Demography Is Destiny

Ann Coulter, WND, November 14, 2012

Liberals brag about having won the hearts and minds of America, as if, through logic and argument, they’ve persuaded people to accept their bankrupt European socialist ideas.

Democrats haven’t changed anyone’s mind. They changed the people.

More white people voted for Mitt Romney this year than voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. Barack Obama lost white voters by 20 points—the widest margin since 1984.

But in 1980, whites were 88 percent of the electorate. In 2012, they were 72 percent of the electorate. Not only that, but the non-white electorate is far more Democratic than it was in 1980.

If the same country that voted in 1980 had voted in 2012, Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did.

Most Americans don’t realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the United States into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!

Under Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from what is euphemistically called “developing countries.”

{snip}

{snip} But the good news is: Rich liberals and soulless businessmen have no trouble finding cheap busboys, gardeners and nannies! (Whom they underpay, requiring taxpayers to make up the difference.)

{snip}

Because recent immigrants have no skills, they arrive in dire need of government assistance. Their desperation has been an enormous boon to the Democratic Party.

Thirty-nine percent of native households receive some form of government assistance. By contrast, 57 percent of immigrant households—legal immigrants—get government assistance. {snip}

{snip}

In the last half-century, California’s non-Hispanic white population has been cut in half, from 80 percent to 40 percent. Meanwhile, the Hispanic population has exploded from less than 10 percent to nearly 40 percent—mostly poor Mexicans.

And with that change, California went from being the state that produced anti-tax initiatives, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan to a state that is absolutely untouchable by Republicans (see Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina) and just enacted the highest tax rate in any state.

The same has happened, or is happening, to other states, such as Colorado, New Mexico, Illinois and New York. If Texas ever flips, Republicans will never win another presidential election. {snip}

Republicans’ low-tax, small-government philosophy will eventually become popular with today’s struggling Hispanics, but not before America is ruined with socialist policies promoted by populist hucksters so strangely beguiling to poor people the world over.

{snip}

Most recent immigrants oppose abortion, gay marriage and big government. The problem is that poor, uneducated people—the Democratic base—are easily demagogued into voting tribally.

A white person can vote for a Republican or a Democrat without anyone saying to him, “HOW CAN YOU VOTE AGAINST YOUR RACE?” But that is exactly how poor Hispanics and blacks are pressured into voting Democratic.

{snip}

Running Hispanics won’t help Republicans. Ask Gary Franks, Lynn Swann or Michael Steele if being black won them the black vote.

Promoting amnesty won’t help—ask John McCain, who won about the same percentage of the Hispanic vote as Romney did.

Or ask California’s Hispanics, only 4 percent of whom oppose Republican immigration policies. Their main beef with the GOP is that they think Republicans are “the rich.”

The only hope is to run another appealing Republican candidate in four years—when we’re not up against an incumbent president—and return our immigration policy to one that helps America and not just the Welfare Party.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Detroit_WASP

    Like I always say, if you want to know the future of the US, just look at Detroit.
    I have seen Ann speak on this subject many times. I have read a lot of what she has written. She and Pat Buchanan are pretty much on the same page. They know the country is going to be ruined by third world immigration, causing dropping IQs and a financial disaster for the government…..but like most they are afraid to tell the whole truth and beat around the bush.
    Maybe the US governement should set aside some land for white reservations?

    • Triarius

      Having grown up in the area I’d like to expand on your idea. I wouldn’t say look at Detroit, that looks like South Africa.

      But, if you look at the Detroit Metro area, yes. You have the blacks in Detroit, the Mexican illegals in Mexican town (clever name, I know), the elite tribe we can’t talk about in Bloomfield Hills, the ANTIFA in Ann Arbor (townies, not students) and some Asians peppered about in the area mainly with Canton in mind.

      After living my whole life in a lily white town there, going to Wayne State, then Ross (UofM), I can honestly say that I hope that place is fire bombed. I took a job for less money in Virginia just to leave that hell hole.

      • Detroit_WASP

        I’m right behind ya man. I’m going to rural Kentucky.

        • Skincognito

          Fellow Euro-Detroiter here. Wayne State grad living in Lexington, KY, not rural, but despite the gay mayor, a vast improvement.
          Detroit is a valuable case-study. Chinese historians in 100 years will research it closely.
          Coulter may lack sufficuent Influence wiyhin the official GOP apparatus, but she is a public opinion stimulant. Old Pat went rogue in 2000 and he’s still relevant. I remain skeptical, but it’s nice to imagine a revival of actual conservatism in this country.

          • Triarius

            Hear good things there. I almost went to Gatton before I got into Ross. But I hear Lexington is a great place.

            What’s Michigan #1 export?

            College graduates.

            (A little joke in grad school)

      • NM156

        Ann Arbor-what a creepy, two-faced liberal Whitopia. Every UM screwball from that town who relocates to the Big City (Chicago) moves to a white SWPL hipster enclave with $2500 rents. The geto and white working-and-middle-class neighborhoods are off limits of course, but they will live in cheap-rent barrio until they can move to a white neighborhood. Their city map is bounded by the borderlands of these neighborhoods. Past that, “there be sea serpents…” First time I stepped foot in an Ann Arbor microbrewery, a gay Asian activist type wanted to discuss whether the better candidate was Hillary or Obama. My eyeballs sunk into my skull…

    • pcmustgo

      More like Brazil or Mexico City. The black population really isn’t growing. They’ll be more George Zimmermans!

      • Liberalsuck

        I say this country will be more like Brazil, that is if it doesn’t break up. The Mexicans will make their areas look like Mexico, the blacks will make their areas look like Africa and whites will be like the Russians or South African whites with their views on race.

      • Skincognito

        I hope so brother, but the overwhelming pattern in the US is one of White retreat. That’s why we need to study Detroit rather than Sao Paulo. Black population growth isn’t the problem, it’s their territorial expansion, a phenomenon dependent on White cowardice. I’m no expert, but my sense is that Brazilian blacks are more effectively contained; free to cannibalize each other, but relatively unable to infect entire metro areas. There were a lot of Trayvons in Detroit during the years of the Great Migration Northward of Southern blacks. Let’s hope to recapture that spirit. All the best.

  • Triarius

    Demography is destiny, indeed. It is also inevitable. Look at the Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Frankish Empire, Ottoman Empire, Umayyad Caliph, Fatimid Caliph, Mongolian Empire, Han Dynasty, British Empire, all the way up Sudan and South Sudan in modern times.

    This country WILL Balkanize, it is a constant in an diverse country. It will happen on race, religion, language, culture, resources, wealth, and/or a combination of all the above.

    • Epiminondas

      It can’t come too soon for me. Why would I want to live in the same country as Californians?

      • Triarius

        Agreed. I am in my late 20s and give it up to 20 more years, but I wish it was tomorrow. California will implode almost overnight and the celebrities will go to Europe, the limosine liberals to Scottsdale, and the Mexicans will take over. All the while spewing the same crap that destroyed the state to begin. I hope for things to happen to them that would be filtered out on this forum.

        They really are a completely different people there, I’ve met quite a few.

        • Sherman_McCoy

          California was a wonderful place to grow up in the 50′s and 60′s. I can still smell the orange blossoms in the Springtime wafting in from the nearby (now razed to build more suburban sprawl) groves. My family has now all left SoCal for Texas, Washington State, and Heaven. Me, I live in Germany and plan to visit Cali, well, never.

    • Liberalsuck

      I know a neocon after they lost the election who said this to me, “I keep telling you, you need to learn Spanish.” This friend of mine knows I loathe illegal immigration and loathe these people not speaking English. When I have repeatedly pointed out to them how this country will racially balkanize, he got angry with me and cut me off. These neocons, even my dearest friends, really are in denial and don’t understand human events. All their pandering to blacks and Hispanics never have nor will it ever pan out well for them.

      • Triarius

        Not sure if you saw the movie, but it is like the beginning of The Matrix when Neo is walking through his first time unplugged.

        It is explained that some people are so hard wired, so deeply invested (financially and emotionally) that they would rather die than admit the truth.

        Those are your friends, and a few of mine. They will grow mustaches, sell oranges, and learn Spanish before they admit they’re wrong. They are beyond saving.

        • Steel_Quake77

          We are on the Titanic, trying frantically to get as many people into the life-boats as possible… but we can not save all of them…

      • NM156

        I’ve had beer-fueled verbal wars with many of my oldest friends who’ve become the most intransigent, delusional leftists after becoming part of the Chicago Public Schools staff and administration. I’ve endlessly rammed their arguments into contradictions that they can’t face or that they must deny in order to carry on with their fantasies of equality and minority parity with white students until someday, when their efforts will be proven right. Those who benefit from this status quo are unreachable, like the nomenklatura during the fall of the USSR. Only a definitive end of some kind will convince them that they live a lie. The City of Chicago is now on the hook for $700,000,000 in back pay for several thousand black fire dept. candidates who couldn’t pass the ’95 test due to “disparate impact”. The aforementioned blame unintentional racism. Not long before the bill came due recently, these teachers were striking for amounts not far off from the settlement amount, which the city doesn’t have either. Since their ignorance now costs me and everyone else real money, I do not suffer their foolishness anymore. The arguments aren’t academic.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    “By Ann Coulter.”

    In other words:

    “Believe that the author actually believes in what she’s saying at your own risk.”

    Yeah, I’ll never forgive her for that.

  • Dr. X

    Coulter is correct about all of this, but the fact remains it is white people who are doing this to themselves. Left-wing whites welcome the “browing” of America because they despise the things that “whiteness” stands for: thrift, sobriety, intelligence, hard work, responsibility, competition. That’s simply too difficult and takes too much effort.

    Left-wing whites embrace black and brown cultures because they want to sing and dance and get high copulate the way black and brown cultures do. Left-wing whites fear other whites, particularly religious ones, more than any other races, because it is those other whites who will impose standards and responsibility and competition upon them.

    • Hal K

      Left-wing whites welcome the “browing” of America because they despise the things that “whiteness” stands for: thrift, sobriety, intelligence, hard work, responsibility, competition.

      In my opinion this misses the mark. A large part of the anti-whiteness of the left comes from various identity groups. Their antipathy is at the basic “they are not us” level.

      Another large part of anti-whiteness comes from the refusal of conservatives to stand up for whites. If group “x” refuses to stand up for itself, while also possessing assets that other groups covet, it is only natural that the other groups will form a coalition for the purpose of extracting said assets. Anti-whiteness fits naturally into this political arrangement. Generic white liberals are just going along for the ride.

      There is also a religious dimension to this. Much of today’s anti-whiteness can be traced back to the Puritans and Quakers from 200+ years ago. They were certainly not opposed to thrift, etc.

      • Liberalsuck

        A few hundred years ago, most whites didn’t want to be called sinners or witches or devils. Now we don’t want to be called racists. Whites are a race that says or does things based on their approval of other whites. At one time whites were embarrassed to be dating a black person or to adopt a black child, now they are more and more common. Another problem, is more and more whites do things based on their “feelings” and not what is the most logical thing to do.

        • StillModerated

          Here are some creative white punishments on display at Williamsburg but, sadly, no longer in use: Hanging, whipping, the stocks, branding, outlawry, and banishment. Confinement was temporary — a month or less. Failure to apply harsh treatment to inferior people is a big mistake.

          Apply generously to the professionally offended first.

    • pcmustgo

      “Left-wing whites welcome the “browning” of America because they despise the things that “whiteness” stands for: ”

      ENGGHH… don’t over-analyze here. Left-wing Whites (I used to be one of them, truly) welcome the Browning of America because they have never experienced first-hand the downside of diversity/multi-culturalism. They haven’t suffered enough abuse from non-whites to drop the “only whites can be racist”/non-white=victim/good, white= guilty, bad thing. They’ve never had to FIGHT BACK against hostile non-whites. And they want to fit in more with their white liberal friends. They don’t want to be racists or get called racists (= losing EVERYTHING in today’s society, including your job). They don’t want to admit the horrible truth, because it’s an UGLY truth.

      Even in super “diverse” cities like LA and NYC, non-whites are mostly out of sight/out-of mind for most whites. They’re more focused on what Angelina Jolie wore to the Oscars than that one time (many more times for us) an angry non-white behaved in a hostile way towards them. NYC, even Brooklyn , is chock full of white pockets, white hoods where the only blacks and latinos are doormen. Ending the racial problem is as simple as adopting a black baby, like Jolie did, etc.

      They don’t have enough PERSONAL EXPERIENCE with Blacks, Latinos, Asians etc to admit that many of the negative stereotypes are true. Or, some white liberals to cop to some of this, but don’t see how the Browning of America could possibly create any problems for them. Kind of like, So, so what? The ballot box, affirmative action, racial war, all of it is totally unthinkable for them.

      They desperately want to live in world where things are “progressing” (Progressivism) and things are getting better (“We have a black president now!”).

      • pcmustgo

        They want to be “good people”. Who doesn’t want to be a “Good Person”. Lot of do-gooders out there. It’s one of the more positive traits of white people. Becoming a racist, even a race realist, means losing that “I’m a good person” feeling, or at least complicating it.

        Who does want to go around “hating blacks” or “hating asians/latinos”. I don’t . I didn’t. Unfortunately I’ve encountered far too many blacks/latinos/asians who HATE ME. No matter what I do. Even when I was a liberal, they still hated and were nasty to me.

        • Liberalsuck

          I wish we were all the same. I wish nonwhite neighorhoods and nonwhite countries were as safe as the average white neighborhoods or countries are. I wish nonwhites would favor the best man for the job instead of someone of their race. I wish nonwhites didn’t think I owed them something because of my skin color. I wish blacks and Latinos were as law-abiding as Asians or most whites are. However, facts are facts, regardless of how ugly they are. I don’t feel good at times having a bias against diversity. I wish I didn’t have to think about diversity or race all the time.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rusty-Shackelford/1434757800 Rusty Shackelford

            The lament of the Reasonable Man. Most of us started out this way. I say this respectfully.

          • Triarius

            Wear your bias proud. It is a badge of honor showing you have pride and can think for yourself. And it’s not really a bias, btw. It is common sense and a spine.

        • eunometic

          “Becoming a racist, even a race realist, means losing that “I’m a good person” feeling, or at least complicating it.”

          This feeling of ill ease is only transitional. I feel really great, I am kind and I am good. I am a White nationalist. I am very at ease with that.

          I only feel guilty that I am not doing enough, not showing enough courage. I anguish over my race. If all of us had the courage to speak the truth all at once the spell would be over.

        • Gracchus123

          “Who does want to go around “hating blacks” or “hating asians/latinos”. I don’t . I didn’t.”
          While I agree that “race is destiny”, and have been a follower of Amren probably since its inception on the internet, I certainly don’t hate other races.

           My approach to this entire subject is to simply look at the facts about the various races and come to the realization that the most harmonious approach for all races is separation.

          No hate is involved. 

        • JackKrak

          THAT’S what it is for liberals – the most important thing for them, above all else, is to be seen as “nice”. They will excuse or ignore any behavior, experience or statistics that might force them to confront realities of HBD – and then congratulate themselves on how wonderfully liberal and tolerant they are (while making sure to avoid the “bad neighborhood” while driving their Prius and sipping on a latte, of course).

        • Steel_Quake77

          ‘Becoming a racist, even a race realist, means losing that “I’m a good person” feeling, or at least complicating it.’

          Really? Personally I would rather follow the Truth then some transitory feelings.

          http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_realism

        • StillModerated

          … and the road to Hell is paved with good intentions!

      • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

        You are on to something Pcmustgo. I taught school in one of the tiny, nearly all-white suburban school districts outside NYC. I also taught in one of the county-wide districts in South Carolina. Families/children in the northern small-district, situation are in an anti-diversity cocoon. Families in the latter big-district southern situation get hammered by diversity. This may explain why norther whites are far more Democratic than southern whites.

        • StillModerated

          I miss Dixiecrats! There’s only one left in Georgia.

      • Liberalsuck

        As I have said before: Just about modern white person who gets “horrified with white racism” has never lived in mixed areas, has never been around large numbers of nonwhites, is ignorant of the high amounts of black on white crimes, lives in a majority nice white area, and probably has never donated their own earned money or time to help out nonwhites. Point any of that out to a white liberal and they will lose their temper and call you a racist, white supremacist, ignorant, etc. Been there, done that. It’s incapable to reason with white liberals. Something is wired wrong.

        • Gracchus123

          They are “true believers”; their liberalism is their religion. And you are correct; it is impossible to reason with them. 

        • StillModerated

          It’s because they read the NY Times

          http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer

          It tells libtards where not to live!

        • john

          It’s impossible to have a serious discussion about Blacks in politics because their presence among us is an artificial and unnatural charade. Without special laws and rules to ensure that they not only win elections but exist in our society, mother nature would quickly prevail.
          Discussing Blacks in politics is rather like wasting time by debating what Koko the Gorilla’s position is on illegal immigration and welfare.

          • ed91

            and that is why discussions about education and how to fix it are so ridiculous. You can’t mention the 800 pound gorilla sitting on your chest.

      • http://www.facebook.com/kevin.killion.71 Kevin Killion

        They feel they have the moral highground by helping non-Whites. Tell them they are supporting White genocide and knock them off that high horse. Make them defend their support of genocide.

      • StillModerated

        Tell your ex-friends to arm up. I prefer revolvers and a steady aim. I will take out all 6 when I’m wounded — which is what the savages do most of the time.

    • eunometic

      “Left-wing whites welcome the “browning”

      Correction there; left wing and right wing Whites, Christian ones, even libertarian Whites. Rove, Bush, all the neocons were as bad as any Democrat. A dumb suicidal ideology has been planted in all “wings”. Reagan’s gift of citizenship to illegals was one of Goodwill. It was not reciprocated and the lesson of unquenchable Hispanic ethnic self interest should have been learned thereafter..

      As the say; stupidity is doing the same thing over and expecting a different result. They don’t call it the stupid party for nothing.

    • StillModerated

      they despise the things that “whiteness” stands for: thrift, sobriety, intelligence, hard work, responsibility, competition … and a largely Christian tradition, too.

      You make a good point, Doc, but don’t worry — liberals are aborting their defective genes out of the pool. If Mormons, Amish and hipsters are our future, then I can live with that.

  • Gwynn Ap Nudd

    Great Ann – just realizing all this now? When it’s too late to do anything? A well functioning intellect can often see things coming long before they arrive. And this one has been obvious for decades. But you were too busy worrying about short term goals and issues and always the Republican Party before the Nation. Now we’ve lost the Nation and the of course the Party too. The latter is no loss but the former is.

    • Liberalsuck

      She didn’t speak up before because she knows who butters her bread.

      • StillModerated

        The professional haters might deduce that your comment is anti-semitic! Shame on you! Haha

    • NM156

      She spent years of her efforts on supporting that oversized douchebag Bush, Cheney, the neoconservatives, and the eight-year, trillion-dollar moron-athon that was the 2003 Iraq War. I have flashbacks of myself so angered by her clownish smugness regarding that mess that I wanted to kick in my TV. Coulter shows signs of maturing, but she is part of GOP Inc. This demographic nightmare is old news. Where was Coulter when it was stoppable?

    • Steel_Quake77

      Actually Coulter has written about issues before. She is a good ‘gateway’. I am glad she is around and it looks like she may replace Pat Buchanan as one of my favorite pundits when Big Pat eventually retires.

      In her book ‘ Guilty: Liberal “Victims” and Their Assault on America’ she defended the Council of Conservative Citizens.

      If some of her readership were to visit cofcc.org then they would quickly come across information about White demographics soon.

  • Stentorian_Commentator

    It might be too late, but it certainly does not hurt to have her write it. Anything that might wake white people up to salvage something of our civilization is a help.

  • fakeemail

    Coulter has *always* known the racial reality; she has coyly danced around it like a perverse dominatrix who won’t quite spill it.

    She knows that the country has reached a flashpoint and to her credit she isn’t “evolving” on immigration like Hannity and the usual suspects who are wealthy enough to maintain their cushy lifestyle in the face of the coming new americans.

    • redfeathers

      How delicious would it be if a few of Hannity’s newly legalized friends moved into his neighborhood waving around their Section 8 vouchers. This fool also wants school choice and school vouchers. I’d love to see his kids’ schools diversified.

  • Hal K

    “The only hope is to run another appealing Republican candidate in four
    years—when we’re not up against an incumbent president—and return our
    immigration policy to one that helps America and not just the Welfare
    Party.”

    Does she seriously think that a Republican president would do anything about immigration? Why would she think that? Is it because now Republicans have finally learned their lesson about demographics? Not likely.

    Anyway, she is still following the same pattern of saying it is just those liberals who trick blacks and Hispanics into voting Democratic. She still doesn’t see the underlying pattern of anti-whiteness behind all of this.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7RORAJVG7LJJZECDJIILHJBE7U So CAL Snowman

    I find it extremely amusing that Hispanics and disingenuous white liberals are quick to label the Republicans as rich, while at the same time screeching about how poor and backwards the South is (you know the BACKBONE of the Republican machine!).

    • Triarius

      Logic was never their strong suit. In fact most rich elites in the US are now vastly liberal. But because of blacks and mexicans, Reublicans as a whole are slightly more wealthy by a few percentage points.

      What is interesting is that the richest of the rich and the poor people are on the same side. I do not think the poor know that though.

    • JohnEngelman

      Liberals are well aware that working class whites in the South usually vote Republican. Regardless of who votes Republican, it is the rich who benefit. They have done quite well since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. Lower income whites have not.

      http://investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=971&mn=389436&pt=msg&mid=10153698

      • mhrutter

        Look, the Republicans don’t support the economic interests of the white working or middle class, they are plutocrats who seek only the welfare of the corporate capitalists and moneychangers. The reason Southerns support them is because the Democrats abandoned them on the race issue and that is all. A party that abandons the de-industralisation of the US by instituting tariffs and stopping all third world immigration will win the presidency and insure the future.

        • JohnEngelman

          I agree with you. I would vote for that party if it also promoted steeply progressive taxation.

          • Gracchus123

            A fundamental Marxist tenet, the graduated income tax.

          • JohnEngelman

            During the Eisenhower administration the top tax rate never got below 91 percent.

          • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

            But the income threshold was so high, plus deductions, and also tax-free trust funds, that virtually no income was ever subject to that tax rate. With good common sense, too: Who would want to earn that kind of money just to see 91% of it taken away?

          • Gracchus123

            “During the Eisenhower administration the top tax rate never got below 91 percent.”
            I cannot respond to the above non-sequitur.

          • Gracchus123

            “During the Eisenhower administration the top tax rate never got below 91 percent.”
            On second thought, I will try to respond to your non-sequitur. I suppose you were implying that since Eisenhower was a Republican (not a Marxist), my statement has to be false. Ludicrous.

            Elements of Marxism have been extant in America virtually since its founding. Under Roosevelt (the 2nd), Marxist policies abounded. Overwhelming documentation proves that his administration was rife, not only with “useful idiots” (running dogs), but with active agents of the Soviet. 

            Read some history instead of limiting yourself to NPR and the Nation magazine. 

      • NM156
  • Barrack Osama

    So she’s now spelling out for the mainstream what VDare and co have been saying forever?

  • Tim Rett

    Fans of Amren should join Ann Coulters forum and discuss White issues,

    http://chat.anncoulter.com/phpBB3/

    Call into Limbaugh and the other shows too.

    A humble request to Jared Taylor, please start referring to amnesty/immigration/diversity as White Genocide.

    • robinbishop34

      The original article as well, it uses Disqus.

      • Michael Alan Prock

        WND does use Disqus but be careful, the WND Mod kicked me off the site for posting this quote from a designer of police exams:

        “Through 18 years and four Presidents the message from the Justice
        Department was clearly that there was no way in Hell they would ever
        sign onto an exam that had an adverse impact on Blacks and Hispanics.
        What we finally came up with was more than satisfactory if you assume a
        cop will never have to write a coherent sentence or interpret what
        someone else has written.”
        From Racially Gerrymandering the Content of Police Tests to Satisfy the U.S. Justice Department: A Case Study; Linda S. Gottfredson;Psychology, Public Policy, and Law; 1996, Vol. 2, pp.418-446

        • Sherman_McCoy

          Perhaps you should not have used the word “hell?”

          Maybe just writing h— would have kept you safe?

          Kidding.

    • David Ashton

      Good ideas.

  • fenway23

    The only gripe I have with the article is when she says “Republicans’ low-tax, small-government philosophy will eventually become popular with today’s struggling Hispanics.”
    It’s true that an assimilationist policy including a moratorium on immigration would help at the margins, but a majority of this group will never vote for any party that advocates limited government. The two main reasons? For starters, their lower average IQ will prevent them from ever reaching economic parity with the larger population. Therefore they will vote their own interests which for poorer people is more govenment, not less. Secondly most minoirities have a tribal mentality when it comes to voting, which I doubt will ever fully go away. Look at Jews and Asians. Both are prosperous but neither group has ever given the Republicans a majority of their votes for this reason.

    Lately Ann has written several articles about the domographic crisis but she has never layed out any concrete solutions to deal with it. She reminds me of the saying; “People always complain about the weather, but no one ever does anything about it.”
    I’d like to know if she subscribes to the belief of many amreners that the exisitng political system is so corrupt and inept that it can never be expcted to deal with this crisis. If so, what’s her plan of action? Likewise, if she thinks this crisis can still be solved using the current system, what are her recommendations for it? The following steps are an absolute necessity:
    An immigration moratorium.
    Ablolishment of birthright citizenship.
    Ceasation of all govermenment benefits for immigrants, illegal or otherwise. People shouldn’t come here to go on the dole.
    Criminalize the wiring of money out of the country by illegals.
    End free education for illegal aliens. Put all the justices of the Supreme Court on notice; if they stand in the way, they will be impeached and their pensions perminently recinded.
    An electrified border fence. Put the warning in both Englsih and Spanish if necessary.
    Charge all those who knowingly hire illegals with Treason. Make them face stiff fines and prison time.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      Also, she and other conservatives who sort of “get it” need to start pushing for white interests. Her main gripe seems to be that it is unjust that minorities are coerced into voting Democrat. It would be better to argue that the descendents of the founders should have the ultimate say in what happens to our country–not the children of illegal Mestizos.

      • seek

        Poor Ann still doesn’t quite get it. Blacks and Hispanics aren’t being “forced” to vote for Democratic Party candidates. They vote Democrat because they know it’s in their interests. They seek a free lunch and Democrats serve the largest portions.

    • pcmustgo

      More and more and more, I’m beginning to think this country is going to break apart. Civil War.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      Next year, I will apply for my permanent Visa here in Germany. The year after, naturalization. Three big prerequisites: Can I prove that I have a privately funded pension plan, can I speak the language FLUENTLY, and have I assimilated into German ways? Germany has great laws in this respect, though I must admit that it appears to me sometimes that the policies are only enforced for white applicants.

    • s shadow

      You have forgotten that it is essential to repeal the 65 immigration act. Without that, all is lost.

    • s shadow

      You have forgotten the Immigration Act of 65. It must repealed or all is lost.

  • John L.

    I heard on the Radio today some talk about the new Chinese President/Leader, and they mentioned that the prevailing Chinese/Asian view is that the U.S. is going downhill, and that China will be the World’s number One Country sooner than They expected. There is no shortage of Race realistsinChina.

    • pcmustgo

      Of course. The funniest is when Obama, years ago , or some federal reserve person, Bernake, was talking about the US Debt being fine and we’ll be able to pay it back no problem and a group of the Chinese diplomats burst out laughing like “yeah, ok, not!”

      • Xerxes22

        Dick Chaney said back in 2002 “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter”. I’ll bet the Chinese had a good laugh over that one.

  • Mahound

    Maybe just maybe the Obama win will become the great awakening.

  • David Ashton

    Better half a loaf from Coulter than nothing at all. She, at least, is not going to say the way forward is more Mexicans, more Muslims and more Muggers. At this rate she is going towards offering the whole loaf. So don’t attack her – encourage her.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      I’d like her more if she would repent in tears for her coal-burning activities of the past.

  • Epiminondas

    She dances around a solution there at the end. Running an “attractive” candidate again when he won’t be up against an incumbent may or may not work, depending on how many MORE minorities are available to vote. And how exactly does she plan on returning our immigration policy “to one that helps America” in time to help the next Republican candidate? Republicans don’t have it in their DNA to appeal to whites to vote in their own self interest as a matter of self-preservation. And this is tragic. Presumably, as things stand now, all the Democrats have to do going forward is to continue to nominate attractive black candidates for president.

    But it is refreshing to see Coulter come right out and admit what the problem is. Is anyone listening?

    • Liberalsuck

      As someone who had been a lifelong Republican voter, I say let the party fold. They’re done for and they have only themselves to blame. Never once did they repeal any anti-gun measures, remove any intrusive anti-business regulations to make more jobs come home, never once did they place our troops on the border, never once did they repeal any of the Civil Rights laws, never once did they openly address black on white crime, never once did they stand up to the race hustlers, etc. They ignored their loyal white conservative base and pandered to people who hate them and who would never vote for them in large numbers. I will stick with third parties from now on. I will not even vote for Republicans at local levels anymore.

  • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

    This incessant Coulter bashing is becoming destructive.

    She’s not perfect. None of us are.

    She is, however, in her own way, bringing up issues to a MSM audience that others can’t. She’s playing it safe so she won’t get exiled. We need her voice and others. The more the better.

    Instead of pointing out her faults and flaws, we need to be supporting her efforts even if you find her methods too coy for your tastes.

    We hang together or we hand separately. Stop being divisive. Your attacks on Ms. Coulter only portray us as petty. This infighting has got to stop.

    Ms. Coulter is not our number one enemy. Stop treating her as such.

    • http://www.awpn.net/ Celestial Time

      “This infighting has got to stop.”

      Maybe you misunderstand the concept of infighting in relation to a Coulter conceived remedy. Coulter is anti-racist. She has no problem with White replacement, so long as the replacements are doing their best Cosby Show impersonation and voting Republican. Her big epiphany on racial realities is meant to sell books.

      This woman might be your version of “in,” but she’s not allowed within a 10 mile radius of mine.

      • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

        If she writes books on racial realities that white people buy, read, and act on, then I say let her sell more books.

        • http://www.awpn.net/ Celestial Time

          Have you ever really listened to Ann Coulter? Those aren’t realities she’s pimping as much as they are detours.

          Here, I’ll give you a quick lesson on Coulterisms:

          http://youtu.be/PyxFHiCjagc?t=6m30s

          Do you understand what she’s doing when she juxtaposes the “racist segregationists” and “against signing the 1964 Civil Rights Act” with the Democrats?

          • http://www.newnation.org/ sbuffalonative

            I’m aware of her fawning over ‘civil rights heroes’ and her trips to ‘the jungle’.

            However, AmRen can look past this and I can too.

            Your comments seem more appropriate for someone trying to stir the pot than to fight for a united cause.

          • http://www.awpn.net/ Celestial Time

            The pot? Since we’re talking about Coulter here, I can only assume you’re talking about the proverbial Melting Pot. No thanks, I’ll pass.

            That’s kind of the problem with White America nowadays; we always seem to “look past” something so obvious and right in front of our face. Have you even stopped to wonder why someone like Coulter, with her supposed racial realities and sudden epiphanies, is regarded as TV Friendly, but someone like Jared Taylor is seen as somewhat of a pariah and certainly persona non grata when it comes to mainstream media? I’m sure Mr. Taylor might have some opinions on why this is so, but you’re probably going to have to wait for another book to come out to if you seek Coulter’s sage advice and opinions.

    • DelmarJackson

      ANYBODY like ann Coulter that dares to bring up the 1965 Immigration Act and how that policy changed America for the worse is a friend of mine. Sure, Ann is late to the party, but so was I.
      ten years ago I could not name an elected official and thought any talk about immigration was a low class thing and borderline racist. Now I know the immigration vote of all my elected reprsentatives and fax the weasels via Numbersusa, read vdare and amren daily and have a picture of pat buchanan with a lit candle in front of it… and if i had a daughter would name her Emma West.
      We need more Ann Coulters.

  • negrolocaust

    typical subhuman diverse blacks beating white homeless for sport and mob robbing stores in dc. typical low iq degenerate savages return to africa where you belong.
    http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/20111408/9-alleged-gang-members-indicted-in-dc-beatings

  • http://www.facebook.com/roger.smith.5496683 Roger Smith

    And what would Romney or any Republican have done to reverse this harmful demographic trend? My guess is NOTHING. The Republicans controlled the White House for 20 out of 28 years while the problem grew out of control. They have no one to blame but themselves. They pushed this problem down the line as far as they could and now want complain about demographics? Please.

    • Gracchus123

      The issue of the “browning” of America is one of those which transcends party politics. I think that, like the issue of the Federal Reserve, it points to the fact of powerful forces working behind “the throne”. It is these forces which will ultimately need to be addressed if we are to solve the problem.

      For more information on The Fed, read THE CREATURE FROM JEKYELL ISLAND by Edward Griffin and/or THE SECRET OF OZ a DVD directed by Bill Still. 

      I am not a conspiracy theorist; these issues are well documented although not widely discussed. 

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

        I own and have read Creature. Unlike most books on that subject matter, it primarily relies on credible original source material, and begs you to draw your own conclusion rather than starting with a conclusion, even though it’s obvious what a writer like G. Edward Griffin wants you to conclude.

  • You Are Now Enriched

    Escalation: Color of Change will go full force on all advertisers for WND and Fox and all others who get near her. She’ll never speak on another campus.

  • NeoconsNailed

    I’ll settle this. Leftist politicians (p-l-e-a-s-e don’t call them liberal) are wrecking everything because it’s what they’re paid to do. It’s really that simple. They’re bribed to do it and five minutes into the process, half their brain agrees with leftist notions, while the other side is simultaneously laughing at the whole thing — but they are, bottom line, paid to shove leftism down our throat and destroy everything standing. Personally they’re as “racist” as anybody but… .they’re not paid to have personal opinions, so that’s not what prevails.

    Leftist *citizens* think leftism is the “in” thing. All they know is fads, it doesn’t go any deeper than that. Conservatish citizens are so brainwashed by the media (and the other institutions that willingly sport its total imprint) that they think a Mitt Romney or Bill O’Reilly is appreciably right-of-center — but they are also merely coasting and skidding around in the directions that fads push them. They would no more want to have an original thought than eat poison; this herd instinct shown no better than in their refusal to vote for Ron Paul twice. Their petitioning Obummer is so puerile! They’ll never work up the guts to actually break away, any more than they’ll ever dare to speak, think or do anything their next-door neighbors would call “racist” — which is to say they’re totally doomed by their own willing and enthusiastic vacuity.

    They could rise up en masse and throw out the election and all the evildoers first thing tomorrow. They really could — they have the strength of numbers and even the ammo. But they won’t do it this week or next or ever. Not fashionable!

    • MarcoPervo

      I call them post-modern leftists or Neo-Liberals, because they’ve absorbed almost every tenant of Cultural Marxism under the guise of PC and are more than happy to ignore The US Constitution when doing so suits their agenda. They aren’t even very liberal anymore on most issues. The Clinton administration stuck it to the working man with GATT, NAFTA, entry into the WTO and adopted the tenants of identity politics into the Democratic platform, effectively displacing the white working class from the party to reform the party with coalitions from the growing numbers of the various grievance groups.

  • Charles Hastings

    “Republicans’ low-tax, small-government philosophy will eventually become popular with today’s struggling Hispanics.”

    No they won’t, Coulter. We have received mostly the peasants of Mexico, permanent under-achievers with low-IQ.

    • Liberalsuck

      Blacks and Hispanics have a very socialist mindset. They like big government because big government is how they are getting all their benefits. White people, more or less, benefit from smaller government. We don’t like being told who we have to do business with, we don’t like having our taxes raised, we don’t like the government passing more gun control measures, we don’t think it’s right to make other people pay for your children, etc.

  • William Allingham

    mexicans evolutionary strategy gives them short therm gaining but in the long run is unstable, this means that although they are increasing in numbers; the pendulum will start to turn when they find themselves around people as dishonest as them (less whites,) the environment changes and the strategy has not effect. Their numbers start to decay and the very few whites who survived (though conservatives) will start to increase again until they recover and overcome this tide of non-whites, of course this happens in various generations so the most important thing is to assure a white refuge to resist the tempest because white cooperation is stable and mexican exploitation is not, although the latter seems to give them rewards without working for them.

  • eunometic

    Have babies. The war on White culture was waged on our abillity to have children.

    • Gracchus123

      Putin has set aside the month of October, IIRC, as the “make a new Russian” month. He has done this because he is well aware of the demographic free-fall being experienced in Russia. The same free-fall is happening in every White country.

  • puffdaddy

    Actually I think she reads VDare…and she may read AR too. Too bad the article still insists that Hispanics are ultimately natural conservatives, when they are not. She is wrong that they do not support gay marriage. I have seen polls that say they do support it or don’t care – they just want their welfare check.

  • 5Sardonicus

    I welcome Ann Coulter’s evolving or growing toward the truth—using the vocabulary of “libspeak” However, she doesn’t go far enough. When the demographic profile of the United States is identical to Brazil or Venezuela, the United States, for all practical purposes, will become those countries. What do I mean? The United States will be a Latin American country with the same plethora of intractable problems and endemic vice and corruption. These include: huge disparities between rich and poor, environmental degradation, corruption and dishonesty at all levels of government, perpetual in-fighting for scarce resources by different racial and ethnic groups, declining liberty by government meddling, and crime and insecurity for all but the very rich and influential.
    I don’t want to give the impression that everyone is evil or corrupt in Latin America. There are many good, intelligent and fair minded people in those countries. Many also have a real zest for living and a sense of fun lacking in 21st century America. The carefree, fun-loving and easy-going attitude of Brazilian and other Latin women can make life a real joy. Nether-the-less, the positive aspects of Latin culture seem to be left at the border by our immigrants, as the United States evolves toward a grim, humorless, politically correct Brazil—a Brazil without any fun!

    • Ignacio

      As a Latin American I can say that your description is quite accurate, You could add the new trend of having a pseudo-communist, pseudo-dictator brown man as a president dedicated to blame Europeans for everything.
      Here in Argentina we are suffering more or less the same.

      • 5Sardonicus

        Yes, Ignacio I did leave out the Bolivarian revolution with Hugo, Evo and the rest of the motley crew. These leftist charlatans are playing the race card and vilifying whites and Spanish culture. I see this revolution as gaining traction in more and more Andean countries and moving North.
        Argentina is one of the better South American countries but has fallen under the same distressing trends. Some of the most beautiful women in the world live in Buenos Aries. They really know how to dress and show off their beauty.

  • http://6th-resurrection.myopenid.com/ OBSERVER

    This lady is an idiot.

  • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

    Buried beneath the brainwashing, the innate reality of race remains like an ember awaiting to be reignited. The re-election of Barack Obama has fanned that flame.

  • StillModerated

    When television becomes complete crap — I’m guessing an hour from now — maybe whites can tune out and boost the population. From what I hear hipsters desire large families and smaller houses. It can be proven that no TV = larger families.

    Anyway about TV; when every commercial features an octaroon or darker in 98% of boobtube sponsorship. The media elite will no longer be able to control YT with its hypnotic, flickering images. They can have the muds.

    And I’m happy the Evil Party will be at the helm when the empire falls off the “fiscal cliff.” The GOP only promised to get us there later — at a mere 85 mph.

  • john

    The terrible irony here is that the great communicator, Ronald Reagan, through his mass amnesty, greatly accelerated the failure and destruction of the Republican Party. Likewise, with both GHW Bush and GW Bush, their Hispanic-friendly policies betrayed White America and permanently ruined the Republican Party.

    The second irony is that Blacks and Browns vote for Democrats, whose policies hurt them the most. Meanwhile, Whites vote for Republicans whose policies hurt us the most. Since the Republican Party has consistently betrayed Whites for over 40 years by bringing all manner of miscreants, undesirables, and third-world filth to live and breed among us, what do they have left to barter away for votes? They’re gravely outnumbered now. All future Democratic candidates for POTUS will be Blacks, Browns, Muslims, and homos.
    The Republican Party will trot out a Bobby Jindal and Susanna Martinez tandem. How many Whites will vote for those two RINO-liberal types?
    I could easily see Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice running as Democratic Party candidates and winning. Very disturbing.