New Photo Released of George Zimmerman from Night of Trayvon Martin Shooting

Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, December 3, 2012

{snip}

On February 26, 2012, neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin dead. The next day he passed a lie detector test. Despite this, the judge on the case jailed and then re-jailed George Zimmerman.

Autopsy results after the shooting revealed that Trayvon Martin had only two injuries on his body—a fatal gunshot wound and bloody knuckles.

George Zimmerman had a fractured nose, two black eyes and cuts on the back of his head following the incident.

{snip}

A new photo was released of George Zimmerman the night of Trayvon Martin’s shooting death:

The version on the left was released previously, while the on the right has been withheld until now.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Bobbala

    He should have left the country on election night.

    • Greg Thomas

      I agree. He should have fled to Peru (or whatever country his mother is from) and plead his case to officials in that country, regarding his inability to get a fair trial and the lynch mob mentality whipped up by the media; making it impossible for him to experience “justice.”
      Extraditing him would be akin to sending him to his early demise.

      • AngryWhiteMan

        That would be interesting. On the one hand Peru is a small, economically weak country and doesn’t have much leverage to use against the US. On the other hand there is zero sense of white guilt there. If anything there’s still a great amount of shame among the country’s browner residents for not being sufficiently white. Plus they have never had a significant black population let alone professional race hustlers like Obama, Sharpton and Jackson.

  • Anan7

    George Zimmerman is a hero. I only wish I had his courage. Because of stories like his, I got my CCW license in PA.

    • Dr. X

      But the Government has rigged the case against Zimmerman to make a sacrifice of him on the altar of political correctness. They charged him with 2nd degree murder, for which he could get life in prison surrounded by Bantus who will want to kill him. If he cops a plea he might get 10 or 20 years on manslaughter instead. Zimmerman may win in a jury trial, but he’s literally got to gamble his life on the jury’s decision, and the jury will surely include Bantus. If he gets acquitted he will still be sued civilly and the Bantu family will have some of the biggest-name lawyers in the country. No matter how you cut it his life is finished — for simply defending himself from an aggressive Bantu youth from a broken home who had been kicked out of school and was out smoking blunts. If Zimmerman’s your hero, then he’s a hero like Jesus Christ, who was convicted in a rigged trial by a corupt government.

      • FourFooted_Messiah

        More like he was out scoping a break and enter. From what I heard, the gated community in question had been suffereing from such since about the time this “nice young black boy” had moved in. I bet the B&E’s stopped after Zimmerman stopped this “nice young black boy” for good.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rusty-Shackelford/1434757800 Rusty Shackelford

          http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/school-report-trayvon-martin-found-jewelry-and-burglary-tool
          Yep, and future astronaut Trayvon was apparently once caught with a sizeable amount of women’s jewelry and “burglary tool” in his backpack while at school. I guess he was out robbing when he wasn’t busy punching bus drivers, smoking pot or mixing “purple drank”. So it’s possible he was casing houses. To be fair, while there were burglaries commited by blacks in that particular community, I’ve not heard about any being tied back to Lil’ Skittles.

        • libertarian 1234

          You’re right on.

          Zimmerman said on the police tapes the perp wass “acting suspicious,” but didn’t elaborate at that time.

          He explained to his dad who was interviewed on two shows, that Martin was evidencing suspicious activity by walking in between homes.

          On the tapes, Zimmerman DID add that he looked as if he might be on drugs.

          If I were to give an educated guess, I would say that the perp WAS casing residences to see what he could steal.

          How did he get his money to buy dope, which obviously he did from his twitter posts? His pockets contained $40.15 in cash. I don’t know many unemployed teens who would have $40 cash on them, unless they were selling drugs or selling stolen property….like women’s jewelry, using a screw drive to gain entry to a home.

      • The__Bobster

        And the same group of people will be doing the rigging.

        • IstvanIN

          That is usually the case.

        • blight14

          Correct as usual Bobster……….we are so lucky to have them….

      • tickyul

        Yes, the jury will be packed with Urban Americans…..Zimmerman is going to do a LOT of time no matter what.

      • David Ashton

        A political prisoner…

      • Joseph

        According to traditional jurisprudence a defendant in a criminal case is to be tried by “a jury of HIS peers” NOT a jury composed of the peers of the aggrieved. I would give 2:1 that the racial composition of the jury will ensure a conviction or at best a hung jury and retrial until the desired result of a conviction is achieved.

        Too bad that Johnny Cochrane is no longer with us. He could get Zimmerman an acquittal.

        • Dr. X

          That’s a myth. Article III, Sec. 2 of the Constitution reads: “The Trial of all Crimes… shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed.” If Zimmerman gets acquitted by an all-white jury there will be coast-to-coat race riots. There’ll be blacks on the jury, and the blacks will vote “guilty” even if the white jurors don’t. You can bet money on it.

      • HamletsGhost

        And if he manages to survive all that, the Justice Dept will land a civil rights prosecution on him like they did with the officers acquitted of beating Rodney King.

    • Liberalsuck

      It’s amazing that even his own race threw him under the bus, even though he identifies as Hispanic. Speaking of ‘white on black crimes’, anyone heard anything about the Dunn story? I’m surprised that’s not receiving more national attention. Maybe the media realized how much they f—ked with the Trayvon Martin story that they felt it best not to push this one in case it blows up in their not-too-bright faces.

  • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

    Why did we get the grainy black and white image instead of the high resolution color photo? For the same reason NBC edited the 911 call to make it sound like Mr. Zimmerman brought up the race of Mr. Martin first.

    • Unperson

      Yes. And also for the same reason that the only photo the MSM showed of Trayvon was as a pre-pubescent choirboy. It’s a psy-ops campaign aimed both at influencing the Zimmerman jury and also the general public.

      Hey, if we’re lucky, maybe in another 10 months they’ll even let us get a look at the BACK of Mr. Zimmerman’s head, which was also injured from being repeatedly smacked on concrete while pinned down by Obama’s Son. Releasing only vague, grainy B+W tabloid-style photos that look like they were taken by Weegee — so as to miminize the damage done to Zimmerman’s head by the sainted black thug — is unacceptable in our Hi-Def age. I can take way better photos than that with my phone, and my phone’s nothing special.

      Just another of the lamestream’s many, many slights against whites — or in George Zimmerman’s case, part-whites who believe in law-and-order. Which is white enough for me.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

        I don’t recall which news outlet I saw coverage from, but I recall everyone reporting there was a scuffle between the two men prior to shots being fired. I also recall a lot of the initial legal speculation being about whether or not this would fly under Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” Law.

        Standing your ground doesn’t mean pursuing and in Mr. Zimmerman’s initial 911 call he was pursuing Martin. He called to report a suspicious person and then exited his vehicle to pursue. The law is pretty clear that you aren’t immune from criminal prosecution if you,

        “ Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:

        (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or

        (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

        Okay, Trayvon Martin was 5′ 11″ 158 pounds at the time of his death, compared to Zimmerman’s beefy 5′ 7″ and 200 pounds the day of the shooting. Which makes it highly unlikely that he could have put George Zimmerman’s life in “imminent danger.” Pardon my lack of sympathy but a busted nose and a banged up head does not constitute “great bodily harm.” Furthermore, as the law is written if George confronted Trayvon then he lost his right to Stand Your Ground defense because he would be the one that initially provoked the use of force by accosting Trayvon.

        Oh and I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised to learn that the photos of the back of Zimmerman’s head were released. He has a few cuts and scrapes but like I said before, it’s not really enough evidence to demonstrate the Trayvon was capable of causing “great bodily harm.”

        If you want to sit here and bitch about the media bias and your perceived need for law and order maybe you should sit down and read the law and decide whether or not he’s guilty or innocent. Or you know I guess you can just continue to do the opposite of whatever “lamestream” media does regardless of whether it’s correct or incorrect.

        • AngryWhiteMan

          No one denies that Zimm followed Trayvon. But that’s not the same as “initially provoking the use of force”. Its not a crime to follow a stranger in your own neighborhood. I think what happened is Saint Skittles took offense to being followed and attacked Zimm. The latter had no duty to retreat. Now kindly go troll on another website.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            > think what happened is Saint Skittles took offense to being followed and attacked Zimm

            Well too fucking bad the law doesn’t operate on what you think. Actually I refuse to believe that you are actually capable of thought until presented with proof to the contrary.

            > The latter had no duty to retreat.

            Sorry man, standing your ground does not = pursuing a suspect no matter how badly you want it to. I’m calling it right now, Zimmerman is going to be sitting his wetback ass in the slammer.

            >Now kindly go troll on another website.

            I forgot that this is the internet any dissenting opinion must be a troll. This is a sad little right wing echo chamber I’ve stumbled upon.

        • libertarian 1234

          “If you want to sit here and bitch about the media bias and your perceived need for law and order maybe you should sit down and read the law and decide whether or not he’s guilty or innocent.”

          If you do not understand the extent of bias in the media you can’t understand anything, and obviously it is you who does not understand the law. Your description of the men involved is wrong as well.

          And obviously you want to substitute the allegation of “pursuing” to describe following from a distance and monitoring, just as radical leftists in the media are doing. However, “pursuing” does not preclude a person from killing a person who is about to kill him or commit serious bodily injury.

          And, “Stand your ground” does not entail a “duty to retreat,” as the old self-defense statue read. I think that’s where you got the above.

          Thirdly, following and observing from a distance is not a legitimate provocation for criminal assault, especially involving a neighborhood watch captain whose job was to monitor the neighborhood for suspicious activity. That’s clearly supported by the police tapes.

          And if you want to insist on calling Zimmerman’s actions “pursuing,” that in itself doesn’t mean the other person has a clear path to killing or maiming him, and a lethal response is justified in that case anyway.

          The 2011 Florida Statutes
          Title XLVI CRIMES Chapter 776
          JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
          776.012 Use of force in defense of
          person.—
          ” ………..However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

          (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; ”

          Here’s another case in Texas where the black perp got shot for hitting a store clerk and the police cleared the shooter on their stand your ground law. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISBQVd8lYtM
          There are many other cases where the black perp is shot as a response to much less of an attack on their person than what Zimmerman received.
          Would you like links to those too?

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >Thirdly, following and observing from a distance is not a legitimate provocation for criminal assault, especially involving a neighborhood watch captain whose job was to monitor the neighborhood for suspicious activity. That’s clearly supported by the police tapes.

            He confronted Martin you fucking dullard. Confronting someone does constitute provoking a situation. Had GZ left Martin to his own devices the police would have caught him. He chose to intervene and in doing so lost his right to assert a “Stand your Ground” defense. Standing your ground doesn’t mean pursuing. He had no obligation to retreat but he had no obligation to pursue.

            >that in itself doesn’t mean the other person has a clear path to killing or maiming him, and a lethal response is justified in that case anyway

            No, lethal force wouldn’t be justified because just as you said, “that in itself doesn’t mean the other person has a clear path to killing or maiming him.”

            George Zimmerman’s boo-boos while admirable aren’t characteristic with grievous bodily harm or an attempt to kill. Any decent lawyer should be able to assert that.

            >There are many other cases where the black perp is shot as a response to much less of an attack on their person than what Zimmerman received.

            You must be a lawyer, I can tell by the way you site youtube videos.

            Honestly I’m deeply saddened by the fact that this is the fate of my once great race. Arguing in a sad little corner of the internet devoid of facts or intellect. No wonder the fucking Chinese are taking over the world, white males are nothing but ignorant basement dwellers flagellating endlessly over black people while our richer half runs the show.

          • Major

            Seems Like you might get a bit more traction if you didn’t call people “fucking dullards”. I’m surprised the moderator let you get that far.

            Just my two cents.

          • libertarian 1234

            RIchard libertarian 1234•32 minutes ago
            “Thirdly, following and observing from a distance is not a legitimate provocation for criminal assault, especially involving a neighborhood watch captain whose job was to monitor the neighborhood for suspicious activity. That’s clearly supported by the police tapes.”

            Richard (konservative1)” He confronted Martin you fucking dullard. Confronting someone does constitute provoking a situation.”

            Where is your evidence that Martin was confronted? You have none, and your entire post is full of nitwit assumptions that you arrived at in your delusionary state of mind.

            And if there is a dullard on here it is you. Nobody else. You gave incorrect descriptions, made false assumptions and allegations and your interpretation of the law sounds like someone from grade school.

            ” Had GZ left Martin to his own devices the police would have caught him. ”

            How so? They didn’t catch many others who committed crimes in the neighborhood. How utterly naive…..and unintelligent.

            “He chose to intervene and in doing so lost his right to assert a “Stand your Ground” defense. Standing your ground doesn’t mean pursuing. He had no obligation to retreat but he had no obligation to pursue.”

            Monitoring and following at a distance doesn’t have anything to do with pursuing, but even if it did it doesn’t justify blind-siding someone with a sucker punch, jumping on top and blasting him in the face and slamming his head into the concrete. The perp learned this the hard way with a bullet to the chest.

            “George Zimmerman’s boo-boos while admirable aren’t characteristic with grievous bodily harm or an attempt to kill. Any decent lawyer should be able to assert that.”

            Will, in spite of your “expert” opinion, there will be no conviction. Sorry, old guy.

            There’s no fair jury in the state of Florida that will convict Zimmerman, and he’s going to be a millionaire after filing several law suits against the leftist dregs in the media, just as Richard Jewel did.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >.However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

            (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; ”

            I’ve already quoted that and a much larger chunk of it to boot. Zimmerman couldn’t reasonably believe that someone unarmed and much smaller put him in the position to experience great bodily harm or imminent death. Unless you’d like to argue that negros are physically superior to another race, than maybe you’re onto something.

            >Here’s another case in Texas where the black perp got shot for hitting a store clerk and the police cleared the shooter on their stand your ground law.

            That’s not another case it’s a case. It’s also not a “case” it’s a youtube video. I’ve been out of school for quite a while but I didn’t realize that security camera footage posted to youtube suddenly constituted a scholarly source.

            >There are many other cases where the black perp is shot as a response to much less of an attack on their person than what Zimmerman received.

            Would you like links to those too?

            Provided those links are scholarly and not youtube videos I would be happy to read them and continue this debate. Honestly I think willful ignorance is more to blame than minorities for the current state of white culture and everyone here is only enforcing that idea.

          • libertarian 1234

            RIchard libertarian 1234•

            “That’s not another case it’s a case. It’s also not a “case” it’s a youtube video.”

            And you’re not being contradictory either, eh? LOL!

            “I’ve been out of school for quite a while but I didn’t realize that security camera footage posted to youtube suddenly constituted a scholarly source.”

            Who said it did?

            The youtube example is a stand your ground incident just like Zimmerman’s. If that has to be explained to you then you’re not really able to comprehend much.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >And you’re not being contradictory either, eh? LOL!

            A “case” refers to an already resolved case that set a precedent. It has absolutely nothing to do with a youtube video and everything to do with what a judge and jury said. Are you capable of understanding that or am I talking too fast? LOL!

            >Who said it did?

            Um, the guy that attempted to use it as proof for an argument? Is today national stupid question day or is it always like this?

            >The youtube example is a stand your ground incident just like Zimmerman’s.

            Uh no, the youtube video was footage from a security camera. If you’d like to present that case to me then give me the judges ruling and the details of the case. I’m not afraid to sit down and read something, I’m white.

            >. If that has to be explained to you then you’re not really able to comprehend much.

            Have you ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? It’s a psychological phenomenon in which unskilled people suffer from illusory superiority . If I have to explain to you why this is relevant, then you’re not really able to comprehend much.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >Truly bizarre coming from someone who cites erroneous details and fails to respond when they’re pointed out,

            Please provide an example of an erroneous detail I cited and a failure to respond on my part.

            > lying about one thing after another, using an illogical process of presenting a point

            Oh come on you seriously believe this? Where did I lie and exactly what process was illogical?

            > And when you write of “willful ignorance” do you realize you’ve exhibited exactly that?

            So white supremacy as been reduced to “I am rubber and you are glue whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you?” Nice.

            >What people think they’re accomplishing by trying to skew the issues involved in this case is a mystery

            I could say the very same about you, but it’s fairly obvious that your bias against black people prevent from seeing the forest for the trees and that it’s exactly what you’re trying to accomplish.

            >and he’s going to be a millionaire by getting huge judgements against, NBC, CBS, the Martin lawyer, plus many other sources, just as Richard Jewel did.

            Lets not confuse the two cases. Richard Jewel was never arrested or charged with a crime, he was only a suspect.

            Richard Jewell (two l’s you retard) was actually a police officer on duty as a security guard at the time, he didn’t shoot anyone but rather found a pipe bomb and was later faced with baseless accusations by media outlets that he was the one responsible. This was despite the fact that Jewell notified police and evacuated the area before the bomb exploded. By all accounts Jewell was a hero, he SAVED lives.

            Compare this to George Zimmerman who has a dead body on his hands and is currently awaiting trial on charges of murder. Jewell deserved protection because he hadn’t committed a crime. The only thing Zimmerman deserves is a fair trial by a jury of his peers. You’re comparing apples to Buicks son, it doesn’t make you look intelligent in the slightest.

            >Read it and weep, old guy.

            I’ve read it and I’m actually laughing and shaking my head. You couldn’t even spell Richard Jewell’s last name right and the two cases had almost nothing to do with each other besides the fact that they were covered by mainstream media.

            Seriously, if you want me to believe in white supremacy you’re going to have to give me a SUPREME argument. Ad hominem attacks on my character,

            > got to be based in some kind of delusional desire to feel as if you’re morally superior or the thought that you’re scoring points for love and tolerance.

            Seems as you you’ve got me all wrong. I HATE all this P.C. tolerance equality bullshit. What I hate even more is a weak argument. None of my argument has reflected my own personal opinion, because my own personal opinion has no bearing on the argument. Do you understand that?

            I’m purposely being contrary to see if anyone here can actually assert an intelligent argument. I’m white and goddamn proud of it, but seeing people like you pass off your feelings as facts in intelligent conversation makes me sick. You can’t even argue intelligently all of your responses are ad hominem attacks and your sources are laughable. If the white race is to continue on it should begin by sterilizing all the stupid trailer park folks before they muddy up the gene pool any further with their inbred stupidity.

            So yes, I believe in white supremacy, I just don’t think being stupid trailer trash qualifies you to be a part of that supremacy.

        • HamletsGhost

          He didn’t pursue him. Get thee to a dictionary and learn the difference between words like “pursue” and “follow”.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            What are the key differences between the words “purse” and “follow” in the eyes of the law. Please provide a few cases along with your explanation. Being white doesn’t mean you’re exempt from the burden of proof.

          • HamletsGhost

            It’s not about skin color. It’s about the definition of basic English words. In case you haven’t seen the photos, Zimmerman isn’t even white, so your last statement is particularly bizarre.

            Here’s a quick illustration, since you can’t seem to find an online dictionary:
            I go for a walk in the woods with my dog. He follows me. If he sees a jackrabbit in the forest, he takes off in hot pursuit of the running rabbit.

            He FOLLOWS me, but he PURSUES the rabbit. See how it works?

            Zimmerman followed Martin from his car till advised not to by the 911 dispatcher, after which he said “okay”. He stopped following, and he never pursued Martin. He did nothing illegal, and was well withing his rights to leave the vehicle, although it’s not a good idea when you have thug wannabees like Trayvon lurking in the shadows.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >It’s not about skin color. It’s about the definition of basic English words. In case you haven’t seen the photos, Zimmerman isn’t even white, so your last statement is particularly bizarre.

            That’s odd that you would say that because I wasn’t accusing you of being biased towards Zimmerman because he was white, I was accusing you of being biased against Trayvon because he was black. I think you knew exactly what I meant, but by all means plead ignorance. It does a somewhat decent job of obfuscating the point I’m trying to make.

            >I go for a walk in the woods with my dog. He follows me. If he sees a jackrabbit in the forest, he takes off in hot pursuit of the running rabbit.

            >He FOLLOWS me, but he PURSUES the rabbit. See how it works?

            What dictionary did you get this from? Words have more than one definition. One definition of pursue it to “follow with intent to overtake.” Overtake is this context is defined as “Catch up with and pass while traveling in the same direction.” I submit that Zimmerman must have caught up to Trayvon, or else how would a scuffle break out? It seems like you’re the one who has trouble finding an online dictionary.

            >Zimmerman followed Martin from his car till advised not to by the 911 dispatcher, after which he said “okay”. He stopped following, and he never pursued Martin.

            Allow me to post an excerpt from the transcript as it seems you’ve left a few things out in a feeble attempt to bolster your incredibly ignorant argument.

            Are you following him? [2:24]

            Zimmerman:

            Yeah. [2:25]

            911 dispatcher:

            OK.

            We don’t need you to do that. [2:26]

            Zimmerman:

            OK. [2:28]

            911 dispatcher:

            Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34]

            Zimmerman:

            George. He ran.

            After this the rest of the conversation is him giving his name, phone number and other boring details to dispatch. Trayvon was shot shortly after. If George didn’t pursue Trayvon then how did the altercation to being? You honestly want me to believe that Trayvon ran away and then double back after Zimmerman got off the phone with 911 to beat Zimmerman’s wet back dry?

            Seriously, If George Zimmerman is going to stay out of jail he’s going to a good defense attorney because this case is far more complex than you simpletons make it out to be when you put the cart before the horse.

          • HamletsGhost

            Actually I didn’t understand what you meant. Your lack of clarity in writing reflects a lack of clarity in thought. Just like my high school English teachers always insisted.

            I am flabbergasted that you have so much trouble with simple words like “follow” and “pursue”. You must be a recent product of the public schools.

            You expect any reasonable person to believe that Zimmerman, after talking on the phone for several minutes with a dispatcher and told to wait for a police car to arrive, would pick THIS moment to break out a can of whup-ass on someone who was bigger and stronger than him, and could have been armed for all he knew?

            On what planet does that happen?

            The case is not complex. It’s a simple open-and-shut case of justified homicide. It’s only demented ideologues like you that simply MUST find an innocent man guilty of something. Anything to appease the blood-lust of the mob that’s been stirred up all too easily by some of the most dishonest news reporting since the demise of Pravda.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >Actually I didn’t understand what you meant. Your lack of clarity in writing reflects a lack of clarity in thought. Just like my high school English teachers always insisted.

            What did you have trouble understanding HamletsGhost? I’ve got some time, I can attempt to dumb it down the high school level for you if that’s as far as you got in school. Judging by the apparent lack of critical thinking skills I’m going to just assume I’m right. Congratulations, you managed to do something that half of the coons did. You hear that? In my eyes you’re on par with half of them.

            >Just like my high school English teachers always insisted.

            Huh, well you got at least part way through high school but you seem to missed the part where they talked about how ad hominem attacks were a logical fallacy. Attacking me seems to be most of your argument. You only mention Zimmerman once in that whole convoluted stream of bullshit, yet you attempt to characterize me as stupid no less than a dozen times.

            >I am flabbergasted that you have so much trouble with simple words like “follow” and “pursue”. You must be a recent product of the public schools.

            Just so we’re clear you do realize that the word “follow” appears in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary definition of the word “pursue?”

            >The case is not complex. It’s a simple open-and-shut case of justified homicide.

            Well it’s a good thing you need more than a high school degree to be a judge. You aren’t even privy to most of the evidence yet you’ve already reached a decision. Justice is blind my friend but it isn’t retarded.

            >. It’s only demented ideologues like you that simply MUST find an innocent man guilty of something.

            I didn’t say he whether I thought he was innocent or guilty I only said that I believe he won’t be afforded protection under the Stand Your Ground Law and that he will be found guilty. It’s only demented ideologues like yourself that feel the need to interject their personal feelings into every argument they enter into.

            Like I said before, you represent an inferior white race that I would liken to negros living in ghettos. This trailer park scum that sits around collecting welfare, smoking/making meth, and squirting out a kid every year or two are no different than the negroidal welfare queens. If you’re white and you don’t have a college education you aren’t superior to the lowliest of negros.

            You’re an ignorant stain on my proud, white t-shirt that desperately needs to be bleached.

          • libertarian 1234

            RIchard HamletsGhost

            “Huh, well you got at least part way through high school but you seem to missed the part where they talked about how ad hominem attacks were a logical fallacy.”

            After issuing a series of ad hominem attacks you claim to be the victim of ad hominem attacks on yourself. LOL!

            Good lord, man, you’re making a fool of yourself with your own words.

            Your assertions and ad hominem attacks are not only the product of a confused, unclear mind, you obviously want to give the impression that you’re highly educated and intelligent just because you say so, but what you write tells any reader all he really needs to know about you.

          • HamletsGhost

            Well, you assumed wrong. I actually graduated from college and graduate school. You know what happens when you assume, don’t you?

            Your hissy fit shows the emotional nature of your argument. When presented with inconvenient facts that contradict your contrived world view, you go into a long shriek about how I insulted you.

            You must become more of a man. Like the man who saved his own life and is now facing a howling media lynch mob, with you too lazy to even get the basic facts straight about the case. I don’t respect such mentally lazy people, and that includes you.

            If you want better treatment on this board, I suggest sticking to the facts, and using cold hard logic to draw conclusion from them.

          • libertarian 1234

            RIchard HamletsGhost•an hour ago
            “What are the key differences between the words “purse” and “follow” in the eyes of the law.”
            A “purse” is what a woman carries and has nothing to do with “follow,” in anybody’s eyes, including the law.
            I think you mean “pursue.”
            “Please provide a few cases along with your explanation.”
            How about providing a few cases showing that they’re the same, since your allegations are so bizarre?
            ” Being white doesn’t mean you’re exempt from the burden of proof.”
            No, it means we are expected to provide more data than anyone else. We know that.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >No, it means we are expected to provide more data than anyone else. We know that.

            If that’s the case I’m the only real white person here and the rest of you are nergoids.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

            >No, it means we are expected to provide more data than anyone else. We know that.

            I’ve been waiting all day for you to produce some data. I think it’s sufficient to say there is no data just like there were no weapons of mass destruction.

    • The__Bobster

      In the ABC version of the video taken after the assault, they actually blurred out the wounds on the back of his head. And Treeboon’s moronic lawyer kept insisting the White Hispanic had no wounds at all. When shown evidence to the contrary, he just moved on to the next lie. These people have no shame.

      • Joseph

        There is no shame in this deception because it serves “the greater good”. It is at least consistent with their general principle that results are all that matter, not how you got there. Running across the center of the field is okay to finish the race first if you are “disadvantaged”. The end justifies the means. Any lie, so long as it achieves the “higher” objective of liberalism is permitted because the good outweighs the bad in their perverted thinking. This is why affirmative action and welfare and “reparations” are justified because it is collective equality of outcomes that is important not justice for the individual. These sociopaths do not care about Martin or Zimmerman or any person really. Individuals do not matter in the hive of the social reconstructionists. They are only the means to an end.

        • David Ashton

          Spot on, Joseph.

        • elo

          what is the end exactly ?

      • Fredrik_H

        Anything as long as it fits the narrative of “White=Evil”,

      • AngryWhiteMan

        As Comrade Lenin said: Who, whom?

  • libertarian 1234

    In skipping briefly over the news sites that are posting this story and
    viewing the comments, I found that most people support Zimmerman. But there’s a
    large number of people who keep saying how terrible it is that a “young boy” was
    killed, as if he were innocent of any wrong doing, overlooking….or not
    understanding or not caring about….. the fact that it was his own criminal
    conduct that got him shot and that his conduct up to the point of the incident
    was of a rabble rousing thief, drug dealer, and trouble-maker who was on a
    collision course with disaster.

    With so many so disposed and so many who voted for Obama, I’m wondering how
    many white people in this country are capable enough or reliable enough to form
    any kind of breakaway sovereign nation.

    And I’m also wondering if there’s more than a scant few who are enough of
    the same kind of mindset and outrage over the loss of our culture…like the
    majority on this site….to ever get up and fight if necessary.

    It may well be that the best, most viable alternative is not winning
    anything back, but a separation from the tumultuous masses in separate
    communities ready to secede at the first opportunity. I’m coming across more and more white people I detest being around as much as loudmouth blacks.

    This whole process of deterioration could well cover many years.,……if
    brother Ben and company can continue to string-out and obfuscate the issue with printed
    money…..most of which could well have society on a par with Brazil where the
    rabble rule the streets at night while others live in armed, gated
    communities.

    • Liberalsuck

      I never trust any media story that glorifies black males. There is always something else to the story that they aren’t reporting, even with the Dunn (white man) who shot “unarmed black teens” or the NFL player that shot his wife and then himself. I don’t have any affinity for black males. None. I don’t feel sorry for how they are. I don’t feel obligated to help them out. I don’t want my daughter to date them. I will not adopt a black kid or mexican kid. I want as little to do with them as possible!

      • The__Bobster

        You mean you don’t have a desire to buy them socks and boots?

  • pcmustgo

    Why was he labelled as white? He’s mesitzo/half latino. Why did they drop the story that dovetailed zimmerman about the little native american boy who committed a REAL hate crime against 5 black men, gunning them down in Tulsa, Oklahoma… ? Oh, that’s right, the media found out the boy wasn’t white, but native american and lived on a reservation. Story over.

    • jay11

      To this day I want to shout from the rooftops: “Look at him, all you libtards! Is he a white dude? Does he look like white to you? Or is the ‘white’ hispanic the same as a white black obama?” Whatever the combination of parents’ races, the ‘look’ of the kid will determine who he is. This guy looks no different than the mestizos who wait at the corner of home depot looking for day labor. It is funny, isn’t it, how the story just disappeared after a few months, like it was left hanging. The leftists inflicted their damage though, cementing in the minfs of blacks further that whitey is all bad and must be polar beared!

      • IstvanIN

        You guys don’t get it. Zimmerman sounds like it would be a white man’s name. They jumped the gun before they realized he was Hispanic. If he had had Spanish surname he could have been blond and blue-eyed and the press would have ignored the whole story. The press thought they had “YT” but now it is too late to back down, thus the :”white” Hispanic backtracking.

        • AngryWhiteMan

          So true… it’s amazing how people conflate Hispanicity with race. Are we really supposed to think that Ricky Martin and Carlos Mencia are exactly the same race? Haha

      • Cesare

        In the leftists warped way of thinking,any individual who hurts the sacred cow black race is classified as White.

        • elo

          Leftards are terrified of facing the reality of endemic sub-Saharan violence. So how do they handle it ? Easy, they just deny it is happening. 50,000
          White women and girls raped annually by coons is totally ignored by these

          twisted fruit-cakes, but if one White man fights back and wins, WOW, he must
          be a bad-Nazi-who murdered-6 million-Jews.

      • Cesare

        I also want to add that blacks are extremely stupid when it comes to the differences between racial characteristics. In the city area where I live ,an Indian man was yanked out of his car and beaten after a “juneteenth day” celebration. They thought he was White according to what the paper said. And yes, no hate crime charges were forthcoming. In their stupid minds, anyone who isn’t black is White.

        • Joseph

          Well, we all look the same you know.

        • AngryWhiteMan

          Ive said for years that the primary divide in this country is black vs non black. But the Marxists have done a good job of stigmifying whiteness and making it socially and economically advantageous to identify as a “person of color”. And the useful idiots in the pro-white movement have helped their cause by alienating potential allies like Asians, Arabs and law abiding, productive Mexican Americans who don’t pledge alliegience to Mexico. The Jews would be the best allies but of course they will never ally with us. Non-parasitic blacks and mulattos would be almost as good of allies but for a multitude of reasons they keep throwing their lot in with the parasites and criminals with very few exceptions.

          • Cesare

            Ironic isn’t it ? Despite all of the differences in culture and religion, all races tend to be united by a loathing of blacks and their behavior. Even the Marxist hierarchy despises them. They only use them (and other useful idiots) as a fifth column to achieve their aims. I dislike multiculturalism, however I don’t hate someone just for being of another culture. My problem is with social engineers trying to displace us Europeans that built this nation. I would have no problem with very limited immigration of other peoples as long as they adapted. And from civilized countries to boot. Now however we require no more immigration due to the Hart-Cellar catastrophe.
            On needing allies, it’s probably best to have Arabs and Muslims. Yes I can hear shrieks as I type this, but ask yourselves, who knows the tricks of a certain tribe and distrusts them as well ?

          • GSJ

            Not all of us Jews are against you comrade. The thing you’re not getting is that Asians, and ESPECIALLY Arabs consider themselves part of the non-white horde, and while many Asians don’t like black people, they don’t want to live in a WHITE state for WHITE people, even if they would not be harassed and would be left alone. I think some Jews feel this way too (“No, I’m Jewish, not white”), but almost all of the Jews who believe in this celebrate diversity crap and race is a social construct have been seriously brainwashed by the same system which affects and brainwashes non-Jewish whites, a system we must destroy.

          • Joseph

            This is certainly true. All evangelical Christians are usually painted with the same brush even here on AmRen so you are no doubt, correct.

    • John Bonham

      Hispanics are only white when they are counted for welfare statistics …

      • Eagle_Eyed

        and crime rates

  • You Are Now Enriched

    Only a racist would look at this picture and draw any conclusions, such as justified DOA Son of Obama.

  • Robert Binion

    Oviously, editors at the New York Times require scant pallor among “white Hispanics.”

  • whiteyyyyy

    I dont see the black eye, but yeah he did get messed up. Maybe he could sue nbc etc IF he does’nt get convicted.

  • Greg Thomas

    Why…because Zimmerman is “White.”

  • Puggg

    They are not perfect, but give Fox News their due credit in this story: Almost consistently when they deal with this story about GZ’s broken nose, do they show images of Trayvon Martin as a grown man or almost grown man, instead of a wee early adolescent.

  • frank

    Did Obama win or was it rigged ?

    • IstvanIN

      Didn’t he lose in every state that had voter ID laws?

      • A. Windaus

        No, but Obama lost every state that requires Photo ID for voting (there were only six states that required this).

        • John Bonham

          Umm, what is your answer ?? IstvanIN is saying the same exact thing as you ..

      • Joseph

        Nope. Iowa passed this fraud off on the public at 51% and they scanned in D.L.’s and made folks sign a voter eligibility affidavit.

        We can thank the university cities for that victory for the dark side.

    • Joseph

      It is always rigged. Just like the old Soviet elections: “We have free democratic elections comrade, two communists to freely choose from, take drink, vote for one”.

  • MekongDelta69

    George Zimmerman is the Bernie Goetz of 2012.

    However, as bad as it was in 1984 (how ironic is this year?) for Bernie, it’s a thousand times worse now.

    Bernie was charged with attempted murder, assault, reckless endangerment and possession of an illegal firearm (because it was unlicensed in NYC, where it’s almost impossible to get a right to carry license). Fortunately, a (no doubt, mostly white) jury acquitted him of everything except the illegal firearm count, for which he served 8 months of a one year sentence.

    Poor George is probably going to be lynched in South Central or Southside Chicago or Bed-Stuy or North Philly or New Orleans’ 9th Ward (or any city for that matter), because leftists have to show people that shooting a Government approved ‘protected’ member of society has ‘consequences.’

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rusty-Shackelford/1434757800 Rusty Shackelford

      When Goetz was acquitted in his criminal trial, NYC was dangerous with high rates of (black) crime, and people understood his actions in the context of the fear felt by many law abiding citizens as they tried to get around the city without getting mugged or shot by the diversity. By the time the civil suit rolled around ten years later, NYC was safe for fat tourists from Indiana to amble around Times Square and the jurors viewed the case through the lens of race and found Goetz liable. I fear the same will be the case in GZ’s criminal trial.

  • negrolocaust

    (gun story, gun related comment?) heres a wake- up call for gun owners: alex jones calls bob costas “anti-american trash”…yes!!… for his anti-gun tirade, he also slams the piece of garbage michael vick for torturing and killing pit bulls. this is why i love alex jones
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXAbGVjU42w

  • negrolocaust

    wheres my comment?

    • http://www.facebook.com/nokwan.noway No Kwan Noway

      They’re moderated. When someone is too truthful, the comment goes down the rabbit hole.

  • anarchyst

    “Saint” Trayvon was a thug that got what he deserved . . .
    It is clear that Zimmerman was protecting his neighborhood when he asked Trayvon what business he had in that neighborhood.
    The “average” person would have replied that he was visiting relatives–that would have been the end of the conversation and he would have been on his way.
    One must understand the warped psychological pathology that exists in today’s blacks and “gangsta thugs”.
    You see, Trayvon felt “disrespected” when asked about his presence in that neighborhood. The only way for him to get his “respect” back was to jump, pummel (and possibly murder) Zimmerman.
    Zimmerman did the only thing that he could . . .
    The “stand your ground” statute was not applicable because Trayvon was ON TOP of Zimmerman, beating his brains out. Zimmerman could not have “retreated” in this case.
    This prosecutor that has brought charges on Zimmerman is pandering to racist, black pressure and is illegal on its face.
    If and when Zimmerman is acquitted, I would like to see him go after the prosecutor for “prosecutorial malpractice”.

    • libertarian 1234

      “Saint” Trayvon was a thug that got what he deserved . . .
      It is clear that Zimmerman was protecting his neighborhood when he asked Trayvon what business he had in that neighborhood. ”

      I agree with most of what you’re saying, but Zimmerman had no conversation with the black perp, until he circled back to where Zimmerman’s vehicle was parked and asked Zimmerman if he had a problem to which he replied “No,’ then was blasted with a sucker punch after the perp announced that, “Well, you do now.”
      http://www.wagist.com/2012/dan-linehan/evidence-that-trayvon-martin-doubled-back

  • tickyul

    Photo does not matter, facts do not matter……..THEY will pack the jury with Urban Americans.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    This was a media coverup plain and simple.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/L3V4YPBTV7424CQSU24ZVJYFVY RIchard

      Cover up of what? There hasn’t even been a trial yet. All of this is irrelevant and only tainting the potential pool of jurors.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    “It’s clear from the video that Zimmerman wasn’t hurt — and certainly not hurt enough to shoot in self-defense”.

    –Al Sharpton

    “Newly released video of George Zimmerman at the Sanford Police Department the night he shot Trayvon Martin to death show the neighborhood watch volunteer without blood on his clothing or bruises on his face or head. His clean-shaven picture seems to contrast with the violent beating he told police he endured at the hands of Martin, 17, who Zimmerman said attacked him from behind.”

    –HuffPo

    This photo should have been all the evidence needed for the DA to dismiss. It is justified self-defense.

    Brain-dead Angela Corey should be disbarred and prosecuted NOW. This is a race-driven case and an obvious effort by prosecutors to conceal evidence and weaken the defenses’s case.

    Note to Mr. Costas: Zimmerman had a gun and used it. Otherwise Mr. Zimmerman would not be alive today.

    Bon

  • JohnEngelman

    I wish I had had a gun the times blacks mugged me. You can bet I would have used it.

    • Michael_C_Scott

      Then why do you vote dumb-o-crat?

      • JohnEngelman

        The rate of violent crime began to decline the same year Bill Clinton was elected president. The decline has continued since then at roughly the same rate under Democrat and Republican presidents.

        http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

        • Michael_C_Scott

          That isn’t a real answer to my question, now is it?

          • JohnEngelman

            The answer was over your head.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            My IQ was tested at 152 by the feds, so I very much doubt that.

          • JohnEngelman

            Logical Fallacie
            Ad hominemAn ad hominem argument is any that attempts to counter another’s claims or conclusions by attacking the person, rather than addressing the argument itself…. T

            The term “poisoning the well” also refers to a form of ad hominem fallacy. This is an attempt to discredit the argument of another by implying that they possess an unsavory trait, or that they are affiliated with other beliefs or people that are wrong or unpopulars…

            Argument from authority
            The basic structure of such arguments is as follows: Professor X believes A, Professor X speaks from authority, therefore A is true. Often this argument is implied by emphasizing the many years of experience, or the formal degrees held by the individual making a specific claim

            http://www.theskepticsguide.org/resources/logicalfallacies.aspx

            —–

            A poster on an internet forum can claim any identity, or any number of achievements. The only thing one really knows about a poster is the nature and quality of the poster’s posts.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            So you’re saying I can usefully be accused of fabricating not only a four-count federal felony conviction, but also dozens of US and international patent awards, as well as publications in peer-reviewed science journals, all while posting under my own name.

            You’re a funny man, Engels.

          • JohnEngelman

            I doubt you are fabricating a four count federal felony conviction.

        • Michael_C_Scott

          Yes, crime rates are going down, but to an individual victim, murder is still a final and very personal experience. If you doubt me, there’s Christopher Newsome: abducted, sodomized, shot, dumped in a ditch and set on fire. There’s also his girlfriend, Channon Christian: abducted, orally, vaginally and anally raped, tortured, hogtied and then suffocated with a plastic bag.

          Go and ask them their opinions about the lower crime rate. I’ll wait.

          • JohnEngelman

            Hopefully I will have the opportunity to ask their opinions in Heaven.

            Unlike you I have no felony convictions. Unlike you I never deserved any. I have been robbed at gunpoint, mugged several times, and nearly murdered. Every single time blacks did it.

            Nevertheless, I try not to draw too many conclusions from my own life.

            Because Jared Taylor and the Bureau of Justice Statistics tell me that blacks have a rate of violent crime that is nearly eight times the white crime rate, I assume it is true.

            http://www.colorofcrime.com/

            http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm

            Because FBI, Uniform Crime Reports tell me that the overall crime rate has declined since 1980, and the rate of violent crime has declined since 1991 I assume that is true too.

            http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

            Being a victim of black crime has not turned me into a Republican, or a hater of blacks. It has made me a hater of criminals, regardless of their race.

          • Michael_C_Scott

            I was robbed at gunpoint once, by a black guy, while still on federal probation and working as morning manager at a Subway sandwich shop. I didn’t want to do fast-food work, but one condition of my paper was employment. He only took the store’s money and not ours, and while it was scary, he didn’t shoot us or rape Robyn. The cops got his prints off the stainless steel counter, and I ID’d him from a photo lineup. The cops then proceeded to throw away all the evidence. My perp had driven from Albuquerque to Denver, sticking up places along the way, and he got us in the morning of his return trip. New Mexico gave him seven years, so it wasn’t a complete wash. I restarted making sandwiches as soon as the cops were finished with me, and got a standing ovation from the waiting customers.

            My own felony conviction was for threatening my wife-beating, child-abusing ex-father over my patent money, after he ran off to Britain with it. Since the threats crossed state lines, it was federal, and since money was involved, it was extortion. It was a peculiar circumstance that would never obtain with anyone else. My mother swore under oath that she is delighted he is terrified of me.

            I was locked up with criminals, and they were a mixed bunch. Some of them delighted in making everyone around them miserable, but some of my bosses when I was a chemist in the microelectronics industry were like that, too. Some of them thought they could get out of trouble by ratting out silly stuff, like booze and marijuana, but those guys were doubtless rats out on the street, and would still be rats if given nice office jobs. I met their type. I went back to the lab most nights after dinner to monitor the progress of reactions I had started, One of the secretaries complained that I usually didn’t show up to work until 10:00 AM and took long lunch breaks. I averaged a patent every four weeks for six years there, and she was eventually fired for stealing from petty cash.

            The guards were the same mixed slice of Americana. I once wrote that 20% hated us and would mess with us every chance they had. Another 20% would help a fellow if he needed it and wasn’t a troublemaker. The other 60% regarded it as just a job. The top 1% didn’t even mind if we got drunk, so long as we didn’t cause trouble.

            The main lesson I learned from going to prison is that I must never provide warnings anymore. Since I am home in Colorado, I can remove myself from situations that infuriate me, so I won’t be going back. That said, if I ever do go back, since I am permanently disallowed from providing any sort of warnings it will be for murder. They say a fellow only has to pay for the first one, and all the rest are free.

            I didn’t hate blacks before going to prison, and I didn’t come out hating them, either. One of my gigs was doing laundry, four postage stamps a load, washed, dried and folded, and I did laundry for anyone who could pay. I even did piecework. One of my black regulars shared a six-man room with a guy who approached me and said that I folded laundry just like his mother did. He was young, and prison was his first time away from home, so I folded his laundry for one postage stamp a load. I regard them as unpredictably dangerous and with grossly inferior intellects.

            I’m not even certain I hate liars or thieves anymore, but that said, if you aren’t trying to draw too many conclusions from your own life, from who’s life do you intend to draw conclusions? I wouldn’t suggest you draw them from mine: The feds walked around my neighborhood “warning” everyone I was back, in July 2003. I went out to get my mail only after dark for quite a few years afterward.

            Sayaka and Ariadne are visiting Sayaka’s parents, so while I have accomplished plenty of postponed work, our house feels empty without them. Just over two more weeks.

  • Jim Jackson

    This “cookie cutting” and “gerrymandering” of facts (e.g., obscuring physical injury via
    a mere black and white image ) is just centerpiece in the dark art of abusive legal process,
    abusive journalistic process, abusive medical diagnostic process, etc etc. . And the citadel of abuse of process is $outhern Poverty Law Center. Want to get “the rest of the story” told?
    It may cost you the going rate of a good lawyer–$300 an hour and, then, only if you’re lucky.

    • David Ashton

      Democracy – government by mob. Republic – government by law…yers.

  • Ulick

    What’s left unsaid in this case by the media is that cops and prosecutor let Zimmerman go not because they’re racist, but because cops and prosecutors are the people most familiar with black criminalty. Based on their entire careers in law enforcement, Zimmerman’s side of the story supported everything that they’ve seen about black violence and criminality. As always, those most familiar with black communities are the most “racist” in the media and academia’s eyes.

  • IKantunderstand

    We know the MSM is anti White. And frankly, I don’t care how they got this way. We need to fight back, and we need to fight back now. I suggest that none of us files an income tax return. I suggest that we all go on strike on April fifteenth. I suggest, that we as Americans, stop watching T.V., stop going to the movies, and, completely remove ourselves from this society. Go John Galt!

  • APaige

    If I was Jewish and had an half-hispanic son that was attacked by a black youth-he would look just like George.

  • Jaego

    Why don’t Hispanics speak up for him? Are they afraid of Blacks? No, but they don’t want to offend their Liberal Allies. The invasion is going well – why mess with a good thing? Zimmerman is a collateral, an acceptable loss in their eyes.

    • AngryWhiteMan

      Plus his mother is Peruvian not Mexican. And his father is non Hispanic. He’s not a member of the reconquistador community

  • John Bonham

    I love it, I argued constantly with youtube morons that insist that Zimmerman stalked Martin down and shot him dead in cold blood ( well, they heard it from the press) .. One was even arguing that Zimmerman had nothing, no head wounds not even a scratch,yet when I directed him to google Zimmerman head wounds, they STILL did believe me.. You can show these idiots this picture too but their minds are made up .. Zimmerman (to them) is a stalking, young black boy, cold blooded killer and would have went on to be the most prolific, stalking young black boy murderer if never arrested .. LOL

    • libertarian 1234

      “I love it, I argued constantly with youtube morons, that insist Zimmerman stalked Martin down and shot him dead in cold blood.”
      They’re on other sites too. This incident more than any other story has revealed how stupid and programmed many white people are. I’ve lost a lot of faith in whites recently. These gullible fools have either allowed themselves to be duped or they’re just too naive and stupid to understand.
      At first I was blasting their opinions with straight, known, provable facts, but no matter how much data or links were provided it did no good, so I I quit wasting my time. Now I just post a general statement of facts and move on.
      If we’re ever to gain secession, or if we win a huge chunk of territory as a sovereign nation in any kind of civil conflict, these people have got to be excluded at all costs by any measures necessary.
      And, until then, every incident those types are involved in, where they’re set upon by the very people they refuse to acknowledge are at war with us, I think deserves a round of applause, like the victims in a beat down who insist the incident had nothing to do with race.

  • jamestown

    How dumb of the media. Didnt they assume he had a 50/50 chance of being black or white with that pic? Its a good thing they never called him white or white hispanic. Apparently returning to the old black and white is preferred by the media in some certain situations.

  • ageofknowledge

    The modern liberal media ensuring that modern liberal ideological objectives were protected (again at the expense of the truth). If that means an innocent man goes to prison for a crime he did not forget: so be it. Distort the truth to accomplish the political objective. There’s a name for that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kenyon.hull Kenyon Hull

    The prosecuter in this case should suffer the same fate as Nifong of the Duke Lacross
    case fame.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rusty-Shackelford/1434757800 Rusty Shackelford

    I’m sure the MSM will be all over this photo. It almost doesn’t matter that this only further backs up his story that Skittles attacked him. The usual suspects will claim that Zimmerman started the fight and shot the poor honah stoodint when poor little Trayvon, who never did nuffin’ to nobody no how, started to gain the upper hand. Or they will claim the inuries were self inflicted.

    • Seamus

      It looks like that low-count racist Zimmerman was beating Martin’s knuckles with his ugly white face.

  • s shadow

    The doctored photo initially released looks like a deliberate attempt to disguise Z’s injuries. It would certainly appear that the prosecutor is civilly and criminally liable for this attempt to deceive. Hopefully she will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

  • Michael_C_Scott

    The pic shows the broken nose, but the pressure cuts to the back of Zimmerman’s scalp from his head being repeatedly slammed into the ground are more telling.

    The judge who gave in to political pressure and rejailed Zimmerman after he bonded out needs a good hanging.

  • Bob Wallace

    George and Trayvon: When Morons Collide.

    Having said that,I trust nothing the government or media says.

  • Michael_C_Scott

    The reason Mr. Zimmerman’s photo here does not show black eyes is that the photo was taken shortly after the incident. The eyes always blacken later after a broken nose is sustained.

    A solid blow to the forehead will also frequently blacken both eyes, but again, it will take several days for it to show.