing is nothing but irrational hypocrisy.

    She says skin color means nothing while ranting about people of a particular skin color. She wants people who had never done anything to apologize for some kind of Christian-like sin that they never ever committed. She says whiteness is “invisible to us” yet her ENTIRE article is a rant about whiteness. She implores us to not be angry or defensive, yet her entire article is angry and offensive. She criticizes “black-bashing” in the media while calling on us to get together and participate in white-bashing. She tells us to shut up because “not everything is about white people being accused of racism,” yet all she seems to talk about is how racist we are. She says black revenge doesn’t exist despite the ongoing Boer genocide. She separates “white people” and “poor” into two separate peoples as if to say that white people are not poor — which is a complete and utter lie. She tells us we need to help “the poor” (poor blacks) while the African Nationalists try to outlaw charities that give to poor whites.

    AND SHE HAS THE LUNACY TO SAY THIS AFTER THAT WHOLE RANT: “[J]ust stop telling everyone who is not white how to behave, what to think and when to say what.”

    WTF!

    This woman is best ignored.

    And if white people really do control everything, then we should put her in a mental hospital and forget about her.

    • Morris Thecat

      I only made it through the first four paragraphs, then checked to see how much more there was, then decided it was not worth my time. I bet most people DO in fact ignore her and move on to something else after only a few paragraphs.

      • http://www.facebook.com/Anglokraut Jacqueline Schumacher

        Guilty as well. I couldn’t read all this vitriol–I had to do some heavy skimming. I think I got the gist of it, unfortunately.

        • Liberalsuck

          I did, too. Here’s what she and her ilk are basically saying, “Whites are bad, they are stupid to fear blacks, they need to pay for past injustices, so excuse me while I go off to my nice, rich white neighborhood/city/state/country where there the white population there is over 90%.”

  • Ulick

    There’s so much wrong with this essay, that I don’t know where to start.  I could write a multi-volume work dissecting this woman’s absurd rambling.

    Let’s start with this — The author keeps saying that “White people were taught growing up that [insert negative view of black behavior].” The truth is that I, along with many Amren readers, were taught the exact opposite.  We were taught by our Liberal parents, our media, and our schools that “we’re all the same.” Not knowing any better due to my youth, folly, and inexperience I bought the “we’re all the same” rhetoric.  It was my personal experiences and self-education that led me to holding the negative (and accurate) views of black behavior.

    I also noticed that the author doesn’t want whites expressing their racial resentments, but when blacks express such resentments she chalks it up as truth.  There is the past half century of race relations in a nutshell.  Nut being fitting for those who ascribe to it.

    • Morris Thecat

      This is so true. At home, my mother, who had a rather opinionated father, taught me that everything my grandfather said and thought about blacks was wrong. I was told NEVER to say the “N” word, that she dod not want to her that in “her” house. She hated her father and thought everything he believed was wrong. Well, not everything, she thought my fathers parents came from the wrong side of the tracks, she believed she was “superior” to them and acted like she had to endure the of smelled human the one time of the year-Christmas Dinner- when they were allowed to come over. Her father traveled a lot for work, he worked in insurance and had a good job all through the depression. He had left home as a teenager and made his way in the world and ended up being an excellent provider, but he didn’t think it made sense to put a girl through college so she and her sister had a deep seated resentment and hatred for him because of that.
      So I grew up in a household where I was taught that pretty much ALL of the beliefs of the older generations were wrong. That racism was wrong , that the belief that women were meant to be mothers and wives was wrong. Also, in school we were constantly fed the narrative about how racism was wrong, all people are the same, blacks have been unfairly treated and discriminated against, blah blah blah.This was the enlightened time, supposedly, of the sixties and seventies, where we put a man on the moon , had modern appliances and comforts past generations could never dream of,and everything was going to get better and better. Everyone was going to have the good life and live the American dream. Well, it didn’t turn out that way did it.
      WWhen I got into the work force I was a liberal, I became angry and self righteous at those who voiced “racist” comments. I ended up working in a business where I had to deal directly with blacks, and not just the one or two in a company, but whole crowds of them. I made excuses for them for about 7 years, claiming it was just that one time, they weren’t that bad, I am just racist so that colors the way I see things, but sooner or later, I had to let go of the brainwashing and admit the truth. They are stupid, aggressive animals. They will see a line of fifty people and cut in the front and then lie to my face and tell me I did not see what I saw. They will cut in a line and then have all of their friends cut in. They will transform a quite, peaceful event into a melee, where things get progressively more out of control until violence erupts. They will lie cheat steal and have no conscience about it whatsoever. They will shamelessly beg and plead and try all sorts of strategies to get things they aren’t supposed to have. They make civilization impossible and it makes no difference if they first come off as acting white and well mannered, they will all do the same.
      That is my EXPERIENCE. My attitudes are born of EXPERIENCE. I held onto the silly liberal beliefs for years but once experience destroys brainwashing, one can never be brainwashed again.

      • The__Bobster
        • Morris Thecat

          Yes , that is just the sort of thing I have experienced repeatedly.

      • whiteunclerukus

        I completely agree with you on the experience point. I found out what they were really like when I went to high school with them. Because I believed the “we are all the same” concept, I tried to play football and basketball with them. Bad idea. Blacks dont believe in that idea at all and I saw that first hand. It’s dangerous to be around black people and have the mindset that “race doesnt matter.”

      • Liberalsuck

        The problem is that even when you or I or any of us here explain our experiences to self-righteous white liberals, they will still call us, “ignorant” or “racist” or “full of hate.” I even get annoyed and have said, “Did you NOT hear what I just said? I just told you these were my experiences.” Liberals don’t want to hear opposing views, even if you have all the experience and facts to back it up. Oh, but we are the ‘close-minded bigots.’

    • Tired

      It is the same for me. I am still young, and my parents are extremely liberal. I was raised with the same propaganda. There were no “racists” in my family or social spheres. I was completely isolated and brainwashed as well. I loved minorities (because I was taught to love minorities) and I hated myself for being white. I was raised to hate white men, even though I was one. I remember having black friends because they were black, despite their idiotic behavior and odor. But.. as I grew older and had more and more experiences with non-whites my views changed, they had to change. I had awakened from the coma my parents (believing they were doing the right thing) had placed me in. To this day my Mother still wants me to have mocha babies (fun liberal world for devolved half-breeds) and my Father constantly tries to convince me of liberalism through emotional means (“look at this suffering family”, “they died for this nation”, “he’s just like *insert family member in here*, don’t you feel human emotion for them?) and it is wrong. I love my family, I truly do.. But sometimes I feel like I’m in a family of insane people.

      Now that I know and now that the curtain has been pulled back and all revealed, I don’t know what to think of the world. It isn’t easy, especially when you are young. Being a racially aware white is not easy. It is emotionally painful and extremely stressful. You are awake as your world ends. But, as my Norse ancestors believed, even if you think you are going to lose, you must fight anyway.

  • concernedcollegekid

    What I don’t understand about people who say that white people are deliberately trying to “keep black people down” because of baseless “racism” is that IT IS NOT IN WHITE PEOPLE’S INTERESTS to “keep blacks down”. It would be in the interest of American whites for “people of color” to be prospering, because then less tax money would be needed to support them. If whites were actually acting in a genuinely selfish way, they would want to help blacks achieve at the level of whites so that whites wouldn’t have to support blacks anymore, but the problem is that this approach hasn’t really worked so far and in my opinion pretending that it will is unfair to both races because it expects too much of blacks AND puts a burden on whites. But if we assume that the author is correct and blacks have the same potential for success as whites and whites are indeed “keeping black people down”, then essentially what white people are doing is “keeping down” a race that has the potential to earn its own money instead of being largely paid for by white taxpayers, which is to say that white people are acting against their own interests.

    Those are my thoughts. Also are there any “bad writing contests” going on right now that someone can enter this in? Because I think we might have found a winner…

  • Svigor

    This is what happens when a population acquiesces to the value of “tolerance”; those advocating “tolerance” take over and instantly rescind “tolerance” for the sucker’s play it is. They have what they want, and they throw “tolerance” into the dustbin.

  • Morris Thecat

    My position that it has always been the females of the white races that are determined to destroy white males, and through that the race. It is the females that have a deep seated and burning hatred for men and their natural position of authority and their natural strength. It is the evil willfulness of such men haters that have driven the white race to the brink of destruction. They are determined to make their men fail and lose everything. These women, beg women have the insanity that all women do, some more than others. The more a woman hates men, the more insane she is. This woman gives this away in her rant.

    • Svigor

      The problem being, females can’t organize a Chinese fire drill. It’s the elite males who make all this happen.

      • Jerrybear

        True but it seems our elites are more successful propagandizing women than men since propaganda appeals to peoples emotion rather than their logic.

        • Morris Thecat

          It is always easier to propagandize a woman than a man, notice that most advertising is aimed at women. This has been true ever since the garden of Eden. One has to get to the women first, and the men will follow them.

          • CourtneyfromAlabama

            I agree with the idea that white women are less capable than men. But if that is the case, I really don’t understand the constant blame and anger directed at white women from men in this movement. You can’t have it both ways. By blaming us for everything wrong with our race, you are giving women more credit than what they are capable of. When I first joined this movement I was sympathetic to this attitude presented by a lot of angry males on here, but I am starting to get turned off by it. What is your solution? Do you want white men to stop mating with white women? Do you want God to banish white women from the earth after He created us? What? Sometimes I enjoy myself more when I am around my neo con boyfriend who is clueless on race, just sitting and watching football, than I am on this website. At least he doesn’t go into constant rants about how he hates white women.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

        They have have to talk and “get in touch with their feelings” first while the house burns down.

      • CourtneyfromAlabama

        I agree with Svigor. Blaming white females for the troubles of our race can only go on for so long, considering that women are less capable than men. When I first joined this movement I was just like some of these other women on here who are so quick to agree with posters like Morris Thecat. I am now barely out of my twenties after being in this movement for nearly ten years, and the constant griping and negative rants about white women are starting to make me a little cold towards this movement. Tell me, what good does it do to constantly make the other fifty percent of your demographic into the boogie man, especially if you need us for breeding.

    • A Swain

      I have to agree and I’m a woman.

      As a result of White women turning rotton to the core due to the influence of the decades-long Ashkenazim-led anti-White agenda in the shape of feminism in this case, I’m of the firm opinion that White women need to be put back ruthlessly in their boxes.

      Maybe, the Islamic method of female gender control ought to be emulated by White men upon their womenfolk as it has long proven highly successful within Muslim societies over the past 1,400 years and is still not in any danger of being overthrown even in the 21st century.

      • concernedcollegekid

        The Islamic method of female gender control should DEFINITELY be imposed PRONTO on all Western “feminists” who get mad if women are less than 50% of any occupation but who think “Islamophobia is never acceptable”.

    • concernedcollegekid

      I’m a young white woman and in my observation, the less good-looking young white women are, the more feminist and PC and man-hating they are in general. The correlation isn’t perfect but I really think there’s truth to it. For those of us who are given positive attention by white men there is no reason to hate them. I don’t hate white men because I’ve had too much success with them both as friends and as dating partners to hate them as a group. I am wary of black guys because in my experience the attention they give tends to be overtly sexual in a way I find extremely off-putting; they aren’t “tender” or “sweet”; I NEED to know that part of a man’s attraction to me is for my mind and all the guys I’ve met that I’ve really connected with intellectually happen to have been white. I didn’t choose this; they just have. I think ugly girls try to fill some sort of a void created by lack of male attention with militant feminism and hatred of men. It gives them a sense of self-importance that they are not getting through validation from males.

      I don’t necessarily think the above is “they way it should be”; I just think it’s the way it is and probably always will be.

      People on this site seem to think white women are turning against white men, but I’ve never, ever met a straight white female who flat-out wasn’t attracted to white males. Dating outside one’s race is a way to “prove” that one isn’t “racist” though, which a lot of people want to do, and black guys know this. It’s common for black guys to say “are you racist?” to white girls who turn them down; this has happened to me. Also, I know a lot of white girls want to “know what it’s like” to be with a black guy out of curiosity.
      I don’t pretend to know what will happen to interracial marriage rates in the future though, and what the media’s role in that is/will be. I just don’t know.

    • Lygeia

      This is really misogynistic. You should be ashamed of yourself lumping all of us women in with this woman. In addition, “females” are how you describes animals. Humans are described as men, women, boys, or girls; and an adult woman does not need to be controlled by a man.

      • Morris Thecat

        you are the problem

      • Gracchus123

        A “family” is an organizaton, and like any organization, someone needs to be in charge. Since man is the natural protector, man has naturally been “in charge”. Full stop.

        • kjh64

          No,a family is a family and a wife is a grown woman who does not need her partner to be in charge of her. They are co-partners who lead over the kids.

      • A Swain

        Look, my dear White women could easily have used their new-found freedoms to enhance the status of their own race, but chose to side with Ashkenazim Zionists by playing the role of useful idiots in the orchestrated plot to dismantle White hegmony and authority across the world particularly the Western world which is merely a euphemism for the White world. Some of these idiot cretins even salivate at the prospect of complete genocide like the twisted White female turd who wrote the article being debated here.

        No, the general perception is that only White women and White men who are active in the fight for survival will be the ones who stand any chance of ultimately surviving at all which is why ethnonationalism is gaining steady momentum amongst the female population as much as amongst the male.

        In other words, White women of all ages are at last seeing the writing on the wall and realizing what needs to be done to avert a total catastrophe befalling the White race worldwide.

      • kjh64

        I agree with Lygeia. Every time you have some woman like this South African woman, the silly male chauvinists and woman bashers come out in force beating their chests and ranting with their ridiculous comments, too ludicrous for me to debate . They don’t seem to do it when Tim Wise does the same thing. I have news for y’all. Men are the ones who have and still are to a large extent, running things. Ok folks. It’s men who created marxism, communisim, socialism. It’s men who passed the Hart/Celler Act, it’s mostly male business owners who hire the cheap illegal Mexican labor, and it’s mostly male politicians, both Reps and Dems, who want amesty for Mexicans, either for their political careers who they’re in with businesses that want the cheap labor. So if you don’t like the shape of things, blame your own gender.

        • Gracchus123

          I’m not interested in a gender war since that simply plays into the game of the deconstructionist cultural marxists. Nor am I interested in the “blame” game.

          I simply am stating facts about how things evolved the way they have. Men are of superior physical strength. Men therefore are selected by nature to be the protectors of the family, clan, tribe, nation. Men are expendable.

          And I stand by what I said about men being the natural leader of the organization called the “family” simply by virtue of their superior physical strength.

    • PesachPatriot

      I often like to joke with my friends that as soon as women in america got the right to vote, they voted to take away men’s right to a cold beer after work. Radical feminism is destructive, especially so for women themselves…

  • 48224

    This could have been called “Dear Detroit” …..40 years ago. Too late now.

  • Le Gaulois

    As usual the same ol’ White male bashing while using the English language, electric power, computer technology, the Internet and everything else she uses and consumes everyday that was invented and is still provided by those same White men.
    Typical…yawn !

  • George White

    I guess that she must be very pleased that white people are being butchered there, and with any luck she’ll be next!

  • Fair Dingum

    I note that Ms. Schutte has never run a business nor been responsible for the livelihoods of dozens or hundreds of others, that she apparently has never held a full time job producing anything other than self-righteous blithering, that she has never had to endure anything that might reasonably be called poverty, that she has never had to deal with deadly anti-white violence, that none of her children (if she has any) have ever been beaten and raped in a school bathroom for being white in a majority black school–that she is, in short, a prime example of an ivory tower intellectual, afflicted with all the uselessness and foolishness the term entails.

    • Laager

      Intellectual?
      Articulate wordsmith, yes
      Intellectual. I don’t think so.
      The multitude of descriptions in the posts above say it all.

  • jackryanvb

    Can some or our South African readers please locate the exact spot where Amy Biehl met her violent end? This spot should be a religious sight where open, female traitors are taken to make the ultimate sacrifice.

    Human sacrifice.

    • http://www.facebook.com/marthinus.potgieter.5 Marthinus Potgieter

      Amy Biehl was murdered in a place called Gugulethu ironically trying to help previously disadvantaged people.“Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out
      laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness
      told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” Four people
      were convicted of killing her. In 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa’s TRC when they stated that their actions had been politically motivated.

      • Jackryanvb

        Thanks Marthinnus, is there anyway you can provide some physical street address, so we can mapquest it and make a vertical shrine of the place? So many white female traitors need to become familiar with this place as the place they end up when they are very bad.

        • CourtneyfromAlabama

          We have too many male traitors too, unfortunately.

        • http://www.facebook.com/marthinus.potgieter.5 Marthinus Potgieter

          Corner of NY1 and NY111 streets, Gugulethu – think of Beirut but possibly 10 times worse! and getting worse by the day as the ANC gov. steal more and more taxpayers money.

  • Terry

    Another white person that believes in black nonsense. Actually, it is the other way around. It isn’t the white people that are at fault, it is the black people. Who does the crime?? Blacks and Hispanics, that is a given.

  • ncpride

    Oh, just come right and and say what you really mean ya cowardly B****.
    Dear White people, just DIE! You deserve every attack,robbery,murder and rape that blacks bestow on you……. Never mind if you’ve never hurt a fly, or if you’re man, woman OR child. You deserve it just because you are WHITE you evil people, so just shut up and stop your damn complaining! Of course, none of this applies to me. Just you other White people.
    There, that’s what she really wants to say.

  • anarchyst

    There IS a film industry built around a certain event in human history–it’s called the jewish “holocaust ™” . . .

    • The__Bobster

      There’s no business like Shoah business.

  • jay11

    First of all, the Dutch arrived and found a mostly empty land. The hotentot roving bands of nomads hardly constitute a ‘civilization’ there.
    Look at the code words, that the black middle class are starting to ‘adopt’ the evil ways of white oppressors, as if black people are incapable of oppressing others on their own.
    Now that the black man rules this woman and the country her ancestors built, I guess she will become a crusader against black priviledge! Not.
    Sadly, I work with leftist dingbats like this.

  • Steve789

    Why do elite whites hate ordinary whites so much? Elite blacks, asians and latinos do not have the same suicidal self hate. White hating whites are disproportionately jewish but the majority aren’t.

    • IstvanIN

      This is one thing we can not blame on the Jews, as much as they hate us and work for our demise. There are plenty of (real) white hating whites, think Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, etc..

      • The__Bobster

        Whom do you think they worked for?

        • Bill

          I begin to think they aren’t so much white HATING as FOR universal world wide disorder so they can implement world wide order through marxist totalitarian means. Whites ARE the single group most likely to bring order out of disorder, build civilizations, problem solve, engineer advances, etc. Therefore whites stand in the way of disorder and disorder is the means to the end desired by the Bush’s, Clintons, Reids, Pelosis, etc. They aren’t white hating so much as they are lovers of Marxist totalitarianism and hate ANYTHING that would get in the way of their ultimate goal. They are the top, everybody else slaves under them. Which explains their general hatred of whites, christians, guns, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, an informed citizenry, etc. All those things stand in the way of their goal. Thus they hate them. Those things must be abolished. Back to the specific issue of this woman. Insane is the only word that applies. And there is much insanity in the liberal mind. Those at the top aren’t insane in the sense they KNOW it’s all lies. The insanity lies in the liberal masses uncritically eating up those lies and then demanding everybody else join in their insanity.

          • Gracchus123

            Excellent synopsis of the overall situation!! Low-level conflict amongst the various ethnic groups, a divide-and-conquer strategy, seems to be working very well for them.

            Feed some vulnerable nut-ball some psychoactive drugs, they shoot up a school, and you get to implement draconian gun restrictions which will deprive the people of the ability to resist your further draconian restrictions on their freedoms.

      • A Swain

        “This is one thing we can not blame on the Jews …..

        Not correct.

        It was the Ashkenazim tribe who created Marxism, Bolshevism, Feminism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness and Gay Rights, etc which they then proceeded to foist upon the Western world and as with any conquered race, one will always observe attention-seeking traitors within their ranks readily prepared to turncoat for 30 pieces of silver.

  • bigone4u

    The sub head on her website reads:
    A Feminist-Tauist-NeoPagan-Post-Structuralist-Deconstructionist-Socialist view of life, love and everything else.
    As noted by others, the subhead might also include “man hating lesbian”. This type of crap is what academia encourages and rewards.

    And this brief bio from another website:
    Gillian Schutte is a writer, filmmaker, poet and healer. She has worked as a consultant with
    universities and organisations developing multi-media educational material. Part
    of this education methodology is based on incorporating ‘storytelling’ into
    academic learning environments. Recently she directed a series of documentaries,
    with husband Sipho Singiswa, on human rights issues, which have shown at local
    and international Human Rights film festivals.

    I guess I should retract the “man hating lesbian” accusation above and replace it with promoter of miscegnation or mudshark or coalburner or some such. When you look up her husband there is an unfortunate pic of their child. Whole thing gives me the creeps.

    • laager

      Yep.

      For those who dont know: husband Sipho Singiswa = black as the ace of spades.

      This is a genuine black African name. Not the Shakiels, Duvons etc that you get in the USA

  • JohnEngelman

    I call on white people to recognise the black-bashing trend of our media, which is largely white owned, and to put an end to this dehumanising and destructive infantile idiocy.

    - Gillian Schutte, Thought Leader, January 2, 2013

    There are far too many taboos against criticizing blacks. It is dangerous to mention high rates of black crime and illegitimacy and the persistent race gap in intellectual performance without claiming that white racism is somehow responsible.

  • StillModerated

    If all the Whites in South Africa crowded on to Robben Island, then the bantus would demand admission, too.

  • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

    Maybe she sees the writing on the wall with the coming death of Mandela and she’s hoping to ingratiate herself with blacks before the purge.

    If so, it won’t work. She’ll be the one bragging of her solidarity with blacks while she’s dragged into the streets, raped, then murdered.

    She believes she can look past skin color. What she doesn’t understand is that blacks can’t, don’t, and won’t overlook her skin color. It will be what they seek to destroy.

    • Laager

      The chances are that if and when the night of the long knives comes she will be one of the first to run to the white man’s [Afrikaner] laager seeking sanctuary and protection.

    • Liberalsuck

      She’s trying to sacrifice herself and us on the altars of political correctness. The same way scientists in Europe during the Middle Ages had to throw themselves on the ground and let priests and clergy literally walk on them to appease themselves for being “sinners” or for challenging the Church. Cultural marxism is as bad as religious fanaticism.

  • fake123

    meh, just another useless liberal woman trying to make herself relevant in a world which has by and large forgotten her. she’s old, fat, ugly, past her prime, and people just dont look at her the way they used to. and thus, in come the ever more insane screeches for attention. the she moves past her prime, the more outlandish and ridiculous the claims will become. best way to deal with a person like this is to treat them like the child they are: pat them on the head, tuck them in for bed, and return to the dinner table for more serious and rational discussion among adults.

    also, facts would be nice next time you want to sit at the grown-up table.

    good night!

  • Barrack Osama

    Anyone can write something as stupid as this. The mechanism that promotes this twaddle needs to be destroyed.

  • Matt

    I confess that I used to think as she did… once. Moving to Vancouver, British Columbia, where I found myself for the first time to be part of a white minority constituted my racial awakening. Out in the real world in Vancouver, I learned the hard truth that non-whites (not just blacks, but also East Asians) will never treat a minority white population with anything even remotely approaching basic respect. Exposure to a majority non-white population and culture will do that to you.

    • Young Man

      Sounds interesting. Care to give us an example of what happened that was so horrible? I’m genuinely interested.

  • The__Bobster

    How is it that I know more about SA history than this brainless twit? She needs to be tossed into the middle of the jungle.

  • Lygeia

    This letter honestly reads like a parody.

    White people settled South Africa because it was uninhabited.

    Blacks in Africa lived in the northwest portion of the continent and had no interest in moving south. The blacks only migrated to South Africa after the whites developed it.

    I bet “Settler Sister” wrote this letter from a safe white enclave.

    Let her take a walk through one of the townships any night of the week and lets see if she makes it out alive. Or perhaps she could house sit while an 80-year old farm couple go to church on a Sunday morning and see who shows up to “rob” her.

  • RHG

    Sorry dummy, but I wasn’t taught to be “superior” to any other race and I don’t believe I am “superior”. I am what I am, a “race realist” because of the life experiences I have lived and seen with my own eyes and I don’t need another white useful idiot, ignoramus blowhard explaining otherwise to me.

  • gemjunior

    This woman is the type of mental case that I absolutely hate more, much much more than any black person anywhere. The continuously stamping boot in the face that awaits us all if people like her are allowed to continue their crazy misled thoughts on paper will not spare her, but in her world she doesn’t even consider it. These people are the types who were probably tracked down on the “Day of Rope” in the book The Turner Diaries (which wasn’t really that good btw I preferred the Covington novels). And it would be well deserved imho. She is a totally repulsive, disgusting douche who will soon have her face battered with a brick by her dearly beloved ones for whom she fights against , rejects and walks away from her own people. Can someone like this have a husband and children in that world that she fears for? Obviously not. Mental.

    • LaShaniqua

      Actually, she does (or did, when she was much younger and still not unattractive, bitter, and hate-filled) have a husband and a child. The husband is black, of course, and the child is biracial. There are numerous hints when you read some of her spewings that she also . . . shall we say, enjoys the scent of a woman . . . tediously typical for this ilk of female liberal pseudo-intellectuals. Reading their hate speech is only worthwhile for an insight into the depths of denial, delusion, racism and rage a woman can descend. I actually feel sorry for her – and MUCH sorrier for her poor child.

      • A Swain

        I suspect, there’s a trace of Ashkenazi in the nasty old harlot too.

  • PesachPatriot

    This bitter hag should read that same speech around midnight in Detroit or Atlanta or NOLA’s 9th ward…I’m sure the hood residents will be moved to tears by her eloquence. I have read a lot about colonialism in africa and while it seems to have been a poor idea in hindsight, it is the only reason there is any sort of modern infrastructure like roads or trains anywhere on the african continent. Am i the only one who finds the term thought leader to be slightly weird? It sounds like a job title in North Korea.

  • IstvanIN

    there would be an entire world domination film industry built upon the “legitimised suffering of white people”

    That is what the Jews have done with Hollywood. We need our own Hollywood.

    • Gracchus123

      “We need our own Hollywood.”

      That is an idea which came, and went, oh, about 80 years ago.

      • Gracchus123

        Oh, and has anyone noticed that the same thing that happened to the US film industry has happened to the Internet??

    • PesachPatriot

      It would be pretty easy and relatively cheap for you guys to start your own hollywood. Video production technology is cheaper than ever and controversy always sells…someone would end up distributing it out of pure profit motive. The reason jews were so active early in hollywood history is that the higher class entertainments of early 20th century america like opera and theatre kept us out….

      Movies were seen as cheap and crude imitations of upper class culture for the vulgar unwashed immigrant masses(remember a mere 80 years ago in 1931 50 cents would get you two tickets to bela lugosi’s dracula as well as popcorn and soda, broadway and opera tickets could often be a month’s wages for the average person)…basically wealthy people had the same attitude as in Shakespeare’s day that professional actors were a notch or two above prostitutes. No respectable WASP bank or financial institution would lend a nickel to startup movie studios which were hardly the multibillion dollar corporate entertainment behemoths that we have today. As a fan of classic cinema my suggestion would be a full color modern day remake of DW Griffith’s birth of a nation featuring trayvon martin, the knoxville horror, sneaker riots, Katrina footage, hardcore pawn, and the jacksonville wal mart flash mob. Use rap music and some good heavy metal and punk( I have always loved Minor Threat’s classic guilty of being white) in it and you could have a blockbuster.

  • IstvanIN

    The only horrors visited upon South Africa were those committed by the British against the Boers 120 years ago and those committed by the blacks against the Boers today. The Boers (Afrikaners) were pretty darn civilized compared to either group.

  • IstvanIN

    Is this broad really “white”? Who is her “tribe”?

    • Xerxes22

      They don’t marry Blacks. They just want our sisters and daughters to marry Blacks.

      • PesachPatriot

        I don’t want anybody’s sister or daughter to marry blacks….I really hope this nutbar isn’t jewish…she’s even loonier than noam chomsky.

  • Sam

    “Before you get angry and defensive, think of this letter as a crash course survival kit for navigating a new reality, and please be assured that if you take heed of the call in this letter your life will change in miraculous ways. ”

    Wow, you are attuned to the Zeitgeist! Crash course survival kits of navigating the new reality are selling so fast the manufacturers can’t keep up. Whites are buying those survival kits like never before. Take a look at the 223 / 556 section on any major white survival website and they are OUT OF STOCK on everything. Same in the 12 section, the 40 section, the 9 section, the 45 section, every section between 17 and 50 I believe.

  • http://politenewyorker.blogspot.com/ Polite New Yorker

    When you put “phallocentric” at the start of your article, you spare the reader from having to read much beyond that. Life to short for such blather. Since I am a heterosexual, I consider my worldview “vagocentric,” and I don’t apologize.

    • Gracchus123

      Bravo sir, bravo!!!

  • ViktorNN

    “I call on white people to reflect on what it means to be born into unearned privilege, to excavate our long history of racist exploitation and assumed superiority—to acknowledge that this is what we were taught and then to reject it wholly.”

    Judging by her lesbo-chic expensive haircut, I doubt this white woman has given up a single thing and has rejected precisely nothing of her inherited “unearned privilege.”

    In fact, she has likely used her status as white, lesbian, female to put together an easy going career of traveling about pontificating about the evils of white people.

    And as an aside, I have no problem with “unearned privilege.” Unearned privilege usually represents the hard work of ancestors who found great fulfillment in building something for themselves and their familes, and would be happy to see what they built passed on to benefit their descendants. In Schutte’s case however, they would probably recognize their efforts as wasted.

    It’s true then, that Schutte truly doesn’t deserve the advantages her ancestors gave her.

    • JvNk

      The hypocrisy of loony lefties never ceases to amaze. This lesbo harridan is pursuing a useless degree – a PhD in multiculturalism – at a South African university.

      So let’s think this through rationally: If she really believed in her profound self-hating bilge, she would not be wasting money by attending university at her advanced age. She would in fact have sold all her “unearned” possessions and handed over all the proceeds to blacks, and especially the money she is wasting at college. Then she would have committed suicide, lest she further “oppress” blacks. If not suicide, and at the very least, she would move out of her liberal suburb, and go and set up a shack in a squatter camp, so as to “free” herself from her “unearned privilege.”

      Will she do any of the above? Nope. She will continue living in her lily-white suburb, behind her electrified fence, and waste money on her useless “studies”, in the lap of privilege, because she does not believe one iota of her own nonsense. This is the surest way to see what these pinko crazies really believe: Do not pay attention to the excrement flowing from their mouths or pens; rather look at how they behave.

  • JvNk

    I invite Amren commentators to go and post on this insane woman’s Facebook wall. http://www.facebook.com/gillian.schutte1

    Here is my contribution on her wall:

    Well, Ms Schutte, I look forward to you not only spewing such self-hating, insane (and inane), racist bilge, but to you actually demonstrating to us that you believe your own idiotic tripe.

    When can we therefore expect your voluntary liquidation of all your assets, given that you appear to labour under the misapprehension that your continued existence in the lap of privilege clearly, if inadvertently, “oppresses” blacks, and that you, like other whites, somehow “stole” from blacks? (By the way: Please do us all a favour and at least be historically accurate in your rantings, by acknowledging that a) many successful countries were colonized at one point, and b) that blacks are also immigrants to Southern Africa, displacing the Khoi and San inhabitants.)

    But given that you are deluding yourself into thinking whites are thieves, at the very least I should expect you to sell all your possessions, hand over the proceeds to blacks, and then to go and set up a shack in your closest squatter camp, thereby disproving to the world the suspicion that you are merely a sanctimonious idiot who doesn’t act upon your banal rantings.

    But you won’t, will you? You will not act on your insane self-loathing, because even you don’t believe the utter bilge spewing from your keyboard. It is so pathetically easy to see right through the loony lefties, by merely making one simple observation: Have a look at how they act, and ignore the deranged droolings issuing forth from their poison pens.

    To the loony leftie, reparations are something other whites, but never themselves, should do. First-rate hypocrisy, in other words.

  • Nathanwartooth

    “And stop bitching and telling black people to get over their history. Goddammit—if those things had happened to white people there would be an entire world domination film industry built upon the “legitimised [sic] suffering of white people” so why will you not understand that colonialism was a holocaust of epic proportions and it will take many, many more decades for the pain to subside.”

    Horrible grammar and spelling notwithstanding, this is complete hogwash.

    I guess she never heard of the Spanish and Italians being taken as slaves by the Arabs. Where is my movie about that?

    I can tell you that she will write many more articles like this for the attention. Her awful blog got around 2,000 readers before this article. After she put this article up she got around 20,000 a day for about 4 days.

    Worst comment section on a blog ever. I tried reading some of the posts but there is no reply or a way to sort the posts. So it’s just a mess of people posting random either hate whitey or hate the author posts.

  • Shawn_thefemale

    I implore you, Settler Sister, to stay in Africa, never contact the U.S. again and call on you to shut the hell up.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

    She should be grateful to white people. If it weren’t for them, she’d still have a bone in her nose and would be wearing an undressed cow skin for clothing.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/NQHEAYZCMBOERHG2VZRDQ3YUSQ Felix

    Wow. Miss Schutte really puts the bull in bulldyke.

  • Unperson

    “I call on white people, to recognise that they fear the emotions of black people”

    What I as a white person fear is the emotionalism of black people. Emotionalism being diametrically opposed to rationalism. We whites fear blacks because they are the least rational race on the planet. A safe, orderly, prosperous society is a society that is rational — something no group of blacks, from ZA to Haiti to Detroit, has ever been able to achieve.

    One other note: the two major white groups with a history in ZA are the Boer (Dutch) and the British. Although the correlation is not perfect, generally speaking it has been the former who have been the more conservative and “racially realistic”; while it’s the latter who have been more active in promoting the “rainbow nation” fantasies that put the communist, white-hating ANC in (seemingly permanent) power. Being of British descent myself, this causes me shame and dismay — as does the British Empire’s disgraceful conduct during the (totally unjustifiable) Boer Wars of the late 1800s/early 1900s (in which my drunken jerk of a Scottish grandfather fought, something I’m not proud of). This “Dear White People” screed’s author’s surname is Schutte. I’m not sure if that’s a Boer name, but I can tell you that I am relieved it’s not a British one.

    • Gracchus123

      “…British Empire’s disgraceful conduct during the (totally unjustifiable) Boer Wars of the late 1800s/early 1900s…”

      It wasn’t unjustifiable if your goal was to get control of the gold and diamonds extant in Southern Africa. And that was the goal of the British government (read Bank of England).

    • Laager

      Source: http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/schutte

      Last name: Schutte:

      Recorded as Schutt, Schutte, and Schutter, this is usually a Germany surname, but can be English from the same period. It has no less than four possible origins. Firstly it may come from the Medieval English word ‘schutte’ meaning to shoot. As such the name may have been an occupational name for an archer. Secondly it may be a variant of ‘Shute’. This is a locational name from a hamlet in the county of Devonshire, so called from the Old English word ‘sceat’, meaning a hill or projection, which is correct as this village is on a prominent.hill. Thirdly the name may be German from ‘schutze’, an occupational word for a bowman. Finally the surname may be a Dutch cognative also from ‘schutz’, but in this case describing an armed watchman. Amongst the very earliest of all recordings are those of Herman Schutto in the charters of the city of Koln, Germany, in the year 1150, whilst Liuricus Shitte was recorded in the Pipe Rolls of Suffolk., England, in 1165. John Schut appears in the Subsidy Rolls of Suffol in 1327, and Hans Schutter is recorded at Strasburg in 1424. The first recorded spelling of the family name is shown to be that of Wulfsige Scytta, which was dated circa 1050, the Old English Bynames (Hertfordshire), during the reign of King Edward, known as “The Confessor”, 1042 – 1066. Throughout the centuries, surnames in every country have continued to “develop” often leading to astonishing variants of the original spelling.

      Read more: http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/schutte#ixzz2HayVEvcP

      @ Unperson

      A few clarifications.

      The word Boer means farmer [Boere - plural] in Dutch and I think also German

      The original white settlement in South Africa was at present day Cape Town established by the Dutch East India Co to service their merchant navy on their voyages between Europe and the East Indies. Later French and German settlers came out and swelled the numbers of the Dutch, eventually intermarrying. As the contracts of employees of the VOC [Dutch East India Co] ended some chose to remain in South Africa as Vryburghers [Free Citizens] They became farmers – Boere – and sold their produce to the VOC. Some became Trekboere [travelling farmers - i.e nomads] and stated migrating east of Cape Town. When the British forcibly took the Cape from the Dutch in 1806 they imposed their authority on the Trekboere living on the eastern frontier at present day Port Elizabeth 500 miles to the east. In protest they burned their farms and trekked into the interior to seek self determination in their own territory. At this phase in their history they referred to themselves as Voortrekkers – the “First People” venturing into the interior. Settled Vryburghers – now the Cape Dutch – near Cape Town did not join this exodus. Eventually the [Voortrekkers] Boere established their republics of Orange Free State and ZAR [Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek - later called Transvaal by the British] These are the territories the British went to war against to gain control of the diamonds and gold.

      While all this was happening the language they spoke – primarily Dutch with German, French, Malay [from the Cape slave population] and English influences – evolved into an independent language recognised as Afrikaans. Afrikaans speakers eventually referred to themselves as Afrikaners – i.e. [white] Africans, the status quo today. However, within the Afrikaners a sub group still refer to themselves as Boere – the militants who left to get away from the British. The descendants of the British – i.e. English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish – today comprise the SA English and speak a dialect of English with an SA accent.

      The Afrikaners [including the Boere] comprise 60% of SA whites and the SA English the remaining 40% of SA whites. Within the English speakers are small communities of Portuguese and Jews plus a smattering from all the other European countries. The German and Dutch immigrants however, tend to join the Afrikaans community.

      In SA today the name Schutte is normally found within the Afrikaans community.

      • Unperson

        Thanks, Laager, I always enjoy your South African history lessons. Always well-researched and informative.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Tired of lesbians, feminists, and coal burners making the majority of white women look bad. Trust me fellows, most white women just want to be loved, to be able to have children, to be able to take care of the interior of a home and decorate it, and to feel pretty. Yes, these things may sound shallow and “inside the box ” so to speak, but that is how God made us as women. Most of us have no interest in hooking up with blacks or being man haters.

  • Tim

    “I called on” cheerleaders, blackjack dealers and foreign car mechanics once, but nobody responded to the message…

  • Luca

    This is the perfect example of “The Eternal Liberal”. This is a person who is intelligent, articulate and well educated yet doesn’t have an ounce of common sense nor is in touch with reality. The human brain is certainly an stubborn and strange organ. These people typically have Liberal Arts degrees and get involved with all kinds of “desk-bound” hobbies, like poetry, journalism, law, literature, minority-studies, film-making, astrology, etc. They are like a large collection of “Miss America” candidates who when asked what they want to do with their lives will probably blurt out something like “Cure world hunger”.

    Maybe if they got out into the real-world once in a while, git their hands dirty and stopped theorizing excuses for failed people and hating successful ones they might actually be semi-productive members of society. “Idle hands are the work of the devil” and these folks spend their whole lives thinking up solutions for things for which they have no experience but feel qualified to do because they studied what their liberal professors told them to and they are able to regurgitate it.

    They are so smug with their developed vocabulary and that oh-so-cool, avant-garde, feeling of being on the cutting edge of what the world really needs. It gives them such a feeling of acceptance and validation to be able to spout this nonsense. The bad news is they are in our media, or academia, our justice system and our politics. The worse news is that young impressionable minds soak this stuff up.

    Therein lies your true enemy. The Eternal Liberal.

  • dear white slut

    Dear white people? Say what? Who the hell is this cockeyed slut talking too other than herself and her liberal slime? Go stick it up your stink white arse hole. White liberals like that are privileged racist piece of feces brainwashed as they are deserving of only a death sentence and deserve what they get as unworthy race traitor enemies to the chosen blessed Shem white caucasoid race of European ancestry. Normal sane whites do not need them in the least. Let them all die the death.

  • liberal dung

    This liberal piece of dung is the real enemy of the sane normal white race.Clumping all white people together is racist and stereotype bigoted. Clearly there are sane and insane whites. Sane whites don’t pander and kiss the rear of their enemies. Insane white liberals are nasty filthy dirty androids worse than those they protect.

  • http://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/ Reuben H

    There’s a part of me that wishes all white South Africans were like her. That way I wouldn’t feel sorry for them as they disappear through genocide. It would be a load off my mind.

    http://www.jewamongyou.wordpress.com

  • Pelagian

    Summary: “I am not yet flayed alive and hoisted on a flag pole in the town square just for being white as I deserve, therefore I am exceedingly grateful.”

  • Dave4088

    Just another self hating white woman who was likely an outsider with her own people. She’s also the kind of white person who thinks the black race has only virtues while the white race has only vices.

    S. African blacks were the freest, richest and healthiest blacks in all of Africa, much like American blacks in the Americas. Yet the blacks both there and here look past the benefits they have richly reaped by living among us and look for reasons to hate and despise us.

  • http://twitter.com/BillEBOBB1 Bill E. BOBB

    Extreme example of the Stockholm syndrome.

  • The g Factor

    During the Apartheid period in South Africa the black population almost quadrupled. Under white rule most blacks had as good or a better life than those under black rule.

  • Laager

    PART 1

    It really was hard work ploughing through all that dross. The best one can say for it is that this is democratic freedom of speech in action.

    The writer plays the classic disinformation game by presenting selected half truths and inconclusive statements as irrefutable facts. Having also lived in South Africa for most of my life and knowing these assertions to be incorrect they must be challenged and rebutted to prevent them from remaining in the public domain as “the truth”

    —————————————————————————————————————

    “Though my single-mother household was never economically privileged we were privileged by virtue of our skin colour and my mother was given assistance by the state that a woman of colour was denied.”

    What she doesn’t say is :

    The reverse of that is true today after 18 years of black majority rule.

    When whites came to SA there was no such thing as money, taxes or social services in black society. Indeed the British actually adopted a policy of: “leave black society alone to live as they have always lived where they have always lived.” Blacks had theie own systems of taking care of the needy in their societies. Education was left to the missionaries. Blacks were free to cross over into white society at their own pace.

    “White economic privilege” Is a classic liberal guilt ridden concept. The support her mother received was from taxes generated by white entrepreneurs in the evolving economy around her. Within this economy whites created millions of jobs for blacks as they abandoned subsistence farming and enterned the white man’s industrialised cash economy to enable themselves to access the material benefits of western civilisation.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    “I call on white people to reflect on what it means to be born into unearned privilege, to excavate our long history of racist exploitation and assumed superiority—to acknowledge that this is what we were taught and then to reject it wholly.”

    “unearned privilege” Once again this bogey phrase of is tossed into the melting pot to get white people grovelling in a morass of guilt and apology to the black man.

    The fact is that there is absolutely nothing privileged about the white man’s way of life, lifestyle and quality of life, whether it be in South Africa or anywhere else in the old and new worlds. Today it is the culmination of hundreds of years of questioning, experimentation, application, failure, anlysis, refinement and repeating processes until success has been achieved. This has all been driven by an enquiring mind, recording and dissemination of information and a solid work ethic.

    The advanced technical civilisation and prosperity we experience and see around us is the reward for all this effort.

    “assumed superiority” Every other ethnic group on the planet has had the same opportunity to achieve these goals in the same time frame. It is the white man that has emerged the leader at this point in time.

    There is absolutely nothing to reject. Indeed these accomplishments should be justifiably celebrated

    “racist exploitation” Just how on earth does she propose SA blacks could be partners or leaders in enterprises when as recently as 1820 they could not read or write? What she calls exploitatation is low wage capitalism driven by supply and demand. A concept exported from Europe to the rest of the world.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    I implore white people to get over their fear that black people are out to slaughter them in a wholesale genocide of revenge. It has not happened yet and there is so much evidence that it will never happen in a country that has built its economic policy on global standards that favour whiteness and rely on the middle class as a buffer zone between the people on the ground and the elite corporate and political class. Just get over yourselves. White people of middle class are still safer than people living in townships.

    “genocide of revenge” It is happening right now all around her. Her left wing media shields her from this reality. She is oblivious to what is going on, hence this ignorant statement.

    “global standards that favour whiteness” This should read: “global standards imported from the developed world by SA whites who wish to participate in the best that the first world has to offer.” Through trickle down black South Africans also benefit from this process to the point where they are the most developed black population on the continent.

    “middle class whites are still safer than blacks living in townships.” She even answers her criticism herself. Blacks are fundamentally more violent than whites to anyone – especially their own kind in their own neighbourhoods.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    I call on white people to work on a strategy to lessen the growing gap between rich and poor because, white people, it is the poor who are really suffering in this country and it is the poor who are the wretched fall-out from a more than 360-year history of white domination, slavery, subjugation and theft of livelihood.

    “white people to work on a strategy to lessen the growing gap between rich and poor” This was addressed in 1994 when ALL the instruments of power – created by the white man – were peacefully transferred to the black majority for free. Prior to that whites created millions of blue collar jobs as a first stepping stone out of subsistence farming. It is now up to the black man to uses these assetts responsibly to ensure his own prgress. he can no longer blame the whie man for his failures.

    “360-year history of white domination” A simple study of history will reveal that it is blacks who have chosen to emulate the white man’s ways. Whites did not aspire to wearing animal hides, live in mud huts etc.

    “slavery” She displays a remarkable ignorance of history with this classic old chesnut. Black “South Africans” were never enslaved. Blacks within what is now South Africa were never forcibly captured, incarcerated, sold to a third party as merchandise, maintained in prison like conditions and set to work without remuneration. There is no historical record of this taking place in South Africa and I challenge her to find it and publish this information if it exists. Indeed, white TrekBoere only encountered blacks [c1770] about 35 years before the British arrived and abolished the slave trade throughout their empire in 1807. The slaves that did exist in the Cape had been bought in by the Dutch from their territories in Indonesia and from the Portuguese in Angola, Mozambique and west Africa.

    “subjugation” What she means is separation. Whites lived in their communities and blacks in theirs. Whites controlled the numbers of blacks entering their communities. Only those who had paid employment could remain. Those without jobs were better off remaining where they were and following their traditional subsistence farming lifestyle. The management of this separation was no different to the process of control through passports and visas exercised by all nations today.

    “theft of livelihood” Another lie. Traditional Black livelihood is subsistence farming. Black territories were preserved as Native Reserves – Bantustans – Homelands to protect this livelihood. Indeed additional material livelihoods were created for them when they crossed over into the industrialised cash economy of the white man. Thus they had the best of both worlds – the choice of farming in their homelands or selling their labour as paid workers in the white man’s world.

  • Laager

    PART 2

    I call on white people to understand that poverty and unemployment are social conditions. By renaming them “laziness”, “lack of ambition” and “stupidity” you are furthering your own illogical delusions that whiteness has nothing to do with the untenable conditions that most black people are forced to live in. These are not inherent traits of being black, as many of you are fond of saying. These are the social consequences of a brutal colonial history and current globalisation—coupled with weak anti-the-poor leadership.

    “poverty and unemployment are social conditions” This statement should be rephrased; “unemployment and poverty are the product of an uncontrolled and irresponsible birth rate” Compare the population growth rate of white South Africa with white Scotland, Ireland, Wales and New Zealand. Pretty much the same. In other words they grew at a rate that their economies could sustain. Black South Africans multiplied at a rate 7 time that of the whites. White entrepreneurs created the jobs. They could not create enough jobs for everyone hence the unemployment and “poverty”. Poverty is a new liberal construct. In the homelands where everyone had a hut and acreage to cultivate they were all equal and there was no “poverty.”

    “untenable conditions that most black people are forced to live in” More ignorance. In the homelands blacks lived in self constructed earth huts with grass roofs. They migrated to the cities where they squatted on vacant land and built rudimentary shacks out of any scavanged material they could find. These settlements developed into overcrowed unhygienic slums. White governments built masonry dwellings laid out on a western suburban model wher they were rehoused with their own kind.Today they have migrated into the inner cities wher they squat in abandoned high rise buildings and pay rent to self appointed slum lords. There is now white man to come to their rescue now and their conditions are entirely of their own making.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    “Be grateful that you are still welcome in a land that was stolen.” Really? Remember the migrating blacks from the north who forced the Bushmen into the Kalahari Desert and the Hottentots into the dry western fringes of the country? Remember Shaka Zulu and his genocide of fellow blacks in the east – the Mfecane c1928? What replaced it? Jungle rules: survival of the fittest – the strong black man rules. Enter the white man with all the benefits of western civilisation systematically shared with black people with the final element, majority democratic rule transferred in 1994 – all for free. No Ms Schutte – it is the black man that should be everlastingly grateful that the white man came to Africa and took them out of the stone age. The white man worked the land and created the wealth from which everyone benefitted. Probably the most visible example is Nelson Mandela – from herd boy to lawyer to President, able to read and write and abandoning animal hide apparel for saville Row Suits.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    why will you not understand that colonialism was a holocaust of epic proportions and it will take many, many more decades for the pain to subside.

    “colonialism was a holocaust of epic proportions” Really? Roads, railways, harbours, airports, dams, bridges, electricty, clean safe drinking water, hospitals, schools, jobs, better houses, household labour saving devices, radio, TV, telecommunications etc. The woman needs an eye test

    —————————————————————————————————————

    “get your hands dirty while helping to restore this country to a space of dignity and respect for all.” Really? It is the black man that is robbing, raping and killing his fellow citizens – both black and white – at the rate of 50 murders /day. Ms Schutte should publish this advice in The Sowetan

    —————————————————————————————————————

    Try now to reconsider the possibility of the healing potential of apologising collectively and genuinely for the wrongs our history has perpetrated against the indigenous people of this land. Perhaps the blacks could take the initiative on this one and apologise first to the Afrikaners for the massacre of Retief’s party and other Great Trek particpants who entered the interior in peace. It is they who drew the line in the sand forcing the white man to take the positions he did. Better still Ms Schutte why don’t you go and educate yourself a little on some true historical events istead of spewing your emotional bigotted, ignorant white hating venom onto the internet. In case you did not know the indgenous people of this land are not the blacks but the San [Bushmen] and Khoi-Khoi [Hottentot] – but that depends on how far back in history you want to go.

    —————————————————————————————————————

  • Laager

    It really was hard work ploughing through all that dross. The best one can say for her point of view is that this is democratic freedom of speech in action.

    “Be grateful that you are still welcome in a land that was stolen.”
    Really?

    Remember the migrating blacks from the north who forced the indigenous San (Bushmen) into the Kalahari Desert and the Khoi-Khoi (Hottentots) into the dry western fringes of the country? Remember Shaka Zulu and his genocide of fellow blacks in the east – the Mfecane c1828? What replaced it? Jungle rules: survival of the fittest – the strong black man rules.

    Enter the white man with all the benefits of western civilisation systematically shared with black people for 240 years with the final element, majority democratic rule transferred in 1994 – all for free.

    It is the black man that should be everlastingly grateful that the white man came to Africa and took them out of the stone age. The white man worked the land and created the wealth from which everyone benefitted.

    Probably the most visible example is Nelson Mandela – from herd boy to lawyer to President, able to speak English, read and write and changing his animal hide apparel to Saville Row suits.

  • http://www.facebook.com/tardola.anthony Tardola Anthony

    To This Author: All i can say is right on!! If people, whatever their background is, would take this approach,then these problems could be solved. I’m surprised this organization would have an article like this. TGIF!!

  • Werdrix

    “I call on white people to recognise the black-bashing trend of our media, which is largely white owned, and to put an end to this dehumanising and destructive infantile idiocy.”

    WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!! Pro-white media? She/he lives in alternative reality.

  • http://www.facebook.com/donald.clark.921 Donald Clark

    I have to wonder if she has even BEEN out of Sandton – she should read up on the 12,000+ farm murders…stupid article…

  • David Sims

    Slavery did happen to white people. Most of the slaves imported to North America between the founding of Jamestown and the Declaration of Independence were whites deemed “excess poor” in Europe, forcibly taken into slavery there and transported across the Atlantic, where they were worked to death.

    Yes, there were also indentured servants, people who were bound for a period of servitude, usually from four to seven years, as punishment for a crime or as a way to repay debt. When I speak of “white slaves,” I don’t mean these. Hundreds of thousands of whites arrived as slaves, were sold as slaves, were slaves all their lives, and their children inherited their status as slaves. They were bought and sold without regard to their personal relationships. Husbands were separated from wives. Parents were separated from their children.

    The same things happened to black slaves, of course. But the black slaves were treated better. Whenever there was work to be done, and the work was dangerous or so intensely difficult that the death of the slaves doing the work seemed likely, the owners told their foremen to make sure that the white slaves were used to do it. The black slaves had cost them more money than the white slaves had.

    Frederick Law Olmstead, the designer of New York’s Central Park, was once in one of South Carolina’s port cities, when he noticed that black slaves were throwing heavy bales of cargo down into the hold of one of the ships. In the hold, white (Irish) slaves were catching them. He asked someone why the blacks were on the top deck while the whites were below, and his guide explained to him that the black slaves were worth too much to be risked. The white slaves were cheaper, so they got the jobs that were most likely to entail death or injury. If one of the Irishmen drowned or got his back broken, it didn’t cost the shipping company as much.

    Also, the treatment of the white slaves, during their passage across the Atlantic, was worse than was the treatment of black slaves from Africa. Although the blacks were treated so poorly during transit that 15% of them died, the whites were treated so much worse that 25% of them died. On the average.

    In America, very few whites actually owned slaves: about 5%. Most whites either had no need of slaves or couldn’t afford them, or were slaves themselves.

    Some blacks owned slaves. The very first slave-owner in North America was a black man named Anthony Johnson. In 1655, he sued a white man to recover the service of a black indentured servant named John Casor. As the result of his suit, the court remanded Casor to Johnson’s custody and furthermore accepted Johnson’s argument that Casor should be his for life. The court thus converted Casor’s indenture into legal slavery.

    In later years, free blacks would become some of the biggest owners and traders in slaves.

    The story about slavery taught in American schools is a gross distortion of real history. You can still learn the real history, if you want to go to the trouble of searching through the official archives kept by state governments. But few people bother to do that, preferring to accept the false story they heard in school, the story that panders to black self-pity and inflicts upon white people a load of undeserved shame and guilt.

    Why is there no movie that shows how things really were? Because the movie and television industries are not really owned and run by white people. Instead, they are owned and run by Jews. Although many Jews have fair skin, they are not “white”—that is, they don’t belong to the same race that I belong to. They are, and for centuries have been, generally hostile to the white race, hating us even as they mooch from us with their predatory financial schemes, of which slavery has been one. (Usury has been another.)

    Skin color isn’t always a reliable identification of race for blacks either. On the island of Panay, in the Philippines, you can find dark-skinned people with nappy hair, who look very much like many Africans do, whose genes differ with those of Africans to about the same degree that white people’s genes differ.

    Which brings up another point. You’re wrong about there being no discernible difference between the races at the genetic level. Since the late 1990s, geneticists have been able to tell from a drop of blood (or a fleck of dandruff) the race of the person it came from, by examining the DNA contained in it. It has been of use to police forensic detectives as well as to people who want to know their racial background in detail.

    The idea that the races have no genetic differences originated with Richard Lewontin, a Jewish geneticist working at Harvard University. He said in 1973 that race has no genetic basis and that racial categorization had no biological utility. Leftists around the world were quick to create a number of slogans based on Lewontin’s statement, including “Race is a social construct” and “There is only ONE race, the HUMAN race!” Unfortunately for them, science proved them wrong about 25 years later.

    The racially variable genes in humans is less than 1% of the total. But that’s still very important. Humans and apes differ by only two percent of their genes, and that most of the genes of men and apes had nothing to do with the differences between them, but rather function to determine them both as animals rather than plants; as multicellular rather than single-celled; as chordates with a central nervous system; as vertebrates with a backbone; as warm-blooded mammals instead of fish or reptiles; as primates rather than felines, ursines or ruminants; as hominids rather than monkeys. Doing all that uses up 98% of our genes.

    If we were discussing the differences between humans and oak trees, a much larger fraction of the genes would be relevant to the debate. But if I’m disputing the equality of the several races of mankind, the only genes that deserve attention are that fraction of a percent that cause human racial differences to occur. The similarity in all the rest of the genes is irrelevant and does not constitute a valid talking point for the egalitarian side. Anyone who thinks otherwise should be asked whether farm tractors and passenger cars are the same things because they both burn fossil fuels, both require lubricant on their moving parts, and both have wheels, transmissions and internal combustion engines.

    While we share a common ancestor with the blacks, it is possible that the skin of that ancestor was covered by fur. While both whites and blacks bleed red, so does any pig or reptile when you cut one open. Egalitarian arguments don’t survive examination.